Sumudu Rangika Samarasinghe, Andrea Gaedigk, Jesse J. Swen, Henk-Jan Guchelaar, Shivashankar H. Nagaraj
Pharmacogenomics has shifted drug therapy from trial-and-error to personalized approaches by leveraging genetic biomarkers. However, traditional genotyping assays and short-read sequencing often fail to resolve structural complexity in pharmacogenes, leading to ambiguous haplotypes and incorrect phenotype predictions. To evaluate the potential of emerging long-read sequencing technologies in overcoming these limitations, we analyzed diplotypes and drug response phenotypes across 20 clinically actionable pharmacogenes using Oxford Nanopore or PacBio data from 100 healthy individuals in the 1,000 Genomes Project and 159 participants from the Genomics England cancer and rare disease cohorts, alongside Illumina short-read sequencing data. Long reads achieved phasing accuracies of >98% (Oxford Nanopore) and 96.5% (PacBio), with most genes covered by a single phased haploblock. Variant detection metrics were high (i.e., precision, recall, and F1 > 0.92). Genotype and phenotype concordance between short- and long-read predictions exceeded 99%. Short-read predictions contributed nearly twice as much to overall discordant cases compared to those of long reads. Notably, long reads identified 19 novel star (*) alleles and 106 novel suballeles in nine pharmacogenes, including CYP2D6, CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP4F2, and SLCO1B1, which have been submitted to PharmVar. Additionally, long reads resolved 13 ambiguous CYP2D6 structural variants, including a potentially novel structure. Also, a homozygous TA repeat (UGT1A1*80 + *28) was identified that is associated with a poor metabolizer phenotype. Overall, we reassigned 77 genotypes across nine genes for 58 of the 100 investigated 1,000 Genomes Project subjects. These results demonstrate the superiority of long-read sequencing in phasing and resolving complex genomic regions enabling more precise pharmacogenomic profiling. As sequencing costs decline with rapid technological advances, long-read sequencing may become the method of choice in clinical pharmacogenomics, enhancing therapeutic safety and efficacy.
{"title":"Long-Read Sequencing Enhances Pharmacogenomic Profiling by Resolving Complex Haplotypes, Novel Star Alleles, and Structural Variants","authors":"Sumudu Rangika Samarasinghe, Andrea Gaedigk, Jesse J. Swen, Henk-Jan Guchelaar, Shivashankar H. Nagaraj","doi":"10.1002/cpt.70115","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpt.70115","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Pharmacogenomics has shifted drug therapy from trial-and-error to personalized approaches by leveraging genetic biomarkers. However, traditional genotyping assays and short-read sequencing often fail to resolve structural complexity in pharmacogenes, leading to ambiguous haplotypes and incorrect phenotype predictions. To evaluate the potential of emerging long-read sequencing technologies in overcoming these limitations, we analyzed diplotypes and drug response phenotypes across 20 clinically actionable pharmacogenes using Oxford Nanopore or PacBio data from 100 healthy individuals in the 1,000 Genomes Project and 159 participants from the Genomics England cancer and rare disease cohorts, alongside Illumina short-read sequencing data. Long reads achieved phasing accuracies of >98% (Oxford Nanopore) and 96.5% (PacBio), with most genes covered by a single phased haploblock. Variant detection metrics were high (i.e., precision, recall, and F1 > 0.92). Genotype and phenotype concordance between short- and long-read predictions exceeded 99%. Short-read predictions contributed nearly twice as much to overall discordant cases compared to those of long reads. Notably, long reads identified <b>19</b> novel star (*) alleles and <b>106</b> novel suballeles in nine pharmacogenes, including <i>CYP2D6</i>, <i>CYP2B6</i>, <i>CYP2C9</i>, <i>CYP2C19</i>, <i>CYP4F2,</i> and <i>SLCO1B1</i>, which have been submitted to PharmVar. Additionally, long reads resolved 13 ambiguous <i>CYP2D6</i> structural variants, including a potentially novel structure. Also, a homozygous TA repeat (<i>UGT1A1*80 + *28</i>) was identified that is associated with a poor metabolizer phenotype. Overall, we reassigned 77 genotypes across nine genes for 58 of the 100 investigated 1,000 Genomes Project subjects. These results demonstrate the superiority of long-read sequencing in phasing and resolving complex genomic regions enabling more precise pharmacogenomic profiling. As sequencing costs decline with rapid technological advances, long-read sequencing may become the method of choice in clinical pharmacogenomics, enhancing therapeutic safety and efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"119 2","pages":"536-545"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145627284","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Exposure-response, or pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic (PKPD), analyses support many drug development decisions. It is typically applied without assessment of causality and homogeneity, where the latter refers to the assumption that the reason for variability in exposure is unimportant for the impact on response. Randomized dose is the ideal variable for instrumental variable (IV) analysis that can help determine causal effects. In this work, we present adaptations of two standard IV models, predictor substitution (PS) and control function (CF), to repeated-measures analyses. We compare these to PKPD (PKPDC) models, without (with) correlations between PK and PD random effects, and to a new, partitioned effects (PE), model that allows separate PD relations for dose, covariate, and random effect-driven variability in exposure. Six scenarios simulate situations: (i) without any confounding, (ii) with three different types of confounding, generated through shared underlying variables (protein binding, disease severity, or renal function) between PK and PD, (iii) of an unmeasured active metabolite responsible for driving the response, and (iv) reversed causality. In all but the base case, the PKPD model provided biased parameter estimates that led to inappropriate dose adjustments for response-, concentrations-, or covariate-based dosing. The other models provided adequate estimates for a majority of the scenarios, but only the PE model provided for all scenarios. The PE model also formed the basis for adequate individualization based on concentration or response and can, like CF and PS, be used based on both single and repeated measures.
{"title":"Addressing Causality and Homogeneity Assumptions in Exposure-Response Analyses","authors":"Mats O. Karlsson, Divya Brundavanam","doi":"10.1002/cpt.70132","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpt.70132","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Exposure-response, or pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic (PKPD), analyses support many drug development decisions. It is typically applied without assessment of causality and homogeneity, where the latter refers to the assumption that the reason for variability in exposure is unimportant for the impact on response. Randomized dose is the ideal variable for instrumental variable (IV) analysis that can help determine causal effects. In this work, we present adaptations of two standard IV models, predictor substitution (PS) and control function (CF), to repeated-measures analyses. We compare these to PKPD (PKPDC) models, without (with) correlations between PK and PD random effects, and to a new, partitioned effects (PE), model that allows separate PD relations for dose, covariate, and random effect-driven variability in exposure. Six scenarios simulate situations: (i) without any confounding, (ii) with three different types of confounding, generated through shared underlying variables (protein binding, disease severity, or renal function) between PK and PD, (iii) of an unmeasured active metabolite responsible for driving the response, and (iv) reversed causality. In all but the base case, the PKPD model provided biased parameter estimates that led to inappropriate dose adjustments for response-, concentrations-, or covariate-based dosing. The other models provided adequate estimates for a majority of the scenarios, but only the PE model provided for all scenarios. The PE model also formed the basis for adequate individualization based on concentration or response and can, like CF and PS, be used based on both single and repeated measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"119 3","pages":"703-712"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpt.70132","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145601513","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Exposure-response (E-R) analyses are essential for dose selection in drug development, yet conventional endpoint E-R approaches often overlook concurrent clinical events such as adverse event (AE)-driven dose modifications (DMs), potentially leading to biased or misleading conclusions. In this study, we developed a framework to quantify the impact of AE-driven DMs on endpoint E-R relationships and to explore strategies to improve their accuracy. Using duvelisib as an exemplar, a drug known for frequent DMs due to Grade ≥ 3 infections, pneumonia, or transaminase elevations, we evaluated E-R relationships under three scenarios: ground truth, conventional E-R (based on planned dose exposures), and DM-adjusted E-R (accounting for AE-induced DMs and resultant exposure changes). Our analyses showed that conventional E-R analyses often deviated substantially from the ground truth at frequent DMs, particularly for AEs with delayed onset. Early-onset AEs and their resultant DMs could significantly distort E-R relationships for subsequent AEs. DM-adjusted E-R analyses better approximate the ground truth, especially for late-occurring AEs, but may introduce a risk of overcorrection of early-occurring AEs. These findings highlight the critical need to incorporate the timing and nature of AEs into E-R analyses to ensure robust interpretation, particularly in settings where DMs are frequent.
{"title":"Endpoint Exposure-Response Analyses in the Presence of Concurrent Dose Modification During Clinical Trials","authors":"Rui Zhong, Yanguang Cao","doi":"10.1002/cpt.70144","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpt.70144","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Exposure-response (E-R) analyses are essential for dose selection in drug development, yet conventional endpoint E-R approaches often overlook concurrent clinical events such as adverse event (AE)-driven dose modifications (DMs), potentially leading to biased or misleading conclusions. In this study, we developed a framework to quantify the impact of AE-driven DMs on endpoint E-R relationships and to explore strategies to improve their accuracy. Using duvelisib as an exemplar, a drug known for frequent DMs due to Grade ≥ 3 infections, pneumonia, or transaminase elevations, we evaluated E-R relationships under three scenarios: ground truth, conventional E-R (based on planned dose exposures), and DM-adjusted E-R (accounting for AE-induced DMs and resultant exposure changes). Our analyses showed that conventional E-R analyses often deviated substantially from the ground truth at frequent DMs, particularly for AEs with delayed onset. Early-onset AEs and their resultant DMs could significantly distort E-R relationships for subsequent AEs. DM-adjusted E-R analyses better approximate the ground truth, especially for late-occurring AEs, but may introduce a risk of overcorrection of early-occurring AEs. These findings highlight the critical need to incorporate the timing and nature of AEs into E-R analyses to ensure robust interpretation, particularly in settings where DMs are frequent.</p>","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"119 2","pages":"546-554"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145601556","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Wan-Yu Chu, Om Prakash Singh, Shyam Sundar, Dinesh Mondal, Krishna Pandey, Pradeep Das, Ignace C. Roseboom, Sheeraz Raja, Ana Torres, Eugenia Carrillo, Alwin D.R. Huitema, Fabiana Alves, Thomas P.C. Dorlo
Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) involves a high macrophage burden in which the Leishmania parasites reside. Liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) plays a key role in the treatment of PKDL. The mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS) is crucial in the distribution of liposomal drugs as well as the leishmaniasis pathophysiology. This study focused on characterizing the interaction between LAmB pharmacokinetics, the MPS, and parasite dynamics for optimal dosing of LAmB in PKDL. Clinical trial data from the Indian subcontinent, involving short-course LAmB administered alone or with miltefosine, were analyzed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. The pharmacokinetics of LAmB were best described by a two-compartment model with a saturable LAmB uptake by the MPS. The maximum MPS uptake capacity was modeled with a baseline component and an additional disease-related component relative to the parasite burden. As treatment progressed, MPS capacity decreased with declining parasite load, resulting in a median 54% increase in the systemic LAmB exposure (AUC0-24h) by the end of treatment. Simulations suggested that a similar parasite clearance could be achieved with a 50% lower total LAmB dose, supporting the potential efficacy of reduced dosing regimens. Combining LAmB and miltefosine further accelerated parasite clearance compared to LAmB alone. This study highlights the importance of understanding the bidirectional interactions between LAmB pharmacokinetics and parasite infection for interpreting systemic exposure and optimizing treatment approaches. If confirmed in clinical trials, reduced LAmB dosing strategies could enable more rational and cost-effective management of PKDL and other dermal leishmaniases.
{"title":"Bidirectional Interaction Between Liposomal Amphotericin B Pharmacokinetics and Parasite Dynamics in Patients With Post-Kala-Azar Dermal Leishmaniasis: Potential Implications for Optimal Dosing","authors":"Wan-Yu Chu, Om Prakash Singh, Shyam Sundar, Dinesh Mondal, Krishna Pandey, Pradeep Das, Ignace C. Roseboom, Sheeraz Raja, Ana Torres, Eugenia Carrillo, Alwin D.R. Huitema, Fabiana Alves, Thomas P.C. Dorlo","doi":"10.1002/cpt.70124","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpt.70124","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) involves a high macrophage burden in which the <i>Leishmania</i> parasites reside. Liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) plays a key role in the treatment of PKDL. The mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS) is crucial in the distribution of liposomal drugs as well as the leishmaniasis pathophysiology. This study focused on characterizing the interaction between LAmB pharmacokinetics, the MPS, and parasite dynamics for optimal dosing of LAmB in PKDL. Clinical trial data from the Indian subcontinent, involving short-course LAmB administered alone or with miltefosine, were analyzed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. The pharmacokinetics of LAmB were best described by a two-compartment model with a saturable LAmB uptake by the MPS. The maximum MPS uptake capacity was modeled with a baseline component and an additional disease-related component relative to the parasite burden. As treatment progressed, MPS capacity decreased with declining parasite load, resulting in a median 54% increase in the systemic LAmB exposure (AUC<sub>0-24h</sub>) by the end of treatment. Simulations suggested that a similar parasite clearance could be achieved with a 50% lower total LAmB dose, supporting the potential efficacy of reduced dosing regimens. Combining LAmB and miltefosine further accelerated parasite clearance compared to LAmB alone. This study highlights the importance of understanding the bidirectional interactions between LAmB pharmacokinetics and parasite infection for interpreting systemic exposure and optimizing treatment approaches. If confirmed in clinical trials, reduced LAmB dosing strategies could enable more rational and cost-effective management of PKDL and other dermal leishmaniases.</p>","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"119 2","pages":"437-446"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpt.70124","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145601462","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Qianxi Lou, Haiyan Zhou, Zhuokang Wang, Jing Cao, Bohao Tang, Yi Zheng, Ying Wang, Xiaowei Bai, John van den Anker, Guoxiang Hao, Enmei Liu, Wei Zhao
Ibuprofen is a commonly used nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, and its injectable form has specific clinical applications. However, ibuprofen injection has not been approved for use in Chinese children. This study aimed to support its approval in this population using a model-informed drug development (MIDD) approach. Ibuprofen injection (Fenliping®) received approval for Chinese pediatric indications in 2019, with a clinical trial waiver based on pediatric extrapolation using modeling and simulation. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was used to assess ethnic differences and determine the optimal dose for Chinese children. A single-arm, open-label trial was conducted in 40 pediatric patients aged 0.5–6 years to confirm the appropriateness of the 10 mg/kg dose. Body temperature, pain scores, and adverse events were collected to evaluate efficacy, safety, tolerability, and were used as clinical endpoints for exposure–response analysis. Sparse sampling was applied for pharmacokinetic analysis. A population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model was developed using clinical data and used to refine the PBPK model and compare pharmacokinetics between Chinese and Caucasian children. Exposure–response analysis evaluated the relationship between exposure and clinical outcomes. The PBPK model showed minimal ethnic impact on pharmacokinetics, supporting a 10 mg/kg dose. In febrile patients, 89.5% achieved temperature < 38.5°C within 4 hours. Pain scores decreased below threshold. One mild drug-related adverse event occurred. PK parameters were comparable across ethnicities, and no exposure–response relationship was observed. The MIDD approach supported full approval of ibuprofen injection in Chinese children. A 10 mg/kg dose was effective, safe, and well-tolerated.
{"title":"Model-Informed Drug Development Supports Full Approval of Ibuprofen Injection in Chinese Pediatric Patients With Fever or Pain","authors":"Qianxi Lou, Haiyan Zhou, Zhuokang Wang, Jing Cao, Bohao Tang, Yi Zheng, Ying Wang, Xiaowei Bai, John van den Anker, Guoxiang Hao, Enmei Liu, Wei Zhao","doi":"10.1002/cpt.70143","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpt.70143","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ibuprofen is a commonly used nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, and its injectable form has specific clinical applications. However, ibuprofen injection has not been approved for use in Chinese children. This study aimed to support its approval in this population using a model-informed drug development (MIDD) approach. Ibuprofen injection (Fenliping®) received approval for Chinese pediatric indications in 2019, with a clinical trial waiver based on pediatric extrapolation using modeling and simulation. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was used to assess ethnic differences and determine the optimal dose for Chinese children. A single-arm, open-label trial was conducted in 40 pediatric patients aged 0.5–6 years to confirm the appropriateness of the 10 mg/kg dose. Body temperature, pain scores, and adverse events were collected to evaluate efficacy, safety, tolerability, and were used as clinical endpoints for exposure–response analysis. Sparse sampling was applied for pharmacokinetic analysis. A population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model was developed using clinical data and used to refine the PBPK model and compare pharmacokinetics between Chinese and Caucasian children. Exposure–response analysis evaluated the relationship between exposure and clinical outcomes. The PBPK model showed minimal ethnic impact on pharmacokinetics, supporting a 10 mg/kg dose. In febrile patients, 89.5% achieved temperature < 38.5°C within 4 hours. Pain scores decreased below threshold. One mild drug-related adverse event occurred. PK parameters were comparable across ethnicities, and no exposure–response relationship was observed. The MIDD approach supported full approval of ibuprofen injection in Chinese children. A 10 mg/kg dose was effective, safe, and well-tolerated.</p>","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"119 3","pages":"729-738"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145601499","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>In the January 2020 issue of <i>Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics</i> (<i>CPT</i>), as the incoming Editors, we coauthored an Editorial entitled “Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2030.”<span><sup>1</sup></span> The goals of the Editorial, which appeared in the inaugural issue under our leadership, were to introduce the editorial team and highlight (over the next 10 years) our expectations for the expanding field of clinical pharmacology. The quote in the title, attributed to Victor Hugo, could not have been more fitting as we cataloged the transformational areas of growth in clinical pharmacology that we expected over the next 10 years (<b>Figure</b> 1).</p><p>As the new leaders of the journal, we appointed an editorial team to guide its content for the next 5 years. Building upon the expert editorial group of the previous Editors, Scott Waldman and Andre Terzic, we reappointed several Associate Editors and appointed new ones, ensuring that major subject matter experts in clinical pharmacology, including pharmacogenomics, pharmacometrics, and regulatory sciences, were well-represented on the editorial team. Our new team included individuals from the United States (US) and around the world with PharmD, MD, and PhD degrees representing academia, industry, healthcare systems, and regulatory agencies. The team reflected the multiple sectors that are part of the ecosystem of clinical pharmacology.</p><p>In addition to our Associate Editors, we introduced a new type of editor, Editor-in-Training (EiT) for the journal. The goal was to appoint two early-career editors, who would work with the team to advance the journal. The EiTs were involved in peer review and decision making, under the mentorship of experienced members of the editorial team. The role provided a unique training opportunity for outstanding young researchers to get closely involved in the running of a top peer-reviewed journal. Collectively, and with an outstanding editorial staff, our editorial team mentored 10 EiTs over our 6-year tenure and in turn received much, including social media posts, analyses of data, considerable enthusiasm, and new ideas for clinical pharmacology.<span><sup>2</sup></span></p><p>As we reflect on the last 6 years, we must acknowledge that the COVID-19 pandemic, which took us and the world by surprise, had an enormous impact on the content and indeed some of the practices of the journal. Our inaugural issue preceded the pandemic by just a few months, and in 6 years, the journal published nearly 100 articles and received about 350 manuscripts focused on various aspects of COVID-19, which catalyzed research in clinical pharmacology. Notably, articles published during this era described the experiences of regulators in the rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines and therapeutics<span><sup>3</sup></span> and the use of real-world data (RWD) and real-world evidence (RWE) for transitioning <i>in vitro</i> diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2 approved under the E
{"title":"What is History? An Echo of the Past in the Future; A Reflex From the Future on the Past","authors":"Kathleen M. Giacomini, Piet H. van der Graaf","doi":"10.1002/cpt.70089","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.70089","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the January 2020 issue of <i>Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics</i> (<i>CPT</i>), as the incoming Editors, we coauthored an Editorial entitled “Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2030.”<span><sup>1</sup></span> The goals of the Editorial, which appeared in the inaugural issue under our leadership, were to introduce the editorial team and highlight (over the next 10 years) our expectations for the expanding field of clinical pharmacology. The quote in the title, attributed to Victor Hugo, could not have been more fitting as we cataloged the transformational areas of growth in clinical pharmacology that we expected over the next 10 years (<b>Figure</b> 1).</p><p>As the new leaders of the journal, we appointed an editorial team to guide its content for the next 5 years. Building upon the expert editorial group of the previous Editors, Scott Waldman and Andre Terzic, we reappointed several Associate Editors and appointed new ones, ensuring that major subject matter experts in clinical pharmacology, including pharmacogenomics, pharmacometrics, and regulatory sciences, were well-represented on the editorial team. Our new team included individuals from the United States (US) and around the world with PharmD, MD, and PhD degrees representing academia, industry, healthcare systems, and regulatory agencies. The team reflected the multiple sectors that are part of the ecosystem of clinical pharmacology.</p><p>In addition to our Associate Editors, we introduced a new type of editor, Editor-in-Training (EiT) for the journal. The goal was to appoint two early-career editors, who would work with the team to advance the journal. The EiTs were involved in peer review and decision making, under the mentorship of experienced members of the editorial team. The role provided a unique training opportunity for outstanding young researchers to get closely involved in the running of a top peer-reviewed journal. Collectively, and with an outstanding editorial staff, our editorial team mentored 10 EiTs over our 6-year tenure and in turn received much, including social media posts, analyses of data, considerable enthusiasm, and new ideas for clinical pharmacology.<span><sup>2</sup></span></p><p>As we reflect on the last 6 years, we must acknowledge that the COVID-19 pandemic, which took us and the world by surprise, had an enormous impact on the content and indeed some of the practices of the journal. Our inaugural issue preceded the pandemic by just a few months, and in 6 years, the journal published nearly 100 articles and received about 350 manuscripts focused on various aspects of COVID-19, which catalyzed research in clinical pharmacology. Notably, articles published during this era described the experiences of regulators in the rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines and therapeutics<span><sup>3</sup></span> and the use of real-world data (RWD) and real-world evidence (RWE) for transitioning <i>in vitro</i> diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2 approved under the E","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"118 6","pages":"1235-1242"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpt.70089","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145580750","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tanja S. Zabka, Michael Lawton, Tom Chu, Gary S. Friedman, Katrina Peron, Stefan R. Sultana, Warren E. Glaab, Nicholas M. P. King
This manuscript describes the scope of implementation and impact of a regulatory agency-qualified panel of six urine biomarkers on drug development, the process for which was conducted and funded by the Critical Path Institute, the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health, and the United States Food and Drug Administration. Since 2018, these qualified kidney injury urine biomarkers have been included in early clinical drug development programs. Drug-induced kidney injury has historically contributed to high drug candidate attrition rates, additional animal testing needed due to the limitations of standard clinical laboratory tests in timely nephrotoxicity detection, and unsustainable development program fiscal costs. By illustrating the practical application, case studies from pharmaceutical companies illustrate how FDA-qualified drug-induced kidney injury biomarkers can enhance early detection and enable more sensitive and/or specific monitoring of nephrotoxicity. Moreover, data from completed trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov show that the use of these non-standard-of-care biomarkers as prespecified safety endpoints has increased since their qualification in 2018.
{"title":"Biomarkers of Drug-Induced Kidney Injury: Use in Clinical Trials and Recent Examples of Impact on Drug Development","authors":"Tanja S. Zabka, Michael Lawton, Tom Chu, Gary S. Friedman, Katrina Peron, Stefan R. Sultana, Warren E. Glaab, Nicholas M. P. King","doi":"10.1002/cpt.70134","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpt.70134","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This manuscript describes the scope of implementation and impact of a regulatory agency-qualified panel of six urine biomarkers on drug development, the process for which was conducted and funded by the Critical Path Institute, the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health, and the United States Food and Drug Administration. Since 2018, these qualified kidney injury urine biomarkers have been included in early clinical drug development programs. Drug-induced kidney injury has historically contributed to high drug candidate attrition rates, additional animal testing needed due to the limitations of standard clinical laboratory tests in timely nephrotoxicity detection, and unsustainable development program fiscal costs. By illustrating the practical application, case studies from pharmaceutical companies illustrate how FDA-qualified drug-induced kidney injury biomarkers can enhance early detection and enable more sensitive and/or specific monitoring of nephrotoxicity. Moreover, data from completed trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov show that the use of these non-standard-of-care biomarkers as prespecified safety endpoints has increased since their qualification in 2018.</p>","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"119 3","pages":"608-617"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpt.70134","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145585378","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Matthijs W. van Hoogdalem, Allison Dunn, Mai Mehanna, Ya-Feng Wen, Yewon (Sofia) Choi, Karen E. Brown, Iris K. Minichmayr, D. Max Smith, Emily J. Cicali, Mohamed H. Shahin, Kathleen M. Giacomini, Piet H. van der Graaf
<p>Much like the unseen roots that anchor a tree, editors quietly sustain the scientific enterprise of a journal. Although they are rarely visible in the array of publications, through the review process, they decide the content of the journal and provide the stability, nourishment, and resilience that allow the journal’s science to grow. In 2019, <i>Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics</i> (<i>CPT</i>) launched its Editor-in-Training (EiT) program as a bold experiment to develop future reviewers and editors for scientific journals and in particular for <i>CPT</i>. With each cycle, the program has matured, leaving its mark on the journal, the broader field it serves, its editors, and the EiTs themselves.</p><p>From the outset, the vision of the EiT program has been twofold: to cultivate the next generation of editorial leaders and to enrich the perspectives and skill set of the editorial team. The EiT role is a practical apprenticeship in the craft of scientific publishing, where early-career researchers learn by doing, guided by experienced editors. In return, the journal benefits from their fresh perspective, energy, and willingness to experiment with new ideas. Each cohort joined for 1 year on average (the initial cohorts remained longer, reflecting the program’s pilot phase), stepping into the daily work of an Associate Editor in the second half of the tenure: triaging manuscripts, selecting reviewers, synthesizing feedback, and shaping manuscript recommendations. Beyond manuscript management, EiTs have contributed to strategic planning for special issues, stepped in as reviewers for time-critical manuscripts, developed social media strategies, written and coauthored editorials,<span><sup>1-14</sup></span> hosted webinars and podcasts, and engaged in discussions on publishing ethics and policy.</p><p>Beyond their daily responsibilities as EiTs, each cohort has also undertaken independent projects, stepping back from the manuscript queue to examine broader questions in scientific publishing. One recurring theme has been the pursuit of how to best define and measure the impact of published work. Early trainees explored whether the first ripples of engagement, such as Altmetric scores and social media mentions, might be linked to later citation patterns. A subsequent cohort revisited the question from a different angle, examining whether manuscript features, such as title, number of authors, and other metadata (e.g., type of submission and open access status) could influence the scientific impact of a manuscript. While these explorations were not designed to provide definitive answers, they highlight a sustained curiosity across cohorts: what helps research not only be published but also endure in the scientific ecosystem?</p><p>If one question was how science leaves its mark, another was how the journal maintains its own. Excellence in scientific publication requires an editorial team and policies that support transparency and ethical colle
{"title":"Seasons of Growth: Reflections on the CPT Editor-in-Training Program","authors":"Matthijs W. van Hoogdalem, Allison Dunn, Mai Mehanna, Ya-Feng Wen, Yewon (Sofia) Choi, Karen E. Brown, Iris K. Minichmayr, D. Max Smith, Emily J. Cicali, Mohamed H. Shahin, Kathleen M. Giacomini, Piet H. van der Graaf","doi":"10.1002/cpt.70102","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.70102","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Much like the unseen roots that anchor a tree, editors quietly sustain the scientific enterprise of a journal. Although they are rarely visible in the array of publications, through the review process, they decide the content of the journal and provide the stability, nourishment, and resilience that allow the journal’s science to grow. In 2019, <i>Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics</i> (<i>CPT</i>) launched its Editor-in-Training (EiT) program as a bold experiment to develop future reviewers and editors for scientific journals and in particular for <i>CPT</i>. With each cycle, the program has matured, leaving its mark on the journal, the broader field it serves, its editors, and the EiTs themselves.</p><p>From the outset, the vision of the EiT program has been twofold: to cultivate the next generation of editorial leaders and to enrich the perspectives and skill set of the editorial team. The EiT role is a practical apprenticeship in the craft of scientific publishing, where early-career researchers learn by doing, guided by experienced editors. In return, the journal benefits from their fresh perspective, energy, and willingness to experiment with new ideas. Each cohort joined for 1 year on average (the initial cohorts remained longer, reflecting the program’s pilot phase), stepping into the daily work of an Associate Editor in the second half of the tenure: triaging manuscripts, selecting reviewers, synthesizing feedback, and shaping manuscript recommendations. Beyond manuscript management, EiTs have contributed to strategic planning for special issues, stepped in as reviewers for time-critical manuscripts, developed social media strategies, written and coauthored editorials,<span><sup>1-14</sup></span> hosted webinars and podcasts, and engaged in discussions on publishing ethics and policy.</p><p>Beyond their daily responsibilities as EiTs, each cohort has also undertaken independent projects, stepping back from the manuscript queue to examine broader questions in scientific publishing. One recurring theme has been the pursuit of how to best define and measure the impact of published work. Early trainees explored whether the first ripples of engagement, such as Altmetric scores and social media mentions, might be linked to later citation patterns. A subsequent cohort revisited the question from a different angle, examining whether manuscript features, such as title, number of authors, and other metadata (e.g., type of submission and open access status) could influence the scientific impact of a manuscript. While these explorations were not designed to provide definitive answers, they highlight a sustained curiosity across cohorts: what helps research not only be published but also endure in the scientific ecosystem?</p><p>If one question was how science leaves its mark, another was how the journal maintains its own. Excellence in scientific publication requires an editorial team and policies that support transparency and ethical colle","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"118 6","pages":"1249-1252"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpt.70102","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145580713","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Karthik Venkatakrishnan, Amita Joshi, Alethea Gerding, Kathleen M. Giacomini, Piet H. van der Graaf
<p>The field of Clinical Pharmacology has undergone remarkable transformations over the past decade, driven by advancements in technology, science, and our understanding of human biology that have redefined drug development and patient care. Innovativeness, strategic context, and clinical relevance, with a heavy emphasis on computational sciences and precision medicine, have been foundational pillars supporting the content published in Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (CPT) over the last 5 years.<span><sup>1</sup></span> The steadfast commitment to developing and empowering the next generation of scientists and leaders has characterized the Journal.<span><sup>2</sup></span> In this issue, we showcase contributions through a lens of innovations enabling evidence generation in the development and practice of medicine. Framed by a <i>State of the Art</i> review on the history and maturation of impactful innovations in clinical pharmacology,<span><sup>3</sup></span> this issue highlights opportunities for our discipline, exploiting multimodal data, next-generation translational technologies, and advanced analytics in enabling sustainable journeys from molecules to medicines.</p><p>An important purpose of clinical pharmacology is to maximize the benefit vs. risk of medicines and efficiently enable access at the right dosage for <i>all</i> patients, as explored in depth in the March 2023 issue of <i>CPT</i>.<span><sup>4</sup></span> This has been enabled by innovations that continue to advance our understanding of the complex interplay of intrinsic and extrinsic factors that govern population variability in drug exposure and response. The integration of omics sciences—spanning pharmacogenomics, proteomics, and the gut microbiome—has enabled unprecedented insights into the genetic, molecular, and environmental determinants of therapeutic outcomes. As discussed by Caudle <i>et al</i>.,<span><sup>5</sup></span> the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) has set the global standard in clinical pharmacogenomics by providing free, evidence-based guidelines that translate genetic test results into actionable prescribing decisions for 34 genes and 164 drugs, with a focus on global reach and education to remove remaining barriers for broader adoption in clinical practice. <i>CPT</i> has been a home for numerous impactful CPIC guidelines, including one in the current issue detailing evidence relevant to the drug-metabolizing enzyme N-acetyl transferase 2 (NAT2) and recommendations for hydralazine prescribing based on <i>NAT2</i> genotype-predicted acetylator phenotype.<span><sup>6</sup></span> Viewed from a broader perspective beyond hydralazine, this CPIC guideline provides a seminal reference to clinical pharmacologists who may be engaged in the discovery and development of investigational agents with NAT2-mediated clearance, where pharmacogenetic considerations will be vital to defining appropriate dosing across populations.</p><p>Th
对于生物治疗药物,如某些单克隆抗体和免疫激动剂机制,人类翻译的临床前模型的有限保真度仍然是一个重大挑战。与可持续临床前研究的目标相一致,考虑到传统动物试验的局限性,旨在提供更多信息和更有效的替代方案的新方法方法(NAMs)的开发是一个重要的创新领域,最近美国FDA14加强了这一点,并指出了多种使用环境中的机会15在他们对这一主题的看法中,Cao和Polacheck强调了临床药理学家与NAM工程师进行跨学科合作的机会,以定义NAMs使用的正确背景,并利用数据科学的进步,基于生理的药代动力学(PBPK)建模和定量系统药理学(QSP)建模,以提高临床翻译的保真度在他对不假性物质表征和鉴定的观点中,Prasad认为定量蛋白质组学对不假性物质的进步至关重要,尤其是微生理系统和建模平台,如PBPK和qsp。虽然这些呼吁用不假性物质代替动物试验的行动强调了新的机遇,但我们必须乐观地对待它们,反思临床药理学创新的丰富历史,这些创新已经产生了可持续的证据框架。例如药物-药物相互作用的预测模型和符合证据总体原则的虚拟生物等效性研究。新的治疗方式,包括基于mrna的治疗、siRNA、基因治疗、先进的药物传递系统、细胞治疗和下一代疫苗,正在迅速改变药物开发和医学实践的格局。CPT于2023年9月出版的18期专门讨论了新模式的主题,强调了我们的学科在加速其从实验到临床的道路和实现收益-风险评估方面的关键重要性。在本刊中,Van等人19在他们的最新综述中,全面概述了临床、转化和定量药理学在基于mrna的疗法和疫苗开发中的作用,包括NAMs促进临床转化的机会。Zhou等人的综述文章深入探讨了这种新兴模式的基于模型的药物开发框架。20这些综合综述强调了分子生物学、免疫学、生物分析、给药技术、PBPK、QSP、药物计量学和数据科学等领域的知识广度和专业知识,临床药理学家需要掌握这些复杂模式。对可持续创新至关重要的是承诺以成长的心态和协作精神不断学习。随着许多新兴的治疗方式的出现,临床药理学家将需要深入思考甚至是最基本的方面,例如在作用部位事件的背景下,从第一原理解释PK测量。这通常需要利用临床前和临床数据进行群体PK建模的创新机制范例,正如Ogawa等人21所示,一种由两种n -乙酰半乳糖胺偶联短干扰RNA分子组成的组合产品正在开发中,作为慢性乙型肝炎病毒感染的潜在治疗方法。作为一门数据驱动的学科,临床药理学一直利用定量分析方法来整合从实验实验室到临床护理环境的不同环境中收集的数据,从而在研究、开发和使用已建立的和新兴的治疗方法中实现数据驱动的假设和基于证据的决策。计算和数据科学的快速发展,无论是数据模式的多样性扩大,还是人工智能和机器学习方法的出现,都稳步推动了这一学科的发展。CPT在202022年4月和2024.23年4月发布的开创性主题问题中全面展示了这一点,在过去的5年里,这一点尤为明显。大型语言模型的进步正在创造前所未有的机会,使用范围也在稳步扩大Krishna等人在本期CPT上发表的白皮书强调了数据科学和基于模型的药物开发如何通过实现高效、数据驱动的决策和减少对大型临床试验的依赖来改变儿科罕见病的治疗开发。作者确定了整合数字生物标志物、患者报告结果和建模技术的机会,例如从成人数据和数字双胞胎中推断,以个性化治疗并加速小型异质儿科人群的药物批准。 此外,他们认为数据共享对于儿科罕见病发展的进展至关重要,因为它允许所有利益相关者汇集知识、专业知识和数据集,并能够整合大型、多样化的数据集,从而增强新型疾病生物标志物的稳健性和预测能力。汤普金斯等人26也说明了数据共享的力量,他们介绍了HIV药理学数据存储库,这是一个标准化的基于网络的平台,用于共享来自HIV研究的PK数据。通过在三个类别(干预、系统和浓度)中实施最低信息标准,该存储库实现了实时数据共享,支持模型知情的药物开发,并促进了先进的药物计量分析,以加速治疗创新。Liu等人在药物再利用方面的工作是一个显著的例子,说明了在使用多模态数据方面的无边界创新。在这项研究中,包括基因组学、甲基组学、代谢组学和转录组学在内的多组学数据被整合来描述骨质疏松症疾病网络。然后将这些网络与基于药物相似性数据(化学结构、基因表达、文本挖掘和体外测试)构建的药物功能网络相结合,筛选超过10,000种化合物,以寻找骨质疏松症的潜在治疗效果。翻译信息学分析确定抗高血压β -肾上腺素能拮抗剂乙酰布洛尔作为潜在的主要药物,并在斑马鱼实验模型中进一步评估了治疗假设,并通过对服用β -肾上腺素能拮抗剂治疗心血管适应症的患者的实际骨密度数据分析加强了治疗假设。虽然从技术角度来看,这项研究是广泛而令人印象深刻的,但重要的是要注意,这是假设生成,临床翻译仍有待建立。定量临床药理学家仍有许多问题需要解决,包括乙胺醇或其他β -肾上腺素能拮抗剂治疗骨质疏松症的治疗窗口和相关剂量的精确定义,需要对剂量/暴露-反应关系进行前瞻性评估,以优化假设检验的剂量由于骨质疏松症治疗的临床评估将需要长时间的大型试验,因此严格应用基于模型的药物开发原则29,30和预测成功概率的定量方法31来指导临床转化的下一步是很重要的。现实世界数据(RWD)正在迅速重塑用于评估药物收益-风险和价值的综合证据生成,在2021年5月、2022年1月32日、2024年11月33日、2024年11月33日和2025年4月发表的CPT问题中突出了显著进展。人们越来越认识到在临床试验中纳入“实用主义因素”的价值,其特点是广泛的资格标准、更接近临床实践环境的设计因素、以患者为中心的结果测量,分散的因素,以及rwd知情的设计和/或行为。Su等人36对2016-2024年间发表的临床试验进行了有针对性的回顾,并确定了22项具有实用因素的试验和5项将RWD纳入临床试验扩展设置的试验。研究结果指出了这种混合试验设计在提高临床研究的相关性、效率和普遍性方面的价值,同时指出了未来研究的挑战和领域,以增加更广泛的采用和价值。当传统设计的随机对照试验可能不可行时,利用基于RWD的外部对照臂的混合设计是从单臂试验或随机对照试验(RCT)中获得证据的重要途径,这些试验减少了样本数量或试验时间。Okami等人对日本监管药物和再生药物审批中RWD的使用情况进行了回顾,37使用RWD的主要背景是在临床试验中支持比较组,而在临床试验中,rct在伦理上或实际上是不可行的,特别是在儿科和罕见疾病的情况下。本期的两篇研究文章在指出充分实现此类设计价值的挑战的同时,也强调了机遇。Zhao等人38阐述了在中国眼科治疗领域使用混合设计III期随机对照试验的应用,贝叶斯借鉴了三个来源的先前数据——全球随机对照试验、中国区域III期随机对照试验和中国RWD。Russek et al.39回顾性调查了2004年至2023年间在欧盟临床试验登记处注册的两种截然不同的疾病背景(乳腺癌和肌萎缩侧索硬化症)的单臂临床试验,目的是评估基于五个德国RWD来源的RWD衍生的外部对照组补充的可行性。
{"title":"Innovations in Clinical Pharmacology: Shaping the Future of Evidence Generation in Research, Development, and Utilization of Medicines","authors":"Karthik Venkatakrishnan, Amita Joshi, Alethea Gerding, Kathleen M. Giacomini, Piet H. van der Graaf","doi":"10.1002/cpt.70109","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.70109","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The field of Clinical Pharmacology has undergone remarkable transformations over the past decade, driven by advancements in technology, science, and our understanding of human biology that have redefined drug development and patient care. Innovativeness, strategic context, and clinical relevance, with a heavy emphasis on computational sciences and precision medicine, have been foundational pillars supporting the content published in Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (CPT) over the last 5 years.<span><sup>1</sup></span> The steadfast commitment to developing and empowering the next generation of scientists and leaders has characterized the Journal.<span><sup>2</sup></span> In this issue, we showcase contributions through a lens of innovations enabling evidence generation in the development and practice of medicine. Framed by a <i>State of the Art</i> review on the history and maturation of impactful innovations in clinical pharmacology,<span><sup>3</sup></span> this issue highlights opportunities for our discipline, exploiting multimodal data, next-generation translational technologies, and advanced analytics in enabling sustainable journeys from molecules to medicines.</p><p>An important purpose of clinical pharmacology is to maximize the benefit vs. risk of medicines and efficiently enable access at the right dosage for <i>all</i> patients, as explored in depth in the March 2023 issue of <i>CPT</i>.<span><sup>4</sup></span> This has been enabled by innovations that continue to advance our understanding of the complex interplay of intrinsic and extrinsic factors that govern population variability in drug exposure and response. The integration of omics sciences—spanning pharmacogenomics, proteomics, and the gut microbiome—has enabled unprecedented insights into the genetic, molecular, and environmental determinants of therapeutic outcomes. As discussed by Caudle <i>et al</i>.,<span><sup>5</sup></span> the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) has set the global standard in clinical pharmacogenomics by providing free, evidence-based guidelines that translate genetic test results into actionable prescribing decisions for 34 genes and 164 drugs, with a focus on global reach and education to remove remaining barriers for broader adoption in clinical practice. <i>CPT</i> has been a home for numerous impactful CPIC guidelines, including one in the current issue detailing evidence relevant to the drug-metabolizing enzyme N-acetyl transferase 2 (NAT2) and recommendations for hydralazine prescribing based on <i>NAT2</i> genotype-predicted acetylator phenotype.<span><sup>6</sup></span> Viewed from a broader perspective beyond hydralazine, this CPIC guideline provides a seminal reference to clinical pharmacologists who may be engaged in the discovery and development of investigational agents with NAT2-mediated clearance, where pharmacogenetic considerations will be vital to defining appropriate dosing across populations.</p><p>Th","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"118 6","pages":"1243-1248"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpt.70109","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145580751","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}