Against the backdrop of a renewed global wave of nuclear energy revival, in which international commercial giants, such as Microsoft, are actively promoting the development of small modular reactors, fast reactors, and even fusion technologies, it is challenging for Generation III (Gen-III) technology, such as the AP1000 and HPR1000, to seize the opportunity in a timely manner while demonstrating its advantages both in economy and in safety. In response to the feedback such as Gen-III's safety advantages not being effectively transformed into the operational benefits, the article proposes a probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) approach that incorporates the concept of checkpoint front-controlled (Front-PRA). A pilot study is being conducted at an AP1000 nuclear power plant in China to demonstrate the methodological feasibility of the proposed front-PRA. During the study, a new risk metric is identified: the triggering frequency of the Automatic Depressurization System (ADS-TF). The feasibility of establishing a four color-coded zone solution with ADS-TF and the traditional risk metric (Core Damage Frequency - CDF) to support operational risk management is thoroughly examined. The study reveals that, for advanced reactors like the AP1000, the current practice of defining the yellow zone as twice the baseline is inappropriate because it fails to translate safety advantages into operational benefits. In addition, the proposed approach also demonstrates its advantage to improve the perceived effectiveness of risk-informed applications.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
