Madeleine Geiger, Marcelo R. Sánchez-Villagra, Emma Sherratt
Domestication leads to phenotypic characteristics that have been described to be similar across species. However, this “domestication syndrome” has been subject to debate, related to a lack of evidence for certain characteristics in many species. Here we review diverse literature and provide new data on cranial shape changes due to domestication in the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) as a preliminary case study, thus contributing novel evidence to the debate. We quantified cranial shape of 30 wild and domestic rabbits using micro-computed tomography scans and three-dimensional geometric morphometrics. The goal was to test (1) if the domesticates exhibit shorter and broader snouts, smaller teeth, and smaller braincases than their wild counterparts; (2) to what extent allometric scaling is responsible for cranial shape variation; (3) if there is evidence for more variation in the neural crest-derived parts of the cranium compared with those derived of the mesoderm, in accordance with the “neural crest hypothesis.” Our own data are consistent with older literature records, suggesting that although there is evidence for some cranial characteristics of the “domestication syndrome” in rabbits, facial length is not reduced. In accordance with the “neural crest hypothesis,” we found more shape variation in neural crest versus mesoderm-derived parts of the cranium. Within the domestic group, allometric scaling relationships of the snout, the braincase, and the teeth shed new light on ubiquitous patterns among related taxa. This study—albeit preliminary due to the limited sample size—adds to the growing evidence concerning nonuniform patterns associated with domestication.
{"title":"Cranial shape variation in domestication: A pilot study on the case of rabbits","authors":"Madeleine Geiger, Marcelo R. Sánchez-Villagra, Emma Sherratt","doi":"10.1002/jez.b.23171","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jez.b.23171","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Domestication leads to phenotypic characteristics that have been described to be similar across species. However, this “domestication syndrome” has been subject to debate, related to a lack of evidence for certain characteristics in many species. Here we review diverse literature and provide new data on cranial shape changes due to domestication in the European rabbit (<i>Oryctolagus cuniculus</i>) as a preliminary case study, thus contributing novel evidence to the debate. We quantified cranial shape of 30 wild and domestic rabbits using micro-computed tomography scans and three-dimensional geometric morphometrics. The goal was to test (1) if the domesticates exhibit shorter and broader snouts, smaller teeth, and smaller braincases than their wild counterparts; (2) to what extent allometric scaling is responsible for cranial shape variation; (3) if there is evidence for more variation in the neural crest-derived parts of the cranium compared with those derived of the mesoderm, in accordance with the “neural crest hypothesis.” Our own data are consistent with older literature records, suggesting that although there is evidence for some cranial characteristics of the “domestication syndrome” in rabbits, facial length is not reduced. In accordance with the “neural crest hypothesis,” we found more shape variation in neural crest versus mesoderm-derived parts of the cranium. Within the domestic group, allometric scaling relationships of the snout, the braincase, and the teeth shed new light on ubiquitous patterns among related taxa. This study—albeit preliminary due to the limited sample size—adds to the growing evidence concerning nonuniform patterns associated with domestication.</p>","PeriodicalId":15682,"journal":{"name":"Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution","volume":"338 8","pages":"532-541"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2022-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9804214/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10838648","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
We compared embryogenesis of five species of domesticated even-toed and one odd-toed ungulate and used a phylogenetic framework to contextualize such comparison. Organ systems that occur relatively earlier in embryogenesis generally have more time to develop and therefore are found to be more mature at birth when compared to structures that appear later in development. We hypothesized that the less mature the animals' organs are at birth, the more they are susceptible to artificial selection. The horse had the most mature organs at birth, followed by cattle, reindeer, sheep/goat, and pig. This pattern of maturity could be observed almost during the entire development. Heterochronic shifts among species were observed only after fur starts to develop. Changes in the fur coloration are one of the first observable signs of domestication and the heterochrony of this trait may be related to the effects on neural crest-derived pigment cells by artificial selection. The six ungulate species also differ in the relative duration of their weaning period and the potential extent of its artificial shortening. We put all these traits in the context of their inherited evolutionary characteristics and artificial domestication process. Related to their altriciality, carnivoran domesticates, which also belong to Scrotifera, are less mature at birth than all domesticated ungulates. Although we detected clear character correlations to life history traits, it is impossible based on the present data, to trace specific exaptations to the domestication process. We hypothesize a deep time developmental penetration of adult characters into embryogenesis.
{"title":"Comparative embryogenesis in ungulate domesticated species","authors":"Xenia Schlindwein, Ingmar Werneburg","doi":"10.1002/jez.b.23172","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jez.b.23172","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We compared embryogenesis of five species of domesticated even-toed and one odd-toed ungulate and used a phylogenetic framework to contextualize such comparison. Organ systems that occur relatively earlier in embryogenesis generally have more time to develop and therefore are found to be more mature at birth when compared to structures that appear later in development. We hypothesized that the less mature the animals' organs are at birth, the more they are susceptible to artificial selection. The horse had the most mature organs at birth, followed by cattle, reindeer, sheep/goat, and pig. This pattern of maturity could be observed almost during the entire development. Heterochronic shifts among species were observed only after fur starts to develop. Changes in the fur coloration are one of the first observable signs of domestication and the heterochrony of this trait may be related to the effects on neural crest-derived pigment cells by artificial selection. The six ungulate species also differ in the relative duration of their weaning period and the potential extent of its artificial shortening. We put all these traits in the context of their inherited evolutionary characteristics and artificial domestication process. Related to their altriciality, carnivoran domesticates, which also belong to Scrotifera, are less mature at birth than all domesticated ungulates. Although we detected clear character correlations to life history traits, it is impossible based on the present data, to trace specific exaptations to the domestication process. We hypothesize a deep time developmental penetration of adult characters into embryogenesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":15682,"journal":{"name":"Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution","volume":"338 8","pages":"495-504"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jez.b.23172","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10395691","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>Website: www.msanchezlab.net</p><p>Google scholar page: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=taTQzw0AAAAJ</p><p><b><i>With whom and where did you study?</i></b></p><p>My undergraduate study in Biology was at Universidad Simón Bolívar in Caracas. After a year of fieldwork and diverse laboratory experiences, I went for a PhD at Duke University, with a thesis on marsupial mammal cranial development and evolution. I had two coadvisors: Kathleen Smith (comparative ontogenetics) and Richard Kay (paleontological work). This was followed by my Habilitation under my mentor Wolfgang Maier in Tübingen (Germany), where I worked on diverse topics of mammalian ontogeny and learned to teach on the comparative anatomy of diverse Deuterostomia groups. During my job at the Natural History Museum in London, I learned about modularity from hosting Anjali Goswami as a postdoc; from many paleontologists there and in Zurich I was inspired to contribute to “developmental paleontology.”</p><p><b><i>What got you interested in biology? When did you know EvoDevo was for you?</i></b></p><p>I came to Biology with a fascination for exploring the natural world; evolution provided an explanation to my questions on origins. My first interest was in reconstructing evolutionary trees, and for that solving homology questions required the ontogenetic perspective.</p><p>Exposure to EvoDevo ideas came from readings at graduate school at Duke on the neural crest, heterochrony, evolutionary novelties, and others—there I learned that EvoDevo was not just about Hox genes, and I became inspired by Pere Alberch's papers. I started to use the sequence heterochrony approach following the work of Kathleen Smith, Mike Richardson, and others, as this allowed me to examine developmental evolution with a comparative approach that did not require perfectly timed series and thus could be more inclusive in taxonomic sampling. When I learned about palaeohistology from my then postdoc Torsten Scheyer in Zurich, I realized that one could directly address matters of growth and life history in fossils, in addition to an approach based on phylogenetic bracket considerations. For my work on animal domestication, I saw the chance to bring a comparative ontogenetic perspective, and here the insights gained on neural crest development by detailed experimental studies in the work of Rich Schneider and others inform much of what we discussed about patterns of morphological diversification.</p><p><i><b>What do you see as the major challenges of EvoDevo?</b></i></p><p>I hope that EvoDevo embraces genuinely comparative ontogenetic research as a part of it, and that technological advances continue to contribute with discoveries but do not determine what can be funded or published, as EvoDevo remains a question-driven discipline as opposed to one driven by methods. Macroevolutionary questions that can be addressed only from a developmental perspective should continue to be part of a broad and pluralistic EvoDe
{"title":"In the spotlight—Established researcher","authors":"Marcelo R. Sánchez-Villagra","doi":"10.1002/jez.b.23170","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jez.b.23170","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Website: www.msanchezlab.net</p><p>Google scholar page: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=taTQzw0AAAAJ</p><p><b><i>With whom and where did you study?</i></b></p><p>My undergraduate study in Biology was at Universidad Simón Bolívar in Caracas. After a year of fieldwork and diverse laboratory experiences, I went for a PhD at Duke University, with a thesis on marsupial mammal cranial development and evolution. I had two coadvisors: Kathleen Smith (comparative ontogenetics) and Richard Kay (paleontological work). This was followed by my Habilitation under my mentor Wolfgang Maier in Tübingen (Germany), where I worked on diverse topics of mammalian ontogeny and learned to teach on the comparative anatomy of diverse Deuterostomia groups. During my job at the Natural History Museum in London, I learned about modularity from hosting Anjali Goswami as a postdoc; from many paleontologists there and in Zurich I was inspired to contribute to “developmental paleontology.”</p><p><b><i>What got you interested in biology? When did you know EvoDevo was for you?</i></b></p><p>I came to Biology with a fascination for exploring the natural world; evolution provided an explanation to my questions on origins. My first interest was in reconstructing evolutionary trees, and for that solving homology questions required the ontogenetic perspective.</p><p>Exposure to EvoDevo ideas came from readings at graduate school at Duke on the neural crest, heterochrony, evolutionary novelties, and others—there I learned that EvoDevo was not just about Hox genes, and I became inspired by Pere Alberch's papers. I started to use the sequence heterochrony approach following the work of Kathleen Smith, Mike Richardson, and others, as this allowed me to examine developmental evolution with a comparative approach that did not require perfectly timed series and thus could be more inclusive in taxonomic sampling. When I learned about palaeohistology from my then postdoc Torsten Scheyer in Zurich, I realized that one could directly address matters of growth and life history in fossils, in addition to an approach based on phylogenetic bracket considerations. For my work on animal domestication, I saw the chance to bring a comparative ontogenetic perspective, and here the insights gained on neural crest development by detailed experimental studies in the work of Rich Schneider and others inform much of what we discussed about patterns of morphological diversification.</p><p><i><b>What do you see as the major challenges of EvoDevo?</b></i></p><p>I hope that EvoDevo embraces genuinely comparative ontogenetic research as a part of it, and that technological advances continue to contribute with discoveries but do not determine what can be funded or published, as EvoDevo remains a question-driven discipline as opposed to one driven by methods. Macroevolutionary questions that can be addressed only from a developmental perspective should continue to be part of a broad and pluralistic EvoDe","PeriodicalId":15682,"journal":{"name":"Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution","volume":"338 8","pages":"443-444"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2022-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9796108/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10445242","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p></p><p>Andreas Wanninger was the coordinator of the EU Research Training Network MOLMORPH that united 5 European universities with research groups using EvoDevo, paleontology, morphology, and phylogeny to tackle various questions revolving around animal evolution. He is the current President-elect of the International Society of Invertebrate Morphology (ISIM).</p><p>Andi was an Associate Editor of JEZ-B from 2012 until 2021.</p><p>Website: https://zoology.univie.ac.at/people/scientific-staff/andreas-wanninger/</p><p><b><i>With whom and where did you study?</i></b></p><p>I received my Diploma in Biology from the Ludwig-Maximilians-University in Munich, Bavaria. When the time had come to look for a thesis project and supervisor, a young and dynamic professor in Zoology had just been hired, Gerhard Haszprunar. As a top-notch morphologist, he had plans to expand his research into molluscan organogenesis and since I have always had a crush on tiny creatures, he offered me a project on gastropod myogenesis using fluorescene markers and confocal microscopy—very fancy stuff for a morphologist at that time. I fell in love with larval and developmental biology, particularly, as to how morphological structures form and change during ontogeny and so I decided to continue with a PhD in his lab looking comparatively into molluscan development.</p><p><b><i>What got you interested in Biology?</i></b></p><p>I grew up in a small village in the Bavarian Alps, close to the border with Austria, and thus was pretty much an outdoor kid. I loved (and still do) hiking in the mountains and being surrounded by nature. Thus, almost inevitably, I have always had an interest in everything living. However, I was never the nerdy kind of guy who would collect tons of insects or plants or would sit endless hours trying to determine those leggy creatures that were crawling and humming around in our backyard. I think I was just too lazy for that. I liked books, too, and that got me exposed to more exotic creatures that were not roaming our backyard such as dinosaurs or everything marine. I developed an interest in finding out something unknown early on; being the first one to see or discover something always had a great appeal to me, and so the wish to pursue a scientific career somehow developed almost naturally.</p><p><b><i>When did you know EvoDevo was for you?</i></b></p><p>Being into small creatures and morphology got me interested in tiny marine larvae, but when I seriously started to look into this during my thesis project I realized how fascinating it is to decipher how structures form and change in short time intervals during ontogeny. So, on a purely morphological level, we did EvoDevo already before the discipline got its name. With very little background in genetics, my focus was first restricted to comparative morphogenesis, but this changed during my Postdoc with Bernie Degnan from Brisbane, during which I got the first hands-on experience with molecular approaches
{"title":"In the Spotlight—Established Researcher","authors":"Andreas Wanninger","doi":"10.1002/jez.b.23169","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jez.b.23169","url":null,"abstract":"<p></p><p>Andreas Wanninger was the coordinator of the EU Research Training Network MOLMORPH that united 5 European universities with research groups using EvoDevo, paleontology, morphology, and phylogeny to tackle various questions revolving around animal evolution. He is the current President-elect of the International Society of Invertebrate Morphology (ISIM).</p><p>Andi was an Associate Editor of JEZ-B from 2012 until 2021.</p><p>Website: https://zoology.univie.ac.at/people/scientific-staff/andreas-wanninger/</p><p><b><i>With whom and where did you study?</i></b></p><p>I received my Diploma in Biology from the Ludwig-Maximilians-University in Munich, Bavaria. When the time had come to look for a thesis project and supervisor, a young and dynamic professor in Zoology had just been hired, Gerhard Haszprunar. As a top-notch morphologist, he had plans to expand his research into molluscan organogenesis and since I have always had a crush on tiny creatures, he offered me a project on gastropod myogenesis using fluorescene markers and confocal microscopy—very fancy stuff for a morphologist at that time. I fell in love with larval and developmental biology, particularly, as to how morphological structures form and change during ontogeny and so I decided to continue with a PhD in his lab looking comparatively into molluscan development.</p><p><b><i>What got you interested in Biology?</i></b></p><p>I grew up in a small village in the Bavarian Alps, close to the border with Austria, and thus was pretty much an outdoor kid. I loved (and still do) hiking in the mountains and being surrounded by nature. Thus, almost inevitably, I have always had an interest in everything living. However, I was never the nerdy kind of guy who would collect tons of insects or plants or would sit endless hours trying to determine those leggy creatures that were crawling and humming around in our backyard. I think I was just too lazy for that. I liked books, too, and that got me exposed to more exotic creatures that were not roaming our backyard such as dinosaurs or everything marine. I developed an interest in finding out something unknown early on; being the first one to see or discover something always had a great appeal to me, and so the wish to pursue a scientific career somehow developed almost naturally.</p><p><b><i>When did you know EvoDevo was for you?</i></b></p><p>Being into small creatures and morphology got me interested in tiny marine larvae, but when I seriously started to look into this during my thesis project I realized how fascinating it is to decipher how structures form and change in short time intervals during ontogeny. So, on a purely morphological level, we did EvoDevo already before the discipline got its name. With very little background in genetics, my focus was first restricted to comparative morphogenesis, but this changed during my Postdoc with Bernie Degnan from Brisbane, during which I got the first hands-on experience with molecular approaches","PeriodicalId":15682,"journal":{"name":"Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution","volume":"338 6","pages":"329-330"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2022-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/74/04/JEZ-338-329.PMC9543878.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40614442","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Emily D. Woodruff, Bonnie K. Kircher, Brooke A. Armfield, Julie K. Levy, Jonathan I. Bloch, Martin J. Cohn
Division of the dentition into morphologically distinct classes of teeth (incisors, canines, premolars, and molars) and the acquisition of tribosphenic molars facilitated precise occlusion between the teeth early in mammal evolution. Despite the evolutionary and ecological importance of distinct classes of teeth with unique cusp, crest, and basin morphologies, relatively little is known about the genetic basis for the development of different tooth classes within the embryo. Here we investigated genetic differences between developing deciduous incisor, canine, and premolar teeth in the domestic cat (Felis catus), which we propose to be a new model for tooth development. We examined differences in both developmental timing and crown morphology between the three tooth classes. Using RNA sequencing of early bell stage tooth germs, we showed that each of the three deciduous tooth classes possess a unique transcriptional profile. Three notable groups of genes emerged from our differential expression analysis; genes involved in the extracellular matrix (ECM), Wnt pathway signaling, and members of multiple homeobox gene families (Lhx, Dlx, Alx, and Nkx). Our results suggest that ECM genes may play a previously under-appreciated role in shaping the surface of the tooth crown during development. Differential regulation of these genes likely underlies differences in tooth crown shape and size, although subtle temporal differences in development between the tooth germs could also be responsible. This study provides foundational data for future experiments to examine the function of these candidate genes in tooth development to directly test their potential effects on crown morphology.
{"title":"Domestic cat embryos reveal unique transcriptomes of developing incisor, canine, and premolar teeth","authors":"Emily D. Woodruff, Bonnie K. Kircher, Brooke A. Armfield, Julie K. Levy, Jonathan I. Bloch, Martin J. Cohn","doi":"10.1002/jez.b.23168","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jez.b.23168","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Division of the dentition into morphologically distinct classes of teeth (incisors, canines, premolars, and molars) and the acquisition of tribosphenic molars facilitated precise occlusion between the teeth early in mammal evolution. Despite the evolutionary and ecological importance of distinct classes of teeth with unique cusp, crest, and basin morphologies, relatively little is known about the genetic basis for the development of different tooth classes within the embryo. Here we investigated genetic differences between developing deciduous incisor, canine, and premolar teeth in the domestic cat (<i>Felis catus</i>), which we propose to be a new model for tooth development. We examined differences in both developmental timing and crown morphology between the three tooth classes. Using RNA sequencing of early bell stage tooth germs, we showed that each of the three deciduous tooth classes possess a unique transcriptional profile. Three notable groups of genes emerged from our differential expression analysis; genes involved in the extracellular matrix (ECM), Wnt pathway signaling, and members of multiple homeobox gene families (<i>Lhx, Dlx, Alx</i>, and <i>Nkx</i>). Our results suggest that ECM genes may play a previously under-appreciated role in shaping the surface of the tooth crown during development. Differential regulation of these genes likely underlies differences in tooth crown shape and size, although subtle temporal differences in development between the tooth germs could also be responsible. This study provides foundational data for future experiments to examine the function of these candidate genes in tooth development to directly test their potential effects on crown morphology.</p>","PeriodicalId":15682,"journal":{"name":"Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution","volume":"338 8","pages":"516-531"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2022-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10394197","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>Natalia Pabón Mora is a Fulbright visiting scholar at the Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology of Harvard University. She was a Dresden Junior Fellow at the Technische Universität Dresden in 2019 and was the recipient of a 2018 James R. Jewett Prize in Plant Science (Arnold Arboretum at Harvard University) and of a 2015 Early Career Research Award from the Pan-American Society for Evolutionary Developmental Biology.</p><p>Website: https://www.evodevoplantas.com</p><p>Google scholar page: https://scholar.google.com/citations?%26user=P4P2XugAAAAJ</p><p><b><i>With whom and where did you study?</i></b></p><p>I studied Biology at the Universidad Nacional de Colombia in Bogotá, Colombia, under the supervision of Favio González. Then I moved to NYC where I completed my MPhil in Biology and my PhD in the joint program between the City University of New York (CUNY) and the New York Botanical Garden (NYBG). My main advisor was Amy Litt (now at UC Riverside) and I had an excellent accompanying committee as my mentors, including Barbara Ambrose (NYBG), Elena Kramer (Harvard University), and Dennis Stevenson (NYBG).</p><p><b><i>What got you interested in biology? When did you know evodevo was for you?</i></b></p><p>Growing up in Colombia, one of the biodiversity hotspots worldwide, and having had a childhood surrounded by nature, I was exposed very early on to horticulture and sustainable farming of tropical ornamental flowers and native crops. During my undergraduate studies, I became interested in plant diversity, ontogeny, and evolution, and was exposed to the quite novel intellectual underpinnings of evolution and development. In college, I took a variety of courses in plant systematics, fern taxonomy, plant genetics, and molecular genetics to explore these different, yet convergent disciplines available to study plants.</p><p>I became fully and genuinely convinced that plant EvoDevo was for me when I attended a Colombian Botanical Conference where Dr Amy Litt was speaking on floral genetics and the ABC model of floral development in the model species <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> (Thale cress), and on the potential of emerging methods to assess gene function in non-model plants. I realized then that EvoDevo was the perfect research program to combine my preferred passions, comparative floral morphology and development, and the genetic bases underlying phenotypic changes. After such a turning point, I have dedicated my entire professional career to study plant EvoDevo focusing on (mostly tropical) non-model taxa.</p><p><b><i>Which achievement are you most proud of?</i></b></p><p>I started the first plant EvoDevo lab in Colombia back in 2012 at the Universidad de Antioquia. My experience was unique as there were no similar labs in Latin America at that time. When I started my lab, I was responsible for securing funding to adapt the infrastructure, get the minimal equipment, and recruit undergraduate and graduate students interested in studyin
Natalia Pabón Mora是哈佛大学有机体和进化生物系的富布赖特访问学者。她于2019年在Technische Universität Dresden担任德累斯顿初级研究员,并获得了2018年James R. Jewett植物科学奖(哈佛大学阿诺德植物园)和2015年泛美进化发育生物学学会的早期职业研究奖。网站:https://www.evodevoplantas.comGoogle学者页面:https://scholar.google.com/citations?%26user=P4P2XugAAAAJWith你在哪里和谁学习?我在哥伦比亚波哥大<e:1>的哥伦比亚国立大学学习生物学,师从Favio González。然后我搬到了纽约,在纽约城市大学(CUNY)和纽约植物园(NYBG)的联合项目中完成了生物学硕士学位和博士学位。我的主要导师是艾米·利特(现在在加州大学河滨分校),我有一个优秀的陪同委员会作为我的导师,包括芭芭拉·安布罗斯(NYBG),埃琳娜·克莱默(哈佛大学)和丹尼斯·史蒂文森(NYBG)。是什么让你对生物学感兴趣的?你什么时候知道evoldevo是为你准备的?我在哥伦比亚长大,那里是世界上生物多样性的热点地区之一,我的童年被大自然包围着,所以我很早就接触到了园艺和热带观赏花卉和本地作物的可持续种植。在本科学习期间,我对植物多样性、个体发生和进化产生了兴趣,并接触到了相当新颖的进化和发展的知识基础。在大学期间,我选修了植物系统学、蕨类植物分类学、植物遗传学和分子遗传学等课程,以探索这些不同但又趋同的学科可以用于研究植物。当我参加哥伦比亚植物学会议时,艾米·利特(Amy Litt)博士就花遗传学和模式物种拟南芥(拟南芥)花发育的ABC模型,以及评估非模式植物基因功能的新兴方法的潜力发表了讲话,我开始完全并真诚地相信植物进化是为我准备的。那时我意识到,EvoDevo是一个完美的研究项目,可以把我喜欢的兴趣、比较花的形态和发育以及表型变化背后的遗传基础结合起来。在经历了这样一个转折点之后,我把我的整个职业生涯都投入到研究植物EvoDevo上,重点是(主要是热带)非模式分类群。你最自豪的成就是什么?2012年,我在哥伦比亚安蒂奥基亚大学建立了第一个植物EvoDevo实验室。我的经历是独特的,因为当时拉丁美洲没有类似的实验室。当我开始我的实验室时,我负责获得资金来改造基础设施,获得最小的设备,并招募对研究植物EvoDevo感兴趣的本科生和研究生。我的方法是同时关注研究和教学,鼓励本科生在职业生涯早期深入研究EvoDevo问题,并在研究生院更深入地解决这些问题。我在安蒂奥基亚大学开始了第一个关于发育生物学的教学大纲。目前,这是我们本科生物专业的核心课程之一,这使我有机会向一年级学生教授一般概念,并尽早为他们的论文登记。要成为一名教师和研究人员,最大的挑战是资金。我正在进行的研究的资金来源仅限于一个以教学为主要目标的机构。尽管发展中国家,如哥伦比亚,通常没有启动资金,与发达国家相比,政府资助机构也较少,但我特别自豪的是,在过去的10年里,我获得了几个国家和国际资助来源,开展了一级研究项目。从这个意义上说,我感谢那些为全世界的教职员工和学生提供研究资助和合作项目的国际科学协会,也感谢与我一起建立了一个坚实而成功的研究小组的本地和国际同事。目前,我们已经学会了如何优化我们有限但非常高效的设施,以及如何利用哥伦比亚的植物多样性作为我们的主要生活实验室。此外,我还完成了19名本科生和7名研究生的培养。总的来说,这是植物EvoDevo的第一代研究生,他们渴望在哥伦比亚继续他们的研究,致力于提高我们对当地生物多样性的认识。我希望哥伦比亚政府和学术机构的科学资助政策保持稳定,并开始以一种方式发展,使我们的早期职业科学家能够在他们的祖国继续他们的学术活动。 到现在这个位置最大的挑战是什么?我的职位广告是“发育生物学”。因此,主要的挑战之一是向评选委员会解释,在结构和分子水平上,已经有新的实验方法用于解决非模式热带植物发育过程背后机制的研究问题。同样具有挑战性的是,将植物进化置于与动物王国中占主导地位的发育生物学所达到的科学、技术和概念水平相当的水平上。我的同事和学生都接受了植物进化研究项目,不断与对植物分子进化、遗传学和发育感兴趣的同行互动。当这么多植物和系统看起来很有趣的时候,总是有一种担心过于分散,但我继续鼓励学生不要把自己或他们的问题局限于标准化的模型系统。我相信,热带非模式植物为我们提供了大量非常有趣但具有挑战性的研究问题,等待我们去回答。到目前为止,我们已经能够解决开花网络、花器官的识别和发育、维管植物果实发育的关键问题,以及寄生植物的结构发育和基因组内容,我们希望随着更多的学生参与EvoDevo问题,我们将继续扩大。你如何看待evoldevo的未来?你对初级evodevo研究者有什么建议吗?我完全相信EvoDevo是一门独特的学科,因为它包含了不同的观点来解决一个单一的问题:进化和发展是如何交织在一起产生如此多样性的生命形式、基因组和表型的。因此,我相信这门学科的未来掌握在那些有兴趣了解这些关键过程如何在自然系统中相互作用的人手中,以及自前达尔文时代以来激发生物学家和科学哲学家兴趣的鼓舞人心的问题。我建议对植物进化感兴趣的年轻研究人员:走出模型系统的舒适区,接受挑战,从结构和分子水平上理解多样性,极端生态系统的发展和进化,环境控制的发育机制,共生,寄生和其他复杂的生物相互作用。这是一项耗时的任务,但也是一项有益的任务,因为人们会发现,他们的研究将为更好地理解自然的复杂性和奇异性铺平道路。为什么在拉丁美洲支持和促进evodevo研究很重要?拉丁美洲是大量生物多样性热点地区的所在地,包括地球上一些最特殊的生物。反过来,EvoDevo针对安第斯山脉或亚马逊盆地等标志性地区的生态自然变化的研究自然会将独特生物和问题的无限来源带入聚光灯下。拉丁美洲的动植物启发并吸引了19世纪和20世纪的博物学家,包括查尔斯·达尔文、a·冯·洪堡、弗里茨·米<e:1>勒、弗洛伦蒂诺·阿梅吉诺和lsamon Croizat。其中一些研究人员对发展与进化思维的整合做出了重大贡献(Marcellini et al., 2017)。今天,由于农业扩张、气候变化、森林砍伐和日益严重的污染,我们的生物多样性面临着前所未有的威胁。作为科学家,我们致力于仔细跟踪这些因素,因为我们可以生成和获取有关健康、生殖过程和发育标志随时间变化的实时数据。具体来说,在植物发育生物学中,生存和适应的许多方面需要迫切研究和监测,包括:(1)随着气候变化的推移,不同海拔梯度开花季节的变化;(2)植物寄生入侵的扩散;(3)当前传粉媒介种群下本地物种的花和果实产量下降;(4)随着紫外线照射增加,植物所有器官的表皮特征和颜色发生表型变化。因此,在拥有世界10%生物多样性的拉丁美洲,实施保护和研究生物多样性的方法以及支持当地研究是关键。
{"title":"In the Spotlight—Established Researcher","authors":"Natalia Pabón Mora","doi":"10.1002/jez.b.23167","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jez.b.23167","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Natalia Pabón Mora is a Fulbright visiting scholar at the Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology of Harvard University. She was a Dresden Junior Fellow at the Technische Universität Dresden in 2019 and was the recipient of a 2018 James R. Jewett Prize in Plant Science (Arnold Arboretum at Harvard University) and of a 2015 Early Career Research Award from the Pan-American Society for Evolutionary Developmental Biology.</p><p>Website: https://www.evodevoplantas.com</p><p>Google scholar page: https://scholar.google.com/citations?%26user=P4P2XugAAAAJ</p><p><b><i>With whom and where did you study?</i></b></p><p>I studied Biology at the Universidad Nacional de Colombia in Bogotá, Colombia, under the supervision of Favio González. Then I moved to NYC where I completed my MPhil in Biology and my PhD in the joint program between the City University of New York (CUNY) and the New York Botanical Garden (NYBG). My main advisor was Amy Litt (now at UC Riverside) and I had an excellent accompanying committee as my mentors, including Barbara Ambrose (NYBG), Elena Kramer (Harvard University), and Dennis Stevenson (NYBG).</p><p><b><i>What got you interested in biology? When did you know evodevo was for you?</i></b></p><p>Growing up in Colombia, one of the biodiversity hotspots worldwide, and having had a childhood surrounded by nature, I was exposed very early on to horticulture and sustainable farming of tropical ornamental flowers and native crops. During my undergraduate studies, I became interested in plant diversity, ontogeny, and evolution, and was exposed to the quite novel intellectual underpinnings of evolution and development. In college, I took a variety of courses in plant systematics, fern taxonomy, plant genetics, and molecular genetics to explore these different, yet convergent disciplines available to study plants.</p><p>I became fully and genuinely convinced that plant EvoDevo was for me when I attended a Colombian Botanical Conference where Dr Amy Litt was speaking on floral genetics and the ABC model of floral development in the model species <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> (Thale cress), and on the potential of emerging methods to assess gene function in non-model plants. I realized then that EvoDevo was the perfect research program to combine my preferred passions, comparative floral morphology and development, and the genetic bases underlying phenotypic changes. After such a turning point, I have dedicated my entire professional career to study plant EvoDevo focusing on (mostly tropical) non-model taxa.</p><p><b><i>Which achievement are you most proud of?</i></b></p><p>I started the first plant EvoDevo lab in Colombia back in 2012 at the Universidad de Antioquia. My experience was unique as there were no similar labs in Latin America at that time. When I started my lab, I was responsible for securing funding to adapt the infrastructure, get the minimal equipment, and recruit undergraduate and graduate students interested in studyin","PeriodicalId":15682,"journal":{"name":"Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution","volume":"340 1","pages":"5-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2022-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jez.b.23167","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9290310","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p></p><p>Abderrahman Khila is a recipient of ATIP-Avenir (CNRS) and ERC Consolidator (Europe), Fondation Recherche Médicale, Agence Nationale de la Recherche grants. He is an Academic Editor at <i>PLoS Biology</i>, and an Associate Editor at <i>Evolution Letters</i>, EvoDevo and former Associate Editor at <i>BMC Evolutionary Biology</i>. Khila is a guest professor at the department of Ecology and Genetics, Evolutionary Biology, Uppsala University, Sweden.</p><p>Website: https://igfl.ens-lyon.fr/equipes/a.-khila-developmental-genomics-and-evolution</p><p>Pubmed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Khila%2Ba</p><p>Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=fUuLtAkAAAAJ</p><p><b><i>With whom and where did you study?</i></b></p><p>My career started with a Master's degree in Nutrition and Food Sciences in Morocco, although my main interest already back then was in genetics. I did a joint PhD in Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology between the University of Fez in Morocco and the University of Toulouse in France. I was advised from the Moroccan side by Dr. Saad Ibnsouda and the French side by Dr. Alain Vincent. I also had the great privilege to be mentored by Dr. François Payre. The aim of the PhD project was to reproduce the ovoD1 female sterile mutation in the olive fruit fly and establish a genetically controlled sterile insect technique for pest management.</p><p><b><i>What got you interested in biology? When did you know EvoDevo was for you?</i></b></p><p>Biology has always been a natural choice for me, primarily because I loved nature since my childhood, but also because I grew up with older siblings who were excited about biology. Having grown up during the 80s in a small town in the South East of Morocco called Ouarzazate, we enjoyed a degree of freedom from our parents that I cannot even think of allowing myself today. I spent most of my free time with friends along a seasonal river fishing, exploring, and often getting into trouble with local farmers. At school, I had a natural leaning toward the natural sciences, and I feel extremely lucky to have had teachers at various levels, who deeply reinforced my interest in Biology.</p><p>I discovered EvoDevo superficially during my PhD and then became part of the community during my first postdoctoral position at the Western University in Ontario, Canada. But my real excitement about EvoDevo started at McGill University, Canada, when I joined the lab of Ehab Abouheif to work on ant development and social evolution. This was truly an experience that allowed me to move from biotechnology-driven projects to fundamental discovery-driven thinking. This experience expanded when Ehab and I teamed up with Locke Rowe from the University of Toronto to include projects dealing with sexual conflict and water surface locomotion in water striders. This was something I enjoyed doing because it allowed me to connect the power of developmental genetics with important evolutionary concepts, suc
{"title":"In the Spotlight—Established Researcher","authors":"Abderrahman Khila","doi":"10.1002/jez.b.23166","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jez.b.23166","url":null,"abstract":"<p></p><p>Abderrahman Khila is a recipient of ATIP-Avenir (CNRS) and ERC Consolidator (Europe), Fondation Recherche Médicale, Agence Nationale de la Recherche grants. He is an Academic Editor at <i>PLoS Biology</i>, and an Associate Editor at <i>Evolution Letters</i>, EvoDevo and former Associate Editor at <i>BMC Evolutionary Biology</i>. Khila is a guest professor at the department of Ecology and Genetics, Evolutionary Biology, Uppsala University, Sweden.</p><p>Website: https://igfl.ens-lyon.fr/equipes/a.-khila-developmental-genomics-and-evolution</p><p>Pubmed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Khila%2Ba</p><p>Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=fUuLtAkAAAAJ</p><p><b><i>With whom and where did you study?</i></b></p><p>My career started with a Master's degree in Nutrition and Food Sciences in Morocco, although my main interest already back then was in genetics. I did a joint PhD in Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology between the University of Fez in Morocco and the University of Toulouse in France. I was advised from the Moroccan side by Dr. Saad Ibnsouda and the French side by Dr. Alain Vincent. I also had the great privilege to be mentored by Dr. François Payre. The aim of the PhD project was to reproduce the ovoD1 female sterile mutation in the olive fruit fly and establish a genetically controlled sterile insect technique for pest management.</p><p><b><i>What got you interested in biology? When did you know EvoDevo was for you?</i></b></p><p>Biology has always been a natural choice for me, primarily because I loved nature since my childhood, but also because I grew up with older siblings who were excited about biology. Having grown up during the 80s in a small town in the South East of Morocco called Ouarzazate, we enjoyed a degree of freedom from our parents that I cannot even think of allowing myself today. I spent most of my free time with friends along a seasonal river fishing, exploring, and often getting into trouble with local farmers. At school, I had a natural leaning toward the natural sciences, and I feel extremely lucky to have had teachers at various levels, who deeply reinforced my interest in Biology.</p><p>I discovered EvoDevo superficially during my PhD and then became part of the community during my first postdoctoral position at the Western University in Ontario, Canada. But my real excitement about EvoDevo started at McGill University, Canada, when I joined the lab of Ehab Abouheif to work on ant development and social evolution. This was truly an experience that allowed me to move from biotechnology-driven projects to fundamental discovery-driven thinking. This experience expanded when Ehab and I teamed up with Locke Rowe from the University of Toronto to include projects dealing with sexual conflict and water surface locomotion in water striders. This was something I enjoyed doing because it allowed me to connect the power of developmental genetics with important evolutionary concepts, suc","PeriodicalId":15682,"journal":{"name":"Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution","volume":"338 5","pages":"275-276"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2022-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jez.b.23166","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77130262","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lisa Hanna, Tom Lamouret, Gonçalo M. Poças, Christen K. Mirth, Armin P. Moczek, Frederik H. Nijhout, Ehab Abouheif
For centuries, it has been understood that the final size of adult holometabolous insects is determined by the end of the larval stage, and that once they transform to adults, holometabolous insects do not grow. Despite this, no previous study has directly tested these “old truths” across holometabolous insects. Here, we demonstrate that final adult size is set at the end of the last larval stage in species representing each of the four orders of holometabolous insects: the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster (Diptera), the tobacco hornworm Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera), the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus (Coleoptera), and the Florida carpenter ant Camponotus floridanus (Hymenoptera). Furthermore, in both D. melanogaster and C. floridanus, we show that the size of adult individuals fluctuates but does not significantly change. Therefore, our study finally confirms these two basic assumptions in the biology of insects, which have for centuries served as the foundation for studies of insect growth, size, and allometry.
{"title":"Evaluating old truths: Final adult size in holometabolous insects is set by the end of larval development","authors":"Lisa Hanna, Tom Lamouret, Gonçalo M. Poças, Christen K. Mirth, Armin P. Moczek, Frederik H. Nijhout, Ehab Abouheif","doi":"10.1002/jez.b.23165","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jez.b.23165","url":null,"abstract":"<p>For centuries, it has been understood that the final size of adult holometabolous insects is determined by the end of the larval stage, and that once they transform to adults, holometabolous insects do not grow. Despite this, no previous study has directly tested these “old truths” across holometabolous insects. Here, we demonstrate that final adult size is set at the end of the last larval stage in species representing each of the four orders of holometabolous insects: the fruit fly <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i> (Diptera), the tobacco hornworm <i>Manduca sexta</i> (Lepidoptera), the dung beetle <i>Onthophagus taurus</i> (Coleoptera), and the Florida carpenter ant <i>Camponotus floridanus</i> (Hymenoptera). Furthermore, in both <i>D. melanogaster</i> and <i>C. floridanus</i>, we show that the size of adult individuals fluctuates but does not significantly change. Therefore, our study finally confirms these two basic assumptions in the biology of insects, which have for centuries served as the foundation for studies of insect growth, size, and allometry.</p>","PeriodicalId":15682,"journal":{"name":"Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution","volume":"340 3","pages":"270-276"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2022-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9984121","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Elena N. Temereva, Maria A. Isaeva, Igor A. Kosevich
Since ctenostomes are traditionally regarded as an ancestral clade to some other bryozoan groups, the study of additional species may help to clarify questions on bryozoan evolution and phylogeny. One of these questions is the bryozoan lophophore evolution: whether it occurred through simplification or complication. The morphology and innervation of the ctenostome Flustrellidra hispida (Fabricius, 1780) lophophore have been studied with electron microscopy and immunocytochemistry with confocal laser scanning microscopy. Lophophore nervous system of F. hispida consists of several main nerve elements: cerebral ganglion, circumoral nerve ring, and the outer nerve ring. Serotonin-like immunoreactive perikarya, which connect with the circumoral nerve ring, bear the cilium that directs to the abfrontal side of the lophophore and extends between tentacle bases. The circumoral nerve ring gives rise to the intertentacular and frontal tentacle nerves. The outer nerve ring gives rise to the abfrontal neurites, which connect to the outer groups of perikarya and contribute to the formation of the abfrontal tentacle nerve. The outer nerve ring has been described before in other bryozoans, but it never contributes to the innervation of tentacles. The presence of the outer nerve ring participating in the innervation of tentacles makes the F. hispida lophophore nervous system particularly similar to the lophophore nervous system of phoronids. This similarity allows to suggest that organization of the F. hispida lophophore nervous system may reflect the ancestral state for all bryozoans. The possible scenario of evolutionary transformation of the lophophore nervous system within bryozoans is suggested.
{"title":"Unusual lophophore innervation in ctenostome Flustrellidra hispida (Bryozoa)","authors":"Elena N. Temereva, Maria A. Isaeva, Igor A. Kosevich","doi":"10.1002/jez.b.23164","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jez.b.23164","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Since ctenostomes are traditionally regarded as an ancestral clade to some other bryozoan groups, the study of additional species may help to clarify questions on bryozoan evolution and phylogeny. One of these questions is the bryozoan lophophore evolution: whether it occurred through simplification or complication. The morphology and innervation of the ctenostome <i>Flustrellidra hispida</i> (Fabricius, 1780) lophophore have been studied with electron microscopy and immunocytochemistry with confocal laser scanning microscopy. Lophophore nervous system of <i>F. hispida</i> consists of several main nerve elements: cerebral ganglion, circumoral nerve ring, and the outer nerve ring. Serotonin-like immunoreactive perikarya, which connect with the circumoral nerve ring, bear the cilium that directs to the abfrontal side of the lophophore and extends between tentacle bases. The circumoral nerve ring gives rise to the intertentacular and frontal tentacle nerves. The outer nerve ring gives rise to the abfrontal neurites, which connect to the outer groups of perikarya and contribute to the formation of the abfrontal tentacle nerve. The outer nerve ring has been described before in other bryozoans, but it never contributes to the innervation of tentacles. The presence of the outer nerve ring participating in the innervation of tentacles makes the <i>F. hispida</i> lophophore nervous system particularly similar to the lophophore nervous system of phoronids. This similarity allows to suggest that organization of the <i>F. hispida</i> lophophore nervous system may reflect the ancestral state for all bryozoans. The possible scenario of evolutionary transformation of the lophophore nervous system within bryozoans is suggested.</p>","PeriodicalId":15682,"journal":{"name":"Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution","volume":"340 3","pages":"245-258"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2022-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9984120","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The chorioallantoic membrane of oviparous reptiles forms a vascular interface with the eggshell. The eggshell contains calcium, primarily as calcium carbonate. Extraction and mobilization of this calcium by the chorioallantoic membrane contributes importantly to embryonic nutrition. Development of the chorioallantoic membrane is primarily known from studies of squamates and birds. Although there are pronounced differences in eggshell structure, squamate and bird embryos each mobilize calcium from eggshells. Specialized cells in the chicken chorionic epithelium transport calcium from the eggshell aided by a second population of cells that secrete protons generated by the enzyme carbonic anhydrase. Calcium transporting cells also are present in the chorioallantoic membrane of corn snakes, although these cells function differently than those of chickens. We used histology and immunohistology to characterize the morphology and functional attributes of the chorioallantoic membrane of corn snakes. We identified two populations of cells in the outer layer of the chorionic epithelium. Calbindin-D28K, a cellular marker for calcium transport expressed in squamate chorioallantoic membranes, is localized in large, flattened cells that predominate in the chorionic epithelium. Smaller cells, interspersed among the large cells, express carbonic anhydrase 2, an enzyme not previously localized in the chorionic epithelium of an oviparous squamate. These findings indicate that differentiation of chorionic epithelial cells contributes to extraction and transport of calcium from the eggshell. The presence of specializations of chorioallantoic membranes for calcium uptake from eggshells in chickens and corn snakes suggests that eggshell calcium was a source of embryonic nutrition early in the evolution of Sauropsida.
{"title":"Functional complexity in the chorioallantoic membrane of an oviparous snake: Specializations for calcium uptake from the eggshell","authors":"Tom W. Ecay, James. R. Stewart, Maleka Khambaty","doi":"10.1002/jez.b.23146","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jez.b.23146","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The chorioallantoic membrane of oviparous reptiles forms a vascular interface with the eggshell. The eggshell contains calcium, primarily as calcium carbonate. Extraction and mobilization of this calcium by the chorioallantoic membrane contributes importantly to embryonic nutrition. Development of the chorioallantoic membrane is primarily known from studies of squamates and birds. Although there are pronounced differences in eggshell structure, squamate and bird embryos each mobilize calcium from eggshells. Specialized cells in the chicken chorionic epithelium transport calcium from the eggshell aided by a second population of cells that secrete protons generated by the enzyme carbonic anhydrase. Calcium transporting cells also are present in the chorioallantoic membrane of corn snakes, although these cells function differently than those of chickens. We used histology and immunohistology to characterize the morphology and functional attributes of the chorioallantoic membrane of corn snakes. We identified two populations of cells in the outer layer of the chorionic epithelium. Calbindin-D<sub>28K</sub>, a cellular marker for calcium transport expressed in squamate chorioallantoic membranes, is localized in large, flattened cells that predominate in the chorionic epithelium. Smaller cells, interspersed among the large cells, express carbonic anhydrase 2, an enzyme not previously localized in the chorionic epithelium of an oviparous squamate. These findings indicate that differentiation of chorionic epithelial cells contributes to extraction and transport of calcium from the eggshell. The presence of specializations of chorioallantoic membranes for calcium uptake from eggshells in chickens and corn snakes suggests that eggshell calcium was a source of embryonic nutrition early in the evolution of Sauropsida.</p>","PeriodicalId":15682,"journal":{"name":"Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution","volume":"338 6","pages":"331-341"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2022-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72509631","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}