Pub Date : 2025-04-10DOI: 10.5867/medwave.2025.03.3033
Johanna Acevedo, Teresa Ip, Lea Maureira, Cesar Sanchez, Claudia Osorio, Claudia Carvajal, Rafael Araos, Hernan Letelier, Francisco Acevedo, Tomas Merino
Introduction: Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in the Americas, and the second leading cause of cancer death. Disparities in the time to treatment can significantly impact patient outcomes and typically affect lower socioeconomic individuals and/or ethnic minorities. Our study sought to evaluate disparities in time to treatment at three health institutions in Chile according to their type of health insurance (public or private).
Methods: Our study analyzed a database of breast cancer patients diagnosed between 2017 and 2018. Analyses included descriptive statistics and a linear regression model that incorporated clinical and demographic variables. Additionally, using a proportional risks model, we analyzed the association between clinical variables and mortality.
Results: Public health insurance (National Health Fund, FONASA) was associated with longer time-to-treatment and extended treatment times versus private health insurance (Social Security Institutions, ISAPRE; p < 0.0001). As expected, a more advanced stage at diagnosis was associated with lower survival. Our proportional risks model found that age was a predictor of breast cancer mortality in stage II patients. Also, total treatment time significantly increased the risk of breast cancer mortality in stage I patients. Conversely, total treatment time did not affect mortality on stages II or III.
Conclusions: We found significant disparities in the time to treatment of Chilean breast cancer patients using FONASA versus private ISAPRE. FONASA patients experience delays in the initiation of treatment and longer total treatment times compared to their private insurance counterparts. Finally, longer time-to-treatment was associated with more advanced stages and increased mortality.
{"title":"Retrospective study on disparities in time-to-treatment by health insurance system in Chilean breast cancer patients.","authors":"Johanna Acevedo, Teresa Ip, Lea Maureira, Cesar Sanchez, Claudia Osorio, Claudia Carvajal, Rafael Araos, Hernan Letelier, Francisco Acevedo, Tomas Merino","doi":"10.5867/medwave.2025.03.3033","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5867/medwave.2025.03.3033","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in the Americas, and the second leading cause of cancer death. Disparities in the time to treatment can significantly impact patient outcomes and typically affect lower socioeconomic individuals and/or ethnic minorities. Our study sought to evaluate disparities in time to treatment at three health institutions in Chile according to their type of health insurance (public or private).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study analyzed a database of breast cancer patients diagnosed between 2017 and 2018. Analyses included descriptive statistics and a linear regression model that incorporated clinical and demographic variables. Additionally, using a proportional risks model, we analyzed the association between clinical variables and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Public health insurance (National Health Fund, FONASA) was associated with longer time-to-treatment and extended treatment times versus private health insurance (Social Security Institutions, ISAPRE; p < 0.0001). As expected, a more advanced stage at diagnosis was associated with lower survival. Our proportional risks model found that age was a predictor of breast cancer mortality in stage II patients. Also, total treatment time significantly increased the risk of breast cancer mortality in stage I patients. Conversely, total treatment time did not affect mortality on stages II or III.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found significant disparities in the time to treatment of Chilean breast cancer patients using FONASA versus private ISAPRE. FONASA patients experience delays in the initiation of treatment and longer total treatment times compared to their private insurance counterparts. Finally, longer time-to-treatment was associated with more advanced stages and increased mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":18597,"journal":{"name":"Medwave","volume":"25 3","pages":"e3033"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144018665","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-09DOI: 10.5867/medwave.2025.03.2937
Andelys De la Rosa, Patxis Taveras, Reveiz Ludovic, Torres Ana Marcela, Mordan José, López-Bencosme Yanely, Sánchez Fernández Salma Arisbel, Camilo Pantaleón Elsa, Buchanan Cecilia
The study aimed to assess the quality and applicability of current maternal-fetal health clinical practice guidelines that countries can adopt or adapt. A systematic search was conducted in the International Database of GRADE Guidelines (BIGG) for practice guidelines developed with the GRADE system (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) and related to maternal-fetal care. The selected guidelines were evaluated with the AGREE-REX (Appraisal of Guidelines REsearch and Evaluation-Recommendations Excellence) tool to assess clinical applicability (domain-1), values and preferences (domain-2) and applicability (domain-3). The variables were presented descriptively, and a statistical analysis was performed on the domains according to institution and country of origin. Of 1,212 clinical practice guidelines, 72 met the inclusion criteria. According to the type of collaborating organization, the World Health Organization predominated with 58.3%, versus specialized medical societies. Domain 1, "Clinical applicability," was the best rated by the reviewers (68.5%) compared to domain 2, "Values and preferences" (60%). According to the type of institution that developed the clinical practice guideline, a significant difference was demonstrated in domains 1 (p= 0.000), 2 (p= 0.006) and 3 (p= 0.000). Only domains 1 (p= 0.000) and 3 (p= 0.018) were statistically significant based on country of origin. This study emphasizes the importance of improving the quality of maternal-fetal clinical practice guidelines developed by organizations and governmental institutions and the need to strengthen the institutionalization of the use of evidence to develop, adapt and implement practice guidelines in countries such as the United Kingdom, Canada, Spain, Colombia, the United States, among others.
{"title":"Characteristics and quality assessment of GRADE practice guidelines on maternal-fetal care.","authors":"Andelys De la Rosa, Patxis Taveras, Reveiz Ludovic, Torres Ana Marcela, Mordan José, López-Bencosme Yanely, Sánchez Fernández Salma Arisbel, Camilo Pantaleón Elsa, Buchanan Cecilia","doi":"10.5867/medwave.2025.03.2937","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5867/medwave.2025.03.2937","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study aimed to assess the quality and applicability of current maternal-fetal health clinical practice guidelines that countries can adopt or adapt. A systematic search was conducted in the International Database of GRADE Guidelines (BIGG) for practice guidelines developed with the GRADE system (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) and related to maternal-fetal care. The selected guidelines were evaluated with the AGREE-REX (Appraisal of Guidelines REsearch and Evaluation-Recommendations Excellence) tool to assess clinical applicability (domain-1), values and preferences (domain-2) and applicability (domain-3). The variables were presented descriptively, and a statistical analysis was performed on the domains according to institution and country of origin. Of 1,212 clinical practice guidelines, 72 met the inclusion criteria. According to the type of collaborating organization, the World Health Organization predominated with 58.3%, versus specialized medical societies. Domain 1, \"Clinical applicability,\" was the best rated by the reviewers (68.5%) compared to domain 2, \"Values and preferences\" (60%). According to the type of institution that developed the clinical practice guideline, a significant difference was demonstrated in domains 1 (p= 0.000), 2 (p= 0.006) and 3 (p= 0.000). Only domains 1 (p= 0.000) and 3 (p= 0.018) were statistically significant based on country of origin. This study emphasizes the importance of improving the quality of maternal-fetal clinical practice guidelines developed by organizations and governmental institutions and the need to strengthen the institutionalization of the use of evidence to develop, adapt and implement practice guidelines in countries such as the United Kingdom, Canada, Spain, Colombia, the United States, among others.</p>","PeriodicalId":18597,"journal":{"name":"Medwave","volume":"25 3","pages":"e2937"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144001800","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-08DOI: 10.5867/medwave.2025.03.2938
Belén Estefanía Sanmartín Zhunio, Belén Micaela Monge Puma, María de Lourdes Rodríguez Coyago
The family encompasses a large group of Gram-negative bacteria of the order Enterobacterales, which are habitual residents of the intestinal and urinary tracts, behaving only as allochthons in the oral cavity. There is no consensus regarding the prevalence, determinants and consequences of high aero-digestive colonization by this family of bacteria. In light of this, a narrative review was conducted on the epidemiology and clinical impact of oral and oropharyngeal colonization by , differentiating by age groups. A bibliographic search was conducted in four digital databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, Scielo, Google Scholar and Cochrane library of clinical and preclinical studies published in the last twenty years (2003 to 2023), on asymptomatic colonization of in the upper aero-digestive tract, its determinants and clinical impact. Oral and oropharyngeal colonization by was 38.24 and 39% on average, respectively. The genera spp. (68.75%), spp. (68.75%), spp. (43.75%), spp. (25%), and spp. (25%) were the most prevalent taxonomic groups in the oral cavity, especially in children and adolescents, while spp. (22.5%), spp. (15.5%) and spp. (8%) were the most prevalent in the oropharyngeal area of senile subjects. This colonization is shown to be associated with an increased risk of infectious and inflammatory episodes such as pneumonia, inflammatory bowel disease, periodontal disease, and progression of renal failure; with determinants that differ depending on age, with periodontal disease being a shared risk factor for senile and non-senile groups. The presence of enterobacteria in the upper aerodigestive tract is significant, predominating in children and adolescents, promoted by various factors that differ according to age and with systemic consequences of an infectious or inflammatory nature in certain types of hosts. Its role in the pathogenesis of oral diseases such as periodontitis is still not possible to specify.
{"title":"Oral and oropharyngeal colonization by Enterobacteriaceae: A narrative review on its epidemiology and clinical impact.","authors":"Belén Estefanía Sanmartín Zhunio, Belén Micaela Monge Puma, María de Lourdes Rodríguez Coyago","doi":"10.5867/medwave.2025.03.2938","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5867/medwave.2025.03.2938","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The family encompasses a large group of Gram-negative bacteria of the order Enterobacterales, which are habitual residents of the intestinal and urinary tracts, behaving only as allochthons in the oral cavity. There is no consensus regarding the prevalence, determinants and consequences of high aero-digestive colonization by this family of bacteria. In light of this, a narrative review was conducted on the epidemiology and clinical impact of oral and oropharyngeal colonization by , differentiating by age groups. A bibliographic search was conducted in four digital databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, Scielo, Google Scholar and Cochrane library of clinical and preclinical studies published in the last twenty years (2003 to 2023), on asymptomatic colonization of in the upper aero-digestive tract, its determinants and clinical impact. Oral and oropharyngeal colonization by was 38.24 and 39% on average, respectively. The genera spp. (68.75%), spp. (68.75%), spp. (43.75%), spp. (25%), and spp. (25%) were the most prevalent taxonomic groups in the oral cavity, especially in children and adolescents, while spp. (22.5%), spp. (15.5%) and spp. (8%) were the most prevalent in the oropharyngeal area of senile subjects. This colonization is shown to be associated with an increased risk of infectious and inflammatory episodes such as pneumonia, inflammatory bowel disease, periodontal disease, and progression of renal failure; with determinants that differ depending on age, with periodontal disease being a shared risk factor for senile and non-senile groups. The presence of enterobacteria in the upper aerodigestive tract is significant, predominating in children and adolescents, promoted by various factors that differ according to age and with systemic consequences of an infectious or inflammatory nature in certain types of hosts. Its role in the pathogenesis of oral diseases such as periodontitis is still not possible to specify.</p>","PeriodicalId":18597,"journal":{"name":"Medwave","volume":"25 3","pages":"e2938"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143812070","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-03DOI: 10.5867/medwave.2025.03.3025
Jaen Cagua-Ordoñez, Inti Quevedo-Bastidas, Daniel Simancas-Racines, Evelyn Frias-Toral, Juan Marcos Parise-Vasco, Jaime Angamarca-Iguago
Introduction: Arboviruses such as dengue, Zika and chikungunya represent a threat to public health in several South American countries, including Ecuador. Accurate identification of local risk areas and detection of critical transmission points are crucial for the effective planning of vector control programs, particularly in the management of the effectively planning vector control programs, particularly in managing mosquito. This study aimed to characterize the variables of receptivity and vulnerability to arboviral transmission at the cantonal level, and to identify hotspots in Ecuador between 2015 and 2019.
Methods: Environmental and sociodemographic data at the cantonal level were used to perform a spatial analysis, which included a spatial autocorrelation analysis to identify transmission hotspots at the parish level. GeoDa software was used to detect these hotspots.
Results: The provinces of Ecuador with the highest levels of receptivity and vulnerability were Manabí, Guayas, El Oro and Esmeraldas. These levels were mainly related to temperature, altitude, and limited access to clean water services. Fifty-six cantons were identified as high transmission areas. Nine parishes were classified as transmission hotspots for five consecutive years.
Conclusions: The spatial analysis allowed for precisely identifying the more susceptible and vulnerable areas for arbovirus transmission in Ecuador. The persistence of transmission hotspots in certain municipalities was evidenced, influenced by environmental and sociodemographic factors. This evidence is key to adapt and improve vector surveillance and control strategies in the most affected regions.
{"title":"Spatial analysis of receptivity and vulnerability to arbovirosis transmission in Ecuador between 2015 and 2019: An ecological study.","authors":"Jaen Cagua-Ordoñez, Inti Quevedo-Bastidas, Daniel Simancas-Racines, Evelyn Frias-Toral, Juan Marcos Parise-Vasco, Jaime Angamarca-Iguago","doi":"10.5867/medwave.2025.03.3025","DOIUrl":"10.5867/medwave.2025.03.3025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Arboviruses such as dengue, Zika and chikungunya represent a threat to public health in several South American countries, including Ecuador. Accurate identification of local risk areas and detection of critical transmission points are crucial for the effective planning of vector control programs, particularly in the management of the effectively planning vector control programs, particularly in managing mosquito. This study aimed to characterize the variables of receptivity and vulnerability to arboviral transmission at the cantonal level, and to identify hotspots in Ecuador between 2015 and 2019.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Environmental and sociodemographic data at the cantonal level were used to perform a spatial analysis, which included a spatial autocorrelation analysis to identify transmission hotspots at the parish level. GeoDa software was used to detect these hotspots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The provinces of Ecuador with the highest levels of receptivity and vulnerability were Manabí, Guayas, El Oro and Esmeraldas. These levels were mainly related to temperature, altitude, and limited access to clean water services. Fifty-six cantons were identified as high transmission areas. Nine parishes were classified as transmission hotspots for five consecutive years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The spatial analysis allowed for precisely identifying the more susceptible and vulnerable areas for arbovirus transmission in Ecuador. The persistence of transmission hotspots in certain municipalities was evidenced, influenced by environmental and sociodemographic factors. This evidence is key to adapt and improve vector surveillance and control strategies in the most affected regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":18597,"journal":{"name":"Medwave","volume":"25 3","pages":"e3025"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143780511","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01DOI: 10.5867/medwave.2025.03.3024
Karina Lalangui, Emmanuelle Quentin, Juan Marcos Parise-Vasco, Claudia Reytor-Gonzalez, Evelyn Frías-Toral, Daniel Simancas-Racines
Introduction: Malignant neoplasms of the oral cavity represent a public health problem worldwide with an increasing incidence, especially in young populations. In Ecuador, the epidemiology of these conditions has been little studied, limiting timely diagnosis and management. The study aims to identify the distribution of hospitalizations and deaths from oral cavity malignant neoplasms in Ecuador during the pre-pandemic years, from 2015 to 2019, describing spatiotemporal patterns by province, gender, and age.
Methods: An observational and descriptive study was conducted using the database of hospitalizations and deaths of the National Institute of Statistics and Census of Ecuador. Variables such as age, gender, province, and location of the neoplasms were analyzed, and frequencies, proportions, and crude rates were calculated.
Results: Between 2015 and 2019, 4444 hospitalizations and 726 deaths were reported, with a notable increase in 2019. Males predominated in all the studied years. Malignant neoplasms of unspecified sites and other sites of the tongue had the highest frequency of cases and deaths. Geographically, the provinces of Loja, El Oro, Cañar, Carchi, and Bolivar had the highest rates.
Conclusions: The study shows an increase in hospitalizations and deaths due to malignant neoplasms of the oral cavity between 2015 and 2019, highlighting the urgency of implementing public health strategies aimed at prevention, early detection, and timely treatment of this disease.
{"title":"Distribution of malignant neoplasms of the oral cavity in Ecuador: an epidemiological study from 2015 to 2019.","authors":"Karina Lalangui, Emmanuelle Quentin, Juan Marcos Parise-Vasco, Claudia Reytor-Gonzalez, Evelyn Frías-Toral, Daniel Simancas-Racines","doi":"10.5867/medwave.2025.03.3024","DOIUrl":"10.5867/medwave.2025.03.3024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Malignant neoplasms of the oral cavity represent a public health problem worldwide with an increasing incidence, especially in young populations. In Ecuador, the epidemiology of these conditions has been little studied, limiting timely diagnosis and management. The study aims to identify the distribution of hospitalizations and deaths from oral cavity malignant neoplasms in Ecuador during the pre-pandemic years, from 2015 to 2019, describing spatiotemporal patterns by province, gender, and age.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational and descriptive study was conducted using the database of hospitalizations and deaths of the National Institute of Statistics and Census of Ecuador. Variables such as age, gender, province, and location of the neoplasms were analyzed, and frequencies, proportions, and crude rates were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2015 and 2019, 4444 hospitalizations and 726 deaths were reported, with a notable increase in 2019. Males predominated in all the studied years. Malignant neoplasms of unspecified sites and other sites of the tongue had the highest frequency of cases and deaths. Geographically, the provinces of Loja, El Oro, Cañar, Carchi, and Bolivar had the highest rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study shows an increase in hospitalizations and deaths due to malignant neoplasms of the oral cavity between 2015 and 2019, highlighting the urgency of implementing public health strategies aimed at prevention, early detection, and timely treatment of this disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":18597,"journal":{"name":"Medwave","volume":"25 3","pages":"e3024"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143764497","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-27DOI: 10.5867/medwave.2025.02.3009
María Belén Reinoso-Cataldo, Mercedes Carrasco-Portiño, Cecilia Bustos-Ibarra, Valeria Stuardo-Ávila
Introduction: Due to the increase and feminization of migration in Chile, and the resulting boost in the demand for sexual and reproductive health consultations, there is a need for analizaing migrants' access to health services from the health agents' perspective.
Objective: To characterize migrants' access to sexual and reproductive healthcare from the health agents' perspective.
Methods: Exploratory-descriptive qualitative study with a phenomenological approach. Theoretical sampling included midwives from primary health care (n=4) and staff from NGOs working with migrants (n=7). Data was collected through semi-structured interviews and a focus group, and then analyzed with ATLAS.ti.
Results: Through healthcare agents, we found that there are gaps in the migrants' access to sexual and reproductive healthcare, which are associated to a lack of information on the Chilean health system, the distance between their living places and the health centers, and health not being migrants' priority, plus other gaps affecting the LGBTQIA+ community. The agents also give suggestions on how to mitigate these gaps, such as increasing information strategies and facilitating cross-sector collaboration. There are positive elements as well, such as the primary healthcare teams' knowledge of health profiles per nationality, ability to fit their speech, and willingness to adapt healthcare to the different cultural practices.
Conclusión: There are gaps in the access of health care and use of sexual and reproductive health services by migrants, which are mainly associated to the lack of information on their rights in Chile and ignorance of sexual and reproductive health services. Information strategies should be expanded towards migrants.
{"title":"Migration and access to sexual and reproductive health from the perspective of health agents in northern Chile.","authors":"María Belén Reinoso-Cataldo, Mercedes Carrasco-Portiño, Cecilia Bustos-Ibarra, Valeria Stuardo-Ávila","doi":"10.5867/medwave.2025.02.3009","DOIUrl":"10.5867/medwave.2025.02.3009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Due to the increase and feminization of migration in Chile, and the resulting boost in the demand for sexual and reproductive health consultations, there is a need for analizaing migrants' access to health services from the health agents' perspective.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterize migrants' access to sexual and reproductive healthcare from the health agents' perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Exploratory-descriptive qualitative study with a phenomenological approach. Theoretical sampling included midwives from primary health care (n=4) and staff from NGOs working with migrants (n=7). Data was collected through semi-structured interviews and a focus group, and then analyzed with ATLAS.ti.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Through healthcare agents, we found that there are gaps in the migrants' access to sexual and reproductive healthcare, which are associated to a lack of information on the Chilean health system, the distance between their living places and the health centers, and health not being migrants' priority, plus other gaps affecting the LGBTQIA+ community. The agents also give suggestions on how to mitigate these gaps, such as increasing information strategies and facilitating cross-sector collaboration. There are positive elements as well, such as the primary healthcare teams' knowledge of health profiles per nationality, ability to fit their speech, and willingness to adapt healthcare to the different cultural practices.</p><p><strong>Conclusión: </strong>There are gaps in the access of health care and use of sexual and reproductive health services by migrants, which are mainly associated to the lack of information on their rights in Chile and ignorance of sexual and reproductive health services. Information strategies should be expanded towards migrants.</p>","PeriodicalId":18597,"journal":{"name":"Medwave","volume":"25 2","pages":"e3009"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143730468","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-25DOI: 10.5867/medwave.2025.02.2915
Ariana Isabel Rojas Aliaga, Yoshua David Rojas Peña, Luis Jesus Arellan Bravo, Sarai Gloria Chavez Bustamante, Briam Cristiam Benito Condor
Introduction: Health-related quality of life in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis has become a fundamental criterion for evaluating the effectiveness of treatments, promoting the overall well-being of this population. The study aims to identify the factors associated with health-related quality of life in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis in Huancayo, Peru, from September to November 2022.
Methods: Observational, descriptive, single-center, cross-sectional study in which sociodemographic data associated with health-related quality of life in hemodialysis patients were identified using the SF-36 instrument.
Results: The SF-36 questionnaire on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was administered to 88 hemodialysis patients, of whom 68.2% were men, and 87.5% were undergoing outpatient dialysis. The main cause of chronic kidney disease was hypertension, affecting 46.6% of participants. Additionally, 80.7% had been on hemodialysis treatment for less than five years. In the bivariate analysis, significant differences were observed in the vitality dimension concerning educational level (p = 0.011) and sex (p = 0.049). Likewise, there was a significant difference between the average values of the emotional role dimension (p = 0.038) of the SF-36 in the nutritional status levels and a significant difference between the average total scores of the SF-36 in the salary levels (p = 0.048). The multivariate analysis identified correlations between nutritional status and pain; educational level and vitality; nutritional status and physical role; economic income; educational level and social function; and nutritional status and emotional role.
Conclusions: Patients on hemodialysis have a total health-related quality of life score ranging from low to moderate (90.8%). The factors associated with a lower quality of life are being male, poor nutrition, low educational level, and a poor emotional state. Early identification of these factors will allow the development of interventions to improve these patients' quality of life. It is crucial to design interventions focused on improving nutrition and preventing mental health disorders, paying special attention to men with low educational levels.
{"title":"Factors associated with health-related quality of life in hemodialysis patients in a Peruvian hospital: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Ariana Isabel Rojas Aliaga, Yoshua David Rojas Peña, Luis Jesus Arellan Bravo, Sarai Gloria Chavez Bustamante, Briam Cristiam Benito Condor","doi":"10.5867/medwave.2025.02.2915","DOIUrl":"10.5867/medwave.2025.02.2915","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Health-related quality of life in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis has become a fundamental criterion for evaluating the effectiveness of treatments, promoting the overall well-being of this population. The study aims to identify the factors associated with health-related quality of life in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis in Huancayo, Peru, from September to November 2022.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observational, descriptive, single-center, cross-sectional study in which sociodemographic data associated with health-related quality of life in hemodialysis patients were identified using the SF-36 instrument.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SF-36 questionnaire on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was administered to 88 hemodialysis patients, of whom 68.2% were men, and 87.5% were undergoing outpatient dialysis. The main cause of chronic kidney disease was hypertension, affecting 46.6% of participants. Additionally, 80.7% had been on hemodialysis treatment for less than five years. In the bivariate analysis, significant differences were observed in the vitality dimension concerning educational level (p = 0.011) and sex (p = 0.049). Likewise, there was a significant difference between the average values of the emotional role dimension (p = 0.038) of the SF-36 in the nutritional status levels and a significant difference between the average total scores of the SF-36 in the salary levels (p = 0.048). The multivariate analysis identified correlations between nutritional status and pain; educational level and vitality; nutritional status and physical role; economic income; educational level and social function; and nutritional status and emotional role.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients on hemodialysis have a total health-related quality of life score ranging from low to moderate (90.8%). The factors associated with a lower quality of life are being male, poor nutrition, low educational level, and a poor emotional state. Early identification of these factors will allow the development of interventions to improve these patients' quality of life. It is crucial to design interventions focused on improving nutrition and preventing mental health disorders, paying special attention to men with low educational levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":18597,"journal":{"name":"Medwave","volume":"25 2","pages":"e2915"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143710801","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-17DOI: 10.5867/medwave.2025.02.2962
Yeisson Rivero-Moreno, Vanessa García-Gil, Andrea García-Nunes, Miguel Rivas-Pérez, Erinor Montero-Palma, Andrea Chávez-Contreras, Gino Ramírez-Calderón, Nelson Martínez-Merizalde, Antony Gonzales-Uribe, Estefhany Areyan-Gamboa, Kevin Morales-Cornieles, Rafael Lezama-Graterol
<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The emergency caused by the COVID-19 pandemic has passed, but we must study the potential sequelae left in the population. Cases of pulmonary fibrosis have been reported after severe COVID-19. However, the association between these factors has not been widely studied in Latin American countries, one of the regions most affected by the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A case-control study was conducted to determine whether a history of hospitalization due to COVID-19 is a risk factor for developing pulmonary fibrosis. We compared patients with a radiological diagnosis of pulmonary fibrosis on high-resolution computed tomography (cases) with those without such findings (controls), conducted between March 2021 and June 2023 in a referral hospital in Lima, Peru.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the total number of patients evaluated, the median age was 72 years, with a predominance of females (58.2%). 7.5% of patients with pulmonary fibrosis had a history of hospitalization due to COVID-19, compared to 6.1% in the control group (OR 1.24; 95% CI 0.65 to 2.36). The stratified analysis revealed a significant odds ratio for the group of patients with arterial hypertension (OR 5.9; 95% CI 1.28 to 27.34). The median follow-up after hospitalization for COVID-19 was 315.5 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hospitalization due to COVID-19 was not a risk factor for developing pulmonary fibrosis one year after medical discharge, except in patients with hypertension. Evidence suggests that the prevalence of pulmonary fibrosis may decrease over time.</p><p><strong>Introducción: </strong>La emergencia por la pandemia de COVID-19 ha pasado, pero debemos estudiar las posibles secuelas que han quedado en la población. Se han reportado casos de fibrosis pulmonar después de casos severos de COVID-19. Sin embargo, la relación de riesgo entre ambos factores no ha sido ampliamente estudiada en países de Latinoamérica, una de las regiones más afectadas por la pandemia.</p><p><strong>Métodos: </strong>Se realizó un estudio de casos y controles con el objetivo de determinar si el antecedente de hospitalización por COVID-19 es un factor de riesgo para el desarrollo de fibrosis pulmonar. Comparamos pacientes con diagnóstico radiológico de fibrosis pulmonar en tomografía computarizada de alta resolución (casos), frente a aquellos sin dicha alteración (controles). Este proceso se realizó entre marzo de 2021 y junio de 2023, en un hospital de referencia en Lima, Perú.</p><p><strong>Resultados: </strong>En el total de pacientes evaluados, la mediana de edad fue de 72 años con predominio del sexo femenino (58,2%). El 7,5% de los pacientes con fibrosis pulmonar tuvieron antecedente de hospitalización por COVID-19, frente al 6,1% del grupo control (: 1,24; intervalo de confianza 95%: 0,65 a 2,36). El análisis estratificado arrojo un significativo en el grupo de pacientes con hipertensión arterial (: 5,9; intervalo de confianza 95
导语:COVID-19大流行造成的紧急情况已经过去,但我们必须研究在人群中留下的潜在后遗症。重症COVID-19后出现肺纤维化病例。然而,在受大流行影响最严重的区域之一拉丁美洲国家,这些因素之间的关联尚未得到广泛研究。方法:通过病例对照研究确定COVID-19住院史是否是发生肺纤维化的危险因素。我们比较了2021年3月至2023年6月在秘鲁利马一家转诊医院进行的高分辨率计算机断层扫描(病例)和未发现肺纤维化的患者(对照组)的放射学诊断。结果:评估的患者中位年龄为72岁,以女性为主(58.2%)。7.5%的肺纤维化患者有新冠肺炎住院史,而对照组为6.1% (OR 1.24;95% CI 0.65 ~ 2.36)。分层分析显示动脉高血压患者组的优势比显著(OR 5.9;95% CI 1.28 ~ 27.34)。COVID-19住院后的中位随访时间为315.5天。结论:除高血压患者外,因COVID-19住院并不是出院一年后发生肺纤维化的危险因素。有证据表明,随着时间的推移,肺纤维化的患病率可能会降低。Introducción: La emergencia por La pandemic de COVID-19 ha pasado, pero debemos estuar as possible secuelas que han quedado en La población。报告了COVID-19重型肺纤维化病例。危险危险罪禁运,la relacion读经台之间没有ha sido ampliamente将作为这些活动的estudiada en《de Latinoamerica una de las地区mas afectadas关于大流行病。Metodos: Se realizo联合国工厂化德卡索y还反对el objetivo de确定如果el antecedente de hospitalizacion为什么COVID-19 es危险因素对位el desarrollo de纤维化pulmonar。比较患者diagnóstico radiológico肺纤维化与tomografía computarizada de alta resolución (casos),肺纤维化与aquellos与dicha alteración(对照)。Este proceso se realizó 2021年至2023年的中心,利马参考医院,Perú。结果:1例患者总评价值,1例媒体诊断诊断值为72例años(58.2%)。7、5%的患者在新冠肺炎(COVID-19)发生前发生肺纤维化,6、1%的患者与对照组相比(1、24;确证区间95%:0,65 a 2,36)。El análisis动脉粥样硬化对El组患者hipertensión动脉粥样硬化的影响不显著(:5,9;95%区间:1,28 ~ 27,34)。《新冠肺炎疫情调查媒体报》hospitalización, 2015, días。结论:除hipertensión动脉栓塞患者外,hospitalización肺纤维化患者与año肺纤维化患者无明显相关性。肺纤维化患病率的证据研究podría与其他病例的比较。
{"title":"COVID-19 as a risk factor for the development of pulmonary fibrosis in a referral hospital in Lima, Peru.","authors":"Yeisson Rivero-Moreno, Vanessa García-Gil, Andrea García-Nunes, Miguel Rivas-Pérez, Erinor Montero-Palma, Andrea Chávez-Contreras, Gino Ramírez-Calderón, Nelson Martínez-Merizalde, Antony Gonzales-Uribe, Estefhany Areyan-Gamboa, Kevin Morales-Cornieles, Rafael Lezama-Graterol","doi":"10.5867/medwave.2025.02.2962","DOIUrl":"10.5867/medwave.2025.02.2962","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The emergency caused by the COVID-19 pandemic has passed, but we must study the potential sequelae left in the population. Cases of pulmonary fibrosis have been reported after severe COVID-19. However, the association between these factors has not been widely studied in Latin American countries, one of the regions most affected by the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A case-control study was conducted to determine whether a history of hospitalization due to COVID-19 is a risk factor for developing pulmonary fibrosis. We compared patients with a radiological diagnosis of pulmonary fibrosis on high-resolution computed tomography (cases) with those without such findings (controls), conducted between March 2021 and June 2023 in a referral hospital in Lima, Peru.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the total number of patients evaluated, the median age was 72 years, with a predominance of females (58.2%). 7.5% of patients with pulmonary fibrosis had a history of hospitalization due to COVID-19, compared to 6.1% in the control group (OR 1.24; 95% CI 0.65 to 2.36). The stratified analysis revealed a significant odds ratio for the group of patients with arterial hypertension (OR 5.9; 95% CI 1.28 to 27.34). The median follow-up after hospitalization for COVID-19 was 315.5 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hospitalization due to COVID-19 was not a risk factor for developing pulmonary fibrosis one year after medical discharge, except in patients with hypertension. Evidence suggests that the prevalence of pulmonary fibrosis may decrease over time.</p><p><strong>Introducción: </strong>La emergencia por la pandemia de COVID-19 ha pasado, pero debemos estudiar las posibles secuelas que han quedado en la población. Se han reportado casos de fibrosis pulmonar después de casos severos de COVID-19. Sin embargo, la relación de riesgo entre ambos factores no ha sido ampliamente estudiada en países de Latinoamérica, una de las regiones más afectadas por la pandemia.</p><p><strong>Métodos: </strong>Se realizó un estudio de casos y controles con el objetivo de determinar si el antecedente de hospitalización por COVID-19 es un factor de riesgo para el desarrollo de fibrosis pulmonar. Comparamos pacientes con diagnóstico radiológico de fibrosis pulmonar en tomografía computarizada de alta resolución (casos), frente a aquellos sin dicha alteración (controles). Este proceso se realizó entre marzo de 2021 y junio de 2023, en un hospital de referencia en Lima, Perú.</p><p><strong>Resultados: </strong>En el total de pacientes evaluados, la mediana de edad fue de 72 años con predominio del sexo femenino (58,2%). El 7,5% de los pacientes con fibrosis pulmonar tuvieron antecedente de hospitalización por COVID-19, frente al 6,1% del grupo control (: 1,24; intervalo de confianza 95%: 0,65 a 2,36). El análisis estratificado arrojo un significativo en el grupo de pacientes con hipertensión arterial (: 5,9; intervalo de confianza 95","PeriodicalId":18597,"journal":{"name":"Medwave","volume":"25 2","pages":"e2962"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143649607","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-10DOI: 10.5867/medwave.2025.02.3020
Giuliano Duarte, Susana Sanduvete-Chaves, Daniel López-Arenas, Salvador Chacón-Moscoso
Introduction: Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are a leading cause of premature mortality, with unsafe sex as a predominant risk factor. Changing risky sexual behaviors and adopting healthy habits is key to preventing STIs, including HIV, essential for public health. Technological advances in digital interventions have revealed significant opportunities, and systematic reviews have evaluated their effectiveness. These digital interventions, using technologies such as mobile phones, apps, and wearable devices, have shown great potential to reduce STIs, particularly among young people, who are a key population for their implementation.
Objective: This protocol aims to describe in advance a systematic review intended to gather, evaluate, and synthesize the available evidence on digital behavior change interventions for STI prevention. In particular, it seeks to identify the most effective behavior change techniques to guide the design of evidence-based interventions that contribute to reducing STIs.
Methods: This protocol outlines a review of systematic reviews. The methodological quality of the included reviews will be assessed using the AMSTAR-2 tool, following the PRISMA-P guidelines. Comprehensive searches will be conducted in Cochrane, PubMed, Epistemonikos, and PsycINFO. The inclusion criteria will focus on systematic reviews evaluating the effect of digital behavior change interventions for STI prevention, covering technologies such as mobile phones, apps, and websites. Data extraction will identify key components using the Behavior Change Techniques Taxonomy version 1 (BCTTv1). The protocol is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023485887).
Expected results: This review is expected to provide theoretical insights into behavior change in STI prevention through digital interventions, identifying the most effective techniques. These findings will help design scalable, evidence-based interventions, aimed especially at youth, and guide policymakers in implementing more effective strategies to reduce STI transmission around the world.
{"title":"Digital strategies and behavior change techniques for preventing sexually transmitted infections: Protocol for an overview of systematic reviews.","authors":"Giuliano Duarte, Susana Sanduvete-Chaves, Daniel López-Arenas, Salvador Chacón-Moscoso","doi":"10.5867/medwave.2025.02.3020","DOIUrl":"10.5867/medwave.2025.02.3020","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are a leading cause of premature mortality, with unsafe sex as a predominant risk factor. Changing risky sexual behaviors and adopting healthy habits is key to preventing STIs, including HIV, essential for public health. Technological advances in digital interventions have revealed significant opportunities, and systematic reviews have evaluated their effectiveness. These digital interventions, using technologies such as mobile phones, apps, and wearable devices, have shown great potential to reduce STIs, particularly among young people, who are a key population for their implementation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This protocol aims to describe in advance a systematic review intended to gather, evaluate, and synthesize the available evidence on digital behavior change interventions for STI prevention. In particular, it seeks to identify the most effective behavior change techniques to guide the design of evidence-based interventions that contribute to reducing STIs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This protocol outlines a review of systematic reviews. The methodological quality of the included reviews will be assessed using the AMSTAR-2 tool, following the PRISMA-P guidelines. Comprehensive searches will be conducted in Cochrane, PubMed, Epistemonikos, and PsycINFO. The inclusion criteria will focus on systematic reviews evaluating the effect of digital behavior change interventions for STI prevention, covering technologies such as mobile phones, apps, and websites. Data extraction will identify key components using the Behavior Change Techniques Taxonomy version 1 (BCTTv1). The protocol is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023485887).</p><p><strong>Expected results: </strong>This review is expected to provide theoretical insights into behavior change in STI prevention through digital interventions, identifying the most effective techniques. These findings will help design scalable, evidence-based interventions, aimed especially at youth, and guide policymakers in implementing more effective strategies to reduce STI transmission around the world.</p>","PeriodicalId":18597,"journal":{"name":"Medwave","volume":"25 2","pages":"e3020"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143597381","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-07DOI: 10.5867/medwave.2025.02.2986
Luis Fidel Abregú-Tueros, Peceros Pinto Benigno, Sheyla Karol Abregú-Arroyo
Introduction: Studies on psychological violence in health care facilities have focused on the analysis of incidences in specific contexts. Nevertheless, consensus studies on the psychosocial factors of interprofessional violence related to interpersonal conflict and motivational demands are scarce. The aim of this study is to determine by Delphi consensus the psychosocial pattern of interprofessional violence in healthcare work for Peru and its geographical regions.
Methods: A mixed Delphi consensus method was applied, bringing together professionals with experience and knowledge of psychological violence. The study was conducted in three stages and three rounds of Delphi consultation between May 2023 and June 2024. The integration of consensus at regional and national levels was carried out through Graph Network Analysis.
Results: Up to the third stage of the study, 444 experts in 32 focus groups from 81 health care institutions participated. 70.5% of the participants were women and 27.6% worked in nursing and emergency departments. After the Delphi consensus analysis, we obtained a ranked list of six psychosocial factors of interprofessional violence for Peru and nine for the regions.
Conclusions: According to the consensus, two of the main psychosocial factors of interprofessional violence in health establishments in the Costa and Forest regions are the devaluation of work and harassment by superiors towards subordinates that induce them to change jobs or resign. Excessive control by colleagues was the first hierarchy for the Sierra region. The differences between geographical regions in Peru and between studies in other countries reflect that the phenomenon of interprofessional violence is very specific and contextual; in the case of Peru the differences between regions may be due to health care facilities with different characteristics (e.g., rural vs. urban facilities).
{"title":"Psychosocial pattern of interprofessional violence in Peruvian healthcare work: A mixed Delphi consensus study.","authors":"Luis Fidel Abregú-Tueros, Peceros Pinto Benigno, Sheyla Karol Abregú-Arroyo","doi":"10.5867/medwave.2025.02.2986","DOIUrl":"10.5867/medwave.2025.02.2986","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Studies on psychological violence in health care facilities have focused on the analysis of incidences in specific contexts. Nevertheless, consensus studies on the psychosocial factors of interprofessional violence related to interpersonal conflict and motivational demands are scarce. The aim of this study is to determine by Delphi consensus the psychosocial pattern of interprofessional violence in healthcare work for Peru and its geographical regions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed Delphi consensus method was applied, bringing together professionals with experience and knowledge of psychological violence. The study was conducted in three stages and three rounds of Delphi consultation between May 2023 and June 2024. The integration of consensus at regional and national levels was carried out through Graph Network Analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Up to the third stage of the study, 444 experts in 32 focus groups from 81 health care institutions participated. 70.5% of the participants were women and 27.6% worked in nursing and emergency departments. After the Delphi consensus analysis, we obtained a ranked list of six psychosocial factors of interprofessional violence for Peru and nine for the regions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>According to the consensus, two of the main psychosocial factors of interprofessional violence in health establishments in the Costa and Forest regions are the devaluation of work and harassment by superiors towards subordinates that induce them to change jobs or resign. Excessive control by colleagues was the first hierarchy for the Sierra region. The differences between geographical regions in Peru and between studies in other countries reflect that the phenomenon of interprofessional violence is very specific and contextual; in the case of Peru the differences between regions may be due to health care facilities with different characteristics (e.g., rural vs. urban facilities).</p>","PeriodicalId":18597,"journal":{"name":"Medwave","volume":"25 2","pages":"2986"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143575803","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}