Stuart H Munsch, Todd R Bennett, Jimmy Faukner, Madison J Halloran, Karrie M Hanson, Martin C Liermann, Michael L McHenry, John R McMillan, Raymond E Moses, Bob Pagliuco, George R Pess, Katherine R Stonecypher, Darren M Ward
Conventionally, juvenile salmonids are thought to migrate unidirectionally from freshwater systems to marine systems and therefore only inhabit natal drainages. Although scattered evidence suggests juveniles can move bidirectionally between freshwater rivers and the ocean, including into non-natal drainages, such movements have never been documented with high replication. Here, we detected hundreds of movements of juvenile salmonids between drainages that involved 0–22% of cohort emigrants in Washington State and California. Individuals moved up to nine times and between drainages up to 70 km apart. These findings reveal a life-history type of salmonids whose remarkably complex migrations have gone unnoticed. Implicitly, juveniles may use any coastal freshwater habitat accessible from the sea and may not descend from spawning populations of drainages they inhabit. Consequently, typical conservation focused on natal drainages may overlook freshwater habitat elsewhere. A concept of coastal areas as meta-nurseries formed by multiple watersheds connected by the sea may accurately describe anadromous species’ habitat options and better inform management.
{"title":"Juvenile salmonids traverse coastal meta-nurseries that connect rivers via the sea","authors":"Stuart H Munsch, Todd R Bennett, Jimmy Faukner, Madison J Halloran, Karrie M Hanson, Martin C Liermann, Michael L McHenry, John R McMillan, Raymond E Moses, Bob Pagliuco, George R Pess, Katherine R Stonecypher, Darren M Ward","doi":"10.1002/fee.2848","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2848","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Conventionally, juvenile salmonids are thought to migrate unidirectionally from freshwater systems to marine systems and therefore only inhabit natal drainages. Although scattered evidence suggests juveniles can move bidirectionally between freshwater rivers and the ocean, including into non-natal drainages, such movements have never been documented with high replication. Here, we detected hundreds of movements of juvenile salmonids between drainages that involved 0–22% of cohort emigrants in Washington State and California. Individuals moved up to nine times and between drainages up to 70 km apart. These findings reveal a life-history type of salmonids whose remarkably complex migrations have gone unnoticed. Implicitly, juveniles may use any coastal freshwater habitat accessible from the sea and may not descend from spawning populations of drainages they inhabit. Consequently, typical conservation focused on natal drainages may overlook freshwater habitat elsewhere. A concept of coastal areas as meta-nurseries formed by multiple watersheds connected by the sea may accurately describe anadromous species’ habitat options and better inform management.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2848","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145197195","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Joseph Gazing Wolf, Ellen Simmons, Paulette Blanchard, Lydia L Jennings, Danielle D Ignace, Dominique M David-Chavez, Deondre Smiles, Michelle Montgomery, Ruth Plenty Sweetgrass-She Kills, Melissa K Nelson, Diana Doan-Crider, Linda Black Elk, Luke Black Elk, Gwen Bridge, Ann Marie Chischilly, Kevin Deer, Kathy DeerinWater, Trudy Ecoffey, Judith Vergun, Daniel Wildcat, James Rattling Leaf
There is a movement across settler–colonial institutions of education and research to engage with Indigenous Peoples and Knowledges. Many settler and Indigenous governments are pursuing pathways to move forward together to address global problems such as climate change. However, given the pervasive history of exploitation and displacement of Indigenous communities, this development has caused some concern among Indigenous leaders and scholars. At the 2022 Annual Meeting of the Ecological Society of America (ESA) in Montreal, Canada, the Traditional Ecological Knowledge Section of the ESA hosted a 2-day workshop. This gathering of 21 Indigenous environmental scientists included scholars from across the career and professional spectrum. By consensus, workshop participants identified three emergent themes—Engage, Heal, and Reconcile—that provide a pathway toward reconciliation between Indigenous and settler–colonial ways of knowing. This path allows for an ever-greater sharing of institutional resources and power toward a co-equal interfacing of Indigenous Knowledges and settler science.
{"title":"A path to reconciliation between Indigenous and settler–colonial epistemologies","authors":"Joseph Gazing Wolf, Ellen Simmons, Paulette Blanchard, Lydia L Jennings, Danielle D Ignace, Dominique M David-Chavez, Deondre Smiles, Michelle Montgomery, Ruth Plenty Sweetgrass-She Kills, Melissa K Nelson, Diana Doan-Crider, Linda Black Elk, Luke Black Elk, Gwen Bridge, Ann Marie Chischilly, Kevin Deer, Kathy DeerinWater, Trudy Ecoffey, Judith Vergun, Daniel Wildcat, James Rattling Leaf","doi":"10.1002/fee.2847","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fee.2847","url":null,"abstract":"<p>There is a movement across settler–colonial institutions of education and research to engage with Indigenous Peoples and Knowledges. Many settler and Indigenous governments are pursuing pathways to move forward together to address global problems such as climate change. However, given the pervasive history of exploitation and displacement of Indigenous communities, this development has caused some concern among Indigenous leaders and scholars. At the 2022 Annual Meeting of the Ecological Society of America (ESA) in Montreal, Canada, the Traditional Ecological Knowledge Section of the ESA hosted a 2-day workshop. This gathering of 21 Indigenous environmental scientists included scholars from across the career and professional spectrum. By consensus, workshop participants identified three emergent themes—Engage, Heal, and Reconcile—that provide a pathway toward reconciliation between Indigenous and settler–colonial ways of knowing. This path allows for an ever-greater sharing of institutional resources and power toward a co-equal interfacing of Indigenous Knowledges and settler science.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2847","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144927735","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Response to Caudill et al. (2025)","authors":"Kira A Cassidy, Douglas W Smith","doi":"10.1002/fee.2834","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fee.2834","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143901101","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
David W Thieltges, David Bruce Conn, Ross N Cuthbert, Alison M Dunn, E Rosa Jolma, M Camille Hopkins, Volodimir Sarabeev, Sander Smolders, Carol A Stepien, K Mathias Wegner, Patrick M Kočovský
Climate change is likely to affect infectious diseases that are facilitated by biological invasions, with repercussions for wildlife conservation and zoonotic risks. Current invasion management and policy are underprepared for the future risks associated with such invasion-related wildlife diseases. By considering evidence from bioclimatology, invasion biology, and disease research, we illustrate how climate change is anticipated to affect disease agents (parasites and pathogens), hosts, and vectors across the different stages of invasions. We highlight the opportunity to integrate these disciplines to identify the effects of climate change on invasion-related wildlife diseases. In addition, shifting to a proactive stance in implementing management and policy, such as by incorporating climate-change effects either into preventative and mitigation measures for biosecurity or with rapid response protocols to limit disease spread and impacts, could help to combat future ecological, economic, and human health risks stemming from invasion-related wildlife diseases.
{"title":"Integrating climate change, biological invasions, and infectious wildlife diseases","authors":"David W Thieltges, David Bruce Conn, Ross N Cuthbert, Alison M Dunn, E Rosa Jolma, M Camille Hopkins, Volodimir Sarabeev, Sander Smolders, Carol A Stepien, K Mathias Wegner, Patrick M Kočovský","doi":"10.1002/fee.2849","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fee.2849","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Climate change is likely to affect infectious diseases that are facilitated by biological invasions, with repercussions for wildlife conservation and zoonotic risks. Current invasion management and policy are underprepared for the future risks associated with such invasion-related wildlife diseases. By considering evidence from bioclimatology, invasion biology, and disease research, we illustrate how climate change is anticipated to affect disease agents (parasites and pathogens), hosts, and vectors across the different stages of invasions. We highlight the opportunity to integrate these disciplines to identify the effects of climate change on invasion-related wildlife diseases. In addition, shifting to a proactive stance in implementing management and policy, such as by incorporating climate-change effects either into preventative and mitigation measures for biosecurity or with rapid response protocols to limit disease spread and impacts, could help to combat future ecological, economic, and human health risks stemming from invasion-related wildlife diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2849","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144751607","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>The annual United Nations Climate Change Conference—COP, or the Conference of the Parties—is the main global forum to advance climate goals through international collaboration. Its most recent gatherings underscored the urgency of reducing carbon emissions, conserving forests and biodiversity, and creating better ways to sustainably manage water and produce food. However, the pathway to achieve such goals is often challenged by a global economy serving the high resource demands of wealthy countries and by socio-environmental conflicts in the Global South.</p><p>Critics often argue that COP benefits wealthy countries the most by setting a global stage for them to showcase their policies. Moreover, the inflow of resources into host cities is applied to event management and infrastructure, which poorly reflect long-term positive changes. Like many other international mega-events, COP might leave behind a legacy of degradation and disruption, for which the host city's most vulnerable residents will bear an outsized impact. And the next one—COP 30, November 10–21, 2025—will be held in the Amazon, with Belém, the capital of the Brazilian state of Pará, as its host city.</p><p>Central to global climate stability, the Amazon region is facing severe, unprecedented environmental crises, which highlight the contradictions of hosting such an event in this place. In 2024 alone, Pará recorded over 50,000 wildfires, almost half of all wildfires recorded in the Brazilian Amazon. That same year, on November 24, in Santarém, Pará's third largest city, air pollution spiked to levels more than 40 times those recommended by the World Health Organization, thereby prompting a climate emergency declaration. Six days later, on November 30, Belém citizens awoke under a blanket of smoke from fires on Mosqueiro Island, over 80 km away. Meanwhile, unlicensed infrastructure projects to meet COP 30 necessities, including a major highway expansion, threaten local biodiversity. Such projects betray the local governance priorities, placing international optics over meaningful action.</p><p>The juxtaposition of Pará's role as host of the “COP of the Forest” and its pressing environmental issues highlights the contradictions that COP faces. These challenges go beyond deforestation and pollution, exposing deep socio-environmental inequities. For instance, 80% of Belém's population lacks access to basic sanitation (<i>Res Soc Dev</i> 2020), underscoring the persistent gap between governance rhetoric and tangible action. Pará has been at the forefront of deforestation in the Amazon, leading the region in forest loss for about two decades. This ongoing deforestation threatens the state's rich biodiversity, including over 20,000 animal and plant species, while also impacting 134 traditional and Indigenous communities across over 25% of Pará's territory. These communities already face increasing pressures from illegal mining, highway and hydroelectric projects, and violent conflicts w
一年一度的联合国气候变化会议(cop),即缔约方会议,是通过国际合作推进气候目标的主要全球论坛。其最近的会议强调了减少碳排放、保护森林和生物多样性以及创造可持续管理水和生产粮食的更好方法的紧迫性。然而,实现这些目标的途径往往受到满足富裕国家高资源需求的全球经济和全球南方的社会环境冲突的挑战。批评人士经常认为,缔约方会议为富裕国家提供了一个展示其政策的全球舞台,从而使富裕国家受益最大。此外,流入主办城市的资源用于赛事管理和基础设施,这很难反映长期的积极变化。像许多其他国际大型活动一样,缔约方大会可能会留下退化和破坏的遗产,主办城市最脆弱的居民将为此承受巨大的影响。下一届缔约方会议将于2025年11月10日至21日在亚马逊举行,巴西帕尔<e:1>州首府贝尔萨姆将作为主办城市。作为全球气候稳定的中心,亚马逊地区正面临着严重的、前所未有的环境危机,这凸显了在这个地方举办这样一场活动的矛盾。仅在2024年,par<e:1>就记录了5万多起野火,几乎是巴西亚马逊地区记录的野火的一半。同年11月24日,在帕尔<s:1>第三大城市圣塔姆姆,空气污染水平飙升至世界卫生组织建议水平的40多倍,因此引发了气候紧急声明。6天后,也就是11月30日,贝尔萨梅姆市民在80多公里外的莫斯克罗岛大火产生的烟雾中醒来。与此同时,为满足COP 30的要求而进行的未经许可的基础设施项目,包括一项大型高速公路扩建,威胁着当地的生物多样性。这些项目违背了地方治理的优先次序,将国际视野置于有意义的行动之上。帕尔<s:1>作为“森林缔约方会议”主办国的角色与其紧迫的环境问题并存,凸显了缔约方会议面临的矛盾。这些挑战不仅限于森林砍伐和污染,还暴露出深刻的社会环境不平等。例如,80%的belsamim人口无法获得基本卫生设施(Res Soc Dev 2020),这突显了治理言论与实际行动之间的持续差距。帕尔<e:1>一直处于亚马逊森林砍伐的最前沿,在大约二十年的时间里引领着该地区的森林损失。这种持续的森林砍伐威胁着该州丰富的生物多样性,包括2万多种动植物物种,同时也影响了帕尔<e:1> 25%以上领土上的134个传统和土著社区。这些社区已经面临着越来越大的压力,包括非法采矿、高速公路和水电项目,以及与农民的暴力冲突。除了这些挑战之外,该州州长最近颁布了第10.820/2024号法律,该法律有可能在农村地区用远程教育取代面对面教育。这一决定于2025年初在巴拉圭全国各地引发了传统社区和土著社区及其盟友的广泛抗议,他们要求废除该法律,并建立一种通过与这些社区对话制定的土著教育新模式。这种排斥和不敏感引起了居民的严重担忧,他们担心COP 30是否会真正解决帕<s:1>紧迫的环境挑战,或者仅仅是一种表演姿态。为了有效地应对这些问题,必须允许土著和传统社区在缔约方会议规划中发挥核心作用,包括担任副主席等关键领导职务。para <e:1>中的问题突出了使缔约方会议有效的挑战。尽管缔约方会议被设定为气候行动的中心,但其实际成果往往达不到其既定目标。尽管召开了数十年的国际会议,但全球范围内的森林砍伐和碳排放仍在上升,对已经被边缘化的社区的影响最大。如果缔约方会议不能在像亚马逊这样对气候行动至关重要的地区促进有意义的变化,它就会对其在全球气候治理中的作用提出根本性的问题。随着COP 30的倒计时继续进行,世界将密切关注我们的家乡。它是成为气候行动和生物多样性保护的希望象征,还是成为全球领导人和地方决策者言行不一致的又一个警示故事,还有待观察。要为未来的缔约方会议设定基准,地方政府应该优先采取实际行动,而不是向国际社会做姿态。这包括解决当地的挑战,如确保基本卫生设施和扑灭野火。 同样,土著和地方的声音必须成为决策的核心,并建立机制使政府对其承诺负责。要做到这一点,就需要使全球优先事项与当地现实保持一致,并确保东道国的责任能够带来具体的成果。否则,下一届缔约方会议将以“烧毁森林的缔约方会议”而告终。
{"title":"“COP of the Forest” highlights global conservation contradictions","authors":"Lucas Colares, Bruno Eleres Soares","doi":"10.1002/fee.2845","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fee.2845","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The annual United Nations Climate Change Conference—COP, or the Conference of the Parties—is the main global forum to advance climate goals through international collaboration. Its most recent gatherings underscored the urgency of reducing carbon emissions, conserving forests and biodiversity, and creating better ways to sustainably manage water and produce food. However, the pathway to achieve such goals is often challenged by a global economy serving the high resource demands of wealthy countries and by socio-environmental conflicts in the Global South.</p><p>Critics often argue that COP benefits wealthy countries the most by setting a global stage for them to showcase their policies. Moreover, the inflow of resources into host cities is applied to event management and infrastructure, which poorly reflect long-term positive changes. Like many other international mega-events, COP might leave behind a legacy of degradation and disruption, for which the host city's most vulnerable residents will bear an outsized impact. And the next one—COP 30, November 10–21, 2025—will be held in the Amazon, with Belém, the capital of the Brazilian state of Pará, as its host city.</p><p>Central to global climate stability, the Amazon region is facing severe, unprecedented environmental crises, which highlight the contradictions of hosting such an event in this place. In 2024 alone, Pará recorded over 50,000 wildfires, almost half of all wildfires recorded in the Brazilian Amazon. That same year, on November 24, in Santarém, Pará's third largest city, air pollution spiked to levels more than 40 times those recommended by the World Health Organization, thereby prompting a climate emergency declaration. Six days later, on November 30, Belém citizens awoke under a blanket of smoke from fires on Mosqueiro Island, over 80 km away. Meanwhile, unlicensed infrastructure projects to meet COP 30 necessities, including a major highway expansion, threaten local biodiversity. Such projects betray the local governance priorities, placing international optics over meaningful action.</p><p>The juxtaposition of Pará's role as host of the “COP of the Forest” and its pressing environmental issues highlights the contradictions that COP faces. These challenges go beyond deforestation and pollution, exposing deep socio-environmental inequities. For instance, 80% of Belém's population lacks access to basic sanitation (<i>Res Soc Dev</i> 2020), underscoring the persistent gap between governance rhetoric and tangible action. Pará has been at the forefront of deforestation in the Amazon, leading the region in forest loss for about two decades. This ongoing deforestation threatens the state's rich biodiversity, including over 20,000 animal and plant species, while also impacting 134 traditional and Indigenous communities across over 25% of Pará's territory. These communities already face increasing pressures from illegal mining, highway and hydroelectric projects, and violent conflicts w","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2845","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143741278","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Gillian Bowser, Kofi Akamani, Meena M Balgopal, John D Coley, Elizabeth D Diaz-Clark, W Chris Funk, Brian Helmuth, Sérgio Henriques, Nikki Grant-Hoffman, Tashiana Osborne, Arathi Seshadri, Pamela H Templer, Mark C Urban, Kim Waddell
<p>In 2022, the US Global Change Research Program initiated the first National Nature Assessment (NNA) via presidential Executive Order, addressing the need to “take stock of US lands, waters, wildlife and the benefits they provide to our economy, health, climate, environmental justice, and national security” (Global Change Research Act of 1990). This order was rescinded in January 2025, effectively cancelling the NNA before the final assessment was published. However, many of its authors deemed this multi-year endeavor important enough to keep alive because the NNA was needed to provide the American public with a “comprehensive understanding of nature, an assessment enriched by braiding together the stories, scientific findings, Indigenous knowledge, and lived experiences of people from across the US” (Tallis <i>et al</i>. <span>2023</span>).</p><p>Performing such an assessment requires moving beyond a mere snapshot of the status and trends of environmental features, ecosystems, and organisms, and weaving in diverse perspectives and knowledge systems representing the cultural complexity and heritage of American communities (Chan <i>et al</i>. <span>2016</span>). As experts convened by the NNA, we—the authors of this commentary—represent different scientific disciplines including ecology, genomics, entomology, science communication, psychology, natural resource management, Earth and environmental sciences, and human dimensions of natural resources. We explored the status, trends, and future projections of nature but recognized that our own perspectives and training represent only a slice of the many cultural perspectives and knowledge systems addressing the human–nature nexus. Regardless, we were tasked, as part of the NNA, with assessing the available scientific literature and associated knowledge sources (including information from museums, zoos, participatory databases, and government agencies). We were and are deeply committed to the view that humans are part of nature, and that human values and perceptions of nature shape what we measure, protect, manage, and love in the environments that surround and sustain us.</p><p>The original vision of the NNA is still critically important as it required us to interlink social perceptions with scientific information and knowledge gaps as ways to understand how the nature of today is uniquely shaped by American society, what the nature of the future will likely be, and how we can use that understanding to support nature that benefits all Americans. We argue that interlinkages among people's perceptions of nature and the data available to measure nature across different biological scales—including populations, communities, and ecosystems—shape a future nature in complex and potentially unpredictable ways.</p><p>Here, we share our approach of using constructive dialogues and storytelling as exemplified by the Talanoa Dialogues introduced by Fiji to the UNFCCC in 2017. We frame the status and trends of nat
2022年,美国全球变化研究计划通过总统行政命令启动了第一次国家自然评估(NNA),解决了“评估美国土地,水域,野生动物及其对我们的经济,健康,气候,环境正义和国家安全的好处”的需要(1990年全球变化研究法案)。该命令于2025年1月被撤销,在最终评估公布之前有效地取消了NNA。然而,它的许多作者认为这项多年的努力足够重要,足以维持下去,因为NNA需要为美国公众提供“对自然的全面了解,一种通过将故事、科学发现、土著知识和来自美国各地的人们的生活经历编织在一起而丰富的评估”(Tallis et al. 2023)。进行这样的评估需要超越仅仅对环境特征、生态系统和生物的现状和趋势的快照,并融入代表美国社区文化复杂性和遗产的不同观点和知识系统(Chan et al. 2016)。作为NNA召集的专家,我们——这篇评论的作者——代表着不同的科学学科,包括生态学、基因组学、昆虫学、科学传播学、心理学、自然资源管理、地球与环境科学以及自然资源的人类维度。我们探索了自然的现状、趋势和未来预测,但认识到我们自己的观点和培训只是解决人与自然关系的许多文化观点和知识体系中的一小部分。无论如何,作为NNA的一部分,我们的任务是评估现有的科学文献和相关的知识来源(包括来自博物馆、动物园、参与性数据库和政府机构的信息)。我们一直坚信,人类是自然的一部分,人类的价值观和对自然的看法决定了我们对周围环境的衡量、保护、管理和爱护。NNA的最初愿景仍然至关重要,因为它要求我们将社会观念与科学信息和知识差距联系起来,以此来理解今天的自然是如何被美国社会独特地塑造的,未来的自然可能是什么,以及我们如何利用这种理解来支持有利于所有美国人的自然。我们认为,人们对自然的感知与可用于测量不同生物尺度(包括人口、社区和生态系统)的自然数据之间的相互联系,以复杂且可能不可预测的方式塑造了未来的自然。在此,我们分享斐济在2017年向《联合国气候变化框架公约》提出的塔拉诺阿对话所体现的建设性对话和讲故事方式。我们根据美国社会的观念和价值观来构建自然的现状和趋势,这些观念和价值观塑造了自然的未来预测。我们在这里的写作是基于Talanoa:我们现在在哪里,我们想去哪里,我们如何到达那里?人类在自然中或在自然之外的位置,以及我们对自然的共同责任,形成了对自然的评估。这些对自然的不同看法以及如何评估自然可以基于美国的职业(如农民、科学家)、景观(如城市、农村)或社会文化群体。过去对自然状况的国际评估是通过IPCC和IPBES进行的(Pörtner et al. 2021),其中包括人类对自然的价值。然而,考虑到美国景观的复杂性,以及居住在这些景观中的丰富多样性,将这些自然概念如何塑造美国及其领土(以下简称美国)的感知和激励行动结合起来,是一项独特而具有挑战性的任务。描述自然状态最常用的方法之一是关注生物多样性最明确的单位——物种。在这种方法中,“状态”是基于物种在其全部或大部分范围内灭绝的可能性(1973年《濒危物种法》,16 USC§1532(6))。然而,随着技术的进步,物种的定义变得有问题,因为我们知道的物种太少了。科学上的新物种正以惊人的规律被描述。此外,许多未被学术科学认可的物种可能已经被传统知识和其他信息来源所记录,它们的状态可能是已知的,也可能是未知的。因此,我们对美国哪些物种重要的认识是有偏差的,这是基于一些人观察到的或直接感兴趣的东西。 较大的和不太隐蔽的脊椎动物出现在大多数评估的前沿,而无脊椎动物(构成生物多样性的大部分)大多处于阴影中,没有足够的信息来确定它们的状态或种群趋势。美国人民的人口结构和信仰是动态的,这种动态影响着我们对自然的理解和对自然的评价。在NNA的发展过程中,我们试图构建一个反映人们信仰多样性的未来自然投影。这样做有时会暴露出不同人的行为之间的冲突,因为我们试图公正对待不同的经济、政治、社会、文化或地理关注点和优先事项。应对这一挑战的一个重要方法是承认以社区为基础的知识,这种知识可以增加对科学和数据收集的参与,并且往往可以为以社区为基础的努力提供信息,以满足多个人群的需求的方式使环境更适合生物多样性。例如,城市居民可以在院子里的草坪上种植本地开花植物,为本地蜜蜂、蝴蝶和蜂鸟等传粉媒介提供合适的筑巢和觅食资源(Cooper et al. 2021)。同样,在农业景观中,在农田边缘的边缘土地上种植开花栖息地,以及在果园中种植行间覆盖作物,可以改善物种多样性和有益生物的丰度,从而减少对农用化学品的需求。在沿海社区,加固的海堤正在被有生命的海岸线所取代,这改善了沿海居民的安全和福祉,增强了当地的生物多样性和鱼类资源,并确保了生态系统的健康。最后,虽然土地退化和恢复往往与土壤微生物有关,其中一些尚未确定,但新技术正在迅速揭示这些分类群的基本信息。这些努力都表明,我们积极地创造了对自然的未来愿景,以及我们想要去的地方。我们看到所有这些努力——从尖端科学到社区参与,再到当地知识、价值观和解决方案——都融入了未来自然的愿景。有几种方法超越了对物种的传统关注,以一种全面的方式评估自然,并考虑了不同的观点和知识体系。新兴技术可以让社区积极参与,创造一个造福所有人的未来愿景。收集基于社区知识的人工智能数据库,如iNaturalist和eBird,已成为增长最快的物种在线数据库,占所描述物种的四分之一,非专业参与者记录了大部分观察结果。这些数据库依赖于参与科学的努力,由此产生的数据减少了属于小型、研究不足或不易接近的分类群的生物的信息差距,包括无脊椎动物和无维管植物。此外,跟踪以社区为基础的恢复项目的倡议,如本土国家公园或国家野生动物联合会的本土植物栖息地,由利益相关者提供信息,这些利益相关者使用基于人工智能的分类识别工具报告数据,包括在GBIF等平台上汇总的数字化博物馆标本。美国土地、水域和保护区的管理反映了社会如何重视和认识大自然对人类的贡献。联邦机构受国会和历任总统的指示,分别通过法律和行政命令监督和评估国家的共享资源,因此,这些机构收集和评估了大量数据。继续获得这些数据对所有美国人的福祉至关重要。在这些评估中整合当地社区的物种知识是很重要的,这种知识使物种识别越来越准确是值得注意的。此外,虽然城市绿地通常很小,但它为城市居民提供了与自然互动的重要机会。在未来的美国,考虑人类如何以及在哪里体验自然应该包括这些小空间,因为它们有时拥有惊人的丰富物种,同时提供一个坐下来并从与自然联系中受益的地方。人类的行为塑造着自然世界,而自然的未来将不仅受到我们监测和理解自然的能力的影响,而且尤其受到我们共同的社会价值观和行动的影响,而这些价值观和行动是由我们对我们与自然的联系方式的看法所决定的。任何对自然的评估都会不可避免地包含数据缺口,这阻碍了真正的整体快照,在不知不觉中忽略了大量的物种——这些物种没有得到人类的重视和描述,但对生态生存能力却是不可或缺的。 “草原想要草原想要草原”也许最好地表达了未来自然的预测,这种预测将通过美国的地理和生物多样性以及复杂的文化遗产来塑造。当科学家评估观点、价值、生态系统和物种时,我们需要分析我们目前关于生物多样性和生态系统功能的知识,收集证据来填补空白,并描述一个可以使所有人受益的未来自然。虽然从表面上
{"title":"Assessing Nature: perceptions, knowledge, and gaps","authors":"Gillian Bowser, Kofi Akamani, Meena M Balgopal, John D Coley, Elizabeth D Diaz-Clark, W Chris Funk, Brian Helmuth, Sérgio Henriques, Nikki Grant-Hoffman, Tashiana Osborne, Arathi Seshadri, Pamela H Templer, Mark C Urban, Kim Waddell","doi":"10.1002/fee.2846","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fee.2846","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In 2022, the US Global Change Research Program initiated the first National Nature Assessment (NNA) via presidential Executive Order, addressing the need to “take stock of US lands, waters, wildlife and the benefits they provide to our economy, health, climate, environmental justice, and national security” (Global Change Research Act of 1990). This order was rescinded in January 2025, effectively cancelling the NNA before the final assessment was published. However, many of its authors deemed this multi-year endeavor important enough to keep alive because the NNA was needed to provide the American public with a “comprehensive understanding of nature, an assessment enriched by braiding together the stories, scientific findings, Indigenous knowledge, and lived experiences of people from across the US” (Tallis <i>et al</i>. <span>2023</span>).</p><p>Performing such an assessment requires moving beyond a mere snapshot of the status and trends of environmental features, ecosystems, and organisms, and weaving in diverse perspectives and knowledge systems representing the cultural complexity and heritage of American communities (Chan <i>et al</i>. <span>2016</span>). As experts convened by the NNA, we—the authors of this commentary—represent different scientific disciplines including ecology, genomics, entomology, science communication, psychology, natural resource management, Earth and environmental sciences, and human dimensions of natural resources. We explored the status, trends, and future projections of nature but recognized that our own perspectives and training represent only a slice of the many cultural perspectives and knowledge systems addressing the human–nature nexus. Regardless, we were tasked, as part of the NNA, with assessing the available scientific literature and associated knowledge sources (including information from museums, zoos, participatory databases, and government agencies). We were and are deeply committed to the view that humans are part of nature, and that human values and perceptions of nature shape what we measure, protect, manage, and love in the environments that surround and sustain us.</p><p>The original vision of the NNA is still critically important as it required us to interlink social perceptions with scientific information and knowledge gaps as ways to understand how the nature of today is uniquely shaped by American society, what the nature of the future will likely be, and how we can use that understanding to support nature that benefits all Americans. We argue that interlinkages among people's perceptions of nature and the data available to measure nature across different biological scales—including populations, communities, and ecosystems—shape a future nature in complex and potentially unpredictable ways.</p><p>Here, we share our approach of using constructive dialogues and storytelling as exemplified by the Talanoa Dialogues introduced by Fiji to the UNFCCC in 2017. We frame the status and trends of nat","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2846","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143741371","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Avery B Paxton, Sarah E Lester, Carter S Smith, Siddharth Narayan, Christine Angelini, Brendan J Runde, Megan I Saunders, Rachel K Gittman, Jacob Allgeier, Maria L Vozzo, D'amy N Steward, Hayley R Lemoine, Stephanie R Valdez, Rebecca L Morris, Douglas P Nowacek, William Seaman, Patrick N Halpin, Brian R Silliman
The extent of built marine infrastructure—from energy infrastructure and ports to artificial reefs and aquaculture—is increasing globally. The rise in built structure coverage is concurrent with losses and degradation of many natural habitats. Although historically associated with net negative impacts on natural systems, built infrastructure—with proper design and innovation—could offer a largely unrealized opportunity to reduce those impacts and support natural habitats. We present nine recommendations that could catalyze momentum toward using built structures to both serve their original function and benefit natural habitats (relative to the status quo, for example). These recommendations integrate functional, economic, and social considerations with marine spatial planning and holistic ecosystem management. As the footprint of the Anthropocene expands into ocean spaces, adopting these nine recommendations at global scales can help to ensure that ecological harm is minimized and that, where feasible, ecological benefits from marine built structures are accrued.
{"title":"Recommendations for built marine infrastructure that supports natural habitats","authors":"Avery B Paxton, Sarah E Lester, Carter S Smith, Siddharth Narayan, Christine Angelini, Brendan J Runde, Megan I Saunders, Rachel K Gittman, Jacob Allgeier, Maria L Vozzo, D'amy N Steward, Hayley R Lemoine, Stephanie R Valdez, Rebecca L Morris, Douglas P Nowacek, William Seaman, Patrick N Halpin, Brian R Silliman","doi":"10.1002/fee.2840","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fee.2840","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The extent of built marine infrastructure—from energy infrastructure and ports to artificial reefs and aquaculture—is increasing globally. The rise in built structure coverage is concurrent with losses and degradation of many natural habitats. Although historically associated with net negative impacts on natural systems, built infrastructure—with proper design and innovation—could offer a largely unrealized opportunity to reduce those impacts and support natural habitats. We present nine recommendations that could catalyze momentum toward using built structures to both serve their original function and benefit natural habitats (relative to the status quo, for example). These recommendations integrate functional, economic, and social considerations with marine spatial planning and holistic ecosystem management. As the footprint of the Anthropocene expands into ocean spaces, adopting these nine recommendations at global scales can help to ensure that ecological harm is minimized and that, where feasible, ecological benefits from marine built structures are accrued.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2840","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144751461","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kristin M Brunk, Joshua F Goldberg, Charles Maxwell, M Zachariah Peery, Gavin M Jones, Lief R Gallagher, H Anu Kramer, Anthony LeRoy Westerling, John J Keane, Stefan Kahl, Connor M Wood
In many forests globally, resilience-focused restoration is necessary to prevent fire-driven regime shifts. However, restoration planning is challenged by limited resources for monitoring biodiversity responses to management intervention and to natural disturbances. Bioregional-scale passive acoustic monitoring, when combined with automated species identification tools and management-relevant habitat data, can be a tractable method to simultaneously monitor suites of complementary indicator species and rapidly generate species-specific information for resource managers. We demonstrate these methods by mapping the occurrence of ten avian indicator species while examining the impact of fire history on patterns of occurrence across 25,000 km2 of California's Sierra Nevada mountains. Monitoring complementary indicator species with rapidly developing bioacoustics technology and relating their occurrence to policy-ready habitat metrics have the potential to transform restoration planning by providing managers with high-resolution, ecosystem-scale information that facilitates adaptive management in an era of rapid environmental change.
{"title":"Bioregional-scale acoustic monitoring can support fire-prone forest restoration planning","authors":"Kristin M Brunk, Joshua F Goldberg, Charles Maxwell, M Zachariah Peery, Gavin M Jones, Lief R Gallagher, H Anu Kramer, Anthony LeRoy Westerling, John J Keane, Stefan Kahl, Connor M Wood","doi":"10.1002/fee.2843","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fee.2843","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In many forests globally, resilience-focused restoration is necessary to prevent fire-driven regime shifts. However, restoration planning is challenged by limited resources for monitoring biodiversity responses to management intervention and to natural disturbances. Bioregional-scale passive acoustic monitoring, when combined with automated species identification tools and management-relevant habitat data, can be a tractable method to simultaneously monitor suites of complementary indicator species and rapidly generate species-specific information for resource managers. We demonstrate these methods by mapping the occurrence of ten avian indicator species while examining the impact of fire history on patterns of occurrence across 25,000 km<sup>2</sup> of California's Sierra Nevada mountains. Monitoring complementary indicator species with rapidly developing bioacoustics technology and relating their occurrence to policy-ready habitat metrics have the potential to transform restoration planning by providing managers with high-resolution, ecosystem-scale information that facilitates adaptive management in an era of rapid environmental change.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144927803","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lindsay E Darling, Christine R Rollinson, Robert T Fahey, Anita T Morzillo, Lea R Johnson, Matthew Baker, Myla FJ Aronson, Brady S Hardiman
The ecological and developmental history of the Chicago, Illinois, region has affected the current distribution of forests therein. These same factors, along with systemic and long-lasting racial segregation, have shaped the distribution of the urban populations that benefit from the ecosystem services provided by urban forests. This study demonstrates that forest patch history is related to forest attributes like tree species composition, tree density, canopy height, and structural heterogeneity—all of which are important predictors of a forest's ability to provide ecosystem services. However, this effect of forest history was only seen in forest cores, as forest edges were similar regardless of patch history. We also found that forests in minoritized communities tended to be less able to support high levels of ecosystem services. This research indicates that, when improving green equity, it is important to consider the variable capacity of forests to provide ecosystem services.
{"title":"Ecological and developmental history impacts the equitable distribution of services","authors":"Lindsay E Darling, Christine R Rollinson, Robert T Fahey, Anita T Morzillo, Lea R Johnson, Matthew Baker, Myla FJ Aronson, Brady S Hardiman","doi":"10.1002/fee.2841","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fee.2841","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The ecological and developmental history of the Chicago, Illinois, region has affected the current distribution of forests therein. These same factors, along with systemic and long-lasting racial segregation, have shaped the distribution of the urban populations that benefit from the ecosystem services provided by urban forests. This study demonstrates that forest patch history is related to forest attributes like tree species composition, tree density, canopy height, and structural heterogeneity—all of which are important predictors of a forest's ability to provide ecosystem services. However, this effect of forest history was only seen in forest cores, as forest edges were similar regardless of patch history. We also found that forests in minoritized communities tended to be less able to support high levels of ecosystem services. This research indicates that, when improving green equity, it is important to consider the variable capacity of forests to provide ecosystem services.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2841","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144751462","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Efforts to restore habitat for wildlife often target single species, with limited consideration of the potential benefits provided to sympatric species. On the basis of range-wide data from the Fourth National Giant Panda Survey and infrared camera trapping, we used species distribution models to project the outcomes of five habitat restoration scenarios—designed to benefit giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca)—for giant pandas as well as for sympatric birds and mammals. Scenario outcomes, particularly those involving the conversion of plantation forests and shrublands into suitable forests, demonstrated a significant enhancement in giant panda habitat suitability, but with contrasting effects for sympatric species. Moreover, while restoration of giant panda habitat may enhance species richness and functional diversity, especially when shrublands are converted into forests, such action could also reduce phylogenetic diversity. Our findings suggest that single-species habitat restoration may have negative outcomes for sympatric species, highlighting the need to consider trade-offs between focal and non-focal taxa.
{"title":"Restoration of giant panda habitat requires balancing single- and multi-species benefits","authors":"Biao Yang, Yu Xu, Qiang Dai, Han Pan, Zhisong Yang, Xuyu Yang, Xiaodong Gu, Jianghong Ran, Zejun Zhang","doi":"10.1002/fee.2844","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fee.2844","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Efforts to restore habitat for wildlife often target single species, with limited consideration of the potential benefits provided to sympatric species. On the basis of range-wide data from the Fourth National Giant Panda Survey and infrared camera trapping, we used species distribution models to project the outcomes of five habitat restoration scenarios—designed to benefit giant pandas (<i>Ailuropoda melanoleuca</i>)—for giant pandas as well as for sympatric birds and mammals. Scenario outcomes, particularly those involving the conversion of plantation forests and shrublands into suitable forests, demonstrated a significant enhancement in giant panda habitat suitability, but with contrasting effects for sympatric species. Moreover, while restoration of giant panda habitat may enhance species richness and functional diversity, especially when shrublands are converted into forests, such action could also reduce phylogenetic diversity. Our findings suggest that single-species habitat restoration may have negative outcomes for sympatric species, highlighting the need to consider trade-offs between focal and non-focal taxa.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144751464","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}