Current conceptions of “urban biodiversity” address only particular taxa, ignoring the full richness of species within cities. Despite their exclusion from these conceptions, tree-dwelling lichens, mosses, and liverworts (collectively, “epiphytes”) are recognized as bioindicators of urbanization, but their inherent contributions to biodiversity are largely unrecognized. Here, we report on a survey of epiphytes in the city of Vancouver, Canada. Using Bayesian multilevel models, we asked the following questions: how diverse are epiphytes in this large temperate city, and what urban and host-tree factors determine their distribution? We found 39 macrolichen, 32 moss, and seven liverwort species on Vancouver street trees, establishing them as rich microenvironments influenced by a network of interacting factors previously unaccounted for. Our results challenge the idea that pollution and urban heat islands primarily regulate urban epiphyte diversity; instead, we identify host-tree genus as having strong effects on all epiphytes. Expanding urban biodiversity to include epiphyte diversity recharacterizes urban landscapes as rewilded spaces of interdependent coexistence.
{"title":"Re-envisioning urban landscapes: lichens, liverworts, and mosses coexist spontaneously with us","authors":"Nicole J Jung, Harold N Eyster, Kai MA Chan","doi":"10.1002/fee.2836","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fee.2836","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Current conceptions of “urban biodiversity” address only particular taxa, ignoring the full richness of species within cities. Despite their exclusion from these conceptions, tree-dwelling lichens, mosses, and liverworts (collectively, “epiphytes”) are recognized as bioindicators of urbanization, but their inherent contributions to biodiversity are largely unrecognized. Here, we report on a survey of epiphytes in the city of Vancouver, Canada. Using Bayesian multilevel models, we asked the following questions: how diverse are epiphytes in this large temperate city, and what urban and host-tree factors determine their distribution? We found 39 macrolichen, 32 moss, and seven liverwort species on Vancouver street trees, establishing them as rich microenvironments influenced by a network of interacting factors previously unaccounted for. Our results challenge the idea that pollution and urban heat islands primarily regulate urban epiphyte diversity; instead, we identify host-tree genus as having strong effects on all epiphytes. Expanding urban biodiversity to include epiphyte diversity recharacterizes urban landscapes as rewilded spaces of interdependent coexistence.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2836","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144751477","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Liba Pejchar, Christine C Rega-Brodsky, Luis-Bernardo Vázquez, Ian MacGregor-Fors
All cities are home to birds, which, through their activities, can either enhance or detract from human well-being. To identify such interactions, we synthesize current understanding of bird-mediated ecosystem services and disservices in cities. We find widespread evidence that birds provide cultural services, but the link between urban bird diversity and these benefits is surprisingly tenuous. Birds also have potential to provide regulating services; however, rather than being measured, these services are usually assumed from non-urban research, and may be overestimated (eg pollination, seed dispersal) or undervalued (decomposition, nutrient cycling). People's perceptions of birds are not uniform, and services are not always delivered equitably among residents. We call for moving beyond using species richness and traits as proxies, and instead explicitly measuring services and disservices across the heterogeneous urban landscape. Such information is critical to designing cities that sustain biodiversity and result in net positive, and equitable, benefits to people.
{"title":"Bird-mediated ecosystem services and disservices in cities and towns","authors":"Liba Pejchar, Christine C Rega-Brodsky, Luis-Bernardo Vázquez, Ian MacGregor-Fors","doi":"10.1002/fee.2835","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fee.2835","url":null,"abstract":"<p>All cities are home to birds, which, through their activities, can either enhance or detract from human well-being. To identify such interactions, we synthesize current understanding of bird-mediated ecosystem services and disservices in cities. We find widespread evidence that birds provide cultural services, but the link between urban bird diversity and these benefits is surprisingly tenuous. Birds also have potential to provide regulating services; however, rather than being measured, these services are usually assumed from non-urban research, and may be overestimated (eg pollination, seed dispersal) or undervalued (decomposition, nutrient cycling). People's perceptions of birds are not uniform, and services are not always delivered equitably among residents. We call for moving beyond using species richness and traits as proxies, and instead explicitly measuring services and disservices across the heterogeneous urban landscape. Such information is critical to designing cities that sustain biodiversity and result in net positive, and equitable, benefits to people.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144191073","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Aaron S David, Sahas Barve, Elizabeth H Boughton, Joshua H Daskin, Hilary M Swain
<p>As society navigates unprecedented global change, we need science-backed solutions to confront compounding ecological crises. While we ecologists often intend to do impactful science that addresses these crises, too often we are guilty of “hoping”, rather than “planning”, for impact. Within ecologically minded institutions, having planned impacts increases the likelihood of success and starts with a well-defined <i>mission</i>, which states the organization's purpose and guides its activities. Mission-oriented science can influence agency policy, shape sustainable land-use planning, guide management best practices, train future scientists, and more. However, the challenge is to build from mission-oriented science to maximize impact. Here, we identify three key ingredients of a recipe for achieving impact: (1) <i>synergistic science</i>, (2) <i>knowledge of place</i>, and (3) <i>bridging to partners</i>. Although grounded in our experiences at Archbold Biological Station, a nonprofit field station in south-central Florida, and in our collective knowledge of similar stations, we believe these ingredients are broadly applicable across scientific institutions.</p><p><i>Synergistic science</i> refers to teams of researchers working together toward an institution's mission. Simply put, complex environmental challenges require diverse teams to address them holistically. For example, Archbold's fire management plan is based on decades of our own science across taxa, providing a comprehensive framework for balancing the fire needs of multiple organisms, and, to date, resulting in >350 prescribed burns of an endangered scrub ecosystem. Synergistic science may be interdisciplinary or emerge from participation in formal research networks (eg USDA's Long-Term Agroecosystem Research [LTAR] network). For instance, testing strategies for sustainable agroecosystems required synthesizing data collected by 18 researchers from 53 long-term co-located studies of biodiversity, water quality, soils, and greenhouse gases at Archbold’s Buck Island Ranch (Nat Commun 2023).</p><p><i>Knowledge of place</i> refers to a deep understanding of local or regional ecosystems, biota, and processes, and to being a trusted information source among key stakeholders in governmental, academic, nonprofit, and for-profit sectors (Univ. of Chicago Press 2010). Solutions to large-scale environmental challenges arise from local actions based on knowledge of place. Developing knowledge of place is often not straightforward and may require lengthy engagement to build relevant expertise, resources, datasets, and partnerships. Ultimately, knowledge of place allows organizations a seat at the table in decision making; in our case, such knowledge allows staff to engage closely with county planners on policies supporting prescribed fire, establishing conservation areas, and avoiding development sprawl.</p><p><i>Bridging to partners</i> refers to how the organization works with other, mission-
{"title":"A field station's recipe for impactful science","authors":"Aaron S David, Sahas Barve, Elizabeth H Boughton, Joshua H Daskin, Hilary M Swain","doi":"10.1002/fee.2833","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fee.2833","url":null,"abstract":"<p>As society navigates unprecedented global change, we need science-backed solutions to confront compounding ecological crises. While we ecologists often intend to do impactful science that addresses these crises, too often we are guilty of “hoping”, rather than “planning”, for impact. Within ecologically minded institutions, having planned impacts increases the likelihood of success and starts with a well-defined <i>mission</i>, which states the organization's purpose and guides its activities. Mission-oriented science can influence agency policy, shape sustainable land-use planning, guide management best practices, train future scientists, and more. However, the challenge is to build from mission-oriented science to maximize impact. Here, we identify three key ingredients of a recipe for achieving impact: (1) <i>synergistic science</i>, (2) <i>knowledge of place</i>, and (3) <i>bridging to partners</i>. Although grounded in our experiences at Archbold Biological Station, a nonprofit field station in south-central Florida, and in our collective knowledge of similar stations, we believe these ingredients are broadly applicable across scientific institutions.</p><p><i>Synergistic science</i> refers to teams of researchers working together toward an institution's mission. Simply put, complex environmental challenges require diverse teams to address them holistically. For example, Archbold's fire management plan is based on decades of our own science across taxa, providing a comprehensive framework for balancing the fire needs of multiple organisms, and, to date, resulting in >350 prescribed burns of an endangered scrub ecosystem. Synergistic science may be interdisciplinary or emerge from participation in formal research networks (eg USDA's Long-Term Agroecosystem Research [LTAR] network). For instance, testing strategies for sustainable agroecosystems required synthesizing data collected by 18 researchers from 53 long-term co-located studies of biodiversity, water quality, soils, and greenhouse gases at Archbold’s Buck Island Ranch (Nat Commun 2023).</p><p><i>Knowledge of place</i> refers to a deep understanding of local or regional ecosystems, biota, and processes, and to being a trusted information source among key stakeholders in governmental, academic, nonprofit, and for-profit sectors (Univ. of Chicago Press 2010). Solutions to large-scale environmental challenges arise from local actions based on knowledge of place. Developing knowledge of place is often not straightforward and may require lengthy engagement to build relevant expertise, resources, datasets, and partnerships. Ultimately, knowledge of place allows organizations a seat at the table in decision making; in our case, such knowledge allows staff to engage closely with county planners on policies supporting prescribed fire, establishing conservation areas, and avoiding development sprawl.</p><p><i>Bridging to partners</i> refers to how the organization works with other, mission-","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2833","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143111292","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Brett M Seymoure, Rachel Buxton, Jeremy M White, Carlos R Linares, Kurt Fristrup, Kevin Crooks, George Wittemyer, Lisa Angeloni
We document the importance of low-light conditions in 136 animal species and then translate the new world atlas of skyglow, which reports artificial night sky brightness, into estimates of anthropogenic illuminance (that is, artificial light reaching Earth's surface). Quantifying habitat illuminance from skyglow facilitates understanding of the disruption of natural light cycles, such as new moon conditions, which are critical to animal ecology. We corroborated this transformation of sky brightness by comparing concurrent field measurements of skyglow and illuminance. We then quantified global artificial illuminance caused by skyglow, finding that skyglow artificially doubled illuminance of new moon conditions—a critical phase for biological processes, such as foraging, courtship, and mating—for 22.9% of the Earth's terrestrial surface, 51.0% of Key Biodiversity Areas, 77.1% of Global Protected Areas, and ~20% of highly diverse areas for mammals, birds, and amphibians. We provide summaries of artificial illuminance at 750-m pixel resolution for each protected area to aid land managers and guide policy in reducing skyglow in areas that may yield the greatest benefits for conserving animal biodiversity.
{"title":"Global artificial light masks biologically important light cycles of animals","authors":"Brett M Seymoure, Rachel Buxton, Jeremy M White, Carlos R Linares, Kurt Fristrup, Kevin Crooks, George Wittemyer, Lisa Angeloni","doi":"10.1002/fee.2832","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fee.2832","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We document the importance of low-light conditions in 136 animal species and then translate the new world atlas of skyglow, which reports artificial night sky brightness, into estimates of anthropogenic illuminance (that is, artificial light reaching Earth's surface). Quantifying habitat illuminance from skyglow facilitates understanding of the disruption of natural light cycles, such as new moon conditions, which are critical to animal ecology. We corroborated this transformation of sky brightness by comparing concurrent field measurements of skyglow and illuminance. We then quantified global artificial illuminance caused by skyglow, finding that skyglow artificially doubled illuminance of new moon conditions—a critical phase for biological processes, such as foraging, courtship, and mating—for 22.9% of the Earth's terrestrial surface, 51.0% of Key Biodiversity Areas, 77.1% of Global Protected Areas, and ~20% of highly diverse areas for mammals, birds, and amphibians. We provide summaries of artificial illuminance at 750-m pixel resolution for each protected area to aid land managers and guide policy in reducing skyglow in areas that may yield the greatest benefits for conserving animal biodiversity.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2832","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143900933","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Danny Caudill, Joshua H Schmidt, Graham G Frye, Elaine D Gallenberg, Gretchen Caudill, Jerrold L Belant
<p>Cassidy <i>et al</i>. (<span>2023</span>) evaluated the effect of mortality on aspects of gray wolf (<i>Canis lupus</i>) demography, concluding that “…human activities can have major negative effects on the biological processes…”. We agree that the effects of human-caused mortalities on wildlife are of broad interest (eg Caudill <i>et al</i>. <span>2017</span>; Schmidt <i>et al</i>. <span>2017</span>; Frye <i>et al</i>. <span>2022</span>). However, we contend Cassidy <i>et al</i>.'s study has shortcomings with regard to its data, design, biological inference, and statistical interpretation.</p><p>Although potentially resolvable, Cassidy <i>et al</i>.'s data contain inconsistencies and are sparse across covariate values (as detailed in Data S1, available at https://irma.nps.gov/DataStore/Reference/Profile/2302764), leading to uncertainty in the reliability and generalizability of their results. For example, missing covariate values resulted in the misapplication of model selection procedures and the exclusion of nearly all data from Voyageurs National Park from some models. Furthermore, the random effects were inappropriately structured and unstable, potentially because one site (Yukon-Charley Rivers National Preserve; YUCH) contained all observations of human-caused mortalities of >4 wolves and most observations of ≥2 leaders lost. Cassidy <i>et al</i>.'s results were also disproportionately influenced by YUCH (Data S1). Moreover, wolf harvest legally occurs within portions of Denali National Park and Preserve and YUCH, and about 62% of mortalities observed in YUCH were attributable to lethal control programs in the surrounding area (~25% of mortalities in the entire dataset were attributed to lethal control). Hence, inference on harvest and wolf control in general (eg transboundary management) is ambiguous. Instead, the results of Cassidy <i>et al</i>. may reflect the previously documented negative impact on wolf demography from a specific lethal management action conducted adjacent to YUCH (Schmidt <i>et al</i>. <span>2017</span>).</p><p>The most critical limitation within Cassidy <i>et al</i>. is the study design. To provide reliable inference, a design must adequately exclude alternate hypotheses (ie Platt <span>1964</span>). A design focused on any subset of mortality types in isolation could represent an a priori false null hypothesis because mortality in general could be negatively related to pack demography. The mixed logistic regression models in Cassidy <i>et al</i>. compared a group of packs in which human-caused mortality was observed (along with an unknown level of natural mortality) to a “contaminated” control group of packs in which human-caused mortality was not observed (but which also experienced unknown levels of natural mortality and human-caused mortality of non-collared pack members). This design cannot exclude the alternate hypothesis that any type of mortality (including natural mortality) could have caused the obser
Cassidy等人(2023)评估了死亡率对灰狼(Canis lupus)人口学方面的影响,得出的结论是“……人类活动可能对生物过程产生重大负面影响……”。我们同意,人类造成的死亡对野生动物的影响具有广泛的利益(例如Caudill等人。2017;Schmidt et al. 2017;Frye et al. 2022)。然而,我们认为Cassidy等人的研究在数据、设计、生物学推断和统计解释方面存在不足。虽然可以解决,但Cassidy等人的数据包含不一致性,并且在协变量值上是稀疏的(详见数据S1,可在https://irma.nps.gov/DataStore/Reference/Profile/2302764上获得),导致其结果的可靠性和普遍性存在不确定性。例如,协变量值的缺失导致模型选择程序的错误应用,并且从某些模型中排除了旅行者国家公园的几乎所有数据。此外,随机效应结构不当且不稳定,可能是因为一个地点(育空-查理河国家保护区;YUCH)包含了4只狼的所有人为死亡的观察结果和2只狼首领丢失的大部分观察结果。Cassidy等人的结果也不成比例地受到了YUCH的影响(数据S1)。此外,在Denali国家公园和保护区以及YUCH的部分区域内合法地进行了狼的捕杀,并且在YUCH观察到的约62%的死亡率可归因于周围地区的致命控制计划(整个数据集中约25%的死亡率归因于致命控制)。因此,对一般的收获和狼的控制(如跨界管理)的推断是模糊的。相反,Cassidy等人的结果可能反映了先前记录的在YUCH附近进行的特定致命管理行动对狼人口统计学的负面影响(Schmidt et al. 2017)。Cassidy等人研究中最关键的限制是研究设计。为了提供可靠的推断,设计必须充分排除其他假设(如Platt 1964)。孤立地关注任何死亡类型子集的设计都可能代表先验的错误零假设,因为总体上死亡率可能与族群人口统计学负相关。Cassidy等人的混合逻辑回归模型将一组观察到人为死亡率(以及未知的自然死亡率)的族群与一组未观察到人为死亡率(但也经历了未知水平的自然死亡率和未戴项圈的族群成员人为死亡率)的“污染”对照组进行了比较。该设计不能排除另一种假设,即任何类型的死亡(包括自然死亡)都可能导致Cassidy等人特别归因于人为原因的观察结果。Borg等人(2015)使用这些相同数据的子集与繁殖狼死亡的案例,通过将每种损失分类为自然或人为原因,比较了特定原因的结果,但没有发现人类特定影响的支持(JAE 2017)。虽然Cassidy等人的设计可以支持种群动态与死亡率之间的负相关(即Borg等人,2015),但它不能提供断言的人类特定推断,这是本文的重点。最后,统计上显著的结果并不一定具有生物学意义(Johnson 1999;Wasserstein and Lazar 2016)。Cassidy等人将统计学上显著的大比值比和条件概率解释为生物学上的大影响。然而,逻辑回归从统计种群中估计参数(Sokal和Rohlf 1981),这可能难以解释(Agresti 2013),并且需要背景来评估其生物学重要性。例如,大的优势比或条件概率可能代表很少的绝对风险(见Andrade 2015)。在Cassidy等人的研究中,受污染的对照组含有大部分包年的样本,并且持续保持较高的比率。在观察到领队因人为原因死亡的一组中,有更少的族群年,而且只有一半以上的族群年持续死亡(见附录S1:图S1)。因此,逻辑回归估计了很大的优势比,因为在污染对照组中观察到的种群持续存在的可能性很高,但种群溶解的联合概率更相似(数据S2,可在https://irma.nps.gov/DataStore/Reference/Profile/2302764上获得)。我们认为,除了条件度量之外,风险的绝对度量为评估生物重要性提供了更好的环境。例如,忽略对照样本的污染,我们计算了人口归因风险(PAR);Fleiss et al. 2003),以量化可具体归因于观察到的人为死亡的溶解比例。 假设样本中观察到的人为死亡率代表了总体死亡率,我们估计PAR为2.9%(数据S2)。人类当然可以影响狼(Hornaday 1913;Schmidt et al. 2017)和人类-掠食者冲突可能需要比人口更精细的规模管理(例如Mech 1995;Caudill et al. 2019)。然而,生物种群通常是野生动物管理发生的规模(Krausman 2022),部分原因是种群是具有适应和持续存在潜力的单位,超出了任何个体的生命。尽管对受影响的个体(或群体)来说,死亡无疑是必然的后果,但野生动物种群往往表现出可以抵消生物影响的补偿机制(Cooch et al. 2014;Caudill et al. 2017)。无论如何,管理目标,以及由此产生的可接受的生物影响,最终取决于决策者设定的基于价值的目标。为了履行他们的信任责任,特别是对于有争议的问题(例如沿着行政边界与不同的管理目标),决策者需要严格和明确传达的科学信息。我们的目的是强调Cassidy等人的局限性,以便读者和政策制定者将有更好的背景来更好地解释其中的发现。
{"title":"Wolves and human-caused mortality—a reply to Cassidy et al.","authors":"Danny Caudill, Joshua H Schmidt, Graham G Frye, Elaine D Gallenberg, Gretchen Caudill, Jerrold L Belant","doi":"10.1002/fee.2830","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fee.2830","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cassidy <i>et al</i>. (<span>2023</span>) evaluated the effect of mortality on aspects of gray wolf (<i>Canis lupus</i>) demography, concluding that “…human activities can have major negative effects on the biological processes…”. We agree that the effects of human-caused mortalities on wildlife are of broad interest (eg Caudill <i>et al</i>. <span>2017</span>; Schmidt <i>et al</i>. <span>2017</span>; Frye <i>et al</i>. <span>2022</span>). However, we contend Cassidy <i>et al</i>.'s study has shortcomings with regard to its data, design, biological inference, and statistical interpretation.</p><p>Although potentially resolvable, Cassidy <i>et al</i>.'s data contain inconsistencies and are sparse across covariate values (as detailed in Data S1, available at https://irma.nps.gov/DataStore/Reference/Profile/2302764), leading to uncertainty in the reliability and generalizability of their results. For example, missing covariate values resulted in the misapplication of model selection procedures and the exclusion of nearly all data from Voyageurs National Park from some models. Furthermore, the random effects were inappropriately structured and unstable, potentially because one site (Yukon-Charley Rivers National Preserve; YUCH) contained all observations of human-caused mortalities of >4 wolves and most observations of ≥2 leaders lost. Cassidy <i>et al</i>.'s results were also disproportionately influenced by YUCH (Data S1). Moreover, wolf harvest legally occurs within portions of Denali National Park and Preserve and YUCH, and about 62% of mortalities observed in YUCH were attributable to lethal control programs in the surrounding area (~25% of mortalities in the entire dataset were attributed to lethal control). Hence, inference on harvest and wolf control in general (eg transboundary management) is ambiguous. Instead, the results of Cassidy <i>et al</i>. may reflect the previously documented negative impact on wolf demography from a specific lethal management action conducted adjacent to YUCH (Schmidt <i>et al</i>. <span>2017</span>).</p><p>The most critical limitation within Cassidy <i>et al</i>. is the study design. To provide reliable inference, a design must adequately exclude alternate hypotheses (ie Platt <span>1964</span>). A design focused on any subset of mortality types in isolation could represent an a priori false null hypothesis because mortality in general could be negatively related to pack demography. The mixed logistic regression models in Cassidy <i>et al</i>. compared a group of packs in which human-caused mortality was observed (along with an unknown level of natural mortality) to a “contaminated” control group of packs in which human-caused mortality was not observed (but which also experienced unknown levels of natural mortality and human-caused mortality of non-collared pack members). This design cannot exclude the alternate hypothesis that any type of mortality (including natural mortality) could have caused the obser","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2830","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143117025","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
David H Klinges, Ilya MD Maclean, Brett R Scheffers
Scientists have long categorized the planet's climate using the Köppen-Geiger (KG) classification to research climate-change impacts, biogeographical realms, agricultural suitability, and conservation. However, global KG maps primarily rely on macroclimate data collected by weather stations, which may not represent microclimatic conditions experienced by most life on Earth. Few studies have explored microclimate at broad scales, largely due to data and computational constraints. Here, we predicted KG classes separately from macroclimate and microclimate for more than 32 million locations across six continents. As compared to macroclimate, microclimate had 14-fold lower error and reclassified 38% of the total area. Microclimate-derived KG classes were not only more spatially variable but also encompassed a broader range of latitudes, relative to macroclimate-derived KG classes. By redrawing the lines of climate classes, our study prompts a reevaluation of the importance of meteorological drivers of ecology across scales, shedding light on how natural, agricultural, and social systems experience and respond to global change.
{"title":"Redrawing Köppen-Geiger classes with microclimate: implications for nature and society","authors":"David H Klinges, Ilya MD Maclean, Brett R Scheffers","doi":"10.1002/fee.2831","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fee.2831","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Scientists have long categorized the planet's climate using the Köppen-Geiger (KG) classification to research climate-change impacts, biogeographical realms, agricultural suitability, and conservation. However, global KG maps primarily rely on macroclimate data collected by weather stations, which may not represent microclimatic conditions experienced by most life on Earth. Few studies have explored microclimate at broad scales, largely due to data and computational constraints. Here, we predicted KG classes separately from macroclimate and microclimate for more than 32 million locations across six continents. As compared to macroclimate, microclimate had 14-fold lower error and reclassified 38% of the total area. Microclimate-derived KG classes were not only more spatially variable but also encompassed a broader range of latitudes, relative to macroclimate-derived KG classes. By redrawing the lines of climate classes, our study prompts a reevaluation of the importance of meteorological drivers of ecology across scales, shedding light on how natural, agricultural, and social systems experience and respond to global change.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144190896","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jonathan D Cook, Evan H Campbell Grant, Howard S Ginsberg, Diann J Prosser, Michael C Runge
One Health initiatives have advanced zoonotic disease management by recognizing the interconnectedness of three sectors of governance (human, ecosystem, and animal) and by identifying options that can improve full-system health. Although One Health has had many successes, its full realization may be inhibited by a lack of strategies to overcome simultaneous impediments in decision making and governance. Decision impediments that hinder management may include uncertainty, risk, resource limitations, and trade-offs among objectives. Governance impediments arise from disparities in costs and benefits of disease management among sectors. Tools and strategies developed from decision science, collaboration, and negotiation theory can help articulate and overcome coinciding decision and governance impediments and enhance multisectoral One Health initiatives. In cases where collaboration and negotiation are insufficient to address disparities in cross-sector costs and benefits, altering incentive structures might improve disease-specific outcomes and improve the realization of One Health.
{"title":"Enhancing One Health outcomes using decision science and negotiation","authors":"Jonathan D Cook, Evan H Campbell Grant, Howard S Ginsberg, Diann J Prosser, Michael C Runge","doi":"10.1002/fee.2827","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fee.2827","url":null,"abstract":"<p>One Health initiatives have advanced zoonotic disease management by recognizing the interconnectedness of three sectors of governance (human, ecosystem, and animal) and by identifying options that can improve full-system health. Although One Health has had many successes, its full realization may be inhibited by a lack of strategies to overcome simultaneous impediments in decision making and governance. Decision impediments that hinder management may include uncertainty, risk, resource limitations, and trade-offs among objectives. Governance impediments arise from disparities in costs and benefits of disease management among sectors. Tools and strategies developed from decision science, collaboration, and negotiation theory can help articulate and overcome coinciding decision and governance impediments and enhance multisectoral One Health initiatives. In cases where collaboration and negotiation are insufficient to address disparities in cross-sector costs and benefits, altering incentive structures might improve disease-specific outcomes and improve the realization of One Health.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2827","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143901027","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Globalization is increasing the threat of invasive forest insects to ecosystems. Control efforts against the same pest species progressively occur across distant jurisdictions as integrated pest management (IPM) programs or tactics developed in one region are adopted by another region. This knowledge exchange accelerates responses and collaboration; however, transplanted IPM programs can overlook preexisting or emerging differences between regions, which may explain their varying success. These differences include biological variation in the pest system, environmental conditions, issues of scale and capacity of the response, regulatory environment, and cultural context. We examine the role of these factors in the adoption and outcomes of IPM programs, drawing from case studies and an online survey of forestry IPM experts. To facilitate regional adaptation of IPM programs during their adoption and implementation in new regions, we propose an evaluation framework and recommend approaches to not only reduce risks but also maximize uptake, efficacy, and resilience.
{"title":"Regional adaptation of integrated pest management to control invasive forest insects","authors":"Michael Stastny, Juan C Corley, Jeremy D Allison","doi":"10.1002/fee.2829","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fee.2829","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Globalization is increasing the threat of invasive forest insects to ecosystems. Control efforts against the same pest species progressively occur across distant jurisdictions as integrated pest management (IPM) programs or tactics developed in one region are adopted by another region. This knowledge exchange accelerates responses and collaboration; however, transplanted IPM programs can overlook preexisting or emerging differences between regions, which may explain their varying success. These differences include biological variation in the pest system, environmental conditions, issues of scale and capacity of the response, regulatory environment, and cultural context. We examine the role of these factors in the adoption and outcomes of IPM programs, drawing from case studies and an online survey of forestry IPM experts. To facilitate regional adaptation of IPM programs during their adoption and implementation in new regions, we propose an evaluation framework and recommend approaches to not only reduce risks but also maximize uptake, efficacy, and resilience.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2829","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144191138","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In a changing world, predicting ecosystem functions is essential to ensuring human well-being and survival. However, commonly used trait-based predictive approaches frequently lack predictive power. Statistical and conceptual attempts to better incorporate environmental factors into trait-based predictions have done so by integrating indirect, trait-mediated effects therein. Here, we define ecosystem functions as changes in the state, position, or nature of energy or matter within an ecosystem, and then illustrate how environmental factors can directly affect ecosystem functions. Given that the effects of organismal traits and environmental factors are not necessarily additive, we also propose that interactions between organismal traits and environmental factors (hereafter, trait–environment interactions) have explanatory power. We propose a conceptual framework in which organismal traits, environmental factors, and trait–environment interactions, together with the environment's effects on traits (plasticity) and traits’ effects on the environment (ecosystem engineering), can explain ecosystem functions. We conclude by discussing the importance of considering trait–environment interactions and identifying future avenues of exploration.
{"title":"Harnessing trait–environment interactions to predict ecosystem functions","authors":"Manuel Blouin, Florence Dubs, Jean-François Ponge","doi":"10.1002/fee.2826","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fee.2826","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In a changing world, predicting ecosystem functions is essential to ensuring human well-being and survival. However, commonly used trait-based predictive approaches frequently lack predictive power. Statistical and conceptual attempts to better incorporate environmental factors into trait-based predictions have done so by integrating indirect, trait-mediated effects therein. Here, we define ecosystem functions as changes in the state, position, or nature of energy or matter within an ecosystem, and then illustrate how environmental factors can directly affect ecosystem functions. Given that the effects of organismal traits and environmental factors are not necessarily additive, we also propose that interactions between organismal traits and environmental factors (hereafter, trait–environment interactions) have explanatory power. We propose a conceptual framework in which organismal traits, environmental factors, and trait–environment interactions, together with the environment's effects on traits (plasticity) and traits’ effects on the environment (ecosystem engineering), can explain ecosystem functions. We conclude by discussing the importance of considering trait–environment interactions and identifying future avenues of exploration.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143901011","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kieran D Cox, Hailey L Davies, Audrey Looby, Kelsie A Murchy, Francis Juanes, Isabelle M Côté
The nexus between changing habitats, faunal communities, and anthropogenic stressors represents an enduring conservation challenge. We propose that habitat-mediated soundscape conservation—the ability of biogenic habitats to attenuate anthropogenic noise—plays an unrecognized role in mitigating underwater noise pollution, a pervasive disturbance that disrupts the ability of species to perceive acoustic cues and communicate. We hypothesize that noise attenuation depends on the composition and physical complexity of biogenic habitats, and severe habitat degradation can cause acoustic conditions to exceed ecological tipping points, resulting in the emergence of alternative acoustic states. We examine this concept in coral reefs and kelp forests, given that the global decline of both ecosystems provides the requisite conditions to investigate our hypothesis. We then explore why anthropogenic structures fail to provide acoustic refugia. Finally, we assess whether habitat restoration or acoustic enrichment can reestablish natural soundscapes. Our review underscores the importance of considering habitat degradation when evaluating the risk that pollutants pose to ecosystems.
{"title":"Habitat-mediated soundscape conservation in marine ecosystems","authors":"Kieran D Cox, Hailey L Davies, Audrey Looby, Kelsie A Murchy, Francis Juanes, Isabelle M Côté","doi":"10.1002/fee.2824","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fee.2824","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The nexus between changing habitats, faunal communities, and anthropogenic stressors represents an enduring conservation challenge. We propose that habitat-mediated soundscape conservation—the ability of biogenic habitats to attenuate anthropogenic noise—plays an unrecognized role in mitigating underwater noise pollution, a pervasive disturbance that disrupts the ability of species to perceive acoustic cues and communicate. We hypothesize that noise attenuation depends on the composition and physical complexity of biogenic habitats, and severe habitat degradation can cause acoustic conditions to exceed ecological tipping points, resulting in the emergence of alternative acoustic states. We examine this concept in coral reefs and kelp forests, given that the global decline of both ecosystems provides the requisite conditions to investigate our hypothesis. We then explore why anthropogenic structures fail to provide acoustic refugia. Finally, we assess whether habitat restoration or acoustic enrichment can reestablish natural soundscapes. Our review underscores the importance of considering habitat degradation when evaluating the risk that pollutants pose to ecosystems.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2824","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143530790","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}