Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery最新文献

Background: Nasal reshaping using hyaluronic acid (HA) filler has become a widespread technique and injections are usually performed in deep layers. As an alternative, we propose an innovative approach where HA is injected into the dermis, the so called MesoRhinoFiller.

Aims and objectives: The aim of this study was to describe our injection technique using a smooth, cohesive, and slightly viscous HA filler injected in the dermis.

Materials and methods: A retrospective review of the author's clinical experience from March 2017 to March 2020 was presented. A total of 280 consecutive patients were treated with HA injections to improve their nasal appearance. The mean volume was 0.5 cc HA filler/treatment.

Results: An average increase of 4.9 ± 3.4° was obtained for the nasofrontal angle, and of 7.0 ± 4.5° for the columella labial angle. Asymmetries in the nasal profile and alar rim were also corrected. All the patients were satisfied with the results and no complications occurred.

Conclusion: Injecting HA fillers in the dermal plane is a versatile approach that provides very satisfactory results. This technique allows one to better correct aesthetical, post-traumatic, and post-surgical defects compared with the usual injection rhinoplasty procedures where the filler is injected deep onto the bone/cartilage in the midline of the nose.

Background: Acne scarring not only affects the aesthetic appearance of an individual but also has a detrimental effect on mental health and social life. Various treatment modalities are available for acne scars.

Aim: In this study, fractional erbium-doped yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) laser resurfacing was compared with 20% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) peeling in terms of efficacy and safety.

Materials and methods: This prospective comparative study included 50 subjects of acne scar who were randomly divided into Groups A and B, 25 patients in each group. Group A was treated with 4 sessions of fractional Er:YAG laser and Group B with 4 session of 20% TCA application as chemical peeling, repeated every 21 days over a period of 3 months. The patients were evaluated for improvement at each visit using Goodman and Baron's qualitative and quantitative acne scar grading.

Results: Statistically significant improvement in Goodman and Barron's qualitative acne scar grades was observed in both groups. At the end of therapy, that is, after 12 weeks of therapy, the mean percentage reduction in Goodman and Baron's quantitative acne scar scores was 21.69% ± 16% in Group A and 20.97% ± 8.70% in Group B. In regards of complications, both procedures were well tolerated.

Conclusion: We concluded that fractional Er:YAG laser resurfacing and 20% TCA peel application in the treatment of atrophic acne scar are equally efficacious. Both procedures are safe and well tolerated by the patients.

Background: Melasma is a common dermatosis in both men and women showing varying degrees of success with treatment. Relapse of melasma is high in dark skin types, which necessitates the need for finding a modality of treatment, which not only treats but also prevents relapse.

Aims: To study the effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in patients of melasma both clinically and dermoscopically in dark skin types.

Materials and methods: A prospective study of 20 female patients of Fitzpatrick skin type IV-V with mixed type of melasma and bilateral involvement of the face were enrolled for the study. PRP was injected intradermally at 4 weeks interval for three sittings, and the results were assessed clinically (by modified melasma area and severity score) and dermoscopically. Patients were counselled to ensure strict sun protection measures. Patient satisfaction was noted at baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks. Patients were followed up for 3 months to see for any relapse of the pigmentation. The follow-up showed no relapse of melasma in these patients.

Statistical analysis: Analysis of variance was used with Bonferroni correction for modified melasma area and severity score at various time interval. Subject global aesthetic improvement scale (SGAIS) and physician global esthetic improvement scale (PGAIS) were expressed in counts. P-value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.

Results: Modified melasma area and severity score and dermoscopic changes showed statistically significant improvement compared at the end of study in mild to severe cases. The subjective assessment was made by PGAIS. Patient satisfaction levels (assessed by SGAIS) also showed significant improvement in successive weeks of treatment. Few patients had mild redness and burning post procedure, which resolved spontaneously after few hours.

Conclusion: From this study we concluded that PRP shows a significant improvement in melasma after 12 weeks of treatment with no relapse even after 3 months. Hence, PRP may be used not only as an adjuvant but also as a first line treatment in the view of longer sustained results when combined with strict sun protection. There is a paucity of studies showing results of PRP treatment in dark skin types, which is more resistant to treatment than lighter skin. Moreover, clinical improvement should not be the only parameter to decide on stopping treatment as chances of relapse can be higher. Dermoscopic evaluation helps in determining the changes in vasculature (telangiectasias) and pigmentation (dots and globules), which are better indicators of success of treatment.