首页 > 最新文献

Journal of interventional cardiology最新文献

英文 中文
Drug-Coated Balloon in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention 药物包被球囊在初级经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用。
IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2023-06-26 DOI: 10.1155/2023/5210808
Hui Zhao, Runran Miao, Fei Lin, Guoan Zhao

According to the latest coronary interventional guidelines, a drug-eluting stent is the recommended reperfusion therapy in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). However, deficiencies and defects, such as in-stent restenosis (ISR), incomplete stent apposition, stent thrombosis, reinfarction after stent implantation, long-term dual antiplatelet drug use, and adverse reactions of metal implants, plague clinicians and patients. Drug-coated balloon (DCB), which delivers antiproliferative agents into the vessel wall without stent implantation and leaves no implants behind after the procedure, is a novel option for percutaneous coronary intervention and has proven to be a promising strategy in cases of ISR, small vessel coronary artery disease, and bifurcation lesions. However, most of the available experience has been gained in elective percutaneous coronary intervention, and experience in pPCI is lacking. The current evidence for the use of DCB-only in pPCI was discussed and analyzed in this review.

根据最新的冠状动脉介入治疗指南,药物洗脱支架是经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(pPCI)中推荐的再灌注治疗方法。然而,支架内再狭窄(ISR)、支架贴置不完全、支架血栓形成、支架植入术后再梗死、长期双重抗血小板药物使用、金属植入物不良反应等缺陷和缺陷困扰着临床医生和患者。药物包被球囊(Drug-coated balloon, DCB)是经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的一种新选择,在ISR、小血管冠状动脉疾病和分叉病变的病例中被证明是一种很有前途的策略。然而,大多数可用的经验都是在选择性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中获得的,而pPCI的经验缺乏。本综述讨论和分析了目前在pPCI中仅使用dcb的证据。
{"title":"Drug-Coated Balloon in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention","authors":"Hui Zhao,&nbsp;Runran Miao,&nbsp;Fei Lin,&nbsp;Guoan Zhao","doi":"10.1155/2023/5210808","DOIUrl":"10.1155/2023/5210808","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 <p>According to the latest coronary interventional guidelines, a drug-eluting stent is the recommended reperfusion therapy in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). However, deficiencies and defects, such as in-stent restenosis (ISR), incomplete stent apposition, stent thrombosis, reinfarction after stent implantation, long-term dual antiplatelet drug use, and adverse reactions of metal implants, plague clinicians and patients. Drug-coated balloon (DCB), which delivers antiproliferative agents into the vessel wall without stent implantation and leaves no implants behind after the procedure, is a novel option for percutaneous coronary intervention and has proven to be a promising strategy in cases of ISR, small vessel coronary artery disease, and bifurcation lesions. However, most of the available experience has been gained in elective percutaneous coronary intervention, and experience in pPCI is lacking. The current evidence for the use of DCB-only in pPCI was discussed and analyzed in this review.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":16329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiology","volume":"2023 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10317576/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10178187","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of New-Onset Conduction Disturbances following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Outcomes: A Single-Center Study 经导管主动脉瓣置换术后新发传导障碍对预后的影响:一项单中心研究
IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2023-05-31 DOI: 10.1155/2023/5390338
Claudia See, Yanting Wang, Haocheng Huang, Helen Parise, Yiping Yang, Daniela Tirziu, Dominic P. Francese, Nikolaos Papoutsidakis, Eric Bader, Ryan K. Kaple, Michael Cleman, Alexandra J. Lansky, John K. Forrest

Background. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is known to increase the incidence of conduction disturbances compared to surgical aortic valve replacement; however, there are limited data on the impact and duration of these conduction disturbances on longer term outcomes. Objective. To determine the differential impact of persistent versus nonpersistent new-onset conduction disturbances on TAVR-related complications and outcomes. Methods. This is a single-center retrospective analysis of 927 consecutive patients with aortic stenosis who underwent TAVR at Yale New Haven Hospital from July 2012 to August 2019. Patients with new-onset conduction disturbances within 7 days following TAVR were selected for this study. Persistent and nonpersistent disturbances were, respectively, defined as persisting or not persisting on all patient ECGs for up to 1.5 years after TAVR or until death. Results. Within 7 days after TAVR, conduction disturbances occurred in 42.3% (392/927) of the patients. Conduction disturbances persisted in 150 (38%) patients and did not persist in 187 (48%) patients, and 55 (14%) patients were excluded for having mixed (both persistent and nonpersistent) disturbances. Compared with nonpersistent disturbances, patients with persistent disturbances were more likely to receive a PPM within 7 days after the TAVR procedure (46.0% versus 4.3%, p < 0.001) and had a greater unadjusted 1-year cardiac-related and all-cause mortality risk (HR 2.54, p = 0.044 and HR 1.90, p = 0.046, respectively). Conclusion. Persistent conduction disturbances were associated with a greater cardiac and all-cause mortality rate at one year following TAVR. Future research should investigate periprocedural factors to reduce persistent conduction disturbances and outcomes beyond one year follow-up.

背景:经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)与外科主动脉瓣置换术相比,已知会增加传导障碍的发生率;然而,关于这些传导干扰对长期结果的影响和持续时间的数据有限。目的:确定持续性和非持续性新发传导障碍对tavr相关并发症和结局的不同影响。方法:对2012年7月至2019年8月在耶鲁大学纽黑文医院连续接受TAVR治疗的927例主动脉瓣狭窄患者进行单中心回顾性分析。本研究选择TAVR后7天内新发传导障碍的患者。持续性和非持续性干扰分别定义为TAVR后1.5年或死亡期间所有患者心电图持续或不持续。结果:TAVR术后7 d内,42.3%(392/927)患者出现传导障碍。传导障碍在150例(38%)患者中持续存在,187例(48%)患者未持续存在,55例(14%)患者因混合(持续性和非持续性)障碍而被排除。与非持续性精神障碍患者相比,持续性精神障碍患者更有可能在TAVR手术后7天内接受PPM(46.0%对4.3%,p < 0.001),并且具有更高的未经调整的1年心脏相关和全因死亡风险(HR 2.54, p=0.044和HR 1.90, p=0.046)。结论:持续的传导障碍与TAVR术后一年较高的心脏死亡率和全因死亡率相关。未来的研究应探讨手术周围的因素,以减少持续的传导障碍和超过一年的随访结果。
{"title":"Impact of New-Onset Conduction Disturbances following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Outcomes: A Single-Center Study","authors":"Claudia See,&nbsp;Yanting Wang,&nbsp;Haocheng Huang,&nbsp;Helen Parise,&nbsp;Yiping Yang,&nbsp;Daniela Tirziu,&nbsp;Dominic P. Francese,&nbsp;Nikolaos Papoutsidakis,&nbsp;Eric Bader,&nbsp;Ryan K. Kaple,&nbsp;Michael Cleman,&nbsp;Alexandra J. Lansky,&nbsp;John K. Forrest","doi":"10.1155/2023/5390338","DOIUrl":"10.1155/2023/5390338","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 <p><i>Background</i>. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is known to increase the incidence of conduction disturbances compared to surgical aortic valve replacement; however, there are limited data on the impact and duration of these conduction disturbances on longer term outcomes. <i>Objective</i>. To determine the differential impact of persistent versus nonpersistent new-onset conduction disturbances on TAVR-related complications and outcomes. <i>Methods</i>. This is a single-center retrospective analysis of 927 consecutive patients with aortic stenosis who underwent TAVR at Yale New Haven Hospital from July 2012 to August 2019. Patients with new-onset conduction disturbances within 7 days following TAVR were selected for this study. Persistent and nonpersistent disturbances were, respectively, defined as persisting or not persisting on all patient ECGs for up to 1.5 years after TAVR or until death. <i>Results</i>. Within 7 days after TAVR, conduction disturbances occurred in 42.3% (392/927) of the patients. Conduction disturbances persisted in 150 (38%) patients and did not persist in 187 (48%) patients, and 55 (14%) patients were excluded for having mixed (both persistent and nonpersistent) disturbances. Compared with nonpersistent disturbances, patients with persistent disturbances were more likely to receive a PPM within 7 days after the TAVR procedure (46.0% versus 4.3%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and had a greater unadjusted 1-year cardiac-related and all-cause mortality risk (HR 2.54, <i>p</i> = 0.044 and HR 1.90, <i>p</i> = 0.046, respectively). <i>Conclusion</i>. Persistent conduction disturbances were associated with a greater cardiac and all-cause mortality rate at one year following TAVR. Future research should investigate periprocedural factors to reduce persistent conduction disturbances and outcomes beyond one year follow-up.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":16329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiology","volume":"2023 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10247319/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9600907","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
P2Y12 Inhibitors in Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Real-World, Community-Based Comparison of Ischemic and Bleeding Outcomes 急性冠状动脉综合征中的 P2Y12 抑制剂:基于社区的缺血和出血结果的真实世界比较。
IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2023-05-20 DOI: 10.1155/2023/1147352
Amit Sachdeva, Ratnabhushan Mutyala, Neha Mantri, Shiyun Zhu, Edward McNulty, Matthew Solomon

Background. Randomized trials have shown superiority of the novel P2Y12 inhibitors over clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), but clinical benefit in the community remains controversial. Our objective was to compare the safety and efficacy of clopidogrel to ticagrelor and prasugrel in patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a real-world population. Methods. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with ACS who underwent PCI and were discharged with clopidogrel, ticagrelor, or prasugrel from 2012 to 2018 within Kaiser Permanente Northern California. We used Cox proportional hazard models with propensity-score matching to evaluate the association of the P2Y12 agent with the primary outcomes of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and bleeding events. Results. The study included 15,476 patients (93.1% on clopidogrel, 3.6% on ticagrelor and 3.2% on prasugrel). Compared to the clopidogrel group, ticagrelorand prasugrel patients were younger with less comorbidities. In multivariable models with propensity-score matching, we found a lower risk of all-cause mortality in the ticagrelor vs the clopidogrel group (HR (95% CI) 0.43 (0.20–0.92)), but no differences in the other endpoints, and no difference between prasugrel and clopidogrel among any endpoints. A larger proportion of patients on ticagrelor or prasugrel switched to an alternative P2Y12 agent vs. clopidogrel (p < 0.01), and a higher level of persistence was seen among patients on clopidogrel vs. ticagrelor (p = 0.03) or prasugrel (p < 0.01). Conclusion. Among patients with ACS who underwent PCI, we observed a lower risk of all-cause mortality in patients treated with ticagrelor vs clopidogrel, but no difference in other clinical endpoints nor any differences in endpoints between prasugrel vs. clopidogrel users. These results suggest that further study is needed to identify an optimal P2Y12 inhibitor in a real-world population.

背景:随机试验显示,新型 P2Y12 抑制剂在急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者中的疗效优于氯吡格雷,但在社区中的临床获益仍存在争议。我们的目的是比较在真实世界人群中接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的 ACS 患者使用氯吡格雷与替卡格雷和普拉格雷的安全性和有效性:我们对北加州凯泽医疗集团(Kaiser Permanente Northern California)内 2012 年至 2018 年期间接受 PCI 且出院时使用氯吡格雷、替卡格雷或普拉格雷的 ACS 患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。我们使用带有倾向分数匹配的 Cox 比例危险模型来评估 P2Y12 药物与全因死亡率、心肌梗死(MI)、中风和出血事件等主要结局之间的关系:研究纳入了 15,476 名患者(93.1% 使用氯吡格雷,3.6% 使用替卡格雷,3.2% 使用普拉格雷)。与氯吡格雷组相比,替卡格雷和普拉格雷患者更年轻,合并症更少。在倾向分数匹配的多变量模型中,我们发现替卡格雷组与氯吡格雷组的全因死亡风险较低(HR (95% CI) 0.43 (0.20-0.92)),但其他终点没有差异,普拉格雷组与氯吡格雷组在任何终点上都没有差异。与氯吡格雷(P = 0.03)或普拉格雷(P = 0.03)相比,使用替卡格雷或普拉格雷的患者中有更大比例的患者转用其他P2Y12药物:在接受 PCI 治疗的 ACS 患者中,我们观察到接受替卡格雷治疗的患者与接受氯吡格雷治疗的患者相比,全因死亡风险更低,但在其他临床终点方面没有差异,普拉格雷与氯吡格雷使用者在终点方面也没有差异。这些结果表明,还需要进一步研究,才能在实际人群中确定最佳的 P2Y12 抑制剂。
{"title":"P2Y12 Inhibitors in Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Real-World, Community-Based Comparison of Ischemic and Bleeding Outcomes","authors":"Amit Sachdeva,&nbsp;Ratnabhushan Mutyala,&nbsp;Neha Mantri,&nbsp;Shiyun Zhu,&nbsp;Edward McNulty,&nbsp;Matthew Solomon","doi":"10.1155/2023/1147352","DOIUrl":"10.1155/2023/1147352","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 <p><i>Background</i>. Randomized trials have shown superiority of the novel P2Y12 inhibitors over clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), but clinical benefit in the community remains controversial. Our objective was to compare the safety and efficacy of clopidogrel to ticagrelor and prasugrel in patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a real-world population. <i>Methods</i>. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with ACS who underwent PCI and were discharged with clopidogrel, ticagrelor, or prasugrel from 2012 to 2018 within Kaiser Permanente Northern California. We used Cox proportional hazard models with propensity-score matching to evaluate the association of the P2Y12 agent with the primary outcomes of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and bleeding events. <i>Results</i>. The study included 15,476 patients (93.1% on clopidogrel, 3.6% on ticagrelor and 3.2% on prasugrel). Compared to the clopidogrel group, ticagrelorand prasugrel patients were younger with less comorbidities. In multivariable models with propensity-score matching, we found a lower risk of all-cause mortality in the ticagrelor vs the clopidogrel group (HR (95% CI) 0.43 (0.20–0.92)), but no differences in the other endpoints, and no difference between prasugrel and clopidogrel among any endpoints. A larger proportion of patients on ticagrelor or prasugrel switched to an alternative P2Y12 agent vs. clopidogrel (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), and a higher level of persistence was seen among patients on clopidogrel vs. ticagrelor (<i>p</i> = 0.03) or prasugrel (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). <i>Conclusion</i>. Among patients with ACS who underwent PCI, we observed a lower risk of all-cause mortality in patients treated with ticagrelor vs clopidogrel, but no difference in other clinical endpoints nor any differences in endpoints between prasugrel vs. clopidogrel users. These results suggest that further study is needed to identify an optimal P2Y12 inhibitor in a real-world population.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":16329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiology","volume":"2023 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2023-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10224789/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9908009","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Learning Curve Analyses for Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing with Conventional Stylet-Driven Pacing Leads 传统风格驱动起搏导联左束分支起搏的学习曲线分析。
IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2023-05-18 DOI: 10.1155/2023/3632257
Ga-In Yu, Tae-Hoon Kim, Hee Tae Yu, Boyoung Joung, Hui-Nam Pak, Moon-Hyoung Lee

Background. Physiological conduction system pacing has attracted attention to overcome the dyssynchrony problems of conventional right ventricular pacing (RVP). Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP), which complements short combing of His bundle pacing (HBP), has emerged and has proven its efficiency and safety. In addition, initial experiences of LBBAP were mainly using lumen-less pacing lead, and the feasibility of stylet-driven pacing lead (SDL) was also established. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the learning curve for LBBAP using SDL. Methods. The study enrolled 265 patients who underwent LBBAP or RVP performed by operators without previous LBBAP experience at Yonsei University Severance Hospital in Korea between December 2020 and October 2021. LBBAP was performed using SDL with an extendable helix. The learning curve was evaluated by analyzing fluoroscopy and procedure times. And, before and after reaching the learning curve, we evaluated how much the time required for the LBBAP differed from the time required for the RVP. Results. LBBAP was successful in 50 of 50 (100.0%) patients left bundle branch pacing was successful in 49 of 50 (98.0%). In 50 patients who underwent LBBAP, mean fluoroscopy and procedural times were 15.1 ± 13.5 minutes and 59.9 ± 24.8 minutes, respectively. The plateau of fluoroscopy time reached in the 25th case and the plateau of procedure time reached in the 24th case. Conclusion. During the initial experience with LBBAP, fluoroscopy and procedural times improved with increasing operator experience. For operators who were experienced in cardiac pacemaker implantation, the steepest part of the learning curve was over the first 24-25 cases. It is shorter than the previously reported learning curves of HBP.

背景:生理传导系统起搏克服了传统右室起搏的非同步性问题,引起了人们的关注。左束分支区域起搏(LBBAP)是对短梳式His束起搏(HBP)的补充,已被证明其有效性和安全性。此外,LBBAP的初步经验主要是使用无腔起搏导联,并确定了风格驱动起搏导联(SDL)的可行性。本研究的目的是评估使用SDL进行LBBAP的学习曲线。方法:该研究招募了265名患者,这些患者在2020年12月至2021年10月期间在韩国延世大学Severance医院接受了LBBAP或RVP手术,由之前没有LBBAP经验的操作员进行。LBBAP采用带可扩展螺旋的SDL进行。通过分析透视和手术时间来评估学习曲线。并且,在达到学习曲线之前和之后,我们评估了LBBAP所需的时间与RVP所需的时间的差异。结果:50例患者中50例(100.0%)LBBAP成功,49例(98.0%)左束支起搏成功。50例行LBBAP的患者,平均透视时间15.1±13.5分钟,手术时间59.9±24.8分钟。第25例透视时间达到平台期,第24例手术时间达到平台期。结论:在LBBAP的初始经验中,随着操作人员经验的增加,透视和手术时间有所改善。对于有心脏起搏器植入经验的操作者,学习曲线最陡峭的部分是在前24-25例。它比先前报道的HBP学习曲线短。
{"title":"Learning Curve Analyses for Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing with Conventional Stylet-Driven Pacing Leads","authors":"Ga-In Yu,&nbsp;Tae-Hoon Kim,&nbsp;Hee Tae Yu,&nbsp;Boyoung Joung,&nbsp;Hui-Nam Pak,&nbsp;Moon-Hyoung Lee","doi":"10.1155/2023/3632257","DOIUrl":"10.1155/2023/3632257","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 <p><i>Background</i>. Physiological conduction system pacing has attracted attention to overcome the dyssynchrony problems of conventional right ventricular pacing (RVP). Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP), which complements short combing of His bundle pacing (HBP), has emerged and has proven its efficiency and safety. In addition, initial experiences of LBBAP were mainly using lumen-less pacing lead, and the feasibility of stylet-driven pacing lead (SDL) was also established. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the learning curve for LBBAP using SDL. <i>Methods</i>. The study enrolled 265 patients who underwent LBBAP or RVP performed by operators without previous LBBAP experience at Yonsei University Severance Hospital in Korea between December 2020 and October 2021. LBBAP was performed using SDL with an extendable helix. The learning curve was evaluated by analyzing fluoroscopy and procedure times. And, before and after reaching the learning curve, we evaluated how much the time required for the LBBAP differed from the time required for the RVP. <i>Results</i>. LBBAP was successful in 50 of 50 (100.0%) patients left bundle branch pacing was successful in 49 of 50 (98.0%). In 50 patients who underwent LBBAP, mean fluoroscopy and procedural times were 15.1 ± 13.5 minutes and 59.9 ± 24.8 minutes, respectively. The plateau of fluoroscopy time reached in the 25th case and the plateau of procedure time reached in the 24th case. <i>Conclusion</i>. During the initial experience with LBBAP, fluoroscopy and procedural times improved with increasing operator experience. For operators who were experienced in cardiac pacemaker implantation, the steepest part of the learning curve was over the first 24-25 cases. It is shorter than the previously reported learning curves of HBP.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":16329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiology","volume":"2023 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10212686/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9923753","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Application of Nanoliposome Alprostadil in the Perioperative Period of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention to Reduce In-Stent Restenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 纳米脂质体前列地尔在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗围手术期减少支架内再狭窄的应用:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2023-05-18 DOI: 10.1155/2023/4100197
Decai Zhu, Dawei Wang, Zhen Zhao, Qingqing Liu, Rongyuan Yang, Qing Liu

Background. In-stent restenosis (ISR) is a common complication after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) surgery for patients with coronary atherosclerotic heart disease (CHD). Reports indicate alprostadil may reduce ISR, and this study aimed at reviewing and summarizing the effect of nanoliposome alprostadil on ISR by meta-analysis. Methods. Articles were searched from databases, and meta-analysis was performed in Review Manager software. Funnel plots were performed to evaluate the publication bias, and sensitivity analysis was performed to determine the robustness of the overall treatment effects. Results. Initially, 113 articles were identified, and 5 studies of 463 subjects were included for analysis eventually. The primary endpoint, i.e., the occurrence of ISR after PCI, occurred in 11.91% of the alprostadil treatment group (28 from 235 patients) vs. 21.49% of the conventional treatment group (49 from 228 patients) and showed a statistical significance in our pooled data (χ2 = 7.654, P = 0.006), while there was no statistically significant difference in all of the separate studies. We observed no statistical methodological heterogeneity among the studies (P = 0.64, I2 ≈ 0%). The pooled odds ratio (OR) of the occurrence of ISR was 49% in a fixed-effect model, and the 95% confidence boundary (95% CI) was 29% to 81%. The funnel plot did not show serious publication bias, and sensitivity analysis showed well robustness of the overall treatment effect. Discussion. In conclusion, the early application of nanoliposome alprostadil after PCI could effectively reduce the occurrence of ISR, and the overall effect of alprostadil treatment in reducing ISR after PCI was relatively stable.

背景:支架内再狭窄(ISR)是冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病(CHD)患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)术后常见的并发症。有报道表明前列地尔可能降低ISR,本研究旨在通过荟萃分析来回顾和总结纳米脂质体前列地尔对ISR的影响。方法:从数据库中检索文章,在Review Manager软件中进行meta分析。采用漏斗图评价发表偏倚,采用敏感性分析确定总体治疗效果的稳健性。结果:最初纳入113篇文献,最终纳入5项研究,共纳入463名受试者。主要终点PCI术后ISR的发生率,前列地尔治疗组(235例患者中28例)为11.91%,常规治疗组(228例患者中49例)为21.49%,合并数据比较差异有统计学意义(χ2 = 7.654, P=0.006),而各独立研究比较差异无统计学意义。我们观察到研究之间没有统计学上的异质性(P=0.64, I2≈0%)。在固定效应模型中,ISR发生的合并优势比(OR)为49%,95%置信区间(95% CI)为29% ~ 81%。漏斗图未显示严重的发表偏倚,敏感性分析显示总体治疗效果具有良好的稳健性。讨论。综上所述,PCI术后早期应用纳米脂质体前列地尔可有效降低ISR的发生,且前列地尔治疗降低PCI术后ISR的总体效果相对稳定。
{"title":"Application of Nanoliposome Alprostadil in the Perioperative Period of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention to Reduce In-Stent Restenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Decai Zhu,&nbsp;Dawei Wang,&nbsp;Zhen Zhao,&nbsp;Qingqing Liu,&nbsp;Rongyuan Yang,&nbsp;Qing Liu","doi":"10.1155/2023/4100197","DOIUrl":"10.1155/2023/4100197","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 <p><i>Background</i>. In-stent restenosis (ISR) is a common complication after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) surgery for patients with coronary atherosclerotic heart disease (CHD). Reports indicate alprostadil may reduce ISR, and this study aimed at reviewing and summarizing the effect of nanoliposome alprostadil on ISR by meta-analysis. <i>Methods</i>. Articles were searched from databases, and meta-analysis was performed in Review Manager software. Funnel plots were performed to evaluate the publication bias, and sensitivity analysis was performed to determine the robustness of the overall treatment effects. <i>Results</i>. Initially, 113 articles were identified, and 5 studies of 463 subjects were included for analysis eventually. The primary endpoint, i.e., the occurrence of ISR after PCI, occurred in 11.91% of the alprostadil treatment group (28 from 235 patients) vs. 21.49% of the conventional treatment group (49 from 228 patients) and showed a statistical significance in our pooled data (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> = 7.654, <i>P</i> = 0.006), while there was no statistically significant difference in all of the separate studies. We observed no statistical methodological heterogeneity among the studies (<i>P</i> = 0.64, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> ≈ 0%). The pooled odds ratio (OR) of the occurrence of ISR was 49% in a fixed-effect model, and the 95% confidence boundary (95% CI) was 29% to 81%. The funnel plot did not show serious publication bias, and sensitivity analysis showed well robustness of the overall treatment effect. <i>Discussion.</i> In conclusion, the early application of nanoliposome alprostadil after PCI could effectively reduce the occurrence of ISR, and the overall effect of alprostadil treatment in reducing ISR after PCI was relatively stable.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":16329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiology","volume":"2023 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10212678/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9923755","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Practice Pattern Variation in Adoption of New and Evolving Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Procedures 采用新的和不断发展的经皮冠状动脉介入手术的实践模式差异。
IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2023-05-04 DOI: 10.1155/2023/2488045
Diana Naranjo, Jacob Doll, Charles Maynard, Kristine Beaver, Aasthaa Bansal, Christian D. Helfrich

Objective. Assess factors contributing to variation in the use of new and evolving diagnostic and interventional procedures for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Background. Evidence-based practices for PCI have the potential to improve outcomes but are variably adopted. Finding possible drivers of PCI procedure-use variability is key for efforts aimed at establishing more uniform practice. Methods. Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking Program data were used to estimate a proportion of variation attributable to hospital-, operator-, and patient-level factors across (a) radial arterial access, (b) intravascular imaging/optical coherence tomography, and (c) atherectomy for PCI. We used random-effects models with hospital, operator, and patient random effects. Overlap between levels generated cumulative variability estimates greater than 100%. Results. A total of 445 operators performed 95,391 PCI procedures across 73 hospitals from 2011 to 2018. The rates of all procedures increased over this time. 24.45% of variability in the use of radial access was attributable to the hospital, 53.04% to the operator, and 57.83% to patient-level characteristics. 9.06% of the variability in intravascular imaging use was attributable to the hospital, 43.92% to the operator, and 21.20% to the patient. Lastly, 20.16% of the variability in use of atherectomy was attributed to the hospital, 34.63% to the operator, and 57.50% to the patient.Conclusions. The use of radial access, intracoronary imaging, and atherectomy is influenced by patient, operator, and hospital factors, but patient and operator-level effects predominate. Efforts to increase the use of evidence-based practices for PCI should consider interventions at these levels.

目标:评估导致经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中新的和不断发展的诊断和介入程序使用差异的因素评估导致经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)使用新的和不断发展的诊断和介入程序方面出现差异的因素:背景:PCI 循证实践有可能改善预后,但采用情况却不尽相同。背景:PCI 循证实践有可能改善预后,但采用情况却不尽相同。找到 PCI 程序使用差异的可能驱动因素是建立更统一实践的关键:退伍军人事务临床评估、报告和追踪计划数据用于估算医院、操作者和患者层面因素在以下方面造成的变异比例:(a) 桡动脉入路;(b) 血管内成像/光学相干断层扫描;(c) 用于 PCI 的动脉粥样硬化切除术。我们使用了具有医院、操作者和患者随机效应的随机效应模型。不同级别之间的重叠产生的累积变异性估计值大于100%:从2011年到2018年,共有445名操作者在73家医院进行了95391例PCI手术。在此期间,所有手术的比率均有所上升。在使用径向入路的变异性中,24.45%归因于医院,53.04%归因于操作者,57.83%归因于患者水平特征。在血管内成像使用的变异中,9.06%归因于医院,43.92%归因于操作者,21.20%归因于患者。最后,在动脉粥样硬化切除术的使用方面,20.16%的变异归因于医院,34.63%归因于操作者,57.50%归因于患者:结论:径向入路、冠状动脉内成像和动脉粥样硬化切除术的使用受患者、操作者和医院因素的影响,但患者和操作者层面的影响占主导地位。为提高PCI循证实践的使用率,应考虑在这些层面进行干预。
{"title":"Practice Pattern Variation in Adoption of New and Evolving Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Procedures","authors":"Diana Naranjo,&nbsp;Jacob Doll,&nbsp;Charles Maynard,&nbsp;Kristine Beaver,&nbsp;Aasthaa Bansal,&nbsp;Christian D. Helfrich","doi":"10.1155/2023/2488045","DOIUrl":"10.1155/2023/2488045","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 <p><i>Objective</i>. Assess factors contributing to variation in the use of new and evolving diagnostic and interventional procedures for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). <i>Background</i>. Evidence-based practices for PCI have the potential to improve outcomes but are variably adopted. Finding possible drivers of PCI procedure-use variability is key for efforts aimed at establishing more uniform practice. <i>Methods</i>. Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking Program data were used to estimate a proportion of variation attributable to hospital-, operator-, and patient-level factors across (a) radial arterial access, (b) intravascular imaging/optical coherence tomography, and (c) atherectomy for PCI. We used random-effects models with hospital, operator, and patient random effects. Overlap between levels generated cumulative variability estimates greater than 100%. <i>Results</i>. A total of 445 operators performed 95,391 PCI procedures across 73 hospitals from 2011 to 2018. The rates of all procedures increased over this time. 24.45% of variability in the use of radial access was attributable to the hospital, 53.04% to the operator, and 57.83% to patient-level characteristics. 9.06% of the variability in intravascular imaging use was attributable to the hospital, 43.92% to the operator, and 21.20% to the patient. Lastly, 20.16% of the variability in use of atherectomy was attributed to the hospital, 34.63% to the operator, and 57.50% to the patient.<i>Conclusions</i>. The use of radial access, intracoronary imaging, and atherectomy is influenced by patient, operator, and hospital factors, but patient and operator-level effects predominate. Efforts to increase the use of evidence-based practices for PCI should consider interventions at these levels.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":16329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiology","volume":"2023 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10175015/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9469102","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Self-Expanding Versus Balloon Expanding Coronary Stents in Intervention of the Degenerated Saphenous Vein Graft: Memmingen Coronary Artery Bypass Stenosis Trial (MECAST) 自扩张与球囊扩张冠状动脉支架介入退行性隐静脉移植物:Memmingen冠状动脉旁路狭窄试验(MECAST)。
IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2023-04-06 DOI: 10.1155/2023/9412132
Marcus Siry, Burak Duymaz, Simon Biesenberger, Deborah Siry, Vanessa Kammerer, Andreas E. May

Objectives. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to compare the patient outcome after interventional therapy of saphenous vein graft (SVG) stenoses in an all-comers population receiving either self-expanding drug-eluting stents (SExS) or balloon expanding drug-eluting stents (BExS). Background. The interventional therapy of degenerated SVGs remains challenging. Diameter variations of stenotic segments and friable plaques can lead to malapposition and distal embolization with increased major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rates. Methods. 107 patients with a total of 130 SVG interventions were separated into two groups according to either SExS (n = 51) or BExS (n = 56) treatment. Primary endpoint was the MACE rate, which is defined as the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel (TVR), and target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 30 days and at one-year follow-up. Results. Both patient groups did not differ significantly regarding patient characteristics. The patient outcome was significantly better in the SExS patient group: the MACE rate at 30 days was 1/51 (2.0%) in group SExS vs. 7/56 (12.5%) in group BExS; p < 0.05. At one-year follow-up, the MACE rate remained significantly lower in the SExS group 8/51(15.7%) vs. 20/56 (35.7%) in the BExS group, p < 0.02. Additionally, cardiac death occurred significantly later within the SExS patient group compared to the BExS group (p < 0.05). A better overall outcome of patients with de novo SVG-stenosis compared to patients with previous CABG (coronary artery bypass graft) intervention was noted in both groups. Conclusion. Our findings demonstrate that SVG treatment with SExS is safe and provides clinical benefits by comparatively improving short and especially long-term patient outcomes.

目的:本回顾性分析的目的是比较接受自扩张药物洗脱支架(SExS)或球囊扩张药物洗脱支架(BExS)的所有患者在接受隐静脉移植(SVG)狭窄介入治疗后的患者预后。背景:svg变性的介入治疗仍然具有挑战性。狭窄节段和易碎斑块的直径变化可导致错位和远端栓塞,增加主要不良心脏事件(MACE)发生率。方法:将107例共130种SVG干预措施的患者根据SExS (n = 51)和BExS (n = 56)治疗分为两组。主要终点为MACE率,定义为30天和1年随访时心源性死亡、心肌梗死(MI)、靶血管(TVR)和靶病变血运重建术(TLR)的总和。结果:两组患者在患者特征上无显著差异。SExS组患者预后明显更好:30天MACE率为SExS组1/51 (2.0%),BExS组7/56 (12.5%);P < 0.05。随访1年时,SExS组的MACE率8/51(15.7%)明显低于BExS组的20/56 (35.7%),p < 0.02。此外,与BExS组相比,SExS组发生心源性死亡的时间明显晚于BExS组(p < 0.05)。在两组中,新发svg狭窄患者的总体预后均优于既往CABG(冠状动脉旁路移植术)干预的患者。结论:我们的研究结果表明SVG与SExS治疗是安全的,并且通过相对改善患者的短期和特别是长期预后提供临床益处。
{"title":"Self-Expanding Versus Balloon Expanding Coronary Stents in Intervention of the Degenerated Saphenous Vein Graft: Memmingen Coronary Artery Bypass Stenosis Trial (MECAST)","authors":"Marcus Siry,&nbsp;Burak Duymaz,&nbsp;Simon Biesenberger,&nbsp;Deborah Siry,&nbsp;Vanessa Kammerer,&nbsp;Andreas E. May","doi":"10.1155/2023/9412132","DOIUrl":"10.1155/2023/9412132","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 <p><i>Objectives</i>. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to compare the patient outcome after interventional therapy of saphenous vein graft (SVG) stenoses in an all-comers population receiving either self-expanding drug-eluting stents (SExS) or balloon expanding drug-eluting stents (BExS). <i>Background</i>. The interventional therapy of degenerated SVGs remains challenging. Diameter variations of stenotic segments and friable plaques can lead to malapposition and distal embolization with increased major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rates. <i>Methods</i>. 107 patients with a total of 130 SVG interventions were separated into two groups according to either SExS (<i>n</i> = 51) or BExS (<i>n</i> = 56) treatment. Primary endpoint was the MACE rate, which is defined as the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel (TVR), and target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 30 days and at one-year follow-up. <i>Results</i>. Both patient groups did not differ significantly regarding patient characteristics. The patient outcome was significantly better in the SExS patient group: the MACE rate at 30 days was 1/51 (2.0%) in group SExS vs. 7/56 (12.5%) in group BExS; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05. At one-year follow-up, the MACE rate remained significantly lower in the SExS group 8/51(15.7%) vs. 20/56 (35.7%) in the BExS group, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.02. Additionally, cardiac death occurred significantly later within the SExS patient group compared to the BExS group (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). A better overall outcome of patients with de novo SVG-stenosis compared to patients with previous CABG (coronary artery bypass graft) intervention was noted in both groups. <i>Conclusion</i>. Our findings demonstrate that SVG treatment with SExS is safe and provides clinical benefits by comparatively improving short and especially long-term patient outcomes.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":16329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiology","volume":"2023 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2023-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10101740/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9310026","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Monitoring Spike Potential and Abrupt Impedance Rise with Concomitant Temperature/Contact Force Change for Timely Detection of the Occurrence of “Silent” or “Nonaudible” Steam Pop 监测尖峰电位和阻抗骤然升高以及伴随的温度/接触力变化,及时发现 "无声 "或 "听不见 "的蒸汽爆裂。
IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2023-04-05 DOI: 10.1155/2023/8873404
Chengye Di, Qun Wang, Yanxi Wu, Longyu Li, Wenhua Lin

Aim. Steam pop (SP) during radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) may cause cardiac perforation, which may require drainage and emergent thoracotomy or even lead to death. Data investigating the timely detection of the occurrence of “silent” or “nonaudible” SP events are limited. Methods and Results. A total of 516 consecutive atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who underwent index PVI were included in this retrospective observational study. The duration, power, impedance, temperature, and contact force (CF) of RFCA were continually monitored and recorded throughout the procedure. A total of 15 (2.9%) audible SP events occurred in 14 patients; 2 of the patients developed pericardial tamponade, 1 patient underwent drainage, and 1 patient underwent emergent thoracotomy. The time from RFCA initiation to the occurrence of audible SP was 19.4 ± 6.9 s. Abrupt temperature change occurred in 13 (86.7%) of the 15 SP events, of which 8 (53.3%) exhibited an abrupt temperature rise of 2.3 ± 1.0°C, 5 (33.3%) exhibited an abrupt temperature drop of 2.3 ± 1.3°C, and 2 (13.3%) exhibited no discernible temperature change. Conclusions. In conclusion, simultaneously recorded spike potentials and abrupt impedance rise with concomitant temperature and/or CF change could be a feasible method for the timely detection of the occurrence of audible, “silent,” or “nonaudible” SP events, particularly in regions where the risk of perforation may be of concern.

目的:肺静脉隔离术(PVI)射频导管消融(RFCA)过程中的蒸汽爆裂(SP)可能会导致心脏穿孔,可能需要引流和紧急开胸手术,甚至导致死亡。及时发现 "无声 "或 "听不见 "SP事件的研究数据非常有限:这项回顾性观察研究共纳入了 516 名连续接受指数 PVI 的心房颤动(房颤)患者。在整个手术过程中持续监测和记录了 RFCA 的持续时间、功率、阻抗、温度和接触力 (CF)。14 名患者共发生了 15 次(2.9%)可闻及的 SP 事件;其中 2 名患者出现心包填塞,1 名患者进行了引流,1 名患者进行了紧急开胸手术。从开始实施 RFCA 到发生可闻 SP 的时间为 19.4±6.9 秒。15 个 SP 事件中有 13 个(86.7%)发生了温度骤变,其中 8 个(53.3%)显示温度骤升 2.3 ± 1.0°C,5 个(33.3%)显示温度骤降 2.3 ± 1.3°C,2 个(13.3%)显示温度无明显变化:总之,同时记录尖峰电位和阻抗骤然升高,并伴随温度和/或 CF 变化,是及时发现可闻、"无声 "或 "不可闻 "SP 事件的可行方法,尤其是在可能存在穿孔风险的地区。
{"title":"Monitoring Spike Potential and Abrupt Impedance Rise with Concomitant Temperature/Contact Force Change for Timely Detection of the Occurrence of “Silent” or “Nonaudible” Steam Pop","authors":"Chengye Di,&nbsp;Qun Wang,&nbsp;Yanxi Wu,&nbsp;Longyu Li,&nbsp;Wenhua Lin","doi":"10.1155/2023/8873404","DOIUrl":"10.1155/2023/8873404","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 <p><i>Aim</i>. Steam pop (SP) during radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) may cause cardiac perforation, which may require drainage and emergent thoracotomy or even lead to death. Data investigating the timely detection of the occurrence of “silent” or “nonaudible” SP events are limited. <i>Methods and Results</i>. A total of 516 consecutive atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who underwent index PVI were included in this retrospective observational study. The duration, power, impedance, temperature, and contact force (CF) of RFCA were continually monitored and recorded throughout the procedure. A total of 15 (2.9%) audible SP events occurred in 14 patients; 2 of the patients developed pericardial tamponade, 1 patient underwent drainage, and 1 patient underwent emergent thoracotomy. The time from RFCA initiation to the occurrence of audible SP was 19.4 ± 6.9 s. Abrupt temperature change occurred in 13 (86.7%) of the 15 SP events, of which 8 (53.3%) exhibited an abrupt temperature rise of 2.3 ± 1.0°C, 5 (33.3%) exhibited an abrupt temperature drop of 2.3 ± 1.3°C, and 2 (13.3%) exhibited no discernible temperature change. <i>Conclusions</i>. In conclusion, simultaneously recorded spike potentials and abrupt impedance rise with concomitant temperature and/or CF change could be a feasible method for the timely detection of the occurrence of audible, “silent,” or “nonaudible” SP events, particularly in regions where the risk of perforation may be of concern.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":16329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiology","volume":"2023 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2023-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10098411/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9310025","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The “L-Sandwich” Strategy for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Randomized Clinical Trial “l -三明治”策略治疗真冠状动脉分叉病变:一项随机临床试验。
IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2023-03-21 DOI: 10.1155/2023/6889836
Quan Guo, Liang Peng, Lixin Rao, Cao Ma, Kang Zhao, Zhenzhou Zhao, Haiyu Tang, Muwei Li

Background. This study explored the efficacy of the “L-sandwich” strategy, which involves the implantation of stents in the main vessel (MV) and shaft of the side branch (SB) with a drug-coated balloon (DCB) applied to the SB ostium, for coronary true bifurcation lesions. Methods and Results. Of 99 patients with true bifurcation lesions, 38 patients underwent the “L-sandwich” strategy (group A), 32 patients underwent a two-stent strategy (group B), and 29 patients underwent a single-stent + DCB strategy (group C). Angiography outcomes (late lumen loss [LLL], minimum lumen diameter [MLD]), and clinical outcomes (major adverse cardiac events [MACEs]) were analyzed. At 6 months, the MLD of the SB ostium in groups A and B were similar (P > 0.05) and group A larger than group C (P < 0.05). The LLL of group B was the largest among the three groups (P < 0.05). The MLD of the SB shaft in groups A and B were larger than in group C (P < 0.05). The LLL of the SB shaft in group C was the lowest (P < 0.05). Two patients in group B received target vessel revascularization at the 6-month followup (P > 0.05), and patients in the other groups had no MACEs. Conclusions. The “L-sandwich” strategy was feasible for the treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions. It is a simpler procedure with similar acute lumen gain than the two-stent strategy, results in a larger SB lumen than the single-stent + DCB strategy, and it can also be used as a remedy for dissection following the single-stent + DCB strategy.

背景:本研究探讨了“L-sandwich”策略对冠状动脉真分叉病变的疗效,该策略涉及将药物包被球囊(DCB)应用于侧支(SB)口,在主血管(MV)和侧支(SB)轴植入支架。方法与结果:99例真分叉病变患者中,38例患者采用“L-sandwich”策略(A组),32例患者采用双支架策略(B组),29例患者采用单支架+ DCB策略(C组)。分析血管造影结果(晚期管腔损失[LLL],最小管腔直径[MLD])和临床结果(主要心脏不良事件[mes])。6个月时,A组和B组SB口MLD相似(P > 0.05), A组大于C组(P < 0.05)。B组的LLL在3组中最大(P < 0.05)。A、B组SB轴MLD均大于C组(P < 0.05)。C组SB轴的LLL最低(P < 0.05)。B组2例患者在随访6个月时完成靶血管重建术(P > 0.05),其他组患者均未发生mace。结论:“L-sandwich”治疗真冠状动脉分叉病变是可行的。它是一种更简单的手术,与双支架策略具有相似的急性管腔增益,结果比单支架+ DCB策略更大的SB管腔,并且它也可以作为单支架+ DCB策略后的夹层补救措施。
{"title":"The “L-Sandwich” Strategy for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Randomized Clinical Trial","authors":"Quan Guo,&nbsp;Liang Peng,&nbsp;Lixin Rao,&nbsp;Cao Ma,&nbsp;Kang Zhao,&nbsp;Zhenzhou Zhao,&nbsp;Haiyu Tang,&nbsp;Muwei Li","doi":"10.1155/2023/6889836","DOIUrl":"10.1155/2023/6889836","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 <p><i>Background</i>. This study explored the efficacy of the “<i>L</i>-sandwich” strategy, which involves the implantation of stents in the main vessel (MV) and shaft of the side branch (SB) with a drug-coated balloon (DCB) applied to the SB ostium, for coronary true bifurcation lesions. <i>Methods and Results</i>. Of 99 patients with true bifurcation lesions, 38 patients underwent the “<i>L</i>-sandwich” strategy (group <i>A</i>), 32 patients underwent a two-stent strategy (group <i>B</i>), and 29 patients underwent a single-stent + DCB strategy (group <i>C</i>). Angiography outcomes (late lumen loss [LLL], minimum lumen diameter [MLD]), and clinical outcomes (major adverse cardiac events [MACEs]) were analyzed. At 6 months, the MLD of the SB ostium in groups <i>A</i> and <i>B</i> were similar (<i>P</i> &gt; 0.05) and group <i>A</i> larger than group <i>C</i> (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05). The LLL of group <i>B</i> was the largest among the three groups (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05). The MLD of the SB shaft in groups <i>A</i> and <i>B</i> were larger than in group <i>C</i> (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05). The LLL of the SB shaft in group <i>C</i> was the lowest (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05). Two patients in group <i>B</i> received target vessel revascularization at the 6-month followup (<i>P</i> &gt; 0.05), and patients in the other groups had no MACEs. <i>Conclusions</i>. The “<i>L</i>-sandwich” strategy was feasible for the treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions. It is a simpler procedure with similar acute lumen gain than the two-stent strategy, results in a larger SB lumen than the single-stent + DCB strategy, and it can also be used as a remedy for dissection following the single-stent + DCB strategy.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":16329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiology","volume":"2023 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2023-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10049845/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9587626","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effect of Radial Artery Compression with a Novel Automatic Pressure-Controlled Radial Compression Device: A Short-Term Prospective Interventional Pilot Study 一种新型自动压力控制桡动脉压缩装置对桡动脉压缩的影响:一项短期前瞻性介入先导研究。
IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2023-03-07 DOI: 10.1155/2023/7533702
HaiZhen Xu, Junya Cheng, DanYing Zhang, Liang Shen, Yingjie Jiang, ChangLin Zhai

This study was conducted to design a novel radial compression device with the function of automatic pressure control and evaluate the feasibility and safety of this new technique. Patients who underwent transradial access (TRA) coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the First Hospital of Jiaxing between August 2021and October 2021 were prospectively enrolled in this pilot interventional study. The patients were grouped in a 1 : 1 ratio to receive compression with a novel device (the experimental group) or a conventional device without pressure control (the control group). The primary endpoint was the compression time, and the main secondary endpoints were rebleeding, upper-limb swelling, radial artery occlusion (RAO), and device-related pressure injury (DPI). Eighty-four patients were enrolled in this study. No significant differences were found in the baseline clinical characteristics between the two groups. Compared with the control group, the compression time in the experimental group was significantly reduced (207.4 ± 15.5 vs. 378.1 ± 19 min, p < 0.001). Besides, the rate of upper-limb swelling was also significantly lower in the novel device group (2.4% vs. 85.7%, p < 0.001), as well as the rate of DPI (19.05% vs. 100%, p = 0.005). Furthermore, the pain score in the experimental group was significantly lower than in the control group (0.79 ± 0.42 vs. 1.83 ± 0.58, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the rate of rebleeding (7.1% vs. 14.3, p = 0.48) between the two groups. In addition, no RAO occurred in any of the groups. The novel automatic pressure-controlled radial compression device could reduce the hemostasis time and decrease the rate of adverse complications. It might be a promising and effective compression device in TRA coronary invasive procedures.

设计了一种具有压力自动控制功能的径向压缩装置,并对其可行性和安全性进行了评价。2021年8月至2021年10月期间在嘉兴市第一医院行经桡动脉通道(TRA)冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者被前瞻性纳入本介入试验研究。患者按1:1的比例进行分组,分别使用新型装置(实验组)和无压力控制的传统装置(对照组)进行按压。主要终点为压迫时间,次要终点为再出血、上肢肿胀、桡动脉闭塞(RAO)和器械相关压力损伤(DPI)。84名患者参加了这项研究。两组患者的基线临床特征无显著差异。与对照组相比,实验组压缩时间明显缩短(207.4±15.5 vs. 378.1±19 min, p p p = 0.005)。实验组疼痛评分明显低于对照组(0.79±0.42∶1.83±0.58,p p = 0.48)。此外,在任何组中均未发生RAO。该新型自动压力控制径向压缩装置可缩短止血时间,降低不良并发症发生率。它可能是一种有前途和有效的压缩装置在TRA冠状动脉侵入性手术。
{"title":"Effect of Radial Artery Compression with a Novel Automatic Pressure-Controlled Radial Compression Device: A Short-Term Prospective Interventional Pilot Study","authors":"HaiZhen Xu,&nbsp;Junya Cheng,&nbsp;DanYing Zhang,&nbsp;Liang Shen,&nbsp;Yingjie Jiang,&nbsp;ChangLin Zhai","doi":"10.1155/2023/7533702","DOIUrl":"10.1155/2023/7533702","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 <p>This study was conducted to design a novel radial compression device with the function of automatic pressure control and evaluate the feasibility and safety of this new technique. Patients who underwent transradial access (TRA) coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the First Hospital of Jiaxing between August 2021and October 2021 were prospectively enrolled in this pilot interventional study. The patients were grouped in a 1 : 1 ratio to receive compression with a novel device (the experimental group) or a conventional device without pressure control (the control group). The primary endpoint was the compression time, and the main secondary endpoints were rebleeding, upper-limb swelling, radial artery occlusion (RAO), and device-related pressure injury (DPI). Eighty-four patients were enrolled in this study. No significant differences were found in the baseline clinical characteristics between the two groups. Compared with the control group, the compression time in the experimental group was significantly reduced (207.4 ± 15.5 vs. 378.1 ± 19 min, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Besides, the rate of upper-limb swelling was also significantly lower in the novel device group (2.4% vs. 85.7%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), as well as the rate of DPI (19.05% vs. 100%, <i>p</i> = 0.005). Furthermore, the pain score in the experimental group was significantly lower than in the control group (0.79 ± 0.42 vs. 1.83 ± 0.58, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). There were no significant differences in the rate of rebleeding (7.1% vs. 14.3, <i>p</i> = 0.48) between the two groups. In addition, no RAO occurred in any of the groups. The novel automatic pressure-controlled radial compression device could reduce the hemostasis time and decrease the rate of adverse complications. It might be a promising and effective compression device in TRA coronary invasive procedures.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":16329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiology","volume":"2023 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10014152/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9139702","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of interventional cardiology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1