Journal of palliative medicine最新文献

The field of Hospice and Palliative Medicine (HPM) has its roots in the principles, promulgated by Dame Cicely Saunders, that patient and family are the unit of care and that comprehensive integration of physical, psychological, social, and spiritual care is necessary to address suffering in all its dimensions. Although we aspire to provide comprehensive care for our patients, most hospice and palliative care (HPM) physicians lack basic competencies for identifying and managing patients with psychological distress and mental health distress and disorders, a growing segment of our clinical population. In this article, I argue that we are not living up to the founding values of our field in how we practice, how we educate our trainees, our research, and in how we pursue our own professional development as faculty. The history of our field, the nature of our clinical workforce, the culture of PC, and our educational programs all contribute to our current practice model, which is not adequate to meet the mental health needs of our patients. I propose strategies to address these challenges focused on enhancing integration between psychiatry/psychology and HPM, changes in fellowship education and faculty development, addressing the stigma against people with mental health diagnoses, and addressing system and cultural challenges that limit our ability to provide the kind of comprehensive, integrative care that our field aspires to.

In this report, we present the case of an older adult with severe obesity and multiple comorbidities, including heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), who experienced a prolonged decline complicated by recurrent hospitalizations and skilled nursing facility stays during the two years preceding death. This case highlights challenges in prognostication attributed to severe obesity complicated by HFpEF, which likely delayed goals of care conversations, and access to palliative care and hospice, despite high symptom burden. We discuss prognostic uncertainty among those with severe obesity and outline potential future directions.

Introduction: Sexual and gender minority (SGM) individuals face increased risk of receiving suboptimal care, including palliative care. Despite research demonstrating strategies to improve care, little is known about the experiences of palliative care clinicians providing care to these communities. Objectives: The primary aim of this study is to characterize attitudes and practices of palliative care physicians around providing care to SGM individuals. Design: This exploratory, qualitative study used semi-structured interviewing. Interviews were transcribed and coded using reflexive thematic analysis. Setting and Participants: Twenty-four palliative care physicians practicing in the homecare, hospice, and hospital settings from geographically diverse sites across Canada were recruited from palliative care organizations using convenience and snowball sampling. Results: Four main themes represent perspectives on improving palliative care for SGM individuals: (1) increasing experience with and knowledge about SGM communities increases clinicians' confidence and competency; (2) standardizing inclusive sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data collection and documentation can improve patient care; (3) addressing individual, systemic, and societal biases may improve palliative care provided to SGM individuals; and (4) knowing SOGI improves care quality. Conclusions: Clinicians must familiarize themselves with the importance of SOGI to the care provided as well as the palliative care needs of SGM communities. Institutions should provide tailored training around the unique needs of SGM patients and implement policies and tools that standardize sexual and gender orientation data collection and documentation.

Background: This analysis examined regret from participation in cancer clinical trials (CCT) and explored associations between regret and symptom burden, symptom bother, therapeutic optimism, and the importance of spiritual beliefs. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of cross-sectional data from a study of American CCT patient-participants conducted from 2015 to 2019. Descriptive statistics, bivariate associations, and logistic regression were used to evaluate regret in this sample (n = 325). Results: About 10% of the sample reported regret. Younger age, increased symptom burden, increased symptom bother, increased severe symptoms, and a lower level of therapeutic optimism were significantly associated with regret (p < 0.05) compared to those who did not experience regret. The final regression model identified that younger age, symptom burden, and therapeutic optimism significantly predicted regret (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Understanding regret among research participants may improve CCT retention and ensure ethical research practices. Symptom experiences may play a key role in experiences of regret in CCT participation.

Background: Navigating pediatric advanced cancer is challenging for children and parents, resulting in increased risk for psychological distress. While research has explored parent worries/concerns, few studies have included children's perspectives. Objectives: To explore worries/concerns in children with advanced cancer and their parents. Design: This was a part of a larger, mixed-methods study examining shared decision-making. Setting/Subjects: Children (of age 5-25) with advanced cancer (i.e., relapsed/refractory disease or physician estimated prognosis of <60%) and their parents in the Midwestern United States. Measurements: Children and parents completed the Response to Stress Questionnaire and individual semi-structured interviews. Coders analyzed the qualitative data via thematic analysis. Results: Parent and child worries/concerns included: (1) prognosis, (2) symptom burden and side effects of treatment, (3) emotional well-being, (4) impact on future, and (5) no concerns/uncertainty (child-only theme). Benefit-finding emerged as a minor theme. Many expressed concerns about treatment response, resulting in worries about death/dying. Others shared fear about managing current symptoms and the impact of long-term treatment side effects on the child's future. Parents reported worry about their child's emotional well-being, while children expressed worries about their families if they died. While all parents were able to identify worries/concerns, some children denied worries/concerns. Quantitatively, parents similarly identified worries about prognosis and symptom burden but also endorsed concern about being unable to help their child feel better. Conclusions: Our findings highlight similarities and differences in worries/concerns among children and parents as they navigate a child's advanced cancer journey. Early integration of palliative care may be helpful in mitigating these issues.