Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy最新文献

Background: In Japan, the supply of one generic meropenem product was restricted from August 2022 to March 2023.

Objective: To determine the effects of meropenem (MEPM) restriction.

Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study comparing antimicrobial use, bacteremia mortality, and drug-resistant bacteria detected before the restriction of MEPM (control period), from September 2021 to February 2022, and after the restriction of MEPM (MEPM supply restriction period), from September 2022 to February 2023, in five institutions.

Results: The number of carbapenem days of therapy (DOTs) were decreased in all five institutions. Fourth-generation cephalosporin DOTs increased in all facilities, and piperacillin/tazobactam DOTs increased in four facilities. The 30-day and 90-day mortality rates were significantly higher during the MEPM supply restriction period than those during the control period. Moreover, survival time was significantly shorter during the MEPM supply restriction period than that during the control period. Multivariable analysis revealed that MEPM supply restriction, age >80 years, Pitt Bacteremia Score ≥4, platelet count <10 × 10⁴/μL, serum albumin level <2.5 g/dL, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection were independent risk factors for 30-day mortality. The detection rates of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae did not differ significantly between the two periods.

Conclusions: MEPM supply restriction decreased the use of carbapenems and increased the use of other broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents, which worsened the prognosis of bacteremia. Overall, carbapenems are important drugs for the treatment of infectious diseases and are difficult to replace in unforeseen situations such as drug supply outages.

Background: Bone and joint infections are challenging infectious diseases to treat and require prolonged antimicrobial treatment. Dalbavancin demonstrated promising pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties for the treatment of these infections. The objective of this meta-analysis is to compare the effectiveness of dalbavancin to standard of care (SOC) for the treatment of bone and joint infections.

Methods: Two independent authors performed a comprehensive search through the major databases up to September 2023. Interventional and observational studies that compared the clinical success of dalbavancin to SOC for the treatment of osteoarticular infections (OAI) were included.

Results: A total of 6 studies and 581 patients were included, 282 in dalbavancin group and 299 in SOC group. Only one study was randomized clinical trial. When the data from the 6 studies were pooled in a meta-analysis, clinical success did not differ in those who received dalbavancin versus SOC (OR = 1.55, 95 % CI = 0.95-2.55, I-squared = 15.89 %) for the treatment of OAI infections. Four studies compared the two groups in terms of hospital length of stay and demonstrated a significant shorter length of stay in dalbavancin group compared to SOC group. Treatment-emergent adverse effects were reported in up to 21.4 % of patients in the dalbavancin group and up to 36.7 % of patients in the SOC group.

Conclusion: This meta-analysis showed that dalbavancin is as effective as SOC for the treatment of patients with OAI infections. More data are needed to validate these findings.

Background: Low vaccination coverage among travelers poses a critical challenge to global health security. Indeed, public concerns regarding vaccines can lead to vaccine reluctance and refusal, but evidence about the impacts of concerns regarding vaccines on the uptake of travel vaccinations remains sparse. We examined the associations between concerns about vaccines and vaccination behavior among travelers.

Methods: Japanese travelers aged 18 years or older, who stayed at a guesthouse in New Delhi, India, were targeted (n = 153). We conducted cross-sectional surveys from August 23 to September 2, 2019, and from February 19 to March 5, 2020. We examined the associations of three concerns regarding vaccines (5-point scale)-serious side effects from vaccines, vaccine safety, and vaccine effectiveness-with the uptake of travel vaccinations.

Results: In total, 60 participants (39.2 %) had been vaccinated for this or a past trip. After adjusting for all potential confounding variables, concerns about serious side effects from vaccines and vaccine safety were negatively associated with the uptake of travel vaccinations. The ORs (95 % CIs) for 1-point increases in concerns about serious side effects from vaccines and vaccine safety were 0.72 (0.52, 0.99) and 0.71 (0.52, 0.96), respectively. Sensitivity analyses did not change the results substantially.

Conclusions: Concerns about vaccine safety issues were negatively associated with the uptake of travel vaccinations among the participants, with no corresponding association observed for vaccine effectiveness. Addressing concerns about vaccine safety issues, rather than vaccine effectiveness may contribute to an increased uptake of travel vaccinations.

Introduction: We developed an antimicrobial and patient background surveillance system (APBSS), an automated surveillance system that can calculate surveillance data such as antimicrobial use and detection of antimicrobial resistance for each indication of antimicrobial administration. We evaluated the validity of the APBSS data.

Methods: Eligible patients were hospitalized at the Toyota Kosei Hospital on July 7, 2022. Evaluated surveillance data included antimicrobial administration, indications for antimicrobial administration, and diagnosis. In the APBSS, surveillance data were calculated using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination data and Japan Nosocomial Infections Surveillance laboratory data. Using surveillance data collected by the Point Prevalence Survey (PPS) as a reference standard, the agreement between the results calculated based on the APBSS was evaluated using Cohen's kappa coefficient. Indications for antimicrobial administration and diagnosis were analyzed in patients identified for antimicrobial administration in PPS or APBSS.

Results: A total of 582 patients were included in this study, 223 of whom were evaluated for indications for antimicrobial administration and diagnosis. For the indications of antimicrobial administration, the Cohen's kappa coefficient was almost perfect (0.81-1.00) for all items. Cohen's kappa coefficient for the diagnosis of healthcare-associated infections was low. However, in major diseases (pneumonia and intra-abdominal, and symptomatic upper urinary tract infections) among community-acquired infections (CAIs) diagnosis, Cohen's kappa coefficient was substantial (0.61-0.80).

Conclusions: The APBSS can identify indications for antimicrobial administration and major CAIs with high accuracy. Therefore, the APBSS can calculate surveillance data, such as antimicrobial use and detection of antimicrobial resistance, for each of these items.

A 19-year-old young man presented with prodromal symptoms including fever and sore throat, followed by the development of scattered rashes in the perianal and penile regions. Monkeypox (MPX) was confirmed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of lesions. On the third day after complete resolution of the initial rash, the patient developed a new rash, which was diagnosed as secondary herpes zoster (HZ). Therefore, clinicians should not only focus on the accurate diagnosis of monkeypox, but also be alert to secondary herpes zoster.

Introduction: Disseminated herpes zoster (DHZ) is a severe infection associated with high incidences and mortality rates in immunocompromised patients. Although studies have shown its occurrence in immunocompetent patients, its epidemiology, clinical presentation, and treatment outcomes in this cohort remain unknown. Thus, this study aimed to examine the clinical presentation, treatment, complications, and outcomes of DHZ in immunocompetent patients and compare these findings with previous studies.

Methods: We included 20 immunocompetent patients of DHZ at our institution and reviewed 42 previously published cases. We then investigated the clinical features, predisposing factors, laboratory findings, treatment, and outcomes of all cases including in-hospital mortality, neurological dysfunction at discharge, and postherpetic neuralgia. We compared DHZ-immunocompetent patients to DHZ-immunocompromised patients.

Results: Patients had a median age of 71.5 years and were predominantly male. The trigeminal area was the most common site of initial rash, with a mean dissemination time of 6.5 days. Pain was the most common symptom, followed by fever (approximately 40 % of cases); acyclovir was the most used treatment. Additionally, the in-hospital mortality was 0 %, neuropathy at discharge was observed in approximately 10 % of patients, and postherpetic neuralgia was present in approximately 40 % of patients. In the immunocompromised cases, the mortality rate was 12 %, which was higher than in our cases; however, the rates of neuropathy and postherpetic neuralgia were lower.

Conclusions: This study provides new insights into the clinical presentation, treatment, and outcomes of DHZ cases in immunocompetent patients, highlighting its tendency for residual neurological damage despite having low mortality rates.

Objective: Tixagevimab/cilgavimab is a cocktail of two long-acting monoclonal antibodies approved for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection (cause of coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19]) in immunocompromised (IC) or high-risk patients. We investigated the patient characteristics and clinical outcomes of IC patients administered tixagevimab/cilgavimab for PrEP in real-world use in Japan.

Methods: This observational study used anonymous secondary data from Real-World Data Co., Ltd. for IC patients aged ≥12 years administered tixagevimab/cilgavimab between September 2022 and September 2023. We analyzed the baseline characteristics and event-rates of COVID-19-related clinical outcomes within 6 months of administration.

Results: Data were analyzed for 397 IC patients. About half (53.4 %) were male and the median age was 71.0 (interquartile range 61.0, 77.0) years. Malignancy (97.2 %), cardiovascular disease (71.3 %), and diabetes (66.5 %) were frequent comorbidities. Systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressants were prescribed to 87.4 % and 24.9 %, respectively. The two most common target clinical conditions were active therapy for hematologic malignancies (88.2 %) and treatment with B cell-depleting therapies (57.4 %). The event-rates per 100 person-months (95 % confidence interval; number) for medically attended COVID-19, COVID-19 hospitalization, in-hospital mortality due to COVID-19, and all-cause death were 4.14 (3.06-5.48; n = 49), 1.74 (1.09-2.64; n = 22), 0.07 (0.00-0.42; n = 1), and 0.60 (0.26-1.17; n = 8), respectively.

Conclusion: This is the first report using a multicenter database to describe the clinical characteristics and COVID-19-related outcomes of IC patients administered with tixagevimab/cilgavimab in real-world settings in Japan. This cohort of IC patients who received tixagevimab/cilgavimab included many elderly patients with comorbidities.