首页 > 最新文献

Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment最新文献

英文 中文
Resist!: Sustaining forest carbon sequestration and wood production after insect disturbance 抵制!昆虫干扰后维持森林碳固存和木材生产
IF 7.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-06-16 DOI: 10.1002/fee.2861
Christopher M Gough, Ben Bond-Lamberty, Robert T Fahey, Catherine McGuigan, Brandon C Alveshere, Cameron Clay, Erin-Darby McClain, Charles E Flower, Kayla C Mathes, Ariel Johnson, Lisa T Haber, Kalyn Dorheim, Derek M Johnson, Lucas E Nave, Kerstin Niedermaier

Disturbances from insect pests threaten ecologically and economically important goods and services supplied by forests, including wood production and carbon sequestration. We highlight the factors that influence these services’ resistance, a term quantifying the initial response to disturbance. Insects inflict damage through a range of mechanisms, prompting distinct plant physiological responses that scale to influence ecosystem processes and, with time, goods and services. The degree and timing of tree mortality and defoliation affect the amount of residual vegetation available to support compensatory wood production and influence carbon sequestration by changing rates of detritus-fueled decomposition. Compounding, or sequential, insect attacks may prime a forest for additional disturbance, further eroding wood production and carbon sequestration. Forest management practices that promote biological and structural diversity, and augment or retain limiting biological and nutrient resources, may buffer against the effects of insect pests on wood production and carbon sequestration.

虫害的干扰威胁到森林提供的生态和经济上重要的商品和服务,包括木材生产和碳固存。我们强调了影响这些服务阻力的因素,这是一个量化对干扰的初始响应的术语。昆虫通过一系列机制造成损害,促使植物产生不同的生理反应,这些生理反应会影响生态系统过程,并随着时间的推移影响产品和服务。树木死亡和落叶的程度和时间影响可用于支持补偿性木材生产的剩余植被的数量,并通过改变碎屑燃料分解的速率影响碳固存。复合或连续的昆虫袭击可能使森林受到额外的干扰,进一步侵蚀木材生产和碳封存。促进生物和结构多样性,增加或保留有限的生物和营养资源的森林管理做法,可以缓冲虫害对木材生产和碳固存的影响。
{"title":"Resist!: Sustaining forest carbon sequestration and wood production after insect disturbance","authors":"Christopher M Gough,&nbsp;Ben Bond-Lamberty,&nbsp;Robert T Fahey,&nbsp;Catherine McGuigan,&nbsp;Brandon C Alveshere,&nbsp;Cameron Clay,&nbsp;Erin-Darby McClain,&nbsp;Charles E Flower,&nbsp;Kayla C Mathes,&nbsp;Ariel Johnson,&nbsp;Lisa T Haber,&nbsp;Kalyn Dorheim,&nbsp;Derek M Johnson,&nbsp;Lucas E Nave,&nbsp;Kerstin Niedermaier","doi":"10.1002/fee.2861","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2861","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Disturbances from insect pests threaten ecologically and economically important goods and services supplied by forests, including wood production and carbon sequestration. We highlight the factors that influence these services’ <i>resistance</i>, a term quantifying the initial response to disturbance. Insects inflict damage through a range of mechanisms, prompting distinct plant physiological responses that scale to influence ecosystem processes and, with time, goods and services. The degree and timing of tree mortality and defoliation affect the amount of residual vegetation available to support compensatory wood production and influence carbon sequestration by changing rates of detritus-fueled decomposition. Compounding, or sequential, insect attacks may prime a forest for additional disturbance, further eroding wood production and carbon sequestration. Forest management practices that promote biological and structural diversity, and augment or retain limiting biological and nutrient resources, may buffer against the effects of insect pests on wood production and carbon sequestration.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2861","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145625582","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A multi-scale approach to integrating rewilding into agricultural landscapes 将野化融入农业景观的多尺度方法
IF 7.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-06-16 DOI: 10.1002/fee.2860
José M Rey Benayas, James M Bullock, Henrique M Pereira

Finding ways to improve the sustainability of modern agriculture by recovering nature in agricultural landscapes is critical for conserving biodiversity and enhancing human well-being. Rewilding principles could be applied to any type of landscape, which raises the possibility of employing rewilding approaches in agricultural areas while maintaining some degree of food production therein. Moving beyond the simple dichotomy of land sparing versus land sharing, here we propose a multi-scale approach that integrates rewilding principles into agricultural landscapes by combining the creation of wilder ecosystems in separate set-aside recovered areas with the implementation of farming approaches that are more sustainable, such as precision farming, ecologically intensified farming, and extensive farming, in adjacent areas. Adoption of such approaches would allow for more biodiversity elements to persist within the agricultural matrix. We explain how this approach could support the three critical components of rewilded land—dispersal, trophic complexity, and stochastic disturbances—and create agroecological landscapes that are biodiverse, resilient, and functionally connected at multiple scales.

通过恢复农业景观中的自然,寻找改善现代农业可持续性的方法,对于保护生物多样性和增进人类福祉至关重要。野化原则可适用于任何类型的景观,这提高了在农业地区采用野化方法同时保持其中某种程度的粮食生产的可能性。在这里,我们超越了土地节约与土地共享的简单二分法,提出了一种多尺度的方法,将野生化原则融入农业景观,将在单独的留出的恢复区域创建更野生的生态系统与在邻近地区实施更可持续的农业方法(如精准农业、生态集约化农业和粗放型农业)相结合。采用这种方法将使更多的生物多样性要素能够在农业基质中持续存在。我们解释了这种方法如何支持重新野生土地的三个关键组成部分——分散、营养复杂性和随机干扰——并创造生物多样性、弹性和在多个尺度上功能连接的农业生态景观。
{"title":"A multi-scale approach to integrating rewilding into agricultural landscapes","authors":"José M Rey Benayas,&nbsp;James M Bullock,&nbsp;Henrique M Pereira","doi":"10.1002/fee.2860","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2860","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Finding ways to improve the sustainability of modern agriculture by recovering nature in agricultural landscapes is critical for conserving biodiversity and enhancing human well-being. Rewilding principles could be applied to any type of landscape, which raises the possibility of employing rewilding approaches in agricultural areas while maintaining some degree of food production therein. Moving beyond the simple dichotomy of land sparing versus land sharing, here we propose a multi-scale approach that integrates rewilding principles into agricultural landscapes by combining the creation of wilder ecosystems in separate set-aside recovered areas with the implementation of farming approaches that are more sustainable, such as precision farming, ecologically intensified farming, and extensive farming, in adjacent areas. Adoption of such approaches would allow for more biodiversity elements to persist within the agricultural matrix. We explain how this approach could support the three critical components of rewilded land—dispersal, trophic complexity, and stochastic disturbances—and create agroecological landscapes that are biodiverse, resilient, and functionally connected at multiple scales.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2860","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145196804","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Inducing biological resistance to invasive plants with adapted native species 用适应的本地物种诱导生物抵抗入侵植物
IF 7.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-06-16 DOI: 10.1002/fee.2857
G Scott Clark, Kerri M Crawford

Invasive plants often benefit from a change in eco-evolutionary context, escaping the herbivores, pathogens, and competing plants from their native range. Introduced into naïve native communities, invasive plants can spread rapidly, threatening native plant diversity and ecosystem functioning. Increasingly, studies have shown that native species sometimes adapt in response to the selection pressures imposed by an invasive plant. While researchers have periodically suggested using adapted native species in the management of invasive plants, the idea generally has not found its way to the field. Here, we (1) compare the concept to the more established practices of assisted migration, classic biological control, and microbiome engineering; (2) discuss some of the hurdles to practical implementation; and (3) outline directions for further research that would help expose the role of native adaptations in shaping the trajectory of plant invasions.

入侵植物通常受益于生态进化环境的变化,从其本土范围逃离食草动物、病原体和竞争植物。入侵植物被引入naïve本地群落后,可以迅速传播,威胁本地植物多样性和生态系统功能。越来越多的研究表明,本地物种有时会适应入侵植物施加的选择压力。虽然研究人员定期建议在管理入侵植物时使用适应的本地物种,但这个想法通常还没有进入该领域。在这里,我们(1)将这一概念与辅助迁移、经典生物控制和微生物组工程等更成熟的实践进行比较;(2)讨论实际实施的一些障碍;(3)概述了进一步研究的方向,这将有助于揭示本地适应在塑造植物入侵轨迹中的作用。
{"title":"Inducing biological resistance to invasive plants with adapted native species","authors":"G Scott Clark,&nbsp;Kerri M Crawford","doi":"10.1002/fee.2857","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2857","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Invasive plants often benefit from a change in eco-evolutionary context, escaping the herbivores, pathogens, and competing plants from their native range. Introduced into naïve native communities, invasive plants can spread rapidly, threatening native plant diversity and ecosystem functioning. Increasingly, studies have shown that native species sometimes adapt in response to the selection pressures imposed by an invasive plant. While researchers have periodically suggested using adapted native species in the management of invasive plants, the idea generally has not found its way to the field. Here, we (1) compare the concept to the more established practices of assisted migration, classic biological control, and microbiome engineering; (2) discuss some of the hurdles to practical implementation; and (3) outline directions for further research that would help expose the role of native adaptations in shaping the trajectory of plant invasions.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145470168","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Managing ecosystem damage from extreme events 管理极端事件造成的生态系统破坏
IF 7.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-06-09 DOI: 10.1002/fee.2855
Virginia H Dale, Steven P Norman, Rebecca A Efroymson

Large disturbances to ecosystems can severely impact the stability of a region's natural resources, habitats, and outdoor recreation. Because extreme events can be large and relatively infrequent, they test institutional capacity to support recovery and restoration. When hurricanes and other large-scale disturbances like wildfires occur, much of the impacted landscape receives little to no active management. Ecosystems are often allowed to either recover or transition without much direct intervention, and successional dynamics are sometimes altered by novel invasive species, management history, or other environmental changes.

Recovery and restoration are especially challenging for landscapes with highly fragmented private ownership, such as the forests of the eastern US. Acting alone, non-industrial private forest landowners have little capacity to effectively respond to unexpected forest loss and to oversee forest recovery, as the scale of actions needed after extreme events may require cooperation across ownerships or jurisdictions.

In September 2024, Hurricane Helene exposed these underlying vulnerabilities of southern Appalachian forests. In western North Carolina alone, about 196,000 hectares of forest received major damage from Hurricane Helene, with most impacts occurring on private lands and in unusually large blowdown patches with no known regional precedent. Not since the widespread forest loss of the late 19th and early 20th centuries due to extensive logging and the American chestnut blight have so few trees covered the region's slopes.

This enormous damage to southern Appalachian forests raises concerns about loss of wildlife habitat, increased wildfire risks due to the abundance of fuel, reduced water quality from erosion and sedimentation, and spread of invasive species. Damaged forests are likely to reestablish as novel ecosystems composed of new species assemblages with a suite of interactions and processes that differ from prior conditions. On public and private lands, the duration of forest recovery will take decades or more and will be highly dependent on management choices and market incentives.

Since Hurricane Helene, disaster relief crews continue to work hard to remove fallen trees and debris near structures, roads, trails, and recreation areas as time and funds are available. However, removing downed and damaged wood is more costly and dangerous than typical forest harvesting. Piles of downed, unused wood may be burned, but combustion releases smoke and carbon into the atmosphere. Historically, debris burning and arson are the region's primary sources of wildfire ignitions, and it is hard to control burns when so many of the surrounding forests have high flammability.

A major dilemma is what to do with all this downed wood and debris from Hurricane Helene and how to pay for its removal. There is ongoing timber demand for large intact boles, at least where they can be accessed, but demand i

对生态系统的巨大干扰会严重影响一个地区自然资源、栖息地和户外娱乐的稳定性。由于极端事件可能规模较大且相对罕见,因此它们考验着支持恢复和恢复的机构能力。当飓风和野火等大规模扰动发生时,大部分受影响的景观几乎没有得到积极的管理。生态系统通常可以在没有太多直接干预的情况下恢复或过渡,演替动态有时会因新入侵物种、管理历史或其他环境变化而改变。对于私人所有权高度分散的景观,如美国东部的森林,恢复和恢复尤其具有挑战性。非工业私人森林土地所有者单独行动,几乎没有能力有效应对意外的森林损失和监督森林恢复,因为极端事件发生后所需的行动规模可能需要跨所有权或司法管辖区的合作。2024年9月,飓风海伦暴露了阿巴拉契亚南部森林的这些潜在脆弱性。仅在北卡罗莱纳西部,就有大约19.6万公顷的森林受到飓风“海伦”的严重破坏,其中大部分影响发生在私人土地上,以及在已知地区没有先例的异常大面积的排污斑块上。自从19世纪末和20世纪初由于大规模伐木和美洲栗树枯萎病而大面积森林消失以来,该地区的山坡上还没有这么少的树木。这种对南部阿巴拉契亚森林的巨大破坏引发了人们对野生动物栖息地丧失、燃料丰富导致野火风险增加、侵蚀和沉积导致水质下降以及入侵物种蔓延的担忧。被破坏的森林很可能重建为新的生态系统,由新的物种组合组成,具有一系列不同于先前条件的相互作用和过程。在公共和私人土地上,森林恢复的持续时间将需要几十年或更长时间,并将高度取决于管理选择和市场激励措施。自飓风“海伦”以来,救灾人员在时间和资金充足的情况下,继续努力清除建筑物、道路、小径和娱乐场所附近倒下的树木和碎片。然而,清除倒下和受损的木材比典型的森林采伐成本更高,也更危险。成堆的倒下的、未使用的木材可以燃烧,但燃烧会向大气中释放烟雾和碳。从历史上看,碎片燃烧和纵火是该地区野火点燃的主要来源,当周围许多森林具有高可燃性时,很难控制燃烧。一个主要的难题是如何处理飓风“海伦”带来的所有这些倒下的木材和碎片,以及如何支付清理费用。对大型完整钻孔的木材需求持续存在,至少在可以进入的地方,但需求远远低于供应。此外,随着最近造纸厂的关闭,美国东南部对受损木材和小直径树木的需求急剧下降。在有限的地区,受损的树木可以卖给生物质热能和电力设施、艺术家或家具制造商。来自沿海港口附近地区的低商业价值的木材可以被海外木屑颗粒市场吸收,但只能在木材质量退化之前有限的时间内吸收。即使没有大的干扰造成破坏,这种“不受欢迎的木材”的丰富也是一个巨大的挑战。随着对小直径树木的需求减少和对大直径树木的获取减少,受损林地可能面临开发和/或分裂成较小所有权地块的高风险。如果没有正的净收入,一些森林所有者就负担不起保留土地的费用。成本分摊支付项目,如美国农业部农场服务局的紧急森林恢复项目,只提供支付,而不是手段,来移除受损的树木。其他应急管理资金不太可能与问题的严重程度相匹配。管理实践必须扩大,因为飓风、火灾、疾病、昆虫和入侵等威胁已经在这样做了。不能简单地从过去的经验中推断出大规模干扰、恢复和应对的影响,未来的行动将需要土地所有者和政府机构之间加强合作。作为生态学家,我们需要研究在大规模扰动后如何管理恢复和利用受损材料。例如,使用低质量的羽化木材作为生物能源,不仅利用了未充分利用的能源,而且还可以鼓励更好地管理森林,并在农村地区创造就业机会,因为农村地区由于失去造纸厂而失去了许多与林业有关的就业机会。科学家可以根据扰动规模的变化,为极端事件制定适当的管理反应和适应策略。 通过与资源管理者、经济学家、社会科学家和工程师合作,生态学家可以帮助确定环境适宜和社会可接受的方式来恢复受损的生态系统的成本和收益。
{"title":"Managing ecosystem damage from extreme events","authors":"Virginia H Dale,&nbsp;Steven P Norman,&nbsp;Rebecca A Efroymson","doi":"10.1002/fee.2855","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fee.2855","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Large disturbances to ecosystems can severely impact the stability of a region's natural resources, habitats, and outdoor recreation. Because extreme events can be large and relatively infrequent, they test institutional capacity to support recovery and restoration. When hurricanes and other large-scale disturbances like wildfires occur, much of the impacted landscape receives little to no active management. Ecosystems are often allowed to either recover or transition without much direct intervention, and successional dynamics are sometimes altered by novel invasive species, management history, or other environmental changes.</p><p>Recovery and restoration are especially challenging for landscapes with highly fragmented private ownership, such as the forests of the eastern US. Acting alone, non-industrial private forest landowners have little capacity to effectively respond to unexpected forest loss and to oversee forest recovery, as the scale of actions needed after extreme events may require cooperation across ownerships or jurisdictions.</p><p>In September 2024, Hurricane Helene exposed these underlying vulnerabilities of southern Appalachian forests. In western North Carolina alone, about 196,000 hectares of forest received major damage from Hurricane Helene, with most impacts occurring on private lands and in unusually large blowdown patches with no known regional precedent. Not since the widespread forest loss of the late 19th and early 20th centuries due to extensive logging and the American chestnut blight have so few trees covered the region's slopes.</p><p>This enormous damage to southern Appalachian forests raises concerns about loss of wildlife habitat, increased wildfire risks due to the abundance of fuel, reduced water quality from erosion and sedimentation, and spread of invasive species. Damaged forests are likely to reestablish as novel ecosystems composed of new species assemblages with a suite of interactions and processes that differ from prior conditions. On public and private lands, the duration of forest recovery will take decades or more and will be highly dependent on management choices and market incentives.</p><p>Since Hurricane Helene, disaster relief crews continue to work hard to remove fallen trees and debris near structures, roads, trails, and recreation areas as time and funds are available. However, removing downed and damaged wood is more costly and dangerous than typical forest harvesting. Piles of downed, unused wood may be burned, but combustion releases smoke and carbon into the atmosphere. Historically, debris burning and arson are the region's primary sources of wildfire ignitions, and it is hard to control burns when so many of the surrounding forests have high flammability.</p><p>A major dilemma is what to do with all this downed wood and debris from Hurricane Helene and how to pay for its removal. There is ongoing timber demand for large intact boles, at least where they can be accessed, but demand i","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2855","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144751549","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sustainability of large language models—user perspective 大型语言模型的可持续性——用户视角
IF 7.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-06-02 DOI: 10.1002/fee.2856
Pavel Pipek, Shane Canavan, Susan Canavan, César Capinha, Jérôme MW Gippet, Ana Novoa, Petr Pyšek, Allan T Souza, Shengyu Wang, Ivan Jarić
<p>Large language models (LLMs) are becoming an integral part of our daily work. In the field of ecology, LLMs are already being applied to a wide range of tasks, such as extracting georeferenced data or taxonomic entities from unstructured texts, information synthesis, coding, and teaching (<i>Methods Ecol Evol</i> 2024; <i>Npj Biodivers</i> 2024). Further development and increased use of LLMs in ecology, as in science in general, is likely to intensify and accelerate the process of research and increase publication output—thus pressuring scientists to keep up with the elevated pace, which in turn creates a feedback loop by promoting even greater LLM use.</p><p>However, this all comes at a cost. While not directly borne by end users, aside from occasional response delays, LLMs require considerable computational power and are energy-demanding during both their initial training phase and their subsequent operational use (<i>Nature</i> 2025). Furthermore, partly externalized energy costs are linked to intensive searching and processing of discovered sources as part of Deep Research. Currently, it remains challenging to estimate the total energy costs of LLMs, largely due to limited transparency from their companies of origin.</p><p>The ways to improve LLM sustainability, for example by algorithmic or hardware optimization and renewable energy use during development and operation, have been extensively examined. However, we contend that the role of end users, including researchers, has been largely overlooked. End users can and should be part of the solution, to their own benefit. By selecting less resource-intensive options, optimizing their prompts, or selecting platforms that use renewable energy sources, users would not only contribute to LLM sustainability but also improve their own workflows. Besides reducing energy consumption, a more parsimonious use of LLMs could also lessen other harms, such as cooling water use and extraction of rare earth metals. Consequently, companies should support users in making such informed choices.</p><p>For instance, most companies provide LLMs of different complexities or sizes, often measured by the number of parameters. Relying on the largest models can be excessive in many cases (eg answering emails, checking grammar, or conducting searches that could be done by traditional search engines). By selecting a smaller, less energy-intensive model, users can also benefit from quicker responses. In addition, some smaller models are trained to perform specific tasks, eg coding, and can thus match or outperform bigger ones.</p><p>Another potential way to reduce energy costs and save user time is to trim the expected length and complexity of the model's response. For example, for some questions, an elaborate answer is unnecessary, if not counterproductive (ie because it takes time to read through); in other cases, only code is needed, without any further explanations. And this can be directly specified in the prompt.<
大型语言模型(llm)正在成为我们日常工作中不可或缺的一部分。在生态学领域,法学硕士已经被广泛应用于各种任务,例如从非结构化文本中提取地理参考数据或分类实体,信息合成,编码和教学(方法Ecol evolution 2024;Npj生物潜水员2024)。法学硕士在生态学中的进一步发展和使用的增加,就像在一般科学中一样,可能会加强和加速研究进程,增加出版物的产出——从而迫使科学家跟上加快的步伐,这反过来又通过促进法学硕士的更多使用创造了一个反馈循环。然而,这一切都是有代价的。虽然llm不直接由最终用户承担,但除了偶尔的响应延迟外,llm在初始训练阶段和随后的操作使用中都需要相当大的计算能力和能源需求(Nature 2025)。此外,作为深度研究的一部分,部分外部化的能源成本与已发现资源的密集搜索和处理有关。目前,估计法学硕士的总能源成本仍然具有挑战性,主要原因是其原产公司的透明度有限。提高LLM可持续性的方法,例如通过算法或硬件优化以及在开发和运营期间使用可再生能源,已经得到了广泛的研究。然而,我们认为包括研究人员在内的最终用户的作用在很大程度上被忽视了。最终用户可以而且应该成为解决方案的一部分,这有利于他们自己。通过选择资源密集度较低的选项、优化提示或选择使用可再生能源的平台,用户不仅可以为法学硕士的可持续性做出贡献,还可以改善自己的工作流程。除了减少能源消耗外,更节约地使用llm还可以减少其他危害,例如冷却水的使用和稀土金属的提取。因此,公司应该支持用户做出这种明智的选择。例如,大多数公司提供不同复杂性或规模的法学硕士,通常以参数的数量来衡量。在许多情况下,依赖最大的模型可能是过度的(例如,回复电子邮件、检查语法或执行传统搜索引擎可以完成的搜索)。通过选择更小、能耗更低的型号,用户还可以从更快的响应中受益。此外,一些较小的模型被训练来执行特定的任务,例如编码,因此可以匹配或优于较大的模型。减少能源成本和节省用户时间的另一种潜在方法是减少模型响应的预期长度和复杂性。例如,对于一些问题,一个详尽的答案是不必要的,如果不是适得其反的话(因为它需要时间来阅读);在其他情况下,只需要代码,不需要任何进一步的解释。这可以在提示符中直接指定。无论是在与人的日常交谈中,还是在与法学硕士的互动中,如果请求表述得当,答案最有可能达到预期。因此,制作提示以避免多次运行模型也很重要。虽然对最佳提示的全面概述超出了本文的范围,但我们建议以下几个简单的方法。通常,明智的做法是利用用户的专业知识,并为模型提供明确的指导。例如,对于编码,提示符可以包括应该使用的工具的名称(例如特定编码语言的库或包),甚至是算法的基本描述,包括任何已知的陷阱,以避免重复提示和重新生成整个代码。此外,如果请求的任务需要最新的信息,或者如果模型在训练期间学习的工具已经过时,则可以要求模型进行网络搜索。只要提示符符合其目的,就应该保存它,如果可能的话,还应该共享它。事实上,已经存在几个提示库,其中一些包含可用于研究的提示。然而,专注于为自然科学研究量身定制的提示的知识库仍然缺失。还有一些提示市场,在这些市场中,人们提供已经针对特定任务进行了优化的提示,从而减少了重复试验和错误的需要,并有助于在此过程中节省精力和时间。同样,已经开发了大量浏览器扩展(插件)来帮助进行提示工程。然而,这些工具应该直接构建到模型的web界面中,这样一个更可持续的提示可以更容易地被更多的用户使用。提供法学硕士的公司确实可以在促进法学硕士的可持续使用方面发挥关键作用,通过提供用户友好的指导来最有效地使用其产品。 此外,公司应该对其模型的能源成本(以及它们使用的能源)更加透明,并引导感兴趣的用户选择要求较低的选项,或者让他们选择只运行由可再生能源驱动的模型。虽然我们认为公司不应该将法学硕士可持续性的责任转移给最终用户,但用户仍然可以发挥重要作用,确保他们合理有效地使用法学硕士,并向公司施压,赋予他们这样做的权力。
{"title":"Sustainability of large language models—user perspective","authors":"Pavel Pipek,&nbsp;Shane Canavan,&nbsp;Susan Canavan,&nbsp;César Capinha,&nbsp;Jérôme MW Gippet,&nbsp;Ana Novoa,&nbsp;Petr Pyšek,&nbsp;Allan T Souza,&nbsp;Shengyu Wang,&nbsp;Ivan Jarić","doi":"10.1002/fee.2856","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fee.2856","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Large language models (LLMs) are becoming an integral part of our daily work. In the field of ecology, LLMs are already being applied to a wide range of tasks, such as extracting georeferenced data or taxonomic entities from unstructured texts, information synthesis, coding, and teaching (&lt;i&gt;Methods Ecol Evol&lt;/i&gt; 2024; &lt;i&gt;Npj Biodivers&lt;/i&gt; 2024). Further development and increased use of LLMs in ecology, as in science in general, is likely to intensify and accelerate the process of research and increase publication output—thus pressuring scientists to keep up with the elevated pace, which in turn creates a feedback loop by promoting even greater LLM use.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, this all comes at a cost. While not directly borne by end users, aside from occasional response delays, LLMs require considerable computational power and are energy-demanding during both their initial training phase and their subsequent operational use (&lt;i&gt;Nature&lt;/i&gt; 2025). Furthermore, partly externalized energy costs are linked to intensive searching and processing of discovered sources as part of Deep Research. Currently, it remains challenging to estimate the total energy costs of LLMs, largely due to limited transparency from their companies of origin.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The ways to improve LLM sustainability, for example by algorithmic or hardware optimization and renewable energy use during development and operation, have been extensively examined. However, we contend that the role of end users, including researchers, has been largely overlooked. End users can and should be part of the solution, to their own benefit. By selecting less resource-intensive options, optimizing their prompts, or selecting platforms that use renewable energy sources, users would not only contribute to LLM sustainability but also improve their own workflows. Besides reducing energy consumption, a more parsimonious use of LLMs could also lessen other harms, such as cooling water use and extraction of rare earth metals. Consequently, companies should support users in making such informed choices.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For instance, most companies provide LLMs of different complexities or sizes, often measured by the number of parameters. Relying on the largest models can be excessive in many cases (eg answering emails, checking grammar, or conducting searches that could be done by traditional search engines). By selecting a smaller, less energy-intensive model, users can also benefit from quicker responses. In addition, some smaller models are trained to perform specific tasks, eg coding, and can thus match or outperform bigger ones.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Another potential way to reduce energy costs and save user time is to trim the expected length and complexity of the model's response. For example, for some questions, an elaborate answer is unnecessary, if not counterproductive (ie because it takes time to read through); in other cases, only code is needed, without any further explanations. And this can be directly specified in the prompt.&lt;","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2856","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144191146","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How can China curb biological invasions to meet Kunming-Montreal Target 6? 中国如何遏制生物入侵以实现《昆明-蒙特利尔目标6》?
IF 7.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-05-15 DOI: 10.1002/fee.2853
Rui-Ting Ju, Xiting Gui, John Measey, Qiang He, Xiaoqing Xian, Jianguo Liu, William J Sutherland, Bo Li, Jihua Wu

To meet Kunming-Montreal Target 6 of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), we argue that more comprehensive measures are needed to manage invasive alien species (IAS), which is especially true for China, given that it is undergoing an unprecedented wave of invasions due to its rapid development. Here, we consider the status of IAS in China, evaluate China's ongoing countermeasures against IAS, and provide recommendations for improving management. In total, 802 IAS have been identified in China. Facing the growing threats of IAS, China has made progress in IAS management, but more stringent and thorough measures are still required. In addition to improving legislation and governance, China should strengthen transdisciplinary and proactive research, implement more comprehensive prevention and control actions against IAS, and enhance international cooperation and translational education. By creating a model for IAS management that other countries can follow, China's efforts can contribute substantially to the CBD's Kunming-Montreal 2030 Global Targets.

为了实现《生物多样性公约》(CBD)的昆蒙目标6,我们认为需要采取更全面的措施来管理外来入侵物种,这对中国来说尤其如此,因为中国的快速发展正经历着前所未有的入侵浪潮。在此,我们考虑了国际会计准则在中国的现状,评估了中国正在采取的应对措施,并提出了改进管理的建议。中国已确定的国际会计准则共有802个。面对国际会计准则日益增长的威胁,中国在国际会计准则管理方面取得了一定进展,但仍需采取更加严格和彻底的措施。除了完善立法和治理外,中国还应加强跨学科和前瞻性研究,实施更全面的IAS防控行动,加强国际合作和转化教育。通过创建一个可供其他国家效仿的国际温室气体管理模式,中国的努力可以为《生物多样性公约》的《昆明-蒙特利尔2030年全球目标》做出重大贡献。
{"title":"How can China curb biological invasions to meet Kunming-Montreal Target 6?","authors":"Rui-Ting Ju,&nbsp;Xiting Gui,&nbsp;John Measey,&nbsp;Qiang He,&nbsp;Xiaoqing Xian,&nbsp;Jianguo Liu,&nbsp;William J Sutherland,&nbsp;Bo Li,&nbsp;Jihua Wu","doi":"10.1002/fee.2853","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fee.2853","url":null,"abstract":"<p>To meet Kunming-Montreal Target 6 of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), we argue that more comprehensive measures are needed to manage invasive alien species (IAS), which is especially true for China, given that it is undergoing an unprecedented wave of invasions due to its rapid development. Here, we consider the status of IAS in China, evaluate China's ongoing countermeasures against IAS, and provide recommendations for improving management. In total, 802 IAS have been identified in China. Facing the growing threats of IAS, China has made progress in IAS management, but more stringent and thorough measures are still required. In addition to improving legislation and governance, China should strengthen transdisciplinary and proactive research, implement more comprehensive prevention and control actions against IAS, and enhance international cooperation and translational education. By creating a model for IAS management that other countries can follow, China's efforts can contribute substantially to the CBD's Kunming-Montreal 2030 Global Targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144927764","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Functionalizing ecological integrity: using functional ecology to monitor animal communities 功能化生态完整性:利用功能生态学对动物群落进行监测
IF 7.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-05-15 DOI: 10.1002/fee.2852
Ana Miller-ter Kuile, Jamie S Sanderlin, Jessalyn Ayars, Helen E Chmura, Melissa Dressen, Jessie D Golding, Gavin M Jones, Rebecca Kirby, Kari EA Norman, Zachary L Steel, Valerie Stein Foster

Ecological integrity—the degree to which an ecosystem supports ecological structure, composition, diversity, function, and connectivity typical of natural conditions—has been a guiding principle in ecosystem monitoring around the world. However, in terrestrial ecosystems, integrity-based monitoring often excludes animal communities, even though they are critical drivers of integrity. Methodological advances in monitoring and data science have made it easier to document animal communities. We highlight examples of these advances and how they remove barriers to adopting animal-specific integrity metrics. We then illustrate how describing animal communities in terms of functional ecology, which has also undergone substantial development over the past several decades, can provide a generalizable approach to incorporating animal communities into integrity-based monitoring across taxa and ecosystems. Incorporating animal communities into ecological integrity monitoring is a vital step toward understanding how human-driven change, restoration, and conservation shape terrestrial ecosystems worldwide.

生态完整性是指生态系统对典型自然条件下的生态结构、组成、多样性、功能和连通性的支持程度,已成为全球生态系统监测的指导原则。然而,在陆地生态系统中,基于完整性的监测往往将动物群落排除在外,尽管它们是完整性的关键驱动因素。监测和数据科学方法的进步使记录动物群落变得更加容易。我们重点介绍了这些进步的例子,以及它们如何消除采用动物特异性完整性指标的障碍。然后,我们说明了如何从功能生态学的角度描述动物群落,这在过去几十年中也经历了实质性的发展,可以提供一种通用的方法,将动物群落纳入跨分类群和生态系统的基于完整性的监测中。将动物群落纳入生态完整性监测是理解人类驱动的变化、恢复和保护如何塑造全球陆地生态系统的重要一步。
{"title":"Functionalizing ecological integrity: using functional ecology to monitor animal communities","authors":"Ana Miller-ter Kuile,&nbsp;Jamie S Sanderlin,&nbsp;Jessalyn Ayars,&nbsp;Helen E Chmura,&nbsp;Melissa Dressen,&nbsp;Jessie D Golding,&nbsp;Gavin M Jones,&nbsp;Rebecca Kirby,&nbsp;Kari EA Norman,&nbsp;Zachary L Steel,&nbsp;Valerie Stein Foster","doi":"10.1002/fee.2852","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fee.2852","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ecological integrity—the degree to which an ecosystem supports ecological structure, composition, diversity, function, and connectivity typical of natural conditions—has been a guiding principle in ecosystem monitoring around the world. However, in terrestrial ecosystems, integrity-based monitoring often excludes animal communities, even though they are critical drivers of integrity. Methodological advances in monitoring and data science have made it easier to document animal communities. We highlight examples of these advances and how they remove barriers to adopting animal-specific integrity metrics. We then illustrate how describing animal communities in terms of functional ecology, which has also undergone substantial development over the past several decades, can provide a generalizable approach to incorporating animal communities into integrity-based monitoring across taxa and ecosystems. Incorporating animal communities into ecological integrity monitoring is a vital step toward understanding how human-driven change, restoration, and conservation shape terrestrial ecosystems worldwide.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144927765","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A stepwise process for actionable environmental science research 可操作的环境科学研究的逐步过程
IF 7.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-05-15 DOI: 10.1002/fee.2854
Margaret A Palmer, James W Boyd

Scholars have long recognized the social dimensions of environmental problems. Environmental scientists have responded by increasingly focusing on the interactions between nature and social dynamics. This helps reveal problematic interactions that cause environmental challenges, many of which impact human well-being. Research teams that include environmental and social scientists engaging with diverse stakeholders can use many available tools to ask how changing a factor pivotal to problematic interactions influences environmental and social outcomes. When the research also includes identifying actions targeting those interactions and identifying those who can implement the actions, the research is most likely to lead to positive outcomes in the long term. This is especially true when researchers link changes to improving a given ecosystem service. Changes can not only involve adapting natural resource policies but also involve altering attitudes and beliefs. We describe a stepwise process that eases the path toward such actionable environmental science by researchers.

学者们早就认识到环境问题的社会层面。环境科学家的回应是越来越关注自然与社会动态之间的相互作用。这有助于揭示导致环境挑战的有问题的相互作用,其中许多影响人类福祉。包括环境和社会科学家在内的研究团队与不同的利益相关者合作,可以使用许多可用的工具来询问改变一个对有问题的相互作用至关重要的因素如何影响环境和社会结果。当研究还包括确定针对这些互动的行动和确定可以实施这些行动的人时,研究最有可能在长期内产生积极的结果。当研究人员将变化与改善给定的生态系统服务联系起来时,这一点尤其正确。变化不仅包括调整自然资源政策,还包括改变态度和信仰。我们描述了一个循序渐进的过程,简化了研究人员走向这种可操作的环境科学的道路。
{"title":"A stepwise process for actionable environmental science research","authors":"Margaret A Palmer,&nbsp;James W Boyd","doi":"10.1002/fee.2854","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fee.2854","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Scholars have long recognized the social dimensions of environmental problems. Environmental scientists have responded by increasingly focusing on the interactions between nature and social dynamics. This helps reveal problematic interactions that cause environmental challenges, many of which impact human well-being. Research teams that include environmental and social scientists engaging with diverse stakeholders can use many available tools to ask how changing a factor pivotal to problematic interactions influences environmental and social outcomes. When the research also includes identifying actions targeting those interactions and identifying those who can implement the actions, the research is most likely to lead to positive outcomes in the long term. This is especially true when researchers link changes to improving a given ecosystem service. Changes can not only involve adapting natural resource policies but also involve altering attitudes and beliefs. We describe a stepwise process that eases the path toward such actionable environmental science by researchers.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2854","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144927763","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Moving beyond continents for global and inclusive science 超越大洲,追求全球和包容性的科学
IF 7.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-05-02 DOI: 10.1002/fee.2851
Ivan Jarić, Christophe Diagne, Shawan Chowdhury
<p>Global science suffers from persistent geographical disparities that skew research toward affluent countries and regions, primarily in Europe and North America (Maas <i>et al</i>. <span>2021</span>; Gomez <i>et al</i>. <span>2022</span>). Despite increased awareness, efforts to foster inclusivity within scientific communities often perpetuate existing biases. Studies claiming to have global representation among their authors are, in reality, mostly skewed to authors from particular countries, typically those that are more economically developed within a given continent. For instance, in research collaborations that include authors from South America, Africa, and Asia, those authors are primarily affiliated with only a few economically developed countries—such as Brazil, South Africa, and China—leaving many other nations on those continents underrepresented. In general, this could deceptively suggest that research is not being conducted in the underrepresented countries. Besides providing a misleading image of global inclusiveness, excluding voices from these regions leads to data gaps and diminished spatial coverage of studies, and overlooks opportunities to enhance scientific capacity in marginalized countries (Shaaban <i>et al</i>. <span>2024</span>).</p><p>This issue is partly driven by international research networks and consortia favoring established “traditional” institutions and experts, alongside the persistence of “parachute research” practices. Scientists from regionally misrepresented countries often face limited professional visibility (eg online profiles, personal websites), as well as restricted access to international conferences, funding, and collaboration networks—further entrenching their geographic exclusion. In addition, many scholars from underrepresented countries often publish research in non-English languages or local scientific journals, both of which are vastly unavailable in or excluded from major international scholarly bibliographic databases (eg Web of Science, Scopus; Chowdhury <i>et al</i>. <span>2022</span>). Consequently, relying on such databases to ascertain representation within so-called global projects, assessments, and analyses (hereafter, global studies) provides a highly incomplete picture of the actual research landscape.</p><p>An analysis of the involvement of authors from misrepresented countries in global studies within the wider field of ecology and conservation (for methods, see Appendix 1: Panel S1) revealed strong regional disparities (Figure 1). In the publications that originated from these global studies (3731 in all), collaborations and authorship tended to be regionally concentrated in only a few economically developed countries, while regionally low-income countries were rarely involved. For example, in purportedly global studies that included at least one author from Africa, authors from low-income countries were involved in only 27% of publications (56 out of 209), which were dominated
全球科学受到持续的地理差异的影响,这些差异使研究向富裕国家和地区倾斜,主要是在欧洲和北美(Maas et al. 2021;Gomez et al. 2022)。尽管提高了认识,但在科学界促进包容性的努力往往使现有的偏见永久化。实际上,声称在其作者中具有全球代表性的研究大多倾向于来自特定国家的作者,通常是那些在给定大陆内经济更发达的国家。例如,在包括来自南美、非洲和亚洲的作者的研究合作中,这些作者主要隶属于少数几个经济发达国家——比如巴西、南非和中国——而这些大陆上的许多其他国家没有得到充分的代表。一般来说,这可能会让人误以为没有在代表性不足的国家进行研究。除了提供全球包容性的误导性形象外,排除这些地区的声音会导致数据缺口和研究的空间覆盖范围缩小,并忽视了提高边缘化国家科学能力的机会(Shaaban et al. 2024)。这一问题部分是由国际研究网络和财团推动的,这些研究网络和财团倾向于成熟的“传统”机构和专家,以及“降落伞研究”实践的持续存在。来自地区代表性不佳的国家的科学家往往面临着有限的专业知名度(例如在线简介、个人网站),以及对国际会议、资助和合作网络的限制——这进一步巩固了他们的地理排斥。此外,许多来自代表性不足的国家的学者经常在非英语语言或当地科学期刊上发表研究成果,这两种语言在主要的国际学术书目数据库(例如Web of Science, Scopus;Chowdhury et al. 2022)。因此,依靠这样的数据库来确定所谓的全球项目、评估和分析(以下简称全球研究)的代表性,对实际的研究前景提供了一个非常不完整的图景。对来自被歪曲的国家的作者参与更广泛的生态和保护领域的全球研究(方法见附录1:专题1)的分析显示出强烈的区域差异(图1)。在源自这些全球研究的出版物(总共3731份)中,合作和作者往往只集中在少数经济发达国家,而区域低收入国家很少参与。例如,在包括至少一名非洲作者的所谓全球研究中,来自低收入国家的作者只参与了27%的出版物(209篇中有56篇),而这些出版物主要是来自南非的作者(54%,209篇中有112篇)——是所有区域低收入国家总和的两倍。同样,在包含至少一位亚洲作者的全球研究中,来自低收入国家的作者仅占出版物的18%(1499篇中有273篇),其中来自中国的作者占主导地位(64%,1499篇中有958篇),其次是日本(13%,1499篇中有188篇)。同样,在包括至少一位南美作者的全球研究中,来自低收入国家的作者仅贡献了24%的出版物(277篇中有67篇),其中巴西作者占主导地位(64%,277篇中有176篇),其次是阿根廷(21%,277篇中有59篇)。来自区域低收入国家的作者参与度最低的是北美(5%,以中美洲国家为代表)和欧洲(14%,主要来自东欧和东南欧国家)。许多亚洲国家和绝大多数非洲国家只参与了一项研究,或者没有参与任何评估的研究(图1)。考虑到这些国家中有许多生物多样性水平很高,当地科学界迫切需要有效地实施保护计划,这一发现尤其令人担忧。由于作者来自这些被排除在外或代表性不足的国家,我们相信一个更综合的愿景不仅可以促进包容性,还可以通过整合不同的观点和资源来提高研究的质量和范围。为了培养真正的包容性,科学必须超越大洲,并在研究合作中优先考虑区域地理公平。这包括主动与代表性不足的国家的科学家接触,以及在组建国际研究团队和联盟时超越区域内的传统合作伙伴。 一个免费访问的在线数据库汇集了来自代表性不足地区的当地专家的当地专业知识描述和联系信息,这将大大提高边缘化科学家的知名度和合作机会。通过全球机构积极推动该平台,并将其与资助机会联系起来,这种工具可以促进持久、公平的伙伴关系,并确保将不同的声音纳入国际研究。此外,可持续性科学通过强调研究不公平的长期、系统解决方案,提供了一种补充方法。通过将公平、包容和能力建设原则纳入研究框架,可持续性科学可以帮助重塑国际合作,使其更加公正和有弹性。这意味着与当地科学家共同制定研究议程,确保知识交流是双向的,并促进以与全球相关的方式解决区域挑战的跨学科方法。将这些原则与结构性改革结合起来,将形成一个更平衡、更有代表性的全球研究生态系统(Clark and Harley 2020)。
{"title":"Moving beyond continents for global and inclusive science","authors":"Ivan Jarić,&nbsp;Christophe Diagne,&nbsp;Shawan Chowdhury","doi":"10.1002/fee.2851","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fee.2851","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Global science suffers from persistent geographical disparities that skew research toward affluent countries and regions, primarily in Europe and North America (Maas &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;span&gt;2021&lt;/span&gt;; Gomez &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;span&gt;2022&lt;/span&gt;). Despite increased awareness, efforts to foster inclusivity within scientific communities often perpetuate existing biases. Studies claiming to have global representation among their authors are, in reality, mostly skewed to authors from particular countries, typically those that are more economically developed within a given continent. For instance, in research collaborations that include authors from South America, Africa, and Asia, those authors are primarily affiliated with only a few economically developed countries—such as Brazil, South Africa, and China—leaving many other nations on those continents underrepresented. In general, this could deceptively suggest that research is not being conducted in the underrepresented countries. Besides providing a misleading image of global inclusiveness, excluding voices from these regions leads to data gaps and diminished spatial coverage of studies, and overlooks opportunities to enhance scientific capacity in marginalized countries (Shaaban &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;span&gt;2024&lt;/span&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This issue is partly driven by international research networks and consortia favoring established “traditional” institutions and experts, alongside the persistence of “parachute research” practices. Scientists from regionally misrepresented countries often face limited professional visibility (eg online profiles, personal websites), as well as restricted access to international conferences, funding, and collaboration networks—further entrenching their geographic exclusion. In addition, many scholars from underrepresented countries often publish research in non-English languages or local scientific journals, both of which are vastly unavailable in or excluded from major international scholarly bibliographic databases (eg Web of Science, Scopus; Chowdhury &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;span&gt;2022&lt;/span&gt;). Consequently, relying on such databases to ascertain representation within so-called global projects, assessments, and analyses (hereafter, global studies) provides a highly incomplete picture of the actual research landscape.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;An analysis of the involvement of authors from misrepresented countries in global studies within the wider field of ecology and conservation (for methods, see Appendix 1: Panel S1) revealed strong regional disparities (Figure 1). In the publications that originated from these global studies (3731 in all), collaborations and authorship tended to be regionally concentrated in only a few economically developed countries, while regionally low-income countries were rarely involved. For example, in purportedly global studies that included at least one author from Africa, authors from low-income countries were involved in only 27% of publications (56 out of 209), which were dominated ","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2851","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143900869","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Dam Beavers, for a more sustainable world 水坝海狸,为了一个更可持续的世界
IF 7.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-05-02 DOI: 10.1002/fee.2850
Brendan Fisher, Olivia Buchler, Mariano Rodriguez-Cabal

Beavers are everywhere…but not literally though. In fact, they are nowhere nearly as ubiquitous compared to where they used to be. Estimates suggest that while as many as 400 million beavers (Castor canadensis) were present in North America prior to European colonialization, there are around 10 million now. In Europe, by the end of the 19th century, the total number of Eurasian beavers (Castor fiber) was estimated to be just 1200 individuals scattered across eight isolated populations. A recent estimate puts the Eurasian beaver population at 1.5 million individuals (Mamm Rev 2021).

The reintroduction of beaver populations represents a major conservation success. Although modern beaver populations remain a fraction of their historical numbers, due to centuries of trapping and habitat loss, their recovery can be attributed to a suite of factors including not only effective conservation and legal protections, habitat restoration, and conflict resolution strategies, but also increased public awareness. Their resurgence, juxtaposed with the near-extirpation of C canadensis and C fiber from North America and Europe, respectively, may contribute to the perception that beavers are now widespread. However, recognizing this recovery within the context of historical population baselines underscores the continuing need for conservation and habitat restoration efforts.

Human fascination with this cute, orange-toothed, semi-aquatic rodent is encapsulated in several successful popular press books including Eager: The surprising, secret life of beavers and why they matter (White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green) by Ben Goldfarb; Beaverland: How one weird rodent made America (New York, NY: Twelve) by Leila Philip; and Bringing back the beaver: The story of one man's quest to rewild Britain's waterways (White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green) by Derek Gow. And there is now among the public a growing recognition of the ecological roles beavers play across the landscape. As ecosystem engineers, they actively shape their environments by regulating water flow, enhancing landscape resilience to wildfire, and creating critical habitat for a diverse array of species. A review out of the University of Helsinki of the ecosystem services that beavers provide would put a value of about $900 per hectare per year where beavers are active (Mamm Rev 2021).

Our lab began studying beavers after a 15-meter-long dam appeared seemingly overnight in one of the University of Vermont's Natural Areas. While students celebrated the new habitat, reactions were mixed, prompting us to reroute a trail and install signage highlighting the ecological benefits of these ecosystem engineers. This event sparked a series of research initiatives examining the ecological and social dimensions of beaver activity. We analyzed water quality upstream and downstream of beaver dams to assess their role in nutrient retentio

海狸到处都是,但不是字面上的。事实上,与过去相比,它们无处不在。据估计,在欧洲殖民之前,北美有多达4亿只海狸(Castor canadensis),现在大约有1000万只。在欧洲,到19世纪末,欧亚海狸(蓖麻纤维)的总数估计只有1200只,分散在8个孤立的种群中。最近的一项估计显示,欧亚海狸的数量为150万只(Mamm Rev 2021)。海狸种群的重新引入代表了一项重大的保护成功。尽管由于几个世纪以来的诱捕和栖息地的丧失,现代海狸的数量仍然是其历史数量的一小部分,但它们的恢复可以归因于一系列因素,不仅包括有效的保护和法律保护,栖息地恢复和冲突解决策略,而且还包括公众意识的提高。它们的复苏,与加拿大C和C纤维分别在北美和欧洲几乎绝迹的同时,可能导致人们认为海狸现在很普遍。然而,在历史人口基线范围内认识到这种恢复强调了继续需要进行保护和生境恢复工作。人类对这种可爱的、橙色牙齿的半水生啮齿动物的迷恋体现在几本成功的流行书籍中,包括本·戈德法布(Ben Goldfarb)的《渴望:海狸令人惊讶的秘密生活和它们的重要性》(怀特河交汇处,VT:切尔西格林);比弗兰:一只奇怪的啮齿动物如何创造了美国(纽约:12)莱拉·菲利普;德里克·高(Derek Gow)的《把海狸带回来》(Bringing the beaver),讲述了一个人试图让英国水道恢复野性的故事(怀特河枢纽,佛蒙特州:切尔西格林)。现在,公众越来越认识到海狸在整个景观中扮演的生态角色。作为生态系统工程师,他们通过调节水流、增强景观对野火的抵御能力、为各种物种创造重要的栖息地来积极塑造环境。赫尔辛基大学对海狸提供的生态系统服务进行的一项评估显示,在海狸活跃的地方,每年每公顷的价值约为900美元(Mamm Rev 2021)。佛蒙特大学的一个自然区域似乎在一夜之间出现了一个15米长的水坝,我们的实验室开始研究海狸。当学生们庆祝新栖息地时,反应不一,促使我们改变路线,并安装标志,突出这些生态系统工程师的生态效益。这一事件引发了一系列研究活动,研究海狸活动的生态和社会层面。我们分析了河狸坝上游和下游的水质,以评估其在营养保持中的作用,调查了水生大型无脊椎动物群落,以评估物种组成的变化,并进行了实验调查,比较了土地所有者和公众对河狸的看法。此外,我们采用定性编码技术分析了自1691年以来美国报纸上的文本,追踪了社会价值观对海狸的转变,从功利资源到奢侈品、保护优先级和滋扰物种。通过这种跨学科的方法,我们深入了解了海狸的生态功能以及它们与人类社区的复杂互动。我们了解到,海狸是检验社会经济和生态系统相互联系的理想模型,这促使我们采用不同的方法来探索景观尺度上的自然和社会科学问题。在对海狸进行了两年多的研究之后,我们证实了许多《前沿》读者可能已经意识到的一点:海狸为研究生态过程、景观动态和物种相互作用提供了一个强有力的视角。它们塑造生态系统的能力使它们成为评估生态系统服务的重要焦点;为恢复工作提供信息;研究人类与野生动物的互动、冲突和共存。此外,它们的濒临灭绝和随后的恢复,尽管基线发生了巨大变化,但突出了人类价值体系的流动性,以及它们随着时间和不同背景而演变的方式。许多物种反映了海狸的这些方面,可以作为保护和生态学的教学、研究和实践的陪衬,但海狸在景观上是非常明显的。它们很有魅力,看起来很有趣,也很顽皮——让它们搬进你的社区的成本和收益在短短几天内就可以观察到。通过一个生物的视角来看待景观、我们的生态网络和我们的社会系统是非常有益的,尽管这个生物非常有魅力。 在我们混乱、快速变化、经常令人沮丧的当前气候中,我们发现放慢速度——放大并深入参与到你觉得有趣的项目中——可能是一剂良药。作为科学家和学生,在我们通常供不应求、资源有限、忙碌的生活中,像Castor spp这样一个鼓舞人心的焦点可以让我们,至少在每天或每周的一小段时间里,忽略我们的社会政治背景每小时都在变化的风向,对我们周围不断变化的自然世界微笑。
{"title":"Dam Beavers, for a more sustainable world","authors":"Brendan Fisher,&nbsp;Olivia Buchler,&nbsp;Mariano Rodriguez-Cabal","doi":"10.1002/fee.2850","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fee.2850","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Beavers are everywhere…but not literally though. In fact, they are nowhere nearly as ubiquitous compared to where they used to be. Estimates suggest that while as many as 400 million beavers (<i>Castor canadensis</i>) were present in North America prior to European colonialization, there are around 10 million now. In Europe, by the end of the 19th century, the total number of Eurasian beavers (<i>Castor fiber</i>) was estimated to be just 1200 individuals scattered across eight isolated populations. A recent estimate puts the Eurasian beaver population at 1.5 million individuals (<i>Mamm Rev</i> 2021).</p><p>The reintroduction of beaver populations represents a major conservation success. Although modern beaver populations remain a fraction of their historical numbers, due to centuries of trapping and habitat loss, their recovery can be attributed to a suite of factors including not only effective conservation and legal protections, habitat restoration, and conflict resolution strategies, but also increased public awareness. Their resurgence, juxtaposed with the near-extirpation of <i>C canadensis</i> and <i>C fiber</i> from North America and Europe, respectively, may contribute to the perception that beavers are now widespread. However, recognizing this recovery within the context of historical population baselines underscores the continuing need for conservation and habitat restoration efforts.</p><p>Human fascination with this cute, orange-toothed, semi-aquatic rodent is encapsulated in several successful popular press books including <i>Eager: The surprising, secret life of beavers and why they matter</i> (White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green) by Ben Goldfarb; <i>Beaverland: How one weird rodent made America</i> (New York, NY: Twelve) by Leila Philip; and <i>Bringing back the beaver: The story of one man's quest to rewild Britain's waterways</i> (White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green) by Derek Gow. And there is now among the public a growing recognition of the ecological roles beavers play across the landscape. As ecosystem engineers, they actively shape their environments by regulating water flow, enhancing landscape resilience to wildfire, and creating critical habitat for a diverse array of species. A review out of the University of Helsinki of the ecosystem services that beavers provide would put a value of about $900 per hectare per year where beavers are active (<i>Mamm Rev</i> 2021).</p><p>Our lab began studying beavers after a 15-meter-long dam appeared seemingly overnight in one of the University of Vermont's Natural Areas. While students celebrated the new habitat, reactions were mixed, prompting us to reroute a trail and install signage highlighting the ecological benefits of these ecosystem engineers. This event sparked a series of research initiatives examining the ecological and social dimensions of beaver activity. We analyzed water quality upstream and downstream of beaver dams to assess their role in nutrient retentio","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2850","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143900872","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1