Tainara Guizolfi MS, Giovana Zardo BE, Rodrigo A. Barbieri MS, Cesar Aguzzoli PhD, Airton Kramer MS, Rafael Menck de Almeida PhD, Sidnei Moura PhD
Highways, the lifeline of the Brazilian economy, transport approximately 75% of the country's economic activity, highlighting its importance. However, professional drivers, accustomed to long daily journeys, make use of tablets widely available in Gas Station, which are known as “Rebites,” which could contain a mixture of legal and illegal compounds. Thus, this study aims at the chemical characterization of these through different analytical methods. Initially, we performed a comprehensive screening of compounds present in seven samples collected across the country using high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS). The findings revealed caffeine as the main compound, alongside theophylline, lidocaine, and clobenzorex, among others. In the next step, we employ quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance (qNMR) to quantify the caffeine content in the tablets. The results indicated a caffeine concentration ranging between 14% and 31% (m/m), which may imply a daily overdose of this compound from around four tablets. In summary, this investigation provides a chemical characterization of real samples of “Rebites” freely obtained along Brazilian highways. Caffeine emerged as the predominant active compound, with its concentration determined by qNMR analysis. The notable presence of caffeine, combined with other stimulants, depressants, and hallucinogens, underscores the need for strict quality control measures regarding “Rebites” to safeguard public health.
{"title":"What's in drugs freely used by Brazilian truck drivers – “Rebites”? Determination of target and nontarget compounds by high-resolution mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance","authors":"Tainara Guizolfi MS, Giovana Zardo BE, Rodrigo A. Barbieri MS, Cesar Aguzzoli PhD, Airton Kramer MS, Rafael Menck de Almeida PhD, Sidnei Moura PhD","doi":"10.1111/1556-4029.15538","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1556-4029.15538","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Highways, the lifeline of the Brazilian economy, transport approximately 75% of the country's economic activity, highlighting its importance. However, professional drivers, accustomed to long daily journeys, make use of tablets widely available in Gas Station, which are known as “Rebites,” which could contain a mixture of legal and illegal compounds. Thus, this study aims at the chemical characterization of these through different analytical methods. Initially, we performed a comprehensive screening of compounds present in seven samples collected across the country using high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS). The findings revealed caffeine as the main compound, alongside theophylline, lidocaine, and clobenzorex, among others. In the next step, we employ quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance (qNMR) to quantify the caffeine content in the tablets. The results indicated a caffeine concentration ranging between 14% and 31% (m/m), which may imply a daily overdose of this compound from around four tablets. In summary, this investigation provides a chemical characterization of real samples of “Rebites” freely obtained along Brazilian highways. Caffeine emerged as the predominant active compound, with its concentration determined by qNMR analysis. The notable presence of caffeine, combined with other stimulants, depressants, and hallucinogens, underscores the need for strict quality control measures regarding “Rebites” to safeguard public health.</p>","PeriodicalId":15743,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic sciences","volume":"69 4","pages":"1449-1455"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140874382","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lorna Flanagan PhD, Charlotte Murphy PhD, Paula Savage MSc, Michelle Breathnach PhD, Jennifer Ryan PhD
The potential evidential value of male underwear in cases of alleged sexual assault is often overlooked. Male underwear can be a critical item in the investigation of alleged sexual assaults. Body fluids/DNA, which may transfer to the penis during sexual contact, may in turn transfer to the inside front of the underwear, and persist for months or years, provided the underwear are not washed. Here, we demonstrate how the case circumstances drive the sampling strategy of male underwear, in order to maximize the effectiveness of the forensic analysis. Sampling considerations including recovery methods and sampling sequence are discussed, and a methodical examination strategy of male underwear is proposed. To highlight the pertinence of male underwear to the investigation of alleged sexual assaults, three real-life cases are discussed, in which male underwear were examined for multiple body fluids/DNA, and the findings obtained proved evidentially significant. The different cases demonstrate the versatility of male underwear examination in situations, where different body fluids and DNA may transfer based on the specific allegation, and emphasize how targeted sampling can allow the scientist to assess the probability of the findings based on two competing propositions. Accurate sampling strategies are imperative for robust probability assignment in evaluative reporting of scientific findings.
在涉嫌性侵犯的案件中,男性内衣的潜在证据价值往往被忽视。男性内裤可能是调查性侵犯指控的关键物品。在性接触过程中,体液/DNA 可能会转移到阴茎上,进而转移到内裤的前内侧,如果内裤不清洗,这些体液/DNA 可能会持续数月或数年。在此,我们展示了案件情况如何驱动男性内衣的取样策略,以最大限度地提高法证分析的有效性。我们讨论了取样的注意事项,包括回收方法和取样顺序,并提出了男性内衣的方法检查策略。为了突出男性内衣在调查性侵犯指控中的相关性,讨论了三个真实案例,在这些案例中,对男性内衣的多种体液/DNA 进行了检查,结果证明具有重要的证据意义。这些不同的案例展示了男性内衣检查在不同体液和 DNA 可能根据具体指控转移的情况下的多功能性,并强调了有针对性的取样如何使科学家能够根据两个相互竞争的命题来评估调查结果的可能性。准确的取样策略对于在科学发现的评估报告中进行可靠的概率分配至关重要。
{"title":"The importance of male underwear in cases of alleged sexual assault","authors":"Lorna Flanagan PhD, Charlotte Murphy PhD, Paula Savage MSc, Michelle Breathnach PhD, Jennifer Ryan PhD","doi":"10.1111/1556-4029.15539","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1556-4029.15539","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The potential evidential value of male underwear in cases of alleged sexual assault is often overlooked. Male underwear can be a critical item in the investigation of alleged sexual assaults. Body fluids/DNA, which may transfer to the penis during sexual contact, may in turn transfer to the inside front of the underwear, and persist for months or years, provided the underwear are not washed. Here, we demonstrate how the case circumstances drive the sampling strategy of male underwear, in order to maximize the effectiveness of the forensic analysis. Sampling considerations including recovery methods and sampling sequence are discussed, and a methodical examination strategy of male underwear is proposed. To highlight the pertinence of male underwear to the investigation of alleged sexual assaults, three real-life cases are discussed, in which male underwear were examined for multiple body fluids/DNA, and the findings obtained proved evidentially significant. The different cases demonstrate the versatility of male underwear examination in situations, where different body fluids and DNA may transfer based on the specific allegation, and emphasize how targeted sampling can allow the scientist to assess the probability of the findings based on two competing propositions. Accurate sampling strategies are imperative for robust probability assignment in evaluative reporting of scientific findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":15743,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic sciences","volume":"69 4","pages":"1481-1489"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140826877","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ananda da Silva Antonio PhD, Gleicielle Tozzi Wurzler PhD, Cecília de Andrade Bhering PhD, Adriana Sousa de Oliveira MSc, Luciana Silva do Amaral Cohen PhD, Marco Antônio Martins de Oliveira PhD, Francisco Radler de Aquino Neto PhD, Gabriela Vanini PhD
The illegal drug market is constantly evolving, with new drugs being created and existing ones being modified. Adulterants are often added to the mix, and the primary substance may be secretly replaced by a new one. Once-known tablets can now be vastly different from what they are sold as, all due to the pursuit of profit and evasion of current drug regulations. These alterations in drug composition pose a threat to society, as their effects are still not well understood. Therefore, it is crucial for police intelligence and public health development to obtain the chemical profiles of illicit drugs. This study presents the chemical fingerprinting of ecstasy tablets seized in the state of Rio de Janeiro (Brazil) between 2012 and 2021. The tablet samples were weighed, extracted, diluted with methanol, and acidified before analysis using gas chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry and attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. The major constituents found were MDMA and clobenzorex, with fewer occurrences of MDA, MDEA, and 2C-B. The results also indicate that the occurrence of mega-events in the study location impacted the chemical fingerprints of ecstasy. A total of 27 combinations of cutting agents, including caffeine, ephedrine, and anesthetics, were identified. Samples composed of clobenzorex were observed throughout the evaluated period in areas near highways, suggesting that this product is mainly used by truck drivers. These findings can help police intelligence units anticipate the behavior of the illicit market during major events, identify traffic routes, and support public health initiatives.
{"title":"Qualitative transformations of street-seized ecstasy over a decade: A case study in Rio de Janeiro (Brazil)","authors":"Ananda da Silva Antonio PhD, Gleicielle Tozzi Wurzler PhD, Cecília de Andrade Bhering PhD, Adriana Sousa de Oliveira MSc, Luciana Silva do Amaral Cohen PhD, Marco Antônio Martins de Oliveira PhD, Francisco Radler de Aquino Neto PhD, Gabriela Vanini PhD","doi":"10.1111/1556-4029.15536","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1556-4029.15536","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The illegal drug market is constantly evolving, with new drugs being created and existing ones being modified. Adulterants are often added to the mix, and the primary substance may be secretly replaced by a new one. Once-known tablets can now be vastly different from what they are sold as, all due to the pursuit of profit and evasion of current drug regulations. These alterations in drug composition pose a threat to society, as their effects are still not well understood. Therefore, it is crucial for police intelligence and public health development to obtain the chemical profiles of illicit drugs. This study presents the chemical fingerprinting of ecstasy tablets seized in the state of Rio de Janeiro (Brazil) between 2012 and 2021. The tablet samples were weighed, extracted, diluted with methanol, and acidified before analysis using gas chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry and attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. The major constituents found were MDMA and clobenzorex, with fewer occurrences of MDA, MDEA, and 2C-B. The results also indicate that the occurrence of mega-events in the study location impacted the chemical fingerprints of ecstasy. A total of 27 combinations of cutting agents, including caffeine, ephedrine, and anesthetics, were identified. Samples composed of clobenzorex were observed throughout the evaluated period in areas near highways, suggesting that this product is mainly used by truck drivers. These findings can help police intelligence units anticipate the behavior of the illicit market during major events, identify traffic routes, and support public health initiatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":15743,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic sciences","volume":"69 4","pages":"1198-1211"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140826572","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In forensic entomology, determining the age of a larva from a body to estimate time since death is commonly performed through the measurement of a physical trait. Gene expression has been studied as an alternative age estimation approach, but the storage conditions required for these studies are different than those used in forensic entomological casework. Studies analyzing gene expression prioritize the preservation of RNA, which requires fresh tissue and ultra-cold storage. Casework, in contrast, utilizes hot water killing specimens that may not be analyzed for a long period after collection. In the current study, the impact of hot water killing on gene expression was assessed for larval samples of the forensically important blow fly, Cochliomyia macellaria. Successful amplification of the sex-determining gene, transformer, was tested across larvae ranging in size from 3.22 to 16.85 mm in length after storage times of 1–2 weeks, 4–5 weeks, and 8–9 weeks at 4°C in RNAlater. Larvae hot water killed were processed in tandem with larvae stored live to allow for a direct assessment of the impact of boiling on gene expression. As expected, the transformer gene was successfully amplified in all larvae stored live. For the hot water-killed larvae, the success rate was only slightly lower, with 3 out of 75 larvae not generating a sex-specific band pattern. The results show gene expression can be used for hot water-killed samples, though future work across different genes, species, and extending to quantitative gene expression methods is needed.
{"title":"Evaluating the impact of hot water killing larvae on gene expression using the transformer gene in Cochliomyia macellaria (Diptera: Calliphoridae)","authors":"Joshua L. Smith PhD","doi":"10.1111/1556-4029.15532","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1556-4029.15532","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In forensic entomology, determining the age of a larva from a body to estimate time since death is commonly performed through the measurement of a physical trait. Gene expression has been studied as an alternative age estimation approach, but the storage conditions required for these studies are different than those used in forensic entomological casework. Studies analyzing gene expression prioritize the preservation of RNA, which requires fresh tissue and ultra-cold storage. Casework, in contrast, utilizes hot water killing specimens that may not be analyzed for a long period after collection. In the current study, the impact of hot water killing on gene expression was assessed for larval samples of the forensically important blow fly, <i>Cochliomyia macellaria</i>. Successful amplification of the sex-determining gene, <i>transformer</i>, was tested across larvae ranging in size from 3.22 to 16.85 mm in length after storage times of 1–2 weeks, 4–5 weeks, and 8–9 weeks at 4°C in RNAlater. Larvae hot water killed were processed in tandem with larvae stored live to allow for a direct assessment of the impact of boiling on gene expression. As expected, the <i>transformer</i> gene was successfully amplified in all larvae stored live. For the hot water-killed larvae, the success rate was only slightly lower, with 3 out of 75 larvae not generating a sex-specific band pattern. The results show gene expression can be used for hot water-killed samples, though future work across different genes, species, and extending to quantitative gene expression methods is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":15743,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic sciences","volume":"69 4","pages":"1467-1472"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140826721","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Several studies have recently attempted to estimate practitioner accuracy when comparing fired ammunition. But whether this research has included sufficiently challenging comparisons dependent upon expertise for accurate conclusions regarding source remains largely unexplored in the literature. Control groups of lay people comprise one means of vetting this question, of assessing whether comparison samples were at least challenging enough to distinguish between experts and novices. This article therefore utilizes such a group, specifically 82 attorneys, as a post hoc control and juxtaposes their performance on a comparison set of cartridge case images from one commonly cited study (Duez et al. in J Forensic Sci. 2018;63:1069–1084) with that of the original participant pool of professionals. Despite lacking the kind of formalized training and experience common to the latter, our lay participants displayed an ability, generally, to distinguish between cartridge cases fired by the same versus different guns in the 327 comparisons they performed. And while their accuracy rates lagged substantially behind those of the original participant pool of professionals on same-source comparisons, their performance on different-source comparisons was essentially indistinguishable from that of trained examiners. This indicates that although the study we vetted may provide useful information about professional accuracy when performing same-source comparisons, it has little to offer in terms of measuring examiners' ability to distinguish between cartridge cases fired by different guns. If similar issues pervade other accuracy studies, then there is little reason to rely on the false-positive rates they have generated.
{"title":"The false promise of firearms examination validation studies: Lay controls, simplistic comparisons, and the failure to soundly measure misidentification rates","authors":"Richard E. Gutierrez JD, Emily J. Prokesch JD","doi":"10.1111/1556-4029.15531","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1556-4029.15531","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Several studies have recently attempted to estimate practitioner accuracy when comparing fired ammunition. But whether this research has included sufficiently challenging comparisons dependent upon expertise for accurate conclusions regarding source remains largely unexplored in the literature. Control groups of lay people comprise one means of vetting this question, of assessing whether comparison samples were at least challenging enough to distinguish between experts and novices. This article therefore utilizes such a group, specifically 82 attorneys, as a post hoc control and juxtaposes their performance on a comparison set of cartridge case images from one commonly cited study (Duez et al. in J Forensic Sci. 2018;63:1069–1084) with that of the original participant pool of professionals. Despite lacking the kind of formalized training and experience common to the latter, our lay participants displayed an ability, generally, to distinguish between cartridge cases fired by the same versus different guns in the 327 comparisons they performed. And while their accuracy rates lagged substantially behind those of the original participant pool of professionals on same-source comparisons, their performance on different-source comparisons was essentially indistinguishable from that of trained examiners. This indicates that although the study we vetted may provide useful information about professional accuracy when performing same-source comparisons, it has little to offer in terms of measuring examiners' ability to distinguish between cartridge cases fired by different guns. If similar issues pervade other accuracy studies, then there is little reason to rely on the false-positive rates they have generated.</p>","PeriodicalId":15743,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic sciences","volume":"69 4","pages":"1334-1349"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1556-4029.15531","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140827101","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Patricia R. Avent MS, Jessica L. Campbell PhD, D-ABFA, Heather M. Garvin PhD, D-ABFA, Lauren N. Butaric PhD
Several code-based methods have been created for comparing the frontal sinus in skeletal identification scenarios. However, little is known regarding matched-pair accuracy rates of these methods or how varying image modalities may affect these rates. The goals of this study were to validate the exclusion rates and to establish matched-pair accuracy rates of two well-cited coding methods, Cameriere et al. [23] and Tatlisumak et al. [24]. Additionally, individual variables were assessed for consistency in scoring between image modalities. Using a sample of U.S. African American, Native American, and European American females and males (n = 225), we examined individual variable scoring and string codes between two different image modalities (radiographs and CT-based 3D models). Arcades showed poor scoring consistency between modalities (p < 0.001). Although exclusion rates were similar to those reported in the original studies (93%–96%), matched-pair accuracy rates were low (13%–18%). None of the demographics (collection, sex, age, ancestry, and orientation) had an effect on the odds of a match. Interobserver and intraobserver analyses showed moderate to near-perfect agreement for all variables except supraorbital cells, which had minimal to no agreement. Currently, we do not recommend the application of these frontal sinus coding methods independent of other supporting identification methods given low variable consistency and accuracy rates. Visual identification should still be used to include or exclude an identification when using the frontal sinus.
{"title":"Personal identification using frontal sinus coding methods: The effect of mixed image modality comparisons","authors":"Patricia R. Avent MS, Jessica L. Campbell PhD, D-ABFA, Heather M. Garvin PhD, D-ABFA, Lauren N. Butaric PhD","doi":"10.1111/1556-4029.15533","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1556-4029.15533","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Several code-based methods have been created for comparing the frontal sinus in skeletal identification scenarios. However, little is known regarding matched-pair accuracy rates of these methods or how varying image modalities may affect these rates. The goals of this study were to validate the exclusion rates and to establish matched-pair accuracy rates of two well-cited coding methods, Cameriere et al. [23] and Tatlisumak et al. [24]. Additionally, individual variables were assessed for consistency in scoring between image modalities. Using a sample of U.S. African American, Native American, and European American females and males (<i>n</i> = 225), we examined individual variable scoring and string codes between two different image modalities (radiographs and CT-based 3D models). Arcades showed poor scoring consistency between modalities (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Although exclusion rates were similar to those reported in the original studies (93%–96%), matched-pair accuracy rates were low (13%–18%). None of the demographics (collection, sex, age, ancestry, and orientation) had an effect on the odds of a match. Interobserver and intraobserver analyses showed moderate to near-perfect agreement for all variables except supraorbital cells, which had minimal to no agreement. Currently, we do not recommend the application of these frontal sinus coding methods independent of other supporting identification methods given low variable consistency and accuracy rates. Visual identification should still be used to include or exclude an identification when using the frontal sinus.</p>","PeriodicalId":15743,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic sciences","volume":"69 4","pages":"1155-1170"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140838042","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The crystal violet (CV) staining technique represents a prevalent approach for the development of latent fingerprints, especially on adhesive tape surfaces. Nevertheless, the technique necessitates intricate formulations to augment its performance. In this investigation, an optimized CV staining protocol was developed, characterized by the absence of residual dye on the target substrates and the capability of facilitating fingerprint visualization under ambient light conditions. Four donors, comprising two males and two females, deposited natural fingerprints on various substrates, including glass microscope slides, aluminum foil, and 115 g glossy coated paper, without any specific guidelines. Fingerprints developed using cyanoacrylate fuming served as benchmarks and were contrasted with those generated through alternative methods: CV, ardrox, rhodamine 6G, powdering, and the optimized CV staining protocol. The fingerprint development experiment was replicated at seven distinct time intervals, encompassing 1 day, 1 week, 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, resulting in a dataset of 420 fingerprints. The evaluation of fingerprint identifiability employed a scoring system established by the Home Office Centre for Applied Science and Technology. The results indicated that the optimized CV staining technique demonstrated superior performance, boasting a 92.9% rate of identifiable fingerprint development in contrast to other employed methodologies. Consequently, this optimized CV staining approach is recommended as an efficient, rapid, and straightforward critical dyeing method, applicable to a wide array of substrates in forensic investigations.
{"title":"Optimization of crystal violet technique for enhanced fingerprint detection on various surfaces","authors":"Yakup Gülekçi PhD, Ahmet Tülek PhD","doi":"10.1111/1556-4029.15534","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1556-4029.15534","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The crystal violet (CV) staining technique represents a prevalent approach for the development of latent fingerprints, especially on adhesive tape surfaces. Nevertheless, the technique necessitates intricate formulations to augment its performance. In this investigation, an optimized CV staining protocol was developed, characterized by the absence of residual dye on the target substrates and the capability of facilitating fingerprint visualization under ambient light conditions. Four donors, comprising two males and two females, deposited natural fingerprints on various substrates, including glass microscope slides, aluminum foil, and 115 g glossy coated paper, without any specific guidelines. Fingerprints developed using cyanoacrylate fuming served as benchmarks and were contrasted with those generated through alternative methods: CV, ardrox, rhodamine 6G, powdering, and the optimized CV staining protocol. The fingerprint development experiment was replicated at seven distinct time intervals, encompassing 1 day, 1 week, 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, resulting in a dataset of 420 fingerprints. The evaluation of fingerprint identifiability employed a scoring system established by the Home Office Centre for Applied Science and Technology. The results indicated that the optimized CV staining technique demonstrated superior performance, boasting a 92.9% rate of identifiable fingerprint development in contrast to other employed methodologies. Consequently, this optimized CV staining approach is recommended as an efficient, rapid, and straightforward critical dyeing method, applicable to a wide array of substrates in forensic investigations.</p>","PeriodicalId":15743,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic sciences","volume":"69 4","pages":"1246-1255"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1556-4029.15534","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140826718","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mark W. Perlin PhD, MD, PhD, Nasir Butt PhD, Mark R. Wilson PhD
<p>This Letter is a response to “Uncertainty in probabilistic genotyping of low template DNA: A case study comparing STRmix™ and TrueAllele®,” a <i>Journal of Forensic Sciences</i> (<i>JFS</i>) Case Report published online in February 2023 [<span>1</span>].</p><p>In a California criminal case, a man was accused of drug possession. At the defendant's request, two drug packages were tested for DNA using short tandem repeat (STR) markers. Both items were two-person mixtures that gave similar match statistic results.</p><p>On one item, Cybergenetics TrueAllele® probabilistic genotyping (PG) software found a strong exclusionary match statistic for the defendant of one over 1.2 million, with a false-negative error rate of one over 222 million. On the same item, ESR's STRmix™ PG program produced a weaker exclusionary match statistic of one over 24.</p><p>There was no trial. Based on the exculpatory DNA evidence, the prosecutor dropped the more serious DNA-related possession charge and offered a plea agreement. The court accepted the defendant's plea in March 2023.</p><p>The TrueAllele and STRmix PG software programs qualitatively agreed. Their likelihood ratio (LR) match statistics both supported the hypothesis that the defendant <i>did not</i> contribute his DNA to the drug package evidence. However, the magnitude of the LR match statistics differed between the software programs.</p><p>This letter briefly explains why the two PG software results differed. As <i>JFS</i> requested, we address some issues raised in the Case Report [<span>1</span>]. A more extensive response [<span>2</span>] to the paper [<span>1</span>] was posted online in May 2023, discussing 20 topics and examining 120 assertions.</p><p>The two programs were given different amounts of STR input data. TrueAllele is a fully Bayesian system capable of looking at all the (allelic and non-allelic) peak data without relying on laboratory-imposed data thresholds. Most other PG software applies peak height thresholds to limit the amount of input data. Peak heights are measured in relative fluorescent units (rfu).</p><p>TrueAllele used 210 data peaks across all 21 GlobalFiler™ STR loci, or 10 peaks per locus. At a 40 rfu threshold, the STRmix program saw 24 peaks across 14 loci, or just 1.7 peaks per locus. This 1.7 peak density is insufficient for an informative analysis of a two-person mixture, since at least three or four peaks would be needed. The 88% reduction in STRmix data peaks, relative to TrueAllele input, accounts for the observed LR output differences.</p><p>We tested STRmix on the STR data at different thresholds, ranging from 0 rfu to 90 rfu, in 10 rfu increments. The weakest STRmix subsource LR value in our sensitivity study was 1 over 3.35 (using 11 peaks at a high 90 rfu threshold), while the strongest LR was 1 over 30.5 million (38 peaks at a low 20 rfu threshold). Less STRmix input data gave less output identification information; more data yielded more information.</p><p>At
本信是对 "低模板 DNA 概率基因分型中的不确定性:在加利福尼亚州的一起刑事案件中,一名男子被指控持有毒品。在被告的要求下,使用短串联重复(STR)标记对两个毒品包装进行了 DNA 检测。在其中一个项目上,Cybergenetics TrueAllele® 概率基因分型(PG)软件发现被告的排除性匹配统计为 120 万分之一,假阴性错误率为 2.22 亿分之一。在同一项目中,ESR 的 STRmix™ PG 程序得出的排除性匹配统计结果较弱,为 24 分之一。基于可开脱罪责的 DNA 证据,检察官撤销了与 DNA 相关的更严重的藏毒指控,并提出了认罪协议。TrueAllele 和 STRmix PG 软件程序在质量上达成了一致。TrueAllele 和 STRmix PG 软件程序的定性结果一致,它们的似然比 (LR) 匹配统计都支持被告的 DNA 没有参与毒品包裹证据的假设。本信简要解释了两个 PG 软件结果不同的原因。根据 JFS 的要求,我们对案例报告[1]中提出的一些问题进行了回应。2023 年 5 月,我们在网上发布了对论文[1]更广泛的回应[2],讨论了 20 个主题,审查了 120 项论断。TrueAllele 是一个完全贝叶斯系统,能够查看所有(等位基因和非等位基因)峰数据,而无需依赖实验室设定的数据阈值。大多数其他 PG 软件都采用峰高阈值来限制输入数据量。TrueAllele 在所有 21 个 GlobalFiler™ STR 基因座中使用了 210 个数据峰,即每个基因座 10 个数据峰。在 40 rfu 的阈值下,STRmix 程序在 14 个基因座上看到了 24 个峰,即每个基因座只有 1.7 个峰。这 1.7 个峰值密度不足以对两人混合物进行信息分析,因为至少需要三到四个峰值。相对于 TrueAllele 输入,STRmix 数据峰值减少了 88%,这就是所观察到的 LR 输出差异的原因。我们以不同的阈值对 STR 数据进行了 STRmix 测试,阈值范围从 0 rfu 到 90 rfu,以 10 rfu 为增量。在我们的灵敏度研究中,最弱的 STRmix 子源 LR 值为 1 超过 3.35(在 90 rfu 的高阈值下使用 11 个峰),而最强的 LR 值为 1 超过 3,050 万(在 20 rfu 的低阈值下使用 38 个峰)。在 10 rfu 阈值(54 个峰)下,STRmix 的 LR 为 1 超过 480 万,接近 TrueAlle 报告的 1 超过 120 万。如果输入更多数据,STRmix 的 LR 结果与 TrueAllele 差不多。数据输入的差异解释了本案中报告的 TrueAllele 和 STRmix LR 值之间的差异。案例报告》的 "意见"[3] 并没有这样说。《案例报告》假定 TrueAllele 和 STRmix 软件在相同的 DNA 证据上应该得出相似的 LR 答案。在DNA含量丰富、阈值不是问题的情况下,两个软件的结果往往一致。但 TrueAllele 的分层建模是专门为处理低模板 DNA 数据而设计的。不同的统计模型会得出不同的答案。案例报告比较了 TrueAllele 和 STRmix 的概率基因型。然而,TrueAllele 使用后验概率数值化表示贡献者基因型,而 STRmix 则使用似然基因型 "权重"。概率和可能性是不同的概念,其数字不能直接进行比较[4]。TrueAllele 检测了所有 21 个 STR 位点上每个位点的 10 个峰。这些 STR 模式数据足以对具有不同 DNA 降解的两人混合物进行分层 MW 建模。然而,STRmix 只分析了 14 个位点,平均每个位点只有 1.7 个峰,这对于确定 MW 的基因分型数据来说是不够的。案例报告只研究了几个无代表性的位点,这些位点显示的 STR 分子很短,几乎没有降解。案例报告比较了 TrueAllele 和 STRmix LR 报告语言。TrueAllele 将复杂的混合物数据分离成概率贡献者基因型,产生比较单一贡献者基因型的 LR 值[5]。STRmix 根据一组基因型对未分离混合物数据的联合解释程度计算 LR 值[6]。这两种方法计算出的 LR 值相同[7],每种方法的计算方法都有适当的报告语言。然而,分离的单一贡献者 LR 语言报告的是匹配概率比,而不是 "匹配"[2]。
{"title":"Commentary on: Thompson WC. Uncertainty in probabilistic genotyping of low template DNA: A case study comparing STRmix™ and TrueAllele®. J Forensic Sci. 2023;68(3):1049–63","authors":"Mark W. Perlin PhD, MD, PhD, Nasir Butt PhD, Mark R. Wilson PhD","doi":"10.1111/1556-4029.15518","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1556-4029.15518","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This Letter is a response to “Uncertainty in probabilistic genotyping of low template DNA: A case study comparing STRmix™ and TrueAllele®,” a <i>Journal of Forensic Sciences</i> (<i>JFS</i>) Case Report published online in February 2023 [<span>1</span>].</p><p>In a California criminal case, a man was accused of drug possession. At the defendant's request, two drug packages were tested for DNA using short tandem repeat (STR) markers. Both items were two-person mixtures that gave similar match statistic results.</p><p>On one item, Cybergenetics TrueAllele® probabilistic genotyping (PG) software found a strong exclusionary match statistic for the defendant of one over 1.2 million, with a false-negative error rate of one over 222 million. On the same item, ESR's STRmix™ PG program produced a weaker exclusionary match statistic of one over 24.</p><p>There was no trial. Based on the exculpatory DNA evidence, the prosecutor dropped the more serious DNA-related possession charge and offered a plea agreement. The court accepted the defendant's plea in March 2023.</p><p>The TrueAllele and STRmix PG software programs qualitatively agreed. Their likelihood ratio (LR) match statistics both supported the hypothesis that the defendant <i>did not</i> contribute his DNA to the drug package evidence. However, the magnitude of the LR match statistics differed between the software programs.</p><p>This letter briefly explains why the two PG software results differed. As <i>JFS</i> requested, we address some issues raised in the Case Report [<span>1</span>]. A more extensive response [<span>2</span>] to the paper [<span>1</span>] was posted online in May 2023, discussing 20 topics and examining 120 assertions.</p><p>The two programs were given different amounts of STR input data. TrueAllele is a fully Bayesian system capable of looking at all the (allelic and non-allelic) peak data without relying on laboratory-imposed data thresholds. Most other PG software applies peak height thresholds to limit the amount of input data. Peak heights are measured in relative fluorescent units (rfu).</p><p>TrueAllele used 210 data peaks across all 21 GlobalFiler™ STR loci, or 10 peaks per locus. At a 40 rfu threshold, the STRmix program saw 24 peaks across 14 loci, or just 1.7 peaks per locus. This 1.7 peak density is insufficient for an informative analysis of a two-person mixture, since at least three or four peaks would be needed. The 88% reduction in STRmix data peaks, relative to TrueAllele input, accounts for the observed LR output differences.</p><p>We tested STRmix on the STR data at different thresholds, ranging from 0 rfu to 90 rfu, in 10 rfu increments. The weakest STRmix subsource LR value in our sensitivity study was 1 over 3.35 (using 11 peaks at a high 90 rfu threshold), while the strongest LR was 1 over 30.5 million (38 peaks at a low 20 rfu threshold). Less STRmix input data gave less output identification information; more data yielded more information.</p><p>At ","PeriodicalId":15743,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic sciences","volume":"69 4","pages":"1516-1518"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1556-4029.15518","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140657926","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>Editor,</p><p>The article I published in February 2023 discussed a case in which two probabilistic genotyping (PG) programs were used to analyze the same DNA mixture using the same data file [<span>1</span>]. The mixture was found on a plastic bag containing illegal drugs. Whether the defendant was a contributor to this DNA mixture became an issue in the case.</p><p>Answering this question posed a technical challenge because there were at least two contributors and the total quantity of DNA in the mixture was only 92 pg. The major contributor was female, which ruled out the male defendant, so the key question is whether the defendant could have been a minor contributor. The amount of DNA from the minor contributor (or contributors) was very low. An analysis of peak heights suggested at least a 4:1 ratio between the major and minor contributor(s). The quantity of male DNA in the mixture was estimated to be only 6.9 pg.</p><p>Two different PG programs, STRmix™ and TrueAllele® (TA), were used to compare the defendant's DNA profile to the mixture. Both programs produced exculpatory findings supporting the hypothesis that the defendant was not a contributor, although the strength of support differed dramatically: TA produced likelihood ratios (LRs) as high as 16.7 million, whereas STRMix produced LRs ranging from 24 to 5 [<span>1</span>]. My article discussed differences between the programs that might explain the different LRs and questioned whether any such findings are sufficiently trustworthy and reliable to be used in court. It also questioned the way these findings were reported.</p><p>Individuals associated with both STRMix [<span>2</span>] and TA [<span>3</span>] have now responded to my article. They presented new data that helped explain why the LRs produced by the programs were so different. The difference arose largely from the use of different analytic thresholds: TA took account of many low-level (<40 rfu) peaks that were ignored by STRMix. I commend both groups for doing empirical studies to help explain why the two programs produced such different findings.</p><p>It is still unclear, however, which of the reported findings is more trustworthy, or indeed whether either should be trusted. While it is now clear that the LRs produced by STRMix were less extreme because the analyst applied an analytic threshold, those who responded to my article appear to disagree about whether such a threshold is necessary or helpful. The group led by John Buckleton, one of the creators of STRMix, expressed concern about reliance on low-level peaks: “Most of us are wary of very low peak heights. This feeling of discomfort is developed from a large body of experience noting the pernicious effects of artifacts that pass the analysis stage” [<span>2</span>]. Whether a lower threshold increases or decreases accuracy can only be determined, they argue, by testing the accuracy of the PG program across a range of ATs with known samples of the type in questi
{"title":"Author's response","authors":"William C. Thompson JD, PhD","doi":"10.1111/1556-4029.15519","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1556-4029.15519","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Editor,</p><p>The article I published in February 2023 discussed a case in which two probabilistic genotyping (PG) programs were used to analyze the same DNA mixture using the same data file [<span>1</span>]. The mixture was found on a plastic bag containing illegal drugs. Whether the defendant was a contributor to this DNA mixture became an issue in the case.</p><p>Answering this question posed a technical challenge because there were at least two contributors and the total quantity of DNA in the mixture was only 92 pg. The major contributor was female, which ruled out the male defendant, so the key question is whether the defendant could have been a minor contributor. The amount of DNA from the minor contributor (or contributors) was very low. An analysis of peak heights suggested at least a 4:1 ratio between the major and minor contributor(s). The quantity of male DNA in the mixture was estimated to be only 6.9 pg.</p><p>Two different PG programs, STRmix™ and TrueAllele® (TA), were used to compare the defendant's DNA profile to the mixture. Both programs produced exculpatory findings supporting the hypothesis that the defendant was not a contributor, although the strength of support differed dramatically: TA produced likelihood ratios (LRs) as high as 16.7 million, whereas STRMix produced LRs ranging from 24 to 5 [<span>1</span>]. My article discussed differences between the programs that might explain the different LRs and questioned whether any such findings are sufficiently trustworthy and reliable to be used in court. It also questioned the way these findings were reported.</p><p>Individuals associated with both STRMix [<span>2</span>] and TA [<span>3</span>] have now responded to my article. They presented new data that helped explain why the LRs produced by the programs were so different. The difference arose largely from the use of different analytic thresholds: TA took account of many low-level (<40 rfu) peaks that were ignored by STRMix. I commend both groups for doing empirical studies to help explain why the two programs produced such different findings.</p><p>It is still unclear, however, which of the reported findings is more trustworthy, or indeed whether either should be trusted. While it is now clear that the LRs produced by STRMix were less extreme because the analyst applied an analytic threshold, those who responded to my article appear to disagree about whether such a threshold is necessary or helpful. The group led by John Buckleton, one of the creators of STRMix, expressed concern about reliance on low-level peaks: “Most of us are wary of very low peak heights. This feeling of discomfort is developed from a large body of experience noting the pernicious effects of artifacts that pass the analysis stage” [<span>2</span>]. Whether a lower threshold increases or decreases accuracy can only be determined, they argue, by testing the accuracy of the PG program across a range of ATs with known samples of the type in questi","PeriodicalId":15743,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic sciences","volume":"69 4","pages":"1519-1522"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1556-4029.15519","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140800534","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}