首页 > 最新文献

JTO Clinical and Research Reports最新文献

英文 中文
Thymic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Evolving Insights and Innovative Approaches 胸腺神经内分泌肿瘤:不断发展的见解和创新的方法
IF 3.5 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100935
Erica Pietroluongo MD, PhD , Christine M. Bestvina MD , Rachel Brattin , Pietro De Placido MD, PhD , Anna Di Lello MD , Waqas Haque MD, MPH , Alessandra Esposito PhD , Roberto Bianco MD, PhD , Noura Choudhury MD , Marina Chiara Garassino MD

Introduction

Thymic neuroendocrine tumors (TNENs) are exceptionally rare and a clinically heterogeneous malignancy, often diagnosed at an advanced stage and lacking standardized treatment algorithms. Due to the scarcity of dedicated evidence, most therapeutic strategies are extrapolated from other neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Methods

This narrative review provides an updated overview of current and emerging treatment approaches for TNENs, focusing on histology-driven strategies and the evolving role of targeted and radionuclide therapies. A comprehensive literature search was conducted through PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase from January 1, 2000, up to May 31, 2025, integrating retrospective series, real-world data, and ongoing clinical trials.

Results

Surgical resection remains the cornerstone of treatment whenever feasible. The benefit of adjuvant therapy in well-differentiated tumors is unclear, whereas thymic neuroendocrine carcinomas often require multimodal approaches, including platinum–etoposide chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Retrospective evidence suggests that even well-differentiated, high-grade tumors may respond to cytotoxic agents. Somatostatin analogues are widely used in indolent or peptide receptor-positive tumors, whereas everolimus and, more recently, cabozantinib represent options for progressive disease. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy has demonstrated encouraging results in somatostatin receptor–positive tumors and is currently under further investigation in prospective trials involving thymic primaries. However, the 5-year overall survival rate varies significantly (approximately 28%–80%), underlining an urgent need for prospective, subtype-specific studies.

Conclusions

The management of TNENs requires a multidisciplinary and individualized approach based on histologic subtype, somatostatin receptor status, and disease aggressiveness. Despite promising therapeutic options, robust prospective data remain limited. The integration of TNENs into basket trials, the molecular refinement of prognostic subgroups (e.g., NET G3), and the conduct of dedicated multicenter prospective studies are urgently needed to define optimal treatment algorithms and improve clinical outcomes in these rare entities.
胸腺神经内分泌肿瘤(TNENs)是一种罕见的临床异质性恶性肿瘤,通常在晚期诊断,缺乏标准化的治疗方法。由于缺乏专门的证据,大多数治疗策略是从其他神经内分泌肿瘤中推断出来的。方法:本文综述了TNENs当前和新兴治疗方法的最新综述,重点关注组织学驱动策略和靶向治疗和放射性核素治疗的演变作用。从2000年1月1日至2025年5月31日,通过PubMed/MEDLINE和Embase进行了全面的文献检索,整合了回顾性系列、真实数据和正在进行的临床试验。结果只要可行,手术切除仍是治疗的基石。在分化良好的肿瘤中,辅助治疗的益处尚不清楚,而胸腺神经内分泌癌通常需要多模式的方法,包括铂-依托泊苷化疗和放疗。回顾性证据表明,即使是分化良好的高级别肿瘤也可能对细胞毒性药物有反应。生长抑素类似物广泛用于惰性或肽受体阳性肿瘤,而依维莫司和最近的卡博桑替尼是进行性疾病的选择。肽受体放射性核素治疗在生长抑素受体阳性肿瘤中显示出令人鼓舞的结果,目前正在胸腺原发的前瞻性试验中进一步研究。然而,5年总生存率差异很大(约28%-80%),强调迫切需要前瞻性的、针对亚型的研究。结论TNENs的治疗需要基于组织学亚型、生长抑素受体状态和疾病侵袭性的多学科和个体化方法。尽管有很好的治疗方案,但可靠的前瞻性数据仍然有限。迫切需要将TNENs整合到篮子试验中,对预后亚组(如NET G3)进行分子细化,并开展专门的多中心前瞻性研究,以确定这些罕见实体的最佳治疗算法并改善临床结果。
{"title":"Thymic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Evolving Insights and Innovative Approaches","authors":"Erica Pietroluongo MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Christine M. Bestvina MD ,&nbsp;Rachel Brattin ,&nbsp;Pietro De Placido MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Anna Di Lello MD ,&nbsp;Waqas Haque MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Alessandra Esposito PhD ,&nbsp;Roberto Bianco MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Noura Choudhury MD ,&nbsp;Marina Chiara Garassino MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100935","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100935","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Thymic neuroendocrine tumors (TNENs) are exceptionally rare and a clinically heterogeneous malignancy, often diagnosed at an advanced stage and lacking standardized treatment algorithms. Due to the scarcity of dedicated evidence, most therapeutic strategies are extrapolated from other neuroendocrine neoplasms.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This narrative review provides an updated overview of current and emerging treatment approaches for TNENs, focusing on histology-driven strategies and the evolving role of targeted and radionuclide therapies. A comprehensive literature search was conducted through PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase from January 1, 2000, up to May 31, 2025, integrating retrospective series, real-world data, and ongoing clinical trials.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Surgical resection remains the cornerstone of treatment whenever feasible. The benefit of adjuvant therapy in well-differentiated tumors is unclear, whereas thymic neuroendocrine carcinomas often require multimodal approaches, including platinum–etoposide chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Retrospective evidence suggests that even well-differentiated, high-grade tumors may respond to cytotoxic agents. Somatostatin analogues are widely used in indolent or peptide receptor-positive tumors, whereas everolimus and, more recently, cabozantinib represent options for progressive disease. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy has demonstrated encouraging results in somatostatin receptor–positive tumors and is currently under further investigation in prospective trials involving thymic primaries. However, the 5-year overall survival rate varies significantly (approximately 28%–80%), underlining an urgent need for prospective, subtype-specific studies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The management of TNENs requires a multidisciplinary and individualized approach based on histologic subtype, somatostatin receptor status, and disease aggressiveness. Despite promising therapeutic options, robust prospective data remain limited. The integration of TNENs into basket trials, the molecular refinement of prognostic subgroups (e.g., NET G3), and the conduct of dedicated multicenter prospective studies are urgently needed to define optimal treatment algorithms and improve clinical outcomes in these rare entities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17675,"journal":{"name":"JTO Clinical and Research Reports","volume":"7 2","pages":"Article 100935"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145980963","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Characteristics of Short-Term Survivors With ALK or ROS1-Altered Metastatic NSCLC ALK或ros1改变的转移性非小细胞肺癌短期幸存者的特征
IF 3.5 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100876
Kai-Lin Liu BA, BS , Alex Watts MS , Connor B. Grady MPH , Geoffrey Liu MD, MSc , Devalben Patel BSc, MLT , Karmugi Balaratnam MD , Stephen V. Liu MD , Gabriela Bravo Montenegro MD , Yunan Nie MD , Jorge Nieva MD , Amanda Herrmann MD , Kristen Marrone MD , Vincent Lam MD , Fangdi Sun MD , Jonathan Dowell MD , William Schwartzman MD , Vamsidhar Velcheti MD , Olivia Fankuchen MD, MS , Tasfiq Ullah MD , Liza Villaruz MD , Melina E. Marmarelis MD, MSCE

Introduction

The prognostic significance of baseline and on-treatment brain and liver metastasis in ALK+ or ROS1+ metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC) remains unclear. As we consider intensification strategies, it is critical to identify factors that predict high-risk disease.

Methods

Clinical characteristics and outcomes were abstracted from the electronic medical records of patients with ALK+ or ROS1+ mNSCLC. Baseline characteristics and the cumulative incidence (CI) of brain and liver metastases were compared (≥2-year survivors versus <2-year; pre-2017 versus post-2017). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the association between factors and overall survival, and multivariable logistic regression models were used for the odds of death within 2 years.

Results

A total of 310 patients with ALK+ mNSCLC were identified (≥2-y: 229, <2-y: 81). There was no difference in cumulative incidence of brain metastases between survival groups (29% at 21 mo). However, the cumulative incidence of liver metastasis was higher in those who survived less than 2 years (20.9% versus 5.4% at 21 mo). The cumulative incidence of brain but not liver metastases has improved post-2017 with the newer generation of ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors. There were 69 patients with ROS1+ mNSCLC who were identified (≥2-y: 46, < 2-y: 23). There was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of brain or liver metastases between less-than-2-year and greater-than-or-equal-to-2-year survivor cohorts (p = 0.664, p = 0.201).

Conclusions

Among patients with ALK+ but not ROS1+ mNSCLC, the presence of liver metastases at baseline and on-treatment was associated with worse survival. In the ALK+ population, the cumulative incidence of brain but not liver metastases is improving, highlighting a need for therapies effective at the treatment and prevention of liver metastases.
ALK+或ROS1+转移性NSCLC (mNSCLC)的基线和治疗期脑和肝转移的预后意义尚不清楚。当我们考虑强化策略时,确定预测高危疾病的因素至关重要。方法从ALK+或ROS1+ mNSCLC患者的电子病历中提取临床特征和结局。比较脑和肝转移的基线特征和累积发生率(CI)(≥2年生存率vs + lt;2年生存率;2017年前vs 2017年后)。采用多变量Cox比例风险模型评价各因素与总生存率的相关性,采用多变量logistic回归模型评价2年内死亡几率。结果共发现310例ALK+ mNSCLC患者(≥2-y: 229例,<;2-y: 81例)。存活组间脑转移的累积发生率无差异(21个月时为29%)。然而,在存活时间少于2年的患者中,肝转移的累积发生率更高(20.9% vs . 21个月的5.4%)。2017年后,随着新一代ALK酪氨酸激酶抑制剂的使用,脑转移而非肝转移的累积发病率有所改善。有69例ROS1+ mNSCLC患者被确定(≥2-y: 46, < 2-y: 23)。在小于2年和大于或等于2年的幸存者队列中,脑或肝转移的累积发生率无显著差异(p = 0.664, p = 0.201)。结论在ALK+而非ROS1+的mNSCLC患者中,基线和治疗时肝转移的存在与较差的生存率相关。在ALK+人群中,脑转移而非肝转移的累积发生率正在改善,这表明需要有效治疗和预防肝转移的治疗方法。
{"title":"Characteristics of Short-Term Survivors With ALK or ROS1-Altered Metastatic NSCLC","authors":"Kai-Lin Liu BA, BS ,&nbsp;Alex Watts MS ,&nbsp;Connor B. Grady MPH ,&nbsp;Geoffrey Liu MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Devalben Patel BSc, MLT ,&nbsp;Karmugi Balaratnam MD ,&nbsp;Stephen V. Liu MD ,&nbsp;Gabriela Bravo Montenegro MD ,&nbsp;Yunan Nie MD ,&nbsp;Jorge Nieva MD ,&nbsp;Amanda Herrmann MD ,&nbsp;Kristen Marrone MD ,&nbsp;Vincent Lam MD ,&nbsp;Fangdi Sun MD ,&nbsp;Jonathan Dowell MD ,&nbsp;William Schwartzman MD ,&nbsp;Vamsidhar Velcheti MD ,&nbsp;Olivia Fankuchen MD, MS ,&nbsp;Tasfiq Ullah MD ,&nbsp;Liza Villaruz MD ,&nbsp;Melina E. Marmarelis MD, MSCE","doi":"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100876","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100876","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The prognostic significance of baseline and on-treatment brain and liver metastasis in <em>ALK</em>+ or <em>ROS1</em>+ metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC) remains unclear. As we consider intensification strategies, it is critical to identify factors that predict high-risk disease.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Clinical characteristics and outcomes were abstracted from the electronic medical records of patients with <em>ALK</em>+ or <em>ROS1</em>+ mNSCLC. Baseline characteristics and the cumulative incidence (CI) of brain and liver metastases were compared (≥2-year survivors versus &lt;2-year; pre-2017 versus post-2017). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the association between factors and overall survival, and multivariable logistic regression models were used for the odds of death within 2 years.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 310 patients with <em>ALK</em>+ mNSCLC were identified (≥2-y: 229, &lt;2-y: 81). There was no difference in cumulative incidence of brain metastases between survival groups (29% at 21 mo). However, the cumulative incidence of liver metastasis was higher in those who survived less than 2 years (20.9% versus 5.4% at 21 mo). The cumulative incidence of brain but not liver metastases has improved post-2017 with the newer generation of ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors. There were 69 patients with <em>ROS1</em>+ mNSCLC who were identified (≥2-y: 46, &lt; 2-y: 23). There was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of brain or liver metastases between less-than-2-year and greater-than-or-equal-to-2-year survivor cohorts (<em>p</em> = 0.664, <em>p</em> = 0.201).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Among patients with <em>ALK</em>+ but not <em>ROS1</em>+ mNSCLC, the presence of liver metastases at baseline and on-treatment was associated with worse survival. In the ALK+ population, the cumulative incidence of brain but not liver metastases is improving, highlighting a need for therapies effective at the treatment and prevention of liver metastases.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17675,"journal":{"name":"JTO Clinical and Research Reports","volume":"6 11","pages":"Article 100876"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145425161","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
AdvanTIG-204: A Phase 2, Randomized, Open-Label Study of Ociperlimab Plus Tislelizumab and Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Versus Tislelizumab and Concurrent Chemotherapy Versus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in First-Line Limited-Stage SCLC AdvanTIG-204:一线有限期SCLC中奥西培单抗+替利单抗+同步放化疗vs替利单抗+同步化疗vs同步放化疗的2期随机开放标签研究
IF 3.5 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100911
Youling Gong MD , Qingsong Pang MD , Rong Yu MD , Zhengfei Zhu MD , Jiangqiong Huang MD , Yufeng Cheng MD , Diansheng Zhong MD , Hongbo Wu MD , Seung Soo Yoo PhD , Tracy Dobbs MD , Zinan Bao MD , Yunxia Zuo MD , Yujuan Gao PhD , Pu Sun PhD , You Lu MD

Introduction

Patients with limited-stage SCLC (LS-SCLC) have a substantial unmet clinical need for new treatments that delay disease progression and prolong survival.

Methods

In this phase 2, multicenter, randomized, multiarm, open-label trial, patients with untreated LS-SCLC received ociperlimab and tislelizumab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) (arm A), tislelizumab plus cCRT (arm B), or cCRT (arm C). The primary objective was to compare progression-free survival (PFS) per investigator for arms A and B versus C (NCT04952597). The contribution of ociperlimab was explored by comparison of arms A versus B. Statistical analyses were descriptive, with no formal hypothesis testing.

Results

A total of 126 patients were randomized to arms A (N = 41), B (N = 42), and C (N = 43). The median PFS [95% confidence interval] exhibited a trend for improvement in arms A (12.6 [8.7–not estimable] months) and B (13.2 [8.5–not estimable]) compared with C (9.5 [8.3–14.4]); the PFS benefit was comparable between Arms A and B.
The objective response rate, complete response rate, and median duration of response were numerically higher in arms A and B than in C. The median overall survival was not reached in all three arms, and the median distant metastasis–free survival revealed no trend for improvement for arms A and B compared with C. All patients experienced at least one treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse event.

Conclusions

Ociperlimab and tislelizumab plus cCRT and tislelizumab plus cCRT exhibited a trend for improvement in PFS and numerically higher objective response rate compared with cCRT, with no new safety signals beyond the known profiles of immune checkpoint inhibitors and cCRT. Adding ociperlimab to tislelizumab plus cCRT was not associated with additional improvement in efficacy.
有限期SCLC (LS-SCLC)患者对延迟疾病进展和延长生存期的新治疗有大量未满足的临床需求。在这项2期、多中心、随机、多组、开放标签的试验中,未经治疗的LS-SCLC患者接受了奥昔哌单抗和替利单抗联合同步放化疗(cCRT) (A组)、替利单抗联合cCRT (B组)或cCRT (C组)。主要目的是比较A组和B组与C组(NCT04952597)的每位研究者的无进展生存期(PFS)。通过A组与b组的比较来探讨奥昔哌单抗的作用。统计分析是描述性的,没有正式的假设检验。结果126例患者随机分为A组(N = 41)、B组(N = 42)和C组(N = 43)。与C组(9.5[8.3-14.4])相比,a组(12.6[8.7 -不可估计]个月)和B组(13.2[8.5 -不可估计]个月)的中位PFS[95%置信区间]显示出改善的趋势;A组和B组的PFS获益具有可比性。A组和B组的客观缓解率、完全缓解率和中位缓解持续时间在数值上高于c组。三个组的中位总生存期均未达到,A组和B组的中位无远处转移生存期与c组相比没有改善的趋势。结论:与cCRT相比,sociperlimab和tislelizumab联合cCRT以及tislelizumab联合cCRT有改善PFS的趋势,客观有效率更高,除了已知的免疫检查点抑制剂和cCRT外,没有新的安全性信号。在替利单抗加cCRT的基础上添加奥昔哌单抗与疗效的进一步改善无关。
{"title":"AdvanTIG-204: A Phase 2, Randomized, Open-Label Study of Ociperlimab Plus Tislelizumab and Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Versus Tislelizumab and Concurrent Chemotherapy Versus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in First-Line Limited-Stage SCLC","authors":"Youling Gong MD ,&nbsp;Qingsong Pang MD ,&nbsp;Rong Yu MD ,&nbsp;Zhengfei Zhu MD ,&nbsp;Jiangqiong Huang MD ,&nbsp;Yufeng Cheng MD ,&nbsp;Diansheng Zhong MD ,&nbsp;Hongbo Wu MD ,&nbsp;Seung Soo Yoo PhD ,&nbsp;Tracy Dobbs MD ,&nbsp;Zinan Bao MD ,&nbsp;Yunxia Zuo MD ,&nbsp;Yujuan Gao PhD ,&nbsp;Pu Sun PhD ,&nbsp;You Lu MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100911","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100911","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Patients with limited-stage SCLC (LS-SCLC) have a substantial unmet clinical need for new treatments that delay disease progression and prolong survival.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this phase 2, multicenter, randomized, multiarm, open-label trial, patients with untreated LS-SCLC received ociperlimab and tislelizumab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) (arm A), tislelizumab plus cCRT (arm B), or cCRT (arm C). The primary objective was to compare progression-free survival (PFS) per investigator for arms A and B versus C (NCT04952597). The contribution of ociperlimab was explored by comparison of arms A versus B. Statistical analyses were descriptive, with no formal hypothesis testing.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 126 patients were randomized to arms A (N = 41), B (N = 42), and C (N = 43). The median PFS [95% confidence interval] exhibited a trend for improvement in arms A (12.6 [8.7–not estimable] months) and B (13.2 [8.5–not estimable]) compared with C (9.5 [8.3–14.4]); the PFS benefit was comparable between Arms A and B.</div><div>The objective response rate, complete response rate, and median duration of response were numerically higher in arms A and B than in C. The median overall survival was not reached in all three arms, and the median distant metastasis–free survival revealed no trend for improvement for arms A and B compared with C. All patients experienced at least one treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse event.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Ociperlimab and tislelizumab plus cCRT and tislelizumab plus cCRT exhibited a trend for improvement in PFS and numerically higher objective response rate compared with cCRT, with no new safety signals beyond the known profiles of immune checkpoint inhibitors and cCRT. Adding ociperlimab to tislelizumab plus cCRT was not associated with additional improvement in efficacy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17675,"journal":{"name":"JTO Clinical and Research Reports","volume":"6 11","pages":"Article 100911"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145425159","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Safety, Efficacy, and Central Nervous System Control in Patients with High Baseline Risk Factors Treated with Tarlatamab for SCLC or Extrapulmonary Small Cell Carcinoma 塔拉他单抗治疗SCLC或肺外小细胞癌的安全性、有效性和中枢神经系统控制
IF 3.5 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100875
Sanjana Mullangi MD , Manidhar Reddy Lekkala MD , Sarah Blocker PharmD , Diana Kim PharmD , Jun Zhang MD , Chao Huang MD , Prakash Neupane MD , Haoran Li MD , Timothy Schieber PharmD

Introduction

SCLC remains the most aggressive lung cancer with a poor prognosis. Tarlatamab, a bispecific T-cell engager, is approved for use in extensive-stage SCLC after progression on a platinum-based chemotherapy on the basis of the DeLLphi-301 trial. Because of the restrictive inclusion criteria of this trial, substantial gaps remain in our understanding of treatment for many patients.

Methods

We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who were treated with tarlatamab at the University of Kansas Cancer Center from May 2024 through December 2024 for SCLC (cohort 1) or extrapulmonary small cell carcinoma (EPSCC) (cohort 2). Patients were included if they received at least one dose of tarlatamab regardless of baseline characteristics.

Results

A total of 21 patients were included in cohort 1, and three patients were included in cohort 2. In the SCLC cohort, 14 patients (66.6%) had central nervous system (CNS) involvement, five patients (23.8%) required baseline oxygen, and five patients (23.8%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 2 or greater. There were 13 patients (61.9%) who developed cytokine release syndrome (CRS), with grade 3 or higher CRS noted in two patients (15.3%). There were 10 patients (47.6%) who developed immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), with three patients (14.2%) developing grade 3 or higher ICANS. In the three patients with extrapulmonary small cell carcinoma, any-grade CRS occurred in two patients (66.7%), and grade 1 ICANS occurred in one patient (33.3%). Characteristics such as ECOG of 2 or higher, baseline oxygen use, and untreated CNS metastases are associated with high rates of CRS and ICANS. In 17 patients evaluable for best response in cohort 1, partial response was seen in six (35.2%) patients. No patients in cohort 2 had disease assessment performed at the time of data cutoff. Alternative CNS disease control using tarlatamab alone or with concurrent radiation provided clinical benefit to three patients.

Conclusions

Baseline risk factors such as oxygen dependence, poor ECOG performance status, bulky disease, and untreated CNS involvement may increase CRS and ICANS rates after tarlatamab. However, subsequent doses exhibited a more favorable safety profile, supporting outpatient administration and reduced observation time. CNS management strategies, including concurrent radiation or monotherapy with tarlatamab, exhibited promising efficacy. These findings highlight the need for further research into CRS and ICANS risk stratification, optimal CNS management, and efficacy in extrapulmonary small cell carcinoma through larger studies.
sclc仍然是最具侵袭性的肺癌,预后较差。Tarlatamab是一种双特异性t细胞结合剂,在delphi -301试验的基础上,在铂基化疗进展后被批准用于大分期SCLC。由于该试验的限制性纳入标准,我们对许多患者的治疗理解仍存在实质性差距。方法:我们对2024年5月至2024年12月在堪萨斯大学癌症中心接受塔拉他单抗治疗的SCLC(队列1)或肺外小细胞癌(队列2)患者进行回顾性图表回顾。无论基线特征如何,如果患者接受了至少一剂塔拉他单抗,则纳入研究。结果队列1共纳入21例患者,队列2纳入3例患者。在SCLC队列中,14例(66.6%)患者有中枢神经系统(CNS)受累,5例(23.8%)患者需要基线供氧,5例(23.8%)患者的东部肿瘤合作组(ECOG)性能状态为2或更高。13例患者(61.9%)出现细胞因子释放综合征(CRS),其中2例(15.3%)出现3级或以上CRS。10例患者(47.6%)出现免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征(ICANS),其中3例患者(14.2%)出现3级或更高级别ICANS。在3例肺外小细胞癌患者中,2例(66.7%)发生了任何级别的CRS, 1例(33.3%)发生了1级ICANS。ECOG为2或更高、基线耗氧量和未经治疗的中枢神经系统转移等特征与CRS和ICANS的高发生率相关。在队列1中可评估为最佳反应的17例患者中,有6例(35.2%)患者出现部分反应。在数据截止时,队列2中没有患者进行疾病评估。单独使用塔拉他单抗或同时使用放疗的替代CNS疾病控制为3例患者提供了临床益处。结论基线危险因素如氧依赖、不良ECOG表现状态、庞大疾病和未治疗的中枢神经系统受累可能增加塔拉他单抗后CRS和ICANS发生率。然而,随后的剂量显示出更有利的安全性,支持门诊给药并缩短观察时间。中枢神经系统管理策略,包括同步放疗或单药塔拉他单抗治疗,显示出良好的疗效。这些发现强调需要通过更大规模的研究来进一步研究CRS和ICANS的风险分层、最佳CNS管理和肺外小细胞癌的疗效。
{"title":"Safety, Efficacy, and Central Nervous System Control in Patients with High Baseline Risk Factors Treated with Tarlatamab for SCLC or Extrapulmonary Small Cell Carcinoma","authors":"Sanjana Mullangi MD ,&nbsp;Manidhar Reddy Lekkala MD ,&nbsp;Sarah Blocker PharmD ,&nbsp;Diana Kim PharmD ,&nbsp;Jun Zhang MD ,&nbsp;Chao Huang MD ,&nbsp;Prakash Neupane MD ,&nbsp;Haoran Li MD ,&nbsp;Timothy Schieber PharmD","doi":"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100875","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100875","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>SCLC remains the most aggressive lung cancer with a poor prognosis. Tarlatamab, a bispecific T-cell engager, is approved for use in extensive-stage SCLC after progression on a platinum-based chemotherapy on the basis of the DeLLphi-301 trial. Because of the restrictive inclusion criteria of this trial, substantial gaps remain in our understanding of treatment for many patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who were treated with tarlatamab at the University of Kansas Cancer Center from May 2024 through December 2024 for SCLC (cohort 1) or extrapulmonary small cell carcinoma (EPSCC) (cohort 2). Patients were included if they received at least one dose of tarlatamab regardless of baseline characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 21 patients were included in cohort 1, and three patients were included in cohort 2. In the SCLC cohort, 14 patients (66.6%) had central nervous system (CNS) involvement, five patients (23.8%) required baseline oxygen, and five patients (23.8%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 2 or greater. There were 13 patients (61.9%) who developed cytokine release syndrome (CRS), with grade 3 or higher CRS noted in two patients (15.3%). There were 10 patients (47.6%) who developed immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), with three patients (14.2%) developing grade 3 or higher ICANS. In the three patients with extrapulmonary small cell carcinoma, any-grade CRS occurred in two patients (66.7%), and grade 1 ICANS occurred in one patient (33.3%). Characteristics such as ECOG of 2 or higher, baseline oxygen use, and untreated CNS metastases are associated with high rates of CRS and ICANS. In 17 patients evaluable for best response in cohort 1, partial response was seen in six (35.2%) patients. No patients in cohort 2 had disease assessment performed at the time of data cutoff. Alternative CNS disease control using tarlatamab alone or with concurrent radiation provided clinical benefit to three patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Baseline risk factors such as oxygen dependence, poor ECOG performance status, bulky disease, and untreated CNS involvement may increase CRS and ICANS rates after tarlatamab. However, subsequent doses exhibited a more favorable safety profile, supporting outpatient administration and reduced observation time. CNS management strategies, including concurrent radiation or monotherapy with tarlatamab, exhibited promising efficacy. These findings highlight the need for further research into CRS and ICANS risk stratification, optimal CNS management, and efficacy in extrapulmonary small cell carcinoma through larger studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17675,"journal":{"name":"JTO Clinical and Research Reports","volume":"6 11","pages":"Article 100875"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145425162","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Safety and Efficacy of Sequential Chemoimmunotherapy Followed by Concurrent Chemoradiation in Unresectable Stage III NSCLC 序贯化学免疫治疗并发放化疗治疗不可切除III期NSCLC的安全性和有效性
IF 3.5 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100890
Arthi Sridhar MD , Aditi Singh MD, MPH , Scott Hansen MD , Sydney Pulsipher MD , Kaushal Parikh MD , Aaron S. Mansfield MD , Anastasios Dimou MD , Julian R. Molina MD , Katherine E. Smith MD , Yolanda I. Garces MD , Sean S. Park MD , Aadel A. Chaudhuri MD, PhD , Kenneth W. Merrell MD , Kenneth R. Olivier MD , Konstantinos Leventakos MD , Dawn Owen MD, PhD , Mohamed Shanshal MD, MBBCh

Background

The eighth edition of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer staging project reports a 5-year overall survival (OS) for stage IIIA, B, and C NSCLC of 41%, 24%, and 12%, respectively, highlighting the need for improved treatment options. Induction chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibition (ID-chemo-ICI) followed by concurrent chemoradiation (cCRT) has not been adequately studied because of concerns about toxicity. We aim to describe the outcomes of patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC who received ID-chemo-ICI followed by cCRT with or without maintenance ICI.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC who received ID-chemo-ICI with the intent to proceed with cCRT across all Mayo Clinic sites. Clinical end points included progression-free survival (PFS), OS, overall response rate per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1, and treatment-related adverse events defined using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0.

Results

A total of 29 patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC, deemed unsuitable for upfront cCRT or surgery, with a plan to proceed with ID-chemo-ICI before cCRT, were identified. The median age was 66 years, 55% were male, most had a history of smoking (93.1%), and 100% identified as White. Tumor histologies were adenocarcinoma (69%), squamous cell carcinoma (24%), poorly differentiated NSCLC (3.4%), and sarcomatoid NSCLC (3.4%). Most were stage IIIB (44.8%), followed by IIIC (41.4%), and IIIA (13.8%). N2 and N3 disease were present in 37.9% and 55.2%, respectively. Programmed death-ligand 1 expression included less than 1% (n = 11, 38%), 1% to 49% (n = 9, 31%), greater than 50% (n = 5, 17%), and unknown (n = 4, 14%). Patients received ID-chemo-ICI with pembrolizumab (82.8%), nivolumab (13.8%), or atezolizumab (3.4%), with a median of four cycles. The overall response rate to ID-chemo-ICI was 93%. Of the cohort, 90% received cCRT, and 76% received maintenance ICI (pembrolizumab or durvalumab). The median PFS was 18 months, and the median OS was 24 months. Pneumonitis occurred in 37.9% (grade 1: 18.2%; grade 2: 63.6%; grade 3: 18%, no grade 4). Esophagitis occurred in 55.2% (grade 1–2: 93%; grade 3: 7%).

Conclusions

ID-chemo-ICI followed by cCRT seems feasible and safe for unresectable stage III NSCLC, particularly for patients unsuitable for upfront cCRT. Larger prospective trials are needed to validate these findings and optimize patient selection.
国际肺癌分期研究协会第八版报告称,IIIA期、B期和C期NSCLC的5年总生存率(OS)分别为41%、24%和12%,强调了改进治疗方案的必要性。诱导化疗和免疫检查点抑制(ID-chemo-ICI)随后同步放化疗(cCRT)尚未得到充分的研究,因为担心毒性。我们的目的是描述不可切除的III期NSCLC患者接受ID-chemo-ICI,然后cCRT伴或不伴维持ICI的结果。方法:我们对不可切除的III期NSCLC患者进行了回顾性分析,这些患者接受了ID-chemo-ICI,目的是在梅奥诊所的所有地点进行cCRT。临床终点包括无进展生存期(PFS), OS,根据实体瘤1.1版反应评价标准的总缓解率,以及使用不良事件通用术语标准5.0版定义的治疗相关不良事件。结果共发现29例无法切除的III期NSCLC患者,认为不适合术前cCRT或手术,计划在cCRT前进行ID-chemo-ICI。中位年龄66岁,55%为男性,大多数有吸烟史(93.1%),100%为白人。肿瘤组织学为腺癌(69%)、鳞状细胞癌(24%)、低分化NSCLC(3.4%)和肉瘤样NSCLC(3.4%)。大多数是IIIB期(44.8%),其次是IIIC期(41.4%)和IIIA期(13.8%)。N2和N3病变发生率分别为37.9%和55.2%。程序性死亡配体1表达包括小于1% (n = 11,38%)、1%至49% (n = 9,31%)、大于50% (n = 5,17%)和未知(n = 4,14%)。患者接受ID-chemo-ICI联合派姆单抗(82.8%)、纳武单抗(13.8%)或阿特唑单抗(3.4%),中位数为4个周期。ID-chemo-ICI的总有效率为93%。在队列中,90%接受cCRT, 76%接受维持性ICI(派姆单抗或杜伐单抗)。中位PFS为18个月,中位OS为24个月。肺炎发生率为37.9%(1级:18.2%;2级:63.6%;3级:18%,无4级)。55.2%的患者发生食管炎(1-2级93%,3级7%)。结论对于不能切除的III期非小细胞肺癌,尤其是不适合行前期cCRT的患者,sid -chemo- ici加cCRT是可行且安全的。需要更大规模的前瞻性试验来验证这些发现并优化患者选择。
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of Sequential Chemoimmunotherapy Followed by Concurrent Chemoradiation in Unresectable Stage III NSCLC","authors":"Arthi Sridhar MD ,&nbsp;Aditi Singh MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Scott Hansen MD ,&nbsp;Sydney Pulsipher MD ,&nbsp;Kaushal Parikh MD ,&nbsp;Aaron S. Mansfield MD ,&nbsp;Anastasios Dimou MD ,&nbsp;Julian R. Molina MD ,&nbsp;Katherine E. Smith MD ,&nbsp;Yolanda I. Garces MD ,&nbsp;Sean S. Park MD ,&nbsp;Aadel A. Chaudhuri MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Kenneth W. Merrell MD ,&nbsp;Kenneth R. Olivier MD ,&nbsp;Konstantinos Leventakos MD ,&nbsp;Dawn Owen MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Mohamed Shanshal MD, MBBCh","doi":"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100890","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100890","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The eighth edition of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer staging project reports a 5-year overall survival (OS) for stage IIIA, B, and C NSCLC of 41%, 24%, and 12%, respectively, highlighting the need for improved treatment options. Induction chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibition (ID-chemo-ICI) followed by concurrent chemoradiation (cCRT) has not been adequately studied because of concerns about toxicity. We aim to describe the outcomes of patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC who received ID-chemo-ICI followed by cCRT with or without maintenance ICI.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC who received ID-chemo-ICI with the intent to proceed with cCRT across all Mayo Clinic sites. Clinical end points included progression-free survival (PFS), OS, overall response rate per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1, and treatment-related adverse events defined using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 29 patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC, deemed unsuitable for upfront cCRT or surgery, with a plan to proceed with ID-chemo-ICI before cCRT, were identified. The median age was 66 years, 55% were male, most had a history of smoking (93.1%), and 100% identified as White. Tumor histologies were adenocarcinoma (69%), squamous cell carcinoma (24%), poorly differentiated NSCLC (3.4%), and sarcomatoid NSCLC (3.4%). Most were stage IIIB (44.8%), followed by IIIC (41.4%), and IIIA (13.8%). N2 and N3 disease were present in 37.9% and 55.2%, respectively. Programmed death-ligand 1 expression included less than 1% (n = 11, 38%), 1% to 49% (n = 9, 31%), greater than 50% (n = 5, 17%), and unknown (n = 4, 14%). Patients received ID-chemo-ICI with pembrolizumab (82.8%), nivolumab (13.8%), or atezolizumab (3.4%), with a median of four cycles. The overall response rate to ID-chemo-ICI was 93%. Of the cohort, 90% received cCRT, and 76% received maintenance ICI (pembrolizumab or durvalumab). The median PFS was 18 months, and the median OS was 24 months. Pneumonitis occurred in 37.9% (grade 1: 18.2%; grade 2: 63.6%; grade 3: 18%, no grade 4). Esophagitis occurred in 55.2% (grade 1–2: 93%; grade 3: 7%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>ID-chemo-ICI followed by cCRT seems feasible and safe for unresectable stage III NSCLC, particularly for patients unsuitable for upfront cCRT. Larger prospective trials are needed to validate these findings and optimize patient selection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17675,"journal":{"name":"JTO Clinical and Research Reports","volume":"6 11","pages":"Article 100890"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145474293","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cost-Effectiveness of Durvalumab After Chemoradiotherapy in Limited-Stage SCLC Durvalumab在有限期SCLC放化疗后的成本-效果
IF 3.5 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100879
Sheng-Han Tsai MD , Jui-Hung Tsai MD , Li-Jun Chen MS , Szu-Chun Yang MD, PhD

Introduction

In the ADRIATIC trial, durvalumab consolidation therapy improved the overall survival and progression-free survival of patients with limited-stage SCLC responding to chemoradiotherapy. Based on the data, we aim to assess the cost-effectiveness of the therapy from the perspective of the Taiwanese health care sector.

Methods

Simulated patients with limited-stage SCLC responding to chemoradiotherapy were entered into a partitioned survival model comparing durvalumab consolidation with no consolidation therapy. The model inputs were derived from the ADRIATIC trial (survival outcomes, adverse events, and subsequent therapies), National Health Insurance payments (costs of physician visits, monitoring, drug administration, and end-of-life care), and the hospital cohort (utility values). A lifetime horizon and annual discount rate of 3% were applied. Subgroup, one-way deterministic, and probabilistic analyses were performed.

Results

Durvalumab consolidation therapy incurred an additional $91,734 USD and brought about 0.90 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $101,734 USD per QALY. The ICER remained higher than the willingness-to-pay threshold of $70,000 USD per QALY across most patient subgroups. The most influential factor for the ICER was the cost of durvalumab. If the 4-week drug cost could be reduced to $3893 USD, the ICER would fall below 70,000 USD per QALY. At the willingness-to-pay threshold, durvalumab consolidation therapy had a probability of 0.3% being cost-effective.

Conclusions

Our analysis suggests that durvalumab consolidation therapy is not cost-effective for patients with limited-stage SCLC. Reducing the price of the therapy enhances cost-effectiveness.
在ADRIATIC试验中,durvalumab巩固治疗改善了对放化疗有反应的有限期SCLC患者的总生存期和无进展生存期。基于这些数据,我们的目的是从台湾医疗保健部门的角度评估该疗法的成本效益。方法模拟对放化疗有反应的有限期SCLC患者进入分区生存模型,比较杜伐单抗巩固治疗和无巩固治疗。模型输入来自亚得里亚海试验(生存结果、不良事件和后续治疗)、国民健康保险支付(医生就诊、监测、药物管理和临终关怀的费用)和医院队列(效用值)。使用寿命期限和3%的年贴现率。进行亚组分析、单向确定性分析和概率分析。结果durvalumab巩固治疗增加了91,734美元,增加了0.90质量调整生命年(QALY),导致每个QALY的增量成本-效果比(ICER)为101,734美元。在大多数患者亚组中,ICER仍然高于每个QALY 7万美元的支付意愿阈值。对ICER影响最大的因素是杜伐单抗的成本。如果4周的药费可以降低到3893美元,ICER将降至每QALY 7万美元以下。在支付意愿阈值下,杜伐单抗巩固治疗的成本效益概率为0.3%。结论我们的分析表明,durvalumab巩固治疗对于有限期SCLC患者并不具有成本效益。降低治疗价格可以提高成本效益。
{"title":"Cost-Effectiveness of Durvalumab After Chemoradiotherapy in Limited-Stage SCLC","authors":"Sheng-Han Tsai MD ,&nbsp;Jui-Hung Tsai MD ,&nbsp;Li-Jun Chen MS ,&nbsp;Szu-Chun Yang MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100879","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100879","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>In the ADRIATIC trial, durvalumab consolidation therapy improved the overall survival and progression-free survival of patients with limited-stage SCLC responding to chemoradiotherapy. Based on the data, we aim to assess the cost-effectiveness of the therapy from the perspective of the Taiwanese health care sector.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Simulated patients with limited-stage SCLC responding to chemoradiotherapy were entered into a partitioned survival model comparing durvalumab consolidation with no consolidation therapy. The model inputs were derived from the ADRIATIC trial (survival outcomes, adverse events, and subsequent therapies), National Health Insurance payments (costs of physician visits, monitoring, drug administration, and end-of-life care), and the hospital cohort (utility values). A lifetime horizon and annual discount rate of 3% were applied. Subgroup, one-way deterministic, and probabilistic analyses were performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Durvalumab consolidation therapy incurred an additional $91,734 USD and brought about 0.90 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $101,734 USD per QALY. The ICER remained higher than the willingness-to-pay threshold of $70,000 USD per QALY across most patient subgroups. The most influential factor for the ICER was the cost of durvalumab. If the 4-week drug cost could be reduced to $3893 USD, the ICER would fall below 70,000 USD per QALY. At the willingness-to-pay threshold, durvalumab consolidation therapy had a probability of 0.3% being cost-effective.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our analysis suggests that durvalumab consolidation therapy is not cost-effective for patients with limited-stage SCLC. Reducing the price of the therapy enhances cost-effectiveness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17675,"journal":{"name":"JTO Clinical and Research Reports","volume":"6 11","pages":"Article 100879"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145425160","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
ICTIS: A Novel Scoring System to Assess the Inclusivity of Advanced NSCLC Immunotherapy Trials ICTIS:一种评估晚期NSCLC免疫治疗试验包容性的新型评分系统
IF 3.5 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100878
Kira Nguyen , Ashley Wei , Srinivas Govindan MD , Eziafa Oduah MD, PhD , Nagashree Seetharamu MD , Wint Yan Aung MD

Introduction

Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of NSCLC. However, trials that led to approval of these agents and ongoing trials often include overly included overly restrictive exclusion criteria, limiting access for a significant proportion of patients. We propose the immunotherapy clinical trial inclusivity score (ICTIS), a scoring system to evaluate trial eligibility criteria for inclusivity.

Methods

ICTIS was developed using national guidelines and validated with a Cohen’s Kappa statistics of 0.807. Eligibility criteria for advanced NSCLC immunotherapy trials on ClinicalTrials.gov were scored using a binary scale (0 = exclusive, 1 = inclusive), with higher summed scores indicating higher inclusivity. Mean ICTIS scores were compared across lines of treatment, start date, and trial phase.

Results

The mean ICTIS score among 142 trials was 12.7 (SD 4), with 28 trials (19.7%) rated as excellent and 34 trials (23.9%) rated poor. The most restrictive criteria were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (78.8%), organ function criteria of bilirubin (76.1%), and absolute neutrophil count (65.5%). First-line trials were significantly more exclusive to patients with pneumonitis history, with 64% exclusion versus 45.5% in second-line (χ2 = 4.917, p = 0.027). The platelet count requirement was more stringent in monotherapy trials. Inclusion of treated leptomeningeal disease improved over time (χ2 = 7.99, p = 0.018), but eligibility criteria remained consistent across different time periods, lines of treatment, and trial phases.

Conclusions

Despite the release of national guidelines, immunotherapy trials have overall retained restrictive eligibility criteria. ICTIS provides a standardized framework for evaluating inclusivity and can assist in designing immunotherapy studies to be more inclusive.
免疫疗法已经彻底改变了非小细胞肺癌的治疗。然而,导致这些药物获得批准的试验和正在进行的试验通常包括过度纳入过于严格的排除标准,限制了很大一部分患者的使用。我们提出了免疫治疗临床试验包容性评分(ICTIS),这是一个评估试验包容性资格标准的评分系统。方法sictis采用国家指南开发,采用0.807的Cohen’s Kappa统计量进行验证。临床试验网站ClinicalTrials.gov上晚期NSCLC免疫治疗试验的资格标准采用二元评分(0 =排他,1 =包容),总得分越高,包容性越高。比较不同治疗线、开始日期和试验阶段的平均ICTIS评分。结果142项试验的ICTIS平均评分为12.7 (SD 4),其中优28项(19.7%),差34项(23.9%)。最严格的标准是东部肿瘤合作组表现状态(78.8%)、胆红素器官功能标准(76.1%)和绝对中性粒细胞计数(65.5%)。一线试验对有肺炎史的患者的排他性更高,排他性为64%,二线试验为45.5% (χ2 = 4.917, p = 0.027)。单药治疗试验对血小板计数的要求更为严格。随着时间的推移,治疗后的轻脑膜疾病的纳入情况有所改善(χ2 = 7.99, p = 0.018),但不同时间段、治疗线和试验阶段的入选标准保持一致。尽管发布了国家指南,但免疫治疗试验总体上保留了限制性的资格标准。ICTIS提供了一个评估包容性的标准化框架,可以帮助设计更具包容性的免疫治疗研究。
{"title":"ICTIS: A Novel Scoring System to Assess the Inclusivity of Advanced NSCLC Immunotherapy Trials","authors":"Kira Nguyen ,&nbsp;Ashley Wei ,&nbsp;Srinivas Govindan MD ,&nbsp;Eziafa Oduah MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Nagashree Seetharamu MD ,&nbsp;Wint Yan Aung MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100878","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100878","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of NSCLC. However, trials that led to approval of these agents and ongoing trials often include overly included overly restrictive exclusion criteria, limiting access for a significant proportion of patients. We propose the immunotherapy clinical trial inclusivity score (ICTIS), a scoring system to evaluate trial eligibility criteria for inclusivity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>ICTIS was developed using national guidelines and validated with a Cohen’s Kappa statistics of 0.807. Eligibility criteria for advanced NSCLC immunotherapy trials on <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> were scored using a binary scale (0 = exclusive, 1 = inclusive), with higher summed scores indicating higher inclusivity. Mean ICTIS scores were compared across lines of treatment, start date, and trial phase.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean ICTIS score among 142 trials was 12.7 (SD 4), with 28 trials (19.7%) rated as excellent and 34 trials (23.9%) rated poor. The most restrictive criteria were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (78.8%), organ function criteria of bilirubin (76.1%), and absolute neutrophil count (65.5%). First-line trials were significantly more exclusive to patients with pneumonitis history, with 64% exclusion versus 45.5% in second-line (χ<sup>2</sup> = 4.917, <em>p</em> = 0.027). The platelet count requirement was more stringent in monotherapy trials. Inclusion of treated leptomeningeal disease improved over time (χ<sup>2</sup> = 7.99, <em>p</em> = 0.018), but eligibility criteria remained consistent across different time periods, lines of treatment, and trial phases.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Despite the release of national guidelines, immunotherapy trials have overall retained restrictive eligibility criteria. ICTIS provides a standardized framework for evaluating inclusivity and can assist in designing immunotherapy studies to be more inclusive.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17675,"journal":{"name":"JTO Clinical and Research Reports","volume":"6 11","pages":"Article 100878"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145425195","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patient-Reported Symptoms and Quality of Life With Sacituzumab Govitecan Versus Docetaxel in Metastatic NSCLC: The Phase 3, Randomized EVOKE-01 Trial Sacituzumab Govitecan与Docetaxel治疗转移性NSCLC患者报告的症状和生活质量:3期随机EVOKE-01试验
IF 3.5 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100929
Niels Reinmuth MD , Sébastien Couraud MD, PhD , Luis Paz-Ares MD, PhD , Marina Chiara Garassino MD , Shobhit Baijal MBBS, BSc , Davey Daniel MD , Pilar Garrido MD, PhD , Terufumi Kato MD , Ivor Percent MD , Achim Rittmeyer MD , Hector Soto Parra MD , Sabeen Mekan MD , Mira Patel PhD , Matthew Radford PhD , Eric Zhang PhD , Christopher G. Pelligra MS , Shien Guo PhD , Enriqueta Felip MD, PhD

Introduction

In the phase 3 EVOKE-01 trial (NCT05089734), sacituzumab govitecan (SG) exhibited a numerical improvement in overall survival and tolerability compared with docetaxel in patients with metastatic NSCLC previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and programmed cell death protein (ligand) 1 inhibitors, although results were not statistically significant. This analysis evaluated health-related quality of life (HRQoL) data from EVOKE-01.

Methods

Patients (N = 603) were randomized 1:1 to SG (n = 299) or docetaxel (n = 304) in 21-day cycles. HRQoL was assessed by the NSCLC Symptom Assessment Questionnaire (NSCLC-SAQ), European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life questionnaire–Core 30 (QLQ-C30), and EuroQol 5 Dimension 3-level questionnaire. Least square mean changes from baseline at week 25, time to first meaningful deterioration or death, and time to confirmed deterioration were analyzed.

Results

SG exhibited significantly and meaningfully better effects than docetaxel on NSCLC-SAQ shortness of breath (SoB), fatigue, total score, and on QLQ-C30 role functioning, fatigue, and dyspnea. Time to first meaningful deterioration or death favored SG over docetaxel for NSCLC-SAQ SoB (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval ]: 0.75 [0.61–0.91]), fatigue (0.70 [0.57–0.86]), and total score (0.80 [0.66–0.97]); QLQ-C30 fatigue (0.80 [0.66–0.96]) and dyspnea (0.74 [0.60–0.90]); and EuroQol visual analog scale (0.79 [0.65–0.96]). The time to confirmed deterioration favored SG over docetaxel for NSCLC-SAQ SoB (0.59 [0.44–0.77]) and fatigue (0.70 [0.52–0.95]), and QLQ-C30 fatigue (0.75 [0.59–0.95]).

Conclusions

These exploratory results suggest that SG may benefit HRQoL over docetaxel, supporting SG as an active therapeutic agent for metastatic NSCLC post platinum-based and programmed cell death protein (ligand) 1 inhibitor therapy.
在3期EVOKE-01试验(NCT05089734)中,与之前接受过铂基化疗和程序性细胞死亡蛋白(配体)1抑制剂治疗的转移性非小细胞肺癌患者相比,sacituzumab govitecan (SG)在总生存率和耐受性方面表现出数值改善,尽管结果没有统计学意义。该分析评估了来自EVOKE-01的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)数据。方法603例患者以1:1的比例随机分为SG (N = 299)和多西他赛(N = 304),每21 d为一个周期。HRQoL采用NSCLC症状评估问卷(NSCLC- saq)、欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷- core 30 (QLQ-C30)、EuroQol 5维度3级问卷进行评估。分析第25周基线的最小二乘平均值变化、到第一次有意义恶化或死亡的时间以及到确认恶化的时间。结果ssg在NSCLC-SAQ呼吸短促(SoB)、疲劳、总分、QLQ-C30功能功能、疲劳、呼吸困难等方面均优于多西他赛。距NSCLC-SAQ SoB首次有意义恶化或死亡的时间较多西他赛更有利于SG(风险比[95%可信区间]:0.75[0.61-0.91])、疲劳(0.70[0.57-0.86])和总分(0.80 [0.66-0.97]);QLQ-C30疲劳(0.80[0.66-0.96])和呼吸困难(0.74 [0.60-0.90]);EuroQol视觉模拟量表(0.79[0.65 ~ 0.96])。对于NSCLC-SAQ的SoB(0.59[0.44-0.77])和疲劳(0.70[0.52-0.95]),以及QLQ-C30的疲劳(0.75[0.59 - 0.95]),证实恶化的时间优于多西他赛。这些探索性结果表明,SG可能比多西他赛更有利于HRQoL,支持SG作为转移性非小细胞肺癌铂基和程序性细胞死亡蛋白(配体)1抑制剂治疗后的有效药物。
{"title":"Patient-Reported Symptoms and Quality of Life With Sacituzumab Govitecan Versus Docetaxel in Metastatic NSCLC: The Phase 3, Randomized EVOKE-01 Trial","authors":"Niels Reinmuth MD ,&nbsp;Sébastien Couraud MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Luis Paz-Ares MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Marina Chiara Garassino MD ,&nbsp;Shobhit Baijal MBBS, BSc ,&nbsp;Davey Daniel MD ,&nbsp;Pilar Garrido MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Terufumi Kato MD ,&nbsp;Ivor Percent MD ,&nbsp;Achim Rittmeyer MD ,&nbsp;Hector Soto Parra MD ,&nbsp;Sabeen Mekan MD ,&nbsp;Mira Patel PhD ,&nbsp;Matthew Radford PhD ,&nbsp;Eric Zhang PhD ,&nbsp;Christopher G. Pelligra MS ,&nbsp;Shien Guo PhD ,&nbsp;Enriqueta Felip MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100929","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100929","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>In the phase 3 EVOKE-01 trial (NCT05089734), sacituzumab govitecan (SG) exhibited a numerical improvement in overall survival and tolerability compared with docetaxel in patients with metastatic NSCLC previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and programmed cell death protein (ligand) 1 inhibitors, although results were not statistically significant. This analysis evaluated health-related quality of life (HRQoL) data from EVOKE-01.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients (N = 603) were randomized 1:1 to SG (n = 299) or docetaxel (n = 304) in 21-day cycles. HRQoL was assessed by the NSCLC Symptom Assessment Questionnaire (NSCLC-SAQ), European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life questionnaire–Core 30 (QLQ-C30), and EuroQol 5 Dimension 3-level questionnaire. Least square mean changes from baseline at week 25, time to first meaningful deterioration or death, and time to confirmed deterioration were analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>SG exhibited significantly and meaningfully better effects than docetaxel on NSCLC-SAQ shortness of breath (SoB), fatigue, total score, and on QLQ-C30 role functioning, fatigue, and dyspnea. Time to first meaningful deterioration or death favored SG over docetaxel for NSCLC-SAQ SoB (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval ]: 0.75 [0.61–0.91]), fatigue (0.70 [0.57–0.86]), and total score (0.80 [0.66–0.97]); QLQ-C30 fatigue (0.80 [0.66–0.96]) and dyspnea (0.74 [0.60–0.90]); and EuroQol visual analog scale (0.79 [0.65–0.96]). The time to confirmed deterioration favored SG over docetaxel for NSCLC-SAQ SoB (0.59 [0.44–0.77]) and fatigue (0.70 [0.52–0.95]), and QLQ-C30 fatigue (0.75 [0.59–0.95]).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These exploratory results suggest that SG may benefit HRQoL over docetaxel, supporting SG as an active therapeutic agent for metastatic NSCLC post platinum-based and programmed cell death protein (ligand) 1 inhibitor therapy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17675,"journal":{"name":"JTO Clinical and Research Reports","volume":"7 2","pages":"Article 100929"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145980962","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Preoperative Immune-Related Adverse Events in Resectable NSCLC Treated With Neoadjuvant Nivolumab Plus Chemotherapy: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis 可切除NSCLC术前新辅助纳武单抗加化疗免疫相关不良事件:一项多中心回顾性分析
IF 3.5 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100930
Takuya Watanabe MD , Kotaro Nomura MD , Shinkichi Takamori MD , Shinya Tane MD , Shuta Ohara MD , Hana Oiki MD , Shinya Katsumata MD , Makoto Endo MD , Satoshi Takamori MD , Marina Nakatsuka MD , Hironori Tenpaku MD , Ryuji Nakamura MD , Hirotsugu Notsuda MD , Kei Namba MD , Kentaro Minegishi MD , Masayuki Tanahashi MD , Masahiro Tsuboi MD , Junichi Soh MD , Mototsugu Shimokawa MD , Yasuhisa Ohde MD

Introduction

Preoperative immune-related adverse events (irAEs) during neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain poorly characterized. We aimed to evaluate their frequency, clinical impact, and associated risk factors.

Methods

This prespecified subanalysis of the multicenter CReGYT-04 Neo-Venus study retrospectively examined 130 patients with resectable NSCLC (stage IIA-IIIB, Union for International Cancer Control, eighth edition) treated with neoadjuvant nivolumab plus platinum-doublet chemotherapy. Clinical data were collected from 29 Japanese institutions. Patients were stratified according to the presence or absence of preoperative irAEs. Exploratory logistic regression was used to identify predictive factors.

Results

Preoperative irAEs were observed in 18.5% of the patients (n = 24). Patients with irAEs had a significantly lower neoadjuvant therapy completion rate (58.3% versus 92.5%, p <0.001) and a higher incidence of cancelled surgery (21.7% versus 5.8%, p = 0.029) than those without irAEs. There were 18 patients (78.3%) with irAEs who underwent surgical resection. R0 resection was achieved in 94.4%. The postoperative complication rates and length of hospital stay were comparable between the groups. The major pathologic response rate (38.9% versus 63.1%) and pathologic complete response rate (27.8% versus 36.8%) were lower in patients with preoperative irAEs. Tumor size greater than 3.8 cm and eosinophil fraction greater than or equal to 2.0% were identified as exploratory predictors of preoperative irAEs.

Conclusion

Preoperative irAEs occurred in approximately 20% of patients with resectable NSCLC treated with neoadjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy and were associated with treatment discontinuation and cancellation of surgery. Nevertheless, curative-intent surgery remained feasible and achieved acceptable perioperative outcomes in most patients with preoperative irAEs.
在可切除的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的新辅助化疗免疫治疗期间,术前免疫相关不良事件(irAEs)的特征仍然很差。我们的目的是评估其发生频率、临床影响和相关危险因素。方法:这项预先指定的多中心CReGYT-04 Neo-Venus研究回顾性分析了130例接受新辅助纳武单抗加铂双药化疗的可切除非小细胞肺癌(iiia - iiib期,国际癌症控制联盟,第八版)患者。临床数据收集自日本29家机构。根据术前是否有irae对患者进行分层。采用探索性逻辑回归确定预测因素。结果24例患者(18.5%)术后出现irae。irAEs患者的新辅助治疗完成率(58.3% vs . 92.5%, p <0.001)明显低于无irAEs患者,而取消手术的发生率(21.7% vs . 5.8%, p = 0.029)高于无irAEs患者。有18例(78.3%)的irae患者接受了手术切除。R0切除率为94.4%。术后并发症发生率和住院时间在两组间具有可比性。术前irae患者的主要病理缓解率(38.9%对63.1%)和病理完全缓解率(27.8%对36.8%)较低。肿瘤大小大于3.8 cm和嗜酸性粒细胞分数大于或等于2.0%被确定为术前irae的探索性预测因子。结论在接受新辅助纳武单抗加化疗的可切除NSCLC患者中,约20%的患者发生了术前irae,并且与治疗停止和手术取消有关。尽管如此,以治愈为目的的手术仍然是可行的,并且在大多数术前irae患者中获得了可接受的围手术期结果。
{"title":"Preoperative Immune-Related Adverse Events in Resectable NSCLC Treated With Neoadjuvant Nivolumab Plus Chemotherapy: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis","authors":"Takuya Watanabe MD ,&nbsp;Kotaro Nomura MD ,&nbsp;Shinkichi Takamori MD ,&nbsp;Shinya Tane MD ,&nbsp;Shuta Ohara MD ,&nbsp;Hana Oiki MD ,&nbsp;Shinya Katsumata MD ,&nbsp;Makoto Endo MD ,&nbsp;Satoshi Takamori MD ,&nbsp;Marina Nakatsuka MD ,&nbsp;Hironori Tenpaku MD ,&nbsp;Ryuji Nakamura MD ,&nbsp;Hirotsugu Notsuda MD ,&nbsp;Kei Namba MD ,&nbsp;Kentaro Minegishi MD ,&nbsp;Masayuki Tanahashi MD ,&nbsp;Masahiro Tsuboi MD ,&nbsp;Junichi Soh MD ,&nbsp;Mototsugu Shimokawa MD ,&nbsp;Yasuhisa Ohde MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100930","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100930","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Preoperative immune-related adverse events (irAEs) during neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain poorly characterized. We aimed to evaluate their frequency, clinical impact, and associated risk factors.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This prespecified subanalysis of the multicenter CReGYT-04 Neo-Venus study retrospectively examined 130 patients with resectable NSCLC (stage IIA-IIIB, Union for International Cancer Control, eighth edition) treated with neoadjuvant nivolumab plus platinum-doublet chemotherapy. Clinical data were collected from 29 Japanese institutions. Patients were stratified according to the presence or absence of preoperative irAEs. Exploratory logistic regression was used to identify predictive factors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Preoperative irAEs were observed in 18.5% of the patients (n = 24). Patients with irAEs had a significantly lower neoadjuvant therapy completion rate (58.3% versus 92.5%, <em>p</em> &lt;0.001) and a higher incidence of cancelled surgery (21.7% versus 5.8%, <em>p</em> = 0.029) than those without irAEs. There were 18 patients (78.3%) with irAEs who underwent surgical resection. R0 resection was achieved in 94.4%. The postoperative complication rates and length of hospital stay were comparable between the groups. The major pathologic response rate (38.9% versus 63.1%) and pathologic complete response rate (27.8% versus 36.8%) were lower in patients with preoperative irAEs. Tumor size greater than 3.8 cm and eosinophil fraction greater than or equal to 2.0% were identified as exploratory predictors of preoperative irAEs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Preoperative irAEs occurred in approximately 20% of patients with resectable NSCLC treated with neoadjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy and were associated with treatment discontinuation and cancellation of surgery. Nevertheless, curative-intent surgery remained feasible and achieved acceptable perioperative outcomes in most patients with preoperative irAEs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17675,"journal":{"name":"JTO Clinical and Research Reports","volume":"7 1","pages":"Article 100930"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145798011","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Direct Comparison of Tumor-Informed and Tumor-Naive Circulating Tumor DNA Assays for Recurrence Detection in Early-Stage NSCLC 早期非小细胞肺癌复发检测中肿瘤知情和肿瘤初始循环肿瘤DNA检测的直接比较
IF 3.5 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100927
Van-Anh Nguyen Hoang MSc , Ngoc Nguyen BSc , Tu Nguyen MSc , Duy Sinh Nguyen MD, PhD , Hoai-Nghia Nguyen PhD , Lan N. Tu PhD

Background

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising prognostic biomarker in early-stage NSCLC. The typical tumor-informed method of ctDNA testing requires tissue specimens of high quality, which is a challenge in developing countries. Tumor-naive approach is an alternative, but the performance of the two methods has not been directly compared using the same samples and platform.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed tumor and blood samples of patients with early-stage NSCLC enrolled in our published study. For analytical performance, pretreatment samples of 42 patients and 50 healthy donors were used to assess the accuracy of ctDNA detection. For clinical performance, 176 postsurgical blood samples of 76 patients with NSCLC were analyzed to compare the ctDNA status with recorded clinical recurrence. The tumor-informed method evaluated personalized mutations and a fixed 500-hotspot panel, whereas the tumor-naive method combined predesigned mutation panels and nonmutation genome-wide features of ctDNA.

Results

The tumor-informed assay had 66.7% sensitivity and 99.3% specificity for detecting ctDNA in early-stage NSCLC, higher than the tumor-naive assay with 52.6% sensitivity and 95.7% specificity. Postsurgical ctDNA status determined by both methods had significant prognostic value to predict recurrence ahead of clinical diagnosis (hazard ratio >100, p < 0.0001). Tumor-informed ctDNA achieved 86.7% sensitivity to detect recurrence, and the 500-hotspot panel improved the ctDNA detection rate for cases with suboptimal tissue specimens. Tumor-naive ctDNA had 80.0% sensitivity to detect recurrence, and integration of nonmutation features was crucial.

Conclusions

Both methods exhibited high accuracy in detecting residual cancer in NSCLC. The tumor-naive approach is a reliable alternative when high-quality tissue specimens are unavailable.
循环肿瘤DNA (ctDNA)是早期非小细胞肺癌预后的一种有前景的生物标志物。典型的肿瘤知情ctDNA检测方法需要高质量的组织标本,这在发展中国家是一个挑战。肿瘤初始方法是一种替代方法,但使用相同的样本和平台,两种方法的性能尚未直接进行比较。方法回顾性分析纳入本研究的早期非小细胞肺癌患者的肿瘤和血液样本。为了分析性能,使用42名患者和50名健康供体的预处理样本来评估ctDNA检测的准确性。在临床表现方面,我们分析了76例NSCLC患者的176份术后血液样本,将ctDNA状态与临床复发记录进行比较。肿瘤知情方法评估个性化突变和固定的500个热点面板,而肿瘤初始方法结合了预先设计的突变面板和ctDNA的非突变全基因组特征。结果肿瘤知情法检测早期NSCLC ctDNA的灵敏度为66.7%,特异性为99.3%,高于肿瘤未知情法检测ctDNA的灵敏度为52.6%,特异性为95.7%。两种方法检测的术后ctDNA状态对临床诊断前预测复发具有显著的预后价值(风险比>;100, p < 0.0001)。肿瘤知情ctDNA检测复发的敏感性达到86.7%,500热点面板提高了组织标本次优病例的ctDNA检出率。肿瘤初始ctDNA检测复发的敏感性为80.0%,非突变特征的整合至关重要。结论两种方法对非小细胞肺癌残留癌的检测准确率较高。当无法获得高质量的组织标本时,肿瘤原位方法是一种可靠的替代方法。
{"title":"Direct Comparison of Tumor-Informed and Tumor-Naive Circulating Tumor DNA Assays for Recurrence Detection in Early-Stage NSCLC","authors":"Van-Anh Nguyen Hoang MSc ,&nbsp;Ngoc Nguyen BSc ,&nbsp;Tu Nguyen MSc ,&nbsp;Duy Sinh Nguyen MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Hoai-Nghia Nguyen PhD ,&nbsp;Lan N. Tu PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100927","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100927","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising prognostic biomarker in early-stage NSCLC. The typical tumor-informed method of ctDNA testing requires tissue specimens of high quality, which is a challenge in developing countries. Tumor-naive approach is an alternative, but the performance of the two methods has not been directly compared using the same samples and platform.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively analyzed tumor and blood samples of patients with early-stage NSCLC enrolled in our published study. For analytical performance, pretreatment samples of 42 patients and 50 healthy donors were used to assess the accuracy of ctDNA detection. For clinical performance, 176 postsurgical blood samples of 76 patients with NSCLC were analyzed to compare the ctDNA status with recorded clinical recurrence. The tumor-informed method evaluated personalized mutations and a fixed 500-hotspot panel, whereas the tumor-naive method combined predesigned mutation panels and nonmutation genome-wide features of ctDNA.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The tumor-informed assay had 66.7% sensitivity and 99.3% specificity for detecting ctDNA in early-stage NSCLC, higher than the tumor-naive assay with 52.6% sensitivity and 95.7% specificity. Postsurgical ctDNA status determined by both methods had significant prognostic value to predict recurrence ahead of clinical diagnosis (hazard ratio &gt;100, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001). Tumor-informed ctDNA achieved 86.7% sensitivity to detect recurrence, and the 500-hotspot panel improved the ctDNA detection rate for cases with suboptimal tissue specimens. Tumor-naive ctDNA had 80.0% sensitivity to detect recurrence, and integration of nonmutation features was crucial.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Both methods exhibited high accuracy in detecting residual cancer in NSCLC. The tumor-naive approach is a reliable alternative when high-quality tissue specimens are unavailable.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17675,"journal":{"name":"JTO Clinical and Research Reports","volume":"7 1","pages":"Article 100927"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145798010","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
JTO Clinical and Research Reports
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1