Journal of Surgical Oncology最新文献

Background: Breast cancer-related lymphedema is a devastating condition that negatively affects the quality of life of breast cancer survivors. We sought to identify risk factors that predicted the timing and development of lymphedema.

Methods: Women with breast cancer that underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) at our institution between 2007 and 2022 were identified and sociodemographic and clinical information was extracted. We used logistic regression analysis to identify risk factors for lymphedema and performed cox-regression analysis to predict the timing of lymphedema presentation after surgery.

Results: We identified 1,223 patients, of which 161 (13.2%) developed lymphedema within 1.8 (mean, SD = 2.5) years postoperatively. Patients with SLNB had significantly lower odds for lymphedema development (vs. ALND, OR = 0.29 [0.14-0.57]). Patients between 40 and 49 years of age, and 50-59 (vs. <40 years, OR = 2.14 [1.00-4.60]; OR = 2.42, [1.13-5.16] respectively), African American patients (vs. Caucasian, OR = 1.86 [1.12-3.09]), patients with stage II, III, and IV disease (vs. stage 0, OR = 3.75 [1.36-10.33]; OR = 6.62 [2.14-20.51]; OR = 9.36 [2.94-29.81]), and patients with Medicaid (vs. private insurance, OR = 3.56 [1.73-7.28]) had higher rates of lymphedema. Cox-regression analysis showed that African American (HR = 1.71 [1.08-2.70]), higher BMI (HR = 1.03 [1.00-1.06]), higher stage (stage II, HR = 2.22 [1.05-7.09]; stage III, HR = 5.26 [1.86-14.88]; stage IV, HR = 6.13 [2.12-17.75]), and Medicaid patients (HR = 2.15 [1.12-3.80]) had higher hazards for lymphedema. Patients with SLNB had lower hazards for lymphedema (HR = 0.43 [0.87-2.11]).

Conclusion: Lymphedema has identifiable risk factors that can reliably be used to predict the chances of lymphedema development and enable clinicians to educate patients better and formulate treatment plans accordingly.

Level of evidence: III (Retrospective study).

Perioperative blood transfusion in ovarian cancer patients was associated with a 28% increase in all-cause mortality. The negative impact of perioperative blood transfusion extends beyond the immediate postoperative period.

Objectives: The effect of perioperative blood transfusions on long-term oncologic outcomes of patients with advanced ovarian cancer undergoing cytoreductive surgery remains uncertain. Our study aims to determine the association between perioperative blood transfusion and all-cause mortality in this population.

Methods: Using province-wide administrative databases, patients with advanced ovarian cancer who underwent surgery between 2007 and 2021 as part of first-line treatment were identified. Perioperative transfusion was defined as any transfusion from date of surgery to discharge from hospital. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to determine if there was an independent association of transfusion with all-cause mortality, accounting significant confounders.

Results: A total of 5891 patients had cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer between 2007 and 2021, of which 2898 (49.2%) had interval cytoreductive surgery (ICS) and 2993 (50.8%) had primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS). Perioperative blood transfusion was given to 37.3% of patients (40.5% ICS and 34.2% PCS). On multivariable analysis, there was an increased hazard of all-cause mortality for patients receiving perioperative transfusion compared to those who did not (hazard ratio: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.20-1.37). The association of increased all-cause mortality was observed starting 1 year after surgery, was sustained thereafter, and seen in both ICS and PCS groups.

Conclusion: Perioperative blood transfusion after cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer is common in Ontario, Canada and was significantly associated with an increase in all-cause mortality. Blood transfusion is a poor prognostic factor, and the negative impact of blood transfusion persists beyond the immediate postoperative period.

The dimensions of healthcare access includes availability, accessibility, accommodation, affordability, and accessibility. Many patients face significant barriers to accessing oncologic care and subsequently, health outcomes are suboptimal. Telehealth offers an opportunity to mitigate many of these barriers to improve health access and outcomes. This review discusses how telehealth can be leveraged to improve healthcare access in surgical oncology while also highlighting important challenges to realizing the full potential of this mode of healthcare delivery.

Background: To determine the optimal multimodal treatment strategy between perioperative chemotherapy (PEC), postoperative chemoradiation therapy (POCR), and postoperative chemotherapy (POC) in resected gastric cancer (GC) patients based on nodal status.

Methods: In this retrospective analysis, the National Cancer Database was used to identify resected non-metastatic GC (2006-2016). Patients were stratified by clinical nodal status-negative (cLN-) and positive (cLN+). In patients with cLN- disease who underwent upfront resection and were upstaged to pathological LN+, overall survival (OS) was compared between POC and POCR. In patients with cLN- and cLN+ disease, OS was compared between PEC, POCR, and POC. Kaplan-Meier survival estimate, log-rank test, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis were performed.

Results: We identified 7827 patients (cLN- 4828; cLN+ 2999). On multivariable analysis in patients with cLN- disease who underwent upfront resection (n = 4314) and were upstaged to pLN+ disease (70%), POCR (n = 2300, aHR 0.78, 95% CI 0.70-0.87, p < 0.001) was associated with improved OS compared to POC (n = 907). No significant difference was noted between POCR (n = 766, aHR 1.11, 95% CI 0.88-1.40, p = 0.39) and POC (n = 341) in patients with pLN- disease. On multivariable analysis in all patients with cLN- disease, POCR (n = 3066) was significantly associated with improved OS (aHR 0.84, 95% CI 0.75-0.92, p < 0.01) compared to POC (n = 1248). No significant difference was noted between POCR (aHR 1.0, 95% CI 0.70-1.01, p = 0.958) and PEC (n = 514). These results remained consistent in patients with cLN+ disease (POCR = 1602, POC = 720, PEC = 677).

Conclusion: Postoperative chemoradiation is associated with improved survival in GC patients upstaged from clinically node-negative disease to pathologically node-positive disease. Negative clinical nodal disease status is not a reliable indicator of pathological nodal disease.

Disparities in surgical oncology care may be due to race/ethnicity. Race norming, defined as the adjustment of medical assessments based on an individual's race/ethnicity, and implicit bias are specifically explored in this focused systematic review. We aim to examine how race norming and bias impact oncologic care and postsurgical outcomes, particularly in Black patient populations, while providing potential strategies to improve equitable and inclusive care.

Background: This study investigates the impact of margin status after colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) resection on outcomes of patients after neoadjuvant treatment versus those who underwent upfront resection.

Methods: An international collaborative database of CLM patients who underwent surgical resection was used. Proportional hazard regression models were created for single and multivariable models to assess the relationship between independent measures and median overall survival (mOS).

Results: R1 was associated with worse OS in the neoadjuvant group (mOS: 51.8 m for R0 vs. 26.0 m for R1; HR: 2.18). In the patients who underwent upfront surgery, R1 was not associated with OS. (mOS: 46.7 m for R0 vs. 42.6 m for R1). When patients with R1 in each group were stratified by adjuvant treatment, there was no significant difference in the neoadjuvant group, while in the upfront surgery group with R1, adjuvant treatment was associated with significant improvement in OS (mOS: 42.6 m for adjuvant vs. 25.0 m for no adjuvant treatment; HR: 0.21).

Conclusion: R1 is associated with worse outcomes in the patients who receive neoadjuvant treatment with no significant improvement with the addition of adjuvant therapy, likely representing an aggressive tumor biology. R1 did not impact OS in patients with upfront surgery who received postoperative chemotherapy.

Background and objectives: Intraperitoneal chemotherapy can be administered as a single dose associated with hyperthermia (HIPEC) or in successive doses under normothermic conditions, such as early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC) or normothermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (NIPEC or NIPEC-LT). Repetitive administration of intraperitoneal chemotherapy over a prolonged period may be associated with catheter-related complications, which are the primary cause of treatment interruption. This study aims to introduce and evaluate an innovative catheter system designed to mitigate these issues.

Methods: Using a porcine experimental model, we tested a new catheter for long-term intraperitoneal access. Sixteen animals underwent catheter implantation followed by normothermic recirculation of peritoneal dialysis solution. Catheter functionality and any complications were monitored throughout successive treatment cycles.

Results: The new catheter system demonstrated optimal recirculation and maintained its functionality throughout successive treatments, without complications. Catheter replacement with a guidewire was successful, ensuring continued efficacy.

Conclusions: The innovative catheter system shows promise in reducing complications and improving compliance in successive intraperitoneal chemotherapy doses, justifying further clinical trials to confirm its efficacy in patients.

Purpose: It is unknown to what extent 10-year overall survival of radical nephrectomy treated intermediate/high-risk non-metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma patients differs from age- and sex-matched population-based controls, especially when race/ethnicity is considered (Caucasian vs. African American vs. Hispanic vs. Asian/Pacific Islander).

Methods: We relied on the SEER database (2004-2018) to identify newly diagnosed radical nephrectomy treated intermediate/high risk non-metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma patients. For each case, we simulated an age- and sex-matched control relying on Social Security Administration Life Tables with 10 years of follow-up. We compared overall survival between renal carcinoma cases and population-based controls. Multivariable competing risks regression models tested for predictors of cancer-specific mortality versus other-cause mortality.

Results: Of 6877 radical nephrectomy treated intermediate/high risk non-metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma patients, 5050 (73%) were Caucasian versus 433 (6%) African American versus 1002 (15%) Hispanic versus 392 (6%) Asian/Pacific Islanders. At 10 years, overall survival difference between radical nephrectomy treated intermediate/high risk non-metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma patients versus population-based controls was greatest in African Americans (51% vs. 81%, Δ = 30%), followed by Hispanics (54% vs. 80%, Δ = 26%), Asian/Pacific Islanders (56% vs. 80%, Δ = 24%) and Caucasians (52% vs. 74%, Δ = 22%). In competing risks regression, only African Americans exhibited significantly higher other cause mortality (hazard ratio = 1.3; 95% confidence interval = 1.1 - 1.6; p = 0.01) than others.

Conclusion: Relative to Life Tables' derived sex- and age-matched controls, radical nephrectomy treated intermediate/high-risk non-metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma patients exhibit worse overall survival, with worst overall survival recorded in African Americans of all race/ethnicity groups.

Background: To explore the most effective adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) through patient derived tumor-like cell clusters (PTC) drug sensitivity test.

Methods: PTC were cultured in vitro with intraoperative specimens, and drug sensitivity test was performed to calculate the most effective chemotherapy regimen for MPM. The patients were divided into conventional and individualized chemotherapy group according to whether they received PTC drug testing. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify independent prognostic factors.

Results: Among 186 MPM patients included, 63 underwent PTC culture and drug sensitivity test. The results showed that the most effective chemotherapy regimen was oxaliplatin + gemcitabine. After propensity score matching, a total of 64 patients were enrolled in the following study, including 32 patients receiving individualized chemotherapy guided by PTC drug results as group 1 and 32 patients receiving conventional chemotherapy as group 2. Survival analysis showed that the median OS of group 1 was not reached, significantly longer than that of group 2 (23.5 months) (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Compared with conventional chemotherapy, individualized chemotherapy guided by PTC drug sensitivity tests can prolong patient survival, and oxaliplatin + gemcitabine + apatinib could be the optimal adjuvant treatment regimen for MPM.

Imprecision in breast conserving surgery results in high rates of take back to theatre for reexcision of margins. This paper reviews the various approaches to improving the precision of oncological margin control in breast conserving surgery. The review describes the rationale for improved tissue characterization over tumor localization and explores technology-free approaches, as well as progress being made to develop and test innovative technological solutions.