首页 > 最新文献

Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment最新文献

英文 中文
Intentional and unintentional changes to avian and mammalian diversities in the UK 有意无意地改变了英国鸟类和哺乳动物的多样性
IF 7.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-03-11 DOI: 10.1002/fee.2842
Wenyuan Zhang, Kevin J Gaston, Ben C Sheldon, Richard Grenyer

Rewilding is emerging as a promising restoration strategy to tackle the challenges posed by global change and maintain natural ecosystems and their biodiversity. However, rewilding has also been criticized for the absence of a consistent definition and insufficient knowledge about its possible outcomes. Here, we explored the effects of rewilding on filling functional gaps created by the extirpation of native species. We contrasted rewilding with three other mechanisms for change in community composition—species extirpation, species introduction, and unassisted colonization—in terms of their impacts on changes in avian and mammalian diversity in the UK. We found that (i) while rewilding increases functional diversity most on average, introduced/naturalized birds contribute more functional uniqueness to native functional space than other groups of birds; and (ii) changes in functional diversity associated with “rewilded” organisms were species-dependent and idiosyncratic. Our results suggest that although rewilding can expand or infill native functional trait space to some extent, such effects require careful assessment.

为了应对全球变化带来的挑战,维护自然生态系统及其生物多样性,野生化正成为一种有希望的恢复策略。然而,野化也因缺乏一致的定义和对其可能结果的认识不足而受到批评。在这里,我们探讨了野化对填补本地物种灭绝所造成的功能空白的影响。我们对比了放归与群落组成变化的其他三种机制——物种灭绝、物种引入和无辅助定植——对英国鸟类和哺乳动物多样性变化的影响。结果表明:(1)虽然再野化对功能多样性的贡献最大,但引进/归化鸟类对本地功能空间的贡献比其他类群更大;(ii)与“再野化”生物体相关的功能多样性变化具有物种依赖性和特异性。我们的研究结果表明,虽然野化可以在一定程度上扩大或填充本地功能性状空间,但这种影响需要仔细评估。
{"title":"Intentional and unintentional changes to avian and mammalian diversities in the UK","authors":"Wenyuan Zhang,&nbsp;Kevin J Gaston,&nbsp;Ben C Sheldon,&nbsp;Richard Grenyer","doi":"10.1002/fee.2842","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fee.2842","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Rewilding is emerging as a promising restoration strategy to tackle the challenges posed by global change and maintain natural ecosystems and their biodiversity. However, rewilding has also been criticized for the absence of a consistent definition and insufficient knowledge about its possible outcomes. Here, we explored the effects of rewilding on filling functional gaps created by the extirpation of native species. We contrasted rewilding with three other mechanisms for change in community composition—species extirpation, species introduction, and unassisted colonization—in terms of their impacts on changes in avian and mammalian diversity in the UK. We found that (i) while rewilding increases functional diversity most on average, introduced/naturalized birds contribute more functional uniqueness to native functional space than other groups of birds; and (ii) changes in functional diversity associated with “rewilded” organisms were species-dependent and idiosyncratic. Our results suggest that although rewilding can expand or infill native functional trait space to some extent, such effects require careful assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2842","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144751465","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Thank you for choosing… 感谢您选择……
IF 7.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI: 10.1002/fee.2838
Scott L Collins
<p>While I was enjoying a recent cross-country flight jammed between the fuselage and a generously proportioned passenger in the middle seat, the pilot came on the intercom and said, “we know you have a choice in airlines, thank you for choosing…”. I found that statement somewhat ironic because through deregulation and consolidation, we actually have fewer choices when we fly today than we did in the past. The same cannot be said for scientific publishing. In contrast to the number of carriers in the airline industry, the number of scientific journals in academic publishing continues to increase. Indeed, the <i>Nature</i> “family” of journals currently includes something like 55 publications, which seems more like a commune than a family to me. Nevertheless, this does mean that authors have more choices when deciding where to submit a manuscript. Of course, not all of those options are appropriate, or even desirable in the case of predatory publishers.</p><p>Although it is possible to categorize journals in multiple ways (impact factors, open access options, etc.), one clear dichotomy when considering where to submit a manuscript is the choice between a society-run journal versus a journal produced by a strictly for-profit publisher. Both the Ecological Society of America (ESA) and the British Ecological Society (BES), to name just two of many scientific societies, publish multiple journals through a commercial publisher, in this case John Wiley and Sons, or simply “Wiley”. Indeed, commercial publishers like Wiley currently dominate publishing in the ecological and broader natural sciences. To some degree, the relationship between scientific societies and commercial publishers is symbiotic in that both benefit from the interaction. Wiley makes a profit by marketing the journals and shares some of that revenue with the scientific society; at the same time, societies like ESA use those funds to advance their goals through a variety of activities as diverse as training workshops, awards and honors, or travel grants to attend the annual meeting. In contrast, with purely for-profit journals, like many published by Springer Nature, revenues go to shareholders. This does not mean that these publishers are necessarily bad choices, but in many such cases the motive is profit and the flow of revenue back to the scientific community is limited.</p><p>My interest in this topic was recently piqued by an article from a group of early career researchers (Ecol Lett 2024) who argued that the publish-or-perish ethic in research universities has created an unethical publishing system. They based this argument on the perception that academics need to publish in high-impact journals to get (and keep) a job, and many such journals originate from for-profit publishers. The authors likened this to David versus Goliath. However, their own data contradict this perception as they report that “roughly half of recent Assistant Professor hires at North American Doctoral Unive
最近,我正享受着一次横穿全国的飞行,机身和中间座位上一位身材匀称的乘客挤在一起,飞行员通过对讲机对我说:“我们知道你在乘坐飞机时可以做出选择,谢谢你选择……”我觉得这句话有点讽刺,因为通过放松管制和整合,我们今天乘坐飞机的选择实际上比过去少了。科学出版就不是这样了。与航空业的航空公司数量形成对比的是,学术出版的科学期刊数量在不断增加。事实上,《自然》杂志“家族”目前包括大约55种出版物,对我来说更像是一个公社而不是一个家庭。然而,这确实意味着作者在决定投稿时有更多的选择。当然,并非所有这些选择都是合适的,甚至在掠夺性出版商的情况下也是可取的。虽然可以用多种方式对期刊进行分类(影响因子、开放获取选项等),但在考虑向哪里提交稿件时,有一个明显的二分法是选择由协会经营的期刊还是由严格以营利为目的的出版商出版的期刊。美国生态学会(ESA)和英国生态学会(BES),仅举两个科学学会的例子,都通过一家商业出版商出版多本期刊,在这种情况下,约翰·威利和儿子,或简称为“威利”。事实上,像Wiley这样的商业出版商目前在生态和更广泛的自然科学领域占据主导地位。在某种程度上,科学协会和商业出版商之间的关系是共生的,因为双方都从互动中受益。Wiley通过销售期刊获利,并与科学协会分享部分收入;与此同时,欧空局等社团利用这些资金通过各种各样的活动来推进他们的目标,这些活动包括培训研讨会、奖励和荣誉,或参加年会的旅行补助。相比之下,纯盈利性期刊,比如b施普林格Nature出版的许多期刊,收益归股东所有。这并不意味着这些出版商一定是糟糕的选择,但在许多这样的情况下,动机是利润,而科学界的收入流是有限的。我对这个话题的兴趣最近被一组早期职业研究人员(Ecol Lett 2024)的一篇文章激起了,他们认为研究型大学的“要么发表要么灭亡”的伦理创造了一个不道德的出版系统。他们认为,学者需要在高影响力的期刊上发表文章,才能得到(并保住)一份工作,而许多这样的期刊都是由营利性出版商创办的。作者把这比作大卫与歌利亚之战。然而,他们自己的数据与这种看法相矛盾,因为他们报告说,“北美生态学博士大学最近聘用的助理教授中,大约有一半在招聘时曾在《科学》、《自然》或《美国科学院院刊》上发表过论文”。另一种不同的看法是,一半新的生态学助理教授没有在这三种期刊上发表文章,其中两种期刊是由非营利出版商出版的。还记得,根据传说,大卫实际上赢得了与歌利亚的战斗。这些作者所做的正确之处,也是我认为在他们的文章中更重要和更敏锐的信息是,他们建议在可能的情况下选择学会期刊,而不是营利性出版物,因为科学学会提供的好处,以及其他原因。考虑到这一点,我想敦促早期的职业研究人员加入相关的科学协会,不仅仅是为了网络利益,而是为了帮助优先考虑如何分配和使用这些出版收入。我承认这篇社论看起来完全是自私的。罪名成立。我曾担任两家科学学会出版的不同期刊的主编。此外,我也为在营利性出版商出版的期刊上合著文章而感到内疚,部分原因是我的许多国际合作者都面临着在知名、高影响力期刊上发表文章的巨大压力。几十年前,我是一个评估长期生态研究项目的实地考察小组的一员,在这个项目中,首席研究员(PI)经常“撇去精华”,目的是在《科学》和《自然》上发表精选的研究结果。网站审查小组对此提出了一些奇怪的反对意见,对此,PI回应道:“奶油味道不错。”它的功能。我明白了。但从另一个角度来看,我认为很多时间被作者浪费了,因为他们追求一个主要的影响因子,他们的手稿从一个期刊到另一个期刊,直到最终确定一个由ESA或BES等科学协会出版的真正好的期刊。 也许在未来,社会期刊的编辑需要说“我们知道你在出版方面有选择,谢谢你选择……”。我们当然需要更好地向作者传达向科学协会出版的备受尊敬的期刊投稿的好处。
{"title":"Thank you for choosing…","authors":"Scott L Collins","doi":"10.1002/fee.2838","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fee.2838","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;While I was enjoying a recent cross-country flight jammed between the fuselage and a generously proportioned passenger in the middle seat, the pilot came on the intercom and said, “we know you have a choice in airlines, thank you for choosing…”. I found that statement somewhat ironic because through deregulation and consolidation, we actually have fewer choices when we fly today than we did in the past. The same cannot be said for scientific publishing. In contrast to the number of carriers in the airline industry, the number of scientific journals in academic publishing continues to increase. Indeed, the &lt;i&gt;Nature&lt;/i&gt; “family” of journals currently includes something like 55 publications, which seems more like a commune than a family to me. Nevertheless, this does mean that authors have more choices when deciding where to submit a manuscript. Of course, not all of those options are appropriate, or even desirable in the case of predatory publishers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Although it is possible to categorize journals in multiple ways (impact factors, open access options, etc.), one clear dichotomy when considering where to submit a manuscript is the choice between a society-run journal versus a journal produced by a strictly for-profit publisher. Both the Ecological Society of America (ESA) and the British Ecological Society (BES), to name just two of many scientific societies, publish multiple journals through a commercial publisher, in this case John Wiley and Sons, or simply “Wiley”. Indeed, commercial publishers like Wiley currently dominate publishing in the ecological and broader natural sciences. To some degree, the relationship between scientific societies and commercial publishers is symbiotic in that both benefit from the interaction. Wiley makes a profit by marketing the journals and shares some of that revenue with the scientific society; at the same time, societies like ESA use those funds to advance their goals through a variety of activities as diverse as training workshops, awards and honors, or travel grants to attend the annual meeting. In contrast, with purely for-profit journals, like many published by Springer Nature, revenues go to shareholders. This does not mean that these publishers are necessarily bad choices, but in many such cases the motive is profit and the flow of revenue back to the scientific community is limited.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My interest in this topic was recently piqued by an article from a group of early career researchers (Ecol Lett 2024) who argued that the publish-or-perish ethic in research universities has created an unethical publishing system. They based this argument on the perception that academics need to publish in high-impact journals to get (and keep) a job, and many such journals originate from for-profit publishers. The authors likened this to David versus Goliath. However, their own data contradict this perception as they report that “roughly half of recent Assistant Professor hires at North American Doctoral Unive","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2838","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143530409","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Conservation of the Atlantic Forest trees through Indigenous sustainability 通过土著可持续性保护大西洋森林树木
IF 7.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI: 10.1002/fee.2839
Francys Alves Paulino, Orivaldo Nunes Júnior, João Carlos Ferreira de Melo Júnior

The Atlantic Forest harbors one of the most diverse and threatened tropical forest biotas worldwide. Recognized as a global biodiversity hotspot, the biome extends along Brazil's Atlantic coast and into eastern Paraguay and northeastern Argentina, spanning a wide range of latitudinal, longitudinal, altitudinal, and climatic gradients. Its flora includes taxa from the Amazon Rainforest, Cerrado gallery forests, and the Andean region, encompassing approximately 25,000 species of vascular plants, 48% of which are endemic and 3400 of which are trees (Oliveira-Filho and Fontes 2000).

The degradation of the Atlantic Forest reflects centuries of human expansion triggered by the arrival of European colonizers in the 16th century CE. Over time, economic cycles, such as those associated with brazilwood, sugarcane, gold, and coffee, as well as urbanization, ranching, and railway/road construction, have severely impacted the forest (Dean 2013). Today, much of the Atlantic Forest consists of patches of secondary forests at varying stages of recovery, monoculture plantations of non-native trees, and small forest fragments surrounded by open areas dominated by anthropogenic landscapes (Tabarelli et al. 2010). An estimated ~120 million people (70% of Brazil's population) live along Brazil's Atlantic coast, exacerbating pressure on the remaining forest, which currently covers only 12% of its original extent (SOS Mata Atlântica 2023). In this context, urban expansion, industrialization, intensive agriculture, and mining not only accelerate deforestation and biodiversity loss but also erode the ancestral knowledge and cultures of Indigenous peoples who have inhabited these lands for millennia.

Currently, Brazil is home to 305 Indigenous peoples who speak 274 different languages. These groups inhabit territories composed of forests and other associated non-forest systems. The differences exhibited by these communities reflect their sociocultural variety, arising from distinct logics, conceptions, and practices specific to each people and shaped by various historical, social, and environmental contexts (Cunha et al. 2022).

Among the Indigenous peoples coexisting within the Atlantic Forest are the Guarani (Guarani Mbya), Kaingang, Pataxó, Tupinambá, and Tupiniquim. For these groups, nature and biodiversity not only are deeply connected with beliefs, knowledge, history, and culture but also depend on management techniques to better ensure their persistence over time. Embedded within multiple dimensions—social, cultural, political, economic, environmental, philosophical, and spiritual—traditional Indigenous knowledge fosters a sustainable way of relating to nature, land, and biodiversity, contributing to landscape and biodiversity conservation (Cunha et al. 2022).

Indigenous cultural practices are expressed through a diversity of songs, dances, c

大西洋森林拥有世界上最多样化和最受威胁的热带森林生物之一。作为公认的全球生物多样性热点,该生物群沿着巴西的大西洋海岸延伸到巴拉圭东部和阿根廷东北部,跨越了广泛的纬度、纵向、高度和气候梯度。它的植物群包括来自亚马逊雨林、塞拉多走廊森林和安第斯地区的分类群,包括大约25,000种维管植物,其中48%是特有的,其中3400种是树木(Oliveira-Filho和Fontes 2000)。大西洋森林的退化反映了公元16世纪欧洲殖民者的到来引发的几个世纪的人类扩张。随着时间的推移,经济周期,例如与巴西木材、甘蔗、黄金和咖啡相关的经济周期,以及城市化、牧场和铁路/公路建设,严重影响了森林(Dean 2013)。今天,大部分大西洋森林由处于不同恢复阶段的次生林斑块、非原生树木的单一种植人工林以及被人为景观主导的开放区域包围的小森林碎片组成(Tabarelli et al. 2010)。据估计,约有1.2亿人(占巴西人口的70%)生活在巴西的大西洋沿岸,这加剧了对剩余森林的压力,目前仅覆盖其原始面积的12% (SOS Mata atlntica 2023)。在这种背景下,城市扩张、工业化、集约化农业和采矿不仅加速了森林砍伐和生物多样性的丧失,而且侵蚀了居住在这些土地上数千年的土著人民的祖先知识和文化。目前,巴西有305个土著民族,他们说274种不同的语言。这些群体居住在由森林和其他相关的非森林系统组成的领土上。这些社区所表现出的差异反映了他们的社会文化多样性,这些多样性源于每个人特有的独特逻辑、概念和实践,并受到各种历史、社会和环境背景的影响(Cunha et al. 2022)。在大西洋森林中共存的土著民族有瓜拉尼人(瓜拉尼Mbya)、Kaingang、Pataxó、tupinamb<e:1>和Tupiniquim。对这些群体来说,自然和生物多样性不仅与信仰、知识、历史和文化密切相关,而且还依赖于管理技术,以更好地确保它们随着时间的推移而持续下去。传统土著知识根植于社会、文化、政治、经济、环境、哲学和精神等多个维度,促进了与自然、土地和生物多样性的可持续联系,有助于景观和生物多样性保护(Cunha et al. 2022)。土著文化习俗通过多种多样的歌曲、舞蹈、比赛、祈祷、神话叙述和语言来表达;植物栽培技术和渔猎技术的发展;医学、分类学、土壤和景观知识;手工艺,包括编织篮子、陶瓷、纺织品(Cunha et al. 2022)和木制手工艺品。数千年来,土著知识的跨代传播塑造了景观,甚至影响了某些生物群落的组织(Maezumi et al. 2023),对文化上重要树种的管理产生了影响。大西洋森林的历史退化与历史上对土著人民,包括森林居民的种族灭绝有关。在欧洲人到来之前,估计有340万土著居民生活在大西洋森林地区(Cunha et al. 2022)。殖民化后,土著人口中普遍存在的死亡率使原始女性人口减少了约50% (O'Fallon和Fehren-Schmitz 2011)。气候变化的影响,包括但不限于生物多样性丧失、极端天气和粮食不安全,继续发生,尽管人们越来越关注森林在缓解这些影响方面的作用(Hossain 2021)。通过砍伐树木和故意焚烧正在改变森林景观,侵蚀了自然生态系统,促进了农业扩张和木材燃料和木材的经济开发。由于森林为当地社区提供食物、医药和文化资源,这些威胁累积起来对生物多样性和人类都产生了影响。通过稳定河流和流域,森林还有助于减少洪水和土壤侵蚀(Pistora 2024)。近几十年来,大西洋森林的人为压力大幅增加,加剧了对本已脆弱的传统社区的影响,往往迫使他们流离失所(Pistora 2024)。在巴西,薄弱的环境治理和政策执行对大西洋森林的危害更大。 腐败、大型企业的经济压力以及执法不力阻碍了对土著领土和生物多样性保护区的有效保护(SOS Mata atlntica 2023)。寻找可行和可持续的解决方案来减轻气候变化的影响,例如森林保护(Pistora 2024;Hossain 2021),将需要将西方科学与传统的土著知识相结合,并促进以建立保护区、保护土著领土和生态恢复为重点的公共政策。因此,迫切需要讨论保护替代方案和谨慎使用现有自然资源(Hossain 2021;凝视沃尔夫等人(2024),特别关注森林保护,土著知识和可持续性。土著人民已经在其领土的可持续管理中发挥了重要作用,土著知识可能成为生物保护的新范式,重塑历史上植根于欧洲中心主义的人类行为(凝视沃尔夫等人,2024)。在科学家中,越来越多的人认为当地土著知识在发现、编目和保护生物多样性方面发挥着关键作用。土著知识必须成为一种模式,通过社会变革,允许建立土著主导的空间,以促进包括西方科学在内的各种知识形式之间的充分对话。这种方法应该给予土著观点同等的价值,不仅在促进发现和解决问题方面,而且在解决生物多样性发现、记录和保护方面的差距方面(凝视沃尔夫等人,2024;guimar<e:1>等人,2024)。通过将文化传统与木材保护措施相结合的做法来维护森林地区的倡议,如巴西南部瓜拉尼Mbya的土著领土规划,是有希望的。通过与土地的平衡和可持续关系表达的土著生存和生活方式,可以推动区域和国际合作,打击毁林和保护大西洋森林。这是减缓气候变化的一条可能途径,强调需要土著人民参与治理机构内制定气候和环境政策的决策过程。
{"title":"Conservation of the Atlantic Forest trees through Indigenous sustainability","authors":"Francys Alves Paulino,&nbsp;Orivaldo Nunes Júnior,&nbsp;João Carlos Ferreira de Melo Júnior","doi":"10.1002/fee.2839","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fee.2839","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Atlantic Forest harbors one of the most diverse and threatened tropical forest biotas worldwide. Recognized as a global biodiversity hotspot, the biome extends along Brazil's Atlantic coast and into eastern Paraguay and northeastern Argentina, spanning a wide range of latitudinal, longitudinal, altitudinal, and climatic gradients. Its flora includes taxa from the Amazon Rainforest, Cerrado gallery forests, and the Andean region, encompassing approximately 25,000 species of vascular plants, 48% of which are endemic and 3400 of which are trees (Oliveira-Filho and Fontes <span>2000</span>).</p><p>The degradation of the Atlantic Forest reflects centuries of human expansion triggered by the arrival of European colonizers in the 16th century CE. Over time, economic cycles, such as those associated with brazilwood, sugarcane, gold, and coffee, as well as urbanization, ranching, and railway/road construction, have severely impacted the forest (Dean <span>2013</span>). Today, much of the Atlantic Forest consists of patches of secondary forests at varying stages of recovery, monoculture plantations of non-native trees, and small forest fragments surrounded by open areas dominated by anthropogenic landscapes (Tabarelli <i>et al</i>. <span>2010</span>). An estimated ~120 million people (70% of Brazil's population) live along Brazil's Atlantic coast, exacerbating pressure on the remaining forest, which currently covers only 12% of its original extent (SOS Mata Atlântica <span>2023</span>). In this context, urban expansion, industrialization, intensive agriculture, and mining not only accelerate deforestation and biodiversity loss but also erode the ancestral knowledge and cultures of Indigenous peoples who have inhabited these lands for millennia.</p><p>Currently, Brazil is home to 305 Indigenous peoples who speak 274 different languages. These groups inhabit territories composed of forests and other associated non-forest systems. The differences exhibited by these communities reflect their sociocultural variety, arising from distinct logics, conceptions, and practices specific to each people and shaped by various historical, social, and environmental contexts (Cunha <i>et al</i>. <span>2022</span>).</p><p>Among the Indigenous peoples coexisting within the Atlantic Forest are the Guarani (Guarani Mbya), Kaingang, Pataxó, Tupinambá, and Tupiniquim. For these groups, nature and biodiversity not only are deeply connected with beliefs, knowledge, history, and culture but also depend on management techniques to better ensure their persistence over time. Embedded within multiple dimensions—social, cultural, political, economic, environmental, philosophical, and spiritual—traditional Indigenous knowledge fosters a sustainable way of relating to nature, land, and biodiversity, contributing to landscape and biodiversity conservation (Cunha <i>et al</i>. <span>2022</span>).</p><p>Indigenous cultural practices are expressed through a diversity of songs, dances, c","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2839","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143530519","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Protecting threatened species and music traditions 保护濒危物种和音乐传统
IF 7.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-24 DOI: 10.1002/fee.2837
Silke Lichtenberg, Udo Nehren, Dieter Anhuf, Iris Brémaud, Tiago de Oliveira Pinto, Viviane S Fonseca-Kruel, Volker Haag, Elisabeth Huber-Sannwald, Stefan Jänicke, Gerald Koch, Jakob Kusnick, Haroldo C Lima, Eduardo Luiz Longui, Daniel Piotto, Juan Antonio Reyes-Agüero, Patrícia Rosa

Musical instruments are indispensable to music traditions worldwide and often made from natural materials derived from species that are increasingly endangered. International trade threatens the survival of some of these species, as addressed by their inclusion in the UN Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). However, CITES regulations can substantially impact music traditions and alone are insufficient to preserve trade-relevant species from extinction, such as the pau-brasil (Paubrasilia echinata), which is used for the bows of stringed instruments. Therefore, new CITES listings of species or species products used in the manufacture of musical instruments, or potential future shifts of CITES-listed species to the strictest category, will require anticipation, preparation, and precautionary actions. In international species trade negotiations, it is crucial to target the protection of species and music traditions beyond trade regulations. We propose novel social–ecological pathways to address these challenges and reconcile conflicting stakeholder interests between species conservation and cultural conservation.

乐器对世界各地的音乐传统来说是不可或缺的,而且乐器的材料往往来自日益濒危的物种。国际贸易威胁到其中一些物种的生存,正如联合国濒危野生动植物种国际贸易公约(CITES)所解决的那样。然而,CITES法规可能对音乐传统产生重大影响,单凭这些法规不足以保护与贸易有关的物种免于灭绝,例如用于弦乐器弓的巴西琴(Paubrasilia echinata)。因此,新列入CITES的物种或用于制造乐器的物种产品,或未来可能将CITES所列物种转移到最严格的类别,将需要预测、准备和预防措施。在国际物种贸易谈判中,至关重要的是将保护物种和音乐传统作为贸易法规之外的目标。我们提出了新的社会生态途径来解决这些挑战,并调和物种保护和文化保护之间利益相关者的利益冲突。
{"title":"Protecting threatened species and music traditions","authors":"Silke Lichtenberg,&nbsp;Udo Nehren,&nbsp;Dieter Anhuf,&nbsp;Iris Brémaud,&nbsp;Tiago de Oliveira Pinto,&nbsp;Viviane S Fonseca-Kruel,&nbsp;Volker Haag,&nbsp;Elisabeth Huber-Sannwald,&nbsp;Stefan Jänicke,&nbsp;Gerald Koch,&nbsp;Jakob Kusnick,&nbsp;Haroldo C Lima,&nbsp;Eduardo Luiz Longui,&nbsp;Daniel Piotto,&nbsp;Juan Antonio Reyes-Agüero,&nbsp;Patrícia Rosa","doi":"10.1002/fee.2837","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fee.2837","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Musical instruments are indispensable to music traditions worldwide and often made from natural materials derived from species that are increasingly endangered. International trade threatens the survival of some of these species, as addressed by their inclusion in the UN Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). However, CITES regulations can substantially impact music traditions and alone are insufficient to preserve trade-relevant species from extinction, such as the pau-brasil (<i>Paubrasilia echinata</i>), which is used for the bows of stringed instruments. Therefore, new CITES listings of species or species products used in the manufacture of musical instruments, or potential future shifts of CITES-listed species to the strictest category, will require anticipation, preparation, and precautionary actions. In international species trade negotiations, it is crucial to target the protection of species and music traditions beyond trade regulations. We propose novel social–ecological pathways to address these challenges and reconcile conflicting stakeholder interests between species conservation and cultural conservation.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2837","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144751491","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Re-envisioning urban landscapes: lichens, liverworts, and mosses coexist spontaneously with us 重新构想城市景观:地衣、苔类植物和苔藓与我们自然共存
IF 7.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI: 10.1002/fee.2836
Nicole J Jung, Harold N Eyster, Kai MA Chan

Current conceptions of “urban biodiversity” address only particular taxa, ignoring the full richness of species within cities. Despite their exclusion from these conceptions, tree-dwelling lichens, mosses, and liverworts (collectively, “epiphytes”) are recognized as bioindicators of urbanization, but their inherent contributions to biodiversity are largely unrecognized. Here, we report on a survey of epiphytes in the city of Vancouver, Canada. Using Bayesian multilevel models, we asked the following questions: how diverse are epiphytes in this large temperate city, and what urban and host-tree factors determine their distribution? We found 39 macrolichen, 32 moss, and seven liverwort species on Vancouver street trees, establishing them as rich microenvironments influenced by a network of interacting factors previously unaccounted for. Our results challenge the idea that pollution and urban heat islands primarily regulate urban epiphyte diversity; instead, we identify host-tree genus as having strong effects on all epiphytes. Expanding urban biodiversity to include epiphyte diversity recharacterizes urban landscapes as rewilded spaces of interdependent coexistence.

目前的“城市生物多样性”概念只涉及特定的分类群,而忽视了城市内物种的全部丰富程度。尽管它们被排除在这些概念之外,树栖地衣、苔藓和苔类(统称为“附生植物”)被认为是城市化的生物指标,但它们对生物多样性的内在贡献在很大程度上没有得到承认。在这里,我们报告了对加拿大温哥华市附生植物的调查。利用贝叶斯多层模型,我们提出了以下问题:在这个大型温带城市中,附生植物的多样性如何?哪些城市和宿主树因素决定了它们的分布?我们在温哥华的行行树上发现了39种大地衣、32种苔藓和7种苔类植物,确定了它们是受先前未考虑的相互作用因素网络影响的丰富微环境。我们的研究结果挑战了污染和城市热岛主要调节城市附生植物多样性的观点;相反,我们认为寄主树属对所有附生植物都有很强的影响。扩大城市生物多样性,包括附生植物多样性,将城市景观重新定义为相互依存共存的野生空间。
{"title":"Re-envisioning urban landscapes: lichens, liverworts, and mosses coexist spontaneously with us","authors":"Nicole J Jung,&nbsp;Harold N Eyster,&nbsp;Kai MA Chan","doi":"10.1002/fee.2836","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fee.2836","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Current conceptions of “urban biodiversity” address only particular taxa, ignoring the full richness of species within cities. Despite their exclusion from these conceptions, tree-dwelling lichens, mosses, and liverworts (collectively, “epiphytes”) are recognized as bioindicators of urbanization, but their inherent contributions to biodiversity are largely unrecognized. Here, we report on a survey of epiphytes in the city of Vancouver, Canada. Using Bayesian multilevel models, we asked the following questions: how diverse are epiphytes in this large temperate city, and what urban and host-tree factors determine their distribution? We found 39 macrolichen, 32 moss, and seven liverwort species on Vancouver street trees, establishing them as rich microenvironments influenced by a network of interacting factors previously unaccounted for. Our results challenge the idea that pollution and urban heat islands primarily regulate urban epiphyte diversity; instead, we identify host-tree genus as having strong effects on all epiphytes. Expanding urban biodiversity to include epiphyte diversity recharacterizes urban landscapes as rewilded spaces of interdependent coexistence.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2836","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144751477","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Bird-mediated ecosystem services and disservices in cities and towns 城市和城镇中鸟类介导的生态系统服务和危害
IF 7.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI: 10.1002/fee.2835
Liba Pejchar, Christine C Rega-Brodsky, Luis-Bernardo Vázquez, Ian MacGregor-Fors

All cities are home to birds, which, through their activities, can either enhance or detract from human well-being. To identify such interactions, we synthesize current understanding of bird-mediated ecosystem services and disservices in cities. We find widespread evidence that birds provide cultural services, but the link between urban bird diversity and these benefits is surprisingly tenuous. Birds also have potential to provide regulating services; however, rather than being measured, these services are usually assumed from non-urban research, and may be overestimated (eg pollination, seed dispersal) or undervalued (decomposition, nutrient cycling). People's perceptions of birds are not uniform, and services are not always delivered equitably among residents. We call for moving beyond using species richness and traits as proxies, and instead explicitly measuring services and disservices across the heterogeneous urban landscape. Such information is critical to designing cities that sustain biodiversity and result in net positive, and equitable, benefits to people.

所有的城市都是鸟类的家园,鸟类通过它们的活动可以增进或损害人类的福祉。为了确定这种相互作用,我们综合了目前对鸟类介导的城市生态系统服务和危害的理解。我们发现鸟类提供文化服务的广泛证据,但城市鸟类多样性与这些好处之间的联系令人惊讶地脆弱。鸟类还具有提供调节服务的潜力;然而,这些服务不是被测量的,而是通常从非城市研究中假设的,并且可能被高估(如授粉、种子传播)或低估(分解、养分循环)。人们对鸟类的看法并不统一,居民之间的服务也并不总是公平的。我们呼吁不再使用物种丰富度和特征作为替代,而是明确衡量异质性城市景观的服务和损害。这些信息对于设计维持生物多样性并为人们带来净积极和公平利益的城市至关重要。
{"title":"Bird-mediated ecosystem services and disservices in cities and towns","authors":"Liba Pejchar,&nbsp;Christine C Rega-Brodsky,&nbsp;Luis-Bernardo Vázquez,&nbsp;Ian MacGregor-Fors","doi":"10.1002/fee.2835","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fee.2835","url":null,"abstract":"<p>All cities are home to birds, which, through their activities, can either enhance or detract from human well-being. To identify such interactions, we synthesize current understanding of bird-mediated ecosystem services and disservices in cities. We find widespread evidence that birds provide cultural services, but the link between urban bird diversity and these benefits is surprisingly tenuous. Birds also have potential to provide regulating services; however, rather than being measured, these services are usually assumed from non-urban research, and may be overestimated (eg pollination, seed dispersal) or undervalued (decomposition, nutrient cycling). People's perceptions of birds are not uniform, and services are not always delivered equitably among residents. We call for moving beyond using species richness and traits as proxies, and instead explicitly measuring services and disservices across the heterogeneous urban landscape. Such information is critical to designing cities that sustain biodiversity and result in net positive, and equitable, benefits to people.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144191073","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A field station's recipe for impactful science 一个野外考察站对科学的影响
IF 7.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI: 10.1002/fee.2833
Aaron S David, Sahas Barve, Elizabeth H Boughton, Joshua H Daskin, Hilary M Swain
<p>As society navigates unprecedented global change, we need science-backed solutions to confront compounding ecological crises. While we ecologists often intend to do impactful science that addresses these crises, too often we are guilty of “hoping”, rather than “planning”, for impact. Within ecologically minded institutions, having planned impacts increases the likelihood of success and starts with a well-defined <i>mission</i>, which states the organization's purpose and guides its activities. Mission-oriented science can influence agency policy, shape sustainable land-use planning, guide management best practices, train future scientists, and more. However, the challenge is to build from mission-oriented science to maximize impact. Here, we identify three key ingredients of a recipe for achieving impact: (1) <i>synergistic science</i>, (2) <i>knowledge of place</i>, and (3) <i>bridging to partners</i>. Although grounded in our experiences at Archbold Biological Station, a nonprofit field station in south-central Florida, and in our collective knowledge of similar stations, we believe these ingredients are broadly applicable across scientific institutions.</p><p><i>Synergistic science</i> refers to teams of researchers working together toward an institution's mission. Simply put, complex environmental challenges require diverse teams to address them holistically. For example, Archbold's fire management plan is based on decades of our own science across taxa, providing a comprehensive framework for balancing the fire needs of multiple organisms, and, to date, resulting in >350 prescribed burns of an endangered scrub ecosystem. Synergistic science may be interdisciplinary or emerge from participation in formal research networks (eg USDA's Long-Term Agroecosystem Research [LTAR] network). For instance, testing strategies for sustainable agroecosystems required synthesizing data collected by 18 researchers from 53 long-term co-located studies of biodiversity, water quality, soils, and greenhouse gases at Archbold’s Buck Island Ranch (Nat Commun 2023).</p><p><i>Knowledge of place</i> refers to a deep understanding of local or regional ecosystems, biota, and processes, and to being a trusted information source among key stakeholders in governmental, academic, nonprofit, and for-profit sectors (Univ. of Chicago Press 2010). Solutions to large-scale environmental challenges arise from local actions based on knowledge of place. Developing knowledge of place is often not straightforward and may require lengthy engagement to build relevant expertise, resources, datasets, and partnerships. Ultimately, knowledge of place allows organizations a seat at the table in decision making; in our case, such knowledge allows staff to engage closely with county planners on policies supporting prescribed fire, establishing conservation areas, and avoiding development sprawl.</p><p><i>Bridging to partners</i> refers to how the organization works with other, mission-
随着社会面临前所未有的全球变化,我们需要科学支持的解决方案来应对日益复杂的生态危机。虽然我们生态学家经常打算做一些有影响力的科学来解决这些危机,但我们常常因为“希望”而不是“计划”产生影响而感到内疚。在有生态意识的机构中,有计划的影响增加了成功的可能性,并从一个明确的使命开始,它陈述了组织的目的并指导其活动。以任务为导向的科学可以影响机构政策,塑造可持续的土地使用规划,指导管理最佳实践,培养未来的科学家等等。然而,挑战在于从以任务为导向的科学中建立,以最大限度地发挥影响。在这里,我们确定了实现影响的配方的三个关键要素:(1)协同科学,(2)地方知识,(3)与合作伙伴的桥梁。尽管基于我们在阿奇博尔德生物站(Archbold Biological Station)的经验,以及我们对类似站点的集体知识,我们相信这些要素广泛适用于所有科学机构。阿奇博尔德生物站是佛罗里达州中南部的一个非营利性野外站点。协同科学指的是为了一个机构的使命而共同努力的研究团队。简单地说,复杂的环境挑战需要不同的团队从整体上解决。例如,阿奇博尔德的火灾管理计划是基于我们几十年来对不同分类群的科学研究,为平衡多种生物的火灾需求提供了一个全面的框架,到目前为止,已经对濒临灭绝的灌木丛生态系统进行了350次规定的焚烧。协同科学可能是跨学科的,也可能来自于参与正式的研究网络(例如美国农业部的长期农业生态系统研究[LTAR]网络)。例如,可持续农业生态系统的测试策略需要综合18名研究人员从阿奇博尔德巴克岛牧场的53项长期共同研究中收集的数据,这些研究涉及生物多样性、水质、土壤和温室气体(Nat Commun 2023)。地方知识是指对当地或区域生态系统、生物群和过程的深刻理解,并成为政府、学术、非营利和营利部门关键利益相关者之间可信的信息来源(芝加哥大学出版社2010年)。大规模环境挑战的解决方案来自于基于地方知识的地方行动。开发地方知识通常不是直截了当的,可能需要长期参与,以建立相关的专业知识、资源、数据集和伙伴关系。最终,对地点的了解使组织能够在决策制定中占有一席之地;在我们的案例中,这些知识使员工能够与县规划人员密切合作,制定支持规定火灾的政策,建立保护区,避免发展蔓延。衔接合作伙伴是指组织如何与其他使命一致的机构和利益攸关方合作,使科学具有可操作性。这一要素的范围可以从与利益相关者真正的合作研究,到与目标最终用户合作,交流发现和建议。例如,大自然保护协会和堪萨斯州立大学在康扎草原生物站有一个共同的使命,致力于长期的生态研究、教育和草原保护,这有助于弗林特山地区的野牛恢复、火灾管理和放牧实践。在佛罗里达州,佛罗里达野生动物走廊旨在保护1770万英亩的相连土地,并动员土地信托、非营利组织、土地所有者、电影制作人和政府机构以及研究人员组成的联盟(《保护科学实践2024》)。对生态学家的影响可以采取各种形式,但通常是具体的结果,如政策、土地保护或改善濒危物种的种群轨迹。重要的是,可量化的指标使机构能够跟踪结果并优先考虑有影响力的活动。例如,使用变化理论模型(2009年评估计划计划)的战略规划可以帮助组织确定期望的保护结果(如物种持久性),以及评估指标(如易位数量)和达到这些结果的研究。在Archbold,我们发现这些因素的结合是提高影响力的秘诀。我们的使命与战略性保护支柱相结合,引导大多数研究朝着基础科学和深思熟虑的保护结果发展。自1941年成立以来,该站的协同科学研究重点是威尔士湖岭许多濒危特有物种的生态学。在20世纪80年代后期,我们的工作扩展到周边的大沼泽地的源头,并对农业和军事用地以及相关的草地栖息地进行了新的研究。 我们扩大了对地方的了解,扩大了Archbold的影响力,从与不同土地所有者一起进行土地管理的当地工作,到景观连通性和水质等区域问题。通过扩大我们基于地点的研究,参与科学网络进一步扩大了Archbold对国家(如LTAR)和全球(如营养网络)的影响。我们最近在佛罗里达野生动物走廊运动中的领导作用,通过立法和投票驱动的土地保护资金,在全州范围内产生了影响(《保护科学实践2024》)。我们敦促在各种类型和规模的机构工作的科学家采用以影响为导向的方法,利用协同科学、地点知识和伙伴关系来应对日益严峻的生态挑战。
{"title":"A field station's recipe for impactful science","authors":"Aaron S David,&nbsp;Sahas Barve,&nbsp;Elizabeth H Boughton,&nbsp;Joshua H Daskin,&nbsp;Hilary M Swain","doi":"10.1002/fee.2833","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fee.2833","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;As society navigates unprecedented global change, we need science-backed solutions to confront compounding ecological crises. While we ecologists often intend to do impactful science that addresses these crises, too often we are guilty of “hoping”, rather than “planning”, for impact. Within ecologically minded institutions, having planned impacts increases the likelihood of success and starts with a well-defined &lt;i&gt;mission&lt;/i&gt;, which states the organization's purpose and guides its activities. Mission-oriented science can influence agency policy, shape sustainable land-use planning, guide management best practices, train future scientists, and more. However, the challenge is to build from mission-oriented science to maximize impact. Here, we identify three key ingredients of a recipe for achieving impact: (1) &lt;i&gt;synergistic science&lt;/i&gt;, (2) &lt;i&gt;knowledge of place&lt;/i&gt;, and (3) &lt;i&gt;bridging to partners&lt;/i&gt;. Although grounded in our experiences at Archbold Biological Station, a nonprofit field station in south-central Florida, and in our collective knowledge of similar stations, we believe these ingredients are broadly applicable across scientific institutions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Synergistic science&lt;/i&gt; refers to teams of researchers working together toward an institution's mission. Simply put, complex environmental challenges require diverse teams to address them holistically. For example, Archbold's fire management plan is based on decades of our own science across taxa, providing a comprehensive framework for balancing the fire needs of multiple organisms, and, to date, resulting in &gt;350 prescribed burns of an endangered scrub ecosystem. Synergistic science may be interdisciplinary or emerge from participation in formal research networks (eg USDA's Long-Term Agroecosystem Research [LTAR] network). For instance, testing strategies for sustainable agroecosystems required synthesizing data collected by 18 researchers from 53 long-term co-located studies of biodiversity, water quality, soils, and greenhouse gases at Archbold’s Buck Island Ranch (Nat Commun 2023).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Knowledge of place&lt;/i&gt; refers to a deep understanding of local or regional ecosystems, biota, and processes, and to being a trusted information source among key stakeholders in governmental, academic, nonprofit, and for-profit sectors (Univ. of Chicago Press 2010). Solutions to large-scale environmental challenges arise from local actions based on knowledge of place. Developing knowledge of place is often not straightforward and may require lengthy engagement to build relevant expertise, resources, datasets, and partnerships. Ultimately, knowledge of place allows organizations a seat at the table in decision making; in our case, such knowledge allows staff to engage closely with county planners on policies supporting prescribed fire, establishing conservation areas, and avoiding development sprawl.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Bridging to partners&lt;/i&gt; refers to how the organization works with other, mission-","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2833","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143111292","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Global artificial light masks biologically important light cycles of animals 全球人造光掩盖了动物生物学上重要的光周期
IF 7.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI: 10.1002/fee.2832
Brett M Seymoure, Rachel Buxton, Jeremy M White, Carlos R Linares, Kurt Fristrup, Kevin Crooks, George Wittemyer, Lisa Angeloni

We document the importance of low-light conditions in 136 animal species and then translate the new world atlas of skyglow, which reports artificial night sky brightness, into estimates of anthropogenic illuminance (that is, artificial light reaching Earth's surface). Quantifying habitat illuminance from skyglow facilitates understanding of the disruption of natural light cycles, such as new moon conditions, which are critical to animal ecology. We corroborated this transformation of sky brightness by comparing concurrent field measurements of skyglow and illuminance. We then quantified global artificial illuminance caused by skyglow, finding that skyglow artificially doubled illuminance of new moon conditions—a critical phase for biological processes, such as foraging, courtship, and mating—for 22.9% of the Earth's terrestrial surface, 51.0% of Key Biodiversity Areas, 77.1% of Global Protected Areas, and ~20% of highly diverse areas for mammals, birds, and amphibians. We provide summaries of artificial illuminance at 750-m pixel resolution for each protected area to aid land managers and guide policy in reducing skyglow in areas that may yield the greatest benefits for conserving animal biodiversity.

我们记录了136种动物在低光条件下的重要性,然后将新的天光世界地图集(该地图集报告了人工夜空亮度)转化为对人为照度(即到达地球表面的人造光)的估计。从天光中量化栖息地的照度有助于理解自然光周期的破坏,例如新月条件,这对动物生态至关重要。我们通过比较天光和照度的同时现场测量,证实了天空亮度的这种变化。然后,我们量化了由天光引起的全球人工照度,发现在22.9%的地球陆地表面、51.0%的关键生物多样性区域、77.1%的全球保护区和约20%的哺乳动物、鸟类和两栖动物高度多样化的区域,天光人为地使新月条件(生物过程的关键阶段,如觅食、求偶和交配)的照度增加了一倍。我们为每个保护区提供了750米像素分辨率的人工照度摘要,以帮助土地管理者和指导政策,减少可能对保护动物生物多样性产生最大利益的地区的天光。
{"title":"Global artificial light masks biologically important light cycles of animals","authors":"Brett M Seymoure,&nbsp;Rachel Buxton,&nbsp;Jeremy M White,&nbsp;Carlos R Linares,&nbsp;Kurt Fristrup,&nbsp;Kevin Crooks,&nbsp;George Wittemyer,&nbsp;Lisa Angeloni","doi":"10.1002/fee.2832","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fee.2832","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We document the importance of low-light conditions in 136 animal species and then translate the new world atlas of skyglow, which reports artificial night sky brightness, into estimates of anthropogenic illuminance (that is, artificial light reaching Earth's surface). Quantifying habitat illuminance from skyglow facilitates understanding of the disruption of natural light cycles, such as new moon conditions, which are critical to animal ecology. We corroborated this transformation of sky brightness by comparing concurrent field measurements of skyglow and illuminance. We then quantified global artificial illuminance caused by skyglow, finding that skyglow artificially doubled illuminance of new moon conditions—a critical phase for biological processes, such as foraging, courtship, and mating—for 22.9% of the Earth's terrestrial surface, 51.0% of Key Biodiversity Areas, 77.1% of Global Protected Areas, and ~20% of highly diverse areas for mammals, birds, and amphibians. We provide summaries of artificial illuminance at 750-m pixel resolution for each protected area to aid land managers and guide policy in reducing skyglow in areas that may yield the greatest benefits for conserving animal biodiversity.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2832","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143900933","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Wolves and human-caused mortality—a reply to Cassidy et al. 狼和人类造成的死亡——对卡西迪等人的回复。
IF 7.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI: 10.1002/fee.2830
Danny Caudill, Joshua H Schmidt, Graham G Frye, Elaine D Gallenberg, Gretchen Caudill, Jerrold L Belant
<p>Cassidy <i>et al</i>. (<span>2023</span>) evaluated the effect of mortality on aspects of gray wolf (<i>Canis lupus</i>) demography, concluding that “…human activities can have major negative effects on the biological processes…”. We agree that the effects of human-caused mortalities on wildlife are of broad interest (eg Caudill <i>et al</i>. <span>2017</span>; Schmidt <i>et al</i>. <span>2017</span>; Frye <i>et al</i>. <span>2022</span>). However, we contend Cassidy <i>et al</i>.'s study has shortcomings with regard to its data, design, biological inference, and statistical interpretation.</p><p>Although potentially resolvable, Cassidy <i>et al</i>.'s data contain inconsistencies and are sparse across covariate values (as detailed in Data S1, available at https://irma.nps.gov/DataStore/Reference/Profile/2302764), leading to uncertainty in the reliability and generalizability of their results. For example, missing covariate values resulted in the misapplication of model selection procedures and the exclusion of nearly all data from Voyageurs National Park from some models. Furthermore, the random effects were inappropriately structured and unstable, potentially because one site (Yukon-Charley Rivers National Preserve; YUCH) contained all observations of human-caused mortalities of >4 wolves and most observations of ≥2 leaders lost. Cassidy <i>et al</i>.'s results were also disproportionately influenced by YUCH (Data S1). Moreover, wolf harvest legally occurs within portions of Denali National Park and Preserve and YUCH, and about 62% of mortalities observed in YUCH were attributable to lethal control programs in the surrounding area (~25% of mortalities in the entire dataset were attributed to lethal control). Hence, inference on harvest and wolf control in general (eg transboundary management) is ambiguous. Instead, the results of Cassidy <i>et al</i>. may reflect the previously documented negative impact on wolf demography from a specific lethal management action conducted adjacent to YUCH (Schmidt <i>et al</i>. <span>2017</span>).</p><p>The most critical limitation within Cassidy <i>et al</i>. is the study design. To provide reliable inference, a design must adequately exclude alternate hypotheses (ie Platt <span>1964</span>). A design focused on any subset of mortality types in isolation could represent an a priori false null hypothesis because mortality in general could be negatively related to pack demography. The mixed logistic regression models in Cassidy <i>et al</i>. compared a group of packs in which human-caused mortality was observed (along with an unknown level of natural mortality) to a “contaminated” control group of packs in which human-caused mortality was not observed (but which also experienced unknown levels of natural mortality and human-caused mortality of non-collared pack members). This design cannot exclude the alternate hypothesis that any type of mortality (including natural mortality) could have caused the obser
Cassidy等人(2023)评估了死亡率对灰狼(Canis lupus)人口学方面的影响,得出的结论是“……人类活动可能对生物过程产生重大负面影响……”。我们同意,人类造成的死亡对野生动物的影响具有广泛的利益(例如Caudill等人。2017;Schmidt et al. 2017;Frye et al. 2022)。然而,我们认为Cassidy等人的研究在数据、设计、生物学推断和统计解释方面存在不足。虽然可以解决,但Cassidy等人的数据包含不一致性,并且在协变量值上是稀疏的(详见数据S1,可在https://irma.nps.gov/DataStore/Reference/Profile/2302764上获得),导致其结果的可靠性和普遍性存在不确定性。例如,协变量值的缺失导致模型选择程序的错误应用,并且从某些模型中排除了旅行者国家公园的几乎所有数据。此外,随机效应结构不当且不稳定,可能是因为一个地点(育空-查理河国家保护区;YUCH)包含了4只狼的所有人为死亡的观察结果和2只狼首领丢失的大部分观察结果。Cassidy等人的结果也不成比例地受到了YUCH的影响(数据S1)。此外,在Denali国家公园和保护区以及YUCH的部分区域内合法地进行了狼的捕杀,并且在YUCH观察到的约62%的死亡率可归因于周围地区的致命控制计划(整个数据集中约25%的死亡率归因于致命控制)。因此,对一般的收获和狼的控制(如跨界管理)的推断是模糊的。相反,Cassidy等人的结果可能反映了先前记录的在YUCH附近进行的特定致命管理行动对狼人口统计学的负面影响(Schmidt et al. 2017)。Cassidy等人研究中最关键的限制是研究设计。为了提供可靠的推断,设计必须充分排除其他假设(如Platt 1964)。孤立地关注任何死亡类型子集的设计都可能代表先验的错误零假设,因为总体上死亡率可能与族群人口统计学负相关。Cassidy等人的混合逻辑回归模型将一组观察到人为死亡率(以及未知的自然死亡率)的族群与一组未观察到人为死亡率(但也经历了未知水平的自然死亡率和未戴项圈的族群成员人为死亡率)的“污染”对照组进行了比较。该设计不能排除另一种假设,即任何类型的死亡(包括自然死亡)都可能导致Cassidy等人特别归因于人为原因的观察结果。Borg等人(2015)使用这些相同数据的子集与繁殖狼死亡的案例,通过将每种损失分类为自然或人为原因,比较了特定原因的结果,但没有发现人类特定影响的支持(JAE 2017)。虽然Cassidy等人的设计可以支持种群动态与死亡率之间的负相关(即Borg等人,2015),但它不能提供断言的人类特定推断,这是本文的重点。最后,统计上显著的结果并不一定具有生物学意义(Johnson 1999;Wasserstein and Lazar 2016)。Cassidy等人将统计学上显著的大比值比和条件概率解释为生物学上的大影响。然而,逻辑回归从统计种群中估计参数(Sokal和Rohlf 1981),这可能难以解释(Agresti 2013),并且需要背景来评估其生物学重要性。例如,大的优势比或条件概率可能代表很少的绝对风险(见Andrade 2015)。在Cassidy等人的研究中,受污染的对照组含有大部分包年的样本,并且持续保持较高的比率。在观察到领队因人为原因死亡的一组中,有更少的族群年,而且只有一半以上的族群年持续死亡(见附录S1:图S1)。因此,逻辑回归估计了很大的优势比,因为在污染对照组中观察到的种群持续存在的可能性很高,但种群溶解的联合概率更相似(数据S2,可在https://irma.nps.gov/DataStore/Reference/Profile/2302764上获得)。我们认为,除了条件度量之外,风险的绝对度量为评估生物重要性提供了更好的环境。例如,忽略对照样本的污染,我们计算了人口归因风险(PAR);Fleiss et al. 2003),以量化可具体归因于观察到的人为死亡的溶解比例。 假设样本中观察到的人为死亡率代表了总体死亡率,我们估计PAR为2.9%(数据S2)。人类当然可以影响狼(Hornaday 1913;Schmidt et al. 2017)和人类-掠食者冲突可能需要比人口更精细的规模管理(例如Mech 1995;Caudill et al. 2019)。然而,生物种群通常是野生动物管理发生的规模(Krausman 2022),部分原因是种群是具有适应和持续存在潜力的单位,超出了任何个体的生命。尽管对受影响的个体(或群体)来说,死亡无疑是必然的后果,但野生动物种群往往表现出可以抵消生物影响的补偿机制(Cooch et al. 2014;Caudill et al. 2017)。无论如何,管理目标,以及由此产生的可接受的生物影响,最终取决于决策者设定的基于价值的目标。为了履行他们的信任责任,特别是对于有争议的问题(例如沿着行政边界与不同的管理目标),决策者需要严格和明确传达的科学信息。我们的目的是强调Cassidy等人的局限性,以便读者和政策制定者将有更好的背景来更好地解释其中的发现。
{"title":"Wolves and human-caused mortality—a reply to Cassidy et al.","authors":"Danny Caudill,&nbsp;Joshua H Schmidt,&nbsp;Graham G Frye,&nbsp;Elaine D Gallenberg,&nbsp;Gretchen Caudill,&nbsp;Jerrold L Belant","doi":"10.1002/fee.2830","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fee.2830","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Cassidy &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;. (&lt;span&gt;2023&lt;/span&gt;) evaluated the effect of mortality on aspects of gray wolf (&lt;i&gt;Canis lupus&lt;/i&gt;) demography, concluding that “…human activities can have major negative effects on the biological processes…”. We agree that the effects of human-caused mortalities on wildlife are of broad interest (eg Caudill &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;span&gt;2017&lt;/span&gt;; Schmidt &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;span&gt;2017&lt;/span&gt;; Frye &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;span&gt;2022&lt;/span&gt;). However, we contend Cassidy &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;.'s study has shortcomings with regard to its data, design, biological inference, and statistical interpretation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Although potentially resolvable, Cassidy &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;.'s data contain inconsistencies and are sparse across covariate values (as detailed in Data S1, available at https://irma.nps.gov/DataStore/Reference/Profile/2302764), leading to uncertainty in the reliability and generalizability of their results. For example, missing covariate values resulted in the misapplication of model selection procedures and the exclusion of nearly all data from Voyageurs National Park from some models. Furthermore, the random effects were inappropriately structured and unstable, potentially because one site (Yukon-Charley Rivers National Preserve; YUCH) contained all observations of human-caused mortalities of &gt;4 wolves and most observations of ≥2 leaders lost. Cassidy &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;.'s results were also disproportionately influenced by YUCH (Data S1). Moreover, wolf harvest legally occurs within portions of Denali National Park and Preserve and YUCH, and about 62% of mortalities observed in YUCH were attributable to lethal control programs in the surrounding area (~25% of mortalities in the entire dataset were attributed to lethal control). Hence, inference on harvest and wolf control in general (eg transboundary management) is ambiguous. Instead, the results of Cassidy &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;. may reflect the previously documented negative impact on wolf demography from a specific lethal management action conducted adjacent to YUCH (Schmidt &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;span&gt;2017&lt;/span&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The most critical limitation within Cassidy &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;. is the study design. To provide reliable inference, a design must adequately exclude alternate hypotheses (ie Platt &lt;span&gt;1964&lt;/span&gt;). A design focused on any subset of mortality types in isolation could represent an a priori false null hypothesis because mortality in general could be negatively related to pack demography. The mixed logistic regression models in Cassidy &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;. compared a group of packs in which human-caused mortality was observed (along with an unknown level of natural mortality) to a “contaminated” control group of packs in which human-caused mortality was not observed (but which also experienced unknown levels of natural mortality and human-caused mortality of non-collared pack members). This design cannot exclude the alternate hypothesis that any type of mortality (including natural mortality) could have caused the obser","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2830","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143117025","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Redrawing Köppen-Geiger classes with microclimate: implications for nature and society 重新绘制Köppen-Geiger类与小气候:对自然和社会的影响
IF 7.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI: 10.1002/fee.2831
David H Klinges, Ilya MD Maclean, Brett R Scheffers

Scientists have long categorized the planet's climate using the Köppen-Geiger (KG) classification to research climate-change impacts, biogeographical realms, agricultural suitability, and conservation. However, global KG maps primarily rely on macroclimate data collected by weather stations, which may not represent microclimatic conditions experienced by most life on Earth. Few studies have explored microclimate at broad scales, largely due to data and computational constraints. Here, we predicted KG classes separately from macroclimate and microclimate for more than 32 million locations across six continents. As compared to macroclimate, microclimate had 14-fold lower error and reclassified 38% of the total area. Microclimate-derived KG classes were not only more spatially variable but also encompassed a broader range of latitudes, relative to macroclimate-derived KG classes. By redrawing the lines of climate classes, our study prompts a reevaluation of the importance of meteorological drivers of ecology across scales, shedding light on how natural, agricultural, and social systems experience and respond to global change.

长期以来,科学家们一直使用Köppen-Geiger (KG)分类来对地球气候进行分类,以研究气候变化的影响、生物地理领域、农业适宜性和保护。然而,全球KG图主要依赖气象站收集的大气候数据,这些数据可能无法代表地球上大多数生命所经历的小气候条件。由于数据和计算的限制,很少有研究在大尺度上探索小气候。在这里,我们分别预测了六大洲3200多万个地点的KG类别,而不是大气候和小气候。与大气候区相比,小气候区误差低14倍,重分类面积占总面积的38%。相对于宏观气候衍生的KG类别,小气候衍生的KG类别不仅具有更大的空间变异性,而且包含更广泛的纬度范围。通过重新绘制气候类别的界线,我们的研究促使人们重新评估跨尺度生态的气象驱动因素的重要性,揭示自然、农业和社会系统如何经历和响应全球变化。
{"title":"Redrawing Köppen-Geiger classes with microclimate: implications for nature and society","authors":"David H Klinges,&nbsp;Ilya MD Maclean,&nbsp;Brett R Scheffers","doi":"10.1002/fee.2831","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fee.2831","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Scientists have long categorized the planet's climate using the Köppen-Geiger (KG) classification to research climate-change impacts, biogeographical realms, agricultural suitability, and conservation. However, global KG maps primarily rely on macroclimate data collected by weather stations, which may not represent microclimatic conditions experienced by most life on Earth. Few studies have explored microclimate at broad scales, largely due to data and computational constraints. Here, we predicted KG classes separately from macroclimate and microclimate for more than 32 million locations across six continents. As compared to macroclimate, microclimate had 14-fold lower error and reclassified 38% of the total area. Microclimate-derived KG classes were not only more spatially variable but also encompassed a broader range of latitudes, relative to macroclimate-derived KG classes. By redrawing the lines of climate classes, our study prompts a reevaluation of the importance of meteorological drivers of ecology across scales, shedding light on how natural, agricultural, and social systems experience and respond to global change.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144190896","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1