Introduction: The relationship between clinician-reported outcome measures (CROM) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) after root canal treatment is poorly understood. Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQOL) is a crucial PROM. Determination of the minimal important difference (MID) is critical for determining patients' perspective of treatment effectiveness, but the MID required to perceive any meaningful change in the OHRQOL after root canal treatment remains unclear. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the relationship between the clinical outcome and OHRQOL after root canal treatment and to determine the corresponding MID values.
Methods: Patients (N = 64) requiring primary nonsurgical root canal treatment were recruited. Clinical and radiographic (cone-beam computed tomography) assessment of treatment outcomes was performed at the 12-month follow-up. OHRQOL and pain were evaluated preoperatively and at the 12-month follow-up using the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 and visual analog scale, respectively. P < .05 was considered statistically significant. MID was assessed using distribution- and anchor-based approaches.
Results: The final analysis included 47 patients. The clinical outcome was favorable for 92.6% of teeth. OHRQOL and pain showed significant improvement after treatment (P < .001). No significant association was found between clinical outcome and OHRQOL (P > .05). The mean Oral Health Impact Profile-14 score change (ie, 13.6) was greater than the range of MID values determined.
Conclusions: Root canal treatment significantly improves OHRQOL. Improvement in the OHRQOL score was greater than the MID values determined, implying a clinically significant change. However, PROM (OHRQOL) does not appear to be correlated with CROM.
Bifid mandibular canals are common anatomical findings with variations based on direction and location of branching, which carry significant clinical implications for endodontic and surgical dental procedures. This case report describes a previously unreported ectopic dental canal that branches off the superior border of the mandibular canal, enters the apex of a mandibular second molar, traverses through the root, anastomoses with the root canal system, and subsequently exits through the lingual aspect of the root. The anastomosis of this ectopic dental canal with the mesial lingual canal led to significant bleeding during rotary instrumentation. This unique anatomical variation demonstrates the importance of a thorough cone-beam computed tomography analysis to identify critical structures prior to undertaking dental procedures involving the root apices of mandibular posterior teeth and adjacent areas.
Introduction: Pain associated with temporomandibular dysfunction (TMD) is often confused with odontogenic pain, which is a challenge in endodontic diagnosis. Validated screening questionnaires can aid in the identification and differentiation of the source of pain. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a virtual assistant based on artificial intelligence using natural language processing techniques to automate the initial screening of patients with tooth pain.
Methods: The PAINe chatbot was developed in Python (Python Software Foundation, Beaverton, OR) language using the PyCharm (JetBrains, Prague, Czech Republic) environment and the openai library to integrate the ChatGPT 4 API (OpenAI, San Francisco, CA) and the Streamlit library (Snowflake Inc, San Francisco, CA) for interface construction. The validated TMD Pain Screener questionnaire and 1 question regarding the current pain intensity were integrated into the chatbot to perform the differential diagnosis of TMD in patients with tooth pain. The accuracy of the responses was evaluated in 50 random scenarios to compare the chatbot with the validated questionnaire. The kappa coefficient was calculated to assess the agreement level between the chatbot responses and the validated questionnaire.
Results: The chatbot achieved an accuracy rate of 86% and a substantial level of agreement (κ = 0.70). Most responses were clear and provided adequate information about the diagnosis.
Conclusions: The implementation of a virtual assistant using natural language processing based on large language models for initial differential diagnosis screening of patients with tooth pain demonstrated substantial agreement between validated questionnaires and the chatbot. This approach emerges as a practical and efficient option for screening these patients.
Introduction: This study aimed to investigate radicular dentin thicknesses in mandibular second molars (MSMs), considering variations in root configuration and the morphology of the pulp chamber floor (PCF). The types of radicular grooves and potential danger zones were also identified.
Methods: A total of 149 MSMs were scanned with micro-computed tomographic imaging and classified into 4 groups according to root fusion and PCF morphology as follows: (1) 45 with fused roots and C-shaped PCFs, (2) 45 with fused roots and non-C-shaped PCFs, (3) 14 with a single canal, and (4) 45 with separated roots. The first 2 groups were subdivided into Ω-shaped, U-shaped, and V-shaped radicular groove subgroups. Measurements included minimum and mean dentin thickness from the start of the radicular groove or root bifurcation extending 5 mm apically, the ratio of outer to inner dentin thickness, and the distribution of dentin thickness.
Results: Ω-shaped and U-shaped subgroups showed significant thinner minimum inner wall thickness than V-shaped subgroups at 2-5 mm from the starting point of the radicular groove in both C-shaped and non-C-shaped pulp floor categories (P < .05). The mesial roots of separated rooted MSMs showed significant thinner dentin than a non-C-shaped floor regarding minimum and mean inner thickness and mean outer thickness (P < .05). Teeth with a single canal had significantly thicker walls compared with the other 3 groups.
Conclusions: In MSMs, caution must be exercised, especially in the presence of Ω-shaped and U-shaped grooves in C-shaped roots and around the root furcation of separated roots.
Introduction: Nonsurgical root canal retreatment (NS-RCRT) becomes necessary when primary endodontic procedures fail. This study evaluates the efficacy of NS-RCRT using 2% chlorhexidine gel and foraminal enlargement techniques, aiming to assess whether these approaches enhance periapical healing outcomes and success rates compared to traditional NS-RCRT techniques reported in the literature.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 120 teeth diagnosed with persistent apical periodontitis, from 80 patients who underwent NS-RCRT between January 2014 and December 2018 at a specialist's private practice. Data were collected following the Preferred Reporting Items for Observational Studies in Endodontics 2023 guidelines. Periapical healing was evaluated using digital periapical radiographs by three calibrated examiners. The outcome of the treatment was analyzed through descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses, including the Chi-Square and Fisher's Exact tests. Treatment outcomes were deemed successful if they showed complete or incomplete repair and unsuccessful if no repair was observed.
Results: The average follow-up period was 30 months. Under loose criteria, 92.50% (n = 111) of the teeth were categorized as successful, and 7.5% (n = 9) as unsuccessful. Bivariate analysis indicated that the radiographic restoration of apical transportation was the only factor that significantly influenced the outcome.
Conclusions: NS-RCRT performed in a single visit using the foraminal enlargement technique and 2% chlorhexidine gel demonstrated high success rates and may be an effective alternative to tooth extraction. This method promoted periapical healing and could significantly improve NS-RCRT protocols. Further prospective studies are recommended to corroborate these findings.
Introduction: This study investigated the impact of implementing hydraulic condensation (HC) as a second obturation technique in the Endodontic Preclinical course for dental students trained in warm vertical compaction (WVC).
Methods: A total of 70 students performed root canal treatment of 2 extracted molars; they performed the HC technique for the first time after a demonstration. The combination of the obturation technique (WVC or HC) and the type of molar (maxillary or mandibular) was randomly assigned, resulting in 4 groups (n = 35). The students answered a questionnaire appraising their learning experience and completed a self-evaluation rubric. Masked instructors graded projects. Data were statistically analyzed (significance set at 5%).
Results: Most of the students (91%) considered learning 2 obturation techniques relevant and considered it difficult to perform the downpack in molars (P < .05). About half of the students (45.7%) responded that HC resulted in fewer errors and disagreed that WVC derives in a more homogeneous obturation; accordingly, 52.9% of the students selected the highest self-grading for HC obturations, while only 38.6% for WVC. No significant difference was found in the distribution of grades attributed by students and instructors (P > .05). Students reported significantly higher levels of confidence for HC and difficulty for WVC (P < .05). No difference was found between the techniques regarding the presence of voids. The presence of multiple errors was more frequent for WVC (P < .05).
Conclusion: The findings indicate a positive learning experience and comparable performance among preclinical dental students in implementing HC as an alternative obturation technique.