Objective: To assess repeatability and agreement of central vault for implantable collamer lens (ICL) measured by the Tomey OA-2000 biometry and Spectralis optical coherence tomography (OCT).
Methods: In this prospective study, the central vault was measured by the Tomey OA-2000 biometer and Spectralis OCT in 84 eyes (43 patients) after ICL implantation at six month follow-up. Three consecutive scans were obtained by one experienced technician using Tomey OA-2000 and the Spectralis OCT in the same day. The coefficient of variation (CoV), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), within-subject standard deviation (Sw), and 2.77 Sw were calculated to assess the repeatability and reproducibility. The paired t-test and Bland-Altman plots were used to analyze the differences and agreements of central vault measured by two devices.
Results: Repeatability of the central vault measured by Tomey OA-2000 biometer and Spectralis OCT showed that the CoV was 2.71% and 1.66%, respectively. The ICC for both devices was 0.996 and 0.999, respectively. The paired t-test showed that central vault measured by Tomey OA-2000 biometer was -7.25 ± 23.57 microns lower than that measured by Spectralis OCT (P = 0.006). The mean difference between measurements for Tomey OA-2000 and ASM-OCT with 95% limits of agreement (LoAs) was -38.94 to 53.44 μm.
Conclusion: Both Tomey OA-2000 biometer and Spectralis OCT displayed good repeatability for the measurement of central vault of ICL. Good reliability and agreement were observed between Tomey OA-2000 biometer and Spectralis OCT. Both instruments are useful but not replaced each other for central vault measurements.
Introduction: Ocular trauma is a common cause of permanent vision loss in adults. The combination of an accurate clinical examination and imaging offers the best prognostic indicators for patients and helps to navigate treatment modalities. This is a retrospective chart review of examination and imaging findings for ocular trauma and how they correlate with treatment course and visual acuity (VA) outcomes.
Methods: Adult patients with ocular trauma presenting to a single institution between January 2013 and December 2020 were evaluated. Initial examination and imaging findings were compared for associations with each other and with VA outcomes.
Results: 136 ocular traumas on 134 patients were included. The median presenting logMAR VA was 2.7 (interquartile range (IQR) 1.2-3.7) with 62% open globe injuries. The most commonly reported finding on initial CT scan was globe deformity (30%), on B-scan was choroidal detachment (20%), and on ultrasound biomicroscopy was intraocular foreign body, ciliochoroidal effusions, or angle recession (21% each). Worse vision was observed for patients positive for retinal detachment on initial B-scan compared to those negative for this finding at 6-month (median logMAR 2.7 vs. 0.5; P < 0.0001) and at final post-injury evaluation (median logMAR 3.7 vs. 0.4; P < 0.0001). Similarly, worse VA was observed for patients with choroidal detachment on initial B-scan compared to those without this finding at 6-month (median logMAR 1.4 vs. 0.5; P = 0.002) and at final post-injury evaluation (median logMAR 2.0 vs. 0.4; P < 0.0001). If positive conjunctiva/sclera examination findings were identified, 66% had positive findings on B-scan, whereas if the conjunctiva/sclera examination findings were absent, 41% had positive findings on B-scan (P = 0.005). If anterior chamber (AC) examination findings were positive, 59% had positive findings on B-scan, whereas if the AC examination findings were absent, 37% had positive findings on B-scan (P = 0.03). Discussion. The predictive value of examination findings in this study may offer insight as to long-term visual prognosis. Positive B-scan or CT findings should increase suspicion for open globe injuries.
Purpose: Assessing the applicability of an algorithm developed for keratoconus detection in adolescents. This algorithm relies on optical coherence tomography (OCT) and incorporates features related to corneal pachymetric and epithelial thickness alterations.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed charts of patients under the age of 18 and divided them into four groups according to the Belin-Ambrosio display (Pentacam): normal, manifest, and subclinical keratoconus, as well as very asymmetric eye with normal topography and tomography (VAE-NTT). Corneal and epithelial thickness maps (Cirrus 5000 HD-OCT, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Germany) were evaluated by a human grader. In the first step, if at least one of four parameters (pachymetry minimum (pachy min), pachy minimum-median (min-med), pachy superonasal-inferotemporal (SN-IT), or epithelial (epi SN-IT)) exceeded its cut-off value, the eye was considered as suspect. In the second step, the combined presence of coincident thinning of total cornea and epithelium as well as concentric epithelial thinning lead to the diagnosis of keratoconus. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to determine area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity for the parameters.
Results: The study involved 19 pediatric patients diagnosed with keratoconus, comprising 29 manifest keratoconic eyes, 3 eyes with subclinical keratoconus, and 5 VAE-NTT eyes. In addition, 22 eyes from 11 normal adolescents were included in the analysis. The AUC values of parameters in step 1 were 0.889 for pachy min, 0.997 for pachy min-med, 0.893 for pachy SN-IT, and 0.998 for epi SN-IT. When both steps were performed, this algorithm captured all manifest and subclinical pediatric keratoconic eyes. When all eyes of the keratoconus patients were combined, step 1 had 97.3% sensitivity and step 2 had 100% specificity.
Conclusion: Using this OCT-based approach in adolescents yielded a high level of agreement with the current gold standard, tomography. Using them together, potentially also with other examinations may improve the diagnostic accuracy of KC in the pediatric population. Integration of this approach into the software of the device to facilitate automated evaluations is desired.
Background: Diabetic mellitus is a vision-threatening disease because it causes diabetic retinopathy worldwide. The main focus of this research is to determine the prevalence and assess the visual outcome in diabetic retinopathy and macular edema patients by injecting Bevacizumab clinically.
Methods: This hospital-based trial case was conducted in Khulna BNSB Eye Hospital, Bangladesh. This study is based on a prospective cohort with a population of macular edema in 41 eyes of 25 diabetic patients, of whom 94 were diagnosed with diabetic retinopathy in 320 type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. The treating physician inserts 1.25 mg (0.05 ml) into the patient's eye. We have used optical coherence tomography (OCT) and colour fundus photography (CFP) for an eye check performed on all patients before and after the injection of Bevacizumab. The method results analyze the effects of the technique using IBM SPSS 25.
Results: The study population selected 25 patients with 41 eyes for clinical investigation by injection of Bevacizumab. The net effects of this study on five eyes with macular edema were entirely resolved. It was BCVA from 6/6 to 6/9. The 29 eyes were partially resolved, which is called improved visual acuity, and BCVA was 6/12 to 6/60. In the case of seven eyes, we found that the vision did not change before or after the Avastin injection. No change was seen in seven eyes of macular edema due to the effects of the Avastin injection before and after.
Conclusions: In clinical trial-based research, Bevacizumab (Avastin) is best effective for diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic macular edema (DME) patients.