Pub Date : 2025-03-28eCollection Date: 2025-04-01DOI: 10.1002/osp4.70049
Morgan E Braxton, Subin Jang, Ashley M Ruiz, Jim Hershey, Justin R Ryder, Aaron S Kelly, Gabriel Q Shaibi
Background: Residential programs have been utilized for the treatment of adolescents with severe obesity, yet few have been evaluated.
Objective: The objectives were to (1) evaluate the effect of a long-term residential treatment program focused on treating adolescent girls with obesity and (2) explore girls' perceptions of weight management during and after participating in the program.
Methods: A mixed-methods approach was used to examine changes in weight outcomes over time among adolescent girls who completed the program (N = 12), and conduct qualitative interviews to explore perceptions of weight management after completion (N = 5).
Results: Girls in the program showed a reduction in mean BMI of 16.1 ± 4.2 kg/m2 (-36.3% ± 5.9%) over a mean of 57 weeks. At follow-up, three participants regained weight while two maintained their completion weight. The program shifted girls' health goals from weight loss to improved overall health. Experiences of social connection and disconnection were identified as components that impacted weight management trajectories over time.
Conclusion: This program demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements in BMI. The structured nature and the emphasis on therapeutic methods were key components of the program. Social support was identified by participants as being integral to successful weight maintenance over time.
{"title":"Evaluating and Understanding Weight Management Experiences Among Adolescent Girls During and After Residential Treatment for Obesity.","authors":"Morgan E Braxton, Subin Jang, Ashley M Ruiz, Jim Hershey, Justin R Ryder, Aaron S Kelly, Gabriel Q Shaibi","doi":"10.1002/osp4.70049","DOIUrl":"10.1002/osp4.70049","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Residential programs have been utilized for the treatment of adolescents with severe obesity, yet few have been evaluated.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objectives were to (1) evaluate the effect of a long-term residential treatment program focused on treating adolescent girls with obesity and (2) explore girls' perceptions of weight management during and after participating in the program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods approach was used to examine changes in weight outcomes over time among adolescent girls who completed the program (<i>N</i> = 12), and conduct qualitative interviews to explore perceptions of weight management after completion (<i>N</i> = 5).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Girls in the program showed a reduction in mean BMI of 16.1 ± 4.2 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (-36.3% ± 5.9%) over a mean of 57 weeks. At follow-up, three participants regained weight while two maintained their completion weight. The program shifted girls' health goals from weight loss to improved overall health. Experiences of social connection and disconnection were identified as components that impacted weight management trajectories over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This program demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements in BMI. The structured nature and the emphasis on therapeutic methods were key components of the program. Social support was identified by participants as being integral to successful weight maintenance over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":19448,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Science & Practice","volume":"11 2","pages":"e70049"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11952060/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143753657","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-11eCollection Date: 2025-04-01DOI: 10.1002/osp4.70065
Leonard H Epstein, John W Apolzan, Molly Moore, Nicholas V Neuwald, Myles S Faith
Background: There are large individual differences in weight loss and maintenance. Metabolic testing can provide phenotypical information that can be used to personalize treatment so that people remain in negative energy balance during weight loss and remain in energy balance during maintenance. Behavioral testing can assess the reinforcing value and change in the temporal window related to the personalized diet and exercise program to motivate people to maintain engagement in healthier eating and activity programs.
Objective: Provide an expository overview of how metabolic testing can be used to personalize weight control. Ideas about incorporating behavioral economic concepts are also included.
Methods: A broad overview of how resting metabolic rate, thermic effect of food and respiratory quotient can be used to improve weight control. Also discussed are behavioral economic principles that can maximize adherence to diet and activity protocols.
Results: Research suggests that measuring metabolic rate can be used to set calorie goals for weight loss and maintenance, thermic effect of food to increase energy expenditure, and respiratory quotient to guide macronutrient composition of the diet and maximize fat loss. Developing programs that foster a strong motivation to eat healthier and be active can maximize treatment success.
Conclusion: Incorporating metabolic measures can personalize behavioral weight loss programs, and the use of behavioral economic principles can increase the probability of adherence and long-term success in weight control.
{"title":"Using Metabolic Testing to Personalize Behavioral Obesity Treatment.","authors":"Leonard H Epstein, John W Apolzan, Molly Moore, Nicholas V Neuwald, Myles S Faith","doi":"10.1002/osp4.70065","DOIUrl":"10.1002/osp4.70065","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are large individual differences in weight loss and maintenance. Metabolic testing can provide phenotypical information that can be used to personalize treatment so that people remain in negative energy balance during weight loss and remain in energy balance during maintenance. Behavioral testing can assess the reinforcing value and change in the temporal window related to the personalized diet and exercise program to motivate people to maintain engagement in healthier eating and activity programs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Provide an expository overview of how metabolic testing can be used to personalize weight control. Ideas about incorporating behavioral economic concepts are also included.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A broad overview of how resting metabolic rate, thermic effect of food and respiratory quotient can be used to improve weight control. Also discussed are behavioral economic principles that can maximize adherence to diet and activity protocols.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Research suggests that measuring metabolic rate can be used to set calorie goals for weight loss and maintenance, thermic effect of food to increase energy expenditure, and respiratory quotient to guide macronutrient composition of the diet and maximize fat loss. Developing programs that foster a strong motivation to eat healthier and be active can maximize treatment success.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Incorporating metabolic measures can personalize behavioral weight loss programs, and the use of behavioral economic principles can increase the probability of adherence and long-term success in weight control.</p>","PeriodicalId":19448,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Science & Practice","volume":"11 2","pages":"e70065"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11894463/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143605795","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01eCollection Date: 2025-04-01DOI: 10.1002/osp4.70066
Melissa M Crane, Catherine Feit, Chen Yeh, Mariangeline Gonzalez Ortiz, Bradley M Appelhans
Objective: Men who work in trade and labor occupations experience high rates of obesity but are underrepresented in weight control programs. This pilot study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of a program tailored to this working group compared with a standard (untailored) weight loss program.
Methods: Participants for this study were recruited via direct mail, a university medical center, and other efforts. They were randomly assigned to either a tailored program or a standard program. Both programs were delivered via 16 one-hour virtual group sessions over six months. Semi-structured interviews and self-reports were used to assess the acceptability of the interventions. Feasibility was assessed using recruitment metrics and proportion group sessions and completed study assessments.
Results: Participants (N = 28; median 44.0 years, 31.8 BMI) were recruited into the study over 7 months, and 71% and 79% were retained for assessments at 3 and 6 months. Participants attended a median of 9.5 (tailored) and 5 (standard) of the 16 group sessions. All participants who completed the 6-month assessment in both groups reported that they would recommend the programs to other men. Participants achieved a median weight loss of 2.3% at 6 months (tailored: -3.0%; standard: -1.9%).
Conclusions: This study suggests that tailoring strategies identified in the formative work were feasible and potentially capable of producing weight loss similar to a standard program. Future research should focus on increasing recruitment and engagement before proceeding to a fully powered efficacy trial.
{"title":"Feasibility and Acceptability of Behavioral Weight Loss Programs for Men in Trade and Labor Occupations: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Melissa M Crane, Catherine Feit, Chen Yeh, Mariangeline Gonzalez Ortiz, Bradley M Appelhans","doi":"10.1002/osp4.70066","DOIUrl":"10.1002/osp4.70066","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Men who work in trade and labor occupations experience high rates of obesity but are underrepresented in weight control programs. This pilot study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of a program tailored to this working group compared with a standard (untailored) weight loss program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants for this study were recruited via direct mail, a university medical center, and other efforts. They were randomly assigned to either a tailored program or a standard program. Both programs were delivered via 16 one-hour virtual group sessions over six months. Semi-structured interviews and self-reports were used to assess the acceptability of the interventions. Feasibility was assessed using recruitment metrics and proportion group sessions and completed study assessments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (<i>N</i> = 28; median 44.0 years, 31.8 BMI) were recruited into the study over 7 months, and 71% and 79% were retained for assessments at 3 and 6 months. Participants attended a median of 9.5 (tailored) and 5 (standard) of the 16 group sessions. All participants who completed the 6-month assessment in both groups reported that they would recommend the programs to other men. Participants achieved a median weight loss of 2.3% at 6 months (tailored: -3.0%; standard: -1.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that tailoring strategies identified in the formative work were feasible and potentially capable of producing weight loss similar to a standard program. Future research should focus on increasing recruitment and engagement before proceeding to a fully powered efficacy trial.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT05386238.</p>","PeriodicalId":19448,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Science & Practice","volume":"11 2","pages":"e70066"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12409651/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145015964","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-17eCollection Date: 2025-02-01DOI: 10.1002/osp4.70058
Paul Czechowski, Anne Hoffmann, Sebastian Dommel, Alexander Jais, Matthias Blüher, Nora Klöting
Objective: A Western diet is associated with obesity, and the link between parental and offsprings' obesity is unclear. Among mice, this study examined how parents' Western diets affect their male offspring's obesity risk. This study further explored whether early exposure to obesogenic diets from either parent influences offsprings' long-term weight gain.
Methods: Three-week-old C57BL6/NTac mice were assigned to a Western diet (WD) or control diet (CD), given from six to 14 weeks old. Adults from these dietary groups were then mated to create four breeding combinations: CD/CD, CD/WD, WD/CD, and WD/WD. Weight gain trajectories were studied in parents (P) and offspring (F1), along with gene expression in four tissues of male offspring. Non-linear mixed effect modeling and q-mode PCA were used to assess the influence of sex, litter size, and parental diet on gene expression, before describing gene expression in more detail.
Results: Offsprings' weight gain was mainly influenced by sex and litter size, with no significant impact from parental diet. At the same time, gene expression differences among offspring, particularly between WD/WD and CD/CD offspring, were linked to genes associated with inflammation, stress response, and other obesity-relevant processes.
Conclusions: Obegenesic diet of two parents with obesity, rather than only one, likely alters the risks of metabolic disease in male mice even at normal weights.
{"title":"Normal-Weight Offspring of Parents With Diet-Induced Obesity Display Altered Gene Expression Profiles.","authors":"Paul Czechowski, Anne Hoffmann, Sebastian Dommel, Alexander Jais, Matthias Blüher, Nora Klöting","doi":"10.1002/osp4.70058","DOIUrl":"10.1002/osp4.70058","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>A Western diet is associated with obesity, and the link between parental and offsprings' obesity is unclear. Among mice, this study examined how parents' Western diets affect their male offspring's obesity risk. This study further explored whether early exposure to obesogenic diets from either parent influences offsprings' long-term weight gain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three-week-old C57BL6/NTac mice were assigned to a Western diet (WD) or control diet (CD), given from six to 14 weeks old. Adults from these dietary groups were then mated to create four breeding combinations: CD/CD, CD/WD, WD/CD, and WD/WD. Weight gain trajectories were studied in parents (P) and offspring (F1), along with gene expression in four tissues of male offspring. Non-linear mixed effect modeling and q-mode PCA were used to assess the influence of sex, litter size, and parental diet on gene expression, before describing gene expression in more detail.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Offsprings' weight gain was mainly influenced by sex and litter size, with no significant impact from parental diet. At the same time, gene expression differences among offspring, particularly between WD/WD and CD/CD offspring, were linked to genes associated with inflammation, stress response, and other obesity-relevant processes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Obegenesic diet of two parents with obesity, rather than only one, likely alters the risks of metabolic disease in male mice even at normal weights.</p>","PeriodicalId":19448,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Science & Practice","volume":"11 1","pages":"e70058"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11832301/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143441627","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-13eCollection Date: 2025-02-01DOI: 10.1002/osp4.70061
Karen E Wetzel, Mary S Himmelstein
Objective: Healthcare is one of the primary contexts in which people experience weight stigma (social devaluation due to body weight), especially in gynecological care, where people's bodies are exposed. Thus, people may feel especially vulnerable to negative evaluations from healthcare providers due to their weight, given the physical exposure which accompanies a breast exam, abdominal palpitations, and a pap-smear or cervical exam. The existing literature examining weight stigma in obstetrics and gynecology has focused almost exclusively on pregnant or postpartum women. The only research on weight stigma during routine gynecological care is based on qualitative studies with small samples.
Methods: Participants (N = 1087; cisgender women) were sampled on Qualtrics, and quotas were set to reflect the most recent US census. The women reported their experiences with gynecological care and then were asked to qualitatively describe what they most recently encountered.
Results: Overall, 14% of the women in this sample had experienced weight stigma in reproductive or gynecological care at least once, and about 5% of this sample reported that this occurred frequently. Participants with higher body weights (≥ 30 kg/m2) were more likely to report frequent weight stigma in gynecological care. A few participants reported more serious experiences, such as misdiagnosis, environmental or systemic weight stigma, and provider reluctance to perform a pelvic exam.
Conclusions: Women experience weight stigma in routine gynecological care, and future research should continue investigating the effects of these experiences.
{"title":"Weight Stigma in Gynecological Care Among Cisgender Women.","authors":"Karen E Wetzel, Mary S Himmelstein","doi":"10.1002/osp4.70061","DOIUrl":"10.1002/osp4.70061","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Healthcare is one of the primary contexts in which people experience weight stigma (social devaluation due to body weight), especially in gynecological care, where people's bodies are exposed. Thus, people may feel especially vulnerable to negative evaluations from healthcare providers due to their weight, given the physical exposure which accompanies a breast exam, abdominal palpitations, and a pap-smear or cervical exam. The existing literature examining weight stigma in obstetrics and gynecology has focused almost exclusively on pregnant or postpartum women. The only research on weight stigma during routine gynecological care is based on qualitative studies with small samples.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (<i>N</i> = 1087; cisgender women) were sampled on Qualtrics, and quotas were set to reflect the most recent US census. The women reported their experiences with gynecological care and then were asked to qualitatively describe what they most recently encountered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 14% of the women in this sample had experienced weight stigma in reproductive or gynecological care at least once, and about 5% of this sample reported that this occurred frequently. Participants with higher body weights (≥ 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) were more likely to report frequent weight stigma in gynecological care. A few participants reported more serious experiences, such as misdiagnosis, environmental or systemic weight stigma, and provider reluctance to perform a pelvic exam.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women experience weight stigma in routine gynecological care, and future research should continue investigating the effects of these experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":19448,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Science & Practice","volume":"11 1","pages":"e70061"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11825290/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143433557","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-12eCollection Date: 2025-02-01DOI: 10.1002/osp4.70052
David Arterburn, Robin Garcia, Dori Rosenberg, Eric Johnson, Kayne Mettert, Janet Ng, Judson Brewer
Background: Few prior interventions for obesity have focused on reward-related eating. Researchers developed a mobile health mindfulness-based intervention, Eat Right Now (ERN), for improving reward related eating; ERN has not yet been feasibility tested as a weight loss intervention.
Objective: To obtain 6-month pilot and feasibility data in patients using the ERN intervention alone or with asynchronous coaching.
Methods: A 6-month, two-arm pilot and feasibility randomized trial was conducted involving 20 adults with a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 recruited from Kaiser Permanente Washington. Participants were randomized to ERN alone or ERN plus individualized coaching. Weight loss was assessed via a Wi-Fi-enabled digital scale.
Results: Among the 20 randomized participants, 17 (85%) started the intervention and remained enrolled in six months. Among these, 82% (14/17) had weight data captured by a Wi-Fi scale and 70.5% (12/17) completed follow-up questionnaires at the 6-month time point. The coached ERN participants had 4.3% weight loss (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.3%, 6.3%) and uncoached participants had 3.6% weight loss (95% CI: 1.2%, 5.9%). Participants in both approaches reported reductions in reward-related eating.
Conclusions: This pilot randomized trial of ERN demonstrates the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention for the majority of both the coached and uncoached groups. Further efforts are needed to ensure high retention and data capture in future studies.
{"title":"Practical Awareness-Based Strategies for Eating (PASE): A Pilot and Feasibility Randomized Trial.","authors":"David Arterburn, Robin Garcia, Dori Rosenberg, Eric Johnson, Kayne Mettert, Janet Ng, Judson Brewer","doi":"10.1002/osp4.70052","DOIUrl":"10.1002/osp4.70052","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Few prior interventions for obesity have focused on reward-related eating. Researchers developed a mobile health mindfulness-based intervention, Eat Right Now (ERN), for improving reward related eating; ERN has not yet been feasibility tested as a weight loss intervention.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To obtain 6-month pilot and feasibility data in patients using the ERN intervention alone or with asynchronous coaching.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 6-month, two-arm pilot and feasibility randomized trial was conducted involving 20 adults with a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup> recruited from Kaiser Permanente Washington. Participants were randomized to ERN alone or ERN plus individualized coaching. Weight loss was assessed via a Wi-Fi-enabled digital scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 20 randomized participants, 17 (85%) started the intervention and remained enrolled in six months. Among these, 82% (14/17) had weight data captured by a Wi-Fi scale and 70.5% (12/17) completed follow-up questionnaires at the 6-month time point. The coached ERN participants had 4.3% weight loss (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.3%, 6.3%) and uncoached participants had 3.6% weight loss (95% CI: 1.2%, 5.9%). Participants in both approaches reported reductions in reward-related eating.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This pilot randomized trial of ERN demonstrates the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention for the majority of both the coached and uncoached groups. Further efforts are needed to ensure high retention and data capture in future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19448,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Science & Practice","volume":"11 1","pages":"e70052"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11821459/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143414875","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-12eCollection Date: 2025-02-01DOI: 10.1002/osp4.70056
Kimberly A Gudzune, Jessica L Schwartz, Kelly Olsson, Erik Almazan, Thomas Grader Beck, Jyotsna Ghosh, Wendy L Bennett, Jeanne M Clark
Background: Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are electronic health record tools that support practitioners' decision-making at the point-of-care. CDSS may aid clinical care but are not often centered on patients or practitioners.
Aims: To develop and preliminarily test a CDSS designed to support evidence-based obesity treatment, promote a patient-centered experience, and integrate with clinical workflows.
Materials & methods: The CDSS allowed patients to complete a pre-visit questionnaire via the patient portal, which activated multiple elements for the primary care practitioner (PCP). A 3-month proof-of-concept study was conducted among 10 PCPs at 5 clinics to determine usefulness, usability, and acceptability through validated surveys (mean score ≥ 2.5 signified positive outcome; max 5). Using t-tests, pre-post differences in PCPs' frequency of self-reported clinical practices (1-never; 5-always) were examined.
Results: Most PCPs were physicians with mean experience of 10.8 years (SD 7.5). Overall, mean scores for usefulness, usability, and acceptability were 3.2 (SD 0.8), 3.5 (SD 0.9), and 3.6 (SD 0.9), respectively. PCPs reported significant increases in three key clinical practices-counseling on behavioral interventions (3.1 vs. 3.9 [p < 0.01]), referring to weight-loss programs (2.8 vs. 3.5 [p < 0.01]), and discussing anti-obesity medications (3.3 vs. 3.8 [p = 0.02]).
Conclusion: This weight management CDSS was useful and usable for PCPs and improved obesity-related practice habits. Future studies need to evaluate its impact on patient outcomes.
背景:临床决策支持系统(CDSS)是电子健康记录工具,支持从业人员在护理点的决策。CDSS可以帮助临床护理,但通常不是以患者或从业人员为中心。目的:开发并初步测试旨在支持循证肥胖治疗的CDSS,促进以患者为中心的体验,并与临床工作流程相结合。材料和方法:CDSS允许患者通过患者门户完成访问前问卷,这为初级保健医生(PCP)激活了多个元素。在5个诊所的10个pcp中进行了为期3个月的概念验证研究,通过验证调查确定有用性,可用性和可接受性(平均得分≥2.5表示阳性结果;使用t检验,pcp自我报告临床实践频率的前后差异(1-never;(总是)被检查。结果:大多数pcp是平均经验为10.8年(SD 7.5)的医生。总体而言,有用性、可用性和可接受性的平均得分分别为3.2 (SD 0.8)、3.5 (SD 0.9)和3.6 (SD 0.9)。pcp报告了三个关键临床实践-行为干预咨询的显著增加(3.1 vs. 3.9 [p p p = 0.02])。结论:体重管理CDSS对pcp和改善肥胖相关的锻炼习惯是有用的。未来的研究需要评估其对患者预后的影响。
{"title":"Centering Weight Management Clinical Decision Support in Primary Care on Patients With Obesity and Practitioners: A Proof-Of-Concept Study.","authors":"Kimberly A Gudzune, Jessica L Schwartz, Kelly Olsson, Erik Almazan, Thomas Grader Beck, Jyotsna Ghosh, Wendy L Bennett, Jeanne M Clark","doi":"10.1002/osp4.70056","DOIUrl":"10.1002/osp4.70056","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are electronic health record tools that support practitioners' decision-making at the point-of-care. CDSS may aid clinical care but are not often centered on patients or practitioners.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To develop and preliminarily test a CDSS designed to support evidence-based obesity treatment, promote a patient-centered experience, and integrate with clinical workflows.</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>The CDSS allowed patients to complete a pre-visit questionnaire via the patient portal, which activated multiple elements for the primary care practitioner (PCP). A 3-month proof-of-concept study was conducted among 10 PCPs at 5 clinics to determine usefulness, usability, and acceptability through validated surveys (mean score ≥ 2.5 signified positive outcome; max 5). Using t-tests, pre-post differences in PCPs' frequency of self-reported clinical practices (1-never; 5-always) were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most PCPs were physicians with mean experience of 10.8 years (SD 7.5). Overall, mean scores for usefulness, usability, and acceptability were 3.2 (SD 0.8), 3.5 (SD 0.9), and 3.6 (SD 0.9), respectively. PCPs reported significant increases in three key clinical practices-counseling on behavioral interventions (3.1 vs. 3.9 [<i>p</i> < 0.01]), referring to weight-loss programs (2.8 vs. 3.5 [<i>p</i> < 0.01]), and discussing anti-obesity medications (3.3 vs. 3.8 [<i>p</i> = 0.02]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This weight management CDSS was useful and usable for PCPs and improved obesity-related practice habits. Future studies need to evaluate its impact on patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19448,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Science & Practice","volume":"11 1","pages":"e70056"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11815222/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143409370","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-11eCollection Date: 2025-02-01DOI: 10.1002/osp4.70059
Yaniv Yonai, Rawan Masarwa, Merav Ben Natan, Yaron Berkovich
Objective: This study aimed to examine how anti-fat attitudes and attitudes toward obesity management influence orthopedic surgeons' treatment preferences for patients with obesity who are candidates for elective total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 150 orthopedic surgeons using a web-based questionnaire. The survey included four sections: socio-demographic data, the Antifat Attitudes Questionnaire (AFA) assessing biases related to obesity (dislike, fear of fatness, and beliefs about willpower), an adapted questionnaire on attitudes toward obesity management, and a custom section on treatment preferences.
Results: The sample had a mean age of 43.4 years (SD = 9.7) and was predominantly male (70.7%). Participants exhibited moderate anti-fat attitudes alongside positive views on obesity management. Stronger anti-fat attitudes correlated with a preference for conservative treatments over surgery (r = 0.45 to r = 0.29, p < 0.001), whereas supportive attitudes toward obesity management were associated with less preference for conservative treatment (r = -0.53, p < 0.001). Male surgeons demonstrated higher anti-fat attitudes and a greater inclination for conservative treatment than female surgeons. Regression analysis identified attitudes toward obesity management as a significant predictor of treatment preferences (β = -0.54, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Findings highlight the impact of weight stigma on clinical decision-making and emphasise the need for increased awareness and education to ensure equitable access to TKA for patients with obesity.
{"title":"Weight Stigma and Orthopedic Surgeons' Treatment Preferences for Patients With Obesity Who Are Candidates for Elective Total Knee Arthroplasty.","authors":"Yaniv Yonai, Rawan Masarwa, Merav Ben Natan, Yaron Berkovich","doi":"10.1002/osp4.70059","DOIUrl":"10.1002/osp4.70059","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to examine how anti-fat attitudes and attitudes toward obesity management influence orthopedic surgeons' treatment preferences for patients with obesity who are candidates for elective total knee arthroplasty (TKA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 150 orthopedic surgeons using a web-based questionnaire. The survey included four sections: socio-demographic data, the Antifat Attitudes Questionnaire (AFA) assessing biases related to obesity (dislike, fear of fatness, and beliefs about willpower), an adapted questionnaire on attitudes toward obesity management, and a custom section on treatment preferences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample had a mean age of 43.4 years (SD = 9.7) and was predominantly male (70.7%). Participants exhibited moderate anti-fat attitudes alongside positive views on obesity management. Stronger anti-fat attitudes correlated with a preference for conservative treatments over surgery (<i>r</i> = 0.45 to <i>r</i> = 0.29, <i>p</i> < 0.001), whereas supportive attitudes toward obesity management were associated with less preference for conservative treatment (<i>r</i> = -0.53, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Male surgeons demonstrated higher anti-fat attitudes and a greater inclination for conservative treatment than female surgeons. Regression analysis identified attitudes toward obesity management as a significant predictor of treatment preferences (<i>β</i> = -0.54, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings highlight the impact of weight stigma on clinical decision-making and emphasise the need for increased awareness and education to ensure equitable access to TKA for patients with obesity.</p>","PeriodicalId":19448,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Science & Practice","volume":"11 1","pages":"e70059"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11813978/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143409337","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-10eCollection Date: 2025-02-01DOI: 10.1002/osp4.70057
Violeta Moizé, Yitka Graham, Ximena Ramos Salas, Mercè Balcells
Background: Patients perceive high levels of weight prejudice, stigma, and discrimination within health systems, affecting their ability to manage their obesity and related chronic conditions. Scientific and patient obesity associations worldwide have prioritized the reduction of weight stigma to improve patient experiences in health systems and overall health outcomes. Since a significant proportion of the population is now living with multiple chronic diseases related to obesity, healthcare systems must shift toward multi-disease management frameworks incorporating person-centered and non-stigmatizing clinical conversations. Motivational Interviewing (MI) has the potential to transform clinical interactions by using non-stigmatizing language, communication, and practices. Studies using MI in obesity management have solely focused on weight loss outcomes, while other patient experience related outcomes would also be relevant to evaluate.
Methods: A narrative review was undertaken to critically analyze the potential impact of MI on obesity and chronic disease management practices and experiences.
Findings: An analysis and contextualization of the MI theoretical framework for obesity management, based on the philosophy of motivational spirit, was reviewed, assessing micro skills or strategies.
Conclusion: MI may assist healthcare professionals conduct non-stigmatizing clinical conversations in accordance with basic principles of collaborative therapeutic alliances. A proposal for research considerations that can help illuminate the potential for of MI in obesity management is also outlined.
{"title":"Motivational Interviewing (MI) in Obesity Care: Cultivating Person-Centered and Supportive Clinical Conversations to Reduce Stigma: A Narrative Review.","authors":"Violeta Moizé, Yitka Graham, Ximena Ramos Salas, Mercè Balcells","doi":"10.1002/osp4.70057","DOIUrl":"10.1002/osp4.70057","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients perceive high levels of weight prejudice, stigma, and discrimination within health systems, affecting their ability to manage their obesity and related chronic conditions. Scientific and patient obesity associations worldwide have prioritized the reduction of weight stigma to improve patient experiences in health systems and overall health outcomes. Since a significant proportion of the population is now living with multiple chronic diseases related to obesity, healthcare systems must shift toward multi-disease management frameworks incorporating person-centered and non-stigmatizing clinical conversations. Motivational Interviewing (MI) has the potential to transform clinical interactions by using non-stigmatizing language, communication, and practices. Studies using MI in obesity management have solely focused on weight loss outcomes, while other patient experience related outcomes would also be relevant to evaluate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A narrative review was undertaken to critically analyze the potential impact of MI on obesity and chronic disease management practices and experiences.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>An analysis and contextualization of the MI theoretical framework for obesity management, based on the philosophy of motivational spirit, was reviewed, assessing micro skills or strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MI may assist healthcare professionals conduct non-stigmatizing clinical conversations in accordance with basic principles of collaborative therapeutic alliances. A proposal for research considerations that can help illuminate the potential for of MI in obesity management is also outlined.</p>","PeriodicalId":19448,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Science & Practice","volume":"11 1","pages":"e70057"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11810810/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143399734","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-06eCollection Date: 2025-02-01DOI: 10.1002/osp4.70055
Jahangir Shahraz, Farahnaz Joukar, Fateme Sheida, Sara Yeganeh, Saman Maroufizadeh, Massood Baghaee, Mohammadreza Naghipour, Fariborz Mansour-Ghanaei
Background: Obesity and dyslipidemia are interconnected complex conditions and their prevalence differs across different geographical regions. As a major risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, dyslipidemia is often misdiagnosed and inadequately treated, highlighting the need for region-specific public health policies. Therefore, the objective of this study was to examine the associations between BMI and dyslipidemia in the Prospective Epidemiological Research Studies in Iran (PERSIAN) Guilan Cohort study (PGCS) population.
Methods: This cross-sectional study analyzed the demographic and biochemical data from 10,519 participants of the PGCS population. Participants were divided into two groups with and without dyslipidemia and were compared based on BMI. Data analysis was performed in SPSS v16 with a significance level of < 0.05.
Results: The average age of the participants was 51.52 ± 8.90 years. The prevalence of dyslipidemia in all participants was equal to 75.83%. Among those with dyslipidemia, 41.18% and 35.39% had overweight and obesity, respectively. There was a positive association between BMI and the prevalence of dyslipidemia (unadjusted OR = 1.09, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.08-1.10) (p < 0.01), indicating that for a one-unit increase in participants' BMI, the probability of having dyslipidemia increased by 9%, which remained statistically significant even after adjusting. Analysis of dyslipidemia components and BMI revealed a significant association between elevated TG and cholesterol, as well as low HDL levels and higher BMI (unadjusted OR = 1.04, 1.01, and 1.09, respectively) (p < 0.01). However, this was not statistically significant for high LDL levels (unadjusted OR = 1.01) (p = 0.05).
Conclusion: Given the high prevalence of dyslipidemia in our studied region and its strong association with obesity, prioritizing obesity management in public health decision-making is vital. Greater focus should be given on accessing and modifying the components of dyslipidemia, particularly LDL particles, as a potentially significant research target to prevent the mismanagement of dyslipidemia in individuals with obesity.
背景:肥胖和血脂异常是相互关联的复杂疾病,其患病率在不同的地理区域有所不同。作为心血管疾病的一个主要危险因素,血脂异常经常被误诊和治疗不当,这突出表明需要制定针对特定区域的公共卫生政策。因此,本研究的目的是在伊朗(波斯)Guilan队列研究(PGCS)人群的前瞻性流行病学研究中检查BMI与血脂异常之间的关系。方法:本横断面研究分析了10,519名PGCS人群的人口学和生化数据。参与者被分为有和没有血脂异常的两组,并根据BMI进行比较。数据分析采用SPSS v16软件,显著性水平< 0.05。结果:参与者平均年龄为51.52±8.90岁。所有参与者的血脂异常患病率为75.83%。血脂异常人群中超重和肥胖分别占41.18%和35.39%。BMI与血脂异常患病率呈正相关(未经调整的OR = 1.09, 95%可信区间(CI): 1.08-1.10) (p p p = 0.05)。结论:鉴于血脂异常在我们研究地区的高患病率及其与肥胖的密切关系,在公共卫生决策中优先考虑肥胖管理是至关重要的。应将更多的注意力放在获取和修改血脂异常的成分上,特别是LDL颗粒,作为防止肥胖个体血脂异常管理不当的潜在重要研究目标。
{"title":"Associations Between Body Mass Index (BMI) and Dyslipidemia: Results From the PERSIAN Guilan Cohort Study (PGCS).","authors":"Jahangir Shahraz, Farahnaz Joukar, Fateme Sheida, Sara Yeganeh, Saman Maroufizadeh, Massood Baghaee, Mohammadreza Naghipour, Fariborz Mansour-Ghanaei","doi":"10.1002/osp4.70055","DOIUrl":"10.1002/osp4.70055","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obesity and dyslipidemia are interconnected complex conditions and their prevalence differs across different geographical regions. As a major risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, dyslipidemia is often misdiagnosed and inadequately treated, highlighting the need for region-specific public health policies. Therefore, the objective of this study was to examine the associations between BMI and dyslipidemia in the Prospective Epidemiological Research Studies in Iran (PERSIAN) Guilan Cohort study (PGCS) population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study analyzed the demographic and biochemical data from 10,519 participants of the PGCS population. Participants were divided into two groups with and without dyslipidemia and were compared based on BMI. Data analysis was performed in SPSS v16 with a significance level of < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average age of the participants was 51.52 ± 8.90 years. The prevalence of dyslipidemia in all participants was equal to 75.83%. Among those with dyslipidemia, 41.18% and 35.39% had overweight and obesity, respectively. There was a positive association between BMI and the prevalence of dyslipidemia (unadjusted OR = 1.09, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.08-1.10) (<i>p</i> < 0.01), indicating that for a one-unit increase in participants' BMI, the probability of having dyslipidemia increased by 9%, which remained statistically significant even after adjusting. Analysis of dyslipidemia components and BMI revealed a significant association between elevated TG and cholesterol, as well as low HDL levels and higher BMI (unadjusted OR = 1.04, 1.01, and 1.09, respectively) (<i>p</i> < 0.01). However, this was not statistically significant for high LDL levels (unadjusted OR = 1.01) (<i>p</i> = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given the high prevalence of dyslipidemia in our studied region and its strong association with obesity, prioritizing obesity management in public health decision-making is vital. Greater focus should be given on accessing and modifying the components of dyslipidemia, particularly LDL particles, as a potentially significant research target to prevent the mismanagement of dyslipidemia in individuals with obesity.</p>","PeriodicalId":19448,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Science & Practice","volume":"11 1","pages":"e70055"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11802237/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143365309","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}