首页 > 最新文献

Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics最新文献

英文 中文
Long-Read Sequencing Enhances Pharmacogenomic Profiling by Resolving Complex Haplotypes, Novel Star Alleles, and Structural Variants 通过解析复杂单倍型、新型星型等位基因和结构变异,长读测序增强了药物基因组学分析。
IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-11-27 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.70115
Sumudu Rangika Samarasinghe, Andrea Gaedigk, Jesse J. Swen, Henk-Jan Guchelaar, Shivashankar H. Nagaraj

Pharmacogenomics has shifted drug therapy from trial-and-error to personalized approaches by leveraging genetic biomarkers. However, traditional genotyping assays and short-read sequencing often fail to resolve structural complexity in pharmacogenes, leading to ambiguous haplotypes and incorrect phenotype predictions. To evaluate the potential of emerging long-read sequencing technologies in overcoming these limitations, we analyzed diplotypes and drug response phenotypes across 20 clinically actionable pharmacogenes using Oxford Nanopore or PacBio data from 100 healthy individuals in the 1,000 Genomes Project and 159 participants from the Genomics England cancer and rare disease cohorts, alongside Illumina short-read sequencing data. Long reads achieved phasing accuracies of >98% (Oxford Nanopore) and 96.5% (PacBio), with most genes covered by a single phased haploblock. Variant detection metrics were high (i.e., precision, recall, and F1 > 0.92). Genotype and phenotype concordance between short- and long-read predictions exceeded 99%. Short-read predictions contributed nearly twice as much to overall discordant cases compared to those of long reads. Notably, long reads identified 19 novel star (*) alleles and 106 novel suballeles in nine pharmacogenes, including CYP2D6, CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP4F2, and SLCO1B1, which have been submitted to PharmVar. Additionally, long reads resolved 13 ambiguous CYP2D6 structural variants, including a potentially novel structure. Also, a homozygous TA repeat (UGT1A1*80 + *28) was identified that is associated with a poor metabolizer phenotype. Overall, we reassigned 77 genotypes across nine genes for 58 of the 100 investigated 1,000 Genomes Project subjects. These results demonstrate the superiority of long-read sequencing in phasing and resolving complex genomic regions enabling more precise pharmacogenomic profiling. As sequencing costs decline with rapid technological advances, long-read sequencing may become the method of choice in clinical pharmacogenomics, enhancing therapeutic safety and efficacy.

药物基因组学通过利用遗传生物标志物将药物治疗从试错法转变为个性化方法。然而,传统的基因分型分析和短读测序往往不能解决药物基因的结构复杂性,导致模棱两可的单倍型和不正确的表型预测。为了评估新兴的长读测序技术在克服这些限制方面的潜力,我们使用牛津纳米孔或PacBio数据分析了20个临床可操作的药物基因的二倍型和药物反应表型,这些数据来自1000基因组计划中的100名健康个体和来自Genomics England癌症和罕见疾病队列的159名参与者,以及Illumina短读测序数据。长读段的相位准确度分别为bb0 98% (Oxford Nanopore)和96.5% (PacBio),其中大多数基因被单个相位单极块覆盖。变异检测指标很高(即,准确率、召回率和F1 > 0.92)。短读和长读预测之间的基因型和表型一致性超过99%。短读预测对总体不一致案例的贡献几乎是长读预测的两倍。值得注意的是,long reads在CYP2D6、CYP2B6、CYP2C9、CYP2C19、CYP4F2和SLCO1B1等9个药物基因中鉴定出19个新的star(*)等位基因和106个新的亚等位基因,并已提交给PharmVar。此外,长读取解决了13个不明确的CYP2D6结构变体,包括一个潜在的新结构。此外,还发现了一个纯合的TA重复序列(UGT1A1*80 + *28),该重复序列与代谢不良表型相关。总体而言,我们对1000个基因组计划调查对象中的58个重新分配了9个基因的77个基因型。这些结果证明了长读测序在分阶段和解决复杂基因组区域方面的优势,从而实现更精确的药物基因组分析。随着测序成本的下降和技术的快速进步,长读段测序可能成为临床药物基因组学的首选方法,提高治疗的安全性和有效性。
{"title":"Long-Read Sequencing Enhances Pharmacogenomic Profiling by Resolving Complex Haplotypes, Novel Star Alleles, and Structural Variants","authors":"Sumudu Rangika Samarasinghe,&nbsp;Andrea Gaedigk,&nbsp;Jesse J. Swen,&nbsp;Henk-Jan Guchelaar,&nbsp;Shivashankar H. Nagaraj","doi":"10.1002/cpt.70115","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpt.70115","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Pharmacogenomics has shifted drug therapy from trial-and-error to personalized approaches by leveraging genetic biomarkers. However, traditional genotyping assays and short-read sequencing often fail to resolve structural complexity in pharmacogenes, leading to ambiguous haplotypes and incorrect phenotype predictions. To evaluate the potential of emerging long-read sequencing technologies in overcoming these limitations, we analyzed diplotypes and drug response phenotypes across 20 clinically actionable pharmacogenes using Oxford Nanopore or PacBio data from 100 healthy individuals in the 1,000 Genomes Project and 159 participants from the Genomics England cancer and rare disease cohorts, alongside Illumina short-read sequencing data. Long reads achieved phasing accuracies of &gt;98% (Oxford Nanopore) and 96.5% (PacBio), with most genes covered by a single phased haploblock. Variant detection metrics were high (i.e., precision, recall, and F1 &gt; 0.92). Genotype and phenotype concordance between short- and long-read predictions exceeded 99%. Short-read predictions contributed nearly twice as much to overall discordant cases compared to those of long reads. Notably, long reads identified <b>19</b> novel star (*) alleles and <b>106</b> novel suballeles in nine pharmacogenes, including <i>CYP2D6</i>, <i>CYP2B6</i>, <i>CYP2C9</i>, <i>CYP2C19</i>, <i>CYP4F2,</i> and <i>SLCO1B1</i>, which have been submitted to PharmVar. Additionally, long reads resolved 13 ambiguous <i>CYP2D6</i> structural variants, including a potentially novel structure. Also, a homozygous TA repeat (<i>UGT1A1*80 + *28</i>) was identified that is associated with a poor metabolizer phenotype. Overall, we reassigned 77 genotypes across nine genes for 58 of the 100 investigated 1,000 Genomes Project subjects. These results demonstrate the superiority of long-read sequencing in phasing and resolving complex genomic regions enabling more precise pharmacogenomic profiling. As sequencing costs decline with rapid technological advances, long-read sequencing may become the method of choice in clinical pharmacogenomics, enhancing therapeutic safety and efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"119 2","pages":"536-545"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145627284","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Addressing Causality and Homogeneity Assumptions in Exposure-Response Analyses 处理暴露-反应分析中的因果关系和同质性假设。
IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-11-25 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.70132
Mats O. Karlsson, Divya Brundavanam

Exposure-response, or pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic (PKPD), analyses support many drug development decisions. It is typically applied without assessment of causality and homogeneity, where the latter refers to the assumption that the reason for variability in exposure is unimportant for the impact on response. Randomized dose is the ideal variable for instrumental variable (IV) analysis that can help determine causal effects. In this work, we present adaptations of two standard IV models, predictor substitution (PS) and control function (CF), to repeated-measures analyses. We compare these to PKPD (PKPDC) models, without (with) correlations between PK and PD random effects, and to a new, partitioned effects (PE), model that allows separate PD relations for dose, covariate, and random effect-driven variability in exposure. Six scenarios simulate situations: (i) without any confounding, (ii) with three different types of confounding, generated through shared underlying variables (protein binding, disease severity, or renal function) between PK and PD, (iii) of an unmeasured active metabolite responsible for driving the response, and (iv) reversed causality. In all but the base case, the PKPD model provided biased parameter estimates that led to inappropriate dose adjustments for response-, concentrations-, or covariate-based dosing. The other models provided adequate estimates for a majority of the scenarios, but only the PE model provided for all scenarios. The PE model also formed the basis for adequate individualization based on concentration or response and can, like CF and PS, be used based on both single and repeated measures.

暴露-反应或药代动力学(PKPD)分析支持许多药物开发决策。它通常在不评估因果关系和同质性的情况下应用,其中后者指的是假设暴露变异的原因对反应的影响不重要。随机剂量是工具变量(IV)分析的理想变量,可以帮助确定因果关系。在这项工作中,我们提出了两个标准的IV模型,预测器替代(PS)和控制函数(CF),以重复测量分析的适应性。我们将这些模型与PKPD (PKPDC)模型进行比较,PKPDC模型没有PK和PD随机效应之间的相关性,并与一个新的分区效应(PE)模型进行比较,该模型允许剂量、协变量和随机效应驱动的暴露变异性单独的PD关系。六种情景模拟情况:(i)没有任何混淆,(ii)通过PK和PD之间共享的潜在变量(蛋白质结合、疾病严重程度或肾功能)产生三种不同类型的混淆,(iii)负责驱动反应的未测量的活性代谢物,以及(iv)反向因果关系。在除基本情况外的所有情况下,PKPD模型提供了有偏差的参数估计,导致对基于反应、浓度或协变量的剂量调整不适当。其他模型为大多数情景提供了充分的估计,但只有PE模型为所有情景提供了估计。PE模型也构成了基于集中或反应的适当个性化的基础,并且可以像CF和PS一样,基于单一和重复测量使用。
{"title":"Addressing Causality and Homogeneity Assumptions in Exposure-Response Analyses","authors":"Mats O. Karlsson,&nbsp;Divya Brundavanam","doi":"10.1002/cpt.70132","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpt.70132","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Exposure-response, or pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic (PKPD), analyses support many drug development decisions. It is typically applied without assessment of causality and homogeneity, where the latter refers to the assumption that the reason for variability in exposure is unimportant for the impact on response. Randomized dose is the ideal variable for instrumental variable (IV) analysis that can help determine causal effects. In this work, we present adaptations of two standard IV models, predictor substitution (PS) and control function (CF), to repeated-measures analyses. We compare these to PKPD (PKPDC) models, without (with) correlations between PK and PD random effects, and to a new, partitioned effects (PE), model that allows separate PD relations for dose, covariate, and random effect-driven variability in exposure. Six scenarios simulate situations: (i) without any confounding, (ii) with three different types of confounding, generated through shared underlying variables (protein binding, disease severity, or renal function) between PK and PD, (iii) of an unmeasured active metabolite responsible for driving the response, and (iv) reversed causality. In all but the base case, the PKPD model provided biased parameter estimates that led to inappropriate dose adjustments for response-, concentrations-, or covariate-based dosing. The other models provided adequate estimates for a majority of the scenarios, but only the PE model provided for all scenarios. The PE model also formed the basis for adequate individualization based on concentration or response and can, like CF and PS, be used based on both single and repeated measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"119 3","pages":"703-712"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpt.70132","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145601513","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Endpoint Exposure-Response Analyses in the Presence of Concurrent Dose Modification During Clinical Trials 临床试验中存在同时剂量调整的终点暴露-反应分析。
IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-11-25 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.70144
Rui Zhong, Yanguang Cao

Exposure-response (E-R) analyses are essential for dose selection in drug development, yet conventional endpoint E-R approaches often overlook concurrent clinical events such as adverse event (AE)-driven dose modifications (DMs), potentially leading to biased or misleading conclusions. In this study, we developed a framework to quantify the impact of AE-driven DMs on endpoint E-R relationships and to explore strategies to improve their accuracy. Using duvelisib as an exemplar, a drug known for frequent DMs due to Grade ≥ 3 infections, pneumonia, or transaminase elevations, we evaluated E-R relationships under three scenarios: ground truth, conventional E-R (based on planned dose exposures), and DM-adjusted E-R (accounting for AE-induced DMs and resultant exposure changes). Our analyses showed that conventional E-R analyses often deviated substantially from the ground truth at frequent DMs, particularly for AEs with delayed onset. Early-onset AEs and their resultant DMs could significantly distort E-R relationships for subsequent AEs. DM-adjusted E-R analyses better approximate the ground truth, especially for late-occurring AEs, but may introduce a risk of overcorrection of early-occurring AEs. These findings highlight the critical need to incorporate the timing and nature of AEs into E-R analyses to ensure robust interpretation, particularly in settings where DMs are frequent.

暴露-反应(E-R)分析对于药物开发中的剂量选择至关重要,然而传统的终点E-R方法往往忽略了同时发生的临床事件,如不良事件(AE)驱动的剂量修改(dm),这可能导致有偏见或误导性的结论。在本研究中,我们开发了一个框架来量化ae驱动的dm对端点E-R关系的影响,并探索提高其准确性的策略。以duvelisib为例,我们评估了三种情况下的E-R关系:基本事实、常规E-R(基于计划剂量暴露)和dm调整E-R(考虑ae诱导的dm和由此产生的暴露变化)。duvelisib是一种因3级以上感染、肺炎或转氨酶升高而频繁发生dm的药物。我们的分析表明,常规的E-R分析在频繁的DMs中往往与基本事实有很大的偏差,特别是对于延迟发作的ae。早发性ae及其产生的dm可能显著扭曲后续ae的E-R关系。dm调整后的E-R分析可以更好地接近基本事实,特别是对于晚发生的ae,但可能会引入对早发生ae的过度校正风险。这些发现强调了将ae的时间和性质纳入E-R分析以确保可靠解释的迫切需要,特别是在dm频繁发生的环境中。
{"title":"Endpoint Exposure-Response Analyses in the Presence of Concurrent Dose Modification During Clinical Trials","authors":"Rui Zhong,&nbsp;Yanguang Cao","doi":"10.1002/cpt.70144","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpt.70144","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Exposure-response (E-R) analyses are essential for dose selection in drug development, yet conventional endpoint E-R approaches often overlook concurrent clinical events such as adverse event (AE)-driven dose modifications (DMs), potentially leading to biased or misleading conclusions. In this study, we developed a framework to quantify the impact of AE-driven DMs on endpoint E-R relationships and to explore strategies to improve their accuracy. Using duvelisib as an exemplar, a drug known for frequent DMs due to Grade ≥ 3 infections, pneumonia, or transaminase elevations, we evaluated E-R relationships under three scenarios: ground truth, conventional E-R (based on planned dose exposures), and DM-adjusted E-R (accounting for AE-induced DMs and resultant exposure changes). Our analyses showed that conventional E-R analyses often deviated substantially from the ground truth at frequent DMs, particularly for AEs with delayed onset. Early-onset AEs and their resultant DMs could significantly distort E-R relationships for subsequent AEs. DM-adjusted E-R analyses better approximate the ground truth, especially for late-occurring AEs, but may introduce a risk of overcorrection of early-occurring AEs. These findings highlight the critical need to incorporate the timing and nature of AEs into E-R analyses to ensure robust interpretation, particularly in settings where DMs are frequent.</p>","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"119 2","pages":"546-554"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145601556","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Bidirectional Interaction Between Liposomal Amphotericin B Pharmacokinetics and Parasite Dynamics in Patients With Post-Kala-Azar Dermal Leishmaniasis: Potential Implications for Optimal Dosing 黑热病后皮肤利什曼病患者脂质体两性霉素B药代动力学和寄生虫动力学之间的双向相互作用:最佳剂量的潜在影响。
IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-11-25 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.70124
Wan-Yu Chu, Om Prakash Singh, Shyam Sundar, Dinesh Mondal, Krishna Pandey, Pradeep Das, Ignace C. Roseboom, Sheeraz Raja, Ana Torres, Eugenia Carrillo, Alwin D.R. Huitema, Fabiana Alves, Thomas P.C. Dorlo

Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) involves a high macrophage burden in which the Leishmania parasites reside. Liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) plays a key role in the treatment of PKDL. The mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS) is crucial in the distribution of liposomal drugs as well as the leishmaniasis pathophysiology. This study focused on characterizing the interaction between LAmB pharmacokinetics, the MPS, and parasite dynamics for optimal dosing of LAmB in PKDL. Clinical trial data from the Indian subcontinent, involving short-course LAmB administered alone or with miltefosine, were analyzed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. The pharmacokinetics of LAmB were best described by a two-compartment model with a saturable LAmB uptake by the MPS. The maximum MPS uptake capacity was modeled with a baseline component and an additional disease-related component relative to the parasite burden. As treatment progressed, MPS capacity decreased with declining parasite load, resulting in a median 54% increase in the systemic LAmB exposure (AUC0-24h) by the end of treatment. Simulations suggested that a similar parasite clearance could be achieved with a 50% lower total LAmB dose, supporting the potential efficacy of reduced dosing regimens. Combining LAmB and miltefosine further accelerated parasite clearance compared to LAmB alone. This study highlights the importance of understanding the bidirectional interactions between LAmB pharmacokinetics and parasite infection for interpreting systemic exposure and optimizing treatment approaches. If confirmed in clinical trials, reduced LAmB dosing strategies could enable more rational and cost-effective management of PKDL and other dermal leishmaniases.

黑热病后皮肤利什曼病(PKDL)涉及利什曼原虫寄生的高巨噬细胞负担。脂质体两性霉素B (LAmB)在PKDL的治疗中起关键作用。单核吞噬细胞系统(MPS)在脂质体药物的分布和利什曼病的病理生理中起着至关重要的作用。本研究的重点是表征LAmB药代动力学、MPS和寄生虫动力学之间的相互作用,以确定PKDL中LAmB的最佳剂量。来自印度次大陆的临床试验数据,包括单独或与米替福辛联合使用短期LAmB,使用非线性混合效应模型进行分析。LAmB的药代动力学最好用双室模型来描述,MPS对LAmB的摄取是饱和的。最大多磺酸粘多糖摄取能力用基线成分和相对于寄生虫负担的额外疾病相关成分建模。随着治疗的进展,MPS能力随着寄生虫负荷的下降而下降,导致治疗结束时全身羔羊暴露(auc0 -24小时)中位数增加54%。模拟结果表明,降低50%的LAmB总剂量也能达到类似的寄生虫清除效果,这支持了减少给药方案的潜在功效。与单独使用兰姆相比,联合使用兰姆和米替福辛进一步加速了寄生虫清除。这项研究强调了了解LAmB药代动力学和寄生虫感染之间的双向相互作用对于解释全身暴露和优化治疗方法的重要性。如果在临床试验中得到证实,减少LAmB剂量策略可以使PKDL和其他皮肤利什曼病的管理更加合理和具有成本效益。
{"title":"Bidirectional Interaction Between Liposomal Amphotericin B Pharmacokinetics and Parasite Dynamics in Patients With Post-Kala-Azar Dermal Leishmaniasis: Potential Implications for Optimal Dosing","authors":"Wan-Yu Chu,&nbsp;Om Prakash Singh,&nbsp;Shyam Sundar,&nbsp;Dinesh Mondal,&nbsp;Krishna Pandey,&nbsp;Pradeep Das,&nbsp;Ignace C. Roseboom,&nbsp;Sheeraz Raja,&nbsp;Ana Torres,&nbsp;Eugenia Carrillo,&nbsp;Alwin D.R. Huitema,&nbsp;Fabiana Alves,&nbsp;Thomas P.C. Dorlo","doi":"10.1002/cpt.70124","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpt.70124","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) involves a high macrophage burden in which the <i>Leishmania</i> parasites reside. Liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) plays a key role in the treatment of PKDL. The mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS) is crucial in the distribution of liposomal drugs as well as the leishmaniasis pathophysiology. This study focused on characterizing the interaction between LAmB pharmacokinetics, the MPS, and parasite dynamics for optimal dosing of LAmB in PKDL. Clinical trial data from the Indian subcontinent, involving short-course LAmB administered alone or with miltefosine, were analyzed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. The pharmacokinetics of LAmB were best described by a two-compartment model with a saturable LAmB uptake by the MPS. The maximum MPS uptake capacity was modeled with a baseline component and an additional disease-related component relative to the parasite burden. As treatment progressed, MPS capacity decreased with declining parasite load, resulting in a median 54% increase in the systemic LAmB exposure (AUC<sub>0-24h</sub>) by the end of treatment. Simulations suggested that a similar parasite clearance could be achieved with a 50% lower total LAmB dose, supporting the potential efficacy of reduced dosing regimens. Combining LAmB and miltefosine further accelerated parasite clearance compared to LAmB alone. This study highlights the importance of understanding the bidirectional interactions between LAmB pharmacokinetics and parasite infection for interpreting systemic exposure and optimizing treatment approaches. If confirmed in clinical trials, reduced LAmB dosing strategies could enable more rational and cost-effective management of PKDL and other dermal leishmaniases.</p>","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"119 2","pages":"437-446"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpt.70124","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145601462","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Model-Informed Drug Development Supports Full Approval of Ibuprofen Injection in Chinese Pediatric Patients With Fever or Pain 基于模型的药物开发支持布洛芬注射液在中国儿科发烧或疼痛患者中的全面批准。
IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-11-25 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.70143
Qianxi Lou, Haiyan Zhou, Zhuokang Wang, Jing Cao, Bohao Tang, Yi Zheng, Ying Wang, Xiaowei Bai, John van den Anker, Guoxiang Hao, Enmei Liu, Wei Zhao

Ibuprofen is a commonly used nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, and its injectable form has specific clinical applications. However, ibuprofen injection has not been approved for use in Chinese children. This study aimed to support its approval in this population using a model-informed drug development (MIDD) approach. Ibuprofen injection (Fenliping®) received approval for Chinese pediatric indications in 2019, with a clinical trial waiver based on pediatric extrapolation using modeling and simulation. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was used to assess ethnic differences and determine the optimal dose for Chinese children. A single-arm, open-label trial was conducted in 40 pediatric patients aged 0.5–6 years to confirm the appropriateness of the 10 mg/kg dose. Body temperature, pain scores, and adverse events were collected to evaluate efficacy, safety, tolerability, and were used as clinical endpoints for exposure–response analysis. Sparse sampling was applied for pharmacokinetic analysis. A population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model was developed using clinical data and used to refine the PBPK model and compare pharmacokinetics between Chinese and Caucasian children. Exposure–response analysis evaluated the relationship between exposure and clinical outcomes. The PBPK model showed minimal ethnic impact on pharmacokinetics, supporting a 10 mg/kg dose. In febrile patients, 89.5% achieved temperature < 38.5°C within 4 hours. Pain scores decreased below threshold. One mild drug-related adverse event occurred. PK parameters were comparable across ethnicities, and no exposure–response relationship was observed. The MIDD approach supported full approval of ibuprofen injection in Chinese children. A 10 mg/kg dose was effective, safe, and well-tolerated.

布洛芬是一种常用的非甾体抗炎药,其注射形式具有特殊的临床应用。然而,布洛芬注射剂尚未被批准用于中国儿童。本研究旨在通过模型知情药物开发(MIDD)方法支持其在这一人群中的批准。布洛芬注射液(芬利平®)于2019年获得中国儿科适应症批准,基于基于建模和模拟的儿科外推的临床试验豁免。采用基于生理的药代动力学(PBPK)模型评估民族差异并确定中国儿童的最佳剂量。在40名年龄0.5-6岁的儿童患者中进行了一项单臂、开放标签试验,以确认10mg /kg剂量的适宜性。收集体温、疼痛评分和不良事件来评估疗效、安全性、耐受性,并将其用作暴露-反应分析的临床终点。采用稀疏抽样进行药代动力学分析。根据临床数据建立了群体药代动力学(PopPK)模型,并用于改进PBPK模型,比较中国和高加索儿童的药代动力学。暴露-反应分析评估了暴露与临床结果之间的关系。PBPK模型显示种族对药代动力学的影响最小,支持10 mg/kg剂量。在发热患者中,89.5%达到体温
{"title":"Model-Informed Drug Development Supports Full Approval of Ibuprofen Injection in Chinese Pediatric Patients With Fever or Pain","authors":"Qianxi Lou,&nbsp;Haiyan Zhou,&nbsp;Zhuokang Wang,&nbsp;Jing Cao,&nbsp;Bohao Tang,&nbsp;Yi Zheng,&nbsp;Ying Wang,&nbsp;Xiaowei Bai,&nbsp;John van den Anker,&nbsp;Guoxiang Hao,&nbsp;Enmei Liu,&nbsp;Wei Zhao","doi":"10.1002/cpt.70143","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpt.70143","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ibuprofen is a commonly used nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, and its injectable form has specific clinical applications. However, ibuprofen injection has not been approved for use in Chinese children. This study aimed to support its approval in this population using a model-informed drug development (MIDD) approach. Ibuprofen injection (Fenliping®) received approval for Chinese pediatric indications in 2019, with a clinical trial waiver based on pediatric extrapolation using modeling and simulation. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was used to assess ethnic differences and determine the optimal dose for Chinese children. A single-arm, open-label trial was conducted in 40 pediatric patients aged 0.5–6 years to confirm the appropriateness of the 10 mg/kg dose. Body temperature, pain scores, and adverse events were collected to evaluate efficacy, safety, tolerability, and were used as clinical endpoints for exposure–response analysis. Sparse sampling was applied for pharmacokinetic analysis. A population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model was developed using clinical data and used to refine the PBPK model and compare pharmacokinetics between Chinese and Caucasian children. Exposure–response analysis evaluated the relationship between exposure and clinical outcomes. The PBPK model showed minimal ethnic impact on pharmacokinetics, supporting a 10 mg/kg dose. In febrile patients, 89.5% achieved temperature &lt; 38.5°C within 4 hours. Pain scores decreased below threshold. One mild drug-related adverse event occurred. PK parameters were comparable across ethnicities, and no exposure–response relationship was observed. The MIDD approach supported full approval of ibuprofen injection in Chinese children. A 10 mg/kg dose was effective, safe, and well-tolerated.</p>","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"119 3","pages":"729-738"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145601499","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What is History? An Echo of the Past in the Future; A Reflex From the Future on the Past 什么是历史?过去在未来的回响;未来对过去的反射
IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-11-23 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.70089
Kathleen M. Giacomini, Piet H. van der Graaf
<p>In the January 2020 issue of <i>Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics</i> (<i>CPT</i>), as the incoming Editors, we coauthored an Editorial entitled “Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2030.”<span><sup>1</sup></span> The goals of the Editorial, which appeared in the inaugural issue under our leadership, were to introduce the editorial team and highlight (over the next 10 years) our expectations for the expanding field of clinical pharmacology. The quote in the title, attributed to Victor Hugo, could not have been more fitting as we cataloged the transformational areas of growth in clinical pharmacology that we expected over the next 10 years (<b>Figure</b> 1).</p><p>As the new leaders of the journal, we appointed an editorial team to guide its content for the next 5 years. Building upon the expert editorial group of the previous Editors, Scott Waldman and Andre Terzic, we reappointed several Associate Editors and appointed new ones, ensuring that major subject matter experts in clinical pharmacology, including pharmacogenomics, pharmacometrics, and regulatory sciences, were well-represented on the editorial team. Our new team included individuals from the United States (US) and around the world with PharmD, MD, and PhD degrees representing academia, industry, healthcare systems, and regulatory agencies. The team reflected the multiple sectors that are part of the ecosystem of clinical pharmacology.</p><p>In addition to our Associate Editors, we introduced a new type of editor, Editor-in-Training (EiT) for the journal. The goal was to appoint two early-career editors, who would work with the team to advance the journal. The EiTs were involved in peer review and decision making, under the mentorship of experienced members of the editorial team. The role provided a unique training opportunity for outstanding young researchers to get closely involved in the running of a top peer-reviewed journal. Collectively, and with an outstanding editorial staff, our editorial team mentored 10 EiTs over our 6-year tenure and in turn received much, including social media posts, analyses of data, considerable enthusiasm, and new ideas for clinical pharmacology.<span><sup>2</sup></span></p><p>As we reflect on the last 6 years, we must acknowledge that the COVID-19 pandemic, which took us and the world by surprise, had an enormous impact on the content and indeed some of the practices of the journal. Our inaugural issue preceded the pandemic by just a few months, and in 6 years, the journal published nearly 100 articles and received about 350 manuscripts focused on various aspects of COVID-19, which catalyzed research in clinical pharmacology. Notably, articles published during this era described the experiences of regulators in the rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines and therapeutics<span><sup>3</sup></span> and the use of real-world data (RWD) and real-world evidence (RWE) for transitioning <i>in vitro</i> diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2 approved under the E
在2020年1月的《临床药理学和治疗学》(CPT)上,作为即将上任的编辑,我们共同撰写了一篇题为《临床药理学和治疗学,2030》的社论。在我们的领导下,这篇社论出现在创刊号上,其目标是介绍编辑团队,并强调(在未来10年)我们对临床药理学领域不断扩大的期望。标题中引用的维克多·雨果的话再合适不过了,因为我们对未来10年临床药理学发展的转型领域进行了分类(图1)。作为杂志的新领导,我们任命了一个编辑团队来指导未来5年的内容。在前任编辑Scott Waldman和Andre Terzic的专家编辑小组的基础上,我们重新任命了几位副编辑,并任命了新的编辑,确保临床药理学的主要主题专家,包括药物基因组学、药物计量学和监管科学,在编辑团队中有充分的代表。我们的新团队包括来自美国和世界各地拥有药学博士、医学博士和博士学位的个人,代表学术界、工业界、医疗保健系统和监管机构。该团队反映了作为临床药理学生态系统一部分的多个部门。除了我们的副编辑,我们还为期刊引入了一种新的编辑,即培训编辑(EiT)。他们的目标是任命两名初出乍到的编辑,他们将与团队一起推动期刊的发展。在经验丰富的编辑团队成员的指导下,eit参与同行评审和决策。该职位为优秀的年轻研究人员提供了一个独特的培训机会,可以密切参与顶级同行评审期刊的运营。在我们优秀的编辑团队的共同努力下,我们的编辑团队在6年的任期内指导了10位eit,并收获了很多,包括社交媒体帖子、数据分析、相当大的热情和临床药理学的新想法。2在回顾过去6年的同时,我们必须承认,令我们和世界感到意外的2019冠状病毒病大流行对《柳叶刀》的内容乃至部分实践产生了巨大影响。我们的创刊号比大流行早了几个月,在6年的时间里,该杂志发表了近100篇文章,收到了大约350份手稿,重点关注了COVID-19的各个方面,这促进了临床药理学的研究。值得注意的是,这一时期发表的文章描述了监管机构在快速开发COVID-19疫苗和疗法3以及使用真实世界数据(RWD)和真实世界证据(RWE)将根据紧急使用授权批准的SARS-CoV-2体外诊断过渡到完全市场授权的经验虽然大流行催生了巨大的创新,但随着科学界竞相开展研究和发表文章,以解决疾病预防和治疗重病患者的问题,文献中也出现了失误。羟氯喹治疗COVID-19成为仓促应用科学的海报故事。尽管关于使用羟氯喹治疗COVID-19的主要文章在其他地方发表,5,6随后被撤回,但包括我们的编辑团队在内的整个出版界吸取了许多教训。它强调了发表的速度不应该影响我们评论的质量,我们作为期刊编辑和所有读者都需要获得原始或原始数据例如,发表在我们杂志上的一篇论文,使用了错误的羟氯喹文章中的信息来推导剂量方案这些教训促使我们改变编辑政策,现在要求临床试验和数据在公共登记处注册,以确保在我们的期刊上发表的研究的完整性。在2021年1月和9月,我们出版了主题问题,重点关注精准和个性化药物,突出实施科学。10、11 1月份的主题是“精确给药”,其中刊登了一系列文章,鼓励从业者从一刀切的给药方法转向基于年龄、疾病诊断和遗传信息等因素的精确给药一个关键的教程,说明了“概念到常规临床实践”的转变,为医疗保健系统和其他如何实施药物基因组学测试提供了指导这篇文章包括对实验室和技术基础设施的建议,以及支持药物基因组学测试和适应未来发现新的可操作等位基因所需的灵活的临床决策支持系统。 重要的是,它强调了指南的迫切需要,如临床药物遗传学实施联盟(CPIC)制定的指南,将遗传变异转化为药物选择和剂量建议事实上,CPIC已经在我们的期刊上发表了许多关于使用遗传信息来给药的文章,并已成为实施药物基因组学测试的主要催化剂之一。重要的是,许多指南超越了药物代谢酶的基因分型,包括受体和转运体,如SLCO1B1、ABCG2和SLC6A4.13-15。CPIC自2009年以来一直参与推进药物基因组学测试,最近在我们的杂志上发表了一篇文章,回顾了他们的历史。该公司最初只是制定将遗传信息解释为药物剂量和选择的指导方针,但已发展成为药物基因组学实施、标准化和可持续整合药物和剂量选择的基因检测的全球领导者CPIC与最近一项专注于药物基因组变体命名标准化的倡议PharmVar一起,在全球范围内极大地推进了药物基因组学测试。鲍威尔等人的一篇文章也出现在这期主题杂志上,18提醒读者,大多数药物标签不包含对现实世界患者的剂量建议。本文为如何设计、预测、确定和持续改进实际患者给药提供了建议。他们的建议包括使用真实世界的数据来了解和确认特定患者群体可能需要的剂量。我们2021年9月的主题刊“药物遗传学和药物基因组学”扩展了“精确剂量”主题刊,更具体地关注遗传多态性和药物反应再一次展示了基因检测在临床应用方面的进展。Luzum等人对“将药物遗传学付诸实践:一切都是关于证据!”的评论从两个患者案例开始,说明药物基因组学测试如何影响他们的病例,并提醒读者一个事实,即治疗剂量的决定通常依赖于随机临床试验中产生的数据。这类临床试验不适用于基于药物基因组学的给药,后者的证据可能来自其他来源,如真实世界的数据Whirl-Carrillo等人的白皮书提供了更多关于药物遗传学证据的信息,因为药物基因组学知识库(PharmGKB)开发了一个评分系统,为药物基因对的证据水平提供了更标准化、更透明的评估。数据科学已经改变了许多学科,并继续改变药物和其他治疗剂的发现、开发和治疗使用。三个主题问题突出了数据科学的影响,包括最近的人工智能,在临床药理学。第一期主题刊于2020年4月出版,题为“数据科学”,探讨了快速发展的数据科学领域如何影响临床药理学的各个方面该问题引入了广泛的主题,这些主题开始影响临床药理学研究,从传统临床试验中产生的数据,尽管有限,但受到控制,并允许仔细检查药物对现实世界数据反应的一些因素,在传统边界之外捕获,允许检查更多因素和现实世界环境。在社论中,我们描述了深度机器学习和人工智能在2020年之前是如何应用于医疗保健的,主要集中在模式识别上,而不是生成任务,并强调了“生成人工智能”在未来几年临床数据科学方面的巨大潜力。“2022年1月,我们通过创建一个以RWE为主题的完整问题,将数据科学聚焦于现实世界。彼得·霍尼格(Peter Honig)为RWE撰写了一篇具有里程碑意义的评论,重点介绍了在COVID-19大流行期间如何使用RWE为关键临床问题提供信息问题包括疫苗保护的持久性,需要多久接种一次疫苗以防止病毒传播,以及罕见的疫苗不良事件发生的频率。他的评论指出了药物开发商和监管机构使用RWE的重要性,并提供了RWE在临床药理学中使用的历史背景。他描述了主题刊中的几篇文章,特别强调了Purpura等人对FDA在制定监管决策时使用RWE的评论24,以及Bakker等人25和Asano等人26的评论,他们分别描述了欧洲医疗机构EMA和日本制药和医疗器械机构PMDA在制定监管决策时使用RWE。 这个前瞻性的主题问题集中在数据科学的主要领域,RWE,并描述了它在临床药理学包括监管科学中的过去,现在和未来的应用。在2020年,我们预测在这十年中,临床药理学家将在推动精准和个性化医疗的创新以及将其转化为患者利益方面发挥主导作用。按计划,2023年的一期主题刊将“
{"title":"What is History? An Echo of the Past in the Future; A Reflex From the Future on the Past","authors":"Kathleen M. Giacomini,&nbsp;Piet H. van der Graaf","doi":"10.1002/cpt.70089","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.70089","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;In the January 2020 issue of &lt;i&gt;Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics&lt;/i&gt; (&lt;i&gt;CPT&lt;/i&gt;), as the incoming Editors, we coauthored an Editorial entitled “Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2030.”&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; The goals of the Editorial, which appeared in the inaugural issue under our leadership, were to introduce the editorial team and highlight (over the next 10 years) our expectations for the expanding field of clinical pharmacology. The quote in the title, attributed to Victor Hugo, could not have been more fitting as we cataloged the transformational areas of growth in clinical pharmacology that we expected over the next 10 years (&lt;b&gt;Figure&lt;/b&gt; 1).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As the new leaders of the journal, we appointed an editorial team to guide its content for the next 5 years. Building upon the expert editorial group of the previous Editors, Scott Waldman and Andre Terzic, we reappointed several Associate Editors and appointed new ones, ensuring that major subject matter experts in clinical pharmacology, including pharmacogenomics, pharmacometrics, and regulatory sciences, were well-represented on the editorial team. Our new team included individuals from the United States (US) and around the world with PharmD, MD, and PhD degrees representing academia, industry, healthcare systems, and regulatory agencies. The team reflected the multiple sectors that are part of the ecosystem of clinical pharmacology.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In addition to our Associate Editors, we introduced a new type of editor, Editor-in-Training (EiT) for the journal. The goal was to appoint two early-career editors, who would work with the team to advance the journal. The EiTs were involved in peer review and decision making, under the mentorship of experienced members of the editorial team. The role provided a unique training opportunity for outstanding young researchers to get closely involved in the running of a top peer-reviewed journal. Collectively, and with an outstanding editorial staff, our editorial team mentored 10 EiTs over our 6-year tenure and in turn received much, including social media posts, analyses of data, considerable enthusiasm, and new ideas for clinical pharmacology.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As we reflect on the last 6 years, we must acknowledge that the COVID-19 pandemic, which took us and the world by surprise, had an enormous impact on the content and indeed some of the practices of the journal. Our inaugural issue preceded the pandemic by just a few months, and in 6 years, the journal published nearly 100 articles and received about 350 manuscripts focused on various aspects of COVID-19, which catalyzed research in clinical pharmacology. Notably, articles published during this era described the experiences of regulators in the rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines and therapeutics&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; and the use of real-world data (RWD) and real-world evidence (RWE) for transitioning &lt;i&gt;in vitro&lt;/i&gt; diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2 approved under the E","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"118 6","pages":"1235-1242"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpt.70089","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145580750","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Biomarkers of Drug-Induced Kidney Injury: Use in Clinical Trials and Recent Examples of Impact on Drug Development 药物性肾损伤的生物标志物:在临床试验中的应用和对药物开发影响的最新实例。
IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-11-23 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.70134
Tanja S. Zabka, Michael Lawton, Tom Chu, Gary S. Friedman, Katrina Peron, Stefan R. Sultana, Warren E. Glaab, Nicholas M. P. King

This manuscript describes the scope of implementation and impact of a regulatory agency-qualified panel of six urine biomarkers on drug development, the process for which was conducted and funded by the Critical Path Institute, the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health, and the United States Food and Drug Administration. Since 2018, these qualified kidney injury urine biomarkers have been included in early clinical drug development programs. Drug-induced kidney injury has historically contributed to high drug candidate attrition rates, additional animal testing needed due to the limitations of standard clinical laboratory tests in timely nephrotoxicity detection, and unsustainable development program fiscal costs. By illustrating the practical application, case studies from pharmaceutical companies illustrate how FDA-qualified drug-induced kidney injury biomarkers can enhance early detection and enable more sensitive and/or specific monitoring of nephrotoxicity. Moreover, data from completed trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov show that the use of these non-standard-of-care biomarkers as prespecified safety endpoints has increased since their qualification in 2018.

本文描述了一个由六种尿液生物标志物组成的监管机构合格小组对药物开发的实施范围和影响,该过程由关键路径研究所、美国国立卫生研究院基金会和美国食品和药物管理局进行和资助。自2018年以来,这些合格的肾损伤尿液生物标志物已被纳入早期临床药物开发项目。从历史上看,药物性肾损伤导致候选药物的高损耗率,由于标准临床实验室测试在及时检测肾毒性方面的局限性,需要额外的动物实验,以及不可持续的开发项目财政成本。通过说明实际应用,来自制药公司的案例研究说明了fda认证的药物性肾损伤生物标志物如何增强早期检测,并使肾毒性更敏感和/或特异性监测成为可能。此外,在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册的已完成试验的数据显示,自2018年获得资格以来,这些非标准护理生物标志物作为预先指定的安全终点的使用有所增加。
{"title":"Biomarkers of Drug-Induced Kidney Injury: Use in Clinical Trials and Recent Examples of Impact on Drug Development","authors":"Tanja S. Zabka,&nbsp;Michael Lawton,&nbsp;Tom Chu,&nbsp;Gary S. Friedman,&nbsp;Katrina Peron,&nbsp;Stefan R. Sultana,&nbsp;Warren E. Glaab,&nbsp;Nicholas M. P. King","doi":"10.1002/cpt.70134","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpt.70134","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This manuscript describes the scope of implementation and impact of a regulatory agency-qualified panel of six urine biomarkers on drug development, the process for which was conducted and funded by the Critical Path Institute, the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health, and the United States Food and Drug Administration. Since 2018, these qualified kidney injury urine biomarkers have been included in early clinical drug development programs. Drug-induced kidney injury has historically contributed to high drug candidate attrition rates, additional animal testing needed due to the limitations of standard clinical laboratory tests in timely nephrotoxicity detection, and unsustainable development program fiscal costs. By illustrating the practical application, case studies from pharmaceutical companies illustrate how FDA-qualified drug-induced kidney injury biomarkers can enhance early detection and enable more sensitive and/or specific monitoring of nephrotoxicity. Moreover, data from completed trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov show that the use of these non-standard-of-care biomarkers as prespecified safety endpoints has increased since their qualification in 2018.</p>","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"119 3","pages":"608-617"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpt.70134","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145585378","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Seasons of Growth: Reflections on the CPT Editor-in-Training Program 成长的季节:对CPT培训编辑项目的思考
IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-11-23 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.70102
Matthijs W. van Hoogdalem, Allison Dunn, Mai Mehanna, Ya-Feng Wen, Yewon (Sofia) Choi, Karen E. Brown, Iris K. Minichmayr, D. Max Smith, Emily J. Cicali, Mohamed H. Shahin, Kathleen M. Giacomini, Piet H. van der Graaf
<p>Much like the unseen roots that anchor a tree, editors quietly sustain the scientific enterprise of a journal. Although they are rarely visible in the array of publications, through the review process, they decide the content of the journal and provide the stability, nourishment, and resilience that allow the journal’s science to grow. In 2019, <i>Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics</i> (<i>CPT</i>) launched its Editor-in-Training (EiT) program as a bold experiment to develop future reviewers and editors for scientific journals and in particular for <i>CPT</i>. With each cycle, the program has matured, leaving its mark on the journal, the broader field it serves, its editors, and the EiTs themselves.</p><p>From the outset, the vision of the EiT program has been twofold: to cultivate the next generation of editorial leaders and to enrich the perspectives and skill set of the editorial team. The EiT role is a practical apprenticeship in the craft of scientific publishing, where early-career researchers learn by doing, guided by experienced editors. In return, the journal benefits from their fresh perspective, energy, and willingness to experiment with new ideas. Each cohort joined for 1 year on average (the initial cohorts remained longer, reflecting the program’s pilot phase), stepping into the daily work of an Associate Editor in the second half of the tenure: triaging manuscripts, selecting reviewers, synthesizing feedback, and shaping manuscript recommendations. Beyond manuscript management, EiTs have contributed to strategic planning for special issues, stepped in as reviewers for time-critical manuscripts, developed social media strategies, written and coauthored editorials,<span><sup>1-14</sup></span> hosted webinars and podcasts, and engaged in discussions on publishing ethics and policy.</p><p>Beyond their daily responsibilities as EiTs, each cohort has also undertaken independent projects, stepping back from the manuscript queue to examine broader questions in scientific publishing. One recurring theme has been the pursuit of how to best define and measure the impact of published work. Early trainees explored whether the first ripples of engagement, such as Altmetric scores and social media mentions, might be linked to later citation patterns. A subsequent cohort revisited the question from a different angle, examining whether manuscript features, such as title, number of authors, and other metadata (e.g., type of submission and open access status) could influence the scientific impact of a manuscript. While these explorations were not designed to provide definitive answers, they highlight a sustained curiosity across cohorts: what helps research not only be published but also endure in the scientific ecosystem?</p><p>If one question was how science leaves its mark, another was how the journal maintains its own. Excellence in scientific publication requires an editorial team and policies that support transparency and ethical colle
就像固定一棵树的看不见的根一样,编辑们默默地支撑着期刊的科学事业。虽然他们很少在出版物中出现,但通过审稿过程,他们决定了期刊的内容,并提供了稳定性、营养和弹性,使期刊的科学得以发展。2019年,临床药理学和治疗学(CPT)推出了培训编辑(EiT)计划,这是一项大胆的实验,旨在培养未来科学期刊的审稿人和编辑,特别是CPT。随着每一个周期的发展,这个项目变得越来越成熟,在期刊、它所服务的更广泛的领域、它的编辑和eit本身都留下了自己的印记。从一开始,EiT项目的愿景就有两个方面:培养下一代编辑领袖和丰富编辑团队的观点和技能。EiT的角色是科学出版工艺中的实际学徒,早期职业研究人员在经验丰富的编辑的指导下从实践中学习。作为回报,杂志从他们新鲜的视角、精力和尝试新想法的意愿中受益。每个队列平均加入1年(最初的队列持续时间更长,反映了项目的试点阶段),在任期的后半段开始从事副编辑的日常工作:对稿件进行分类、选择审稿人、综合反馈和形成稿件建议。除了稿件管理,eit还为特刊的战略规划做出了贡献,为时间紧迫的稿件提供了审稿人,制定了社交媒体策略,撰写和合作撰写了社论,主持了1-14次网络研讨会和播客,并参与了关于出版道德和政策的讨论。除了作为eit的日常职责之外,每个小组还承担了独立的项目,从稿件队列中退了出来,研究科学出版中更广泛的问题。一个反复出现的主题是如何最好地定义和衡量已发表作品的影响。早期的受训者探讨了参与的第一波涟漪,如Altmetric分数和社交媒体提及,是否可能与后来的引用模式有关。随后的队列从不同的角度重新审视了这个问题,研究了论文的特征,如标题、作者数量和其他元数据(如投稿类型和开放获取状态)是否会影响论文的科学影响。虽然这些探索并不是为了提供明确的答案,但它们突显了一种持续的好奇心:是什么帮助研究不仅发表,而且在科学生态系统中得以延续?如果说一个问题是科学如何留下印记,那么另一个问题就是杂志如何保持自己的印记。卓越的科学出版需要一个编辑团队和政策,支持透明和合乎道德的数据收集,并向作者提供有关期刊新兴兴趣领域的建议。对于临床试验而言,所有患者通过公共注册中心开放获取试验信息至关重要。一批eit开展的一项倡议是引入临床试验注册的系统检查,6使CPT与国际标准保持一致,并导致作者指南的更新。发表在本刊上的临床试验必须在适当的试验注册中心注册,以便潜在的受试者了解并参加试验。EiT队列的另一个项目是比较CPT的内容组合与同行期刊的内容组合,绘制治疗领域,文章类型,重要的是,确定新兴领域。通过检查在CPT上发表的主题随着时间的推移的趋势,EiT队列能够确定临床药理学的发展领域,如真实世界的数据,药物基因组学和新的治疗模式另一组研究了编辑领导和作者如何通过共同撰写一篇社论来促进临床药理学领域的研究,强调需要在哪些方面取得进展以及该领域如何应对总之,这些项目强化了该杂志的核心原则,即研究应该是创新的、透明的、有代表性的和值得信赖的。连续的队列帮助CPT将其声音扩展到期刊页面之外。EiTs尝试了将研究与读者联系起来的新方法,测试了在线可见性的方法,监测了读者对内容的参与情况,并考虑了不同的平台如何扩大期刊的影响范围。他们还通过帮助确定高兴趣的主题,并与资深编辑和研究典范合作,使这些收藏栩栩如生,在塑造期刊的方向方面发挥了作用。 在某些情况下,eit领导的项目研究了人工智能和机器学习在科学文献中的兴起,研究了这些工具在未来几年可能如何影响出版实践。国际合作也加深了,网络研讨会旨在与不同地区和语言的作者直接联系。通过这些面向外部的努力,该计划的影响范围扩大了,提供了知名度和联系,远远超出了期刊的核心读者。除了EiT项目给期刊带来的好处之外,参与这个项目也给EiT带来了好处。沉浸在编辑过程中使受训者对科学有了新的看法,认为手稿不仅是潜在的出版物,而且是需要仔细判断和建设性指导的正在进行的工作。许多人反思这如何使他们自己的写作和评论更加敏锐(图1),让他们更深刻地认识到什么加强了一篇论文,什么削弱了一篇论文。除了机械之外,这段经历还培养了一些难以量化但同样重要的技能:领导力、战略思维、沟通和专业网络。一名受训者称,让他们参与艰难的编辑对话的信任“既鼓舞人心,又非常宝贵”。另一位学生强调,沉浸在决策过程中如何使他们成为更自信、更挑剔的科学评估者。但增长很少没有压力。平衡全职工作的要求和企业所得税的责任并非没有挑战。持续一年或更长时间的每周社交媒体帖子,对即使是最精力充沛的人群的创造力也进行了测试。然后,还有以“逾期助理编辑任务”为标题的自动电子邮件的形式不断提醒责任。这些邮件像时钟一样有规律地出现在更自由放任的EiT的收件箱里,包括周末和节假日,提醒人们科学不等待任何人。这段经历既有益又严谨,因为它让我真正体会到了坐在编辑部的真正意义。该计划的影响远远超出了其1年的周期。校友们把他们的编辑经验带入了广泛的环境:学术界、工业界、监管机构等等。一些人从博士后开始,现在担任助理或副教授的职位,把CPT的经验教训带到他们自己的指导和研究项目中。其他人则从研究生的入门级职位过渡到人工智能、临床药理学、医学和行业咨询总监的角色,利用他们在EiT期间建立的判断力和信心。少数人在这个过程中跨越了国家和大陆,反映了该领域和该计划的全球影响力。将这些路径联系在一起的不是校友们现在的位置,而是他们所拥有的东西:平衡的判断、更敏锐的写作和编辑技巧、对同行评议更深刻的理解,以及从内到外对科学界的归属感。一位前实习生将这段经历描述为“对推动期刊发展的决策的前排座位”。另一个则强调了它如何“打开了通往领导和服务机会的大门”,否则这些机会可能不会出现。每个故事都强调了同样的信息:这个项目从来不只是关于手稿;它一直是关于培养现在从新的优势和视角为该领域做出贡献的人。经过5年的发展,EiT项目已经成为CPT及其姊妹期刊的一部分。但就像任何生命系统一样,它也在不断进化。未来几年将有机会扩大其全球影响力,因为该项目已经因美国以外的参与者而丰富起来,将继续邀请来自广泛地区和背景的eit。该杂志还将面临新的出版领域,如人工智能、开放科学和新颖的交流模式,eit具有独特的优势,可以用新的视角进行探索。另一个仍在形成的分支是校友网络:更有意地将过去的学员联系起来,以便他们的集体见解能够继续滋养期刊及其社区。目标保持不变:确保早期职业研究人员不仅在编辑技术方面受过培训,而且有能力将这些经验教训带到临床药理学扎根的许多地方。编辑不是天生的,而是通过实践、指导和信任培养出来的。在五个队列中,EiT计划加强并扩展了期刊的新方向。如今,eit在学术界、工业界和监管科学界蓬勃发展。每一季都有自己的成长周期,它们共同形成了一个活生生的记录,告诉我们早期的研究人员是如何成为各自领域的领导者的。然而,这还不是最后的收获。 未来的季节将带来新的增长,将推动该计划向前发展。这项工作没有收到任何资金。作者声明这项工作没有竞争利益。
{"title":"Seasons of Growth: Reflections on the CPT Editor-in-Training Program","authors":"Matthijs W. van Hoogdalem,&nbsp;Allison Dunn,&nbsp;Mai Mehanna,&nbsp;Ya-Feng Wen,&nbsp;Yewon (Sofia) Choi,&nbsp;Karen E. Brown,&nbsp;Iris K. Minichmayr,&nbsp;D. Max Smith,&nbsp;Emily J. Cicali,&nbsp;Mohamed H. Shahin,&nbsp;Kathleen M. Giacomini,&nbsp;Piet H. van der Graaf","doi":"10.1002/cpt.70102","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.70102","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Much like the unseen roots that anchor a tree, editors quietly sustain the scientific enterprise of a journal. Although they are rarely visible in the array of publications, through the review process, they decide the content of the journal and provide the stability, nourishment, and resilience that allow the journal’s science to grow. In 2019, &lt;i&gt;Clinical Pharmacology &amp; Therapeutics&lt;/i&gt; (&lt;i&gt;CPT&lt;/i&gt;) launched its Editor-in-Training (EiT) program as a bold experiment to develop future reviewers and editors for scientific journals and in particular for &lt;i&gt;CPT&lt;/i&gt;. With each cycle, the program has matured, leaving its mark on the journal, the broader field it serves, its editors, and the EiTs themselves.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;From the outset, the vision of the EiT program has been twofold: to cultivate the next generation of editorial leaders and to enrich the perspectives and skill set of the editorial team. The EiT role is a practical apprenticeship in the craft of scientific publishing, where early-career researchers learn by doing, guided by experienced editors. In return, the journal benefits from their fresh perspective, energy, and willingness to experiment with new ideas. Each cohort joined for 1 year on average (the initial cohorts remained longer, reflecting the program’s pilot phase), stepping into the daily work of an Associate Editor in the second half of the tenure: triaging manuscripts, selecting reviewers, synthesizing feedback, and shaping manuscript recommendations. Beyond manuscript management, EiTs have contributed to strategic planning for special issues, stepped in as reviewers for time-critical manuscripts, developed social media strategies, written and coauthored editorials,&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1-14&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; hosted webinars and podcasts, and engaged in discussions on publishing ethics and policy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Beyond their daily responsibilities as EiTs, each cohort has also undertaken independent projects, stepping back from the manuscript queue to examine broader questions in scientific publishing. One recurring theme has been the pursuit of how to best define and measure the impact of published work. Early trainees explored whether the first ripples of engagement, such as Altmetric scores and social media mentions, might be linked to later citation patterns. A subsequent cohort revisited the question from a different angle, examining whether manuscript features, such as title, number of authors, and other metadata (e.g., type of submission and open access status) could influence the scientific impact of a manuscript. While these explorations were not designed to provide definitive answers, they highlight a sustained curiosity across cohorts: what helps research not only be published but also endure in the scientific ecosystem?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If one question was how science leaves its mark, another was how the journal maintains its own. Excellence in scientific publication requires an editorial team and policies that support transparency and ethical colle","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"118 6","pages":"1249-1252"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpt.70102","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145580713","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Innovations in Clinical Pharmacology: Shaping the Future of Evidence Generation in Research, Development, and Utilization of Medicines 临床药理学的创新:塑造药物研究、开发和利用中证据生成的未来
IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-11-23 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.70109
Karthik Venkatakrishnan, Amita Joshi, Alethea Gerding, Kathleen M. Giacomini, Piet H. van der Graaf
<p>The field of Clinical Pharmacology has undergone remarkable transformations over the past decade, driven by advancements in technology, science, and our understanding of human biology that have redefined drug development and patient care. Innovativeness, strategic context, and clinical relevance, with a heavy emphasis on computational sciences and precision medicine, have been foundational pillars supporting the content published in Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (CPT) over the last 5 years.<span><sup>1</sup></span> The steadfast commitment to developing and empowering the next generation of scientists and leaders has characterized the Journal.<span><sup>2</sup></span> In this issue, we showcase contributions through a lens of innovations enabling evidence generation in the development and practice of medicine. Framed by a <i>State of the Art</i> review on the history and maturation of impactful innovations in clinical pharmacology,<span><sup>3</sup></span> this issue highlights opportunities for our discipline, exploiting multimodal data, next-generation translational technologies, and advanced analytics in enabling sustainable journeys from molecules to medicines.</p><p>An important purpose of clinical pharmacology is to maximize the benefit vs. risk of medicines and efficiently enable access at the right dosage for <i>all</i> patients, as explored in depth in the March 2023 issue of <i>CPT</i>.<span><sup>4</sup></span> This has been enabled by innovations that continue to advance our understanding of the complex interplay of intrinsic and extrinsic factors that govern population variability in drug exposure and response. The integration of omics sciences—spanning pharmacogenomics, proteomics, and the gut microbiome—has enabled unprecedented insights into the genetic, molecular, and environmental determinants of therapeutic outcomes. As discussed by Caudle <i>et al</i>.,<span><sup>5</sup></span> the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) has set the global standard in clinical pharmacogenomics by providing free, evidence-based guidelines that translate genetic test results into actionable prescribing decisions for 34 genes and 164 drugs, with a focus on global reach and education to remove remaining barriers for broader adoption in clinical practice. <i>CPT</i> has been a home for numerous impactful CPIC guidelines, including one in the current issue detailing evidence relevant to the drug-metabolizing enzyme N-acetyl transferase 2 (NAT2) and recommendations for hydralazine prescribing based on <i>NAT2</i> genotype-predicted acetylator phenotype.<span><sup>6</sup></span> Viewed from a broader perspective beyond hydralazine, this CPIC guideline provides a seminal reference to clinical pharmacologists who may be engaged in the discovery and development of investigational agents with NAT2-mediated clearance, where pharmacogenetic considerations will be vital to defining appropriate dosing across populations.</p><p>Th
对于生物治疗药物,如某些单克隆抗体和免疫激动剂机制,人类翻译的临床前模型的有限保真度仍然是一个重大挑战。与可持续临床前研究的目标相一致,考虑到传统动物试验的局限性,旨在提供更多信息和更有效的替代方案的新方法方法(NAMs)的开发是一个重要的创新领域,最近美国FDA14加强了这一点,并指出了多种使用环境中的机会15在他们对这一主题的看法中,Cao和Polacheck强调了临床药理学家与NAM工程师进行跨学科合作的机会,以定义NAMs使用的正确背景,并利用数据科学的进步,基于生理的药代动力学(PBPK)建模和定量系统药理学(QSP)建模,以提高临床翻译的保真度在他对不假性物质表征和鉴定的观点中,Prasad认为定量蛋白质组学对不假性物质的进步至关重要,尤其是微生理系统和建模平台,如PBPK和qsp。虽然这些呼吁用不假性物质代替动物试验的行动强调了新的机遇,但我们必须乐观地对待它们,反思临床药理学创新的丰富历史,这些创新已经产生了可持续的证据框架。例如药物-药物相互作用的预测模型和符合证据总体原则的虚拟生物等效性研究。新的治疗方式,包括基于mrna的治疗、siRNA、基因治疗、先进的药物传递系统、细胞治疗和下一代疫苗,正在迅速改变药物开发和医学实践的格局。CPT于2023年9月出版的18期专门讨论了新模式的主题,强调了我们的学科在加速其从实验到临床的道路和实现收益-风险评估方面的关键重要性。在本刊中,Van等人19在他们的最新综述中,全面概述了临床、转化和定量药理学在基于mrna的疗法和疫苗开发中的作用,包括NAMs促进临床转化的机会。Zhou等人的综述文章深入探讨了这种新兴模式的基于模型的药物开发框架。20这些综合综述强调了分子生物学、免疫学、生物分析、给药技术、PBPK、QSP、药物计量学和数据科学等领域的知识广度和专业知识,临床药理学家需要掌握这些复杂模式。对可持续创新至关重要的是承诺以成长的心态和协作精神不断学习。随着许多新兴的治疗方式的出现,临床药理学家将需要深入思考甚至是最基本的方面,例如在作用部位事件的背景下,从第一原理解释PK测量。这通常需要利用临床前和临床数据进行群体PK建模的创新机制范例,正如Ogawa等人21所示,一种由两种n -乙酰半乳糖胺偶联短干扰RNA分子组成的组合产品正在开发中,作为慢性乙型肝炎病毒感染的潜在治疗方法。作为一门数据驱动的学科,临床药理学一直利用定量分析方法来整合从实验实验室到临床护理环境的不同环境中收集的数据,从而在研究、开发和使用已建立的和新兴的治疗方法中实现数据驱动的假设和基于证据的决策。计算和数据科学的快速发展,无论是数据模式的多样性扩大,还是人工智能和机器学习方法的出现,都稳步推动了这一学科的发展。CPT在202022年4月和2024.23年4月发布的开创性主题问题中全面展示了这一点,在过去的5年里,这一点尤为明显。大型语言模型的进步正在创造前所未有的机会,使用范围也在稳步扩大Krishna等人在本期CPT上发表的白皮书强调了数据科学和基于模型的药物开发如何通过实现高效、数据驱动的决策和减少对大型临床试验的依赖来改变儿科罕见病的治疗开发。作者确定了整合数字生物标志物、患者报告结果和建模技术的机会,例如从成人数据和数字双胞胎中推断,以个性化治疗并加速小型异质儿科人群的药物批准。 此外,他们认为数据共享对于儿科罕见病发展的进展至关重要,因为它允许所有利益相关者汇集知识、专业知识和数据集,并能够整合大型、多样化的数据集,从而增强新型疾病生物标志物的稳健性和预测能力。汤普金斯等人26也说明了数据共享的力量,他们介绍了HIV药理学数据存储库,这是一个标准化的基于网络的平台,用于共享来自HIV研究的PK数据。通过在三个类别(干预、系统和浓度)中实施最低信息标准,该存储库实现了实时数据共享,支持模型知情的药物开发,并促进了先进的药物计量分析,以加速治疗创新。Liu等人在药物再利用方面的工作是一个显著的例子,说明了在使用多模态数据方面的无边界创新。在这项研究中,包括基因组学、甲基组学、代谢组学和转录组学在内的多组学数据被整合来描述骨质疏松症疾病网络。然后将这些网络与基于药物相似性数据(化学结构、基因表达、文本挖掘和体外测试)构建的药物功能网络相结合,筛选超过10,000种化合物,以寻找骨质疏松症的潜在治疗效果。翻译信息学分析确定抗高血压β -肾上腺素能拮抗剂乙酰布洛尔作为潜在的主要药物,并在斑马鱼实验模型中进一步评估了治疗假设,并通过对服用β -肾上腺素能拮抗剂治疗心血管适应症的患者的实际骨密度数据分析加强了治疗假设。虽然从技术角度来看,这项研究是广泛而令人印象深刻的,但重要的是要注意,这是假设生成,临床翻译仍有待建立。定量临床药理学家仍有许多问题需要解决,包括乙胺醇或其他β -肾上腺素能拮抗剂治疗骨质疏松症的治疗窗口和相关剂量的精确定义,需要对剂量/暴露-反应关系进行前瞻性评估,以优化假设检验的剂量由于骨质疏松症治疗的临床评估将需要长时间的大型试验,因此严格应用基于模型的药物开发原则29,30和预测成功概率的定量方法31来指导临床转化的下一步是很重要的。现实世界数据(RWD)正在迅速重塑用于评估药物收益-风险和价值的综合证据生成,在2021年5月、2022年1月32日、2024年11月33日、2024年11月33日和2025年4月发表的CPT问题中突出了显著进展。人们越来越认识到在临床试验中纳入“实用主义因素”的价值,其特点是广泛的资格标准、更接近临床实践环境的设计因素、以患者为中心的结果测量,分散的因素,以及rwd知情的设计和/或行为。Su等人36对2016-2024年间发表的临床试验进行了有针对性的回顾,并确定了22项具有实用因素的试验和5项将RWD纳入临床试验扩展设置的试验。研究结果指出了这种混合试验设计在提高临床研究的相关性、效率和普遍性方面的价值,同时指出了未来研究的挑战和领域,以增加更广泛的采用和价值。当传统设计的随机对照试验可能不可行时,利用基于RWD的外部对照臂的混合设计是从单臂试验或随机对照试验(RCT)中获得证据的重要途径,这些试验减少了样本数量或试验时间。Okami等人对日本监管药物和再生药物审批中RWD的使用情况进行了回顾,37使用RWD的主要背景是在临床试验中支持比较组,而在临床试验中,rct在伦理上或实际上是不可行的,特别是在儿科和罕见疾病的情况下。本期的两篇研究文章在指出充分实现此类设计价值的挑战的同时,也强调了机遇。Zhao等人38阐述了在中国眼科治疗领域使用混合设计III期随机对照试验的应用,贝叶斯借鉴了三个来源的先前数据——全球随机对照试验、中国区域III期随机对照试验和中国RWD。Russek et al.39回顾性调查了2004年至2023年间在欧盟临床试验登记处注册的两种截然不同的疾病背景(乳腺癌和肌萎缩侧索硬化症)的单臂临床试验,目的是评估基于五个德国RWD来源的RWD衍生的外部对照组补充的可行性。
{"title":"Innovations in Clinical Pharmacology: Shaping the Future of Evidence Generation in Research, Development, and Utilization of Medicines","authors":"Karthik Venkatakrishnan,&nbsp;Amita Joshi,&nbsp;Alethea Gerding,&nbsp;Kathleen M. Giacomini,&nbsp;Piet H. van der Graaf","doi":"10.1002/cpt.70109","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.70109","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;The field of Clinical Pharmacology has undergone remarkable transformations over the past decade, driven by advancements in technology, science, and our understanding of human biology that have redefined drug development and patient care. Innovativeness, strategic context, and clinical relevance, with a heavy emphasis on computational sciences and precision medicine, have been foundational pillars supporting the content published in Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (CPT) over the last 5 years.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; The steadfast commitment to developing and empowering the next generation of scientists and leaders has characterized the Journal.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; In this issue, we showcase contributions through a lens of innovations enabling evidence generation in the development and practice of medicine. Framed by a &lt;i&gt;State of the Art&lt;/i&gt; review on the history and maturation of impactful innovations in clinical pharmacology,&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; this issue highlights opportunities for our discipline, exploiting multimodal data, next-generation translational technologies, and advanced analytics in enabling sustainable journeys from molecules to medicines.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;An important purpose of clinical pharmacology is to maximize the benefit vs. risk of medicines and efficiently enable access at the right dosage for &lt;i&gt;all&lt;/i&gt; patients, as explored in depth in the March 2023 issue of &lt;i&gt;CPT&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;4&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; This has been enabled by innovations that continue to advance our understanding of the complex interplay of intrinsic and extrinsic factors that govern population variability in drug exposure and response. The integration of omics sciences—spanning pharmacogenomics, proteomics, and the gut microbiome—has enabled unprecedented insights into the genetic, molecular, and environmental determinants of therapeutic outcomes. As discussed by Caudle &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;.,&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;5&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) has set the global standard in clinical pharmacogenomics by providing free, evidence-based guidelines that translate genetic test results into actionable prescribing decisions for 34 genes and 164 drugs, with a focus on global reach and education to remove remaining barriers for broader adoption in clinical practice. &lt;i&gt;CPT&lt;/i&gt; has been a home for numerous impactful CPIC guidelines, including one in the current issue detailing evidence relevant to the drug-metabolizing enzyme N-acetyl transferase 2 (NAT2) and recommendations for hydralazine prescribing based on &lt;i&gt;NAT2&lt;/i&gt; genotype-predicted acetylator phenotype.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;6&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Viewed from a broader perspective beyond hydralazine, this CPIC guideline provides a seminal reference to clinical pharmacologists who may be engaged in the discovery and development of investigational agents with NAT2-mediated clearance, where pharmacogenetic considerations will be vital to defining appropriate dosing across populations.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Th","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"118 6","pages":"1243-1248"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpt.70109","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145580751","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Highlighted Articles 突出显示的文章
IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-11-23 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.70093
{"title":"Highlighted Articles","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/cpt.70093","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.70093","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"118 6","pages":"1253-1254"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145581261","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1