Pub Date : 2026-01-15DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2026.01.030
Nalinee Panichyawat, Mathilde Duchon, Pauline Chauvet, Nicolas Bourdel
Objective: To demonstrate a step-by-step technique of intraoperative intraureteric indocyanine green (ICG) administration under cystoscopic guidance to localize intraoperative ureters under near-infrared fluorescence imaging during laparoscopic deep endometriosis surgery. The standardization and description of the surgery in 10 steps are the main objective of this video (Video 1).
Setting: A university tertiary care hospital DESIGN: Step-by-step video demonstration of the technique PARTICIPANT: Patient who diagnosed with deep endometriosis underwent laparoscopic surgery treatment. The local institutional review board ruled that approval was not required for this video article because the video describes a technique and does not report a clinical case.
Intervention: Ten main steps of cystoscopy with of intraureteral ICG administration to allow real time visualization of intraoperative ureters during adhesiolysis and endometriosis resection were described in detail: step 1 preparing ICG; step 2 preparing ureteric catheter; step 3 preparing instruments for cystoscopy; step 4 cystoscopy; step 5 identify the ureteric orifices; step 6 insertion ureteric catheter through ureteric orifices; step 7 injection of ICG; step 8 laparoscopic surgery; step 9 intraoperative visualization of ureters; and step 10 deep endometriosis surgery CONCLUSION: The use of cystoscopy-guided intraureteric ICG dye instillation and intraoperative ureteric near-infrared fluorescence imaging is a safe and effective tool for visualization of the ureteric position precisely and in real time, making the procedure faster, easier and reduce the intraoperative ureteric complication during laparoscopic deep endometriosis surgery.
{"title":"Intraureteric Indocyanine Green in Laparoscopic Endometriosis Surgery 10 Steps.","authors":"Nalinee Panichyawat, Mathilde Duchon, Pauline Chauvet, Nicolas Bourdel","doi":"10.1016/j.jmig.2026.01.030","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2026.01.030","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To demonstrate a step-by-step technique of intraoperative intraureteric indocyanine green (ICG) administration under cystoscopic guidance to localize intraoperative ureters under near-infrared fluorescence imaging during laparoscopic deep endometriosis surgery. The standardization and description of the surgery in 10 steps are the main objective of this video (Video 1).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A university tertiary care hospital DESIGN: Step-by-step video demonstration of the technique PARTICIPANT: Patient who diagnosed with deep endometriosis underwent laparoscopic surgery treatment. The local institutional review board ruled that approval was not required for this video article because the video describes a technique and does not report a clinical case.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Ten main steps of cystoscopy with of intraureteral ICG administration to allow real time visualization of intraoperative ureters during adhesiolysis and endometriosis resection were described in detail: step 1 preparing ICG; step 2 preparing ureteric catheter; step 3 preparing instruments for cystoscopy; step 4 cystoscopy; step 5 identify the ureteric orifices; step 6 insertion ureteric catheter through ureteric orifices; step 7 injection of ICG; step 8 laparoscopic surgery; step 9 intraoperative visualization of ureters; and step 10 deep endometriosis surgery CONCLUSION: The use of cystoscopy-guided intraureteric ICG dye instillation and intraoperative ureteric near-infrared fluorescence imaging is a safe and effective tool for visualization of the ureteric position precisely and in real time, making the procedure faster, easier and reduce the intraoperative ureteric complication during laparoscopic deep endometriosis surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":16397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145994281","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-15DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2026.01.026
Maria C Alzamora Schmatz, Gabrielle Mintz, Liron Bar-El, Megan Billow
Objective: To demonstrate a minimally invasive surgical approach for managing a retained intrauterine device (IUD) in a patient with severe cervical stenosis and a cesarean scar defect.
Setting: Tertiary care center with expertise in complex gynecologic surgery.
Participants: A 33-year-old G1P1001 with a history of cesarean delivery. She had a prior LEEP and IUD insertion, followed by cold-knife conization where IUD strings were transected. She presented with pelvic pain, irregular bleeding and cervical stenosis. She underwent multiple failed IUD removal attempts complicated by uterine and rectovaginal septum perforations. Imaging revealed an isthmocele with minimal residual myometrium and cervical shortening.
Intervention: Patient underwent laparoscopic transuterine IUD removal, transuterine cervical dilation with intrauterine catheter placement to maintain cervical patency, isthmocele repair, and transabdominal cerclage. Transabdominal approach was selected over transvaginal cerclage or expectant management due to severe cervical distortion from prior excisional procedures and cervical shortening.
{"title":"Laparoscopic Management of Retained IUD, Isthmocele, and Cervical Stenosis with Concurrent Transabdominal Cerclage in a Fertility-Seeking Patient.","authors":"Maria C Alzamora Schmatz, Gabrielle Mintz, Liron Bar-El, Megan Billow","doi":"10.1016/j.jmig.2026.01.026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2026.01.026","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To demonstrate a minimally invasive surgical approach for managing a retained intrauterine device (IUD) in a patient with severe cervical stenosis and a cesarean scar defect.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary care center with expertise in complex gynecologic surgery.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A 33-year-old G1P1001 with a history of cesarean delivery. She had a prior LEEP and IUD insertion, followed by cold-knife conization where IUD strings were transected. She presented with pelvic pain, irregular bleeding and cervical stenosis. She underwent multiple failed IUD removal attempts complicated by uterine and rectovaginal septum perforations. Imaging revealed an isthmocele with minimal residual myometrium and cervical shortening.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Patient underwent laparoscopic transuterine IUD removal, transuterine cervical dilation with intrauterine catheter placement to maintain cervical patency, isthmocele repair, and transabdominal cerclage. Transabdominal approach was selected over transvaginal cerclage or expectant management due to severe cervical distortion from prior excisional procedures and cervical shortening.</p>","PeriodicalId":16397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145994275","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-15DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2026.01.029
Monica M Jackson, Logan R Eckhardt, Michael Zamani, Nora Watson, Paul Levett, Scott P Endicott
Objective: To evaluate whether adding metronidazole to cefazolin for hysterectomy is more effective in prevention of surgical site infection than the existing recommendation of cefazolin alone.
Data sources: MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched until October 16, 2024. The following words made up the search strategy: hysterectomy, cefazolin, metronidazole, and surgical site infection, and their variants.
Methods of study selection: Our search identified 987 studies, which were uploaded to Covidence for review management; 302 duplicates were automatically removed. A team of two reviewers screened 685 studies, and a third reviewer resolved conflicts. Studies were included if they 1) consisted of peer-reviewed research published between 1980 and 2024, 2) assessed patients undergoing hysterectomy by any route, 3) compared cefazolin to cefazolin and metronidazole, and 4) reported primary outcome of surgical site infection within 30 days of procedure.
Tabulation, integration, and results: Five studies with a total of 5,838 participants met eligibility criteria; two were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and three were observational (retrospective cohort studies). The two RCTs each used vaginal metronidazole and the three observational studies each used intravenous (IV) metronidazole. The RCTs each found qualitatively lower risk of SSI with vaginal metronidazole compared to cefazolin alone (ORs 0.28 and 0.43). Observational studies consistently found similar ORs for lower risk of surgical site infection (SSI) with IV metronidazole compared to cefazolin alone (OR range 0.40-0.63). These large effect sizes were statistically significant in only the two largest studies, reflecting limited statistical power of several individual studies due to low absolute frequencies of infections.
Conclusion: Systematic review of the literature demonstrates evidence that the use of metronidazole in addition to cefazolin reduces the risk of surgical site infection after hysterectomy by any route and for any indication. Intravenous use of metronidazole in particular may be the preferred route of administration by both the patient and surgeon.
目的:评价头孢唑林联合甲硝唑行子宫切除术是否比目前推荐的头孢唑林单用更有效地预防手术部位感染。数据来源:MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science检索至2024年10月16日。以下词汇构成了搜索策略:子宫切除术、头孢唑林、甲硝唑和手术部位感染及其变体。研究选择方法:我们的搜索确定了987项研究,这些研究被上传到covid进行审查管理;302个副本被自动删除。由两名审稿人组成的团队筛选了685项研究,第三名审稿人解决了冲突。纳入的研究包括:1)发表于1980年至2024年间的同行评审研究,2)评估通过任何途径进行子宫切除术的患者,3)比较头孢唑林与头孢唑林和甲硝唑,4)报告手术后30天内手术部位感染的主要结局。制表、整合和结果:5项研究共5,838名受试者符合入选标准;2项为随机对照试验(rct), 3项为观察性研究(回顾性队列研究)。两项随机对照试验均使用阴道注射甲硝唑,三项观察性研究均使用静脉注射甲硝唑。随机对照试验均发现阴道使用甲硝唑与单独使用头孢唑林相比发生SSI的定性风险较低(or分别为0.28和0.43)。观察性研究一致发现,与单独使用头孢唑林相比,静脉注射甲硝唑手术部位感染(SSI)风险较低的OR相似(OR范围0.40-0.63)。这些大的效应量仅在两个最大的研究中具有统计学意义,反映了由于感染的绝对频率较低,几个单独研究的统计能力有限。结论:系统的文献综述表明,甲硝唑加头孢唑林在任何途径和任何适应症下均可降低子宫切除术后手术部位感染的风险。特别是静脉注射甲硝唑可能是患者和外科医生的首选给药途径。
{"title":"Metronidazole Plus Cefazolin Compared with Cefazolin Alone for Surgical Site Infection Prophylaxis in Patients Undergoing Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Monica M Jackson, Logan R Eckhardt, Michael Zamani, Nora Watson, Paul Levett, Scott P Endicott","doi":"10.1016/j.jmig.2026.01.029","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2026.01.029","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether adding metronidazole to cefazolin for hysterectomy is more effective in prevention of surgical site infection than the existing recommendation of cefazolin alone.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched until October 16, 2024. The following words made up the search strategy: hysterectomy, cefazolin, metronidazole, and surgical site infection, and their variants.</p><p><strong>Methods of study selection: </strong>Our search identified 987 studies, which were uploaded to Covidence for review management; 302 duplicates were automatically removed. A team of two reviewers screened 685 studies, and a third reviewer resolved conflicts. Studies were included if they 1) consisted of peer-reviewed research published between 1980 and 2024, 2) assessed patients undergoing hysterectomy by any route, 3) compared cefazolin to cefazolin and metronidazole, and 4) reported primary outcome of surgical site infection within 30 days of procedure.</p><p><strong>Tabulation, integration, and results: </strong>Five studies with a total of 5,838 participants met eligibility criteria; two were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and three were observational (retrospective cohort studies). The two RCTs each used vaginal metronidazole and the three observational studies each used intravenous (IV) metronidazole. The RCTs each found qualitatively lower risk of SSI with vaginal metronidazole compared to cefazolin alone (ORs 0.28 and 0.43). Observational studies consistently found similar ORs for lower risk of surgical site infection (SSI) with IV metronidazole compared to cefazolin alone (OR range 0.40-0.63). These large effect sizes were statistically significant in only the two largest studies, reflecting limited statistical power of several individual studies due to low absolute frequencies of infections.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Systematic review of the literature demonstrates evidence that the use of metronidazole in addition to cefazolin reduces the risk of surgical site infection after hysterectomy by any route and for any indication. Intravenous use of metronidazole in particular may be the preferred route of administration by both the patient and surgeon.</p>","PeriodicalId":16397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145994317","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-14DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2026.01.021
Maria C Alzamora Schmatz, Hala Al Kallas, Erna Forgó, Cara R King
This report presents a patient with deeply infiltrating bladder endometriosis who underwent laparoscopic excision with partial cystectomy, revealing focal atypical endometrial hyperplasia within the bladder nodule on histopathology. The case highlights the importance of surgical planning, thorough surgical excision and histologic assessment of complex endometriosis cases, as well as the need for individualized management and surveillance strategies when atypia is identified in extrauterine endometriotic disease.
{"title":"Focal Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia Arising Within a Deeply Infiltrating Bladder Endometriotic Nodule.","authors":"Maria C Alzamora Schmatz, Hala Al Kallas, Erna Forgó, Cara R King","doi":"10.1016/j.jmig.2026.01.021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2026.01.021","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This report presents a patient with deeply infiltrating bladder endometriosis who underwent laparoscopic excision with partial cystectomy, revealing focal atypical endometrial hyperplasia within the bladder nodule on histopathology. The case highlights the importance of surgical planning, thorough surgical excision and histologic assessment of complex endometriosis cases, as well as the need for individualized management and surveillance strategies when atypia is identified in extrauterine endometriotic disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":16397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145989652","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-14DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2026.01.024
Catherine E Lyons, Mark E Smolkin, Hong Zhu, Maureen E Farrell, Nyia L Noel, Florence E Turrentine, Laura N Homewood
<p><strong>Study objective: </strong>To evaluate whether higher Distressed Communities Index (DCI) scores, as a measure of community-level socioeconomic distress, are associated with worse risk-adjusted postoperative outcomes and healthcare resource utilization after gynecologic surgery DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study utilizing the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) Gynecology Collaborative database. Generalized linear mixed-effect models and linear mixed-effect models were used to evaluate the association between Distressed Community Index (DCI) scores and surgical outcomes, with institution treated as a random effect and models adjusted for the ACS-NSQIP predicted morbidity percentage .</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Six ACS-NSQIP Gynecology Collaborative sites in the United States, between January 1, 2018, and June 30, 2023.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Adult patients undergoing gynecologic operations during the study period. Patient records including ZIP Code data were merged with DCI scores ranging from 0 (low distress) to 100 (high distress), with DCI >75 identifying distressed communities.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>No therapeutic interventions were applied. Exposures of interest were community-level distress as measured by DCI. The primary outcome was a composite measure of postoperative morbidity. Secondary outcomes included markers of resource utilization (length of stay, discharge to nursing facility, and hospital readmission) and comparisons of outcomes between oncologic and benign procedures.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Patients with DCI >75 had a higher mean body mass index, greater comorbidity burden, higher ACS-NSQIP predicted morbidity percentage, longer mean length of stay, and higher unadjusted composite postoperative complication rates compared with patients with DCI ≤75. In generalized and linear mixed-effect models adjusting for ACS-NSQIP predicted morbidity, DCI (modeled continuously or dichotomized at >75) was not independently associated with postoperative complications (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.86-1.30, p=0.62), discharge destination (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.38-1.26, p=0.23), unplanned readmission (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.86-1.54, p=0.34), or length of stay. By contrast, higher ACS-NSQIP predicted morbidity percentage remained strongly associated with composite complications and hospital length of stay.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our multicenter cohort, DCI showed no independent association with postoperative outcomes in multivariable analysis. Future research should include samples with higher proportions of participants from highly distressed communities, as well as more precise SES measures (income, education, neighborhood), since ZIP code-based indicators may lack granularity. Such efforts could enhance individual risk stratification and targeted interventions. Linking clinical and community data is promising, but
研究目的:评估作为衡量社区社会经济困境的指标,较高的社区困境指数(DCI)评分是否与妇科手术后较差的风险调整术后结果和医疗资源利用有关。设计:这是一项回顾性队列研究,利用了美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)妇科协作数据库。采用广义线性混合效应模型和线性混合效应模型评估痛苦社区指数(DCI)评分与手术结果之间的关系,将机构视为随机效应,并根据ACS-NSQIP调整模型预测发病率。研究地点:2018年1月1日至2023年6月30日,美国6个ACS-NSQIP妇科合作中心。研究对象:研究期间接受妇科手术的成年患者。包括邮政编码数据在内的患者记录与DCI评分合并,DCI评分范围从0(低痛苦)到100(高痛苦),DCI bbb75表示痛苦社区。干预措施:未采用治疗性干预措施。感兴趣的暴露是由DCI测量的社区水平的痛苦。主要终点是术后发病率的综合指标。次要结局包括资源利用的标志(住院时间、出院到护理机构和再入院)以及肿瘤手术和良性手术结局的比较。测量和主要结果:与DCI≤75的患者相比,DCI≤75的患者具有更高的平均体重指数、更大的合并症负担、更高的ACS-NSQIP预测发病率、更长的平均住院时间和更高的未经调整的术后复合并发症发生率。在调整ACS-NSQIP预测发病率的广义和线性混合效应模型中,DCI(连续建模或在bbb75处二分类)与术后并发症(or 1.06, 95% CI 0.86-1.30, p=0.62)、出院目的地(or 0.69, 95% CI 0.38-1.26, p=0.23)、意外再入院(or 1.15, 95% CI 0.86-1.54, p=0.34)或住院时间无关。相比之下,ACS-NSQIP预测的高发病率与复合并发症和住院时间密切相关。结论:在我们的多中心队列中,多变量分析显示DCI与术后预后无独立关联。未来的研究应该包括来自高度贫困社区的参与者比例更高的样本,以及更精确的SES测量(收入,教育,社区),因为基于邮政编码的指标可能缺乏粒度。这种努力可以加强个人风险分层和有针对性的干预措施。将临床和社区数据联系起来是有希望的,但成功需要严格的协调、质量控制和方法改进。
{"title":"A National Analysis of Community Level Socioeconomic Status and Surgical Outcomes in Gynecologic Surgery.","authors":"Catherine E Lyons, Mark E Smolkin, Hong Zhu, Maureen E Farrell, Nyia L Noel, Florence E Turrentine, Laura N Homewood","doi":"10.1016/j.jmig.2026.01.024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2026.01.024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objective: </strong>To evaluate whether higher Distressed Communities Index (DCI) scores, as a measure of community-level socioeconomic distress, are associated with worse risk-adjusted postoperative outcomes and healthcare resource utilization after gynecologic surgery DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study utilizing the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) Gynecology Collaborative database. Generalized linear mixed-effect models and linear mixed-effect models were used to evaluate the association between Distressed Community Index (DCI) scores and surgical outcomes, with institution treated as a random effect and models adjusted for the ACS-NSQIP predicted morbidity percentage .</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Six ACS-NSQIP Gynecology Collaborative sites in the United States, between January 1, 2018, and June 30, 2023.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Adult patients undergoing gynecologic operations during the study period. Patient records including ZIP Code data were merged with DCI scores ranging from 0 (low distress) to 100 (high distress), with DCI >75 identifying distressed communities.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>No therapeutic interventions were applied. Exposures of interest were community-level distress as measured by DCI. The primary outcome was a composite measure of postoperative morbidity. Secondary outcomes included markers of resource utilization (length of stay, discharge to nursing facility, and hospital readmission) and comparisons of outcomes between oncologic and benign procedures.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Patients with DCI >75 had a higher mean body mass index, greater comorbidity burden, higher ACS-NSQIP predicted morbidity percentage, longer mean length of stay, and higher unadjusted composite postoperative complication rates compared with patients with DCI ≤75. In generalized and linear mixed-effect models adjusting for ACS-NSQIP predicted morbidity, DCI (modeled continuously or dichotomized at >75) was not independently associated with postoperative complications (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.86-1.30, p=0.62), discharge destination (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.38-1.26, p=0.23), unplanned readmission (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.86-1.54, p=0.34), or length of stay. By contrast, higher ACS-NSQIP predicted morbidity percentage remained strongly associated with composite complications and hospital length of stay.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our multicenter cohort, DCI showed no independent association with postoperative outcomes in multivariable analysis. Future research should include samples with higher proportions of participants from highly distressed communities, as well as more precise SES measures (income, education, neighborhood), since ZIP code-based indicators may lack granularity. Such efforts could enhance individual risk stratification and targeted interventions. Linking clinical and community data is promising, but ","PeriodicalId":16397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145989694","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: Fluorescence imaging using indocyanine green (ICG) has recently gained widespread use in gynecologic surgery and is considered a useful method for facilitation of ureteric identification and dissection during deep endometriosis (DE) surgery [1-3]. However, we encountered a case of DE in which ureteral visualization using intraureteral ICG was inadequate. This video presents clinical details and discusses possible reasons and implications.
Setting: An urban general hospital. Stepwise demonstration with narrated video footage.
Participants: A 42-year-old woman presented with dysmenorrhea and chronic pelvic pain. She had a history of surgery for DE (ovarian cystectomy and uterosacral ligament resection). MRI showed uterine leiomyomas, adenomyosis, bilateral ovarian endometrioma, left hematosalpinx, and DE involving the surface of the rectum and uterosacral ligament.
Interventions: Robot-assisted nerve-sparing hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and complete DE resection was planned using the da Vinci SP. Retrograde intraureteral ICG instillation was performed cystoscopically using ureteral catheters (2.5 mg/mL, 5 mL per side). Due to severe pelvic adhesion and fibrosis, the course of the pelvic ureters could not be identified with ICG fluorescence alone. The non-visualized segment became visible only after careful dissection of fibrotic tissue, and some portions remained non-fluorescent even after complete exposure of the ureter.
Conclusion: Even minimal periureteral fibrosis, as thin as 1-2 mm, can significantly attenuate fluorescence transmission depending on its density [4, 5]. Although intraureteral ICG is a valuable adjunct for ureteral identification during DE surgery, surgeons should be aware of its optical limitations and rely on meticulous anatomical dissection, which remains the cornerstone of safe pelvic surgery.
{"title":"Is identifying the ureter using indocyanine green in severe deep endometriosis always useful?","authors":"Tomoka Kashiwabara, Kiyoshi Kanno, Taisuke Iwata, Masaaki Andou","doi":"10.1016/j.jmig.2026.01.028","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2026.01.028","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Fluorescence imaging using indocyanine green (ICG) has recently gained widespread use in gynecologic surgery and is considered a useful method for facilitation of ureteric identification and dissection during deep endometriosis (DE) surgery [1-3]. However, we encountered a case of DE in which ureteral visualization using intraureteral ICG was inadequate. This video presents clinical details and discusses possible reasons and implications.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>An urban general hospital. Stepwise demonstration with narrated video footage.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A 42-year-old woman presented with dysmenorrhea and chronic pelvic pain. She had a history of surgery for DE (ovarian cystectomy and uterosacral ligament resection). MRI showed uterine leiomyomas, adenomyosis, bilateral ovarian endometrioma, left hematosalpinx, and DE involving the surface of the rectum and uterosacral ligament.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Robot-assisted nerve-sparing hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and complete DE resection was planned using the da Vinci SP. Retrograde intraureteral ICG instillation was performed cystoscopically using ureteral catheters (2.5 mg/mL, 5 mL per side). Due to severe pelvic adhesion and fibrosis, the course of the pelvic ureters could not be identified with ICG fluorescence alone. The non-visualized segment became visible only after careful dissection of fibrotic tissue, and some portions remained non-fluorescent even after complete exposure of the ureter.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even minimal periureteral fibrosis, as thin as 1-2 mm, can significantly attenuate fluorescence transmission depending on its density [4, 5]. Although intraureteral ICG is a valuable adjunct for ureteral identification during DE surgery, surgeons should be aware of its optical limitations and rely on meticulous anatomical dissection, which remains the cornerstone of safe pelvic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":16397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145989682","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-13DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2026.01.019
Eun Bi Jang, Seung-Hyuk Shim, Jeong-Yeol Park
Objective: To compare the oncologic outcomes of sentinel lymph node mapping (SLNM) and systemic lymphadenectomy (LND) in patients with high-risk endometrial cancer (EC) using a meta-analysis.
Data sources: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched from inception to November 2024 using terms related to "sentinel lymph node," "lymphadenectomy," and "endometrial cancer," with no language or publication date restrictions.
Methods of study selection: Retrospective studies comparing SLNM and LND in high-risk or high-intermediate-risk EC were included. Thirteen studies met eligibility criteria, comprising 1,405 patients in the SLNM group and 7,606 in the LND group.
Tabulation, integration, and results: Overall, 13 retrospective studies were included (SLNM, 1405 patients; LND, 7606 patients). No significant differences in recurrence (HR = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.74-1.07; I2 = 0; P < 1.00) and mortality (HR = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.56-1.01; I2 = 63.3; P = 0.001) were observed between the two groups. Subgroup analysis according to histology with mortality data showed no increase in mortality with carcinosarcoma, serous carcinoma, and clear cell carcinoma (HR = 0.51; 95% CI: 0.38-0.67; I2 = 0.0; P = 0.001). Further subgroup analysis according to stage, histology, and risk groups supported the overall findings, showing no significant differences between SLNM and LND.
Conclusion: SLNM alone for high-risk EC did not increase recurrence or mortality when compared to LND. Although SLNM offers several advantages, such as reduced complications and improved quality of life, further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and refine SLNM guidelines in high-risk EC.
{"title":"Sentinel lymph node mapping versus systemic lymphadenectomy in high-risk endometrial cancer patients: A meta-analysis of oncologic outcomes.","authors":"Eun Bi Jang, Seung-Hyuk Shim, Jeong-Yeol Park","doi":"10.1016/j.jmig.2026.01.019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2026.01.019","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the oncologic outcomes of sentinel lymph node mapping (SLNM) and systemic lymphadenectomy (LND) in patients with high-risk endometrial cancer (EC) using a meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched from inception to November 2024 using terms related to \"sentinel lymph node,\" \"lymphadenectomy,\" and \"endometrial cancer,\" with no language or publication date restrictions.</p><p><strong>Methods of study selection: </strong>Retrospective studies comparing SLNM and LND in high-risk or high-intermediate-risk EC were included. Thirteen studies met eligibility criteria, comprising 1,405 patients in the SLNM group and 7,606 in the LND group.</p><p><strong>Tabulation, integration, and results: </strong>Overall, 13 retrospective studies were included (SLNM, 1405 patients; LND, 7606 patients). No significant differences in recurrence (HR = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.74-1.07; I<sup>2</sup> = 0; P < 1.00) and mortality (HR = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.56-1.01; I<sup>2</sup> = 63.3; P = 0.001) were observed between the two groups. Subgroup analysis according to histology with mortality data showed no increase in mortality with carcinosarcoma, serous carcinoma, and clear cell carcinoma (HR = 0.51; 95% CI: 0.38-0.67; I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0; P = 0.001). Further subgroup analysis according to stage, histology, and risk groups supported the overall findings, showing no significant differences between SLNM and LND.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SLNM alone for high-risk EC did not increase recurrence or mortality when compared to LND. Although SLNM offers several advantages, such as reduced complications and improved quality of life, further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and refine SLNM guidelines in high-risk EC.</p>","PeriodicalId":16397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145989650","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Study objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic versus transvaginal ethanol sclerotherapy in patients with ovarian endometriomas (OEMs).
Design: Preliminary retrospective cohort study SETTING: Reproductive Medicine Research Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, China & Fertility Center, Shenzhen Hengsheng Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Intervention: laparoscopic ethanol sclerotherapy or transvaginal ethanol sclerotherapy MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: From June 2019 to June 2024, 124 patients with OEMs were divided into two groups: transvaginal (n=62) and laparoscopic (n=62) ethanol sclerotherapy. After 1:1 propensity score matching, 42 patients remained in each group with balanced baseline characteristics. All returned for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) 2 months postoperatively. No severe complications occurred. The laparoscopic group showed a significantly less decline in AMH (-0.18 vs. -0.27 ng/mL, p=0.042). The number of oocytes retrieved was similar (9.5 vs. 9.5, p=0.890). Fertilization rates (75.4% vs. 64.7%, p<0.001) and high-quality D3 embryo formation rates (60.6% vs. 45.4%, p<0.001) were significantly higher in the laparoscopic group, with D3 embryo formation rates marginally higher (80.4% vs. 73.9%, p=0.057). Blastocyst development and rates of no embryo availability did not differ. After adjustment, biochemical pregnancy rate (77.5% vs. 64.3%, OR=1.304, 95% CI: 0.434-3.936, p=0.634), clinical pregnancy rate (57.5% vs. 59.5%, OR=0.885, 95% CI: 0.321-2.437, p=0.813), and live birth rate (52.5% vs. 57.1%, OR=0.954, 95% CI: 0.348-2.615, p=0.927) showed no significant difference.
Conclusion: Both transvaginal and laparoscopic ethanol sclerotherapy were safe options for treating ovarian endometriomas. But laparoscopic surgery proved better preserve ovarian reserve and improve embryo development.
Trial registration: Not applicable.
研究目的:比较腹腔镜与经阴道乙醇硬化治疗卵巢子宫内膜异位瘤(OEMs)患者的安全性和有效性。设计:初步回顾性队列研究设置:中国中山大学附属第六医院生殖医学研究中心及深圳市恒盛医院生育中心,中国广东省深圳市。测量和主要结果:2019年6月至2024年6月,124例oem患者分为经阴道(n=62)和腹腔镜(n=62)乙醇硬化治疗两组。在1:1倾向评分匹配后,每组42例患者基线特征平衡。术后2个月复查控制性卵巢过度刺激(COH)。无严重并发症发生。腹腔镜组AMH下降幅度明显小于腹腔镜组(-0.18 vs -0.27 ng/mL, p=0.042)。找回的卵母细胞数相似(9.5 vs 9.5, p=0.890)。结论:经阴道和腹腔镜乙醇硬化疗法均是治疗卵巢子宫内膜异位瘤的安全选择。但腹腔镜手术被证明能更好地保留卵巢储备,促进胚胎发育。试验注册:不适用。
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic versus transvaginal ethanol sclerotherapy for ovarian endometriomas: a preliminary study.","authors":"Yutong Wang, Feng Wang, Manchao Li, Zhi Zeng, Jintao Peng, Xiaoyan Liang, Weifen Deng, Haitao Zeng","doi":"10.1016/j.jmig.2026.01.006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2026.01.006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objective: </strong>To compare the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic versus transvaginal ethanol sclerotherapy in patients with ovarian endometriomas (OEMs).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Preliminary retrospective cohort study SETTING: Reproductive Medicine Research Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, China & Fertility Center, Shenzhen Hengsheng Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>laparoscopic ethanol sclerotherapy or transvaginal ethanol sclerotherapy MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: From June 2019 to June 2024, 124 patients with OEMs were divided into two groups: transvaginal (n=62) and laparoscopic (n=62) ethanol sclerotherapy. After 1:1 propensity score matching, 42 patients remained in each group with balanced baseline characteristics. All returned for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) 2 months postoperatively. No severe complications occurred. The laparoscopic group showed a significantly less decline in AMH (-0.18 vs. -0.27 ng/mL, p=0.042). The number of oocytes retrieved was similar (9.5 vs. 9.5, p=0.890). Fertilization rates (75.4% vs. 64.7%, p<0.001) and high-quality D3 embryo formation rates (60.6% vs. 45.4%, p<0.001) were significantly higher in the laparoscopic group, with D3 embryo formation rates marginally higher (80.4% vs. 73.9%, p=0.057). Blastocyst development and rates of no embryo availability did not differ. After adjustment, biochemical pregnancy rate (77.5% vs. 64.3%, OR=1.304, 95% CI: 0.434-3.936, p=0.634), clinical pregnancy rate (57.5% vs. 59.5%, OR=0.885, 95% CI: 0.321-2.437, p=0.813), and live birth rate (52.5% vs. 57.1%, OR=0.954, 95% CI: 0.348-2.615, p=0.927) showed no significant difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both transvaginal and laparoscopic ethanol sclerotherapy were safe options for treating ovarian endometriomas. But laparoscopic surgery proved better preserve ovarian reserve and improve embryo development.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":16397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145984930","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-12DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2026.01.013
Christian Silva-Rengifo, Lucia Chaul, Ramiro Cabrera-Carranco, Fernando Heredia Muñoz
Objective: To show the safety of en bloc hysterectomy with segmental bowel resection utilizing the NOSE-technique in the management of ovarian cancer and deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE).
Design: Demonstration of the technique with narrated video.
Settings: Endometriosis, particularly endometriomas, increases the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer and complicates surgical management. En bloc hysterectomy with NOSE-assisted anastomosis offers a less invasive, effective alternative, improving outcomes and recovery.
Participant: A 39-year-old patient with DIE and an adnexal mass (ORADS-4), diagnosed with endometrioid adenocarcinoma involving both ovaries (FIGO-Stage-IIB).
Interventions: Laparoscopic en bloc hysterectomy with bowel resection and cytoreduction was performed, with intestinal anastomosis via the NOSE-technique.
Conclusions: En bloc hysterectomy with NOSE anastomosis reduces morbidity, enhances visualization, recovery, and achieves effective cytoreduction, offering a less invasive option for ovarian cancer with DIE.
{"title":"En Bloc Hysterectomy with segmental bowel resection by NOSE-procedure: Surgical Management of Ovarian Cancer in context of Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis.","authors":"Christian Silva-Rengifo, Lucia Chaul, Ramiro Cabrera-Carranco, Fernando Heredia Muñoz","doi":"10.1016/j.jmig.2026.01.013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2026.01.013","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To show the safety of en bloc hysterectomy with segmental bowel resection utilizing the NOSE-technique in the management of ovarian cancer and deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Demonstration of the technique with narrated video.</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>Endometriosis, particularly endometriomas, increases the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer and complicates surgical management. En bloc hysterectomy with NOSE-assisted anastomosis offers a less invasive, effective alternative, improving outcomes and recovery.</p><p><strong>Participant: </strong>A 39-year-old patient with DIE and an adnexal mass (ORADS-4), diagnosed with endometrioid adenocarcinoma involving both ovaries (FIGO-Stage-IIB).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Laparoscopic en bloc hysterectomy with bowel resection and cytoreduction was performed, with intestinal anastomosis via the NOSE-technique.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>En bloc hysterectomy with NOSE anastomosis reduces morbidity, enhances visualization, recovery, and achieves effective cytoreduction, offering a less invasive option for ovarian cancer with DIE.</p>","PeriodicalId":16397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145984950","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}