首页 > 最新文献

Lung Cancer最新文献

英文 中文
Safety assessment of KRAS (G12C) inhibitors based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database: A real-world pharmacovigilance study 基于 FDA 不良事件报告系统 (FAERS) 数据库的 KRAS (G12C) 抑制剂安全性评估:真实世界药物警戒研究。
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107966
Maohua Chen , Yaping Huang , Shaojun Jiang , Chengjie Ke

Objectives

KRAS (G12C) inhibitors (sotorasib and adagrasib) have approved treatment in patients with KRAS (G12C)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The post-marketing data concerning KRAS (G12C) inhibitors remain limited, and the outcomes of relevant studies are yet to yield conclusive evidence supporting the long-term safety of KRAS (G12C) inhibitors.

Materials and methods

This investigation comprehensively assessed adverse events (AEs) attributed to KRAS (G12C) inhibitors by employing advanced data mining techniques, utilizing the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). The dataset encompasses the period from the first quarter of 2021 to the first quarter of 2024. A disproportionality analysis was conducted to quantify the correlation between KRAS (G12C) inhibitors and AEs. The metrics employed for the evaluation of disproportionality comprise the reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), the information component (IC), and the empirical Bayesian geometric mean (EBGM).

Results

A total of 2,253 and 486 reports were identified as related to sotorasib and adagrasib, with the identification of 51 and 26 preferred terms, respectively. The most frequent AEs of sotorasib comprised diarrhoea (ROR 5.27), hepatotoxicity (ROR 38.09), alanine aminotransferase increased (ROR 17.41), aspartate aminotransferase increased (ROR 20.88), and hepatic function abnormal (ROR 19.88). The most common AEs of adagrasib included diarrhoea (ROR 4.21), nausea (ROR 3.84), vomiting (ROR 5.36), decreased appetite (ROR 4.79), and dehydration (ROR 7.00). A relatively reduced risk of hepatotoxicity but a increased risk of serious AEs in adagrasib compared to sotorasib (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Our findings would provide valued evidence for healthcare professionals to recognize AEs associated with KRAS (G12C) inhibitors and differences between sotorasib and adagrasib, and guide their clinical practice.
目的:KRAS(G12C)抑制剂(sotorasib和adagrasib)已获准用于治疗KRAS(G12C)突变的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者。KRAS (G12C)抑制剂上市后的相关数据仍然有限,相关研究结果尚未得出支持KRAS (G12C)抑制剂长期安全性的确凿证据:这项调查采用先进的数据挖掘技术,利用美国食品药物管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS),全面评估了KRAS(G12C)抑制剂引起的不良事件(AEs)。数据集涵盖 2021 年第一季度至 2024 年第一季度。为了量化 KRAS (G12C) 抑制剂与 AE 之间的相关性,我们进行了比例失调分析。评估比例失调的指标包括报告几率比(ROR)、比例报告比(PRR)、信息成分(IC)和经验贝叶斯几何平均数(EBGM):共识别出2253份和486份与索托拉西布和阿达拉西布相关的报告,分别识别出51个和26个首选术语。索托拉西布最常见的不良反应包括腹泻(ROR 5.27)、肝毒性(ROR 38.09)、丙氨酸氨基转移酶升高(ROR 17.41)、天冬氨酸氨基转移酶升高(ROR 20.88)和肝功能异常(ROR 19.88)。阿达拉昔布最常见的不良反应包括腹泻(ROR 4.21)、恶心(ROR 3.84)、呕吐(ROR 5.36)、食欲下降(ROR 4.79)和脱水(ROR 7.00)。与索拉西布相比,阿达拉西布发生肝毒性的风险相对较低,但发生严重AEs的风险较高(P 结论:阿达拉西布的肝毒性风险相对较低,但发生严重AEs的风险较高):我们的研究结果将为医护人员识别 KRAS (G12C) 抑制剂相关的 AEs 以及索托拉西布和阿达拉西布之间的差异提供有价值的证据,并指导他们的临床实践。
{"title":"Safety assessment of KRAS (G12C) inhibitors based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database: A real-world pharmacovigilance study","authors":"Maohua Chen ,&nbsp;Yaping Huang ,&nbsp;Shaojun Jiang ,&nbsp;Chengjie Ke","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107966","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107966","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div><em>KRAS (G12C)</em> inhibitors (sotorasib and adagrasib) have approved treatment in patients with <em>KRAS (G12C)</em>-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The post-marketing data concerning <em>KRAS (G12C)</em> inhibitors remain limited, and the outcomes of relevant studies are yet to yield conclusive evidence supporting the long-term safety of <em>KRAS (G12C)</em> inhibitors.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>This investigation comprehensively assessed adverse events (AEs) attributed to <em>KRAS (G12C)</em> inhibitors by employing advanced data mining techniques, utilizing the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). The dataset encompasses the period from the first quarter of 2021 to the first quarter of 2024. A disproportionality analysis was conducted to quantify the correlation between <em>KRAS (G12C)</em> inhibitors and AEs. The metrics employed for the evaluation of disproportionality comprise the reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), the information component (IC), and the empirical Bayesian geometric mean (EBGM).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 2,253 and 486 reports were identified as related to sotorasib and adagrasib, with the identification of 51 and 26 preferred terms, respectively. The most frequent AEs of sotorasib comprised diarrhoea (ROR 5.27), hepatotoxicity (ROR 38.09), alanine aminotransferase increased (ROR 17.41), aspartate aminotransferase increased (ROR 20.88), and hepatic function abnormal (ROR 19.88). The most common AEs of adagrasib included diarrhoea (ROR 4.21), nausea (ROR 3.84), vomiting (ROR 5.36), decreased appetite (ROR 4.79), and dehydration (ROR 7.00). A relatively reduced risk of hepatotoxicity but a increased risk of serious AEs in adagrasib compared to sotorasib (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our findings would provide valued evidence for healthcare professionals to recognize AEs associated with <em>KRAS (G12C)</em> inhibitors and differences between sotorasib and adagrasib, and guide their clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"196 ","pages":"Article 107966"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142349510","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The prediction of treatment outcome in NSCLC patients harboring an EGFR exon 20 mutation using molecular modeling 利用分子建模预测表皮生长因子受体外显子 20 基因突变的非小细胞肺癌患者的治疗效果。
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107973
F. Zwierenga , L. Zhang , J. Melcr , E. Schuuring , B.A.M.H. van Veggel , A.J. de Langen , H.J.M. Groen , M.R. Groves , A.J. van der Wekken

Introduction

The structural effect of uncommon heterogenous in-frame deletion and/or insertion mutations within exon 20 (EGFRex20+) in relation to therapy response is poorly understood. This study aims to elucidate the structural alterations caused by EGFRex20+ mutations and correlate these changes with patient responses.

Material and method

We selected EGFRex20+ mutations from advanced NSCLC patients in the Position20 and AFACET studies for computational analysis. Homology models representing both inactive and active conformations of these mutations were generated using the Swiss-Model server. Molecular docking studies with EGFR-TKIs was conducted using smina, followed by Molecular Dynamic (MD) simulations performed with GROMACS. These computational findings were compared with clinical outcomes to evaluate their potential in predicting patient response.

Results

Our docking studies of 29 EGFRex20+ mutations revealed that the binding energies of afatinib, osimertinib, zipalertinib, and sunvozertinib, compared to the wild type, do not significantly impact either TKI’s efficacy. MD simulations for eight EGFRex20+ mutations (A763_Y764insFQEA, A767_V769dup, S768_D770dup, D770_N771insG, D770_P772dup, N771_H773dup, H773_V774insY and H773_V774delinsLM) revealed varying degrees of instability. For six variants, predicted activation based on the αC-helix stability and orientation, as well as TKI sensitivity, aligned well with clinical observations from the Position20 and AFACET studies. Two mutations (D770_N771insG and N771_H773dup) predicted as poor to moderate responders, showed minimal activation of the αC-helix region, warranting further investigation.

Conclusion

In conclusion, MD simulations can effectively predict patient outcomes by connecting computational results with clinical data and advancing our understanding of EGFR mutations and their therapeutic responses.
简介:人们对表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)外显子20(EGFRex20+)内不常见的异源框内缺失和/或插入突变的结构效应与治疗反应的关系知之甚少。本研究旨在阐明表皮生长因子受体ex20+突变引起的结构改变,并将这些改变与患者的反应相关联:我们选择了 Position20 和 AFACET 研究中晚期 NSCLC 患者的 EGFRex20+ 突变进行计算分析。使用 Swiss-Model 服务器生成了代表这些突变的非活性和活性构象的同源模型。使用 smina 与 EGFR-TKIs 进行了分子对接研究,然后使用 GROMACS 进行了分子动力学 (MD) 模拟。这些计算结果与临床结果进行了比较,以评估它们在预测患者反应方面的潜力:结果:我们对 29 个 EGFRex20+ 突变基因进行的对接研究显示,与野生型相比,阿法替尼、奥西莫替尼、齐帕替尼和桑沃泽替尼的结合能对两种 TKI 的疗效均无显著影响。对八个 EGFRex20+ 突变(A763_Y764insFQEA、A767_V769dup、S768_D770dup、D770_N771insG、D770_P772dup、N771_H773dup、H773_V774insY 和 H773_V774delinsLM)的 MD 模拟显示了不同程度的不稳定性。对于 6 个变异,根据 αC 螺旋的稳定性和方向以及 TKI 敏感性预测的激活与 Position20 和 AFACET 研究的临床观察结果非常吻合。两个突变(D770_N771insG 和 N771_H773dup)被预测为反应较差至中等,但显示出对αC螺旋区域的激活极小,值得进一步研究:总之,通过将计算结果与临床数据联系起来,MD 模拟可以有效预测患者的预后,并促进我们对表皮生长因子受体突变及其治疗反应的了解。
{"title":"The prediction of treatment outcome in NSCLC patients harboring an EGFR exon 20 mutation using molecular modeling","authors":"F. Zwierenga ,&nbsp;L. Zhang ,&nbsp;J. Melcr ,&nbsp;E. Schuuring ,&nbsp;B.A.M.H. van Veggel ,&nbsp;A.J. de Langen ,&nbsp;H.J.M. Groen ,&nbsp;M.R. Groves ,&nbsp;A.J. van der Wekken","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107973","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107973","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The structural effect of uncommon heterogenous in-frame deletion and/or insertion mutations within exon 20 (EGFRex20+) in relation to therapy response is poorly understood. This study aims to elucidate the structural alterations caused by EGFRex20+ mutations and correlate these changes with patient responses.</div></div><div><h3>Material and method</h3><div>We selected EGFRex20+ mutations from advanced NSCLC patients in the Position20 and AFACET studies for computational analysis. Homology models representing both inactive and active conformations of these mutations were generated using the Swiss-Model server. Molecular docking studies with EGFR-TKIs was conducted using smina, followed by Molecular Dynamic (MD) simulations performed with GROMACS. These computational findings were compared with clinical outcomes to evaluate their potential in predicting patient response.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our docking studies of 29 EGFRex20+ mutations revealed that the binding energies of afatinib, osimertinib, zipalertinib, and sunvozertinib, compared to the wild type, do not significantly impact either TKI’s efficacy. MD simulations for eight EGFRex20+ mutations (A763_Y764insFQEA, A767_V769dup, S768_D770dup, D770_N771insG, D770_P772dup, N771_H773dup, H773_V774insY and H773_V774delinsLM) revealed varying degrees of instability. For six variants, predicted activation based on the αC-helix stability and orientation, as well as TKI sensitivity, aligned well with clinical observations from the Position20 and AFACET studies. Two mutations (D770_N771insG and N771_H773dup) predicted as poor to moderate responders, showed minimal activation of the αC-helix region, warranting further investigation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In conclusion, MD simulations can effectively predict patient outcomes by connecting computational results with clinical data and advancing our understanding of EGFR mutations and their therapeutic responses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 107973"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142391655","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
MTAP as an emerging biomarker in thoracic malignancies MTAP 作为胸部恶性肿瘤的新兴生物标记物。
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107963
Magdalena M. Brune , Spasenija Savic Prince , Tatjana Vlajnic , Obinna Chijioke , Luca Roma , David König , Lukas Bubendorf
S-methyl-5′-thioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP) deficiency is an emerging biomarker in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and beyond. The MTAP gene is located in the chromosomal region 9p21.3, which shows one of the most common homozygous deletions across all human cancers (9p21 loss). Loss of 9p21 is found in the majority of pleural mesotheliomas, where it serves as an established diagnostic marker. Until recently, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was the gold standard for the detection of 9p21 losses, but loss of MTAP expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) gains increasing importance as an easy to apply and cost-effective diagnostic surrogate marker. Besides, MTAP loss, which has been reported in 13% of NSCLC, is becoming an emerging predictive biomarker in two different scenarios in NSCLC and other cancer types: 1) MTAP loss seems to negatively predict the response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment via silencing of the tumor microenvironment, and 2) MTAP loss serves as a predictive biomarker for novel targeted treatment strategies. MTAP deficiency leads to an impaired function of the protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) due to its partial inhibition by MTAP’s accumulating substrate methylthioadenosine (MTA). This process leaves MTAP deficient tumor cells heavily dependent on the remaining function of PRMT5, making it a perfect target for synthetic lethality. Indeed, MTA-cooperative PRMT5-inhibitors are now tested in several clinical trials with promising early results in solid malignancies. With its emergence as a predictive biomarker, the implementation of MTAP IHC into diagnostic routine for NSCLC and other tumors is likely to take place soon. In this review article, we summarize the current literature on the role of MTAP in thoracic tumors and evaluate different testing methods, including IHC, FISH and next generation sequencing.
S-甲基-5'-硫代腺苷磷酸化酶(MTAP)缺乏症是非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)及其他癌症的一种新兴生物标志物。MTAP 基因位于染色体区域 9p21.3,该区域是所有人类癌症中最常见的同源缺失区域之一(9p21 缺失)。大多数胸膜间皮瘤中都存在 9p21 缺失,它已成为胸膜间皮瘤的诊断标志。直到最近,荧光原位杂交(FISH)仍是检测 9p21 缺失的金标准,但通过免疫组化(IHC)检测 MTAP 表达的缺失,作为一种易于应用且经济有效的诊断替代标记,其重要性与日俱增。此外,有报道称13%的NSCLC存在MTAP缺失,它正在成为NSCLC和其他癌症类型中两种不同情况下的新兴预测性生物标记物:1)MTAP缺失似乎可以通过抑制肿瘤微环境对免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)治疗的反应做出负面预测;2)MTAP缺失可作为新型靶向治疗策略的预测性生物标志物。MTAP 缺乏会导致精氨酸甲基转移酶 5(PRMT5)功能受损,因为 MTAP 的累积底物甲硫腺苷(MTA)会对其产生部分抑制作用。这一过程使 MTAP 缺乏的肿瘤细胞严重依赖 PRMT5 的剩余功能,使其成为合成致死的完美靶点。事实上,MTA 协同 PRMT5 抑制剂目前已在几项临床试验中进行了测试,在实体恶性肿瘤中取得了令人鼓舞的早期结果。随着MTAP作为一种预测性生物标记物的出现,MTAP IHC很可能很快就会应用于NSCLC和其他肿瘤的常规诊断中。在这篇综述文章中,我们总结了目前有关 MTAP 在胸部肿瘤中作用的文献,并评估了不同的检测方法,包括 IHC、FISH 和新一代测序。
{"title":"MTAP as an emerging biomarker in thoracic malignancies","authors":"Magdalena M. Brune ,&nbsp;Spasenija Savic Prince ,&nbsp;Tatjana Vlajnic ,&nbsp;Obinna Chijioke ,&nbsp;Luca Roma ,&nbsp;David König ,&nbsp;Lukas Bubendorf","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107963","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107963","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>S-methyl-5′-thioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP) deficiency is an emerging biomarker in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and beyond. The <em>MTAP</em> gene is located in the chromosomal region <em>9p21.3</em>, which shows one of the most common homozygous deletions across all human cancers (<em>9p21</em> loss). Loss of <em>9p21</em> is found in the majority of pleural mesotheliomas, where it serves as an established diagnostic marker. Until recently, fluorescence <em>in situ</em> hybridization (FISH) was the gold standard for the detection of <em>9p21</em> losses, but loss of MTAP expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) gains increasing importance as an easy to apply and cost-effective diagnostic surrogate marker. Besides, <em>MTAP</em> loss, which has been reported in 13% of NSCLC, is becoming an emerging predictive biomarker in two different scenarios in NSCLC and other cancer types: 1) <em>MTAP</em> loss seems to negatively predict the response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment via silencing of the tumor microenvironment, and 2) <em>MTAP</em> loss serves as a predictive biomarker for novel targeted treatment strategies. MTAP deficiency leads to an impaired function of the protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) due to its partial inhibition by MTAP’s accumulating substrate methylthioadenosine (MTA). This process leaves MTAP deficient tumor cells heavily dependent on the remaining function of PRMT5, making it a perfect target for synthetic lethality. Indeed, MTA-cooperative PRMT5-inhibitors are now tested in several clinical trials with promising early results in solid malignancies. With its emergence as a predictive biomarker, the implementation of MTAP IHC into diagnostic routine for NSCLC and other tumors is likely to take place soon. In this review article, we summarize the current literature on the role of MTAP in thoracic tumors and evaluate different testing methods, including IHC, FISH and next generation sequencing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 107963"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142365767","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Systematic review and network meta-analysis of lorlatinib with comparison to other anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as first-line treatment for ALK-positive advanced non-smallcell lung cancer (NSCLC) 罗拉替尼与其他无性淋巴瘤激酶(ALK)酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)作为ALK阳性晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)一线治疗药物的系统综述和网络荟萃分析。
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107968
Sai-Hong Ou , Hannah Kilvert , Jane Candlish , Ben Lee , Anna Polli , Despina Thomaidou , Hannah Le

Background

Next-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (alectinib, brigatinib, and lorlatinib) demonstrate superior progression-free survival (PFS) over chemotherapy or crizotinib as first-line (1L) treatment of ALK-positive advanced non-smallcell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

We conducted network meta-analyses (NMAs) comparing the relative efficacy of lorlatinib with other ALK TKIs in this indication. Evidence identified from a systematic literature review and subsequent updates formed the basis of our evidence. The primary analysis investigated PFS by independent review committee (IRC) in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Secondary outcomes included PFS among subgroups, intracranial time to progression (IC TTP), adverse events, and discontinuation due to adverse events. For each of the outcomes, Bayesian proportional hazards NMAs estimated the relative treatment effects.
Additionally, we compared the design and results of eight published NMAs conducted for 1L ALK + advanced NSCLC to date.

Results

We formed a network of 10 trials, allowing indirect treatment comparisons. Two trials directly compared alectinib (600 mg twice daily) to crizotinib and one trial directly compared lorlatinib to crizotinib. The results of the NMA show that the hazard ratios (95 % credible interval [CrI]) for ITT PFS IRC were 0.61 (95 % CrI: 0.39, 0.97) when comparing lorlatinib with alectinib (600 mg twice daily) and 0.57 (95 % CrI: 0.35, 0.93) when comparing lorlatinib with brigatinib.
In the review of published NMAs, HRs for lorlatinib versus alectinib (600 mg twice daily) and brigatinib were compared. This comparison confirmed that each published NMA yielded similar results.

Conclusions

Our NMA analysis adds to existing findings and supplements data gaps from other published NMAs. Findings from eight published NMAs consistently supported lorlatinib as a clinically effective 1L treatment for ALK + advanced NSCLC patients compared to other TKIs.
背景:新一代无性淋巴瘤激酶(ALK)酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)(阿来替尼、布瑞加替尼和lorlatinib)在一线(1L)治疗ALK阳性晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中显示出优于化疗或克唑替尼的无进展生存期(PFS):我们进行了网络荟萃分析(NMAs),比较了lorlatinib与其他ALK TKIs在该适应症中的相对疗效。从系统文献综述和后续更新中发现的证据构成了我们的证据基础。主要分析由独立审查委员会(IRC)对意向治疗(ITT)人群的PFS进行调查。次要结果包括亚组间的 PFS、颅内进展时间(IC TTP)、不良事件以及因不良事件而停药。对于每种结果,贝叶斯比例危险度近似模型都估算了相对治疗效果。此外,我们还比较了迄今为止已发表的8项针对1L ALK +晚期NSCLC的NMA的设计和结果:我们形成了一个由 10 项试验组成的网络,允许进行间接治疗比较。两项试验直接比较了阿来替尼(600 毫克,每天两次)和克唑替尼,一项试验直接比较了洛拉替尼和克唑替尼。NMA结果显示,在将洛拉替尼与阿来替尼(600毫克,每天两次)进行比较时,ITT PFS IRC的危险比(95%可信区间[CrI])为0.61(95% CrI:0.39,0.97);在将洛拉替尼与布瑞替尼进行比较时,ITT PFS IRC的危险比为0.57(95% CrI:0.35,0.93)。在对已发表的NMA进行回顾时,比较了洛拉替尼与阿来替尼(600毫克,每天两次)和布加替尼的HRs。这一比较证实,每个已发表的NMA都得出了相似的结果:我们的NMA分析补充了现有的研究结果,并补充了其他已发表NMA的数据缺口。与其他TKIs相比,8项已发表的NMA研究结果一致支持罗拉替尼作为ALK+晚期NSCLC患者临床有效的1L治疗药物。
{"title":"Systematic review and network meta-analysis of lorlatinib with comparison to other anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as first-line treatment for ALK-positive advanced non-smallcell lung cancer (NSCLC)","authors":"Sai-Hong Ou ,&nbsp;Hannah Kilvert ,&nbsp;Jane Candlish ,&nbsp;Ben Lee ,&nbsp;Anna Polli ,&nbsp;Despina Thomaidou ,&nbsp;Hannah Le","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107968","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107968","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Next-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (alectinib, brigatinib, and lorlatinib) demonstrate superior progression-free survival (PFS) over chemotherapy or crizotinib as first-line (1L) treatment of ALK-positive advanced non-smallcell lung cancer (NSCLC).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted network meta-analyses (NMAs) comparing the relative efficacy of lorlatinib with other ALK TKIs in this indication. Evidence identified from a systematic literature review and subsequent updates formed the basis of our evidence. The primary analysis investigated PFS by independent review committee (IRC) in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Secondary outcomes included PFS among subgroups, intracranial time to progression (IC TTP), adverse events, and discontinuation due to adverse events. For each of the outcomes, Bayesian proportional hazards NMAs estimated the relative treatment effects.</div><div>Additionally, we compared the design and results of eight published NMAs conducted for 1L ALK + advanced NSCLC to date.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We formed a network of 10 trials, allowing indirect treatment comparisons. Two trials directly compared alectinib (600 mg twice daily) to crizotinib and one trial directly compared lorlatinib to crizotinib. The results of the NMA show that the hazard ratios (95 % credible interval [CrI]) for ITT PFS IRC were 0.61 (95 % CrI: 0.39, 0.97) when comparing lorlatinib with alectinib (600 mg twice daily) and 0.57 (95 % CrI: 0.35, 0.93) when comparing lorlatinib with brigatinib.</div><div>In the review of published NMAs, HRs for lorlatinib versus alectinib (600 mg twice daily) and brigatinib were compared. This comparison confirmed that each published NMA yielded similar results.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our NMA analysis adds to existing findings and supplements data gaps from other published NMAs. Findings from eight published NMAs consistently supported lorlatinib as a clinically effective 1L treatment for ALK + advanced NSCLC patients compared to other TKIs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 107968"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142378006","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Association of alcohol with lung cancer risk in men with different growth hormone receptor genotypes 酒精与不同生长激素受体基因型男性患肺癌风险的关系。
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107971
Randi Chen , Timothy A. Donlon , Brian J. Morris , Richard C. Allsopp , Bradley J. Willcox , Kamal H. Masaki

Objective

To test whether genetic variants of the growth hormone receptor gene (GHR) modulate the effect of lifestyle variables on lung cancer (LC) risk.

Materials and methods

This population-based cohort study involved 6,439 men from the Japan-Hawaii Cancer study drawn from the Kuakini Honolulu Heart Program who were cancer-free at baseline examination (1965–1968; age 45–68 years) and followed-up until December 1999. We determined the association of GHR SNP rs4130113 genotypes GHR-AA (common allele A homozygotes) and GHR-G (minor allele G carriage) with alcohol drinking, BMI, physical activity and cigarette smoking in relation to LC and non-small cell LC (NSCLC). Results were expressed as hazard ratios and 95 % CIs estimated from Cox proportional hazard models.

Results

Over mean 26.7 ± 7.4 SD years follow-up, 190 LC cases, including 133 NSCLC cases, were diagnosed. After adjusting for age, education, alcohol intake, BMI, physical activity, cigarette smoking, green tea consumption and dietary saturated fat, main-effect Cox models showed that compared with GHR-AA, GHR-G was associated with protection against LC: HR = 0.75 (95 % CI, 0.56–1.00). Full Cox models showed GHR-G interacted with alcohol intake only (β = 1.171; p = 0.0003; drinks per week: β = 0.279; P = 0.0024). Stratified analyses showed that for GHR-AA, drinkers had reduced LC risk (HR = 0.54; 95 % CI, 0.35–0.85), and that <2 drinks/week had the strongest protection (HR = 0.38; 95 % CI, 0.18–0.83). In contrast, for GHR-G, alcohol drinkers had increased LC risk (HR = 1.70; 95 % CI, 1.07–2.69) which was dose-dependent (P for trend = 0.005). Results for NSCLC were similar.

Conclusion

In men with the GHR-AA genotype, alcohol drinking at a low dose poses significantly less risk of LC compared with non-drinkers and higher alcohol consumption., the overall relationship being U-shaped. In contrast, in GHR minor allele carriers, alcohol posed a progressively greater risk of LC as amount consumed increased.
目的:检测生长激素受体基因的遗传变异是否会调节生活方式变量对肺癌风险的影响:检验生长激素受体基因(GHR)的遗传变异是否会调节生活方式变量对肺癌(LC)风险的影响:这项基于人群的队列研究涉及日本-夏威夷癌症研究中的 6439 名男性,他们来自 Kuakini 檀香山心脏计划,在基线检查(1965-1968 年;年龄 45-68 岁)时未患癌症,随访至 1999 年 12 月。我们确定了 GHR SNP rs4130113 基因型 GHR-AA(普通等位基因 A 的同卵双生者)和 GHR-G(小等位基因 G 的携带者)与饮酒、体重指数、体力活动和吸烟与 LC 和非小细胞 LC(NSCLC)的关系。结果以Cox比例危险模型估计的危险比和95 % CIs表示:在平均 26.7 ± 7.4 SD 年的随访期间,共诊断出 190 例 LC,其中包括 133 例 NSCLC。在对年龄、教育程度、酒精摄入量、体重指数、体力活动、吸烟、绿茶摄入量和膳食饱和脂肪进行调整后,主效应 Cox 模型显示,与 GHR-AA 相比,GHR-G 与预防 LC 相关:HR = 0.75(95 % CI,0.56-1.00)。完全 Cox 模型显示,GHR-G 仅与酒精摄入量存在交互作用(β = 1.171;P = 0.0003;每周饮酒量:β = 0.279;P = 0.0024)。分层分析表明,GHR-AA 饮酒者的 LC 风险降低(HR = 0.54;95 % CI,0.35-0.85),结论是:GHR-AA 饮酒者的 LC 风险降低(HR = 0.54;95 % CI,0.35-0.85):在具有 GHR-AA 基因型的男性中,与不饮酒者和饮酒量较高者相比,低剂量饮酒导致 LC 的风险明显降低,总体关系呈 U 型。与此相反,在 GHR 小等位基因携带者中,随着饮酒量的增加,患 LC 的风险逐渐增大。
{"title":"Association of alcohol with lung cancer risk in men with different growth hormone receptor genotypes","authors":"Randi Chen ,&nbsp;Timothy A. Donlon ,&nbsp;Brian J. Morris ,&nbsp;Richard C. Allsopp ,&nbsp;Bradley J. Willcox ,&nbsp;Kamal H. Masaki","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107971","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107971","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To test whether genetic variants of the growth hormone receptor gene (<em>GHR</em>) modulate the effect of lifestyle variables on lung cancer (LC) risk.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>This population-based cohort study involved 6,439 men from the Japan-Hawaii Cancer study drawn from the Kuakini Honolulu Heart Program who were cancer-free at baseline examination (1965–1968; age 45–68 years) and followed-up until December 1999. We determined the association of <em>GHR</em> SNP <em>rs4130113</em> genotypes <em>GHR</em>-<em>AA</em> (common allele <em>A</em> homozygotes) and <em>GHR</em>-<em>G</em> (minor allele <em>G</em> carriage) with alcohol drinking, BMI, physical activity and cigarette smoking in relation to LC and non-small cell LC (NSCLC). Results were expressed as hazard ratios and 95 % CIs estimated from Cox proportional hazard models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Over mean 26.7 ± 7.4 SD years follow-up, 190 LC cases, including 133 NSCLC cases, were diagnosed. After adjusting for age, education, alcohol intake, BMI, physical activity, cigarette smoking, green tea consumption and dietary saturated fat, main-effect Cox models showed that compared with <em>GHR</em>-<em>AA</em>, <em>GHR</em>-<em>G</em> was associated with protection against LC: HR = 0.75 (95 % CI, 0.56–1.00). Full Cox models showed <em>GHR</em>-<em>G</em> interacted with alcohol intake only (β = 1.171; p = 0.0003; drinks per week: β = 0.279; P = 0.0024). Stratified analyses showed that for <em>GHR-AA</em>, drinkers had reduced LC risk (HR = 0.54; 95 % CI, 0.35–0.85), and that &lt;2 drinks/week had the strongest protection (HR = 0.38; 95 % CI, 0.18–0.83). In contrast, for <em>GHR</em>-<em>G,</em> alcohol drinkers had increased LC risk (HR = 1.70; 95 % CI, 1.07–2.69) which was dose-dependent (P for trend = 0.005). Results for NSCLC were similar.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In men with the <em>GHR</em>-<em>AA</em> genotype, alcohol drinking at a low dose poses significantly less risk of LC compared with non-drinkers and higher alcohol consumption., the overall relationship being U-shaped. In contrast, in <em>GHR</em> minor allele carriers, alcohol posed a progressively greater risk of LC as amount consumed increased.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 107971"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142621704","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Combined analysis of circulating tumor DNA and tumor tissue to overcome osimertinib resistance (OSIRIS); the second line osimertinib cohort 联合分析循环肿瘤 DNA 和肿瘤组织以克服奥希替尼耐药性(OSIRIS);二线奥希替尼队列
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107972
J.W.T. van der Wel , M. Jebbink , D. van den Broek , L.C. Steinbusch , W.S.M.E. Theelen , G. Ruiter , W. Buikhuisen , J.A. Burgers , P. Baas , M. Vermeulen , V. van der Noort , S.M.S. Hashemi , L.J.W. Bosch , K. Monkhorst , E.F. Smit , M.C. Boelens , A.J. de Langen

Introduction

Osimertinib resistance inevitably occurs in EGFR mutated NSCLC. We aimed to identify resistance mechanisms (RM) using paired plasma and tumor samples in patients that progressed on 2nd/3rd line osimertinib.

Methods

From 09 – 2019 to 02 – 2021, 51 patients were enrolled. Plasma sequencing used AVENIO Expanded Panel (research use only), tumor biopsies underwent DNA and RNA sequencing and histological evaluation. Sequencing was regarded successful when the driver mutation was confirmed with a variant allele frequency of ≥0.10%. Concordance between modalities was calculated for the driver mutation and RMs covered in both modalities. The Molecular Tumor Board formulated a treatment advice.

Results

The driver mutation was detected in 42/51 plasma samples (82%) and in 50/51 tumor samples (98%), concordance rate was 80%. In 41/51 (80%) patients ≥1 RM was identified. Thirty-two RMs covered in both modalities were found in plasma (61.5%), 39 in tumor (75%), nineteen in both. RM concordance rate was 36.5%.

Conclusion

Combined analysis of plasma and tumor samples post 2nd/3rd line osimertinib identifies additional RMs regardless of the comparative approach used. Plasma sequencing identified 61.5% of RMs, tumor analysis identified 75%. Combined, they provide a superior overview of osimertinib resistance, enabling more tailored treatment options.
导言表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变的 NSCLC 不可避免地会出现奥希替尼耐药性。我们的目的是利用二线/三线奥希替尼治疗进展患者的配对血浆和肿瘤样本确定耐药机制(RM)。血浆测序使用 AVENIO Expanded Panel(仅供研究使用),肿瘤活检进行 DNA 和 RNA 测序以及组织学评估。当驱动基因突变得到确认且变异等位基因频率≥0.10%时,测序即为成功。针对两种模式中的驱动基因突变和RMs,计算模式间的一致性。结果42/51份血浆样本(82%)和50/51份肿瘤样本(98%)检测到驱动基因突变,一致率为80%。在 41/51 例(80%)患者中,发现了≥1 个 RM。在血浆(61.5%)中发现了 32 个两种模式都涵盖的 RM,在肿瘤(75%)中发现了 39 个,在两种模式中都发现了 19 个。结论无论采用哪种比较方法,对奥希替尼二线/三线治疗后的血浆和肿瘤样本进行联合分析都能发现更多的RM。血浆测序鉴定出61.5%的RM,肿瘤分析鉴定出75%的RM。两者结合可提供奥希替尼耐药的更佳概况,从而提供更有针对性的治疗方案。
{"title":"Combined analysis of circulating tumor DNA and tumor tissue to overcome osimertinib resistance (OSIRIS); the second line osimertinib cohort","authors":"J.W.T. van der Wel ,&nbsp;M. Jebbink ,&nbsp;D. van den Broek ,&nbsp;L.C. Steinbusch ,&nbsp;W.S.M.E. Theelen ,&nbsp;G. Ruiter ,&nbsp;W. Buikhuisen ,&nbsp;J.A. Burgers ,&nbsp;P. Baas ,&nbsp;M. Vermeulen ,&nbsp;V. van der Noort ,&nbsp;S.M.S. Hashemi ,&nbsp;L.J.W. Bosch ,&nbsp;K. Monkhorst ,&nbsp;E.F. Smit ,&nbsp;M.C. Boelens ,&nbsp;A.J. de Langen","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107972","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107972","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Osimertinib resistance inevitably occurs in EGFR mutated NSCLC. We aimed to identify resistance mechanisms (RM) using paired plasma and tumor samples in patients that progressed on 2nd/3rd line osimertinib.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>From 09 – 2019 to 02 – 2021, 51 patients were enrolled. Plasma sequencing used AVENIO Expanded Panel (research use only), tumor biopsies underwent DNA and RNA sequencing and histological evaluation. Sequencing was regarded successful when the driver mutation was confirmed with a variant allele frequency of ≥0.10%. Concordance between modalities was calculated for the driver mutation and RMs covered in both modalities. The Molecular Tumor Board formulated a treatment advice.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The driver mutation was detected in 42/51 plasma samples (82%) and in 50/51 tumor samples (98%), concordance rate was 80%. In 41/51 (80%) patients ≥1 RM was identified. Thirty-two RMs covered in both modalities were found in plasma (61.5%), 39 in tumor (75%), nineteen in both. RM concordance rate was 36.5%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Combined analysis of plasma and tumor samples post 2nd/3rd line osimertinib identifies additional RMs regardless of the comparative approach used. Plasma sequencing identified 61.5% of RMs, tumor analysis identified 75%. Combined, they provide a superior overview of osimertinib resistance, enabling more tailored treatment options.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 107972"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142652704","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cost-effectiveness of next-generation sequencing for advanced EGFR/ALK-negative non-small cell lung cancer 晚期表皮生长因子受体/ALK阴性非小细胞肺癌的新一代测序成本效益。
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107970
Dong-Won Kang , Sun-Kyeong Park , Sokbom Kang , Eui-Kyung Lee

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of next-generation sequencing (NGS) versus sequential single-gene testing (SGT), including the long-term costs and survival outcomes of relevant treatments for advanced EGFR/ALK-negative non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Materials and Methods

We developed a decision tree linked to a partitioned survival model to estimate the clinical outcomes and costs over the five-year analysis period. The decision tree consisted of treatment types based on molecular biomarker (ROS1, BRAF, NTRK, MET, RET, and KRAS alterations) test results. The probability of receiving each targeted therapy was estimated based on 1) the testing rate, 2) the proportion of alterations detected, and 3) the proportion of patients receiving treatment consistent with the testing results. We estimated the long-term overall survival and progression-free survival for each treatment using parametric estimation by reconstructing patient-level data from clinical trials. The costs of testing, drugs, administration, physician visits, monitoring, adverse events, post-progression, and end-of-life care were included. The utility values were obtained from a previous study. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of NGS within a threshold of $38,701 (50,000,000 KRW) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY).

Results

The incremental life-years (LYs) and QALYs for the NGS group versus the SGT group were 0.028 and 0.023, respectively. The total medical cost for the NGS group was $8,375 higher than that for the SGT group. The difference in drug costs accounted for most of the differences in total medical costs. NGS was not cost-effective compared to sequential SGT, with an ICER of $300,233/LY and $359,405/QALY, respectively.

Conclusions

NGS is not cost-effective for advanced EGFR/ALK-negative NSCLC, but has a survival benefit over sequential SGT. Our findings provide a basis for decision-making regarding the coverage and clinical utilization of NGS in regions where EGFR alterations are prevalent.
研究目的本研究旨在评估新一代测序(NGS)与顺序单基因检测(SGT)的成本效益,包括晚期表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)/ALK 阴性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)相关治疗的长期成本和生存结果:我们开发了一个与分区生存模型相连的决策树,以估算五年分析期内的临床结果和成本。决策树包括基于分子生物标志物(ROS1、BRAF、NTRK、MET、RET 和 KRAS 改变)检测结果的治疗类型。接受每种靶向治疗的概率是根据:1)检测率;2)检测到的改变比例;3)接受与检测结果一致的治疗的患者比例估算的。我们通过重构临床试验中患者层面的数据,使用参数估计法估算了每种疗法的长期总生存期和无进展生存期。检测、药物、管理、就诊、监测、不良事件、进展后和临终关怀的成本也包括在内。效用值来自之前的一项研究。在每质量调整生命年(QALY)38,701 美元(50,000,000 韩元)的临界值范围内,采用增量成本效益比(ICER)评估 NGS 的成本效益:结果:NGS 组与 SGT 组的增量生命年 (LY) 和 QALY 分别为 0.028 和 0.023。NGS 组的总医疗费用比 SGT 组高 8375 美元。药物成本的差异是总医疗成本差异的主要原因。与序贯 SGT 相比,NGS 不具成本效益,ICER 分别为 300,233 美元/LY 和 359,405 美元/QALY:NGS治疗晚期表皮生长因子受体/ALK阴性NSCLC不具成本效益,但与序贯SGT相比具有生存获益。我们的研究结果为在表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)改变普遍的地区就 NGS 的覆盖范围和临床应用做出决策提供了依据。
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness of next-generation sequencing for advanced EGFR/ALK-negative non-small cell lung cancer","authors":"Dong-Won Kang ,&nbsp;Sun-Kyeong Park ,&nbsp;Sokbom Kang ,&nbsp;Eui-Kyung Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107970","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107970","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of next-generation sequencing (NGS) versus sequential single-gene testing (SGT), including the long-term costs and survival outcomes of relevant treatments for advanced EGFR/ALK-negative non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>We developed a decision tree linked to a partitioned survival model to estimate the clinical outcomes and costs over the five-year analysis period. The decision tree consisted of treatment types based on molecular biomarker (ROS1, BRAF, NTRK, MET, RET, and KRAS alterations) test results. The probability of receiving each targeted therapy was estimated based on 1) the testing rate, 2) the proportion of alterations detected, and 3) the proportion of patients receiving treatment consistent with the testing results. We estimated the long-term overall survival and progression-free survival for each treatment using parametric estimation by reconstructing patient-level data from clinical trials. The costs of testing, drugs, administration, physician visits, monitoring, adverse events, post-progression, and end-of-life care were included. The utility values were obtained from a previous study. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of NGS within a threshold of $38,701 (50,000,000 KRW) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The incremental life-years (LYs) and QALYs for the NGS group versus the SGT group were 0.028 and 0.023, respectively. The total medical cost for the NGS group was $8,375 higher than that for the SGT group. The difference in drug costs accounted for most of the differences in total medical costs. NGS was not cost-effective compared to sequential SGT, with an ICER of $300,233/LY and $359,405/QALY, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>NGS is not cost-effective for advanced EGFR/ALK-negative NSCLC, but has a survival benefit over sequential SGT. Our findings provide a basis for decision-making regarding the coverage and clinical utilization of NGS in regions where EGFR alterations are prevalent.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 107970"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142375678","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Highly sensitive and accurate detection of ALK-TKI resistance mutations by oligoribonucleotide interference-PCR (ORNi-PCR)-based methods 基于寡核苷酸干扰PCR(ORNi-PCR)的方法高灵敏、准确地检测ALK-TKI耐药突变。
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107969
Chiori Tabe , Toshitsugu Fujita , Kageaki Taima , Hisashi Tanaka , Tomonori Makiguchi , Masamichi Itoga , Yoshiko Ishioka , Sadatomo Tasaka , Hodaka Fujii

Background

Patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are treated with ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Although most patients benefit from ALK-TKIs, the development of resistance mutations is common and results in NSCLC recurrence. To identify ALK-TKI-resistant NSCLC at the early recurrent phase, highly sensitive and accurate methods for the detection of mutations are essential.

Objective

The aim of this study was to establish highly sensitive, accurate, cost-effective, and clinically practical methods for the detection of two frequent ALK-TKI resistance mutations, ALK G1202R and L1196M, by liquid biopsy.

Methods

The efficacy of oligoribonucleotide interference-PCR (ORNi-PCR) was examined by first optimizing experimental conditions to specifically amplify the ALK-TKI resistance mutant DNA corresponding to ALK G1202R and L1196M mutations. ORNi-PCR was then combined with droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) or real-time PCR to detect these mutations in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) extracted from NSCLC patients.

Results

ORNi-PCR followed by ddPCR/real-time PCR detected 1–10 copy(s) of G1202R and L1196M DNA in model cfDNA. These mutations in patients’ cfDNA were identified using ORNi-PCR-based methods, whereas conventional ddPCR failed to detect them.

Conclusion

ORNi-PCR followed by ddPCR/real-time PCR enables highly sensitive and accurate detection of ALK mutations by liquid biopsy. Although the clinical data are limited, our results show that these methods are potentially useful for identifying ALK-TKI-resistant NSCLC at the early recurrent phase.
背景:无性淋巴瘤激酶(ALK)阳性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者接受ALK酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)治疗。虽然大多数患者都能从ALK-TKIs中获益,但耐药突变的发生很常见,并导致NSCLC复发。要在早期复发阶段识别ALK-TKI耐药的NSCLC,高灵敏度和准确的突变检测方法至关重要:本研究旨在通过液体活检建立高灵敏度、高准确性、高成本效益和临床实用的方法,用于检测两种常见的 ALK-TKI 耐药突变(ALK G1202R 和 L1196M):方法:首先优化实验条件,特异性扩增与ALK G1202R和L1196M突变相对应的ALK-TKI耐药突变DNA,以此检验寡核苷酸干扰PCR(ORNi-PCR)的有效性。然后将 ORNi-PCR 与液滴数字 PCR(ddPCR)或实时 PCR 结合使用,检测从 NSCLC 患者体内提取的无细胞 DNA(cfDNA)中的这些突变:结果:ORNi-PCR 和 ddPCR/real-time PCR 检测出模型 cfDNA 中有 1-10 个 G1202R 和 L1196M DNA 拷贝。使用基于 ORNi-PCR 的方法在患者的 cfDNA 中确定了这些突变,而传统的 ddPCR 则未能检测到这些突变:结论:ORNi-PCR 和 ddPCR/real-time PCR 能够通过液体活检高度灵敏、准确地检测 ALK 基因突变。结论:ORNi-PCR 和 ddPCR/real-time PCR 可通过液体活检高度灵敏、准确地检测 ALK 突变,尽管临床数据有限,但我们的研究结果表明,这些方法可用于在复发早期识别 ALK-TKI 耐药的 NSCLC。
{"title":"Highly sensitive and accurate detection of ALK-TKI resistance mutations by oligoribonucleotide interference-PCR (ORNi-PCR)-based methods","authors":"Chiori Tabe ,&nbsp;Toshitsugu Fujita ,&nbsp;Kageaki Taima ,&nbsp;Hisashi Tanaka ,&nbsp;Tomonori Makiguchi ,&nbsp;Masamichi Itoga ,&nbsp;Yoshiko Ishioka ,&nbsp;Sadatomo Tasaka ,&nbsp;Hodaka Fujii","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107969","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107969","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are treated with ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Although most patients benefit from ALK-TKIs, the development of resistance mutations is common and results in NSCLC recurrence. To identify ALK-TKI-resistant NSCLC at the early recurrent phase, highly sensitive and accurate methods for the detection of mutations are essential.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim of this study was to establish highly sensitive, accurate, cost-effective, and clinically practical methods for the detection of two frequent ALK-TKI resistance mutations, ALK G1202R and L1196M, by liquid biopsy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The efficacy of oligoribonucleotide interference-PCR (ORNi-PCR) was examined by first optimizing experimental conditions to specifically amplify the ALK-TKI resistance mutant DNA corresponding to ALK G1202R and L1196M mutations. ORNi-PCR was then combined with droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) or real-time PCR to detect these mutations in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) extracted from NSCLC patients.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>ORNi-PCR followed by ddPCR/real-time PCR detected 1–10 copy(s) of G1202R and L1196M DNA in model cfDNA. These mutations in patients’ cfDNA were identified using ORNi-PCR-based methods, whereas conventional ddPCR failed to detect them.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ORNi-PCR followed by ddPCR/real-time PCR enables highly sensitive and accurate detection of <em>ALK</em> mutations by liquid biopsy. Although the clinical data are limited, our results show that these methods are potentially useful for identifying ALK-TKI-resistant NSCLC at the early recurrent phase.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 107969"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142381239","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A phase Ib study of the combination of naporafenib with rineterkib or trametinib in patients with advanced and metastatic KRAS- or BRAF-mutant non-small cell lung cancer 晚期和转移性 KRAS 或 BRAF 突变非小细胞肺癌患者纳罗非尼联合瑞奈替尼或曲美替尼的 Ib 期研究。
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107964
David Planchard , Jürgen Wolf , Benjamin Solomon , Martin Sebastian , Martin Wermke , Rebecca S. Heist , Jong-Mu Sun , Tae Min Kim , Noemi Reguart , Miguel F. Sanmamed , Enriqueta Felip , Pilar Garrido , Armando Santoro , Douglas Bootle , Xuân-Mai Couillebault , Anil Gaur , Christina Mueller , Teresa Poggio , Jie Yang , Michele Moschetta , Christophe Dooms

Background

Genetic alterations activating the MAPK pathway are common in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients with NSCLC may benefit from treatment with the pan-RAF inhibitor naporafenib (LXH254) plus the ERK1/2 inhibitor rineterkib (LTT462) or MEK1/2 inhibitor trametinib.

Methods

This first-in-human phase 1b dose-escalation/dose-expansion study investigated the combinations of naporafenib (50–350 mg once daily [QD] or 300–600 mg twice daily [BID]) with rineterkib (100–300 mg QD) in patients with KRAS-/BRAF-mutant NSCLC and naporafenib (200 mg BID or 400 mg BID) with trametinib (0.5 mg QD, 1 mg QD or 1 mg QD 2 weeks on/2 weeks off) in patients with KRAS-/BRAF-mutant NSCLC and NRAS-mutant melanoma. The primary objectives were to identify the recommended dose for expansion (RDE) and evaluate tolerability and safety. Secondary objectives included antitumor activity and pharmacodynamics.

Results

Overall, 216 patients were treated with naporafenib plus rineterkib (NSCLC: n = 101) or naporafenib plus trametinib (NSCLC: n = 79; melanoma: n = 36). In total, 10 of 62 (16%) patients experienced at least one dose-limiting toxicity. The RDEs were established as naporafenib 400 mg BID plus rineterkib 200 mg QD, naporafenib 200 mg BID plus trametinib 1 mg QD and naporafenib 400 mg BID plus trametinib 0.5 mg QD. The most frequent grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse event was increased lipase (8/101 [7.9%] patients) for naporafenib plus rineterkib and rash (22/115 [19.1%] patients) for naporafenib plus trametinib. Among patients with NSCLC, partial response was observed in three patients (one with KRAS-mutant, two with BRAFnon-V600-mutant NSCLC) treated with naporafenib plus rineterkib and two patients (both with KRAS-mutant NSCLC) treated with naporafenib plus trametinib. On-treatment median reductions in DUSP6 mRNA levels from baseline were 45.5% and 76.1% with naporafenib plus rineterkib or trametinib, respectively.

Conclusions

Both naporafenib combinations had acceptable safety profiles. Antitumor activity was limited in patients with NSCLC, despite the observed on-target pharmacodynamic effect.
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02974725.
背景:激活MAPK通路的基因改变在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中很常见。泛RAF抑制剂纳罗非尼(LXH254)加ERK1/2抑制剂瑞奈替基(LTT462)或MEK1/2抑制剂曲美替尼可使NSCLC患者从治疗中获益:这项首次人体1b期剂量递增/剂量扩大研究调查了KRAS/BRAF突变NSCLC患者中纳罗非尼(50-350毫克,每日1次[QD]或300-600毫克,每日2次[BID])与瑞奈替基布(100-300毫克,每日1次)以及纳罗非尼(200毫克,每日2次或400毫克,每日2次)与曲美替尼(0.5 mg QD、1 mg QD或1 mg QD,开药2周,停药2周)治疗KRAS/BRAF突变NSCLC和NRAS突变黑色素瘤患者。首要目标是确定推荐扩大剂量(RDE)并评估耐受性和安全性。次要目标包括抗肿瘤活性和药效学:共有216名患者接受了纳罗非尼加瑞奈替基(NSCLC:n = 101)或纳罗非尼加曲美替尼(NSCLC:n = 79;黑色素瘤:n = 36)治疗。62例患者中,共有10例(16%)至少出现了一种剂量限制性毒性。确定的RDE为纳波拉非尼400 mg BID加瑞奈替基200 mg QD、纳波拉非尼200 mg BID加曲美替尼1 mg QD和纳波拉非尼400 mg BID加曲美替尼0.5 mg QD。最常见的≥3级治疗相关不良事件是纳罗非尼加瑞奈替基(8/101[7.9%]名患者)的脂肪酶升高和纳罗非尼加曲美替尼的皮疹(22/115[19.1%]名患者)。在NSCLC患者中,接受纳泊非尼加瑞奈替基治疗的3例患者(1例为KRAS突变型NSCLC患者,2例为BRAFnon-V600突变型NSCLC患者)和接受纳泊非尼加曲美替尼治疗的2例患者(均为KRAS突变型NSCLC患者)观察到了部分应答。纳罗非尼联合瑞奈替基(lineterkib)或曲美替尼治疗后,DUSP6 mRNA水平与基线相比的中位降低率分别为45.5%和76.1%:结论:纳波非尼和曲美替尼的安全性均可接受。尽管观察到了靶向药效学效应,但NSCLC患者的抗肿瘤活性有限:NCT02974725。
{"title":"A phase Ib study of the combination of naporafenib with rineterkib or trametinib in patients with advanced and metastatic KRAS- or BRAF-mutant non-small cell lung cancer","authors":"David Planchard ,&nbsp;Jürgen Wolf ,&nbsp;Benjamin Solomon ,&nbsp;Martin Sebastian ,&nbsp;Martin Wermke ,&nbsp;Rebecca S. Heist ,&nbsp;Jong-Mu Sun ,&nbsp;Tae Min Kim ,&nbsp;Noemi Reguart ,&nbsp;Miguel F. Sanmamed ,&nbsp;Enriqueta Felip ,&nbsp;Pilar Garrido ,&nbsp;Armando Santoro ,&nbsp;Douglas Bootle ,&nbsp;Xuân-Mai Couillebault ,&nbsp;Anil Gaur ,&nbsp;Christina Mueller ,&nbsp;Teresa Poggio ,&nbsp;Jie Yang ,&nbsp;Michele Moschetta ,&nbsp;Christophe Dooms","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107964","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107964","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Genetic alterations activating the MAPK pathway are common in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients with NSCLC may benefit from treatment with the pan-RAF inhibitor naporafenib (LXH254) plus the ERK1/2 inhibitor rineterkib (LTT462) or MEK1/2 inhibitor trametinib.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This first-in-human phase 1b dose-escalation/dose-expansion study investigated the combinations of naporafenib (50–350 mg once daily [QD] or 300–600 mg twice daily [BID]) with rineterkib (100–300 mg QD) in patients with <em>KRAS</em>-/<em>BRAF</em>-mutant NSCLC and naporafenib (200 mg BID or 400 mg BID) with trametinib (0.5 mg QD, 1 mg QD or 1 mg QD 2 weeks on/2 weeks off) in patients with <em>KRAS</em>-/<em>BRAF</em>-mutant NSCLC and <em>NRAS</em>-mutant melanoma. The primary objectives were to identify the recommended dose for expansion (RDE) and evaluate tolerability and safety. Secondary objectives included antitumor activity and pharmacodynamics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 216 patients were treated with naporafenib plus rineterkib (NSCLC: n = 101) or naporafenib plus trametinib (NSCLC: n = 79; melanoma: n = 36). In total, 10 of 62 (16%) patients experienced at least one dose-limiting toxicity. The RDEs were established as naporafenib 400 mg BID plus rineterkib 200 mg QD, naporafenib 200 mg BID plus trametinib 1 mg QD and naporafenib 400 mg BID plus trametinib 0.5 mg QD. The most frequent grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse event was increased lipase (8/101 [7.9%] patients) for naporafenib plus rineterkib and rash (22/115 [19.1%] patients) for naporafenib plus trametinib. Among patients with NSCLC, partial response was observed in three patients (one with <em>KRAS</em>-mutant, two with <em>BRAF<sup>non-V600</sup></em>-mutant NSCLC) treated with naporafenib plus rineterkib and two patients (both with <em>KRAS</em>-mutant NSCLC) treated with naporafenib plus trametinib. On-treatment median reductions in <em>DUSP6</em> mRNA levels from baseline were 45.5% and 76.1% with naporafenib plus rineterkib or trametinib, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Both naporafenib combinations had acceptable safety profiles. Antitumor activity was limited in patients with NSCLC, despite the observed on-target pharmacodynamic effect.</div><div><span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> identifier: NCT02974725.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 107964"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142391653","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Survival and recurrence rates following SBRT or surgery in medically operable Stage I NSCLC 可接受药物手术的 I 期 NSCLC 患者接受 SBRT 或手术后的存活率和复发率。
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107962
Michael Snider , Joseph K. Salama , Matthew Boyer

Objectives

Surgery is the standard of care for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with SBRT reserved for patients who are not surgical candidates. We hypothesized overall survival (OS), lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS), progression free survival (PFS), and recurrence rates following SBRT or surgery in medically operable patients with Stage I NSCLC from the Veterans’ Health Care System (VAHS) would be equivalent.

Materials and methods

Medically operable patients diagnosed with Stage I NSCLC between 2000–2020 from the VAHS, determined by an FEV1 or DLCO > 60 % of predicted and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) of 0 or 1, treated with SBRT or surgery were identified. SBRT patients were propensity score matched in a 1:1:1 ratio to those undergoing resection (SBRT:lobectomy:sub-lobar resection). OS, LCSS, and PFS and site of recurrence were determined.

Results

103 patients were included in each cohort. With a median follow-up of 7.9 years 5-year OS for all patients was 51 % (95 % CI 46–57 %). After propensity score matching, OS (HR 2.08, 1.59), LCSS (HR 2.28, 1.97), and PFS (1.97, 1.45) were significantly worse with SBRT compared to either lobectomy or sub-lobar resection, respectively, (p < 0.05 for each comparison). Regional recurrence was significantly higher following SBRT (15.5 % vs 6.8 % or 4.9 %; p < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in local (28.2 % vs 21.4 % or 21.4 %; p > 0.05) or distant recurrence (10.7 % vs 9.7 % or 13.6 %; p > 0.05) when compared to lobectomy or sub-lobar resection, respectively.

Conclusion

In medically operable patients, OS, LCSS, and PFS following either lobectomy or sub-lobar resection were superior to that for SBRT for Stage I NSCLC, likely due in part to higher regional recurrence following SBRT. This suggests that pulmonary function test results and CCI alone are insufficient to define a cohort of medically operable patients suited for SBRT. These data support strategies to overcome regional recurrences seen with SBRT.
目标:手术是治疗早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的标准方法:手术是早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的标准治疗方法,SBRT 则是为不适合手术的患者保留的治疗方法。我们假设,退伍军人医疗保健系统(VAHS)中可接受医疗手术的 I 期 NSCLC 患者接受 SBRT 或手术治疗后的总生存期(OS)、肺癌特异性生存期(LCSS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和复发率是相同的:对退伍军人医疗保健系统(VAHS)中 2000-2020 年间确诊为 I 期 NSCLC 的可进行医疗手术的患者进行鉴定,患者的 FEV1 或 DLCO > 预测值的 60% 且 Charlson 合并症指数 (CCI) 为 0 或 1,接受 SBRT 或手术治疗。SBRT患者与接受切除术的患者按1:1:1的比例进行倾向评分匹配(SBRT:肺叶切除术:肺叶下切除术)。确定了OS、LCSS、PFS和复发部位:每个队列共纳入103名患者。中位随访时间为7.9年,所有患者的5年OS为51%(95% CI 46-57%)。经过倾向评分匹配后,与肺叶切除术或肺叶下切除术相比,SBRT的OS(HR 2.08,1.59)、LCSS(HR 2.28,1.97)和PFS(1.97,1.45)分别显著低于肺叶切除术或肺叶下切除术(P 0.05)或远处复发(10.7% vs 9.7% 或 13.6%;P > 0.05):结论:对于可接受药物治疗的患者,肺叶切除术或肺叶下切除术后的OS、LCSS和PFS均优于SBRT治疗I期NSCLC,部分原因可能是SBRT治疗后区域复发率较高。这表明,仅凭肺功能测试结果和CCI还不足以确定哪些患者适合接受SBRT治疗。这些数据为克服 SBRT 区域复发的策略提供了支持。
{"title":"Survival and recurrence rates following SBRT or surgery in medically operable Stage I NSCLC","authors":"Michael Snider ,&nbsp;Joseph K. Salama ,&nbsp;Matthew Boyer","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107962","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107962","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Surgery is the standard of care for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with SBRT reserved for patients who are not surgical candidates. We hypothesized overall survival (OS), lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS), progression free survival (PFS), and recurrence rates following SBRT or surgery in medically operable patients with Stage I NSCLC from the Veterans’ Health Care System (VAHS) would be equivalent.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Medically operable patients diagnosed with Stage I NSCLC between 2000–2020 from the VAHS, determined by an FEV1 or DLCO &gt; 60 % of predicted and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) of 0 or 1, treated with SBRT or surgery were identified. SBRT patients were propensity score matched in a 1:1:1 ratio to those undergoing resection (SBRT:lobectomy:sub-lobar resection). OS, LCSS, and PFS and site of recurrence were determined.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>103 patients were included in each cohort. With a median follow-up of 7.9 years 5-year OS for all patients was 51 % (95 % CI 46–57 %). After propensity score matching, OS (HR 2.08, 1.59), LCSS (HR 2.28, 1.97), and PFS (1.97, 1.45) were significantly worse with SBRT compared to either lobectomy or sub-lobar resection, respectively, (p &lt; 0.05 for each comparison). Regional recurrence was significantly higher following SBRT (15.5 % vs 6.8 % or 4.9 %; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05), but there was no significant difference in local (28.2 % vs 21.4 % or 21.4 %; <em>p</em> &gt; 0.05) or distant recurrence (10.7 % vs 9.7 % or 13.6 %; <em>p</em> &gt; 0.05) when compared to lobectomy or sub-lobar resection, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In medically operable patients, OS, LCSS, and PFS following either lobectomy or sub-lobar resection were superior to that for SBRT for Stage I NSCLC, likely due in part to higher regional recurrence following SBRT. This suggests that pulmonary function test results and CCI alone are insufficient to define a cohort of medically operable patients suited for SBRT. These data support strategies to overcome regional recurrences seen with SBRT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 107962"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142375679","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Lung Cancer
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1