Medical Care最新文献

Background: Plan of Care of Visits (POCV), including the patient, nurse, and hospital provider were implemented across an integrated health system to improve provider-patient communication during hospitalization and patient outcomes.

Objectives: To assess POCV adoption after implementation, patient characteristics assosites were classified as teachsites were classified as teachsites were classified as teachsites were classified as ciated with POCV completion, and association of POCV with 30-day readmissions.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized electronic medical record (EMR) data of 237,430 adult patients discharged to home from 11 hospitals from January 2020 to December 2022. POCV completion was a discrete EMR variable. POCV adoption was estimated monthly by hospital as proportion of patients with at least 1 POCV during hospitalization, with variation among hospitals measured using the Variance Partition Coefficient (VPC). Multivariable logistic regressions assessed factors associated with POCV completion and POCV association with 30-day readmission.

Results: POCV adoption increased from 69% to 94% (2020-2022) and varied by 50% across hospitals (VPC 0.50, 95% CI: 0.29-0.70). Odds of a discharge-day POCV were lower among older patients (≥65 vs. 18-34 y, OR 0.81, CI: 0.79-0.83), and higher among female (OR 1.06; CI: 1.04-1.07), Asian (vs. White, OR 1.13; CI: 1.06-1.21), Hispanic (OR 1.09; CI: 1.05-1.13), and surgical patients (vs. medical, OR 1.33; CI: 1.30-1.35). Patients completing discharge-day POCV had lower 30-day readmission odds (2022 OR 0.76, CI: 0.73-0.79). Patients with POCV on ≥75% of hospital days had similar readmission odds trends.

Conclusions: POCV implementation was successful, and POCV completion was associated with fewer 30-day readmissions. Future work should focus on increasing POCV adoption while reducing hospital variation.

Objectives: To provide population utility norms from the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) for the province of Quebec, Canada.

Methods: This study used data from the Care Trajectories Enriched Data (TorSaDE) cohort, which combines data from the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) and the Quebec Provincial Insurance Board [Régie de l'assurance maladie du Quebec (RAMQ)]. The CCHS is a multiround health-related survey conducted by Statistics Canada since 2007. For each round spanning over 2 years, respondents were randomly selected and completed an online questionnaire. Quebec data for the HUI3 were available in the CCHS for rounds 2007, 2009, and 2013. The RAMQ database is an administrative database that contains information on health care services use and medical diagnostics. HUI3 scores were stratified by sociodemographic variables, as well as by self-reported health problems in the CCHS and by medical diagnostics from the RAMQ. Medical diagnostics were retrieved for the CCHS completion year and the year before and identifiable with the ICD-9 code in the RAMQ database.

Results: A total of 55,656 individuals were considered in this analysis. The mean (95% CI) and the median interquartile range of HUI3 were respectively 0.919 (0.918-0.919) and 0.973 (0.905-1) for the entire population. Individuals with lower scores were females, those aged 75 and over, divorced or widowed, unemployed during the last 12 months, less educated, or with a lower annual household income. Individuals born abroad and with normal weight of body mass index had higher utility scores. HUI3 score decreased with the number of diagnosed diseases from 0.946 (0.946-0946) for individuals without diagnosed disease to 0.682 (0.678-0.686) for individuals diagnosed with up to 18 diseases. Regardless of the number of diagnosed diseases in the RAMQ database, individuals who self-reported suffering from a single health problem presented a significantly lower HUI3 ranging from 0.944 (0.943-0.944) for Asthma to 0.789 (0.782-0.796) for Alzheimer compared with 0.956 (0.956-0.957) for individuals with no reported health problems. The same pattern was observed when considering individuals regardless of the diagnosed and self-reported diseases.

Conclusion: Utility score norms for HUI3 were produced in the general population of Quebec. Significant differences among various health problems were identified and norms can be used to compare populations in studies that do not have a control group.

Objective: Physician turnover rates are rising in the United States. The cancer workforce, which relies heavily on clinical teamwork and care coordination, may be more greatly impacted by turnover. In this study, we aimed to characterize oncologists who move to identify targets for recruitment and retention efforts.

Methods: We identified medical, radiation, and surgical oncologists who treated Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with breast, colorectal, or lung cancer in 2016-2019. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify physician-level and multivariable multinomial regression to identify region-level characteristics associated with turnover. Measures included demographic, practice, and patient-sharing network characteristics.

Results: Our cohort included 25,012 medical, radiation, and surgical oncologists, of which, 1448 (5.8%) moved. Women [vs men; odds ratio (OR): 1.46; 95% CI: 1.30-1.64] and surgeons (vs medical oncologists; OR: 1.17; 95% CI; 1.04-1.33) had higher odds of moving. Compared with oncologists with moderate patient-sharing ties, those with many ties had lower odds of moving (OR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.43-0.70). Patient-sharing networks with low efficiency (vs moderate) were more likely to have a net loss in their oncology workforce (OR: 3.06; 95% CI: 1.12-8.35), whereas those with low specialist vulnerability (vs moderate) were less likely to have a net loss (OR: 0.32; 95% CI: 0.1-0.99).

Conclusions: This study identified novel patient-sharing network characteristics associated with turnover, providing new insights into how the structural features of patient-sharing networks may be related to the recruitment and retention of oncologists.

For more than 2 decades, medical care for adults with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities (IDDs) has been difficult to access and has not substantially changed the persistently poor health status that is common in this population cohort. While there has been some progress in the development of models of care that are designed with and for adults with IDD, it has been slow and sporadic, with little data or analyses of efficacy or effectiveness. Very few medical schools and other health science professional education in the United States include curricular content on adults with IDD, resulting in health care practitioners being under or altogether unprepared to provide care to them. Public and private health care policy and financing are not responsive to the medical care needs and experiences of adults with IDD. More recently, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on adults with IDD was disproportionally more severe, with significantly higher rates of morbidity and mortality than on adults without IDD, having nothing to do with the presence of an IDD itself. This commentary reviews persistent barriers to accessible, responsive medical care for adults with IDD and reviews a number of health care models that have been developed since the turn of the 21st century. It also offers a brief review of Medicaid Managed Care as a potential policy and financing solution to long-standing financing and related obstacles to optimal medical care.

The lack of physician training in serving patients with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDDs) has been highlighted as a key modifiable root cause of health disparities experienced by this high-priority public health population. To address gaps in medical education regarding the lack of IDD curriculum, lack of evaluation/assessment, and lack of coordination across institutions, the American Academy of Developmental Medicine and Dentistry created the National Inclusive Curriculum for Health Education-Medical (NICHE-MED) Initiative in 2016. The aims of NICHE-MED are to: (1) impact medical students' attitudes and/or knowledge to address underlying ableism and address how future physicians think about disability; (2) apply a lens of health equity and intersectionality, centering people with IDD, but fostering conversation and learning about issues faced by other disability and minoritized populations; and (3) support community-engaged scholarship within medical education. As of 2024, the NICHE-MED initiative consists of close to 40 Medical School Partners, each with their own community-engaged disability curriculum intervention paired with a rigorous evaluation that ties centrally to coordinated program evaluation. The NICHE-MED initiative demonstrates implementation success at scale and is a successful community-engaged curriculum change model that may be replicated regarding disability more broadly and regarding necessary medical education efforts that center other marginalized populations.

Background: Adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDDs) have a similar prevalence of hypertension as the general population, but a higher rate of medication nonadherence at 50% compared with the average of 30%.

Objectives: To assess the cost-effectiveness of educational messaging and prescription-fill reminders to adults with IDD and hypertension and their helpers among Medicaid members in a randomized control trial.

Research design: The authors calculated net cost savings by subtracting per-participant intervention costs from differences in spending between preintervention/postintervention cases versus controls. Using bootstrap samples, they assessed the probability of positive cost savings. They used quantile and logistic regression to examine which members contributed to the cost savings and to identify future high-cost members at baseline.

Subjects: Four hundred twelve members with IDD and their helpers were recruited from the South Carolina Medicaid agency in 2018.

Measures: Intervention costs were determined using labor and communication costs. Health expenditures were obtained from South Carolina's all-payer claims database, using actual Medicaid expenditures and total all-payer expenditures estimated with cost-to-charge ratios.

Results: The intervention, which cost $26.10 per member, saved $1008.02 in all-payer spending and $1126.42 in Medicaid payments per member, respectively, with 78% and 91% confidence. Cost savings occurred among members above the 85th percentile of spending, and those using the emergency department or inpatient services at least twice at baseline were predicted to be future high-cost members.

Conclusions: The intervention is cost-saving, and insurers can prospectively identify and target members who will likely benefit.

Background: Evidence is limited on insured patients' use of safety net providers as vertically integrated health systems spread throughout the United States.

Objectives: To examine whether market-level health system penetration is associated with: (1) switches in Medicare beneficiaries' usual source of primary care from federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) to health systems; and (2) FQHCs' overall Medicare patient and visit volume.

Research design: Beneficiary-level discrete-time survival analysis and market-level linear regression analysis using Medicare fee-for-service claims data from 2013 to 2018.

Subjects: A total of 659,652 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65 and older lived in one of 27,386 empirically derived primary care markets whose usual source of care in 2013 was an FQHC or a non-FQHC-independent physician organization that predominantly served low-income patients.

Measures: Beneficiary-year measure of the probability of switching to health system-affiliated physician organizations and market-year measures of the number of FQHC visits by Medicare beneficiaries, number of beneficiaries attributed to FQHCs, and FQHC Medicare market shares.

Results: During 2013-2018, 16.5% of beneficiaries who sought care from FQHCs switched to health systems. When health system penetration increases from the 25th to 75th percentile, the probability of Medicare FQHC patient switching increases by 4.6 percentage points, with 22 fewer Medicare FQHC visits and 4 fewer beneficiaries attributed to FQHCs per market year. Complex patients and patients who sought care from non-FQHC, independent physician organizations exhibited higher rates of switching to health systems.

Conclusions: Health system expansion was associated with the loss of Medicare patients by FQHCs, suggesting potential negative spillovers of vertical integration on independent safety net providers.

Objective: To test the impact of virtual care usage on quality metrics used for performance measurement.

Background: Virtual care improves access to primary care; however, the quality of care must not be adversely impacted by its use.

Methods: This is a mixed-design etiologic study using data from patients receiving primary care in a large, regional health system from January 2020 through December 2021. Eligible patients had at least one primary care contact. Eligible physicians had 10 or more patient contacts. The quartile of virtual visits per physician per month is calculated as the percentage of total visits conducted by phone or video (Q1 is the lowest). Six metrics used for value-based reimbursement were chosen for modeling with generalized linear mixed models.

Results: The data included 200,090 patients of 683 physicians in 42 clinics over 24 months. Virtual care usage peaked in April 2020 at 78% and then stabilized at 18%. The blood pressure metric was met in 66% (95% CI: 63%-69%) of physician months in Q1 and 65% (95% CI: 63%-68%) in Q4 ( P = 0.003). The hemoglobin A1c metric was met in 73% (95% CI: 70%-76%) of physician months in Q1 and 72% (95% CI: 69%-75%) in Q4, not a significant difference. Breast cancer screening completion and colon cancer screening completion did not differ across virtual care quartiles. Medicare annual wellness visits were completed in 55% (95% CI: 50%-60%) of Q1 physician months and 54% in each of Q2, Q3, and Q4 ( P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Some quality metrics were modestly impacted by high virtual primary care usage; the absolute differences in rates were small. This may provide reassurance to physicians and their health systems that telemedicine use may not adversely impact quality metrics.

Background: Evidence suggests that screening and provider-led discussions of parental adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) may help identify at-risk families and be linked to positive health outcomes in caregivers and their children. However, the direct effect of ACEs screening and discussions on posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has yet to be studied.

Objectives: To determine if screening or provider-led discussions of parental ACEs are associated with inadvertent worsening of PTSD symptoms 1 week after screening.

Research design: Data was obtained as part of a cluster randomized controlled trial to examine the effects of ACEs screening and provider-led discussions on child health care utilization outcomes. Baseline surveys were completed before scheduled infant well child checks (WCCs). Providers were randomized into the standard of care or intervention (discussion) conditions. Intervention providers were trained in delivering brief trauma-informed discussions about the impact of ACEs on parenting during WCCs.

Subjects: Caregivers in a pediatric primary care clinic serving predominantly Hispanic and low socioeconomically resourced families (N=179, 93% female, 87% Hispanic).

Measures: The Primary Care PTSD Screen for DSM-5 (PC-PTSD-5), Brief Resilience Scale (BRS), and ACEs screening were completed at baseline. PC-PTSD-5 was repeated 1-week after screening.

Results: Mixed-effects ordinal logistic regression analysis of PTSD scores from baseline to 1-week postscreening with the full sample showed no significant effect of time [odds ratio (OR)=1.21, P=0.68], group (OR=1.68, P=0.33), or their interaction (OR=0.48, P=0.21).

Conclusions: Screening or brief discussion of ACEs with providers trained in trauma-informed care were not associated with worsening PTSD symptoms.