首页 > 最新文献

Lung Cancer最新文献

英文 中文
1000 Robotic-assisted lobectomies for primary lung cancer: 16 years single center experience 1000例机器人辅助肺叶切除术治疗原发性肺癌:16年单中心经验。
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-31 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107903

Objective

This study aimed at describing our high-volume single center experience in robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) to evaluate short outcome and feasibility of the technique, the adequacy of oncological results, and the learning curve.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed data from 1000 consecutive patients who underwent lobectomy and systematic lymphadenectomy for primary lung cancer using RATS approach between May 2007 and May 2023.

Results

Nine-hundred ninety-seven patients (99.7 %) underwent lobectomy, whereas 3 (0.03 %) patients bilobectomy. Conversion rate to open surgery was 3.7 %. Minor complications occurred in 213 (21.3 %) patients, major complications in 29 patients (2.9 %). The 30-day and 90-day operative mortality was 0 % and 0.1 %, respectively. The median number of N1 + N2 stations resected was 5 (range 0–9), with a median number of 17 of N1 + N2 lymph nodes resected (range 0–55). The oncological outcome was evaluated only on the subgroup of patients (n = 895) with non-small cell lung cancer. Pathological lymph node upstaging from cN0 to pN1/pN2 was evident in 147 patients (17.3 %): 9 % from cN0 to pN1 and 7.1 % from cN0 to pN2. With a median follow-up of 3.9, 5-year OS and DFS were respectively 89.3 % and 83.6 % for stage I, 74 % and 66.5 % for stage II, and 61 % and 36.4 % for stage IIIA.

Conclusions

Better vision and excellent instrument maneuverability of the robotic surgical system allowed excellent results in terms of early, adequate oncological outcome comparable to open surgery literature data, and acceptable learning curve.

Ultramini abstract

1000 consecutive patients who underwent lobectomy and systematic lymphadenectomy for primary lung cancer using RATS approach have been analyzed with the aim to describe our high-volume single center experience, and to evaluate short outcome and feasibility of the technique, the adequacy of oncological results, and the learning curve.

目的:本研究旨在描述我们高容量单中心机器人辅助胸腔镜手术(RATS)的经验,以评估该技术的短期疗效和可行性、肿瘤学结果的充分性以及学习曲线:我们回顾性分析了2007年5月至2023年5月期间使用RATS方法接受肺叶切除术和系统淋巴结切除术治疗原发性肺癌的1000名连续患者的数据:97名患者(99.7%)接受了肺叶切除术,3名患者(0.03%)接受了双叶切除术。转为开放手术的比例为 3.7%。213名患者(21.3%)出现了轻微并发症,29名患者(2.9%)出现了严重并发症。30天和90天手术死亡率分别为0%和0.1%。切除的N1+N2淋巴结中位数为5个(范围0-9),切除的N1+N2淋巴结中位数为17个(范围0-55)。仅对非小细胞肺癌患者亚组(n = 895)的肿瘤预后进行了评估。病理淋巴结上移从 cN0 到 pN1/pN2 的患者有 147 例(17.3%):9%从cN0升至pN1,7.1%从cN0升至pN2。中位随访时间为3.9年,I期患者的5年OS和DFS分别为89.3%和83.6%,II期患者的5年OS和DFS分别为74%和66.5%,IIIA期患者的5年OS和DFS分别为61%和36.4%:奥特里米尼摘要:我们对1000例使用RATS方法接受肺叶切除术和系统淋巴腺切除术的原发性肺癌患者进行了分析,旨在描述我们高容量单中心的经验,并评估该技术的短期疗效和可行性、肿瘤结果的充分性以及学习曲线。
{"title":"1000 Robotic-assisted lobectomies for primary lung cancer: 16 years single center experience","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107903","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107903","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed at describing our high-volume single center experience in robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) to evaluate short outcome and feasibility of the technique, the adequacy of oncological results, and the learning curve.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively analyzed data from 1000 consecutive patients who underwent lobectomy and systematic lymphadenectomy for primary lung cancer using RATS approach between May 2007 and May 2023.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Nine-hundred ninety-seven patients (99.7 %) underwent lobectomy, whereas 3 (0.03 %) patients bilobectomy. Conversion rate to open surgery was 3.7 %. Minor complications occurred in 213 (21.3 %) patients, major complications in 29 patients (2.9 %). The 30-day and 90-day operative mortality was 0 % and 0.1 %, respectively. The median number of N1 + N2 stations resected was 5 (range 0–9), with a median number of 17 of N1 + N2 lymph nodes resected (range 0–55). The oncological outcome was evaluated only on the subgroup of patients (n = 895) with non-small cell lung cancer. Pathological lymph node upstaging from cN0 to pN1/pN2 was evident in 147 patients (17.3 %): 9 % from cN0 to pN1 and 7.1 % from cN0 to pN2. With a median follow-up of 3.9, 5-year OS and DFS were respectively 89.3 % and 83.6 % for stage I, 74 % and 66.5 % for stage II, and 61 % and 36.4 % for stage IIIA.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Better vision and excellent instrument maneuverability of the robotic surgical system allowed excellent results in terms of early, adequate oncological outcome comparable to open surgery literature data, and acceptable learning curve.</p></div><div><h3>Ultramini abstract</h3><p>1000 consecutive patients who underwent lobectomy and systematic lymphadenectomy for primary lung cancer using RATS approach have been analyzed with the aim to describe our high-volume single center experience, and to evaluate short outcome and feasibility of the technique, the adequacy of oncological results, and the learning curve.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141889682","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A predictive model for prognostic risk stratification of early-stage NSCLC based on clinicopathological and miRNA panel 基于临床病理和 miRNA 面板的早期 NSCLC 预后风险分层预测模型。
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107902

Objective

The 5-year survival rate of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still not optimistic. We aimed to construct prognostic tools using clinicopathological (CP) and serum 8-miRNA panel to predict the risk of overall survival (OS) in early-stage NSCLC.

Materials and methods

A total of 799 patients with early-stage NSCLC, treated between April 2008 and September 2019, were included in this study. A sub-group of patients with serum samples, 280, were analyzed for miRNA profiling. The primary endpoint of the study was OS. The CP panel for prognosis was developed using multivariate and forward stepwise selection analyses. The serum 8-miRNA panel was developed using the miRNAs that were significant for prognosis, screened using real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) followed by differential, univariate and Cox regression analyses. The combined model was developed using CP panel and serum 8-miRNA panel. The predictive performance of the panels and the combined model was evaluated using the area under curve (AUC) values of receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

Result

The prognostic panels and the combined model (comprising CP panel and serum 8-miRNA panel) was used to classify the patients into high-risk and low-risk groups. The OS rates of these two groups were significantly different (P<0.05). The two panels had higher AUC than the two guidelines, and the combined model had the highest AUC. The AUC of the combined model (AUC=0.788; 95 %CI 0.706–0.871) was better than that of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline (AUC=0.601; 95 %CI 0.505–0.697) and Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) guideline (AUC=0.614; 95 %CI 0.520–0.708).

Conclusion

The combined model based on CP panel and serum 8-miRNA panel allows better prognostic risk stratification of patients with early-stage NSCLC to predict risk of OS.

目的:早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的 5 年生存率仍然不容乐观:早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的5年生存率仍不容乐观。我们旨在利用临床病理(CP)和血清8-miRNA面板构建预后工具,以预测早期NSCLC的总生存(OS)风险:本研究共纳入2008年4月至2019年9月期间接受治疗的799例早期NSCLC患者。对其中280例患者的血清样本进行了miRNA图谱分析。研究的主要终点是OS。通过多变量分析和前向逐步选择分析,建立了用于预后的 CP 面板。利用实时定量 PCR(qPCR)筛选出对预后有显著影响的 miRNA,然后进行差异分析、单变量分析和 Cox 回归分析,从而建立了血清 8-miRNA 面板。使用 CP 面板和血清 8-miRNA 面板建立了组合模型。使用接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)的曲线下面积(AUC)值和 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析评估了预后面板和组合模型的预测性能:结果:预后面板和组合模型(包括 CP 面板和血清 8-miRNA 面板)可用于将患者分为高危和低危两组。两组患者的 OS 率有显著差异(PConclusion:基于CP面板和血清8-miRNA面板的联合模型能更好地对早期NSCLC患者进行预后风险分层,预测OS风险。
{"title":"A predictive model for prognostic risk stratification of early-stage NSCLC based on clinicopathological and miRNA panel","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107902","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107902","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The 5-year survival rate of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still not optimistic. We aimed to construct prognostic tools using clinicopathological (CP) and serum 8-miRNA panel to predict the risk of overall survival (OS) in early-stage NSCLC.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>A total of 799 patients with early-stage NSCLC, treated between April 2008 and September 2019, were included in this study. A sub-group of patients with serum samples, 280, were analyzed for miRNA profiling. The primary endpoint of the study was OS. The CP panel for prognosis was developed using multivariate and forward stepwise selection analyses. The serum 8-miRNA panel was developed using the miRNAs that were significant for prognosis, screened using real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) followed by differential, univariate and Cox regression analyses. The combined model was developed using CP panel and serum 8-miRNA panel. The predictive performance of the panels and the combined model was evaluated using the area under curve (AUC) values of receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Result</h3><p>The prognostic panels and the combined model (comprising CP panel and serum 8-miRNA panel) was used to classify the patients into high-risk and low-risk groups. The OS rates of these two groups were significantly different (<em>P</em>&lt;0.05). The two panels had higher AUC than the two guidelines, and the combined model had the highest AUC. The AUC of the combined model (AUC=0.788; 95 %CI 0.706–0.871) was better than that of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline (AUC=0.601; 95 %CI 0.505–0.697) and Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) guideline (AUC=0.614; 95 %CI 0.520–0.708).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The combined model based on CP panel and serum 8-miRNA panel allows better prognostic risk stratification of patients with early-stage NSCLC to predict risk of OS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141913175","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Befotertinib for patients with pretreated EGFR T790M mutated locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC: Final overall survival results from a phase 2 trial 贝福替尼用于治疗表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)T790M突变的局部晚期或转移性NSCLC患者:2期试验的最终总生存期结果
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107901

Background

In the initial analysis of a pivotal phase 2 single-arm study (NCT03861156), befotertinib (D-0316) showed clinical benefit with a manageable safety profile in pretreated patients with EGFR T790M mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including those with brain metastases.

Methods

Eligible patients received oral befotertinib of 50 mg (cohort A) or 75–100 mg (cohort B) once daily until disease progression, withdrawal of informed consent, or death. The primary endpoint for the initial analysis was objective response rate (ORR) assessed by an independent review committee. OS and safety were secondary endpoints. Herein, we present the final OS and safety data.

Results

A total of 176 patients in cohort A and 290 patients in cohort B were finally enrolled. At data cutoff (May 31, 2023), the median duration of follow-up was 47.9 months (95 % CI: 47.1–48.3) in cohort A and 36.7 months (35.9–37.9) in cohort B. The median OS was 23.9 months (95 % CI: 21.1–27.2) in cohort A and 31.5 months (26.8–35.3) in cohort B. The median OS for patients with and without brain metastasis in cohort A was 18.6 months (95 % CI: 14.9–26.3) and 26.4 months (95 % CI: 23.0–29.0), respectively. In cohort B, these data was 23.0 months (95 % CI: 18.6–29.1) and 35.5 months (95 % CI: 29.3–NE), respectively. The safety profile of befotertinib remained consistent with previous data. Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events were 38.1 % in the cohort A and 50.3 % in the cohort B, and 22.2 % and 31.7 % were related to the study drug.

Conclusion

Befotertinib demonstrated a more profound OS benefit compared to other 3rd-generation EGFR TKI, despite that cross trial data comparison should be interpreted with caution. The safety profile was manageable and consistent with previously report data in pretreated patients with confirmed T790M mutation-positive NSCLC.

背景在一项关键性2期单臂研究(NCT03861156)的初步分析中,贝福替尼(D-0316)对表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)T790M突变的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者(包括脑转移患者)的预处理显示出临床获益和可控的安全性。方法符合条件的患者每天一次口服50毫克(A组)或75-100毫克(B组)贝福替尼,直至疾病进展、撤销知情同意或死亡。初步分析的主要终点是由独立审查委员会评估的客观反应率(ORR)。OS和安全性是次要终点。结果 A组共有176名患者入组,B组共有290名患者入组。截至数据截止日(2023 年 5 月 31 日),A 组的中位随访时间为 47.9 个月(95 % CI:47.1-48.3),B 组为 36.7 个月(35.9-37.9)。在 A 组群中,有脑转移和无脑转移患者的中位 OS 分别为 18.6 个月(95 % CI:14.9-26.3)和 26.4 个月(95 % CI:23.0-29.0)。在队列 B 中,这些数据分别为 23.0 个月(95 % CI:18.6-29.1)和 35.5 个月(95 % CI:29.3-NE)。贝福替尼的安全性与之前的数据保持一致。A组和B组分别有38.1%和50.3%的患者出现3级或3级以上的治疗突发不良事件,其中22.2%和31.7%与研究药物有关。该药的安全性是可控的,与之前报告的T790M突变阳性NSCLC患者的预处理数据一致。
{"title":"Befotertinib for patients with pretreated EGFR T790M mutated locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC: Final overall survival results from a phase 2 trial","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107901","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107901","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In the initial analysis of a pivotal phase 2 single-arm study (NCT03861156), befotertinib (D-0316) showed clinical benefit with a manageable safety profile in pretreated patients with EGFR T790M mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including those with brain metastases.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Eligible patients received oral befotertinib of 50 mg (cohort A) or 75–100 mg (cohort B) once daily until disease progression, withdrawal of informed consent, or death. The primary endpoint for the initial analysis was objective response rate (ORR) assessed by an independent review committee. OS and safety were secondary endpoints. Herein, we present the final OS and safety data.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 176 patients in cohort A and 290 patients in cohort B were finally enrolled. At data cutoff (May 31, 2023), the median duration of follow-up was 47.9 months (95 % CI: 47.1–48.3) in cohort A and 36.7 months (35.9–37.9) in cohort B. The median OS was 23.9 months (95 % CI: 21.1–27.2) in cohort A and 31.5 months (26.8–35.3) in cohort B. The median OS for patients with and without brain metastasis in cohort A was 18.6 months (95 % CI: 14.9–26.3) and 26.4 months (95 % CI: 23.0–29.0), respectively. In cohort B, these data was 23.0 months (95 % CI: 18.6–29.1) and 35.5 months (95 % CI: 29.3–NE), respectively. The safety profile of befotertinib remained consistent with previous data. Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events were 38.1 % in the cohort A and 50.3 % in the cohort B, and 22.2 % and 31.7 % were related to the study drug.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Befotertinib demonstrated a more profound OS benefit compared to other 3rd-generation EGFR TKI, despite that cross trial data comparison should be interpreted with caution. The safety profile was manageable and consistent with previously report data in pretreated patients with confirmed T790M mutation-positive NSCLC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141844924","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Asbestos Surveillance Program Aachen (ASPA): Cancer mortality among asbestos exposed power industry workers 亚琛石棉监测计划(ASPA):接触石棉的电力行业工人的癌症死亡率
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107899

Background

The time between initial asbestos exposure and asbestos-related disease can span several decades. The Asbestos Surveillance Program aims to detect early asbestos-related diseases in a cohort of 8,565 power industry workers formerly exposed to asbestos.

Research question

How does asbestos exposure patterns affect cancer mortality and the duration of latency until death?

Methods

A mortality follow-up was conducted with available vital status for 8,476 participants (99 %) and available death certificates for 89.9 % of deceased participants. Standardised mortality ratios (SMR) were calculated for asbestos-related cancers. The SMR of mesothelioma and lung cancer were stratified by exposure duration, cumulative asbestos exposure and smoking. The effect of age at first exposure, cumulative asbestos exposure and smoking on the duration of latency until death was examined using multiple linear regression analysis.

Results

The mortality risk of mesothelioma (n = 104) increased with cumulative asbestos exposure but not with exposure duration; the highest mortality (SMR: 23.20; 95 % CI: 17.62–29.99) was observed in participants who performed activities with short extremely high exposures (steam turbine revisions). Lung cancer mortality (n = 215) was not increased (SMR: 1.03; 95 % CI: 0.89–1.17). Median latency until death was 46 (15–63) years for mesothelioma and 44 (15–70) years for lung cancer and deaths occurred between age 64 and 82 years. Latency until death was not influenced by age at first exposure, cumulative exposure, or smoking.

Conclusion

Cumulative dose seems to be more appropriate than exposure duration for estimating the risk of mesothelioma death. Additionally, exposure with high cumulative doses in short time should be considered. Since only lung cancer mortality, not incidence, was recorded in this study, lung cancer risk associated with asbestos exposure could not be assessed and the lung cancer mortality was lower than expected probably due to screening effects and improved treatments. The critical time window of death from asbestos-related cancer is between the seventh and ninth decade of life. Future studies should further explore the concept of latency, especially since large ranges are reported throughout the literature.

背景从最初接触石棉到患上石棉相关疾病之间的时间可能长达几十年。研究问题石棉暴露模式如何影响癌症死亡率和死亡前的潜伏期?方法对 8476 名参与者(99%)的生命体征和 89.9% 死亡参与者的死亡证明进行了死亡率跟踪。计算了石棉相关癌症的标准化死亡率(SMR)。间皮瘤和肺癌的标准死亡率按接触时间、累积石棉接触量和吸烟情况进行了分层。结果间皮瘤的死亡风险(n = 104)随累积石棉暴露时间的增加而增加,但不随暴露时间的增加而增加;在从事短期极高暴露活动(蒸汽轮机改装)的参与者中观察到的死亡率最高(SMR:23.20;95 % CI:17.62-29.99)。肺癌死亡率(n = 215)没有增加(SMR:1.03;95 % CI:0.89-1.17)。间皮瘤的死亡潜伏期中位数为 46(15-63)年,肺癌的死亡潜伏期中位数为 44(15-70)年,死亡年龄在 64-82 岁之间。死亡潜伏期不受首次暴露年龄、累积暴露或吸烟的影响。此外,应考虑短时间内接触高累积剂量的情况。由于本研究只记录了肺癌死亡率而非发病率,因此无法评估与接触石棉有关的肺癌风险,而肺癌死亡率低于预期的原因可能是筛查效果和治疗方法的改进。与石棉相关的癌症致死的关键时间窗口是在生命的第七个十年到第九个十年之间。今后的研究应进一步探讨潜伏期的概念,特别是因为文献中报告的潜伏期范围很大。
{"title":"Asbestos Surveillance Program Aachen (ASPA): Cancer mortality among asbestos exposed power industry workers","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107899","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107899","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The time between initial asbestos exposure and asbestos-related disease can span several decades. The Asbestos Surveillance Program aims to detect early asbestos-related diseases in a cohort of 8,565 power industry workers formerly exposed to asbestos.</p></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><p>How does asbestos exposure patterns affect cancer mortality and the duration of latency until death?</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A mortality follow-up was conducted with available vital status for 8,476 participants (99 %) and available death certificates for 89.9 % of deceased participants. Standardised mortality ratios (SMR) were calculated for asbestos-related cancers. The SMR of mesothelioma and lung cancer were stratified by exposure duration, cumulative asbestos exposure and smoking. The effect of age at first exposure, cumulative asbestos exposure and smoking on the duration of latency until death was examined using multiple linear regression analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mortality risk of mesothelioma (n = 104) increased with cumulative asbestos exposure but not with exposure duration; the highest mortality (SMR: 23.20; 95 % CI: 17.62–29.99) was observed in participants who performed activities with short extremely high exposures (steam turbine revisions). Lung cancer mortality (n = 215) was not increased (SMR: 1.03; 95 % CI: 0.89–1.17). Median latency until death was 46 (15–63) years for mesothelioma and 44 (15–70) years for lung cancer and deaths occurred between age 64 and 82 years. Latency until death was not influenced by age at first exposure, cumulative exposure, or smoking.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Cumulative dose seems to be more appropriate than exposure duration for estimating the risk of mesothelioma death. Additionally, exposure with high cumulative doses in short time should be considered. Since only lung cancer mortality, not incidence, was recorded in this study, lung cancer risk associated with asbestos exposure could not be assessed and the lung cancer mortality was lower than expected probably due to screening effects and improved treatments. The critical time window of death from asbestos-related cancer is between the seventh and ninth decade of life. Future studies should further explore the concept of latency, especially since large ranges are reported throughout the literature.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141852423","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prognostic impact of Interleukin-8 levels in lung cancer: A meta-analysis and a bioinformatic validation 白细胞介素-8水平对肺癌预后的影响:荟萃分析和生物信息学验证
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107893

Background

High interleukin-8 (IL-8) levels have been linked to poor prognosis in lung cancer, but conclusive data are lacking.

Materials and methods

A comprehensive search was conducted on April 1st, 2023, from electronic databases, focusing on studies with IL-8 expression evaluations and the availability of hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) or adequate data for their estimation. Then, we examined IL-8 and CXCR1 RNA-seq data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset, and we correlated these data with OS.

Results

Among 2655 produced records, 10 manuscripts involving both non-small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer, were included in the analysis. Two manuscripts and one study included two and three different cohorts, respectively, for a total of 14 cohorts of patients. Overall, 4 cohorts evaluated IL-8 levels in patients treated with chemotherapy, 3 cohorts immunotherapy, 2 cohorts surgical patients and 4 cohorts other treatments; 1 cohort was removed, as the type of treatments was lacking. The 12 cohorts included in the OS analysis revealed that patients with high IL-8 levels have a lower OS probability, as compared to patients with low IL-8 levels (HR=1.75, 95 % CI 1.36–2.26). No significant difference between patients with high and low IL-8 levels was observed in the 8 cohorts available for PFS analysis. Sensitivity analysis according to treatment revealed significant PFS and OS differences for patients treated with chemotherapy or immunotherapy. Analysis of RNA-seq data from TCGA, confirmed the correlation between high IL-8 and CXCR1 expression and worse OS in patients with resected lung cancer.

Conclusion

To the best of our knowledge, this study represents the first meta-analysis demonstrating a negative prognostic impact of high IL-8 level in lung cancer, particularly in patients treated with chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy.

背景:高白细胞介素-8(IL-8)水平与肺癌的不良预后有关,但目前尚缺乏确凿的数据:2023年4月1日,我们在电子数据库中进行了一次全面检索,重点是对IL-8表达进行评估,并提供总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和无病生存期(DFS)的危险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI)或足够的数据用于估算的研究。然后,我们研究了癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)数据集中的IL-8和CXCR1 RNA-seq数据,并将这些数据与OS相关联:在2655条记录中,有10篇同时涉及非小细胞肺癌和小细胞肺癌的稿件被纳入分析。两篇稿件和一项研究分别包含了两个和三个不同的队列,共计 14 个队列的患者。总体而言,4个队列评估了化疗患者的IL-8水平,3个队列评估了免疫疗法患者的IL-8水平,2个队列评估了外科手术患者的IL-8水平,4个队列评估了其他疗法患者的IL-8水平。纳入 OS 分析的 12 个队列显示,与 IL-8 水平低的患者相比,IL-8 水平高的患者 OS 概率较低(HR=1.75,95 % CI 1.36-2.26)。在可进行PFS分析的8个队列中,未观察到IL-8水平高和低的患者之间存在明显差异。根据治疗方法进行的敏感性分析显示,接受化疗或免疫治疗的患者的 PFS 和 OS 有明显差异。来自TCGA的RNA-seq数据分析证实了IL-8和CXCR1高表达与切除肺癌患者较差的OS之间的相关性:据我们所知,该研究是首个证明高IL-8水平对肺癌预后有负面影响的荟萃分析,尤其是在接受化疗和/或免疫治疗的患者中。
{"title":"Prognostic impact of Interleukin-8 levels in lung cancer: A meta-analysis and a bioinformatic validation","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107893","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107893","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>High interleukin-8 (IL-8) levels have been linked to poor prognosis in lung cancer, but conclusive data are lacking.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>A comprehensive search was conducted on April 1st, 2023, from electronic databases, focusing on studies with IL-8 expression evaluations and the availability of hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) or adequate data for their estimation. Then, we examined IL-8 and CXCR1 RNA-seq data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset, and we correlated these data with OS.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 2655 produced records, 10 manuscripts involving both non-small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer, were included in the analysis. Two manuscripts and one study included two and three different cohorts, respectively, for a total of 14 cohorts of patients. Overall, 4 cohorts evaluated IL-8 levels in patients treated with chemotherapy, 3 cohorts immunotherapy, 2 cohorts surgical patients and 4 cohorts other treatments; 1 cohort was removed, as the type of treatments was lacking. The 12 cohorts included in the OS analysis revealed that patients with high IL-8 levels have a lower OS probability, as compared to patients with low IL-8 levels (HR=1.75, 95 % CI 1.36–2.26). No significant difference between patients with high and low IL-8 levels was observed in the 8 cohorts available for PFS analysis. Sensitivity analysis according to treatment revealed significant PFS and OS differences for patients treated with chemotherapy or immunotherapy. Analysis of RNA-seq data from TCGA, confirmed the correlation between high IL-8 and CXCR1 expression and worse OS in patients with resected lung cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>To the best of our knowledge, this study represents the first <em>meta</em>-analysis demonstrating a negative prognostic impact of high IL-8 level in lung cancer, particularly in patients treated with chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169500224004276/pdfft?md5=51ea460145370293504ec1e00a8a0097&pid=1-s2.0-S0169500224004276-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141620310","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of PD-L1 expression on the efficacy of first-line crizotinib in advanced ROS1-rearranged NSCLC PD-L1表达对克唑替尼一线治疗晚期ROS1重排NSCLC疗效的影响
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107892

Background

The predictive value of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression for the efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with advanced ROS1-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains underexplored. This study analyzed patients with advanced NSCLC harboring ROS1 rearrangements who received first-line crizotinib to evaluate the correlation between baseline PD-L1 expression and crizotinib efficacy.

Methods

In this study, the clinical data from 371 patients diagnosed with ROS1-rearranged NSCLC at Shanghai Chest Hospital between November 2017 and December 2022 were reviewed. The patients were categorized into three groups according to the baseline PD-L1 expression: tumor proportion score (TPS) <1%, TPS 1 %-49 %, and TPS≥50 %. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and progression-free survival (PFS) following first-line crizotinib treatment were measured.

Results

A total of 64 patients were included in the analysis, with 16 patients in the TPS<1% group, 22 in the TPS 1 %-49 % group, and 26 in the TPS≥50 % group. The overall DCR was 100 %, and the overall ORR was 76.5 %. The ORRs were 81.2 % (13/16) in the TPS<1% group, 63.6 % (14/22) in the TPS 1 %-49 % group, and 84.6 % (22/26) in the TPS≥50 % group (p = 0.218). The median PFS across all patients was 20.21 months (95 % CI: 15.71–24.71), with a median PFS of 28.96 months (95 % CI: 19.87–38.04) in the TPS<1% group, 17.56 months (95 % CI: 12.25–22.86) in the TPS 1 %-49 % group, and 25.85 months (95 % CI: 18.52–33.17) in the TPS≥50 % group (p = 0.100). The median PFS for patients with CD74 fusion was 18.23 months (95 % CI: 15.24–21.22), while those with non-CD74 fusion exhibited a PFS of 16.49 months (95 % CI: 9.75–23.23) (p = 0.359).

Conclusion

Patients with advanced ROS1-rearranged NSCLC were found to benefit from first-line crizotinib treatment, irrespective of baseline PD-L1 expression.

背景程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)表达对酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)在ROS1重排的晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中疗效的预测价值仍未得到充分探索。本研究分析了接受克唑替尼一线治疗的携带ROS1重排的晚期NSCLC患者,以评估基线PD-L1表达与克唑替尼疗效之间的相关性。方法本研究回顾了2017年11月至2022年12月期间上海胸科医院确诊的371例ROS1重排NSCLC患者的临床数据。根据基线PD-L1表达情况将患者分为三组:肿瘤比例评分(TPS)<1%、TPS 1 %-49 %和TPS≥50 %。结果 共有64名患者纳入分析,其中TPS<1%组16人,TPS 1 %-49%组22人,TPS≥50%组26人。总 DCR 为 100%,总 ORR 为 76.5%。TPS<1%组的ORR为81.2%(13/16),TPS 1%-49%组为63.6%(14/22),TPS≥50%组为84.6%(22/26)(P = 0.218)。所有患者的中位 PFS 为 20.21 个月(95 % CI:15.71-24.71),其中 TPS<1% 组的中位 PFS 为 28.96 个月(95 % CI:19.87-38.04),TPS 1 %-49 % 组的中位 PFS 为 17.56 个月(95 % CI:12.25-22.86),TPS≥50 % 组的中位 PFS 为 25.85 个月(95 % CI:18.52-33.17)(p = 0.100)。CD74融合患者的中位PFS为18.23个月(95 % CI:15.24-21.22),而非CD74融合患者的PFS为16.49个月(95 % CI:9.75-23.23)(p = 0.359)。
{"title":"Impact of PD-L1 expression on the efficacy of first-line crizotinib in advanced ROS1-rearranged NSCLC","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107892","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107892","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The predictive value of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression for the efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with advanced ROS1-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains underexplored. This study analyzed patients with advanced NSCLC harboring ROS1 rearrangements who received first-line crizotinib to evaluate the correlation between baseline PD-L1 expression and crizotinib efficacy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this study, the clinical data from 371 patients diagnosed with ROS1-rearranged NSCLC at Shanghai Chest Hospital between November 2017 and December 2022 were reviewed. The patients were categorized into three groups according to the baseline PD-L1 expression: tumor proportion score (TPS) &lt;1%, TPS 1 %-49 %, and TPS≥50 %. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and progression-free survival (PFS) following first-line crizotinib treatment were measured.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 64 patients were included in the analysis, with 16 patients in the TPS&lt;1% group, 22 in the TPS 1 %-49 % group, and 26 in the TPS≥50 % group. The overall DCR was 100 %, and the overall ORR was 76.5 %. The ORRs were 81.2 % (13/16) in the TPS&lt;1% group, 63.6 % (14/22) in the TPS 1 %-49 % group, and 84.6 % (22/26) in the TPS≥50 % group (p = 0.218). The median PFS across all patients was 20.21 months (95 % CI: 15.71–24.71), with a median PFS of 28.96 months (95 % CI: 19.87–38.04) in the TPS&lt;1% group, 17.56 months (95 % CI: 12.25–22.86) in the TPS 1 %-49 % group, and 25.85 months (95 % CI: 18.52–33.17) in the TPS≥50 % group (p = 0.100). The median PFS for patients with CD74 fusion was 18.23 months (95 % CI: 15.24–21.22), while those with non-CD74 fusion exhibited a PFS of 16.49 months (95 % CI: 9.75–23.23) (p = 0.359).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Patients with advanced ROS1-rearranged NSCLC were found to benefit from first-line crizotinib treatment, irrespective of baseline PD-L1 expression.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141623960","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of the variability and diagnostic efficacy of respiratory-gated PET/CT based radiomics features with ungated PET/CT in lung lesions 基于放射组学特征的呼吸门控 PET/CT 与非门控 PET/CT 在肺部病变中的变异性和诊断效果比较
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107889

Objectives

To investigate the variability and diagnostic efficacy of respiratory-gated (RG) PET/CT based radiomics features compared to ungated (UG) PET/CT in the differentiation of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and benign lesions.

Methods

117 patients with suspected lung lesions from March 2020 to May 2021 and consent to undergo UG PET/CT and chest RG PET/CT (including phase-based quiescent period gating, pQPG and phase-matched 4D PET/CT, 4DRG) were prospectively included. 377 radiomics features were extracted from PET images of each scan. Paired t test was used to compare UG and RG features for inter-scan variability analysis. We developed three radiomics models with UG and RG features (i.e. UGModel, pQPGModel and 4DRGModel). ROC curves were used to compare diagnostic efficiencies, and the model-level comparison of diagnostic value was performed by five-fold cross-validation. A P value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

A total of 111 patients (average age ± standard deviation was 59.1 ± 11.6 y, range, 29 – 88 y, and 63 were males) with 209 lung lesions were analyzed for features variability and the subgroup of 126 non-metastasis lesions in 91 patients without treatment before PET/CT were included for diagnosis analysis. 101/377 (26.8 %) 4DRG features and 82/377 (21.8 %) pQPG features showed significant difference compared to UG features (both P<0.05). 61/377 (16.2 %) and 59/377 (15.6 %) of them showed significantly better discriminant ability (ΔAUC% (i.e. (AUCRG – AUCUG) / AUCUG×100 %) > 0 and P<0.05) in malignant recognition, respectively. For the model-level comparison, 4DRGModel achieved the highest diagnostic efficacy (sen 73.2 %, spe 87.3 %) compared with UGModel (sen 57.7 %, spe 76.4 %) and pQPGModel (sen 63.4 %, spe 81.8 %).

Conclusion

RG PET/CT performs better in the quantitative assessment of metabolic heterogeneity for lung lesions and the subsequent diagnosis in patients with NSCLC compared with UG PET/CT.

方法前瞻性地纳入了2020年3月至2021年5月期间疑似肺部病变并同意接受UG PET/CT和胸部RG PET/CT(包括基于相位的静息期门控(pQPG)和相位匹配4D PET/CT(4DRG))检查的117例患者。从每次扫描的 PET 图像中提取了 377 个放射组学特征。使用配对 t 检验比较 UG 和 RG 特征,进行扫描间变异性分析。我们建立了三种具有 UG 和 RG 特征的放射组学模型(即 UG 模型、pQPG 模型和 4DRG 模型)。我们使用 ROC 曲线来比较诊断效率,并通过五倍交叉验证来比较模型的诊断价值。结果 共有 111 名患者(平均年龄(± 标准差)为 59.1 ± 11.6 岁,范围为 29 - 88 岁,男性 63 名)的 209 个肺部病灶进行了特征变异性分析,并将 PET/CT 前未经治疗的 91 名患者中的 126 个非转移病灶亚组纳入诊断分析。101/377(26.8%)例的 4DRG 特征和 82/377 (21.8%)例的 pQPG 特征与 UG 特征相比有显著差异(P<0.05)。其中 61/377 (16.2 %) 和 59/377 (15.6 %) 在恶性识别中分别显示出明显更好的判别能力(ΔAUC%(即 (AUCRG - AUCUG) / AUCUG×100 %)> 0 和 P<0.05)。结论与 UG PET/CT 相比,RG PET/CT 在定量评估 NSCLC 患者肺部病变的代谢异质性及后续诊断方面表现更好。
{"title":"Comparison of the variability and diagnostic efficacy of respiratory-gated PET/CT based radiomics features with ungated PET/CT in lung lesions","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107889","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107889","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To investigate the variability and diagnostic efficacy of respiratory-gated (RG) PET/CT based radiomics features compared to ungated (UG) PET/CT in the differentiation of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and benign lesions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>117 patients with suspected lung lesions from March 2020 to May 2021 and consent to undergo UG PET/CT and chest RG PET/CT (including phase-based quiescent period gating, pQPG and phase-matched 4D PET/CT, 4DRG) were prospectively included. 377 radiomics features were extracted from PET images of each scan. Paired <em>t</em> test was used to compare UG and RG features for inter-scan variability analysis. We developed three radiomics models with UG and RG features (i.e. UGModel, pQPGModel and 4DRGModel). ROC curves were used to compare diagnostic efficiencies, and the model-level comparison of diagnostic value was performed by five-fold cross-validation. A P value &lt; 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 111 patients (average age ± standard deviation was 59.1 ± 11.6 y, range, 29 – 88 y, and 63 were males) with 209 lung lesions were analyzed for features variability and the subgroup of 126 non-metastasis lesions in 91 patients without treatment before PET/CT were included for diagnosis analysis. 101/377 (26.8 %) 4DRG features and 82/377 (21.8 %) pQPG features showed significant difference compared to UG features (both P&lt;0.05). 61/377 (16.2 %) and 59/377 (15.6 %) of them showed significantly better discriminant ability (ΔAUC% (i.e. (AUC<sub>RG</sub> – AUC<sub>UG</sub>) / AUC<sub>UG</sub>×100 %) &gt; 0 and P&lt;0.05) in malignant recognition, respectively. For the model-level comparison, 4DRGModel achieved the highest diagnostic efficacy (sen 73.2 %, spe 87.3 %) compared with UGModel (sen 57.7 %, spe 76.4 %) and pQPGModel (sen 63.4 %, spe 81.8 %).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>RG PET/CT performs better in the quantitative assessment of metabolic heterogeneity for lung lesions and the subsequent diagnosis in patients with NSCLC compared with UG PET/CT.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141690909","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Risk and survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer and pre-existing autoimmune disorders receiving immune checkpoint blockade therapy: Survival analysis with inverse probability weighting from a nationwide, multi-institutional, retrospective study (NEJ047) 接受免疫检查点阻断疗法的非小细胞肺癌和原有自身免疫性疾病患者的风险和生存率:一项全国性多机构回顾性研究的反概率加权生存分析 (NEJ047)
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107894

Background

The risk and survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with pre-existing autoimmune disorders (AIDs) receiving immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy have not been clearly established.

Patients and methods

This multi-institutional, retrospective cohort study was conducted in collaboration with 20 centers in Japan.

Results

In total, 229 patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC and pre-existing AID, with or without ICB treatment from January 2010–February 2020, were included and analyzed. Among 69 patients who received ICB, 2 received two lines of ICBs with a total of 71 ICB treatments; 57 (80.3 %) and 14 (19.7 %) patients received ICB monotherapy and combination therapy, respectively. AID flares were observed in 18 patients (25.4 %, 95 % confidence interval [CI], 15.8–37.1 %) receiving ICB. AID exacerbations were more likely when NSCLC was diagnosed less than 1 year after the AID diagnosis (odds ratio 5.26 [95 % CI, 1.40–21.61]; P = 0.016). Immune-related adverse events were observed in 32 patients (45.1 %, 95 % CI, 33.2–57.3 %); 17 had grade 3 or higher. The safety profile of combination immunotherapy was not significantly different from that of the monotherapy. After inverse probability weighting, the use of ICB prolonged survival (hazard ratio 0.43 [95 % CI, 0.26–0.70]; P = 0.0006).

Conclusions

These findings revealed a novel risk factor for AID flares following ICB treatment, that is the diagnosis of NSCLC within 1 year of AID diagnosis, and showed that ICBs may improve survival in this population. These results support the utilization of ICB in patients with NSCLC and pre-existing AID.

背景非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者在接受免疫检查点阻断剂(ICB)治疗前已存在自身免疫性疾病(AID),其风险和生存率尚未明确确定。结果共纳入并分析了229例晚期或复发性NSCLC患者,这些患者在2010年1月至2020年2月期间接受或未接受ICB治疗。在接受 ICB 治疗的 69 例患者中,有 2 例患者接受了两线 ICB 治疗,共计 71 次 ICB 治疗;分别有 57 例(80.3%)和 14 例(19.7%)患者接受了 ICB 单药治疗和联合治疗。接受 ICB 治疗的患者中有 18 人(25.4%,95% 置信区间 [CI],15.8%-37.1%)出现 AID 复发。如果NSCLC在AID确诊后不到1年才确诊,则AID加重的可能性更大(几率比5.26 [95 % CI, 1.40-21.61];P = 0.016)。32名患者(45.1%,95% CI,33.2-57.3%)出现了免疫相关不良反应,其中17人的不良反应为3级或3级以上。联合免疫疗法的安全性与单一疗法无明显差异。结论这些研究结果发现了一个新的风险因素,即在确诊AID后1年内诊断出NSCLC,这也是AID复发的风险因素。这些结果支持在患有 NSCLC 并已存在 AID 的患者中使用 ICB。
{"title":"Risk and survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer and pre-existing autoimmune disorders receiving immune checkpoint blockade therapy: Survival analysis with inverse probability weighting from a nationwide, multi-institutional, retrospective study (NEJ047)","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107894","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107894","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The risk and survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with pre-existing autoimmune disorders (AIDs) receiving immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy have not been clearly established.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>This multi-institutional, retrospective cohort study was conducted in collaboration with 20 centers in Japan.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 229 patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC and pre-existing AID, with or without ICB treatment from January 2010–February 2020, were included and analyzed. Among 69 patients who received ICB, 2 received two lines of ICBs with a total of 71 ICB treatments; 57 (80.3 %) and 14 (19.7 %) patients received ICB monotherapy and combination therapy, respectively. AID flares were observed in 18 patients (25.4 %, 95 % confidence interval [CI], 15.8–37.1 %) receiving ICB. AID exacerbations were more likely when NSCLC was diagnosed less than 1 year after the AID diagnosis (odds ratio 5.26 [95 % CI, 1.40–21.61]; <em>P</em> = 0.016). Immune-related adverse events were observed in 32 patients (45.1 %, 95 % CI, 33.2–57.3 %); 17 had grade 3 or higher. The safety profile of combination immunotherapy was not significantly different from that of the monotherapy. After inverse probability weighting, the use of ICB prolonged survival (hazard ratio 0.43 [95 % CI, 0.26–0.70]; <em>P</em> = 0.0006).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These findings revealed a novel risk factor for AID flares following ICB treatment, that is the diagnosis of NSCLC within 1 year of AID diagnosis, and showed that ICBs may improve survival in this population. These results support the utilization of ICB in patients with NSCLC and pre-existing AID.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141701802","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
CT-guided needle biopsy is not associated with increased ipsilateral pleural metastasis CT 引导下的针刺活检与同侧胸膜转移增加无关
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107890
Benedikt Niedermaier , Yao Kou , Elizabeth Tong , Monika Eichinger , Laura V. Klotz , Martin E. Eichhorn , Thomas Muley , Felix Herth , Hans-Ulrich Kauczor , Claus Peter Heußel , Hauke Winter

Introduction

Histological confirmation of a lung tumor is the prerequisite for treatment planning. It has been suspected that CT-guided needle biopsy (CTGNB) exposes the patient to a higher risk of pleural recurrence. However, the distance between tumor and pleura has largely been neglected as a possible confounder when comparing CTGNB to bronchoscopy.

Methods

All patients with lung cancer histologically confirmed by bronchoscopy or CTGNB between 2010 and 2020 were enrolled and studied. Patients’ medical histories, radiologic and pathologic findings and surgical records were reviewed. Pleural recurrence was diagnosed by pleural biopsy, fluid cytology, or by CT chest imaging showing progressive pleural nodules.

Results

In this retrospective unicenter analysis, 844 patients underwent curative resection for early-stage lung cancer between 2010 and 2020. Median follow-up was 47.5 months (3–137). 27 patients (3.2 %) with ipsilateral pleural recurrence (IPR) were identified. The distance of the tumor to the pleura was significantly smaller in patients who underwent CTGNB. A tendency of increased risk of IPR was observed in tumors located in the lower lobe (HR: 2.18 [±0.43], p = 0.068), but only microscopic pleural invasion was a significant independent predictive factor for increased risk of IPR (HR: 5.33 [± 0.51], p = 0.001) by multivariate cox analysis. Biopsy by CTGNB did not affect IPR (HR: 1.298 [± 0.39], p = 0.504).

Conclusion

CTGNB is safe and not associated with an increased incidence of IPR in our cohort of patients. This observation remains to be validated in a larger multicenter patient cohort.

导言肺部肿瘤的组织学确诊是制定治疗计划的先决条件。人们一直怀疑 CT 引导下针刺活检(CTGNB)会增加患者胸膜复发的风险。然而,在比较 CTGNB 与支气管镜检查时,肿瘤与胸膜之间的距离作为一个可能的混杂因素在很大程度上被忽视了。研究方法:对 2010-2020 年间所有经支气管镜检查或 CTGNB 组织学确诊的肺癌患者进行登记和研究。研究人员回顾了患者的病史、放射学和病理学检查结果以及手术记录。胸膜复发是通过胸膜活检、胸腔积液细胞学检查或胸部CT成像显示进行性胸膜结节来诊断的。中位随访时间为 47.5 个月(3-137)。27名患者(3.2%)出现同侧胸膜复发(IPR)。接受 CTGNB 的患者肿瘤与胸膜的距离明显较小。通过多变量考克斯分析发现,位于下叶的肿瘤发生 IPR 的风险有增加的趋势(HR:2.18 [±0.43],p = 0.068),但只有微小胸膜侵犯才是 IPR 风险增加的重要独立预测因素(HR:5.33 [±0.51],p = 0.001)。CTGNB活检不会影响IPR(HR:1.298 [±0.39],P = 0.504)。这一观察结果还有待在更大规模的多中心患者队列中进行验证。
{"title":"CT-guided needle biopsy is not associated with increased ipsilateral pleural metastasis","authors":"Benedikt Niedermaier ,&nbsp;Yao Kou ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Tong ,&nbsp;Monika Eichinger ,&nbsp;Laura V. Klotz ,&nbsp;Martin E. Eichhorn ,&nbsp;Thomas Muley ,&nbsp;Felix Herth ,&nbsp;Hans-Ulrich Kauczor ,&nbsp;Claus Peter Heußel ,&nbsp;Hauke Winter","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107890","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107890","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Histological confirmation of a lung tumor is the prerequisite for treatment planning. It has been suspected that CT-guided needle biopsy (CTGNB) exposes the patient to a higher risk of pleural recurrence. However, the distance between tumor and pleura has largely been neglected as a possible confounder when comparing CTGNB to bronchoscopy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All patients with lung cancer histologically confirmed by bronchoscopy or CTGNB between 2010 and 2020 were enrolled and studied. Patients’ medical histories, radiologic and pathologic findings and surgical records were reviewed. Pleural recurrence was diagnosed by pleural biopsy, fluid cytology, or by CT chest imaging showing progressive pleural nodules.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In this retrospective unicenter analysis, 844 patients underwent curative resection for early-stage lung cancer between 2010 and 2020. Median follow-up was 47.5 months (3–137). 27 patients (3.2 %) with ipsilateral pleural recurrence (IPR) were identified. The distance of the tumor to the pleura was significantly smaller in patients who underwent CTGNB. A tendency of increased risk of IPR was observed in tumors located in the lower lobe (HR: 2.18 [±0.43], p = 0.068), but only microscopic pleural invasion was a significant independent predictive factor for increased risk of IPR (HR: 5.33 [± 0.51], p = 0.001) by multivariate cox analysis. Biopsy by CTGNB did not affect IPR (HR: 1.298 [± 0.39], p = 0.504).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>CTGNB is safe and not associated with an increased incidence of IPR in our cohort of patients. This observation remains to be validated in a larger multicenter patient cohort.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169500224004240/pdfft?md5=536fc348ac19e3281b6b25bcc9871d8a&pid=1-s2.0-S0169500224004240-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141606408","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A prospective analysis of the management practices for patients with Stage-III-N2Non-Small-Cell lung cancer (OBSERVE IIIA–B GFPC 04-2020Study) 对 III-N2 期非小细胞肺癌患者管理方法的前瞻性分析(OBSERVE IIIA-B GFPC 04-2020 研究)
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107868
Mathilde Jacob , Pierre Fournel , Claire Tissot , Jacques Cadranel , Olivier Bylicki , Isabelle Monnet , Grégoire Justeau , Charles Ricordel , Pascal Thomas , Lionel Falchero , Chrystel Locher , Marie Wislez , Alain Vergnenegre , Samir Abdiche , Floran Guisier , Acya Bizieux , Regine Lamy , Geraldine François , Gonzagues De Chabot , Thomas Pierret , Laurent Greillier

Background

Management of stage-III-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) based on a multimodal strategy (surgery or radiotherapycombined with systemic drugs) remains controversial. Patients are treated with a curative intent, and available data suggestprolonged survival after complete resection. However, no consensual definition of “tumor resectability” exists. This study aimed to analyze the concordanceamong French tumor board meeting (TBM)-emittedtherapeutic decisions forstage-III-N2 NSCLC.

Methods

Six patients with stage-III-N2 NSCLC discussed at Saint-Etienne University Hospital’sthoracic TBMs were selected, anonymouslyreported, and submitted to the participating TBMs. The primary goal of this multicenter, prospective, observational study was to assess the consistency of TBMpanel decisions for each case. The secondary endpointwas identifying the demographic or technical factors that potentiallyaffected decision-making.

Results

Twenty-seven TBMs from university hospitals, a cancer center, general hospitals, and a private hospitalparticipated in this study. None of their decisions for the six cases were unanimous.The decisions were homogenous for three cases (78%, 85%, and 88% TBMs opted for medical treatment, respectively),andmore ambivalent for the other three (medical versus surgical strategies were favored by 44%/56%, 46%/54%, and 58%/42% TBMs, respectively). Interestingly, decisions regarding chemoradiationand perioperative chemotherapyinthe medical and surgical strategies, respectively, were also discordant. Hospital type, specialist participation in TBMs, and activity volumes were not significantly associated with therapeutic decisions.

Conclusion

The results of this study highlight substantial disparities amongFrench TBMs regarding therapeutic management of stage-III-N2 NSCLC. The decisions were not associated with local conditions.

背景对 III-N2 期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的多模式治疗(手术或放疗结合全身用药)仍存在争议。患者接受治疗的目的是治愈,现有数据表明完全切除后患者的生存期延长。然而,目前对 "肿瘤可切除性 "尚无一致的定义。本研究旨在分析法国肿瘤委员会会议(TBM)发布的 III-N2 期 NSCLC 治疗决定的一致性。方法选取圣埃蒂安大学医院胸科 TBM 讨论的 6 例 III-N2 期 NSCLC 患者,匿名报告并提交给参与的 TBM。这项多中心、前瞻性、观察性研究的主要目的是评估治疗管理小组对每个病例的决定是否一致。结果来自大学医院、癌症中心、综合医院和一家私立医院的 27 名技术管理专家参与了这项研究。他们对六个病例的决策没有一个是一致的。三个病例的决策是一致的(分别有 78%、85% 和 88% 的 TBM 选择内科治疗),另外三个病例的决策则比较矛盾(分别有 44%/56%、46%/54% 和 58%/42% 的 TBM 选择内科治疗还是外科治疗)。有趣的是,内科和外科手术策略中关于化学放疗和围手术期化疗的决定也不一致。医院类型、TBM 中的专家参与情况以及活动量与治疗决策无明显关联。这些决定与当地条件无关。
{"title":"A prospective analysis of the management practices for patients with Stage-III-N2Non-Small-Cell lung cancer (OBSERVE IIIA–B GFPC 04-2020Study)","authors":"Mathilde Jacob ,&nbsp;Pierre Fournel ,&nbsp;Claire Tissot ,&nbsp;Jacques Cadranel ,&nbsp;Olivier Bylicki ,&nbsp;Isabelle Monnet ,&nbsp;Grégoire Justeau ,&nbsp;Charles Ricordel ,&nbsp;Pascal Thomas ,&nbsp;Lionel Falchero ,&nbsp;Chrystel Locher ,&nbsp;Marie Wislez ,&nbsp;Alain Vergnenegre ,&nbsp;Samir Abdiche ,&nbsp;Floran Guisier ,&nbsp;Acya Bizieux ,&nbsp;Regine Lamy ,&nbsp;Geraldine François ,&nbsp;Gonzagues De Chabot ,&nbsp;Thomas Pierret ,&nbsp;Laurent Greillier","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107868","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107868","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Management of stage-III-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) based on a multimodal strategy (surgery or radiotherapycombined with systemic drugs) remains controversial. Patients are treated with a curative intent, and available data suggestprolonged survival after complete resection. However, no consensual definition of “tumor resectability” exists. This study aimed to analyze the concordanceamong French tumor board meeting (TBM)-emittedtherapeutic decisions forstage-III-N2 NSCLC.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Six patients with stage-III-N2 NSCLC discussed at Saint-Etienne University Hospital’sthoracic TBMs were selected, anonymouslyreported, and submitted to the participating TBMs. The primary goal of this multicenter, prospective, observational study was to assess the consistency of TBMpanel decisions for each case. The secondary endpointwas identifying the demographic or technical factors that potentiallyaffected decision-making.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-seven TBMs from university hospitals, a cancer center, general hospitals, and a private hospitalparticipated in this study. None of their decisions for the six cases were unanimous.The decisions were homogenous for three cases (78%, 85%, and 88% TBMs opted for medical treatment, respectively),andmore ambivalent for the other three (medical versus surgical strategies were favored by 44%/56%, 46%/54%, and 58%/42% TBMs, respectively). Interestingly, decisions regarding chemoradiationand perioperative chemotherapyinthe medical and surgical strategies, respectively, were also discordant. Hospital type, specialist participation in TBMs, and activity volumes were not significantly associated with therapeutic decisions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The results of this study highlight substantial disparities amongFrench TBMs regarding therapeutic management of stage-III-N2 NSCLC. The decisions were not associated with local conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169500224004021/pdfft?md5=58189a66e935ae87e985ed81b74a96a3&pid=1-s2.0-S0169500224004021-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141606409","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Lung Cancer
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1