首页 > 最新文献

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network最新文献

英文 中文
Current and Emerging Biomarkers: Impact on Risk Stratification for Neuroblastoma. 当前和新兴的生物标记物:对神经母细胞瘤风险分层的影响。
IF 14.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2024.7051
Meredith S Irwin, Kelly C Goldsmith

Neuroblastoma has heterogenous clinical presentations that are reflected by several well-defined clinical factors and biomarkers. Combinations of these clinical and biologic prognostic factors have been used for decades to generate classifiers to stratify patients into risk groups (low, intermediate, and high), which in turn are used to inform and tailor treatment as reported in the new NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for Neuroblastoma. Risk classification uses clinical features, such as age and tumor stage, along with the most significant prognostic tumor biomarkers, including histologic features (differentiation and mitosis-karyorrhexis index), MYCN amplification status, chromosomal copy number alterations (segmental or numerical), and ploidy (DNA content). Recent next-generation sequencing approaches have identified additional tumor-specific genetic factors that have potential roles as prognostic and predictive biomarkers. These emerging biomarkers include telomerase maintenance mechanisms, such as telomerase reverse transcription (TERT) expression and alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) status. Somatic alterations of genes, including mutations in the anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene ALK, detected in >10% of patients with newly diagnosed disease, have both prognostic and predictive roles in determining eligibility for targeted therapies (eg, ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors). In addition to diagnostic tumor-derived biomarkers, significant effort is being directed toward identification of markers to predict response to chemotherapy and immunotherapies. With the increasing use of GD2-containing immunotherapy regimens, efforts are aimed at identifying host or tumor microenvironment immune correlatives that can serve as predictive biomarkers. Understanding the potential role of liquid biopsies as biomarkers during and following treatment, including sequential circulating tumor DNA or tumor-specific mRNA transcripts, is expected to enhance the ability to predict recurrences and also inform understanding of tumor evolution and therapy resistance. These and other emerging biomarkers will lead to refinement and optimization of future neuroblastoma risk classification systems.

神经母细胞瘤的临床表现多种多样,有几种明确的临床因素和生物标志物。几十年来,这些临床和生物预后因素的组合被用于生成分类器,将患者分为低、中和高风险组,进而用于指导和调整治疗,正如新的《NCCN 神经母细胞瘤肿瘤学临床实践指南》所报告的那样。风险分类使用年龄和肿瘤分期等临床特征以及最重要的预后肿瘤生物标志物,包括组织学特征(分化和有丝分裂-核分裂指数)、MYCN扩增状态、染色体拷贝数改变(节段性或数字性)和倍性(DNA含量)。最近的新一代测序方法发现了更多肿瘤特异性遗传因素,这些因素有可能成为预后和预测生物标志物。这些新出现的生物标志物包括端粒酶维持机制,如端粒酶逆转录(TERT)表达和端粒替代性延长(ALT)状态。在超过10%的新确诊患者中检测到的基因体细胞改变,包括无性淋巴瘤激酶基因ALK的突变,在确定靶向治疗(如ALK酪氨酸激酶抑制剂)的资格方面具有预后和预测作用。除了诊断性肿瘤衍生生物标记物外,人们还在努力确定预测化疗和免疫疗法反应的标记物。随着含有 GD2 的免疫疗法方案的使用越来越多,人们正致力于鉴定可作为预测性生物标记物的宿主或肿瘤微环境免疫相关因子。了解液体活检作为生物标记物在治疗过程中和治疗后的潜在作用,包括连续循环肿瘤 DNA 或肿瘤特异性 mRNA 转录物,有望提高预测复发的能力,并为了解肿瘤演变和治疗耐药性提供信息。这些和其他新出现的生物标志物将有助于完善和优化未来的神经母细胞瘤风险分类系统。
{"title":"Current and Emerging Biomarkers: Impact on Risk Stratification for Neuroblastoma.","authors":"Meredith S Irwin, Kelly C Goldsmith","doi":"10.6004/jnccn.2024.7051","DOIUrl":"10.6004/jnccn.2024.7051","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neuroblastoma has heterogenous clinical presentations that are reflected by several well-defined clinical factors and biomarkers. Combinations of these clinical and biologic prognostic factors have been used for decades to generate classifiers to stratify patients into risk groups (low, intermediate, and high), which in turn are used to inform and tailor treatment as reported in the new NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for Neuroblastoma. Risk classification uses clinical features, such as age and tumor stage, along with the most significant prognostic tumor biomarkers, including histologic features (differentiation and mitosis-karyorrhexis index), MYCN amplification status, chromosomal copy number alterations (segmental or numerical), and ploidy (DNA content). Recent next-generation sequencing approaches have identified additional tumor-specific genetic factors that have potential roles as prognostic and predictive biomarkers. These emerging biomarkers include telomerase maintenance mechanisms, such as telomerase reverse transcription (TERT) expression and alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) status. Somatic alterations of genes, including mutations in the anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene ALK, detected in >10% of patients with newly diagnosed disease, have both prognostic and predictive roles in determining eligibility for targeted therapies (eg, ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors). In addition to diagnostic tumor-derived biomarkers, significant effort is being directed toward identification of markers to predict response to chemotherapy and immunotherapies. With the increasing use of GD2-containing immunotherapy regimens, efforts are aimed at identifying host or tumor microenvironment immune correlatives that can serve as predictive biomarkers. Understanding the potential role of liquid biopsies as biomarkers during and following treatment, including sequential circulating tumor DNA or tumor-specific mRNA transcripts, is expected to enhance the ability to predict recurrences and also inform understanding of tumor evolution and therapy resistance. These and other emerging biomarkers will lead to refinement and optimization of future neuroblastoma risk classification systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":17483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","volume":"22 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.8,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141995974","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Care Patterns and Barriers to Outpatient Care for Adults With AML Following Intensive Chemotherapy at NCCN Member Institutions. NCCN 成员机构为接受强化化疗的急性髓细胞性白血病成人患者提供的护理模式和门诊护理障碍。
IF 14.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-30 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2024.7026
Anna B Halpern, Jessica M Sugalski, Lindsey Bandini, Megan Othus, F Marc Stewart, Roland B Walter

Background: Prolonged hospitalization following intensive (re)induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), while standard, is costly and resource intense, limits inpatient bed capacity, and negatively impacts quality of life. Early hospital discharge (EHD) following completion of chemotherapy has proven safe as an alternative at select institutions, but is not widely implemented.

Patients and methods: From February 2023 through May 2023, the NCCN Best Practices Committee conducted a survey evaluating AML hospitalization patterns, care models, and barriers to EHD at its 33 member institutions.

Results: A total of 30 (91%) institutions completed the survey; two-thirds treat >100 patients with AML annually and 45% treat more than half of these with intensive chemotherapy. In the (re)induction setting, 80% of institutions keep patients hospitalized until blood count recovery, whereas 20% aim to discharge patients after completion of chemotherapy if medically stable and logistically feasible. The predominant reasons for the perceived need for ongoing hospitalization were high risk of infection, treatment toxicities, and lack of nearby/accessible housing. There was no significant association between ability to practice EHD and annual AML volume or treatment intensity patterns (P=.60 and P=.11, respectively). In contrast, in the postremission setting, 87% of centers support patients following chemotherapy in the outpatient setting unless toxicities arise requiring readmission. Survey responses showed that 80% of centers were interested in exploring EHD after (re)induction but noted significant barriers, including accessible housing (71%), transportation (50%), high toxicity/infection rate (50%), high transfusion burden (50%), and limited bed availability for rehospitalization (50%).

Conclusions: Hospitalization and care patterns following intensive AML therapy vary widely across major US cancer institutions. Although only 20% of surveyed centers practice EHD following intensive (re)induction chemotherapy, 87% do so following postremission therapy. Given the interest in exploring the EHD approach given potential advantages of EHD for both patients and health care systems, strategies to address identified medical and logistical barriers should be explored.

背景:急性髓性白血病(AML)强化(再)诱导化疗后的长期住院治疗虽然是标准治疗,但费用高昂、资源紧张、限制了住院床位,并对生活质量产生负面影响。化疗结束后提前出院(EHD)作为一种替代方案已在部分机构证明是安全的,但并未广泛实施:从 2023 年 2 月到 2023 年 5 月,NCCN 最佳实践委员会对其 33 个成员机构的急性髓细胞性白血病住院模式、护理模式和 EHD 的障碍进行了调查评估:共有 30 家(91%)机构完成了调查;三分之二的机构每年治疗的急性髓细胞性白血病患者超过 100 人,45% 的机构对其中一半以上的患者进行了强化化疗。在(再)诱导治疗中,80%的机构会让患者住院直至血细胞计数恢复,而20%的机构则希望患者在完成化疗后出院,前提是病情稳定且在后勤上可行。患者认为需要继续住院治疗的主要原因是感染风险高、治疗毒性反应以及附近/交通不便。实施 EHD 的能力与每年急性髓细胞白血病的治疗量或治疗强度模式之间没有明显联系(分别为 P=.60 和 P=.11)。相比之下,在缓解后的治疗中,87%的中心支持患者在门诊接受化疗,除非出现需要再次入院的毒性反应。调查结果显示,80%的中心有兴趣在(再)诱导后探索EHD,但也注意到了一些重大障碍,包括无障碍住房(71%)、交通(50%)、高毒性/感染率(50%)、高输血负担(50%)以及再住院的床位有限(50%):结论:美国各大癌症机构在急性髓细胞白血病强化治疗后的住院和护理模式差异很大。尽管只有 20% 的受访中心在强化(再)诱导化疗后实施 EHD,但 87% 的中心在缓解后治疗后实施 EHD。鉴于EHD对患者和医疗系统的潜在优势,人们对探索EHD方法很感兴趣,因此应探索解决已发现的医疗和后勤障碍的策略。
{"title":"Care Patterns and Barriers to Outpatient Care for Adults With AML Following Intensive Chemotherapy at NCCN Member Institutions.","authors":"Anna B Halpern, Jessica M Sugalski, Lindsey Bandini, Megan Othus, F Marc Stewart, Roland B Walter","doi":"10.6004/jnccn.2024.7026","DOIUrl":"10.6004/jnccn.2024.7026","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prolonged hospitalization following intensive (re)induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), while standard, is costly and resource intense, limits inpatient bed capacity, and negatively impacts quality of life. Early hospital discharge (EHD) following completion of chemotherapy has proven safe as an alternative at select institutions, but is not widely implemented.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>From February 2023 through May 2023, the NCCN Best Practices Committee conducted a survey evaluating AML hospitalization patterns, care models, and barriers to EHD at its 33 member institutions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 30 (91%) institutions completed the survey; two-thirds treat >100 patients with AML annually and 45% treat more than half of these with intensive chemotherapy. In the (re)induction setting, 80% of institutions keep patients hospitalized until blood count recovery, whereas 20% aim to discharge patients after completion of chemotherapy if medically stable and logistically feasible. The predominant reasons for the perceived need for ongoing hospitalization were high risk of infection, treatment toxicities, and lack of nearby/accessible housing. There was no significant association between ability to practice EHD and annual AML volume or treatment intensity patterns (P=.60 and P=.11, respectively). In contrast, in the postremission setting, 87% of centers support patients following chemotherapy in the outpatient setting unless toxicities arise requiring readmission. Survey responses showed that 80% of centers were interested in exploring EHD after (re)induction but noted significant barriers, including accessible housing (71%), transportation (50%), high toxicity/infection rate (50%), high transfusion burden (50%), and limited bed availability for rehospitalization (50%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hospitalization and care patterns following intensive AML therapy vary widely across major US cancer institutions. Although only 20% of surveyed centers practice EHD following intensive (re)induction chemotherapy, 87% do so following postremission therapy. Given the interest in exploring the EHD approach given potential advantages of EHD for both patients and health care systems, strategies to address identified medical and logistical barriers should be explored.</p>","PeriodicalId":17483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","volume":" ","pages":"469-474"},"PeriodicalIF":14.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141855884","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Establishing Consensus for Mohs Micrographic Surgical Techniques in the Treatment of Melanoma in Situ for Future Clinical Trials: A Modified Delphi Study. 建立莫氏显微外科技术治疗原位黑色素瘤的共识,以利于未来的临床试验:改良德尔菲研究。
IF 14.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-30 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2024.7036
Kristen K Curtis, Nathan J Fakult, Jennifer L Strunck, Sumaira Z Aasi, Christine S Ahn, Murad Alam, Anna A Bar, Ramona Behshad, Christopher K Bichakjian, Diana Bolotin, Susan L Boone, Jeremy S Bordeaux, Jerry D Brewer, David R Carr, John A Carucci, Jason R Castillo, Sean R Christensen, Melanie A Clark, Lindsey K Collins, Addison M Demer, Daniel B Eisen, Hao Feng, Bahar F Firoz, Roy C Grekin, Jason M Hirshburg, Todd E Holmes, Conway C Huang, Thomas A Jennings, Shang I Brian Jiang, Sailesh Konda, Justin J Leitenberger, Jesse M Lewin, Ian A Maher, Elise Ng, Ida F Orengo, Faramarz H Samie, Drew K Saylor, Victoria Rose Sharon, Teo Soleymani, Susan M Swetter, Jesalyn A Tate, Marta J Van Beek, Nahid Y Vidal, Alok Vij, Ashley Wysong, Yaohui Gloria Xu, Bryan T Carroll, Wesley Y Yu

Background: Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is a promising treatment modality for melanoma in situ (MIS). However, variations in surgical technique limit the generalizability of existing data and may impede future study of MMS in clinical trials.

Methods: A modified Delphi method was selected to establish consensus on optimal MMS techniques for treating MIS in future clinical trials. The Delphi method was selected due to the limited current data, the wide range of techniques used in the field, and the intention to establish a standardized technique for future clinical trials. A literature review and interviews with experienced MMS surgeons were performed to identify dimensions of the MMS technique for MIS that (1) likely impacted costs or outcomes of the procedure, and (2) showed significant variability between surgeons. A total of 8 dimensions of technical variation were selected. The Delphi process consisted of 2 rounds of voting and commentary, during which 44 expert Mohs surgeons across the United States rated their agreement with specific recommendations using a Likert scale.

Results: Five of eight recommendations achieved consensus in Round 1. All 3 of the remaining recommendations achieved consensus in Round 2. Techniques achieving consensus in Round 1 included the use of a starting peripheral margin of ≤5 mm, application of immunohistochemistry, frozen tissue processing, and resecting to the depth of subcutaneous fat. Consensus on the use of Wood's lamp, dermatoscope, and negative tissue controls was established in Round 2.

Conclusions: This study generated 8 consensus recommendations intended to offer guidance for Mohs surgeons treating MIS. The adoption of these recommendations will promote standardization to facilitate comparisons of aggregate data in multicenter clinical trials.

背景:莫氏显微放射手术(MMS)是治疗原位黑色素瘤(MIS)的一种很有前景的方法。然而,手术技术的差异限制了现有数据的可推广性,并可能妨碍今后在临床试验中对 MMS 进行研究:方法:我们选择了一种改良德尔菲法,以便在未来的临床试验中就治疗 MIS 的最佳 MMS 技术达成共识。之所以选择德尔菲法,是因为目前的数据有限,该领域使用的技术种类繁多,而且有意为未来的临床试验建立标准化技术。通过文献综述和对经验丰富的 MMS 外科医生的访谈,我们确定了 MIS 的 MMS 技术的以下方面:(1)可能影响手术成本或疗效;(2)外科医生之间存在显著差异。总共选出了 8 个技术差异维度。德尔菲过程包括两轮投票和评议,在此期间,全美 44 名莫氏外科专家使用李克特量表对他们是否同意具体建议进行评分:结果:8 项建议中有 5 项在第一轮达成共识,其余 3 项在第二轮达成共识。在第一轮中达成共识的技术包括使用≤5 mm的起始周边边缘、应用免疫组化、冷冻组织处理和切除至皮下脂肪深度。在第二轮中,就伍德灯、皮肤镜和阴性组织对照的使用达成了共识:本研究提出了 8 项共识建议,旨在为莫氏外科医生治疗 MIS 提供指导。采用这些建议将促进标准化,以便于在多中心临床试验中对综合数据进行比较。
{"title":"Establishing Consensus for Mohs Micrographic Surgical Techniques in the Treatment of Melanoma in Situ for Future Clinical Trials: A Modified Delphi Study.","authors":"Kristen K Curtis, Nathan J Fakult, Jennifer L Strunck, Sumaira Z Aasi, Christine S Ahn, Murad Alam, Anna A Bar, Ramona Behshad, Christopher K Bichakjian, Diana Bolotin, Susan L Boone, Jeremy S Bordeaux, Jerry D Brewer, David R Carr, John A Carucci, Jason R Castillo, Sean R Christensen, Melanie A Clark, Lindsey K Collins, Addison M Demer, Daniel B Eisen, Hao Feng, Bahar F Firoz, Roy C Grekin, Jason M Hirshburg, Todd E Holmes, Conway C Huang, Thomas A Jennings, Shang I Brian Jiang, Sailesh Konda, Justin J Leitenberger, Jesse M Lewin, Ian A Maher, Elise Ng, Ida F Orengo, Faramarz H Samie, Drew K Saylor, Victoria Rose Sharon, Teo Soleymani, Susan M Swetter, Jesalyn A Tate, Marta J Van Beek, Nahid Y Vidal, Alok Vij, Ashley Wysong, Yaohui Gloria Xu, Bryan T Carroll, Wesley Y Yu","doi":"10.6004/jnccn.2024.7036","DOIUrl":"10.6004/jnccn.2024.7036","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is a promising treatment modality for melanoma in situ (MIS). However, variations in surgical technique limit the generalizability of existing data and may impede future study of MMS in clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A modified Delphi method was selected to establish consensus on optimal MMS techniques for treating MIS in future clinical trials. The Delphi method was selected due to the limited current data, the wide range of techniques used in the field, and the intention to establish a standardized technique for future clinical trials. A literature review and interviews with experienced MMS surgeons were performed to identify dimensions of the MMS technique for MIS that (1) likely impacted costs or outcomes of the procedure, and (2) showed significant variability between surgeons. A total of 8 dimensions of technical variation were selected. The Delphi process consisted of 2 rounds of voting and commentary, during which 44 expert Mohs surgeons across the United States rated their agreement with specific recommendations using a Likert scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five of eight recommendations achieved consensus in Round 1. All 3 of the remaining recommendations achieved consensus in Round 2. Techniques achieving consensus in Round 1 included the use of a starting peripheral margin of ≤5 mm, application of immunohistochemistry, frozen tissue processing, and resecting to the depth of subcutaneous fat. Consensus on the use of Wood's lamp, dermatoscope, and negative tissue controls was established in Round 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study generated 8 consensus recommendations intended to offer guidance for Mohs surgeons treating MIS. The adoption of these recommendations will promote standardization to facilitate comparisons of aggregate data in multicenter clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":17483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141855885","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Increasing Colorectal Screening Uptake in Spouses of Patients With Colorectal Cancer Using a Randomized Behavioral Trial. 通过随机行为试验提高结直肠癌患者配偶的结直肠癌筛查率
IF 14.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-29 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2024.7018
Jerrald Lau, Lina Choe, Daphne Hui Juan Lee, Athena Ming-Gui Khoo, Wei-Ling Koh, Cherie Peh, Alyssa Ng, Tian-Zhi Lim, Bettina Lieske, Kuok-Chung Lee, Choon-Seng Chong, Choon-Sheong Seow, Christopher H L Keh, Jing-Yu Ng, Ker-Kan Tan

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the few cancers for which screening has been associated with better survival and morbidity, but screening uptake has been underexplored in spouses of existing patients with CRC. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether a brief, structured behavioral intervention delivered to spouses of patients with CRC in a colorectal clinical setting could increase fecal immunochemical test (FIT) uptake within 3 months of the study period.

Methods: This study was designed as a block randomized, unblinded, parallel trial conducted in the colorectal outpatient clinics of 2 public tertiary hospitals in Singapore from December 2017 to February 2023. The intervention group received a structured informational pamphlet on CRC screening by the Singapore Ministry of Health and a printed guide with instructions on how to properly use a FIT kit.

Results: No significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed between the 2 groups. There was a statistically significant difference (P<.001) in FIT screening uptake between spouses in each group, with 86.2% (n=25) in the intervention group and 38.7% (n=12) in the control group.

Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that a brief, structured behavioral intervention offered to spouses accompanying patients with CRC while they wait for the clinic appointment is useful in increasing FIT screening uptake rates. Colorectal clinics can consider setting aside 10 to 15 minutes to educate accompanying spouses in the future as a complementary avenue to holistically promote CRC prevention, subjected to the resources available in each clinic.

Clinicaltrials: gov identifier: NCT04544852.

背景:结直肠癌(CRC)是少数几种通过筛查可以提高生存率和发病率的癌症之一,但对 CRC 现有患者配偶的筛查接受率还没有进行充分的研究。本研究的目的是评估在结直肠临床环境中向 CRC 患者的配偶提供简短、结构化的行为干预是否能在研究期间的 3 个月内提高粪便免疫化学检验(FIT)的接受率:本研究设计为整群随机、非盲、平行试验,于2017年12月至2023年2月在新加坡两家公立三级医院的结直肠门诊进行。干预组收到了新加坡卫生部提供的关于 CRC 筛查的结构化信息小册子,以及一份印刷指南,其中说明了如何正确使用 FIT 套件:结果:两组的基线特征无明显差异。结论:我们的研究结果表明,简明扼要的 FIT 工具包能帮助患者更好地进行癌症筛查:我们的研究表明,在陪同 CRC 患者等待门诊预约时向其配偶提供简短、结构化的行为干预有助于提高 FIT 筛查的接受率。结直肠门诊今后可根据各门诊的资源情况,考虑留出 10 到 15 分钟的时间对随行配偶进行教育,作为全面促进 CRC 预防的补充途径:NCT04544852。
{"title":"Increasing Colorectal Screening Uptake in Spouses of Patients With Colorectal Cancer Using a Randomized Behavioral Trial.","authors":"Jerrald Lau, Lina Choe, Daphne Hui Juan Lee, Athena Ming-Gui Khoo, Wei-Ling Koh, Cherie Peh, Alyssa Ng, Tian-Zhi Lim, Bettina Lieske, Kuok-Chung Lee, Choon-Seng Chong, Choon-Sheong Seow, Christopher H L Keh, Jing-Yu Ng, Ker-Kan Tan","doi":"10.6004/jnccn.2024.7018","DOIUrl":"10.6004/jnccn.2024.7018","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the few cancers for which screening has been associated with better survival and morbidity, but screening uptake has been underexplored in spouses of existing patients with CRC. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether a brief, structured behavioral intervention delivered to spouses of patients with CRC in a colorectal clinical setting could increase fecal immunochemical test (FIT) uptake within 3 months of the study period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was designed as a block randomized, unblinded, parallel trial conducted in the colorectal outpatient clinics of 2 public tertiary hospitals in Singapore from December 2017 to February 2023. The intervention group received a structured informational pamphlet on CRC screening by the Singapore Ministry of Health and a printed guide with instructions on how to properly use a FIT kit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed between the 2 groups. There was a statistically significant difference (P<.001) in FIT screening uptake between spouses in each group, with 86.2% (n=25) in the intervention group and 38.7% (n=12) in the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrated that a brief, structured behavioral intervention offered to spouses accompanying patients with CRC while they wait for the clinic appointment is useful in increasing FIT screening uptake rates. Colorectal clinics can consider setting aside 10 to 15 minutes to educate accompanying spouses in the future as a complementary avenue to holistically promote CRC prevention, subjected to the resources available in each clinic.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov identifier: NCT04544852.</p>","PeriodicalId":17483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141792703","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Systemic Treatment Strategies and Outcomes of Patients With Synchronous Peritoneal Metastases of Gastric Origin: A Nationwide Population-Based Study. 胃源性腹膜同步转移患者的系统治疗策略和疗效:一项基于全国人口的研究。
IF 14.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-29 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2024.7013
Niels A D Guchelaar, Bo J Noordman, Marion W Welten, Myron T van Santen, Micha J de Neijs, Stijn L W Koolen, Rob H A Verhoeven, Esther Oomen-de Hoop, Pieter C van der Sluis, Sjoerd M Lagarde, Hanneke W M van Laarhoven, Ignace H J T de Hingh, Geert-Jan Creemers, Bianca Mostert, Bas P L Wijnhoven, Ron H J Mathijssen

Background: Palliative systemic treatment is currently standard of care for metastatic gastric cancer. However, patients with peritoneal metastases of gastric origin are often underrepresented in clinical studies due to unmeasurable radiologic disease. This study describes the systemic treatment strategies and outcomes in patients with peritoneal metastases in a nationwide real-world setting.

Methods: Patients with gastric adenocarcinoma and synchronous peritoneal metastases (with or without other metastases) diagnosed in the Netherlands between 2015 and 2020 were identified from the nationwide Netherlands Cancer Registry. Median overall survival (OS) and time-to-treatment failure were determined and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to compare treatment groups, corrected for relevant tumor and patient characteristics.

Results: In total, 1,972 patients were included, of whom 842 (43%) were treated with palliative systemic therapy. The majority received capecitabine + oxaliplatin (CAPOX; 44%), followed by fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin (FOLFOX; 19%), and epirubicin + capecitabine + oxaliplatin (EOX; 8%). Of the 99 (45%) patients who received second-line systemic treatment, ramucirumab + paclitaxel were administered most frequently (63%). After adjustment for sex, age, comorbidities, performance status, tumor location, Lauren classification, and the presence of metastases outside of the peritoneum, patients treated with a triplet containing docetaxel and those treated with a regimen containing trastuzumab had a significantly longer OS compared with patients treated with a doublet containing a fluoropyrimidine derivate + oxaliplatin (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.52-0.91, and HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.51-0.91, respectively). Monotherapy was associated with a shorter OS (HR, 2.08, 95% CI, 1.53-2.83).

Conclusions: There is substantial heterogeneity in systemic treatment choices in patients with gastric cancer and peritoneal metastases in the Netherlands. In this study, patients treated with triplets containing docetaxel and with trastuzumab-containing regimens survived longer than patients who received doublet therapy. Despite this, median OS for all treatment groups remained below one year.

背景:姑息性全身治疗是目前治疗转移性胃癌的标准方法。然而,胃癌腹膜转移患者由于放射学疾病无法测量,在临床研究中往往代表性不足。本研究描述了全国范围内腹膜转移患者的系统治疗策略和结果:方法:从荷兰全国范围内的癌症登记处确定2015年至2020年间在荷兰确诊的胃腺癌和同步腹膜转移(伴有或不伴有其他转移)患者。在对相关肿瘤和患者特征进行校正后,确定了中位总生存期(OS)和治疗失败时间,并使用多变量考克斯回归分析对治疗组进行了比较:共纳入了1972名患者,其中842人(43%)接受了姑息性系统治疗。大多数患者接受了卡培他滨+奥沙利铂治疗(CAPOX;44%),其次是氟尿嘧啶/亮紫杉醇/奥沙利铂治疗(FOLFOX;19%),以及表柔比星+卡培他滨+奥沙利铂治疗(EOX;8%)。在接受二线系统治疗的99名患者(45%)中,使用最多的是拉穆西单抗+紫杉醇(63%)。在对性别、年龄、合并症、表现状态、肿瘤位置、劳伦分类以及是否存在腹膜外转移进行调整后,与使用含氟嘧啶衍生物+奥沙利铂的三联疗法的患者相比,使用含多西他赛的三联疗法和含曲妥珠单抗的治疗方案的患者的OS明显更长(危险比[HR],0.69;95% CI,0.52-0.91;HR,0.68;95% CI,0.51-0.91)。单药治疗与较短的OS相关(HR,2.08,95% CI,1.53-2.83):结论:在荷兰,胃癌腹膜转移患者在选择全身治疗时存在很大的异质性。在这项研究中,接受含多西他赛的三联疗法和含曲妥珠单抗疗法的患者比接受双联疗法的患者存活时间更长。尽管如此,所有治疗组的中位生存期仍低于一年。
{"title":"Systemic Treatment Strategies and Outcomes of Patients With Synchronous Peritoneal Metastases of Gastric Origin: A Nationwide Population-Based Study.","authors":"Niels A D Guchelaar, Bo J Noordman, Marion W Welten, Myron T van Santen, Micha J de Neijs, Stijn L W Koolen, Rob H A Verhoeven, Esther Oomen-de Hoop, Pieter C van der Sluis, Sjoerd M Lagarde, Hanneke W M van Laarhoven, Ignace H J T de Hingh, Geert-Jan Creemers, Bianca Mostert, Bas P L Wijnhoven, Ron H J Mathijssen","doi":"10.6004/jnccn.2024.7013","DOIUrl":"10.6004/jnccn.2024.7013","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Palliative systemic treatment is currently standard of care for metastatic gastric cancer. However, patients with peritoneal metastases of gastric origin are often underrepresented in clinical studies due to unmeasurable radiologic disease. This study describes the systemic treatment strategies and outcomes in patients with peritoneal metastases in a nationwide real-world setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with gastric adenocarcinoma and synchronous peritoneal metastases (with or without other metastases) diagnosed in the Netherlands between 2015 and 2020 were identified from the nationwide Netherlands Cancer Registry. Median overall survival (OS) and time-to-treatment failure were determined and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to compare treatment groups, corrected for relevant tumor and patient characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 1,972 patients were included, of whom 842 (43%) were treated with palliative systemic therapy. The majority received capecitabine + oxaliplatin (CAPOX; 44%), followed by fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin (FOLFOX; 19%), and epirubicin + capecitabine + oxaliplatin (EOX; 8%). Of the 99 (45%) patients who received second-line systemic treatment, ramucirumab + paclitaxel were administered most frequently (63%). After adjustment for sex, age, comorbidities, performance status, tumor location, Lauren classification, and the presence of metastases outside of the peritoneum, patients treated with a triplet containing docetaxel and those treated with a regimen containing trastuzumab had a significantly longer OS compared with patients treated with a doublet containing a fluoropyrimidine derivate + oxaliplatin (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.52-0.91, and HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.51-0.91, respectively). Monotherapy was associated with a shorter OS (HR, 2.08, 95% CI, 1.53-2.83).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is substantial heterogeneity in systemic treatment choices in patients with gastric cancer and peritoneal metastases in the Netherlands. In this study, patients treated with triplets containing docetaxel and with trastuzumab-containing regimens survived longer than patients who received doublet therapy. Despite this, median OS for all treatment groups remained below one year.</p>","PeriodicalId":17483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","volume":" ","pages":"405-412"},"PeriodicalIF":14.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141792731","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Impact of Adjuvant Chemotherapy on the Long-Term Prognosis of Breast Malignant Phyllodes Tumors: A Propensity Score-Matched Study. 辅助化疗对乳腺恶性植物瘤长期预后的影响:倾向评分匹配研究
IF 14.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-29 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2024.7023
Zilin Zhuang, Ailifeire Yilihamu, Zhihua Li, Rong Lei, Xun Li, Mengjia Han, Wei Wei, Guangxin Li, Zhen Ma, Yulu Zhang, Hui Hu, Xiaoyun Xiao, Yan Nie

Background: Malignant phyllodes tumors (MPTs) are rare breast tumors with high risks of local recurrence and distant metastasis. Surgical intervention is the primary treatment, but the effectiveness of adjuvant therapies is uncertain. This study was designed to analyze the prognostic risk factors associated with MPTs and evaluate the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy.

Patients and methods: Patients who were first diagnosed with MPT without distant metastasis and received R0 resection surgery between 1999 and 2023 were included in the present study and stratified into 2 groups: chemotherapy and nonchemotherapy groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline characteristics between groups. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS). Cox proportional hazards analyses (univariate and multivariate) were conducted to identify prognostic risk factors.

Results: We conducted a study involving 145 patients, 31 of whom underwent a total of 12 different chemotherapy regimens following initial surgical resection. Most patients received chemotherapy regimens primarily consisting of anthracyclines, including anthracycline + ifosfamide (AI) or anthracycline + cyclophosphamide/docetaxel (AC-T) regimens. After a median follow-up of 54.5 months, 37 (25.5%) patients experienced local recurrence and 24 (16.6%) experienced distant metastasis. No significant difference was detected in the rates of local recurrence or distant metastasis between the 2 groups. Axillary lymph node positivity was the only risk factor for LRFS, whereas older age, larger tumors, axillary lymph node positivity, local recurrence, and distant metastasis were significantly associated with worse OS. Chemotherapy did not emerge as a protective factor for LRFS (P=.501) or OS (P=.854). After PSM, patients in the chemotherapy group did not exhibit better 5-year LRFS (P=.934) or 5-year OS (P=.328).

Conclusions: According to our retrospective evaluation, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with improved survival in patients with MPTs without distant metastasis.

背景:恶性葡萄胎是一种罕见的乳腺肿瘤,局部复发和远处转移的风险很高。手术治疗是主要的治疗方法,但辅助治疗的效果尚不确定。本研究旨在分析 MPT 的相关预后风险因素,并评估术后辅助化疗的疗效:本研究纳入了1999年至2023年间首次诊断为MPT且无远处转移并接受R0切除手术的患者,并将其分为两组:化疗组和非化疗组。采用倾向评分匹配法(PSM)平衡各组间的基线特征。采用 Kaplan-Meier 曲线估算无局部复发生存期(LRFS)和总生存期(OS)。进行了 Cox 比例危险度分析(单变量和多变量),以确定预后风险因素:我们对145名患者进行了研究,其中31名患者在初次手术切除后接受了共12种不同的化疗方案。大多数患者接受的化疗方案主要由蒽环类药物组成,包括蒽环类+伊佛酰胺(AI)或蒽环类+环磷酰胺/多西他赛(AC-T)方案。中位随访 54.5 个月后,37 例(25.5%)患者出现局部复发,24 例(16.6%)出现远处转移。两组患者的局部复发率和远处转移率无明显差异。腋窝淋巴结阳性是LRFS的唯一风险因素,而年龄较大、肿瘤较大、腋窝淋巴结阳性、局部复发和远处转移与较差的OS显著相关。化疗并不是LRFS(P=.501)或OS(P=.854)的保护因素。PSM后,化疗组患者的5年LRFS(P=.934)或5年OS(P=.328)并没有改善:根据我们的回顾性评估,术后辅助化疗与无远处转移的 MPT 患者生存率的提高无关。
{"title":"The Impact of Adjuvant Chemotherapy on the Long-Term Prognosis of Breast Malignant Phyllodes Tumors: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.","authors":"Zilin Zhuang, Ailifeire Yilihamu, Zhihua Li, Rong Lei, Xun Li, Mengjia Han, Wei Wei, Guangxin Li, Zhen Ma, Yulu Zhang, Hui Hu, Xiaoyun Xiao, Yan Nie","doi":"10.6004/jnccn.2024.7023","DOIUrl":"10.6004/jnccn.2024.7023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Malignant phyllodes tumors (MPTs) are rare breast tumors with high risks of local recurrence and distant metastasis. Surgical intervention is the primary treatment, but the effectiveness of adjuvant therapies is uncertain. This study was designed to analyze the prognostic risk factors associated with MPTs and evaluate the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients who were first diagnosed with MPT without distant metastasis and received R0 resection surgery between 1999 and 2023 were included in the present study and stratified into 2 groups: chemotherapy and nonchemotherapy groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline characteristics between groups. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS). Cox proportional hazards analyses (univariate and multivariate) were conducted to identify prognostic risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We conducted a study involving 145 patients, 31 of whom underwent a total of 12 different chemotherapy regimens following initial surgical resection. Most patients received chemotherapy regimens primarily consisting of anthracyclines, including anthracycline + ifosfamide (AI) or anthracycline + cyclophosphamide/docetaxel (AC-T) regimens. After a median follow-up of 54.5 months, 37 (25.5%) patients experienced local recurrence and 24 (16.6%) experienced distant metastasis. No significant difference was detected in the rates of local recurrence or distant metastasis between the 2 groups. Axillary lymph node positivity was the only risk factor for LRFS, whereas older age, larger tumors, axillary lymph node positivity, local recurrence, and distant metastasis were significantly associated with worse OS. Chemotherapy did not emerge as a protective factor for LRFS (P=.501) or OS (P=.854). After PSM, patients in the chemotherapy group did not exhibit better 5-year LRFS (P=.934) or 5-year OS (P=.328).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>According to our retrospective evaluation, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with improved survival in patients with MPTs without distant metastasis.</p>","PeriodicalId":17483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141792732","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
21-Gene Recurrence Score and Survival Outcomes in the Phase III Multicenter TAILORx Clinical Trial. 21 基因复发评分与 TAILORx III 期多中心临床试验的生存结果。
IF 14.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-17 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2024.7008
Sherry X Yang, John Yu, Molin Wang

Background: Recurrence score (RS) based on a 21-gene genomic assay is frequently used to estimate risk of distant recurrence for choice of adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. It remains unclear whether RS is an independent prognostic factor for breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) in the TAILORx trial population.

Methods: We evaluated the association of RS with BCSS and OS plus recurrence-free interval (RFI) and invasive disease-free survival (DFS) using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, adjusting for clinicopathologic measures, in 8,916 patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer. Likelihood ratio (LR) test was used to assess the relative amount of prognostic information provided by RS to BCSS, OS, RFI, and DFS, comparatively.

Results: Event rates for BCSS, OS, RFI, and DFS were 1.7%, 5.2%, 5.6%, and 12.6%, respectively, by up to 11.6 years of follow-up. Compared with low-range RS (0-10), patients with midrange (11-25) and high-range (26-100) RS had inferior BCSS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 5.12 [95% CI, 2.09-16.92] and 8.03 [95% CI, 2.91-28.47], respectively) and RFI (aHR, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.23-2.36] and 3.05 [95% CI, 2.02-4.67], respectively), independent of clinicopathologic factors. High-range score was associated with an increased risk of DFS (aHR, 1.56 [95% CI, 1.20-2.04]) but not significantly associated with OS (aHR, 1.44 [95% CI, 0.95-2.18]). Midrange score was associated with neither DFS (aHR, 1.15 [95% CI, 0.96-1.38]) nor OS (HR 1.14 [95% CI, 0.87-1.52]). LR-χ2 values were 83.0 and 65.1 for RFI and BCSS, respectively, and 17.5 and 33.6 for OS and DFS, respectively (P<.0001).

Conclusions: RS is an independent measure for BCSS and recurrence prognoses relative to OS in early-stage breast cancer. It carries more prognostic information for breast cancer-specific outcomes.

背景:基于21个基因基因组检测的复发评分(RS)常用于估计乳腺癌远处复发的风险,以便选择辅助化疗。在 TAILORx 试验人群中,RS 是否是乳腺癌特异性生存(BCSS)和总生存(OS)的独立预后因素仍不清楚:方法:我们对 8916 名激素受体阳性、HER2 阴性、结节阴性乳腺癌患者进行了多变量 Cox 比例危险回归分析,评估了 RS 与 BCSS 和 OS 以及无复发间期(RFI)和无侵袭性疾病生存期(DFS)的关系,并对临床病理指标进行了调整。使用似然比(LR)检验来评估RS为BCSS、OS、RFI和DFS提供的相对预后信息量:在长达11.6年的随访中,BCSS、OS、RFI和DFS的事件发生率分别为1.7%、5.2%、5.6%和12.6%。与低范围RS(0-10分)相比,中范围(11-25分)和高范围(26-100分)RS患者的BCSS(调整后危险比[aHR]分别为5.12[95% CI, 2.09-16.92]和8.03[95% CI, 2.91-28.47])和RFI(aHR分别为1.68[95% CI, 1.23-2.36]和3.05[95% CI, 2.02-4.67])较差,与临床病理因素无关。高范围评分与 DFS 风险增加有关(aHR,1.56 [95% CI,1.20-2.04]),但与 OS 无关(aHR,1.44 [95% CI,0.95-2.18])。中档评分与 DFS(aHR,1.15 [95% CI,0.96-1.38])和 OS(HR 1.14 [95% CI,0.87-1.52])均无相关性。RFI和BCSS的LR-χ2值分别为83.0和65.1,OS和DFS的LR-χ2值分别为17.5和33.6(结论:RS是BCSS的独立测量指标:相对于OS,RS是衡量早期乳腺癌BCSS和复发预后的独立指标。它为乳腺癌特异性预后提供了更多信息。
{"title":"21-Gene Recurrence Score and Survival Outcomes in the Phase III Multicenter TAILORx Clinical Trial.","authors":"Sherry X Yang, John Yu, Molin Wang","doi":"10.6004/jnccn.2024.7008","DOIUrl":"10.6004/jnccn.2024.7008","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recurrence score (RS) based on a 21-gene genomic assay is frequently used to estimate risk of distant recurrence for choice of adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. It remains unclear whether RS is an independent prognostic factor for breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) in the TAILORx trial population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated the association of RS with BCSS and OS plus recurrence-free interval (RFI) and invasive disease-free survival (DFS) using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, adjusting for clinicopathologic measures, in 8,916 patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer. Likelihood ratio (LR) test was used to assess the relative amount of prognostic information provided by RS to BCSS, OS, RFI, and DFS, comparatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Event rates for BCSS, OS, RFI, and DFS were 1.7%, 5.2%, 5.6%, and 12.6%, respectively, by up to 11.6 years of follow-up. Compared with low-range RS (0-10), patients with midrange (11-25) and high-range (26-100) RS had inferior BCSS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 5.12 [95% CI, 2.09-16.92] and 8.03 [95% CI, 2.91-28.47], respectively) and RFI (aHR, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.23-2.36] and 3.05 [95% CI, 2.02-4.67], respectively), independent of clinicopathologic factors. High-range score was associated with an increased risk of DFS (aHR, 1.56 [95% CI, 1.20-2.04]) but not significantly associated with OS (aHR, 1.44 [95% CI, 0.95-2.18]). Midrange score was associated with neither DFS (aHR, 1.15 [95% CI, 0.96-1.38]) nor OS (HR 1.14 [95% CI, 0.87-1.52]). LR-χ2 values were 83.0 and 65.1 for RFI and BCSS, respectively, and 17.5 and 33.6 for OS and DFS, respectively (P<.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RS is an independent measure for BCSS and recurrence prognoses relative to OS in early-stage breast cancer. It carries more prognostic information for breast cancer-specific outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":17483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","volume":" ","pages":"376-381"},"PeriodicalIF":14.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141633799","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patient-Reported Quality of Life at Diagnosis in Adolescent and Young Adults With Cancer. 青少年癌症患者在确诊时的生活质量报告。
IF 14.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-12 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2024.7012
Goldy C George, Clark Andersen, Xiaohui Tang, Elizabeth Rodriguez, Midhat Jafry, Maria C Swartz, Sairah Ahmed, Carlos H Barcenas, J Andrew Livingston, Michael E Roth, Michelle A T Hildebrandt

Background: The overall landscape of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has not been thoroughly investigated in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer. Data are also lacking on how well HRQoL at the time of cancer diagnosis can prognosticate long-term survival in AYA survivors.

Patients and methods: We included 3,497 survivors of AYA cancer (age 15-39 years at diagnosis) who completed the Short-Form 12 Health Survey (SF-12) HRQoL questionnaire at diagnosis. Physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores were generated, with scores <50 representing poor HRQoL. Differences in HRQoL by patient characteristics and tumor type were investigated using violin plots and t tests/analysis of variance. The effect of HRQoL on overall survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox proportional hazards models.

Results: Overall mean PCS and MCS scores in this racially/ethnically diverse cohort (64% White, 19% Hispanic, 10% Black, and 7% other race/ethnicity) were 43.6 and 46.7, respectively. Women with breast cancer reported the most favorable PCS (50.8), and those with cervical cancer reported the lowest MCS (42.8). Age at diagnosis was associated positively with PCS (P<.001) and inversely with MCS (P<.001). Females had higher PCS yet lower MCS than males (both P<.001). Marginalized racial and ethnic populations reported lower PCS than White patients (P<.001). Physical and mental HRQoL were prognostic and associated with increased risk of poor survival (hazard ratio, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.72-2.21 for physical HRQoL, and 1.26; 95% CI, 1.13-1.40 for mental HRQoL).

Conclusions: Physical and mental HRQoL at diagnosis vary across patient characteristics in AYA cancer survivors. Poor HRQoL at diagnosis may be a prognosticator of diminished overall survival among AYA cancer survivors.

背景:对于青少年和年轻成人癌症患者的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的整体情况尚未进行深入研究。此外,关于癌症确诊时的 HRQoL 如何预示青少年癌症幸存者的长期生存率,也缺乏相关数据:我们纳入了 3,497 名青少年癌症幸存者(确诊时年龄为 15-39 岁),他们在确诊时填写了短表 12 健康调查(SF-12)HRQoL 问卷。得出了身体成分汇总 (PCS) 和精神成分汇总 (MCS) 分数,并得出了评分 结果:在这个种族/族裔多元化的群体(64% 白人、19% 西班牙裔、10% 黑人和 7% 其他种族/族裔)中,PCS 和 MCS 的总平均分分别为 43.6 分和 46.7 分。乳腺癌妇女的 PCS 值最高(50.8),宫颈癌妇女的 MCS 值最低(42.8)。确诊时的年龄与 PCS 呈正相关(PConclusions:不同年龄段癌症幸存者在确诊时的身体和心理 HRQoL 因患者特征而异。诊断时不良的 HRQoL 可能是导致青少年癌症幸存者总生存率下降的预兆因素。
{"title":"Patient-Reported Quality of Life at Diagnosis in Adolescent and Young Adults With Cancer.","authors":"Goldy C George, Clark Andersen, Xiaohui Tang, Elizabeth Rodriguez, Midhat Jafry, Maria C Swartz, Sairah Ahmed, Carlos H Barcenas, J Andrew Livingston, Michael E Roth, Michelle A T Hildebrandt","doi":"10.6004/jnccn.2024.7012","DOIUrl":"10.6004/jnccn.2024.7012","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The overall landscape of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has not been thoroughly investigated in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer. Data are also lacking on how well HRQoL at the time of cancer diagnosis can prognosticate long-term survival in AYA survivors.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We included 3,497 survivors of AYA cancer (age 15-39 years at diagnosis) who completed the Short-Form 12 Health Survey (SF-12) HRQoL questionnaire at diagnosis. Physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores were generated, with scores <50 representing poor HRQoL. Differences in HRQoL by patient characteristics and tumor type were investigated using violin plots and t tests/analysis of variance. The effect of HRQoL on overall survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox proportional hazards models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall mean PCS and MCS scores in this racially/ethnically diverse cohort (64% White, 19% Hispanic, 10% Black, and 7% other race/ethnicity) were 43.6 and 46.7, respectively. Women with breast cancer reported the most favorable PCS (50.8), and those with cervical cancer reported the lowest MCS (42.8). Age at diagnosis was associated positively with PCS (P<.001) and inversely with MCS (P<.001). Females had higher PCS yet lower MCS than males (both P<.001). Marginalized racial and ethnic populations reported lower PCS than White patients (P<.001). Physical and mental HRQoL were prognostic and associated with increased risk of poor survival (hazard ratio, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.72-2.21 for physical HRQoL, and 1.26; 95% CI, 1.13-1.40 for mental HRQoL).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Physical and mental HRQoL at diagnosis vary across patient characteristics in AYA cancer survivors. Poor HRQoL at diagnosis may be a prognosticator of diminished overall survival among AYA cancer survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":17483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11684396/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141600312","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Patients With Gastroesophageal Cancer. 胃食管癌患者化疗引起的周围神经病变
IF 14.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-08 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2024.7014
Merel J M van Velzen, Marieke Pape, Mirjam A G Sprangers, Jessy Joy van Kleef, Bianca Mostert, Laurens V Beerepoot, Marije Slingerland, Elske C Gootjes, Ronald Hoekstra, Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse, Nadia Haj Mohammad, Hanneke W M van Laarhoven

Background: Chemotherapy for various stages of gastroesophageal cancer (GEC) is often neurotoxic. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) impairs health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This study investigates the incidence and severity of CIPN and its association with HRQoL in patients with GEC.

Patients and methods: Patients who received chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy for GEC were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patient-reported data (measured using the EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 and EORTC QLQ-C30) were collected through the Prospective Observational Cohort Study of Esophageal-Gastric Cancer Patients (POCOP) at baseline and at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months after treatment initiation. Linear mixed effects models were constructed to assess CIPN and the correlation between CIPN and HRQoL was analyzed using Spearman's correlation.

Results: A total of 2,135 patients were included (chemoradiotherapy: 1,593; chemotherapy with curative intent: 295; palliative chemotherapy: 247). In all 3 treatment groups, CIPN significantly increased during treatment (adjusted mean score of CIPN at 6 months: chemoradiotherapy, 8.3 [baseline: 5.5]; chemotherapy with curative intent, 16.0 [baseline: 5.6]; palliative therapy, 25.4 [baseline: 10.7]). For chemoradiotherapy, the adjusted mean score continued to increase after treatment (24 months: 11.2). For chemotherapy with curative intent and palliative therapy, the adjusted mean score of CIPN decreased after treatment but did not return to baseline values. CIPN was negatively correlated with HRQoL in all treatment groups, although significance and strength of the correlation differed over time.

Conclusions: Because of the poor prognosis of GEC, it is essential to consider side effects of (neurotoxic) treatment. The high prevalence and association with HRQoL indicate the need for early recognition of CIPN.

背景:针对不同阶段胃食管癌(GEC)的化疗通常具有神经毒性。化疗引起的周围神经病变(CIPN)会损害健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)。本研究调查了化疗诱发周围神经病变的发生率、严重程度及其与胃食管癌患者 HRQoL 的关系:患者和方法:从荷兰癌症登记处确定了接受化放疗或化疗的 GEC 患者。患者报告数据(使用 EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 和 EORTC QLQ-C30 测量)是通过食管胃癌患者前瞻性观察队列研究(POCOP)在基线和治疗开始后 3、6、9、12、18 和 24 个月收集的。建立线性混合效应模型来评估CIPN,并使用斯皮尔曼相关性分析CIPN与HRQoL之间的相关性:共纳入2135名患者(化放疗:1593人;治愈性化疗:295人;姑息性化疗:295人):295例;姑息化疗247例)。在所有 3 个治疗组中,CIPN 在治疗期间均显著增加(6 个月时的 CIPN 调整后平均得分:化放疗,8.3 [基线:5.5];治愈性化疗,16.0 [基线:5.6];姑息治疗,25.4 [基线:10.7])。化疗放疗的调整后平均得分在治疗后继续上升(24 个月:11.2)。对于治愈性化疗和姑息治疗,CIPN的调整后平均得分在治疗后有所下降,但没有恢复到基线值。在所有治疗组中,CIPN与HRQoL均呈负相关,但相关性的显著性和强度随时间推移而不同:结论:由于 GEC 预后不良,因此必须考虑(神经毒性)治疗的副作用。高发病率以及与 HRQoL 的相关性表明,有必要及早识别 CIPN。
{"title":"Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Patients With Gastroesophageal Cancer.","authors":"Merel J M van Velzen, Marieke Pape, Mirjam A G Sprangers, Jessy Joy van Kleef, Bianca Mostert, Laurens V Beerepoot, Marije Slingerland, Elske C Gootjes, Ronald Hoekstra, Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse, Nadia Haj Mohammad, Hanneke W M van Laarhoven","doi":"10.6004/jnccn.2024.7014","DOIUrl":"10.6004/jnccn.2024.7014","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chemotherapy for various stages of gastroesophageal cancer (GEC) is often neurotoxic. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) impairs health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This study investigates the incidence and severity of CIPN and its association with HRQoL in patients with GEC.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients who received chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy for GEC were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patient-reported data (measured using the EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 and EORTC QLQ-C30) were collected through the Prospective Observational Cohort Study of Esophageal-Gastric Cancer Patients (POCOP) at baseline and at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months after treatment initiation. Linear mixed effects models were constructed to assess CIPN and the correlation between CIPN and HRQoL was analyzed using Spearman's correlation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,135 patients were included (chemoradiotherapy: 1,593; chemotherapy with curative intent: 295; palliative chemotherapy: 247). In all 3 treatment groups, CIPN significantly increased during treatment (adjusted mean score of CIPN at 6 months: chemoradiotherapy, 8.3 [baseline: 5.5]; chemotherapy with curative intent, 16.0 [baseline: 5.6]; palliative therapy, 25.4 [baseline: 10.7]). For chemoradiotherapy, the adjusted mean score continued to increase after treatment (24 months: 11.2). For chemotherapy with curative intent and palliative therapy, the adjusted mean score of CIPN decreased after treatment but did not return to baseline values. CIPN was negatively correlated with HRQoL in all treatment groups, although significance and strength of the correlation differed over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Because of the poor prognosis of GEC, it is essential to consider side effects of (neurotoxic) treatment. The high prevalence and association with HRQoL indicate the need for early recognition of CIPN.</p>","PeriodicalId":17483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","volume":" ","pages":"455-461"},"PeriodicalIF":14.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141559010","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Artificial Intelligence and Oncology. 人工智能与肿瘤学。
IF 14.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2024.0037
Daniel M Geynisman
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence and Oncology.","authors":"Daniel M Geynisman","doi":"10.6004/jnccn.2024.0037","DOIUrl":"10.6004/jnccn.2024.0037","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","volume":"22 5","pages":"277"},"PeriodicalIF":14.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141633800","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1