首页 > 最新文献

Journal of interventional cardiology最新文献

英文 中文
Peripheral Artery Disease Intervention: Drug-Coated Balloon vs Drug-Eluting Stent, A Long-Term Comparison 外周动脉疾病干预:药物涂层球囊与药物洗脱支架的长期比较。
IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2022-08-27 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5175607
Nathan Marzlin, M. Fuad Jan, Louie Kostopoulos, Ana Cristina Perez Moreno, Tanvir Bajwa, Suhail Q. Allaqaband

Objectives. The aim of the study is to evaluate current trends and long-term durability of both drug-eluting stents (DES) and drug-coated balloons (DCB) in the treatment of peripheral artery disease (PAD). Background. PAD affects more than 200 million people worldwide. Endovascular treatment of critical PAD has advanced in recent years. DES and DCB have demonstrated superiority compared to balloon angioplasty or bare metal stenting. The current literature lacks any long-term, direct comparison. Methods. A retrospective analysis was completed on patients who had femoral-popliteal interventions from June 2014 to June 2018 with either DCB or DES. Patient medical data and lesion characteristics were retrieved using the Vascular Quality Initiative database. Outcomes were analyzed through December 2019. Primary endpoint of time to clinical event-driven target lesion reintervention (TLR) and secondary endpoint of all-cause mortality were examined. Results. Four hundred eighty-three patients with a total of 563 interventions met the inclusion criteria. Three hundred fifty-nine DCB and 204 DES were performed. Of the DCBs, 132 required bailout stenting at the time of procedure. The mean time for TLR in the DES group was 1,277 days (SD 546), compared to 904 days (SD 330.1) for DCB. For patients requiring TLR, DES remained patent significantly longer (373 days longer on average) (p < 0.001). For all-cause mortality there was no significant difference at 50 months between DCB and DES (p = 0.06). Conclusions. In patients who required TLR, DES had a significantly longer length of time to reintervention vs DCB (average 373 days), although no difference in mortality was observed.

研究目的本研究旨在评估药物洗脱支架(DES)和药物涂层球囊(DCB)在治疗外周动脉疾病(PAD)方面的当前趋势和长期耐久性:背景:全世界有超过 2 亿人患有 PAD。背景:PAD 影响着全球 2 亿人。近年来,危重 PAD 的血管内治疗取得了进展。与球囊血管成形术或裸金属支架相比,DES 和 DCB 已显示出优越性。目前的文献缺乏长期、直接的比较:对2014年6月至2018年6月期间使用DCB或DES进行股腘动脉介入治疗的患者进行了回顾性分析。使用血管质量倡议数据库检索了患者的医疗数据和病变特征。结果分析截至 2019 年 12 月。研究的主要终点是临床事件驱动的靶病变再介入(TLR)时间,次要终点是全因死亡率:共有 483 名患者接受了 563 次介入治疗,符合纳入标准。共实施了 359 例 DCB 和 204 例 DES。在DCB中,有132例患者在手术时需要保外支架。DES组的TLR平均时间为1277天(SD 546),而DCB组为904天(SD 330.1)。对于需要TLR的患者,DES保持专利的时间明显更长(平均长373天)(p < 0.001)。在50个月的全因死亡率方面,DCB和DES没有明显差异(p = 0.06):结论:在需要TLR的患者中,DES与DCB的再介入时间明显更长(平均373天),但死亡率无差异。
{"title":"Peripheral Artery Disease Intervention: Drug-Coated Balloon vs Drug-Eluting Stent, A Long-Term Comparison","authors":"Nathan Marzlin,&nbsp;M. Fuad Jan,&nbsp;Louie Kostopoulos,&nbsp;Ana Cristina Perez Moreno,&nbsp;Tanvir Bajwa,&nbsp;Suhail Q. Allaqaband","doi":"10.1155/2022/5175607","DOIUrl":"10.1155/2022/5175607","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 <p><i>Objectives</i>. The aim of the study is to evaluate current trends and long-term durability of both drug-eluting stents (DES) and drug-coated balloons (DCB) in the treatment of peripheral artery disease (PAD). <i>Background</i>. PAD affects more than 200 million people worldwide. Endovascular treatment of critical PAD has advanced in recent years. DES and DCB have demonstrated superiority compared to balloon angioplasty or bare metal stenting. The current literature lacks any long-term, direct comparison. <i>Methods</i>. A retrospective analysis was completed on patients who had femoral-popliteal interventions from June 2014 to June 2018 with either DCB or DES. Patient medical data and lesion characteristics were retrieved using the Vascular Quality Initiative database. Outcomes were analyzed through December 2019. Primary endpoint of time to clinical event-driven target lesion reintervention (TLR) and secondary endpoint of all-cause mortality were examined. <i>Results</i>. Four hundred eighty-three patients with a total of 563 interventions met the inclusion criteria. Three hundred fifty-nine DCB and 204 DES were performed. Of the DCBs, 132 required bailout stenting at the time of procedure. The mean time for TLR in the DES group was 1,277 days (SD 546), compared to 904 days (SD 330.1) for DCB. For patients requiring TLR, DES remained patent significantly longer (373 days longer on average) (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). For all-cause mortality there was no significant difference at 50 months between DCB and DES (<i>p</i> = 0.06). <i>Conclusions</i>. In patients who required TLR, DES had a significantly longer length of time to reintervention vs DCB (average 373 days), although no difference in mortality was observed.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":16329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiology","volume":"2022 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2022-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9440843/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40356316","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficacy and Safety of Coronary Intervention via Distal Transradial Access (dTRA) in Patients with Low Body Mass Index 低体重指数患者经桡动脉远端介入治疗(dTRA)的疗效和安全性。
IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2022-08-24 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1901139
La-Mei Li, Liu-Yan Zhang, Hao-Min Huang, Tao Chen, Feng Li, Gan-Wei Shi, Wen-Hua Li, Jian-Qiang Xiao, Chun Gong, She-Liang Xue, Bo Xu, Jun Gu, Yan-Bin Song, Dan-Dan Shen, Rong-Rong Ji, Gao-Jun Cai

The study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of coronary intervention via distal transradial access (dTRA) in patients with low body mass index (BMI). A total of 67 patients with low BMI who underwent coronary intervention, comprising 29 patients via dTRA and 38 patients via conventional transradial access (cTRA), were retrospectively included. There was no significant difference in the puncture success rate between the two groups (dTRA 96.6%, cTRA 97.4%, P = 0.846). Compared with the cTRA group, the success rate of one-needle puncture in the dTRA group was lower (51.7% vs. 81.6%, P = 0.020). The compression haemostasis time in the dTRA group was shorter than that in the cTRA group (P  <  0.001). However, the incidence of radial artery occlusion was lower in the dTRA group than in the cTRA group (4.0% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.007). In conclusion, coronary intervention via dTRA was safe and effective in patients with low BMI.

本研究旨在探讨低体重指数(BMI)患者经桡动脉远端介入治疗(dTRA)的有效性和安全性。回顾性分析了67例接受冠状动脉介入治疗的低BMI患者,其中29例经dTRA治疗,38例经常规经桡动脉介入治疗。两组穿刺成功率比较差异无统计学意义(dTRA 96.6%, cTRA 97.4%, P=0.846)。与cTRA组相比,dTRA组单针穿刺成功率较低(51.7%比81.6%,P=0.020)。dTRA组压缩止血时间明显短于cTRA组(P < 0.001)。然而,dTRA组桡动脉闭塞发生率低于cTRA组(4.0% vs. 33.3%, P=0.007)。结论:低BMI患者行dTRA冠脉介入治疗是安全有效的。
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Coronary Intervention via Distal Transradial Access (dTRA) in Patients with Low Body Mass Index","authors":"La-Mei Li,&nbsp;Liu-Yan Zhang,&nbsp;Hao-Min Huang,&nbsp;Tao Chen,&nbsp;Feng Li,&nbsp;Gan-Wei Shi,&nbsp;Wen-Hua Li,&nbsp;Jian-Qiang Xiao,&nbsp;Chun Gong,&nbsp;She-Liang Xue,&nbsp;Bo Xu,&nbsp;Jun Gu,&nbsp;Yan-Bin Song,&nbsp;Dan-Dan Shen,&nbsp;Rong-Rong Ji,&nbsp;Gao-Jun Cai","doi":"10.1155/2022/1901139","DOIUrl":"10.1155/2022/1901139","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 <p>The study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of coronary intervention via distal transradial access (dTRA) in patients with low body mass index (BMI). A total of 67 patients with low BMI who underwent coronary intervention, comprising 29 patients via dTRA and 38 patients via conventional transradial access (cTRA), were retrospectively included. There was no significant difference in the puncture success rate between the two groups (dTRA 96.6%, cTRA 97.4%, <i>P</i> = 0.846). Compared with the cTRA group, the success rate of one-needle puncture in the dTRA group was lower (51.7% vs. 81.6%, <i>P</i> = 0.020). The compression haemostasis time in the dTRA group was shorter than that in the cTRA group (<i>P</i>  &lt;  0.001). However, the incidence of radial artery occlusion was lower in the dTRA group than in the cTRA group (4.0% <i>vs</i>. 33.3%, <i>P</i> = 0.007). In conclusion, coronary intervention via dTRA was safe and effective in patients with low BMI.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":16329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiology","volume":"2022 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2022-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9433246/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33455497","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of Early Efficacy of the Percutaneous Presuture Technique with the Femoral Artery Incision Technique in Endovascular Aortic Repair under Local Anesthesia for Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection 经皮预缝合技术与股动脉切开技术在局麻下血管内修复无并发症B型主动脉夹层的早期疗效比较。
IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2022-08-22 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6550759
Qingsong Wu, Debin Jiang, Xiaochai Lv, Jiaxin Zhang, Rongda Huang, Zhihuang Qiu, Liangwan Chen

Objective. To compare the efficacy of the percutaneous presuture technique (PPST) and the femoral artery incision technique (FAIT) under local anesthesia in the treatment of endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) for patients with uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (uTBAD). Method. Two hundred and ninety-five patients diagnosed with uTBAD who underwent EVAR under local anesthesia from June 2017 to December 2021 were consecutively and randomly selected for retrospective analysis. The PPST was performed in 178 cases and the FAIT was performed in 117 cases. The clinical characteristics and surgical and postoperative data from the two groups were analyzed. Results. There were no significant differences in clinical characteristics between the two groups (p > 0.05). The operative time of the PPST group was significantly shorter than that of the FAIT group (46 (33, 58) versus 72 (67.5, 78.0) minutes, p < 0.001), as was the operative approach procedure time (6 (4.5, 9.0) versus 38 (36.5, 43.5) minutes, p < 0.001), and length of postoperative hospital stay (5.19 ± 2.26 versus 8.33 ± 3.76 days, p < 0.001). There were fewer postoperative approach-related procedural complications in the PPST group than in the FAIT group (2 versus 12, p < 0.001); similarly, the average frequency of postoperative wound disinfection was significantly lower in the PPST group (1.08 ± 0.39 versus 3.31 ± 0.91 times, p < 0.05). Obesity was identified as an independent risk factor for postoperative approach-related procedural complications (OR, 22.26; 95% CI, 4.74–104.49; p < 0.001). Conclusions. The PPST has comparable safety and efficacy to the FAIT in EVAR under local anesthesia. It can shorten the length of hospital stay, reduce operation time, lower the risk of wound-related complications, reduce the frequency of postoperative wound disinfection, and hasten postoperative recovery. It can therefore be used as a first-line surgical technique in EVAR of uTBAD under local anesthesia, especially in obese patients.

目的:比较局麻下经皮预缝合技术(PPST)与股动脉切开技术(FAIT)在无并发症B型主动脉夹层(uTBAD)患者血管内主动脉修复(EVAR)中的应用效果。方法:选取2017年6月至2021年12月确诊为uTBAD的295例局部麻醉下行EVAR的患者,连续随机抽取进行回顾性分析。其中PPST 178例,FAIT 117例。分析两组患者的临床特点及手术及术后资料。结果:两组患者临床特征比较,差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。PPST组的手术时间明显短于FAIT组(46 (33,58)vs 72 (67.5, 78.0) min, p < 0.001),手术入路时间(6 (4.5,9.0)vs 38 (36.5, 43.5) min, p < 0.001),术后住院时间(5.19±2.26 vs 8.33±3.76 d, p < 0.001)。与FAIT组相比,PPST组术后入路相关的手术并发症较少(2例对12例,p < 0.001);同样,PPST组术后伤口消毒平均次数(1.08±0.39次)明显低于对照组(3.31±0.91次),p < 0.05。肥胖被认为是术后入路相关手术并发症的独立危险因素(OR, 22.26;95% ci, 4.74-104.49;P < 0.001)。结论:PPST与FAIT在局麻下EVAR的安全性和有效性相当。缩短住院时间,减少手术时间,降低创面相关并发症的发生风险,减少术后创面消毒次数,加快术后恢复。因此,它可以作为局部麻醉下uTBAD EVAR的一线手术技术,特别是肥胖患者。
{"title":"Comparison of Early Efficacy of the Percutaneous Presuture Technique with the Femoral Artery Incision Technique in Endovascular Aortic Repair under Local Anesthesia for Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection","authors":"Qingsong Wu,&nbsp;Debin Jiang,&nbsp;Xiaochai Lv,&nbsp;Jiaxin Zhang,&nbsp;Rongda Huang,&nbsp;Zhihuang Qiu,&nbsp;Liangwan Chen","doi":"10.1155/2022/6550759","DOIUrl":"10.1155/2022/6550759","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 <p><i>Objective</i>. To compare the efficacy of the percutaneous presuture technique (PPST) and the femoral artery incision technique (FAIT) under local anesthesia in the treatment of endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) for patients with uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (uTBAD). <i>Method</i>. Two hundred and ninety-five patients diagnosed with uTBAD who underwent EVAR under local anesthesia from June 2017 to December 2021 were consecutively and randomly selected for retrospective analysis. The PPST was performed in 178 cases and the FAIT was performed in 117 cases. The clinical characteristics and surgical and postoperative data from the two groups were analyzed. <i>Results</i>. There were no significant differences in clinical characteristics between the two groups (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). The operative time of the PPST group was significantly shorter than that of the FAIT group (46 (33, 58) versus 72 (67.5, 78.0) minutes, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), as was the operative approach procedure time (6 (4.5, 9.0) versus 38 (36.5, 43.5) minutes, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and length of postoperative hospital stay (5.19 ± 2.26 versus 8.33 ± 3.76 days, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). There were fewer postoperative approach-related procedural complications in the PPST group than in the FAIT group (2 versus 12, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001); similarly, the average frequency of postoperative wound disinfection was significantly lower in the PPST group (1.08 ± 0.39 versus 3.31 ± 0.91 times, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Obesity was identified as an independent risk factor for postoperative approach-related procedural complications (OR, 22.26; 95% CI, 4.74–104.49; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). <i>Conclusions</i>. The PPST has comparable safety and efficacy to the FAIT in EVAR under local anesthesia. It can shorten the length of hospital stay, reduce operation time, lower the risk of wound-related complications, reduce the frequency of postoperative wound disinfection, and hasten postoperative recovery. It can therefore be used as a first-line surgical technique in EVAR of uTBAD under local anesthesia, especially in obese patients.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":16329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiology","volume":"2022 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2022-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9424020/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40342207","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
CT-IGFBP-4 as a Predictive Novel Biomarker of Ischemic Cardiovascular Events and Mortality: A Systematic Review CT-IGFBP-4作为预测缺血性心血管事件和死亡率的新型生物标志物:系统综述
IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2022-08-21 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1816504
Abhinav Bhattarai, Pritam Singh Sunar, Sangam Shah, Rajan Chamlagain, Nishan Babu Pokhrel, Pitambar Khanal, Sanjit Kumar Sah, Sujan Poudel, Kapil Belbase, Swati Chand, Rajaram Khanal, Anil Bhattarai

Background and objective. Numerous novel biomarkers have been proposed for the early diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases. Measurement of the carboxyl-terminal (CT) fragment of IGFBP-4, the CT-IGFBP-4, has shown promising efficacy in cardiac risk assessment in various studies. We performed a systematic review of studies that accessed the utility and predictability of CT-IGFBP-4 in different ischemic cardiovascular events. Methods. The electronic databases PubMed, medRxiv, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar were searched for relevant literature from inception to the 10th of December, 2021. Thus, retrieved literature was screened by title and abstract, followed by full-text screening based on the eligibility criteria. The risk of bias was accessed using the quality in prognostic studies (QUIPSs) tool. The data on cardiovascular outcomes about CT-IGFBP-4 levels were studied and the results were synthesized. Results. Five studies with a total of 1,417 participants were included in our study. The studies reported a low risk of bias. The mean age of the participants was 66.14 and more than 65% were males. Elevated CT-IGFBP-4 levels were associated with poor cardiovascular outcomes and increased mortality in severely ill patients. In contrast, there were no significant findings in the case of stable patients. Sandwich ELISA using lithium-heparin plasma provided a better detection limit of 0.15 ng/ml, low cross-reactivity (<2%), and generated linear results between 12 and 500 ng/ml. Conclusion. CT-IGFBP-4 is an efficient biomarker for the prediction of MACE and mortality in patients with severe ischemic cardiovascular events.

方法:检索PubMed、medRxiv、ScienceDirect、Google Scholar等电子数据库,检索自成立至2021年12月10日的相关文献。因此,检索文献通过标题和摘要进行筛选,然后根据资格标准进行全文筛选。使用预后研究质量(quips)工具评估偏倚风险。研究CT-IGFBP-4水平对心血管结局的影响,并对结果进行综合分析。结果:本研究共纳入5项研究,共1417名受试者。这些研究报告偏倚风险较低。参与者的平均年龄为66.14岁,超过65%是男性。在重症患者中,升高的CT-IGFBP-4水平与心血管预后不良和死亡率增加相关。相比之下,在病情稳定的患者中没有明显的发现。采用锂-肝素血浆的夹心ELISA检测限为0.15 ng/ml,交叉反应性低(结论:CT-IGFBP-4是预测严重缺血性心血管事件患者MACE和死亡率的有效生物标志物。
{"title":"CT-IGFBP-4 as a Predictive Novel Biomarker of Ischemic Cardiovascular Events and Mortality: A Systematic Review","authors":"Abhinav Bhattarai,&nbsp;Pritam Singh Sunar,&nbsp;Sangam Shah,&nbsp;Rajan Chamlagain,&nbsp;Nishan Babu Pokhrel,&nbsp;Pitambar Khanal,&nbsp;Sanjit Kumar Sah,&nbsp;Sujan Poudel,&nbsp;Kapil Belbase,&nbsp;Swati Chand,&nbsp;Rajaram Khanal,&nbsp;Anil Bhattarai","doi":"10.1155/2022/1816504","DOIUrl":"10.1155/2022/1816504","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 <p><i>Background and objective</i>. Numerous novel biomarkers have been proposed for the early diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases. Measurement of the carboxyl-terminal (CT) fragment of IGFBP-4, the CT-IGFBP-4, has shown promising efficacy in cardiac risk assessment in various studies. We performed a systematic review of studies that accessed the utility and predictability of CT-IGFBP-4 in different ischemic cardiovascular events. <i>Methods</i>. The electronic databases PubMed, medRxiv, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar were searched for relevant literature from inception to the 10<sup>th</sup> of December, 2021. Thus, retrieved literature was screened by title and abstract, followed by full-text screening based on the eligibility criteria. The risk of bias was accessed using the quality in prognostic studies (QUIPSs) tool. The data on cardiovascular outcomes about CT-IGFBP-4 levels were studied and the results were synthesized. <i>Results</i>. Five studies with a total of 1,417 participants were included in our study. The studies reported a low risk of bias. The mean age of the participants was 66.14 and more than 65% were males. Elevated CT-IGFBP-4 levels were associated with poor cardiovascular outcomes and increased mortality in severely ill patients. In contrast, there were no significant findings in the case of stable patients. Sandwich ELISA using lithium-heparin plasma provided a better detection limit of 0.15 ng/ml, low cross-reactivity (&lt;2%), and generated linear results between 12 and 500 ng/ml. <i>Conclusion</i>. CT-IGFBP-4 is an efficient biomarker for the prediction of MACE and mortality in patients with severe ischemic cardiovascular events.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":16329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiology","volume":"2022 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2022-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9420648/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40340688","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of Effectiveness and Safety between High-Power Short-Duration Ablation and Conventional Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 高功率短时间消融术与常规消融术治疗心房颤动的有效性和安全性比较:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2022-08-16 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6013474
Shuyu Jin, Lu Fu, Junrong Jiang, Xingdong Ye, Huiyi Liu, Yanlin Chen, Sijia Pu, Shulin Wu, Yumei Xue

Aim. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety between high-power short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and conventional RFA in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods. Studies comparing HPSD and traditional applications in patients undergoing initial catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation from inception through December 2021 were searched on Pubmed, Medline, Cochrane, and Clinicaltrials.gov. Results. The meta-analysis included seventeen studies with a total of 4934 patients. HPSD group decreased procedure duration (mean difference (MD) −38.28 min, P < 0.001), RF duration (MD −20.51 min, P < 0.001), fluoroscopy duration (MD −5.19 min, P < 0.001), and acute pulmonary vein reconnection (Odds ratio (OR) 0.40, P < 0.001), while improving the freedom from atrial arrhythmia at one year (OR 1.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12–1.94, P = 0.005) and rates of first-pass isolation (OR 8.92, P = 0.001). Compared with the conventional group, freedom from atrial arrhythmia at one-year follow-up was higher in the HPSD group without the guidance of AI/LSI (OR 1.66, P = 0.01) and studies with a power setting of 40–50 W (OR 1.93, P = 0.002). Nevertheless, the two groups had similar effectiveness with a power setting of 50 W in the HPSD RFA (OR 1.10, P = 0.52). There was no difference in complications between the two groups (P = 0.71). Conclusion. HPSD RFA was associated with shorter procedure duration, higher freedom from atrial arrhythmia, and comparable safety compared to conventional RFA.

目的:我们旨在评估高功率短时间(HPSD)射频消融(RFA)与常规射频消融(RFA)治疗心房颤动(AF)患者的有效性和安全性。方法:从一开始到2021年12月,在Pubmed、Medline、Cochrane和clinicaltrials . gov.v上检索比较HPSD和传统应用在房颤初始导管消融患者中的研究。结果:荟萃分析包括17项研究,共4934例患者。HPSD组缩短了手术时间(平均差值(MD) -38.28分钟,P < 0.001)、射频检查时间(MD -20.51分钟,P < 0.001)、透视时间(MD -5.19分钟,P < 0.001)和急性肺静脉重连(优势比(OR) 0.40, P < 0.001),同时改善了一年内房颤的自由度(OR 1.48, 95%可信区间(CI) 1.12-1.94, P=0.005)和首次分离率(OR 8.92, P=0.001)。与常规组相比,无AI/LSI指导的HPSD组(OR 1.66, P=0.01)和功率设置为40-50 W的研究组(OR 1.93, P=0.002)一年随访时房性心律失常发生率更高。然而,两组在HPSD RFA功率设置为50 W时具有相似的有效性(OR 1.10, P=0.52)。两组并发症发生率无差异(P=0.71)。结论:与传统RFA相比,HPSD RFA具有更短的手术时间、更高的房性心律失常发生率和相当的安全性。
{"title":"Comparison of Effectiveness and Safety between High-Power Short-Duration Ablation and Conventional Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Shuyu Jin,&nbsp;Lu Fu,&nbsp;Junrong Jiang,&nbsp;Xingdong Ye,&nbsp;Huiyi Liu,&nbsp;Yanlin Chen,&nbsp;Sijia Pu,&nbsp;Shulin Wu,&nbsp;Yumei Xue","doi":"10.1155/2022/6013474","DOIUrl":"10.1155/2022/6013474","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 <p><i>Aim</i>. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety between high-power short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and conventional RFA in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). <i>Methods</i>. Studies comparing HPSD and traditional applications in patients undergoing initial catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation from inception through December 2021 were searched on Pubmed, Medline, Cochrane, and Clinicaltrials.gov. <i>Results</i>. The meta-analysis included seventeen studies with a total of 4934 patients. HPSD group decreased procedure duration (mean difference (MD) −38.28 min, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001), RF duration (MD −20.51 min, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001), fluoroscopy duration (MD −5.19 min, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001), and acute pulmonary vein reconnection (Odds ratio (OR) 0.40, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001), while improving the freedom from atrial arrhythmia at one year (OR 1.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12–1.94, <i>P</i> = 0.005) and rates of first-pass isolation (OR 8.92, <i>P</i> = 0.001). Compared with the conventional group, freedom from atrial arrhythmia at one-year follow-up was higher in the HPSD group without the guidance of AI/LSI (OR 1.66, <i>P</i> = 0.01) and studies with a power setting of 40–50 W (OR 1.93, <i>P</i> = 0.002). Nevertheless, the two groups had similar effectiveness with a power setting of 50 W in the HPSD RFA (OR 1.10, <i>P</i> = 0.52). There was no difference in complications between the two groups (<i>P</i> = 0.71). <i>Conclusion</i>. HPSD RFA was associated with shorter procedure duration, higher freedom from atrial arrhythmia, and comparable safety compared to conventional RFA.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":16329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiology","volume":"2022 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2022-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9398879/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33448493","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Safety Assessment of Microcatheter-Protected Rotational Atherectomy with the Double Guiding Catheter Technique for Severely Calcified Left Main Bifurcation 微导管保护双导管旋转动脉粥样硬化切除术治疗严重钙化左主干分叉的安全性评价。
IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2022-08-09 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1399510
Shijun Yang, Silai Dong, Yanzhao Zhou, Yumiao Wei, Ning Zhao, Chunhua Sun, Xiang Cheng

Background. Rotational atherectomy (RA) is a tool for calcium modification, but there is a risk of losing the side branch in left main coronary artery (LM) bifurcation lesions, resulting in disastrous consequences. Microcatheter-protected RA with the double guiding catheter (GC) technique for severely calcified LM bifurcations has been described previously, but its safety warrants further investigation. Methods. Various sizes of coronary calcification vascular simulators were utilized to model calcified LM bifurcation lesions for RA in in vitro. The damage to the side branch protective microcatheters and guidewires was accessed after microcatheter-protected RA with the double GC technique. In clinical practice, microcatheter-protected RA with the double GC technique was carried out in two patients. Results. In vitro, none of the protective microcatheters or guidewires were completely fractured, although the majority of them were damaged to varying degrees. In clinical practice, we successfully carried out two cases of percutaneous coronary intervention for severely calcified LM bifurcation with microcatheter-protected RA using the double GC technique. Conclusion. RA of severely calcified LM bifurcation lesions may be successfully performed using microcatheter-protected RA with the double GC technique, potentially reducing the risk of side branch occlusion. Since majority of protective microcatheters or guidewires were damaged, there was still some risk, and it is recommended to use this technique only in highly selected patient population of severely calcified true (Medina 1, 1, 1) LM bifurcations.

背景:旋转动脉粥样硬化切除术(RA)是一种钙修饰的工具,但在左冠状动脉主干(LM)分叉病变中存在失去侧支的风险,导致灾难性后果。微导管保护类风湿性关节炎与双引导导管(GC)技术严重钙化LM分叉之前已经有报道,但其安全性有待进一步研究。方法:采用不同尺寸的冠状动脉钙化血管模拟器,在体外模拟RA的钙化LM分叉病变。采用双GC技术观察微导管保护RA后侧支保护微导管及导丝的损伤情况。在临床实践中,采用双GC技术对2例微导管保护类风湿性关节炎患者进行了治疗。结果:体外保护微导管和导丝均未发生完全断裂,但多数有不同程度的损伤。在临床实践中,我们成功应用双GC技术对2例重度钙化LM分叉伴微导管保护类风湿性关节炎进行了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。结论:双GC技术微导管保护RA可成功治疗重度钙化LM分叉病变,降低侧支闭塞风险。由于大多数保护性微导管或导丝被损坏,仍然存在一定的风险,建议仅在高度选择的严重钙化的真(Medina 1,1,1) LM分叉患者群体中使用该技术。
{"title":"Safety Assessment of Microcatheter-Protected Rotational Atherectomy with the Double Guiding Catheter Technique for Severely Calcified Left Main Bifurcation","authors":"Shijun Yang,&nbsp;Silai Dong,&nbsp;Yanzhao Zhou,&nbsp;Yumiao Wei,&nbsp;Ning Zhao,&nbsp;Chunhua Sun,&nbsp;Xiang Cheng","doi":"10.1155/2022/1399510","DOIUrl":"10.1155/2022/1399510","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 <p><i>Background</i>. Rotational atherectomy (RA) is a tool for calcium modification, but there is a risk of losing the side branch in left main coronary artery (LM) bifurcation lesions, resulting in disastrous consequences. Microcatheter-protected RA with the double guiding catheter (GC) technique for severely calcified LM bifurcations has been described previously, but its safety warrants further investigation. <i>Methods</i>. Various sizes of coronary calcification vascular simulators were utilized to model calcified LM bifurcation lesions for RA in in vitro<i>.</i> The damage to the side branch protective microcatheters and guidewires was accessed after microcatheter-protected RA with the double GC technique. In clinical practice, microcatheter-protected RA with the double GC technique was carried out in two patients. <i>Results</i>. In vitro, none of the protective microcatheters or guidewires were completely fractured, although the majority of them were damaged to varying degrees. In clinical practice, we successfully carried out two cases of percutaneous coronary intervention for severely calcified LM bifurcation with microcatheter-protected RA using the double GC technique. <i>Conclusion</i>. RA of severely calcified LM bifurcation lesions may be successfully performed using microcatheter-protected RA with the double GC technique, potentially reducing the risk of side branch occlusion. Since majority of protective microcatheters or guidewires were damaged, there was still some risk, and it is recommended to use this technique only in highly selected patient population of severely calcified true (Medina 1, 1, 1) LM bifurcations.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":16329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiology","volume":"2022 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2022-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9381278/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33448547","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Temporal Trends in Internal vs. External Referrals for TAVR in a Large Academic Center: Patients Characteristics and Outcomes 大型学术中心TAVR内部与外部转诊的时间趋势:患者特征和结果。
IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2022-08-05 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6074368
Aurelie Merlo, Audrey Khoury, Mohsin Shah, Tabitha Linville, John Ikonomidis, Matthew Cavender, John Vavalle, Thomas Caranasos

Background. Since transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) first became approved for inoperable patients followed by high, intermediate-, and low-risk patients, referrals to TAVR centers have rapidly increased. The purpose of this study was to investigate referral patterns to a large academic TAVR center in the state of North Carolina and evaluate differences between externally and internally referred patients. Methods. Data for all patients who underwent TAVR at our institution between November 2014 and March 2020 were pulled from the Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry. The electronic medical record was used to determine the referral source. The descriptive statistical analysis was performed using Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, Washington). Results. 491 patients underwent TAVR at our institution between November 2014 and March 2020. Half of the patients were referred by a cardiologist within the same health system (N = 250, 50.9%). Other referral sources included a cardiologist external to the health system (N = 210, N = 42.8%) and a surgeon or proceduralist (such as urologist, surgeon, or gastroenterologist) during the workup for another procedure (N = 26, 5.3%). Over time, there was a trend toward an increasing proportion of patients referred by a cardiologist external to our system, but this trend did not reach statistical significance (20.0% in 2014, 29.2% in 2015, 30.7% in 2016, 53.0% in 2017, 36% in 2018, 48.4% in 2019, and 56.8% in 2020, p = 0.06 using the Mann–Kendall trend test). Externally referred patients were less likely to have private insurance and were more likely to have a reduced ejection fraction and had a higher mean gradient across the valve. Postprocedure, externally referred patients were more likely to have the procedure under moderate sedation and less likely to be discharged home. Conclusions. This study presents the referral pattern to a large TAVR center in North Carolina. Over time, there was an increase in external referrals suggesting that TAVR is increasingly adopted as an important component of the management of aortic valve stenosis. Internally and externally referred patients have differences in baseline demographic and clinical characteristics which may have an impact on clinical outcomes.

背景:自从经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)首先被批准用于不能手术的患者,然后是高、中、低风险患者,转诊到TAVR中心的人数迅速增加。本研究的目的是调查北卡罗莱纳州一个大型学术TAVR中心的转诊模式,并评估外部和内部转诊患者之间的差异。方法:2014年11月至2020年3月期间在我院接受TAVR治疗的所有患者的数据均来自经导管瓣膜治疗登记处。利用电子病历确定转诊来源。描述性统计分析使用Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, Washington)进行。结果:2014年11月至2020年3月期间,我院491例患者接受了TAVR。一半的患者由同一卫生系统内的心脏病专家转诊(N = 250, 50.9%)。其他转诊来源包括卫生系统外的心脏病专家(N = 210, N = 42.8%)和外科医生或程序医生(如泌尿科医生、外科医生或胃肠科医生)在其他程序的检查期间(N = 26, 5.3%)。随着时间的推移,由我们系统外的心脏病专家转诊的患者比例呈上升趋势,但这一趋势没有达到统计学意义(2014年为20.0%,2015年为29.2%,2016年为30.7%,2017年为53.0%,2018年为36%,2019年为48.4%,2020年为56.8%,使用Mann-Kendall趋势检验p=0.06)。外部转诊的患者不太可能有私人保险,更有可能有一个较低的射血分数,并有较高的平均梯度通过瓣膜。术后,外部转诊患者更有可能在中度镇静下进行手术,出院回家的可能性更小。结论:本研究提出了转诊模式在北卡罗莱纳的一个大型TAVR中心。随着时间的推移,外部转诊的增加表明TAVR越来越多地被采用为主动脉瓣狭窄治疗的重要组成部分。内部和外部转诊患者在基线人口统计学和临床特征方面存在差异,这可能对临床结果产生影响。
{"title":"Temporal Trends in Internal vs. External Referrals for TAVR in a Large Academic Center: Patients Characteristics and Outcomes","authors":"Aurelie Merlo,&nbsp;Audrey Khoury,&nbsp;Mohsin Shah,&nbsp;Tabitha Linville,&nbsp;John Ikonomidis,&nbsp;Matthew Cavender,&nbsp;John Vavalle,&nbsp;Thomas Caranasos","doi":"10.1155/2022/6074368","DOIUrl":"10.1155/2022/6074368","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 <p><i>Background</i>. Since transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) first became approved for inoperable patients followed by high, intermediate-, and low-risk patients, referrals to TAVR centers have rapidly increased. The purpose of this study was to investigate referral patterns to a large academic TAVR center in the state of North Carolina and evaluate differences between externally and internally referred patients. <i>Methods</i>. Data for all patients who underwent TAVR at our institution between November 2014 and March 2020 were pulled from the Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry. The electronic medical record was used to determine the referral source. The descriptive statistical analysis was performed using Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, Washington). <i>Results</i>. 491 patients underwent TAVR at our institution between November 2014 and March 2020. Half of the patients were referred by a cardiologist within the same health system (<i>N</i> = 250, 50.9%). Other referral sources included a cardiologist external to the health system (<i>N</i> = 210, <i>N</i> = 42.8%) and a surgeon or proceduralist (such as urologist, surgeon, or gastroenterologist) during the workup for another procedure (<i>N</i> = 26, 5.3%). Over time, there was a trend toward an increasing proportion of patients referred by a cardiologist external to our system, but this trend did not reach statistical significance (20.0% in 2014, 29.2% in 2015, 30.7% in 2016, 53.0% in 2017, 36% in 2018, 48.4% in 2019, and 56.8% in 2020, <i>p</i> = 0.06 using the Mann–Kendall trend test). Externally referred patients were less likely to have private insurance and were more likely to have a reduced ejection fraction and had a higher mean gradient across the valve. Postprocedure, externally referred patients were more likely to have the procedure under moderate sedation and less likely to be discharged home. <i>Conclusions</i>. This study presents the referral pattern to a large TAVR center in North Carolina. Over time, there was an increase in external referrals suggesting that TAVR is increasingly adopted as an important component of the management of aortic valve stenosis. Internally and externally referred patients have differences in baseline demographic and clinical characteristics which may have an impact on clinical outcomes.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":16329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiology","volume":"2022 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2022-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9410986/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40340687","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in Patients with Severe Renal Insufficiency Undergoing PCI for Acute Coronary Syndrome 替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷在急性冠脉综合征重症肾功能不全患者行PCI治疗中的作用。
IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2022-07-31 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6476777
Yunxian Chen, Shaowen Tu, Zhixin Chen, Jue Xia, Baofeng Chen, Jinfeng Chen, Jiarong Liang, Xiangyang Liu, Liangqiu Tang

Background. Current guidelines recommend the use of potent antiplatelet agents in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) following an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, data about optimal platelet inhibition in severe renal insufficiency patients are scarce. The purpose of this study is to determine if ticagrelor is more effective than clopidogrel in patients with ACS and severe renal insufficiency treated with PCI. Methods. We retrospectively enrolled patients with ACS and severe renal insufficiency (eGFR ≤ 30 ml/min·1.73 m2 or dialysis) who underwent PCI at our hospital between January 2015 and March 2020. We used the adjusted Cox proportional hazards models to analyze the 1-year outcome endpoints, including the primary endpoint (the composite of cardiovascular death, recurrence of MI, or nonfatal ischemic stroke), death from any cause, and bleeding events (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium, BARC criteria). Results. A total of 276 patients with ACS and severe renal insufficiency who were treated with PCI with ticagrelor (n = 108) or clopidogrel (n = 168) were included in the study. After adjustment, there was no statistical difference in risk of the primary endpoint (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.46–1.33; P = 0.367) and death from any cause (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.38–1.89; P = 0.708) in the ticagrelor group against the clopidogrel group. However, the risk of total bleeding was significantly higher in the ticagrelor group (HR, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.81–5.62; P = 0.01). Subgroup analysis according to the confounders did not identify any significant subgroup heterogeneity. Conclusion. Ticagrelor did not improve the major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality when compared to clopidogrel, but significantly increased the risk of bleeding in Chinese patients with ACS and severe renal insufficiency undergoing PCI.

背景:目前的指南推荐在急性冠脉综合征(ACS)后接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者使用强效抗血小板药物。然而,关于严重肾功能不全患者最佳血小板抑制的数据很少。本研究的目的是确定替格瑞洛是否比氯吡格雷更有效地治疗ACS和PCI治疗的严重肾功能不全患者。方法:回顾性纳入2015年1月至2020年3月在我院行PCI治疗的ACS合并严重肾功能不全(eGFR≤30 ml/min·1.73 m2或透析)患者。我们使用调整后的Cox比例风险模型来分析1年结局终点,包括主要终点(心血管死亡、心肌梗死复发或非致死性缺血性卒中的综合)、任何原因导致的死亡和出血事件(出血学术研究联盟,BARC标准)。结果:276例ACS合并严重肾功能不全患者行替格瑞洛(n = 108)或氯吡格雷(n = 168) PCI治疗纳入研究。调整后,两组主要终点的风险无统计学差异(HR, 0.78;95% ci, 0.46-1.33;P=0.367)和任何原因死亡(HR, 0.86;95% ci, 0.38-1.89;P=0.708),替格瑞洛组与氯吡格雷组比较。然而,替格瑞洛组发生总出血的风险显著高于替格瑞洛组(HR, 3.01;95% ci, 1.81-5.62;P = 0.01)。根据混杂因素进行的亚组分析未发现任何显著的亚组异质性。结论:与氯吡格雷相比,替格瑞洛没有改善主要不良心血管事件和全因死亡率,但显著增加了中国ACS合并严重肾功能不全患者行PCI的出血风险。
{"title":"Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in Patients with Severe Renal Insufficiency Undergoing PCI for Acute Coronary Syndrome","authors":"Yunxian Chen,&nbsp;Shaowen Tu,&nbsp;Zhixin Chen,&nbsp;Jue Xia,&nbsp;Baofeng Chen,&nbsp;Jinfeng Chen,&nbsp;Jiarong Liang,&nbsp;Xiangyang Liu,&nbsp;Liangqiu Tang","doi":"10.1155/2022/6476777","DOIUrl":"10.1155/2022/6476777","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 <p><i>Background</i>. Current guidelines recommend the use of potent antiplatelet agents in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) following an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, data about optimal platelet inhibition in severe renal insufficiency patients are scarce. The purpose of this study is to determine if ticagrelor is more effective than clopidogrel in patients with ACS and severe renal insufficiency treated with PCI. <i>Methods</i>. We retrospectively enrolled patients with ACS and severe renal insufficiency (eGFR ≤ 30 ml/min·1.73 m<sup>2</sup> or dialysis) who underwent PCI at our hospital between January 2015 and March 2020. We used the adjusted Cox proportional hazards models to analyze the 1-year outcome endpoints, including the primary endpoint (the composite of cardiovascular death, recurrence of MI, or nonfatal ischemic stroke), death from any cause, and bleeding events (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium, BARC criteria). <i>Results</i>. A total of 276 patients with ACS and severe renal insufficiency who were treated with PCI with ticagrelor (<i>n</i> = 108) or clopidogrel (<i>n</i> = 168) were included in the study. After adjustment, there was no statistical difference in risk of the primary endpoint (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.46–1.33; <i>P</i> = 0.367) and death from any cause (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.38–1.89; <i>P</i> = 0.708) in the ticagrelor group against the clopidogrel group. However, the risk of total bleeding was significantly higher in the ticagrelor group (HR, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.81–5.62; <i>P</i> = 0.01). Subgroup analysis according to the confounders did not identify any significant subgroup heterogeneity. <i>Conclusion</i>. Ticagrelor did not improve the major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality when compared to clopidogrel, but significantly increased the risk of bleeding in Chinese patients with ACS and severe renal insufficiency undergoing PCI.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":16329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiology","volume":"2022 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2022-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9357815/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40613639","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical Features and Long-Term Outcomes in Very Young Patients with Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries 非常年轻的非阻塞性冠状动脉心肌梗死患者的临床特征和长期预后。
IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2022-07-30 DOI: 10.1155/2022/9584527
Pablo Juan-Salvadores, Víctor Alfonso Jiménez Díaz, Ana Rodríguez González de Araujo, Cristina Iglesia Carreño, Alba Guitián González, Cesar Veiga Garcia, José Antonio Baz Alonso, Francisco Caamaño Isorna, Andrés Iñiguez Romo

Background. The main cause of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is coronary artery obstruction due to atherosclerotic plaque growth or thrombus formation secondary to plaque rupture or erosion. However, there is a subgroup of patients with signs and symptoms suggestive of ACS but without relevant coronary artery obstruction on coronary angiography. This population is defined as myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA). The present study analyzes the clinical features and outcomes of very young patients with a diagnosis of MINOCA. Method. Nested case-control study of ≤40-year-old patients referred for coronary angiography due to clinical suspicion of ACS. Patients were divided into three groups: patients with obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), patients diagnosed with MINOCA, and controls with non-coronary artery disease. Results. Of 19,321 coronary angiographies performed in our center in a period of 10 years, 408 (2.1%) were in patients ≤40 years old, and MINOCA was identified in 32 (21%) patients. The cardiovascular risk factors for obstructive CAD and MINOCA were very similar. The incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at follow-up was significantly higher in the MINOCA (HR 4.13 (95%CI 1.22–13.89) and obstructive CAD (HR 4.59 (95%CI 1.90–10.99) patients compared to controls. Cocaine use HR 14.58 (95%CI 3.08–69.02), family history of CAD HR 6.20 (95%CI 1.40–27.43), and depression HR 5.16 (95%CI 1.06–25.24) were associated with a poor outcome in the MINOCA population. Conclusion. Very young patients with MINOCA had a poor prognosis at long-term follow-up, similar to patients with obstructive CAD. Focusing efforts on secondary prevention is essential in this population.

背景:急性冠脉综合征(ACS)的主要原因是由于动脉粥样硬化斑块生长或继发于斑块破裂或糜烂的血栓形成导致冠状动脉阻塞。然而,有一小部分患者在冠状动脉造影中有提示ACS的体征和症状,但没有相关的冠状动脉阻塞。该人群定义为心肌梗死伴非阻塞性冠状动脉(MINOCA)。本研究分析了诊断为MINOCA的非常年轻患者的临床特征和结果。方法:巢式病例对照研究,选取年龄≤40岁因临床怀疑为ACS而行冠状动脉造影的患者。患者分为三组:阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者、MINOCA诊断患者和非冠状动脉疾病对照组。结果:在本中心10年间进行的19321例冠状动脉造影中,408例(2.1%)患者年龄≤40岁,32例(21%)患者发现MINOCA。阻塞性CAD和MINOCA的心血管危险因素非常相似。随访时,MINOCA患者的主要不良心血管事件(MACE)发生率(HR 4.13 (95%CI 1.22-13.89)和阻塞性CAD患者(HR 4.59 (95%CI 1.90-10.99))显著高于对照组。可卡因使用HR 14.58 (95%CI 3.08-69.02)、CAD家族史HR 6.20 (95%CI 1.40-27.43)和抑郁症HR 5.16 (95%CI 1.06-25.24)与MINOCA人群的不良预后相关。结论:非常年轻的MINOCA患者在长期随访中预后较差,与阻塞性CAD患者相似。在这一人群中,重点关注二级预防至关重要。
{"title":"Clinical Features and Long-Term Outcomes in Very Young Patients with Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries","authors":"Pablo Juan-Salvadores,&nbsp;Víctor Alfonso Jiménez Díaz,&nbsp;Ana Rodríguez González de Araujo,&nbsp;Cristina Iglesia Carreño,&nbsp;Alba Guitián González,&nbsp;Cesar Veiga Garcia,&nbsp;José Antonio Baz Alonso,&nbsp;Francisco Caamaño Isorna,&nbsp;Andrés Iñiguez Romo","doi":"10.1155/2022/9584527","DOIUrl":"10.1155/2022/9584527","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 <p><i>Background</i><i>.</i> The main cause of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is coronary artery obstruction due to atherosclerotic plaque growth or thrombus formation secondary to plaque rupture or erosion. However, there is a subgroup of patients with signs and symptoms suggestive of ACS but without relevant coronary artery obstruction on coronary angiography. This population is defined as myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA). The present study analyzes the clinical features and outcomes of very young patients with a diagnosis of MINOCA. <i>Method.</i> Nested case-control study of ≤40-year-old patients referred for coronary angiography due to clinical suspicion of ACS. Patients were divided into three groups: patients with obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), patients diagnosed with MINOCA, and controls with non-coronary artery disease. <i>Results.</i> Of 19,321 coronary angiographies performed in our center in a period of 10 years, 408 (2.1%) were in patients ≤40 years old, and MINOCA was identified in 32 (21%) patients. The cardiovascular risk factors for obstructive CAD and MINOCA were very similar. The incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at follow-up was significantly higher in the MINOCA (HR 4.13 (95%CI 1.22–13.89) and obstructive CAD (HR 4.59 (95%CI 1.90–10.99) patients compared to controls. Cocaine use HR 14.58 (95%CI 3.08–69.02), family history of CAD HR 6.20 (95%CI 1.40–27.43), and depression HR 5.16 (95%CI 1.06–25.24) were associated with a poor outcome in the MINOCA population. <i>Conclusion.</i> Very young patients with MINOCA had a poor prognosis at long-term follow-up, similar to patients with obstructive CAD. Focusing efforts on secondary prevention is essential in this population.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":16329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiology","volume":"2022 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2022-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9356902/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40628661","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison between the Right and Left Distal Radial Access for Patients Undergoing Coronary Procedures: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis 冠状动脉手术患者左、右桡动脉远端通道的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2022-07-21 DOI: 10.1155/2022/7932114
Kristian Rivera, Diego Fernández-Rodríguez, Juan Casanova-Sandoval, Ignacio Barriuso, Marta Zielonka, Nuria Pueyo-Balsells, Immaculada Calaf Valls, Fernando Worner

Introduction. Distal radial access for coronary procedures decreases hemostasis time, prevents radial occlusion, and improves patient comfort compared to conventional transradial access. Initially described for left distal radial access (lDRA), the right distal radial access (rDRA) is feasible. However, there are no comparative studies to date. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the access site on vascular access and procedural performance. Methods. From August 2020 to October 2021, coronary procedures performed through distal radial access were prospectively recorded. After propensity score matching, the rDRA and lDRA were compared. The primary endpoint was the proportion of approach success. The secondary endpoints included access time, coronary procedural success, radial spasm, exposition to ionizing radiation, patient comfort, and vascular access-related complications. Results. From a total of 385 procedures in 382 patients, after a propensity score matching, 182 procedures were compared between the rDRA and lDRA. There were no differences in the baseline characteristics between the groups. Compared to the lDRA, the rDRA presented similar approach success (96.7% vs. 96.7%, p = 1.0), less access time (39 (25–60) sec vs. 50 (29–90) sec, p = 0.018), comparable coronary procedural success after sheath placement (100% vs. 100%, p = 1.000), and not statistically significant radial spasm (2.19% vs. 6.59%, p = 0.148). No differences in dose-area product (32 (20–56.2) Gy.m2 vs. 32.3 (19.4–46.3) Gy.m2; p = 0.472) and fluoroscopy time (4.4 (2.5–9.1) min vs. 4.3 (2.4–7.5) min, p = 0.251) were detected between the groups. No vascular access-related complications were observed in any group. Conclusions. The rDRA, compared to the lDRA, had the same proportion of approach success and procedural performance, with a slight reduction in access time for patients undergoing coronary procedures.

与传统的经桡动脉通路相比,桡动脉远端通路用于冠状动脉手术减少了止血时间,防止了桡动脉闭塞,提高了患者的舒适度。最初描述了左桡骨远端通路(lDRA),右桡骨远端通路(rDRA)是可行的。然而,到目前为止还没有比较研究。本研究旨在评估通路位置对血管通路和手术性能的影响。方法:从2020年8月至2021年10月,前瞻性记录通过桡动脉远端通道进行的冠状动脉手术。倾向得分匹配后,比较rDRA和lDRA。主要终点为入路成功率。次要终点包括通路时间、冠状动脉手术成功、桡动脉痉挛、电离辐射暴露、患者舒适度和血管通路相关并发症。结果:从382例患者的385例手术中,经过倾向评分匹配,182例手术在rDRA和lDRA之间进行了比较。两组之间的基线特征没有差异。与lDRA相比,rDRA的入路成功率相似(96.7% vs. 96.7%, p=1.0),入路时间更短(39(25-60)秒vs. 50(29-90)秒,p=0.018),置入鞘后冠状动脉手术成功率相似(100% vs. 100%, p=1.000),桡动脉痉挛无统计学意义(2.19% vs. 6.59%, p=0.148)。剂量面积积无差异(32 (20-56.2)Gy)。m2 vs. 32.3 (19.4-46.3) Gy.m2;P =0.472)、透视时间(4.4 (2.5 ~ 9.1)min vs. 4.3 (2.4 ~ 7.5) min, P =0.251)。两组均未见血管通路相关并发症。结论:与lDRA相比,rDRA有相同比例的入路成功和手术表现,患者接受冠状动脉手术的时间略有减少。
{"title":"Comparison between the Right and Left Distal Radial Access for Patients Undergoing Coronary Procedures: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis","authors":"Kristian Rivera,&nbsp;Diego Fernández-Rodríguez,&nbsp;Juan Casanova-Sandoval,&nbsp;Ignacio Barriuso,&nbsp;Marta Zielonka,&nbsp;Nuria Pueyo-Balsells,&nbsp;Immaculada Calaf Valls,&nbsp;Fernando Worner","doi":"10.1155/2022/7932114","DOIUrl":"10.1155/2022/7932114","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 <p><i>Introduction</i>. Distal radial access for coronary procedures decreases hemostasis time, prevents radial occlusion, and improves patient comfort compared to conventional transradial access. Initially described for left distal radial access (lDRA), the right distal radial access (rDRA) is feasible. However, there are no comparative studies to date. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the access site on vascular access and procedural performance. <i>Methods</i>. From August 2020 to October 2021, coronary procedures performed through distal radial access were prospectively recorded. After propensity score matching, the rDRA and lDRA were compared. The primary endpoint was the proportion of approach success. The secondary endpoints included access time, coronary procedural success, radial spasm, exposition to ionizing radiation, patient comfort, and vascular access-related complications. <i>Results</i>. From a total of 385 procedures in 382 patients, after a propensity score matching, 182 procedures were compared between the rDRA and lDRA. There were no differences in the baseline characteristics between the groups. Compared to the lDRA, the rDRA presented similar approach success (96.7% vs. 96.7%, <i>p</i> = 1.0), less access time (39 (25–60) sec vs. 50 (29–90) sec, <i>p</i> = 0.018), comparable coronary procedural success after sheath placement (100% vs. 100%, <i>p</i> = 1.000), and not statistically significant radial spasm (2.19% vs. 6.59%, <i>p</i> = 0.148). No differences in dose-area product (32 (20–56.2) Gy.m2 vs. 32.3 (19.4–46.3) Gy.m2; <i>p</i> = 0.472) and fluoroscopy time (4.4 (2.5–9.1) min vs. 4.3 (2.4–7.5) min, <i>p</i> = 0.251) were detected between the groups. No vascular access-related complications were observed in any group. <i>Conclusions</i>. The rDRA, compared to the lDRA, had the same proportion of approach success and procedural performance, with a slight reduction in access time for patients undergoing coronary procedures.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":16329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiology","volume":"2022 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2022-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9334045/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40699370","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of interventional cardiology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1