Jill Ehrenreich-May, Amanda Jensen-Doss, Lauren Milgram, David Rosenfield, Ashley M Shaw, Jamie LoCurto, Monica Nanda Robinson, E B Caron, Phyllis Lee, Golda S Ginsburg
Objective: This article presents primary outcomes from the Community Study of Outcome Monitoring for Emotional Disorders in Teens, a two-site, randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of the Unified Protocols for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Adolescents plus measurement-based care (UP-A), measurement-based care alone (TAU+), and treatment as usual (TAU) in community mental health clinics. Method: A total of 174 clinicians were randomized to implement TAU (n = 49), TAU plus an MBC measure (TAU+; n = 63), or UP-A plus MBC (UP-A; n = 62). In addition, 196 adolescents were randomized to receive 16 weeks of either TAU (n = 68), TAU+ (n = 60), or UP-A (n = 68). Independent evaluator-, self-, and caregiver-reported adolescent anxiety and depression symptoms were measured at baseline and Weeks 8, 16, and 28 postenrollment. Results: Adolescents in all groups showed improvement over time, and compared with TAU, adolescents receiving TAU+ and UP-A conditions improved more quickly on adolescent-report measures only. There were no treatment group differences observed on independent evaluator (primary outcome) or caregiver-report measures. In post hoc analyses, moderators of treatment response included treatment duration and complexity of symptom presentation. Conclusions: In one of the largest adolescent-focused, community-located psychotherapy trials conducted in the United States, transdiagnostic treatment plus measurement-based care and measurement-based care alone conferred some adolescent-reported symptom benefits compared with treatment as usual, although adolescents in all conditions exhibited improvements in anxiety and depression. Future directions for subsequent adolescent psychotherapy effectiveness trials for anxiety and depression are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
目的本文介绍了 "青少年情感障碍结果监测社区研究"(Community Study of Outcome Monitoring for Emotional Disorders in Teens)的主要结果。这是一项两地随机对照试验,比较了青少年情感障碍跨诊断治疗统一方案(Unified Protocols for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Adolescents)加测量护理(UP-A)、单纯测量护理(TAU+)和社区心理健康诊所常规治疗(TAU)的有效性。方法:共有174名临床医生被随机分配实施TAU(49人)、TAU加MBC测量(TAU+;63人)或UP-A加MBC(UP-A;62人)。此外,196名青少年被随机分配接受为期16周的TAU(68人)、TAU+(60人)或UP-A(68人)治疗。在基线期和接受治疗后的第8、16和28周,对独立评估人、自我和护理人报告的青少年焦虑和抑郁症状进行了测量。结果显示与TAU相比,接受TAU+和UP-A治疗的青少年在青少年报告的症状方面改善得更快。在独立评估者(主要结果)或照顾者报告的指标上,没有观察到治疗组的差异。在事后分析中,治疗反应的调节因素包括治疗持续时间和症状表现的复杂性。结论在美国进行的规模最大的一项以青少年为中心的社区心理治疗试验中,与常规治疗相比,跨诊断治疗加测量型护理和单纯测量型护理在青少年报告的症状方面有一些益处,尽管所有条件下的青少年在焦虑和抑郁方面都有所改善。本文讨论了针对焦虑和抑郁的青少年心理治疗有效性试验的未来方向。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"A randomized controlled effectiveness trial of transdiagnostic treatment and measurement-based care for adolescents with emotional disorders in community clinics.","authors":"Jill Ehrenreich-May, Amanda Jensen-Doss, Lauren Milgram, David Rosenfield, Ashley M Shaw, Jamie LoCurto, Monica Nanda Robinson, E B Caron, Phyllis Lee, Golda S Ginsburg","doi":"10.1037/ccp0000947","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ccp0000947","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> This article presents primary outcomes from the Community Study of Outcome Monitoring for Emotional Disorders in Teens, a two-site, randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of the <i>Unified Protocols for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Adolescents</i> plus measurement-based care (UP-A), measurement-based care alone (TAU+), and treatment as usual (TAU) in community mental health clinics. <b><i>Method:</i></b> A total of 174 clinicians were randomized to implement TAU (<i>n</i> = 49), TAU plus an MBC measure (TAU+; <i>n</i> = 63), or UP-A plus MBC (UP-A; <i>n</i> = 62). In addition, 196 adolescents were randomized to receive 16 weeks of either TAU (<i>n</i> = 68), TAU+ (<i>n</i> = 60), or UP-A (<i>n</i> = 68). Independent evaluator-, self-, and caregiver-reported adolescent anxiety and depression symptoms were measured at baseline and Weeks 8, 16, and 28 postenrollment. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Adolescents in all groups showed improvement over time, and compared with TAU, adolescents receiving TAU+ and UP-A conditions improved more quickly on adolescent-report measures only. There were no treatment group differences observed on independent evaluator (primary outcome) or caregiver-report measures. In post hoc analyses, moderators of treatment response included treatment duration and complexity of symptom presentation. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In one of the largest adolescent-focused, community-located psychotherapy trials conducted in the United States, transdiagnostic treatment plus measurement-based care and measurement-based care alone conferred some adolescent-reported symptom benefits compared with treatment as usual, although adolescents in all conditions exhibited improvements in anxiety and depression. Future directions for subsequent adolescent psychotherapy effectiveness trials for anxiety and depression are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","volume":"93 3","pages":"144-160"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11937838/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143523413","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Yannick Vander Zwalmen, David Demeester, Kristof Hoorelbeke, Nick Verhaeghe, Chris Baeken, Ernst H W Koster
Objective: Cognitive control impairments are frequently observed after remission from depression. There is evidence to show that cognitive control training (CCT) can reduce such impairments and related risk for recurrent episodes. However, it is currently unclear how many CCT sessions are required for short- and long-term effects. Method: This randomized controlled trial investigates the dose-response relationship of CCT in a sample of individuals with remitted depression (n = 216). Participants were randomly assigned to one of six arms, each receiving a different amount of training sessions (zero, one, five, 10, 15, or 20 sessions) over the course of 4 weeks, with each session lasting 15 min. Depressive symptoms and other cognitive and emotional transfer effects were examined shortly after training, as well as at 3- and 6-month follow-up. Results: We found task-specific, but no near cognitive transfer. Mixed-effects models showed that a minimum of 10 training sessions was required for a significant decrease in depressive symptoms shortly after training with medium effect sizes, but this was not maintained at 3- or 6-month follow-up. We observed reductions in perseverative thinking in all groups receiving 10 or more CCT sessions, which remained present until 6-month follow-up. Conclusions: A minimum of 10 CCT sessions is required for beneficial effects on depressive symptoms and perseverative thinking. Where perseverative thinking remained decreased long-term, this was not the case for depressive symptoms, indicating the need for continued training or the use of booster sessions to maintain training-related improvement. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"The more, the merrier? Establishing a dose-response relationship for the effects of cognitive control training on depressive symptomatology.","authors":"Yannick Vander Zwalmen, David Demeester, Kristof Hoorelbeke, Nick Verhaeghe, Chris Baeken, Ernst H W Koster","doi":"10.1037/ccp0000945","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ccp0000945","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> Cognitive control impairments are frequently observed after remission from depression. There is evidence to show that cognitive control training (CCT) can reduce such impairments and related risk for recurrent episodes. However, it is currently unclear how many CCT sessions are required for short- and long-term effects. <b><i>Method:</i></b> This randomized controlled trial investigates the dose-response relationship of CCT in a sample of individuals with remitted depression (<i>n</i> = 216). Participants were randomly assigned to one of six arms, each receiving a different amount of training sessions (zero, one, five, 10, 15, or 20 sessions) over the course of 4 weeks, with each session lasting 15 min. Depressive symptoms and other cognitive and emotional transfer effects were examined shortly after training, as well as at 3- and 6-month follow-up. <b><i>Results:</i></b> We found task-specific, but no near cognitive transfer. Mixed-effects models showed that a minimum of 10 training sessions was required for a significant decrease in depressive symptoms shortly after training with medium effect sizes, but this was not maintained at 3- or 6-month follow-up. We observed reductions in perseverative thinking in all groups receiving 10 or more CCT sessions, which remained present until 6-month follow-up. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> A minimum of 10 CCT sessions is required for beneficial effects on depressive symptoms and perseverative thinking. Where perseverative thinking remained decreased long-term, this was not the case for depressive symptoms, indicating the need for continued training or the use of booster sessions to maintain training-related improvement. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","volume":"93 3","pages":"161-175"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143523427","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marc J Weintraub, Megan C Ichinose, Jamie L Zinberg, Anabel Salimian, Robin D Brown, Georga Morgan-Fleming, Jennifer M Gamarra, Tiffany Tran, David J Miklowitz
Objectives: Evidence-based psychosocial treatments for the early stages of mood or psychotic spectrum disorders are difficult to find in public health settings, and the efficacy of these treatments is limited by inconsistent behavioral skill practice among youth between sessions. Treatments can be made more accessible and efficacious when delivered through a group format that makes use of mobile applications to remind users to practice skills. Method: We conducted a 9-week, randomized controlled trial of the unified protocol (UP) for cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) delivered via telehealth in a group format, comparing an app-enhanced version of the treatment (AppUP) to standard UP for adolescents with mood and psychotic spectrum conditions. The app was designed to help participants review session content, practice treatment skills, and log their psychiatric symptoms. Study assessors evaluated adolescents for psychiatric symptom severity and psychosocial functioning prior to treatment, at posttreatment, and 3 months posttreatment. Results: Sixty adolescents (Mage = 15.0, SD = 1.3) initiated the trial (30 were randomly assigned to each condition) with 49 retained at posttreatment (9 weeks) and 48 retained at 3 months posttreatment. Adolescents in AppUP showed greater improvements in psychosocial functioning over the 5-month study compared with those in standard UP. AppUP was also associated with greater reductions in depression severity among youth with more self-reported skill practice compared to those in standard UP. Conclusions: This study supports the benefits of transdiagnostic CBT for youth with mood and psychotic symptoms. An adjunctive app appears to improve psychosocial functioning and mood among these youth, especially among those who practice behavioral skills regularly. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"A randomized trial of an app-enhanced group cognitive behavioral therapy for adolescents with mood or psychotic spectrum disorders.","authors":"Marc J Weintraub, Megan C Ichinose, Jamie L Zinberg, Anabel Salimian, Robin D Brown, Georga Morgan-Fleming, Jennifer M Gamarra, Tiffany Tran, David J Miklowitz","doi":"10.1037/ccp0000946","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ccp0000946","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i><b>Objectives</b></i>: Evidence-based psychosocial treatments for the early stages of mood or psychotic spectrum disorders are difficult to find in public health settings, and the efficacy of these treatments is limited by inconsistent behavioral skill practice among youth between sessions. Treatments can be made more accessible and efficacious when delivered through a group format that makes use of mobile applications to remind users to practice skills. <b><i>Method</i></b>: We conducted a 9-week, randomized controlled trial of the unified protocol (UP) for cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) delivered via telehealth in a group format, comparing an app-enhanced version of the treatment (AppUP) to standard UP for adolescents with mood and psychotic spectrum conditions. The app was designed to help participants review session content, practice treatment skills, and log their psychiatric symptoms. Study assessors evaluated adolescents for psychiatric symptom severity and psychosocial functioning prior to treatment, at posttreatment, and 3 months posttreatment. <b><i>Results</i></b>: Sixty adolescents (<i>M</i>age = 15.0, SD = 1.3) initiated the trial (30 were randomly assigned to each condition) with 49 retained at posttreatment (9 weeks) and 48 retained at 3 months posttreatment. Adolescents in AppUP showed greater improvements in psychosocial functioning over the 5-month study compared with those in standard UP. AppUP was also associated with greater reductions in depression severity among youth with more self-reported skill practice compared to those in standard UP. <b><i>Conclusions</i></b>: This study supports the benefits of transdiagnostic CBT for youth with mood and psychotic symptoms. An adjunctive app appears to improve psychosocial functioning and mood among these youth, especially among those who practice behavioral skills regularly. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","volume":"93 3","pages":"131-143"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12002134/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143523418","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Bruce F Chorpita, Kimberly D Becker, Alayna L Park, Davielle Lakind, Karen Guan, Maya M Boustani, Meredith R Boyd, Wendy Chu, Eleanor G Wu, Kendra S Knudsen
Objective: Despite decades of policy emphasizing the role of evidence in guiding services, few studies have sought to improve the degree to which evidence is used in supervision and treatment. This study reports supervisor and therapist outcomes from the Reaching Families multisite cluster-randomized controlled trial, which tested the effects of a coordinated knowledge system (CKS) against practice guidelines (PG) on the use of evidence in supervision and treatment targeting low treatment engagement in publicly funded youth community mental health organizations located in two geographically distinct, underresourced communities where service inequities are common.
Method: The sample included 121 mental health professionals (92.6% female; 81.0% Black, Indigenous, and people of color1) randomly assigned to a CKS or PG control condition. We recorded, transcribed, and coded 430 supervision and 208 treatment sessions involving 221 youth (Mage = 13.1 years, 46.2% female; 78.7% Black, Indigenous, and people of color) and/or their caregivers who reported engagement concerns during therapy.
Results: CKS dyads showed uniformly greater use of evidence focused on specific client needs relative to dyads in the PG condition, with large effect sizes and no differences in the effect of condition across the sites. Secondary analyses showed that tools in the CKS condition were perceived significantly more positively than those in the PG condition in terms of effort and effectiveness, and supervisory workload was the same across both conditions.
Conclusions: In routine clinical care delivered within highly representative community settings, a strategically designed knowledge resource can improve evidence-based reasoning and action and be perceived as easy to use and useful without negatively impacting workload. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
目的:尽管几十年来的政策都强调证据在指导服务中的作用,但很少有研究试图提高证据在监督和治疗中的使用程度。本研究报告了来自“到达家庭”多站点集群随机对照试验的主管和治疗师的结果,该试验测试了协调知识系统(CKS)与实践指南(PG)在监督和治疗中使用证据的效果,这些证据针对的是位于两个地理位置不同、资源不足、服务不公平现象普遍的公共资助青年社区精神卫生组织的低治疗参与度。方法:121名心理卫生专业人员(女性92.6%;81.0%的黑人、原住民和有色人种1)随机分配到CKS或PG控制条件。我们记录、转录和编码了430次监督和208次治疗,涉及221名青少年(年龄13.1岁,46.2%为女性;78.7%黑人、原住民和有色人种)和/或他们的照顾者在治疗期间报告了参与问题。结果:相对于PG组,CKS组对特定客户需求的证据使用一致更多,效应量大,不同部位的条件效果无差异。二次分析表明,在努力和有效性方面,CKS条件下的工具被认为比PG条件下的工具更积极,两种情况下的监督工作量是相同的。结论:在具有高度代表性的社区环境中提供的常规临床护理中,战略性设计的知识资源可以改善循证推理和行动,并被认为易于使用和有用,而不会对工作量产生负面影响。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Cultivating evidence-based clinical reasoning and action in youth mental health care: The Reaching Families multisite randomized trial.","authors":"Bruce F Chorpita, Kimberly D Becker, Alayna L Park, Davielle Lakind, Karen Guan, Maya M Boustani, Meredith R Boyd, Wendy Chu, Eleanor G Wu, Kendra S Knudsen","doi":"10.1037/ccp0000939","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ccp0000939","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Despite decades of policy emphasizing the role of evidence in guiding services, few studies have sought to improve the degree to which evidence is used in supervision and treatment. This study reports supervisor and therapist outcomes from the Reaching Families multisite cluster-randomized controlled trial, which tested the effects of a coordinated knowledge system (CKS) against practice guidelines (PG) on the use of evidence in supervision and treatment targeting low treatment engagement in publicly funded youth community mental health organizations located in two geographically distinct, underresourced communities where service inequities are common.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The sample included 121 mental health professionals (92.6% female; 81.0% Black, Indigenous, and people of color1) randomly assigned to a CKS or PG control condition. We recorded, transcribed, and coded 430 supervision and 208 treatment sessions involving 221 youth (Mage = 13.1 years, 46.2% female; 78.7% Black, Indigenous, and people of color) and/or their caregivers who reported engagement concerns during therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CKS dyads showed uniformly greater use of evidence focused on specific client needs relative to dyads in the PG condition, with large effect sizes and no differences in the effect of condition across the sites. Secondary analyses showed that tools in the CKS condition were perceived significantly more positively than those in the PG condition in terms of effort and effectiveness, and supervisory workload was the same across both conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In routine clinical care delivered within highly representative community settings, a strategically designed knowledge resource can improve evidence-based reasoning and action and be perceived as easy to use and useful without negatively impacting workload. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","volume":"93 2","pages":"65-82"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143364964","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2025-01-06DOI: 10.1037/ccp0000934
Tao Lin, Timothy Anderson, Eva Antebi-Lerman, Jordan Bate, Katie Aafjes-van Doorn
Objective: Therapists report a lack of confidence and competence in teletherapy compared to in-person therapy. Training focusing on teletherapy skills is scarce. This study reports on (a) the development of a training workshop for facilitative interpersonal skills (FIS) in teletherapy (tele-FIRST) and (b) a randomized controlled trial assessing the efficacy of tele-FIRST. Tele-FIRST is a 2-hr online synchronous training workshop that incorporates didactics, deliberate practice, simulation of teletherapy challenges, modeling, and discussion.
Method: A set of tele-FIS stimulus clips that depict four types of teletherapy challenges (e.g., emotional disconnection, distraction) was used to evaluate and train therapists' teletherapy skills. A total of 182 licensed therapists and trainees were randomized into either the tele-FIRST or a waitlist group. Of these, 153 participants completed baseline assessment and were included in the final analyses (tele-FIRST: n = 82; waitlist: n = 71). At baseline, posttraining, and follow-up, participants were assessed on their observer-rated FIS for teletherapy, self-reported FIS, teletherapy skills, acceptance of teletherapy, and self-efficacy.
Results: Therapists demonstrated increased teletherapy skills following the tele-FIRST workshop. After controlling for baseline scores, the tele-FIRST group demonstrated significantly higher observer-rated tele-FIS (ηp² = .134), self-reported FIS (ηp² = .106), teletherapy skills (ηp² = .037), acceptance of teletherapy technology (ηp² = .082), and self-efficacy (ηp² = .036) compared to the waitlist group at posttraining.
Conclusion: The tele-FIRST demonstrated significant short-term effects on enhancing therapists' teletherapy skills as rated by both independent observers and therapists themselves. Tele-FIRST may improve the quality of teletherapy, though more research is needed to investigate its long-term effects. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
目的:与面对面治疗相比,治疗师报告远程治疗缺乏信心和能力。专注于远程治疗技能的培训很少。本研究报告了(a)远程治疗中促进人际关系技巧(FIS)培训工作坊的发展(tele-FIRST)和(b)评估远程治疗疗效的随机对照试验。Tele-FIRST是一个2小时的在线同步培训研讨会,包括教学、刻意练习、远程治疗挑战模拟、建模和讨论。方法:采用一组远程fis刺激片段,描述四种类型的远程治疗挑战(如情绪分离、分心),以评估和训练治疗师的远程治疗技能。共有182名执业治疗师和受训人员被随机分为远程第一组和候补组。其中,153名参与者完成了基线评估,并被纳入最终分析(tele-FIRST: n = 82;等待名单:n = 71)。在基线、训练后和随访时,对参与者进行了远程治疗的观察者评价的FIS、自我报告的FIS、远程治疗技能、远程治疗接受度和自我效能感的评估。结果:在远程第一研讨会之后,治疗师表现出了更高的远程治疗技能。在控制基线分数后,远程第一组在训练后表现出显著高于候补组的观察者评价的远程治疗效果(ηp²= 0.134)、自我报告的远程治疗效果(ηp²= 0.106)、远程治疗技能(ηp²= 0.037)、远程治疗技术接受度(ηp²= 0.082)和自我效能感(ηp²= 0.036)。结论:根据独立观察者和治疗师自己的评价,远程- first在提高治疗师的远程治疗技能方面表现出显著的短期效果。Tele-FIRST可能会提高远程治疗的质量,尽管还需要更多的研究来调查其长期效果。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Efficacy of facilitative interpersonal and relational skills training for teletherapy: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Tao Lin, Timothy Anderson, Eva Antebi-Lerman, Jordan Bate, Katie Aafjes-van Doorn","doi":"10.1037/ccp0000934","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ccp0000934","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Therapists report a lack of confidence and competence in teletherapy compared to in-person therapy. Training focusing on teletherapy skills is scarce. This study reports on (a) the development of a training workshop for facilitative interpersonal skills (FIS) in teletherapy (tele-FIRST) and (b) a randomized controlled trial assessing the efficacy of tele-FIRST. Tele-FIRST is a 2-hr online synchronous training workshop that incorporates didactics, deliberate practice, simulation of teletherapy challenges, modeling, and discussion.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A set of tele-FIS stimulus clips that depict four types of teletherapy challenges (e.g., emotional disconnection, distraction) was used to evaluate and train therapists' teletherapy skills. A total of 182 licensed therapists and trainees were randomized into either the tele-FIRST or a waitlist group. Of these, 153 participants completed baseline assessment and were included in the final analyses (tele-FIRST: <i>n</i> = 82; waitlist: <i>n</i> = 71). At baseline, posttraining, and follow-up, participants were assessed on their observer-rated FIS for teletherapy, self-reported FIS, teletherapy skills, acceptance of teletherapy, and self-efficacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Therapists demonstrated increased teletherapy skills following the tele-FIRST workshop. After controlling for baseline scores, the tele-FIRST group demonstrated significantly higher observer-rated tele-FIS (η<i><sub>p</sub></i>² = .134), self-reported FIS (η<i><sub>p</sub></i>² = .106), teletherapy skills (η<sub><i>p</i></sub>² = .037), acceptance of teletherapy technology (η<i><sub>p</sub></i>² = .082), and self-efficacy (η<sub><i>p</i></sub>² = .036) compared to the waitlist group at posttraining.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The tele-FIRST demonstrated significant short-term effects on enhancing therapists' teletherapy skills as rated by both independent observers and therapists themselves. Tele-FIRST may improve the quality of teletherapy, though more research is needed to investigate its long-term effects. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","volume":" ","pages":"83-95"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142932038","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-12-30DOI: 10.1037/ccp0000941
Jonathan G Shalom, Asher Y Strauss, Jonathan D Huppert, Gerhard Andersson, Idan M Aderka
Objective: Sudden gains in psychotherapy have been found to predict outcome, but the conditions under which this occurs remain understudied. In the present study, we experimentally examined the effects of processing sudden gains on treatment outcome.
Method: As part of a large randomized controlled trial of internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy for social anxiety disorder (n = 182), we experimentally manipulated therapists' responses to sudden gains. Specifically, we randomized individuals who experienced a sudden gain (n = 52) to either receive (n = 26) or not receive (n = 26) processing of the gain.
Results: We found that processed sudden gains were significantly less likely to be reversed compared to unprocessed sudden gains. We also found that individuals with processed sudden gains had lower symptom levels at posttreatment/follow-up compared to individuals with unprocessed sudden gains (Mdifference = 15.65, SE = 5.87, p = .023, Cohen's d = 0.84; Mdifference = 16.68, SE = 6.36, p = .026, Cohen's d = 1.05; respectively). In addition, individuals with unprocessed sudden gains did not have significantly different symptom levels at posttreatment/follow-up compared to individuals who did not experience a sudden gain during treatment.
Conclusions: Our findings suggest that in internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy for social anxiety disorder, the processing of sudden gains (rather than the gains themselves) leads to upward spirals of improvement that affect long-term outcomes. Replication of these findings in additional studies is needed, and, if replicated, such findings could provide the basis for adding processing of sudden gains to existing therapeutic protocols. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
目的:已经发现心理治疗的突然获益可以预测结果,但这种情况发生的条件仍未得到充分研究。在本研究中,我们通过实验检验了处理突发性增益对治疗结果的影响。方法:作为网络认知行为治疗社交焦虑障碍的大型随机对照试验的一部分(n = 182),我们通过实验操纵治疗师对突然收益的反应。具体来说,我们将经历突然增益的个体(n = 52)随机分配给接受(n = 26)或不接受(n = 26)增益处理的个体。结果:我们发现,与未处理的突然增益相比,处理过的突然增益明显不太可能逆转。我们还发现,与未处理突然增益的个体相比,处理突然增益的个体在治疗后/随访时的症状水平较低(Mdifference = 15.65, SE = 5.87, p = 0.023, Cohen’s d = 0.84;Mdifference = 16.68, SE = 6.36, p = 0.026, Cohen’s d = 1.05;分别)。此外,在治疗后/随访中,与在治疗期间没有经历突然增加的个体相比,未经处理的突然增加的个体没有显著不同的症状水平。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在针对社交焦虑障碍的网络认知行为治疗中,对突然收益的处理(而不是收益本身)导致了影响长期结果的改善的上升螺旋。需要在其他研究中重复这些发现,如果重复,这些发现可以为在现有治疗方案中增加处理突然收益提供基础。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"A theoretically based experimental manipulation of the processing of sudden gains: Considering reasons, meaning, and opportunities to leverage the gain.","authors":"Jonathan G Shalom, Asher Y Strauss, Jonathan D Huppert, Gerhard Andersson, Idan M Aderka","doi":"10.1037/ccp0000941","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ccp0000941","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Sudden gains in psychotherapy have been found to predict outcome, but the conditions under which this occurs remain understudied. In the present study, we experimentally examined the effects of processing sudden gains on treatment outcome.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>As part of a large randomized controlled trial of internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy for social anxiety disorder (<i>n</i> = 182), we experimentally manipulated therapists' responses to sudden gains. Specifically, we randomized individuals who experienced a sudden gain (<i>n</i> = 52) to either receive (n = 26) or not receive (<i>n</i> = 26) processing of the gain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that processed sudden gains were significantly less likely to be reversed compared to unprocessed sudden gains. We also found that individuals with processed sudden gains had lower symptom levels at posttreatment/follow-up compared to individuals with unprocessed sudden gains (<i>M</i><sub>difference</sub> = 15.65, <i>SE</i> = 5.87, <i>p</i> = .023, Cohen's <i>d</i> = 0.84; <i>M</i><sub>difference</sub> = 16.68, <i>SE</i> = 6.36<i>, p</i> = .026, Cohen's <i>d</i> = 1.05; respectively). In addition, individuals with unprocessed sudden gains did not have significantly different symptom levels at posttreatment/follow-up compared to individuals who did not experience a sudden gain during treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that in internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy for social anxiety disorder, the processing of sudden gains (rather than the gains themselves) leads to upward spirals of improvement that affect long-term outcomes. Replication of these findings in additional studies is needed, and, if replicated, such findings could provide the basis for adding processing of sudden gains to existing therapeutic protocols. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","volume":"93 2","pages":"120-130"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143364961","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jordan P Davis, Eric R Pedersen, Brian Borsari, Sarah Bowen, Jason E Owen, Angeles Sedano, Denise D Tran, Shaddy Saba, Reagan E Fitzke, Joannalyn Delacruz, Liv Canning
Objective: Veterans returning from deployment have high rates of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and co-occurring alcohol use disorder (AUD). Current treatments for PTSD and AUD report high dropout rates, and many veterans report alcohol misuse to cope with symptoms of PTSD. The present study is a pilot randomized controlled trial in which veterans (N = 201) were randomized to receive a mobile mindfulness-based intervention enhanced with brief alcohol intervention content (Mind Guide) or an active stress management program.
Method: To be eligible for the study, veterans had to have served after September 11, 2001 (post-9/11 veteran) and screen positive for PTSD and AUD. All participants were asked to complete a baseline and four monthly follow-up assessments (two during treatment phase and two posttreatment phase). Primary outcomes were PTSD symptoms, frequency of alcohol use, and alcohol use consequences.
Results: Engagement with Mind Guide was excellent (averages of over 31 logins and 5 hr of app usage). Those assigned to Mind Guide showed significant reductions in PTSD symptoms (d = -0.36; 16-week follow-up). No differences emerged for frequency of alcohol use (d = -0.12; 16-week follow-up) or consequences (d = -0.12; 16-week follow-up).
Conclusions: Mind Guide may be a valuable adjunct to more intensive in-person PTSD treatment by facilitating interest in services, integration into care, and/or sustainment of posttreatment improvements. Further development of Mind Guide may enhance efficacy at reducing alcohol use and consequences. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Effects of a mobile mindfulness smartphone app on posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms and alcohol use problems for veterans: A pilot randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Jordan P Davis, Eric R Pedersen, Brian Borsari, Sarah Bowen, Jason E Owen, Angeles Sedano, Denise D Tran, Shaddy Saba, Reagan E Fitzke, Joannalyn Delacruz, Liv Canning","doi":"10.1037/ccp0000940","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ccp0000940","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Veterans returning from deployment have high rates of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and co-occurring alcohol use disorder (AUD). Current treatments for PTSD and AUD report high dropout rates, and many veterans report alcohol misuse to cope with symptoms of PTSD. The present study is a pilot randomized controlled trial in which veterans (N = 201) were randomized to receive a mobile mindfulness-based intervention enhanced with brief alcohol intervention content (Mind Guide) or an active stress management program.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>To be eligible for the study, veterans had to have served after September 11, 2001 (post-9/11 veteran) and screen positive for PTSD and AUD. All participants were asked to complete a baseline and four monthly follow-up assessments (two during treatment phase and two posttreatment phase). Primary outcomes were PTSD symptoms, frequency of alcohol use, and alcohol use consequences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Engagement with Mind Guide was excellent (averages of over 31 logins and 5 hr of app usage). Those assigned to Mind Guide showed significant reductions in PTSD symptoms (d = -0.36; 16-week follow-up). No differences emerged for frequency of alcohol use (d = -0.12; 16-week follow-up) or consequences (d = -0.12; 16-week follow-up).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mind Guide may be a valuable adjunct to more intensive in-person PTSD treatment by facilitating interest in services, integration into care, and/or sustainment of posttreatment improvements. Further development of Mind Guide may enhance efficacy at reducing alcohol use and consequences. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","volume":"93 2","pages":"96-109"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12101609/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143364287","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Xinyao Zhang, Simon B Goldberg, Scott A Baldwin, Michael J Tanana, Lauren M Weitzman, Shrikanth S Narayanan, David C Atkins, Zac E Imel
Objective: This study applied a machine-learning-based skill assessment system to investigate the association between supportive counseling skills (empathy, open questions, and reflections) and treatment outcomes. We hypothesized that higher empathy and higher use of open questions and reflections would be associated with greater symptom reduction.
Method: We used a data set with 2,974 sessions, 610 clients, and 48 therapists collected from a university counseling center, which included 845,953 rated therapist statements. Client outcome was routinely monitored by the Counseling Center Assessment of Psychological Symptoms Instruments. Therapists' skills were measured via computer by a bidirectional-long-short-term-memory-based system that rated use of supportive counseling skills. We used multilevel modeling to separate the between-therapist and the within-therapist associations of the skills and outcome.
Results: Use of open questions and reflections was associated with client symptom reduction between therapists but not within therapists. We did not find significant associations between therapist empathy and client symptom reduction but found that empathy was negatively associated with clients' baseline symptom level within therapists.
Conclusions: Therapist exploration of clients' experience and expression of understanding may be important skills that are associated with clients' better outcomes. This study highlights the importance of support counseling skills, as well as the potential of machine-learning-based measures in psychotherapy research. We discuss the limitations of the study, including the limitations related to the speaker recognition system and potential reasons for the lack of association between empathy and client outcome. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
目的:本研究应用基于机器学习的技能评估系统来调查支持性咨询技能(共情、开放性问题和反思)与治疗结果之间的关系。我们假设,更高的同理心和更高的开放性问题和反思的使用将与更大的症状减轻有关。方法:我们使用了从大学咨询中心收集的2,974次会议,610名客户和48名治疗师的数据集,其中包括845,953名评级治疗师的陈述。咨询中心心理症状评估仪器对患者的预后进行常规监测。治疗师的技能是通过一个基于双向长短期记忆的系统通过电脑测量的,该系统对支持性咨询技能的使用进行了评级。我们使用多层模型来分离治疗师之间和治疗师内部的技能和结果的关联。结果:开放式问题和反思的使用与治疗师之间的来访者症状减轻有关,但与治疗师内部无关。我们没有发现治疗师共情与来访者症状减轻之间的显著关联,但发现共情与来访者在治疗师内部的基线症状水平呈负相关。结论:治疗师对来访者体验的探索和理解的表达可能是与来访者更好的结果相关的重要技能。这项研究强调了支持咨询技能的重要性,以及在心理治疗研究中基于机器学习的措施的潜力。我们讨论了本研究的局限性,包括与说话人识别系统相关的局限性以及共情与客户结果之间缺乏关联的潜在原因。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Association of machine-learning-rated supportive counseling skills with psychotherapy outcome.","authors":"Xinyao Zhang, Simon B Goldberg, Scott A Baldwin, Michael J Tanana, Lauren M Weitzman, Shrikanth S Narayanan, David C Atkins, Zac E Imel","doi":"10.1037/ccp0000935","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ccp0000935","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study applied a machine-learning-based skill assessment system to investigate the association between supportive counseling skills (empathy, open questions, and reflections) and treatment outcomes. We hypothesized that higher empathy and higher use of open questions and reflections would be associated with greater symptom reduction.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We used a data set with 2,974 sessions, 610 clients, and 48 therapists collected from a university counseling center, which included 845,953 rated therapist statements. Client outcome was routinely monitored by the Counseling Center Assessment of Psychological Symptoms Instruments. Therapists' skills were measured via computer by a bidirectional-long-short-term-memory-based system that rated use of supportive counseling skills. We used multilevel modeling to separate the between-therapist and the within-therapist associations of the skills and outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Use of open questions and reflections was associated with client symptom reduction between therapists but not within therapists. We did not find significant associations between therapist empathy and client symptom reduction but found that empathy was negatively associated with clients' baseline symptom level within therapists.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Therapist exploration of clients' experience and expression of understanding may be important skills that are associated with clients' better outcomes. This study highlights the importance of support counseling skills, as well as the potential of machine-learning-based measures in psychotherapy research. We discuss the limitations of the study, including the limitations related to the speaker recognition system and potential reasons for the lack of association between empathy and client outcome. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","volume":"93 2","pages":"110-119"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11804870/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143364962","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Robin Anno Wester, Tobias Koch, Fabian Münch, Charles Driver, Wolfgang Lutz, Julian Rubel
Objective: The therapeutic alliance is one of the most stable predictors of symptom burden over the course of therapy. So far, this effect has only been examined on the basis of sessions. Continuous-time models (CTM) allow this relationship to be modeled as a continuous process in which the actual time interval between measurements is considered. The aim of the present study was to compare the fit of discrete-time models (DTM) of the alliance-symptom relationship with CTM using different time variables (sessions vs. actual time interval).
Method: Data from 1,413 patients at a university psychotherapy outpatient clinic were analyzed. The alliance and symptom burden were assessed each session with the Bernese Session Report and the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-Short-Form, respectively. Different DTM and CTM were estimated using the R-package ctsem and compared in their fit via the Akaike information criterion.
Results: CTMs with session as the time unit fitted the data best. Significant negative within-person effects of alliance and symptom burden were found. These effects showed a significant positive correlation, implying that individuals with a stronger effect of the alliance on symptom severity also showed a stronger effect of symptom severity on the alliance.
Conclusions: When modeling the relationship of symptom severity and alliance, it seems to be of more importance to capture the fact that a session occurred than to capture the exact time intervals between sessions. Future studies should examine this finding for other psychotherapeutic factors. Interpersonal factors might explain the positive association of the reciprocal alliance-symptom effects. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
目的:治疗联合度是治疗过程中症状负担最稳定的预测指标之一。到目前为止,这种影响只是在会议的基础上进行了研究。连续时间模型(CTM)允许将这种关系建模为考虑测量之间实际时间间隔的连续过程。本研究的目的是比较不同时间变量(会话与实际时间间隔)下联盟-症状关系的离散时间模型(DTM)与CTM的拟合。方法:对某高校心理治疗门诊1413例患者资料进行分析。每次治疗时分别用伯尔尼会议报告和霍普金斯症状检查表对联盟和症状负担进行评估。使用R-package ctsem估计不同的DTM和CTM,并通过Akaike信息准则比较其拟合性。结果:以会话为时间单位的CTMs拟合效果最好。联盟和症状负担的负性人内效应显著。这些效应呈显著正相关,说明联盟对症状严重程度影响越强的个体,其症状严重程度对联盟的影响也越强。结论:当对症状严重程度和联合的关系进行建模时,捕捉一个会话发生的事实似乎比捕捉会话之间的确切时间间隔更重要。未来的研究应该在其他心理治疗因素中检验这一发现。人际因素可能解释互惠联盟-症状效应的正相关。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"In search of lost time: Discrete- versus continuous-time models of working alliance and symptom severity.","authors":"Robin Anno Wester, Tobias Koch, Fabian Münch, Charles Driver, Wolfgang Lutz, Julian Rubel","doi":"10.1037/ccp0000929","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ccp0000929","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The therapeutic alliance is one of the most stable predictors of symptom burden over the course of therapy. So far, this effect has only been examined on the basis of sessions. Continuous-time models (CTM) allow this relationship to be modeled as a continuous process in which the actual time interval between measurements is considered. The aim of the present study was to compare the fit of discrete-time models (DTM) of the alliance-symptom relationship with CTM using different time variables (sessions vs. actual time interval).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data from 1,413 patients at a university psychotherapy outpatient clinic were analyzed. The alliance and symptom burden were assessed each session with the Bernese Session Report and the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-Short-Form, respectively. Different DTM and CTM were estimated using the R-package ctsem and compared in their fit via the Akaike information criterion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CTMs with session as the time unit fitted the data best. Significant negative within-person effects of alliance and symptom burden were found. These effects showed a significant positive correlation, implying that individuals with a stronger effect of the alliance on symptom severity also showed a stronger effect of symptom severity on the alliance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When modeling the relationship of symptom severity and alliance, it seems to be of more importance to capture the fact that a session occurred than to capture the exact time intervals between sessions. Future studies should examine this finding for other psychotherapeutic factors. Interpersonal factors might explain the positive association of the reciprocal alliance-symptom effects. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","volume":"93 1","pages":"27-39"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142949637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abagail E Ciriegio, Abigail E Pine, David A Cole, Laura G McKee, Rex Forehand, Bruce E Compas
Objective: The present study assessed two theory-driven mediators of the effects of a family group cognitive-behavioral (FGCB) preventive intervention for youth of parents with a history of major depressive disorder (MDD) or dysthymia on long-term youth psychopathology symptoms and diagnoses.
Method: Sample included 180 parents (Mage = 41.9, 89% female, 82% White, non-Hispanic) and one of their children/adolescents ages 9-15 years (Mage = 11.4, 49% female, 74% White, non-Hispanic). Changes in the hypothesized mediators, observations of positive parenting (Iowa Family Interaction Rating Scales) and youth secondary control coping (SCC) skills (Responses to Stress Questionnaire), were assessed at 6 months. Changes in youth psychopathology symptoms were assessed on the Child Behavior Checklist and Youth Self-Report at 18- and 24-month follow-ups and MDD diagnoses with the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia at 12 and 24 months.
Results: Changes in youth SCC skills (e.g., acceptance, reappraisal) after the intervention mediated the effects of the FGCB program on changes in youth internalizing and externalizing symptoms at 18- and 24-month follow-ups. Effects for changes in positive parenting behaviors as a mediator were more limited. SCC skills were further shown to mediate the effects of the FGCB intervention on MDD diagnoses from 12 to 24 months.
Conclusions: This study provides clear and strong evidence that changes in youth SCC skills mediated the long-term effects of preventive intervention for families of depressed parents. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Mediators of a randomized controlled trial of a preventive intervention for youth of parents with depressive disorders.","authors":"Abagail E Ciriegio, Abigail E Pine, David A Cole, Laura G McKee, Rex Forehand, Bruce E Compas","doi":"10.1037/ccp0000928","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ccp0000928","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present study assessed two theory-driven mediators of the effects of a family group cognitive-behavioral (FGCB) preventive intervention for youth of parents with a history of major depressive disorder (MDD) or dysthymia on long-term youth psychopathology symptoms and diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Sample included 180 parents (<i>M<sub>age</sub></i> = 41.9, 89% female, 82% White, non-Hispanic) and one of their children/adolescents ages 9-15 years (<i>M<sub>age</sub></i> = 11.4, 49% female, 74% White, non-Hispanic). Changes in the hypothesized mediators, observations of positive parenting (Iowa Family Interaction Rating Scales) and youth secondary control coping (SCC) skills (Responses to Stress Questionnaire), were assessed at 6 months. Changes in youth psychopathology symptoms were assessed on the Child Behavior Checklist and Youth Self-Report at 18- and 24-month follow-ups and MDD diagnoses with the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia at 12 and 24 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Changes in youth SCC skills (e.g., acceptance, reappraisal) after the intervention mediated the effects of the FGCB program on changes in youth internalizing and externalizing symptoms at 18- and 24-month follow-ups. Effects for changes in positive parenting behaviors as a mediator were more limited. SCC skills were further shown to mediate the effects of the FGCB intervention on MDD diagnoses from 12 to 24 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides clear and strong evidence that changes in youth SCC skills mediated the long-term effects of preventive intervention for families of depressed parents. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","volume":"93 1","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11934267/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142949647","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}