首页 > 最新文献

Local and Regional Anesthesia最新文献

英文 中文
Neuropathies Following an Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block. 超声引导下腋窝臂丛神经阻滞后的神经病变。
IF 2.9 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/LRA.S426515
Keito Koh, Onishi Tatsuki, Sonoko Sakuraba, Sho Yamazaki, Hajime Yako, Takeshi Omae
Purpose Ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block (UGBPB) has interscalene, supraclavicular, infraclavicular, and axillary approaches. The axillary block is considered to be the safest and with fewer adverse events compared to the interscalene (eg, phrenic nerve block, spinal cord or vertebral artery puncture) and supraclavicular (eg, pneumothorax). However, with regard to postoperative neurological symptoms (PONS), it is controversial whether its incidence after an axillary block was higher than that after non-axillary approaches”. In this study, we investigated whether the incidence of a neuropathy after an axillary block was higher than that after non-axillary approaches. Patients and Methods This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study. All UGBPBs were performed under general anesthesia between January 2014 and March 2020. The outcomes included the overall incidence of PONS and neuropathies for axillary and non-axillary approaches. The etiology, symptoms, and outcomes of patients were investigated. Results Of the 992 patients, 143 (14%) and 849 (86%) were subjected to axillary and non-axillary approaches, respectively. Among 19 cases (19.2:1000; 95% confidence interval [CI], 18.2–20.1) of PONS, four (4.0:1000; 95% CI, 3.8–4.2) were neuropathies attributed to the UGBPB, three (21.0:1000; 95% CI, 18.1–23.8) to the axillary and one (2.8:1000; 95% CI, 2.6–3.1) to non-axillary approaches. The incidence of neuropathies after an axillary block was significantly higher than that after non-axillary approaches (P = 0.005). Conclusion The incidence of neuropathies after US-guided axillary block under general anesthesia was significantly higher than that after non-axillary approaches.
目的:超声引导下臂丛阻滞(UGBPB)有斜角肌间、锁骨上、锁骨下和腋窝入路。与斜角肌间(如膈神经阻滞、脊髓或椎动脉穿刺)和锁骨上(如气胸)相比,腋窝阻滞被认为是最安全的,不良事件较少。然而,关于术后神经系统症状(PONS),腋路阻滞后的发生率是否高于非腋路入路仍存在争议”。在这项研究中,我们调查了腋窝阻滞后神经病变的发生率是否高于非腋窝入路。患者和方法:这是一项单中心、回顾性队列研究。所有UGBPBs均于2014年1月至2020年3月在全身麻醉下进行。结果包括腋窝和非腋窝入路的PONS和神经病变的总发生率。对患者的病因、症状和预后进行了调查。结果:992例患者中,143例(14%)采用腋窝入路,849例(86%)采用非腋窝入路。19例中(19.2:1000;PONS的95%置信区间[CI], 18.2-20.1), 4例(4.0:1000;95% CI, 3.8-4.2)为UGBPB所致神经病,3例(21.0:1000;95% CI, 18.1-23.8)和1 (2.8:1000;95% CI, 2.6-3.1)到非腋窝入路。腋窝入路后神经病变发生率明显高于非腋窝入路(P = 0.005)。结论:全麻下us引导下腋窝阻滞术后神经病变的发生率明显高于非腋窝入路。
{"title":"Neuropathies Following an Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block.","authors":"Keito Koh, Onishi Tatsuki, Sonoko Sakuraba, Sho Yamazaki, Hajime Yako, Takeshi Omae","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S426515","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S426515","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block (UGBPB) has interscalene, supraclavicular, infraclavicular, and axillary approaches. The axillary block is considered to be the safest and with fewer adverse events compared to the interscalene (eg, phrenic nerve block, spinal cord or vertebral artery puncture) and supraclavicular (eg, pneumothorax). However, with regard to postoperative neurological symptoms (PONS), it is controversial whether its incidence after an axillary block was higher than that after non-axillary approaches”. In this study, we investigated whether the incidence of a neuropathy after an axillary block was higher than that after non-axillary approaches. Patients and Methods This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study. All UGBPBs were performed under general anesthesia between January 2014 and March 2020. The outcomes included the overall incidence of PONS and neuropathies for axillary and non-axillary approaches. The etiology, symptoms, and outcomes of patients were investigated. Results Of the 992 patients, 143 (14%) and 849 (86%) were subjected to axillary and non-axillary approaches, respectively. Among 19 cases (19.2:1000; 95% confidence interval [CI], 18.2–20.1) of PONS, four (4.0:1000; 95% CI, 3.8–4.2) were neuropathies attributed to the UGBPB, three (21.0:1000; 95% CI, 18.1–23.8) to the axillary and one (2.8:1000; 95% CI, 2.6–3.1) to non-axillary approaches. The incidence of neuropathies after an axillary block was significantly higher than that after non-axillary approaches (P = 0.005). Conclusion The incidence of neuropathies after US-guided axillary block under general anesthesia was significantly higher than that after non-axillary approaches.","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":"16 ","pages":"123-132"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/92/b4/lra-16-123.PMC10488563.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10213224","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Magnesium Sulfate in Pediatric Abdominal Cancer Surgery: Safety and Efficacy in Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane (US-TAP) Block in Conjugation with Levobupivacaine. 硫酸镁在小儿腹部肿瘤手术中的安全性和有效性:超声引导下经腹平面(US-TAP)阻滞联合左布比卡因。
IF 2.9 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/LRA.S425649
Fatma El Sherif, Doaa Gomaa Sayed, Khaled Mohamed Fares, Sahar Abdel-Baky Mohamed, Amira Mahmoud Osman, Ahmed Kamal Sayed, Shereen Mamdouh Kamal

Purpose: Magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) may enhance the effects of local anesthetics when used as an adjuvant in peripheral nerve blocks. Our objective was to evaluate efficiency and safety of utilizing MgSO4 alongside levobupivacaine in bilateral ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (US-TAP) block for postoperative pain in pediatric cancer patients who underwent abdominal surgery.

Methodology: A randomized double-blinded controlled trial at South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt, included that 40 pediatric patients with Wilms' tumor or neuroblastoma were randomly allocated to get bilateral (US-TAP) block and divided into two groups; M group: received US-TAP with 0.6 mL/kg levobupivacaine 0.25% + 2 mg/kg MgSO4 and C group: received with 0.6 mL/kg levobupivacaine 0.25% only. FLACC scores (Face, Leg, Activity, Cry, Consolability) were used to evaluate post-operative pain, first analgesic request, total analgesic consumption, adverse effects, as well as hemodynamics were monitored for 24 h and recorded at time points (2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24h). Parent's satisfaction at discharge, also, was evaluated.

Results: FLACC score in M group was significantly lower than in C group from 4 h to 24 h with the first analgesic request being longer (15.95 ± 1.99 vs 7.70 ± 0.80 (h); p < 0.001) and lower total analgesic consumption (231.75 ± 36.57 vs 576.00 ± 170.71 (mg); p < 0.001) when comparing M group to C group, respectively. Both groups had insignificant differences regarding hemodynamics, parent satisfaction, postoperative agitation, and side effects except vomiting occurred in two patients in the C group and one patient in the M group.

Conclusion: We conclude that adding magnesium sulphate as an adjuvant to local anaesthetic in US-TAP block for pain management in pediatric abdominal cancer surgeries resulted in better and longer analgesia, with less consumption of rescue analgesics with no serious side effects.

目的:硫酸镁(MgSO4)作为周围神经阻滞的辅助剂可增强局麻药的作用。我们的目的是评估MgSO4联合左布比卡因在双侧超声引导下经腹平面(US-TAP)阻滞治疗接受腹部手术的儿童癌症患者术后疼痛的有效性和安全性。方法:在埃及Assiut大学南埃及癌症研究所进行的一项随机双盲对照试验中,将40例患有Wilms肿瘤或神经母细胞瘤的儿童患者随机分配至双侧(US-TAP)阻滞组,并分为两组;M组:US-TAP加0.6 mL/kg左布比卡因0.25% + 2 mg/kg MgSO4; C组:只加0.6 mL/kg左布比卡因0.25%。采用FLACC评分(面部、腿部、活动、哭泣、安慰)评估术后疼痛,首次镇痛要求、总镇痛消耗、不良反应,监测24小时血流动力学,并在时间点(2、4、6、8、12、18和24小时)记录。出院时父母的满意度也进行了评估。结果:M组FLACC评分在4 ~ 24 h显著低于C组(15.95±1.99 vs 7.70±0.80 (h)),且首次镇痛时间较C组长;P < 0.001)和较低的总镇痛用量(231.75±36.57 vs 576.00±170.71 (mg));p < 0.001)。两组在血流动力学、父母满意度、术后躁动和副作用方面差异不显著,C组2例,M组1例出现呕吐。结论:我们认为在US-TAP阻滞中加入硫酸镁作为局部麻醉的辅助剂用于小儿腹部肿瘤手术疼痛管理,镇痛效果更好,镇痛时间更长,使用的抢救镇痛药较少,无严重副作用。
{"title":"Magnesium Sulfate in Pediatric Abdominal Cancer Surgery: Safety and Efficacy in Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane (US-TAP) Block in Conjugation with Levobupivacaine.","authors":"Fatma El Sherif,&nbsp;Doaa Gomaa Sayed,&nbsp;Khaled Mohamed Fares,&nbsp;Sahar Abdel-Baky Mohamed,&nbsp;Amira Mahmoud Osman,&nbsp;Ahmed Kamal Sayed,&nbsp;Shereen Mamdouh Kamal","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S425649","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S425649","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) may enhance the effects of local anesthetics when used as an adjuvant in peripheral nerve blocks. Our objective was to evaluate efficiency and safety of utilizing MgSO4 alongside levobupivacaine in bilateral ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (US-TAP) block for postoperative pain in pediatric cancer patients who underwent abdominal surgery.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A randomized double-blinded controlled trial at South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt, included that 40 pediatric patients with Wilms' tumor or neuroblastoma were randomly allocated to get bilateral (US-TAP) block and divided into two groups; M group: received US-TAP with 0.6 mL/kg levobupivacaine 0.25% + 2 mg/kg MgSO4 and C group: received with 0.6 mL/kg levobupivacaine 0.25% only. FLACC scores (Face, Leg, Activity, Cry, Consolability) were used to evaluate post-operative pain, first analgesic request, total analgesic consumption, adverse effects, as well as hemodynamics were monitored for 24 h and recorded at time points (2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24h). Parent's satisfaction at discharge, also, was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FLACC score in M group was significantly lower than in C group from 4 h to 24 h with the first analgesic request being longer (15.95 ± 1.99 vs 7.70 ± 0.80 (h); p < 0.001) and lower total analgesic consumption (231.75 ± 36.57 vs 576.00 ± 170.71 (mg); p < 0.001) when comparing M group to C group, respectively. Both groups had insignificant differences regarding hemodynamics, parent satisfaction, postoperative agitation, and side effects except vomiting occurred in two patients in the C group and one patient in the M group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We conclude that adding magnesium sulphate as an adjuvant to local anaesthetic in US-TAP block for pain management in pediatric abdominal cancer surgeries resulted in better and longer analgesia, with less consumption of rescue analgesics with no serious side effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":"16 ","pages":"133-141"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b5/ce/lra-16-133.PMC10505031.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10306745","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Intrathecal Morphine versus Morphine-Dexmedetomidine Combination for Postoperative Pain Control After Total Knee Replacement: A Randomized Controlled Trial. 鞘内吗啡与吗啡-右美托咪定联合用于全膝关节置换术后疼痛控制:一项随机对照试验。
IF 2.9 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/LRA.S419465
Amany F Omara, Hadal Hassan Mohsen, Alaa Mohammed Abo Hagar, Ahmed F Abdelrahman

Objective: This prospective study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of intrathecal morphine, dexmedetomidine, and a combination of both in patients undergoing total knee replacement (TKR).

Patients and methods: This randomized prospective study was carried out in Tanta university hospital in orthopedic surgery for 6 months on 105 adult patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Class II and III, aged > 50 years, and scheduled for total knee replacement surgery randomly allocated into morphine group received 0.5% heavy bupivacaine plus 0.1 mg of morphine, morphine/ dexmedetomidine group, received 0.5% heavy bupivacaine plus 0.1 mg of morphine and 5 mcg of dexmedetomidine and dexmedetomidine group received 0.5% heavy bupivacaine plus 5 mcg of dexmedetomidine. The time of the first required analgesia, postoperative pain severity, the total dose of morphine, postoperative complication, and the patient's level of sedation were recorded.

Results: About half of the patients in the dexmedetomidine group requested first rescue analgesia 6 hours after the operation, significantly shorter than the other two groups. On the other hand, the other two groups show no significant difference between them regarding the first required analgesia. At rest, the dexmedetomidine group have significantly higher VAS with a significant increase in patients who required morphine as rescue analgesia than the other two groups. While at movement, patients in the dexmedetomidine group felt pain at 4 hrs postoperatively with significantly higher VAS than the other two groups. At the same time, the sedation score was significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group than in the other two groups. 22.2% of cases in the morphine group developed nausea and vomiting with a significant difference between the three groups.

Conclusion: Despite the absence of substantial side effects, our findings did not suggest enhanced analgesia with the combination of intrathecal morphine and dexmedetomidine.

目的:本前瞻性研究旨在比较鞘内吗啡、右美托咪定以及两者联合应用在全膝关节置换术(TKR)患者中的镇痛效果和不良反应。患者及方法:本随机前瞻性研究在坦塔大学医院骨科外科进行了为期6个月的105例美国麻醉学会身体状态II级和III级,年龄> 50岁,计划行全膝关节置换术的成人患者,随机分为吗啡组,给予0.5%重布比卡因加0.1 mg吗啡,吗啡/右美托咪定组。给予0.5%重布比卡因加吗啡0.1 mg,右美托咪定5 MCG,右美托咪定组给予0.5%重布比卡因加右美托咪定5 MCG。记录首次镇痛时间、术后疼痛严重程度、吗啡总剂量、术后并发症及患者镇静水平。结果:右美托咪定组约有一半患者在术后6小时要求首次抢救性镇痛,明显短于其他两组。另一方面,其他两组在第一组所需的镇痛方面没有显着差异。休息时,右美托咪定组VAS明显高于其他两组,需要吗啡作为救急镇痛的患者明显增加。在运动时,右美托咪定组患者术后4小时感到疼痛,VAS明显高于其他两组。同时,右美托咪定组镇静评分明显低于其他两组。吗啡组出现恶心呕吐的发生率为22.2%,三组间差异有统计学意义。结论:尽管没有明显的副作用,但我们的研究结果并不表明鞘内吗啡和右美托咪定联合使用可以增强镇痛效果。
{"title":"Intrathecal Morphine versus Morphine-Dexmedetomidine Combination for Postoperative Pain Control After Total Knee Replacement: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Amany F Omara,&nbsp;Hadal Hassan Mohsen,&nbsp;Alaa Mohammed Abo Hagar,&nbsp;Ahmed F Abdelrahman","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S419465","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S419465","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This prospective study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of intrathecal morphine, dexmedetomidine, and a combination of both in patients undergoing total knee replacement (TKR).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This randomized prospective study was carried out in Tanta university hospital in orthopedic surgery for 6 months on 105 adult patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Class II and III, aged > 50 years, and scheduled for total knee replacement surgery randomly allocated into morphine group received 0.5% heavy bupivacaine plus 0.1 mg of morphine, morphine/ dexmedetomidine group, received 0.5% heavy bupivacaine plus 0.1 mg of morphine and 5 mcg of dexmedetomidine and dexmedetomidine group received 0.5% heavy bupivacaine plus 5 mcg of dexmedetomidine. The time of the first required analgesia, postoperative pain severity, the total dose of morphine, postoperative complication, and the patient's level of sedation were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About half of the patients in the dexmedetomidine group requested first rescue analgesia 6 hours after the operation, significantly shorter than the other two groups. On the other hand, the other two groups show no significant difference between them regarding the first required analgesia. At rest, the dexmedetomidine group have significantly higher VAS with a significant increase in patients who required morphine as rescue analgesia than the other two groups. While at movement, patients in the dexmedetomidine group felt pain at 4 hrs postoperatively with significantly higher VAS than the other two groups. At the same time, the sedation score was significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group than in the other two groups. 22.2% of cases in the morphine group developed nausea and vomiting with a significant difference between the three groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the absence of substantial side effects, our findings did not suggest enhanced analgesia with the combination of intrathecal morphine and dexmedetomidine.</p>","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":"16 ","pages":"113-122"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a5/f7/lra-16-113.PMC10404426.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9960146","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Systemic Analgesia versus Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) Infusion During Paediatric Nephrectomy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. 在小儿肾切除术中,全身性镇痛与连续勃起脊柱平面阻滞(ESPB)输注:一项随机对照试验。
IF 2.9 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/LRA.S401980
Suzan Adlan, Ahmad Abd El-Rahman, Sahar Abdel-Baky Mohamed, Ahmed M Thabet, Eman Maghawry Hamada, Basma Rezk Farouk, Fatma Adel El Sherif

Purpose: A subcostal flank incision is required for open radical nephrectomy, which is a surgical procedure used to remove tumors of the kidney that are malignant. The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and continuous catheter use in children are receiving more and more support by paediatric regional anaesthesiologists. Our objective was to compare systemic analgesic to continuous ESPB for pain relief in paediatric patients undergoing open radical nephrectomy.

Methods: Sixty children with cancer ASA I or II and undergoing open radical nephrectomy between the ages of two and seven participated in this prospective, randomized, controlled, and open label study. The cases were divided into two equal groups (E and T groups); Group E received ipsilateral continuous ultrasound-guided ESPB at T9 (thoracic vertebrae), with a bolus of 0.4 mL/kg bupivacaine 0.25%. Immediately postoperatively, Group E (ESPB group) received continuous ESPB with a PCA (patient controlled analgesia) pump at a rate of 0.2 mL/kg/hour bupivacaine 0.125%. Group T (Tramadol group), Tramadol hydrochloride was administered intravenously at a dose of 2 mg/kg/8hour, which could be increased to 2 mg/kg/6hours. Then, we followed up on patients' total analgesic consumption for 48 hours following surgery, as well as the time it took for them to request rescue analgesic, their FLACC and sedation scores, and their hemodynamics and side effects immediately following surgery as well as at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 48 hours.

Results: A highly significant difference in total tramadol consumed in group T 11.97 ± 1.13 mg/kg while group E was 2.07± 1.54 mg/kg (p < 0.001). 100% patients in group T requested analgesia compared to 46.7% patients in group E (p < 0.001). From 2 to 48 hour, FLACC significantly decreased in E compared to T group (p≤ 0.006) at all-time points.

Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided continuous ESPB significantly provided better postoperative pain relief, reduced postoperative tramadol consumption and reduced pain scores compared with the use of tramadol alone, in paediatric cancer patients undergoing nephrectomy.

目的:开放性根治性肾切除术需要肋下侧切口,这是一种用于切除恶性肾肿瘤的外科手术。直立脊柱平面阻滞(ESPB)和连续导管在儿童中的应用越来越受到儿科区域麻醉医师的支持。我们的目的是比较全身性镇痛和持续ESPB在接受开放性根治性肾切除术的儿童患者中的疼痛缓解效果。方法:60名年龄在2至7岁之间的ASA I或II型癌症儿童接受开放性根治性肾切除术,参与了这项前瞻性、随机、对照和开放标签的研究。将病例分为两组(E组和T组);E组在T9(胸椎)行同侧超声引导下连续ESPB,剂量为0.25%布比卡因0.4 mL/kg。术后即刻,E组(ESPB组)采用PCA(患者自控镇痛)泵持续ESPB,剂量为0.2 mL/kg/h布比卡因0.125%。T组(曲马多组),静脉滴注盐酸曲马多,剂量为2 mg/kg/8h,可增加至2 mg/kg/6h。然后,我们随访了患者术后48小时的总镇痛用量,以及他们要求抢救镇痛所需的时间,他们的FLACC和镇静评分,以及手术后立即以及2、4、6、8、12、18、24、36和48小时的血流动力学和副作用。结果:T组曲马多总消耗量为11.97±1.13 mg/kg, E组为2.07±1.54 mg/kg,差异极显著(p < 0.001)。T组100%患者要求镇痛,而E组46.7%患者要求镇痛(p < 0.001)。2 ~ 48 h, E组FLACC在各时间点均较T组显著降低(p≤0.006)。结论:与单独使用曲马多相比,超声引导下的持续ESPB能更好地缓解小儿肿瘤肾切除术患者的术后疼痛,减少术后曲马多的使用,降低疼痛评分。
{"title":"Systemic Analgesia versus Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) Infusion During Paediatric Nephrectomy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.","authors":"Suzan Adlan,&nbsp;Ahmad Abd El-Rahman,&nbsp;Sahar Abdel-Baky Mohamed,&nbsp;Ahmed M Thabet,&nbsp;Eman Maghawry Hamada,&nbsp;Basma Rezk Farouk,&nbsp;Fatma Adel El Sherif","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S401980","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S401980","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A subcostal flank incision is required for open radical nephrectomy, which is a surgical procedure used to remove tumors of the kidney that are malignant. The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and continuous catheter use in children are receiving more and more support by paediatric regional anaesthesiologists. Our objective was to compare systemic analgesic to continuous ESPB for pain relief in paediatric patients undergoing open radical nephrectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty children with cancer ASA I or II and undergoing open radical nephrectomy between the ages of two and seven participated in this prospective, randomized, controlled, and open label study. The cases were divided into two equal groups (E and T groups); Group E received ipsilateral continuous ultrasound-guided ESPB at T<sub>9</sub> (thoracic vertebrae), with a bolus of 0.4 mL/kg bupivacaine 0.25%. Immediately postoperatively, Group E (ESPB group) received continuous ESPB with a PCA (patient controlled analgesia) pump at a rate of 0.2 mL/kg/hour bupivacaine 0.125%. Group T (Tramadol group), Tramadol hydrochloride was administered intravenously at a dose of 2 mg/kg/8hour, which could be increased to 2 mg/kg/6hours. Then, we followed up on patients' total analgesic consumption for 48 hours following surgery, as well as the time it took for them to request rescue analgesic, their FLACC and sedation scores, and their hemodynamics and side effects immediately following surgery as well as at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 48 hours.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A highly significant difference in total tramadol consumed in group T 11.97 ± 1.13 mg/kg while group E was 2.07± 1.54 mg/kg (p < 0.001). 100% patients in group T requested analgesia compared to 46.7% patients in group E (p < 0.001). From 2 to 48 hour, FLACC significantly decreased in E compared to T group (p≤ 0.006) at all-time points.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultrasound-guided continuous ESPB significantly provided better postoperative pain relief, reduced postoperative tramadol consumption and reduced pain scores compared with the use of tramadol alone, in paediatric cancer patients undergoing nephrectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":"16 ","pages":"59-69"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0d/79/lra-16-59.PMC10254591.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9623250","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Case Report: Erector Spinae Block in Perforated Viscus. 病例报告:粘滞穿孔的竖脊肌阻滞。
IF 2.9 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/LRA.S393913
Jassim Rauf, Mohammad Mohsin A M Haji

Background: Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) a new block described for post-operative analgesia. Since 2016 the block has become a common practice in many institutions globally. Evidence has shown that ESPB is superior to truncal and abdominal wall blocks for many thoracic and abdominal surgeries.

Case presentation: A 29-year-old male, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) IIE patient presented with acute appendicitis. Patient was scheduled to undergo Laparoscopic Appendicectomy under general anesthesia (GA) with ESPB for post op analgesia. In the operating room after induction of GA patient received an ultrasound (US) guided bilateral ESPB at T10 level of the spinal cord with 20 mls of 0.25% levobupivacaine on each side. Intraoperatively the appendix was found to be normal and there was an incidental finding of perforated superior/first part of duodenum (D1). The duodenum was repaired. Patient remained hemodynamically stable intraoperatively. No intraoperative morphine was required. After uneventful extubation, the patient was transferred to post-operative anesthesia care unit (PACU). Patient reported pain score of zero on a 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) in PACU. No morphine was required in the next 24 hours on the ward either.

Conclusion: ESPB can provide opioid free analgesia for laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer both intra and postoperatively.

背景:直立脊柱平面阻滞(ESPB)是一种用于术后镇痛的新型阻滞。自2016年以来,区块链已成为全球许多机构的普遍做法。有证据表明,在许多胸腹外科手术中,ESPB优于躯干和腹壁阻滞。病例报告:一名29岁男性,ASA(美国麻醉医师协会)IIE患者出现急性阑尾炎。患者计划在全麻(GA)下行腹腔镜阑尾切除术,并使用ESPB进行术后镇痛。GA诱导后患者在手术室接受超声引导下双侧脊髓T10水平ESPB,两侧各20 ml 0.25%左布比卡因。术中阑尾未见异常,偶见十二指肠上/上段穿孔(D1)。十二指肠修复。术中患者血流动力学保持稳定。术中不需要吗啡。在顺利拔管后,患者被转移到术后麻醉护理病房(PACU)。患者在PACU的11分数值评定量表(NRS)中报告疼痛评分为零。在接下来的24小时里,病房里也不需要吗啡。结论:ESPB在腹腔镜十二指肠溃疡穿孔修复术中及术后均可提供无阿片类镇痛。
{"title":"Case Report: Erector Spinae Block in Perforated Viscus.","authors":"Jassim Rauf,&nbsp;Mohammad Mohsin A M Haji","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S393913","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S393913","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) a new block described for post-operative analgesia. Since 2016 the block has become a common practice in many institutions globally. Evidence has shown that ESPB is superior to truncal and abdominal wall blocks for many thoracic and abdominal surgeries.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>A 29-year-old male, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) IIE patient presented with acute appendicitis. Patient was scheduled to undergo Laparoscopic Appendicectomy under general anesthesia (GA) with ESPB for post op analgesia. In the operating room after induction of GA patient received an ultrasound (US) guided bilateral ESPB at T10 level of the spinal cord with 20 mls of 0.25% levobupivacaine on each side. Intraoperatively the appendix was found to be normal and there was an incidental finding of perforated superior/first part of duodenum (D1). The duodenum was repaired. Patient remained hemodynamically stable intraoperatively. No intraoperative morphine was required. After uneventful extubation, the patient was transferred to post-operative anesthesia care unit (PACU). Patient reported pain score of zero on a 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) in PACU. No morphine was required in the next 24 hours on the ward either.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ESPB can provide opioid free analgesia for laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer both intra and postoperatively.</p>","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":"16 ","pages":"19-23"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/70/d4/lra-16-19.PMC9940489.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9327787","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Randomized Control Trial to Compare Hemodynamic Parameters of Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Under Combined Spinal-Epidural and General Anesthesia in a Tertiary Hospital. 三甲医院经皮肾镜取石术中脊髓-硬膜外联合麻醉与全身麻醉血流动力学参数比较的随机对照试验
IF 2.9 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/LRA.S410510
Ksheerabdhi Sankar, Kuppusamy Anand, Swetha Ramani, Balasubramaniam Gayathri

Background and aim: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under epidural anesthesia has been reported to have few advantages over general anesthesia, like lower postoperative pain and less need for analgesics. There are limited studies on PCNL being performed under neuraxial anesthesia in supine position. Hence the present study was conceived to compare hemodynamic parameters in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the supine position under combined spinal-epidural with general anesthesia (GA).

Material and methods: A prospective, randomized control trial was conducted among 90 patients who were posted to undergo elective percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the the supine position, after obtaining Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC) approval and CTRI (Clinical Trial Registry - India) registration. Patients were randomly allotted to undergo surgery either under general anesthesia (group GA) or combined spinal epidural anesthesia (group CSE) by computer-generated random number method. Hemodynamic parameters, postoperative analgesic requirement and incidence of blood transfusion were recorded and analyzed.

Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to gender, ASA grade, surgery duration, calculus size and pulse rate. There was a statistically significant reduction in mean arterial pressure from 5 to 50 minutes of surgery and less incidence of blood transfusion in patients in the CSE group. Patients who underwent PCNL in the supine position under CSE required lesser analgesics postoperatively compared to those under general anesthesia.

Conclusion: Combined spinal epidural analgesia can be used as an alternative to general anesthesia for patients undergoing PCNL in the supine position in view of less MAP and reduced postoperative analgesic and blood transfusion requirement.

背景和目的:据报道硬膜外麻醉下经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)与全麻相比没有什么优势,比如术后疼痛更低,对镇痛药的需求更少。在仰卧位下,在神经轴麻醉下进行PCNL的研究有限。因此,本研究旨在比较脊髓-硬膜外联合全身麻醉(GA)下仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)患者的血流动力学参数。材料和方法:在获得机构伦理委员会(IEC)批准和CTRI(印度临床试验注册中心)注册后,在90例患者中进行了前瞻性随机对照试验,这些患者在仰卧位接受选择性经皮肾镜取石术。采用计算机生成随机数法将患者随机分为全身麻醉组(GA组)和脊髓硬膜外联合麻醉组(CSE组)。记录并分析血流动力学参数、术后镇痛需求及输血发生率。结果:两组患者在性别、ASA分级、手术时间、结石大小、脉搏率等方面差异无统计学意义。CSE组患者手术后5 - 50分钟平均动脉压降低,输血发生率降低,统计学意义显著。与全麻下的患者相比,在CSE下仰卧位进行PCNL的患者术后需要较少的镇痛药。结论:脊髓硬膜外联合镇痛可作为PCNL患者仰卧位全麻的替代麻醉,可减少MAP,减少术后镇痛和输血需求。
{"title":"A Randomized Control Trial to Compare Hemodynamic Parameters of Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Under Combined Spinal-Epidural and General Anesthesia in a Tertiary Hospital.","authors":"Ksheerabdhi Sankar,&nbsp;Kuppusamy Anand,&nbsp;Swetha Ramani,&nbsp;Balasubramaniam Gayathri","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S410510","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S410510","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under epidural anesthesia has been reported to have few advantages over general anesthesia, like lower postoperative pain and less need for analgesics. There are limited studies on PCNL being performed under neuraxial anesthesia in supine position. Hence the present study was conceived to compare hemodynamic parameters in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the supine position under combined spinal-epidural with general anesthesia (GA).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A prospective, randomized control trial was conducted among 90 patients who were posted to undergo elective percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the the supine position, after obtaining Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC) approval and CTRI (Clinical Trial Registry - India) registration. Patients were randomly allotted to undergo surgery either under general anesthesia (group GA) or combined spinal epidural anesthesia (group CSE) by computer-generated random number method. Hemodynamic parameters, postoperative analgesic requirement and incidence of blood transfusion were recorded and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to gender, ASA grade, surgery duration, calculus size and pulse rate. There was a statistically significant reduction in mean arterial pressure from 5 to 50 minutes of surgery and less incidence of blood transfusion in patients in the CSE group. Patients who underwent PCNL in the supine position under CSE required lesser analgesics postoperatively compared to those under general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combined spinal epidural analgesia can be used as an alternative to general anesthesia for patients undergoing PCNL in the supine position in view of less MAP and reduced postoperative analgesic and blood transfusion requirement.</p>","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":"16 ","pages":"41-49"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/08/3a/lra-16-41.PMC10202212.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9521993","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Thermal Imaging to Predict Failed Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: A Prospective Observational Study. 热成像预测锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞失败:一项前瞻性观察研究。
IF 2.9 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/LRA.S406057
Medhat Gamal, Ahmed Hasanin, Nada Adly, Maha Mostafa, Ahmed M Yonis, Ashraf Rady, Nasr M Abdallah, Mohammed Ibrahim, Mohamed Elsayad

Background: Successful brachial plexus blockade produces sympathetic blockade, resulting in increased skin temperature in the blocked segments. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of infrared thermography in predicting failed segmental supraclavicular brachial plexus block.

Methods: This prospective observational study included adult patients undergoing upper-limb surgery under supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Sensation was evaluated at the dermatomal distribution of the ulnar, median, and radial nerves. Block failure was defined as absence of complete sensory loss 30 min after block completion. Skin temperature was evaluated by infrared thermography at the dermatomal supply of the ulnar, median, and radial nerves at baseline, 5, 10, 15, and 20 min after block completion. The temperature change from the baseline measurement was calculated for each time point. Outcomes were the ability of temperature change at each site to predict failed block of the corresponding nerve using area under receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis.

Results: Eighty patients were available for the final analysis. The AUC (95% confidence interval [CI]) for the ability of temperature change at 5 min to predict failed ulnar, median, and radial nerve block was 0.79 (0.68-0.87), 0.77 (0.67-0.86), and 0.79 (0.69-0.88). The AUC (95% CI) increased progressively and reached its maximum values at 15 min (ulnar nerve 0.98 [0.92-1.00], median nerve 0.97 [0.90-0.99], radial nerve 0.96 [0.89-0.99]) with negative predictive value of 100%.

Conclusion: Infrared thermography of different skin segments provides an accurate tool for predicting failed supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Increased skin temperature at each segment can exclude block failure in the corresponding nerve with 100% accuracy.

背景:成功的臂丛阻滞产生交感阻滞,导致阻滞节段皮肤温度升高。本研究旨在评估红外热成像预测锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞失败的准确性。方法:本前瞻性观察研究纳入锁骨上臂丛阻滞下接受上肢手术的成年患者。在尺神经、正中神经和桡神经的皮皮分布上评估感觉。阻滞失败定义为阻滞完成后30分钟没有完全感觉丧失。在阻滞完成后的基线、5分钟、10分钟、15分钟和20分钟,通过红外热像仪评估尺神经、正中神经和桡神经皮皮供应处的皮肤温度。计算每个时间点与基线测量值相比的温度变化。结果是利用受者操作特征曲线(AUC)分析下的面积,每个部位的温度变化预测相应神经阻滞失败的能力。结果:80例患者可用于最终分析。5分钟温度变化预测尺神经、正中神经和桡神经阻滞失败的AUC(95%置信区间[CI])分别为0.79(0.68-0.87)、0.77(0.67-0.86)和0.79(0.69-0.88)。AUC (95% CI)逐渐增加,15 min时达到最大值(尺神经0.98[0.92-1.00],正中神经0.97[0.90-0.99],桡神经0.96[0.89-0.99]),阴性预测值为100%。结论:不同皮肤节段的红外热成像为预测锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞失败提供了准确的工具。每节段皮肤温度升高可以100%准确地排除相应神经阻滞失败。
{"title":"Thermal Imaging to Predict Failed Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: A Prospective Observational Study.","authors":"Medhat Gamal,&nbsp;Ahmed Hasanin,&nbsp;Nada Adly,&nbsp;Maha Mostafa,&nbsp;Ahmed M Yonis,&nbsp;Ashraf Rady,&nbsp;Nasr M Abdallah,&nbsp;Mohammed Ibrahim,&nbsp;Mohamed Elsayad","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S406057","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S406057","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Successful brachial plexus blockade produces sympathetic blockade, resulting in increased skin temperature in the blocked segments. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of infrared thermography in predicting failed segmental supraclavicular brachial plexus block.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective observational study included adult patients undergoing upper-limb surgery under supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Sensation was evaluated at the dermatomal distribution of the ulnar, median, and radial nerves. Block failure was defined as absence of complete sensory loss 30 min after block completion. Skin temperature was evaluated by infrared thermography at the dermatomal supply of the ulnar, median, and radial nerves at baseline, 5, 10, 15, and 20 min after block completion. The temperature change from the baseline measurement was calculated for each time point. Outcomes were the ability of temperature change at each site to predict failed block of the corresponding nerve using area under receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty patients were available for the final analysis. The AUC (95% confidence interval [CI]) for the ability of temperature change at 5 min to predict failed ulnar, median, and radial nerve block was 0.79 (0.68-0.87), 0.77 (0.67-0.86), and 0.79 (0.69-0.88). The AUC (95% CI) increased progressively and reached its maximum values at 15 min (ulnar nerve 0.98 [0.92-1.00], median nerve 0.97 [0.90-0.99], radial nerve 0.96 [0.89-0.99]) with negative predictive value of 100%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Infrared thermography of different skin segments provides an accurate tool for predicting failed supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Increased skin temperature at each segment can exclude block failure in the corresponding nerve with 100% accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":"16 ","pages":"71-80"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/99/71/lra-16-71.PMC10263017.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9655807","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Erector Spinae Plane Block as an Analgesic Intervention in Acute Rib Fractures: A Scoping Review. 竖脊肌平面阻滞作为急性肋骨骨折的镇痛干预:范围综述。
IF 2.9 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/LRA.S414056
Michael Jiang, Varun Peri, Bobby Ou Yang, Jaewon Chang, Douglas Hacking

Introduction: Rib fractures are a common sequelae of chest trauma and are associated with significant morbidity. The erector spinae nerve block (ESB) has been proposed as an alternative first-line regional technique for rib fractures due to ease of administration and minimal complication profile. We aimed to investigate the current literature surrounding this topic with a focus on pain and respiratory outcomes.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed on the Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane databases. Keywords of "erector spinae block" and "rib fractures" were used to form the search strategy. Papers published in English investigating ESB as an analgesic intervention for acute rib fracture were included. Exclusion criteria were operative rib fixation, or where the indication for ESB was not rib fracture.

Results: There were 37 studies which met the inclusion criteria for this scoping review. Of these, 31 studies reported on pain outcomes and demonstrated a 40% decrease in pain scores post administration within the first 24 hours. Respiratory parameters were reported in 8 studies where an increase in incentive spirometry was demonstrated. Respiratory complication was not consistently reported. ESB was associated with minimal complications; only 5 cases of haematoma and infection were (incidence 0.6%) reported, none of which required further intervention.

Discussion: Current literature surrounding ESB in rib fracture management provides a positive qualitative evaluation of efficacy and safety. Improvements in pain and respiratory parameters were almost universal. The notable outcome from this review was the improved safety profile of ESB. The ESB was not associated with complications requiring intervention even in the setting of anticoagulation and coagulopathy. There still remains a paucity of large cohort, prospective data. Moreover, no current studies reflect an improvement in respiratory complication rates compared to current techniques. Taken together, these areas should be the focus of any future research.

简介:肋骨骨折是胸部外伤的常见后遗症,发病率高。竖脊神经阻滞术(ESB)被认为是治疗肋骨骨折的一种替代的一线区域性技术,因为它易于操作且并发症最少。我们的目的是调查当前的文献围绕这一主题,重点是疼痛和呼吸结果。方法:在Medline、Embase、Web of Science、Scopus和Cochrane数据库中进行全面的文献检索。以“竖脊肌阻滞”和“肋骨骨折”为关键词,形成搜索策略。英文发表的研究ESB作为急性肋骨骨折镇痛干预的论文被纳入。排除标准是手术肋骨固定,或ESB的指征不是肋骨骨折。结果:37项研究符合纳入标准。其中,31项研究报告了疼痛结果,并证明在给药后24小时内疼痛评分降低了40%。8项研究报告了呼吸参数,其中激励性肺活量测定法被证实增加。呼吸道并发症的报道并不一致。ESB并发症最少;仅报告了5例血肿和感染(发生率0.6%),均无需进一步干预。讨论:目前关于ESB在肋骨骨折治疗中的文献对其疗效和安全性进行了积极的定性评价。疼痛和呼吸参数的改善几乎是普遍的。这次审查的显著结果是改进了ESB的安全性。ESB与需要干预的并发症无关,即使在抗凝和凝血功能障碍的情况下也是如此。目前仍然缺乏大型队列前瞻性数据。此外,目前没有研究表明与目前的技术相比,呼吸并发症发生率有所改善。综上所述,这些领域应该是未来研究的重点。
{"title":"Erector Spinae Plane Block as an Analgesic Intervention in Acute Rib Fractures: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Michael Jiang,&nbsp;Varun Peri,&nbsp;Bobby Ou Yang,&nbsp;Jaewon Chang,&nbsp;Douglas Hacking","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S414056","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S414056","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Rib fractures are a common sequelae of chest trauma and are associated with significant morbidity. The erector spinae nerve block (ESB) has been proposed as an alternative first-line regional technique for rib fractures due to ease of administration and minimal complication profile. We aimed to investigate the current literature surrounding this topic with a focus on pain and respiratory outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was performed on the Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane databases. Keywords of \"erector spinae block\" and \"rib fractures\" were used to form the search strategy. Papers published in English investigating ESB as an analgesic intervention for acute rib fracture were included. Exclusion criteria were operative rib fixation, or where the indication for ESB was not rib fracture.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 37 studies which met the inclusion criteria for this scoping review. Of these, 31 studies reported on pain outcomes and demonstrated a 40% decrease in pain scores post administration within the first 24 hours. Respiratory parameters were reported in 8 studies where an increase in incentive spirometry was demonstrated. Respiratory complication was not consistently reported. ESB was associated with minimal complications; only 5 cases of haematoma and infection were (incidence 0.6%) reported, none of which required further intervention.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Current literature surrounding ESB in rib fracture management provides a positive qualitative evaluation of efficacy and safety. Improvements in pain and respiratory parameters were almost universal. The notable outcome from this review was the improved safety profile of ESB. The ESB was not associated with complications requiring intervention even in the setting of anticoagulation and coagulopathy. There still remains a paucity of large cohort, prospective data. Moreover, no current studies reflect an improvement in respiratory complication rates compared to current techniques. Taken together, these areas should be the focus of any future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":"16 ","pages":"81-90"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c7/3e/lra-16-81.PMC10275321.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9661524","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Opioid-Free Segmental Thoracic Spinal Anesthesia with Intrathecal Sedation for Breast and Axillary Surgery: Report of Four Cases 无阿片类药物分段胸脊麻鞘内镇静用于乳腺和腋窝手术4例报告
IF 2.9 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI: 10.2147/LRA.S358157
P. Vincenzi, M. Stronati, P. Isidori, Salvatore Iuorio, Diletta Gaudenzi, G. Boccoli, Roberto Starnari
Purpose Few studies have described segmental thoracic spinal anesthesia (STSA) as primary anesthesiologic method in breast and axillary surgery, documenting the association of intrathecal local anesthetics and opioids. This case series reports an opioid-free scheme of STSA in four elderly patients undergoing major breast and axillary oncological surgery. Patients and Methods STSA was performed in three female patients undergoing unilateral mastectomy ± axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or sentinel lymph node biopsy for invasive ductal carcinoma and in one male patient undergoing ALND for melanoma metastases. The level of needle insertion was included between T6-8, via a median or paramedian approach. Midazolam (2 mg) and ketamine (20 mg) were used as adjuvants for intrathecal sedation, followed by the administration of hypobaric ropivacaine 0.25% at a dose of 8 mg. The level of sensory blockade achieved was comprised between C2-3 and T11-12. Postoperative analgesia was maintained through continuous intravenous administration of Ketorolac by an elastomeric pump (90 mg over 24 hrs.). Results Spinal anesthesia was completed without complications in all patients. Conversion to general anesthesia (GA) and perioperative intravenous sedation were not required. No major postoperative complications and no episodes of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were reported. No rescue analgesic was administered. All patients were discharged in postoperative day 2 and are alive at 30, 29, 27 and 13 months after surgery, respectively. High grade of satisfaction on the anesthesiologic method was expressed by all cases. Conclusion STSA with local anesthetic plus midazolam and ketamine might be considered a safe and effective alternative to GA, even in surgeries involving the breast and axillary region, particularly in elderly and frail patients. Larger prospective studies are required to validate these findings.
目的很少有研究将节段性胸椎麻醉(STSA)描述为乳腺和腋窝手术的主要麻醉方法,记录鞘内局部麻醉剂和阿片类药物的相关性。本病例系列报道了四名接受大型乳腺和腋窝肿瘤手术的老年患者的无阿片类药物STSA方案。患者和方法对3例因浸润性导管癌接受单侧乳房切除术±腋窝淋巴结清扫(ALND)或前哨淋巴结活检的女性患者和1例因黑色素瘤转移接受ALND的男性患者进行STSA。针插入水平包括在T6-8之间,通过正中或正中入路。使用咪唑安定(2 mg)和氯胺酮(20 mg)作为鞘内镇静的佐剂,然后以8 mg的剂量给药0.25%的低压罗哌卡因。实现的感觉阻断水平介于C2-3和T11-12之间。术后镇痛通过弹性泵持续静脉注射酮咯酸(90mg,24小时)维持。结果所有患者均完成了脊髓麻醉,无并发症。不需要转为全身麻醉(GA)和围手术期静脉镇静。没有报告主要的术后并发症和术后恶心呕吐(PONV)发作。未给予任何抢救性镇痛药。所有患者均于术后第2天出院,分别于术后30、29、27和13个月存活。所有病例均对麻醉方法表示高度满意。结论即使在涉及乳腺和腋窝的手术中,特别是在年老体弱的患者中,局部麻醉剂加咪达唑仑和氯胺酮的STSA可能被认为是GA的安全有效的替代方案。需要更大规模的前瞻性研究来验证这些发现。
{"title":"Opioid-Free Segmental Thoracic Spinal Anesthesia with Intrathecal Sedation for Breast and Axillary Surgery: Report of Four Cases","authors":"P. Vincenzi, M. Stronati, P. Isidori, Salvatore Iuorio, Diletta Gaudenzi, G. Boccoli, Roberto Starnari","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S358157","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S358157","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Few studies have described segmental thoracic spinal anesthesia (STSA) as primary anesthesiologic method in breast and axillary surgery, documenting the association of intrathecal local anesthetics and opioids. This case series reports an opioid-free scheme of STSA in four elderly patients undergoing major breast and axillary oncological surgery. Patients and Methods STSA was performed in three female patients undergoing unilateral mastectomy ± axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or sentinel lymph node biopsy for invasive ductal carcinoma and in one male patient undergoing ALND for melanoma metastases. The level of needle insertion was included between T6-8, via a median or paramedian approach. Midazolam (2 mg) and ketamine (20 mg) were used as adjuvants for intrathecal sedation, followed by the administration of hypobaric ropivacaine 0.25% at a dose of 8 mg. The level of sensory blockade achieved was comprised between C2-3 and T11-12. Postoperative analgesia was maintained through continuous intravenous administration of Ketorolac by an elastomeric pump (90 mg over 24 hrs.). Results Spinal anesthesia was completed without complications in all patients. Conversion to general anesthesia (GA) and perioperative intravenous sedation were not required. No major postoperative complications and no episodes of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were reported. No rescue analgesic was administered. All patients were discharged in postoperative day 2 and are alive at 30, 29, 27 and 13 months after surgery, respectively. High grade of satisfaction on the anesthesiologic method was expressed by all cases. Conclusion STSA with local anesthetic plus midazolam and ketamine might be considered a safe and effective alternative to GA, even in surgeries involving the breast and axillary region, particularly in elderly and frail patients. Larger prospective studies are required to validate these findings.","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":"15 1","pages":"23 - 29"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42000867","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Positioning the Catheter Tip Anterior or Posterior to the Saphenous Nerve in Continuous Adductor Canal Block: A Mono-Centric Retrospective Comparative Study. 在连续内收管阻滞中,导管尖端在隐神经前方或后方定位:一项单中心回顾性比较研究。
IF 2.9 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/LRA.S383601
Antonio Coviello, Alessio Bernasconi, Giovanni Balato, Ezio Spasari, Marilena Ianniello, Massimo Mariconda, Maria Vargas, Carmine Iacovazzo, Francesco Smeraglia, Andrea Tognù, Giuseppe Servillo

Background and aim: Ultrasound-guided continuous adductor canal block (cACB) is a conventional choice in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for the management of the postoperative pain. This study aims to compare different catheter tip locations for cACB relative to the saphenous nerve (anteriorly vs posteriorly) in terms of efficacy and complications.

Methods: At the department of Surgical Sciences, Orthopedic Trauma and Emergencies of the University of Naples Federico II (Naples, Italy), between January 2020 and November 2021, retrospective comparative study was executed. Patients planned for TKA were included in the study if they met the follow inclusion criteria: patients undergone TKA; aged 50-85 years; body mass index (BMI) of 18-35 kg/m2; American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification from I to III; subarachnoid technique for anesthesiology plane; continuous adductor canal block performed by an anesthetist with considerable experience. Patients were assigned to receive cACB with the catheter tip located anteriorly (Group 1, G1) or posteriorly to the saphenous nerve (Group 2, G2). Postoperative pain, ambulation ability, episodes of pump block and rate of catheter dislodgement and leakage were evaluated and analyzed.

Results: Altogether, 102 patients were admitted to the study (48 in G1 and 54 in G2). After the first 8 postoperative hours, in G1 17 patients (35.4%) had a VAS greater than 4, while in group 2 only 3 patients (5.6%) had a VAS greater than 4 (p-value <0.01). All patients of both groups showed ambulation ability in the postoperative period. No episode of leakage was recorded. While the catheter displacement rate was similar in the two groups (2.1% for G1 vs 3.7% for G2; p-value >0.05), the episodes of pump block were significantly less in G2 than in G1 (3.7% vs 20.8%; p-value <0.01).

Conclusion: In cACB for TKA, we found that positioning the catheter tip posteriorly to the saphenous nerve may lead to a greater postoperative analgesia and reduce the risk of pump block compared to placing the catheter tip anteriorly to the nerve.

背景与目的:超声引导连续内收管阻滞(cACB)是全膝关节置换术(TKA)患者治疗术后疼痛的常规选择。本研究的目的是比较不同的导管尖端位置相对于隐神经(前部与后部)的疗效和并发症。方法:于2020年1月至2021年11月在意大利那不勒斯费德里科二世大学外科科学、骨科创伤与急诊科进行回顾性比较研究。计划进行TKA的患者如果符合以下纳入标准,则纳入研究:接受TKA的患者;年龄50-85岁;体重指数(BMI) 18-35 kg/m2;美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状态分级从I到III;麻醉平面的蛛网膜下腔技术;由经验丰富的麻醉师进行连续内收管阻滞。患者被分配接受cACB,导管尖端位于隐神经前方(1组,G1)或后方(2组,G2)。评估和分析术后疼痛、行走能力、泵阻塞发生率、导管移位和漏出率。结果:共纳入102例患者(G1 48例,G2 54例)。术后前8 h, G1组有17例(35.4%)患者VAS评分大于4分,而2组只有3例(5.6%)患者VAS评分大于4分(p值0.05),G2组的泵阻发作次数明显少于G1组(3.7% vs 20.8%;结论:在TKA的cACB中,我们发现将导管尖端置于隐神经后方比将导管尖端置于神经前方可获得更大的术后镇痛效果,并降低泵阻塞的风险。
{"title":"Positioning the Catheter Tip Anterior or Posterior to the Saphenous Nerve in Continuous Adductor Canal Block: A Mono-Centric Retrospective Comparative Study.","authors":"Antonio Coviello,&nbsp;Alessio Bernasconi,&nbsp;Giovanni Balato,&nbsp;Ezio Spasari,&nbsp;Marilena Ianniello,&nbsp;Massimo Mariconda,&nbsp;Maria Vargas,&nbsp;Carmine Iacovazzo,&nbsp;Francesco Smeraglia,&nbsp;Andrea Tognù,&nbsp;Giuseppe Servillo","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S383601","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S383601","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Ultrasound-guided continuous adductor canal block (cACB) is a conventional choice in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for the management of the postoperative pain. This study aims to compare different catheter tip locations for cACB relative to the saphenous nerve (anteriorly vs posteriorly) in terms of efficacy and complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>At the department of Surgical Sciences, Orthopedic Trauma and Emergencies of the University of Naples Federico II (Naples, Italy), between January 2020 and November 2021, retrospective comparative study was executed. Patients planned for TKA were included in the study if they met the follow inclusion criteria: patients undergone TKA; aged 50-85 years; body mass index (BMI) of 18-35 kg/m2; American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification from I to III; subarachnoid technique for anesthesiology plane; continuous adductor canal block performed by an anesthetist with considerable experience. Patients were assigned to receive cACB with the catheter tip located anteriorly (Group 1, G1) or posteriorly to the saphenous nerve (Group 2, G2). Postoperative pain, ambulation ability, episodes of pump block and rate of catheter dislodgement and leakage were evaluated and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Altogether, 102 patients were admitted to the study (48 in G1 and 54 in G2). After the first 8 postoperative hours, in G1 17 patients (35.4%) had a VAS greater than 4, while in group 2 only 3 patients (5.6%) had a VAS greater than 4 (p-value <0.01). All patients of both groups showed ambulation ability in the postoperative period. No episode of leakage was recorded. While the catheter displacement rate was similar in the two groups (2.1% for G1 vs 3.7% for G2; p-value >0.05), the episodes of pump block were significantly less in G2 than in G1 (3.7% vs 20.8%; p-value <0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In cACB for TKA, we found that positioning the catheter tip posteriorly to the saphenous nerve may lead to a greater postoperative analgesia and reduce the risk of pump block compared to placing the catheter tip anteriorly to the nerve.</p>","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":"15 ","pages":"97-105"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/30/c9/lra-15-97.PMC9807124.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10481479","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
期刊
Local and Regional Anesthesia
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1