Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs. Supplement最新文献

Objective: The needs of substance problem use services (SPUSs) should ideally be assessed locally to support the provision of appropriate, cost-effective services for the population. In this article we present a model for estimating the adult population's potential needs for and actual use of SPUSs. We used Finnish survey and register data as material for a qualitative assessment. The purpose of our article is to contribute to a discussion on the dimensions of assessment of the need for SPUSs at a local level.

Method: Seven Finnish municipalities were chosen as examples. The need for SPUSs was assessed by freely available register and survey data of the use of services, substance use and problem use, side effects of use, and lack of social support. Babor et al.'s (2008) description of links between the use of services and need for treatment, in terms of substance use and general social conditions, and Ritter's (2014a) set of methods for assessing the need for treatment are used as theoretical background.

Results: The number of people using SPUSs varied from one municipality to the next. The local service system policy and the general well-being of the population have a remarkable role in the use of SPUSs.

Conclusions: Estimations of need and demand with indicators can be useful for local treatment system policy but must be interpreted with thorough knowledge of the local treatment and social handling resources and general social situation. Comparisons between different local areas should be made with caution.

Objective: Minimal knowledge exists on the factors that affect implementation of performance measurement systems, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). To address this, we describe the implementation of a performance measurement system for South Africa's substance abuse treatment services known as the Service Quality Measures (SQM) initiative.

Method: We conducted a mixed-methods evaluation of system implementation. We surveyed 81 providers about the extent of system implementation within their agencies and the factors that facilitated implementation. We conducted 26 in-depth interviews of providers' perceived barriers and facilitators to implementation.

Results: The overall penetration of this system was high. Almost all providers viewed the system as feasible to implement, acceptable, appropriate for use in their context, and useful for guiding service improvements. However, the extent of implementation varied significantly across sites (p < .05). Leadership support (p < .05) was associated with increased implementation in multivariable analyses. Providers reflected that high rates of patient attrition, variability in willingness to implement the system, and limited capacity for interpreting performance feedback affected the extent of system implementation.

Conclusions: It is feasible to implement a performance measurement system in LMICs if the system is acceptable, appropriate, and useful to providers. To ensure the utility of this system for treatment service strengthening, system implementation must be optimized. Efforts to enhance target population coverage, strengthen leadership support for performance measurement, and build capacity for performance feedback utilization may enhance the implementation of this performance measurement system.

Objective: Estimates of the extent of treatment need (defined by the presence of a diagnosis for which there is an effective treatment available) and treatment demand (defined as treatment seeking) are essential parts of effective treatment planning, service provision, and treatment funding. This article reviews the existing literature on approaches to estimating need and demand and the use of models to inform such estimation, and then considers the implications for health planners.

Method: A thematic review of the literature was undertaken, with a focus on covering the key concepts and research methods that have been used to date.

Results: Both need and demand are important estimates in planning for services but contain many difficulties in moving from the theory of measurement to the practicalities of establishing these figures. Furthermore, the simple quantum of need or demand is limited in its usefulness unless it is matched with consideration of different treatment types and their relative intensity, and/or explored as a function of geography and subpopulation. Modeling can assist with establishing more fine-tuned planning estimates, and is able to take into account both client severity and the various treatment types that might be available.

Conclusions: Moving from relatively simplistic estimates of need and demand for treatment, this review has shown that although such estimation can inform national or subnational treatment planning, more sophisticated models are required for alcohol and other drug treatment planning. These can help health planners to determine the appropriate amount and mix of treatments for substance use disorders.

Objective: System planners and funders encounter many challenges in taking action toward evidence-informed enhancement of substance use treatment systems. Researchers are increasingly asked to contribute expertise to these processes through comprehensive system reviews. In this role, all parties can benefit from guiding frameworks to help organize key questions and data collection activities, and thereby set the stage for both high-level and on-the-ground strategic directions and recommendations. This article summarizes seven core principles of substance use treatment system design that are supported by a large international evidence base and that together have proven applicable as a framework for several systems review projects conducted predominantly in Canada.

Method: The methodology was based on a narrative review approach.

Results: The principles address a wide range of issues. Specifically, a broad systems approach is needed to address the full spectrum of issues; accessibility and effectiveness are improved through collaboration across stakeholders; a range of system supports are needed; need for services should be grounded in self-determination, holistic cultural practices, choice, and partnership; attention to diversity and social-structural disadvantages are crucial to equitable system design; systematic screening and assessment is needed to match people to appropriate treatment services in a stepped service framework; and, last, individualized treatment planning must include the right mix of evidence-informed interventions.

Conclusions: By bringing researchers and stakeholders back to the high-level goals of substance use treatment systems, these principles provide a comprehensive, evidence-based, organizing framework that has the potential to improve the quality of system design and review internationally.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to estimate the need for population-level services for alcohol and other drug abuse in support of local planning.

Method: Data were drawn from a subsample of 2,942 interviewees from the São Paulo Megacity Study, which evaluated mental health in the general population (18 years and older) of residents in the São Paulo metropolitan area. This population was classified into five hierarchical categories of severity, making it possible to obtain estimates of need for services, combining evaluation criteria regarding drug and alcohol use and general and mental health comorbidities over the last 12 months. For the at-risk groups in this population, estimates from the Potential Demand for the Use of Services survey interviews over the last year were generated.

Results: Concerning the need for services, 86.5% of the population (Tier 1) had no problems related to drug and alcohol use, 8.9% (Tier 2) used heavily, 3.5% (Tiers 3, 4, and 5) met criteria for substance abuse disorders, among whom 1.3% (Tiers 4 and 5) require more specialized and intensive treatment and support. The following estimates for the Potential Demand for the Use of Services were found: 25.5% (Tier 3) and 51.1% (Tier 4), indicating that a significant number of individuals met criteria for substance abuse disorders but did not perceive any need for professional help or neglected the help available.

Conclusions: In São Paulo there exists a large sector of the population that requires prevention strategies regarding the risks and harm resulting from alcohol and drug use, followed by a group requiring more specialized care. But a large number of substance users requiring specialized support did not use services and did not believe that they needed professional help.