Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-06-07DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2023.1115
Sydney R Archer, Kristin M Wall, Melissa J Kottke
Background: The postpartum period is a time of unmet contraceptive need for many women. Home visits by a health care worker during pregnancy or after delivery could increase postpartum contraceptive use and decrease barriers to accessing postpartum care. This study investigated the association between prenatal or postpartum home visits and postpartum contraceptive use using a large sample of U.S. women from 41 states. Subjects and Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis using weighted survey data from the 2012-2015 Phase 7 Pregnancy Risk Assessment and Monitoring Systems Core and Standard Questionnaires. Descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression models estimated the association between having a prenatal or postpartum home visit and self-reported postpartum contraceptive use. Results: Of 141,296 women, approximately 21% received prenatal or postpartum home visits and 79% used postpartum contraception. After controlling for sociodemographic, reproductive, and health-related factors, women who received prenatal or postpartum home visits had a higher odds of postpartum contraception use (adjusted odds ratio 1.08, 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.15, p = 0.009). Women who were older, were minority race, had less than a high school education, received inadequate prenatal care, experienced partner abuse during pregnancy, or experienced multiple stressors during pregnancy had a lower odds of postpartum contraception use in adjusted analyses controlling for home visitation. Conclusion: Given the benefits of recommended interpregnancy intervals to both the mother and the baby, adding formal contraceptive counseling and offering a variety of postpartum contraceptive methods in the home could further strengthen home visitation programs in the United States and may support women in achieving their reproductive goals.
{"title":"Prenatal and Postpartum Home Visits and Postpartum Contraceptive Use: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.","authors":"Sydney R Archer, Kristin M Wall, Melissa J Kottke","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2023.1115","DOIUrl":"10.1089/jwh.2023.1115","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> The postpartum period is a time of unmet contraceptive need for many women. Home visits by a health care worker during pregnancy or after delivery could increase postpartum contraceptive use and decrease barriers to accessing postpartum care. This study investigated the association between prenatal or postpartum home visits and postpartum contraceptive use using a large sample of U.S. women from 41 states. <b><i>Subjects and Methods:</i></b> We conducted a cross-sectional analysis using weighted survey data from the 2012-2015 Phase 7 Pregnancy Risk Assessment and Monitoring Systems Core and Standard Questionnaires. Descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression models estimated the association between having a prenatal or postpartum home visit and self-reported postpartum contraceptive use. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of 141,296 women, approximately 21% received prenatal or postpartum home visits and 79% used postpartum contraception. After controlling for sociodemographic, reproductive, and health-related factors, women who received prenatal or postpartum home visits had a higher odds of postpartum contraception use (adjusted odds ratio 1.08, 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.15, <i>p</i> = 0.009). Women who were older, were minority race, had less than a high school education, received inadequate prenatal care, experienced partner abuse during pregnancy, or experienced multiple stressors during pregnancy had a lower odds of postpartum contraception use in adjusted analyses controlling for home visitation. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Given the benefits of recommended interpregnancy intervals to both the mother and the baby, adding formal contraceptive counseling and offering a variety of postpartum contraceptive methods in the home could further strengthen home visitation programs in the United States and may support women in achieving their reproductive goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":" ","pages":"85-94"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141288223","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-10-31DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2023.1109
Sarah H O'Brien, Joseph R Stanek, Andrea House, Robert M Cronin, Susan E Creary, Andrea H Roe, Sara K Vesely
Background: Although the risk of pregnancy-related morbidity and mortality in people with sickle cell disease (SCD) is well established, limitations in data sources and heterogeneity in outcome reporting hinder the ability to make meaningful comparisons between historical and contemporary populations. This study used a national administrative claims database to compare pregnancy outcomes in people with SCD between 2006-2011 and 2012-2018. Materials and Methods: Pregnant females aged 16-44 years with SCD were identified from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service Analytic eXtract, along with a control cohort of pregnant people. People were followed from first identified pregnancy until one year postpartum. Outcomes of interest were identified with ICD-9 or 10 codes. Results: We included 6,388 people with SCD and 17,278 controls in analyses. Preeclampsia/eclampsia, hypertension, thrombosis, poor fetal growth, preterm delivery, and postpartum hemorrhage were all more common in people with SCD compared with controls. Maternal death occurred in 0.5% of people with SCD versus <0.1% in those without SCD (p < 0.001). When comparing infant deliveries in 2006-2011 to those occurring in 2012-2018, all pregnancy-related complications except preterm delivery, including maternal death, occurred at similar or higher frequencies in more recent years. Conclusions: Between 2006 and 2018, maternal death occurred in approximately 1 out of every 200 publicly insured people with SCD in the year following infant delivery. Our work confirms, on a national-level, that pregnancy-related outcomes in people with SCD in the United States have not improved with time, and that some complications have in fact increased in frequency.
{"title":"Trends in Pregnancy Outcomes in People with Sickle Cell Disease and Medicaid Insurance (2006-2018).","authors":"Sarah H O'Brien, Joseph R Stanek, Andrea House, Robert M Cronin, Susan E Creary, Andrea H Roe, Sara K Vesely","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2023.1109","DOIUrl":"10.1089/jwh.2023.1109","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Although the risk of pregnancy-related morbidity and mortality in people with sickle cell disease (SCD) is well established, limitations in data sources and heterogeneity in outcome reporting hinder the ability to make meaningful comparisons between historical and contemporary populations. This study used a national administrative claims database to compare pregnancy outcomes in people with SCD between 2006-2011 and 2012-2018. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> Pregnant females aged 16-44 years with SCD were identified from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service Analytic eXtract, along with a control cohort of pregnant people. People were followed from first identified pregnancy until one year postpartum. Outcomes of interest were identified with ICD-9 or 10 codes. <b><i>Results:</i></b> We included 6,388 people with SCD and 17,278 controls in analyses. Preeclampsia/eclampsia, hypertension, thrombosis, poor fetal growth, preterm delivery, and postpartum hemorrhage were all more common in people with SCD compared with controls. Maternal death occurred in 0.5% of people with SCD versus <0.1% in those without SCD (<i>p</i> < 0.001). When comparing infant deliveries in 2006-2011 to those occurring in 2012-2018, all pregnancy-related complications except preterm delivery, including maternal death, occurred at similar or higher frequencies in more recent years. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Between 2006 and 2018, maternal death occurred in approximately 1 out of every 200 publicly insured people with SCD in the year following infant delivery. Our work confirms, on a national-level, that pregnancy-related outcomes in people with SCD in the United States have not improved with time, and that some complications have in fact increased in frequency.</p>","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":" ","pages":"21-26"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142546235","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-12-04DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2024.0983
Eli Y Adashi, Daniel P O'Mahony, I Glenn Cohen
{"title":"The <i>Right to Contraception Act</i>: A Present-Day Imperative.","authors":"Eli Y Adashi, Daniel P O'Mahony, I Glenn Cohen","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2024.0983","DOIUrl":"10.1089/jwh.2024.0983","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":" ","pages":"164-165"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142770133","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-09-20DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2023.1046
Deirdre A Quinn, Florentina E Sileanu, Maria K Mor, Lisa S Callegari, Sonya Borrero
Background: Veterans who use VA pregnancy benefits may be at high risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes; however, little is known about rates of adverse pregnancy events or pregnancy-associated death among Veterans. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using VA national administrative data for Veterans ages 18-45 with at least one pregnancy outcome between October 2009 and September 2016 and a VA primary care visit within one year prior to pregnancy. We identified adverse events during pregnancy and up to 42 days after pregnancy and all-cause mortality within one year of pregnancy and compared prevalence of adverse events by Veteran race/ethnicity using adjusted logistic regression. Results: Pregnancies among Black Veterans had 69% higher odds of any adverse event than those among White Veterans (aOR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.43, 2.00). All-cause mortality during pregnancy or within one year of pregnancy was recorded for 18 pregnancies, resulting in an estimated overall pregnancy-associated mortality rate of 76 deaths per 100,000 live births. Conclusions: We identified high overall rates of adverse pregnancy events and pregnancy-associated death among Veterans using VA benefits. As in non-VA populations, there were stark racial disparities in adverse pregnancy events among Veterans.
{"title":"Describing Adverse Pregnancy Events and Pregnancy-Associated Death Among Veterans.","authors":"Deirdre A Quinn, Florentina E Sileanu, Maria K Mor, Lisa S Callegari, Sonya Borrero","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2023.1046","DOIUrl":"10.1089/jwh.2023.1046","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Veterans who use VA pregnancy benefits may be at high risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes; however, little is known about rates of adverse pregnancy events or pregnancy-associated death among Veterans. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We conducted a retrospective cohort study using VA national administrative data for Veterans ages 18-45 with at least one pregnancy outcome between October 2009 and September 2016 and a VA primary care visit within one year prior to pregnancy. We identified adverse events during pregnancy and up to 42 days after pregnancy and all-cause mortality within one year of pregnancy and compared prevalence of adverse events by Veteran race/ethnicity using adjusted logistic regression. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Pregnancies among Black Veterans had 69% higher odds of any adverse event than those among White Veterans (aOR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.43, 2.00). All-cause mortality during pregnancy or within one year of pregnancy was recorded for 18 pregnancies, resulting in an estimated overall pregnancy-associated mortality rate of 76 deaths per 100,000 live births. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> We identified high overall rates of adverse pregnancy events and pregnancy-associated death among Veterans using VA benefits. As in non-VA populations, there were stark racial disparities in adverse pregnancy events among Veterans.</p>","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":" ","pages":"166-175"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142290182","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-06-26DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2024.0088
Hayley E Miller, Jonathan A Mayo, Ravali A Reddy, Stephanie A Leonard, Henry C Lee, Sanaa Suharwardy, Deirdre J Lyell
Background: The frequency of cervical insufficiency differs among the major racial and ethnic groups, with limited data specific to Asian American and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (AANHPI) subpopulations. We assessed cervical insufficiency diagnoses and related outcomes across 10 racial and ethnic groups, including disaggregated AANHPI subgroups, in a large population-based cohort. Study Design: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all singleton births between 20-42 weeks' gestation in California from 2007 to 2018. Logistic regression models were performed to estimate the odds of cervical insufficiency and, among people with cervical insufficiency, the odds of cerclage and preterm birth according to self-reported race and ethnicity. Results: Among 5,114,470 births, 38,605 (0.8%) had a diagnosis code for cervical insufficiency. Compared with non-Hispanic White people, non-Hispanic Black people had the highest odds of cervical insufficiency (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.97, 3.18), for cerclage placement and higher odds for preterm birth. Disaggregating AANHPI subgroups showed that Indian people had the highest odds (aOR 1.94; 95% CI, 1.82, 2.07) of cervical insufficiency and had significantly higher odds of cerclage without increased odds of preterm birth; Southeast Asian people had the highest odds of preterm birth. Conclusion: Within a large, diverse population-based cohort, non-Hispanic Black people experienced the highest rates of cervical insufficiency, and among those with cervical insufficiency, had among the highest rates of cerclage and preterm birth. Among AANHPI subgroups specifically, Indian people had the highest rates of cervical insufficiency and cerclage placement, without increased rates of preterm birth; Southeast Asian people had the highest rates of preterm birth, without increased rates of cerclage. Disaggregating AANHPI subgroups identifies important differences in obstetric risk factors and outcomes.
{"title":"Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Cervical Insufficiency, Cervical Cerclage, and Preterm Birth.","authors":"Hayley E Miller, Jonathan A Mayo, Ravali A Reddy, Stephanie A Leonard, Henry C Lee, Sanaa Suharwardy, Deirdre J Lyell","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2024.0088","DOIUrl":"10.1089/jwh.2024.0088","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> The frequency of cervical insufficiency differs among the major racial and ethnic groups, with limited data specific to Asian American and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (AANHPI) subpopulations. We assessed cervical insufficiency diagnoses and related outcomes across 10 racial and ethnic groups, including disaggregated AANHPI subgroups, in a large population-based cohort. <b><i>Study Design:</i></b> We performed a retrospective cohort study of all singleton births between 20-42 weeks' gestation in California from 2007 to 2018. Logistic regression models were performed to estimate the odds of cervical insufficiency and, among people with cervical insufficiency, the odds of cerclage and preterm birth according to self-reported race and ethnicity. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Among 5,114,470 births, 38,605 (0.8%) had a diagnosis code for cervical insufficiency. Compared with non-Hispanic White people, non-Hispanic Black people had the highest odds of cervical insufficiency (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.97, 3.18), for cerclage placement and higher odds for preterm birth. Disaggregating AANHPI subgroups showed that Indian people had the highest odds (aOR 1.94; 95% CI, 1.82, 2.07) of cervical insufficiency and had significantly higher odds of cerclage without increased odds of preterm birth; Southeast Asian people had the highest odds of preterm birth. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Within a large, diverse population-based cohort, non-Hispanic Black people experienced the highest rates of cervical insufficiency, and among those with cervical insufficiency, had among the highest rates of cerclage and preterm birth. Among AANHPI subgroups specifically, Indian people had the highest rates of cervical insufficiency and cerclage placement, without increased rates of preterm birth; Southeast Asian people had the highest rates of preterm birth, without increased rates of cerclage. Disaggregating AANHPI subgroups identifies important differences in obstetric risk factors and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":" ","pages":"70-77"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11807857/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141457703","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2024.01254.revack
{"title":"Acknowledgment of Reviewers 2024.","authors":"","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2024.01254.revack","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.01254.revack","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":"34 1","pages":"159-161"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142950770","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-11-26DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2024.0079
Gloria Richard-Davis, Mayank Ajmera, Aki Shiozawa, Riddhi Doshi, Christopher Young, Jason Yeaw, Shayna Mancuso
Objective: To estimate the prevalence of diagnosed vasomotor symptoms (VMS) due to menopause among US women aged 40-64 years and assess sociodemographic differences in VMS prevalence and risk of discontinuing VMS-related treatment. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study evaluated merged data from IQVIA's PharMetrics Plus medical claims and consumer attributes databases for 2017-2020. VMS diagnosis was identified using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) diagnosis codes. Continuous enrollment was required ≥6 months before and 12 months after diagnosis date. Treatment discontinuation was measured for VMS-related treatments initiated at diagnosis or during the 12 months after diagnosis. Treatment duration was measured from diagnosis to the first day of a ≥90-day treatment gap. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine factors associated with risk of treatment discontinuation. Results: Among 7,386,206 eligible women, the 4-year prevalence of diagnosed VMS in 2017-2020 was 79.1 per 1,000 and was highest among non-Hispanic White women (82.5 per 1,000), followed by Hispanic (77.3), Black (71.6), and Asian women (64.5). Rates were higher among women living in urban areas and those with higher education and income. Among women newly diagnosed with VMS (n = 226,262), median treatment duration was 297 days. Black, Asian, and Hispanic women had higher risks of discontinuing treatment than non-Hispanic White women. Lower income was also associated with higher risk of discontinuation than higher income. Conclusion: Lower prevalence of diagnosed VMS and higher risk of treatment discontinuation were observed among racial/ethnic minorities and women with less education and income, suggesting possible underdiagnosis and unmet needs.
{"title":"Health Disparities in Vasomotor Symptom Prevalence and Treatment Discontinuation in Women of Menopausal Age: A Commercial Claims Analysis.","authors":"Gloria Richard-Davis, Mayank Ajmera, Aki Shiozawa, Riddhi Doshi, Christopher Young, Jason Yeaw, Shayna Mancuso","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2024.0079","DOIUrl":"10.1089/jwh.2024.0079","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> To estimate the prevalence of diagnosed vasomotor symptoms (VMS) due to menopause among US women aged 40-64 years and assess sociodemographic differences in VMS prevalence and risk of discontinuing VMS-related treatment. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> This retrospective study evaluated merged data from IQVIA's PharMetrics Plus medical claims and consumer attributes databases for 2017-2020. VMS diagnosis was identified using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) diagnosis codes. Continuous enrollment was required ≥6 months before and 12 months after diagnosis date. Treatment discontinuation was measured for VMS-related treatments initiated at diagnosis or during the 12 months after diagnosis. Treatment duration was measured from diagnosis to the first day of a ≥90-day treatment gap. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine factors associated with risk of treatment discontinuation. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Among 7,386,206 eligible women, the 4-year prevalence of diagnosed VMS in 2017-2020 was 79.1 per 1,000 and was highest among non-Hispanic White women (82.5 per 1,000), followed by Hispanic (77.3), Black (71.6), and Asian women (64.5). Rates were higher among women living in urban areas and those with higher education and income. Among women newly diagnosed with VMS (<i>n</i> = 226,262), median treatment duration was 297 days. Black, Asian, and Hispanic women had higher risks of discontinuing treatment than non-Hispanic White women. Lower income was also associated with higher risk of discontinuation than higher income. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Lower prevalence of diagnosed VMS and higher risk of treatment discontinuation were observed among racial/ethnic minorities and women with less education and income, suggesting possible underdiagnosis and unmet needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":" ","pages":"176-186"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142715834","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-10-23DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2024.0251
Jane J Chen, Indra N Sarkar, Emily Hsu, Don S Dizon
Background: Disparities in cervical cancer (CC) screening exist within racial/ethnic minority and immigrant groups. However, few studies have explored the joint influence of race/ethnicity and immigrant status on screening, and the disparities that have been identified by existing studies remain incompletely explained. This study aims to identify the joint influence of race/ethnicity and immigrant status on CC screening and elucidate the barriers contributing to identified disparities. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of 25,660 U.S. women from the 2005, 2010, and 2015 National Health Interview Surveys was done. The CC screening up-to-date status of cases was analyzed by race/ethnicity and immigrant status using logistic regression models. Conceptualized mediators were added to models to identify their contribution to identified disparities. Results: All immigrants had lower screening odds than U.S.-born non-Hispanic White women with foreign-born non-Hispanic Asians having the lowest odds (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26-0.49) followed by foreign-born non-Hispanic White (aOR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.36-0.76), Hispanic/Latinx (aOR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.47-0.73), and non-Hispanic Black women (aOR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.38-0.99). Adjusting for only socioeconomic status or access to care attenuated the aOR: for foreign-born Hispanic/Latinx and non-Hispanic Black women only. Adjusting simultaneously for language and acculturation attenuated the aOR: for all immigrants. Conclusions: Disparities in CC screening were only found in the immigrant populations of various racial/ethnic groups. Targeting insurance and health care access may address disparities in immigrant Hispanic/Latinx and non-Hispanic Black women. Focusing on culturally and linguistically competent care and education may be more crucial for immigrant non-Hispanic Asian and White women.
背景:少数种族/族裔和移民群体在宫颈癌(CC)筛查方面存在差异。然而,很少有研究探讨种族/民族和移民身份对筛查的共同影响,现有研究发现的差异仍未得到完整解释。本研究旨在确定种族/民族和移民身份对 CC 筛查的共同影响,并阐明导致已发现差异的障碍。研究方法:对2005年、2010年和2015年全国健康访谈调查中的25660名美国妇女进行了横断面分析。利用逻辑回归模型,按种族/族裔和移民身份分析了病例的 CC 筛查达标情况。在模型中加入了概念化的中介因素,以确定它们对已识别差异的贡献。结果显示所有移民的筛查几率均低于美国在国外出生的非西班牙裔亚裔妇女的筛查几率最低(调整几率比 [aOR]:0.36,95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.26-0.49),其次是在国外出生的非西班牙裔亚裔妇女。49),其次是外国出生的非西班牙裔白人妇女(aOR:0.52,95% CI:0.36-0.76)、西班牙裔/拉丁裔妇女(aOR:0.58,95% CI:0.47-0.73)和非西班牙裔黑人妇女(aOR:0.62,95% CI:0.38-0.99)。仅调整社会经济地位或获得医疗服务的情况削弱了 aOR:仅针对外国出生的西班牙裔/拉丁裔妇女和非西班牙裔黑人妇女。同时对语言和文化适应性进行调整后,所有移民的 aOR 均有所降低。结论:只有在不同种族/族裔的移民人群中才发现了CC筛查的差异。针对保险和医疗服务可解决西班牙裔/拉丁裔移民妇女和非西班牙裔黑人妇女的差异。对于非西班牙裔亚裔和白人移民妇女来说,注重文化和语言方面的护理和教育可能更为重要。
{"title":"An Intersectional Approach to Cervical Cancer Screening Disparities by Race/Ethnicity and Immigrant Status.","authors":"Jane J Chen, Indra N Sarkar, Emily Hsu, Don S Dizon","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2024.0251","DOIUrl":"10.1089/jwh.2024.0251","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Disparities in cervical cancer (CC) screening exist within racial/ethnic minority and immigrant groups. However, few studies have explored the joint influence of race/ethnicity and immigrant status on screening, and the disparities that have been identified by existing studies remain incompletely explained. This study aims to identify the joint influence of race/ethnicity and immigrant status on CC screening and elucidate the barriers contributing to identified disparities. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A cross-sectional analysis of 25,660 U.S. women from the 2005, 2010, and 2015 National Health Interview Surveys was done. The CC screening up-to-date status of cases was analyzed by race/ethnicity and immigrant status using logistic regression models. Conceptualized mediators were added to models to identify their contribution to identified disparities. <b><i>Results:</i></b> All immigrants had lower screening odds than U.S.-born non-Hispanic White women with foreign-born non-Hispanic Asians having the lowest odds (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26-0.49) followed by foreign-born non-Hispanic White (aOR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.36-0.76), Hispanic/Latinx (aOR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.47-0.73), and non-Hispanic Black women (aOR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.38-0.99). Adjusting for only socioeconomic status or access to care attenuated the aOR: for foreign-born Hispanic/Latinx and non-Hispanic Black women only. Adjusting simultaneously for language and acculturation attenuated the aOR: for all immigrants. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Disparities in CC screening were only found in the immigrant populations of various racial/ethnic groups. Targeting insurance and health care access may address disparities in immigrant Hispanic/Latinx and non-Hispanic Black women. Focusing on culturally and linguistically competent care and education may be more crucial for immigrant non-Hispanic Asian and White women.</p>","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":" ","pages":"261-270"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142503017","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-07-01DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2023.0829
Carly O'Connor-Terry, Xinhua Zhao, Maria K Mor, Judy C Chang, Lisa S Callegari, Sonya Borrero, Deirdre A Quinn
Objective: Many people report becoming pregnant while using contraception. Understanding more about this phenomenon may provide insight into pregnant people's responses to and healthcare needs for these pregnancies. This study explores the outcome (e.g., birth, miscarriage, abortion) of pregnancies among Veterans in which conception occurred in the month of contraceptive use. Study Design: We used data from the Examining Contraceptive Use and Unmet Need Study, a telephone-based survey conducted in 2014-2016 of women Veterans (n = 2302) ages 18-44 receiving primary care from the Veterans Health Administration. For each pregnancy, we estimated the relationship between occurrence in the month of contraceptive use and the outcome of the pregnancy using multinomial logistic regression, controlling for relevant demographic, clinical, and military factors and clustering of pregnancies from the same Veteran. Results: The study included 4436 pregnancies from 1689 Veterans. Most participants were ≥30 years of age (n = 1445, 85.6%), identified as non-Hispanic white (n = 824, 51.6%), and lived in the Southern United States (n = 994, 55.6%). Nearly 60% (n = 1007) of Veterans who had ever been pregnant reported experiencing a pregnancy in the month of contraceptive use; a majority of those pregnancies (n = 1354, 80.9%) were described as unintended. In adjusted models, pregnancies occurring in the month of contraceptive use were significantly more likely to end in abortion (aOR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.42-2.18) than live birth. Conclusions: Pregnancy while using contraception is common among Veterans; these pregnancies are more likely to end in abortion than live birth. Given widespread restrictions to reproductive health services across much of the United States, ensuring Veterans' access to comprehensive care, including abortion, is critical to supporting reproductive autonomy and whole health.
{"title":"Abortion After Pregnancy Occurrence with Contraceptive Use Among Veterans.","authors":"Carly O'Connor-Terry, Xinhua Zhao, Maria K Mor, Judy C Chang, Lisa S Callegari, Sonya Borrero, Deirdre A Quinn","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2023.0829","DOIUrl":"10.1089/jwh.2023.0829","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> Many people report becoming pregnant while using contraception. Understanding more about this phenomenon may provide insight into pregnant people's responses to and healthcare needs for these pregnancies. This study explores the outcome (e.g., birth, miscarriage, abortion) of pregnancies among Veterans in which conception occurred in the month of contraceptive use. <b><i>Study Design:</i></b> We used data from the <i>Examining Contraceptive Use and Unmet Need Study,</i> a telephone-based survey conducted in 2014-2016 of women Veterans (<i>n</i> = 2302) ages 18-44 receiving primary care from the Veterans Health Administration. For each pregnancy, we estimated the relationship between occurrence in the month of contraceptive use and the outcome of the pregnancy using multinomial logistic regression, controlling for relevant demographic, clinical, and military factors and clustering of pregnancies from the same Veteran. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The study included 4436 pregnancies from 1689 Veterans. Most participants were ≥30 years of age (<i>n</i> = 1445, 85.6%), identified as non-Hispanic white (<i>n</i> = 824, 51.6%), and lived in the Southern United States (<i>n</i> = 994, 55.6%). Nearly 60% (<i>n</i> = 1007) of Veterans who had ever been pregnant reported experiencing a pregnancy in the month of contraceptive use; a majority of those pregnancies (<i>n</i> = 1354, 80.9%) were described as unintended. In adjusted models, pregnancies occurring in the month of contraceptive use were significantly more likely to end in abortion (aOR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.42-2.18) than live birth. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Pregnancy while using contraception is common among Veterans; these pregnancies are more likely to end in abortion than live birth. Given widespread restrictions to reproductive health services across much of the United States, ensuring Veterans' access to comprehensive care, including abortion, is critical to supporting reproductive autonomy and whole health.</p>","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":" ","pages":"103-110"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141469103","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}