Journal of virological methods最新文献

Rabies, a fatal zoonotic viral disease affecting mammals, including humans, remains a significant global health concern, particularly in low-income countries. The disease, primarily transmitted through infected animal saliva, prompts urgent diagnosis for timely post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP). The gold standard diagnostic test, direct fluorescent antibody test (dFAT), while sensitive, suffers from limitations such as subjective interpretation and high costs. As a confirmatory technique, the LN34 Pan-Lyssavirus RT-qPCR assay has emerged as a promising tool for universal Lyssavirus detection. This study evaluated its performance using 130 rabies virus isolates representing eleven Brazilian variants and 303 clinical samples from surveillance operations. The LN34 assay demonstrated 100% sensitivity and 98% specificity compared to dFAT. Additionally, it detected all samples, including those missed by dFAT, indicating superior sensitivity. The assay's specificity was confirmed through Sanger nucleotide sequencing, with only a minimal false-positive rate. Comparative analysis revealed higher accuracy and concordance with dFAT than traditional rabies tissue culture infection tests (RTCIT). False-negative RTCIT results were attributed to low viral load or suboptimal sampling. These findings underscore the LN34 assay's utility as a confirmatory technique, enhancing rabies surveillance and control in Brazil. Its widespread adoption could significantly improve diagnostic sensitivity, crucial for effective PEP and public health interventions.

Background

T cell immunity plays a pivotal role in mitigating the severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Therefore, reliable functional T cell assays are required to evaluate severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-specific T cell immunity in specific patient populations.

Methods

We recruited a cohort of 23 healthcare workers who received their bivalent Omicron BA.1 / ancestral mRNA booster vaccination or were infected with the Omicron variant at a median of 144 days and 227 days before blood collection, respectively. In this cohort, we compared the performances of two widely utilized commercial SARS-CoV-2 interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs), i.e., QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 and T-SPOT.COVID, and an in-house designed Omicron enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISpot).

Results

The QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 and T-SPOT.COVID assays detected SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific T cells in 34.8 % and 21.7 % of participants, respectively. Moreover, our in-house designed ELISpot that included Omicron BA.4 and BA.5 full-spike peptides detected T cell responses in 47.8 % of participants and was strongly associated with the T-SPOT.COVID.

Conclusion

The evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 T cell immunity using commercially accessible assays may yield disparate outcomes as results from different assays are not directly comparable. A specific Omicron ELISpot should be considered to assess Omicron-specific T cell immunity.

Rubella virus infection during early pregnancy sometimes causes severe birth defects termed congenital rubella syndrome. Although there are safe and effective live-attenuated vaccines, rubella has only been certified as eliminated in the Americas within the six World Health Organization regions. Rubella remains an endemic disease in many regions, and outbreaks occur wherever population immunity is insufficient. There are two main methods for diagnosis of rubella: detection of anti-rubella IgM antibodies by enzyme immunoassay and detection of the viral genome by real-time RT-PCR. Both of these methods require substantial time and effort. In the present study, a rapid rubella detection assay using real-time fluorescent reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification with quenching primers was developed. The time required for the new assay was one-half that required for a real-time RT-PCR assay. The assay had 93.6% positive percent agreement and 100% negative percent agreement for clinical specimens compared with the real-time RT-PCR assay. The new assay is considered useful for diagnosis of rubella in areas where rubella is endemic.

We established primary porcine nasal, tracheal, and bronchial epithelial cells that recapitulate the physical and functional properties of the respiratory tract and have the ability to fully differentiate. Trans-well cultures demonstrated increased transepithelial electrical resistance over time the presence of tight junctions as demonstrated by immunohistochemistry. The nasal, tracheal, and bronchial epithelial cells developed cilia, secreted mucus, and expressed sialic acids on surface glycoproteins, the latter which are required for influenza A virus infection. Swine influenza viruses were shown to replicate efficiently in the primary epithelial cell cultures, supporting the use of these culture models to assess swine influenza and other virus infection. Primary porcine nasal, tracheal, and bronchial epithelial cell culture models enable assessment of emerging and novel influenza viruses for pandemic potential as well as mechanistic studies to understand mechanisms of infection, reassortment, and generation of novel virus. As swine are susceptible to infection with multiple viral and bacterial respiratory pathogens, these primary airway cell models may enable study of the cellular response to infection by pathogens associated with Porcine Respiratory Disease Complex.

Broad bean true mosaic virus (BBTMV) infects broad beans and peas, reducing yield. As BBTMV is transmitted through broad beans, many countries have implemented regulations to prevent the distribution of infected seeds. Currently, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is commonly used to detect BBTMV. While the PCR-based method is preferred for seed virus detection due to its sensitivity and speed. A BBTMV-specific PCR detection method has not yet been reported. A universal detection method currently exists that utilizes reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) for the Comovirus genus, to which BBTMV belongs. However, sequence analysis is required for species identification. To address this limitation, we developed and verified RT-PCR detection methods using newly designed BBTMV-specific primers. RT-PCR and real-time RT-PCR with these primers were approximately 5 × 10⁵–10⁶ times more sensitive than ELISA and 100–1000 times more sensitive than previously reported RT-PCR methods. Using RT-PCR and real-time RT-PCR employing these primers, we could detect BBTMV with same sensitivity when more than 3.0 × 10⁵ copies were present per gram of broad bean seeds. Our newly developed detection methods can test for BBTMV with high sensitivity and speed.

H5, H7 and H9 are the major subtypes of avian influenza virus (AIV) that cause economic losses in the poultry industry and sporadic zoonotic infection. Early detection of AIV is essential for preventing disease spread. Therefore, molecular diagnosis and subtyping of AIV via real-time RT-PCR (rRT-PCR) is preferred over other classical diagnostic methods, such as egg inoculation, RT-PCR and HI test, due to its high sensitivity, specificity and convenience. The singleplex rRT-PCRs for the Matrix, H5 and H7 gene used for the national surveillance program in Korea have been developed in 2017; however, these methods were not designed for multiplexing, and does not reflect the sequences of currently circulating strains completely. In this study, the multiplex H5/7/9 rRT-PCR assay was developed with sets of primers and probe updated or newly designed to simultaneously detect the H5, H7 and H9 genes. Multiplex H5/7/9 rRT-PCR showed 100% specificity without cross-reactivity with other subtypes of AIVs and avian disease-causing viruses or bacteria, and the limit of detection was 1–10 EID₅₀/0.1 ml (50% egg infectious dose). Artificial mixed infections with the three different subtypes could be detected accurately with high analytical sensitivity even under highly biased relative molecular ratios by balancing the reactivities of each subtype by modifying the concentration of the primers and probes. The multiplex H5/7/9 rRT-PCR assay developed in this study could be a useful tool for large-scale surveillance programs for viral detection as well as subtyping due to its high specificity, sensitivity and robustness in discriminating viruses in mixed infections, and this approach would greatly decrease the time, cost, effort and chance of cross-contamination compared to the conventional method of testing three subtypes by different singleplex rRT-PCR methods in parallel or in series.

Heparin is postulated to block the interaction of SARS-CoV-2 with highly glycosylated proteins which are critical for binding the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), an essential mechanism for host-cell entry and viral replication. Intranasal heparin is under investigation for use as a SARS-CoV-2 preventative in the IntraNasal Heparin Trial (INHERIT, NCT05204550). Heparin directly interferes with real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), the gold standard for SARS-CoV-2 detection. This study aimed to investigate the magnitude of heparin interference across various clinical laboratory testing platforms, and the reversal of any interference by degradation of heparin using the heparinase I enzyme in nasopharyngeal swab (NP) samples for SARS-CoV-2 analysis by RT-qPCR. Heparin-mediated PCR interference was evident at heparin concentrations as low as 10 IU/mL across all platforms tested, with the exclusion of the Hologic Panther Aptima SARS-CoV-2 assay. Rates of false negative or invalid results increased with increasing heparin concentrations on all platforms, except the Hologic Panther Aptima and Roche Cobas LIAT. Heparinase I reversed heparin-mediated PCR inhibition across in all samples tested, except those with initial Ct values >35. Our study shows that the use of heparin-containing nasal sprays interferes with the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in NP swab samples by RT-qPCR, a phenomenon that is not well recognised in the literature. Furthermore, this study has also demonstrated that heparin-mediated PCR inhibition can be prevented through heparinase I treatment, demonstrating restoration of clinically significant results with Ct values <35.

As variants of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) continue to emerge, assessment of vaccine immunogenicity remains a critical factor to support continued vaccination. To this end, an in vitro microneutralization (MN50) assay was validated to quantitate SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies against prototype and variant strains (Beta, Delta, Omicron BA.1, Omicron BA.5, and XBB.1.5) in human serum. For the prototype strain, the MN50 assay met acceptance criteria for inter-/intra-assay precision, specificity, linearity, and selectivity. The assay was robust against changes to virus/serum incubation time, cell seeding density, virus content per well, cell passage number, and serum interference. Analyte in serum samples was stable up to five freeze/thaw cycles and for up to 12 months of storage at –80 ± 10 °C. Similar results were observed for the variant-adapted MN50 assays. The conversion factor to convert assay result units to WHO international standard units (IU/mL) was determined to be 0.62 for the prototype strain. This MN50 assay will be useful for vaccine immunogenicity analyses in clinical trial samples, enabling assessment of vaccine immunogenicity for ancestral and variant strains as variant-adapted vaccines are developed.

Quantification of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA in serum or plasma samples is an essential parameter in HCV diagnostics. Here, the NeuMoDx™Molecular System (Qiagen) was tested for the most common HCV genotypes and compared to the cobas c6800 system (Roche).

HCV-RNA from 131 plasma/serum samples from chronically infected patients was determined in parallel on the NeuMoDx and c6800 systems. Linearity was analysed using the four most common HCV genotypes (1−4) in our cohort. The coefficient of variation (CV) within (intra-assay) and between (inter-assay) runs was calculated based on HCV-RNA concentration. Quantitative HCV-RNA results were highly correlated on both test systems (R² = 0.7947; y = 0.94 x + 0.37). On average, the NeuMoDx and c6800 HCV RNA levels showed a mean difference of only 0.05 log10 IU/mL but with a broad distribution (±1.2 2 x SD). The NeuMoDx demonstrated very good linearity across all HCV genotypes tested at concentrations between 1.7 and 6.2 log10 IU/mL (R² range: 0.9257–0.9991) with the highest mean coefficient of determination for genotype 1 (R² = 0.9909). The mean intra- and inter-assay CV for both serum and plasma samples was <5 %. The NeuMoDx HCV-RNA Assay demonstrates high subtype-independent comparability, linearity, and reproducibility for the quantification of HCV-RNA in serum and plasma samples from chronically infected patients.

Despite increasing scale-up of antiretroviral therapy (ART) coverage, challenges related to adherence and HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) remain. The high cost of HIVDR surveillance is a persistent challenge with implementation in resource-constrained settings. Dried blood spot (DBS) specimens have been demonstrated to be a feasible alternative to plasma or serum for HIVDR genotyping and are more suitable for lower resource settings. There is a need for affordable HIVDR genotyping assays which can amplify HIV-1 sequences from DBS specimens, particularly those with low viral loads, at a low cost. Here, we present an in-house assay capable of reliably amplifying HIV-1 protease and partial reverse transcriptase genes from DBS specimens, which covers the complete World Health Organization 2009 list of drug resistance mutations under surveillance. DBS specimens were prepared using whole blood spiked with HIV-1 at concentrations of 10,000, 5000, 1000, and 500 copies/mL (n=30 for each concentration). Specimens were tested in triplicate. A two-step approach was used consisting of cDNA synthesis followed by nested PCR. The limit of detection of the assay was calculated to be approximately 5000 (95 % CI: 3200–10,700) copies/mL for the protease gene and 3600 (95 % CI: 2200–10,000) copies/mL for reverse transcriptase. The assay was observed to be most sensitive with higher viral load specimens (97.8 % [95 % CI: 92.2–99.7]) for both protease and reverse transcriptase at 10,000 copies/mL with performance decreasing with the use of specimens with lower viral loads (46.7 % [36.1–57.5] and 60.0 % [49.1–70.2] at 500 copies/mL for protease and reverse transcriptase, respectively). Ultimately, this assay presents a promising opportunity for use in resource-constrained settings. Future work should involve validation under field conditions including sub-optimal storage conditions and preparation of DBS with fingerprick blood in order to accurately reflect real-world collection scenarios.