Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2026-01-11DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2026.108916
Dong Hyun Kim , Miso Kim , Jeonghwan Youk , Tae Min Kim , Gyeong-Won Lee , Se Hyun Kim , Yu Jung Kim , Jin-Soo Kim , Sook-Hee Hong , Mi Sun Ahn , Seong Hoon Shin , Dong-Wan Kim , Joo-Hang Kim , Bhumsuk Keam
Introduction
Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) is a rare cancer characterized by a high programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, suggesting a potential therapeutic benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors. We investigated the efficacy of durvalumab-containing combination therapy and explored potential predictive biomarkers in patients with recurrent or metastatic (R/M) PSC.
Method
In this pooled post hoc analysis, data were integrated from two prospective phase II trials (NCT03022500 and NCT04224337) wherein durvalumab-containing combination therapies were evaluated in patients with R/M PSC. PD-L1 expression was assessed using 22C3 or SP263 assays, and circulating lymphocyte subsets were analyzed using flow cytometry.
Results
Overall, 33 patients were included, of whom 66.7 % had a PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥ 1 % and 45.5 % had a TPS ≥ 50 %. The overall response rate was 33.3 % (95 % confidence interval [CI], 18.0 %–51.8 %), and the disease control rate was 72.7 % (95 % CI, 54.5 %–86.7 %). The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.4 (95 % CI, 2.8–9.4) and 15.7 (95 % CI, 11.3–not estimated) months, respectively. PD-L1 expression was not associated with the response or survival outcomes. Patients who achieved disease control exhibited a higher proportion of circulating CD8+ T cells (mean, 28.5 % vs. 20.3 %, P = 0.083) and a lower CD4+/CD8+ ratio (median, 1.4 vs. 1.7, P = 0.048) than did those with progressive disease.
Conclusion
Durvalumab-containing combination therapy showed promising efficacy in patients with R/M PSC, irrespective of PD-L1 expression. A lower CD4+/CD8+ ratio may be associated with favorable disease control.
{"title":"Durvalumab-containing treatment for recurrent or metastatic pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma: A pooled post hoc analysis of two KCSG phase II trials","authors":"Dong Hyun Kim , Miso Kim , Jeonghwan Youk , Tae Min Kim , Gyeong-Won Lee , Se Hyun Kim , Yu Jung Kim , Jin-Soo Kim , Sook-Hee Hong , Mi Sun Ahn , Seong Hoon Shin , Dong-Wan Kim , Joo-Hang Kim , Bhumsuk Keam","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2026.108916","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2026.108916","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) is a rare cancer characterized by a high programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, suggesting a potential therapeutic benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors. We investigated the efficacy of durvalumab-containing combination therapy and explored potential predictive biomarkers in patients with recurrent or metastatic (R/M) PSC.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>In this pooled <em>post hoc</em> analysis, data were integrated from two prospective phase II trials (NCT03022500 and NCT04224337) wherein durvalumab-containing combination therapies were evaluated in patients with R/M PSC. PD-L1 expression was assessed using 22C3 or SP263 assays, and circulating lymphocyte subsets were analyzed using flow cytometry.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 33 patients were included, of whom 66.7 % had a PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥ 1 % and 45.5 % had a TPS ≥ 50 %. The overall response rate was 33.3 % (95 % confidence interval [CI], 18.0 %–51.8 %), and the disease control rate was 72.7 % (95 % CI, 54.5 %–86.7 %). The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.4 (95 % CI, 2.8–9.4) and 15.7 (95 % CI, 11.3–not estimated) months, respectively. PD-L1 expression was not associated with the response or survival outcomes. Patients who achieved disease control exhibited a higher proportion of circulating CD8<sup>+</sup> T cells (mean, 28.5 % vs. 20.3 %, <em>P</em> = 0.083) and a lower CD4<sup>+</sup>/CD8<sup>+</sup> ratio (median, 1.4 vs. 1.7, <em>P</em> = 0.048) than did those with progressive disease.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Durvalumab-containing combination therapy showed promising efficacy in patients with R/M PSC, irrespective of PD-L1 expression. A lower CD4<sup>+</sup>/CD8<sup>+</sup> ratio may be associated with favorable disease control.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 108916"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145950220","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2026-02-02DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2026.109302
Caicun Zhou , Ke-Jing Tang , Baogang Liu , Sang-We Kim , Satoru Kitazono , Akira Ono , Muthukkumaran Thiagarajan , Jen-Yu Hung , Michael Boyer , Timuçin Çİl , Yu Yao , Rajnish Nagarkar , John Xie , Archan Bhattacharya , Honeylet Wortman-Vayn , Mahadi Baig , Trishala Agrawal , Patricia Lorenzini , Se-Hoon Lee , Byoung Chul Cho
Background
Amivantamab is a bispecific, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and MET-proto-oncogene (MET)-targeting antibody with immune cell-directing activity. In the global Phase 3 PAPILLON trial, amivantamab plus carboplatin-pemetrexed (amivantamab-chemotherapy) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) vs chemotherapy alone in previously untreated participants with locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC with EGFR exon 20 insertions (Ex20ins). We evaluated clinical outcomes in Asian participants in PAPILLON (NCT04538664).
Methods
Participants were randomized 1:1 to amivantamab-chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone. Study endpoints for this analysis were PFS by blinded independent central review (primary), objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), PFS after first subsequent therapy (PFS2), overall survival (OS), and safety (secondary). Crossover to amivantamab monotherapy was allowed when disease progressed on chemotherapy alone.
Results
Among 186 participants in the Asian sub-cohort, 97 received amivantamab-chemotherapy and 89 received chemotherapy. At median follow-up of 16.6 months, median PFS (95% confidence interval [CI]) in the amivantamab-chemotherapy/chemotherapy groups was 11.5/5.6 months (hazard ratio [HR] 0.34; 95%CI, 0.23–0.49; nominal p < 0.0001) arms. The ORR was 70% vs 51% (odds ratio 2.2, 95%CI, 1.2–3.9; nominal p = 0.012), DoR 10.1 vs 5.5 months. Median PFS2 was not estimable vs 18.8 months (HR 0.46, 95%CI 0.26–0.83; nominal p = 0.008), and median interim OS not estimable vs 24.4 months HR 0.65, 95%CI 0.34–1.24; nominal p = 0.189), respectively, despite substantial (73%) crossover. Safety profiles for both arms were similar to the overall PAPILLON population.
Conclusions
Amivantamab-chemotherapy demonstrated superior PFS vs chemotherapy and represents a new standard of care for first-line treatment of Asian participants with Ex20ins-mutated NSCLC.
{"title":"Amivantamab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for first-line treatment of participants with EGFR exon 20 insertion-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer: PAPILLON Asia subgroup analysis","authors":"Caicun Zhou , Ke-Jing Tang , Baogang Liu , Sang-We Kim , Satoru Kitazono , Akira Ono , Muthukkumaran Thiagarajan , Jen-Yu Hung , Michael Boyer , Timuçin Çİl , Yu Yao , Rajnish Nagarkar , John Xie , Archan Bhattacharya , Honeylet Wortman-Vayn , Mahadi Baig , Trishala Agrawal , Patricia Lorenzini , Se-Hoon Lee , Byoung Chul Cho","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2026.109302","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2026.109302","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Amivantamab is a bispecific, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and MET-proto-oncogene (MET)-targeting antibody with immune cell-directing activity. In the global Phase 3 PAPILLON trial, amivantamab plus carboplatin-pemetrexed (amivantamab-chemotherapy) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) vs chemotherapy alone in previously untreated participants with locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC with <em>EGFR</em> exon 20 insertions (Ex20ins). We evaluated clinical outcomes in Asian participants in PAPILLON (NCT04538664).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Participants were randomized 1:1 to amivantamab-chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone. Study endpoints for this analysis were PFS by blinded independent central review (primary), objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), PFS after first subsequent therapy (PFS2), overall survival (OS), and safety (secondary). Crossover to amivantamab monotherapy was allowed when disease progressed on chemotherapy alone.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 186 participants in the Asian sub-cohort, 97 received amivantamab-chemotherapy and 89 received chemotherapy. At median follow-up of 16.6 months, median PFS (95% confidence interval [CI]) in the amivantamab-chemotherapy/chemotherapy groups was 11.5/5.6 months (hazard ratio [HR] 0.34; 95%CI, 0.23–0.49; nominal p < 0.0001) arms. The ORR was 70% vs 51% (odds ratio 2.2, 95%CI, 1.2–3.9; nominal p = 0.012), DoR 10.1 vs 5.5 months. Median PFS2 was not estimable vs 18.8 months (HR 0.46, 95%CI 0.26–0.83; nominal p = 0.008), and median interim OS not estimable vs 24.4 months HR 0.65, 95%CI 0.34–1.24; nominal p = 0.189), respectively, despite substantial (73%) crossover. Safety profiles for both arms were similar to the overall PAPILLON population.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Amivantamab-chemotherapy demonstrated superior PFS vs chemotherapy and represents a new standard of care for first-line treatment of Asian participants with Ex20ins-mutated NSCLC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 109302"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146165724","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2026-01-04DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108905
Monireh Sadat Seyyedsalehi , Massimiliano Cani , Qian Wang , Chitra Thakur , Umberto Malapelle , Chung Yin Kong , Silvia Novello , Paolo Boffetta
Lung cancer (LC) remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality among women worldwide. Compared to men, LC in women presents distinct epidemiologic, biological, and clinical characteristics. A large proportion of LC cases in women occur in never-smokers, underscoring the important roles of environmental exposures, genetic susceptibility, and hormonal influences in disease pathogenesis. LC in women also displays unique molecular profiles, with a higher prevalence of actionable alterations such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements, which inform targeted therapy selection. Despite advances in chemotherapy, targeted agents, and immunotherapy, sex-based differences in treatment efficacy, toxicity, and survivorship persist and remain incompletely understood. Additional barriers, including limited access to LC screening and the underrepresentation of women in clinical trials, further constrain the application of evidence-based interventions for women. This review synthesizes latest evidence on epidemiology, risk factors, molecular features, screening, treatment outcomes, and survivorship challenges in women with LC with a deep focus on novel approaches to overcome current barriers and disparities to improve prevention, early detection, treatment, and long-term survivorship care.
{"title":"Lung cancer in women: current evidence and future research priorities","authors":"Monireh Sadat Seyyedsalehi , Massimiliano Cani , Qian Wang , Chitra Thakur , Umberto Malapelle , Chung Yin Kong , Silvia Novello , Paolo Boffetta","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108905","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108905","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Lung cancer (LC) remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality among women worldwide. Compared to men, LC in women presents distinct epidemiologic, biological, and clinical characteristics. A large proportion of LC cases in women occur in never-smokers, underscoring the important roles of environmental exposures, genetic susceptibility, and hormonal influences in disease pathogenesis. LC in women also displays unique molecular profiles, with a higher prevalence of actionable alterations such as epidermal growth factor receptor (<em>EGFR</em>) mutations and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (<em>ALK</em>) rearrangements, which inform targeted therapy selection. Despite advances in chemotherapy, targeted agents, and immunotherapy, sex-based differences in treatment efficacy, toxicity, and survivorship persist and remain incompletely understood. Additional barriers, including limited access to LC screening and the underrepresentation of women in clinical trials, further constrain the application of evidence-based interventions for women. This review synthesizes latest evidence on epidemiology, risk factors, molecular features, screening, treatment outcomes, and survivorship challenges in women with LC with a deep focus on novel approaches to overcome current barriers and disparities to improve prevention, early detection, treatment, and long-term survivorship care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 108905"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146010182","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2026-01-12DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2026.108930
Xiaoyu Gang , Yige Sun , Junli Hao , Suya Zhao , Yizheng Wang , Xinrui Yang , Heming Li , Mingfang Zhao
Background
KRAS is a common driver gene in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Owing to the absence of universally effective targeted agents and marked heterogeneity, optimal treatment selection for KRAS-mutant NSCLC remains uncertain. This study combined network meta-analysis (NMA) with real-world evidence to inform precision treatment strategies.
Methods
Thirteen randomized controlled trials were included in a Bayesian NMA to compare efficacy outcomes across regimens in KRAS-mutant and KRAS G12C-mutant NSCLC. In parallel, real-world data from advanced KRAS-mutant NSCLC patients treated at our center were analyzed.
Results
Across KRAS and G12C NMAs, immunotherapy-based regimens generally outperformed chemotherapy-based regimens. PD-(L)1 inhibitors monotherapy ranked highest for overall survival (OS), while chemotherapy plus PD-(L)1 inhibitors and anti-angiogenic therapy (anti-VEGF) ranked highest for progression-free survival (PFS). Chemotherapy plus dual immune checkpoint blockade (PD-(L)1 and CTLA-4) yielded a greater improvement in OS than in PFS. In our real-world cohort, first-line PD-(L)1 monotherapy achieved the best outcomes (objective response rate: 88.9%; median PFS: 22.2 months), followed by chemotherapy plus PD-(L)1 ± anti-VEGF. On multivariable analysis, ECOG performance status 0–1, PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50%, TMB ≥ 10 mut/Mb, and chemotherapy plus PD-(L)1 ± anti-VEGF were independently associated with longer first-line PFS. In subsequent lines, G12C inhibitors significantly improved outcomes versus other therapies, whereas non-G12C disease derived limited benefit from available strategies.
Conclusions
Immunotherapy constitutes the cornerstone of first-line therapy for KRAS-mutant NSCLC. Within this framework, PD-(L)1 monotherapy may be appropriate for carefully selected patients with high PD-L1 expression, whereas chemoimmunotherapy can extend benefit to broader subgroups; escalation with anti-VEGF or anti-CTLA-4 agents appears clinically promising and merits biomarker-driven prospective evaluation. KRAS G12C inhibitors are effective in later lines, while treatment options for non-G12C disease remain limited.
{"title":"KRAS-mutant advanced NSCLC: efficacy and clinical outcomes from network meta-analysis and real-world evidence","authors":"Xiaoyu Gang , Yige Sun , Junli Hao , Suya Zhao , Yizheng Wang , Xinrui Yang , Heming Li , Mingfang Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2026.108930","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2026.108930","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div><em>KRAS</em> is a common driver gene in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Owing to the absence of universally effective targeted agents and marked heterogeneity, optimal treatment selection for <em>KRAS</em>-mutant NSCLC remains uncertain. This study combined network meta-analysis (NMA) with real-world evidence to inform precision treatment strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Thirteen randomized controlled trials were included in a Bayesian NMA to compare efficacy outcomes across regimens in <em>KRAS</em>-mutant and <em>KRAS</em> G12C-mutant NSCLC. In parallel, real-world data from advanced <em>KRAS</em>-mutant NSCLC patients treated at our center were analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Across <em>KRAS</em> and G12C NMAs, immunotherapy-based regimens generally outperformed chemotherapy-based regimens. PD-(L)1 inhibitors monotherapy ranked highest for overall survival (OS), while chemotherapy plus PD-(L)1 inhibitors and anti-angiogenic therapy (anti-VEGF) ranked highest for progression-free survival (PFS). Chemotherapy plus dual immune checkpoint blockade (PD-(L)1 and CTLA-4) yielded a greater improvement in OS than in PFS. In our real-world cohort, first-line PD-(L)1 monotherapy achieved the best outcomes (objective response rate: 88.9%; median PFS: 22.2 months), followed by chemotherapy plus PD-(L)1 ± anti-VEGF. On multivariable analysis, ECOG performance status 0–1, PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50%, TMB ≥ 10 mut/Mb, and chemotherapy plus PD-(L)1 ± anti-VEGF were independently associated with longer first-line PFS. In subsequent lines, G12C inhibitors significantly improved outcomes versus other therapies, whereas non-G12C disease derived limited benefit from available strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Immunotherapy constitutes the cornerstone of first-line therapy for <em>KRAS</em>-mutant NSCLC. Within this framework, PD-(L)1 monotherapy may be appropriate for carefully selected patients with high PD-L1 expression, whereas chemoimmunotherapy can extend benefit to broader subgroups; escalation with anti-VEGF or anti-CTLA-4 agents appears clinically promising and merits biomarker-driven prospective evaluation. KRAS G12C inhibitors are effective in later lines, while treatment options for non-G12C disease remain limited.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 108930"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145981781","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2026-01-10DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2026.108910
Jingjing Chen, Dakota McNierney, Joe G. Zein, Laszlo T. Vaszar, Karen L. Swanson, Natalya Azadeh, Kenneth K. Sakata
Background
Robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (RAB) is limited by CT-to-body divergence. Cone-beam CT (CBCT) may enhance tool-to-lesion alignment and diagnostic yield (DY), but the benefit of integrating mobile CBCT (mCBCT) into the MonarchTM RAB remains understudied. This is the first study to evaluate diagnostic performance between Monarch alone versus Monarch plus mCBCT for peripheral pulmonary lesion (PPL) biopsy, hypothesizing improved DY with the combined approach.
Methods
This single-center retrospective study examined adults undergoing RAB biopsy for PPLs (May 2019—March 2023), applying a strict DY definition. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were evaluated in Monarch and Monarch plus mCBCT groups.
Results
Of 331 cases, 179 used Monarch and 152 used Monarch plus mCBCT. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics. DY was not different (70.9 % in Monarch vs 71.7 % in Monarch plus mCBCT, p = 0.976) nor were complication rates (7.3 % in Monarch vs. 3.9 % in Monarch plus mCBCT, p = 0.291). In the Monarch group, the procedure duration was longer (77 min in Monarch vs. 69 min in Monarch plus mCBCT, p = 0.002) and the radiation dose was lower (7.4 mGy in Monarch vs. 285.9 mGy in Monarch plus mCBCT, p < 0.001). Adjusted analysis demonstrated that mCBCT was not associated with improved DY (OR [95 % CI]: 1.33[0.78–2.28]) or reduced risk for complications (OR [95 % CI]: 0.41 [0.13; 1.14]). DY increased with larger nodule size but not with lesion location.
Conclusions
Evaluating outcomes across two sequential practice eras, the addition of mCBCT to Monarch RAB did not significantly improve DY or reduce complications but reduced procedure duration at the cost of increased radiation exposure.
Summary
- Evaluated diagnostic performance of Monarch™ vs. Monarch™ + mobile Cone-beam CT (mCBCT).
- Diagnostic yield and complication rates were similar.
- The mCBCT group had shorter procedure times and about 40-fold higher radiation doses.
Conference presentation
The study findings have been presented in American Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology Annual Conference in 2024.
The institutional review board approved all protocols (IRB 23–005284).
{"title":"Diagnostic performance of monarch robotic bronchoscopy with and without mobile cone-beam CT support","authors":"Jingjing Chen, Dakota McNierney, Joe G. Zein, Laszlo T. Vaszar, Karen L. Swanson, Natalya Azadeh, Kenneth K. Sakata","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2026.108910","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2026.108910","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (RAB) is limited by CT-to-body divergence. Cone-beam CT (CBCT) may enhance tool-to-lesion alignment and diagnostic yield (DY), but the benefit of integrating mobile CBCT (mCBCT) into the Monarch<sup>TM</sup> RAB remains understudied. This is the first study to evaluate diagnostic performance between Monarch alone versus Monarch plus mCBCT for peripheral pulmonary lesion (PPL) biopsy, hypothesizing improved DY with the combined approach.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This single-center retrospective study examined adults undergoing RAB biopsy for PPLs (May 2019—March 2023), applying a strict DY definition. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were evaluated in Monarch and Monarch plus mCBCT groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 331 cases, 179 used Monarch and 152 used Monarch plus mCBCT. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics. DY was not different (70.9 % in Monarch vs 71.7 % in Monarch plus mCBCT, p = 0.976) nor were complication rates (7.3 % in Monarch vs. 3.9 % in Monarch plus mCBCT, p = 0.291). In the Monarch group, the procedure duration was longer (77 min in Monarch vs. 69 min in Monarch plus mCBCT, p = 0.002) and the radiation dose was lower (7.4 mGy in Monarch vs. 285.9 mGy in Monarch plus mCBCT, p < 0.001). Adjusted analysis demonstrated that mCBCT was not associated with improved DY (OR [95 % CI]: 1.33[0.78–2.28]) or reduced risk for complications (OR [95 % CI]: 0.41 [0.13; 1.14]). DY increased with larger nodule size but not with lesion location.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Evaluating outcomes across two sequential practice eras, the addition of mCBCT to Monarch RAB did not significantly improve DY or reduce complications but reduced procedure duration at the cost of increased radiation exposure.</div></div><div><h3>Summary</h3><div>- Evaluated diagnostic performance of Monarch™ vs. Monarch™ + mobile Cone-beam CT (mCBCT).</div><div>- Diagnostic yield and complication rates were similar.</div><div>- The mCBCT group had shorter procedure times and about 40-fold higher radiation doses.</div></div><div><h3>Conference presentation</h3><div>The study findings have been presented in American Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology Annual Conference in 2024.</div><div>The institutional review board approved all protocols (IRB 23–005284).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 108910"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146009919","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2026-01-09DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2026.108906
Omar Abdel-Rahman , Paul Taylor , Mary O’Brien , Jo Raskin , Claudio Dazzi , Veerle Surmont , Sabrina Zonato , Robin Young , Anne-Claire Toffart , Petra Jankowska , Adam Hassani , Sandrine Marreaud , Luc Boone , Sanjay Popat
Introduction
Pleural mesothelioma (PM) is a lethal malignancy in which angiogenesis and progressive fibrosis drives disease. We evaluated angiogenesis inhibition using nintedanib monotherapy as switch maintenance in patients with PM that completed 4–6 cycles of prior platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy. The trial was performed in parallel to the LUME-Meso trial in an era prior to routine immune checkpoint inhibitor use, when platinum-pemetrexed was standard of care.
Methods
This is a triple-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentric, randomized, phase II study. Patients with inoperable PM (all histologies) that completed 4–6 cycles of platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy were randomized to nintedanib or placebo. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and safety.
Results
The trial was prematurely closed due to poor accrual after LUME-meso reported. 37 patients were randomized (18 to nintedanib, 19 to placebo). All analyses performed were descriptive. The median PFS was 3.4 months (95% CI: 2.83–5.82) and 4.6 months (95% CI: 3.65–13.17) for nintedanib and placebo arms, respectively (HR = 2.25, 95% CI: 1.07–4.73) with corresponding median OS of 13.1 months (95% CI: 10.22–26.02) and 38.9 months (95% CI: 18.66-NE) for nintedanib and placebo arms, respectively (HR = 2.38, 95% CI: 1.05–5.43). Two patients (11.1%) in the nintedanib arm experienced ≥ grade 3 treatment-related adverse events. Post progression treatment was balanced between arms but more patients in the placebo arm received immunotherapy (87% vs 54%).
Conclusions
Descriptive analyses suggest switch maintenance nintedanib does not improve PFS nor OS compared to placebo. Efficacy of the placebo arm may be related to imbalanced immunotherapy usage.
{"title":"Nintedanib as switch maintenance treatment in malignant pleural mesothelioma (NEMO): A double-blind randomized phase II trial (EORTC-08112-LCG)","authors":"Omar Abdel-Rahman , Paul Taylor , Mary O’Brien , Jo Raskin , Claudio Dazzi , Veerle Surmont , Sabrina Zonato , Robin Young , Anne-Claire Toffart , Petra Jankowska , Adam Hassani , Sandrine Marreaud , Luc Boone , Sanjay Popat","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2026.108906","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2026.108906","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Pleural mesothelioma (PM) is a lethal malignancy in which angiogenesis and progressive fibrosis drives disease. We evaluated angiogenesis inhibition using nintedanib monotherapy as switch maintenance in patients with PM that completed 4–6 cycles of prior platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy. The trial was performed in parallel to the LUME-Meso trial in an era prior to routine immune checkpoint inhibitor use, when platinum-pemetrexed was standard of care.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a triple-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentric, randomized, phase II study. Patients with inoperable PM (all histologies) that completed 4–6 cycles of platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy were randomized to nintedanib or placebo. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and safety.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The trial was prematurely closed due to poor accrual after LUME-meso reported. 37 patients were randomized (18 to nintedanib, 19 to placebo). All analyses performed were descriptive. The median PFS was 3.4 months (95% CI: 2.83–5.82) and 4.6 months (95% CI: 3.65–13.17) for nintedanib and placebo arms, respectively (HR = 2.25, 95% CI: 1.07–4.73) with corresponding median OS of 13.1 months (95% CI: 10.22–26.02) and 38.9 months (95% CI: 18.66-NE) for nintedanib and placebo arms, respectively (HR = 2.38, 95% CI: 1.05–5.43). Two patients (11.1%) in the nintedanib arm experienced ≥ grade 3 treatment-related adverse events. Post progression treatment was balanced between arms but more patients in the placebo arm received immunotherapy (87% vs 54%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Descriptive analyses suggest switch maintenance nintedanib does not improve PFS nor OS compared to placebo. Efficacy of the placebo arm may be related to imbalanced immunotherapy usage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 108906"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145981117","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-10-03DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108788
Luis Paz-Ares , Remi Veillon , Margarita Majem , Caicun Zhou , Ke-Jing Tang , Sang-We Kim , Gary Richardson , Nicolas Girard , Rachel E. Sanborn , Aaron S. Mansfield , Keunchil Park , Julia Schuchard , Joris Diels , Jan Sermon , Archan Bhattacharya , Patricia Lorenzini , Honeylet Wortman-Vayn , Roland E. Knoblauch , Trishala Agrawal , Mahadi Baig , Joshua K. Sabari
Background
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertions (Ex20ins) are the third most common type of EGFR mutation, occurring in up to 12% of EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC). Ex20ins-mutated NSCLC can be resistant to most approved tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The Phase III PAPILLON trial (NCT04538664) demonstrated that amivantamab plus chemotherapy significantly improves progression-free survival (PFS) compared to chemotherapy alone, leading to its approval as a first-line treatment for patients with Ex20ins NSCLC. PAPILLON further evaluated patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and time to symptomatic progression (TTSP).
Methods
The open-label, multicenter trial randomized 308 treatment-naïve patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC harboring Ex20ins to receive either amivantamab plus carboplatin-pemetrexed (n = 154) or chemotherapy alone (n = 154). TTSP was defined as the time to onset or worsening of lung cancer-related symptoms necessitating treatment change or clinical intervention, or death. PROs were assessed using the PROMIS PF8c and EORTC QLQ-C30.
Results
At 12 months, 77 % of patients in the amivantamab-chemotherapy arm remained free of symptomatic progression versus 60 % in the chemotherapy arm (HR, 0.67; 95 % CI, 0.46–0.98; p = 0.04). Physical functioning and global health status PROs were maintained in both arms, with a higher proportion of patients treated in the amivantamab-chemotherapy arm reporting stable or improved quality of life at 6 and 12 months.
Conclusions
Amivantamab plus chemotherapy significantly delays symptomatic progression without compromising health-related quality of life, reinforcing its role as a first-line treatment for Ex20ins-mutated NSCLC.
{"title":"Patient-reported outcomes and time to symptomatic progression from PAPILLON: amivantamab plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy as first-line treatment of EGFR exon 20 insertion-mutated advanced NSCLC","authors":"Luis Paz-Ares , Remi Veillon , Margarita Majem , Caicun Zhou , Ke-Jing Tang , Sang-We Kim , Gary Richardson , Nicolas Girard , Rachel E. Sanborn , Aaron S. Mansfield , Keunchil Park , Julia Schuchard , Joris Diels , Jan Sermon , Archan Bhattacharya , Patricia Lorenzini , Honeylet Wortman-Vayn , Roland E. Knoblauch , Trishala Agrawal , Mahadi Baig , Joshua K. Sabari","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108788","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108788","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Epidermal growth factor receptor (<em>EGFR</em>) exon 20 insertions (Ex20ins) are the third most common type of <em>EGFR</em> mutation, occurring in up to 12% of <em>EGFR</em>-mutated non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC). Ex20ins-mutated NSCLC can be resistant to most approved tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The Phase III PAPILLON trial (NCT04538664) demonstrated that amivantamab plus chemotherapy significantly improves progression-free survival (PFS) compared to chemotherapy alone, leading to its approval as a first-line treatment for patients with Ex20ins NSCLC. PAPILLON further evaluated patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and time to symptomatic progression (TTSP).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The open-label, multicenter trial randomized 308 treatment-naïve patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC harboring Ex20ins to receive either amivantamab plus carboplatin-pemetrexed (n = 154) or chemotherapy alone (n = 154). TTSP was defined as the time to onset or worsening of lung cancer-related symptoms necessitating treatment change or clinical intervention, or death. PROs were assessed using the PROMIS PF8c and EORTC QLQ-C30.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>At 12 months, 77 % of patients in the amivantamab-chemotherapy arm remained free of symptomatic progression versus 60 % in the chemotherapy arm (HR, 0.67; 95 % CI, 0.46–0.98; p = 0.04). Physical functioning and global health status PROs were maintained in both arms, with a higher proportion of patients treated in the amivantamab-chemotherapy arm reporting stable or improved quality of life at 6 and 12 months.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Amivantamab plus chemotherapy significantly delays symptomatic progression without compromising health-related quality of life, reinforcing its role as a first-line treatment for Ex20ins-mutated NSCLC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 108788"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146079605","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Curative surgery followed by adjuvant osimertinib according to pathological stage (pStage) is standard for resectable epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nevertheless, recurrence remains a concern even in Stage IA, for which adjuvant osimertinib is not indicated. We evaluated the utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to predict recurrence in patients with resected pStage I-III EGFR-mutated NSCLC and examined prognostic value of preoperative biomarkers and pathological features.
Methods
Between January 2017 and May 2020, 382 patients with lung tumors underwent surgery at Kanazawa University Hospital, including 88 with NSCLC harboring common EGFR mutations. Preoperative ctDNA was analyzed using droplet digital PCR, targeting EGFR mutations. Patients were followed for up to 6.4 years, and disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated.
Results
Preoperative ctDNA positivity was detected in 26.1 % and venous invasion in 39.8 %. ctDNA-positive patients had lower 60-month DFS (54.1 % vs. 84.1 %; HR = 3.25; 95 % CI, 1.13–9.21; p = 0.028) and 60-month OS (65.1 % vs. 95.9 %; HR = 6.10; 95 % CI, 1.11–33.46; p = 0.037). Venous invasion was independently associated with poorer DFS (HR = 8.73; 95 % CI, 1.81–41.93; p = 0.0068). In combined analyses, no recurrences occurred in the double-negative, whereas the double-positive had a lower 60-month DFS than the single-positive (HR = 3.61; 95 % CI, 1.19–10.93; p = 0.023).
Conclusion
Preoperative ctDNA detection and pathological venous invasion provide complementary prognostic information, and venous invasion is an independent predictor of recurrence risk in EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Combined assessment may refine postoperative risk stratification and inform perioperative management.
根据病理分期(pStage)进行根治性手术后辅以奥希替尼是可切除的表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的标准治疗方法。然而,即使在IA期,复发仍然是一个问题,辅助奥希替尼不适用。我们评估了循环肿瘤DNA (ctDNA)在预测切除的pi - iii期egfr突变的非小细胞肺癌患者复发中的应用,并检查了术前生物标志物和病理特征的预后价值。方法2017年1月至2020年5月,382例肺肿瘤患者在金泽大学医院接受了手术,其中88例患有常见EGFR突变的非小细胞肺癌。术前ctDNA分析采用液滴数字PCR,靶向EGFR突变。患者随访6.4年,评估无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)。结果术前ctDNA阳性占26.1%,静脉浸润占39.8%。ctdna阳性患者的60个月DFS(54.1%比84.1%;HR = 3.25; 95% CI, 1.13-9.21; p = 0.028)和60个月OS(65.1%比95.9%;HR = 6.10; 95% CI, 1.11-33.46; p = 0.037)较低。静脉侵犯与较差的DFS独立相关(HR = 8.73; 95% CI, 1.81 ~ 41.93; p = 0.0068)。在联合分析中,双阴性患者没有复发,而双阳性患者的60个月DFS低于单阳性患者(HR = 3.61; 95% CI, 1.19-10.93; p = 0.023)。结论术前ctDNA检测和病理性静脉浸润提供了互补的预后信息,静脉浸润是egfr突变NSCLC复发风险的独立预测因子。综合评估可细化术后风险分层,为围手术期管理提供信息。
{"title":"Prognostic value of preoperative ctDNA and pathological venous invasion for recurrence in EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer","authors":"Yuya Murase , Hayato Koba , Hideharu Kimura , Isao Matsumoto , Tsukasa Ueda , Shunichi Nomura , Sachiko Arai , Nanao Terada , Liu Yifeng , Shigeki Nanjo , Yuichi Tambo , Takafumi Kobayashi , Satoshi Watanabe , Kenta Yamamura , Noriyuki Ohkura , Miki Abo , Akihiro Nomura , Seiji Yano","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108818","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108818","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Curative surgery followed by adjuvant osimertinib according to pathological stage (pStage) is standard for resectable epidermal growth factor receptor (<em>EGFR</em>)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nevertheless, recurrence remains a concern even in Stage IA, for which adjuvant osimertinib is not indicated. We evaluated the utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to predict recurrence in patients with resected pStage I-III <em>EGFR</em>-mutated NSCLC and examined prognostic value of preoperative biomarkers and pathological features.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Between January 2017 and May 2020, 382 patients with lung tumors underwent surgery at Kanazawa University Hospital, including 88 with NSCLC harboring common <em>EGFR</em> mutations. Preoperative ctDNA was analyzed using droplet digital PCR, targeting <em>EGFR</em> mutations. Patients were followed for up to 6.4 years, and disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Preoperative ctDNA positivity was detected in 26.1 % and venous invasion in 39.8 %. ctDNA-positive patients had lower 60-month DFS (54.1 % vs. 84.1 %; HR = 3.25; 95 % CI, 1.13–9.21; <em>p</em> = 0.028) and 60-month OS (65.1 % vs. 95.9 %; HR = 6.10; 95 % CI, 1.11–33.46; <em>p</em> = 0.037). Venous invasion was independently associated with poorer DFS (HR = 8.73; 95 % CI, 1.81–41.93; <em>p</em> = 0.0068). In combined analyses, no recurrences occurred in the double-negative, whereas the double-positive had a lower 60-month DFS than the single-positive (HR = 3.61; 95 % CI, 1.19–10.93; <em>p</em> = 0.023).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Preoperative ctDNA detection and pathological venous invasion provide complementary prognostic information, and venous invasion is an independent predictor of recurrence risk in <em>EGFR</em>-mutated NSCLC. Combined assessment may refine postoperative risk stratification and inform perioperative management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 108818"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145981780","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2026-01-17DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2026.108915
Erica Pietroluongo , Giovannella Palmieri , Paolo Antonio Ascierto , Margaret Ottaviano
Background and objective
Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) are rare malignancies often associated with immunological disorders (IDs), including autoimmune diseases and paraneoplastic syndromes. Myasthenia gravis (MG) is the most frequently reported condition, although other IDs can manifest across various organ systems. This review aims to give an overview of the current knowledge on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, and management of IDs associated with TETs, emphasizing their prognostic impact and challenges in clinical practice.
Methods
We performed a narrative review using PubMed and Embase databases to identify relevant literature published between January 1971 and October 2024. Keywords included “thymic epithelial tumors”, “immunological disorders,” “autoimmune diseases,” and “paraneoplastic syndromes.” Only peer-reviewed articles in English were included.
Key content and findings
This review examines the association of TETs with the most frequent IDs, including MG, pure red cell aplasia, and Good’s syndrome. The prognostic implications of IDs in TETs remain unclear, and the available literature presents conflicting data. While some studies suggest correlations with favourable outcomes, others fail to establish IDs as independent prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS).
Conclusions
The management of TETs with associated IDs requires a multidisciplinary approach that integrates tumor-specific treatments and tailored interventions for immune-related disorders. Advances in understanding molecular mechanisms have shed light on their pathogenesis. Nevertheless, gaps persist regarding prognostic implications and long-term management. Future efforts should focus on identifying predictive biomarkers for immune complications, optimizing therapies, and enhancing international data collection to clarify the impact of IDs on patient outcomes.
{"title":"Immune-related disorders in patients with Thymic Epithelial Tumors: from pathogenesis to tailored interventions","authors":"Erica Pietroluongo , Giovannella Palmieri , Paolo Antonio Ascierto , Margaret Ottaviano","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2026.108915","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2026.108915","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) are rare malignancies often associated with immunological disorders (IDs), including autoimmune diseases and paraneoplastic syndromes. Myasthenia gravis (MG) is the most frequently reported condition, although other IDs can manifest across various organ systems. This review aims to give an overview of the current knowledge on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, and management of IDs associated with TETs, emphasizing their prognostic impact and challenges in clinical practice.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a narrative review using PubMed and Embase databases to identify relevant literature published between January 1971 and October 2024. Keywords included “thymic epithelial tumors”, “immunological disorders,” “autoimmune diseases,” and “paraneoplastic syndromes.” Only peer-reviewed articles in English were included.</div></div><div><h3>Key content and findings</h3><div>This review examines the association of TETs with the most frequent IDs, including MG, pure red cell aplasia, and Good’s syndrome. The prognostic implications of IDs in TETs remain unclear, and the available literature presents conflicting data. While some studies suggest correlations with favourable outcomes, others fail to establish IDs as independent prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The management of TETs with associated IDs requires a multidisciplinary approach that integrates tumor-specific treatments and tailored interventions for immune-related disorders. Advances in understanding molecular mechanisms have shed light on their pathogenesis. Nevertheless, gaps persist regarding prognostic implications and long-term management. Future efforts should focus on identifying predictive biomarkers for immune complications, optimizing therapies, and enhancing international data collection to clarify the impact of IDs on patient outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 108915"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146029993","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2026-01-23DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2026.108937
Xiaorong Lu, Shanshan Yuan
{"title":"Methodological considerations in assessing the clinical impact of TP53 classifications in advanced NSCLC","authors":"Xiaorong Lu, Shanshan Yuan","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2026.108937","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2026.108937","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 108937"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146035673","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}