首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Clinical Anesthesia最新文献

英文 中文
Spinal cord ischemia after ESP block ESP阻滞后脊髓缺血。
IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111662
Alessandro De Cassai
{"title":"Spinal cord ischemia after ESP block","authors":"Alessandro De Cassai","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111662","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111662","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"99 ","pages":"Article 111662"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142501298","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rationale for assessing preoperative anxiety as part of the preoperative evaluation process. 将评估术前焦虑作为术前评估过程一部分的理由。
IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111656
Paul F White, Ofelia Loani Elvir-Lazo
{"title":"Rationale for assessing preoperative anxiety as part of the preoperative evaluation process.","authors":"Paul F White, Ofelia Loani Elvir-Lazo","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111656","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111656","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":"111656"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142501293","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of emergence delirium on long-term survival in older patients after major noncardiac surgery: A longitudinal prospective observational study 非心脏大手术后出现谵妄对老年患者长期生存的影响:一项纵向前瞻性观察研究。
IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111663
Bing-Yan Cai M.D. , Shu-Ting He M.D. , Yan Zhang M.D. , Jia-Hui Ma Ph.D , Dong-Liang Mu M.D. , Dong-Xin Wang M.D., Ph.D

Study objective

To test the hypothesis that emergence delirium might be associated with worse long-term survival.

Design

A longitudinal prospective observational study.

Setting

A tertiary hospital in Beijing, China.

Patients

A total of 942 patients aged 65–90 years who were admitted to post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) after major noncardiac surgery under general anesthesia.

Exposures

Emergence delirium was assessed with the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit during PACU stay.

Measurements

Patients were followed up once a year for at least 3 years. Our primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary endpoints included recurrence-free and event-free survivals. Associations between emergence delirium and long-term survivals were analyzed with the Cox proportional hazard models.

Main results

Among enrolled patients, 915 completed perioperative assessments; 906 completed long-term follow-up (mean age 72 years; 60 % [545/906] male; 73 % [660/906] cancer surgery). At the end of follow-up (median 43 months), there were 69 deaths in 331 patients (21 %) with emergence delirium versus 114 deaths in 575 patients (20 %) without: unadjusted hazard ratio 1.10 (95 % CI: 0.81 to 1.48); P = 0.547; adjusted hazard ratio 0.96 (95 % CI: 0.70 to 1.32); P = 0.797. Recurrence-free survival was 73/331 (22 %) in patients with emergence delirium versus 121/575 (21 %) without: unadjusted hazard ratio 1.08 (95 % CI: 0.81 to 1.45); P = 0.598; adjusted hazard ratio 0.94 (95 % CI: 0.69 to 1.28); P = 0.695. Event-free survival was 159/331 (48 %) in patients with emergence delirium versus 268/575 (47 %) without: unadjusted hazard ratio 1.06 (95 % CI: 0.87 to 1.29); P = 0.563; adjusted hazard ratio 0.98 (95 % CI: 0.80 to 1.21); P = 0.875.

Conclusions

We did not find significant association between emergence delirium and worse long-term survival in older patients after general anesthesia and major surgery mainly for cancer. The effects of emergence delirium on long-term outcomes deserve further investigation.
Clinical trial registrations: www.chictr.org.cn; ChiCTR-OOC-17012734.
研究目的验证谵妄的出现可能与长期生存率下降有关的假设:设计:纵向前瞻性观察研究:地点:中国北京一家三级甲等医院:患者:942名年龄在65-90岁之间、在全身麻醉下接受非心脏大手术后入住麻醉后护理病房(PACU)的患者:在PACU住院期间,使用重症监护室意识混乱评估方法对出现的谵妄进行评估:每年对患者进行一次随访,至少持续3年。我们的主要终点是总生存率。次要终点包括无复发生存率和无事件生存率。采用 Cox 比例危险模型分析了出现谵妄与长期存活率之间的关系:在登记的患者中,915 人完成了围手术期评估;906 人完成了长期随访(平均年龄 72 岁;60% [545/906] 为男性;73% [660/906] 接受过癌症手术)。随访结束时(中位数为 43 个月),出现谵妄的 331 名患者中有 69 人死亡(21%),而未出现谵妄的 575 名患者中有 114 人死亡(20%):未调整危险比为 1.10(95% CI:0.81 至 1.48);P = 0.547;调整后危险比为 0.96(95% CI:0.70 至 1.32);P = 0.797。出现谵妄的患者无复发生存率为73/331(22%),而未出现谵妄的患者为121/575(21%):未调整危险比为1.08(95 % CI:0.81至1.45);P = 0.598;调整后危险比为0.94(95 % CI:0.69至1.28);P = 0.695。出现谵妄的患者无事件生存率为159/331(48%),而未出现谵妄的患者为268/575(47%):未调整危险比为1.06(95 % CI:0.87至1.29);P = 0.563;调整危险比为0.98(95 % CI:0.80至1.21);P = 0.875:我们没有发现老年患者在接受全身麻醉和主要针对癌症的大型手术后出现谵妄与长期生存率下降之间存在明显联系。出现谵妄对长期预后的影响值得进一步研究。临床试验注册:www.chictr.org.cn;ChiCTR-OOC-17012734。
{"title":"Impact of emergence delirium on long-term survival in older patients after major noncardiac surgery: A longitudinal prospective observational study","authors":"Bing-Yan Cai M.D. ,&nbsp;Shu-Ting He M.D. ,&nbsp;Yan Zhang M.D. ,&nbsp;Jia-Hui Ma Ph.D ,&nbsp;Dong-Liang Mu M.D. ,&nbsp;Dong-Xin Wang M.D., Ph.D","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111663","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111663","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study objective</h3><div>To test the hypothesis that emergence delirium might be associated with worse long-term survival.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A longitudinal prospective observational study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>A tertiary hospital in Beijing, China.</div></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><div>A total of 942 patients aged 65–90 years who were admitted to post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) after major noncardiac surgery under general anesthesia.</div></div><div><h3>Exposures</h3><div>Emergence delirium was assessed with the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit during PACU stay.</div></div><div><h3>Measurements</h3><div>Patients were followed up once a year for at least 3 years. Our primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary endpoints included recurrence-free and event-free survivals. Associations between emergence delirium and long-term survivals were analyzed with the Cox proportional hazard models.</div></div><div><h3>Main results</h3><div>Among enrolled patients, 915 completed perioperative assessments; 906 completed long-term follow-up (mean age 72 years; 60 % [545/906] male; 73 % [660/906] cancer surgery). At the end of follow-up (median 43 months), there were 69 deaths in 331 patients (21 %) with emergence delirium versus 114 deaths in 575 patients (20 %) without: unadjusted hazard ratio 1.10 (95 % CI: 0.81 to 1.48); <em>P</em> = 0.547; adjusted hazard ratio 0.96 (95 % CI: 0.70 to 1.32); <em>P</em> = 0.797. Recurrence-free survival was 73/331 (22 %) in patients with emergence delirium versus 121/575 (21 %) without: unadjusted hazard ratio 1.08 (95 % CI: 0.81 to 1.45); <em>P</em> = 0.598; adjusted hazard ratio 0.94 (95 % CI: 0.69 to 1.28); <em>P</em> = 0.695. Event-free survival was 159/331 (48 %) in patients with emergence delirium versus 268/575 (47 %) without: unadjusted hazard ratio 1.06 (95 % CI: 0.87 to 1.29); <em>P</em> = 0.563; adjusted hazard ratio 0.98 (95 % CI: 0.80 to 1.21); <em>P</em> = 0.875.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We did not find significant association between emergence delirium and worse long-term survival in older patients after general anesthesia and major surgery mainly for cancer. The effects of emergence delirium on long-term outcomes deserve further investigation.</div><div><strong>Clinical trial registrations</strong>: <span><span>www.chictr.org.cn</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>; ChiCTR-OOC-17012734.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"99 ","pages":"Article 111663"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142501296","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The perioperative care in liver transplantation multicenter database: Building the foundation for research collaboration in liver transplantation 肝移植围手术期护理多中心数据库:为肝移植研究合作奠定基础。
IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111651
Dieter Adelmann M.D., Ph.D. , Mallika Reddy , George P. Zhou M.D. , Kyota Fukazawa M.D., Ph.D. , Ryan Wang M.D. , Cale Kassel M.D. , Christine Nguyen-Buckley M.D. , Javier Bastidas M.D., M.Sc , Lorenzo De Marchi M.D., FASE , Elizabeth A. Wilson M.D. , Ryan Nazemian M.D., Ph.D. , Ana Fernandez-Bustamante M.D., Ph.D., FASA , Alexandra Anderson M.D. , Ryan M. Chadha M.D. , Jiapeng Huang M.D., Ph.D. , Marina Moguilevitch M.D. , Elizabeth Townsend M.D., Ph.D. , David M. Rosenfeld M.D. , Rishi P. Kothari M.D.
{"title":"The perioperative care in liver transplantation multicenter database: Building the foundation for research collaboration in liver transplantation","authors":"Dieter Adelmann M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Mallika Reddy ,&nbsp;George P. Zhou M.D. ,&nbsp;Kyota Fukazawa M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Ryan Wang M.D. ,&nbsp;Cale Kassel M.D. ,&nbsp;Christine Nguyen-Buckley M.D. ,&nbsp;Javier Bastidas M.D., M.Sc ,&nbsp;Lorenzo De Marchi M.D., FASE ,&nbsp;Elizabeth A. Wilson M.D. ,&nbsp;Ryan Nazemian M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Ana Fernandez-Bustamante M.D., Ph.D., FASA ,&nbsp;Alexandra Anderson M.D. ,&nbsp;Ryan M. Chadha M.D. ,&nbsp;Jiapeng Huang M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Marina Moguilevitch M.D. ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Townsend M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;David M. Rosenfeld M.D. ,&nbsp;Rishi P. Kothari M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111651","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111651","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"99 ","pages":"Article 111651"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142501299","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Postoperative quality of recovery comparison between ciprofol and propofol in total intravenous anesthesia for elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic major abdominal surgery: A randomized, controlled, double-blind, non-inferiority trial 对接受腹腔镜大腹部手术的老年患者进行全静脉麻醉时,比较异丙酚和丙泊酚的术后恢复质量:随机、对照、双盲、非劣效试验。
IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111660
Zenghui Liang MMed , Jing Liu MMed , Shuhan Chen MMed , Xiaona Zhao MMed , Gezi Chen MMed , Yanle Xie MMed , Dongmei Wang MMed , Fei Xing MMed , Yuanyuan Mao MMed , Wei Zhang MD , Zhongyu Wang MD , Jingjing Yuan MD

Study objectives

We conducted a non-inferiority study to assess the postoperative quality of recovery (QoR) in elderly patients receiving ciprofol or propofol total intravenous anesthersia(TIVA)after elective laparoscopic major abdominal surgery, with QoR-15 scores as the main measure.

Design

A prospective, double-blind, randomized non-inferiority trial was conducted in the theater, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), and the ward.

Participants

144 elderly patients (age ≥ 65 years) were randomly assigned to either the ciprofol group or the propofol group.

Interventions

The ciprofol group received continuous infusion of ciprofol with remifentanil, and the propofol group received infusion of propofol with remifentanil.

Outcome measures

The primary outcome was the QoR-15 on the first postoperative day (POD1), assessed in both intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations, with the mean difference between groups compared to a non-inferiority threshold of −8. Additional assessments included QoR-15 scores on POD2, 3, and 5 for both analysis sets. Other evaluated perioperative value factors included hemodynamic parameters and injection discomfort in the intention-to-treat analysis. A linear mixed model was utilized to examine the impact of group-time interactions on hemodynamic data and QoR-15.

Main results

The QoR-15 scores on POD1 in the ciprofol group were non-inferior to those in the propofol group both in intention-to-treat set (mean [95 %CI], 95.9[93.7–98.2] vs. 95.6 [93.3–97.8]; mean difference [95 % CI], 0.4 [−2.8–3.5]; P<0.001 for noninferiority) and per-protocol set (mean [95 %CI], 96.7 [94.4–99.0] vs. 95.7 [93.4–98.0]; mean difference [95 % CI], 1.0 [−2.2–4.3]; P<0.001 for noninferiority). Comparable outcomes were noted on postoperative days 2, 3, and 5 following the procedure in both analysis sets. Additionally: compared with propofol group, the occurrence of injection pain was lower (2.8 % vs. 27.8 %, P < 0.001); the hypotension was less frequent (33.3 % vs. 54.2 %, P = 0.012); the bradycardia was more common (38.9 % vs. 23.6 %, P = 0.048).

Conclusions

Ciprofol is not inferior to propofol in QoR. Ciprofol can be suitably administered to elderly patients undergoing elective laparoscopic major abdominal surgery.
研究目的我们开展了一项非劣效性研究,以QoR-15评分为主要测量指标,评估择期腹腔镜大腹部手术后接受异丙酚或丙泊酚全静脉麻醉(TIVA)的老年患者的术后恢复质量(QoR):设计:在手术室、麻醉后护理病房(PACU)和病房进行前瞻性、双盲、随机非劣效性试验:144名老年患者(年龄≥65岁)被随机分配到异丙酚组或丙泊酚组:干预措施:环丙酚组持续输注环丙酚和瑞芬太尼,丙泊酚组输注丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼:主要结果是术后第一天(POD1)的QoR-15,在意向治疗组和按方案治疗组中进行评估,组间平均差异与非劣效阈值-8进行比较。在意向治疗分析中,其他评估的围手术期价值因素包括血液动力学参数和注射不适感。利用线性混合模型研究了组间时间交互作用对血液动力学数据和 QoR-15 的影响:主要结果:在意向治疗组中,环丙酚组 POD1 的 QoR-15 评分均不劣于异丙酚组(平均值[95 %CI],95.9[93.7-98.2] vs. 95.6 [93.3-97.8];平均差[95 %CI],0.4 [-2.8-3.5] ;PC 结论:环丙酚不劣于异丙酚:在QoR方面,异丙酚并不逊色于丙泊酚。接受择期腹腔镜大腹部手术的老年患者可以适当使用异丙酚。
{"title":"Postoperative quality of recovery comparison between ciprofol and propofol in total intravenous anesthesia for elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic major abdominal surgery: A randomized, controlled, double-blind, non-inferiority trial","authors":"Zenghui Liang MMed ,&nbsp;Jing Liu MMed ,&nbsp;Shuhan Chen MMed ,&nbsp;Xiaona Zhao MMed ,&nbsp;Gezi Chen MMed ,&nbsp;Yanle Xie MMed ,&nbsp;Dongmei Wang MMed ,&nbsp;Fei Xing MMed ,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Mao MMed ,&nbsp;Wei Zhang MD ,&nbsp;Zhongyu Wang MD ,&nbsp;Jingjing Yuan MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111660","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111660","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study objectives</h3><div>We conducted a non-inferiority study to assess the postoperative quality of recovery (QoR) in elderly patients receiving ciprofol or propofol total intravenous anesthersia(TIVA)after elective laparoscopic major abdominal surgery, with QoR-15 scores as the main measure.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A prospective, double-blind, randomized non-inferiority trial was conducted in the theater, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), and the ward.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>144 elderly patients (age ≥ 65 years) were randomly assigned to either the ciprofol group or the propofol group.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>The ciprofol group received continuous infusion of ciprofol with remifentanil, and the propofol group received infusion of propofol with remifentanil.</div></div><div><h3>Outcome measures</h3><div>The primary outcome was the QoR-15 on the first postoperative day (POD1), assessed in both intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations, with the mean difference between groups compared to a non-inferiority threshold of −8. Additional assessments included QoR-15 scores on POD2, 3, and 5 for both analysis sets. Other evaluated perioperative value factors included hemodynamic parameters and injection discomfort in the intention-to-treat analysis. A linear mixed model was utilized to examine the impact of group-time interactions on hemodynamic data and QoR-15.</div></div><div><h3>Main results</h3><div>The QoR-15 scores on POD1 in the ciprofol group were non-inferior to those in the propofol group both in intention-to-treat set (mean [95 %CI], 95.9[93.7–98.2] vs. 95.6 [93.3–97.8]; mean difference [95 % CI], 0.4 [−2.8–3.5]; <em>P</em>&lt;0.001 for noninferiority) and per-protocol set (mean [95 %CI], 96.7 [94.4–99.0] vs. 95.7 [93.4–98.0]; mean difference [95 % CI], 1.0 [−2.2–4.3]; <em>P</em>&lt;0.001 for noninferiority). Comparable outcomes were noted on postoperative days 2, 3, and 5 following the procedure in both analysis sets. Additionally: compared with propofol group, the occurrence of injection pain was lower (2.8 % vs. 27.8 %, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001); the hypotension was less frequent (33.3 % vs. 54.2 %, <em>P</em> = 0.012); the bradycardia was more common (38.9 % vs. 23.6 %, <em>P</em> = 0.048).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Ciprofol is not inferior to propofol in QoR. Ciprofol can be suitably administered to elderly patients undergoing elective laparoscopic major abdominal surgery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"99 ","pages":"Article 111660"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142466708","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Letter to the editor regarding “Effect of remimazolam versus propofol on hypotension after anesthetic induction in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: A randomized controlled trial”. 致编辑的信,内容涉及 "瑞马唑仑与异丙酚对冠状动脉旁路移植术患者麻醉诱导后低血压的影响:随机对照试验 "的来信。
IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111658
Jie Wang MD, Xiaocou Wang MD, Congcong Huang MD
{"title":"Letter to the editor regarding “Effect of remimazolam versus propofol on hypotension after anesthetic induction in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: A randomized controlled trial”.","authors":"Jie Wang MD,&nbsp;Xiaocou Wang MD,&nbsp;Congcong Huang MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111658","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111658","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"99 ","pages":"Article 111658"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142445567","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Gastric insufflation with and without an inserted gastric tube in second-generation laryngeal mask airways: A randomized controlled cross-over trial. 在第二代喉罩通气道中使用和不使用插入式胃管进行胃充气:随机对照交叉试验。
IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111653
Johannes Hell MD , Grischa Schelker , Stefan Schumann PhD , Axel Schmutz PhD

Study objective

Second-generation laryngeal mask airways are equipped with an additional lumen for a gastric tube, with the intention to reduce the risk of aspiration by draining gastric content. However, the effect of an inserted gastric tube through the gastric channel on gastric insufflation, a substantial part of the pathomechanism of aspiration, during positive-pressure ventilation is not clear. We hypothesized, that an inserted gastric tube increases the risk of gastric insufflation.

Design

Single center, prospective, randomized-controlled cross-over trial.

Setting

Tertiary academic hospital in Germany.

Patients

152 patients, ASA I-III, scheduled for general anesthesia with a laryngeal mask airway.

Interventions

Gastric insufflation was investigated during an incremental pressure trial up to a maximum airway pressure of 30 cmH2O and during oropharyngeal leak pressure measurement with and without an inserted gastric tube while one of two laryngeal mask airways with different cuff designs (inflatable or thermoelastic) was used.

Measurements

Gastric insufflation was detected with real-time ultrasound.

Main results

Frequency of gastric insufflation was higher with than without inserted gastric tube during the incremental pressure trial (10.9 % (16/147) vs. 2.7 % (4/147), p = 0.009) and during oropharyngeal leak pressure measurement (16.3 % (24/147) vs. 5.4 % (8/147), p = 0.004). Risk of gastric insufflation didn't differ between the two cuff-types (p = 0.100). Flow over the open gastric channel was associated with gastric insufflation during positive-pressure ventilation (p = 0.003) and during oropharyngeal leak pressure measurement (p = 0.049). Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was higher in patients in which gastric insufflation was detected, compared to others (17.1 % (6/35) vs. 5.4 % (6/112), p = 0.037).

Conclusion

Placement of a gastric tube through the gastric channel of a second-generation laryngeal mask airway, independent of the cuff-type, increases the risk of gastric insufflation. Flow over the gastric channel indicate a higher risk of gastric insufflation and gastric insufflation may increase the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting.
研究目的第二代喉罩通气道配有一个额外的胃管管腔,目的是通过排出胃内容物来降低吸入风险。然而,在正压通气过程中,通过胃通道插入胃管对胃充气(吸入病理机制的重要组成部分)的影响尚不清楚。我们假设,插入胃管会增加胃充气的风险。设计单中心、前瞻性、随机对照交叉试验。干预措施在使用两种不同充气罩囊设计(充气式或热塑式)的喉罩气道中的一种时,在最高气道压力为 30 cmH2O 的增压试验中以及在插入或未插入胃管的情况下测量口咽漏压时对胃充气进行了研究。主要结果在增压试验(10.9 % (16/147) vs. 2.7 % (4/147),p = 0.009)和口咽漏压测量(16.3 % (24/147) vs. 5.4 % (8/147),p = 0.004)期间,插入胃管比未插入胃管的胃充气频率更高。两种袖带类型的胃充气风险没有差异(p = 0.100)。在正压通气期间(p = 0.003)和口咽漏压测量期间(p = 0.049),开放胃通道的流量与胃充气有关。结论通过第二代喉罩通气道的胃通道放置胃管(与充气罩囊类型无关)会增加胃充气的风险。胃通道上方的流量表明胃充气的风险较高,而胃充气可能会增加术后恶心和呕吐的风险。
{"title":"Gastric insufflation with and without an inserted gastric tube in second-generation laryngeal mask airways: A randomized controlled cross-over trial.","authors":"Johannes Hell MD ,&nbsp;Grischa Schelker ,&nbsp;Stefan Schumann PhD ,&nbsp;Axel Schmutz PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111653","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111653","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study objective</h3><div>Second-generation laryngeal mask airways are equipped with an additional lumen for a gastric tube, with the intention to reduce the risk of aspiration by draining gastric content. However, the effect of an inserted gastric tube through the gastric channel on gastric insufflation, a substantial part of the pathomechanism of aspiration, during positive-pressure ventilation is not clear. We hypothesized, that an inserted gastric tube increases the risk of gastric insufflation.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Single center, prospective, randomized-controlled cross-over trial.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Tertiary academic hospital in Germany.</div></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><div>152 patients, ASA I-III, scheduled for general anesthesia with a laryngeal mask airway.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Gastric insufflation was investigated during an incremental pressure trial up to a maximum airway pressure of 30 cmH<sub>2</sub>O and during oropharyngeal leak pressure measurement with and without an inserted gastric tube while one of two laryngeal mask airways with different cuff designs (inflatable or thermoelastic) was used.</div></div><div><h3>Measurements</h3><div>Gastric insufflation was detected with real-time ultrasound.</div></div><div><h3>Main results</h3><div>Frequency of gastric insufflation was higher with than without inserted gastric tube during the incremental pressure trial (10.9 % (16/147) vs. 2.7 % (4/147), <em>p</em> = 0.009) and during oropharyngeal leak pressure measurement (16.3 % (24/147) vs. 5.4 % (8/147), <em>p</em> = 0.004). Risk of gastric insufflation didn't differ between the two cuff-types (<em>p</em> = 0.100). Flow over the open gastric channel was associated with gastric insufflation during positive-pressure ventilation (<em>p</em> = 0.003) and during oropharyngeal leak pressure measurement (<em>p</em> = 0.049). Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was higher in patients in which gastric insufflation was detected, compared to others (17.1 % (6/35) vs. 5.4 % (6/112), <em>p</em> = 0.037).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Placement of a gastric tube through the gastric channel of a second-generation laryngeal mask airway, independent of the cuff-type, increases the risk of gastric insufflation. Flow over the gastric channel indicate a higher risk of gastric insufflation and gastric insufflation may increase the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"99 ","pages":"Article 111653"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142445566","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Letter to the editor regarding “Intraoperative hypotension during liver transplantation and postoperative outcomes: Retrospective cohort study” 致编辑的信,内容涉及 "肝移植术中低血压与术后结果:回顾性队列研究"
IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111655
Luyuan Yao , Zhihuan Luo
{"title":"Letter to the editor regarding “Intraoperative hypotension during liver transplantation and postoperative outcomes: Retrospective cohort study”","authors":"Luyuan Yao ,&nbsp;Zhihuan Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111655","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111655","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"99 ","pages":"Article 111655"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142441074","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Machine learning prediction of unexpected readmission or death after discharge from intensive care: A retrospective cohort study 重症监护出院后意外再入院或死亡的机器学习预测:回顾性队列研究
IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111654
Thomas Tschoellitsch MD , Alexander Maletzky PhD , Philipp Moser PhD , Philipp Seidl MSc , Carl Böck PhD , Tina Tomic Mahečić MD , Stefan Thumfart PhD , Michael Giretzlehner PhD , Sepp Hochreiter PhD , Jens Meier MD

Background

Intensive care units (ICUs) harbor the sickest patients with the utmost needs of medical care. Discharge from ICU needs to consider the reason for admission and stability after ICU care. Organ dysfunction or instability after ICU discharge constitute potentially life-threatening situations for patients.

Methods

This is a single center, observational, retrospective cohort study conducted at ICUs at the Kepler University Hospital in Linz, Austria. Patients aged 18 years and above admitted to the study center's ICUs between 2010 and 01-01 and 2019-10-31 were included in the study. Patients transferred to another ICU, discharged to a different hospital or home, or that died during their ICU stay were excluded. We used machine learning (ML) models to predict unplanned ICU readmission or death using an internal dataset or MIMIC-IV as training data and compared the models with the Stability and Workload Index for Transfer (SWIFT) score. Further, we evaluated the influence of features on the models using Shapley Additive Explanations.

Results

The best ML models achieved an area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic (AUC-ROC) of 0.721 ± 0.029 and a high negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.990 ± 0.002. The most important features were heart rate, peripheral oxygen saturation and arterial blood pressure. Performance of the SWIFT score was worse than the ML models (best AUC-ROC 0.618 ± 0.011).

Conclusions

ML models were able to identify patients that will not need unplanned ICU readmission and will not die within 48 h after discharge.
背景重症监护病房(ICU)收治的都是最需要医疗护理的病人。从重症监护室出院需要考虑入院原因和重症监护室护理后的稳定性。ICU出院后器官功能障碍或不稳定可能会危及患者的生命。方法这是一项在奥地利林茨开普勒大学医院 ICU 进行的单中心、观察性、回顾性队列研究。研究对象包括2010年1月1日至2019年10月31日期间入住研究中心重症监护室的18岁及以上患者。不包括转入其他重症监护室、出院到其他医院或家中的患者,也不包括在重症监护室住院期间死亡的患者。我们使用内部数据集或 MIMIC-IV 作为训练数据,使用机器学习(ML)模型预测非计划 ICU 再入院或死亡,并将模型与转院稳定性和工作量指数(SWIFT)评分进行比较。结果最佳 ML 模型的接收者操作特征曲线下面积 (AUC-ROC) 为 0.721 ± 0.029,负预测值 (NPV) 为 0.990 ± 0.002。最重要的特征是心率、外周血氧饱和度和动脉血压。SWIFT评分的性能比ML模型差(最佳AUC-ROC为0.618 ± 0.011)。结论ML模型能够识别不需要非计划ICU再入院且不会在出院后48小时内死亡的患者。
{"title":"Machine learning prediction of unexpected readmission or death after discharge from intensive care: A retrospective cohort study","authors":"Thomas Tschoellitsch MD ,&nbsp;Alexander Maletzky PhD ,&nbsp;Philipp Moser PhD ,&nbsp;Philipp Seidl MSc ,&nbsp;Carl Böck PhD ,&nbsp;Tina Tomic Mahečić MD ,&nbsp;Stefan Thumfart PhD ,&nbsp;Michael Giretzlehner PhD ,&nbsp;Sepp Hochreiter PhD ,&nbsp;Jens Meier MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111654","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111654","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Intensive care units (ICUs) harbor the sickest patients with the utmost needs of medical care. Discharge from ICU needs to consider the reason for admission and stability after ICU care. Organ dysfunction or instability after ICU discharge constitute potentially life-threatening situations for patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a single center, observational, retrospective cohort study conducted at ICUs at the Kepler University Hospital in Linz, Austria. Patients aged 18 years and above admitted to the study center's ICUs between 2010 and 01-01 and 2019-10-31 were included in the study. Patients transferred to another ICU, discharged to a different hospital or home, or that died during their ICU stay were excluded. We used machine learning (ML) models to predict unplanned ICU readmission or death using an internal dataset or MIMIC-IV as training data and compared the models with the Stability and Workload Index for Transfer (SWIFT) score. Further, we evaluated the influence of features on the models using Shapley Additive Explanations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The best ML models achieved an area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic (AUC-ROC) of 0.721 ± 0.029 and a high negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.990 ± 0.002. The most important features were heart rate, peripheral oxygen saturation and arterial blood pressure. Performance of the SWIFT score was worse than the ML models (best AUC-ROC 0.618 ± 0.011).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>ML models were able to identify patients that will not need unplanned ICU readmission and will not die within 48 h after discharge.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"99 ","pages":"Article 111654"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142433443","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of the clinical performance of the Ambu®AuraGain™ laryngeal mask in children undergoing surgery in the supine and prone position – A prospective, non-inferiority clinical trial 比较 Ambu®AuraGain™ 喉罩在儿童仰卧位和俯卧位手术中的临床表现 - 一项前瞻性、非劣效性临床试验
IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111652
Darhae Eum , Ha Yan Kim , Yangjin Kim , Seokyung Shin

Study objective

Reports are limited regarding supraglottic airway (SGA) usage in children in the prone position. This study aimed to compare the clinical performance of the Ambu®AuraGain™, a 2nd generation SGA, in children undergoing surgery in the prone and supine positions. We hypothesized that oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) in the prone position would not be inferior to that in the supine position.

Design

Single-center, prospective, non-randomized controlled study.

Setting

Operating room.

Patients

One hundred and twenty-six children, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III, aged 2–12 years, undergoing elective surgery for 2 h or less in the supine or prone position.

Interventions

After induction of general anesthesia and insertion of the AuraGain, patients were positioned either supine or prone, according to type of surgery.

Measurements

OLP immediately after surgical positioning was measured as the primary outcome. The anatomical position of the AuraGain was evaluated using a flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope (Olympus LF-DP Tracheal Intubation Fiberscope, Melville, New York, USA). Airway maneuvers performed during placement and maintenance of the AuraGain and airway-related adverse events were recorded.

Main findings

The mean difference in OLP immediately after positioning was 0.048 cmH2O (95 % confidence interval: −1.521 to 1.616), and the non-inferiority hypothesis was accepted (P < 0.001 for non-inferiority). There was no significant difference in the anatomical position of the SGA and adverse events. Airway maneuvers were significantly more commonly performed during placement in the Prone group compared to the Supine group (51 (81.0 %) vs. 3 (4.8 %), respectively; P < 0.001).

Conclusion

OLP when using AuraGain in the prone position in children was not inferior to that in the supine position. This suggests that the AuraGain may be an effective option for children undergoing short surgical procedures in the prone position.
研究目的有关儿童俯卧位使用声门上气道(SGA)的报道很有限。本研究旨在比较第二代 SGA Ambu®AuraGain™ 在俯卧位和仰卧位接受手术的儿童中的临床表现。我们假设俯卧位的口咽漏压(OLP)不会低于仰卧位。设计单中心、前瞻性、非随机对照研究。干预措施诱导全身麻醉并插入 AuraGain 后,根据手术类型让患者仰卧或俯卧。使用柔性纤维支气管镜(Olympus LF-DP 气管插管纤维镜,美国纽约梅尔维尔)评估 AuraGain 的解剖位置。主要研究结果定位后即刻的 OLP 平均差异为 0.048 cmH2O(95 % 置信区间:-1.521 至 1.616),非劣效性假设成立(非劣效性 P < 0.001)。SGA 的解剖位置与不良事件无明显差异。与仰卧位组相比,俯卧位组在置管过程中更常进行气道操作(分别为 51 (81.0 %) vs. 3 (4.8 %);P < 0.001)。这表明,AuraGain 可能是儿童在俯卧位接受短手术的有效选择。
{"title":"Comparison of the clinical performance of the Ambu®AuraGain™ laryngeal mask in children undergoing surgery in the supine and prone position – A prospective, non-inferiority clinical trial","authors":"Darhae Eum ,&nbsp;Ha Yan Kim ,&nbsp;Yangjin Kim ,&nbsp;Seokyung Shin","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111652","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111652","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study objective</h3><div>Reports are limited regarding supraglottic airway (SGA) usage in children in the prone position. This study aimed to compare the clinical performance of the Ambu®AuraGain™, a 2nd generation SGA, in children undergoing surgery in the prone and supine positions. We hypothesized that oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) in the prone position would not be inferior to that in the supine position.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Single-center, prospective, non-randomized controlled study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Operating room.</div></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><div>One hundred and twenty-six children, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III, aged 2–12 years, undergoing elective surgery for 2 h or less in the supine or prone position.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>After induction of general anesthesia and insertion of the AuraGain, patients were positioned either supine or prone, according to type of surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Measurements</h3><div>OLP immediately after surgical positioning was measured as the primary outcome. The anatomical position of the AuraGain was evaluated using a flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope (Olympus LF-DP Tracheal Intubation Fiberscope, Melville, New York, USA). Airway maneuvers performed during placement and maintenance of the AuraGain and airway-related adverse events were recorded.</div></div><div><h3>Main findings</h3><div>The mean difference in OLP immediately after positioning was 0.048 cmH<sub>2</sub>O (95 % confidence interval: −1.521 to 1.616), and the non-inferiority hypothesis was accepted (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001 for non-inferiority). There was no significant difference in the anatomical position of the SGA and adverse events. Airway maneuvers were significantly more commonly performed during placement in the Prone group compared to the Supine group (51 (81.0 %) vs. 3 (4.8 %), respectively; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>OLP when using AuraGain in the prone position in children was not inferior to that in the supine position. This suggests that the AuraGain may be an effective option for children undergoing short surgical procedures in the prone position.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"99 ","pages":"Article 111652"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142417270","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1