Background
Despite the availability of several validated therapies, the optimal second-line regimen for EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) failure remains uncertain.
Methods
The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251157131). We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and conference proceedings (to Oct 20, 2025) for phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and the incidence of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).
Results
Eleven RCTs (3,650 patients, seven regimens) were included. Compared to chemotherapy, sacituzumab tirumotecan (SacTMT), amivantamab plus chemotherapy (Chemo-Ami), and chemo-immunotherapy plus anti-angiogenic agent (Chemo-IO-anti-VEGF) demonstrated superior PFS (HR 0.49, 0.48, 0.53, respectively) and OS (HR 0.60, 0.73, 0.83, respectively). SacTMT also significantly improved OS over chemo-immunotherapy (HR 0.68, 95 % CrI 0.48 to 0.95). Regarding safety, Chemo-Ami carried higher grade ≥3 TRAEs risk (OR 2.83, 95 % CrI 1.01 to 7.90) versus chemotherapy, while SacTMT and Chemo-IO-anti-VEGF demonstrated toxicity comparable to chemotherapy.
Conclusions
SacTMT, Chemo-Ami, and Chemo-IO-anti-VEGF offer superior efficacy over chemotherapy for EGFR-mutant NSCLC after TKI progression. SacTMT and Chemo-IO-anti-VEGF may have more favorable safety profiles than Chemo-Ami. This comparative evidence helps to inform clinical decision-making.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
