Journal of women's health最新文献

Introduction: We investigated associations of menopausal age category with body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, waist-hip ratio, and waist-height ratio. We also explored the moderating effect of anthropometric measures on associations of menopausal age category with prespecified sex hormones: estradiol, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), sex hormone-binding globulin, bioavailable testosterone, and total testosterone-estradiol (T/E) ratio. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we included 2,436 postmenopausal women from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis who had menopausal age, anthropometric, and sex hormone data at baseline. Menopausal age was categorized as <45 years (early menopause), 45-49 years, 50-54 years (referent), and ≥55 years (late menopause). Linear models were used for analysis. Results: The mean (standard deviation) age was 64.7 (9.2) years. After multivariable adjustment, women who experienced late menopause had higher waist circumference (2.28 cm), waist-hip ratio (0.013 units), and waist-height ratio (0.014 units) but not BMI than those in the referent category. The interaction terms between menopausal age category and anthropometric measures were not significant for prespecified sex hormones (all P_interaction >0.05). When compared with the referent category, T/E ratio was 21% (4.72 - 39.8%) higher among women with late menopause while DHEA levels were 9% (1 - 16%) higher among women who experienced menopause between 45 and 49 years in multivariable adjusted models. Conclusion: Women with late menopause had higher abdominal adiposity but not generalized adiposity when compared with those who experienced menopause between 50 and 54 years of age. Androgenicity was higher among women who experienced menopause between 45 and 49 years of age and those with late menopause, based on DHEA and T/E ratios, respectively.

Objective: Failure to "make weight" carries significant consequences for military personnel including additional training burdens, stigma, possible demotion, or even separation from service. The aim of this study was to examine potential gender differences in, and investigate relationships between, military making weight behavior and obesity, eating pathology, and mental health later in life. Method: Iraq and Afghanistan war era Veterans (N = 1,126, 51.8% women) completed the Making Weight Inventory (MWI), a measure of making weight behaviors engaged in during military service, and validated measures of eating behavior and mental health. Analyses compared participants who engaged in at least one making weight behavior (MWI+) versus those who did not (MWI-). Results: Overall, 41% (n = 462) of the sample was categorized as MWI+. The most frequently endorsed making weight behavior was excessive exercise (35.7%). Among those who were MWI+, there was a significantly greater proportion of women (58.2% versus 47.3%, p < 0.001). The MWI+ group had higher rates of obesity (52.4% versus 26.2%) and had significantly higher levels of dietary restraint, emotional eating, food addiction, depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress disorder than the MWI- group (p's < 0.001). Conclusions: Military making weight behavior was associated with female gender, higher weight, eating pathology, and mental health later in life. Collectively, these findings suggest these factors may place female service members at a disadvantage for career advancement and salary. Efforts to better understand and address extreme making weight efforts in military populations, particularly in female service members and Veterans, are warranted.

This clinical update serves as a brief summary of recently published and potentially practice changing journal articles. We review recent publications related to contraceptive safety and efficacy. The article discusses updated medical eligibility recommendations, effectiveness of progestin-only pills (including the newly approved over-the-counter pill), safety of estrogen containing contraceptives in those with migraine, topiramate interactions with hormonal contraception, and the use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) with oral emergency contraception to improve efficacy.

Objective: To examine publication trends pertaining to fertility-sparing management in patients of reproductive age with gynecological malignancies. Methods: Ovid MEDLINE was used to aggregate all publications on gynecological cancers and fertility between 1946 and 2022. Original research, reviews, case series/reports, and editorials were included. Publication information was extracted from Ovid MEDLINE. Individual authors' subspecialty credentials were individually reviewed and confirmed. Descriptive statistics were generated. Results: The initial query generated 2,057 publications. Of these, 1,057 (51.4%) publications met search criteria, with the first study being published in 1991 and with 16.6% published in the last 2 years. Only 34 (5.5%) studies were published with collaboration between reproductive endocrinology and infertility (REI) and gynecological oncology physicians in the United States. Gynecological oncologists comprised most senior authors (50.9%), followed by REI specialists (18.6%). Topics of the publications centered on fertility-sparing surgical management (43.1%), medical management of gynecological malignancies (11.3%), and oocyte/ovarian tissue preservation (6.0%). Most publications focused on ovarian malignancies (349, 33.3%), followed by cervical cancer (299, 28.5%), and uterine/endometrial cancer (258, 24.6%). While the number of publications regarding fertility-sparing management has increased over the last 30 years, the majority are retrospective studies and case reports/series. In the last 10 years, only five studies were randomized controlled trials. Conclusions: There is an urgent need for more prospective research in oncofertility. While fertility care in the setting of gynecological cancer is a collaborative effort between the specialties of gynecological oncology and REI, this partnership is not reflected in the authorship of current literature.

Background: Mental health conditions and epilepsy frequently coexist and have independently been associated with severe maternal morbidity (SMM). Since little is known about the risks of these conditions when they occur together in pregnancy, we evaluated the associations of mental health conditions, epilepsy, and SMM. Methods: We conducted a population-based study of births in California between 2007 and 2018. Antenatal epilepsy and mental health conditions (defined as depression, anxiety, posttraumatic stress disorder, and other) were identified using billing codes. We categorized individuals into the following mutually exclusive exposure groups: no epilepsy or mental health conditions (referent), mental health conditions alone, epilepsy alone, or both epilepsy and mental health conditions. Our primary outcome was SMM, defined by the 20-indicator Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Index. We conducted multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical confounding factors. Results: In a cohort of 5,275,994 births, SMM occurred more frequently in individuals with mental health conditions alone, epilepsy alone, and both mental health conditions and epilepsy (1.8%, 3.0%, 4.2%, respectively) compared with the referent group (0.8%). The odds of SMM were significantly increased for each exposure group: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.05-2.22 for mental health conditions; aOR 3.79, 95% CI 3.45-4.18 for epilepsy; and aOR 4.91, 95% CI 4.01-6.00 for both. Conclusion: Epilepsy and mental health conditions were independently associated with SMM, and individuals carrying both diagnoses had the highest odds of SMM. Our results highlight the need for awareness of SMM risks in this population.

Background: The postpartum period is a time of unmet contraceptive need for many women. Home visits by a health care worker during pregnancy or after delivery could increase postpartum contraceptive use and decrease barriers to accessing postpartum care. This study investigated the association between prenatal or postpartum home visits and postpartum contraceptive use using a large sample of U.S. women from 41 states. Subjects and Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis using weighted survey data from the 2012-2015 Phase 7 Pregnancy Risk Assessment and Monitoring Systems Core and Standard Questionnaires. Descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression models estimated the association between having a prenatal or postpartum home visit and self-reported postpartum contraceptive use. Results: Of 141,296 women, approximately 21% received prenatal or postpartum home visits and 79% used postpartum contraception. After controlling for sociodemographic, reproductive, and health-related factors, women who received prenatal or postpartum home visits had a higher odds of postpartum contraception use (adjusted odds ratio 1.08, 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.15, p = 0.009). Women who were older, were minority race, had less than a high school education, received inadequate prenatal care, experienced partner abuse during pregnancy, or experienced multiple stressors during pregnancy had a lower odds of postpartum contraception use in adjusted analyses controlling for home visitation. Conclusion: Given the benefits of recommended interpregnancy intervals to both the mother and the baby, adding formal contraceptive counseling and offering a variety of postpartum contraceptive methods in the home could further strengthen home visitation programs in the United States and may support women in achieving their reproductive goals.

Background: The frequency of cervical insufficiency differs among the major racial and ethnic groups, with limited data specific to Asian American and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (AANHPI) subpopulations. We assessed cervical insufficiency diagnoses and related outcomes across 10 racial and ethnic groups, including disaggregated AANHPI subgroups, in a large population-based cohort. Study Design: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all singleton births between 20-42 weeks' gestation in California from 2007 to 2018. Logistic regression models were performed to estimate the odds of cervical insufficiency and, among people with cervical insufficiency, the odds of cerclage and preterm birth according to self-reported race and ethnicity. Results: Among 5,114,470 births, 38,605 (0.8%) had a diagnosis code for cervical insufficiency. Compared with non-Hispanic White people, non-Hispanic Black people had the highest odds of cervical insufficiency (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.97, 3.18), for cerclage placement and higher odds for preterm birth. Disaggregating AANHPI subgroups showed that Indian people had the highest odds (aOR 1.94; 95% CI, 1.82, 2.07) of cervical insufficiency and had significantly higher odds of cerclage without increased odds of preterm birth; Southeast Asian people had the highest odds of preterm birth. Conclusion: Within a large, diverse population-based cohort, non-Hispanic Black people experienced the highest rates of cervical insufficiency, and among those with cervical insufficiency, had among the highest rates of cerclage and preterm birth. Among AANHPI subgroups specifically, Indian people had the highest rates of cervical insufficiency and cerclage placement, without increased rates of preterm birth; Southeast Asian people had the highest rates of preterm birth, without increased rates of cerclage. Disaggregating AANHPI subgroups identifies important differences in obstetric risk factors and outcomes.