首页 > 最新文献

Obstetrics and gynecology最新文献

英文 中文
Association Among Surgeon Volume, Surgical Approach, and Uterine Size for Hysterectomy for Benign Indications. 良性子宫切除术的外科医生数量、手术方法和子宫大小之间的关系。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-03 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005745
Sarah Santiago, Darington Richardson, Neil Kamdar, Sara R Till, Sawsan As-Sanie, Christopher X Hong

Objective: To assess the relationship between surgeon volume and surgical approach for patients undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications among uteri of varying sizes.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent hysterectomy for benign indications from 2012 to 2021 within the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative registry. For each hysterectomy, the relative annual volume of the performing surgeon was assessed by calculating the proportion of hysterectomy cases contributed by the surgeon each calendar year relative to the total number of hysterectomies in the registry for that year. Hysterectomies were stratified into tertiles: those performed by low-volume surgeons, intermediate-volume surgeons, and high-volume surgeons. Uterine size was represented by the uterine specimen weight and categorized to facilitate clinical interpretation. Multivariable logistic regression models were developed incorporating interaction terms for surgeon volume and uterine size to explore potential effect modification.

Results: A total of 54,150 hysterectomies were included. Hysterectomies performed by intermediate- and high-volume surgeons were more likely to be performed through a minimally invasive approach compared with those performed by low-volume surgeons (intermediate-volume: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.68, 95% CI, 1.47-1.92; high-volume: aOR 2.14, 95% CI, 1.87-2.46). Moreover, this likelihood increased with increasing uterine weight. For uteri weighing between 1,000 g and 1,999 g, the odds of minimally invasive approach was significantly higher among intermediate-volume surgeons (aOR 3.38, 95% CI, 2.04-5.12) and high-volume (aOR 9.26, 95% CI, 5.64-15.2) surgeons, compared with low-volume surgeons. After including an interaction term for uterine weight and surgeon volume, we identified effect modification of surgeon volume on the relationship between uterine size and choice of minimally invasive surgery.

Conclusion: For uteri up to 3,000 g in weight, hysterectomies performed by high-volume surgeons have a higher likelihood of being performed through a minimally invasive approach compared with those performed by low-volume surgeons.

目的评估不同大小子宫的良性子宫切除术患者的外科医生数量和手术方法之间的关系:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是密歇根州手术质量协作登记处 2012 年至 2021 年期间因良性适应症接受子宫切除术的患者。对于每例子宫切除术,通过计算外科医生在每一日历年所贡献的子宫切除术病例占当年注册表中子宫切除术总数的比例,来评估实施手术的外科医生的相对年手术量。子宫切除术分为三等分:由低手术量外科医生、中等手术量外科医生和高手术量外科医生实施的子宫切除术。子宫大小以子宫标本重量表示,并进行分类以方便临床解释。我们建立了多变量逻辑回归模型,其中包含了外科医生数量和子宫大小的交互项,以探索潜在的影响修正:结果:共纳入了 54,150 例子宫切除术。与手术量小的外科医生相比,手术量中等和手术量大的外科医生更有可能采用微创方法进行子宫切除术(手术量中等:调整赔率比 [aOR] 1.68,95% CI,1.47-1.92;手术量大:aOR 2.14,95% CI,1.87-2.46)。此外,这种可能性随着子宫重量的增加而增加。对于子宫重量在 1,000 克到 1,999 克之间的患者,与手术量小的外科医生相比,手术量中等的外科医生(aOR 3.38,95% CI,2.04-5.12)和手术量大的外科医生(aOR 9.26,95% CI,5.64-15.2)采用微创方法的几率明显更高。在加入子宫重量与外科医生数量的交互项后,我们确定了外科医生数量对子宫大小与选择微创手术之间关系的影响:结论:对于重量不超过 3,000 克的子宫,与手术量小的外科医生相比,手术量大的外科医生采用微创方法进行子宫切除术的可能性更高。
{"title":"Association Among Surgeon Volume, Surgical Approach, and Uterine Size for Hysterectomy for Benign Indications.","authors":"Sarah Santiago, Darington Richardson, Neil Kamdar, Sara R Till, Sawsan As-Sanie, Christopher X Hong","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005745","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005745","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the relationship between surgeon volume and surgical approach for patients undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications among uteri of varying sizes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent hysterectomy for benign indications from 2012 to 2021 within the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative registry. For each hysterectomy, the relative annual volume of the performing surgeon was assessed by calculating the proportion of hysterectomy cases contributed by the surgeon each calendar year relative to the total number of hysterectomies in the registry for that year. Hysterectomies were stratified into tertiles: those performed by low-volume surgeons, intermediate-volume surgeons, and high-volume surgeons. Uterine size was represented by the uterine specimen weight and categorized to facilitate clinical interpretation. Multivariable logistic regression models were developed incorporating interaction terms for surgeon volume and uterine size to explore potential effect modification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 54,150 hysterectomies were included. Hysterectomies performed by intermediate- and high-volume surgeons were more likely to be performed through a minimally invasive approach compared with those performed by low-volume surgeons (intermediate-volume: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.68, 95% CI, 1.47-1.92; high-volume: aOR 2.14, 95% CI, 1.87-2.46). Moreover, this likelihood increased with increasing uterine weight. For uteri weighing between 1,000 g and 1,999 g, the odds of minimally invasive approach was significantly higher among intermediate-volume surgeons (aOR 3.38, 95% CI, 2.04-5.12) and high-volume (aOR 9.26, 95% CI, 5.64-15.2) surgeons, compared with low-volume surgeons. After including an interaction term for uterine weight and surgeon volume, we identified effect modification of surgeon volume on the relationship between uterine size and choice of minimally invasive surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For uteri up to 3,000 g in weight, hysterectomies performed by high-volume surgeons have a higher likelihood of being performed through a minimally invasive approach compared with those performed by low-volume surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"817-825"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142372449","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
ACOG Committee Statement No. 12: Health Care for Women and Gender-Diverse Active-Duty and Reserve Uniformed Service Members and Veterans. 美国妇产科协会委员会第 12 号声明:女性和性别多元化现役和后备役军人及退伍军人的医疗保健。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005754

An increasing percentage of the active-duty and reserve uniformed services force are women, and they are the fastest growing population in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Additionally, the VHA is one of the largest providers of gender-affirming care in the United States. Asking about a patient's military service and being aware of the unique health and reproductive health care needs of this population are critically important. Members of these populations may be at increased risk for a variety of health-related issues, including intimate partner violence, a history of military sexual trauma, and other health conditions. This Committee Statement highlights the unique reproductive and other health needs of and special considerations for women and gender-diverse current and former active-duty and reserve uniform service members.

在现役和预备役军警部队中,女性所占的比例越来越大,她们也是退伍军人医疗管理局(VHA)中增长最快的人群。此外,退伍军人医疗管理局也是美国最大的性别平等医疗服务提供者之一。询问患者的兵役情况并了解该人群独特的健康和生殖保健需求至关重要。这些人群的成员可能会增加各种健康相关问题的风险,包括亲密伴侣暴力、军队性创伤史和其他健康问题。本委员会声明强调了女性和性别多元化的现役和退役军警成员的独特生殖健康和其他健康需求以及特殊考虑因素。
{"title":"ACOG Committee Statement No. 12: Health Care for Women and Gender-Diverse Active-Duty and Reserve Uniformed Service Members and Veterans.","authors":"","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005754","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005754","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An increasing percentage of the active-duty and reserve uniformed services force are women, and they are the fastest growing population in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Additionally, the VHA is one of the largest providers of gender-affirming care in the United States. Asking about a patient's military service and being aware of the unique health and reproductive health care needs of this population are critically important. Members of these populations may be at increased risk for a variety of health-related issues, including intimate partner violence, a history of military sexual trauma, and other health conditions. This Committee Statement highlights the unique reproductive and other health needs of and special considerations for women and gender-diverse current and former active-duty and reserve uniform service members.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"144 6","pages":"e144-e151"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142731248","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
ACOG Clinical Consensus No. 4: Urinary Tract Infection in Pregnant Individuals: Correction. 美国妇产科临床共识第 4 号:孕妇尿路感染:更正。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005779
{"title":"ACOG Clinical Consensus No. 4: Urinary Tract Infection in Pregnant Individuals: Correction.","authors":"","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005779","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005779","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"144 6","pages":"e138-e139"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142731172","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
In Reply. 回复中。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005765
Elizabeth A Pritts
{"title":"In Reply.","authors":"Elizabeth A Pritts","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005765","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005765","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"144 6","pages":"e135-e136"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142731297","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Management of Red Cell Alloimmunization in Pregnancy: Correction. 妊娠期红细胞异体免疫的管理:更正。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005775
{"title":"Management of Red Cell Alloimmunization in Pregnancy: Correction.","authors":"","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005775","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005775","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"144 6","pages":"e138"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142731314","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sexual Orientation-Related Disparities in Neonatal Outcomes. 新生儿结局中与性取向相关的差异。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-03 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005747
Payal Chakraborty, Colleen A Reynolds, Sarah McKetta, Kodiak R S Soled, Aimee K Huang, Brent Monseur, Jae Downing Corman, Juno Obedin-Maliver, A Heather Eliassen, Jorge E Chavarro, S Bryn Austin, Bethany Everett, Sebastien Haneuse, Brittany M Charlton

Objective: To evaluate whether disparities exist in adverse neonatal outcomes among the offspring of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and other sexually minoritized (LGB+) birthing people.

Methods: We used longitudinal data from 1995 to 2017 from the Nurses' Health Study II, a cohort of nurses across the United States. We restricted analyses to those who reported live births (N=70,642) in the 2001 or 2009 lifetime pregnancy questionnaires. Participants were asked about sexual orientation identity (current and past) and same-sex attractions and partners. We examined preterm birth, low birth weight, and macrosomia among 1) completely heterosexual; 2) heterosexual with past same-sex attractions, partners, or identity; 3) mostly heterosexual; 4) bisexual; and 5) lesbian or gay participants. We used log-binomial models to estimate risk ratios for each outcome and weighted generalized estimating equations to account for multiple pregnancies per person over time and informative cluster sizes.

Results: Compared with completely heterosexual participants, offspring born to parents in all LGB+ groups combined (groups 2-5) had higher estimated risks of preterm birth (risk ratio 1.22, 95% CI, 1.15-1.30) and low birth weight (1.27, 95% CI, 1.15-1.40) but not macrosomia (0.98, 95% CI, 0.94-1.02). In the subgroup analysis, risk ratios were statistically significant for heterosexual participants with past same-sex attractions, partners, or identity (preterm birth 1.25, 95% CI, 1.13-1.37; low birth weight 1.32, 95% CI, 1.18-1.47). Risk ratios were elevated but not statistically significant for lesbian or gay participants (preterm birth 1.37, 95% CI, 0.98-1.93; low birth weight 1.46, 95% CI, 0.96-2.21) and bisexual participants (preterm birth 1.29, 95% CI, 0.85-1.93; low birth weight 1.24, 95% CI, 0.74-2.08).

Conclusion: The offspring of LGB+ birthing people experience adverse neonatal outcomes, specifically preterm birth and low birth weight. These findings highlight the need to better understand health risks, social inequities, and health care experiences that drive these adverse outcomes.

目的评估女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和其他性取向未成年者(LGB+)的后代在新生儿不良结局方面是否存在差异:我们使用了 "护士健康研究 II"(Nurses' Health Study II)中 1995 年至 2017 年的纵向数据。我们的分析仅限于在 2001 年或 2009 年终生妊娠调查问卷中报告活产的人群(N=70642)。我们询问了参与者的性取向认同(当前和过去)以及同性吸引力和伴侣。我们研究了以下人群的早产、低出生体重和巨大儿情况:1)完全异性恋者;2)有同性吸引、伴侣或身份的异性恋者;3)大部分为异性恋者;4)双性恋者;5)女同性恋或男同性恋者。我们使用对数二项式模型来估算每种结果的风险比,并使用加权广义估计方程来考虑每个人在不同时期的多次怀孕情况和信息集群规模:与完全异性恋的参与者相比,所有 LGB+ 组别(第 2-5 组)的父母所生的后代发生早产(风险比为 1.22,95% CI 为 1.15-1.30)和低出生体重(1.27,95% CI 为 1.15-1.40)的估计风险较高,但发生巨大儿(0.98,95% CI 为 0.94-1.02)的估计风险不高。在亚组分析中,曾有同性吸引、伴侣或身份的异性恋参与者的风险比具有统计学意义(早产 1.25,95% CI,1.13-1.37;低出生体重 1.32,95% CI,1.18-1.47)。女同性恋或男同性恋参与者(早产 1.37,95% CI,0.98-1.93;出生体重不足 1.46,95% CI,0.96-2.21)和双性恋参与者(早产 1.29,95% CI,0.85-1.93;出生体重不足 1.24,95% CI,0.74-2.08)的风险比升高,但无统计学意义:结论:LGB+生育者的后代会经历不良的新生儿结局,尤其是早产和出生体重不足。这些发现突出表明,有必要更好地了解导致这些不良后果的健康风险、社会不平等和医疗保健经历。
{"title":"Sexual Orientation-Related Disparities in Neonatal Outcomes.","authors":"Payal Chakraborty, Colleen A Reynolds, Sarah McKetta, Kodiak R S Soled, Aimee K Huang, Brent Monseur, Jae Downing Corman, Juno Obedin-Maliver, A Heather Eliassen, Jorge E Chavarro, S Bryn Austin, Bethany Everett, Sebastien Haneuse, Brittany M Charlton","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005747","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005747","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether disparities exist in adverse neonatal outcomes among the offspring of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and other sexually minoritized (LGB+) birthing people.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used longitudinal data from 1995 to 2017 from the Nurses' Health Study II, a cohort of nurses across the United States. We restricted analyses to those who reported live births (N=70,642) in the 2001 or 2009 lifetime pregnancy questionnaires. Participants were asked about sexual orientation identity (current and past) and same-sex attractions and partners. We examined preterm birth, low birth weight, and macrosomia among 1) completely heterosexual; 2) heterosexual with past same-sex attractions, partners, or identity; 3) mostly heterosexual; 4) bisexual; and 5) lesbian or gay participants. We used log-binomial models to estimate risk ratios for each outcome and weighted generalized estimating equations to account for multiple pregnancies per person over time and informative cluster sizes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with completely heterosexual participants, offspring born to parents in all LGB+ groups combined (groups 2-5) had higher estimated risks of preterm birth (risk ratio 1.22, 95% CI, 1.15-1.30) and low birth weight (1.27, 95% CI, 1.15-1.40) but not macrosomia (0.98, 95% CI, 0.94-1.02). In the subgroup analysis, risk ratios were statistically significant for heterosexual participants with past same-sex attractions, partners, or identity (preterm birth 1.25, 95% CI, 1.13-1.37; low birth weight 1.32, 95% CI, 1.18-1.47). Risk ratios were elevated but not statistically significant for lesbian or gay participants (preterm birth 1.37, 95% CI, 0.98-1.93; low birth weight 1.46, 95% CI, 0.96-2.21) and bisexual participants (preterm birth 1.29, 95% CI, 0.85-1.93; low birth weight 1.24, 95% CI, 0.74-2.08).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The offspring of LGB+ birthing people experience adverse neonatal outcomes, specifically preterm birth and low birth weight. These findings highlight the need to better understand health risks, social inequities, and health care experiences that drive these adverse outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"843-851"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11602367/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142372452","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effect of Patient Age on Decisional Regret After Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. 患者年龄对腹腔镜子宫切除术后决策后悔的影响
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-19 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005730
Nathan R King, Alison M Zeccola, Li Wang, John A Harris, Christine E Foley

Objective: To compare long-term decision regret between younger (30 years or younger) and older (31-49 years) patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease.

Methods: We conducted a matched retrospective cohort study to analyze patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomies for benign indications from 2009 to 2016. Respondents completed surveys including two validated decision regret scales: one measuring surgical decision regret and the other measuring loss-of-fertility regret. Participant aged was dichotomized as 30 years or younger and 31-49 years. Chi square, Fisher exact, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests and logistic regression were used to compare groups.

Results: Two hundred eighty-seven participants were successfully contacted, and 241 completed the survey (84.0%). Seventy-seven respondents (32.0%) were aged 30 years or younger, and 164 (68.0%) were aged 31-49 years. The average time since surgery was 7.2 years (±2.2 years; range 3.7-12.1 years). Participants aged 30 years or younger regretted both undergoing surgery (32.5% vs 9.1%, P<.001; OR 4.8, 95% CI, 2.3-9.8) and loss of fertility (39.0% vs 13.4%, P<.001, OR 4.1, 95% CI, 2.2-7.8) at significantly higher rates than participants aged 31-49 years. Overall, 83.1% of younger participants agreed that hysterectomy was the right choice compared with 97% of older participants (P<.001). Higher rates of surgical and loss-of-fertility regret were seen in participants with self-reported pelvic pain (P=.003, P=.011), preoperative diagnosis of endometriosis (P=.037, P=.046), and postoperative complications (P=.043, P<.001). Although time since hysterectomy did not affect rate of surgical regret (P=.138), participants further from their hysterectomies had lower rates of loss-of-fertility regret (P=.003). Patient age remained significantly associated with both surgical regret (adjusted OR 2.9 (95% CI, 1.3-6.5) and loss-of-fertility regret (adjusted OR 2.8 (95% CI, 1.3-6.0) on multivariable logistic regression.

Conclusion: Participants aged 30 years or younger were more likely to regret their decision to undergo hysterectomy than participants aged 31-49 years, regardless of parity, prior sterilization, or previous treatment.

目的比较因良性疾病接受腹腔镜子宫切除术的年轻(30 岁或以下)和年长(31-49 岁)患者的长期决策遗憾:我们进行了一项匹配的回顾性队列研究,分析了 2009 年至 2016 年期间因良性适应症接受腹腔镜子宫切除术的患者。受访者填写了调查问卷,其中包括两个经过验证的决策后悔量表:一个测量手术决策后悔,另一个测量丧失生育能力后悔。参与者的年龄被二分为 30 岁或以下和 31-49 岁。采用卡方检验、费雪精确检验、Wilcoxon 秩和检验和逻辑回归对各组进行比较:成功联系到 287 名参与者,其中 241 人(84.0%)完成了调查。77 名受访者(32.0%)的年龄在 30 岁或以下,164 名受访者(68.0%)的年龄在 31-49 岁之间。平均手术时间为 7.2 年(±2.2 年;范围为 3.7-12.1 年)。年龄在 30 岁或以下的参与者对接受手术均表示后悔(32.5% 对 9.1%,PC 结论:年龄在 30 岁或以下的参与者对接受手术均表示后悔:30岁或30岁以下的参与者比31-49岁的参与者更有可能后悔接受子宫切除术的决定,而与奇偶性、之前的绝育手术或之前的治疗无关。
{"title":"Effect of Patient Age on Decisional Regret After Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.","authors":"Nathan R King, Alison M Zeccola, Li Wang, John A Harris, Christine E Foley","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005730","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005730","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare long-term decision regret between younger (30 years or younger) and older (31-49 years) patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a matched retrospective cohort study to analyze patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomies for benign indications from 2009 to 2016. Respondents completed surveys including two validated decision regret scales: one measuring surgical decision regret and the other measuring loss-of-fertility regret. Participant aged was dichotomized as 30 years or younger and 31-49 years. Chi square, Fisher exact, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests and logistic regression were used to compare groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred eighty-seven participants were successfully contacted, and 241 completed the survey (84.0%). Seventy-seven respondents (32.0%) were aged 30 years or younger, and 164 (68.0%) were aged 31-49 years. The average time since surgery was 7.2 years (±2.2 years; range 3.7-12.1 years). Participants aged 30 years or younger regretted both undergoing surgery (32.5% vs 9.1%, P<.001; OR 4.8, 95% CI, 2.3-9.8) and loss of fertility (39.0% vs 13.4%, P<.001, OR 4.1, 95% CI, 2.2-7.8) at significantly higher rates than participants aged 31-49 years. Overall, 83.1% of younger participants agreed that hysterectomy was the right choice compared with 97% of older participants (P<.001). Higher rates of surgical and loss-of-fertility regret were seen in participants with self-reported pelvic pain (P=.003, P=.011), preoperative diagnosis of endometriosis (P=.037, P=.046), and postoperative complications (P=.043, P<.001). Although time since hysterectomy did not affect rate of surgical regret (P=.138), participants further from their hysterectomies had lower rates of loss-of-fertility regret (P=.003). Patient age remained significantly associated with both surgical regret (adjusted OR 2.9 (95% CI, 1.3-6.5) and loss-of-fertility regret (adjusted OR 2.8 (95% CI, 1.3-6.0) on multivariable logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants aged 30 years or younger were more likely to regret their decision to undergo hysterectomy than participants aged 31-49 years, regardless of parity, prior sterilization, or previous treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"144 6","pages":"757-764"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11884687/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142731250","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessment and Treatment of Vaginitis. 阴道炎的评估和治疗。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-11 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005673
Caroline M Mitchell

Vaginitis is the presenting symptom at millions of office visits each year in the United States. Although treatment of sporadic cases is often straightforward, recurrent cases present both diagnostic and treatment challenges. Molecular diagnostic tests are likely superior to in-office microscopy for most clinicians and most cases. In both recurrent bacterial vaginosis and recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis, national treatment guidelines recommend an extended treatment duration with one of the first-line agents. In cases in which such treatment is not successful, vaginal boric acid is likely the cheapest and easiest alternative option. New antifungal medications offer additional but limited treatment options. Probiotics are not recommended for prevention of vulvovaginal candidiasis; however, vaginal products containing Lactobacillus crispatus may have promise for recurrent bacterial vaginosis. Trichomoniasis should be treated with a 1-week course of metronidazole; this is the only sexually transmitted infection for which treatment recommendations vary by sex. In cases in which patients do not respond to initial treatment, the diagnosis should be reconsidered, and other potential causes such as desquamative inflammatory vaginitis, genitourinary syndrome of menopause, or vulvodynia should be considered.

在美国,每年有数百万人因阴道炎就诊。虽然散发性病例的治疗通常很简单,但复发性病例的诊断和治疗都面临挑战。对于大多数临床医生和大多数病例来说,分子诊断测试可能优于诊室显微镜检查。对于复发性细菌性阴道病和复发性外阴阴道念珠菌病,国家治疗指南都建议使用一种一线药物延长治疗时间。在这种治疗不成功的情况下,阴道硼酸可能是最便宜、最简单的替代选择。新的抗真菌药物提供了额外但有限的治疗选择。不建议使用益生菌来预防外阴阴道念珠菌病;不过,含有脆片乳杆菌的阴道产品可能对复发性细菌性阴道病有帮助。滴虫性阴道炎应接受为期一周的甲硝唑治疗;这是唯一一种治疗建议因性别而异的性传播感染。如果患者对初始治疗无效,则应重新考虑诊断,并考虑其他可能的病因,如脱屑性炎症性阴道炎、更年期泌尿生殖系统综合征或外阴炎。
{"title":"Assessment and Treatment of Vaginitis.","authors":"Caroline M Mitchell","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005673","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005673","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vaginitis is the presenting symptom at millions of office visits each year in the United States. Although treatment of sporadic cases is often straightforward, recurrent cases present both diagnostic and treatment challenges. Molecular diagnostic tests are likely superior to in-office microscopy for most clinicians and most cases. In both recurrent bacterial vaginosis and recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis, national treatment guidelines recommend an extended treatment duration with one of the first-line agents. In cases in which such treatment is not successful, vaginal boric acid is likely the cheapest and easiest alternative option. New antifungal medications offer additional but limited treatment options. Probiotics are not recommended for prevention of vulvovaginal candidiasis; however, vaginal products containing Lactobacillus crispatus may have promise for recurrent bacterial vaginosis. Trichomoniasis should be treated with a 1-week course of metronidazole; this is the only sexually transmitted infection for which treatment recommendations vary by sex. In cases in which patients do not respond to initial treatment, the diagnosis should be reconsidered, and other potential causes such as desquamative inflammatory vaginitis, genitourinary syndrome of menopause, or vulvodynia should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"765-781"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141590877","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Compliance Rate With Triage Test and Treatment for Participants Screening Positive in Cervical Cancer Screening Programs: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. 宫颈癌筛查计划中筛查阳性参与者的分诊测试和治疗依从率:系统回顾与元分析》。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-12 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005723
Minmin Wang, Mailikezhati Maimaitiming, Yanxin Bi, Yinzi Jin

Objective: To assess the rates of adherence to triage testing after positive screening results and referral to treatment for precancerous lesions in global cervical cancer screening programs.

Data sources: We searched three electronic databases (Medline, EMBASE, and Web of Science) for articles published in the English language from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2023. We included studies reporting the compliance rate of triage testing and precancer treatment in cervical cancer screening programs. ClinicalTrials.gov was reviewed, and no more studies were identified.

Methods of study selection: The combined search strategies identified 1,673 titles, of which 858 titles and abstracts were screened and 113 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. A total of 33 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis.

Tabulation, integration, and results: Thirty-three studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The average compliance rate for women screening positive was 77.1% for triage testing and 69.4% for referral to treatment. Compliance varied by country income level, screening guideline approach, and target population.

Conclusion: The current compliance rate was lower than the 90% target set by the World Health Organization's global strategy to eliminate cervical cancer. Inadequate follow-up of participants screening positive revealed a gap between the screening program and clinical care.

目的评估全球宫颈癌筛查项目中筛查结果呈阳性后坚持分流检测以及癌前病变转诊治疗的比例:我们检索了三个电子数据库(Medline、EMBASE 和 Web of Science)中自 2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 12 月 31 日以英文发表的文章。我们纳入了报告宫颈癌筛查项目中分流检测和癌前病变治疗达标率的研究。对ClinicalTrials.gov进行了审查,没有发现更多的研究:综合搜索策略确定了 1,673 篇标题,筛选了其中 858 篇标题和摘要,并对 113 篇全文进行了资格评估。共有 33 项研究符合纳入标准并被纳入荟萃分析:有 33 项研究被纳入系统综述和荟萃分析。筛查结果呈阳性的妇女接受分流检测的平均依从率为 77.1%,接受转诊治疗的平均依从率为 69.4%。不同国家的收入水平、筛查指南方法和目标人群的符合率各不相同:目前的符合率低于世界卫生组织消除宫颈癌全球战略设定的 90% 的目标。对筛查结果呈阳性的参与者的随访不足表明筛查计划与临床治疗之间存在差距。
{"title":"Compliance Rate With Triage Test and Treatment for Participants Screening Positive in Cervical Cancer Screening Programs: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Minmin Wang, Mailikezhati Maimaitiming, Yanxin Bi, Yinzi Jin","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005723","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005723","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the rates of adherence to triage testing after positive screening results and referral to treatment for precancerous lesions in global cervical cancer screening programs.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>We searched three electronic databases (Medline, EMBASE, and Web of Science) for articles published in the English language from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2023. We included studies reporting the compliance rate of triage testing and precancer treatment in cervical cancer screening programs. ClinicalTrials.gov was reviewed, and no more studies were identified.</p><p><strong>Methods of study selection: </strong>The combined search strategies identified 1,673 titles, of which 858 titles and abstracts were screened and 113 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. A total of 33 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Tabulation, integration, and results: </strong>Thirty-three studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The average compliance rate for women screening positive was 77.1% for triage testing and 69.4% for referral to treatment. Compliance varied by country income level, screening guideline approach, and target population.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current compliance rate was lower than the 90% target set by the World Health Organization's global strategy to eliminate cervical cancer. Inadequate follow-up of participants screening positive revealed a gap between the screening program and clinical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"791-800"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142292399","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Navigating the Legal Landscape of Reproductive Rights and Medical Training After LePage v. Mobile Infirmary Clinic. LePage 诉 Mobile Infirmary Clinic 案之后,生殖权利和医疗培训的法律前景。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-12 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005728
Alexandra Herweck, Ariana M Traub, Lisa M Shandley
{"title":"Navigating the Legal Landscape of Reproductive Rights and Medical Training After LePage v. Mobile Infirmary Clinic.","authors":"Alexandra Herweck, Ariana M Traub, Lisa M Shandley","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005728","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005728","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"e129-e133"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142292403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Obstetrics and gynecology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1