首页 > 最新文献

Lung Cancer最新文献

英文 中文
Durvalumab-containing treatment for recurrent or metastatic pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma: A pooled post hoc analysis of two KCSG phase II trials 含durvalumab治疗复发或转移性肺肉瘤样癌:两项KCSG II期试验的合并事后分析
IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2026.108916
Dong Hyun Kim , Miso Kim , Jeonghwan Youk , Tae Min Kim , Gyeong-Won Lee , Se Hyun Kim , Yu Jung Kim , Jin-Soo Kim , Sook-Hee Hong , Mi Sun Ahn , Seong Hoon Shin , Dong-Wan Kim , Joo-Hang Kim , Bhumsuk Keam

Introduction

Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) is a rare cancer characterized by a high programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, suggesting a potential therapeutic benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors. We investigated the efficacy of durvalumab-containing combination therapy and explored potential predictive biomarkers in patients with recurrent or metastatic (R/M) PSC.

Method

In this pooled post hoc analysis, data were integrated from two prospective phase II trials (NCT03022500 and NCT04224337) wherein durvalumab-containing combination therapies were evaluated in patients with R/M PSC. PD-L1 expression was assessed using 22C3 or SP263 assays, and circulating lymphocyte subsets were analyzed using flow cytometry.

Results

Overall, 33 patients were included, of whom 66.7 % had a PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥ 1 % and 45.5 % had a TPS ≥ 50 %. The overall response rate was 33.3 % (95 % confidence interval [CI], 18.0 %–51.8 %), and the disease control rate was 72.7 % (95 % CI, 54.5 %–86.7 %). The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.4 (95 % CI, 2.8–9.4) and 15.7 (95 % CI, 11.3–not estimated) months, respectively. PD-L1 expression was not associated with the response or survival outcomes. Patients who achieved disease control exhibited a higher proportion of circulating CD8+ T cells (mean, 28.5 % vs. 20.3 %, P = 0.083) and a lower CD4+/CD8+ ratio (median, 1.4 vs. 1.7, P = 0.048) than did those with progressive disease.

Conclusion

Durvalumab-containing combination therapy showed promising efficacy in patients with R/M PSC, irrespective of PD-L1 expression. A lower CD4+/CD8+ ratio may be associated with favorable disease control.
肺肉瘤样癌(PSC)是一种罕见的癌症,其特征是程序性死亡配体1 (PD-L1)高表达,提示免疫检查点抑制剂具有潜在的治疗益处。我们研究了含杜伐单抗联合治疗的疗效,并探索了复发或转移性(R/M) PSC患者的潜在预测生物标志物。方法在这项合并的事后分析中,整合了两项前瞻性II期试验(NCT03022500和NCT04224337)的数据,其中评估了durvalumab联合疗法对R/M PSC患者的治疗效果。用22C3或SP263检测PD-L1表达,用流式细胞术分析循环淋巴细胞亚群。结果共纳入33例患者,其中66.7%的患者PD-L1肿瘤比例评分(TPS)≥1%,45.5%的患者TPS≥50%。总有效率为33.3%(95%可信区间[CI], 18.0% ~ 51.8%),疾病控制率为72.7% (95% CI, 54.5% ~ 86.7%)。中位无进展生存期和总生存期分别为5.4个月(95% CI, 2.8-9.4)和15.7个月(95% CI, 11.3 -未估计)。PD-L1表达与反应或生存结果无关。获得疾病控制的患者比疾病进展的患者表现出更高的循环CD8+ T细胞比例(平均28.5%对20.3%,P = 0.083)和更低的CD4+/CD8+比值(中位数,1.4对1.7,P = 0.048)。结论杜伐单抗联合治疗对R/M型PSC患者具有良好的疗效,与PD-L1表达无关。较低的CD4+/CD8+比值可能与有利的疾病控制有关。
{"title":"Durvalumab-containing treatment for recurrent or metastatic pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma: A pooled post hoc analysis of two KCSG phase II trials","authors":"Dong Hyun Kim ,&nbsp;Miso Kim ,&nbsp;Jeonghwan Youk ,&nbsp;Tae Min Kim ,&nbsp;Gyeong-Won Lee ,&nbsp;Se Hyun Kim ,&nbsp;Yu Jung Kim ,&nbsp;Jin-Soo Kim ,&nbsp;Sook-Hee Hong ,&nbsp;Mi Sun Ahn ,&nbsp;Seong Hoon Shin ,&nbsp;Dong-Wan Kim ,&nbsp;Joo-Hang Kim ,&nbsp;Bhumsuk Keam","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2026.108916","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2026.108916","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) is a rare cancer characterized by a high programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, suggesting a potential therapeutic benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors. We investigated the efficacy of durvalumab-containing combination therapy and explored potential predictive biomarkers in patients with recurrent or metastatic (R/M) PSC.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>In this pooled <em>post hoc</em> analysis, data were integrated from two prospective phase II trials (NCT03022500 and NCT04224337) wherein durvalumab-containing combination therapies were evaluated in patients with R/M PSC. PD-L1 expression was assessed using 22C3 or SP263 assays, and circulating lymphocyte subsets were analyzed using flow cytometry.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 33 patients were included, of whom 66.7 % had a PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥ 1 % and 45.5 % had a TPS ≥ 50 %. The overall response rate was 33.3 % (95 % confidence interval [CI], 18.0 %–51.8 %), and the disease control rate was 72.7 % (95 % CI, 54.5 %–86.7 %). The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.4 (95 % CI, 2.8–9.4) and 15.7 (95 % CI, 11.3–not estimated) months, respectively. PD-L1 expression was not associated with the response or survival outcomes. Patients who achieved disease control exhibited a higher proportion of circulating CD8<sup>+</sup> T cells (mean, 28.5 % vs. 20.3 %, <em>P</em> = 0.083) and a lower CD4<sup>+</sup>/CD8<sup>+</sup> ratio (median, 1.4 vs. 1.7, <em>P</em> = 0.048) than did those with progressive disease.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Durvalumab-containing combination therapy showed promising efficacy in patients with R/M PSC, irrespective of PD-L1 expression. A lower CD4<sup>+</sup>/CD8<sup>+</sup> ratio may be associated with favorable disease control.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 108916"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145950220","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Diagnostic performance of monarch robotic bronchoscopy with and without mobile cone-beam CT support 君主机器人支气管镜在有和没有移动锥束CT支持下的诊断性能。
IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2026.108910
Jingjing Chen, Dakota McNierney, Joe G. Zein, Laszlo T. Vaszar, Karen L. Swanson, Natalya Azadeh, Kenneth K. Sakata

Background

Robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (RAB) is limited by CT-to-body divergence. Cone-beam CT (CBCT) may enhance tool-to-lesion alignment and diagnostic yield (DY), but the benefit of integrating mobile CBCT (mCBCT) into the MonarchTM RAB remains understudied. This is the first study to evaluate diagnostic performance between Monarch alone versus Monarch plus mCBCT for peripheral pulmonary lesion (PPL) biopsy, hypothesizing improved DY with the combined approach.

Methods

This single-center retrospective study examined adults undergoing RAB biopsy for PPLs (May 2019—March 2023), applying a strict DY definition. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were evaluated in Monarch and Monarch plus mCBCT groups.

Results

Of 331 cases, 179 used Monarch and 152 used Monarch plus mCBCT. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics. DY was not different (70.9 % in Monarch vs 71.7 % in Monarch plus mCBCT, p = 0.976) nor were complication rates (7.3 % in Monarch vs. 3.9 % in Monarch plus mCBCT, p = 0.291). In the Monarch group, the procedure duration was longer (77 min in Monarch vs. 69 min in Monarch plus mCBCT, p = 0.002) and the radiation dose was lower (7.4 mGy in Monarch vs. 285.9 mGy in Monarch plus mCBCT, p < 0.001). Adjusted analysis demonstrated that mCBCT was not associated with improved DY (OR [95 % CI]: 1.33[0.78–2.28]) or reduced risk for complications (OR [95 % CI]: 0.41 [0.13; 1.14]). DY increased with larger nodule size but not with lesion location.

Conclusions

Evaluating outcomes across two sequential practice eras, the addition of mCBCT to Monarch RAB did not significantly improve DY or reduce complications but reduced procedure duration at the cost of increased radiation exposure.

Summary

- Evaluated diagnostic performance of Monarch™ vs. Monarch™ + mobile Cone-beam CT (mCBCT).
- Diagnostic yield and complication rates were similar.
- The mCBCT group had shorter procedure times and about 40-fold higher radiation doses.

Conference presentation

The study findings have been presented in American Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology Annual Conference in 2024.
The institutional review board approved all protocols (IRB 23–005284).
背景:机器人辅助支气管镜检查(RAB)受到ct -体发散的限制。锥形束CT (CBCT)可以提高工具到病变的对齐和诊断率(DY),但将移动CBCT (mCBCT)整合到MonarchTM RAB的好处仍有待研究。这是第一个评估君主单独与君主联合mCBCT对周围肺病变(PPL)活检诊断性能的研究,假设联合方法改善了DY。方法:本研究采用严格的DY定义,对2019年5月至2023年3月接受RAB活检的ppl成人进行了单中心回顾性研究。评估Monarch组和Monarch + mCBCT组的临床特征和结果。结果:331例患者中,君主179例,君主联合mCBCT 152例。两组的基线特征无显著差异。死亡率无差异(Monarch组70.9% vs Monarch + mCBCT组71.7%,p = 0.976),并发症发生率也无差异(Monarch组7.3% vs Monarch + mCBCT组3.9%,p = 0.291)。在Monarch组中,手术时间更长(Monarch组为77分钟,而Monarch + mCBCT组为69分钟,p = 0.002),辐射剂量更低(Monarch组为7.4 mGy,而Monarch组为285.9 mGy, p)。结论:评估两个连续实践时期的结果,在Monarch RAB中添加mCBCT并没有显著改善DY或减少并发症,但以增加辐射暴露为代价减少了手术时间。总结:-评估君主™与君主™+移动锥束CT (mCBCT)的诊断性能。诊断率和并发症发生率相似。- mCBCT组的手术时间更短,辐射剂量约高40倍。会议报告:该研究结果已在2024年美国支气管学和介入肺病学协会年会上发表。机构审查委员会批准了所有方案(IRB 23-005284)。
{"title":"Diagnostic performance of monarch robotic bronchoscopy with and without mobile cone-beam CT support","authors":"Jingjing Chen,&nbsp;Dakota McNierney,&nbsp;Joe G. Zein,&nbsp;Laszlo T. Vaszar,&nbsp;Karen L. Swanson,&nbsp;Natalya Azadeh,&nbsp;Kenneth K. Sakata","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2026.108910","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2026.108910","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (RAB) is limited by CT-to-body divergence. Cone-beam CT (CBCT) may enhance tool-to-lesion alignment and diagnostic yield (DY), but the benefit of integrating mobile CBCT (mCBCT) into the Monarch<sup>TM</sup> RAB remains understudied. This is the first study to evaluate diagnostic performance between Monarch alone versus Monarch plus mCBCT for peripheral pulmonary lesion (PPL) biopsy, hypothesizing improved DY with the combined approach.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This single-center retrospective study examined adults undergoing RAB biopsy for PPLs (May 2019—March 2023), applying a strict DY definition. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were evaluated in Monarch and Monarch plus mCBCT groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 331 cases, 179 used Monarch and 152 used Monarch plus mCBCT. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics. DY was not different (70.9 % in Monarch vs 71.7 % in Monarch plus mCBCT, p = 0.976) nor were complication rates (7.3 % in Monarch vs. 3.9 % in Monarch plus mCBCT, p = 0.291). In the Monarch group, the procedure duration was longer (77 min in Monarch vs. 69 min in Monarch plus mCBCT, p = 0.002) and the radiation dose was lower (7.4 mGy in Monarch vs. 285.9 mGy in Monarch plus mCBCT, p &lt; 0.001). Adjusted analysis demonstrated that mCBCT was not associated with improved DY (OR [95 % CI]: 1.33[0.78–2.28]) or reduced risk for complications (OR [95 % CI]: 0.41 [0.13; 1.14]). DY increased with larger nodule size but not with lesion location.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Evaluating outcomes across two sequential practice eras, the addition of mCBCT to Monarch RAB did not significantly improve DY or reduce complications but reduced procedure duration at the cost of increased radiation exposure.</div></div><div><h3>Summary</h3><div>- Evaluated diagnostic performance of Monarch™ vs. Monarch™ + mobile Cone-beam CT (mCBCT).</div><div>- Diagnostic yield and complication rates were similar.</div><div>- The mCBCT group had shorter procedure times and about 40-fold higher radiation doses.</div></div><div><h3>Conference presentation</h3><div>The study findings have been presented in American Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology Annual Conference in 2024.</div><div>The institutional review board approved all protocols (IRB 23–005284).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 108910"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146009919","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
SEZ6 expression and lineage plasticity in small cell lung cancer and transformed non-small cell lung cancer SEZ6在小细胞肺癌和转化非小细胞肺癌中的表达和谱系可塑性
IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2026.108913
Jennifer A. Marks , Kieran Sweeney , Andrew Elliott , Brinda Gupta , Ari VanderWalde , Sonam Puri , Misty Dawn Shields , Jorge J. Nieva , Heloisa P. Soares , Patrick C. Ma , Balazs Halmos , Stephen V. Liu
<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and extrapulmonary neuroendocrine (NE) tumors are aggressive malignancies with limited treatment options. Seizure-related homolog 6 (SEZ6) is a potential therapeutic target, but its expression in these tumors remains poorly understood. Lineage plasticity contributes to resistance in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), where some cases can undergo SCLC-transformation after targeted therapy. We aimed to characterize <em>SEZ6</em> expression across NE tumors and presumed NSCLC-to-SCLC transformations.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>DNA and RNA sequencing were performed for SCLC, NSCLC, and NE samples. Samples were stratified by SEZ6 RNA expression quartiles and classified into subtypes based on ASCL1, NEUROD1, and POU2F3 expression. Significance was tested using the Mann-Whitney <em>U</em> test. Real-world overall survival was obtained from insurance claims data, with p-values calculated using the log-rank test. Paired samples for NSCLC-to-SCLC transformation were identified by sequential biopsies classified as NSCLC followed by SCLC.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>RNA sequencing was performed on 1318 SCLC and 2218 NE samples. Median SEZ6<!--> <!-->expression was higher in SCLC (39.7 transcripts per million (TPM)) than in NE tumors (20.8 TPM, p<0.0001) and NSCLC (1.34 TPM, p<0.001). Among NE tumors, median SEZ6 expression was highest in prostate (52.0 TPM, p=0.0016 vs SCLC) and lowest in adrenal gland tumors (1.2 TPM, p<0.0001 vs SCLC). In SCLC,<!--> <!-->SEZ6<!--> <!-->expression was positively correlated with ASCL1<!--> <!-->(p=0.44, p<0.0001) and<!--> <!-->NEUROD1<!--> <!-->(p=0.16, p<0.0001) expression but not<!--> <!-->POU2F3<!--> <!-->(p=-0.04, p=0.1253). Median survival was longest in SEZ6-Q2 for both SCLC and NE (13.0 mos. and 33.7 mos., respectively). NSCLC-to-SCLC transformation samples showed numerically higher SEZ6 expression post-transformation (median: 86.2 vs 2.4 TPM).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>SEZ6<!--> <!-->expression is higher in SCLC than in NE tumors, with notable heterogeneity by subtype, warranting consideration of expanded use of SEZ6-directed therapy.</div><div>Translational Relevance Statement:</div><div>This study establishes SEZ6 as a promising therapeutic target in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and transformed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), demonstrating its significantly elevated expression compared to neuroendocrine (NE) tumors and NSCLC. The positive correlation of <em>SEZ6</em> expression with NE lineage markers, particularly in <em>ASCL1</em> and <em>NEUROD1</em> subtypes, highlights its role as a lineage-specific marker, guiding the development of SEZ6-targeted antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). Additionally, the increased <em>SEZ6</em> expression following NSCLC-to-SCLC transformation suggests that SEZ6-targeted therapies could address resistance mechanisms in transformed tumors. Importantly, the association be
小细胞肺癌(SCLC)和肺外神经内分泌(NE)肿瘤是侵袭性恶性肿瘤,治疗选择有限。癫痫相关同源物6 (SEZ6)是一个潜在的治疗靶点,但其在这些肿瘤中的表达仍然知之甚少。谱系可塑性有助于非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的耐药,其中一些病例在靶向治疗后可发生sclc转化。我们的目的是表征SEZ6在NE肿瘤中的表达,并推测nsclc到sclc的转化。方法对SCLC、NSCLC和NE样本进行dna和RNA测序。根据SEZ6 RNA表达四分位数对样品进行分层,并根据ASCL1、NEUROD1和POU2F3的表达情况将样品分为亚型。采用Mann-Whitney U检验进行显著性检验。真实世界的总生存率从保险索赔数据中获得,p值使用log-rank检验计算。配对样本的NSCLC到SCLC转化通过顺序活检分类为NSCLC和SCLC。结果对1318例SCLC和2218例NE样本进行了rna测序。SEZ6在SCLC中的中位表达(39.7转录本/百万(TPM))高于NE肿瘤(20.8 TPM, 0.0001)和NSCLC (1.34 TPM, p<0.001)。在NE肿瘤中,SEZ6中位表达在前列腺中最高(52.0 TPM, p=0.0016 vs SCLC),在肾上腺肿瘤中最低(1.2 TPM, p= 0.0001 vs SCLC)。在SCLC中,SEZ6表达与ASCL1 (p=0.44, p= 0.0001)和NEUROD1 (p=0.16, p= 0.0001)表达呈正相关,而与POU2F3表达无关(p=-0.04, p=0.1253)。SCLC和NE的SEZ6-Q2中位生存期最长(13.0个月)。33.7个。分别)。nsclc - sclc转化样本在转化后的SEZ6表达量更高(中位数:86.2 vs 2.4 TPM)。结论sez6在SCLC中的表达高于NE,且在亚型上存在显著的异质性,值得考虑扩大sez6定向治疗的应用。翻译相关性声明:本研究确立了SEZ6在小细胞肺癌(SCLC)和转化的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中有前景的治疗靶点,与神经内分泌(NE)肿瘤和NSCLC相比,SEZ6的表达显著升高。SEZ6表达与NE谱系标记正相关,特别是在ASCL1和NEUROD1亚型中,突出了其作为谱系特异性标记的作用,指导了SEZ6靶向抗体-药物偶联物(adc)的发展。此外,在nsclc向sclc转化后SEZ6表达增加,表明SEZ6靶向治疗可以解决转化肿瘤的耐药机制。重要的是,高SEZ6表达与较短生存期之间的关联表明,将SEZ6状态整合到诊断工作流程中可以帮助根据风险对患者进行分层,并指导治疗决策。这项研究的结果将为未来的临床试验提供信息,旨在实施sez6靶向治疗,作为侵袭性NE恶性肿瘤精确肿瘤学策略的一部分。
{"title":"SEZ6 expression and lineage plasticity in small cell lung cancer and transformed non-small cell lung cancer","authors":"Jennifer A. Marks ,&nbsp;Kieran Sweeney ,&nbsp;Andrew Elliott ,&nbsp;Brinda Gupta ,&nbsp;Ari VanderWalde ,&nbsp;Sonam Puri ,&nbsp;Misty Dawn Shields ,&nbsp;Jorge J. Nieva ,&nbsp;Heloisa P. Soares ,&nbsp;Patrick C. Ma ,&nbsp;Balazs Halmos ,&nbsp;Stephen V. Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2026.108913","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2026.108913","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Introduction&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and extrapulmonary neuroendocrine (NE) tumors are aggressive malignancies with limited treatment options. Seizure-related homolog 6 (SEZ6) is a potential therapeutic target, but its expression in these tumors remains poorly understood. Lineage plasticity contributes to resistance in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), where some cases can undergo SCLC-transformation after targeted therapy. We aimed to characterize &lt;em&gt;SEZ6&lt;/em&gt; expression across NE tumors and presumed NSCLC-to-SCLC transformations.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;DNA and RNA sequencing were performed for SCLC, NSCLC, and NE samples. Samples were stratified by SEZ6 RNA expression quartiles and classified into subtypes based on ASCL1, NEUROD1, and POU2F3 expression. Significance was tested using the Mann-Whitney &lt;em&gt;U&lt;/em&gt; test. Real-world overall survival was obtained from insurance claims data, with p-values calculated using the log-rank test. Paired samples for NSCLC-to-SCLC transformation were identified by sequential biopsies classified as NSCLC followed by SCLC.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;RNA sequencing was performed on 1318 SCLC and 2218 NE samples. Median SEZ6&lt;!--&gt; &lt;!--&gt;expression was higher in SCLC (39.7 transcripts per million (TPM)) than in NE tumors (20.8 TPM, p&lt;0.0001) and NSCLC (1.34 TPM, p&lt;0.001). Among NE tumors, median SEZ6 expression was highest in prostate (52.0 TPM, p=0.0016 vs SCLC) and lowest in adrenal gland tumors (1.2 TPM, p&lt;0.0001 vs SCLC). In SCLC,&lt;!--&gt; &lt;!--&gt;SEZ6&lt;!--&gt; &lt;!--&gt;expression was positively correlated with ASCL1&lt;!--&gt; &lt;!--&gt;(p=0.44, p&lt;0.0001) and&lt;!--&gt; &lt;!--&gt;NEUROD1&lt;!--&gt; &lt;!--&gt;(p=0.16, p&lt;0.0001) expression but not&lt;!--&gt; &lt;!--&gt;POU2F3&lt;!--&gt; &lt;!--&gt;(p=-0.04, p=0.1253). Median survival was longest in SEZ6-Q2 for both SCLC and NE (13.0 mos. and 33.7 mos., respectively). NSCLC-to-SCLC transformation samples showed numerically higher SEZ6 expression post-transformation (median: 86.2 vs 2.4 TPM).&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Conclusions&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;SEZ6&lt;!--&gt; &lt;!--&gt;expression is higher in SCLC than in NE tumors, with notable heterogeneity by subtype, warranting consideration of expanded use of SEZ6-directed therapy.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Translational Relevance Statement:&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;This study establishes SEZ6 as a promising therapeutic target in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and transformed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), demonstrating its significantly elevated expression compared to neuroendocrine (NE) tumors and NSCLC. The positive correlation of &lt;em&gt;SEZ6&lt;/em&gt; expression with NE lineage markers, particularly in &lt;em&gt;ASCL1&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;NEUROD1&lt;/em&gt; subtypes, highlights its role as a lineage-specific marker, guiding the development of SEZ6-targeted antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). Additionally, the increased &lt;em&gt;SEZ6&lt;/em&gt; expression following NSCLC-to-SCLC transformation suggests that SEZ6-targeted therapies could address resistance mechanisms in transformed tumors. Importantly, the association be","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 108913"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145981115","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Nintedanib as switch maintenance treatment in malignant pleural mesothelioma (NEMO): A double-blind randomized phase II trial (EORTC-08112-LCG) 尼达尼布作为恶性胸膜间皮瘤(NEMO)的开关维持治疗:一项双盲随机II期试验(EORTC-08112-LCG)
IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2026.108906
Omar Abdel-Rahman , Paul Taylor , Mary O’Brien , Jo Raskin , Claudio Dazzi , Veerle Surmont , Sabrina Zonato , Robin Young , Anne-Claire Toffart , Petra Jankowska , Adam Hassani , Sandrine Marreaud , Luc Boone , Sanjay Popat

Introduction

Pleural mesothelioma (PM) is a lethal malignancy in which angiogenesis and progressive fibrosis drives disease. We evaluated angiogenesis inhibition using nintedanib monotherapy as switch maintenance in patients with PM that completed 4–6 cycles of prior platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy. The trial was performed in parallel to the LUME-Meso trial in an era prior to routine immune checkpoint inhibitor use, when platinum-pemetrexed was standard of care.

Methods

This is a triple-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentric, randomized, phase II study. Patients with inoperable PM (all histologies) that completed 4–6 cycles of platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy were randomized to nintedanib or placebo. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and safety.

Results

The trial was prematurely closed due to poor accrual after LUME-meso reported. 37 patients were randomized (18 to nintedanib, 19 to placebo). All analyses performed were descriptive. The median PFS was 3.4 months (95% CI: 2.83–5.82) and 4.6 months (95% CI: 3.65–13.17) for nintedanib and placebo arms, respectively (HR = 2.25, 95% CI: 1.07–4.73) with corresponding median OS of 13.1 months (95% CI: 10.22–26.02) and 38.9 months (95% CI: 18.66-NE) for nintedanib and placebo arms, respectively (HR = 2.38, 95% CI: 1.05–5.43). Two patients (11.1%) in the nintedanib arm experienced ≥ grade 3 treatment-related adverse events. Post progression treatment was balanced between arms but more patients in the placebo arm received immunotherapy (87% vs 54%).

Conclusions

Descriptive analyses suggest switch maintenance nintedanib does not improve PFS nor OS compared to placebo. Efficacy of the placebo arm may be related to imbalanced immunotherapy usage.
胸膜间皮瘤(PM)是一种由血管生成和进行性纤维化驱动的致死性恶性肿瘤。我们评估了尼达尼布单药治疗在完成4-6个周期铂-培美曲塞化疗的PM患者中的血管生成抑制作用。该试验与LUME-Meso试验同时进行,在常规免疫检查点抑制剂使用之前,铂-培美曲塞是标准治疗方案。方法:这是一项三盲、安慰剂对照、多中心、随机、II期研究。完成4-6个周期铂-培美曲塞化疗的不能手术的PM患者(所有组织学)被随机分配到尼达尼布或安慰剂组。主要终点为无进展生存期(PFS)。次要终点包括总生存期(OS)和安全性。结果LUME-meso报告后,由于累积不良,试验提前结束。37名患者被随机分配(18名接受尼达尼布治疗,19名接受安慰剂治疗)。所有的分析都是描述性的。尼达尼布组和安慰剂组的中位PFS分别为3.4个月(95% CI: 2.83-5.82)和4.6个月(95% CI: 3.65-13.17) (HR = 2.25, 95% CI: 1.07-4.73),相应的尼达尼布组和安慰剂组的中位OS分别为13.1个月(95% CI: 10.22-26.02)和38.9个月(95% CI: 18.66-NE) (HR = 2.38, 95% CI: 1.05-5.43)。尼达尼布组2例患者(11.1%)出现≥3级治疗相关不良事件。进展后治疗在两组之间是平衡的,但安慰剂组更多的患者接受了免疫治疗(87%对54%)。结论描述性分析表明,与安慰剂相比,切换维护尼达尼布不能改善PFS和OS。安慰剂组的疗效可能与不平衡的免疫治疗使用有关。
{"title":"Nintedanib as switch maintenance treatment in malignant pleural mesothelioma (NEMO): A double-blind randomized phase II trial (EORTC-08112-LCG)","authors":"Omar Abdel-Rahman ,&nbsp;Paul Taylor ,&nbsp;Mary O’Brien ,&nbsp;Jo Raskin ,&nbsp;Claudio Dazzi ,&nbsp;Veerle Surmont ,&nbsp;Sabrina Zonato ,&nbsp;Robin Young ,&nbsp;Anne-Claire Toffart ,&nbsp;Petra Jankowska ,&nbsp;Adam Hassani ,&nbsp;Sandrine Marreaud ,&nbsp;Luc Boone ,&nbsp;Sanjay Popat","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2026.108906","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2026.108906","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Pleural mesothelioma (PM) is a lethal malignancy in which angiogenesis and progressive fibrosis drives disease. We evaluated angiogenesis inhibition using nintedanib monotherapy as switch maintenance in patients with PM that completed 4–6 cycles of prior platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy. The trial was performed in parallel to the LUME-Meso trial in an era prior to routine immune checkpoint inhibitor use, when platinum-pemetrexed was standard of care.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a triple-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentric, randomized, phase II study. Patients with inoperable PM (all histologies) that completed 4–6 cycles of platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy were randomized to nintedanib or placebo. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and safety.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The trial was prematurely closed due to poor accrual after LUME-meso reported. 37 patients were randomized (18 to nintedanib, 19 to placebo). All analyses performed were descriptive. The median PFS was 3.4 months (95% CI: 2.83–5.82) and 4.6 months (95% CI: 3.65–13.17) for nintedanib and placebo arms, respectively (HR = 2.25, 95% CI: 1.07–4.73) with corresponding median OS of 13.1 months (95% CI: 10.22–26.02) and 38.9 months (95% CI: 18.66-NE) for nintedanib and placebo arms, respectively (HR = 2.38, 95% CI: 1.05–5.43). Two patients (11.1%) in the nintedanib arm experienced ≥ grade 3 treatment-related adverse events. Post progression treatment was balanced between arms but more patients in the placebo arm received immunotherapy (87% vs 54%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Descriptive analyses suggest switch maintenance nintedanib does not improve PFS nor OS compared to placebo. Efficacy of the placebo arm may be related to imbalanced immunotherapy usage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 108906"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145981117","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative efficacy and safety of post-TKI treatments for advanced EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis tki后治疗晚期egfr突变非小细胞肺癌的比较疗效和安全性:系统综述和网络荟萃分析
IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2026.108914
Yuanyuan Wang , Lin Zhang , Jianhua Zhan , Ling Wen , Xinyuan Zhao , Haishuang Sun , Xueyuan Chen , Yaxiong Zhang , Gang Chen , Yuanyuan Zhao , Yan Huang , Wenfeng Fang , Li Zhang , Dongchen Sun , Yunpeng Yang

Background

Despite the availability of several validated therapies, the optimal second-line regimen for EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) failure remains uncertain.

Methods

The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251157131). We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and conference proceedings (to Oct 20, 2025) for phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and the incidence of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).

Results

Eleven RCTs (3,650 patients, seven regimens) were included. Compared to chemotherapy, sacituzumab tirumotecan (SacTMT), amivantamab plus chemotherapy (Chemo-Ami), and chemo-immunotherapy plus anti-angiogenic agent (Chemo-IO-anti-VEGF) demonstrated superior PFS (HR 0.49, 0.48, 0.53, respectively) and OS (HR 0.60, 0.73, 0.83, respectively). SacTMT also significantly improved OS over chemo-immunotherapy (HR 0.68, 95 % CrI 0.48 to 0.95). Regarding safety, Chemo-Ami carried higher grade ≥3 TRAEs risk (OR 2.83, 95 % CrI 1.01 to 7.90) versus chemotherapy, while SacTMT and Chemo-IO-anti-VEGF demonstrated toxicity comparable to chemotherapy.

Conclusions

SacTMT, Chemo-Ami, and Chemo-IO-anti-VEGF offer superior efficacy over chemotherapy for EGFR-mutant NSCLC after TKI progression. SacTMT and Chemo-IO-anti-VEGF may have more favorable safety profiles than Chemo-Ami. This comparative evidence helps to inform clinical decision-making.
背景:尽管有几种有效的治疗方法,但酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)失效后egfr突变的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的最佳二线治疗方案仍不确定。方法该方案在PROSPERO注册(CRD420251157131)。我们系统地检索了MEDLINE、Embase、CENTRAL和会议论文集(至2025年10月20日)的III期随机对照试验(rct)。采用贝叶斯网络进行meta分析。主要终点为无进展生存期(PFS)。次要结局包括总生存期(OS)和≥3级治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs)的发生率。结果纳入6项随机对照试验(共3650例患者,7个方案)。与化疗相比,舒妥珠单抗替鲁莫替康(SacTMT)、阿米万他单抗联合化疗(Chemo-Ami)和化疗免疫联合抗血管生成药物(Chemo-IO-anti-VEGF)的PFS (HR分别为0.49、0.48、0.53)和OS (HR分别为0.60、0.73、0.83)均优于化疗。与化疗免疫治疗相比,SacTMT也显著改善了OS (HR 0.68, 95% CrI 0.48 - 0.95)。在安全性方面,与化疗相比,Chemo-Ami具有更高的≥3级TRAEs风险(OR 2.83, 95% CrI 1.01至7.90),而SacTMT和Chemo-IO-anti-VEGF显示出与化疗相当的毒性。结论sactmt、Chemo-Ami和Chemo-IO-anti-VEGF治疗TKI进展后egfr突变型NSCLC的疗效优于化疗。SacTMT和Chemo-IO-anti-VEGF可能比Chemo-Ami具有更有利的安全性。这种比较证据有助于告知临床决策。
{"title":"Comparative efficacy and safety of post-TKI treatments for advanced EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis","authors":"Yuanyuan Wang ,&nbsp;Lin Zhang ,&nbsp;Jianhua Zhan ,&nbsp;Ling Wen ,&nbsp;Xinyuan Zhao ,&nbsp;Haishuang Sun ,&nbsp;Xueyuan Chen ,&nbsp;Yaxiong Zhang ,&nbsp;Gang Chen ,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Zhao ,&nbsp;Yan Huang ,&nbsp;Wenfeng Fang ,&nbsp;Li Zhang ,&nbsp;Dongchen Sun ,&nbsp;Yunpeng Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2026.108914","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2026.108914","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Despite the availability of several validated therapies, the optimal second-line regimen for <em>EGFR</em>-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) failure remains uncertain.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251157131). We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and conference proceedings (to Oct 20, 2025) for phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A Bayesian network <em>meta</em>-analysis was performed. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and the incidence of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eleven RCTs (3,650 patients, seven regimens) were included. Compared to chemotherapy, sacituzumab tirumotecan (SacTMT), amivantamab plus chemotherapy (Chemo-Ami), and chemo-immunotherapy plus anti-angiogenic agent (Chemo-IO-anti-VEGF) demonstrated superior PFS (HR 0.49, 0.48, 0.53, respectively) and OS (HR 0.60, 0.73, 0.83, respectively). SacTMT also significantly improved OS over chemo-immunotherapy (HR 0.68, 95 % CrI 0.48 to 0.95). Regarding safety, Chemo-Ami carried higher grade ≥3 TRAEs risk (OR 2.83, 95 % CrI 1.01 to 7.90) versus chemotherapy, while SacTMT and Chemo-IO-anti-VEGF demonstrated toxicity comparable to chemotherapy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>SacTMT, Chemo-Ami, and Chemo-IO-anti-VEGF offer superior efficacy over chemotherapy for <em>EGFR</em>-mutant NSCLC after TKI progression. SacTMT and Chemo-IO-anti-VEGF may have more favorable safety profiles than Chemo-Ami. This comparative evidence helps to inform clinical decision-making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 108914"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145927316","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Letter to the editor: treatment sequencing in synchronous oligometastatic NSCLC − the need for standardized patient selection Criteria 致编辑的信:同步少转移性NSCLC的治疗测序-需要标准化的患者选择标准
IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2026.108911
Peng Bai , Jun Zhang
{"title":"Letter to the editor: treatment sequencing in synchronous oligometastatic NSCLC − the need for standardized patient selection Criteria","authors":"Peng Bai ,&nbsp;Jun Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2026.108911","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2026.108911","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 108911"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145927315","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Proteomic profiling of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer identifies a high-performance protein signature associated with postoperative recurrence 早期非小细胞肺癌的蛋白质组学分析确定了与术后复发相关的高性能蛋白质特征。
IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2026.108907
Ying Huang , Qiuhua Deng , Jie Li , Runchen Wang , Zhen Li , Liping Liu , Lei Song , Xiaohong Zhao , Liyan Huang , Haihong Yang , Weiqiang Yin

Background

The 5-year recurrence rate remains significantly high (∼30 %) in patients with early-stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), even after complete tumor resection. Recurrence prediction primarily relies on pathological assessment and genomic abnormalities. However, proteins — the functional executors of genetic information — may offer additional prognostic value. In this study, we aimed to develop a model integrating proteomic and clinical features to improve recurrence prediction in early-stage NSCLC.

Methods

We recruited 351 stage Ⅰ NSCLC patients who underwent radical surgery in discovery corhort. An additional 103 participants from external prospective cohort were used for validation. Clinical data and follow-up outcomes were retrospectively collected. Tumor proteomics profiling was performed using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The proteomics data were acquired using a data-independent acquisition mode with a 150-minute gradient method and analyzed against the human UniProt database using DIA-NN (v1.8.1). We assessed the association between proteomic and clinicopathologic factors and disease-free survival (DFS) using Cox proportional hazards regression. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to construct the predictive model.

Results

Of the 351 patients analyzed, 4260 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were identified as being associated with tumor recurrence. A nine-protein prediction model outperformed the clinicopathologic-based model (AUC, 0.898 vs. 0.742; P < 0.001) in predicting DFS. A combined model incorporating nine proteins and clinicopathological features demonstrated excellent predictive value for 5-year recurrence in the discovery cohort (AUC = 0.896). Nine proteins combined with clinicopathological features showed an AUC of 0.810 in the external validation cohort and an AUC of 0.844 in the combined cohort.

Conclusion

Integrating tumor proteomics with clinicopathologic features enhances risk stratification and improves recurrence prediction after surgical resection of early-stage NSCLC. This approach may enable more personalized postoperative management through refined surveillance intervals and potential adjuvant therapies.
背景:早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的5年复发率仍然非常高(~ 30 %),即使在肿瘤完全切除后也是如此。复发预测主要依赖于病理评估和基因组异常。然而,蛋白质-遗传信息的功能执行者-可能提供额外的预后价值。在这项研究中,我们旨在建立一个整合蛋白质组学和临床特征的模型,以提高早期非小细胞肺癌的复发预测。方法:我们招募了351例接受根治性手术的Ⅰ期非小细胞肺癌患者。另外103名来自外部前瞻性队列的参与者被用于验证。回顾性收集临床资料和随访结果。采用液相色谱-质谱法(LC-MS/MS)进行肿瘤蛋白质组学分析。蛋白质组学数据采用与数据无关的获取模式,采用150分钟梯度法获取,并使用DIA-NN (v1.8.1)对human UniProt数据库进行分析。我们使用Cox比例风险回归评估了蛋白质组学和临床病理因素与无病生存(DFS)之间的关系。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析建立预测模型。结果:在分析的351例患者中,4260个差异表达蛋白(DEPs)被确定与肿瘤复发相关。9蛋白预测模型优于基于临床病理的模型(AUC, 0.898 vs. 0.742; P 结论:将肿瘤蛋白质组学与临床病理特征相结合可以增强风险分层,提高早期NSCLC手术切除后的复发预测。这种方法可以通过精确的监测间隔和潜在的辅助治疗实现更个性化的术后管理。
{"title":"Proteomic profiling of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer identifies a high-performance protein signature associated with postoperative recurrence","authors":"Ying Huang ,&nbsp;Qiuhua Deng ,&nbsp;Jie Li ,&nbsp;Runchen Wang ,&nbsp;Zhen Li ,&nbsp;Liping Liu ,&nbsp;Lei Song ,&nbsp;Xiaohong Zhao ,&nbsp;Liyan Huang ,&nbsp;Haihong Yang ,&nbsp;Weiqiang Yin","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2026.108907","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2026.108907","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The 5-year recurrence rate remains significantly high (∼30 %) in patients with early-stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), even after complete tumor resection. Recurrence prediction primarily relies on pathological assessment and genomic abnormalities. However, proteins — the functional executors of genetic information — may offer additional prognostic value. In this study, we aimed to develop a model integrating proteomic and clinical features to improve recurrence prediction in early-stage NSCLC.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We recruited 351 stage Ⅰ NSCLC patients who underwent radical surgery in discovery corhort. An additional 103 participants from external prospective cohort were used for validation. Clinical data and follow-up outcomes were retrospectively collected. Tumor proteomics profiling was performed using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The proteomics data were acquired using a data-independent acquisition mode with a 150-minute gradient method and analyzed against the human UniProt database using DIA-NN (v1.8.1). We assessed the association between proteomic and clinicopathologic factors and disease-free survival (DFS) using Cox proportional hazards regression. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to construct the predictive model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 351 patients analyzed, 4260 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were identified as being associated with tumor recurrence. A nine-protein prediction model outperformed the clinicopathologic-based model (AUC, 0.898 vs. 0.742; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) in predicting DFS. A combined model incorporating nine proteins and clinicopathological features demonstrated excellent predictive value for 5-year recurrence in the discovery cohort (AUC = 0.896). Nine proteins combined with clinicopathological features showed an AUC of 0.810 in the external validation cohort and an AUC of 0.844 in the combined cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Integrating tumor proteomics with clinicopathologic features enhances risk stratification and improves recurrence prediction after surgical resection of early-stage NSCLC. This approach may enable more personalized postoperative management through refined surveillance intervals and potential adjuvant therapies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 108907"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146046900","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Survival outcomes of patients with uncommon EGFR mutations in surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma: A multi-institutional real-world database study (CReGYT-01 EGFR study) 手术切除肺腺癌中罕见EGFR突变患者的生存结局:一项多机构真实世界数据库研究(CReGYT-01 EGFR研究)
IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2026.108908
Kazuki Hayasaka , Mototsugu Shimokawa , Naoki Haratake , Hirotsugu Notsuda , Shinya Katsumata , Akira Hamada , Kotaro Nomura , Kosuke Fujino , Mao Yoshikawa , Ken Suzawa , Kazuhiko Shien , Kenichi Suda , Shuta Ohara , Shota Fukuda , Ikuhiko Kinoshita , Shinkichi Takamori , Satoshi Muto , Yusuke Takanashi , Kiyomichi Mizuno , Takamitsu Hayakawa , Yoshinori Okada

Introduction

Uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations (UCM) account for approximately 10% of EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) cases; however, their prognostic impact remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate postoperative outcomes in patients with UCM compared to those with common mutations (CM) using a large multicenter database.

Materials and methods

This retrospective study included 1,636 patients with EGFR-mutant LUAD who underwent complete resection between 2015 and 2018 at 21 Japanese institutions. Patients were classified into the CM and UCM groups. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS), and survival after recurrence (SAR) were analyzed using univariable and multivariable analyses and the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method.

Results

Among the patients, 1,441 (88.1%) had CM and 195 (11.9%) had UCM. RFS was comparable between the groups. However, patients with UCM showed significantly shorter OS and LCSS than those with CM (OS: multivariable hazard ratio [HR] 1.538, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.003–2.359; LCSS: multivariable HR 1.803, 95% CI 1.064–3.056). This trend was consistently validated using IPTW methods. SAR was also significantly shorter in patients with UCM. Subtype-specific analyses revealed that patients with exon 20 insertions (Ex20ins) had a significantly worse prognosis than those with other UCMs.

Conclusion

Patients with UCM had significantly worse OS, LCSS, and SAR than those with CM despite similar RFS. These survival disadvantages in UCM were strongly associated with the Ex20ins subtype. These findings highlight the urgent need for novel perioperative treatments for patients with UCM, especially Ex20ins.
罕见的表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变(UCM)约占EGFR突变型肺腺癌(LUAD)病例的10%;然而,它们的预后影响仍不清楚。本研究旨在利用大型多中心数据库评估UCM患者与普通突变(CM)患者的术后预后。材料和方法本回顾性研究包括2015年至2018年在日本21家机构接受完全切除的1636例egfr突变LUAD患者。将患者分为CM组和UCM组。采用单变量和多变量分析及治疗加权逆概率(IPTW)法分析无复发生存期(RFS)、总生存期(OS)、肺癌特异性生存期(LCSS)和复发后生存期(SAR)。结果CM 1441例(88.1%),UCM 195例(11.9%)。两组间的RFS具有可比性。然而,UCM患者的OS和LCSS明显短于CM患者(OS:多变量风险比[HR] 1.538, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.003-2.359; LCSS:多变量风险比[HR] 1.803, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.064-3.056)。使用IPTW方法,这种趋势得到了一致的验证。UCM患者的SAR也明显较短。亚型特异性分析显示,外显子20插入(Ex20ins)的患者预后明显差于其他ucm患者。结论尽管RFS相似,但UCM患者的OS、LCSS和SAR均明显低于CM患者。UCM中的这些生存劣势与Ex20ins亚型密切相关。这些发现强调了UCM患者迫切需要新的围手术期治疗,特别是ex20in。
{"title":"Survival outcomes of patients with uncommon EGFR mutations in surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma: A multi-institutional real-world database study (CReGYT-01 EGFR study)","authors":"Kazuki Hayasaka ,&nbsp;Mototsugu Shimokawa ,&nbsp;Naoki Haratake ,&nbsp;Hirotsugu Notsuda ,&nbsp;Shinya Katsumata ,&nbsp;Akira Hamada ,&nbsp;Kotaro Nomura ,&nbsp;Kosuke Fujino ,&nbsp;Mao Yoshikawa ,&nbsp;Ken Suzawa ,&nbsp;Kazuhiko Shien ,&nbsp;Kenichi Suda ,&nbsp;Shuta Ohara ,&nbsp;Shota Fukuda ,&nbsp;Ikuhiko Kinoshita ,&nbsp;Shinkichi Takamori ,&nbsp;Satoshi Muto ,&nbsp;Yusuke Takanashi ,&nbsp;Kiyomichi Mizuno ,&nbsp;Takamitsu Hayakawa ,&nbsp;Yoshinori Okada","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2026.108908","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2026.108908","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations (UCM) account for approximately 10% of EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) cases; however, their prognostic impact remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate postoperative outcomes in patients with UCM compared to those with common mutations (CM) using a large multicenter database.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>This retrospective study included 1,636 patients with EGFR-mutant LUAD who underwent complete resection between 2015 and 2018 at 21 Japanese institutions. Patients were classified into the CM and UCM groups. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS), and survival after recurrence (SAR) were analyzed using univariable and multivariable analyses and the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the patients, 1,441 (88.1%) had CM and 195 (11.9%) had UCM. RFS was comparable between the groups. However, patients with UCM showed significantly shorter OS and LCSS than those with CM (OS: multivariable hazard ratio [HR] 1.538, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.003–2.359; LCSS: multivariable HR 1.803, 95% CI 1.064–3.056). This trend was consistently validated using IPTW methods. SAR was also significantly shorter in patients with UCM. Subtype-specific analyses revealed that patients with exon 20 insertions (Ex20ins) had a significantly worse prognosis than those with other UCMs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients with UCM had significantly worse OS, LCSS, and SAR than those with CM despite similar RFS. These survival disadvantages in UCM were strongly associated with the Ex20ins subtype. These findings highlight the urgent need for novel perioperative treatments for patients with UCM, especially Ex20ins.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 108908"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145927806","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Lung cancer in women: current evidence and future research priorities 女性肺癌:当前证据和未来研究重点。
IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-04 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108905
Monireh Sadat Seyyedsalehi , Massimiliano Cani , Qian Wang , Chitra Thakur , Umberto Malapelle , Chung Yin Kong , Silvia Novello , Paolo Boffetta
Lung cancer (LC) remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality among women worldwide. Compared to men, LC in women presents distinct epidemiologic, biological, and clinical characteristics. A large proportion of LC cases in women occur in never-smokers, underscoring the important roles of environmental exposures, genetic susceptibility, and hormonal influences in disease pathogenesis. LC in women also displays unique molecular profiles, with a higher prevalence of actionable alterations such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements, which inform targeted therapy selection. Despite advances in chemotherapy, targeted agents, and immunotherapy, sex-based differences in treatment efficacy, toxicity, and survivorship persist and remain incompletely understood. Additional barriers, including limited access to LC screening and the underrepresentation of women in clinical trials, further constrain the application of evidence-based interventions for women. This review synthesizes latest evidence on epidemiology, risk factors, molecular features, screening, treatment outcomes, and survivorship challenges in women with LC with a deep focus on novel approaches to overcome current barriers and disparities to improve prevention, early detection, treatment, and long-term survivorship care.
肺癌(LC)仍然是全球妇女癌症相关死亡的主要原因。与男性相比,女性LC表现出不同的流行病学、生物学和临床特征。很大一部分女性LC病例发生在从不吸烟的人群中,强调了环境暴露、遗传易感性和激素影响在疾病发病机制中的重要作用。女性LC也显示出独特的分子特征,具有更高的可操作改变发生率,如表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变和间变性淋巴瘤激酶(ALK)重排,这为靶向治疗选择提供了信息。尽管在化疗、靶向药物和免疫治疗方面取得了进展,但基于性别的治疗效果、毒性和生存率的差异仍然存在,并且仍然不完全清楚。其他障碍,包括获得LC筛查的机会有限和妇女在临床试验中的代表性不足,进一步限制了以证据为基础的妇女干预措施的应用。本综述综合了LC女性的流行病学、危险因素、分子特征、筛查、治疗结果和生存挑战的最新证据,并深入探讨了克服当前障碍和差距的新方法,以改善预防、早期发现、治疗和长期生存护理。
{"title":"Lung cancer in women: current evidence and future research priorities","authors":"Monireh Sadat Seyyedsalehi ,&nbsp;Massimiliano Cani ,&nbsp;Qian Wang ,&nbsp;Chitra Thakur ,&nbsp;Umberto Malapelle ,&nbsp;Chung Yin Kong ,&nbsp;Silvia Novello ,&nbsp;Paolo Boffetta","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108905","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108905","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Lung cancer (LC) remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality among women worldwide. Compared to men, LC in women presents distinct epidemiologic, biological, and clinical characteristics. A large proportion of LC cases in women occur in never-smokers, underscoring the important roles of environmental exposures, genetic susceptibility, and hormonal influences in disease pathogenesis. LC in women also displays unique molecular profiles, with a higher prevalence of actionable alterations such as epidermal growth factor receptor (<em>EGFR</em>) mutations and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (<em>ALK</em>) rearrangements, which inform targeted therapy selection. Despite advances in chemotherapy, targeted agents, and immunotherapy, sex-based differences in treatment efficacy, toxicity, and survivorship persist and remain incompletely understood. Additional barriers, including limited access to LC screening and the underrepresentation of women in clinical trials, further constrain the application of evidence-based interventions for women. This review synthesizes latest evidence on epidemiology, risk factors, molecular features, screening, treatment outcomes, and survivorship challenges in women with LC with a deep focus on novel approaches to overcome current barriers and disparities to improve prevention, early detection, treatment, and long-term survivorship care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 108905"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146010182","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Multi-omic screening for pleural mesothelioma in Asbestos-Exposed Populations: A literature review and Recommendations 石棉暴露人群胸膜间皮瘤的多组学筛查:文献综述和建议
IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108893
Kathleen Zwijsen , Ellen Heirwegh , Eline Schillebeeckx , Elly Marcq , Adrian Covaci , Ken Op de Beeck , Jan P. van Meerbeeck , Jo Raskin , Annelies Janssens , Annemiek Snoeckx , Kevin Lamote

Objectives

Pleural mesothelioma (PM) is an aggressive thoracic cancer related to historical exposure to asbestos fibres. Symptoms often appear at an advanced stage, leading to delayed diagnosis and dismal prognosis. Early diagnosis is thus crucial in improving patient outcome. Current biomarker research for early detection focuses on different −omics research fields (genomics, proteomics, transcriptomics, metabolomics and volatomics), however with no clinically useful result. Moreover, currently no screening program is advocated for asymptomatic individuals with an established asbestos exposure. The aim of this review is to summarise the advances in different −omics fields and to pinpoint state-of-the art biomarkers with the highest potential to serve as primary targets in clinical trials for early PM detection or screening.

Methods

A literature search was performed in the databases MEDLINE and Web Of Science. Research articles published before 1 August 2025 were eligible.

Results

In total, 63 articles were included in this review, with specific focus on radiomics, genomics, transcriptomics, epigenomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and volatomics. Several research groups have focused on investigating biomarkers or screening techniques for pleural mesothelioma among individuals with a history of asbestos exposure. Notable approaches include using low-dose Computed Tomography, and determining mesothelin levels and micro-RNAs in blood, and volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath.

Discussion

Single biomarkers like miRNAs, mesothelin, and VOCs show promise, but further validation is needed in larger cohorts with correct control groups. A multi-omics approach, which integrates biomarker panels from various −omics areas, has the potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy.
目的胸膜间皮瘤(PM)是一种与石棉纤维暴露史有关的侵袭性胸部肿瘤。症状往往出现在晚期,导致诊断延误和预后不佳。因此,早期诊断对于改善患者预后至关重要。目前用于早期检测的生物标志物研究主要集中在不同的组学研究领域(基因组学、蛋白质组学、转录组学、代谢组学和挥发组学),但没有临床有用的结果。此外,目前没有筛查方案提倡无症状的个体与石棉暴露。本综述的目的是总结不同组学领域的进展,并确定最有潜力作为早期PM检测或筛查临床试验主要靶点的最先进的生物标志物。方法在MEDLINE和Web Of Science数据库中进行文献检索。在2025年8月1日之前发表的研究论文符合条件。结果本综述共纳入63篇文献,重点关注放射组学、基因组学、转录组学、表观基因组学、蛋白质组学、代谢组学和挥发组学。几个研究小组已经专注于研究有石棉暴露史的个体胸膜间皮瘤的生物标志物或筛选技术。值得注意的方法包括使用低剂量计算机断层扫描,测定血液中的间皮素水平和微rna,以及呼出气体中的挥发性有机化合物。单个生物标志物如mirna、间皮素和VOCs显示出希望,但需要在更大的队列和正确的对照组中进一步验证。多组学方法集成了来自不同组学领域的生物标志物面板,具有提高诊断准确性的潜力。
{"title":"Multi-omic screening for pleural mesothelioma in Asbestos-Exposed Populations: A literature review and Recommendations","authors":"Kathleen Zwijsen ,&nbsp;Ellen Heirwegh ,&nbsp;Eline Schillebeeckx ,&nbsp;Elly Marcq ,&nbsp;Adrian Covaci ,&nbsp;Ken Op de Beeck ,&nbsp;Jan P. van Meerbeeck ,&nbsp;Jo Raskin ,&nbsp;Annelies Janssens ,&nbsp;Annemiek Snoeckx ,&nbsp;Kevin Lamote","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108893","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108893","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Pleural mesothelioma (PM) is an aggressive thoracic cancer related to historical exposure to asbestos fibres. Symptoms often appear at an advanced stage, leading to delayed diagnosis and dismal prognosis. Early diagnosis is thus crucial in improving patient outcome. Current biomarker research for early detection focuses on different −omics research fields (genomics, proteomics, transcriptomics, metabolomics and volatomics), however with no clinically useful result. Moreover, currently no screening program is advocated for asymptomatic individuals with an established asbestos exposure. The aim of this review is to summarise the advances in different −omics fields and to pinpoint state-of-the art biomarkers with the highest potential to serve as primary targets in clinical trials for early PM detection or screening.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A literature search was performed in the databases MEDLINE and Web Of Science. Research articles published before 1 August 2025 were eligible.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 63 articles were included in this review, with specific focus on radiomics, genomics, transcriptomics, epigenomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and volatomics. Several research groups have focused on investigating biomarkers or screening techniques for pleural mesothelioma among individuals with a history of asbestos exposure. Notable approaches include using low-dose Computed Tomography, and determining mesothelin levels and micro-RNAs in blood, and volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Single biomarkers like miRNAs, mesothelin, and VOCs show promise, but further validation is needed in larger cohorts with correct control groups. A multi-omics approach, which integrates biomarker panels from various −omics areas, has the potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 108893"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145927314","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Lung Cancer
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1