Michael D Cobler-Lichter, Jessica M Delamater, Talia R Arcieri, Ana M Reyes, Jonathan D Stallings, Vincente S Nelson, Nicholas Namias, Kirby R Gross, Shawn E Boomsma, Mark D Buzzelli, Jennifer Gurney, Kenneth G Proctor, Paul J Wetstein
Introduction: Role 2 (R2) U.S. military treatment facilities provide lifesaving far forward damage control resuscitation and surgery. Given the austere conditions at R2s, infection risk is a major concern. We aimed to evaluate the infection rate after external fixation (EF) in military casualties based on where in the evacuation pathway the EF was performed, hypothesizing that lower-echelon EF would be associated with increased infections.
Materials and methods: The Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DoDTR) was retrospectively reviewed from 2003 to 2024. Non-U.S. military patients, deaths, and burns were excluded. Lower-echelon EF was defined as the first EF performed at R2, or Role 3 (R3) in cases of R2 bypass. Infection was defined as any one of seventeen infectious complications recorded in the DoDTR. We evaluated the independent association of lower-echelon EF on both wound infection (WI) and overall infection using multiple regression.
Results: In 6,115 patients, 2,529 met inclusion criteria, of whom 646 (25.5%) developed postoperative infection. 19.0% of all EFs were placed at R2, 67.7% at R3, 5.4% at Role 4 (R4), and 7.8% at R4-Continental United States (R4c). Overall infection rate after EF was 19.2% for R2, 24.9% for R3, 19.8% for R4, and 38.8% for R4c (25.5% overall). Wound infection was the most common infectious complication at (8.6% after EF at R2, 14.5% for R3, 15.3% for R4, and 24.5% for R4C, 15.2% overall). On adjusted analysis, higher-echelon EF was independently associated with WI and overall infection: adjusted odds ratio of 1.718 (97.5% CI, 1.311-2.250), and 1.514 (97.5% CI, 1.208-1.899), respectively.
Conclusions: For U.S. military casualties, lower-echelon external fixation is associated with decreased infection despite the austere setting. Although this study is unable to elucidate the specific factor(s) responsible for this association, it highlights the need to maintain orthopedic expertise close to point-of-injury and for future work to identify the specific characteristics of either the patients who receive lower-echelon EF, their injuries, or the EFs at the Role 2 and Role 3 facilities themselves that are responsible for this association.
角色2 (R2):美军治疗设施提供挽救生命的远前方损伤控制复苏和手术。鉴于R2s的严峻条件,感染风险是一个主要问题。我们的目的是评估军事伤亡中外固定(EF)后的感染率,基于在疏散路径中进行外固定的位置,假设较低层次的外固定与感染增加有关。材料和方法:对2003年至2024年美国国防部创伤登记处(DoDTR)的数据进行回顾性分析。美国。军人病人、死亡和烧伤被排除在外。低梯队EF被定义为在R2进行的第一次EF,或在R2旁路情况下的角色3 (R3)。感染定义为DoDTR中记录的17种感染并发症中的任何一种。我们使用多元回归评估了低阶EF与伤口感染(WI)和整体感染的独立关联。结果:6115例患者中,2529例符合纳入标准,其中646例(25.5%)发生术后感染。19.0%的EFs位于R2, 67.7%位于R3, 5.4%位于角色4 (R4), 7.8%位于R4- continental United States (R4c)。EF术后R2、R3、R4、R4c的总感染率分别为19.2%、24.9%、19.8%和38.8%(总感染率为25.5%)。伤口感染是最常见的感染并发症(EF R2为8.6%,R3为14.5%,R4为15.3%,R4C为24.5%,总体为15.2%)。在调整分析中,高阶EF与WI和整体感染独立相关:调整优势比分别为1.718 (97.5% CI, 1.311-2.250)和1.514 (97.5% CI, 1.208-1.899)。结论:对于美军伤亡人员,尽管环境严峻,但低梯队外固定与感染减少有关。虽然本研究无法阐明导致这种关联的具体因素,但它强调了保持接近损伤点的骨科专业知识的必要性,并为未来的工作确定接受低层次EF的患者、他们的损伤或角色2和角色3设施的EF本身的具体特征,这些特征都是导致这种关联的原因。
{"title":"Echelon of Care at Time of External Fixation and Infection Risk in Military Combat Casualties.","authors":"Michael D Cobler-Lichter, Jessica M Delamater, Talia R Arcieri, Ana M Reyes, Jonathan D Stallings, Vincente S Nelson, Nicholas Namias, Kirby R Gross, Shawn E Boomsma, Mark D Buzzelli, Jennifer Gurney, Kenneth G Proctor, Paul J Wetstein","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usaf367","DOIUrl":"10.1093/milmed/usaf367","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Role 2 (R2) U.S. military treatment facilities provide lifesaving far forward damage control resuscitation and surgery. Given the austere conditions at R2s, infection risk is a major concern. We aimed to evaluate the infection rate after external fixation (EF) in military casualties based on where in the evacuation pathway the EF was performed, hypothesizing that lower-echelon EF would be associated with increased infections.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DoDTR) was retrospectively reviewed from 2003 to 2024. Non-U.S. military patients, deaths, and burns were excluded. Lower-echelon EF was defined as the first EF performed at R2, or Role 3 (R3) in cases of R2 bypass. Infection was defined as any one of seventeen infectious complications recorded in the DoDTR. We evaluated the independent association of lower-echelon EF on both wound infection (WI) and overall infection using multiple regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 6,115 patients, 2,529 met inclusion criteria, of whom 646 (25.5%) developed postoperative infection. 19.0% of all EFs were placed at R2, 67.7% at R3, 5.4% at Role 4 (R4), and 7.8% at R4-Continental United States (R4c). Overall infection rate after EF was 19.2% for R2, 24.9% for R3, 19.8% for R4, and 38.8% for R4c (25.5% overall). Wound infection was the most common infectious complication at (8.6% after EF at R2, 14.5% for R3, 15.3% for R4, and 24.5% for R4C, 15.2% overall). On adjusted analysis, higher-echelon EF was independently associated with WI and overall infection: adjusted odds ratio of 1.718 (97.5% CI, 1.311-2.250), and 1.514 (97.5% CI, 1.208-1.899), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For U.S. military casualties, lower-echelon external fixation is associated with decreased infection despite the austere setting. Although this study is unable to elucidate the specific factor(s) responsible for this association, it highlights the need to maintain orthopedic expertise close to point-of-injury and for future work to identify the specific characteristics of either the patients who receive lower-echelon EF, their injuries, or the EFs at the Role 2 and Role 3 facilities themselves that are responsible for this association.</p>","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e176-e183"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144708062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ileene Berrios, Philip Castañeda, Brandon M Carius, Cecil J Simmons
Background: Whole blood is commonly used for casualty resuscitation in the prehospital setting. According to the 2021 Committee on Tactical Combat Casualty Care guidelines, whole blood is the preferred fluid for resuscitating casualties with signs of hemorrhagic shock, followed by fresh whole blood (FWB). There is limited literature on soldiers' physical and cognitive performance following donation, particularly regarding their small marksmanship accuracy immediately after 1 unit of FWB donation. Current research on marksmanship accuracy post-FWB donation among military personnel is limited to the Norwegian and Israeli militaries. The lack of Department of Defense clinical practice guidelines restricting soldiers' duties after FWB donation highlights the paucity of data. This study evaluates the effects of FWB donation on U.S. Army conventional soldiers' small marksmanship accuracy and provides quantifiable data for future U.S. Army post-FWB donation guidelines.
Methods: This was a prospective, controlled trial assessing small arms marksmanship accuracy pre- and post-FWB donation with a convenience sample of conventional U.S. Army conventional soldiers, using an indoor Electronic Skill Trainer (EST) simulator. The primary outcome assessed for a difference in small arms marksmanship accuracy following FWB donation. Participants served as their own controls, with baseline marksmanship accuracy testing performed before FWB donation and again immediately after. Secondary outcomes were the participants' pre- and post-FWB donation self-efficacy scores.
Results: Sixteen participants completed small arms marksmanship accuracy testing pre- and post-FWB donation. We found no significant difference in small arms marksmanship accuracy following FWB donation (24.69 vs. 26.32, P = .38). Similarly, we evaluated small arms marksmanship accuracy self-efficacy via a Bandura Scale and found no significant difference between pre-and post-FWB donation (86.25 vs. 85.63, P = .67).
Conclusions: The accuracy of U.S. Army conventional soldiers small arms marksmanship was not significantly different after donating 1 unit of FWB. This study provides data on post-FWB donation marksmanship accuracy, which could inform future guidelines for soldiers returning to duty after donating 1 unit of FWB blood. Larger, comparative studies need to be performed to further investigate soldiers' post-FWB donation marksmanship accuracy.
背景:全血通常用于院前急救。根据2021年战术战斗伤亡护理委员会的指导方针,全血是复苏有失血性休克迹象的伤员的首选液体,其次是新鲜全血。关于捐赠后士兵身体和认知表现的文献有限,特别是关于捐赠1单位FWB后他们的小射击精度。目前在军事人员中对fwb捐赠后枪法精度的研究仅限于挪威和以色列军队。在FWB捐赠后,国防部缺乏限制士兵职责的临床实践指南,这凸显了数据的缺乏。本研究评估了FWB捐赠对美国陆军常规士兵小射击精度的影响,并为未来美国陆军后FWB捐赠指南提供了可量化的数据。方法:这是一项前瞻性对照试验,使用室内电子技能训练器(EST)模拟器,以美国陆军常规士兵为方便样本,评估轻武器射击精度前后的fwb捐赠。主要结果评估了捐赠FWB后轻武器射击精度的差异。参与者作为自己的对照,在FWB捐赠前和捐赠后立即进行基线射击精度测试。次要结果是参与者捐赠fwb前后的自我效能评分。结果:16名参与者完成了捐赠前后轻武器射击精度测试。我们发现捐赠FWB后轻武器射击精度无显著差异(24.69 vs. 26.32, P = .38)。同样,我们通过Bandura量表评估轻武器射击精度自我效能,发现捐赠fwb前后无显著差异(86.25 vs. 85.63, P = 0.67)。结论:捐赠1单位FWB后,美军常规士兵轻武器射击精度无显著差异。本研究提供了FWB献血后枪法精度的数据,可以为未来士兵在捐出1单位FWB血后重返岗位提供指导。需要进行更大规模的比较研究,以进一步调查士兵在fwb捐赠后的射击精度。
{"title":"Small Arms Marksmanship Accuracy Surrounding Fresh Whole Blood Donation in the U.S. Army Conventional Soldier.","authors":"Ileene Berrios, Philip Castañeda, Brandon M Carius, Cecil J Simmons","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usaf402","DOIUrl":"10.1093/milmed/usaf402","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whole blood is commonly used for casualty resuscitation in the prehospital setting. According to the 2021 Committee on Tactical Combat Casualty Care guidelines, whole blood is the preferred fluid for resuscitating casualties with signs of hemorrhagic shock, followed by fresh whole blood (FWB). There is limited literature on soldiers' physical and cognitive performance following donation, particularly regarding their small marksmanship accuracy immediately after 1 unit of FWB donation. Current research on marksmanship accuracy post-FWB donation among military personnel is limited to the Norwegian and Israeli militaries. The lack of Department of Defense clinical practice guidelines restricting soldiers' duties after FWB donation highlights the paucity of data. This study evaluates the effects of FWB donation on U.S. Army conventional soldiers' small marksmanship accuracy and provides quantifiable data for future U.S. Army post-FWB donation guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, controlled trial assessing small arms marksmanship accuracy pre- and post-FWB donation with a convenience sample of conventional U.S. Army conventional soldiers, using an indoor Electronic Skill Trainer (EST) simulator. The primary outcome assessed for a difference in small arms marksmanship accuracy following FWB donation. Participants served as their own controls, with baseline marksmanship accuracy testing performed before FWB donation and again immediately after. Secondary outcomes were the participants' pre- and post-FWB donation self-efficacy scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen participants completed small arms marksmanship accuracy testing pre- and post-FWB donation. We found no significant difference in small arms marksmanship accuracy following FWB donation (24.69 vs. 26.32, P = .38). Similarly, we evaluated small arms marksmanship accuracy self-efficacy via a Bandura Scale and found no significant difference between pre-and post-FWB donation (86.25 vs. 85.63, P = .67).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The accuracy of U.S. Army conventional soldiers small arms marksmanship was not significantly different after donating 1 unit of FWB. This study provides data on post-FWB donation marksmanship accuracy, which could inform future guidelines for soldiers returning to duty after donating 1 unit of FWB blood. Larger, comparative studies need to be performed to further investigate soldiers' post-FWB donation marksmanship accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e248-e253"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144835713","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Daniel T Corry, Anne G Sadler, Michelle A Mengeling, Brian L Cook, Jeffrey L Smith, Alison B Hamilton, Jonathan M Platt, James C Torner
Introduction: Stress from the COVID-19 pandemic may have had a profound impact on the mental health of Reserve and National Guard (RNG) women Veterans, especially if they have a history of traumatic brain injury (TBI). This cross-sectional study aimed to assess the potential mediating effect of stress stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic on the association between TBI and depression symptoms.
Materials and methods: Women RNG Veterans between the ages of 18 and 60 were interviewed about their lifetime history of TBI, symptoms of depression, and any stressful experiences resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. Using interview responses, we utilized exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to approximate COVID-19 stress. We then used the results from EFA in mediation analysis of linear regression models of TBI history on depression. Ethical approval for the study and analyses was obtained from the University of Iowa Institutional Review Board (IRB) (IRB ID #201911171).
Results: We identified 9 items across a 3-factor model ("Stress about Daily Necessities," "Stress about Health," "Increasing Alcohol Use") that approximated COVID-19 stress. Of the 351 women Veterans included in this study, 145 (41.3%) had history of TBI. Those with TBI had more severe symptoms of depression (risk difference: 1.81, 95% CI: 0.41-3.20) than those without TBI. Total COVID-19 stress mediated the association between TBI and symptoms of depression (indirect effect: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.24-1.21; 35.5% mediated). Stress about Daily Necessities alone also mediated the TBI-depression association (indirect effect: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.44-0.84; 34.8% mediated).
Conclusions: Women RNG Veterans with prior TBI reported more severe depression symptoms than those without TBI, and these depression symptoms seem to be exacerbated upon the introduction of stress because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Future research of this complex TBI-stress-depression relationship should be longitudinal in nature, especially as the long-term effects of the COVID-19 pandemic continue to emerge, to understand how events that introduce significant economic and health-related consequences affect how symptoms of depression and responses to stress evolve over time.
{"title":"Pandemic Stress and Mediation of Depression Symptoms After Traumatic Brain Injury in Women Veterans: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Daniel T Corry, Anne G Sadler, Michelle A Mengeling, Brian L Cook, Jeffrey L Smith, Alison B Hamilton, Jonathan M Platt, James C Torner","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usaf391","DOIUrl":"10.1093/milmed/usaf391","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Stress from the COVID-19 pandemic may have had a profound impact on the mental health of Reserve and National Guard (RNG) women Veterans, especially if they have a history of traumatic brain injury (TBI). This cross-sectional study aimed to assess the potential mediating effect of stress stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic on the association between TBI and depression symptoms.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Women RNG Veterans between the ages of 18 and 60 were interviewed about their lifetime history of TBI, symptoms of depression, and any stressful experiences resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. Using interview responses, we utilized exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to approximate COVID-19 stress. We then used the results from EFA in mediation analysis of linear regression models of TBI history on depression. Ethical approval for the study and analyses was obtained from the University of Iowa Institutional Review Board (IRB) (IRB ID #201911171).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 9 items across a 3-factor model (\"Stress about Daily Necessities,\" \"Stress about Health,\" \"Increasing Alcohol Use\") that approximated COVID-19 stress. Of the 351 women Veterans included in this study, 145 (41.3%) had history of TBI. Those with TBI had more severe symptoms of depression (risk difference: 1.81, 95% CI: 0.41-3.20) than those without TBI. Total COVID-19 stress mediated the association between TBI and symptoms of depression (indirect effect: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.24-1.21; 35.5% mediated). Stress about Daily Necessities alone also mediated the TBI-depression association (indirect effect: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.44-0.84; 34.8% mediated).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women RNG Veterans with prior TBI reported more severe depression symptoms than those without TBI, and these depression symptoms seem to be exacerbated upon the introduction of stress because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Future research of this complex TBI-stress-depression relationship should be longitudinal in nature, especially as the long-term effects of the COVID-19 pandemic continue to emerge, to understand how events that introduce significant economic and health-related consequences affect how symptoms of depression and responses to stress evolve over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e310-e318"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144847641","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Loneliness among older adults is a significant public health concern. There is a critical need to develop effective, tailored strategies to combat loneliness that accounts for the diverse nature of older adult populations, including those with unique life experiences, such as Veterans. In order to develop and implement these strategies and meet the specific needs of the diverse older population, the research field requires a comprehensive understanding of the various factors that contribute to loneliness across different subgroups of older adults, including Veterans and civilians. In this study, we aimed to address this research gap by investigating and comparing characteristics associated with loneliness among both older Veterans and civilians.
Materials and methods: In this cross-sectional exploratory study, we used data from the RAND Health and Retirement Study Longitudinal File 2020, derived from the Health and Retirement Study and provided by the RAND Center for the Study of Aging (N = 5,259) to assess and compare characteristics associated with loneliness among older Veterans and civilians. We conducted logistic regression and moderation analyses to investigate associations between demographic, health, health behavior, and psychosocial factors and loneliness.
Results: Our results showed significant positively associations between loneliness and being unmarried/unpartnered, greater depressive symptoms, and greater negative affect for both Veterans and civilians. Similarly, we found significant negative associations between loneliness and greater life satisfaction and positive affect for both subsamples. Our results showed that having health conditions that limit an individual's ability to work was a unique risk factor for loneliness among Veterans. Moderation analyses revealed that the positive association between being unmarried/unpartnered and loneliness and the negative association between rural residence and loneliness were significantly greater for Veterans, as compared to civilians.
Conclusions: Our findings suggest the importance of considering life course perspectives and developing targeted interventions to address loneliness among older adults, particularly Veterans. Future research should focus on longitudinal studies to investigate the effectiveness of such interventions, explore protective factors, and examine the impact of social interventions on reducing loneliness in these populations.
{"title":"Loneliness Factors in Aging Veterans and Civilians: A Comparative Study.","authors":"JoAnn Jabbari, Kyle A Pitzer, Rachael Beard","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usaf389","DOIUrl":"10.1093/milmed/usaf389","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Loneliness among older adults is a significant public health concern. There is a critical need to develop effective, tailored strategies to combat loneliness that accounts for the diverse nature of older adult populations, including those with unique life experiences, such as Veterans. In order to develop and implement these strategies and meet the specific needs of the diverse older population, the research field requires a comprehensive understanding of the various factors that contribute to loneliness across different subgroups of older adults, including Veterans and civilians. In this study, we aimed to address this research gap by investigating and comparing characteristics associated with loneliness among both older Veterans and civilians.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional exploratory study, we used data from the RAND Health and Retirement Study Longitudinal File 2020, derived from the Health and Retirement Study and provided by the RAND Center for the Study of Aging (N = 5,259) to assess and compare characteristics associated with loneliness among older Veterans and civilians. We conducted logistic regression and moderation analyses to investigate associations between demographic, health, health behavior, and psychosocial factors and loneliness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our results showed significant positively associations between loneliness and being unmarried/unpartnered, greater depressive symptoms, and greater negative affect for both Veterans and civilians. Similarly, we found significant negative associations between loneliness and greater life satisfaction and positive affect for both subsamples. Our results showed that having health conditions that limit an individual's ability to work was a unique risk factor for loneliness among Veterans. Moderation analyses revealed that the positive association between being unmarried/unpartnered and loneliness and the negative association between rural residence and loneliness were significantly greater for Veterans, as compared to civilians.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest the importance of considering life course perspectives and developing targeted interventions to address loneliness among older adults, particularly Veterans. Future research should focus on longitudinal studies to investigate the effectiveness of such interventions, explore protective factors, and examine the impact of social interventions on reducing loneliness in these populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e300-e309"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144961166","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nathaniel E Smith, William O'Connell, Rebecca Johnson, George Leonard
Historically, military anatomic pathology (AP) services have been significantly compartmentalized, with each branch independently executing its laboratory support mission. The result is redundant and costly duplication of nearly identical services in close geographic proximity. The duplication of AP services disperses the overall caseload, resulting in pathologist diagnostic acumen atrophy, excessive support personnel requirements, inadequate utilization of subspecialty expertise, and overall lower-quality patient care. Unlike many medical specialties, implementing AP services does not require direct patient interaction and is principally not as time-sensitive as other clinical laboratory testing. The practice of AP is conducive to a more consolidatory paradigm to achieve economies of scale. Pathology service unification would also afford the stationing of predominantly subspecialists at tertiary care centers to handle higher caseloads. Larger groups of pathologists increase patient safety enhancing peer-to-peer and subspeciality quality assurance processes during case review. Conversely, the nature of clinical pathology services requires a more widespread presence-even at the smaller, auxiliary clinics throughout the military health system. Clinical pathology services would also benefit from additional triservice cooperation including standardization of quality management processes, increased resource sharing, exchange, and cooperative contingency planning. Laboratory directorships also benefit from consolidating expertise, where pathologists could be physically located at a central site with remote oversight of laboratory services. Here, we propose a holistic triservice consolidation plan for military pathology to optimize resource utilization and ultimately realize the overarching strategic plan for military medicine set forth by the Defense Health Agency.
{"title":"Holistic Tri-Service Military Pathology: A Proposed Paradigm for Consolidation.","authors":"Nathaniel E Smith, William O'Connell, Rebecca Johnson, George Leonard","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usaf035","DOIUrl":"10.1093/milmed/usaf035","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Historically, military anatomic pathology (AP) services have been significantly compartmentalized, with each branch independently executing its laboratory support mission. The result is redundant and costly duplication of nearly identical services in close geographic proximity. The duplication of AP services disperses the overall caseload, resulting in pathologist diagnostic acumen atrophy, excessive support personnel requirements, inadequate utilization of subspecialty expertise, and overall lower-quality patient care. Unlike many medical specialties, implementing AP services does not require direct patient interaction and is principally not as time-sensitive as other clinical laboratory testing. The practice of AP is conducive to a more consolidatory paradigm to achieve economies of scale. Pathology service unification would also afford the stationing of predominantly subspecialists at tertiary care centers to handle higher caseloads. Larger groups of pathologists increase patient safety enhancing peer-to-peer and subspeciality quality assurance processes during case review. Conversely, the nature of clinical pathology services requires a more widespread presence-even at the smaller, auxiliary clinics throughout the military health system. Clinical pathology services would also benefit from additional triservice cooperation including standardization of quality management processes, increased resource sharing, exchange, and cooperative contingency planning. Laboratory directorships also benefit from consolidating expertise, where pathologists could be physically located at a central site with remote oversight of laboratory services. Here, we propose a holistic triservice consolidation plan for military pathology to optimize resource utilization and ultimately realize the overarching strategic plan for military medicine set forth by the Defense Health Agency.</p>","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"5-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143080582","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Matthew R Beymer, Courtney P Paolicelli, Joanna J Reagan, Shellye A Suttles, Matthew P Rabbitt
Introduction: Military satisfaction is an important determinant for military retention and subsequently military readiness. Military readiness is also impacted by food insecurity, which affected 25% of active duty service members in 2018 and 2020, much higher than the 10% prevalence observed in civilians. The objective of this study is to estimate the association between food insecurity and 3 indicators of satisfaction with military life: active duty service member's overall satisfaction with military life, active duty service member's intent to leave the military, and married active duty service members' perceptions regarding spousal desire to leave the military.
Materials and methods: The 2020 Status of Forces Survey of Active Duty Members is a probability-based sample of all active duty service members in the U.S. Military (n = 12,324). Weighted logistic regressions were used to estimate the associations between food insecurity and retention indicators controlling for observable confounders. This study was approved as public health practice by the Defense Centers for Public Health-Aberdeen.
Results: Respondents with either low food insecurity (adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 1.45; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.18-1.78) or very low food insecurity (AOR: 1.68; 95% CI, 1.30-2.16) had greater odds of dissatisfaction with military way of life compared to food secure respondents. Additionally, very low food security was associated with greater odds of spousal desire to leave the active duty military. Respondents who reported they had lower levels of financial security had lower satisfaction with the military way of life, greater intent to leave the military, and greater spousal desire to leave active duty.
Conclusions: In the present era of an all-volunteer military, novel strategies are needed to recruit and retain service members and their families. Although food insecurity was only associated with overall satisfaction with the military way of life, lower financial security was associated with satisfaction and intent to leave the military. Future studies could determine how financial security, including food insecurity, can be bolstered among active duty service members to increase retention and maintain military readiness.
{"title":"The Association Between Food Security and Military Satisfaction Among a Representative Sample of the Active-Duty United States Military Service Members, 2020.","authors":"Matthew R Beymer, Courtney P Paolicelli, Joanna J Reagan, Shellye A Suttles, Matthew P Rabbitt","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usaf304","DOIUrl":"10.1093/milmed/usaf304","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Military satisfaction is an important determinant for military retention and subsequently military readiness. Military readiness is also impacted by food insecurity, which affected 25% of active duty service members in 2018 and 2020, much higher than the 10% prevalence observed in civilians. The objective of this study is to estimate the association between food insecurity and 3 indicators of satisfaction with military life: active duty service member's overall satisfaction with military life, active duty service member's intent to leave the military, and married active duty service members' perceptions regarding spousal desire to leave the military.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The 2020 Status of Forces Survey of Active Duty Members is a probability-based sample of all active duty service members in the U.S. Military (n = 12,324). Weighted logistic regressions were used to estimate the associations between food insecurity and retention indicators controlling for observable confounders. This study was approved as public health practice by the Defense Centers for Public Health-Aberdeen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents with either low food insecurity (adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 1.45; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.18-1.78) or very low food insecurity (AOR: 1.68; 95% CI, 1.30-2.16) had greater odds of dissatisfaction with military way of life compared to food secure respondents. Additionally, very low food security was associated with greater odds of spousal desire to leave the active duty military. Respondents who reported they had lower levels of financial security had lower satisfaction with the military way of life, greater intent to leave the military, and greater spousal desire to leave active duty.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the present era of an all-volunteer military, novel strategies are needed to recruit and retain service members and their families. Although food insecurity was only associated with overall satisfaction with the military way of life, lower financial security was associated with satisfaction and intent to leave the military. Future studies could determine how financial security, including food insecurity, can be bolstered among active duty service members to increase retention and maintain military readiness.</p>","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e219-e226"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144497487","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Simon Pollett, Brian K Agan, Andrew G Letizia, Stephanie A Richard, Chad Porter, Nusrat J Epsi, Mark Haigney, David Saunders, Rhonda Colombo, Timothy H Burgess, Michael Morris, David R Tribble, Christina La Croix, Milissa Jones, Robert J O'Connell
Introduction: This narrative review highlights the impact and epidemiology of post-COVID conditions (PCC, 'Long COVID') in military service members and beneficiaries, characterizing the threat of Long COVID to military readiness. We leveraged this review to propose a Long COVID research road map for Military Health System (MHS)-based studies, identifying key questions and knowledge gaps that the Department of Defense research enterprise is well-positioned to address.
Materials and methods: We searched MEDLINE (PubMed) in addition to MHS conference abstracts and websites, bibliographies of relevant published articles and https://clinicaltrials.gov/.
Results: Multiple studies in U.S., U.K., and European military service members have noted medically attended and patient reported post-acute sequelae and symptoms across the domains of cardiorespiratory, neurocognitive, and mental health. Studies have also noted an association with SARS-CoV-2 infection and fitness in young adult service members, but the ongoing prevalence, morbidity, and functional impact of Long COVID in military populations in the current era remains unclear. All identified studies have limitations.
Conclusions: Considerable research has been conducted to understand the risk of and risk factors associated with Long COVID in active duty, much in the earlier pandemic period. Future research priorities include establishing Long COVID definitions most relevant to active duty personnel and conducting studies to delineate, treat, and prevent Long COVID's impact on cognitive, cardiorespiratory, and overall health and fitness for duty. Many considerations in this review article may also apply to post-acute sequelae from other infectious diseases, which pose risks to military health and readiness, including future respiratory virus pandemics.
{"title":"Long COVID and the Military: A Current Research Landscape, Knowledge Gaps, and Future Directions.","authors":"Simon Pollett, Brian K Agan, Andrew G Letizia, Stephanie A Richard, Chad Porter, Nusrat J Epsi, Mark Haigney, David Saunders, Rhonda Colombo, Timothy H Burgess, Michael Morris, David R Tribble, Christina La Croix, Milissa Jones, Robert J O'Connell","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usaf343","DOIUrl":"10.1093/milmed/usaf343","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This narrative review highlights the impact and epidemiology of post-COVID conditions (PCC, 'Long COVID') in military service members and beneficiaries, characterizing the threat of Long COVID to military readiness. We leveraged this review to propose a Long COVID research road map for Military Health System (MHS)-based studies, identifying key questions and knowledge gaps that the Department of Defense research enterprise is well-positioned to address.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE (PubMed) in addition to MHS conference abstracts and websites, bibliographies of relevant published articles and https://clinicaltrials.gov/.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multiple studies in U.S., U.K., and European military service members have noted medically attended and patient reported post-acute sequelae and symptoms across the domains of cardiorespiratory, neurocognitive, and mental health. Studies have also noted an association with SARS-CoV-2 infection and fitness in young adult service members, but the ongoing prevalence, morbidity, and functional impact of Long COVID in military populations in the current era remains unclear. All identified studies have limitations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Considerable research has been conducted to understand the risk of and risk factors associated with Long COVID in active duty, much in the earlier pandemic period. Future research priorities include establishing Long COVID definitions most relevant to active duty personnel and conducting studies to delineate, treat, and prevent Long COVID's impact on cognitive, cardiorespiratory, and overall health and fitness for duty. Many considerations in this review article may also apply to post-acute sequelae from other infectious diseases, which pose risks to military health and readiness, including future respiratory virus pandemics.</p>","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e102-e110"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144765085","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alison L Drew, Huidi Yang, Kimberly A Rhoades, Amy M Smith Slep, Richard E Heyman
<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) requires the implementation of evidence-based behavioral health interventions (EBIs) to prevent harmful behaviors such as suicide, harassment, sexual assault, and partner and child abuse. However, EBI sustainment with fidelity over time is a tremendous challenge, and a failure to do so limits the potential impact of these EBIs. Although implementation science theories and empirical research have identified determinants of EBI sustainment in the civilian context, unique aspects of the military social ecology likely influence sustainment in this context. Building on our prior leader interviews, this study examines program implementers' perspectives on factors influencing military behavioral health EBI sustainment. The combined perspectives of leaders and implementers will inform a military-specific model for implementing and sustaining behavioral health EBIs that can then be empirically tested.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted focus groups with 24 implementers representing 5 behavioral health EBIs currently implemented in the U.S. Military: 4 evidence-based sexual assault prevention programs and 1 longstanding, evidence-based suicide prevention program. We conducted a multi-step thematic analysis to identify supports and impediments to sustaining EBIs, organized by levels of the social ecology. Themes were organized using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: outer setting (DoD, Congress, service, major command), inner setting (installation, service agency), characteristics of individuals (implementers, end users), and innovation characteristics. The New York University Institutional Review Board reviewed and approved the study (IRB-FY2020-4345), and the U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command Human Research Protections Office provided concurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants identified socioecological supports and impediments to sustaining EBIs in the military context and described how factors at the outer levels of the social ecology influence implementers' and end users' experiences. They noted the importance of (1) choosing EBIs that have been evaluated in a military context and have support from leaders in the outer and inner settings, and (2) implementation by an educated and trained workforce. Notably, aspects of military culture (e.g., hierarchical structure, frequent moves, mission focus, mandated participation) can both support and challenge the implementation of behavioral health EBIs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prevention implementers confirmed leadership-identified military-specific social-ecological factors influencing behavioral health EBI fidelity and sustainability, while providing unique, on-the-ground insights into implementer and end-user experiences. The study's results reinforce the need for implementation scientists to use a military-informed model to understand the determinan
{"title":"Behavioral Health Implementers' Perspectives on Facilitators and Barriers to Sustaining Evidence-Based Prevention Interventions in the U.S. Military.","authors":"Alison L Drew, Huidi Yang, Kimberly A Rhoades, Amy M Smith Slep, Richard E Heyman","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usaf397","DOIUrl":"10.1093/milmed/usaf397","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) requires the implementation of evidence-based behavioral health interventions (EBIs) to prevent harmful behaviors such as suicide, harassment, sexual assault, and partner and child abuse. However, EBI sustainment with fidelity over time is a tremendous challenge, and a failure to do so limits the potential impact of these EBIs. Although implementation science theories and empirical research have identified determinants of EBI sustainment in the civilian context, unique aspects of the military social ecology likely influence sustainment in this context. Building on our prior leader interviews, this study examines program implementers' perspectives on factors influencing military behavioral health EBI sustainment. The combined perspectives of leaders and implementers will inform a military-specific model for implementing and sustaining behavioral health EBIs that can then be empirically tested.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted focus groups with 24 implementers representing 5 behavioral health EBIs currently implemented in the U.S. Military: 4 evidence-based sexual assault prevention programs and 1 longstanding, evidence-based suicide prevention program. We conducted a multi-step thematic analysis to identify supports and impediments to sustaining EBIs, organized by levels of the social ecology. Themes were organized using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: outer setting (DoD, Congress, service, major command), inner setting (installation, service agency), characteristics of individuals (implementers, end users), and innovation characteristics. The New York University Institutional Review Board reviewed and approved the study (IRB-FY2020-4345), and the U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command Human Research Protections Office provided concurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants identified socioecological supports and impediments to sustaining EBIs in the military context and described how factors at the outer levels of the social ecology influence implementers' and end users' experiences. They noted the importance of (1) choosing EBIs that have been evaluated in a military context and have support from leaders in the outer and inner settings, and (2) implementation by an educated and trained workforce. Notably, aspects of military culture (e.g., hierarchical structure, frequent moves, mission focus, mandated participation) can both support and challenge the implementation of behavioral health EBIs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prevention implementers confirmed leadership-identified military-specific social-ecological factors influencing behavioral health EBI fidelity and sustainability, while providing unique, on-the-ground insights into implementer and end-user experiences. The study's results reinforce the need for implementation scientists to use a military-informed model to understand the determinan","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e338-e345"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144835706","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tammie M Jones, Amanda L Haberstroh, Andrea E Crunkhorn
Introduction: An estimated 5.6 million individuals in the U.S. experience limb loss and absence, but national estimates exclude Military Health System (MHS) beneficiaries. The purpose of this study is to characterize MHS beneficiaries with limb loss and absence and estimate incidence and prevalence.
Material and methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the MHS Information Platform. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the study population, including demographics, level of limb loss and absence, and etiology. Bivariate analyses between demographic characteristics and level of limb loss were conducted using analysis of variance and chi-square tests. The sample includes MHS beneficiaries diagnosed with limb loss or absence from 2005 to 2023. The study was determined exempt human subjects research by the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences Institutional Review Board.
Results: The cohort (118,587) was 64.6% male and 35.4% female, with mean age 58 years (SD = 23.4). Racial distribution included 49.8% White, 6.4% Black, and approximately 42.1% other or unknown. Service branches were Army (41.0%), Air Force (26.7%), Navy (19.7%), Marine Corps (7.0%), other (3.9%), Coast Guard (1.7%), and Space Force (0%). The majority were retired (46.2%) or other (32.0%), with a smaller portion active duty (12.0%) and dependents (9.9%). Levels of limb loss were 72% lower limb, 26.1% upper limb, and 2% unspecified. Causes included acquired absence (53.8%), traumatic amputation (34%), and congenital absence (12.1%). Bivariate analysis showed significant associations between demographics and limb loss levels (P = .000). Incidence (z = -2.43, P = .015) and prevalence (z = -13.69, P = .000) rates declined over 19 and 8 years, respectively.
Conclusion: This study highlights demographic characteristics, causes, and declining rates of limb loss and absence among MHS beneficiaries, providing a foundation for future research and informing clinical practices and policies to enhance care and resource allocation.
导读:估计有560万人在美国经历肢体丧失和缺失,但国家估计不包括军事卫生系统(MHS)受益人。本研究的目的是描述MHS受益人肢体丧失和缺失的特征,并估计发病率和患病率。材料和方法:我们使用来自MHS信息平台的数据进行了一项回顾性队列研究。描述性统计用于描述研究人群的特征,包括人口统计学、肢体丧失和缺失水平以及病因。采用方差分析和卡方检验对人口学特征和肢体丧失水平进行双变量分析。样本包括2005年至2023年被诊断为肢体丧失或缺失的MHS受益人。该研究被卫生科学统一服务大学机构审查委员会确定为豁免人体受试者研究。结果:该队列(118,587)男性占64.6%,女性占35.4%,平均年龄58岁(SD = 23.4)。种族分布包括49.8%的白人,6.4%的黑人,约42.1%的其他或未知人种。军种为陆军(41.0%)、空军(26.7%)、海军(19.7%)、海军陆战队(7.0%)、其他(3.9%)、海岸警卫队(1.7%)和太空部队(0%)。大多数是退休人员(46.2%)或其他人员(32.0%),少部分是现役人员(12.0%)和家属(9.9%)。肢体丧失的程度为下肢72%,上肢26.1%,未明确的2%。病因包括后天性缺失(53.8%)、外伤性截肢(34%)和先天性缺失(12.1%)。双变量分析显示,人口统计学与肢体丧失水平之间存在显著关联(P = 0.000)。发病率(z = -2.43, P =。015)和患病率(z = -13.69, P =。000)的比率分别在19年和8年内下降。结论:本研究突出了MHS受益人中肢体丧失和缺位率的人口统计学特征、原因和下降趋势,为未来的研究奠定了基础,并为临床实践和政策提供了信息,以加强护理和资源配置。
{"title":"Characterizing Limb Loss and Absence in Military Health System Beneficiaries: Demographics, Causes, and Trends (2005-2023).","authors":"Tammie M Jones, Amanda L Haberstroh, Andrea E Crunkhorn","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usaf386","DOIUrl":"10.1093/milmed/usaf386","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>An estimated 5.6 million individuals in the U.S. experience limb loss and absence, but national estimates exclude Military Health System (MHS) beneficiaries. The purpose of this study is to characterize MHS beneficiaries with limb loss and absence and estimate incidence and prevalence.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the MHS Information Platform. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the study population, including demographics, level of limb loss and absence, and etiology. Bivariate analyses between demographic characteristics and level of limb loss were conducted using analysis of variance and chi-square tests. The sample includes MHS beneficiaries diagnosed with limb loss or absence from 2005 to 2023. The study was determined exempt human subjects research by the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences Institutional Review Board.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort (118,587) was 64.6% male and 35.4% female, with mean age 58 years (SD = 23.4). Racial distribution included 49.8% White, 6.4% Black, and approximately 42.1% other or unknown. Service branches were Army (41.0%), Air Force (26.7%), Navy (19.7%), Marine Corps (7.0%), other (3.9%), Coast Guard (1.7%), and Space Force (0%). The majority were retired (46.2%) or other (32.0%), with a smaller portion active duty (12.0%) and dependents (9.9%). Levels of limb loss were 72% lower limb, 26.1% upper limb, and 2% unspecified. Causes included acquired absence (53.8%), traumatic amputation (34%), and congenital absence (12.1%). Bivariate analysis showed significant associations between demographics and limb loss levels (P = .000). Incidence (z = -2.43, P = .015) and prevalence (z = -13.69, P = .000) rates declined over 19 and 8 years, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights demographic characteristics, causes, and declining rates of limb loss and absence among MHS beneficiaries, providing a foundation for future research and informing clinical practices and policies to enhance care and resource allocation.</p>","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e388-e395"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145008385","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Darshan Thota, David Alt, Jacob Cole, Vi Song Tring
Introduction: Generating clinical narrative summaries is a critical use case for the Military Health System. This study evaluates the performance of detailed versus vague prompts in generating summaries that yield accurate, bias-free, and meaningful outputs.
Materials and methods: Eight anonymized large language models (LLMs) were evaluated by volunteer clinicians for clinical narrative summary generation from October through November of 2024. Eight clinical scenarios were presented to each model with structured and vague prompt variations, and the responses were evaluated for conformance, task adequacy, hallucinations, and bias.
Results: Both approaches were comparable in conforming to instructions (64%). The structured approach was more likely to produce a clinically adequate summary (39% compared to 9%) but also more likely to introduce hallucinations and bias.
Discussion: The structured prompt, following best practices for prompt engineering, produced a superior response but was prone to hallucinations. This could be mitigated with additional tuning. None of the models tested reliably produced clinically usable summaries.
Conclusion: Efficient generation of clinical summaries is critical for the Military Health System. Using a structured prompt that employs role, task, tone, and format increases the output quality. Institutions seeking to use LLMs to summarize clinical notes may have more success with a structured approach but need to be cautious in ensuring the summary itself is true to its source documents.
{"title":"Prompting Pro Tips! Best Practices for Generating Clinical Narrative Summaries.","authors":"Darshan Thota, David Alt, Jacob Cole, Vi Song Tring","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usaf247","DOIUrl":"10.1093/milmed/usaf247","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Generating clinical narrative summaries is a critical use case for the Military Health System. This study evaluates the performance of detailed versus vague prompts in generating summaries that yield accurate, bias-free, and meaningful outputs.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Eight anonymized large language models (LLMs) were evaluated by volunteer clinicians for clinical narrative summary generation from October through November of 2024. Eight clinical scenarios were presented to each model with structured and vague prompt variations, and the responses were evaluated for conformance, task adequacy, hallucinations, and bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both approaches were comparable in conforming to instructions (64%). The structured approach was more likely to produce a clinically adequate summary (39% compared to 9%) but also more likely to introduce hallucinations and bias.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The structured prompt, following best practices for prompt engineering, produced a superior response but was prone to hallucinations. This could be mitigated with additional tuning. None of the models tested reliably produced clinically usable summaries.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Efficient generation of clinical summaries is critical for the Military Health System. Using a structured prompt that employs role, task, tone, and format increases the output quality. Institutions seeking to use LLMs to summarize clinical notes may have more success with a structured approach but need to be cautious in ensuring the summary itself is true to its source documents.</p>","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e445-e448"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144192015","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}