首页 > 最新文献

Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment最新文献

英文 中文
Science in a changing world 变化世界中的科学
IF 1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI: 10.1002/fee.2797
Juli G Pausas
<p>Science aims not only to describe the universe but also to make predictions, allowing us to react accordingly and improve our quality of life. Over recent decades, scientists have meticulously recorded and described climate patterns and processes worldwide. Predictions regarding climate change in response to anthropogenic factors, such as atmospheric greenhouse-gas emissions, were initially made long ago (<i>Q J Roy Meteor Soc</i> 1938; <i>Nature</i> 1972; <i>Science</i> 1975) and have been continually refined through successive studies and reports from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Presented in a plethora of international conferences, these predictions were reasonably close to current observations. However, humanity has largely disregarded these predictions, and as a result, science has not fully served one of its purposes. Thus, the current widespread occurrence of droughts, heatwaves, and intense wildfires should come as no surprise—in fact, it can be argued that these are outcomes that humanity has collectively chosen. Despite some uncertainties, including local-scale processes and societal reactions, the climate will continue to change in the short term.</p><p>For different parts of the world and for different branches of the tree of life, scientists have also been predicting the ecological consequences of ignoring those climate predictions. Given that humans have changed the climate, the distribution and structure of biota must also change, and given the rate of change, this implies a loss of biodiversity. Aiming to preserve 20th-century ecosystems within a 21st-century climate is naive. Examples of shifts in ecosystem structure, function, and biodiversity caused by droughts, warming temperatures, and changes in fire regimes are accumulating, and many more shifts are yet to come; indeed, studies of such phenomena are likely to overwhelm ecological research in the coming years. Relentless climate change, together with other anthropogenic impacts such as pollution, land-use change, and non-native invasive species, is shifting the biodiversity baseline to a new normal. Ecological restoration no longer requires looking at the past (reference ecosystems) but rather focusing on sustainability under the predicted future (novel ecosystems and no-analog communities).</p><p>Self-interest and social inertia across the entire human population, along with purposeful misinformation by major social actors like fossil-fuel companies (<i>Science</i> 2023), have led to the so-called “tragedy of the commons” prevailing over scientific evidence. Improving our predictive ability (one of the objectives of science) does not seem to be a priority anymore as it is not a limiting factor. Ecologists continue to monitor the changes (for example, scientists as “insectometers”; <i>P Natl Acad Sci USA</i> 2021). In so doing, we certainly learn about how the biosphere and biodiversity are functioning, but we are witnessing a vanishing world that has—up
科学的目的不仅在于描述宇宙,还在于做出预测,让我们能够做出相应的反应,提高我们的生活质量。近几十年来,科学家们对全世界的气候模式和过程进行了细致的记录和描述。很久以前(Q J Roy Meteor Soc 1938 年;Nature 1972 年;Science 1975 年),人们就开始预测大气温室气体排放等人为因素导致的气候变化,并通过政府间气候变化专门委员会的连续研究和报告不断完善这些预测。在大量国际会议上提出的这些预测与目前的观测结果相当接近。然而,人类在很大程度上无视这些预测,因此,科学并没有完全达到其目的之一。因此,目前普遍发生的干旱、热浪和强烈野火不足为奇--事实上,可以说这些都是人类共同选择的结果。尽管存在一些不确定因素,包括局部范围的过程和社会反应,但短期内气候仍将继续变化。对于世界不同地区和生命之树的不同分支,科学家们也一直在预测忽视这些气候预测的生态后果。鉴于人类已经改变了气候,生物群的分布和结构也必须随之改变,而鉴于变化的速度,这意味着生物多样性的丧失。想要在 21 世纪的气候条件下保护 20 世纪的生态系统是天真的想法。干旱、气温升高和火灾制度的变化导致生态系统结构、功能和生物多样性发生变化的例子正在不断积累,更多的变化还在后头;事实上,对这些现象的研究很可能会在未来几年压倒生态学研究。无情的气候变化,加上其他人为影响,如污染、土地使用变化和非本地入侵物种,正在将生物多样性基线转变为新常态。生态恢复不再需要着眼于过去(参考生态系统),而是要关注预测未来(新型生态系统和无模拟群落)下的可持续性。全人类的自身利益和社会惰性,加上化石燃料公司等主要社会行为者有目的的误导(《科学 2023》),导致所谓的 "公地悲剧 "压倒了科学证据。提高我们的预测能力(科学的目标之一)似乎不再是当务之急,因为它并不是一个限制因素。生态学家继续监测变化(例如,科学家作为 "昆虫测量仪";P Natl Acad Sci USA 2021)。在此过程中,我们当然可以了解生物圈和生物多样性是如何运作的,但我们目睹的是一个正在消失的世界,而到目前为止,这个世界已经很好地适应了人类。这不禁让人想起莱昂西奥-巴迪亚(Leoncio Badia,1939-1945 年间西班牙巴伦西亚帕泰尔纳的殡葬业者),他亲眼目睹了佛朗哥独裁政权处决同事的残酷现实,并小心翼翼地将尸体秘密掩埋,一丝不苟地记录下所有细节并贴上标签,以便日后辨认(这确实发生过)。同样,今天的科学家目睹了自然界的消失,为了子孙后代的利益,他们悄悄地、小心翼翼地记录下了这些细节,并感觉到这一过程的力量是不可阻挡的(巴迪亚效应)。对于那些对生物多样性和自然历史感兴趣的人来说,这种感觉很奇怪,也很不舒服。人类可能会开发出一些技术来帮助自己不断适应新的气候,但生物多样性很可能会被抛在后面。要想尽快有效地稳定气候,就需要全球各行各业采取集体行动和持续努力。重要的是要意识到气候是一种共同利益,需要全球努力保护,以造福子孙后代。在推动实质性政策变革的同时,我们必须认识到,我们--人民--是一个巨大的集体。我们个人和社区行为的微小变化看似微不足道,但却可以通过类似传染病(非线性)的过程不断积累和扩散,最终导致当前趋势的突然转变。因此,"放眼全球,立足当地 "这句古老的口号比以往任何时候都更具现实意义,"超前思考,立即行动 "也是如此。
{"title":"Science in a changing world","authors":"Juli G Pausas","doi":"10.1002/fee.2797","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2797","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Science aims not only to describe the universe but also to make predictions, allowing us to react accordingly and improve our quality of life. Over recent decades, scientists have meticulously recorded and described climate patterns and processes worldwide. Predictions regarding climate change in response to anthropogenic factors, such as atmospheric greenhouse-gas emissions, were initially made long ago (&lt;i&gt;Q J Roy Meteor Soc&lt;/i&gt; 1938; &lt;i&gt;Nature&lt;/i&gt; 1972; &lt;i&gt;Science&lt;/i&gt; 1975) and have been continually refined through successive studies and reports from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Presented in a plethora of international conferences, these predictions were reasonably close to current observations. However, humanity has largely disregarded these predictions, and as a result, science has not fully served one of its purposes. Thus, the current widespread occurrence of droughts, heatwaves, and intense wildfires should come as no surprise—in fact, it can be argued that these are outcomes that humanity has collectively chosen. Despite some uncertainties, including local-scale processes and societal reactions, the climate will continue to change in the short term.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For different parts of the world and for different branches of the tree of life, scientists have also been predicting the ecological consequences of ignoring those climate predictions. Given that humans have changed the climate, the distribution and structure of biota must also change, and given the rate of change, this implies a loss of biodiversity. Aiming to preserve 20th-century ecosystems within a 21st-century climate is naive. Examples of shifts in ecosystem structure, function, and biodiversity caused by droughts, warming temperatures, and changes in fire regimes are accumulating, and many more shifts are yet to come; indeed, studies of such phenomena are likely to overwhelm ecological research in the coming years. Relentless climate change, together with other anthropogenic impacts such as pollution, land-use change, and non-native invasive species, is shifting the biodiversity baseline to a new normal. Ecological restoration no longer requires looking at the past (reference ecosystems) but rather focusing on sustainability under the predicted future (novel ecosystems and no-analog communities).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Self-interest and social inertia across the entire human population, along with purposeful misinformation by major social actors like fossil-fuel companies (&lt;i&gt;Science&lt;/i&gt; 2023), have led to the so-called “tragedy of the commons” prevailing over scientific evidence. Improving our predictive ability (one of the objectives of science) does not seem to be a priority anymore as it is not a limiting factor. Ecologists continue to monitor the changes (for example, scientists as “insectometers”; &lt;i&gt;P Natl Acad Sci USA&lt;/i&gt; 2021). In so doing, we certainly learn about how the biosphere and biodiversity are functioning, but we are witnessing a vanishing world that has—up","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"22 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2797","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142130343","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Contribution of environmental DNA toward fungal Red Listing 环境 DNA 对真菌红色名录的贡献
IF 1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-18 DOI: 10.1002/fee.2791
Ovidiu Copoț, Asko Lõhmus, Kessy Abarenkov, Leho Tedersoo, Kadri Runnel

In navigating the biodiversity crisis, a major uncertainty is the conservation status of inconspicuous, yet megadiverse and functionally crucial, soil organisms. Massive datasets on soil biota are accumulating through molecular sampling approaches, but to date these datasets have provided only limited input into conservation planning and management. We investigated how environmental DNA (eDNA) data of soil macrofungi contribute to regional Red List assessments, which are currently based on fruiting bodies (hereafter, fruit-bodies). In our test region of Estonia (northern Europe), which contained ~15,000 fruit-body records for 1583 assessed species, an average soil sample increased the range estimates of Threatened and Near Threatened fungal species by 0.18%. Five hundred soil samples almost doubled their known localities and added 19% previously unrecorded species. However, even after accumulating >1000 soil samples, about half of the Threatened and Near Threatened species known by fruit-bodies remained undetected through eDNA techniques. Effective conservation assessment of soil fungi thus requires both fruit-body and eDNA data; therefore, special efforts are needed to make these data available to conservationists.

在应对生物多样性危机的过程中,一个主要的不确定因素是那些不起眼、但却种类繁多、功能关键的土壤生物的保护状况。通过分子取样方法,有关土壤生物区系的大量数据集正在积累,但迄今为止,这些数据集仅为保护规划和管理提供了有限的投入。我们研究了土壤大型真菌的环境 DNA(eDNA)数据对地区红色名录评估的贡献。在我们的测试区域爱沙尼亚(北欧),有 1583 个评估物种的约 15000 个子实体记录,平均一个土壤样本可使濒危和近危真菌物种的范围估计值增加 0.18%。五百个土壤样本几乎将其已知地点增加了一倍,并增加了 19% 以前未记录的物种。然而,即使积累了 1000 个土壤样本,通过 eDNA 技术仍有约一半的濒危和近危物种未被发现。因此,对土壤真菌进行有效的保护评估需要果实体和 eDNA 数据;因此,需要做出特别努力,向保护工作者提供这些数据。
{"title":"Contribution of environmental DNA toward fungal Red Listing","authors":"Ovidiu Copoț,&nbsp;Asko Lõhmus,&nbsp;Kessy Abarenkov,&nbsp;Leho Tedersoo,&nbsp;Kadri Runnel","doi":"10.1002/fee.2791","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fee.2791","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In navigating the biodiversity crisis, a major uncertainty is the conservation status of inconspicuous, yet megadiverse and functionally crucial, soil organisms. Massive datasets on soil biota are accumulating through molecular sampling approaches, but to date these datasets have provided only limited input into conservation planning and management. We investigated how environmental DNA (eDNA) data of soil macrofungi contribute to regional Red List assessments, which are currently based on fruiting bodies (hereafter, fruit-bodies). In our test region of Estonia (northern Europe), which contained ~15,000 fruit-body records for 1583 assessed species, an average soil sample increased the range estimates of Threatened and Near Threatened fungal species by 0.18%. Five hundred soil samples almost doubled their known localities and added 19% previously unrecorded species. However, even after accumulating &gt;1000 soil samples, about half of the Threatened and Near Threatened species known by fruit-bodies remained undetected through eDNA techniques. Effective conservation assessment of soil fungi thus requires both fruit-body and eDNA data; therefore, special efforts are needed to make these data available to conservationists.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"22 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2791","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142185885","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Can 30 × 30 targets stop island extinctions? 30×30 目标能否阻止岛屿灭绝?
IF 1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI: 10.1002/fee.2790
Tyrone H Lavery, Steve Cranwell, George Tauika, David Lindenmayer
{"title":"Can 30 × 30 targets stop island extinctions?","authors":"Tyrone H Lavery,&nbsp;Steve Cranwell,&nbsp;George Tauika,&nbsp;David Lindenmayer","doi":"10.1002/fee.2790","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fee.2790","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"22 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141926663","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Supplementary bird feeding as an overlooked contribution to local phosphorus cycles 被忽视的鸟类补充食物对当地磷循环的贡献
IF 1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI: 10.1002/fee.2793
Andrew J Abraham, Christopher E Doughty, Kate E Plummer, Ethan S Duvall

Supplementary feeding of garden birds and gamebirds is a common practice worldwide. Bird feed is rich in phosphorus (P), which plays a key role in animal health and ecosystem function. However, much of the P in bird feed originates from mined rock deposits, which is then transported thousands of kilometers to feeder stations, where it represents an external source of nutrients for recipient ecosystems. Here, we demonstrate that diffusion of P by birds and other animals from feeder stations to ecosystems can represent a nontrivial contribution to local biogeochemical cycles. Using the UK as a case study, we show that supplementary bird feeding supplies 2.4 (range: 1.9–3.0) gigagrams of P per year across the UK, a flux similar in magnitude to atmospheric deposition. Phosphorus provided to garden birds alone is equal to that supplied through the application of garden fertilizers. In natural and semi-natural ecosystems, additional feeder-derived P inputs may exacerbate eutrophication at the local scale and adversely impact biodiversity.

对园林鸟类和野鸟进行补充喂养是全世界的普遍做法。鸟类饲料富含磷 (P),对动物健康和生态系统功能起着关键作用。然而,鸟类饲料中的磷大部分来自开采的岩石矿床,然后被运输到数千公里外的喂食站,成为受体生态系统的外部营养源。在这里,我们证明了鸟类和其他动物从饲养站向生态系统的钾扩散对当地生物地球化学循环的贡献非同小可。以英国为例,我们发现鸟类的补充喂食每年为英国提供 2.4(范围:1.9-3.0)千兆克的磷,其通量与大气沉降量相近。仅园林鸟类提供的磷就相当于施用园林肥料所提供的磷。在自然和半自然生态系统中,额外的馈源磷输入可能会加剧局部范围的富营养化,并对生物多样性产生不利影响。
{"title":"Supplementary bird feeding as an overlooked contribution to local phosphorus cycles","authors":"Andrew J Abraham,&nbsp;Christopher E Doughty,&nbsp;Kate E Plummer,&nbsp;Ethan S Duvall","doi":"10.1002/fee.2793","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fee.2793","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Supplementary feeding of garden birds and gamebirds is a common practice worldwide. Bird feed is rich in phosphorus (P), which plays a key role in animal health and ecosystem function. However, much of the P in bird feed originates from mined rock deposits, which is then transported thousands of kilometers to feeder stations, where it represents an external source of nutrients for recipient ecosystems. Here, we demonstrate that diffusion of P by birds and other animals from feeder stations to ecosystems can represent a nontrivial contribution to local biogeochemical cycles. Using the UK as a case study, we show that supplementary bird feeding supplies 2.4 (range: 1.9–3.0) gigagrams of P per year across the UK, a flux similar in magnitude to atmospheric deposition. Phosphorus provided to garden birds alone is equal to that supplied through the application of garden fertilizers. In natural and semi-natural ecosystems, additional feeder-derived P inputs may exacerbate eutrophication at the local scale and adversely impact biodiversity.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"22 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2793","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141945179","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Modern building structures are a landscape-level driver of bat–human exposure risk in Kenya 现代建筑结构是肯尼亚蝙蝠与人类接触风险的景观层面驱动因素
IF 1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI: 10.1002/fee.2795
Tamika J Lunn, Reilly T Jackson, Paul W Webala, Joseph G Ogola, Kristian M Forbes

Identifying the locations and drivers of high-risk interfaces between humans and wildlife is crucial for managing zoonotic disease risk. We suggest that continent-wide improvements to residential housing in Africa are inadvertently creating artificial roosting habitat for synanthropic free-tailed bats (family Molossidae), and that improved buildings are a rapidly accelerating exposure interface that needs urgent research attention and investment. Along a residential gradient in rural southern Kenya, we mapped building use by free-tailed bats in 1109 buildings. We show that bats often roost in human-occupied buildings, with almost one-in-ten buildings exhibiting evidence of bat occupation (9.2%) and one-in-13 found to contain active bat roosts (7.6%). We identified modern-build styles and triangular roofing as building-level predictors of bat occupation, and the proportion of modern buildings as a landscape-level predictor of bat occupancy. Humane preemptive exclusion of bats (by sealing bat entry points to buildings) and restoration of natural roosting habitats should be prioritized as One Health land-use planning strategies in rural Africa.

确定人类与野生动物之间高风险界面的位置和驱动因素对于管理人畜共患病风险至关重要。我们认为,非洲大陆范围内居民住房的改善无意中为同类的自由尾蝠(蝠科)创造了人工栖息地,改善后的建筑是一个迅速加速的暴露界面,亟需研究关注和投资。沿着肯尼亚南部农村地区的住宅梯度,我们绘制了 1109 栋建筑物中自由尾蝠的栖息地分布图。我们发现,蝙蝠经常在人类居住的建筑物中栖息,几乎十分之一的建筑物都有蝙蝠栖息的迹象(9.2%),而十三分之一的建筑物中发现有活跃的蝙蝠栖息地(7.6%)。我们发现,现代建筑风格和三角形屋顶是建筑层面上预测蝙蝠栖息地的因素,而现代建筑的比例则是景观层面上预测蝙蝠栖息地的因素。非洲农村地区的 "一个健康 "土地利用规划战略应优先考虑对蝙蝠进行人性化的先期驱逐(通过封闭蝙蝠进入建筑物的入口)和恢复自然栖息地。
{"title":"Modern building structures are a landscape-level driver of bat–human exposure risk in Kenya","authors":"Tamika J Lunn,&nbsp;Reilly T Jackson,&nbsp;Paul W Webala,&nbsp;Joseph G Ogola,&nbsp;Kristian M Forbes","doi":"10.1002/fee.2795","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fee.2795","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Identifying the locations and drivers of high-risk interfaces between humans and wildlife is crucial for managing zoonotic disease risk. We suggest that continent-wide improvements to residential housing in Africa are inadvertently creating artificial roosting habitat for synanthropic free-tailed bats (family Molossidae), and that improved buildings are a rapidly accelerating exposure interface that needs urgent research attention and investment. Along a residential gradient in rural southern Kenya, we mapped building use by free-tailed bats in 1109 buildings. We show that bats often roost in human-occupied buildings, with almost one-in-ten buildings exhibiting evidence of bat occupation (9.2%) and one-in-13 found to contain active bat roosts (7.6%). We identified modern-build styles and triangular roofing as building-level predictors of bat occupation, and the proportion of modern buildings as a landscape-level predictor of bat occupancy. Humane preemptive exclusion of bats (by sealing bat entry points to buildings) and restoration of natural roosting habitats should be prioritized as One Health land-use planning strategies in rural Africa.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2795","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141945176","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Species control for managing thermal guild interactions in warming food webs 在气候变暖的食物网中进行物种控制,以管理热导相互作用
IF 1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI: 10.1002/fee.2794
Lauren Jarvis, Bailey C McMeans, Cindy Chu, Tyler D Tunney

To promote sustainable fisheries under climate change, fisheries managers must apply appropriate adaptation measures. However, little is known about how species interactions shift with climate change and the potential effectiveness of such adaptation measures. Here, we modeled the application of a species control measure in a lake ecosystem using a temperature-dependent food-web model containing different thermal guilds. A warm-adapted predator (bass, Micropterus spp) was removed to locally mitigate undesirable effects of climate warming on a cool-adapted species (walleye, Sander vitreus). Nevertheless, a warming-induced thermally mediated trophic cascade can lead to expected and unexpected outcomes, with bass removal depending on food-web linkages. With low levels of bass predation on juvenile walleye, walleye persist in warmer temperatures when bass are present (not controlled) than when bass are absent (controlled). Therefore, we encourage managers to use caution and consider various scenarios of food-web changes, to determine when species control may be effective for climate adaptation.

为促进气候变化下的可持续渔业,渔业管理者必须采取适当的适应措施。然而,人们对物种间的相互作用如何随气候变化而变化以及此类适应措施的潜在效果知之甚少。在这里,我们利用一个包含不同热量行会的温度依赖性食物网模型,模拟了在湖泊生态系统中应用物种控制措施的情况。移除适应暖气候的捕食者(鲈鱼,Micropterus spp),以局部缓解气候变暖对适应冷气候的物种(马黑鱼,Sander vitreus)的不良影响。然而,气候变暖引起的热介导营养级联反应可能会导致意料之中和意料之外的结果,鲈鱼的移除取决于食物网的联系。由于鲈鱼对马口鱼幼鱼的捕食水平较低,当鲈鱼存在(未受控制)时,马口鱼在较高温度下的存活率要高于鲈鱼不存在(受控制)时的存活率。因此,我们鼓励管理者谨慎行事,考虑食物网变化的各种情况,以确定物种控制何时可有效适应气候。
{"title":"Species control for managing thermal guild interactions in warming food webs","authors":"Lauren Jarvis,&nbsp;Bailey C McMeans,&nbsp;Cindy Chu,&nbsp;Tyler D Tunney","doi":"10.1002/fee.2794","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fee.2794","url":null,"abstract":"<p>To promote sustainable fisheries under climate change, fisheries managers must apply appropriate adaptation measures. However, little is known about how species interactions shift with climate change and the potential effectiveness of such adaptation measures. Here, we modeled the application of a species control measure in a lake ecosystem using a temperature-dependent food-web model containing different thermal guilds. A warm-adapted predator (bass, <i>Micropterus</i> spp) was removed to locally mitigate undesirable effects of climate warming on a cool-adapted species (walleye, <i>Sander vitreus</i>). Nevertheless, a warming-induced thermally mediated trophic cascade can lead to expected and unexpected outcomes, with bass removal depending on food-web linkages. With low levels of bass predation on juvenile walleye, walleye persist in warmer temperatures when bass are present (not controlled) than when bass are absent (controlled). Therefore, we encourage managers to use caution and consider various scenarios of food-web changes, to determine when species control may be effective for climate adaptation.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"22 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2794","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141945178","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Monitoring ecosystem services with essential ecosystem service variables 用基本生态系统服务变量监测生态系统服务
IF 1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI: 10.1002/fee.2792
Amanda M Schwantes, Carina Rauen Firkowski, Flavio Affinito, Peter S Rodriguez, Marie-Josée Fortin, Andrew Gonzalez

In the Anthropocene, ecosystems are changing along with their capacity to support human well-being. Monitoring ecosystem services (ESs) is required to assess the changing state of human–nature interactions. To standardize the monitoring of multiple facets of ESs, the Group on Earth Observations Biodiversity Observation Network (GEO BON) recently proposed the essential ecosystem service variables (EESVs), which are organized into six classes: Ecological Supply, Use, Demand, Anthropogenic Contribution, Instrumental Value, and Relational Value. We apply the EESV framework to three case studies in British Columbia, Canada, each targeting a single ES. Using trend and intervention analysis, we show how EESVs are changing and affected by policy. We discuss key challenges and solutions while providing guidance on how to quantify EESVs. Finally, we demonstrate the potential of EESVs to harmonize metrics across conceptual frameworks, monitor ES change, and provide decision support to assess progress under various international policy conventions.

在 "人类世",生态系统正在发生变化,其支持人类福祉的能力也在发生变化。需要对生态系统服务(ES)进行监测,以评估人类与自然互动的变化状况。为了对生态系统服务的多个方面进行标准化监测,地球观测组织生物多样性观测网络(GEO BON)最近提出了基本生态系统服务变量(EESVs),共分为六类:生态供应、使用、需求、人为贡献、工具价值和关系价值。我们将 EESV 框架应用于加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的三个案例研究,每个案例研究针对一个单一的生态系统服务。通过趋势和干预分析,我们展示了 EESV 如何变化并受到政策的影响。我们讨论了主要挑战和解决方案,同时就如何量化 EESV 提供了指导。最后,我们展示了 EESV 在协调不同概念框架下的衡量标准、监测 ES 变化以及为评估各种国际政策公约的进展提供决策支持方面的潜力。
{"title":"Monitoring ecosystem services with essential ecosystem service variables","authors":"Amanda M Schwantes,&nbsp;Carina Rauen Firkowski,&nbsp;Flavio Affinito,&nbsp;Peter S Rodriguez,&nbsp;Marie-Josée Fortin,&nbsp;Andrew Gonzalez","doi":"10.1002/fee.2792","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fee.2792","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the Anthropocene, ecosystems are changing along with their capacity to support human well-being. Monitoring ecosystem services (ESs) is required to assess the changing state of human–nature interactions. To standardize the monitoring of multiple facets of ESs, the Group on Earth Observations Biodiversity Observation Network (GEO BON) recently proposed the essential ecosystem service variables (EESVs), which are organized into six classes: <i>Ecological Supply</i>, <i>Use</i>, <i>Demand</i>, <i>Anthropogenic Contribution</i>, <i>Instrumental Value</i>, and <i>Relational Value</i>. We apply the EESV framework to three case studies in British Columbia, Canada, each targeting a single ES. Using trend and intervention analysis, we show how EESVs are changing and affected by policy. We discuss key challenges and solutions while providing guidance on how to quantify EESVs. Finally, we demonstrate the potential of EESVs to harmonize metrics across conceptual frameworks, monitor ES change, and provide decision support to assess progress under various international policy conventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"22 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2792","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141945177","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What's the point of peer review? 同行评审的意义何在?
IF 1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1002/fee.2785
Gavin M Jones
<p>If there is one common experience shared by all scientists, regardless of subdiscipline, it is the gauntlet of peer review. We all know the painful experience of rejection, the frustration of acquiescing to reviewers’ demands, and the many months that can sometimes elapse between the submission of and first decision on a paper. But for many, it is the peer-review process that adds the necessary ingredient of rigor—the stamp of approval—to science. For instance, science journalists primarily cover peer-reviewed studies, and the court systems consider peer-reviewed science to be the gold standard in environmental and conservation-related cases.</p><p>I have always thought that peer review acted as the primary filter excluding the most egregious error-laden and misguided science from entering the canon of scientific literature. But think about it—how often have you tossed out a paper of yours because it was rejected after peer review? How often have you, after making minimal changes, or no changes at all, re-submitted to another journal hoping for a “better” draw of peer reviewers? Perhaps several decades ago, when all journals were print-only and page space and the number of journal options were limited, the situation really was “make the changes or bust”. But with the remarkable proliferation of journals that now exist in every subdiscipline, every paper can find a home. According to Scopus, there are at least 550 indexed journals in the environmental science subcategory of “ecology”, and that number is growing. After each rejection, you could quite literally re-submit the same paper every few months to a new journal for the rest of your career, and know that you'll get a bite at some point.</p><p>The problem of poor-quality science in the literature is worsened by the exponentially growing sector of “predatory” or “pay-to-publish” outlets. These outlets’ journals, which often spam prospective authors with urgent messages asking for a rapid submission, will publish papers with little to no peer-review oversight, and for a fee. Much has been written about this seedy underbelly of academic publishing, and “sting” operations have revealed how little these outlets care about the content in their journals. One of my favorite examples occurred in 2020 when Dr. Dan Baldassarre, a behavioral ecologist at the State University of New York-Oswego, submitted a spoof paper titled “What's the Deal with Birds?” to a suspected predatory journal, the <i>Scientific Journal of Research and Reviews</i>. To the delight of Dr. Baldassarre's followers on social media, the paper was accepted, published within only seven days of its initial submission (!) if the metadata are to be believed, and still stands as one of the greatest publishing punk-jobs in science. Sometimes we have to laugh so that we don't cry; and while this example still makes me chuckle, the problems in publishing do not.</p><p>If we cannot trust journals at the “fringe”, then perhaps we can place mo
如果说所有科学家,无论属于哪个分支学科,都有一个共同的经历,那就是同行评审的重重考验。我们都知道被拒稿的痛苦经历,默许审稿人要求的挫败感,以及有时从提交论文到首次做出决定之间长达数月的时间。但对许多人来说,正是同行评审过程为科学增添了必要的严谨成分--认可的印记。例如,科学记者主要报道经过同行评议的研究,而法院系统则认为经过同行评议的科学是环境和保护相关案件的黄金标准。我一直认为,同行评议是一个主要的过滤器,可以将最严重的错误和误导性科学排除在科学文献之外。但仔细想想,你有多少次因为同行评审后论文被拒而放弃自己的论文?你又有多少次在做了极少的改动或根本没有改动之后,又重新投稿给另一家期刊,希望能抽到 "更好的 "同行评审员?也许几十年前,当所有期刊都是纯印刷版,版面空间和期刊选择有限时,情况确实是 "要么改,要么废"。但随着现在各分支学科期刊的大量涌现,每篇论文都能找到归宿。根据 Scopus 的统计,在 "生态学 "这一环境科学子类中,至少有 550 种期刊被收录,而且这一数字还在不断增长。每次被拒后,你都可以在职业生涯的余下时间里,每隔几个月向新的期刊重新投递同一篇论文,而且你知道自己总会有机会被采用。这些机构的期刊经常会向潜在作者发送紧急邮件,要求他们尽快投稿,它们会在几乎没有同行评审监督的情况下发表论文,并收取一定费用。关于学术出版界的这一丑恶现象已经有很多报道,"刺探 "行动也揭示了这些机构对其期刊内容的漠不关心。我最喜欢的一个例子发生在 2020 年,当时纽约州立大学奥斯威戈分校的行为生态学家丹-巴尔达萨里博士(Dr. Dan Baldassarre)向疑似掠夺性期刊《科学研究与评论杂志》(Scientific Journal of Research and Reviews)提交了一篇题为《鸟类是怎么回事?让 Baldassarre 博士在社交媒体上的粉丝们欣喜若狂的是,这篇论文被接受了,如果元数据属实的话,它在首次投稿后仅七天内就发表了(!),至今仍是科学界最伟大的出版朋克之一。如果我们不能信任 "边缘 "期刊,那么也许我们可以更多地信任在顶级期刊和社会办期刊上发表的科学成果,比如您现在正在阅读的这本期刊。我确实认为这是一个部分解决方案;专业学会在维护其在学术界的声誉方面有着强烈的既得利益,而学会期刊通常由该领域德高望重的人士编辑。但我们仍能看到论文被撤稿的情况,即使是在声誉极佳的期刊上,最近也有一些备受瞩目的数据捏造或篡改事件被曝光。一家隶属于知名学术团体的期刊最近发现,作为特刊一部分发表的大量论文存在造假行为。在另一家学会主办的期刊上发表论文的作者对同行评审人的评论质量低下表示担忧。这暗示了审稿人负担过重这一更广泛的问题。不过,从整体上看,我们在科学文献中读到的东西开始变得越来越不可信。那么,既然同行评审存在缺陷,它的意义何在?同行评审虽然不是灵丹妙药,但它确实起到了过滤器的作用,哪怕只是一个粗糙的过滤器。同行评议往往会产生更好的论文,即使它们仍然不完美。主编、副主编和审稿人不可能发现所有的错误或错误推论,而要找出不当行为更是难上加难。同行评审的局限性应该让我们学会对所读到的任何东西保持健康的怀疑态度;这种永恒的质疑精神正是优秀科学家的标志,不是吗?当社会上的其他人都在努力解决如何解析互联网上的(错误)信息时,我们也必须对已发表的科学成果提出更多质疑,同时避免愤世嫉俗。对于科学家和社会来说,减少将同行评审视为认可的印章,而成为更具批判性的信息消费者,也许是一件健康的事情。
{"title":"What's the point of peer review?","authors":"Gavin M Jones","doi":"10.1002/fee.2785","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fee.2785","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;If there is one common experience shared by all scientists, regardless of subdiscipline, it is the gauntlet of peer review. We all know the painful experience of rejection, the frustration of acquiescing to reviewers’ demands, and the many months that can sometimes elapse between the submission of and first decision on a paper. But for many, it is the peer-review process that adds the necessary ingredient of rigor—the stamp of approval—to science. For instance, science journalists primarily cover peer-reviewed studies, and the court systems consider peer-reviewed science to be the gold standard in environmental and conservation-related cases.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have always thought that peer review acted as the primary filter excluding the most egregious error-laden and misguided science from entering the canon of scientific literature. But think about it—how often have you tossed out a paper of yours because it was rejected after peer review? How often have you, after making minimal changes, or no changes at all, re-submitted to another journal hoping for a “better” draw of peer reviewers? Perhaps several decades ago, when all journals were print-only and page space and the number of journal options were limited, the situation really was “make the changes or bust”. But with the remarkable proliferation of journals that now exist in every subdiscipline, every paper can find a home. According to Scopus, there are at least 550 indexed journals in the environmental science subcategory of “ecology”, and that number is growing. After each rejection, you could quite literally re-submit the same paper every few months to a new journal for the rest of your career, and know that you'll get a bite at some point.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The problem of poor-quality science in the literature is worsened by the exponentially growing sector of “predatory” or “pay-to-publish” outlets. These outlets’ journals, which often spam prospective authors with urgent messages asking for a rapid submission, will publish papers with little to no peer-review oversight, and for a fee. Much has been written about this seedy underbelly of academic publishing, and “sting” operations have revealed how little these outlets care about the content in their journals. One of my favorite examples occurred in 2020 when Dr. Dan Baldassarre, a behavioral ecologist at the State University of New York-Oswego, submitted a spoof paper titled “What's the Deal with Birds?” to a suspected predatory journal, the &lt;i&gt;Scientific Journal of Research and Reviews&lt;/i&gt;. To the delight of Dr. Baldassarre's followers on social media, the paper was accepted, published within only seven days of its initial submission (!) if the metadata are to be believed, and still stands as one of the greatest publishing punk-jobs in science. Sometimes we have to laugh so that we don't cry; and while this example still makes me chuckle, the problems in publishing do not.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If we cannot trust journals at the “fringe”, then perhaps we can place mo","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"22 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2785","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141883231","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A new and unexpected survivor of Aristolochia toxicity? 马兜铃毒性的新的意外幸存者?
IF 1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1002/fee.2786
Joelcio Freitas, Elton John de Lírio, Favio González, Anderson Alves-Araújo
{"title":"A new and unexpected survivor of Aristolochia toxicity?","authors":"Joelcio Freitas,&nbsp;Elton John de Lírio,&nbsp;Favio González,&nbsp;Anderson Alves-Araújo","doi":"10.1002/fee.2786","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fee.2786","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"22 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141883232","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What is the fitness benefit of night lighting for toads? 夜间照明对蟾蜍的健身有什么好处?
IF 1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1002/fee.2787
Matthew L Richardson
{"title":"What is the fitness benefit of night lighting for toads?","authors":"Matthew L Richardson","doi":"10.1002/fee.2787","DOIUrl":"10.1002/fee.2787","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"22 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141883359","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1