首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Medical Internet Research最新文献

英文 中文
Tailored Internet-Delivered Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Transarterial Chemoembolization: Qualitative Study. 针对肝细胞癌经动脉化疗栓塞后患者量身定制的基于互联网的正念干预:定性研究。
IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-01-29 DOI: 10.2196/78337
Zengxia Liu, Min Li, Yong Jia, Li Chen

Background: Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) experience significant psychological distress, impacting outcomes. While mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) are beneficial, access is limited. Internet-delivered MBIs (iMBIs) offer an accessible alternative; yet, qualitative understanding of patient experiences with tailored iMBIs for this specific population is lacking.

Objective: This study aimed to explore the facilitators and barriers of patients with HCC post TACE and participated in tailored iMBIs.

Methods: From November 2020 to December 2022, 11 patients with HCC post TACE who had taken part in tailored iMBIs were purposively recruited from a tertiary hospital in Jilin Province. Data were collected through semistructured interviews lasting 30-60 minutes. The interviews were analyzed using conventional content analysis.

Results: Five main categories emerged from the analysis: (1) mindfulness mindset, including acceptance, calmness, and mood improvement; (2) improvement of physical discomfort, such as better sleep, pain relief, reduced gastrointestinal symptoms, and increased activity levels; (3) resistance to mindfulness practice, including perceived lack of effectiveness, unsuitable conditions, equipment limitations, and difficulty concentrating; (4) support and encouragement, involving social support, supervision, and professional guidance; and (5) accessibility and convenience characterized by restoration of life balance and user-friendly features of the practice. Each category encompassed several subcategories reflecting the diverse experiences of participants.

Conclusions: While iMBIs were generally perceived as convenient and accessible, challenges such as equipment limitations were noted. Future implementation should focus on enhancing supportive factors to improve adherence, minimizing barriers, and refining the design and delivery of iMBI programs.

Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR1900027976; https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=46657.

背景:肝细胞癌(HCC)接受经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)的患者会经历显著的心理困扰,影响预后。虽然正念干预(mbi)是有益的,但获取途径有限。互联网传输的mbi (imbi)提供了一种可访问的替代方案;然而,针对这一特定人群的量身定制的imbi患者体验的定性理解是缺乏的。目的:本研究旨在探讨HCC患者TACE后的促进因素和障碍,并参与量身定制的imbi。方法:从2020年11月至2022年12月,在吉林省某三级医院有目的地招募11例参加过量身定制imbi的肝癌术后TACE患者。数据通过持续30-60分钟的半结构化访谈收集。访谈采用常规内容分析法进行分析。结果:从分析中得出五个主要类别:(1)正念心态,包括接纳、平静和情绪改善;(2)改善身体不适,如改善睡眠、缓解疼痛、减轻胃肠道症状和增加活动水平;(3)抗拒正念练习,包括感觉缺乏有效性、条件不合适、设备限制和难以集中注意力;(4)支持和鼓励,包括社会支持、监督和专业指导;(5)以恢复生活平衡和人性化为特征的可达性和便利性。每个类别都包含若干子类别,反映了参与者的不同经历。结论:虽然imbi通常被认为是方便和可访问的,但注意到设备限制等挑战。未来的实施应侧重于加强支持性因素,以提高依从性,最大限度地减少障碍,并改进iMBI项目的设计和交付。试验注册:中国临床试验注册中心ChiCTR1900027976;https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=46657。
{"title":"Tailored Internet-Delivered Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Transarterial Chemoembolization: Qualitative Study.","authors":"Zengxia Liu, Min Li, Yong Jia, Li Chen","doi":"10.2196/78337","DOIUrl":"10.2196/78337","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) experience significant psychological distress, impacting outcomes. While mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) are beneficial, access is limited. Internet-delivered MBIs (iMBIs) offer an accessible alternative; yet, qualitative understanding of patient experiences with tailored iMBIs for this specific population is lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to explore the facilitators and barriers of patients with HCC post TACE and participated in tailored iMBIs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From November 2020 to December 2022, 11 patients with HCC post TACE who had taken part in tailored iMBIs were purposively recruited from a tertiary hospital in Jilin Province. Data were collected through semistructured interviews lasting 30-60 minutes. The interviews were analyzed using conventional content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five main categories emerged from the analysis: (1) mindfulness mindset, including acceptance, calmness, and mood improvement; (2) improvement of physical discomfort, such as better sleep, pain relief, reduced gastrointestinal symptoms, and increased activity levels; (3) resistance to mindfulness practice, including perceived lack of effectiveness, unsuitable conditions, equipment limitations, and difficulty concentrating; (4) support and encouragement, involving social support, supervision, and professional guidance; and (5) accessibility and convenience characterized by restoration of life balance and user-friendly features of the practice. Each category encompassed several subcategories reflecting the diverse experiences of participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While iMBIs were generally perceived as convenient and accessible, challenges such as equipment limitations were noted. Future implementation should focus on enhancing supportive factors to improve adherence, minimizing barriers, and refining the design and delivery of iMBI programs.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR1900027976; https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=46657.</p>","PeriodicalId":16337,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","volume":"28 ","pages":"e78337"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12902756/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146086107","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assistive Robotics for Healthy Aging: A Foundational Phenomenological Co-Design Exercise. 健康老龄化的辅助机器人:基础现象学协同设计练习。
IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-01-28 DOI: 10.2196/77179
Stephen Potter, Mark Hawley, Angela Higgins, Farshid Amirabdollahian, Mauro Dragone, Alessandro Di Nuovo, Praminda Caleb-Solly

Background: Assistive robotics for helping older people live well and stay independent has, to date, failed to fulfill its promise: there are few assistive robots in everyday use. In part, this failing can be attributed to inadequate or missing co-design activities that would ensure that these technologies and any services that incorporate them are developed with prospective end users, addressing their actual needs and wants, and not merely for them, and based on lazy assumptions about heterogeneous user groups.

Objective: This exercise aimed to address some of these limitations by taking a "phenomenological snapshot" of what it means to be an older person in the current sociotechnological context, and making this snapshot, along with the co-design materials developed, available to the wider assistive robotics community to provide solid foundational evidence for steering the development of assistive robotics in more productive directions.

Methods: Two rounds of co-design workshops have been conducted with older people and their caregivers, based on an innovative methodology that used personas and speculative designs to explore sensitive everyday difficulties faced by participants and highlight some of their general wishes for and concerns about assistive robotics. The data collected during the workshops were analyzed, and key themes were extracted.

Results: Analysis of the workshop data gives access to the lived experience of older people and their caregivers, and their opinions about domestic robotics and assistive technologies more generally. The findings are organized thematically as everyday difficulties, the daily problems faced by older people; ideas for aging better, older people's own suggestions for how their lives could be improved; and living with technology, their preferences and requirements for assistive robots, along with their concerns about what the introduction of robots might mean, both for themselves and for society more widely.

Conclusions: We believe that our findings provide solid foundational evidence for the development of assistive robotics for older people. We are in the process of disseminating these results through various channels to the wider assistive robotics community; ultimately, the success of our activities will be demonstrated only through the development of acceptable, useful, and viable assistive robotics for older people.

背景:迄今为止,帮助老年人更好地生活和保持独立的辅助机器人尚未实现其承诺:日常使用的辅助机器人很少。在某种程度上,这种失败可以归因于不充分或缺失的协同设计活动,这些活动可以确保这些技术和包含它们的任何服务是与潜在的最终用户一起开发的,满足他们的实际需求和愿望,而不仅仅是为了他们,并且基于对异构用户组的懒惰假设。目的:本练习旨在通过对当前社会技术背景下老年人的含义进行“现象学快照”来解决其中的一些限制,并使该快照以及开发的协同设计材料可用于更广泛的辅助机器人社区,为指导辅助机器人技术向更富有成效的方向发展提供坚实的基础证据。​对研讨会期间收集的数据进行了分析,并提取了关键主题。结果:通过对研讨会数据的分析,可以了解老年人及其护理人员的生活经验,以及他们对家用机器人和辅助技术的普遍看法。调查结果按主题组织为日常困难,老年人面临的日常问题;如何更好地老化的想法,老年人对如何改善生活的建议;与科技共存,他们对辅助机器人的偏好和要求,以及他们对机器人引入对他们自己和更广泛的社会可能意味着什么的担忧。结论:我们相信我们的发现为老年人辅助机器人的发展提供了坚实的基础证据。我们正在通过各种渠道向更广泛的辅助机器人社区传播这些结果;最终,我们的活动的成功将通过为老年人开发可接受的、有用的、可行的辅助机器人来证明。
{"title":"Assistive Robotics for Healthy Aging: A Foundational Phenomenological Co-Design Exercise.","authors":"Stephen Potter, Mark Hawley, Angela Higgins, Farshid Amirabdollahian, Mauro Dragone, Alessandro Di Nuovo, Praminda Caleb-Solly","doi":"10.2196/77179","DOIUrl":"10.2196/77179","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assistive robotics for helping older people live well and stay independent has, to date, failed to fulfill its promise: there are few assistive robots in everyday use. In part, this failing can be attributed to inadequate or missing co-design activities that would ensure that these technologies and any services that incorporate them are developed with prospective end users, addressing their actual needs and wants, and not merely for them, and based on lazy assumptions about heterogeneous user groups.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This exercise aimed to address some of these limitations by taking a \"phenomenological snapshot\" of what it means to be an older person in the current sociotechnological context, and making this snapshot, along with the co-design materials developed, available to the wider assistive robotics community to provide solid foundational evidence for steering the development of assistive robotics in more productive directions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two rounds of co-design workshops have been conducted with older people and their caregivers, based on an innovative methodology that used personas and speculative designs to explore sensitive everyday difficulties faced by participants and highlight some of their general wishes for and concerns about assistive robotics. The data collected during the workshops were analyzed, and key themes were extracted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of the workshop data gives access to the lived experience of older people and their caregivers, and their opinions about domestic robotics and assistive technologies more generally. The findings are organized thematically as everyday difficulties, the daily problems faced by older people; ideas for aging better, older people's own suggestions for how their lives could be improved; and living with technology, their preferences and requirements for assistive robots, along with their concerns about what the introduction of robots might mean, both for themselves and for society more widely.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We believe that our findings provide solid foundational evidence for the development of assistive robotics for older people. We are in the process of disseminating these results through various channels to the wider assistive robotics community; ultimately, the success of our activities will be demonstrated only through the development of acceptable, useful, and viable assistive robotics for older people.</p>","PeriodicalId":16337,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","volume":"28 ","pages":"e77179"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12895153/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146194562","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Development and Use of AI Chatbots for Health Behavior Change: Scoping Review. 人工智能聊天机器人在健康行为改变中的发展和使用:范围审查。
IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-01-28 DOI: 10.2196/79677
Lingyi Fu, Ryan Burns, Yuhuan Xie, Jincheng Shen, Shandian Zhe, Paul Estabrooks, Yang Bai
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots are technologies that facilitate human-computer interaction through communication in a natural language format. By increasing cost-effectiveness, interaction, autonomy, personalization, and support, mobile health interventions can benefit health behavior change and make it more natural and intuitive.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to provide an up-to-date and practical overview of how text-based AI chatbots are designed, developed, and evaluated across 8 health behaviors, including their roles, theoretical foundations, health behavior change techniques, technology development workflow, and performance validation framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In accordance with the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) framework, relevant studies published before March 2024 were identified from 9 bibliographic databases (ie, PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, APA PsycINFO, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Digital Library). Two stages (ie, title and abstract screening followed by full-text screening) were conducted to screen the eligibility of the papers via Covidence software. Finally, we extracted the data via Microsoft Excel software and used a narrative approach, content analysis, and evidence map to synthesize the reported results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our systematic search initially identified 10,508 publications, 43 of which met our inclusion criteria. AI chatbots primarily served 2 main roles: routine coach (27/43, 62.79%) and on-demand assistant (12/43, 27.91%), while 4 studies (4/43, 9.30%) integrated both roles. Frameworks like cognitive behavioral therapy (13/24, 54.17%) and behavior change techniques, such as goal setting, feedback and monitoring, and social support, guided the development of theory-driven AI chatbots. Noncode platforms (eg, Google Dialogflow and IBM Watson) integrated with social messaging platforms (eg, Facebook Messenger) were commonly used to develop AI chatbots (23/43, 53.49%). AI chatbots have been evaluated across 4 domains: technical performance (17/43, 39.53%), usability (17/43, 39.53%), engagement (37/43, 86.05%), and health behavior change (33/43, 76.74%). Evidence for health behavior changes remains exploratory but promising. Among 33 studies with 120 comparisons, 81.67% (98/120) showed positive outcomes, though only 35.83% (43/120) had moderate or larger effects (Hedges g or odds ratio or Cohen d>0.5). Most involved nonclinical (36/43, 83.72%) and adults (23/43, 53.49%), and a few were randomized controlled trials (14/43, 32.56%). Benefits were mainly seen in physical activity, smoking cessation, stress management, and diet, with limited evidence for other behaviors. Findings were inconsistent regarding the influence of long-term effects, intervention duration, modality, and engagement on health behavior change outcomes.</p><p><st
背景:人工智能(AI)聊天机器人是一种通过自然语言格式的通信促进人机交互的技术。通过提高成本效益、互动、自主、个性化和支持,移动卫生干预措施可有利于卫生行为改变,使其更加自然和直观。目的:本研究旨在为基于文本的人工智能聊天机器人的设计、开发和评估提供最新和实用的概述,包括它们的角色、理论基础、健康行为改变技术、技术开发流程和性能验证框架。方法:按照PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and meta - analysis extension for Scoping Reviews)框架,从9个书目数据库(PubMed、CINAHL、MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science、Scopus、APA PsycINFO、IEEE Xplore和ACM Digital Library)中检索2024年3月前发表的相关研究。通过covid - ence软件筛选论文的合格性分为两个阶段(即标题和摘要筛选,然后是全文筛选)。最后,我们通过Microsoft Excel软件提取数据,并采用叙述方法、内容分析和证据图对报告结果进行综合。结果:我们的系统检索最初确定了10,508篇出版物,其中43篇符合我们的纳入标准。AI聊天机器人主要扮演两个主要角色:日常教练(27/43,62.79%)和点选助手(12/43,27.91%),有4项研究(4/43,9.30%)将这两个角色整合在一起。认知行为疗法(13/24,54.17%)和行为改变技术(如目标设定、反馈和监控、社会支持)等框架指导了理论驱动型人工智能聊天机器人的发展。非代码平台(如谷歌Dialogflow和IBM Watson)与社交消息平台(如Facebook Messenger)集成在一起,通常用于开发人工智能聊天机器人(23/43,53.49%)。人工智能聊天机器人在4个领域进行了评估:技术性能(17/43,39.53%)、可用性(17/43,39.53%)、参与度(37/43,86.05%)和健康行为改变(33/43,76.74%)。健康行为改变的证据仍然是探索性的,但很有希望。33项研究共120组比较中,81.67%(98/120)的结果为阳性,但只有35.83%(43/120)的结果为中等或较大的效果(Hedges g or比值比或Cohen d >.5)。大多数涉及非临床(36/43,83.72%)和成人(23/43,53.49%),少数为随机对照试验(14/43,32.56%)。益处主要体现在体育锻炼、戒烟、压力管理和饮食方面,其他行为方面的证据有限。关于长期效果、干预持续时间、方式和参与对健康行为改变结果的影响,研究结果不一致。结论:探索性综合为开发和评估人工智能聊天机器人在健康行为改变中的作用提供了路线图,强调需要进一步研究成本、实施结果以及睡眠、体重管理、久坐行为和酒精使用等未被充分探索的行为。
{"title":"The Development and Use of AI Chatbots for Health Behavior Change: Scoping Review.","authors":"Lingyi Fu, Ryan Burns, Yuhuan Xie, Jincheng Shen, Shandian Zhe, Paul Estabrooks, Yang Bai","doi":"10.2196/79677","DOIUrl":"10.2196/79677","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots are technologies that facilitate human-computer interaction through communication in a natural language format. By increasing cost-effectiveness, interaction, autonomy, personalization, and support, mobile health interventions can benefit health behavior change and make it more natural and intuitive.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;This study aimed to provide an up-to-date and practical overview of how text-based AI chatbots are designed, developed, and evaluated across 8 health behaviors, including their roles, theoretical foundations, health behavior change techniques, technology development workflow, and performance validation framework.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;In accordance with the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) framework, relevant studies published before March 2024 were identified from 9 bibliographic databases (ie, PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, APA PsycINFO, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Digital Library). Two stages (ie, title and abstract screening followed by full-text screening) were conducted to screen the eligibility of the papers via Covidence software. Finally, we extracted the data via Microsoft Excel software and used a narrative approach, content analysis, and evidence map to synthesize the reported results.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Our systematic search initially identified 10,508 publications, 43 of which met our inclusion criteria. AI chatbots primarily served 2 main roles: routine coach (27/43, 62.79%) and on-demand assistant (12/43, 27.91%), while 4 studies (4/43, 9.30%) integrated both roles. Frameworks like cognitive behavioral therapy (13/24, 54.17%) and behavior change techniques, such as goal setting, feedback and monitoring, and social support, guided the development of theory-driven AI chatbots. Noncode platforms (eg, Google Dialogflow and IBM Watson) integrated with social messaging platforms (eg, Facebook Messenger) were commonly used to develop AI chatbots (23/43, 53.49%). AI chatbots have been evaluated across 4 domains: technical performance (17/43, 39.53%), usability (17/43, 39.53%), engagement (37/43, 86.05%), and health behavior change (33/43, 76.74%). Evidence for health behavior changes remains exploratory but promising. Among 33 studies with 120 comparisons, 81.67% (98/120) showed positive outcomes, though only 35.83% (43/120) had moderate or larger effects (Hedges g or odds ratio or Cohen d&gt;0.5). Most involved nonclinical (36/43, 83.72%) and adults (23/43, 53.49%), and a few were randomized controlled trials (14/43, 32.56%). Benefits were mainly seen in physical activity, smoking cessation, stress management, and diet, with limited evidence for other behaviors. Findings were inconsistent regarding the influence of long-term effects, intervention duration, modality, and engagement on health behavior change outcomes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;st","PeriodicalId":16337,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","volume":"28 ","pages":"e79677"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12895150/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146086122","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Implementing an Artificial Intelligence Decision Support System in Radiology: Prospective Qualitative Evaluation Study Using the Nonadoption Abandonment Scale-Up, Spread, and Sustainability (NASSS) Framework. 在放射学中实施人工智能决策支持系统:使用不采用放弃、扩大、传播和可持续性(NASSS)框架的前瞻性定性评估研究。
IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-01-28 DOI: 10.2196/80342
Sundresan Naicker, Paul Schmidt, Bruce Shar, Amina Tariq, Ashleigh Earnshaw, Steven McPhail
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical imaging remains at the forefront of advancements in adopting digital health technologies in clinical practice. Regulator-approved artificial intelligence (AI) clinical decision support systems are commercially available and being embedded into routine practices for radiologists internationally. These decision support solutions show promising clinical validity compared to standard practice conditions; however, their implementation over time and implications on radiologists' practice are poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This paper aims to examine the real-world implementation of an AI clinical decision support tool in radiology through a qualitative evaluation across pre-, peri-, and postimplementation phases. Specifically, it seeks to identify the key contextual, organizational, and human factors shaping adoption and sustainability, to map these influences using the nonadoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread, and sustainability (NASSS) framework, and to generate insights that inform evidence-based strategies and policy for integrating AI safely and effectively into public hospital imaging services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study was conducted in a large public tertiary referral hospital in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. One-to-one participant interviews were undertaken across the 3 implementation phases. Participants comprised radiology consultants, registrars, and radiographers involved in chest computed tomography studies during the study period. Interviews were guided by the NASSS framework to identify contextual factors influencing implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 43 semistructured interviews were conducted across baseline (n=16), peri-implementation (n=9), and postimplementation (n=18) phases, comprising 7 (16%) radiographers, 20 (47%) registrar radiologists, and 16 (37%) consultant radiologists. Across NASSS domains, 56 barriers and 18 enablers were identified at baseline, 55 and 14 during peri-implementation, and 82 and 33 postimplementation. Organizational barriers dominated early phases, while technological issues such as system accuracy, interoperability, and information overload became most prominent during and after rollout. Enablers increased over time, particularly within the technology and value proposition domains, as some clinicians adapted the AI as a secondary safety check. Trust and adoption remained constrained by performance inconsistency, weak communication, and medicolegal uncertainty.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implementation of AI decision support in radiology is as much an organizational and cultural process as a technological one. Clinicians remain willing to engage, but sustainable adoption depends on consolidating early positive experiences and addressing negative ones, embedding communication and training, and maintaining iterative feedback between users, vendors, and system leaders. Applying t
背景:在临床实践中,医学成像仍然处于采用数字健康技术的前沿。监管机构批准的人工智能(AI)临床决策支持系统已经商业化,并被嵌入到国际放射科医生的常规实践中。与标准实践条件相比,这些决策支持解决方案显示出有希望的临床有效性;然而,随着时间的推移,它们的实施和对放射科医生实践的影响却知之甚少。目的:本文旨在通过实施前、实施中和实施后阶段的定性评估,研究人工智能临床决策支持工具在放射学中的实际实施情况。具体而言,它试图确定影响采用和可持续性的关键环境、组织和人为因素,使用不采用、放弃、扩大、传播和可持续性(NASSS)框架来绘制这些影响,并产生见解,为基于证据的战略和政策提供信息,以便安全有效地将人工智能整合到公立医院成像服务中。方法:本前瞻性研究在澳大利亚昆士兰州布里斯班的一家大型公立三级转诊医院进行。在三个实施阶段进行了一对一的参与者访谈。参与者包括在研究期间参与胸部计算机断层扫描研究的放射学顾问、登记员和放射技师。访谈以NASSS框架为指导,以确定影响实施的背景因素。结果:在基线(n=16)、实施期间(n=9)和实施后(n=18)阶段共进行了43次半结构化访谈,包括7名(16%)放射技师、20名(47%)注册放射科医师和16名(37%)放射咨询医师。在NASSS领域,基线时确定了56个障碍和18个促进因素,实施期间确定了55个和14个,实施后确定了82个和33个。组织障碍在早期阶段占主导地位,而技术问题,如系统准确性、互操作性和信息过载,在推出期间和之后变得最为突出。随着时间的推移,推动因素越来越多,特别是在技术和价值主张领域,因为一些临床医生将人工智能作为二次安全检查。信任和采用仍然受到性能不一致、沟通薄弱和医学法律不确定性的限制。结论:人工智能决策支持在放射学中的实施既是一个技术过程,也是一个组织和文化过程。临床医生仍然愿意参与,但是可持续的采用依赖于巩固早期的积极经验和解决消极经验,嵌入沟通和培训,以及维护用户、供应商和系统领导者之间的迭代反馈。应用NASSS框架揭示了领域如何随时间动态交互,为寻求从试点转向常规、可信赖的人工智能集成的医院提供了对社会技术复杂性的理论见解和实践指导。
{"title":"Implementing an Artificial Intelligence Decision Support System in Radiology: Prospective Qualitative Evaluation Study Using the Nonadoption Abandonment Scale-Up, Spread, and Sustainability (NASSS) Framework.","authors":"Sundresan Naicker, Paul Schmidt, Bruce Shar, Amina Tariq, Ashleigh Earnshaw, Steven McPhail","doi":"10.2196/80342","DOIUrl":"10.2196/80342","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Medical imaging remains at the forefront of advancements in adopting digital health technologies in clinical practice. Regulator-approved artificial intelligence (AI) clinical decision support systems are commercially available and being embedded into routine practices for radiologists internationally. These decision support solutions show promising clinical validity compared to standard practice conditions; however, their implementation over time and implications on radiologists' practice are poorly understood.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;This paper aims to examine the real-world implementation of an AI clinical decision support tool in radiology through a qualitative evaluation across pre-, peri-, and postimplementation phases. Specifically, it seeks to identify the key contextual, organizational, and human factors shaping adoption and sustainability, to map these influences using the nonadoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread, and sustainability (NASSS) framework, and to generate insights that inform evidence-based strategies and policy for integrating AI safely and effectively into public hospital imaging services.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;This prospective study was conducted in a large public tertiary referral hospital in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. One-to-one participant interviews were undertaken across the 3 implementation phases. Participants comprised radiology consultants, registrars, and radiographers involved in chest computed tomography studies during the study period. Interviews were guided by the NASSS framework to identify contextual factors influencing implementation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;A total of 43 semistructured interviews were conducted across baseline (n=16), peri-implementation (n=9), and postimplementation (n=18) phases, comprising 7 (16%) radiographers, 20 (47%) registrar radiologists, and 16 (37%) consultant radiologists. Across NASSS domains, 56 barriers and 18 enablers were identified at baseline, 55 and 14 during peri-implementation, and 82 and 33 postimplementation. Organizational barriers dominated early phases, while technological issues such as system accuracy, interoperability, and information overload became most prominent during and after rollout. Enablers increased over time, particularly within the technology and value proposition domains, as some clinicians adapted the AI as a secondary safety check. Trust and adoption remained constrained by performance inconsistency, weak communication, and medicolegal uncertainty.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;The implementation of AI decision support in radiology is as much an organizational and cultural process as a technological one. Clinicians remain willing to engage, but sustainable adoption depends on consolidating early positive experiences and addressing negative ones, embedding communication and training, and maintaining iterative feedback between users, vendors, and system leaders. Applying t","PeriodicalId":16337,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","volume":"28 ","pages":"e80342"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12895160/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146194535","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficacy of Brain-Computer Interface Therapy for Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Chronic Stroke: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. 脑机接口治疗对慢性脑卒中上肢康复的疗效:随机对照试验的系统评价和meta分析。
IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-01-28 DOI: 10.2196/79132
HongJie Chen, GuoJun Yun
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Over 50% of people with chronic stroke experience persistent upper limb dysfunction. Brain-computer interface (BCI) therapy, creating a sensorimotor loop via neural feedback, is a promising alternative; yet, its optimal application remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This meta-analysis evaluates BCI's efficacy on motor function, tone, and activities of daily living (ADL) in chronic stroke and identifies optimal feedback modalities and intervention parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Wanfang Data from inception to October 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing BCI-based training to control interventions in adults with chronic stroke. Primary outcomes were upper limb motor function (Fugl-Meyer Assessment for upper extremity [FMA-UE], Action Research Arm Test [ARAT]), muscle tone (Modified Ashworth Scale [MAS]), and ADL (Modified Barthel Index [MBI], Motor Activity Log [MAL]). Screening, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment were performed independently. Meta-analysis used a random-effects model with Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman adjustment. Pooled mean differences (MDs) with 95% CIs and 95% prediction intervals (PIs) were calculated. Subgroup analyses examined feedback modalities, intervention intensity, and follow-up effects. Sensitivity analysis was also conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 3529 records, 21 RCTs (650 participants) were included. BCI training significantly improved motor function (FMA-UE: MD 2.50, 95% CI 0.60-4.40; P=.01; 95% PI -2.52 to 7.22) and ADL performance (MBI: MD 8.38, 95% CI 2.23-14.53; P=.02; 95% PI -3.92 to 20.53; MAL: MD 2.09, 95% CI 0.42-3.76; P=.03; 95% PI -0.69 to 4.54). No significant effects were observed for fine motor skills (ARAT: MD 0.18, 95% CI -0.27 to 0.62; P=.30; 95% PI -3.64 to 3.99) or muscle tone (MAS: MD -0.48, 95% CI -1 to 0.03; P=.06; 95% PI -1.27 to 0.35). Subgroup analyses revealed that BCI-functional electrical stimulation (FES) yielded the greatest improvement in motor recovery (FMA-UE: MD 5, 95% CI 1.86-8.13; P=.01). The optimal intervention protocol was identified as 30-minute sessions, administered 4-5 times per week over 2 weeks (total of 10-12 sessions). However, benefits were not sustained at follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Low- to moderate-certainty evidence suggests that BCI training, particularly the BCI-FES paradigm, can improve upper limb motor function and ADL in people with chronic stroke on average. However, wide prediction intervals indicate the effect may vary substantially across settings, ranging from negligible to beneficial. Subgroup analyses suggested a potential optimal protocol of 30-minute sessions, 4-5 times per week for 2 weeks, but these findings are limited by the small number of studies in each subgroup and the high risk of bias in several included trials. Therefore, this propose
背景:超过50%的慢性中风患者经历持续的上肢功能障碍。脑机接口(BCI)疗法,通过神经反馈创造一个感觉运动回路,是一个很有前途的选择;然而,它的最佳应用仍不清楚。目的:本荟萃分析评估脑机接口对慢性卒中患者运动功能、音调和日常生活活动(ADL)的影响,并确定最佳反馈模式和干预参数。方法:我们系统地检索了Cochrane Library、Embase、PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和Wanfang Data,检索了从成立到2025年10月的随机对照试验(RCTs),比较了基于bci的训练与控制干预对成年慢性卒中患者的影响。主要结果为上肢运动功能(Fugl-Meyer上肢评估[FMA-UE]、动作研究臂测试[ARAT])、肌肉张力(改良Ashworth量表[MAS])和ADL(改良Barthel指数[MBI]、运动活动日志[MAL])。筛选、数据提取和偏倚风险评估是独立进行的。meta分析采用Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman调整的随机效应模型。计算95% ci和95%预测区间的合并平均差异(MDs)。亚组分析检查了反馈方式、干预强度和随访效果。并进行敏感性分析。结果:从3529条记录中,纳入21项随机对照试验(650名受试者)。BCI训练显著改善运动功能(FMA-UE: MD 2.50, 95% CI 0.60-4.40; P= 0.01; 95% PI -2.52至7.22)和ADL表现(MBI: MD 8.38, 95% CI 2.23-14.53; P= 0.02; 95% PI -3.92至20.53;MAL: MD 2.09, 95% CI 0.42-3.76; P= 0.03; 95% PI -0.69至4.54)。在精细运动技能(ARAT: MD 0.18, 95% CI -0.27至0.62;P= 0.30; 95% PI -3.64至3.99)或肌肉张力(MAS: MD -0.48, 95% CI -1至0.03;P= 0.06; 95% PI -1.27至0.35)方面未观察到显著影响。亚组分析显示,脑机接口功能电刺激(FES)对运动恢复的改善最大(FMA-UE: MD 5, 95% CI 1.86-8.13; P= 0.01)。最佳干预方案确定为每次30分钟,每周4-5次,持续2周(共10-12次)。然而,这些益处在随访中并未持续。结论:低到中等确定性的证据表明,BCI训练,特别是BCI- fes模式,可以改善慢性卒中患者的上肢运动功能和ADL。然而,较宽的预测间隔表明,在不同的设置中,效果可能有很大差异,从可以忽略到有益。亚组分析提示可能的最佳方案是每次30分钟,每周4-5次,持续2周,但这些发现受到每个亚组的研究数量较少和几个纳入试验的高偏倚风险的限制。因此,该方案应被视为初步的,需要在未来高质量的随机对照试验中进行验证。未来的研究还应侧重于确定最有可能受益的患者亚组,并制定维持长期收益的策略。试验注册:PROSPERO CRD420251063808;https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251063808。
{"title":"Efficacy of Brain-Computer Interface Therapy for Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Chronic Stroke: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"HongJie Chen, GuoJun Yun","doi":"10.2196/79132","DOIUrl":"10.2196/79132","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Over 50% of people with chronic stroke experience persistent upper limb dysfunction. Brain-computer interface (BCI) therapy, creating a sensorimotor loop via neural feedback, is a promising alternative; yet, its optimal application remains unclear.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;This meta-analysis evaluates BCI's efficacy on motor function, tone, and activities of daily living (ADL) in chronic stroke and identifies optimal feedback modalities and intervention parameters.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;We systematically searched Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Wanfang Data from inception to October 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing BCI-based training to control interventions in adults with chronic stroke. Primary outcomes were upper limb motor function (Fugl-Meyer Assessment for upper extremity [FMA-UE], Action Research Arm Test [ARAT]), muscle tone (Modified Ashworth Scale [MAS]), and ADL (Modified Barthel Index [MBI], Motor Activity Log [MAL]). Screening, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment were performed independently. Meta-analysis used a random-effects model with Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman adjustment. Pooled mean differences (MDs) with 95% CIs and 95% prediction intervals (PIs) were calculated. Subgroup analyses examined feedback modalities, intervention intensity, and follow-up effects. Sensitivity analysis was also conducted.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;From 3529 records, 21 RCTs (650 participants) were included. BCI training significantly improved motor function (FMA-UE: MD 2.50, 95% CI 0.60-4.40; P=.01; 95% PI -2.52 to 7.22) and ADL performance (MBI: MD 8.38, 95% CI 2.23-14.53; P=.02; 95% PI -3.92 to 20.53; MAL: MD 2.09, 95% CI 0.42-3.76; P=.03; 95% PI -0.69 to 4.54). No significant effects were observed for fine motor skills (ARAT: MD 0.18, 95% CI -0.27 to 0.62; P=.30; 95% PI -3.64 to 3.99) or muscle tone (MAS: MD -0.48, 95% CI -1 to 0.03; P=.06; 95% PI -1.27 to 0.35). Subgroup analyses revealed that BCI-functional electrical stimulation (FES) yielded the greatest improvement in motor recovery (FMA-UE: MD 5, 95% CI 1.86-8.13; P=.01). The optimal intervention protocol was identified as 30-minute sessions, administered 4-5 times per week over 2 weeks (total of 10-12 sessions). However, benefits were not sustained at follow-up.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;Low- to moderate-certainty evidence suggests that BCI training, particularly the BCI-FES paradigm, can improve upper limb motor function and ADL in people with chronic stroke on average. However, wide prediction intervals indicate the effect may vary substantially across settings, ranging from negligible to beneficial. Subgroup analyses suggested a potential optimal protocol of 30-minute sessions, 4-5 times per week for 2 weeks, but these findings are limited by the small number of studies in each subgroup and the high risk of bias in several included trials. Therefore, this propose","PeriodicalId":16337,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","volume":"28 ","pages":"e79132"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12895162/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146097114","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Multimodal Large Language Models for Cystoscopic Image Interpretation and Bladder Lesion Classification: Comparative Study. 膀胱镜图像解释和膀胱病变分类的多模态大语言模型:比较研究。
IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-01-28 DOI: 10.2196/87193
Yung-Chi Shih, Cheng-Yang Wu, Shi-Wei Huang, Chung-You Tsai
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cystoscopy remains the gold standard for diagnosing bladder lesions; however, its diagnostic accuracy is operator dependent and prone to missing subtle abnormalities such as carcinoma in situ or misinterpreting mimic lesions (tumor, inflammation, or normal variants). Artificial intelligence-based image-analysis systems are emerging, yet conventional models remain limited to single tasks and cannot produce explanatory reports or articulate diagnostic reasoning. Multimodal large language models (MM-LLMs) integrate visual recognition, contextual reasoning, and language generation, offering interpretive capabilities beyond conventional artificial intelligence.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to rigorously evaluate state-of-the-art MM-LLMs for cystoscopic image interpretation and lesion classification using clinician-defined stress-test datasets enriched with rare, diverse, and challenging lesions, focusing on diagnostic accuracy, reasoning quality, and clinical relevance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four MM-LLMs (OpenAI-o3 and ChatGPT-4o [OpenAI]; Gemini 2.5 Pro and MedGemma-27B [Google]) were evaluated under blinded, randomized procedures across two tasks: (1) free-text image interpretation for anatomic site, findings, lesion reasoning, and final diagnosis (n=401) and (2) seven-class tumor-like lesion classification (n=113) within a multiple-choice framework (cystitis, polyps, papilloma, papillary urothelial carcinoma, carcinoma in situ, non-urothelial carcinoma, and none of the above). Three raters independently scored outputs using a 5-point Likert scale, and classification metrics (accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, Youden J index (Youden J), and Matthews correlation coefficient [MCC]) were calculated for lesion detection, biopsy indication, and malignancy endpoints. For optimization, model performance was compared between zero-shot and text-based in-context learning prompts that were prefixed with brief descriptions of tumor features.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 401-image test set spanned 40 subcategories, with 322 (80.3%) containing abnormal findings in the image interpretation task. OpenAI-o3 demonstrated strong reasoning, with high satisfaction for anatomy (339/401, 84.5%) and findings (305/401, 76%), but lower satisfaction for lesion reasoning (211/401, 52.5%) and final diagnosis (193/401, 48.2%), indicating increasing difficulty with higher-order synthesis. Mean Likert score differences (OpenAI-o3 minus Gemini 2.5 Pro) were +0.27 for findings (adjusted P value: q=0.002), +0.24 for lesion reasoning (q=0.047), and +0.19 for final diagnosis. For clinically relevant endpoints in the full set, OpenAI-o3 achieved the most balanced performance, with lesion detection accuracy of 88.3%, sensitivity of 92%, specificity of 73.1%, Youden J of 0.650, and MCC of 0.635. In 7-class tumor-like lesion classification, OpenAI-o3 achieved accuracies of 73.5% for biopsy indication and 62.8% for malig
背景:膀胱镜检查仍然是诊断膀胱病变的金标准;然而,它的诊断准确性依赖于操作者,并且容易遗漏细微的异常,如原位癌或误解模拟病变(肿瘤,炎症或正常变异)。基于人工智能的图像分析系统正在兴起,但传统模型仍然局限于单一任务,无法产生解释性报告或清晰的诊断推理。多模态大型语言模型(mm - llm)集成了视觉识别、上下文推理和语言生成,提供了超越传统人工智能的解释能力。目的:本研究旨在严格评估最先进的mm - llm用于膀胱镜图像解释和病变分类,使用临床定义的压力测试数据集,丰富罕见,多样和具有挑战性的病变,重点关注诊断准确性,推理质量和临床相关性。方法:4个MM-LLMs (OpenAI- 03和chatgpt - 40 [OpenAI]);Gemini 2.5 Pro和MedGemma-27B [b谷歌]在两项任务下采用盲法、随机程序进行评估:(1)对解剖部位、发现、病变推理和最终诊断的自由文本图像解释(n=401);(2)在多项选择框架(膀胱炎、息肉、乳头状瘤、乳头状尿路上皮癌、原位癌、非尿路上皮癌,以及以上均非)中对七类肿瘤样病变进行分类(n=113)。三位评分者使用5分制Likert量表对结果进行独立评分,并计算病变检测、活检指征和恶性终点的分类指标(准确性、敏感性、特异性、约登J指数(Youden J)和马修斯相关系数[MCC])。为了优化,比较了零射击和基于文本的上下文学习提示(前缀为肿瘤特征的简要描述)之间的模型性能。结果:401张图像测试集跨越40个子类别,其中322个(80.3%)在图像判读任务中包含异常发现。OpenAI-o3表现出较强的推理能力,对解剖(339/401,84.5%)和发现(305/401,76%)的满意度较高,但对病变推理(211/401,52.5%)和最终诊断(193/401,48.2%)的满意度较低,表明高阶综合难度增加。平均李克特评分差异(OpenAI-o3减去Gemini 2.5 Pro)在发现方面为+0.27(校正P值:q=0.002),在病变推理方面为+0.24 (q=0.047),在最终诊断方面为+0.19。对于全套临床相关终点,OpenAI-o3的表现最为平衡,病变检测准确率为88.3%,灵敏度为92%,特异性为73.1%,Youden J为0.650,MCC为0.635。在7级肿瘤样病变分类中,OpenAI-o3对活检指征的准确率为73.5%,对恶性肿瘤的准确率为62.8%,具有平衡的敏感性和特异性权衡,优于其他模型。值得注意的是,OpenAI-o3在常见恶性病变上表现最好。chatgpt - 40和Gemini 2.5 Pro表现出高灵敏度但低特异性,而MedGemma-27B表现不佳。上下文学习提高了OpenAI-o3的微平均准确率(40.7%→46.0%;MCC 0.311→0.370),但在其他模型中只产生了轻微的特异性增益和最小的准确率变化,可能受到缺少成对的图像-文本上下文的限制。结论:mm - llm在产生可解释的膀胱镜检查理由和支持活检分诊和培训方面显示出有意义的辅助潜力。然而,在困难的鉴别诊断方面的表现仍然温和,需要在安全的临床整合之前进一步优化。
{"title":"Multimodal Large Language Models for Cystoscopic Image Interpretation and Bladder Lesion Classification: Comparative Study.","authors":"Yung-Chi Shih, Cheng-Yang Wu, Shi-Wei Huang, Chung-You Tsai","doi":"10.2196/87193","DOIUrl":"10.2196/87193","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Cystoscopy remains the gold standard for diagnosing bladder lesions; however, its diagnostic accuracy is operator dependent and prone to missing subtle abnormalities such as carcinoma in situ or misinterpreting mimic lesions (tumor, inflammation, or normal variants). Artificial intelligence-based image-analysis systems are emerging, yet conventional models remain limited to single tasks and cannot produce explanatory reports or articulate diagnostic reasoning. Multimodal large language models (MM-LLMs) integrate visual recognition, contextual reasoning, and language generation, offering interpretive capabilities beyond conventional artificial intelligence.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;This study aims to rigorously evaluate state-of-the-art MM-LLMs for cystoscopic image interpretation and lesion classification using clinician-defined stress-test datasets enriched with rare, diverse, and challenging lesions, focusing on diagnostic accuracy, reasoning quality, and clinical relevance.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;Four MM-LLMs (OpenAI-o3 and ChatGPT-4o [OpenAI]; Gemini 2.5 Pro and MedGemma-27B [Google]) were evaluated under blinded, randomized procedures across two tasks: (1) free-text image interpretation for anatomic site, findings, lesion reasoning, and final diagnosis (n=401) and (2) seven-class tumor-like lesion classification (n=113) within a multiple-choice framework (cystitis, polyps, papilloma, papillary urothelial carcinoma, carcinoma in situ, non-urothelial carcinoma, and none of the above). Three raters independently scored outputs using a 5-point Likert scale, and classification metrics (accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, Youden J index (Youden J), and Matthews correlation coefficient [MCC]) were calculated for lesion detection, biopsy indication, and malignancy endpoints. For optimization, model performance was compared between zero-shot and text-based in-context learning prompts that were prefixed with brief descriptions of tumor features.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;The 401-image test set spanned 40 subcategories, with 322 (80.3%) containing abnormal findings in the image interpretation task. OpenAI-o3 demonstrated strong reasoning, with high satisfaction for anatomy (339/401, 84.5%) and findings (305/401, 76%), but lower satisfaction for lesion reasoning (211/401, 52.5%) and final diagnosis (193/401, 48.2%), indicating increasing difficulty with higher-order synthesis. Mean Likert score differences (OpenAI-o3 minus Gemini 2.5 Pro) were +0.27 for findings (adjusted P value: q=0.002), +0.24 for lesion reasoning (q=0.047), and +0.19 for final diagnosis. For clinically relevant endpoints in the full set, OpenAI-o3 achieved the most balanced performance, with lesion detection accuracy of 88.3%, sensitivity of 92%, specificity of 73.1%, Youden J of 0.650, and MCC of 0.635. In 7-class tumor-like lesion classification, OpenAI-o3 achieved accuracies of 73.5% for biopsy indication and 62.8% for malig","PeriodicalId":16337,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","volume":"28 ","pages":"e87193"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12895159/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146194584","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ethical Knowledge, Challenges, and Institutional Strategies Among Medical AI Developers and Researchers: Focus Group Study. 医疗人工智能开发者和研究人员的伦理知识、挑战和制度策略:焦点小组研究。
IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-01-28 DOI: 10.2196/79613
Sophia Fantus, Jinxu Li, Tianci Wang, Lu Tang
<p><strong>Background: </strong>As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly embedded in clinical decision-making and preventive care, it is urgent to address ethical concerns such as bias, privacy, and transparency to protect clinician and patient populations. Although prior research has examined the perspectives of medical AI stakeholders, including clinicians, patients, and health system leaders, far less is known about how medical AI developers and researchers understand and engage with ethical challenges as they develop AI tools. This gap is consequential because developers' ethical awareness, decision-making, and institutional environments influence how AI tools are conceptualized and deployed in practice. Thus, it is essential to understand how developers perceive these issues and what supports they identify as necessary for ethical AI development.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objectives of the study were twofold: (1) to examine medical AI developers' and researchers' knowledge, attitudes, and experiences with AI ethics; and (2) to identify recommendations to enhance and strengthen interpersonal and institutional ethics-focused training and support.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted 2 semistructured focus groups (60-90 minutes each) in 2024 with 13 AI developers and researchers affiliated with 5 US-based academic institutions. Participants' work spanned a wide variety of medical AI applications, including Alzheimer disease prediction, clinical imaging, electronic health records analysis, digital health, counseling and behavioral health, and genotype-phenotype modeling. Focus groups were conducted via Microsoft Teams, recorded, and transcribed verbatim. We applied conventional qualitative content analysis to inductively identify emerging concepts, categories, and themes. Coding was performed independently by 3 researchers, with consensus reached through iterative team meetings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis identified four key themes: (1) AI ethics knowledge acquisition: participants reported learning about ethics informally through peer-reviewed literature, reviewer feedback, social media, and mentorship rather than through structured training; (2) ethical encounters: participants described recurring ethical challenges related to data bias, patient privacy, generative AI use, commercialization pressures, and a tendency for research environments to prioritize model accuracy over ethical reflection; (3) reflections on ethical implications: participants expressed concern about downstream effects on patient care and clinician autonomy, and model generalizability, noting that rapid technological innovation outpaces regulatory and evaluative processes; and (4) strategies to mitigate ethical concerns: recommendations included clearer institutional guidelines, ethics checklists, interdisciplinary collaboration, multi-institutional data sharing, enhanced institutional review board support, and the inclusio
背景:随着人工智能(AI)越来越多地融入临床决策和预防保健,迫切需要解决诸如偏见、隐私和透明度等伦理问题,以保护临床医生和患者群体。尽管之前的研究已经检查了医疗人工智能利益相关者(包括临床医生、患者和卫生系统领导者)的观点,但对于医疗人工智能开发人员和研究人员在开发人工智能工具时如何理解和应对伦理挑战,人们知之甚少。这种差距是必然的,因为开发人员的道德意识、决策和制度环境会影响人工智能工具在实践中的概念化和部署。因此,有必要了解开发人员如何看待这些问题,以及他们认为道德人工智能开发所必需的支持。目的:本研究的目的有两个:(1)调查医疗人工智能开发人员和研究人员对人工智能伦理的知识、态度和经验;(2)提出建议,加强以人际和机构道德为重点的培训和支持。方法:我们在2024年与隶属于5个美国学术机构的13名人工智能开发人员和研究人员进行了两次半结构化焦点小组(每次60-90分钟)。参与者的工作涵盖了各种各样的医疗人工智能应用,包括阿尔茨海默病预测、临床成像、电子健康记录分析、数字健康、咨询和行为健康以及基因型-表型建模。焦点小组通过微软团队进行,逐字记录和转录。我们应用传统的定性内容分析来归纳识别新出现的概念、类别和主题。编码由3名研究人员独立完成,通过反复的团队会议达成共识。结果:分析确定了四个关键主题:(1)人工智能伦理知识获取:参与者报告通过同行评审文献、审稿人反馈、社交媒体和指导等非正式方式学习伦理知识,而不是通过结构化培训;(2)伦理遭遇:参与者描述了与数据偏差、患者隐私、生成式人工智能使用、商业化压力以及研究环境优先考虑模型准确性而非伦理反思的趋势相关的反复出现的伦理挑战;(3)伦理影响的反思:与会者对患者护理和临床医生自主权的下游影响以及模型的可泛化性表示担忧,并指出快速的技术创新超过了监管和评估过程;(4)减轻伦理问题的策略:建议包括更明确的机构指南、伦理清单、跨学科合作、多机构数据共享、加强机构审查委员会的支持,以及将生物伦理学家纳入人工智能研究团队。结论:医疗人工智能开发人员和研究人员认识到他们的工作中存在重大的伦理挑战,但缺乏结构化的培训、资源和体制机制来解决这些问题。本研究的结果强调了机构需要考虑通过实用工具、指导和跨学科伙伴关系将伦理嵌入研究过程。加强这些支持对于培养下一代开发人员在卫生保健领域设计和部署合乎道德的人工智能至关重要。
{"title":"Ethical Knowledge, Challenges, and Institutional Strategies Among Medical AI Developers and Researchers: Focus Group Study.","authors":"Sophia Fantus, Jinxu Li, Tianci Wang, Lu Tang","doi":"10.2196/79613","DOIUrl":"10.2196/79613","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly embedded in clinical decision-making and preventive care, it is urgent to address ethical concerns such as bias, privacy, and transparency to protect clinician and patient populations. Although prior research has examined the perspectives of medical AI stakeholders, including clinicians, patients, and health system leaders, far less is known about how medical AI developers and researchers understand and engage with ethical challenges as they develop AI tools. This gap is consequential because developers' ethical awareness, decision-making, and institutional environments influence how AI tools are conceptualized and deployed in practice. Thus, it is essential to understand how developers perceive these issues and what supports they identify as necessary for ethical AI development.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;The objectives of the study were twofold: (1) to examine medical AI developers' and researchers' knowledge, attitudes, and experiences with AI ethics; and (2) to identify recommendations to enhance and strengthen interpersonal and institutional ethics-focused training and support.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;We conducted 2 semistructured focus groups (60-90 minutes each) in 2024 with 13 AI developers and researchers affiliated with 5 US-based academic institutions. Participants' work spanned a wide variety of medical AI applications, including Alzheimer disease prediction, clinical imaging, electronic health records analysis, digital health, counseling and behavioral health, and genotype-phenotype modeling. Focus groups were conducted via Microsoft Teams, recorded, and transcribed verbatim. We applied conventional qualitative content analysis to inductively identify emerging concepts, categories, and themes. Coding was performed independently by 3 researchers, with consensus reached through iterative team meetings.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;The analysis identified four key themes: (1) AI ethics knowledge acquisition: participants reported learning about ethics informally through peer-reviewed literature, reviewer feedback, social media, and mentorship rather than through structured training; (2) ethical encounters: participants described recurring ethical challenges related to data bias, patient privacy, generative AI use, commercialization pressures, and a tendency for research environments to prioritize model accuracy over ethical reflection; (3) reflections on ethical implications: participants expressed concern about downstream effects on patient care and clinician autonomy, and model generalizability, noting that rapid technological innovation outpaces regulatory and evaluative processes; and (4) strategies to mitigate ethical concerns: recommendations included clearer institutional guidelines, ethics checklists, interdisciplinary collaboration, multi-institutional data sharing, enhanced institutional review board support, and the inclusio","PeriodicalId":16337,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","volume":"28 ","pages":"e79613"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12895146/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146194589","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Development and User-Centered Evaluation of Smart Systems for Loneliness Monitoring in Older Adults: Mixed Methods Study. 老年人孤独感监测智能系统的开发和以用户为中心的评估:混合方法研究。
IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-01-28 DOI: 10.2196/81027
Yi Zhou, Jessica Rees, Faith Matcham, Ashay Patel, Michela Antonelli, Anthea Tinker, Sebastien Ourselin, Wei Liu
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Loneliness is a critical issue among older adults and constitutes a significant risk factor for a range of physical and mental health conditions. However, current assessment methods primarily rely on self-report questionnaires and clinical evaluations, which are susceptible to recall bias and social desirability bias, highlighting the need for more objective and continuous assessment approaches. Recent studies have reported associations between physiological and behavioral indicators and the experience of loneliness in older adults. While these technologies have demonstrated correlations between physiological and behavioral sensor data and the experience of loneliness, their implementation has been limited. Most systems rely on fixed-location sensors or smartphone apps, with little attention given to the integration of these tools into users' daily routines. To date, no published studies have applied smart textile technology, which integrates sensing capabilities directly into garments or furniture, as a medium for loneliness detection. This study addresses that gap by exploring the usability, experiential acceptability, and ethical considerations of smart textile-based monitoring systems.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to assess the perceived usability, acceptability, and emotional resonance of a smart loneliness monitoring system integrating sensing garments, furniture, and a mobile app and identify design implications to guide future improvement and promote sustained engagement among older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Building on earlier conceptual research, a functional prototype system was developed and evaluated through 2 immersive in-person workshops with older adults (N=10). A mixed methods approach was applied, combining structured questionnaires, sensory ethnographic observations, focus group discussions, and experience-based co-design. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively, and qualitative data were analyzed thematically to explore user perceptions related to system usability, emotional response, lifestyle compatibility, and ethical considerations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Quantitative data indicated high user satisfaction in dimensions such as comfort, ease of use, and feedback clarity. However, trust in long-term monitoring and willingness to use the system regularly varied. Thematic analysis revealed 4 main areas influencing acceptance, including wearability, usability, and daily integration; trust, privacy, and data control; perceptions of loneliness and the limits of detection; and adoption, applicability, and ethical futures. Participants emphasized the need for discretion, personalization, and human oversight in system feedback and data-sharing mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The resulting prototype was positively received, demonstrating the potential of smart systems for passive and personalized loneliness monitoring among older adults.
背景:孤独是老年人的一个关键问题,是一系列身心健康状况的重要风险因素。然而,目前的评估方法主要依赖于自我报告问卷和临床评估,容易受到回忆偏差和社会期望偏差的影响,因此需要更客观和持续的评估方法。最近的研究报告了生理和行为指标与老年人孤独感之间的联系。虽然这些技术已经证明了生理和行为传感器数据与孤独体验之间的相关性,但它们的实施受到限制。大多数系统依赖于固定位置传感器或智能手机应用程序,很少关注将这些工具整合到用户的日常生活中。到目前为止,还没有发表的研究将智能纺织品技术作为孤独检测的媒介,这种技术将传感能力直接集成到服装或家具中。本研究通过探索基于智能纺织品的监测系统的可用性、经验可接受性和伦理考虑来解决这一差距。目的:本研究旨在评估集成传感服装、家具和移动应用程序的智能孤独监测系统的感知可用性、可接受性和情感共鸣,并确定设计含义,以指导未来的改进并促进老年人的持续参与。方法:在早期概念研究的基础上,开发了一个功能原型系统,并通过两次与老年人(N=10)的沉浸式面对面研讨会进行了评估。采用混合方法,结合结构化问卷调查、感官人种学观察、焦点小组讨论和基于经验的共同设计。定量数据进行描述性分析,定性数据进行主题分析,以探索与系统可用性、情感反应、生活方式兼容性和伦理考虑相关的用户感知。结果:定量数据表明,在舒适度、易用性和反馈清晰度等方面,用户满意度较高。然而,对长期监测的信任和定期使用该系统的意愿各不相同。专题分析揭示了影响接受度的4个主要领域,包括可穿戴性、可用性和日常集成;信任、隐私和数据控制;对孤独的感知和检测的限制;以及采用,适用性和道德的未来。与会者强调在系统反馈和数据共享机制中需要酌情决定、个性化和人为监督。结论:由此产生的原型得到了积极的接受,证明了智能系统在老年人中被动和个性化孤独监测的潜力。然而,收养受自主性、情绪敏感性和情境整合的影响。未来的发展应侧重于护理基础设施的模块化、透明度和一体化,以确保合乎道德和可持续的部署。
{"title":"Development and User-Centered Evaluation of Smart Systems for Loneliness Monitoring in Older Adults: Mixed Methods Study.","authors":"Yi Zhou, Jessica Rees, Faith Matcham, Ashay Patel, Michela Antonelli, Anthea Tinker, Sebastien Ourselin, Wei Liu","doi":"10.2196/81027","DOIUrl":"10.2196/81027","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Loneliness is a critical issue among older adults and constitutes a significant risk factor for a range of physical and mental health conditions. However, current assessment methods primarily rely on self-report questionnaires and clinical evaluations, which are susceptible to recall bias and social desirability bias, highlighting the need for more objective and continuous assessment approaches. Recent studies have reported associations between physiological and behavioral indicators and the experience of loneliness in older adults. While these technologies have demonstrated correlations between physiological and behavioral sensor data and the experience of loneliness, their implementation has been limited. Most systems rely on fixed-location sensors or smartphone apps, with little attention given to the integration of these tools into users' daily routines. To date, no published studies have applied smart textile technology, which integrates sensing capabilities directly into garments or furniture, as a medium for loneliness detection. This study addresses that gap by exploring the usability, experiential acceptability, and ethical considerations of smart textile-based monitoring systems.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;This study aims to assess the perceived usability, acceptability, and emotional resonance of a smart loneliness monitoring system integrating sensing garments, furniture, and a mobile app and identify design implications to guide future improvement and promote sustained engagement among older adults.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;Building on earlier conceptual research, a functional prototype system was developed and evaluated through 2 immersive in-person workshops with older adults (N=10). A mixed methods approach was applied, combining structured questionnaires, sensory ethnographic observations, focus group discussions, and experience-based co-design. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively, and qualitative data were analyzed thematically to explore user perceptions related to system usability, emotional response, lifestyle compatibility, and ethical considerations.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Quantitative data indicated high user satisfaction in dimensions such as comfort, ease of use, and feedback clarity. However, trust in long-term monitoring and willingness to use the system regularly varied. Thematic analysis revealed 4 main areas influencing acceptance, including wearability, usability, and daily integration; trust, privacy, and data control; perceptions of loneliness and the limits of detection; and adoption, applicability, and ethical futures. Participants emphasized the need for discretion, personalization, and human oversight in system feedback and data-sharing mechanisms.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;The resulting prototype was positively received, demonstrating the potential of smart systems for passive and personalized loneliness monitoring among older adults.","PeriodicalId":16337,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","volume":"28 ","pages":"e81027"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12895156/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146194598","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Extended Grammar of Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine - Clinical Terms for Semantic Representation of Clinical Data: Methodological Study. 医学系统化命名法的扩展语法。临床数据语义表示的临床术语:方法学研究
IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-01-28 DOI: 10.2196/80314
Christophe Gaudet-Blavignac, Julien Ehrsam, Monika Baumann, Adel Bensahla, Mirjam Mattei, Yuanyuan Zheng, Christian Lovis

Background: Interoperability has been a challenge for half a century. Led by an informatics view of the world, the quest for interoperability has evolved from typing and categorizing data to building increasingly complex models. In parallel with the development of these models, the field of terminologies and ontologies emerged to refine granularity and introduce notions of hierarchy. Clinical data models and terminology systems vary in purpose, and their fixed categories shape and constrain representation, which inevitably leads to information loss.

Objective: Despite these efforts, semantic interoperability remains imperfect. Achieving it is essential for effective data reuse but requires more than rich terminologies and standardized models. This methodological study explores the extent to which the SNOMED CT (Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine - Clinical Terms) compositional grammar can be leveraged and extended to approximate a formal descriptive grammar, allowing clinical reality to be expressed in coherent, meaningful sentences rather than preconstrained categories.

Methods: Building on a decade of semantic representation efforts at the Geneva University Hospitals, we developed a framework to identify recurring semantic gaps in clinical data. We addressed these gaps by systematically modifying the SNOMED CT Machine Read` Concept Model and extending its Augmented Backus-Naur Form syntax to support necessary grammatical structures and external vocabularies.

Results: This approach enabled the semantic representation of over 119,000 distinct data elements covering 13 billion instances. By extending the grammar, we successfully addressed critical limitations such as negation, scalar values, uncertainty, temporality, and the integration of external terminologies like Pango. The extensions proved essential for capturing complex clinical nuances that standard precoordinated concepts could not represent.

Conclusions: Rather than creating a new standard from scratch, extending the grammatical capabilities of SNOMED CT offers a viable pathway toward high-fidelity semantic representation. This work serves as a proof-of-concept that separating the rules of composition from vocabulary allows for a more flexible and robust description of clinical reality, provided that challenges regarding governance and machine readability are addressed.

背景:半个世纪以来,互操作性一直是一个挑战。在信息学世界观的引导下,对互操作性的追求已经从输入和分类数据发展到构建越来越复杂的模型。在开发这些模型的同时,出现了术语和本体领域,以细化粒度并引入层次结构的概念。临床数据模型和术语系统的目的各不相同,其固定的类别塑造和约束了表征,不可避免地导致信息丢失。目的:尽管有这些努力,语义互操作性仍然不完善。实现这一点对于有效的数据重用至关重要,但需要的不仅仅是丰富的术语和标准化模型。本方法学研究探讨了SNOMED CT(系统化医学术语-临床术语)组成语法可以被利用和扩展到近似正式描述性语法的程度,允许临床现实用连贯、有意义的句子表达,而不是预先限制的类别。方法:在日内瓦大学医院十年语义表示工作的基础上,我们开发了一个框架来识别临床数据中反复出现的语义差距。我们通过系统地修改SNOMED CT机器读取概念模型并扩展其增强Backus-Naur形式语法来支持必要的语法结构和外部词汇来解决这些差距。结果:该方法实现了覆盖130亿个实例的超过119,000个不同数据元素的语义表示。通过扩展语法,我们成功地解决了一些关键的限制,比如否定、标量值、不确定性、时间性,以及像Pango这样的外部术语的集成。事实证明,扩展对于捕捉复杂的临床细微差别至关重要,而标准的预先协调概念无法表示这些细微差别。结论:与其从头开始创建一个新的标准,不如扩展SNOMED CT的语法能力,为实现高保真语义表示提供了一条可行的途径。这项工作作为概念证明,将组合规则从词汇表中分离出来,可以更灵活、更健壮地描述临床现实,前提是解决了有关治理和机器可读性的挑战。
{"title":"Extended Grammar of Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine - Clinical Terms for Semantic Representation of Clinical Data: Methodological Study.","authors":"Christophe Gaudet-Blavignac, Julien Ehrsam, Monika Baumann, Adel Bensahla, Mirjam Mattei, Yuanyuan Zheng, Christian Lovis","doi":"10.2196/80314","DOIUrl":"10.2196/80314","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Interoperability has been a challenge for half a century. Led by an informatics view of the world, the quest for interoperability has evolved from typing and categorizing data to building increasingly complex models. In parallel with the development of these models, the field of terminologies and ontologies emerged to refine granularity and introduce notions of hierarchy. Clinical data models and terminology systems vary in purpose, and their fixed categories shape and constrain representation, which inevitably leads to information loss.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Despite these efforts, semantic interoperability remains imperfect. Achieving it is essential for effective data reuse but requires more than rich terminologies and standardized models. This methodological study explores the extent to which the SNOMED CT (Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine - Clinical Terms) compositional grammar can be leveraged and extended to approximate a formal descriptive grammar, allowing clinical reality to be expressed in coherent, meaningful sentences rather than preconstrained categories.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Building on a decade of semantic representation efforts at the Geneva University Hospitals, we developed a framework to identify recurring semantic gaps in clinical data. We addressed these gaps by systematically modifying the SNOMED CT Machine Read` Concept Model and extending its Augmented Backus-Naur Form syntax to support necessary grammatical structures and external vocabularies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This approach enabled the semantic representation of over 119,000 distinct data elements covering 13 billion instances. By extending the grammar, we successfully addressed critical limitations such as negation, scalar values, uncertainty, temporality, and the integration of external terminologies like Pango. The extensions proved essential for capturing complex clinical nuances that standard precoordinated concepts could not represent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rather than creating a new standard from scratch, extending the grammatical capabilities of SNOMED CT offers a viable pathway toward high-fidelity semantic representation. This work serves as a proof-of-concept that separating the rules of composition from vocabulary allows for a more flexible and robust description of clinical reality, provided that challenges regarding governance and machine readability are addressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":16337,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","volume":"28 ","pages":"e80314"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12895155/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146194552","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Predicting the Intention to Use Generative Artificial Intelligence for Health Information: Comparative Survey Study. 预测健康信息使用生成式人工智能的意图:比较调查研究。
IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-01-28 DOI: 10.2196/75648
Jörg Matthes, Anne Reinhardt, Selma Hodzic, Jaroslava Kaňková, Alice Binder, Ljubisa Bojic, Helle Terkildsen Maindal, Corina Paraschiv, Knud Ryom
<p><strong>Background: </strong>The rise of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as ChatGPT is rapidly transforming how people access information online. In the health context, generative AI is seen as a potentially disruptive information source due to its low entry barriers, conversational style, and ability to tailor content to users' needs. However, little is known about whether and how individuals use generative AI for health purposes, and which groups may benefit or be left behind, raising important questions of digital health equity.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the current relevance of generative AI as a health information source and to identify key factors predicting individuals' intention to use it. We applied the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2, focusing on 6 core predictors: performance expectancy, effort expectancy, facilitating conditions, social influence, habit, and hedonic motivation. In addition, we extended the model by including health literacy and health status. A cross-national design enabled comparison across 4 European countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A representative online survey was conducted in September 2024 with 1990 participants aged 16 to 74 years from Austria (n=502), Denmark (n=507), France (n=498), and Serbia (n=483). Structural equation modeling with metric measurement invariance was used to test associations across countries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Usage of generative AI for health information was still limited: only 39.5% of respondents reported having used it at least rarely. Generative AI ranked last among all measured health information sources (mean 2.08, SD 1.66); instead, medical experts (mean 4.77, SD 1.70) and online search engines (mean 4.57, SD 1.88) are still the most frequently used health information sources. Despite this, performance expectancy (b range=0.44-0.53; all P<.001), habit (b range=0.28-0.32; all P<.001), and hedonic motivation (b range=0.22-0.45; all P<.001) consistently predicted behavioral intention in all countries. Facilitating conditions also showed small but significant effects (b range=0.12-0.24; all P<.01). In contrast, effort expectancy, social influence, health literacy, and health status were unrelated to intention in all countries, with one marginal exception (France: health status, b=-0.09; P=.007). Model fit was good (comparative fit index=0.95; root mean square error of approximation=0.03), and metric invariance was confirmed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Generative AI use for health information is currently driven by early adopters-those who find it useful, easy to integrate, enjoyable, and have the necessary skills and infrastructure to do so. Cross-national consistency suggests a shared adoption pattern across Europe. To promote equitable adoption, communication efforts should focus on usefulness, convenience, and enjoyment, while ensuring digital access and safeguards for vul
背景:ChatGPT等生成式人工智能(AI)工具的兴起正在迅速改变人们在线获取信息的方式。在卫生领域,生成式人工智能被视为一种潜在的颠覆性信息源,因为它的入门门槛低、对话风格和根据用户需求定制内容的能力。然而,对于个人是否以及如何为健康目的使用生成人工智能,以及哪些群体可能受益或落后,人们知之甚少,这就提出了数字卫生公平的重要问题。目的:本研究旨在评估当前生成式人工智能作为健康信息源的相关性,并确定预测个人使用它的意愿的关键因素。我们应用了技术接受和使用统一理论2,重点关注6个核心预测因素:绩效预期、努力预期、促进条件、社会影响、习惯和享乐动机。此外,我们通过纳入健康素养和健康状况扩展了模型。一项跨国设计使4个欧洲国家之间的比较成为可能。方法:于2024年9月对来自奥地利(n=502)、丹麦(n=507)、法国(n=498)和塞尔维亚(n=483)的1990名16至74岁的参与者进行有代表性的在线调查。使用具有度量不变性的结构方程模型来检验各国之间的关联。结果:生成式人工智能在健康信息方面的使用仍然有限:只有39.5%的受访者表示至少很少使用它。生成式人工智能在所有测量的健康信息源中排名最后(平均值2.08,标准差1.66);相反,医学专家(平均4.77,标准差1.70)和在线搜索引擎(平均4.57,标准差1.88)仍然是最常用的健康信息来源。尽管如此,性能预期(b范围=0.44-0.53);所有结论:健康信息的生成式人工智能使用目前是由早期采用者驱动的——那些认为它有用、易于集成、令人愉快,并且拥有必要的技能和基础设施的人。跨国一致性表明,整个欧洲的采用模式是一致的。为促进公平采用,传播工作应侧重于有用性、便利性和享受性,同时确保弱势用户的数字访问和保障。
{"title":"Predicting the Intention to Use Generative Artificial Intelligence for Health Information: Comparative Survey Study.","authors":"Jörg Matthes, Anne Reinhardt, Selma Hodzic, Jaroslava Kaňková, Alice Binder, Ljubisa Bojic, Helle Terkildsen Maindal, Corina Paraschiv, Knud Ryom","doi":"10.2196/75648","DOIUrl":"10.2196/75648","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;The rise of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as ChatGPT is rapidly transforming how people access information online. In the health context, generative AI is seen as a potentially disruptive information source due to its low entry barriers, conversational style, and ability to tailor content to users' needs. However, little is known about whether and how individuals use generative AI for health purposes, and which groups may benefit or be left behind, raising important questions of digital health equity.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;This study aimed to assess the current relevance of generative AI as a health information source and to identify key factors predicting individuals' intention to use it. We applied the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2, focusing on 6 core predictors: performance expectancy, effort expectancy, facilitating conditions, social influence, habit, and hedonic motivation. In addition, we extended the model by including health literacy and health status. A cross-national design enabled comparison across 4 European countries.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;A representative online survey was conducted in September 2024 with 1990 participants aged 16 to 74 years from Austria (n=502), Denmark (n=507), France (n=498), and Serbia (n=483). Structural equation modeling with metric measurement invariance was used to test associations across countries.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Usage of generative AI for health information was still limited: only 39.5% of respondents reported having used it at least rarely. Generative AI ranked last among all measured health information sources (mean 2.08, SD 1.66); instead, medical experts (mean 4.77, SD 1.70) and online search engines (mean 4.57, SD 1.88) are still the most frequently used health information sources. Despite this, performance expectancy (b range=0.44-0.53; all P&lt;.001), habit (b range=0.28-0.32; all P&lt;.001), and hedonic motivation (b range=0.22-0.45; all P&lt;.001) consistently predicted behavioral intention in all countries. Facilitating conditions also showed small but significant effects (b range=0.12-0.24; all P&lt;.01). In contrast, effort expectancy, social influence, health literacy, and health status were unrelated to intention in all countries, with one marginal exception (France: health status, b=-0.09; P=.007). Model fit was good (comparative fit index=0.95; root mean square error of approximation=0.03), and metric invariance was confirmed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;Generative AI use for health information is currently driven by early adopters-those who find it useful, easy to integrate, enjoyable, and have the necessary skills and infrastructure to do so. Cross-national consistency suggests a shared adoption pattern across Europe. To promote equitable adoption, communication efforts should focus on usefulness, convenience, and enjoyment, while ensuring digital access and safeguards for vul","PeriodicalId":16337,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","volume":"28 ","pages":"e75648"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12851524/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146093398","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Medical Internet Research
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1