In this article, we studied the role of the topological structure of semantic networking in creating verbal aggression. It is shown that centralities such as degree, betweenness and closeness play an important role in the activation of verbal aggression in the network. We have also shown that aggressive labelled nodes with spectral clustering in different spectra are often divided into two groups, with the larger group activating more aggressive labelled nodes. In addition, the parameter of eccentric distribution from the origin is introduced to study the dispersion of aggressive nodes around the specific nodes. Hence, studying two networks with different contexts shows that the dispersion of nodes with aggressive labelling around the network's hub, as the centre of the network with political context, is much more than artistic context. In addition, different clusters of verbal aggression in the political and artistic context have the same pattern of frequency. In addition, we investigated semantic features in creating verbal aggression, showing that non-aggressive words are prone to create verbal aggression as much as aggressive words.
{"title":"The role of network topological structure and semantic features in creating verbal aggression","authors":"Meghdad Abarghouei Nejad;Salman Abarghouei Nejad;Azizollah Memariani;Masoud Asadpour;Javad Hatami;Mohammad Mahdi Kashani","doi":"10.1093/comnet/cnac056","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/comnet/cnac056","url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we studied the role of the topological structure of semantic networking in creating verbal aggression. It is shown that centralities such as degree, betweenness and closeness play an important role in the activation of verbal aggression in the network. We have also shown that aggressive labelled nodes with spectral clustering in different spectra are often divided into two groups, with the larger group activating more aggressive labelled nodes. In addition, the parameter of eccentric distribution from the origin is introduced to study the dispersion of aggressive nodes around the specific nodes. Hence, studying two networks with different contexts shows that the dispersion of nodes with aggressive labelling around the network's hub, as the centre of the network with political context, is much more than artistic context. In addition, different clusters of verbal aggression in the political and artistic context have the same pattern of frequency. In addition, we investigated semantic features in creating verbal aggression, showing that non-aggressive words are prone to create verbal aggression as much as aggressive words.","PeriodicalId":15442,"journal":{"name":"Journal of complex networks","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49961483","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Individuals who interact with each other in social networks often exchange ideas and influence each other's opinions. A popular approach to study the spread of opinions on networks is by examining bounded-confidence models (BCMs), in which the nodes of a network have continuous-valued states that encode their opinions and are receptive to other nodes’ opinions when they lie within some confidence bound of their own opinion. In this article, we extend the Deffuant–Weisbuch (DW) model, which is a well-known BCM, by examining the spread of opinions that coevolve with network structure. We propose an adaptive variant of the DW model in which the nodes of a network can (1) alter their opinions when they interact with neighbouring nodes and (2) break connections with neighbours based on an opinion tolerance threshold and then form new connections following the principle of homophily. This opinion tolerance threshold determines whether or not the opinions of adjacent nodes are sufficiently different to be viewed as ‘discordant’. Using numerical simulations, we find that our adaptive DW model requires a larger confidence bound than a baseline DW model for the nodes of a network to achieve a consensus opinion. In one region of parameter space, we observe ‘pseudo-consensus’ steady states, in which there exist multiple subclusters of an opinion cluster with opinions that differ from each other by a small amount. In our simulations, we also examine the roles of early-time dynamics and nodes with initially moderate opinions for achieving consensus. Additionally, we explore the effects of coevolution on the convergence time of our BCM.
{"title":"An adaptive bounded-confidence model of opinion dynamics on networks","authors":"Unchitta Kan;Michelle Feng;Mason A Porter","doi":"10.1093/comnet/cnac055","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/comnet/cnac055","url":null,"abstract":"Individuals who interact with each other in social networks often exchange ideas and influence each other's opinions. A popular approach to study the spread of opinions on networks is by examining bounded-confidence models (BCMs), in which the nodes of a network have continuous-valued states that encode their opinions and are receptive to other nodes’ opinions when they lie within some confidence bound of their own opinion. In this article, we extend the Deffuant–Weisbuch (DW) model, which is a well-known BCM, by examining the spread of opinions that coevolve with network structure. We propose an adaptive variant of the DW model in which the nodes of a network can (1) alter their opinions when they interact with neighbouring nodes and (2) break connections with neighbours based on an opinion tolerance threshold and then form new connections following the principle of homophily. This opinion tolerance threshold determines whether or not the opinions of adjacent nodes are sufficiently different to be viewed as ‘discordant’. Using numerical simulations, we find that our adaptive DW model requires a larger confidence bound than a baseline DW model for the nodes of a network to achieve a consensus opinion. In one region of parameter space, we observe ‘pseudo-consensus’ steady states, in which there exist multiple subclusters of an opinion cluster with opinions that differ from each other by a small amount. In our simulations, we also examine the roles of early-time dynamics and nodes with initially moderate opinions for achieving consensus. Additionally, we explore the effects of coevolution on the convergence time of our BCM.","PeriodicalId":15442,"journal":{"name":"Journal of complex networks","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel7/8016804/10068397/10068398.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49961486","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Graphs have become crucial for representing and examining biological, social and technological interactions. In this context, the graph spectrum is an exciting feature to be studied because it encodes the structural and dynamic characteristics of the graph. Hence, it becomes essential to efficiently compute the graph's spectral distribution (eigenvalue's density function). Recently, some authors proposed degree-based methods to obtain the spectral density of locally tree-like networks in linear time. The bottleneck of their approach is that they assumed that the graph's assortativity is zero. However, most real-world networks, such as social and biological networks, present assortativity. Consequently, their spectral density approximations may be inaccurate. Here, we propose a method that considers assortativity. Our algorithm's time and space complexities are $mathscr{O}(d_{max}^{2})$