Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy最新文献

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to dynamically assess variations in tunnel diameters following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and investigate correlations with patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and graft maturity based on signal-to-noise quotient (SNQ).

Methods: Tunnel diameter and tunnel position were measured using three-dimensional models derived from computed tomography (CT) data. Postoperative graft maturity and integration were evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Clinical outcomes were assessed through PROs, which included the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores and Lysholm scores. The correlation between tunnel enlargement extent, PROs and SNQ values, as well as correlations between confounding factors, tunnel diameter differences and SNQ were analyzed.

Results: A total of 73 participants underwent primary ACLR and scheduled follow-ups. At the segment of the articular aperture, the femoral tunnel was enlarged by 32.3% to 10.4 ± 1.6 mm (p < 0.05), and the tibial tunnel was widened by 17.2% to 9.6 ± 1.2 mm (p < 0.05) at the 6-month follow-up. At 1 year postoperatively, diameters at the articular aperture were not further increased on the femoral (n.s.) and tibial (n.s.) sides. In early postoperative follow-up, the femoral tunnel was anteriorly and distally shifted, coupled with posterior and lateral deviation involving the tibial side, exhibiting minimal migration at 1-year follow-up. The degree of tunnel widening was not correlated with PROs and SNQ values. Age, gender, body mass index (BMI), time from surgery to follow-up, concomitant injuries and autograft type were not correlated with tunnel diameter differences and SNQ.

Conclusions: The femoral and tibial bone tunnels exhibited eccentrical widening and gradually stabilized at 1 year following ACLR. Furthermore, the enlarged bone tunnels were not correlated with unsatisfied PROs and inferior graft maturity.

Level of evidence: Level IV.

Explorative data analysis (EDA) is a critical step in scientific projects, aiming to uncover valuable insights and patterns within data. Traditionally, EDA involves manual inspection, visualization, and various statistical methods. The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) has the potential to improve EDA, offering more sophisticated approaches that enhance its efficacy. This review explores how AI and ML algorithms can improve feature engineering and selection during EDA, leading to more robust predictive models and data-driven decisions. Tree-based models, regularized regression, and clustering algorithms were identified as key techniques. These methods automate feature importance ranking, handle complex interactions, perform feature selection, reveal hidden groupings, and detect anomalies. Real-world applications include risk prediction in total hip arthroplasty and subgroup identification in scoliosis patients. Recent advances in explainable AI and EDA automation show potential for further improvement. The integration of AI and ML into EDA accelerates tasks and uncovers sophisticated insights. However, effective utilization requires a deep understanding of the algorithms, their assumptions, and limitations, along with domain knowledge for proper interpretation. As data continues to grow, AI will play an increasingly pivotal role in EDA when combined with human expertise, driving more informed, data-driven decision-making across various scientific domains. Level of Evidence: Level V - Expert opinion.

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of surgical treatment of the discoid lateral meniscus with osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) through clinical and radiological evaluations, focusing on recurrent or postoperative OCD occurrence.

Methods: This retrospective study included patients with symptomatic discoid lateral meniscus with OCD (pre-OCD group) and without OCD (non-OCD group) who had undergone arthroscopic surgery with >5 years of follow-up. Age, sex, Lysholm score, Tegner activity scale, surgical procedure, and recurrent or postoperative OCD lesions were compared. The association between patient variables and postoperative OCD was determined using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results: Of the 95 knees, 15 (15%) were in the pre-OCD group. Healing was observed in 14/15 (93%) knees. Recurrent and postoperative OCDs were reported in 4/15 (28.5%) knees in the pre-OCD and 7/80 (8.8%) knees in the non-OCD groups at a mean of 3.2 ± 1.1 and 3.7 ± 1.2 years, respectively. Pre- and postoperative Tegner activity scale and Lysholm scores were higher in the pre-OCD group but similar to those in the non-OCD group. The incidence of recurrent OCD in the pre-OCD group was significantly higher than that of postoperative OCD in the non-OCD group. Younger patients (odds ratio, 0.49; p = 0.003) had an increased risk of experiencing recurrent or postoperative OCD in multivariate analysis. The optimal cutoff age for distinguishing recurrent or postoperative OCD was 9 years.

Conclusion: Surgical procedures for OCD lesions in the pre-OCD group were successful. Multivariate analysis identified age as a risk factor for recurrent or postoperative OCD; therefore, conservative treatment is recommended for patients with discoid lateral meniscus before preadolescence to prevent postoperative OCD occurrence.

Level of evidence: Level III.

Cucchi D., Di Giacomo G., Compagnoni R., et al. A high level of scientific evidence is available to guide treatment of primary shoulder stiffness: the SIAGASCOT consensus. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2024;32(1):37-46. doi:10.1002/ksa.12017

Three affiliations were listed for the last author, Laura De Girolamo, however, just one should have appeared. The following is Dr. De Girolamo's sole affiliation:

Laboratorio di Biotecnologie applicate all'Ortopedia, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy.

We apologize for this error.

Purpose: To determine whether femoral tunnel length (FTL) affects clinical or functional outcomes following primary Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with single-bundle quadriceps tendon autograft, both with and without a patellar bone block.

Methods: An electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases was carried out via OVID. Data pertaining to study characteristics, patient demographics, surgical techniques, femoral tunnel length, and subjective/objective clinical outcomes was abstracted. Studies were stratified into two groups based on FTL; a short femoral tunnel (S-FT) group of ≤25 mm, and a long femoral tunnel (L-FT) group of >25 mm. There was a high degree of heterogeneity between studies, prohibiting meta-analysis.

Results: Seven studies comprising 368 total patients with a mean age of 30.3 years (range: 23.4-34 years) were included for analysis. The S-FT group included 126 patients and the L-FT group 242 patients. Both groups demonstrated statistically significant postoperative improvements across both subjective and objective clinical and functional outcomes. Average complication rates were 11.9% (range: 0%-29%) in the S-FT group and 4.5% (range: 1%-14%) in the L-FT group. Ranges of re-rupture rates were 0%-2% and 0%-3% for the S-FT and L-FT groups, respectively (n.s.).

Conclusion: Both S-FT and L-FT groups demonstrated comparable postoperative outcomes following primary ACLR with single bundle quadriceps tendon autograft. There were slightly superior, although non-significant, outcomes reported with short femoral tunnel length, however, this may have been confounded by the variation in surgical technique used.

Level of evidence: IV.

Purpose: In symptomatic mid-sized focal chondral defects, autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) and minced cartilage implantation (MCI) offer two versatile treatment options. This study aimed to conduct a matched-patient analysis of patient-reported outcome measures to compare these two surgical treatment methods for focal chondral defects.

Methods: At the first centre, patients underwent a single-stage procedure in which autologous cartilage was hand-minced, implanted into the defect and fixed with fibrin glue. At the second centre, patients underwent AMIC, which was fixed in place with fibrin glue. All patients were seen 2-4 years postoperatively. Postoperative outcomes were assessed using the visual analogue scale for pain (VAS), the Lysholm score and the five domains of the knee osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS). Patients from each surgical centre were matched by age, sex, defect size and defect localisation.

Results: In total, 48 patients from two surgical centres (24 from each site) were matched for sex, age (MCI 30.3 ± 14.9 years vs. AMIC 30.8 ± 13.7 years) and defect size (MCI 2.49 ± 1.5 cm² vs. AMIC 2.65 ± 1.1 cm²). Significantly better scores in the AMIC cohort were noted for VAS (p = 0.004), Lysholm (p = 0.043) and the KOOS subscales for pain (p = 0.016) and quality of life (p = 0.036). There was a significantly greater proportion of positive responders for Lysholm in the AMIC group (92%) compared with the MCI group (64%).

Conclusions: The AMIC procedure delivers superior patient outcomes compared with hand-minced autologous cartilage implantation. These are mid-term outcomes, with follow-up between 2 and 4 years.

Level of evidence: Level III.

Purpose: The purpose of the study is to evaluate the healing potential of a full-thickness tendon defect in the rotator cuff of rabbits using a bioabsorbable scaffold impregnated with bone marrow-mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) or rotator cuff-derived mesenchymal stem cells (RC-MSCs).

Methods: Sixteen adult rabbits were subjected to a full-thickness rotator cuff deficit. Rabbits were randomly assigned to four groups of four animals. In Group 0 (control), the deficit was left untreated. In Group 1, the deficit was treated with a single synthetic scaffold alone. In Group 2, the deficit was treated with the previous scaffold loaded with allogeneic BM-MSCs. In Group 3, the deficit was treated with the previous scaffold loaded with allogenic RC-MSCs. After animal sacrifice, tissue samples were subjected to histological and immunohistochemical analysis.

Results: Group 1 showed the highest mean tendon maturing score (15.3 ± 0.9) postoperatively, being significantly higher, in comparison to groups 0, 2 and 3 (p = 0.01, 0.02 and 0.01, respectively). Group 1 showed the highest mean collagen I/collagen III ratio (1.4 ± 0.8) postoperatively but without any statistical significance.

Conclusions: The utilization of MSCs in rotator cuff repair in a rabbit model has not been associated with an enhancement in tendon healing in 16 weeks postoperatively, in comparison to controls and bioabsorbable scaffolds. The addition of MSCs does not result in better rotator cuff healing.

Level of evidence: Not applicable. This is an animal study.

Recognizing and addressing the controversies surrounding using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is crucial for enhancing evaluation standards in clinical studies in orthopedics, sports medicine, and rehabilitation. The article comprehensively described the challenges of using PROMs to evaluate knee conditions in these fields. Apart from defining and characterizing patient-reported outcomes and their measures, the article discussed controversies around them, such as using them as primary outcomes. It highlighted the importance of standardizing and validating PROMs. Several initiatives taken to improve the selection of appropriate outcomes for clinical research purposes were described. Additionally, the potential of technology, mainly digital health tools and mobile applications, was mentioned in the context of enhancing the collection and analysis of PROMs. The article also raised the issue of the readability of PROMs, defined as the ease with which they can be read and understood by patients. The article concluded that adopting a complementary approach to treatment evaluation by integrating subjective and objective measures is imperative for accurately assessing efficacy. This comprehensive approach provides a more holistic understanding of patient outcomes, forms the foundation for evidence-based medicine, and informs future healthcare policies. Proactive measures are urgently needed to address concerns and improve the reliability and validity of PROMs for clinical practice and research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: level V.