Disorders of Consciousness (DoC) caused by severe brain injuries represent a challenging clinical entity, which is easy to misdiagnosis and lacks effective treatment options. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive neuroelectric stimulation method that shows promise in improving consciousness for DoC, especially in minimally conscious state (MCS). However, there is little evidence of its effectiveness, especially in RCT studies. Twenty MCS patients participated in a double-blind, randomized, crossover, sham-controlled clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of rTMS for MCS. Subjects were randomized into two groups: one group received rTMS-active for 10 consecutive days (n = 10), and the other group received rTMS-sham for 10 consecutive days (n = 10). After a 10-day washout period, the two groups were crossed over and received the opposite treatment. the rTMS protocol consisted of 2,000 pulses per day in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (L-DLPFC), sent at 10 Hz. The stimulation intensity was 90% of the resting motor threshold. Coma Recovery Scale Revised (CRS-R), the main evaluation index, was evaluated before and after each phase in a double-blind manner. Meanwhile RS-EEG and TMS-EEG data were acquired and relative alpha power (RAP), and perturbational complexity index based on state transitions (PCIst) were caculated. One-way ANOVA revealed significantly higher scores in rTMS-active treatment compared to rTMS-sham across various measures, including CRS-R total score, RAP, PCIst (all P < 0.05). Among the 20 MCS patients, 7 (35%) were identified as responders following rTMS treatment. Compared to rTMS-sham, responder scores for CRS-R, RAP, and PCIst (all P < 0.05) were significantly elevated after rTMS-active treatment. Conversely, there was no significant difference observed in non-responders. Furthermore, post-hoc analysis revealed that baseline PCIst was significantly higher in responders than non-responders. Upon a 6-month follow-up, CRS-R scores significantly increased in all 20 patients (P = 0.026). However, the responder group exhibited a more favorable prognosis compared to the non-responder group (P = 0.031). Applying 10 Hz rTMS to L-DLPFC significantly increased consciousness level in MCS patients. PCIst is a neurophysiological index that has the potential to evaluate and predict therapeutic efficacy. www.ClinicalTrials.gov , identifier: NCT05187000.
{"title":"Perturbational complexity index in assessing responsiveness to rTMS treatment in patients with disorders of consciousness: a cross-over randomized controlled trial study","authors":"Chengwei Xu, Zhanxing Yuan, Zerong Chen, Ziqin Liao, Shuiyan Li, Yanqi Feng, Ziqiang Tang, Jichan Nian, Xiyan Huang, Haili Zhong, Qiuyou Xie","doi":"10.1186/s12984-024-01455-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-024-01455-1","url":null,"abstract":"Disorders of Consciousness (DoC) caused by severe brain injuries represent a challenging clinical entity, which is easy to misdiagnosis and lacks effective treatment options. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive neuroelectric stimulation method that shows promise in improving consciousness for DoC, especially in minimally conscious state (MCS). However, there is little evidence of its effectiveness, especially in RCT studies. Twenty MCS patients participated in a double-blind, randomized, crossover, sham-controlled clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of rTMS for MCS. Subjects were randomized into two groups: one group received rTMS-active for 10 consecutive days (n = 10), and the other group received rTMS-sham for 10 consecutive days (n = 10). After a 10-day washout period, the two groups were crossed over and received the opposite treatment. the rTMS protocol consisted of 2,000 pulses per day in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (L-DLPFC), sent at 10 Hz. The stimulation intensity was 90% of the resting motor threshold. Coma Recovery Scale Revised (CRS-R), the main evaluation index, was evaluated before and after each phase in a double-blind manner. Meanwhile RS-EEG and TMS-EEG data were acquired and relative alpha power (RAP), and perturbational complexity index based on state transitions (PCIst) were caculated. One-way ANOVA revealed significantly higher scores in rTMS-active treatment compared to rTMS-sham across various measures, including CRS-R total score, RAP, PCIst (all P < 0.05). Among the 20 MCS patients, 7 (35%) were identified as responders following rTMS treatment. Compared to rTMS-sham, responder scores for CRS-R, RAP, and PCIst (all P < 0.05) were significantly elevated after rTMS-active treatment. Conversely, there was no significant difference observed in non-responders. Furthermore, post-hoc analysis revealed that baseline PCIst was significantly higher in responders than non-responders. Upon a 6-month follow-up, CRS-R scores significantly increased in all 20 patients (P = 0.026). However, the responder group exhibited a more favorable prognosis compared to the non-responder group (P = 0.031). Applying 10 Hz rTMS to L-DLPFC significantly increased consciousness level in MCS patients. PCIst is a neurophysiological index that has the potential to evaluate and predict therapeutic efficacy. www.ClinicalTrials.gov , identifier: NCT05187000.","PeriodicalId":16384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142249015","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-19DOI: 10.1186/s12984-024-01456-0
Lin Meng, Yu Shi, Hongbo Zhao, Deyu Wang, Xiaodong Zhu, Dong Ming
The loss of gait automaticity is a key cause of motor deficits in Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients, even at the early stage of the disease. Action observation training (AOT) shows promise in enhancing gait automaticity. However, effective assessment methods are lacking. We aimed to propose a novel gait normalcy index based on dual task cost (NIDTC) and evaluate its validity and responsiveness for early-stage PD rehabilitation. Thirty early-stage PD patients were recruited and randomly assigned to the AOT or active control (CON) group. The proposed NIDTC during straight walking and turning tasks and clinical scale scores were measured before and after 12 weeks of rehabilitation. The correlations between the NIDTCs and clinical scores were analyzed with Pearson correlation coefficient analysis to evaluate the construct validity. The rehabilitative changes were assessed using repeated-measures ANOVA, while the responsiveness of NIDTC was further compared by t tests. The turning-based NIDTC was significantly correlated with multiple clinical scales. Significant group-time interactions were observed for the turning-based NIDTC (F = 4.669, p = 0.042), BBS (F = 6.050, p = 0.022) and PDQ-39 (F = 7.772, p = 0.011) tests. The turning-based NIDTC reflected different rehabilitation effects between the AOT and CON groups, with the largest effect size (p = 0.020, Cohen’s d = 0.933). The turning-based NIDTC exhibited the highest responsiveness for identifying gait automaticity improvement by providing a comprehensive representation of motor ability during dual tasks. It has great potential as a valid measure for early-stage PD diagnosis and rehabilitation assessment. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2300067657
{"title":"The inertial-based gait normalcy index of dual task cost during turning quantifies gait automaticity improvement in early-stage Parkinson’s rehabilitation","authors":"Lin Meng, Yu Shi, Hongbo Zhao, Deyu Wang, Xiaodong Zhu, Dong Ming","doi":"10.1186/s12984-024-01456-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-024-01456-0","url":null,"abstract":"The loss of gait automaticity is a key cause of motor deficits in Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients, even at the early stage of the disease. Action observation training (AOT) shows promise in enhancing gait automaticity. However, effective assessment methods are lacking. We aimed to propose a novel gait normalcy index based on dual task cost (NIDTC) and evaluate its validity and responsiveness for early-stage PD rehabilitation. Thirty early-stage PD patients were recruited and randomly assigned to the AOT or active control (CON) group. The proposed NIDTC during straight walking and turning tasks and clinical scale scores were measured before and after 12 weeks of rehabilitation. The correlations between the NIDTCs and clinical scores were analyzed with Pearson correlation coefficient analysis to evaluate the construct validity. The rehabilitative changes were assessed using repeated-measures ANOVA, while the responsiveness of NIDTC was further compared by t tests. The turning-based NIDTC was significantly correlated with multiple clinical scales. Significant group-time interactions were observed for the turning-based NIDTC (F = 4.669, p = 0.042), BBS (F = 6.050, p = 0.022) and PDQ-39 (F = 7.772, p = 0.011) tests. The turning-based NIDTC reflected different rehabilitation effects between the AOT and CON groups, with the largest effect size (p = 0.020, Cohen’s d = 0.933). The turning-based NIDTC exhibited the highest responsiveness for identifying gait automaticity improvement by providing a comprehensive representation of motor ability during dual tasks. It has great potential as a valid measure for early-stage PD diagnosis and rehabilitation assessment. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2300067657","PeriodicalId":16384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142248910","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Robot-Assisted Gait Training (RAGT) is a novel technology widely employed in the field of neurological rehabilitation for patients with subacute stroke. However, the effectiveness of RAGT compared to conventional gait training (CGT) in improving lower extremity function remains a topic of debate. This study aimed to investigate and compare the effects of RAGT and CGT on lower extremity movement in patients with subacute stroke. Comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EBSCO, Embase, Scopus, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wan Fang, SinoMed and Vip Journal Integration Platform. The database retrieval was performed up until July 9, 2024. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software. A total of 24 RCTs were included in the analysis. The results indicate that, compared with CGT, RAGT led to significant improvements in the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Lower Extremity [MD = 2.10, 95%CI (0.62, 3.59), P = 0.005], Functional Ambulation Category[MD = 0.44, 95%CI (0.23, 0.65), P < 0.001], Berg Balance Scale [MD = 4.55, 95%CI (3.00, 6.11), P < 0.001], Timed Up and Go test [MD = −4.05, 95%CI (−5.12, −2.98), P < 0.001], and 6-Minute Walk Test [MD = 30.66, 95%CI (22.36, 38.97), P < 0.001] for patients with subacute stroke. However, it did not show a significant effect on the 10-Meter Walk Test [MD = 0.06, 95%CI (−0.01, 0.14), P = 0.08]. This study provides evidence that RAGT can enhance lower extremity function, balance function, walking ability, and endurance levels compared to CGT. However, the quality of evidence for improvements in gait speed remains low.
{"title":"Efficacy of robot-assisted gait training on lower extremity function in subacute stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Miao-miao Hu, Shan Wang, Cai-qin Wu, Kun-peng Li, Zhao-hui Geng, Guo-hui Xu, Lu Dong","doi":"10.1186/s12984-024-01463-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-024-01463-1","url":null,"abstract":"Robot-Assisted Gait Training (RAGT) is a novel technology widely employed in the field of neurological rehabilitation for patients with subacute stroke. However, the effectiveness of RAGT compared to conventional gait training (CGT) in improving lower extremity function remains a topic of debate. This study aimed to investigate and compare the effects of RAGT and CGT on lower extremity movement in patients with subacute stroke. Comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EBSCO, Embase, Scopus, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wan Fang, SinoMed and Vip Journal Integration Platform. The database retrieval was performed up until July 9, 2024. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software. A total of 24 RCTs were included in the analysis. The results indicate that, compared with CGT, RAGT led to significant improvements in the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Lower Extremity [MD = 2.10, 95%CI (0.62, 3.59), P = 0.005], Functional Ambulation Category[MD = 0.44, 95%CI (0.23, 0.65), P < 0.001], Berg Balance Scale [MD = 4.55, 95%CI (3.00, 6.11), P < 0.001], Timed Up and Go test [MD = −4.05, 95%CI (−5.12, −2.98), P < 0.001], and 6-Minute Walk Test [MD = 30.66, 95%CI (22.36, 38.97), P < 0.001] for patients with subacute stroke. However, it did not show a significant effect on the 10-Meter Walk Test [MD = 0.06, 95%CI (−0.01, 0.14), P = 0.08]. This study provides evidence that RAGT can enhance lower extremity function, balance function, walking ability, and endurance levels compared to CGT. However, the quality of evidence for improvements in gait speed remains low.","PeriodicalId":16384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142248911","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-18DOI: 10.1186/s12984-024-01452-4
Jing He, Lingyu Wu, Wei Du, Fei Zhang, Shinuan Lin, Yun Ling, Kang Ren, Zhonglue Chen, Haibo Chen, Wen Su
The acute levodopa challenge test (ALCT) is a universal method for evaluating levodopa response (LR). Assessment of Movement Disorder Society’s Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale part III (MDS-UPDRS III) is a key step in ALCT, which is some extent subjective and inconvenience. This study developed a machine learning method based on instrumented Timed Up and Go (iTUG) test to evaluate the patients’ response to levodopa and compared it with classic ALCT. Forty-two patients with parkinsonism were recruited and administered with levodopa. MDS-UPDRS III and the iTUG were conducted in both OFF-and ON-medication state. Kinematic parameters, signal time and frequency domain features were extracted from sensor data. Two XGBoost models, levodopa response regression (LRR) model and motor symptom evaluation (MSE) model, were trained to predict the levodopa response (LR) of the patients using leave-one-subject-out cross-validation. The LR predicted by the LRR model agreed with that calculated by the classic ALCT (ICC = 0.95). When the LRR model was used to detect patients with a positive LR, the positive predictive value was 0.94. Machine learning based on wearable sensor data and the iTUG test may be effective and comprehensive for evaluating LR and predicting the benefit of dopaminergic therapy.
{"title":"Instrumented timed up and go test and machine learning-based levodopa response evaluation: a pilot study","authors":"Jing He, Lingyu Wu, Wei Du, Fei Zhang, Shinuan Lin, Yun Ling, Kang Ren, Zhonglue Chen, Haibo Chen, Wen Su","doi":"10.1186/s12984-024-01452-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-024-01452-4","url":null,"abstract":"The acute levodopa challenge test (ALCT) is a universal method for evaluating levodopa response (LR). Assessment of Movement Disorder Society’s Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale part III (MDS-UPDRS III) is a key step in ALCT, which is some extent subjective and inconvenience. This study developed a machine learning method based on instrumented Timed Up and Go (iTUG) test to evaluate the patients’ response to levodopa and compared it with classic ALCT. Forty-two patients with parkinsonism were recruited and administered with levodopa. MDS-UPDRS III and the iTUG were conducted in both OFF-and ON-medication state. Kinematic parameters, signal time and frequency domain features were extracted from sensor data. Two XGBoost models, levodopa response regression (LRR) model and motor symptom evaluation (MSE) model, were trained to predict the levodopa response (LR) of the patients using leave-one-subject-out cross-validation. The LR predicted by the LRR model agreed with that calculated by the classic ALCT (ICC = 0.95). When the LRR model was used to detect patients with a positive LR, the positive predictive value was 0.94. Machine learning based on wearable sensor data and the iTUG test may be effective and comprehensive for evaluating LR and predicting the benefit of dopaminergic therapy.","PeriodicalId":16384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","volume":"194 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142249021","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-18DOI: 10.1186/s12984-024-01459-x
Stefan Vestring, Elias Wolf, Johanna Dinkelacker, Sibylle Frase, Carolin Hessling-Zeinen, Shrabon Insan, Maral M. Kumlehn, Bernd Feige, Katharina Domschke, Claus Normann, Lukas Frase
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is capable of eliciting changes in cortical neuroplasticity. Increasing duration or repetition of tDCS during the after-effects of a first stimulation has been hypothesized to enhance efficacy. Computational models suggest sequential stimulation patterns with changing polarities to further enhance effects. Lasting tDCS effects on neural plasticity are of great importance for clinical applications. The study systematically examined the influence of different tDCS paradigms on long term potentiation (LTP)-like plasticity in humans, focusing on stimulation duration, repetition frequency and sequential combinations of changing polarities as the underlying characteristics. Amplitude changes of motor evoked potentials (MEP) were measured in response to paired associative stimulation (PAS) 6 h after application of different tDCS protocols. In total, 36 healthy participants completed the study, randomised into three groups with different stimulation protocols (N = 12 each). tDCS was able to display lasting modulatory effects on the inducibility of LTP-like plasticity in the human motor cortex 6 h after stimulation. TDCS with the anode on primary motor cortex significantly increased MEP amplitudes following PAS induction. Further analyses highlighted single stimulation block duration to be of higher importance than repetitive protocols for efficacy of effects. tDCS is capable of inducing lasting changes in the brain’s capability to interact with future stimuli. Especially, effects on the inducibility of LTP-like plasticity might only be detectable with specific tests such as PAS and might otherwise be overlooked. Refined tDCS protocols should focus on higher current and duration of single stimulations instead of implementing complex repetitive schedules.
{"title":"Lasting effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on the inducibility of synaptic plasticity by paired-associative stimulation in humans","authors":"Stefan Vestring, Elias Wolf, Johanna Dinkelacker, Sibylle Frase, Carolin Hessling-Zeinen, Shrabon Insan, Maral M. Kumlehn, Bernd Feige, Katharina Domschke, Claus Normann, Lukas Frase","doi":"10.1186/s12984-024-01459-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-024-01459-x","url":null,"abstract":"Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is capable of eliciting changes in cortical neuroplasticity. Increasing duration or repetition of tDCS during the after-effects of a first stimulation has been hypothesized to enhance efficacy. Computational models suggest sequential stimulation patterns with changing polarities to further enhance effects. Lasting tDCS effects on neural plasticity are of great importance for clinical applications. The study systematically examined the influence of different tDCS paradigms on long term potentiation (LTP)-like plasticity in humans, focusing on stimulation duration, repetition frequency and sequential combinations of changing polarities as the underlying characteristics. Amplitude changes of motor evoked potentials (MEP) were measured in response to paired associative stimulation (PAS) 6 h after application of different tDCS protocols. In total, 36 healthy participants completed the study, randomised into three groups with different stimulation protocols (N = 12 each). tDCS was able to display lasting modulatory effects on the inducibility of LTP-like plasticity in the human motor cortex 6 h after stimulation. TDCS with the anode on primary motor cortex significantly increased MEP amplitudes following PAS induction. Further analyses highlighted single stimulation block duration to be of higher importance than repetitive protocols for efficacy of effects. tDCS is capable of inducing lasting changes in the brain’s capability to interact with future stimuli. Especially, effects on the inducibility of LTP-like plasticity might only be detectable with specific tests such as PAS and might otherwise be overlooked. Refined tDCS protocols should focus on higher current and duration of single stimulations instead of implementing complex repetitive schedules.","PeriodicalId":16384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142248680","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-18DOI: 10.1186/s12984-024-01462-2
Shishi Chen, Jingjing Gao, Ye Zhou, Beisi Zheng, Yuxiang Liu, Manting Cao, Haiping Huang, Xinyi Su, Jianer Chen
Improper gait patterns, impaired balance and foot drop consistently plague stroke survivors, preventing them from walking independently and safely. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) technology can help patients reactivate their muscles and regain motor coordination. This study aims to systematically review and summarize the evidence for the potential benefits of NMES on the improvement of gait patterns after stroke. PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Science Direct and Web of Science were systematically searched until April 2024, to identify randomized controlled trials with the following criteria: stroke survivors as participants; NMES as intervention; conventional rehabilitation as a comparator; and gait assessment, through scales or quantitative parameters, as outcome measures. 29 publications involving 1711 patients met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis showed no significant differences in Ten-meter walk test, Fugl-Meyer assessment lower extremity, Modified Ashworth Assessment and asymmetry between the NMES group and the control group. Besides, NMES was associated with changes in outcome indicators such as quantitative gait analysis speed [SMD = 0.53, 95% CI (0.20, 0.85), P = 0.001], cadence [SMD = 0.76, 95% CI (0.32, 1.20), P = 0.0008], affected side step length [SMD = 0.73, 95% CI (0.16, 1.31), P = 0.01], angle of ankle dorsiflexion [WMD = 1.57, 95% CI (0.80, 2.33), P < 0.0001], Six-Minute Walk Test [WMD = 14.83, 95% CI (13.55, 16.11), P<0.00001]. According to the PEDro scale, 21 (72.4%) studies were of high quality and 8 were of moderate quality (27.6%). Taken together, the review synthesis indicated that NMES might play a potential role in stroke-induced walking dysfunction. And NMES may be superior for survivors in the chronic phase than the acute and subacute phases, and the efficacy of short sessions received by patients was greater than that of those who participated in a longer session. Additionally, further comparisons of the effects of NMES with different types or stimulation frequencies may provide unexpected benefits.
步态不正确、平衡能力受损和足下垂一直困扰着中风患者，使他们无法独立、安全地行走。神经肌肉电刺激（NMES）技术可以帮助患者重新激活肌肉，恢复运动协调能力。本研究旨在系统回顾和总结 NMES 对改善中风后步态的潜在益处的证据。在 2024 年 4 月之前，对 PubMed、Cochrane Library、Embase、Science Direct 和 Web of Science 进行了系统检索，以确定符合以下标准的随机对照试验：以中风幸存者为参与者；以 NMES 为干预措施；以常规康复为比较对象；以通过量表或定量参数进行的步态评估为结果测量指标。符合纳入标准的出版物有 29 篇，涉及 1711 名患者。Meta 分析表明，NMES 组与对照组在十米步行测试、下肢 Fugl-Meyer 评估、改良 Ashworth 评估和不对称方面无明显差异。此外，NMES 与定量步态分析速度[SMD = 0.53，95% CI (0.20，0.85)，P = 0.001]、步幅[SMD = 0.76，95% CI (0.32，1.20)，P = 0.001]、受影响侧步长[SMD = 0.001，95% CI (0.32，1.20)，P = 0.001]等结果指标的变化相关。0008]、患侧步长[SMD=0.73，95% CI（0.16，1.31），P=0.01]、踝关节背屈角度[WMD=1.57，95% CI（0.80，2.33），P<0.0001]、六分钟步行测试[WMD=14.83，95% CI（13.55，16.11），P<0.00001]。根据 PEDro 量表，21 项研究（72.4%）为高质量，8 项为中等质量（27.6%）。综上所述，综述表明，NMES 可能在中风引起的行走功能障碍中发挥潜在作用。而且，NMES 对慢性期幸存者的疗效可能优于急性期和亚急性期，患者接受短期疗程的疗效优于参加长期疗程的疗效。此外，进一步比较不同类型或刺激频率的 NMES 效果可能会带来意想不到的益处。
{"title":"Implications of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on gait ability, balance and kinematic parameters after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Shishi Chen, Jingjing Gao, Ye Zhou, Beisi Zheng, Yuxiang Liu, Manting Cao, Haiping Huang, Xinyi Su, Jianer Chen","doi":"10.1186/s12984-024-01462-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-024-01462-2","url":null,"abstract":"Improper gait patterns, impaired balance and foot drop consistently plague stroke survivors, preventing them from walking independently and safely. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) technology can help patients reactivate their muscles and regain motor coordination. This study aims to systematically review and summarize the evidence for the potential benefits of NMES on the improvement of gait patterns after stroke. PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Science Direct and Web of Science were systematically searched until April 2024, to identify randomized controlled trials with the following criteria: stroke survivors as participants; NMES as intervention; conventional rehabilitation as a comparator; and gait assessment, through scales or quantitative parameters, as outcome measures. 29 publications involving 1711 patients met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis showed no significant differences in Ten-meter walk test, Fugl-Meyer assessment lower extremity, Modified Ashworth Assessment and asymmetry between the NMES group and the control group. Besides, NMES was associated with changes in outcome indicators such as quantitative gait analysis speed [SMD = 0.53, 95% CI (0.20, 0.85), P = 0.001], cadence [SMD = 0.76, 95% CI (0.32, 1.20), P = 0.0008], affected side step length [SMD = 0.73, 95% CI (0.16, 1.31), P = 0.01], angle of ankle dorsiflexion [WMD = 1.57, 95% CI (0.80, 2.33), P < 0.0001], Six-Minute Walk Test [WMD = 14.83, 95% CI (13.55, 16.11), P<0.00001]. According to the PEDro scale, 21 (72.4%) studies were of high quality and 8 were of moderate quality (27.6%). Taken together, the review synthesis indicated that NMES might play a potential role in stroke-induced walking dysfunction. And NMES may be superior for survivors in the chronic phase than the acute and subacute phases, and the efficacy of short sessions received by patients was greater than that of those who participated in a longer session. Additionally, further comparisons of the effects of NMES with different types or stimulation frequencies may provide unexpected benefits.","PeriodicalId":16384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142248912","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-16DOI: 10.1186/s12984-024-01460-4
Matjaž Zadravec, Zlatko Matjačić
Gait event detection is crucial for assessment, evaluation and provision of biofeedback during rehabilitation of walking. Existing online gait event detection algorithms mostly rely on add-on sensors, limiting their practicality. Instrumented treadmills offer a promising alternative by utilizing the Center of Pressure (CoP) signal for real-time gait event detection. However, current methods have limitations, particularly in detecting cross-step events during perturbed walking conditions. We present and validate a CoP-based algorithm to detect gait events and cross-steps in real-time, which combines thresholding and logic techniques. The algorithm was evaluated on CoP datasets from healthy participants (age range 21–61 years), stroke survivors (age range 20–67 years), and people with unilateral transtibial amputation (age range 28–63 years) that underwent perturbation-based balance assessments, encompassing different walking speeds. Detected gait events from a simulated real-time processing operation were compared to offline identified counterparts in order to present related temporal absolute mean errors (AME) and success rate. The proposed algorithm demonstrated high accuracy in detecting gait events during native gait, as well as cross-step events during perturbed walking conditions. It successfully recognized the majority of cross-steps, with a detection success rate of 94%. However, some misclassifications or missed events occurred, mainly due to the complexity of cross-step events. AME for heel strikes (HS) during native gait and cross-step events averaged at 78 ms and 64 ms respectively, while toe off (TO) AME were 126 ms and 111 ms respectively. A statistically significant difference in the algorithm's success rate score in detecting gait events during cross-step intervals was observed across various walking speeds in a sample of 12 healthy participants, while there was no significant difference among groups. The proposed algorithm represents an advancement in gait event detection on instrumented treadmills. By leveraging the CoP signal, it successfully identifies gait events and cross-steps in the simulated real-time processing operation, providing valuable insights into human locomotion. The algorithm's ability to accommodate diverse CoP patterns enhance its applicability to a wide range of individuals and gait characteristics. The algorithm's performance was consistent across different populations, suggesting its potential for diverse clinical and research settings, particularly in the domains of gait analysis and rehabilitation practices.
{"title":"Cross-step detection using center-of-pressure based algorithm for real-time applications","authors":"Matjaž Zadravec, Zlatko Matjačić","doi":"10.1186/s12984-024-01460-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-024-01460-4","url":null,"abstract":"Gait event detection is crucial for assessment, evaluation and provision of biofeedback during rehabilitation of walking. Existing online gait event detection algorithms mostly rely on add-on sensors, limiting their practicality. Instrumented treadmills offer a promising alternative by utilizing the Center of Pressure (CoP) signal for real-time gait event detection. However, current methods have limitations, particularly in detecting cross-step events during perturbed walking conditions. We present and validate a CoP-based algorithm to detect gait events and cross-steps in real-time, which combines thresholding and logic techniques. The algorithm was evaluated on CoP datasets from healthy participants (age range 21–61 years), stroke survivors (age range 20–67 years), and people with unilateral transtibial amputation (age range 28–63 years) that underwent perturbation-based balance assessments, encompassing different walking speeds. Detected gait events from a simulated real-time processing operation were compared to offline identified counterparts in order to present related temporal absolute mean errors (AME) and success rate. The proposed algorithm demonstrated high accuracy in detecting gait events during native gait, as well as cross-step events during perturbed walking conditions. It successfully recognized the majority of cross-steps, with a detection success rate of 94%. However, some misclassifications or missed events occurred, mainly due to the complexity of cross-step events. AME for heel strikes (HS) during native gait and cross-step events averaged at 78 ms and 64 ms respectively, while toe off (TO) AME were 126 ms and 111 ms respectively. A statistically significant difference in the algorithm's success rate score in detecting gait events during cross-step intervals was observed across various walking speeds in a sample of 12 healthy participants, while there was no significant difference among groups. The proposed algorithm represents an advancement in gait event detection on instrumented treadmills. By leveraging the CoP signal, it successfully identifies gait events and cross-steps in the simulated real-time processing operation, providing valuable insights into human locomotion. The algorithm's ability to accommodate diverse CoP patterns enhance its applicability to a wide range of individuals and gait characteristics. The algorithm's performance was consistent across different populations, suggesting its potential for diverse clinical and research settings, particularly in the domains of gait analysis and rehabilitation practices.","PeriodicalId":16384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142248914","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-14DOI: 10.1186/s12984-024-01465-z
Quting Huang, Michael K. Yeung, Kenneth N. K. Fong, Chi-Wen Chien
Children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD) have impaired online motor control. Researchers posit that this impairment could be due to a deficit in utilizing the internal model control process. However, there is little neurological evidence to support this view because few neuroimaging studies have focused specifically on tasks involving online motor control. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the differences in cortical hemodynamic activity during an online movement adjustment task between children with and without DCD. Twenty children with DCD (mean age: 9.88 ± 1.67 years; gender: 14M/6F) and twenty age-and-gender matched children with typical development (TD) (mean age: 9.87 ± 1.59 years; gender: 14M/6F) were recruited via convenience sampling. Participants performed a double-step reaching task under two conditions (with and without online adjustment of reaching). Cortical hemodynamic activity during task in ten regions of interest, including bilateral primary somatosensory cortex, primary motor cortex, premotor cortex, superior parietal cortex, and inferior parietal cortex was recorded using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. In the analyses, change in oxyhemoglobin (ΔHbO) concentration was used to characterize hemodynamic response. Two-way analyses of variance were conducted for each region of interest to compare hemodynamic responses between groups and conditions. Additionally, Pearson’s r correlations between hemodynamic response and task performance were performed. Outcome showed that children with DCD required significantly more time to correct their reaching movements compared to the control group (t = 3.948, P < 0.001). Furthermore, children with DCD have a significantly lower ΔHbO change in the left superior parietal cortex during movement correction, compared to children with TD (F = 4.482, P = 0.041). Additionally, a significant negative correlation (r = − 0.598, P < 0.001) was observed between the difference in movement time of reaching and the difference in ΔHbO between conditions in the left superior parietal cortex. The findings of this study suggest that deficiencies in processing real-time sensory feedback, considering the function of the superior parietal cortex, might be related to the impaired online motor control observed in children with DCD. Interventions could target this issue to enhance their performance in online motor control.
{"title":"Cortical activity during online motor control in children with and without developmental coordination disorder: a cross-sectional functional near-infrared spectroscopy study","authors":"Quting Huang, Michael K. Yeung, Kenneth N. K. Fong, Chi-Wen Chien","doi":"10.1186/s12984-024-01465-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-024-01465-z","url":null,"abstract":"Children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD) have impaired online motor control. Researchers posit that this impairment could be due to a deficit in utilizing the internal model control process. However, there is little neurological evidence to support this view because few neuroimaging studies have focused specifically on tasks involving online motor control. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the differences in cortical hemodynamic activity during an online movement adjustment task between children with and without DCD. Twenty children with DCD (mean age: 9.88 ± 1.67 years; gender: 14M/6F) and twenty age-and-gender matched children with typical development (TD) (mean age: 9.87 ± 1.59 years; gender: 14M/6F) were recruited via convenience sampling. Participants performed a double-step reaching task under two conditions (with and without online adjustment of reaching). Cortical hemodynamic activity during task in ten regions of interest, including bilateral primary somatosensory cortex, primary motor cortex, premotor cortex, superior parietal cortex, and inferior parietal cortex was recorded using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. In the analyses, change in oxyhemoglobin (ΔHbO) concentration was used to characterize hemodynamic response. Two-way analyses of variance were conducted for each region of interest to compare hemodynamic responses between groups and conditions. Additionally, Pearson’s r correlations between hemodynamic response and task performance were performed. Outcome showed that children with DCD required significantly more time to correct their reaching movements compared to the control group (t = 3.948, P < 0.001). Furthermore, children with DCD have a significantly lower ΔHbO change in the left superior parietal cortex during movement correction, compared to children with TD (F = 4.482, P = 0.041). Additionally, a significant negative correlation (r = − 0.598, P < 0.001) was observed between the difference in movement time of reaching and the difference in ΔHbO between conditions in the left superior parietal cortex. The findings of this study suggest that deficiencies in processing real-time sensory feedback, considering the function of the superior parietal cortex, might be related to the impaired online motor control observed in children with DCD. Interventions could target this issue to enhance their performance in online motor control.","PeriodicalId":16384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142248913","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-13DOI: 10.1186/s12984-024-01449-z
Bonanno M, Maggio MG, Quartarone A, De Nunzio AM, Calabrò RS
Neurological disorders, such as Parkinson’s disease (PD), multiple sclerosis (MS), cerebral palsy (CP) and stroke are well-known causes of gait and balance alterations. Innovative devices (i.e., robotics) are often used to promote motor recovery. As an alternative, anti-gravity treadmills, which were developed by NASA, allow early mobilization, walking with less effort to reduce gait energy costs and fatigue. A systematic search, according to PRISMA guidelines, was conducted for all peer-reviewed articles published from January 2010 through September 2023, using the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, PEDro and IEEE Xplore. After an accurate screening, we selected only 16 articles (e.g., 5 RCTs, 2 clinical trials, 7 pilot studies, 1 prospective study and 1 exploratory study). The evidence collected in this systematic review reported promising results in the field of anti-gravity technology for neurological patients, in terms of improvement in gait and balance outcomes. However, we are not able to provide any clinical recommendation about the dose and parameters of anti-gravity treadmill training, because of the lack of robust high-quality RCT studies and large samples. Registration number CRD42023459665.
{"title":"Simulating space walking: a systematic review on anti-gravity technology in neurorehabilitation","authors":"Bonanno M, Maggio MG, Quartarone A, De Nunzio AM, Calabrò RS","doi":"10.1186/s12984-024-01449-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-024-01449-z","url":null,"abstract":"Neurological disorders, such as Parkinson’s disease (PD), multiple sclerosis (MS), cerebral palsy (CP) and stroke are well-known causes of gait and balance alterations. Innovative devices (i.e., robotics) are often used to promote motor recovery. As an alternative, anti-gravity treadmills, which were developed by NASA, allow early mobilization, walking with less effort to reduce gait energy costs and fatigue. A systematic search, according to PRISMA guidelines, was conducted for all peer-reviewed articles published from January 2010 through September 2023, using the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, PEDro and IEEE Xplore. After an accurate screening, we selected only 16 articles (e.g., 5 RCTs, 2 clinical trials, 7 pilot studies, 1 prospective study and 1 exploratory study). The evidence collected in this systematic review reported promising results in the field of anti-gravity technology for neurological patients, in terms of improvement in gait and balance outcomes. However, we are not able to provide any clinical recommendation about the dose and parameters of anti-gravity treadmill training, because of the lack of robust high-quality RCT studies and large samples. Registration number CRD42023459665.","PeriodicalId":16384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142213034","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-12DOI: 10.1186/s12984-024-01464-0
Michelle McNally, Gabriel Byczynski, Sven Vanneste
Many studies over the recent decades have attempted the modulation of motor learning using brain stimulation. Alternating currents allow for researchers not only to electrically stimulate the brain, but to further investigate the effects of specific frequencies, in and beyond the context of their endogenous associations. Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) has therefore been used during motor learning to modulate aspects of acquisition, consolidation and performance of a learned motor skill. Despite numerous reviews on the effects of tACS, and its role in motor learning, there are few studies which synthesize the numerous frequencies and their respective theoretical mechanisms as they relate to motor and perceptual processes. Here we provide a short overview of the main stimulation frequencies used in motor learning modulation (e.g., alpha, beta, and gamma), and discuss the effect and proposed mechanisms of these studies. We summarize with the current state of the field, the effectiveness and variability in motor learning modulation, and novel mechanistic proposals from other fields.
{"title":"An overview of the effects and mechanisms of transcranial stimulation frequency on motor learning","authors":"Michelle McNally, Gabriel Byczynski, Sven Vanneste","doi":"10.1186/s12984-024-01464-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-024-01464-0","url":null,"abstract":"Many studies over the recent decades have attempted the modulation of motor learning using brain stimulation. Alternating currents allow for researchers not only to electrically stimulate the brain, but to further investigate the effects of specific frequencies, in and beyond the context of their endogenous associations. Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) has therefore been used during motor learning to modulate aspects of acquisition, consolidation and performance of a learned motor skill. Despite numerous reviews on the effects of tACS, and its role in motor learning, there are few studies which synthesize the numerous frequencies and their respective theoretical mechanisms as they relate to motor and perceptual processes. Here we provide a short overview of the main stimulation frequencies used in motor learning modulation (e.g., alpha, beta, and gamma), and discuss the effect and proposed mechanisms of these studies. We summarize with the current state of the field, the effectiveness and variability in motor learning modulation, and novel mechanistic proposals from other fields.","PeriodicalId":16384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","volume":"108 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142213031","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：