Jane J Chen, Indra N Sarkar, Emily Hsu, Don S Dizon
Background: Disparities in cervical cancer (CC) screening exist within racial/ethnic minority and immigrant groups. However, few studies have explored the joint influence of race/ethnicity and immigrant status on screening, and the disparities that have been identified by existing studies remain incompletely explained. This study aims to identify the joint influence of race/ethnicity and immigrant status on CC screening and elucidate the barriers contributing to identified disparities. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of 25,660 U.S. women from the 2005, 2010, and 2015 National Health Interview Surveys was done. The CC screening up-to-date status of cases was analyzed by race/ethnicity and immigrant status using logistic regression models. Conceptualized mediators were added to models to identify their contribution to identified disparities. Results: All immigrants had lower screening odds than U.S.-born non-Hispanic White women with foreign-born non-Hispanic Asians having the lowest odds (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26-0.49) followed by foreign-born non-Hispanic White (aOR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.36-0.76), Hispanic/Latinx (aOR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.47-0.73), and non-Hispanic Black women (aOR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.38-0.99). Adjusting for only socioeconomic status or access to care attenuated the aOR: for foreign-born Hispanic/Latinx and non-Hispanic Black women only. Adjusting simultaneously for language and acculturation attenuated the aOR: for all immigrants. Conclusions: Disparities in CC screening were only found in the immigrant populations of various racial/ethnic groups. Targeting insurance and health care access may address disparities in immigrant Hispanic/Latinx and non-Hispanic Black women. Focusing on culturally and linguistically competent care and education may be more crucial for immigrant non-Hispanic Asian and White women.
背景:少数种族/族裔和移民群体在宫颈癌(CC)筛查方面存在差异。然而,很少有研究探讨种族/民族和移民身份对筛查的共同影响,现有研究发现的差异仍未得到完整解释。本研究旨在确定种族/民族和移民身份对 CC 筛查的共同影响,并阐明导致已发现差异的障碍。研究方法:对2005年、2010年和2015年全国健康访谈调查中的25660名美国妇女进行了横断面分析。利用逻辑回归模型,按种族/族裔和移民身份分析了病例的 CC 筛查达标情况。在模型中加入了概念化的中介因素,以确定它们对已识别差异的贡献。结果显示所有移民的筛查几率均低于美国在国外出生的非西班牙裔亚裔妇女的筛查几率最低(调整几率比 [aOR]:0.36,95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.26-0.49),其次是在国外出生的非西班牙裔亚裔妇女。49),其次是外国出生的非西班牙裔白人妇女(aOR:0.52,95% CI:0.36-0.76)、西班牙裔/拉丁裔妇女(aOR:0.58,95% CI:0.47-0.73)和非西班牙裔黑人妇女(aOR:0.62,95% CI:0.38-0.99)。仅调整社会经济地位或获得医疗服务的情况削弱了 aOR:仅针对外国出生的西班牙裔/拉丁裔妇女和非西班牙裔黑人妇女。同时对语言和文化适应性进行调整后,所有移民的 aOR 均有所降低。结论:只有在不同种族/族裔的移民人群中才发现了CC筛查的差异。针对保险和医疗服务可解决西班牙裔/拉丁裔移民妇女和非西班牙裔黑人妇女的差异。对于非西班牙裔亚裔和白人移民妇女来说,注重文化和语言方面的护理和教育可能更为重要。
{"title":"An Intersectional Approach to Cervical Cancer Screening Disparities by Race/Ethnicity and Immigrant Status.","authors":"Jane J Chen, Indra N Sarkar, Emily Hsu, Don S Dizon","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2024.0251","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.0251","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Disparities in cervical cancer (CC) screening exist within racial/ethnic minority and immigrant groups. However, few studies have explored the joint influence of race/ethnicity and immigrant status on screening, and the disparities that have been identified by existing studies remain incompletely explained. This study aims to identify the joint influence of race/ethnicity and immigrant status on CC screening and elucidate the barriers contributing to identified disparities. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A cross-sectional analysis of 25,660 U.S. women from the 2005, 2010, and 2015 National Health Interview Surveys was done. The CC screening up-to-date status of cases was analyzed by race/ethnicity and immigrant status using logistic regression models. Conceptualized mediators were added to models to identify their contribution to identified disparities. <b><i>Results:</i></b> All immigrants had lower screening odds than U.S.-born non-Hispanic White women with foreign-born non-Hispanic Asians having the lowest odds (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26-0.49) followed by foreign-born non-Hispanic White (aOR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.36-0.76), Hispanic/Latinx (aOR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.47-0.73), and non-Hispanic Black women (aOR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.38-0.99). Adjusting for only socioeconomic status or access to care attenuated the aOR: for foreign-born Hispanic/Latinx and non-Hispanic Black women only. Adjusting simultaneously for language and acculturation attenuated the aOR: for all immigrants. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Disparities in CC screening were only found in the immigrant populations of various racial/ethnic groups. Targeting insurance and health care access may address disparities in immigrant Hispanic/Latinx and non-Hispanic Black women. Focusing on culturally and linguistically competent care and education may be more crucial for immigrant non-Hispanic Asian and White women.</p>","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142503017","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jill M Hagey, Ambika V Viswanathan, Brooke W Bullington, Kristen A Berg, Emily S Miller, Margaret Boozer, Tania B Serna, Jennifer L Bailit, Kavita S Arora
Objective: To evaluate long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) use versus permanent contraception (PC) use at hospital discharge through 1 year postpartum after an unfulfilled immediate postpartum PC request. Study Design: We present a secondary analysis of a retrospective cohort study of patients across four study sites between 2018 and 2019 with PC as their documented inpatient postpartum contraceptive plan. We abstracted demographic and clinical characteristics, contraceptive plans and time to contraceptive fulfillment, reasons for non-fulfillment, and pregnancy incidence up to 1 year postpartum from medical records. Results: Of 3,013 patients initially desiring PC, 1,759 patients (58.4%) received PC and 136 patients (4.5%) received LARC on discharge; with an additional 217 patients receiving PC and an additional 176 patients receiving LARC in the 1 year postpartum. Participants who received inpatient LARC were more likely to be younger, to be unmarried, to have Medicaid insurance, and to have delivered vaginally compared with participants who received inpatient PC. Of the 304 patients who received LARC rather than PC during the year postpartum, 49 (16.1%) expressed an interest in LARC prenatally. Reasons for non-fulfillment of PC were varied at different time points postpartum, with 50.3% stating they did not receive PC by 1 year postpartum because they had changed their mind. Conclusions: Ten percent of patients with an unmet postpartum PC request use LARC methods instead at 1 year postpartum. Patients who do use LARC are unlikely to bridge to receipt of PC. Institutions should prioritize fulfillment of desired postpartum PC prior to hospital discharge.
目的评估产后立即使用 LARC 与使用永久性避孕药具 (PC) 的对比情况。研究设计:我们对 2018 年至 2019 年期间在四个研究地点进行的一项回顾性队列研究进行了二次分析,研究对象是将 PC 作为其记录在案的住院患者产后避孕计划的患者。我们从医疗记录中抽取了人口统计学和临床特征、避孕计划和避孕措施完成时间、未完成原因以及产后 1 年内的妊娠发生率。结果:在 3,013 名最初希望接受 PC 的患者中,1,759 名患者(58.4%)接受了 PC,136 名患者(4.5%)在出院时接受了 LARC;另外 217 名患者接受了 PC,176 名患者在产后 1 年接受了 LARC。与接受住院 PC 的参试者相比,接受住院 LARC 的参试者更有可能是年轻人、未婚、有医疗补助保险以及阴道分娩。在产后一年内接受 LARC 而非 PC 的 304 名患者中,有 49 人(16.1%)表示有兴趣在产前接受 LARC。在产后的不同时间点,未接受 PC 的原因各不相同,50.3% 的患者表示在产后一年内未接受 PC 是因为他们改变了主意。结论在产后 PC 要求未得到满足的患者中,10% 在产后 1 年使用 LARC 方法。使用 LARC 方法的患者不太可能过渡到接受 PC。医疗机构应优先考虑在出院前满足产后 PC 的要求。
{"title":"Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Use after Non-Receipt of Postpartum Permanent Contraception: A Retrospective Analysis.","authors":"Jill M Hagey, Ambika V Viswanathan, Brooke W Bullington, Kristen A Berg, Emily S Miller, Margaret Boozer, Tania B Serna, Jennifer L Bailit, Kavita S Arora","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2024.0395","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.0395","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> To evaluate long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) use versus permanent contraception (PC) use at hospital discharge through 1 year postpartum after an unfulfilled immediate postpartum PC request. <b><i>Study Design:</i></b> We present a secondary analysis of a retrospective cohort study of patients across four study sites between 2018 and 2019 with PC as their documented inpatient postpartum contraceptive plan. We abstracted demographic and clinical characteristics, contraceptive plans and time to contraceptive fulfillment, reasons for non-fulfillment, and pregnancy incidence up to 1 year postpartum from medical records. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of 3,013 patients initially desiring PC, 1,759 patients (58.4%) received PC and 136 patients (4.5%) received LARC on discharge; with an additional 217 patients receiving PC and an additional 176 patients receiving LARC in the 1 year postpartum. Participants who received inpatient LARC were more likely to be younger, to be unmarried, to have Medicaid insurance, and to have delivered vaginally compared with participants who received inpatient PC. Of the 304 patients who received LARC rather than PC during the year postpartum, 49 (16.1%) expressed an interest in LARC prenatally. Reasons for non-fulfillment of PC were varied at different time points postpartum, with 50.3% stating they did not receive PC by 1 year postpartum because they had changed their mind. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Ten percent of patients with an unmet postpartum PC request use LARC methods instead at 1 year postpartum. Patients who do use LARC are unlikely to bridge to receipt of PC. Institutions should prioritize fulfillment of desired postpartum PC prior to hospital discharge.</p>","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142468910","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rana Aliani, Vienne Seitz, Shirng-Wern Tsaih, Benjamin D Beran, Emily R W Davidson
Objective: This study aims to determine if race, ethnicity, insurance status, or procedural timing is associated with type of sterilization procedure. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed. The study population included women who underwent elective sterilization at one institution from January 2010 to December 2020. The medical record was reviewed to obtain age, race, ethnicity, procedure type and timing, and insurance status. Race and ethnicity groups included were Asian, non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, or non-Hispanic White. Timing was divided into peripartum (at the time of cesarean section or before discharge after vaginal delivery) and interval procedures. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to assess the association of procedure type with race, ethnicity, insurance status, and timing. In addition, a sensitivity analysis was performed for procedures after January 1, 2016, to determine if the associations with the above categories differed. Results: A sample of 2,041 individuals received sterilization procedures, and 1,115 were included in the analysis: 70% (782) of sterilizations were performed during the peripartum period, and 60% (670) of women had public insurance. On multivariate analysis, both non-Hispanic Black (odds ratio [OR] 0.54 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32-0.89) and Asian (OR 0.23 95% CI 0.06-0.72) individuals were less likely to have salpingectomy (SL) when compared with non-Hispanic White individuals. On sensitivity analysis for procedures after January 1, 2016, non-Hispanic Black (OR 0.31 95% CI 0.17-0.56), Hispanic (OR 0.31 95% CI 0.14-0.66), and Asian (OR 95% CI 0.04-0.54) individuals were less likely to have when compared with non-Hispanic White individuals. Conclusion: Tubal ligation is more frequently performed in our health system, and we identified critical disparities in performance of SL for sterilization.
{"title":"Impact of Race, Ethnicity, Insurance, and Procedural Timing on Sterilization Method.","authors":"Rana Aliani, Vienne Seitz, Shirng-Wern Tsaih, Benjamin D Beran, Emily R W Davidson","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2024.0200","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.0200","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> This study aims to determine if race, ethnicity, insurance status, or procedural timing is associated with type of sterilization procedure. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A retrospective cohort study was performed. The study population included women who underwent elective sterilization at one institution from January 2010 to December 2020. The medical record was reviewed to obtain age, race, ethnicity, procedure type and timing, and insurance status. Race and ethnicity groups included were Asian, non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, or non-Hispanic White. Timing was divided into peripartum (at the time of cesarean section or before discharge after vaginal delivery) and interval procedures. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to assess the association of procedure type with race, ethnicity, insurance status, and timing. In addition, a sensitivity analysis was performed for procedures after January 1, 2016, to determine if the associations with the above categories differed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A sample of 2,041 individuals received sterilization procedures, and 1,115 were included in the analysis: 70% (782) of sterilizations were performed during the peripartum period, and 60% (670) of women had public insurance. On multivariate analysis, both non-Hispanic Black (odds ratio [OR] 0.54 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32-0.89) and Asian (OR 0.23 95% CI 0.06-0.72) individuals were less likely to have salpingectomy (SL) when compared with non-Hispanic White individuals. On sensitivity analysis for procedures after January 1, 2016, non-Hispanic Black (OR 0.31 95% CI 0.17-0.56), Hispanic (OR 0.31 95% CI 0.14-0.66), and Asian (OR 95% CI 0.04-0.54) individuals were less likely to have when compared with non-Hispanic White individuals. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Tubal ligation is more frequently performed in our health system, and we identified critical disparities in performance of SL for sterilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142468909","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Protection against postpartum depression is a commonly cited maternal benefit of breastfeeding. However, recent studies have found that negative breastfeeding experiences may actually increase the risk of depressive symptoms. Objective: To investigate women's self-reported associations between breastfeeding experiences and depressive symptoms on a social media platform. Study Design: An electronic search was conducted on Reddit of all original user posts using keywords "breastfeeding" and "depression" from February 2013 to July 2021. Relevant posts and corresponding comments were manually extracted, evaluated for inclusion and exclusion criteria, and analyzed for thematic content. Results: In total, 584 entries was analyzed. Mothers most frequently described difficulty breastfeeding as the cause of new onset mental health symptoms (53%); however, mothers breastfeeding without difficulty were also susceptible (20%). Mothers also reported exacerbated preexisting mental health symptoms-predominantly related to difficulty breastfeeding (17%), but again, others experienced no difficulty (6%). Common words included among all entries were "guilt" (17%), "fail" (14%), "pressure" (7%), "shame" (6%), and "alone" (6%). Among mothers mentioning bonding (n = 99), 58% reported that breastfeeding inhibited infant bonding, versus 1% enhanced bonding; furthermore, 63% reported increased bonding after switching to formula versus 8% unchanged and 6% decreased bonding. Nearly one-quarter (23%) of all posts described inadequate breastfeeding counseling. Finally, 9% of all posts reported a negative experience with health care providers versus 6% a positive experience. Conclusions: Mothers struggling to breastfeed may not experience the classically described benefits of breastfeeding, instead experiencing increased depressive and other mental health symptoms and impaired maternal-infant bonding. Furthermore, limited provider disclosure about potential breastfeeding challenges and alternatives to breastfeeding may exacerbate mental health symptoms associated with breastfeeding difficulties. Balanced information should be presented to mothers contemplating breastfeeding in order to minimize maternal perceptions of "failure."
{"title":"Mothers with Breastfeeding Difficulty Report Increased Depressive Symptoms and Impaired Maternal-Infant Bonding on Social Media.","authors":"Elizabeth A Wright, Aashna Mehta, Anita L Nelson","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2024.0151","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.0151","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Protection against postpartum depression is a commonly cited maternal benefit of breastfeeding. However, recent studies have found that negative breastfeeding experiences may actually increase the risk of depressive symptoms. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> To investigate women's self-reported associations between breastfeeding experiences and depressive symptoms on a social media platform. <b><i>Study Design:</i></b> An electronic search was conducted on Reddit of all original user posts using keywords \"breastfeeding\" and \"depression\" from February 2013 to July 2021. Relevant posts and corresponding comments were manually extracted, evaluated for inclusion and exclusion criteria, and analyzed for thematic content. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In total, 584 entries was analyzed. Mothers most frequently described difficulty breastfeeding as the cause of new onset mental health symptoms (53%); however, mothers breastfeeding without difficulty were also susceptible (20%). Mothers also reported exacerbated preexisting mental health symptoms-predominantly related to difficulty breastfeeding (17%), but again, others experienced no difficulty (6%). Common words included among all entries were \"guilt\" (17%), \"fail\" (14%), \"pressure\" (7%), \"shame\" (6%), and \"alone\" (6%). Among mothers mentioning bonding (<i>n</i> = 99), 58% reported that breastfeeding inhibited infant bonding, versus 1% enhanced bonding; furthermore, 63% reported increased bonding after switching to formula versus 8% unchanged and 6% decreased bonding. Nearly one-quarter (23%) of all posts described inadequate breastfeeding counseling. Finally, 9% of all posts reported a negative experience with health care providers versus 6% a positive experience. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Mothers struggling to breastfeed may not experience the classically described benefits of breastfeeding, instead experiencing increased depressive and other mental health symptoms and impaired maternal-infant bonding. Furthermore, limited provider disclosure about potential breastfeeding challenges and alternatives to breastfeeding may exacerbate mental health symptoms associated with breastfeeding difficulties. Balanced information should be presented to mothers contemplating breastfeeding in order to minimize maternal perceptions of \"failure.\"</p>","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142468912","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Pregnancy anxiety increases the risk of preterm birth but less is known about the impacts on glucose intolerance during pregnancy, such as gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The present study examined the relationship between pregnancy anxiety and the risk of GDM in a prospective cohort Centering and Racial Disparities (CRADLE) study of racially diverse pregnant women in the United States. Methods: This is a prospective analysis among racially diverse pregnant women in the United States who enrolled in the CRADLE study. Pregnancy anxiety was assessed twice using the Pregnancy-Specific Anxiety Scale (PSAS): the baseline survey at <20 gestational weeks (GW) and the second survey at >30 GW. GDM was screened at 24-30 GW and diagnosed based on the Carpenter and Coustan criteria. The associations of baseline PSAS score (>9 [median] versus ≤9) and PSAS score change with GDM risk were estimated using multivariable logistic regressions with adjustment for potential confounders. Results: Among a total of 2,310 women (40.74% Black, 20.91% Hispanic), 154 (6.67%) developed GDM. No association was found between baseline PSAS and GDM (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70-1.42) after adjusting for confounders. Individuals with an increased PSAS during pregnancy had 52% higher GDM risk (adjusted OR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.04-2.23) compared with those with no change or decreased scores. Conclusions: Pregnant individuals who increased their pregnancy-specific anxiety level during pregnancy had a higher risk of developing GDM. Clinical Trials Registration Identifier: NCT02640638. Registered with ClinicalTrials.gov December 29, 2015. Study recruitment began February 24, 2016. URL of ClincialTrials.gov registration site: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02640638?term=NCT02640638&draw=2&rank=1.
{"title":"Pregnancy Anxiety and Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Among a Diverse U.S. Cohort.","authors":"Cheng-Tzu Hsieh, Lu Zhang, Jessica Britt, Skye Shodahl, Amy Crockett, Liwei Chen","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2024.0453","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.0453","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Pregnancy anxiety increases the risk of preterm birth but less is known about the impacts on glucose intolerance during pregnancy, such as gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The present study examined the relationship between pregnancy anxiety and the risk of GDM in a prospective cohort Centering and Racial Disparities (CRADLE) study of racially diverse pregnant women in the United States. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This is a prospective analysis among racially diverse pregnant women in the United States who enrolled in the CRADLE study. Pregnancy anxiety was assessed twice using the Pregnancy-Specific Anxiety Scale (PSAS): the baseline survey at <20 gestational weeks (GW) and the second survey at >30 GW. GDM was screened at 24-30 GW and diagnosed based on the Carpenter and Coustan criteria. The associations of baseline PSAS score (>9 [median] versus ≤9) and PSAS score change with GDM risk were estimated using multivariable logistic regressions with adjustment for potential confounders. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Among a total of 2,310 women (40.74% Black, 20.91% Hispanic), 154 (6.67%) developed GDM. No association was found between baseline PSAS and GDM (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70-1.42) after adjusting for confounders. Individuals with an increased PSAS during pregnancy had 52% higher GDM risk (adjusted OR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.04-2.23) compared with those with no change or decreased scores. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Pregnant individuals who increased their pregnancy-specific anxiety level during pregnancy had a higher risk of developing GDM. <b>Clinical Trials Registration Identifier:</b> NCT02640638. Registered with ClinicalTrials.gov December 29, 2015. Study recruitment began February 24, 2016. URL of ClincialTrials.gov registration site: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02640638?term=NCT02640638&draw=2&rank=1.</p>","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142468913","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Eva Laura Siegel, Brianna VanNoy, Lauren C Houghton, Nadia Khati, Ayman Al-Hendy, Cherie Q Marfori, Ami R Zota
Objective: Early menarche is associated with uterine fibroid risk, but the association between menarcheal timing and fibroid severity remains to be explored. Given the hormonal dependence of fibroids, earlier menarche may increase physical burden (e.g., number of fibroids) and/or symptoms (e.g., heavy menstrual bleeding), though the two are not always correlated. We hypothesized that individuals with earlier menarche are more likely to have severe fibroids. Design: We analyzed observational data using linear regression models to examine the association between earlier age at menarche and fibroid severity. Subjects: Individuals seeking hysterectomy (n = 110) for fibroid management at a hospital in Washington, D.C. from 2014 to 2021 as part of the Fibroids, Observational Research on Genes and the Environment study. Exposure: Participants recalled age at menarche during adulthood. We modeled age at menarche continuously, and we defined early menarche as menarche before 12 years in descriptive analyses. Main Outcome Measures: We evaluated three types of fibroid severity outcomes: self-reported symptoms using validated scales, clinical parameters (e.g., fibroid number and size), and age at hysterectomy. Results: In our predominantly Black sample, early menarche (i.e., <12 years) was reported by 25.5% (28/110) of participants. In adjusted linear models, earlier menarche was associated with increased symptom severity [b = -3.3 (95% CI: -6.05, -0.56)], younger age at hysterectomy [b = 0.8 (95% CI: 0.2, 1.41)], and uterine weight over 250 g (compared with ≤250 g) [b = -0.05 (95% CI: -0.11, -0.00)], but not with other measures of physical fibroid burden. Conclusion: Earlier menarche was associated with measures of fibroid severity. Prolonged exposure to estrogen via early menarche may accelerate the tumorigenesis process. Patient-reported symptoms as well as measures of physical burden should be considered when investigating the etiology of fibroid-related morbidity.
{"title":"Associations Between Earlier Menarche and Fibroid Severity in Individuals Seeking Hysterectomy.","authors":"Eva Laura Siegel, Brianna VanNoy, Lauren C Houghton, Nadia Khati, Ayman Al-Hendy, Cherie Q Marfori, Ami R Zota","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2024.0403","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.0403","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> Early menarche is associated with uterine fibroid risk, but the association between menarcheal timing and fibroid severity remains to be explored. Given the hormonal dependence of fibroids, earlier menarche may increase physical burden (e.g., number of fibroids) and/or symptoms (e.g., heavy menstrual bleeding), though the two are not always correlated. We hypothesized that individuals with earlier menarche are more likely to have severe fibroids. <b><i>Design:</i></b> We analyzed observational data using linear regression models to examine the association between earlier age at menarche and fibroid severity. <b><i>Subjects</i></b>: Individuals seeking hysterectomy (n = 110) for fibroid management at a hospital in Washington, D.C. from 2014 to 2021 as part of the Fibroids, Observational Research on Genes and the Environment study. <b><i>Exposure:</i></b> Participants recalled age at menarche during adulthood. We modeled age at menarche continuously, and we defined early menarche as menarche before 12 years in descriptive analyses. <b><i>Main Outcome Measures:</i></b> We evaluated three types of fibroid severity outcomes: self-reported symptoms using validated scales, clinical parameters (e.g., fibroid number and size), and age at hysterectomy. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In our predominantly Black sample, early menarche (i.e., <12 years) was reported by 25.5% (28/110) of participants. In adjusted linear models, earlier menarche was associated with increased symptom severity [<i>b</i> = -3.3 (95% CI: -6.05, -0.56)], younger age at hysterectomy [<i>b</i> = 0.8 (95% CI: 0.2, 1.41)], and uterine weight over 250 g (compared with ≤250 g) [<i>b</i> = -0.05 (95% CI: -0.11, -0.00)], but not with other measures of physical fibroid burden. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Earlier menarche was associated with measures of fibroid severity. Prolonged exposure to estrogen <i>via</i> early menarche may accelerate the tumorigenesis process. Patient-reported symptoms as well as measures of physical burden should be considered when investigating the etiology of fibroid-related morbidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142468907","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jensen D Reckhow, Alessandra J Ainsworth, Kimberly A Holst, Elizabeth B Habermann, Ruth E DeFoster Bates, Susan N Kok, Chandra C Shenoy
Objective: To evaluate the reproductive experiences of physicians across gender and specialty. Patients and Methods: Between November and December 2021, we surveyed nontrainee physicians of all genders at a single quaternary institution using a modified version of an existing survey instrument. Experiences with family planning, fertility, pregnancy, and parental leave were assessed. Results: There were 422 completed responses. Respondents reported a higher prevalence of infertility as compared to the general U.S. population (26% versus 19%), with no difference in infertility or obstetrical complications by specialty. Most respondents (75%) reported stigma regarding having children in medicine, and 71% reported delaying childbearing. These trends were strongest in the subanalysis of female respondents. Forty-five percent of respondents reported that their work increased the risk for subfertility, infertility, or pregnancy complications. Surgeons were significantly more likely to report physically demanding work conditions (75% versus 30%, p < 0.001), radiation exposure (39% versus 14%, p < 0.001), and bloodborne pathogen exposure (25% versus 12%, p = 0.03) as occupational reproductive hazards. Only 55% of respondents with a pregnancy history reported ever taking parental leave. Among those who took less than the full amount offered, 63% cited concerns about falling behind educationally or professionally as significantly influencing this decision. Conclusions: These results support previous trends showing delayed childbearing and increased infertility among physicians while shedding new light on stigma associated with childbearing and parental leave. A better understanding of the reproductive experiences of physicians is critical to recruiting and retaining a skilled workforce and fostering career and life satisfaction in this profession.
{"title":"Reproductive Experiences of Physicians in Medical and Surgical Subspecialties.","authors":"Jensen D Reckhow, Alessandra J Ainsworth, Kimberly A Holst, Elizabeth B Habermann, Ruth E DeFoster Bates, Susan N Kok, Chandra C Shenoy","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2023.0579","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2023.0579","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> To evaluate the reproductive experiences of physicians across gender and specialty. <b><i>Patients and Methods:</i></b> Between November and December 2021, we surveyed nontrainee physicians of all genders at a single quaternary institution using a modified version of an existing survey instrument. Experiences with family planning, fertility, pregnancy, and parental leave were assessed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> There were 422 completed responses. Respondents reported a higher prevalence of infertility as compared to the general U.S. population (26% versus 19%), with no difference in infertility or obstetrical complications by specialty. Most respondents (75%) reported stigma regarding having children in medicine, and 71% reported delaying childbearing. These trends were strongest in the subanalysis of female respondents. Forty-five percent of respondents reported that their work increased the risk for subfertility, infertility, or pregnancy complications. Surgeons were significantly more likely to report physically demanding work conditions (75% versus 30%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), radiation exposure (39% versus 14%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and bloodborne pathogen exposure (25% versus 12%, <i>p</i> = 0.03) as occupational reproductive hazards. Only 55% of respondents with a pregnancy history reported ever taking parental leave. Among those who took less than the full amount offered, 63% cited concerns about falling behind educationally or professionally as significantly influencing this decision. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> These results support previous trends showing delayed childbearing and increased infertility among physicians while shedding new light on stigma associated with childbearing and parental leave. A better understanding of the reproductive experiences of physicians is critical to recruiting and retaining a skilled workforce and fostering career and life satisfaction in this profession.</p>","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142468914","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Amy R Nichols, Izzuddin Aris, Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman, Marie-France Hivert, Jorge E Chavarro, Emily Oken
Introduction: Pregnancy loss has been associated with later cardiometabolic conditions, potentially due to shared underlying etiology, but associations with midlife blood pressure (BP) remain unclear. Methods: We examined participants enrolled 1999-2002 in prospective Project Viva. At midlife ∼18 years after enrollment, we collected lifetime pregnancy history and measured BP. Exposures included any pregnancy loss or number of pregnancy losses. Outcomes were systolic and diastolic BP (SBP, DBP), and American Heart Association (AHA) BP categories. We performed multivariable regression adjusted for race and ethnicity, education, income, perceived body size at age 10 years, and age at outcome. Results: Of 623 participants, 33.7% reported pregnancy loss, 9.6% had elevated BP, and 34.8% had hypertension. Mean(±standard deviation) age was 50.7 ± 5.0 years, SBP 118.1 ± 15.6 mmHg, and DBP 74.8 ± 11.5 mmHg. In adjusted models, any pregnancy loss was associated with higher SBP (β = 2.25 mmHg, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.23, 4.78). Strongest associations with SBP were among those with first pregnancy loss ≥35 years (β = 5.58 mmHg, 95% CI: 1.76, 9.40 versus 0 pregnancy losses and first pregnancy <35 years). All associations with DBP were nonsignificant but similar in direction. For AHA outcomes, pregnancy loss was associated with higher risk for elevated BP (relative-risk ratio [RRR] = 2.93, 95% CI: 1.58, 5.43) but not with hypertension (RRR = 1.45, 95% CI: 0.95, 2.22) versus normotension. In models examining race and ethnicity, SBP was higher among non-Hispanic White and Hispanic individuals with pregnancy loss; non-Hispanic Black individuals had higher BP regardless of pregnancy loss status. Conclusions: History of pregnancy loss was associated with higher SBP and elevated BP category at midlife. These findings highlight reproductive history as an important consideration for cardiopreventive strategies and interventions.
{"title":"History of Pregnancy Loss and Risk for Higher Midlife Blood Pressure in Parous Females.","authors":"Amy R Nichols, Izzuddin Aris, Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman, Marie-France Hivert, Jorge E Chavarro, Emily Oken","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2024.0285","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.0285","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Pregnancy loss has been associated with later cardiometabolic conditions, potentially due to shared underlying etiology, but associations with midlife blood pressure (BP) remain unclear. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We examined participants enrolled 1999-2002 in prospective Project Viva. At midlife ∼18 years after enrollment, we collected lifetime pregnancy history and measured BP. Exposures included any pregnancy loss or number of pregnancy losses. Outcomes were systolic and diastolic BP (SBP, DBP), and American Heart Association (AHA) BP categories. We performed multivariable regression adjusted for race and ethnicity, education, income, perceived body size at age 10 years, and age at outcome. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of 623 participants, 33.7% reported pregnancy loss, 9.6% had elevated BP, and 34.8% had hypertension. Mean(±standard deviation) age was 50.7 ± 5.0 years, SBP 118.1 ± 15.6 mmHg, and DBP 74.8 ± 11.5 mmHg. In adjusted models, any pregnancy loss was associated with higher SBP (β = 2.25 mmHg, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.23, 4.78). Strongest associations with SBP were among those with first pregnancy loss ≥35 years (β = 5.58 mmHg, 95% CI: 1.76, 9.40 versus 0 pregnancy losses and first pregnancy <35 years). All associations with DBP were nonsignificant but similar in direction. For AHA outcomes, pregnancy loss was associated with higher risk for elevated BP (relative-risk ratio [RRR] = 2.93, 95% CI: 1.58, 5.43) but not with hypertension (RRR = 1.45, 95% CI: 0.95, 2.22) versus normotension. In models examining race and ethnicity, SBP was higher among non-Hispanic White and Hispanic individuals with pregnancy loss; non-Hispanic Black individuals had higher BP regardless of pregnancy loss status. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> History of pregnancy loss was associated with higher SBP and elevated BP category at midlife. These findings highlight reproductive history as an important consideration for cardiopreventive strategies and interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142468908","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kristin M Mattocks, Lisa L Shenette, Karen Goldstein, Bevanne Bean-Mayberry, Nancy Maher, Sally Haskell
Background: Women veterans who experience certain conditions during pregnancy, such as gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, and gestational diabetes, are at increased risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD) later in life. Many women are unaware of this risk. Furthermore, women often face financial, socioeconomic, or physical challenges when trying to make healthy behavior modifications to reduce CVD risk. Objective: To examine Veterans' pregnancy-related cardiovascular (CV) risk conditions, risk identification, and risk communication with primary care providers. Research Design: Telephone/video interviews were conducted with female Veterans who had experienced at least one sex-specific CV risk condition during pregnancy. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using content analysis techniques. Major themes and representative quotes were derived. Results: Twenty-eight women Veterans participated in the study, conducted between October and December 2023. A majority of participants were racial/ethnic minorities, and the average age was 38. Four themes arose: (1) Veterans Affairs (VA) medical records may contain limited information regarding CV risk factors experienced during pregnancy; (2) strong relationships between Veterans and their VA primary care providers can facilitate management of CV risk factors following pregnancy; (3) some Veterans receive vague and/or conflicting recommendations for CV risk reduction following pregnancy; and (4) social determinants of health may play a key role in Veterans' ability to follow recommended CV risk reduction behaviors. Conclusions: Women Veterans with pregnancy-related CV risk conditions may not know that they are at increased risk of developing future CVD conditions, often because VA providers receive limited records from outside providers. Those who are aware often receive conflicting or vague recommendations to address these risk factors. When trying to follow CV health recommendations, many women have difficulty due to lack of finances, childcare, or safe areas. Future interventions should be aimed at improving access to medical records between outside and VA providers, patient education, and access to heart-healthy resources.
{"title":"Understanding Pregnancy-Related Cardiovascular Disease Risk Communication and Management Among Women Veterans.","authors":"Kristin M Mattocks, Lisa L Shenette, Karen Goldstein, Bevanne Bean-Mayberry, Nancy Maher, Sally Haskell","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2024.0618","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.0618","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Women veterans who experience certain conditions during pregnancy, such as gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, and gestational diabetes, are at increased risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD) later in life. Many women are unaware of this risk. Furthermore, women often face financial, socioeconomic, or physical challenges when trying to make healthy behavior modifications to reduce CVD risk. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> To examine Veterans' pregnancy-related cardiovascular (CV) risk conditions, risk identification, and risk communication with primary care providers. <b><i>Research Design:</i></b> Telephone/video interviews were conducted with female Veterans who had experienced at least one sex-specific CV risk condition during pregnancy. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using content analysis techniques. Major themes and representative quotes were derived. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Twenty-eight women Veterans participated in the study, conducted between October and December 2023. A majority of participants were racial/ethnic minorities, and the average age was 38. Four themes arose: (1) Veterans Affairs (VA) medical records may contain limited information regarding CV risk factors experienced during pregnancy; (2) strong relationships between Veterans and their VA primary care providers can facilitate management of CV risk factors following pregnancy; (3) some Veterans receive vague and/or conflicting recommendations for CV risk reduction following pregnancy; and (4) social determinants of health may play a key role in Veterans' ability to follow recommended CV risk reduction behaviors. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Women Veterans with pregnancy-related CV risk conditions may not know that they are at increased risk of developing future CVD conditions, often because VA providers receive limited records from outside providers. Those who are aware often receive conflicting or vague recommendations to address these risk factors. When trying to follow CV health recommendations, many women have difficulty due to lack of finances, childcare, or safe areas. Future interventions should be aimed at improving access to medical records between outside and VA providers, patient education, and access to heart-healthy resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142391547","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Ending Female Genital Mutilation: A New Ruling in the Gambia Can Reignite Progress Towards SDG Target 5.3.","authors":"Pooja Lalwani, Faraan O Rahim, Meghna Katyal, Jayashabari Shankar, Huda Haque, Fatou Baldeh, Adriana Kaplan-Marcusán","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2024.0900","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.0900","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142391544","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}