Journal of women's health最新文献

Background: Veterans who use VA pregnancy benefits may be at high risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes; however, little is known about rates of adverse pregnancy events or pregnancy-associated death among Veterans. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using VA national administrative data for Veterans ages 18-45 with at least one pregnancy outcome between October 2009 and September 2016 and a VA primary care visit within one year prior to pregnancy. We identified adverse events during pregnancy and up to 42 days after pregnancy and all-cause mortality within one year of pregnancy and compared prevalence of adverse events by Veteran race/ethnicity using adjusted logistic regression. Results: Pregnancies among Black Veterans had 69% higher odds of any adverse event than those among White Veterans (aOR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.43, 2.00). All-cause mortality during pregnancy or within one year of pregnancy was recorded for 18 pregnancies, resulting in an estimated overall pregnancy-associated mortality rate of 76 deaths per 100,000 live births. Conclusions: We identified high overall rates of adverse pregnancy events and pregnancy-associated death among Veterans using VA benefits. As in non-VA populations, there were stark racial disparities in adverse pregnancy events among Veterans.

Background: Although the risk of pregnancy-related morbidity and mortality in people with sickle cell disease (SCD) is well established, limitations in data sources and heterogeneity in outcome reporting hinder the ability to make meaningful comparisons between historical and contemporary populations. This study used a national administrative claims database to compare pregnancy outcomes in people with SCD between 2006-2011 and 2012-2018. Materials and Methods: Pregnant females aged 16-44 years with SCD were identified from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service Analytic eXtract, along with a control cohort of pregnant people. People were followed from first identified pregnancy until one year postpartum. Outcomes of interest were identified with ICD-9 or 10 codes. Results: We included 6,388 people with SCD and 17,278 controls in analyses. Preeclampsia/eclampsia, hypertension, thrombosis, poor fetal growth, preterm delivery, and postpartum hemorrhage were all more common in people with SCD compared with controls. Maternal death occurred in 0.5% of people with SCD versus <0.1% in those without SCD (p < 0.001). When comparing infant deliveries in 2006-2011 to those occurring in 2012-2018, all pregnancy-related complications except preterm delivery, including maternal death, occurred at similar or higher frequencies in more recent years. Conclusions: Between 2006 and 2018, maternal death occurred in approximately 1 out of every 200 publicly insured people with SCD in the year following infant delivery. Our work confirms, on a national-level, that pregnancy-related outcomes in people with SCD in the United States have not improved with time, and that some complications have in fact increased in frequency.

Objective: Many people report becoming pregnant while using contraception. Understanding more about this phenomenon may provide insight into pregnant people's responses to and healthcare needs for these pregnancies. This study explores the outcome (e.g., birth, miscarriage, abortion) of pregnancies among Veterans in which conception occurred in the month of contraceptive use. Study Design: We used data from the Examining Contraceptive Use and Unmet Need Study, a telephone-based survey conducted in 2014-2016 of women Veterans (n = 2302) ages 18-44 receiving primary care from the Veterans Health Administration. For each pregnancy, we estimated the relationship between occurrence in the month of contraceptive use and the outcome of the pregnancy using multinomial logistic regression, controlling for relevant demographic, clinical, and military factors and clustering of pregnancies from the same Veteran. Results: The study included 4436 pregnancies from 1689 Veterans. Most participants were ≥30 years of age (n = 1445, 85.6%), identified as non-Hispanic white (n = 824, 51.6%), and lived in the Southern United States (n = 994, 55.6%). Nearly 60% (n = 1007) of Veterans who had ever been pregnant reported experiencing a pregnancy in the month of contraceptive use; a majority of those pregnancies (n = 1354, 80.9%) were described as unintended. In adjusted models, pregnancies occurring in the month of contraceptive use were significantly more likely to end in abortion (aOR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.42-2.18) than live birth. Conclusions: Pregnancy while using contraception is common among Veterans; these pregnancies are more likely to end in abortion than live birth. Given widespread restrictions to reproductive health services across much of the United States, ensuring Veterans' access to comprehensive care, including abortion, is critical to supporting reproductive autonomy and whole health.

Background: Disparities in cervical cancer (CC) screening exist within racial/ethnic minority and immigrant groups. However, few studies have explored the joint influence of race/ethnicity and immigrant status on screening, and the disparities that have been identified by existing studies remain incompletely explained. This study aims to identify the joint influence of race/ethnicity and immigrant status on CC screening and elucidate the barriers contributing to identified disparities. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of 25,660 U.S. women from the 2005, 2010, and 2015 National Health Interview Surveys was done. The CC screening up-to-date status of cases was analyzed by race/ethnicity and immigrant status using logistic regression models. Conceptualized mediators were added to models to identify their contribution to identified disparities. Results: All immigrants had lower screening odds than U.S.-born non-Hispanic White women with foreign-born non-Hispanic Asians having the lowest odds (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26-0.49) followed by foreign-born non-Hispanic White (aOR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.36-0.76), Hispanic/Latinx (aOR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.47-0.73), and non-Hispanic Black women (aOR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.38-0.99). Adjusting for only socioeconomic status or access to care attenuated the aOR: for foreign-born Hispanic/Latinx and non-Hispanic Black women only. Adjusting simultaneously for language and acculturation attenuated the aOR: for all immigrants. Conclusions: Disparities in CC screening were only found in the immigrant populations of various racial/ethnic groups. Targeting insurance and health care access may address disparities in immigrant Hispanic/Latinx and non-Hispanic Black women. Focusing on culturally and linguistically competent care and education may be more crucial for immigrant non-Hispanic Asian and White women.

Background: Our objective was to investigate patient-reported maternal and perinatal outcomes and survival among women undergoing aortic valve and/or aortic root replacement (AVR/ARR). Methods: This was a single-center observational study of U.S. women identified in our surgical/obstetric databases who underwent AVR/ARR between 1967 and 2019. Available, consenting patients participated in a telephone survey detailing patient-reported outcomes. The status of remaining individuals was verified through the Alabama Department of Public Health. Date of death, immediate and underlying cause of death, and death location were abstracted from death certificates. Results: Of 317 patients, 72 were confirmed living, 86 were deceased, and 159 were of unknown status. Mean age at first aortic valve replacement was 43 years. Of patients with known status (n = 158), 33% were Black, and the majority received a mechanical valve (58%). Of 57 participants completing the survey, reported complications included miscarriage (30%), preterm birth (12%), preeclampsia (14%), antepartum maternal intensive care unit admissions (6%), and congenital heart disease in the neonate (8%). Most pregnancies preceded AVR (78%). Among 86 decedents, the average age of death was 52.5 years; the average time from AVR/ARR to death was 7 years. Of those who died, a higher proportion were Black (75%) and had aortic insufficiency (72%). Conclusions: Patients who underwent aortic valve surgery report high rates of maternal and perinatal complications, and death certificate data confirm high rates of racial disparities and death within a decade of surgery. Interventions are urgently needed to improve maternal and perinatal outcomes in individuals with aortic valve disease and to eliminate preventable racial disparities.

Objective: To estimate the prevalence of diagnosed vasomotor symptoms (VMS) due to menopause among US women aged 40-64 years and assess sociodemographic differences in VMS prevalence and risk of discontinuing VMS-related treatment. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study evaluated merged data from IQVIA's PharMetrics Plus medical claims and consumer attributes databases for 2017-2020. VMS diagnosis was identified using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) diagnosis codes. Continuous enrollment was required ≥6 months before and 12 months after diagnosis date. Treatment discontinuation was measured for VMS-related treatments initiated at diagnosis or during the 12 months after diagnosis. Treatment duration was measured from diagnosis to the first day of a ≥90-day treatment gap. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine factors associated with risk of treatment discontinuation. Results: Among 7,386,206 eligible women, the 4-year prevalence of diagnosed VMS in 2017-2020 was 79.1 per 1,000 and was highest among non-Hispanic White women (82.5 per 1,000), followed by Hispanic (77.3), Black (71.6), and Asian women (64.5). Rates were higher among women living in urban areas and those with higher education and income. Among women newly diagnosed with VMS (n = 226,262), median treatment duration was 297 days. Black, Asian, and Hispanic women had higher risks of discontinuing treatment than non-Hispanic White women. Lower income was also associated with higher risk of discontinuation than higher income. Conclusion: Lower prevalence of diagnosed VMS and higher risk of treatment discontinuation were observed among racial/ethnic minorities and women with less education and income, suggesting possible underdiagnosis and unmet needs.

Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination during the postpartum period is an opportunity for vaccine eligible individuals to be vaccinated. Objective: Identify predictors of vaccine acceptance in the postpartum period among patients aged 18-26. Study Design: A retrospective chart review was conducted to evaluate the rate of HPV vaccination to eligible postpartum patients aged 18-26 who delivered between January 2021 and May 2023 at our institution. Clinical and demographic data were extracted. Comparisons were made between fully vaccinated individuals and those who were unvaccinated or incompletely vaccinated. Variables significantly associated with vaccination status or acceptance were included in a multivariable logistic regression model. Results: Of the 1,130 patients who met the study inclusion criteria, 42.1% were eligible for postpartum HPV vaccination. The average age was 23 years, the majority White (74.5%), and English speaking (93.1%). Nineteen percent of eligible patients accepted HPV vaccination, with differences between those who accepted or declined the vaccine identified in: preferred language, tobacco use, delivering provider's specialty, and receiving any vaccination during pregnancy. Spanish-speaking patients had >5× the odds of accepting the vaccine compared with English-speaking patients. Smokers, patients delivered by a family medicine provider, and those who accepted any vaccine during pregnancy had more than twice the odds of receiving the vaccine postpartum. Conclusion(s): The postpartum period remains an opportunity to provide HPV vaccination. Our study identified patients less likely to be vaccinated prior to delivery, as well as patients who are more likely to accept vaccinations postpartum.

Objective: This study aims to determine if race, ethnicity, insurance status, or procedural timing is associated with type of sterilization procedure. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed. The study population included women who underwent elective sterilization at one institution from January 2010 to December 2020. The medical record was reviewed to obtain age, race, ethnicity, procedure type and timing, and insurance status. Race and ethnicity groups included were Asian, non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, or non-Hispanic White. Timing was divided into peripartum (at the time of cesarean section or before discharge after vaginal delivery) and interval procedures. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to assess the association of procedure type with race, ethnicity, insurance status, and timing. In addition, a sensitivity analysis was performed for procedures after January 1, 2016, to determine if the associations with the above categories differed. Results: A sample of 2,041 individuals received sterilization procedures, and 1,115 were included in the analysis: 70% (782) of sterilizations were performed during the peripartum period, and 60% (670) of women had public insurance. On multivariate analysis, both non-Hispanic Black (odds ratio [OR] 0.54 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32-0.89) and Asian (OR 0.23 95% CI 0.06-0.72) individuals were less likely to have salpingectomy (SL) when compared with non-Hispanic White individuals. On sensitivity analysis for procedures after January 1, 2016, non-Hispanic Black (OR 0.31 95% CI 0.17-0.56), Hispanic (OR 0.31 95% CI 0.14-0.66), and Asian (OR 95% CI 0.04-0.54) individuals were less likely to have when compared with non-Hispanic White individuals. Conclusion: Tubal ligation is more frequently performed in our health system, and we identified critical disparities in performance of SL for sterilization.

Objective: To evaluate the reproductive experiences of physicians across gender and specialty. Patients and Methods: Between November and December 2021, we surveyed nontrainee physicians of all genders at a single quaternary institution using a modified version of an existing survey instrument. Experiences with family planning, fertility, pregnancy, and parental leave were assessed. Results: There were 422 completed responses. Respondents reported a higher prevalence of infertility as compared to the general U.S. population (26% versus 19%), with no difference in infertility or obstetrical complications by specialty. Most respondents (75%) reported stigma regarding having children in medicine, and 71% reported delaying childbearing. These trends were strongest in the subanalysis of female respondents. Forty-five percent of respondents reported that their work increased the risk for subfertility, infertility, or pregnancy complications. Surgeons were significantly more likely to report physically demanding work conditions (75% versus 30%, p < 0.001), radiation exposure (39% versus 14%, p < 0.001), and bloodborne pathogen exposure (25% versus 12%, p = 0.03) as occupational reproductive hazards. Only 55% of respondents with a pregnancy history reported ever taking parental leave. Among those who took less than the full amount offered, 63% cited concerns about falling behind educationally or professionally as significantly influencing this decision. Conclusions: These results support previous trends showing delayed childbearing and increased infertility among physicians while shedding new light on stigma associated with childbearing and parental leave. A better understanding of the reproductive experiences of physicians is critical to recruiting and retaining a skilled workforce and fostering career and life satisfaction in this profession.