Judith D Schaechter, Jacqueline R Starr, Julie K Silver
Objective: Attrition of women health care professionals is high, threatening patient care and advances in health care sciences. Women health care professionals have often reported experiencing challenges in the workplace that lower their sense of belonging and may precipitate their attrition. The current study sought to identify dimensions of workplace belonging in women health care professionals and to determine the relative strength of association of these belonging dimensions with intent to leave (ITL) their institution. Methods: Attendees of a continuing education course on women's leadership skills in health care were surveyed about their ITL and workplace belonging experiences. Dimensions of workplace belonging were identified by factor analysis. The strength of association between ITL and each workplace belonging dimension, as well as their relative strengths of association, were assessed in ordinal regression analyses. Results: Women comprised 99% of survey participants. Three dimensions of workplace belonging were identified: "institutional culture," "interactions with supervisor," and "interpersonal relationships." More frequent experiences of support in any of the three belonging dimensions associated strongly with lower ITL. When all three belonging dimensions were considered simultaneously, ITL remained strongly related with experiences of a supportive "institutional culture" (odds ratio 0.41, p < 0.0001), while it became much less strongly related with supportive experiences in the other two dimensions. Conclusions: These findings suggest a dominant role of institutional culture in attrition risk in women health care professionals. Interventions that foster an institutional culture of diversity, opportunities for career advancement, and inclusivity might be effective in improving retention of women health care professionals.
{"title":"Institutional Culture of Belonging and Attrition Risk Among Women Health Care Professionals.","authors":"Judith D Schaechter, Jacqueline R Starr, Julie K Silver","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2024.0321","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.0321","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> Attrition of women health care professionals is high, threatening patient care and advances in health care sciences. Women health care professionals have often reported experiencing challenges in the workplace that lower their sense of belonging and may precipitate their attrition. The current study sought to identify dimensions of workplace belonging in women health care professionals and to determine the relative strength of association of these belonging dimensions with intent to leave (ITL) their institution. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Attendees of a continuing education course on women's leadership skills in health care were surveyed about their ITL and workplace belonging experiences. Dimensions of workplace belonging were identified by factor analysis. The strength of association between ITL and each workplace belonging dimension, as well as their relative strengths of association, were assessed in ordinal regression analyses. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Women comprised 99% of survey participants. Three dimensions of workplace belonging were identified: \"institutional culture,\" \"interactions with supervisor,\" and \"interpersonal relationships.\" More frequent experiences of support in any of the three belonging dimensions associated strongly with lower ITL. When all three belonging dimensions were considered simultaneously, ITL remained strongly related with experiences of a supportive \"institutional culture\" (odds ratio 0.41, <i>p</i> < 0.0001), while it became much less strongly related with supportive experiences in the other two dimensions. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> These findings suggest a dominant role of institutional culture in attrition risk in women health care professionals. Interventions that foster an institutional culture of diversity, opportunities for career advancement, and inclusivity might be effective in improving retention of women health care professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142290206","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Deirdre A Quinn, Florentina E Sileanu, Maria K Mor, Lisa S Callegari, Sonya Borrero
Background: Veterans who use VA pregnancy benefits may be at high risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes; however, little is known about rates of adverse pregnancy events or pregnancy-associated death among Veterans. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using VA national administrative data for Veterans ages 18-45 with at least one pregnancy outcome between October 2009 and September 2016 and a VA primary care visit within one year prior to pregnancy. We identified adverse events during pregnancy and up to 42 days after pregnancy and all-cause mortality within one year of pregnancy and compared prevalence of adverse events by Veteran race/ethnicity using adjusted logistic regression. Results: Pregnancies among Black Veterans had 69% higher odds of any adverse event than those among White Veterans (aOR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.43, 2.00). All-cause mortality during pregnancy or within one year of pregnancy was recorded for 18 pregnancies, resulting in an estimated overall pregnancy-associated mortality rate of 76 deaths per 100,000 live births. Conclusions: We identified high overall rates of adverse pregnancy events and pregnancy-associated death among Veterans using VA benefits. As in non-VA populations, there were stark racial disparities in adverse pregnancy events among Veterans.
{"title":"Describing Adverse Pregnancy Events and Pregnancy-Associated Death Among Veterans.","authors":"Deirdre A Quinn, Florentina E Sileanu, Maria K Mor, Lisa S Callegari, Sonya Borrero","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2023.1046","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2023.1046","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Veterans who use VA pregnancy benefits may be at high risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes; however, little is known about rates of adverse pregnancy events or pregnancy-associated death among Veterans. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We conducted a retrospective cohort study using VA national administrative data for Veterans ages 18-45 with at least one pregnancy outcome between October 2009 and September 2016 and a VA primary care visit within one year prior to pregnancy. We identified adverse events during pregnancy and up to 42 days after pregnancy and all-cause mortality within one year of pregnancy and compared prevalence of adverse events by Veteran race/ethnicity using adjusted logistic regression. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Pregnancies among Black Veterans had 69% higher odds of any adverse event than those among White Veterans (aOR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.43, 2.00). All-cause mortality during pregnancy or within one year of pregnancy was recorded for 18 pregnancies, resulting in an estimated overall pregnancy-associated mortality rate of 76 deaths per 100,000 live births. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> We identified high overall rates of adverse pregnancy events and pregnancy-associated death among Veterans using VA benefits. As in non-VA populations, there were stark racial disparities in adverse pregnancy events among Veterans.</p>","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142290182","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Trends in Adverse Pregnancy Events Among Veterans: Racial Disparities and Care Coordination.","authors":"Lynette Hamlin","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2024.0690","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.0690","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142290208","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Colleen L MacCallum-Bridges,Robert Kaestner,Zhehui Luo,Claudia Holzman,Tim A Bruckner,Claire E Margerison
Background: Nearly half of all pregnancies in the United States are considered unintended (mistimed or unwanted), and this rate is even higher among younger and lower income women. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) dependent coverage provision may have influenced the frequency of unintended pregnancies by increasing accessibility to and affordability of family planning services among young adults. Furthermore, the impact of this provision may differ by young adult income level as those with lower income are less likely to be insured and thus more likely to benefit from this provision. Our objective was to estimate the association between the ACA dependent coverage provision and unintended pregnancy, overall, and by young adult income level. Methods: We applied a difference-in-differences approach to data from multiple cycles of the National Survey of Family Growth (n = 10,104) and compared trends in unintended pregnancy between those who were eligible to benefit (ages 18-25 years) and those who were ineligible to benefit (ages 26-33 years) from the provision, overall, and among income subgroups. Results: We found evidence that the dependent coverage provision was associated with a -7.4 percentage point reduction (95% CI: -13.5, -1.3) in the prevalence of unintended pregnancy among young adults with lower income (<100% of the federal poverty level). There was limited evidence, however, that the provision was associated with unintended pregnancy among young adults with higher income levels. Conclusions: These findings suggest the ACA dependent coverage provision may have reduced unintended pregnancy among a particularly high-risk group (i.e., young adults with lower income).
{"title":"The Affordable Care Act Dependent Coverage Provision and Unintended Pregnancy.","authors":"Colleen L MacCallum-Bridges,Robert Kaestner,Zhehui Luo,Claudia Holzman,Tim A Bruckner,Claire E Margerison","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2023.0956","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2023.0956","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Nearly half of all pregnancies in the United States are considered unintended (mistimed or unwanted), and this rate is even higher among younger and lower income women. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) dependent coverage provision may have influenced the frequency of unintended pregnancies by increasing accessibility to and affordability of family planning services among young adults. Furthermore, the impact of this provision may differ by young adult income level as those with lower income are less likely to be insured and thus more likely to benefit from this provision. Our objective was to estimate the association between the ACA dependent coverage provision and unintended pregnancy, overall, and by young adult income level. Methods: We applied a difference-in-differences approach to data from multiple cycles of the National Survey of Family Growth (n = 10,104) and compared trends in unintended pregnancy between those who were eligible to benefit (ages 18-25 years) and those who were ineligible to benefit (ages 26-33 years) from the provision, overall, and among income subgroups. Results: We found evidence that the dependent coverage provision was associated with a -7.4 percentage point reduction (95% CI: -13.5, -1.3) in the prevalence of unintended pregnancy among young adults with lower income (<100% of the federal poverty level). There was limited evidence, however, that the provision was associated with unintended pregnancy among young adults with higher income levels. Conclusions: These findings suggest the ACA dependent coverage provision may have reduced unintended pregnancy among a particularly high-risk group (i.e., young adults with lower income).","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142248134","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Female child welfare-involved youths who are removed from the home are at risk of commercial sexual exploitation of children (CSEC). The aim of this study was to develop a prediction model to identify those at greatest risk of trafficking. Methods: Data were from the Florida Department of Children and Families' Florida Safe Families Network Database. A Cox proportional hazard regression of 60 cases and 3857 controls generated the proposed risk model. Results: Factors found to be associated with a higher risk of trafficking were quantified into point scores, generating the Welfare-Involved Female Sexual Exploitation Risk Assessment (WISER) tool with a cutoff of 20 points: first out-of-home placement at ≥15 years of age (11 points); run away from home in past year and age <15 years (40 points) or ≥15 years (16 points); English spoken as other language (14 points); on a psychotropic drug (17 points); congregate first placement (14 points); runaway/abducted status first "placement" (16 points); psychiatric facility experience (9 points); residential facility experience (7 points); and no time in temporary shelter (9 points). Of those who experienced CSEC, 92% had a WISER score above 20. Discussion: The WISER tool achieved good discrimination and calibration ability with a receiver operating characteristic for the validation data set of 0.923. The WISER tool can (1) inform risk assessment for CSEC among child welfare-involved females and (2) identify youths at greatest risk before they are harmed by trafficking.
{"title":"Risk Prediction Model for Child Sex Trafficking Among Female Child Welfare-Involved Youth: Welfare-Involved Female Sexual Exploitation Risk Assessment Tool.","authors":"Jaya Prakash,Rishi Goel,Yi Mu,Bernard Rosner,Hanni Stoklosa","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2024.0415","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.0415","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Female child welfare-involved youths who are removed from the home are at risk of commercial sexual exploitation of children (CSEC). The aim of this study was to develop a prediction model to identify those at greatest risk of trafficking. Methods: Data were from the Florida Department of Children and Families' Florida Safe Families Network Database. A Cox proportional hazard regression of 60 cases and 3857 controls generated the proposed risk model. Results: Factors found to be associated with a higher risk of trafficking were quantified into point scores, generating the Welfare-Involved Female Sexual Exploitation Risk Assessment (WISER) tool with a cutoff of 20 points: first out-of-home placement at ≥15 years of age (11 points); run away from home in past year and age <15 years (40 points) or ≥15 years (16 points); English spoken as other language (14 points); on a psychotropic drug (17 points); congregate first placement (14 points); runaway/abducted status first \"placement\" (16 points); psychiatric facility experience (9 points); residential facility experience (7 points); and no time in temporary shelter (9 points). Of those who experienced CSEC, 92% had a WISER score above 20. Discussion: The WISER tool achieved good discrimination and calibration ability with a receiver operating characteristic for the validation data set of 0.923. The WISER tool can (1) inform risk assessment for CSEC among child welfare-involved females and (2) identify youths at greatest risk before they are harmed by trafficking.","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":"46 29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142248133","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nancy T Cannizzaro,Brian S Mittman,Erin E Hahn,Quyen Ngo-Metzger,Michael K Gould,Chunyi Hsu,Ernest Shen,Devansu Tewari,Chun R Chao
Background: Current clinical guidelines recommended primary human papillomavirus (HPV) screening for cervical cancer testing. Previous studies reported patient-level barriers (e.g., limited knowledge and attachment to Pap test) that may hinder wide adoption of primary HPV screening. We assessed these women-level factors following the implementation of primary HPV screening (July 2020) at Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC). Methods: We administered a patient survey (mail and on-line) to female KPSC members aged 30-65 years who received primary HPV screening between October and December 2020. Those who preferred English vs. Spanish language were sampled separately. The survey included domains on knowledge about HPV and HPV screening, awareness of screening guidelines, and attitudes about HPV testing. Demographic data were collected using electronic health records. We used weighted multivariable logistic and modified Poisson regressions for associations between language preference and survey responses. Results: In total, 3,009 surveys were returned (38.0% response rate). Few women (7.0%) found HPV testing as an acceptable screening method. The majority of women (92.2%) remained unaware that HPV testing can replace Pap test for screening. The Pap test was the most preferred screening approach for 33.2% Spanish-speaking women vs. 19.9% English-speaking women. Only 20.6% knew that women aged 30-65 years can be screened every 5 years with cotest or primary HPV screening. Most women (96.4%) did not perceive stigma about taking the HPV test. Conclusion: Proactive patient education will help improve women's knowledge about primary HPV screening, which may facilitate its implementation in additional health care settings.
{"title":"Primary Human Papillomavirus Screening: Women's Perceptions of New Cervical Cancer Screening Recommendations.","authors":"Nancy T Cannizzaro,Brian S Mittman,Erin E Hahn,Quyen Ngo-Metzger,Michael K Gould,Chunyi Hsu,Ernest Shen,Devansu Tewari,Chun R Chao","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2023.1180","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2023.1180","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Current clinical guidelines recommended primary human papillomavirus (HPV) screening for cervical cancer testing. Previous studies reported patient-level barriers (e.g., limited knowledge and attachment to Pap test) that may hinder wide adoption of primary HPV screening. We assessed these women-level factors following the implementation of primary HPV screening (July 2020) at Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC). Methods: We administered a patient survey (mail and on-line) to female KPSC members aged 30-65 years who received primary HPV screening between October and December 2020. Those who preferred English vs. Spanish language were sampled separately. The survey included domains on knowledge about HPV and HPV screening, awareness of screening guidelines, and attitudes about HPV testing. Demographic data were collected using electronic health records. We used weighted multivariable logistic and modified Poisson regressions for associations between language preference and survey responses. Results: In total, 3,009 surveys were returned (38.0% response rate). Few women (7.0%) found HPV testing as an acceptable screening method. The majority of women (92.2%) remained unaware that HPV testing can replace Pap test for screening. The Pap test was the most preferred screening approach for 33.2% Spanish-speaking women vs. 19.9% English-speaking women. Only 20.6% knew that women aged 30-65 years can be screened every 5 years with cotest or primary HPV screening. Most women (96.4%) did not perceive stigma about taking the HPV test. Conclusion: Proactive patient education will help improve women's knowledge about primary HPV screening, which may facilitate its implementation in additional health care settings.","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142181712","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Differences in time commitments and resources contribute to the difficulties of work-life integration for many physician-scientists, particularly for women with family caregiving responsibilities. Understanding the challenges faced by this population is critical for the retention of these critical members of the workforce. Methods: We conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with recipients of the 2017 Doris Duke Charitable Foundation's Fund to Retain Clinical Scientists (FRCS) and reviewed application narratives from the 2020 award recipients. Award recipients were asked about their caregiving responsibilities and careers, particularly as they related to the impact of the FRCS award and the aftereffects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Analysts then iteratively revised the coding scheme and interpreted the data using qualitative thematic analysis. Results: Of the 14 interviewees and 19 narrative contributors, 25 (76%) were women. The main qualitative themes that emerged were as follows: (1) women experience unrealistically high caregiving burdens, (2) women are overburdened by disadvantageous and undervalued expectations at work, (3) work-life expectations increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, and (4) unrealistic work-life expectations led to guilt and burnout. Conclusions: These findings provide a rich understanding of the factors contributing to guilt and burnout among physician-scientists, particularly women, and how work duties that increase physician obligations exacerbated these challenges. Understanding these experiences is critical to supporting and retaining a diverse workforce in academic medicine.
{"title":"Qualitative Exploration of the \"Guilt Gap\" Among Physician-Faculty with Caregiving Responsibilities.","authors":"Jamie Takayesu,Lauren Szczygiel,Rochelle D Jones,Lydia Perry,Laura Balcer,Gail Daumit,Wonder Drake,Heather Gatcombe,Christina Mangurian,Bess Marshall,Judith Regensteiner,Reshma Jagsi","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2024.0106","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.0106","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Differences in time commitments and resources contribute to the difficulties of work-life integration for many physician-scientists, particularly for women with family caregiving responsibilities. Understanding the challenges faced by this population is critical for the retention of these critical members of the workforce. Methods: We conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with recipients of the 2017 Doris Duke Charitable Foundation's Fund to Retain Clinical Scientists (FRCS) and reviewed application narratives from the 2020 award recipients. Award recipients were asked about their caregiving responsibilities and careers, particularly as they related to the impact of the FRCS award and the aftereffects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Analysts then iteratively revised the coding scheme and interpreted the data using qualitative thematic analysis. Results: Of the 14 interviewees and 19 narrative contributors, 25 (76%) were women. The main qualitative themes that emerged were as follows: (1) women experience unrealistically high caregiving burdens, (2) women are overburdened by disadvantageous and undervalued expectations at work, (3) work-life expectations increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, and (4) unrealistic work-life expectations led to guilt and burnout. Conclusions: These findings provide a rich understanding of the factors contributing to guilt and burnout among physician-scientists, particularly women, and how work duties that increase physician obligations exacerbated these challenges. Understanding these experiences is critical to supporting and retaining a diverse workforce in academic medicine.","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":"117 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142181710","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common endocrine condition, affecting up to 20% of reproductive aged women worldwide. Polycystic ovarian morphology (PCOM) may be present, but is not required for diagnosis. Our study seeks to evaluate the utility of ultrasound in diagnosing or excluding PCOS by 2023 International Guidelines Criteria. Materials and Methods: Subjects were patients seen in a tertiary care referral clinic in whom other causes of hyperandrogenism (HA) were ruled out. All underwent complete history, physical, modified Ferriman Gallwey scoring, and serum androgen testing; followed by transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) to assess ovarian morphology if indicated. PCOM was identified as antral follicle count ≥20 and/or ovarian volume >10 mL in at least one ovary. After clinical classification, PCOS was diagnosed by at least two of three: biochemical/clinical HA, ovulatory dysfunction (OD), and PCOM. Statistics were calculated using Fisher's exact test and chi-square. Results: In total, 454 subjects were included. 299 were classified as group A/B and did not require TVUS for diagnosis. Of 82 subjects with HA alone, 50 (61.0%) were classified as group C after demonstrating PCOM. Fifty-five subjects had OD alone, 37 (67.3%) of which were classified as group D based on PCOM. In total, 137/454, or 30.2% of subjects required TVUS for diagnosis or exclusion of PCOS. Conclusions: TVUS was necessary in less than one-third of subjects, primarily identifying PCOS groups C or D. Selective use of ovarian ultrasonography may reduce the costs and complexity of epidemiological and clinical studies for PCOS.
{"title":"How Frequently Is Ultrasound Required to Diagnose Polycystic Ovary Syndrome in a Clinical Population?","authors":"Lauren Pace,Joshua Waldeck,Jessica Chan,Margareta Pisarska,Ricardo Azziz","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2024.0186","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.0186","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common endocrine condition, affecting up to 20% of reproductive aged women worldwide. Polycystic ovarian morphology (PCOM) may be present, but is not required for diagnosis. Our study seeks to evaluate the utility of ultrasound in diagnosing or excluding PCOS by 2023 International Guidelines Criteria. Materials and Methods: Subjects were patients seen in a tertiary care referral clinic in whom other causes of hyperandrogenism (HA) were ruled out. All underwent complete history, physical, modified Ferriman Gallwey scoring, and serum androgen testing; followed by transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) to assess ovarian morphology if indicated. PCOM was identified as antral follicle count ≥20 and/or ovarian volume >10 mL in at least one ovary. After clinical classification, PCOS was diagnosed by at least two of three: biochemical/clinical HA, ovulatory dysfunction (OD), and PCOM. Statistics were calculated using Fisher's exact test and chi-square. Results: In total, 454 subjects were included. 299 were classified as group A/B and did not require TVUS for diagnosis. Of 82 subjects with HA alone, 50 (61.0%) were classified as group C after demonstrating PCOM. Fifty-five subjects had OD alone, 37 (67.3%) of which were classified as group D based on PCOM. In total, 137/454, or 30.2% of subjects required TVUS for diagnosis or exclusion of PCOS. Conclusions: TVUS was necessary in less than one-third of subjects, primarily identifying PCOS groups C or D. Selective use of ovarian ultrasonography may reduce the costs and complexity of epidemiological and clinical studies for PCOS.","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142181711","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Christine G T Nguyen, Ava Mandelbaum, Lucy Ward, Katherine Bolten, Keenan Yanit, Jessica Currier, Amanda S Bruegl
Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination during the postpartum period is an opportunity for vaccine eligible individuals to be vaccinated. Objective: Identify predictors of vaccine acceptance in the postpartum period among patients aged 18-26. Study Design: A retrospective chart review was conducted to evaluate the rate of HPV vaccination to eligible postpartum patients aged 18-26 who delivered between January 2021 and May 2023 at our institution. Clinical and demographic data were extracted. Comparisons were made between fully vaccinated individuals and those who were unvaccinated or incompletely vaccinated. Variables significantly associated with vaccination status or acceptance were included in a multivariable logistic regression model. Results: Of the 1,130 patients who met the study inclusion criteria, 42.1% were eligible for postpartum HPV vaccination. The average age was 23 years, the majority White (74.5%), and English speaking (93.1%). Nineteen percent of eligible patients accepted HPV vaccination, with differences between those who accepted or declined the vaccine identified in: preferred language, tobacco use, delivering provider's specialty, and receiving any vaccination during pregnancy. Spanish-speaking patients had >5× the odds of accepting the vaccine compared with English-speaking patients. Smokers, patients delivered by a family medicine provider, and those who accepted any vaccine during pregnancy had more than twice the odds of receiving the vaccine postpartum. Conclusion(s): The postpartum period remains an opportunity to provide HPV vaccination. Our study identified patients less likely to be vaccinated prior to delivery, as well as patients who are more likely to accept vaccinations postpartum.
{"title":"Predictors of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination in the Postpartum Period for Individuals Aged 18-26.","authors":"Christine G T Nguyen, Ava Mandelbaum, Lucy Ward, Katherine Bolten, Keenan Yanit, Jessica Currier, Amanda S Bruegl","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2024.0551","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.0551","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination during the postpartum period is an opportunity for vaccine eligible individuals to be vaccinated. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> Identify predictors of vaccine acceptance in the postpartum period among patients aged 18-26. <b><i>Study Design:</i></b> A retrospective chart review was conducted to evaluate the rate of HPV vaccination to eligible postpartum patients aged 18-26 who delivered between January 2021 and May 2023 at our institution. Clinical and demographic data were extracted. Comparisons were made between fully vaccinated individuals and those who were unvaccinated or incompletely vaccinated. Variables significantly associated with vaccination status or acceptance were included in a multivariable logistic regression model. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of the 1,130 patients who met the study inclusion criteria, 42.1% were eligible for postpartum HPV vaccination. The average age was 23 years, the majority White (74.5%), and English speaking (93.1%). Nineteen percent of eligible patients accepted HPV vaccination, with differences between those who accepted or declined the vaccine identified in: preferred language, tobacco use, delivering provider's specialty, and receiving any vaccination during pregnancy. Spanish-speaking patients had >5× the odds of accepting the vaccine compared with English-speaking patients. Smokers, patients delivered by a family medicine provider, and those who accepted any vaccine during pregnancy had more than twice the odds of receiving the vaccine postpartum. <b><i>Conclusion(s):</i></b> The postpartum period remains an opportunity to provide HPV vaccination. Our study identified patients less likely to be vaccinated prior to delivery, as well as patients who are more likely to accept vaccinations postpartum.</p>","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142140465","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Caroline Cochrane, Chelsea Anderson, Sara Mitra, Laura Green, Christopher D Baggett, Jennifer E Mersereau, Darios Getahun, Marilyn L Kwan, Chun R Chao, Lawrence H Kushi, Hazel B Nichols
Objective: To describe patterns of cancer treatment and live birth outcomes that followed a cancer diagnosis during pregnancy. Study Design: The Adolescent and Young Adult (AYA) Horizon Study is an observational study evaluating outcomes in survivors of the five most common types of cancer in this age group (15-39 years old). Of the 23,629 individuals identified diagnosed with breast, lymphoma, thyroid, melanoma, or gynecological cancer in North Carolina (2000-2015) and California (2004-2016), we identified 555 live births to individuals who experienced cancer diagnosis during pregnancy. Births to individuals diagnosed with cancer during pregnancy were matched ∼1:5 on maternal age and year of delivery to live births to individuals without a cancer diagnosis (N = 2,667). Multivariable Poisson regression was used to compare birth outcomes between pregnancies affected by a cancer diagnosis and unaffected matched pregnancies. Results: Cancer diagnosis during pregnancy was associated with an increased risk of preterm delivery (prevalence ratio [PR] 2.70; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.24, 3.26); very preterm delivery (PR 1.74; 95% CI 1.12, 2.71); induction of labor (PR 1.48; 95% CI 1.27, 1.73); low birth weight (PR 1.97; 95% CI 1.55, 2.50); and cesarean delivery (PR 1.18; 95% CI 1.04, 1.34) but not associated with low Apgar score (PR 0.90; 95% CI 0.39, 2.06). In our sample, 41% of patients received chemotherapy, half of whom initiated chemotherapy during pregnancy, and 86% received surgery, 58% of whom had surgery during pregnancy. Of the 19% who received radiation, all received radiation treatment following pregnancy. Conclusion: We identified an increased risk of birth outcomes, including preterm and very preterm delivery, induction of labor, low birth weight, and cesarean delivery, to those experiencing a cancer diagnosis during pregnancy. This analysis contributes to the available evidence for those experiencing a cancer diagnosis during pregnancy.
{"title":"Cancer Diagnosis During Pregnancy and Livebirth Outcomes in the Adolescent and Young Adult Horizon Study.","authors":"Caroline Cochrane, Chelsea Anderson, Sara Mitra, Laura Green, Christopher D Baggett, Jennifer E Mersereau, Darios Getahun, Marilyn L Kwan, Chun R Chao, Lawrence H Kushi, Hazel B Nichols","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2024.0064","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.0064","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> To describe patterns of cancer treatment and live birth outcomes that followed a cancer diagnosis during pregnancy. <b><i>Study Design:</i></b> The Adolescent and Young Adult (AYA) Horizon Study is an observational study evaluating outcomes in survivors of the five most common types of cancer in this age group (15-39 years old). Of the 23,629 individuals identified diagnosed with breast, lymphoma, thyroid, melanoma, or gynecological cancer in North Carolina (2000-2015) and California (2004-2016), we identified 555 live births to individuals who experienced cancer diagnosis during pregnancy. Births to individuals diagnosed with cancer during pregnancy were matched ∼1:5 on maternal age and year of delivery to live births to individuals without a cancer diagnosis (<i>N</i> = 2,667). Multivariable Poisson regression was used to compare birth outcomes between pregnancies affected by a cancer diagnosis and unaffected matched pregnancies. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Cancer diagnosis during pregnancy was associated with an increased risk of preterm delivery (prevalence ratio [PR] 2.70; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.24, 3.26); very preterm delivery (PR 1.74; 95% CI 1.12, 2.71); induction of labor (PR 1.48; 95% CI 1.27, 1.73); low birth weight (PR 1.97; 95% CI 1.55, 2.50); and cesarean delivery (PR 1.18; 95% CI 1.04, 1.34) but not associated with low Apgar score (PR 0.90; 95% CI 0.39, 2.06). In our sample, 41% of patients received chemotherapy, half of whom initiated chemotherapy during pregnancy, and 86% received surgery, 58% of whom had surgery during pregnancy. Of the 19% who received radiation, all received radiation treatment following pregnancy. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> We identified an increased risk of birth outcomes, including preterm and very preterm delivery, induction of labor, low birth weight, and cesarean delivery, to those experiencing a cancer diagnosis during pregnancy. This analysis contributes to the available evidence for those experiencing a cancer diagnosis during pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142133098","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}