Journal of nursing measurement最新文献

Background and purpose: Assessment of digital health literacy should be a major concern for healthcare providers. We aimed to translate and adapt the Digital Health Literacy (DHL) Instrument into Brazilian Portuguese and examine the content validity for individuals with heart failure (HF). Methods: The instrument was translated, back translated, and evaluated by a panel of six experts regarding linguistic equivalences. An agreement analysis was performed, with values ≥80% considered acceptable. The experts then evaluated clarity, theoretical relevance, and practical pertinence. The content validity index (CVI) was calculated for each item. A CVI ≥.83 was considered acceptable. The expert's opinions were also evaluated through the modified kappa coefficient for content validity studies. Values >.74 were considered excellent. The content validity ratio (CVR) was also calculated. A critical value of CVR of 1.00 was determined. Cognitive testing (understanding the meaning of each item and their respective answers) was performed with 33 individuals with HF. Results: The adapted version obtained an agreement of ≥83.3% for each item on linguistic equivalences. Total CVI was ≥0.83, kappa values for each item were >.74, and the CVR values were 1.00 for all items. After two rounds of evaluation, all patients were able to understand the items and response scale. Conclusions: The Brazilian version has satisfactory evidence of linguistic and content validity to measure DHL in patients with HF. Additional psychometric properties will be tested in the country.

Background and Purpose: The number of patients in need of lifesaving organ transplants continues to exceed the number of available. One of the most critical factors influencing peoples' practices and rates of organ donation is their attitude and beliefs. This study aimed to develop and validate an instrument that evaluates peoples' attitudes and beliefs about organ donation. Methods: A cross-sectional methodological study was used to guide the development of a questionnaire after reviewing the literature. Results: The initial items (n = 45) were evaluated by 15 nonexperts pilot to verify face validity; then, content validity was established by three experts, and exploratory factorial analysis established construct validity. Afterward, internal consistency was checked using Cronbach's α analysis. Eventually, 31 items were included in the questionnaire, comprising four subscales. Conclusion: According to the results, we found that the "Public Attitudes and Beliefs about Organ Donation" questionnaire has adequate validity and reliability to assess peoples' attitudes and beliefs about organ donation.

Background and Purpose: Noncontact forehead thermometers have become increasingly widespread because of their advantages, such as rapid measurement of temperature, noninvasiveness, ease of use, and portability. The aim of the study was to compare the body temperature values measured using a noncontact forehead thermometer and a tympanic thermometer. Methods: A cross-sectional, comparative, and quasiexperimental research design was used in this study. The research population was composed of 200 adult individuals older than 18 years who were being treated at the hospital between January 2015 and March 2015. The temperature and humidity of the environment were measured with an electronic thermo-hygrometer. The body temperature of the patient was measured with both a noncontact forehead thermometer and a tympanic thermometer by the same researcher. The data were recorded in the patient information form and the patient observation form. Results: Mean body temperature values measured with a noncontact forehead thermometer and a tympanic thermometer were 36.17°C ± 0.47°C and 36.89°C ± 0.44°C, respectively. Results showed that there was no clear relationship between differences and averages, and there was conformity between the two methods. Conclusions: The mean forehead temperature is lower than the tympanic temperature, and there is conformity between the two methods.

Background and Purpose: An absence of specific and precise instruments that measure the construct of intrapersonal and interpersonal communication in nursing was verified. This study aimed to construct and validate the intrapersonal and interpersonal communication scale in nursing. Methods: A psychometric study was conducted on a sample of 360 nurses from a hospital and university center in the central region of Portugal. Reliability was assessed through internal consistency and construct validity through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Results: Four factors were decided upon: "self-efficacy," "empathy," "assertiveness," and "self-knowledge." Good internal consistency was obtained with Cronbach's alpha and adequate quality of adjustment indexes for the model. Conclusions: The key global indicators of the model's adjustment and reliability analysis express their quality for the Portuguese population.

Background and Purpose: The Compassionate Care Assessment Tool was designed to evaluate the compassionate care characteristics of nurses. The aim of this study was to examine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version. Methods: This study was a methodological type of study. Data were collected from 300 patients hospitalized in different services. Data were analyzed using SPSS 22.0 and LISREL 8.7. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to analyze the data. Results: The content validity index of the scale was 0.94. Confirmatory factor analysis conducted on the Turkish form showed that all items fell within the subscales of the original scale. and that their factor loads were between 0.37 and 0.78. The Cronbach's alpha of the scale was 0.897. Conclusions: The tool is a valid and reliable tool for evaluating compassionate care given by nurses.

Background and Purpose: Diabetes-specific distress (DD) is a crucial predictor of patients' self-care, necessitating reliable screening tools. The Diabetes Distress Scale captures typical sources of patients' distress effectively. Methods: The Hungarian Diabetes Distress Scale (HDDS) was employed in two studies with 450 type 2 diabetes patients. Study 1 explored DD's link to the specific quality of life, while study 2 examined its associations with depressive symptoms, anxiety, and illness perception. We evaluated HDDS's construct validity, internal consistency, and intercorrelations. Convergent validity and discriminant validity were analyzed in the second study. Results: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses validated HDDS's structure. Subscales exhibited strong internal consistency and correlated as expected with quality of life, anxiety, depression, illness perception, and demographic/medical data. Conclusions: The Hungarian DDS demonstrates robust psychometric properties, affirming its reliability and validity.

Background and Purpose: The Analgesic Adverse Drug Event Measure (AADEM) measures how people respond when they experience analgesic adverse drug events (ADEs). The purpose of this study was to confirm the underlying constructs of the AADEM: attributed ADE, consulted provider, sought care, and continued/discontinued analgesic. Methods: A cross-sectional instrumentation design was used. Three hundred and thirty-two adults who self-reported an analgesic ADE responded to the online AADEM. Confirmatory factor analysis and reliability testing were conducted. Results: Model fit was adequate across all indexes. Internal consistency for the full AADEM was low, while subscale internal consistency was generally acceptable probably due to three significant negative correlations and two positive correlations between the latent factors. Conclusions: The results supported the construct validity of the AADEM. Advanced practice nurses and other primary care providers can use the AADEM to investigate analgesic ADEs. Greater insight into how people respond to an analgesic ADE via the use of the AADEM may help prevent future analgesic ADEs.