首页 > 最新文献

Obstetrics and gynecology最新文献

英文 中文
Noncardiovascular Medical Conditions in the Pregnancy Mortality Surveillance System, 2012-2022. 2012-2022年妊娠死亡率监测系统中的非心血管疾病
IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-22 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000006175
Fanny Njie,Ashley A Busacker,Crystal Gibson,Carla Syverson,Kristi Seed,David A Goodman,Lisa M Hollier
Pregnancy Mortality Surveillance System (PMSS) data from 2012-2022 were analyzed for this descriptive study. Specific subclassifications of deaths within the PMSS category of "other noncardiovascular medical conditions" (OMC) were analyzed by sociodemographic characteristics, and pregnancy-related mortality ratios (PRMRs; pregnancy-related deaths/100,000 live births) were calculated within each subclassification. Prepandemic (2012-2019) and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic (2020-2022) time periods are reported separately. The overall OMC-specific PRMR was 2.20 (95% CI, 2.06-2.35). Epilepsy was the most frequent specific subclassification of pregnancy-related OMC deaths before (15.7%) and during (16.1%) the COVID-19 pandemic. Diabetes (10.7%) and asthma (10.1%) followed epilepsy prepandemic, and asthma (13.1%) and diabetes (10.2%) followed during the pandemic. Reporting subclassifications of pregnancy-related deaths improves the ability to focus attention and interventions on these less frequently occurring consistent causes of pregnancy-related death.
本描述性研究分析了2012-2022年妊娠死亡率监测系统(PMSS)的数据。根据社会人口学特征分析了PMSS“其他非心血管疾病”(OMC)类别中死亡的具体子分类,并在每个子分类中计算了与妊娠有关的死亡率(PRMRs;与妊娠有关的死亡/10万活产)。大流行前(2012-2019)和冠状病毒病2019 (COVID-19)大流行(2020-2022)时间段分别报告。总体omc特异性PRMR为2.20 (95% CI, 2.06-2.35)。癫痫是COVID-19大流行之前(15.7%)和期间(16.1%)妊娠相关OMC死亡中最常见的特定亚型。癫痫大流行前继发糖尿病(10.7%)和哮喘(10.1%),大流行期间继发哮喘(13.1%)和糖尿病(10.2%)。报告与妊娠有关的死亡的分类,有助于将注意力和干预措施集中在这些不太经常发生的与妊娠有关的死亡原因上。
{"title":"Noncardiovascular Medical Conditions in the Pregnancy Mortality Surveillance System, 2012-2022.","authors":"Fanny Njie,Ashley A Busacker,Crystal Gibson,Carla Syverson,Kristi Seed,David A Goodman,Lisa M Hollier","doi":"10.1097/aog.0000000000006175","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000006175","url":null,"abstract":"Pregnancy Mortality Surveillance System (PMSS) data from 2012-2022 were analyzed for this descriptive study. Specific subclassifications of deaths within the PMSS category of \"other noncardiovascular medical conditions\" (OMC) were analyzed by sociodemographic characteristics, and pregnancy-related mortality ratios (PRMRs; pregnancy-related deaths/100,000 live births) were calculated within each subclassification. Prepandemic (2012-2019) and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic (2020-2022) time periods are reported separately. The overall OMC-specific PRMR was 2.20 (95% CI, 2.06-2.35). Epilepsy was the most frequent specific subclassification of pregnancy-related OMC deaths before (15.7%) and during (16.1%) the COVID-19 pandemic. Diabetes (10.7%) and asthma (10.1%) followed epilepsy prepandemic, and asthma (13.1%) and diabetes (10.2%) followed during the pandemic. Reporting subclassifications of pregnancy-related deaths improves the ability to focus attention and interventions on these less frequently occurring consistent causes of pregnancy-related death.","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146021454","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparing Efficacy of Medication Abortion by Health Care Modality at a California Health System. 加州某医疗系统中不同医疗保健方式药物流产的疗效比较。
IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-22 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000006174
Rajita Patil,Rebecca Woofter,May Sudhinaraset,Jessica D Gipson
OBJECTIVETo compare the efficacy and safety of telemedicine medication abortion and clinic-based medication abortion among patients at one academic health system in California.METHODSWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of electronic medical records for all patients who had either telemedicine medication abortion or clinic-based medication abortion up to 77 days of gestation between April 1, 2020, and December 31, 2022. All patients who met eligibility requirements were offered telemedicine medication abortion. Patients who were not eligible for or did not prefer telemedicine medication abortion completed clinic-based medication abortion. We examined attendance at follow-up visits, successful medication abortion without requiring surgical intervention, and occurrence of serious adverse events. Among patients who had telemedicine medication abortion, we also examined attendance at 4-week follow-up visits and results of home urine pregnancy tests.RESULTSOverall, 165 patients who had telemedicine medication abortion and 411 patients who had clinic-based medication abortion were included in the study. A total of 91.6% of patients who had telemedicine medication abortion and 84.5% of patients who had clinic-based medication abortion completed at least one follow-up visit, with no significant difference detected by modality after controlling for covariates (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.90, 95% CI, 0.96-3.77). Ninety percent of patients who had telemedicine medication abortion and 88.4% of patients who had clinic-based medication abortion had successful abortions without requiring surgical intervention. Odds of successful abortions did not statistically significantly differ by medication abortion modality (aOR 0.78, 95% CI, 0.38-1.59). Because of the rarity of serious adverse events (less than 1% in both groups, all requiring either intravenous antibiotics or blood transfusions), we could not complete multivariable models for this outcome.CONCLUSIONOur findings from one academic health system in California support prior studies showing that telemedicine medication abortion and clinic-based medication abortion are equally effective. When possible, the provision of telemedicine medication abortion should be expanded to meet the growing demand for abortion access.
目的比较加州某学术卫生系统远程医疗药物流产与临床药物流产的疗效和安全性。方法对2020年4月1日至2022年12月31日期间妊娠77天以内的所有远程医疗药物流产或临床药物流产患者的电子病历进行回顾性队列研究。所有符合资格要求的患者均被提供远程医疗药物流产。不符合或不喜欢远程医疗药物流产的患者完成了基于临床的药物流产。我们检查了随访的出席率,不需要手术干预的药物流产的成功,以及严重不良事件的发生。在远程医疗药物流产的患者中,我们还检查了4周随访的出勤率和家庭尿妊娠试验的结果。结果共纳入165例远程医疗药物流产患者和411例临床药物流产患者。91.6%的远程医疗药物流产患者和84.5%的临床药物流产患者完成了至少一次随访,在控制协变量后,两组间的模态差异无统计学意义(校正优势比[aOR] 1.90, 95% CI, 0.96-3.77)。90%的远程医疗药物流产患者和88.4%的临床药物流产患者在不需要手术干预的情况下成功流产。不同药物流产方式流产成功率差异无统计学意义(aOR 0.78, 95% CI 0.38-1.59)。由于严重不良事件的罕见性(两组均小于1%,均需要静脉注射抗生素或输血),我们无法完成该结果的多变量模型。结论:我们在加州一个学术卫生系统的研究结果支持了先前的研究,即远程医疗药物流产和临床药物流产同样有效。在可能的情况下,应扩大提供远程医疗药物堕胎,以满足日益增长的堕胎服务需求。
{"title":"Comparing Efficacy of Medication Abortion by Health Care Modality at a California Health System.","authors":"Rajita Patil,Rebecca Woofter,May Sudhinaraset,Jessica D Gipson","doi":"10.1097/aog.0000000000006174","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000006174","url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVETo compare the efficacy and safety of telemedicine medication abortion and clinic-based medication abortion among patients at one academic health system in California.METHODSWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of electronic medical records for all patients who had either telemedicine medication abortion or clinic-based medication abortion up to 77 days of gestation between April 1, 2020, and December 31, 2022. All patients who met eligibility requirements were offered telemedicine medication abortion. Patients who were not eligible for or did not prefer telemedicine medication abortion completed clinic-based medication abortion. We examined attendance at follow-up visits, successful medication abortion without requiring surgical intervention, and occurrence of serious adverse events. Among patients who had telemedicine medication abortion, we also examined attendance at 4-week follow-up visits and results of home urine pregnancy tests.RESULTSOverall, 165 patients who had telemedicine medication abortion and 411 patients who had clinic-based medication abortion were included in the study. A total of 91.6% of patients who had telemedicine medication abortion and 84.5% of patients who had clinic-based medication abortion completed at least one follow-up visit, with no significant difference detected by modality after controlling for covariates (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.90, 95% CI, 0.96-3.77). Ninety percent of patients who had telemedicine medication abortion and 88.4% of patients who had clinic-based medication abortion had successful abortions without requiring surgical intervention. Odds of successful abortions did not statistically significantly differ by medication abortion modality (aOR 0.78, 95% CI, 0.38-1.59). Because of the rarity of serious adverse events (less than 1% in both groups, all requiring either intravenous antibiotics or blood transfusions), we could not complete multivariable models for this outcome.CONCLUSIONOur findings from one academic health system in California support prior studies showing that telemedicine medication abortion and clinic-based medication abortion are equally effective. When possible, the provision of telemedicine medication abortion should be expanded to meet the growing demand for abortion access.","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"263 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146021455","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Understanding Postpartum Hospital Use Among Birthing People With Medicaid Insurance. 了解有医疗补助保险的产妇的产后医院使用情况。
IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-22 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000006170
Sarah M Lindley,Kimberly B Glazer,Teresa Janevic,Molly Passarella,Angelina Malenda,Natalia N Egorova,Jennifer Zeitlin,Scott A Lorch,Elizabeth A Howell
Individuals with Medicaid insurance are more likely to have pregnancy-related complications than individuals with private insurance, but previous research has not described postpartum hospital use in the population of patients with Medicaid. Using Medicaid claims data, we analyzed time to the first instance of postpartum hospital use during the postpartum year using Kaplan-Meier curves and described causes of postpartum hospital use at different postpartum windows. Among 1,626,056 birthing individuals, 20.7% had postpartum hospital use at 1 year postpartum. We found a higher proportion of postpartum hospital use after the typical 30-day postpartum analysis window than within the initial 30 days postpartum, with causes of postpartum hospital use shifting away from delivery-related causes over time. This highlights the need to better understand postpartum hospital use in the population of patients with Medicaid insurance, because 40% of births in the United States occur in this population.
拥有医疗补助保险的个体比拥有私人保险的个体更有可能出现与妊娠相关的并发症,但之前的研究并没有描述医疗补助患者群体的产后住院情况。使用医疗补助索赔数据,我们使用Kaplan-Meier曲线分析了产后一年内首次产后住院的时间,并描述了不同产后窗口期产后住院的原因。在1,626,056名分娩个体中,20.7%在产后1年使用过产后医院。我们发现,在典型的产后30天分析窗口后,产后住院的比例高于产后最初30天,随着时间的推移,产后住院的原因逐渐从分娩相关的原因转移。这突出了需要更好地了解医疗补助保险患者群体的产后医院使用情况,因为美国40%的分娩发生在这一人群中。
{"title":"Understanding Postpartum Hospital Use Among Birthing People With Medicaid Insurance.","authors":"Sarah M Lindley,Kimberly B Glazer,Teresa Janevic,Molly Passarella,Angelina Malenda,Natalia N Egorova,Jennifer Zeitlin,Scott A Lorch,Elizabeth A Howell","doi":"10.1097/aog.0000000000006170","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000006170","url":null,"abstract":"Individuals with Medicaid insurance are more likely to have pregnancy-related complications than individuals with private insurance, but previous research has not described postpartum hospital use in the population of patients with Medicaid. Using Medicaid claims data, we analyzed time to the first instance of postpartum hospital use during the postpartum year using Kaplan-Meier curves and described causes of postpartum hospital use at different postpartum windows. Among 1,626,056 birthing individuals, 20.7% had postpartum hospital use at 1 year postpartum. We found a higher proportion of postpartum hospital use after the typical 30-day postpartum analysis window than within the initial 30 days postpartum, with causes of postpartum hospital use shifting away from delivery-related causes over time. This highlights the need to better understand postpartum hospital use in the population of patients with Medicaid insurance, because 40% of births in the United States occur in this population.","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146021453","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Expression of Concern: Fezolinetant and Elinzanetant Therapy for Menopausal Women Experiencing Vasomotor Symptoms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 关注的表达:非唑啉奈坦和依兰那坦治疗出现血管舒缩症状的绝经妇女:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-16 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000006180
{"title":"Expression of Concern: Fezolinetant and Elinzanetant Therapy for Menopausal Women Experiencing Vasomotor Symptoms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"","doi":"10.1097/aog.0000000000006180","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000006180","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145971874","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Hook & Roll Maneuver for Resolution of Shoulder Dystocia. 钩滚手法治疗肩难产。
IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-15 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000006167
Erica A Heilman,Hannah E Sweeney,Ella Stern,Matthew K Hoffman
BACKGROUNDShoulder dystocia is an obstetric emergency with the potential to cause maternal and neonatal injuries.TECHNIQUEThe hook & roll maneuver is a modification of other posterior axilla maneuvers that involves hooking the posterior axilla with one finger and providing gentle traction, elevating the posterior shoulder toward the vaginal opening while simultaneously rolling the anterior shoulder toward the fetal face and rotating approximately 30-90°.EXPERIENCEAt the time of this submission, the hook & roll maneuver has been used 54 times in our institution, successfully resolving shoulder dystocia in 53 of the 54 cases (98.1%). In 16 cases in which the hook & roll maneuver was used as the primary internal maneuver, no neonatal injuries occurred.CONCLUSIONHook & roll is a posterior axilla maneuver combined with rotation of the anterior shoulder ventrally that is highly successful and easy to perform. The hook & roll maneuver is a promising alternative maneuver to consider in cases of shoulder dystocia, and early data suggest low rates of neonatal complications.
背景:肩难产是一种产科急诊,有可能导致孕产妇和新生儿损伤。钩滚手法是对其他后腋窝手法的改进,包括用一根手指钩住后腋窝并提供温和牵引,将后肩向阴道口抬高,同时将前肩向胎儿面部滚动并旋转约30-90°。在本文提交时,我们机构已使用钩滚手法54次,54例中53例(98.1%)成功解决肩难产。在16例以钩滚手法为主的患儿中,未发生新生儿损伤。结论钩滚是一种结合前肩腹侧旋转的后腋窝手法,成功率高,操作简单。钩滚手法是一种很有前途的替代手法,可以考虑在肩部难产的情况下,早期的数据表明新生儿并发症的发生率低。
{"title":"The Hook & Roll Maneuver for Resolution of Shoulder Dystocia.","authors":"Erica A Heilman,Hannah E Sweeney,Ella Stern,Matthew K Hoffman","doi":"10.1097/aog.0000000000006167","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000006167","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDShoulder dystocia is an obstetric emergency with the potential to cause maternal and neonatal injuries.TECHNIQUEThe hook & roll maneuver is a modification of other posterior axilla maneuvers that involves hooking the posterior axilla with one finger and providing gentle traction, elevating the posterior shoulder toward the vaginal opening while simultaneously rolling the anterior shoulder toward the fetal face and rotating approximately 30-90°.EXPERIENCEAt the time of this submission, the hook & roll maneuver has been used 54 times in our institution, successfully resolving shoulder dystocia in 53 of the 54 cases (98.1%). In 16 cases in which the hook & roll maneuver was used as the primary internal maneuver, no neonatal injuries occurred.CONCLUSIONHook & roll is a posterior axilla maneuver combined with rotation of the anterior shoulder ventrally that is highly successful and easy to perform. The hook & roll maneuver is a promising alternative maneuver to consider in cases of shoulder dystocia, and early data suggest low rates of neonatal complications.","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145971876","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Diagnosis and Management of Syphilis in Pregnancy. 妊娠期梅毒的诊断与处理。
IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-15 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000006166
Emily H Adhikari
With rising syphilis and congenital syphilis rates in the United States and globally, clinicians who may not have seen or diagnosed syphilis in training are now faced with recognition of myriad symptoms of the "great masquerader" and interpretation of diagnostic algorithms that can be perplexing. Screening for syphilis at the first prenatal visit, in the third trimester, and at delivery is now recommended by the American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists. Although increased screening improves detection of asymptomatic (latent) infection, there is also potential for overtreatment or misdiagnosis. This report serves to familiarize clinicians with symptomatic manifestations of primary and secondary syphilis, to assist with correct interpretation of traditional and reverse algorithms, and to inform clinical staging to maximize the likelihood of adequate and timely treatment. Prompt and accurate public health reporting is discussed to facilitate prioritization of partner services. Additional guidance is provided for clinicians whose laboratories plan a transition from traditional to reverse-sequence screening for syphilis, with focused review of management of the obstetric patient with discordant screening tests.
随着梅毒和先天性梅毒在美国和全球的发病率不断上升,那些在培训中可能没有见过或诊断过梅毒的临床医生,现在面临着对“大假面舞者”的无数症状的识别,以及对诊断算法的解释,这可能令人困惑。美国妇产科医师学会现在建议在第一次产前检查、妊娠晚期和分娩时进行梅毒筛查。虽然增加筛查可以提高对无症状(潜伏)感染的发现,但也有可能出现过度治疗或误诊。本报告旨在使临床医生熟悉原发性和继发性梅毒的症状表现,协助正确解释传统和反向算法,并告知临床分期,以最大限度地提高适当和及时治疗的可能性。讨论了及时和准确的公共卫生报告,以促进确定伙伴服务的优先次序。为临床医生提供了额外的指导,这些临床医生的实验室计划从传统的梅毒筛查过渡到反向序列筛查,重点审查筛查结果不一致的产科患者的管理。
{"title":"Diagnosis and Management of Syphilis in Pregnancy.","authors":"Emily H Adhikari","doi":"10.1097/aog.0000000000006166","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000006166","url":null,"abstract":"With rising syphilis and congenital syphilis rates in the United States and globally, clinicians who may not have seen or diagnosed syphilis in training are now faced with recognition of myriad symptoms of the \"great masquerader\" and interpretation of diagnostic algorithms that can be perplexing. Screening for syphilis at the first prenatal visit, in the third trimester, and at delivery is now recommended by the American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists. Although increased screening improves detection of asymptomatic (latent) infection, there is also potential for overtreatment or misdiagnosis. This report serves to familiarize clinicians with symptomatic manifestations of primary and secondary syphilis, to assist with correct interpretation of traditional and reverse algorithms, and to inform clinical staging to maximize the likelihood of adequate and timely treatment. Prompt and accurate public health reporting is discussed to facilitate prioritization of partner services. Additional guidance is provided for clinicians whose laboratories plan a transition from traditional to reverse-sequence screening for syphilis, with focused review of management of the obstetric patient with discordant screening tests.","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145971877","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Severe Early Pregnancy Morbidity at a Tertiary Care Referral Center After the Dobbs Decision. 多布斯决定后三级保健转诊中心的严重早期妊娠发病率。
IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-09 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000006163
Susan E Nourse, Alexandra Gero, Taryn T Hunt-Smith, David K Turok, Lori M Gawron, Rebecca Simmons, Michelle P Debbink, Jessica N Sanders

The objectives of our study were to estimate trends in severe early pregnancy morbidity in pregnant individuals at less than 24 weeks of gestation at a referral center in an abortion-restricted environment and to assess differences after the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision. We measured severe early pregnancy morbidity from January 2017 to December 2023 using billing codes, transfusion records, and intensive care transfers. We verified events and assessed preventability using chart review. We performed an interrupted time series analysis evaluating whether the level or slope of the severe early pregnancy morbidity rate varied with the Dobbs decision. We identified 407 severe early pregnancy morbidity events among 46,181 pregnancies. We noted no significant changes in the rate of total severe early pregnancy morbidity before and after the Dobbs decision, but we did note a significant level increase of 19 events per 100 total events (95% CI, 8.9-29.8) in the rate of preventable severe early pregnancy morbidity.

本研究的目的是估计在堕胎限制环境下转诊中心妊娠少于24周的孕妇严重早期妊娠发病率的趋势,并评估Dobbs诉Jackson妇女健康组织判决后的差异。我们使用账单代码、输血记录和重症监护转移来测量2017年1月至2023年12月的严重早期妊娠发病率。我们使用图表审查来验证事件并评估可预防性。我们进行了中断时间序列分析,评估严重早期妊娠发病率的水平或斜率是否随Dobbs决定而变化。我们在46181例妊娠中发现了407例严重的妊娠早期发病率。我们注意到,在Dobbs判决之前和之后,严重早期妊娠总发病率没有显著变化,但我们确实注意到,可预防的严重早期妊娠总发病率每100个事件中有19个事件显著增加(95% CI, 8.9-29.8)。
{"title":"Severe Early Pregnancy Morbidity at a Tertiary Care Referral Center After the Dobbs Decision.","authors":"Susan E Nourse, Alexandra Gero, Taryn T Hunt-Smith, David K Turok, Lori M Gawron, Rebecca Simmons, Michelle P Debbink, Jessica N Sanders","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006163","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000006163","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objectives of our study were to estimate trends in severe early pregnancy morbidity in pregnant individuals at less than 24 weeks of gestation at a referral center in an abortion-restricted environment and to assess differences after the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision. We measured severe early pregnancy morbidity from January 2017 to December 2023 using billing codes, transfusion records, and intensive care transfers. We verified events and assessed preventability using chart review. We performed an interrupted time series analysis evaluating whether the level or slope of the severe early pregnancy morbidity rate varied with the Dobbs decision. We identified 407 severe early pregnancy morbidity events among 46,181 pregnancies. We noted no significant changes in the rate of total severe early pregnancy morbidity before and after the Dobbs decision, but we did note a significant level increase of 19 events per 100 total events (95% CI, 8.9-29.8) in the rate of preventable severe early pregnancy morbidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145933535","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pregnancy-Related Mortality Due to Infection: Maternal Mortality Review Committees in 29 U.S. States, 2017-2019. 感染导致的妊娠相关死亡率:美国29个州孕产妇死亡率审查委员会,2017-2019。
IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-09 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000006172
Naima T Joseph, Susanna L Trost, Lisa M Hollier, Kiran M Perkins, David A Goodman, Mackenzie Leonard, Ashley Busacker

Objective: To describe demographic and clinical characteristics, preventability, Maternal Mortality Review Committee (MMRC)-determined contributing factors, and example recommendations for pregnancy-related deaths due to infection using data from MMRCs.

Methods: We used pregnancy-related death data from MMRCs in 29 states occurring during 2017-2019 with MMRC-determined underlying cause of death of infection. We describe the distribution of demographic and clinical characteristics, present the most frequent contributing factor classes, and provide example MMRC prevention recommendations.

Results: Ninety-one pregnancy-related infection deaths were identified, and MMRCs determined that 86.4% of deaths were preventable among 88 deaths for which MMRCs determined preventability. Most deaths occurred within 42 days of delivery (69.3%). Additional clinical information was available for many deaths. Group A streptococci were the most frequently identified pathogen (34.0%, 18/53) and genital tract was the most frequently identified source (47.9%, 35/73) of the infection. The most frequent health care encounter before death was hospitalization (50.7%, 36/71). More than half of decedents (69.1%, 47/68) had a health care encounter less than 7 days before death. The five most frequent contributing factor classes were clinical skill/quality of care (18.6%), delay (10.1%), knowledge (10.1%), lack of continuity of care (9.6%), and lack of access/financial resources (7.8%). The MMRC prevention recommendations occur at multiple levels, addressing frequent contributing factor classes.

Conclusion: Most pregnancy-related deaths due to infection are preventable. Example MMRC recommendations highlight prevention opportunities, including improving patient and clinician knowledge regarding clinical signs and symptoms of serious infections, implementing obstetric sepsis protocols, and enhancing care coordination within and across systems.

目的:描述人口统计学和临床特征、可预防性、孕产妇死亡率审查委员会(MMRC)确定的影响因素,以及使用MMRC数据对感染导致的妊娠相关死亡的示例建议。方法:我们使用了2017-2019年29个州MMRCs的妊娠相关死亡数据,mmrc确定了感染死亡的潜在原因。我们描述了人口统计学和临床特征的分布,提出了最常见的影响因素类别,并提供了MMRC预防建议的示例。结果:确定了91例妊娠相关感染死亡,MMRCs确定在88例MMRCs确定可预防的死亡中86.4%的死亡是可预防的。大多数死亡发生在分娩后42天内(69.3%)。还提供了许多死亡病例的额外临床资料。A群链球菌是最常见的病原菌(34.0%,18/53),生殖道是最常见的感染源(47.9%,35/73)。死亡前就医次数最多的是住院(50.7%,36/71)。超过一半的死者(69.1%,47/68)在死亡前不到7天内就诊过。五个最常见的影响因素类别是临床技能/护理质量(18.6%)、延迟(10.1%)、知识(10.1%)、缺乏连续性护理(9.6%)和缺乏获取/财务资源(7.8%)。MMRC的预防建议涉及多个层面,针对常见的致病因素类别。结论:大多数感染导致的妊娠相关死亡是可以预防的。MMRC的建议强调了预防机会,包括改善患者和临床医生对严重感染临床体征和症状的了解,实施产科败血症方案,以及加强系统内和系统间的护理协调。
{"title":"Pregnancy-Related Mortality Due to Infection: Maternal Mortality Review Committees in 29 U.S. States, 2017-2019.","authors":"Naima T Joseph, Susanna L Trost, Lisa M Hollier, Kiran M Perkins, David A Goodman, Mackenzie Leonard, Ashley Busacker","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006172","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000006172","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe demographic and clinical characteristics, preventability, Maternal Mortality Review Committee (MMRC)-determined contributing factors, and example recommendations for pregnancy-related deaths due to infection using data from MMRCs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used pregnancy-related death data from MMRCs in 29 states occurring during 2017-2019 with MMRC-determined underlying cause of death of infection. We describe the distribution of demographic and clinical characteristics, present the most frequent contributing factor classes, and provide example MMRC prevention recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-one pregnancy-related infection deaths were identified, and MMRCs determined that 86.4% of deaths were preventable among 88 deaths for which MMRCs determined preventability. Most deaths occurred within 42 days of delivery (69.3%). Additional clinical information was available for many deaths. Group A streptococci were the most frequently identified pathogen (34.0%, 18/53) and genital tract was the most frequently identified source (47.9%, 35/73) of the infection. The most frequent health care encounter before death was hospitalization (50.7%, 36/71). More than half of decedents (69.1%, 47/68) had a health care encounter less than 7 days before death. The five most frequent contributing factor classes were clinical skill/quality of care (18.6%), delay (10.1%), knowledge (10.1%), lack of continuity of care (9.6%), and lack of access/financial resources (7.8%). The MMRC prevention recommendations occur at multiple levels, addressing frequent contributing factor classes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most pregnancy-related deaths due to infection are preventable. Example MMRC recommendations highlight prevention opportunities, including improving patient and clinician knowledge regarding clinical signs and symptoms of serious infections, implementing obstetric sepsis protocols, and enhancing care coordination within and across systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145934745","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pregnancy Test Use and Timing of Pregnancy Detection in a Prospective Cohort of Pregnancy Planners. 妊娠计划者前瞻性队列中妊娠试验的使用和妊娠检测的时机。
IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-08 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000006157
Alexandra C Sundermann, Elizabeth A Jasper, Anne Marie Z Jukic, Kenneth J Rothman, Lauren A Wise

Objective: To identify determinants of selected pregnancy testing behaviors among pregnancy planners and to elucidate the relationship between pregnancy testing and detection.

Methods: In PRESTO (Pregnancy Study Online), a North American prepregnancy cohort study of pregnancy planners (2018-2024), participants reported day-specific information about pregnancy testing spanning 4 days before day of expected menstruation through 4 days after. We used generalized linear models to estimate the association between maternal attributes and pregnancy testing behavior, characterized as the timing of the first test and testing frequency. We used quantile regression to estimate the timing of pregnancy detection among participants who conceived by maternal characteristics and pregnancy testing behavior. We estimated the adjusted risk of having a negative test result and the probability of detecting a very early pregnancy loss by the timing of the pregnancy test.

Results: We analyzed data from 20,458 pregnancy tests across 6,569 unique participants. Of the participants, 40.7% of reported they engaged in very early testing, defined as testing more than 4 days before their expected period. We observed a range of pregnancy testing intensity, with some participants testing only once and others testing every day. Among participants who detected pregnancy, very early testers were more than 5 times more likely to have a negative test result before a positive test result than those who waited until the day of expected period to test (adjusted risk ratio [aRR[ 5.89; 95% CI, 4.73-7.33). Very early testers were more than 3 times more likely to have an initial positive test result followed by a negative test result, likely reflecting increased detection of very early pregnancy losses (aRR 3.80; 95% CI, 2.12-6.80).

Conclusion: Patterns in home pregnancy testing varied widely among pregnancy planners. Early initiation of pregnancy testing was associated with slightly earlier pregnancy detection, but also a marked increase in risk of negative test results and detection of very early pregnancy losses.

目的:探讨计划生育者选择妊娠检测行为的影响因素,阐明妊娠检测与检测之间的关系。方法:在PRESTO(妊娠研究在线)中,一项针对怀孕计划者的北美孕前队列研究(2018-2024),参与者报告了从预期月经日前4天到后4天的妊娠检测的具体日期信息。我们使用广义线性模型来估计母亲属性与妊娠检测行为之间的关联,其特征为第一次检测的时间和检测频率。我们使用分位数回归来估计孕妇特征和妊娠检测行为的妊娠检测时间。我们估计了检测结果为阴性的调整风险,以及通过妊娠试验的时机发现早期妊娠丢失的概率。结果:我们分析了6,569名独特参与者的20,458次妊娠试验数据。在参与者中,40.7%的人报告说他们参与了非常早的测试,定义为在预期期前4天以上进行测试。我们观察了一系列的妊娠测试强度,一些参与者只测试一次,而其他人每天都测试。在发现怀孕的参与者中,非常早的测试者在测试结果阳性之前出现阴性结果的可能性是等到预产期当天才进行测试的人的5倍以上(调整风险比[aRR] 5.89; 95% CI, 4.73-7.33)。极早期检测者最初检测结果为阳性,随后检测结果为阴性的可能性增加了3倍以上,这可能反映了极早期妊娠丢失的检测增加(aRR 3.80; 95% CI, 2.12-6.80)。结论:家庭验孕方式在计划孕者中存在较大差异。早期开始妊娠检测与稍早的妊娠检测有关,但也与阴性检测结果和早期妊娠丢失检测的风险显着增加有关。
{"title":"Pregnancy Test Use and Timing of Pregnancy Detection in a Prospective Cohort of Pregnancy Planners.","authors":"Alexandra C Sundermann, Elizabeth A Jasper, Anne Marie Z Jukic, Kenneth J Rothman, Lauren A Wise","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006157","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006157","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify determinants of selected pregnancy testing behaviors among pregnancy planners and to elucidate the relationship between pregnancy testing and detection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In PRESTO (Pregnancy Study Online), a North American prepregnancy cohort study of pregnancy planners (2018-2024), participants reported day-specific information about pregnancy testing spanning 4 days before day of expected menstruation through 4 days after. We used generalized linear models to estimate the association between maternal attributes and pregnancy testing behavior, characterized as the timing of the first test and testing frequency. We used quantile regression to estimate the timing of pregnancy detection among participants who conceived by maternal characteristics and pregnancy testing behavior. We estimated the adjusted risk of having a negative test result and the probability of detecting a very early pregnancy loss by the timing of the pregnancy test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed data from 20,458 pregnancy tests across 6,569 unique participants. Of the participants, 40.7% of reported they engaged in very early testing, defined as testing more than 4 days before their expected period. We observed a range of pregnancy testing intensity, with some participants testing only once and others testing every day. Among participants who detected pregnancy, very early testers were more than 5 times more likely to have a negative test result before a positive test result than those who waited until the day of expected period to test (adjusted risk ratio [aRR[ 5.89; 95% CI, 4.73-7.33). Very early testers were more than 3 times more likely to have an initial positive test result followed by a negative test result, likely reflecting increased detection of very early pregnancy losses (aRR 3.80; 95% CI, 2.12-6.80).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patterns in home pregnancy testing varied widely among pregnancy planners. Early initiation of pregnancy testing was associated with slightly earlier pregnancy detection, but also a marked increase in risk of negative test results and detection of very early pregnancy losses.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12788791/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145934641","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Psychostimulant Continuation and Postpartum Mental Health in Pregnant People With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. 精神兴奋剂的持续使用与产后精神健康的孕妇注意缺陷/多动障碍。
IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-08 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000006169
Kevin Y Xu, Lisa M Pappas, Tashalee R Brown, Madeline O Jansen, Vitor S Tardelli, Thiago M Fidalgo, Frances R Levin, Richard A Grucza, Elizabeth A Suarez, Marcela C Smid, Joshua John Horns, Ann M Bruno

Objective: To evaluate the association between psychostimulant continuation, compared with discontinuation, and postpartum mental health outcomes in pregnant people with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) who had consistent psychostimulant prescriptions before pregnancy.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study that used the Merative MarketScan Commercial Claims Database (2011-2021). Included individuals were aged 13-50 years with singleton pregnancies, had delivered at or after 20 weeks of gestation, and had an ADHD diagnosis and psychostimulant adherence. Psychostimulant use during pregnancy was classified as no refills, the proportion of days covered below 80%, or the proportion of days covered at or above 80%. The primary outcomes were mental health events that occurred within 1 year postpartum, such as emergency department or inpatient mental health-related admissions, and new diagnoses of mood or anxiety disorders. Adjusted event rate ratios were estimated using Poisson regression, controlling for maternal age, gestational age at delivery, maternal comorbidities, and preexisting mental health diagnoses.

Results: Among 3,676 eligible patients, 1,521 (41.4%) had no psychostimulant prescriptions during pregnancy (discontinued), 1,899 (51.7%) had a proportion of days covered below 80%, and 256 (7.0%) maintained a proportion of days covered at or above 80%. Overall, 3.3% (95% CI, 2.7-4.0%) experienced postpartum mental health-related admissions and 16.2% (95% CI, 14.6-18.0%) received new postpartum mood or anxiety disorder diagnoses. Although unadjusted analyses suggested a higher incidence of postpartum mood or anxiety disorders among patients continuing psychostimulants than those who discontinued (19.3% vs 12.8%; rate ratio 1.46, 95% CI, 1.17-1.83), this association was no longer observed after controlling for confounders. In adjusted analyses, continuation of psychostimulants during pregnancy was not associated with differences in postpartum mental health-related admissions (rate ratio 1.01, 95% CI, 0.59-1.71) or new mood or anxiety disorder diagnoses (rate ratio 1.30, 95% CI, 0.97-1.74). Preexisting mental health diagnoses (rate ratio 2.60, 95% CI, 1.76-3.90) and medical comorbidities (rate ratio 1.98, 95% CI, 1.33-2.93) were the strongest predictors of postpartum admissions.

Conclusion: Among individuals with ADHD adherent to psychostimulants before pregnancy, the continuation of medication during pregnancy was not associated with adverse postpartum mental health outcomes when compared with discontinuation of medication.

目的:评估持续使用精神兴奋剂(与停用相比)与怀孕前服用一致精神兴奋剂处方的注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)孕妇产后心理健康结果之间的关系。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,使用了Merative MarketScan商业索赔数据库(2011-2021)。纳入的个体年龄在13-50岁之间,是单胎妊娠,在妊娠20周或20周后分娩,有ADHD诊断和精神兴奋剂依从性。妊娠期间精神兴奋剂的使用分为不补充、覆盖天数比例低于80%、覆盖天数比例等于或高于80%。主要结局是产后1年内发生的心理健康事件,如急诊或与心理健康相关的住院患者,以及新诊断的情绪或焦虑障碍。使用泊松回归估计调整后的事件发生率比,控制产妇年龄、分娩胎龄、产妇合并症和先前存在的精神健康诊断。结果:在3676例符合条件的患者中,1521例(41.4%)患者在妊娠期间没有服用精神兴奋剂(停用),1899例(51.7%)患者的用药天数比例低于80%,256例(7.0%)患者的用药天数比例保持在80%以上。总体而言,3.3% (95% CI, 2.7-4.0%)经历过产后精神健康相关的入院治疗,16.2% (95% CI, 14.6-18.0%)接受了新的产后情绪或焦虑障碍诊断。虽然未经调整的分析表明,继续使用精神兴奋剂的患者的产后情绪或焦虑障碍发生率高于停止使用的患者(19.3% vs 12.8%;比率为1.46,95% CI, 1.17-1.83),但在控制混杂因素后,这种关联不再被观察到。在调整分析中,怀孕期间继续使用精神兴奋剂与产后精神健康相关入院(比率比1.01,95% CI, 0.59-1.71)或新的情绪或焦虑障碍诊断(比率比1.30,95% CI, 0.97-1.74)的差异无关。先前存在的精神健康诊断(比率比2.60,95% CI, 1.76-3.90)和医学合并症(比率比1.98,95% CI, 1.33-2.93)是产后入院的最强预测因子。结论:在怀孕前坚持使用精神兴奋剂的ADHD患者中,与停用药物相比,在怀孕期间继续使用药物与不良的产后心理健康结果无关。
{"title":"Psychostimulant Continuation and Postpartum Mental Health in Pregnant People With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.","authors":"Kevin Y Xu, Lisa M Pappas, Tashalee R Brown, Madeline O Jansen, Vitor S Tardelli, Thiago M Fidalgo, Frances R Levin, Richard A Grucza, Elizabeth A Suarez, Marcela C Smid, Joshua John Horns, Ann M Bruno","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006169","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006169","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the association between psychostimulant continuation, compared with discontinuation, and postpartum mental health outcomes in pregnant people with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) who had consistent psychostimulant prescriptions before pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study that used the Merative MarketScan Commercial Claims Database (2011-2021). Included individuals were aged 13-50 years with singleton pregnancies, had delivered at or after 20 weeks of gestation, and had an ADHD diagnosis and psychostimulant adherence. Psychostimulant use during pregnancy was classified as no refills, the proportion of days covered below 80%, or the proportion of days covered at or above 80%. The primary outcomes were mental health events that occurred within 1 year postpartum, such as emergency department or inpatient mental health-related admissions, and new diagnoses of mood or anxiety disorders. Adjusted event rate ratios were estimated using Poisson regression, controlling for maternal age, gestational age at delivery, maternal comorbidities, and preexisting mental health diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 3,676 eligible patients, 1,521 (41.4%) had no psychostimulant prescriptions during pregnancy (discontinued), 1,899 (51.7%) had a proportion of days covered below 80%, and 256 (7.0%) maintained a proportion of days covered at or above 80%. Overall, 3.3% (95% CI, 2.7-4.0%) experienced postpartum mental health-related admissions and 16.2% (95% CI, 14.6-18.0%) received new postpartum mood or anxiety disorder diagnoses. Although unadjusted analyses suggested a higher incidence of postpartum mood or anxiety disorders among patients continuing psychostimulants than those who discontinued (19.3% vs 12.8%; rate ratio 1.46, 95% CI, 1.17-1.83), this association was no longer observed after controlling for confounders. In adjusted analyses, continuation of psychostimulants during pregnancy was not associated with differences in postpartum mental health-related admissions (rate ratio 1.01, 95% CI, 0.59-1.71) or new mood or anxiety disorder diagnoses (rate ratio 1.30, 95% CI, 0.97-1.74). Preexisting mental health diagnoses (rate ratio 2.60, 95% CI, 1.76-3.90) and medical comorbidities (rate ratio 1.98, 95% CI, 1.33-2.93) were the strongest predictors of postpartum admissions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among individuals with ADHD adherent to psychostimulants before pregnancy, the continuation of medication during pregnancy was not associated with adverse postpartum mental health outcomes when compared with discontinuation of medication.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12795318/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145933541","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Obstetrics and gynecology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1