After reading with careful attention the recently published article entitled “Do Microplastics Contribute to the Total Number Concentration of Ice Nucleating Particles?” (Tatsii et al., 2025, https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jd042827), improper assumptions were noticed. Whereas the simulation methodology is not questioned, the input data is simply wrong: emissions of tyre wear and brake wear particles were taken together with polymer contents in road markings (RM) and in polymer-modified bitumen. The polymer contents in organic-inorganic mixtures do not imply their emissions as microplastic. These are two different parameters that cannot be used interchangeably. In this commentary plentiful references from field and laboratory studies are provided that demonstrate significant overestimate of the total emissions and the relative contributions.
在仔细阅读了最近发表的题为“微塑料对冰核粒子的总数量浓度有贡献吗?”(Tatsii et al., 2025, https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jd042827),注意到不适当的假设。虽然模拟方法没有受到质疑,但输入的数据完全是错误的:轮胎磨损和刹车磨损颗粒的排放与道路标线(RM)和聚合物改性沥青中的聚合物含量一起。有机-无机混合物中的聚合物含量并不意味着它们的排放是微塑料。这是两个不同的参数,不能互换使用。在这篇评论中,提供了大量来自实地和实验室研究的参考资料,证明了对总排放量和相对贡献的严重高估。
{"title":"Microplastic Emissions and Polymer Contents Are Not the Same: Regarding a Confusion in Tatsii et al. “Do Microplastics Contribute to the Total Number Concentration of Ice Nucleating Particles?”","authors":"Tomasz E. Burghardt","doi":"10.1029/2025JD043777","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2025JD043777","url":null,"abstract":"<p>After reading with careful attention the recently published article entitled “Do Microplastics Contribute to the Total Number Concentration of Ice Nucleating Particles?” (Tatsii et al., 2025, https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jd042827), improper assumptions were noticed. Whereas the simulation methodology is not questioned, the input data is simply wrong: <i>emissions</i> of tyre wear and brake wear particles were taken together with <i>polymer contents</i> in road markings (RM) and in polymer-modified bitumen. The <i>polymer contents</i> in organic-inorganic mixtures do not imply their <i>emissions</i> as microplastic. These are two different parameters that cannot be used interchangeably. In this commentary plentiful references from field and laboratory studies are provided that demonstrate significant overestimate of the total emissions and the relative contributions.</p>","PeriodicalId":15986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","volume":"130 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145846004","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Daria Tatsii, Blaž Gasparini, Ioanna Evangelou, Silvia Bucci, Andreas Stohl
This reply addresses the comment by T. Burghardt, ‘Microplastic emissions and polymer contents are not the same: regarding a confusion in Tatsii et al. “Do Microplastics Contribute to the Total Number Concentration of Ice Nucleating Particles?’”, on the paper by Tatsii et al. (2025), https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jd042827. The original study quantified road traffic-related microplastic number concentrations and estimated their contribution to total ice nucleating particle concentrations using an atmospheric transport model. In this reply, we clarify raised concerns related to the estimation of microplastic emissions from road markings and polymer-modified bitumen. We further elaborate on the methodology and objectives of our study to resolve the identified misunderstanding. The main conclusion is that applying the emission constraints for road markings and polymer-modified bitumen proposed by T. Burghardt, values that are one order of magnitude lower than those used in the original study, has a negligible impact on the reported results, as these sources represent a relatively small fraction of the total emissions.
{"title":"Reply to the Comment by T. Burghardt ‘Microplastic Emissions and Polymer Contents Are Not the Same: Regarding a Confusion in Tatsii et al. “Do Microplastics Contribute to the Total Number Concentration of Ice Nucleating Particles?”’","authors":"Daria Tatsii, Blaž Gasparini, Ioanna Evangelou, Silvia Bucci, Andreas Stohl","doi":"10.1029/2025JD045416","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2025JD045416","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This reply addresses the comment by T. Burghardt, ‘Microplastic emissions and polymer contents are not the same: regarding a confusion in Tatsii et al. “Do Microplastics Contribute to the Total Number Concentration of Ice Nucleating Particles?’”, on the paper by Tatsii et al. (2025), https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jd042827. The original study quantified road traffic-related microplastic number concentrations and estimated their contribution to total ice nucleating particle concentrations using an atmospheric transport model. In this reply, we clarify raised concerns related to the estimation of microplastic emissions from road markings and polymer-modified bitumen. We further elaborate on the methodology and objectives of our study to resolve the identified misunderstanding. The main conclusion is that applying the emission constraints for road markings and polymer-modified bitumen proposed by T. Burghardt, values that are one order of magnitude lower than those used in the original study, has a negligible impact on the reported results, as these sources represent a relatively small fraction of the total emissions.</p>","PeriodicalId":15986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","volume":"130 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145824738","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
L. Keith Fifield, David M. Etheridge, Mariana L. di Tada, Kexin Liu, Richard G. Cresswell, Melita D. Keywood
The radioisotope 36Cl was produced prolifically by nuclear weapons testing, principally at Bikini and Enewetak Atolls in the 1950s. Much of this was injected into the stratosphere, from where it was dispersed worldwide. The fallout of this bomb-produced 36Cl has been measured as a function of time in an ice core from a high-accumulation site in Antarctica. These measurements complement an earlier study in an Arctic ice core. A box model has been developed to describe simultaneously the data from both the two sites. Using an up-to-date catalog, the 36Cl production of the individual tests has been estimated and used as input to the box model. Production is dominated by high-yield thermonuclear tests carried out on barges moored in the lagoons of the atolls in the 1950s. Exchange times of 3.7 years for gaseous exchange between stratosphere and troposphere and 4.2 years for gaseous exchange between the stratospheres of the two hemispheres are deduced. The 36Cl bomb pulse constitutes a global tracer with an input function that is well-defined in space and time, and its exchange between stratosphere and troposphere is dominated by one-way transport due to its rapid removal once in the troposphere. This latter behavior greatly simplifies the interpretation of the data in terms of an exchange time relative to the 14C bomb pulse. The stratosphere-troposphere exchange time derived here from the bomb-produced 36Cl offers an independent constraint on the flux of ozone between stratosphere and troposphere which agrees well with other more direct estimates.
{"title":"The 36Cl Bomb-Pulse in Ice at a High-Accumulation Site in Antarctica","authors":"L. Keith Fifield, David M. Etheridge, Mariana L. di Tada, Kexin Liu, Richard G. Cresswell, Melita D. Keywood","doi":"10.1029/2025JD044388","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2025JD044388","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The radioisotope <sup>36</sup>Cl was produced prolifically by nuclear weapons testing, principally at Bikini and Enewetak Atolls in the 1950s. Much of this was injected into the stratosphere, from where it was dispersed worldwide. The fallout of this bomb-produced <sup>36</sup>Cl has been measured as a function of time in an ice core from a high-accumulation site in Antarctica. These measurements complement an earlier study in an Arctic ice core. A box model has been developed to describe simultaneously the data from both the two sites. Using an up-to-date catalog, the <sup>36</sup>Cl production of the individual tests has been estimated and used as input to the box model. Production is dominated by high-yield thermonuclear tests carried out on barges moored in the lagoons of the atolls in the 1950s. Exchange times of 3.7 years for gaseous exchange between stratosphere and troposphere and 4.2 years for gaseous exchange between the stratospheres of the two hemispheres are deduced. The <sup>36</sup>Cl bomb pulse constitutes a global tracer with an input function that is well-defined in space and time, and its exchange between stratosphere and troposphere is dominated by one-way transport due to its rapid removal once in the troposphere. This latter behavior greatly simplifies the interpretation of the data in terms of an exchange time relative to the <sup>14</sup>C bomb pulse. The stratosphere-troposphere exchange time derived here from the bomb-produced <sup>36</sup>Cl offers an independent constraint on the flux of ozone between stratosphere and troposphere which agrees well with other more direct estimates.</p>","PeriodicalId":15986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","volume":"130 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145824700","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Umar Farooq, Heping Liu, Qianyu Zhang, Muhammad Muzammil, Jingfeng Wang, Lian Shen
Lakes are a critical component of the terrestrial hydrological cycle, yet their sensitivity to future climate warming—especially in terms of evaporation (