首页 > 最新文献

Local and Regional Anesthesia最新文献

英文 中文
Safety of Cubital Tunnel Release Under General versus Regional Anesthesia. 全麻与区域麻醉下肘管释放的安全性。
IF 2.9 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/LRA.S389011
Courtney R Carlson Strother, Lauren E Dittman, Marco Rizzo, Steven L Moran, Peter C Rhee

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the occurrence of early (<6 weeks) post-operative complications following ulnar nerve decompressions at the cubital tunnel performed under regional anesthesia compared to those performed under general anesthesia.

Methods: In situ ulnar nerve decompressions at the cubital tunnel performed at a single institution from 2012 through 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Post-operative complications were compared between subjects who underwent the procedure with regional versus general anesthesia.

Results: Ninety-one ulnar nerve in situ decompressions were included in the study, which were performed under regional anesthesia in 55 and general anesthesia in 36 cases. The occurrence of post-operative complications was not significantly different between patients who received regional (n = 7) anesthesia and general (n = 8) anesthesia. None of the complications were directly attributed to the type of anesthesia administered. The change in pre- and post-operative McGowan scores were not significantly different between anesthesia groups (p = 0.81).

Conclusion: In situ ulnar nerve decompression at the cubital tunnel under regional anesthesia does not result in increased post-operative complications compared to those surgeries performed under general anesthesia. In situ ulnar nerve decompression performed under regional anesthesia is a safe and reliable option for patients who wish to avoid general anesthesia.

Level of evidence: III.

目的:本研究的目的是评估早期尺神经减压的发生率(方法:回顾性回顾2012年至2019年在单一机构进行的肘管原位尺神经减压术。比较了区域麻醉和全身麻醉的术后并发症。结果:纳入91例尺神经原位减压术,其中区域麻醉55例,全身麻醉36例。局部麻醉(n = 7)和全身麻醉(n = 8)患者术后并发症的发生率无显著差异。没有任何并发症直接归因于麻醉的类型。麻醉组术前、术后McGowan评分差异无统计学意义(p = 0.81)。结论:与全麻手术相比,区域麻醉下肘管尺神经原位减压术的术后并发症没有增加。局部麻醉下的尺神经原位减压术是避免全身麻醉的一种安全可靠的选择。证据水平:III。
{"title":"Safety of Cubital Tunnel Release Under General versus Regional Anesthesia.","authors":"Courtney R Carlson Strother,&nbsp;Lauren E Dittman,&nbsp;Marco Rizzo,&nbsp;Steven L Moran,&nbsp;Peter C Rhee","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S389011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S389011","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the occurrence of early (<6 weeks) post-operative complications following ulnar nerve decompressions at the cubital tunnel performed under regional anesthesia compared to those performed under general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In situ ulnar nerve decompressions at the cubital tunnel performed at a single institution from 2012 through 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Post-operative complications were compared between subjects who underwent the procedure with regional versus general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-one ulnar nerve in situ decompressions were included in the study, which were performed under regional anesthesia in 55 and general anesthesia in 36 cases. The occurrence of post-operative complications was not significantly different between patients who received regional (n = 7) anesthesia and general (n = 8) anesthesia. None of the complications were directly attributed to the type of anesthesia administered. The change in pre- and post-operative McGowan scores were not significantly different between anesthesia groups (<i>p</i> = 0.81).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In situ ulnar nerve decompression at the cubital tunnel under regional anesthesia does not result in increased post-operative complications compared to those surgeries performed under general anesthesia. In situ ulnar nerve decompression performed under regional anesthesia is a safe and reliable option for patients who wish to avoid general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p>","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":"16 ","pages":"91-98"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cf/07/lra-16-91.PMC10335303.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10193282","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Regional Anesthetic Use in Trans-Hiatal Esophagectomy. Are They Worth Consideration? A Case Series. 区域麻醉在食管切除术中的应用。他们值得考虑吗?案例系列。
IF 2.9 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/LRA.S398331
William Mitchell, Thomas Roser, Jessica Heard, Shankar Logarajah, John Ok, John Jay, Houssam Osman, D Rohan Jeyarajah

Background: Esophagectomy traditionally has high levels of perioperative morbidity and mortality due to surgical techniques and case complexity. While thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is considered first-line for postoperative analgesia after esophagectomy, complications can arise related to its sympathectomy and mobility impairment. Additionally, it has been shown that postoperative outcomes are improved with early extubation following esophagectomy. Our aim is to describe the impact of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks on extubation rates following esophagectomy when uncoupled from TEA.

Methods: This is a case series of 42 patients who underwent trans-hiatal esophagectomy between 2019 and 2022 who received a TAP block without TEA. The primary outcomes of interest were the rates of extubation within the operating room (OR) and reintubation. Secondary outcomes included: intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS), opioid pain medication use, post-operative hypotension, fluid administration, postoperative pain scores, development of anastomotic leak, and 30-day readmission.

Results: The mean age at operation was 63 years and 97.6% of patients were represented by American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) physical status class III or IV. Thirty-four (81%) patients immediately extubated postoperatively. Nine patients (21.4%) underwent reintubation during their hospital course. Only seven patients (16.7%) required vasopressors postoperatively. The median LOS was five days in the ICU and 10 days in the hospital. TAP block alone was found to be equivalent to TAP with additional regional blocks (TAP+) on the basis of immediate extubation, reintubation, ICU and hospital LOS, and reported postoperative pain.

Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrated immediate extubation is possible using TAP blocks while limiting post-operative hypotension and fluid administration. This was shown despite the elevated comorbidity burden of this study's population. Overall, this study supports the use of TAP blocks as a possible alternative for primary analgesia in patients undergoing trans-hiatal esophagectomy.

Trial registration: This study includes participants who were retrospectively registered. IRB# 037.HPB.2018.R.

背景:由于手术技术和病例复杂性,传统的食管切除术具有很高的围手术期发病率和死亡率。虽然胸段硬膜外镇痛(TEA)被认为是食管切除术后的一线镇痛方法,但其交感神经切除术和活动障碍可能引起并发症。此外,研究表明食管切除术后早期拔管可改善术后预后。我们的目的是描述经腹平面(TAP)阻滞对食管癌切除术后脱离TEA后拔管率的影响。方法:这是一个病例系列,包括42名在2019年至2022年期间接受了经裂孔食管切除术的患者,他们接受了不含TEA的TAP阻滞。主要的结局是拔管率在手术室(OR)和再插管。次要结局包括:重症监护病房(ICU)和住院时间(LOS)、阿片类止痛药的使用、术后低血压、液体给药、术后疼痛评分、吻合口漏的发生和30天再入院。结果:手术时平均年龄63岁,97.6%的患者被美国麻醉学会(ASA)评定为III级或IV级,术后立即拔管34例(81%)。9例患者(21.4%)在住院期间接受了再插管。只有7例患者(16.7%)术后需要血管加压药物。在ICU的平均生存期为5天,在医院的平均生存期为10天。在立即拔管、再插管、ICU和医院LOS以及报告的术后疼痛的基础上,发现单独TAP阻滞与TAP加局部阻滞(TAP+)相当。结论:本研究的结果表明,在限制术后低血压和液体给药的情况下,使用TAP阻滞立即拔管是可能的。尽管该研究人群的合并症负担升高,但仍显示出这一点。总的来说,本研究支持TAP阻滞作为经裂孔食管切除术患者初级镇痛的可能替代方案。试验注册:本研究包括回顾性注册的参与者。IRB hpb.2018.r # 037.。
{"title":"Regional Anesthetic Use in Trans-Hiatal Esophagectomy. Are They Worth Consideration? A Case Series.","authors":"William Mitchell,&nbsp;Thomas Roser,&nbsp;Jessica Heard,&nbsp;Shankar Logarajah,&nbsp;John Ok,&nbsp;John Jay,&nbsp;Houssam Osman,&nbsp;D Rohan Jeyarajah","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S398331","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S398331","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Esophagectomy traditionally has high levels of perioperative morbidity and mortality due to surgical techniques and case complexity. While thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is considered first-line for postoperative analgesia after esophagectomy, complications can arise related to its sympathectomy and mobility impairment. Additionally, it has been shown that postoperative outcomes are improved with early extubation following esophagectomy. Our aim is to describe the impact of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks on extubation rates following esophagectomy when uncoupled from TEA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a case series of 42 patients who underwent trans-hiatal esophagectomy between 2019 and 2022 who received a TAP block without TEA. The primary outcomes of interest were the rates of extubation within the operating room (OR) and reintubation. Secondary outcomes included: intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS), opioid pain medication use, post-operative hypotension, fluid administration, postoperative pain scores, development of anastomotic leak, and 30-day readmission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age at operation was 63 years and 97.6% of patients were represented by American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) physical status class III or IV. Thirty-four (81%) patients immediately extubated postoperatively. Nine patients (21.4%) underwent reintubation during their hospital course. Only seven patients (16.7%) required vasopressors postoperatively. The median LOS was five days in the ICU and 10 days in the hospital. TAP block alone was found to be equivalent to TAP with additional regional blocks (TAP+) on the basis of immediate extubation, reintubation, ICU and hospital LOS, and reported postoperative pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study demonstrated immediate extubation is possible using TAP blocks while limiting post-operative hypotension and fluid administration. This was shown despite the elevated comorbidity burden of this study's population. Overall, this study supports the use of TAP blocks as a possible alternative for primary analgesia in patients undergoing trans-hiatal esophagectomy.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study includes participants who were retrospectively registered. IRB# 037.HPB.2018.R.</p>","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":"16 ","pages":"99-111"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/13/5c/lra-16-99.PMC10349603.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9825151","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Postoperative Outcomes of Analgesic Management with Erector Spine Plane Block at T5 Level in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery with Sternotomy: A Cohort Study. 一项队列研究:胸骨切开术儿童心脏手术患者T5水平勃起椎平面阻滞镇痛管理的效果
IF 2.9 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/LRA.S392307
Gustavo A Cruz-Suárez, David E Rebellón Sánchez, Daniela Torres-Salazar, Akemi Arango Sakamoto, Leidy Jhoanna López-Erazo, Iván F Quintero-Cifuentes, María A Vélez-Esquivia, Sergio A Jaramillo-Valencia, Antonio J T Suguimoto-Erasso

Introduction: There is limited evidence on the impact of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) as part of multimodal analgesia in pediatric population undergoing cardiac surgery.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in patients under 18 years of age, who underwent cardiac surgery Risk Adjusted classification for Congenital Heart Surgery (RACHS-1) ≤3 by sternotomy. The study aims to evaluate the effect of ESPB as part of multimodal analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery compared to conventional analgesia (CA) on relevant clinical outcomes: length of hospital stay, length of ICU stay, opioid consumption, time to extubation, mortality, and postoperative complications. The participants included were treated in a reference hospital in Colombia from July 2019 to June 2022.

Results: Eighty participants were included, 40 in the ESPB group and 40 in the CA group. There was a significant decrease (Log rank test p = 0.007) in days to length of hospital stay in ESPB group (median 6.5 days (IQR: 4-11)) compared to the CA group (median 10.5 days (IQR: 6-25)). Likewise, there was a higher probability of discharge from the ICU in the ESPB group (HR 1.71 (95% CI: 1.05-2.79)). The ESPB group had lower opioid consumption (p < 0.05). There were no differences in time to extubation, mortality, and postoperative complications.

Conclusion: ESPB as part of multimodal analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery is feasible and associated with shorter hospital length of stay, faster ICU discharge and lower opioid consumption.

在接受心脏手术的儿科人群中,关于竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)作为多模式镇痛的一部分的影响的证据有限。方法:回顾性队列研究18岁以下胸骨切开行先天性心脏手术风险调整分级(RACHS-1)≤3级的患者。本研究旨在评估ESPB作为儿科心脏手术患者多模式镇痛的一部分,与常规镇痛(CA)相比,对相关临床结果的影响:住院时间、ICU住院时间、阿片类药物消耗、拔管时间、死亡率和术后并发症。纳入的参与者于2019年7月至2022年6月在哥伦比亚的一家参考医院接受治疗。结果:共纳入80例受试者,ESPB组40例,CA组40例。与CA组(中位数10.5天(IQR: 6-25))相比,ESPB组住院天数与住院时间(中位数6.5天(IQR: 4-11))显著降低(Log rank检验p = 0.007)。同样,ESPB组从ICU出院的概率更高(HR 1.71 (95% CI: 1.05-2.79))。ESPB组阿片类药物消耗明显降低(p < 0.05)。两组在拔管时间、死亡率和术后并发症方面无差异。结论:ESPB作为小儿心脏手术患者多模式镇痛的一部分是可行的,且与缩短住院时间、加快出院速度和降低阿片类药物消耗有关。
{"title":"Postoperative Outcomes of Analgesic Management with Erector Spine Plane Block at T5 Level in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery with Sternotomy: A Cohort Study.","authors":"Gustavo A Cruz-Suárez,&nbsp;David E Rebellón Sánchez,&nbsp;Daniela Torres-Salazar,&nbsp;Akemi Arango Sakamoto,&nbsp;Leidy Jhoanna López-Erazo,&nbsp;Iván F Quintero-Cifuentes,&nbsp;María A Vélez-Esquivia,&nbsp;Sergio A Jaramillo-Valencia,&nbsp;Antonio J T Suguimoto-Erasso","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S392307","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S392307","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is limited evidence on the impact of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) as part of multimodal analgesia in pediatric population undergoing cardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted in patients under 18 years of age, who underwent cardiac surgery Risk Adjusted classification for Congenital Heart Surgery (RACHS-1) ≤3 by sternotomy. The study aims to evaluate the effect of ESPB as part of multimodal analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery compared to conventional analgesia (CA) on relevant clinical outcomes: length of hospital stay, length of ICU stay, opioid consumption, time to extubation, mortality, and postoperative complications. The participants included were treated in a reference hospital in Colombia from July 2019 to June 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty participants were included, 40 in the ESPB group and 40 in the CA group. There was a significant decrease (Log rank test p = 0.007) in days to length of hospital stay in ESPB group (median 6.5 days (IQR: 4-11)) compared to the CA group (median 10.5 days (IQR: 6-25)). Likewise, there was a higher probability of discharge from the ICU in the ESPB group (HR 1.71 (95% CI: 1.05-2.79)). The ESPB group had lower opioid consumption (p < 0.05). There were no differences in time to extubation, mortality, and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ESPB as part of multimodal analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery is feasible and associated with shorter hospital length of stay, faster ICU discharge and lower opioid consumption.</p>","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":"16 ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fa/c4/lra-16-1.PMC9926978.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9291420","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the Efficacy of Single versus Triple Injection Technique for Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Block in Upper Limb Surgeries. 一项比较超声引导下锁骨下阻滞在上肢手术中单次和三次注射技术疗效的随机对照试验。
IF 2.9 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/LRA.S409211
Raksha Vedavyas, Ravi Saravanan, Gunaseelan Mirunalini, Balasubramaniam Gayathri

Introduction: The ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block by triple-point injection method was aimed at blocking the three individual cords in the infraclavicular region. Recently, a single-point injection method which does not require visualization of cords to produce nerve block has been introduced. This study compared the block onset time, performance time, patient's satisfaction, and complications between the ultrasound guided triple-point injection and single-point injection methods.

Patients and method: This randomized controlled trial was conducted in a tertiary care hospital. Sixty patients were divided into two groups - Group S: 30 patients received single-point injection method of infraclavicular block. Group T: 30 patients received triple-point injection method of infraclavicular block. Drugs used were 0.5% ropivacaine with 8 mg dexamethasone.

Results: The sensory onset time was significantly longer in Group S (11.13 ±1.83 min) than Group T (6.20 ±1.19min). No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups regarding mean motor onset time. The composite sensorimotor onset time was similar between the groups. The mean time to perform the block was significantly lesser in Group S (1.35 ±0.38 min) when compared to group T (3.44 ±0.61min). The patient satisfaction score, conversion to general anesthesia and complications were not significant among the two groups.

Conclusion: We concluded that single-point injection method had a shorter performance time and similar total onset time with less procedural complications compared with triple point injection method.

超声引导下锁骨下臂丛阻滞采用三点注射的方法,目的是阻断锁骨下区域的三条单独的束。最近,一种不需要看到脊髓就能产生神经阻滞的单点注射方法被引入。本研究比较超声引导下三点注射与单点注射两种方法在阻滞起效时间、手术时间、患者满意度及并发症等方面的差异。患者和方法:本随机对照试验在一家三级保健医院进行。60例患者分为两组:S组:30例患者采用锁骨下阻滞单点注射法。T组:30例患者采用锁骨下阻滞三点法注射。所用药物为0.5%罗哌卡因加8mg地塞米松。结果:S组感觉起效时间(11.13±1.83 min)明显长于T组(6.20±1.19min)。两组平均运动发作时间无统计学差异。两组间复合感觉运动发作时间相似。S组的平均阻滞时间(1.35±0.38 min)明显少于T组(3.44±0.61min)。两组患者满意度评分、转全麻及并发症均无显著差异。结论:与三点注射相比,单点注射的起效时间更短,总起效时间相似,手术并发症更少。
{"title":"A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the Efficacy of Single versus Triple Injection Technique for Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Block in Upper Limb Surgeries.","authors":"Raksha Vedavyas,&nbsp;Ravi Saravanan,&nbsp;Gunaseelan Mirunalini,&nbsp;Balasubramaniam Gayathri","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S409211","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S409211","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block by triple-point injection method was aimed at blocking the three individual cords in the infraclavicular region. Recently, a single-point injection method which does not require visualization of cords to produce nerve block has been introduced. This study compared the block onset time, performance time, patient's satisfaction, and complications between the ultrasound guided triple-point injection and single-point injection methods.</p><p><strong>Patients and method: </strong>This randomized controlled trial was conducted in a tertiary care hospital. Sixty patients were divided into two groups - Group S: 30 patients received single-point injection method of infraclavicular block. Group T: 30 patients received triple-point injection method of infraclavicular block. Drugs used were 0.5% ropivacaine with 8 mg dexamethasone.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sensory onset time was significantly longer in Group S (11.13 ±1.83 min) than Group T (6.20 ±1.19min). No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups regarding mean motor onset time. The composite sensorimotor onset time was similar between the groups. The mean time to perform the block was significantly lesser in Group S (1.35 ±0.38 min) when compared to group T (3.44 ±0.61min). The patient satisfaction score, conversion to general anesthesia and complications were not significant among the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We concluded that single-point injection method had a shorter performance time and similar total onset time with less procedural complications compared with triple point injection method.</p>","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":"16 ","pages":"51-58"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/09/72/lra-16-51.PMC10202210.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9518520","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Neuropathies Following an Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block. 超声引导下腋窝臂丛神经阻滞后的神经病变。
IF 2.9 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/LRA.S426515
Keito Koh, Onishi Tatsuki, Sonoko Sakuraba, Sho Yamazaki, Hajime Yako, Takeshi Omae
Purpose Ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block (UGBPB) has interscalene, supraclavicular, infraclavicular, and axillary approaches. The axillary block is considered to be the safest and with fewer adverse events compared to the interscalene (eg, phrenic nerve block, spinal cord or vertebral artery puncture) and supraclavicular (eg, pneumothorax). However, with regard to postoperative neurological symptoms (PONS), it is controversial whether its incidence after an axillary block was higher than that after non-axillary approaches”. In this study, we investigated whether the incidence of a neuropathy after an axillary block was higher than that after non-axillary approaches. Patients and Methods This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study. All UGBPBs were performed under general anesthesia between January 2014 and March 2020. The outcomes included the overall incidence of PONS and neuropathies for axillary and non-axillary approaches. The etiology, symptoms, and outcomes of patients were investigated. Results Of the 992 patients, 143 (14%) and 849 (86%) were subjected to axillary and non-axillary approaches, respectively. Among 19 cases (19.2:1000; 95% confidence interval [CI], 18.2–20.1) of PONS, four (4.0:1000; 95% CI, 3.8–4.2) were neuropathies attributed to the UGBPB, three (21.0:1000; 95% CI, 18.1–23.8) to the axillary and one (2.8:1000; 95% CI, 2.6–3.1) to non-axillary approaches. The incidence of neuropathies after an axillary block was significantly higher than that after non-axillary approaches (P = 0.005). Conclusion The incidence of neuropathies after US-guided axillary block under general anesthesia was significantly higher than that after non-axillary approaches.
目的:超声引导下臂丛阻滞(UGBPB)有斜角肌间、锁骨上、锁骨下和腋窝入路。与斜角肌间(如膈神经阻滞、脊髓或椎动脉穿刺)和锁骨上(如气胸)相比,腋窝阻滞被认为是最安全的,不良事件较少。然而,关于术后神经系统症状(PONS),腋路阻滞后的发生率是否高于非腋路入路仍存在争议”。在这项研究中,我们调查了腋窝阻滞后神经病变的发生率是否高于非腋窝入路。患者和方法:这是一项单中心、回顾性队列研究。所有UGBPBs均于2014年1月至2020年3月在全身麻醉下进行。结果包括腋窝和非腋窝入路的PONS和神经病变的总发生率。对患者的病因、症状和预后进行了调查。结果:992例患者中,143例(14%)采用腋窝入路,849例(86%)采用非腋窝入路。19例中(19.2:1000;PONS的95%置信区间[CI], 18.2-20.1), 4例(4.0:1000;95% CI, 3.8-4.2)为UGBPB所致神经病,3例(21.0:1000;95% CI, 18.1-23.8)和1 (2.8:1000;95% CI, 2.6-3.1)到非腋窝入路。腋窝入路后神经病变发生率明显高于非腋窝入路(P = 0.005)。结论:全麻下us引导下腋窝阻滞术后神经病变的发生率明显高于非腋窝入路。
{"title":"Neuropathies Following an Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block.","authors":"Keito Koh,&nbsp;Onishi Tatsuki,&nbsp;Sonoko Sakuraba,&nbsp;Sho Yamazaki,&nbsp;Hajime Yako,&nbsp;Takeshi Omae","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S426515","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S426515","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block (UGBPB) has interscalene, supraclavicular, infraclavicular, and axillary approaches. The axillary block is considered to be the safest and with fewer adverse events compared to the interscalene (eg, phrenic nerve block, spinal cord or vertebral artery puncture) and supraclavicular (eg, pneumothorax). However, with regard to postoperative neurological symptoms (PONS), it is controversial whether its incidence after an axillary block was higher than that after non-axillary approaches”. In this study, we investigated whether the incidence of a neuropathy after an axillary block was higher than that after non-axillary approaches. Patients and Methods This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study. All UGBPBs were performed under general anesthesia between January 2014 and March 2020. The outcomes included the overall incidence of PONS and neuropathies for axillary and non-axillary approaches. The etiology, symptoms, and outcomes of patients were investigated. Results Of the 992 patients, 143 (14%) and 849 (86%) were subjected to axillary and non-axillary approaches, respectively. Among 19 cases (19.2:1000; 95% confidence interval [CI], 18.2–20.1) of PONS, four (4.0:1000; 95% CI, 3.8–4.2) were neuropathies attributed to the UGBPB, three (21.0:1000; 95% CI, 18.1–23.8) to the axillary and one (2.8:1000; 95% CI, 2.6–3.1) to non-axillary approaches. The incidence of neuropathies after an axillary block was significantly higher than that after non-axillary approaches (P = 0.005). Conclusion The incidence of neuropathies after US-guided axillary block under general anesthesia was significantly higher than that after non-axillary approaches.","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":"16 ","pages":"123-132"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/92/b4/lra-16-123.PMC10488563.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10213224","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Magnesium Sulfate in Pediatric Abdominal Cancer Surgery: Safety and Efficacy in Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane (US-TAP) Block in Conjugation with Levobupivacaine. 硫酸镁在小儿腹部肿瘤手术中的安全性和有效性:超声引导下经腹平面(US-TAP)阻滞联合左布比卡因。
IF 2.9 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/LRA.S425649
Fatma El Sherif, Doaa Gomaa Sayed, Khaled Mohamed Fares, Sahar Abdel-Baky Mohamed, Amira Mahmoud Osman, Ahmed Kamal Sayed, Shereen Mamdouh Kamal

Purpose: Magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) may enhance the effects of local anesthetics when used as an adjuvant in peripheral nerve blocks. Our objective was to evaluate efficiency and safety of utilizing MgSO4 alongside levobupivacaine in bilateral ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (US-TAP) block for postoperative pain in pediatric cancer patients who underwent abdominal surgery.

Methodology: A randomized double-blinded controlled trial at South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt, included that 40 pediatric patients with Wilms' tumor or neuroblastoma were randomly allocated to get bilateral (US-TAP) block and divided into two groups; M group: received US-TAP with 0.6 mL/kg levobupivacaine 0.25% + 2 mg/kg MgSO4 and C group: received with 0.6 mL/kg levobupivacaine 0.25% only. FLACC scores (Face, Leg, Activity, Cry, Consolability) were used to evaluate post-operative pain, first analgesic request, total analgesic consumption, adverse effects, as well as hemodynamics were monitored for 24 h and recorded at time points (2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24h). Parent's satisfaction at discharge, also, was evaluated.

Results: FLACC score in M group was significantly lower than in C group from 4 h to 24 h with the first analgesic request being longer (15.95 ± 1.99 vs 7.70 ± 0.80 (h); p < 0.001) and lower total analgesic consumption (231.75 ± 36.57 vs 576.00 ± 170.71 (mg); p < 0.001) when comparing M group to C group, respectively. Both groups had insignificant differences regarding hemodynamics, parent satisfaction, postoperative agitation, and side effects except vomiting occurred in two patients in the C group and one patient in the M group.

Conclusion: We conclude that adding magnesium sulphate as an adjuvant to local anaesthetic in US-TAP block for pain management in pediatric abdominal cancer surgeries resulted in better and longer analgesia, with less consumption of rescue analgesics with no serious side effects.

目的:硫酸镁(MgSO4)作为周围神经阻滞的辅助剂可增强局麻药的作用。我们的目的是评估MgSO4联合左布比卡因在双侧超声引导下经腹平面(US-TAP)阻滞治疗接受腹部手术的儿童癌症患者术后疼痛的有效性和安全性。方法:在埃及Assiut大学南埃及癌症研究所进行的一项随机双盲对照试验中,将40例患有Wilms肿瘤或神经母细胞瘤的儿童患者随机分配至双侧(US-TAP)阻滞组,并分为两组;M组:US-TAP加0.6 mL/kg左布比卡因0.25% + 2 mg/kg MgSO4; C组:只加0.6 mL/kg左布比卡因0.25%。采用FLACC评分(面部、腿部、活动、哭泣、安慰)评估术后疼痛,首次镇痛要求、总镇痛消耗、不良反应,监测24小时血流动力学,并在时间点(2、4、6、8、12、18和24小时)记录。出院时父母的满意度也进行了评估。结果:M组FLACC评分在4 ~ 24 h显著低于C组(15.95±1.99 vs 7.70±0.80 (h)),且首次镇痛时间较C组长;P < 0.001)和较低的总镇痛用量(231.75±36.57 vs 576.00±170.71 (mg));p < 0.001)。两组在血流动力学、父母满意度、术后躁动和副作用方面差异不显著,C组2例,M组1例出现呕吐。结论:我们认为在US-TAP阻滞中加入硫酸镁作为局部麻醉的辅助剂用于小儿腹部肿瘤手术疼痛管理,镇痛效果更好,镇痛时间更长,使用的抢救镇痛药较少,无严重副作用。
{"title":"Magnesium Sulfate in Pediatric Abdominal Cancer Surgery: Safety and Efficacy in Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane (US-TAP) Block in Conjugation with Levobupivacaine.","authors":"Fatma El Sherif,&nbsp;Doaa Gomaa Sayed,&nbsp;Khaled Mohamed Fares,&nbsp;Sahar Abdel-Baky Mohamed,&nbsp;Amira Mahmoud Osman,&nbsp;Ahmed Kamal Sayed,&nbsp;Shereen Mamdouh Kamal","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S425649","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S425649","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) may enhance the effects of local anesthetics when used as an adjuvant in peripheral nerve blocks. Our objective was to evaluate efficiency and safety of utilizing MgSO4 alongside levobupivacaine in bilateral ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (US-TAP) block for postoperative pain in pediatric cancer patients who underwent abdominal surgery.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A randomized double-blinded controlled trial at South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt, included that 40 pediatric patients with Wilms' tumor or neuroblastoma were randomly allocated to get bilateral (US-TAP) block and divided into two groups; M group: received US-TAP with 0.6 mL/kg levobupivacaine 0.25% + 2 mg/kg MgSO4 and C group: received with 0.6 mL/kg levobupivacaine 0.25% only. FLACC scores (Face, Leg, Activity, Cry, Consolability) were used to evaluate post-operative pain, first analgesic request, total analgesic consumption, adverse effects, as well as hemodynamics were monitored for 24 h and recorded at time points (2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24h). Parent's satisfaction at discharge, also, was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FLACC score in M group was significantly lower than in C group from 4 h to 24 h with the first analgesic request being longer (15.95 ± 1.99 vs 7.70 ± 0.80 (h); p < 0.001) and lower total analgesic consumption (231.75 ± 36.57 vs 576.00 ± 170.71 (mg); p < 0.001) when comparing M group to C group, respectively. Both groups had insignificant differences regarding hemodynamics, parent satisfaction, postoperative agitation, and side effects except vomiting occurred in two patients in the C group and one patient in the M group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We conclude that adding magnesium sulphate as an adjuvant to local anaesthetic in US-TAP block for pain management in pediatric abdominal cancer surgeries resulted in better and longer analgesia, with less consumption of rescue analgesics with no serious side effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":"16 ","pages":"133-141"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b5/ce/lra-16-133.PMC10505031.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10306745","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Intrathecal Morphine versus Morphine-Dexmedetomidine Combination for Postoperative Pain Control After Total Knee Replacement: A Randomized Controlled Trial. 鞘内吗啡与吗啡-右美托咪定联合用于全膝关节置换术后疼痛控制:一项随机对照试验。
IF 2.9 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/LRA.S419465
Amany F Omara, Hadal Hassan Mohsen, Alaa Mohammed Abo Hagar, Ahmed F Abdelrahman

Objective: This prospective study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of intrathecal morphine, dexmedetomidine, and a combination of both in patients undergoing total knee replacement (TKR).

Patients and methods: This randomized prospective study was carried out in Tanta university hospital in orthopedic surgery for 6 months on 105 adult patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Class II and III, aged > 50 years, and scheduled for total knee replacement surgery randomly allocated into morphine group received 0.5% heavy bupivacaine plus 0.1 mg of morphine, morphine/ dexmedetomidine group, received 0.5% heavy bupivacaine plus 0.1 mg of morphine and 5 mcg of dexmedetomidine and dexmedetomidine group received 0.5% heavy bupivacaine plus 5 mcg of dexmedetomidine. The time of the first required analgesia, postoperative pain severity, the total dose of morphine, postoperative complication, and the patient's level of sedation were recorded.

Results: About half of the patients in the dexmedetomidine group requested first rescue analgesia 6 hours after the operation, significantly shorter than the other two groups. On the other hand, the other two groups show no significant difference between them regarding the first required analgesia. At rest, the dexmedetomidine group have significantly higher VAS with a significant increase in patients who required morphine as rescue analgesia than the other two groups. While at movement, patients in the dexmedetomidine group felt pain at 4 hrs postoperatively with significantly higher VAS than the other two groups. At the same time, the sedation score was significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group than in the other two groups. 22.2% of cases in the morphine group developed nausea and vomiting with a significant difference between the three groups.

Conclusion: Despite the absence of substantial side effects, our findings did not suggest enhanced analgesia with the combination of intrathecal morphine and dexmedetomidine.

目的:本前瞻性研究旨在比较鞘内吗啡、右美托咪定以及两者联合应用在全膝关节置换术(TKR)患者中的镇痛效果和不良反应。患者及方法:本随机前瞻性研究在坦塔大学医院骨科外科进行了为期6个月的105例美国麻醉学会身体状态II级和III级,年龄> 50岁,计划行全膝关节置换术的成人患者,随机分为吗啡组,给予0.5%重布比卡因加0.1 mg吗啡,吗啡/右美托咪定组。给予0.5%重布比卡因加吗啡0.1 mg,右美托咪定5 MCG,右美托咪定组给予0.5%重布比卡因加右美托咪定5 MCG。记录首次镇痛时间、术后疼痛严重程度、吗啡总剂量、术后并发症及患者镇静水平。结果:右美托咪定组约有一半患者在术后6小时要求首次抢救性镇痛,明显短于其他两组。另一方面,其他两组在第一组所需的镇痛方面没有显着差异。休息时,右美托咪定组VAS明显高于其他两组,需要吗啡作为救急镇痛的患者明显增加。在运动时,右美托咪定组患者术后4小时感到疼痛,VAS明显高于其他两组。同时,右美托咪定组镇静评分明显低于其他两组。吗啡组出现恶心呕吐的发生率为22.2%,三组间差异有统计学意义。结论:尽管没有明显的副作用,但我们的研究结果并不表明鞘内吗啡和右美托咪定联合使用可以增强镇痛效果。
{"title":"Intrathecal Morphine versus Morphine-Dexmedetomidine Combination for Postoperative Pain Control After Total Knee Replacement: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Amany F Omara,&nbsp;Hadal Hassan Mohsen,&nbsp;Alaa Mohammed Abo Hagar,&nbsp;Ahmed F Abdelrahman","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S419465","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S419465","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This prospective study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of intrathecal morphine, dexmedetomidine, and a combination of both in patients undergoing total knee replacement (TKR).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This randomized prospective study was carried out in Tanta university hospital in orthopedic surgery for 6 months on 105 adult patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Class II and III, aged > 50 years, and scheduled for total knee replacement surgery randomly allocated into morphine group received 0.5% heavy bupivacaine plus 0.1 mg of morphine, morphine/ dexmedetomidine group, received 0.5% heavy bupivacaine plus 0.1 mg of morphine and 5 mcg of dexmedetomidine and dexmedetomidine group received 0.5% heavy bupivacaine plus 5 mcg of dexmedetomidine. The time of the first required analgesia, postoperative pain severity, the total dose of morphine, postoperative complication, and the patient's level of sedation were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About half of the patients in the dexmedetomidine group requested first rescue analgesia 6 hours after the operation, significantly shorter than the other two groups. On the other hand, the other two groups show no significant difference between them regarding the first required analgesia. At rest, the dexmedetomidine group have significantly higher VAS with a significant increase in patients who required morphine as rescue analgesia than the other two groups. While at movement, patients in the dexmedetomidine group felt pain at 4 hrs postoperatively with significantly higher VAS than the other two groups. At the same time, the sedation score was significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group than in the other two groups. 22.2% of cases in the morphine group developed nausea and vomiting with a significant difference between the three groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the absence of substantial side effects, our findings did not suggest enhanced analgesia with the combination of intrathecal morphine and dexmedetomidine.</p>","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":"16 ","pages":"113-122"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a5/f7/lra-16-113.PMC10404426.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9960146","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Systemic Analgesia versus Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) Infusion During Paediatric Nephrectomy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. 在小儿肾切除术中,全身性镇痛与连续勃起脊柱平面阻滞(ESPB)输注:一项随机对照试验。
IF 2.9 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/LRA.S401980
Suzan Adlan, Ahmad Abd El-Rahman, Sahar Abdel-Baky Mohamed, Ahmed M Thabet, Eman Maghawry Hamada, Basma Rezk Farouk, Fatma Adel El Sherif

Purpose: A subcostal flank incision is required for open radical nephrectomy, which is a surgical procedure used to remove tumors of the kidney that are malignant. The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and continuous catheter use in children are receiving more and more support by paediatric regional anaesthesiologists. Our objective was to compare systemic analgesic to continuous ESPB for pain relief in paediatric patients undergoing open radical nephrectomy.

Methods: Sixty children with cancer ASA I or II and undergoing open radical nephrectomy between the ages of two and seven participated in this prospective, randomized, controlled, and open label study. The cases were divided into two equal groups (E and T groups); Group E received ipsilateral continuous ultrasound-guided ESPB at T9 (thoracic vertebrae), with a bolus of 0.4 mL/kg bupivacaine 0.25%. Immediately postoperatively, Group E (ESPB group) received continuous ESPB with a PCA (patient controlled analgesia) pump at a rate of 0.2 mL/kg/hour bupivacaine 0.125%. Group T (Tramadol group), Tramadol hydrochloride was administered intravenously at a dose of 2 mg/kg/8hour, which could be increased to 2 mg/kg/6hours. Then, we followed up on patients' total analgesic consumption for 48 hours following surgery, as well as the time it took for them to request rescue analgesic, their FLACC and sedation scores, and their hemodynamics and side effects immediately following surgery as well as at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 48 hours.

Results: A highly significant difference in total tramadol consumed in group T 11.97 ± 1.13 mg/kg while group E was 2.07± 1.54 mg/kg (p < 0.001). 100% patients in group T requested analgesia compared to 46.7% patients in group E (p < 0.001). From 2 to 48 hour, FLACC significantly decreased in E compared to T group (p≤ 0.006) at all-time points.

Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided continuous ESPB significantly provided better postoperative pain relief, reduced postoperative tramadol consumption and reduced pain scores compared with the use of tramadol alone, in paediatric cancer patients undergoing nephrectomy.

目的:开放性根治性肾切除术需要肋下侧切口,这是一种用于切除恶性肾肿瘤的外科手术。直立脊柱平面阻滞(ESPB)和连续导管在儿童中的应用越来越受到儿科区域麻醉医师的支持。我们的目的是比较全身性镇痛和持续ESPB在接受开放性根治性肾切除术的儿童患者中的疼痛缓解效果。方法:60名年龄在2至7岁之间的ASA I或II型癌症儿童接受开放性根治性肾切除术,参与了这项前瞻性、随机、对照和开放标签的研究。将病例分为两组(E组和T组);E组在T9(胸椎)行同侧超声引导下连续ESPB,剂量为0.25%布比卡因0.4 mL/kg。术后即刻,E组(ESPB组)采用PCA(患者自控镇痛)泵持续ESPB,剂量为0.2 mL/kg/h布比卡因0.125%。T组(曲马多组),静脉滴注盐酸曲马多,剂量为2 mg/kg/8h,可增加至2 mg/kg/6h。然后,我们随访了患者术后48小时的总镇痛用量,以及他们要求抢救镇痛所需的时间,他们的FLACC和镇静评分,以及手术后立即以及2、4、6、8、12、18、24、36和48小时的血流动力学和副作用。结果:T组曲马多总消耗量为11.97±1.13 mg/kg, E组为2.07±1.54 mg/kg,差异极显著(p < 0.001)。T组100%患者要求镇痛,而E组46.7%患者要求镇痛(p < 0.001)。2 ~ 48 h, E组FLACC在各时间点均较T组显著降低(p≤0.006)。结论:与单独使用曲马多相比,超声引导下的持续ESPB能更好地缓解小儿肿瘤肾切除术患者的术后疼痛,减少术后曲马多的使用,降低疼痛评分。
{"title":"Systemic Analgesia versus Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) Infusion During Paediatric Nephrectomy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.","authors":"Suzan Adlan,&nbsp;Ahmad Abd El-Rahman,&nbsp;Sahar Abdel-Baky Mohamed,&nbsp;Ahmed M Thabet,&nbsp;Eman Maghawry Hamada,&nbsp;Basma Rezk Farouk,&nbsp;Fatma Adel El Sherif","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S401980","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S401980","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A subcostal flank incision is required for open radical nephrectomy, which is a surgical procedure used to remove tumors of the kidney that are malignant. The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and continuous catheter use in children are receiving more and more support by paediatric regional anaesthesiologists. Our objective was to compare systemic analgesic to continuous ESPB for pain relief in paediatric patients undergoing open radical nephrectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty children with cancer ASA I or II and undergoing open radical nephrectomy between the ages of two and seven participated in this prospective, randomized, controlled, and open label study. The cases were divided into two equal groups (E and T groups); Group E received ipsilateral continuous ultrasound-guided ESPB at T<sub>9</sub> (thoracic vertebrae), with a bolus of 0.4 mL/kg bupivacaine 0.25%. Immediately postoperatively, Group E (ESPB group) received continuous ESPB with a PCA (patient controlled analgesia) pump at a rate of 0.2 mL/kg/hour bupivacaine 0.125%. Group T (Tramadol group), Tramadol hydrochloride was administered intravenously at a dose of 2 mg/kg/8hour, which could be increased to 2 mg/kg/6hours. Then, we followed up on patients' total analgesic consumption for 48 hours following surgery, as well as the time it took for them to request rescue analgesic, their FLACC and sedation scores, and their hemodynamics and side effects immediately following surgery as well as at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 48 hours.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A highly significant difference in total tramadol consumed in group T 11.97 ± 1.13 mg/kg while group E was 2.07± 1.54 mg/kg (p < 0.001). 100% patients in group T requested analgesia compared to 46.7% patients in group E (p < 0.001). From 2 to 48 hour, FLACC significantly decreased in E compared to T group (p≤ 0.006) at all-time points.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultrasound-guided continuous ESPB significantly provided better postoperative pain relief, reduced postoperative tramadol consumption and reduced pain scores compared with the use of tramadol alone, in paediatric cancer patients undergoing nephrectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":"16 ","pages":"59-69"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0d/79/lra-16-59.PMC10254591.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9623250","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Case Report: Erector Spinae Block in Perforated Viscus. 病例报告:粘滞穿孔的竖脊肌阻滞。
IF 2.9 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/LRA.S393913
Jassim Rauf, Mohammad Mohsin A M Haji

Background: Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) a new block described for post-operative analgesia. Since 2016 the block has become a common practice in many institutions globally. Evidence has shown that ESPB is superior to truncal and abdominal wall blocks for many thoracic and abdominal surgeries.

Case presentation: A 29-year-old male, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) IIE patient presented with acute appendicitis. Patient was scheduled to undergo Laparoscopic Appendicectomy under general anesthesia (GA) with ESPB for post op analgesia. In the operating room after induction of GA patient received an ultrasound (US) guided bilateral ESPB at T10 level of the spinal cord with 20 mls of 0.25% levobupivacaine on each side. Intraoperatively the appendix was found to be normal and there was an incidental finding of perforated superior/first part of duodenum (D1). The duodenum was repaired. Patient remained hemodynamically stable intraoperatively. No intraoperative morphine was required. After uneventful extubation, the patient was transferred to post-operative anesthesia care unit (PACU). Patient reported pain score of zero on a 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) in PACU. No morphine was required in the next 24 hours on the ward either.

Conclusion: ESPB can provide opioid free analgesia for laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer both intra and postoperatively.

背景:直立脊柱平面阻滞(ESPB)是一种用于术后镇痛的新型阻滞。自2016年以来,区块链已成为全球许多机构的普遍做法。有证据表明,在许多胸腹外科手术中,ESPB优于躯干和腹壁阻滞。病例报告:一名29岁男性,ASA(美国麻醉医师协会)IIE患者出现急性阑尾炎。患者计划在全麻(GA)下行腹腔镜阑尾切除术,并使用ESPB进行术后镇痛。GA诱导后患者在手术室接受超声引导下双侧脊髓T10水平ESPB,两侧各20 ml 0.25%左布比卡因。术中阑尾未见异常,偶见十二指肠上/上段穿孔(D1)。十二指肠修复。术中患者血流动力学保持稳定。术中不需要吗啡。在顺利拔管后,患者被转移到术后麻醉护理病房(PACU)。患者在PACU的11分数值评定量表(NRS)中报告疼痛评分为零。在接下来的24小时里,病房里也不需要吗啡。结论:ESPB在腹腔镜十二指肠溃疡穿孔修复术中及术后均可提供无阿片类镇痛。
{"title":"Case Report: Erector Spinae Block in Perforated Viscus.","authors":"Jassim Rauf,&nbsp;Mohammad Mohsin A M Haji","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S393913","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S393913","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) a new block described for post-operative analgesia. Since 2016 the block has become a common practice in many institutions globally. Evidence has shown that ESPB is superior to truncal and abdominal wall blocks for many thoracic and abdominal surgeries.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>A 29-year-old male, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) IIE patient presented with acute appendicitis. Patient was scheduled to undergo Laparoscopic Appendicectomy under general anesthesia (GA) with ESPB for post op analgesia. In the operating room after induction of GA patient received an ultrasound (US) guided bilateral ESPB at T10 level of the spinal cord with 20 mls of 0.25% levobupivacaine on each side. Intraoperatively the appendix was found to be normal and there was an incidental finding of perforated superior/first part of duodenum (D1). The duodenum was repaired. Patient remained hemodynamically stable intraoperatively. No intraoperative morphine was required. After uneventful extubation, the patient was transferred to post-operative anesthesia care unit (PACU). Patient reported pain score of zero on a 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) in PACU. No morphine was required in the next 24 hours on the ward either.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ESPB can provide opioid free analgesia for laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer both intra and postoperatively.</p>","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":"16 ","pages":"19-23"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/70/d4/lra-16-19.PMC9940489.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9327787","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Randomized Control Trial to Compare Hemodynamic Parameters of Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Under Combined Spinal-Epidural and General Anesthesia in a Tertiary Hospital. 三甲医院经皮肾镜取石术中脊髓-硬膜外联合麻醉与全身麻醉血流动力学参数比较的随机对照试验
IF 2.9 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/LRA.S410510
Ksheerabdhi Sankar, Kuppusamy Anand, Swetha Ramani, Balasubramaniam Gayathri

Background and aim: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under epidural anesthesia has been reported to have few advantages over general anesthesia, like lower postoperative pain and less need for analgesics. There are limited studies on PCNL being performed under neuraxial anesthesia in supine position. Hence the present study was conceived to compare hemodynamic parameters in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the supine position under combined spinal-epidural with general anesthesia (GA).

Material and methods: A prospective, randomized control trial was conducted among 90 patients who were posted to undergo elective percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the the supine position, after obtaining Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC) approval and CTRI (Clinical Trial Registry - India) registration. Patients were randomly allotted to undergo surgery either under general anesthesia (group GA) or combined spinal epidural anesthesia (group CSE) by computer-generated random number method. Hemodynamic parameters, postoperative analgesic requirement and incidence of blood transfusion were recorded and analyzed.

Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to gender, ASA grade, surgery duration, calculus size and pulse rate. There was a statistically significant reduction in mean arterial pressure from 5 to 50 minutes of surgery and less incidence of blood transfusion in patients in the CSE group. Patients who underwent PCNL in the supine position under CSE required lesser analgesics postoperatively compared to those under general anesthesia.

Conclusion: Combined spinal epidural analgesia can be used as an alternative to general anesthesia for patients undergoing PCNL in the supine position in view of less MAP and reduced postoperative analgesic and blood transfusion requirement.

背景和目的:据报道硬膜外麻醉下经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)与全麻相比没有什么优势,比如术后疼痛更低,对镇痛药的需求更少。在仰卧位下,在神经轴麻醉下进行PCNL的研究有限。因此,本研究旨在比较脊髓-硬膜外联合全身麻醉(GA)下仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)患者的血流动力学参数。材料和方法:在获得机构伦理委员会(IEC)批准和CTRI(印度临床试验注册中心)注册后,在90例患者中进行了前瞻性随机对照试验,这些患者在仰卧位接受选择性经皮肾镜取石术。采用计算机生成随机数法将患者随机分为全身麻醉组(GA组)和脊髓硬膜外联合麻醉组(CSE组)。记录并分析血流动力学参数、术后镇痛需求及输血发生率。结果:两组患者在性别、ASA分级、手术时间、结石大小、脉搏率等方面差异无统计学意义。CSE组患者手术后5 - 50分钟平均动脉压降低,输血发生率降低,统计学意义显著。与全麻下的患者相比,在CSE下仰卧位进行PCNL的患者术后需要较少的镇痛药。结论:脊髓硬膜外联合镇痛可作为PCNL患者仰卧位全麻的替代麻醉,可减少MAP,减少术后镇痛和输血需求。
{"title":"A Randomized Control Trial to Compare Hemodynamic Parameters of Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Under Combined Spinal-Epidural and General Anesthesia in a Tertiary Hospital.","authors":"Ksheerabdhi Sankar,&nbsp;Kuppusamy Anand,&nbsp;Swetha Ramani,&nbsp;Balasubramaniam Gayathri","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S410510","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S410510","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under epidural anesthesia has been reported to have few advantages over general anesthesia, like lower postoperative pain and less need for analgesics. There are limited studies on PCNL being performed under neuraxial anesthesia in supine position. Hence the present study was conceived to compare hemodynamic parameters in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the supine position under combined spinal-epidural with general anesthesia (GA).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A prospective, randomized control trial was conducted among 90 patients who were posted to undergo elective percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the the supine position, after obtaining Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC) approval and CTRI (Clinical Trial Registry - India) registration. Patients were randomly allotted to undergo surgery either under general anesthesia (group GA) or combined spinal epidural anesthesia (group CSE) by computer-generated random number method. Hemodynamic parameters, postoperative analgesic requirement and incidence of blood transfusion were recorded and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to gender, ASA grade, surgery duration, calculus size and pulse rate. There was a statistically significant reduction in mean arterial pressure from 5 to 50 minutes of surgery and less incidence of blood transfusion in patients in the CSE group. Patients who underwent PCNL in the supine position under CSE required lesser analgesics postoperatively compared to those under general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combined spinal epidural analgesia can be used as an alternative to general anesthesia for patients undergoing PCNL in the supine position in view of less MAP and reduced postoperative analgesic and blood transfusion requirement.</p>","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":"16 ","pages":"41-49"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/08/3a/lra-16-41.PMC10202212.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9521993","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
期刊
Local and Regional Anesthesia
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1