Étienne Sence, Magali Billhot, Wanda Gaspard, Jean-Noel Lorenzi, Anne-Pierre Dubourdieu, Vincent Foissaud, Christine Bernard, Marc Aletti, Caroline Doutrelon
Introduction: Tuberculosis (TB) remains a leading cause of death from infectious diseases worldwide. Military personnel are particularly vulnerable to TB because of the factors like deployments to endemic regions and close-quarters living. This study aims to compare the characteristics and outcomes of symptomatic TB cases between military and civilian patients treated at 2 French military hospitals, with a specific focus on diagnostic delay.
Materials and methods: This retrospective observational study included patients over 18 years old with culture-confirmed symptomatic TB treated between 2008 and 2021. Military patients (Group A) were compared to civilian patients (Group B), matched by age and sex. Data collected included demographic details, diagnostic delay, clinical presentations, and treatment outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed using chi-squared tests and Mann-Whitney tests, with significance set at P < .05.
Results: A total of 17 military and 38 civilian patients were included in the study. The median diagnostic delay was shorter for military patients at 49 days, compared to 64 days for civilians, although this difference was not statistically significant (P = .42). In the military group, 59% had been deployed to TB endemic regions, with 35% showing symptoms during operational missions. Clinical presentations and microbiological findings were similar between the two groups. Notably, two military patients were infected with Mycobacterium canettii, likely linked to deployments in Djibouti, where this strain is endemic. The military population showed a significant burden of physical sequelae, with 25% experiencing lasting physical impairments post-treatment.
Conclusion: Tuberculosis presentation and outcomes in military and civilian patients were generally comparable. Early diagnosis remains essential to minimize disease severity and operational impact, particularly in military settings.
{"title":"Comparison of Tuberculosis Cases in Military Personnel Versus Civilians: A Retrospective Descriptive Study.","authors":"Étienne Sence, Magali Billhot, Wanda Gaspard, Jean-Noel Lorenzi, Anne-Pierre Dubourdieu, Vincent Foissaud, Christine Bernard, Marc Aletti, Caroline Doutrelon","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usae503","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usae503","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Tuberculosis (TB) remains a leading cause of death from infectious diseases worldwide. Military personnel are particularly vulnerable to TB because of the factors like deployments to endemic regions and close-quarters living. This study aims to compare the characteristics and outcomes of symptomatic TB cases between military and civilian patients treated at 2 French military hospitals, with a specific focus on diagnostic delay.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study included patients over 18 years old with culture-confirmed symptomatic TB treated between 2008 and 2021. Military patients (Group A) were compared to civilian patients (Group B), matched by age and sex. Data collected included demographic details, diagnostic delay, clinical presentations, and treatment outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed using chi-squared tests and Mann-Whitney tests, with significance set at P < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 17 military and 38 civilian patients were included in the study. The median diagnostic delay was shorter for military patients at 49 days, compared to 64 days for civilians, although this difference was not statistically significant (P = .42). In the military group, 59% had been deployed to TB endemic regions, with 35% showing symptoms during operational missions. Clinical presentations and microbiological findings were similar between the two groups. Notably, two military patients were infected with Mycobacterium canettii, likely linked to deployments in Djibouti, where this strain is endemic. The military population showed a significant burden of physical sequelae, with 25% experiencing lasting physical impairments post-treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tuberculosis presentation and outcomes in military and civilian patients were generally comparable. Early diagnosis remains essential to minimize disease severity and operational impact, particularly in military settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142546373","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Suhair Hussni Al-Ghabeesh, Gusoon Al-Taamraha, Hasan Abualruz
Introduction: Military trauma has a significant impact on soldiers, affecting many aspects of their lives, with the highest impact on their quality of life and psychological wellness. This study aimed to measure psychological distress and its relationship with the quality of life among Jordanian military trauma patients.
Materials and methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in The Hashemite Protection Departments for military causalities in Amman, Irbid, and Al-Karuk. The authors used the WHO Quality of Life Scale-Brief and Trauma Symptoms Checklist-40 scales for assessing the quality of life and psychological distress among Jordanian military trauma patients. A total of 145 trauma survivors participated in the study and responded to all questionnaires out of 173 distributed. The study was approved by the institutional review board of Al-Zaytoonah University.
Results: The result of this study revealed that military trauma survivors had high levels of psychological distress with a mean of 85.66 (SD = 19.418). The subscale of "Dissociation symptoms" had the highest rating (M = 19.92, SD = 5.096), while the "sleep disorders" subscale had the lowest rating (M = 10.000, SD = 3.501). On the quality of life scale, a moderate level of quality of life resulted among the participants with a mean of 61.620 (SD = 17.190). The "general health" subscale scored the highest among the other domains (M = 18.241, SD = 5.434), while the "physical health" domain scored the lowest (M = 4.910, SD = 2.078). Furthermore, a statistically significant negative relationship between psychological distress and quality of life was reported (r =-0.178, P < .05).
Conclusion: Jordanian injured military persons had a moderate quality of life level and high level of psychological distress. A structured follow-up program is required to be developed to improve those patients' health and quality of life. Furthermore, additional research is needed to investigate the impact of military trauma and services on soldiers in Jordan and the Middle East.
{"title":"Psychological Distress and Quality of Life Among Military Trauma Patients.","authors":"Suhair Hussni Al-Ghabeesh, Gusoon Al-Taamraha, Hasan Abualruz","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usae502","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usae502","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Military trauma has a significant impact on soldiers, affecting many aspects of their lives, with the highest impact on their quality of life and psychological wellness. This study aimed to measure psychological distress and its relationship with the quality of life among Jordanian military trauma patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in The Hashemite Protection Departments for military causalities in Amman, Irbid, and Al-Karuk. The authors used the WHO Quality of Life Scale-Brief and Trauma Symptoms Checklist-40 scales for assessing the quality of life and psychological distress among Jordanian military trauma patients. A total of 145 trauma survivors participated in the study and responded to all questionnaires out of 173 distributed. The study was approved by the institutional review board of Al-Zaytoonah University.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The result of this study revealed that military trauma survivors had high levels of psychological distress with a mean of 85.66 (SD = 19.418). The subscale of \"Dissociation symptoms\" had the highest rating (M = 19.92, SD = 5.096), while the \"sleep disorders\" subscale had the lowest rating (M = 10.000, SD = 3.501). On the quality of life scale, a moderate level of quality of life resulted among the participants with a mean of 61.620 (SD = 17.190). The \"general health\" subscale scored the highest among the other domains (M = 18.241, SD = 5.434), while the \"physical health\" domain scored the lowest (M = 4.910, SD = 2.078). Furthermore, a statistically significant negative relationship between psychological distress and quality of life was reported (r =-0.178, P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Jordanian injured military persons had a moderate quality of life level and high level of psychological distress. A structured follow-up program is required to be developed to improve those patients' health and quality of life. Furthermore, additional research is needed to investigate the impact of military trauma and services on soldiers in Jordan and the Middle East.</p>","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142522405","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
A 39 year-old female with a history of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass underwent emergent partial colectomy. Her postoperative analgesic management of a transversus abdominus plane block administered with a combination of bupivacaine and liposomal bupivacaine was ineffective. A bupivacaine thoracic epidural was then placed, which provided significant pain relief. This use of a bupivacaine thoracic epidural infusion following liposomal bupivacaine regional anesthesia demonstrated a case of effective analgesia without the development of local anesthetic systemic toxicity symptoms in a remote hospital setting, where certain laboratory analyses were not readily available.
{"title":"Thoracic Epidural and Analgesic Options After Failed Transversus Abdominus Plane Block With Liposomal Bupivacaine.","authors":"Kevin T Cohen, Matthew I Lee","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usae470","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usae470","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A 39 year-old female with a history of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass underwent emergent partial colectomy. Her postoperative analgesic management of a transversus abdominus plane block administered with a combination of bupivacaine and liposomal bupivacaine was ineffective. A bupivacaine thoracic epidural was then placed, which provided significant pain relief. This use of a bupivacaine thoracic epidural infusion following liposomal bupivacaine regional anesthesia demonstrated a case of effective analgesia without the development of local anesthetic systemic toxicity symptoms in a remote hospital setting, where certain laboratory analyses were not readily available.</p>","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142522406","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Michael W Struthers, Amar Kosaraju, Kraig S Vandewalle
Introduction: A core objective of U.S. medical services is to ensure the medical and dental readiness of military personnel. Oral diseases, resulting in pain, infection, or functional impairment, greatly affect the operational effectiveness of military personnel. This study aimed to compare the current causes of dental emergencies and the rates of dental disease nonbattle injuries in a deployed setting with those documented in previous research. Additionally, the study sought to determine if these rates have decreased because of preventive measures or potential improvements in overall oral health.
Methods: Each soldier reporting to the health facility for dental care was screened by a dentist to determine the presence of a dental emergency. The reason for seeking care was classified into 1 of 7 categories and the rate of dental emergencies per 1,000 military members per calendar year was calculated.
Results: The majority of emergencies (38.60%) were due to tooth fractures and/or caries. The second most common reason for visiting the dental clinic was pain from a tooth requiring endodontic therapy (16.81%). This was followed by musculoskeletal or nonendodontic tooth pain (16.10%), most often associated with stress. Periodontal issues accounted for 14.33% of emergencies. Teeth requiring extraction made up 7.16% of all emergencies, prosthodontic bonding complications accounted for 5.16%, and orthodontic bonding complications affected 1.84% of individuals. The dental disease nonbattle injuries rates determined from the current study were 154 emergencies per 1,000 personnel per year for Air Force members and 264 emergencies per 1,000 personnel per year for Army members, which align with previous research findings.
Conclusions: The results of this study confirm that dental emergencies continue to be a threat to overall readiness in deployed environments. The primary etiologic factor in the current study was as a result of tooth fracture and/or caries.
{"title":"Dental Emergency Rates at an Expeditionary Medical Facility Supporting Operation Inherent Resolve.","authors":"Michael W Struthers, Amar Kosaraju, Kraig S Vandewalle","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usae505","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usae505","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A core objective of U.S. medical services is to ensure the medical and dental readiness of military personnel. Oral diseases, resulting in pain, infection, or functional impairment, greatly affect the operational effectiveness of military personnel. This study aimed to compare the current causes of dental emergencies and the rates of dental disease nonbattle injuries in a deployed setting with those documented in previous research. Additionally, the study sought to determine if these rates have decreased because of preventive measures or potential improvements in overall oral health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Each soldier reporting to the health facility for dental care was screened by a dentist to determine the presence of a dental emergency. The reason for seeking care was classified into 1 of 7 categories and the rate of dental emergencies per 1,000 military members per calendar year was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of emergencies (38.60%) were due to tooth fractures and/or caries. The second most common reason for visiting the dental clinic was pain from a tooth requiring endodontic therapy (16.81%). This was followed by musculoskeletal or nonendodontic tooth pain (16.10%), most often associated with stress. Periodontal issues accounted for 14.33% of emergencies. Teeth requiring extraction made up 7.16% of all emergencies, prosthodontic bonding complications accounted for 5.16%, and orthodontic bonding complications affected 1.84% of individuals. The dental disease nonbattle injuries rates determined from the current study were 154 emergencies per 1,000 personnel per year for Air Force members and 264 emergencies per 1,000 personnel per year for Army members, which align with previous research findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study confirm that dental emergencies continue to be a threat to overall readiness in deployed environments. The primary etiologic factor in the current study was as a result of tooth fracture and/or caries.</p>","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142522403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jordan Lachaux, Quentin Vuillemin, Emilie Savatier, Maxime Duval, Thomas Colléony, Pierre-Éric Schwartzbrod
Juvenile spring eruption is a sun-related skin eruption primarily affecting boys or young adult males. The pathophysiology is unknown, but there appears to be a link with sun exposure in cold weather. It can cause small outbreaks, particularly in groups of children or young adults. The primary lesions can be pruritic erythema, with or without associated papules, vesicles, or bullae. They are notable for almost exclusively affecting the ears. Spontaneous healing occurs within a few days without leaving scars. We report an outbreak and 2 sporadic cases that occurred at the Valdahon military camp in France between 2021 and 2024 among military personnel.
{"title":"Juvenile Spring Eruption: A Report on an Outbreak and 2 Sporadic Cases in French Military Personnel.","authors":"Jordan Lachaux, Quentin Vuillemin, Emilie Savatier, Maxime Duval, Thomas Colléony, Pierre-Éric Schwartzbrod","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usae501","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usae501","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Juvenile spring eruption is a sun-related skin eruption primarily affecting boys or young adult males. The pathophysiology is unknown, but there appears to be a link with sun exposure in cold weather. It can cause small outbreaks, particularly in groups of children or young adults. The primary lesions can be pruritic erythema, with or without associated papules, vesicles, or bullae. They are notable for almost exclusively affecting the ears. Spontaneous healing occurs within a few days without leaving scars. We report an outbreak and 2 sporadic cases that occurred at the Valdahon military camp in France between 2021 and 2024 among military personnel.</p>","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142522404","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Military medical students participate in a separate residency match program, distinct from their civilian counterparts. There is limited information regarding factors that applicants find important when selecting a residency program in Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics (GSO). We aimed to identify factors that influence applicant program selection.
Materials and methods: A voluntary, anonymous, 45-question survey was distributed to military candidates pursuing GSO residency training in the fall of 2023. Participants were asked to rate the factors they considered most important when ranking residency programs.
Results: Thirty-seven of the sixty (61.7%) applicants completed the survey. The culture of the residency program was deemed "important" by most participants (94.6%), followed by surgical volume (70.3%) and obstetric volume (70.3%). When asked to rank selection factors, the culture of the residency program, geographic location, and surgical volume were among the top 5 influential factors for the majority of applicants. Participants considered the following factors "not important": Salary (military pay versus civilian salary) (43.2%), research opportunities (32.4%), and availability of abortion training (21.6%). Most military applicants (62.2%) stated that abortion restrictions would not affect program selection, while 37.8% reported that this would affect their rankings.
Conclusions: Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics military applicants deemed the residency program's culture, surgical volume, and obstetrical volume to be the most important factors impacting residency program selection. Residency programs can use these findings to promote program strengths, improve program shortfalls, and guide applicant recruitment.
{"title":"What Military Applicants Value When Choosing a Residency in Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics.","authors":"Judith Makenzie Mathess, Kristina Karlson, Lindsay Chatfield, Katerina Shvartsman","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usae472","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usae472","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Military medical students participate in a separate residency match program, distinct from their civilian counterparts. There is limited information regarding factors that applicants find important when selecting a residency program in Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics (GSO). We aimed to identify factors that influence applicant program selection.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A voluntary, anonymous, 45-question survey was distributed to military candidates pursuing GSO residency training in the fall of 2023. Participants were asked to rate the factors they considered most important when ranking residency programs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-seven of the sixty (61.7%) applicants completed the survey. The culture of the residency program was deemed \"important\" by most participants (94.6%), followed by surgical volume (70.3%) and obstetric volume (70.3%). When asked to rank selection factors, the culture of the residency program, geographic location, and surgical volume were among the top 5 influential factors for the majority of applicants. Participants considered the following factors \"not important\": Salary (military pay versus civilian salary) (43.2%), research opportunities (32.4%), and availability of abortion training (21.6%). Most military applicants (62.2%) stated that abortion restrictions would not affect program selection, while 37.8% reported that this would affect their rankings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics military applicants deemed the residency program's culture, surgical volume, and obstetrical volume to be the most important factors impacting residency program selection. Residency programs can use these findings to promote program strengths, improve program shortfalls, and guide applicant recruitment.</p>","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142504023","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kelly J Buckshire, Kraig A Vandewalle, Jisuk Park, Scott P Irwin
<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Clinical decision-making varies among dentists. However, the literature is limited and narrow in scope regarding the variation between public and private sector dentists. Because both types of dentists' decisions can directly influence military dental readiness, it is important to understand the potential differences in diagnosis, treatment planning, and the delivery of care. The purpose of this pilot study was to compare treatment planning recommendations between civilian and military providers.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patient-level data from the 2018 Recruit Surveillance, a stratified, cross-sectional study of 1,208 randomly selected U.S. Air Force recruits, were used to evaluate treatment planning outcomes for the 2 provider groups (2 civilians; seven military providers). Treatment planning outcomes included type of noninvasive, operative, and oral surgery treatment recommended, temporomandibular disorder referrals, and orthodontic referrals. Patient demographic variables included age, gender, education, race/ethnicity, and military component ("status"). Data were examined both at the tooth level and patient level for statistical significance. Multivariate analyses were performed with statistically significant variables included in each final model for patient-level data. Data were analyzed with logistic regression and Poisson regression (alpha = 0.05). Bivariate logistic regression analyses were performed for tooth-level data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences were found between military and civilian dentists' treatment planning decisions (P < .05) for both patient-level and tooth-level data. Adjusted for significant bivariate predictors of patient demographics at the patient level, civilian dentists were more likely to refer patients for orthodontic treatment, prescribe remineralization for sound tooth surfaces, incipient caries, and carious teeth, and prescribe direct restorations for teeth with 3 to 5 carious surfaces instead of single crowns compared to military dentists. Additionally, civilian dentists were less likely to prescribe sealants for sound tooth surfaces or carious teeth. No statistically significant difference in treatment planning outcomes was observed between civilian and military dentists for sealants for incipient caries, single crowns, or extraction of third molars. At the tooth level, civilian dentists were more likely to prescribe remineralization for sound tooth surfaces, remineralization instead of sealants for carious surfaces, and extraction of third molars. No statistically significant differences were noted between civilian and military providers for recommending sealant or remineralization for teeth with incipient caries or prescribing a single crown versus placing a direct restoration on posterior teeth with 3 to 5 carious surfaces.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant differences in treatment planning outcomes between civi
{"title":"Comparing Military and Civilian Dentists' Treatment Planning Decisions: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Kelly J Buckshire, Kraig A Vandewalle, Jisuk Park, Scott P Irwin","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usae491","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usae491","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Clinical decision-making varies among dentists. However, the literature is limited and narrow in scope regarding the variation between public and private sector dentists. Because both types of dentists' decisions can directly influence military dental readiness, it is important to understand the potential differences in diagnosis, treatment planning, and the delivery of care. The purpose of this pilot study was to compare treatment planning recommendations between civilian and military providers.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patient-level data from the 2018 Recruit Surveillance, a stratified, cross-sectional study of 1,208 randomly selected U.S. Air Force recruits, were used to evaluate treatment planning outcomes for the 2 provider groups (2 civilians; seven military providers). Treatment planning outcomes included type of noninvasive, operative, and oral surgery treatment recommended, temporomandibular disorder referrals, and orthodontic referrals. Patient demographic variables included age, gender, education, race/ethnicity, and military component (\"status\"). Data were examined both at the tooth level and patient level for statistical significance. Multivariate analyses were performed with statistically significant variables included in each final model for patient-level data. Data were analyzed with logistic regression and Poisson regression (alpha = 0.05). Bivariate logistic regression analyses were performed for tooth-level data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences were found between military and civilian dentists' treatment planning decisions (P < .05) for both patient-level and tooth-level data. Adjusted for significant bivariate predictors of patient demographics at the patient level, civilian dentists were more likely to refer patients for orthodontic treatment, prescribe remineralization for sound tooth surfaces, incipient caries, and carious teeth, and prescribe direct restorations for teeth with 3 to 5 carious surfaces instead of single crowns compared to military dentists. Additionally, civilian dentists were less likely to prescribe sealants for sound tooth surfaces or carious teeth. No statistically significant difference in treatment planning outcomes was observed between civilian and military dentists for sealants for incipient caries, single crowns, or extraction of third molars. At the tooth level, civilian dentists were more likely to prescribe remineralization for sound tooth surfaces, remineralization instead of sealants for carious surfaces, and extraction of third molars. No statistically significant differences were noted between civilian and military providers for recommending sealant or remineralization for teeth with incipient caries or prescribing a single crown versus placing a direct restoration on posterior teeth with 3 to 5 carious surfaces.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant differences in treatment planning outcomes between civi","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142504018","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Allison N Brindle, Garrett C Ballo, Charles M Caley, Michael J Mason, William N Bennett V
Paederus dermatitis, also known as dermatitis linearis, is an acute cutaneous condition caused by contact with the potent vesicant toxin paederin, produced by endosymbiotic Pseudomonas-like bacteria within Paederus spp. beetles. Paederin is a protein synthesis inhibitor that halts cell division, leading to vesiculation and necrotic breakdown of the epidermis. The resultant damage facilitates secondary infection, especially in austere conditions. Between October 2022 and July 2023, several US special operations teams forward deployed to various countries in East Africa reported over 17 cases of painful, blistering skin eruptions consistent with Paederus dermatitis, 2 of which are summarized in this report. To confirm the best treatment approach, 1 team's medic reached back to a deployed infectious disease physician in the same Combatant Command as well as through the DoD ADVISOR line to a dermatologist in the United States. All cases were managed with irrigation, followed by a combination of topical steroid and antibacterial ointments, with resolution occurring after 3 to 7 days, whereas 38% of the cases in July 2023 developed secondary cellulitis by day 7, requiring oral antibiotic treatment. Strict preventative measures were implemented to limit exposure while carefully observing each case, as this was critical to optimize medical readiness of the team. Ultimately, we seek to highlight the identification of beetles specific to East Africa, seasonal prevalence, and the importance of preventative measures as they vary depending on specific beetle characteristics. Additionally, we reiterate classic presentation features that help avoid misdiagnosis for cases that occur outside of the typical epidemiologic criteria.
{"title":"Paederus Dermatitis: Two Outbreaks of an Entomologic Disease in Austere Expeditionary Care.","authors":"Allison N Brindle, Garrett C Ballo, Charles M Caley, Michael J Mason, William N Bennett V","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usae487","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usae487","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Paederus dermatitis, also known as dermatitis linearis, is an acute cutaneous condition caused by contact with the potent vesicant toxin paederin, produced by endosymbiotic Pseudomonas-like bacteria within Paederus spp. beetles. Paederin is a protein synthesis inhibitor that halts cell division, leading to vesiculation and necrotic breakdown of the epidermis. The resultant damage facilitates secondary infection, especially in austere conditions. Between October 2022 and July 2023, several US special operations teams forward deployed to various countries in East Africa reported over 17 cases of painful, blistering skin eruptions consistent with Paederus dermatitis, 2 of which are summarized in this report. To confirm the best treatment approach, 1 team's medic reached back to a deployed infectious disease physician in the same Combatant Command as well as through the DoD ADVISOR line to a dermatologist in the United States. All cases were managed with irrigation, followed by a combination of topical steroid and antibacterial ointments, with resolution occurring after 3 to 7 days, whereas 38% of the cases in July 2023 developed secondary cellulitis by day 7, requiring oral antibiotic treatment. Strict preventative measures were implemented to limit exposure while carefully observing each case, as this was critical to optimize medical readiness of the team. Ultimately, we seek to highlight the identification of beetles specific to East Africa, seasonal prevalence, and the importance of preventative measures as they vary depending on specific beetle characteristics. Additionally, we reiterate classic presentation features that help avoid misdiagnosis for cases that occur outside of the typical epidemiologic criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142504020","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Aaron J Hill, Yvonne L Eaglehouse, Sarah Darmon, Heather J Tracy, Brett J Theeler, Kangmin Zhu, Craig D Shriver, Hong Xue
Introduction: Malignant brain and other central nervous system tumors (MBT) are deadly and disproportionately affect younger men and women in the age range of most active-duty service members. Timely and appropriate treatment is important to both survival and quality of life of patients. Information on treatment factors across direct care (DC) and private sector care (PSC) networks may be important for provider training and staffing for the DoD. The aim of this study was to analyze treatment patterns for patients with MBT within the DoD's universal access Military Health System (MHS), comparing DC and PSC networks.
Materials and methods: The Military Cancer Epidemiology database was used to identify patients 18 years and older who were diagnosed with an MBT between 1999 and 2014 who received primary treatment. Differences in first treatment type and time from diagnosis to initial treatment between DC and PSC were assessed using chi-square and Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests, respectively. Frequency of treatment initiation beyond the 28-day TRICARE Prime access standard for Specialty Care was also compared between care settings using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Then logistic regression models generated odds of treatment initiation beyond 28 days and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) associated with care setting. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank tests compared survival between DC and PSC.
Results: The study included 857 patients, with n = 540 treated in DC and n = 317 treated in PSC. The proportion of patients receiving each initial treatment type did not differ by care setting (P = .622). Median time from diagnosis to initial treatment (interquartile range) varied significantly between DC at 6 (0 to 25) days and PSC at 12 (0 to 37) days for all treatment types combined (P < .001). For all years combined, treatment was initiated beyond 28 days for 21% of patients using DC compared to 31% of patients using PSC (P = .001). The odds of treatment initiation beyond 28 days for a patient treated in PSC were 1.61 (95% CI, 1.11 to 2.33, P = .012) compared to patients treated in DC when controlling for demographic, military, tumor, and patient variables. Survival did not differ by care setting (P = 1.000).
Conclusions: Based on the available data between 1999 and 2014, care setting was associated with differences in time to initial treatment and odds of treatment initiation beyond 28 days among DoD beneficiaries with MBT receiving care in the MHS. Information on these differences may help inform MHS leadership decisions on the most appropriate location for military provider training and staffing.
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Treatment Patterns in DoD Beneficiaries With Malignant Central Nervous System Tumors: A Focus on Care Setting.","authors":"Aaron J Hill, Yvonne L Eaglehouse, Sarah Darmon, Heather J Tracy, Brett J Theeler, Kangmin Zhu, Craig D Shriver, Hong Xue","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usae477","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usae477","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Malignant brain and other central nervous system tumors (MBT) are deadly and disproportionately affect younger men and women in the age range of most active-duty service members. Timely and appropriate treatment is important to both survival and quality of life of patients. Information on treatment factors across direct care (DC) and private sector care (PSC) networks may be important for provider training and staffing for the DoD. The aim of this study was to analyze treatment patterns for patients with MBT within the DoD's universal access Military Health System (MHS), comparing DC and PSC networks.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The Military Cancer Epidemiology database was used to identify patients 18 years and older who were diagnosed with an MBT between 1999 and 2014 who received primary treatment. Differences in first treatment type and time from diagnosis to initial treatment between DC and PSC were assessed using chi-square and Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests, respectively. Frequency of treatment initiation beyond the 28-day TRICARE Prime access standard for Specialty Care was also compared between care settings using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Then logistic regression models generated odds of treatment initiation beyond 28 days and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) associated with care setting. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank tests compared survival between DC and PSC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 857 patients, with n = 540 treated in DC and n = 317 treated in PSC. The proportion of patients receiving each initial treatment type did not differ by care setting (P = .622). Median time from diagnosis to initial treatment (interquartile range) varied significantly between DC at 6 (0 to 25) days and PSC at 12 (0 to 37) days for all treatment types combined (P < .001). For all years combined, treatment was initiated beyond 28 days for 21% of patients using DC compared to 31% of patients using PSC (P = .001). The odds of treatment initiation beyond 28 days for a patient treated in PSC were 1.61 (95% CI, 1.11 to 2.33, P = .012) compared to patients treated in DC when controlling for demographic, military, tumor, and patient variables. Survival did not differ by care setting (P = 1.000).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on the available data between 1999 and 2014, care setting was associated with differences in time to initial treatment and odds of treatment initiation beyond 28 days among DoD beneficiaries with MBT receiving care in the MHS. Information on these differences may help inform MHS leadership decisions on the most appropriate location for military provider training and staffing.</p>","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142504017","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Aaron S Wickard, Bailey M Grimsley, Matthew D Tadlock
<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A major fire at sea is among the most devastating events that can occur while a U.S. Navy combatant vessel is underway. Since World War II, no attack on a large U.S. Navy capital ship has occurred during combat operations. However, increasing global tensions raise the threat of future peer adversary naval combat, and shipboard medical caregivers must be prepared for mass casualty events in the deployed maritime environment. To better prepare modern naval caregivers for this possibility, we reviewed mass casualty events from major fires aboard large U.S. Navy aircraft carriers from 1950 through 2020 to summarize available objective data and identify lessons learned.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Underway fires from any cause aboard U.S. Navy aircraft carriers and large amphibious assault ships causing more than 10 casualties (injuries + deaths) were reviewed from 1950 through 2020 using available open access sources including literature review, the Naval Safety Command mishap database, and U.S. Navy Judge Advocate Manual reports.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 246 fires identified, 27 met inclusion criteria resulting in 1,634 casualties with a combined crew mortality of 23% of those injured. In the 16 events with at least 1 death, 2.0% of the total crew was injured with a combined mortality of 28%. All mishaps occurred while underway during routine training or combat operations; none were caused by an enemy combatant attack. Those events affecting more than 5% of the crew were particularly devastating resulting in a mortality rate of 29% of 1,056 total casualties. Given that main medical spaces may be damaged or destroyed during major fires from any cause, identified lessons learned included the need for (1) distributed medical supplies, (2) flexible medical treatment locations throughout the ship, (3) specific training to prepare non-physician caregivers and non-medical first responders to provide burn and hemorrhagic shock resuscitation, airway management, and prolonged care at or near the point of injury, and (4) the prolonged holding capability of critically ill burned and injured patients if evacuation off the ships is unavailable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Shipboard fires underway pose a significant threat to crew safety with a mortality of nearly a quarter of those injured. These fire mass casualty events immediately overwhelm shipboard medical capabilities requiring a complex response from all hands beginning with non-medical first responders. Notably, all events occurred outside of direct enemy combat, potentially underestimating the impact and number of casualties of a shipboard fire during naval combat. Advances in peer weaponry and the threat of future conflict emphasize the need for pre-deployment burn care training for all shipboard medical caregivers as well as advanced airway and resuscitation training for non-physician caregivers. This review underscores the profound i
{"title":"Fire at Sea: A 70-year Review of Fire-Related Mass Casualty Events on U.S. Aircraft Carriers.","authors":"Aaron S Wickard, Bailey M Grimsley, Matthew D Tadlock","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usae483","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usae483","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A major fire at sea is among the most devastating events that can occur while a U.S. Navy combatant vessel is underway. Since World War II, no attack on a large U.S. Navy capital ship has occurred during combat operations. However, increasing global tensions raise the threat of future peer adversary naval combat, and shipboard medical caregivers must be prepared for mass casualty events in the deployed maritime environment. To better prepare modern naval caregivers for this possibility, we reviewed mass casualty events from major fires aboard large U.S. Navy aircraft carriers from 1950 through 2020 to summarize available objective data and identify lessons learned.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Underway fires from any cause aboard U.S. Navy aircraft carriers and large amphibious assault ships causing more than 10 casualties (injuries + deaths) were reviewed from 1950 through 2020 using available open access sources including literature review, the Naval Safety Command mishap database, and U.S. Navy Judge Advocate Manual reports.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 246 fires identified, 27 met inclusion criteria resulting in 1,634 casualties with a combined crew mortality of 23% of those injured. In the 16 events with at least 1 death, 2.0% of the total crew was injured with a combined mortality of 28%. All mishaps occurred while underway during routine training or combat operations; none were caused by an enemy combatant attack. Those events affecting more than 5% of the crew were particularly devastating resulting in a mortality rate of 29% of 1,056 total casualties. Given that main medical spaces may be damaged or destroyed during major fires from any cause, identified lessons learned included the need for (1) distributed medical supplies, (2) flexible medical treatment locations throughout the ship, (3) specific training to prepare non-physician caregivers and non-medical first responders to provide burn and hemorrhagic shock resuscitation, airway management, and prolonged care at or near the point of injury, and (4) the prolonged holding capability of critically ill burned and injured patients if evacuation off the ships is unavailable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Shipboard fires underway pose a significant threat to crew safety with a mortality of nearly a quarter of those injured. These fire mass casualty events immediately overwhelm shipboard medical capabilities requiring a complex response from all hands beginning with non-medical first responders. Notably, all events occurred outside of direct enemy combat, potentially underestimating the impact and number of casualties of a shipboard fire during naval combat. Advances in peer weaponry and the threat of future conflict emphasize the need for pre-deployment burn care training for all shipboard medical caregivers as well as advanced airway and resuscitation training for non-physician caregivers. This review underscores the profound i","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142504019","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}