首页 > 最新文献

Obstetrics and gynecology最新文献

英文 中文
Association of Central and General Obesity Measures With Pelvic Organ Prolapse. 中心性肥胖和全身性肥胖与盆腔器官脱垂的关系
IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000005758
Keyi Si,Yingying Yang,Qianqian Liu,Qin Wang,Shaohua Yin,Qingqiang Dai,Yuting Yao,Lei Yuan,Guizhu Wu
OBJECTIVETo examine the association between the combination of central and general obesity measures and the risk of pelvic organ prolapse (POP).METHODSWaist/height ratio and body mass index (BMI, calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) for 251,143 participants (aged 39-71 years) without pre-existing POP from the UK Biobank were collected at enrollment between 2006 and 2010. Participants were followed through December 19, 2022. Incident POP was identified using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes and operating procedure codes in the medical records. Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the association between obesity measures and incident POP. Population-attributable fractions were calculated to indicate the proportion of cases that were attributable to obesity measures.RESULTSDuring a median follow-up of 13.8 years, 9,781 POP cases were recorded. Central obesity (waist/height ratio 0.5 or greater) was associated with a 48% increased risk of POP regardless of BMI (hazard ratio [HR] 1.48; 95% CI, 1.41-1.56). Approximately 21.7% (95% CI, 19.1-24.4%) of all POP cases were attributable to central obesity. In addition, overweight without central obesity (BMI 25-29.9 and waist/height ratio less than 0.5) was associated with a 23% higher risk of POP (HR 1.23; 95% CI, 1.14-1.34), and this accounted for 2.0% (95% CI, 1.1-2.9%) of all POP cases. The magnitude of increased POP risk associated with central obesity varied by age (younger than 60 years vs 60 years or older: 57% vs 39%) and by history of hysterectomy (no vs yes: 54% vs 27%).CONCLUSIONCentral obesity and overweight without central obesity are risk factors for POP.
目的:研究中心性肥胖和全身性肥胖的综合指标与盆腔器官脱垂(POP)风险之间的关系。方法:2006 年至 2010 年间,在英国生物库(UK Biobank)注册时收集了 251,143 名未患 POP 的参与者(年龄 39-71 岁)的腰围/身高比和体重指数(BMI,以体重(公斤)除以身高(米)的平方计算)。对参与者的随访至 2022 年 12 月 19 日。通过病历中的《国际疾病分类》第十版代码和手术程序代码确定发病的 POP。采用 Cox 比例危险模型来估算肥胖指标与发病 POP 之间的关系。结果在中位 13.8 年的随访期间,共记录了 9781 例 POP 病例。无论体重指数如何,中心性肥胖(腰围/身高比大于或等于 0.5)与 POP 风险增加 48% 相关(危险比 [HR] 1.48;95% CI,1.41-1.56)。在所有 POP 病例中,约有 21.7%(95% CI,19.1-24.4%)的病例可归因于中心性肥胖。此外,无中心性肥胖的超重(体重指数 25-29.9 且腰围/身高比小于 0.5)与 POP 风险增加 23% 相关(HR 1.23;95% CI,1.14-1.34),占所有 POP 病例的 2.0%(95% CI,1.1-2.9%)。与中心性肥胖相关的 POP 风险增加的程度因年龄(60 岁以下 vs 60 岁或以上:57% vs 39%)和子宫切除史(无 vs 有:54% vs 27%)而异。
{"title":"Association of Central and General Obesity Measures With Pelvic Organ Prolapse.","authors":"Keyi Si,Yingying Yang,Qianqian Liu,Qin Wang,Shaohua Yin,Qingqiang Dai,Yuting Yao,Lei Yuan,Guizhu Wu","doi":"10.1097/aog.0000000000005758","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000005758","url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVETo examine the association between the combination of central and general obesity measures and the risk of pelvic organ prolapse (POP).METHODSWaist/height ratio and body mass index (BMI, calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) for 251,143 participants (aged 39-71 years) without pre-existing POP from the UK Biobank were collected at enrollment between 2006 and 2010. Participants were followed through December 19, 2022. Incident POP was identified using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes and operating procedure codes in the medical records. Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the association between obesity measures and incident POP. Population-attributable fractions were calculated to indicate the proportion of cases that were attributable to obesity measures.RESULTSDuring a median follow-up of 13.8 years, 9,781 POP cases were recorded. Central obesity (waist/height ratio 0.5 or greater) was associated with a 48% increased risk of POP regardless of BMI (hazard ratio [HR] 1.48; 95% CI, 1.41-1.56). Approximately 21.7% (95% CI, 19.1-24.4%) of all POP cases were attributable to central obesity. In addition, overweight without central obesity (BMI 25-29.9 and waist/height ratio less than 0.5) was associated with a 23% higher risk of POP (HR 1.23; 95% CI, 1.14-1.34), and this accounted for 2.0% (95% CI, 1.1-2.9%) of all POP cases. The magnitude of increased POP risk associated with central obesity varied by age (younger than 60 years vs 60 years or older: 57% vs 39%) and by history of hysterectomy (no vs yes: 54% vs 27%).CONCLUSIONCentral obesity and overweight without central obesity are risk factors for POP.","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142490504","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Age to Initiate Routine Breast Cancer Screening. 开始常规乳腺癌筛查的年龄。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005757

This Clinical Practice Update provides revised guidance on the age to start routine breast cancer screening with mammography. This document is a focused update of related content in Practice Bulletin No. 179, Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Screening in Average-Risk Women (Obstet Gynecol 2017;130:e1-16).

本《临床实践更新》就开始常规乳腺 X 射线摄影乳腺癌筛查的年龄提供了修订指南。本文件是对第179号实践公告《普通风险女性的乳腺癌风险评估和筛查》(Obstet Gynecol 2017;130:e1-16)中相关内容的重点更新。
{"title":"Age to Initiate Routine Breast Cancer Screening.","authors":"","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005757","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005757","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This Clinical Practice Update provides revised guidance on the age to start routine breast cancer screening with mammography. This document is a focused update of related content in Practice Bulletin No. 179, Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Screening in Average-Risk Women (Obstet Gynecol 2017;130:e1-16).</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142400891","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Tribute to John T. Queenan, MD (1933-2024). 向 John T. Queenan 医生(1933-2024 年)致敬。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005768
James R Scott
{"title":"A Tribute to John T. Queenan, MD (1933-2024).","authors":"James R Scott","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005768","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005768","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142400890","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Combining Ultrasonography and Endometrial Aspiration as a One-Stop Screening for Endometrial Neoplasia. 结合超声波检查和子宫内膜抽吸术,一站式筛查子宫内膜肿瘤。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005752
Ohad Rotenberg, Georgios Doulaveris, Gary L Goldberg, Malte Renz, Kathleen Whitney, Leeann Dar, Noam Rotenberg, Haotian Wu, Thierry Van den Bosch, Pe'er Dar

Objective: To assess the performance of simultaneous endometrial aspiration and sonohysterography to screen for endometrial cancer or hyperplasia in women aged 50 years or older.

Methods: We conducted a prospective study from February 2014 to October 2020 at the ultrasound unit of a large urban academic medical center. The study included 1,635 women aged 50 years or older referred for endometrial evaluation, with follow-up through January 2021. Participants underwent saline infusion sonohysterography combined with ultrasound-guided endometrial aspiration. The primary outcome measured was a diagnosis of endometrial cancer or hyperplasia within 1 year from screening. The diagnostic accuracy of the combined evaluation method, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV), was assessed.

Results: Of 1,170 women who completed the study protocol, 82 (7.0%) had endometrial cancer and 42 (3.6%) had endometrial hyperplasia. Of all patients who developed cancer during the follow-up period, 85.5% were diagnosed within 1 year after evaluation. The application of simultaneous endometrial aspiration and sonohysterography together demonstrated a sensitivity of 99.1%, specificity of 24.9%, PPV of 11.8%, and NPV of 99.6%. Using a theoretical sequential approach, assuming an endometrial aspiration is performed only in patients determined to be high risk by sonohysterography, demonstrated a sensitivity of 93.4%, specificity of 99.9%, PPV of 99.0%, and NPV of 99.3%.

Conclusion: Simultaneous endometrial aspiration and sonohysterography is an effective one-stop outpatient screening tool for detecting endometrial cancer and hyperplasia in women aged 50 years or older. With the integration of two screening modalities into a single procedure, simultaneous endometrial aspiration and sonohysterography may overcome the limitations inherent in each of the currently recommended methods individually, potentially improving patient prognosis and streamlining the diagnostic process.

目的评估同时进行子宫内膜抽吸术和超声造影术筛查 50 岁及以上女性子宫内膜癌或增生的效果:我们于 2014 年 2 月至 2020 年 10 月在一家大型城市学术医疗中心的超声科开展了一项前瞻性研究。研究纳入了 1635 名转诊接受子宫内膜评估的 50 岁及以上女性,随访至 2021 年 1 月。参与者均接受了生理盐水输注超声心动图检查和超声引导下子宫内膜抽吸术。测量的主要结果是筛查后 1 年内子宫内膜癌或增生的诊断结果。评估了联合评估方法的诊断准确性,包括敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV):在完成研究方案的 1170 名妇女中,82 人(7.0%)罹患子宫内膜癌,42 人(3.6%)罹患子宫内膜增生症。在随访期间罹患癌症的所有患者中,85.5%是在评估后一年内确诊的。同时应用子宫内膜抽吸术和超声波宫腔镜检查的敏感性为 99.1%,特异性为 24.9%,PPV 为 11.8%,NPV 为 99.6%。假设仅对超声宫腔镜检查确定为高风险的患者进行子宫内膜抽吸术,采用理论顺序法的灵敏度为 93.4%,特异性为 99.9%,PPV 为 99.0%,NPV 为 99.3%:同时进行子宫内膜抽吸术和超声宫腔镜检查是一种有效的一站式门诊筛查工具,可用于检测 50 岁及以上妇女的子宫内膜癌和子宫内膜增生症。通过将两种筛查方式整合到一个程序中,同时进行子宫内膜穿刺术和超声波宫腔镜检查可能会克服目前推荐的每种方法各自固有的局限性,从而有可能改善患者的预后并简化诊断过程。
{"title":"Combining Ultrasonography and Endometrial Aspiration as a One-Stop Screening for Endometrial Neoplasia.","authors":"Ohad Rotenberg, Georgios Doulaveris, Gary L Goldberg, Malte Renz, Kathleen Whitney, Leeann Dar, Noam Rotenberg, Haotian Wu, Thierry Van den Bosch, Pe'er Dar","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005752","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005752","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the performance of simultaneous endometrial aspiration and sonohysterography to screen for endometrial cancer or hyperplasia in women aged 50 years or older.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective study from February 2014 to October 2020 at the ultrasound unit of a large urban academic medical center. The study included 1,635 women aged 50 years or older referred for endometrial evaluation, with follow-up through January 2021. Participants underwent saline infusion sonohysterography combined with ultrasound-guided endometrial aspiration. The primary outcome measured was a diagnosis of endometrial cancer or hyperplasia within 1 year from screening. The diagnostic accuracy of the combined evaluation method, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV), was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,170 women who completed the study protocol, 82 (7.0%) had endometrial cancer and 42 (3.6%) had endometrial hyperplasia. Of all patients who developed cancer during the follow-up period, 85.5% were diagnosed within 1 year after evaluation. The application of simultaneous endometrial aspiration and sonohysterography together demonstrated a sensitivity of 99.1%, specificity of 24.9%, PPV of 11.8%, and NPV of 99.6%. Using a theoretical sequential approach, assuming an endometrial aspiration is performed only in patients determined to be high risk by sonohysterography, demonstrated a sensitivity of 93.4%, specificity of 99.9%, PPV of 99.0%, and NPV of 99.3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Simultaneous endometrial aspiration and sonohysterography is an effective one-stop outpatient screening tool for detecting endometrial cancer and hyperplasia in women aged 50 years or older. With the integration of two screening modalities into a single procedure, simultaneous endometrial aspiration and sonohysterography may overcome the limitations inherent in each of the currently recommended methods individually, potentially improving patient prognosis and streamlining the diagnostic process.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11556823/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142400893","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Betamethasone Exposure and Neonatal Respiratory Morbidity Among Late Preterm Births by Planned Mode of Delivery and Gestational Age. 按计划分娩方式和胎龄划分的晚期早产儿中倍他米松暴露与新生儿呼吸系统发病率。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005756
Mark A Clapp, Siguo Li, Jessica L Cohen, Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman, Amy B Knudsen, Scott A Lorch, Tanayott Thaweethai, Jason D Wright, Anjali J Kaimal, Alexander Melamed

Objective: To estimate the effect of late preterm antenatal steroids on the risk of respiratory morbidity among subgroups of patients on the basis of the planned mode of delivery and gestational age at presentation.

Methods: This was a secondary analysis of the ALPS (Antenatal Late Preterm Steroid) Trial, a multicenter trial conducted within the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network of individuals with singleton gestations and without preexisting diabetes who were at high risk for late preterm delivery (34-36 weeks of gestation). We fit binomial regression models to estimate the risk of respiratory morbidity, with and without steroid administration, by gestational age and planned mode of delivery at the time of presentation. We assumed a homogeneous effect of steroids on the log-odds scale, as was reported in the ALPS trial. The primary outcome was neonatal respiratory morbidity, as defined in the ALPS Trial.

Results: The analysis included 2,825 patients at risk for late preterm birth. The risk of respiratory morbidity varied significantly by planned mode of delivery (adjusted risk ratio [RR] 1.90, 95% CI, 1.55-2.33 for cesarean delivery vs vaginal delivery) and week of gestation at presentation (adjusted RR 0.56, 95% CI, 0.50-0.63). For those planning cesarean delivery and presenting in the 34th week of gestation, the risk of neonatal respiratory morbidity was 39.4% (95% CI, 30.8-47.9%) without steroids and 32.0% (95% CI, 24.6-39.4%) with steroids. In contrast, for patients presenting in the 36th week and planning vaginal delivery, the risk of neonatal respiratory morbidity was 6.9% (95% CI, 5.2-8.6%) without steroids and 5.6% (95% CI, 4.2-7.0%) with steroids.

Conclusion: The absolute risk difference of neonatal respiratory morbidity between those exposed and those unexposed to late preterm antenatal steroids varies considerably by gestational age at presentation and planned mode of delivery. Because only communicating the relative risk reduction of antenatal steroids for respiratory morbidity may lead to an inaccurate perception of benefit, more patient-specific estimates of risk expected with and without treatment may inform shared decision making.

目的根据计划分娩方式和发病时的胎龄,估计晚期早产儿产前类固醇对亚组患者呼吸系统发病风险的影响:这是对 ALPS(产前晚期早产类固醇)试验的二次分析,该试验是在尤妮斯-肯尼迪-施莱佛国家儿童健康与人类发展研究所母胎医学单位网络内进行的一项多中心试验,对象是单胎妊娠且无糖尿病的晚期早产高危人群(妊娠 34-36 周)。我们建立了二项回归模型,以估算在使用和未使用类固醇的情况下,根据妊娠年龄和分娩时的计划分娩方式得出的呼吸系统发病风险。正如 ALPS 试验报告的那样,我们假定类固醇的对数效应是均一的。根据 ALPS 试验的定义,主要结果是新生儿呼吸系统发病率:分析包括 2825 名有晚期早产风险的患者。不同计划分娩方式(剖宫产与阴道分娩的调整风险比[RR]为1.90,95% CI为1.55-2.33)和妊娠周数(调整RR为0.56,95% CI为0.50-0.63)导致的呼吸系统发病风险差异显著。对于计划剖宫产且在妊娠第 34 周分娩的患者,不使用类固醇的新生儿呼吸系统发病风险为 39.4%(95% CI,30.8-47.9%),使用类固醇的新生儿呼吸系统发病风险为 32.0%(95% CI,24.6-39.4%)。相比之下,对于第36周分娩并计划阴道分娩的患者,不使用类固醇的新生儿呼吸系统发病风险为6.9%(95% CI,5.2-8.6%),使用类固醇的新生儿呼吸系统发病风险为5.6%(95% CI,4.2-7.0%):结论:使用和未使用早产晚期类固醇的新生儿呼吸系统发病率的绝对风险差异因胎龄和计划分娩方式的不同而有很大差异。由于仅告知产前类固醇可降低呼吸系统发病率的相对风险,可能会导致对其益处的不准确认识,因此,对接受和不接受治疗时的预期风险进行更多针对患者的估计,可为共同决策提供依据。
{"title":"Betamethasone Exposure and Neonatal Respiratory Morbidity Among Late Preterm Births by Planned Mode of Delivery and Gestational Age.","authors":"Mark A Clapp, Siguo Li, Jessica L Cohen, Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman, Amy B Knudsen, Scott A Lorch, Tanayott Thaweethai, Jason D Wright, Anjali J Kaimal, Alexander Melamed","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005756","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005756","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the effect of late preterm antenatal steroids on the risk of respiratory morbidity among subgroups of patients on the basis of the planned mode of delivery and gestational age at presentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a secondary analysis of the ALPS (Antenatal Late Preterm Steroid) Trial, a multicenter trial conducted within the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network of individuals with singleton gestations and without preexisting diabetes who were at high risk for late preterm delivery (34-36 weeks of gestation). We fit binomial regression models to estimate the risk of respiratory morbidity, with and without steroid administration, by gestational age and planned mode of delivery at the time of presentation. We assumed a homogeneous effect of steroids on the log-odds scale, as was reported in the ALPS trial. The primary outcome was neonatal respiratory morbidity, as defined in the ALPS Trial.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 2,825 patients at risk for late preterm birth. The risk of respiratory morbidity varied significantly by planned mode of delivery (adjusted risk ratio [RR] 1.90, 95% CI, 1.55-2.33 for cesarean delivery vs vaginal delivery) and week of gestation at presentation (adjusted RR 0.56, 95% CI, 0.50-0.63). For those planning cesarean delivery and presenting in the 34th week of gestation, the risk of neonatal respiratory morbidity was 39.4% (95% CI, 30.8-47.9%) without steroids and 32.0% (95% CI, 24.6-39.4%) with steroids. In contrast, for patients presenting in the 36th week and planning vaginal delivery, the risk of neonatal respiratory morbidity was 6.9% (95% CI, 5.2-8.6%) without steroids and 5.6% (95% CI, 4.2-7.0%) with steroids.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The absolute risk difference of neonatal respiratory morbidity between those exposed and those unexposed to late preterm antenatal steroids varies considerably by gestational age at presentation and planned mode of delivery. Because only communicating the relative risk reduction of antenatal steroids for respiratory morbidity may lead to an inaccurate perception of benefit, more patient-specific estimates of risk expected with and without treatment may inform shared decision making.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142400892","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A New Tool for Estimating the Number of Pregnant People in the United States. 估算美国怀孕人数的新工具。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005750
Penelope Strid, Regina M Simeone, Rebecca Hall, Jessica R Meeker, Sascha R Ellington

Background: Knowing the approximate number of women of reproductive age (ie, 15-49 years) who are pregnant at a point in time in the United States can aid in emergency preparedness resource allocation. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released a pregnancy estimator toolkit in 2012, which could be used to estimate the number of pregnant people in a geographic area at a point in time. This original toolkit did not account for pregnancy losses before 20 weeks of gestation; however, an updated toolkit released by the CDC in May 2024 uses a ratio of live births to estimate the number of pregnancy losses before 20 weeks at a point in time for improved estimation of total pregnant people at a point in time.

Instrument: We used the CDC's updated reproductive health tool, "Estimating the Number of Pregnant Women in a Geographic Area."

Experience: Using publicly available data for 2020, we gathered the necessary input values, including total births, fetal deaths, and induced abortions, and applied the equation available in the CDC toolkit to estimate the number of pregnant people in the United States at any point in time in 2020.

Conclusion: In 2020, there were 75,582,028 women of reproductive age in the United States, and we estimate that approximately 2,962,052 or 3.9% of women of reproductive age were pregnant at any point in time in the United States.

背景:了解美国育龄妇女(即 15-49 岁)在某一时点怀孕的大致人数有助于应急准备资源的分配。美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)于 2012 年发布了一个怀孕估计工具包,可用于估计某一时间点某一地理区域的怀孕人数。然而,疾控中心于 2024 年 5 月发布的更新版工具包使用活产比率来估算某一时间点 20 周前的妊娠损失数量,从而更好地估算某一时间点的总怀孕人数:我们使用了疾控中心更新的生殖健康工具 "估算地理区域内的孕妇人数":利用 2020 年的公开数据,我们收集了必要的输入值,包括总出生人数、胎儿死亡数和人工流产数,并应用疾病预防控制中心工具包中的公式估算了 2020 年美国任何时间点的孕妇人数:结论:2020 年,美国有 75,582,028 名育龄妇女,我们估计约有 2,962,052 名育龄妇女或 3.9% 的育龄妇女在美国的任何时间点怀孕。
{"title":"A New Tool for Estimating the Number of Pregnant People in the United States.","authors":"Penelope Strid, Regina M Simeone, Rebecca Hall, Jessica R Meeker, Sascha R Ellington","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005750","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005750","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Knowing the approximate number of women of reproductive age (ie, 15-49 years) who are pregnant at a point in time in the United States can aid in emergency preparedness resource allocation. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released a pregnancy estimator toolkit in 2012, which could be used to estimate the number of pregnant people in a geographic area at a point in time. This original toolkit did not account for pregnancy losses before 20 weeks of gestation; however, an updated toolkit released by the CDC in May 2024 uses a ratio of live births to estimate the number of pregnancy losses before 20 weeks at a point in time for improved estimation of total pregnant people at a point in time.</p><p><strong>Instrument: </strong>We used the CDC's updated reproductive health tool, \"Estimating the Number of Pregnant Women in a Geographic Area.\"</p><p><strong>Experience: </strong>Using publicly available data for 2020, we gathered the necessary input values, including total births, fetal deaths, and induced abortions, and applied the equation available in the CDC toolkit to estimate the number of pregnant people in the United States at any point in time in 2020.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In 2020, there were 75,582,028 women of reproductive age in the United States, and we estimate that approximately 2,962,052 or 3.9% of women of reproductive age were pregnant at any point in time in the United States.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142372362","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Association Among Surgeon Volume, Surgical Approach, and Uterine Size for Hysterectomy for Benign Indications. 良性子宫切除术的外科医生数量、手术方法和子宫大小之间的关系。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005745
Sarah Santiago, Darington Richardson, Neil Kamdar, Sara R Till, Sawsan As-Sanie, Christopher X Hong

Objective: To assess the relationship between surgeon volume and surgical approach for patients undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications among uteri of varying sizes.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent hysterectomy for benign indications from 2012 to 2021 within the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative registry. For each hysterectomy, the relative annual volume of the performing surgeon was assessed by calculating the proportion of hysterectomy cases contributed by the surgeon each calendar year relative to the total number of hysterectomies in the registry for that year. Hysterectomies were stratified into tertiles: those performed by low-volume surgeons, intermediate-volume surgeons, and high-volume surgeons. Uterine size was represented by the uterine specimen weight and categorized to facilitate clinical interpretation. Multivariable logistic regression models were developed incorporating interaction terms for surgeon volume and uterine size to explore potential effect modification.

Results: A total of 54,150 hysterectomies were included. Hysterectomies performed by intermediate- and high-volume surgeons were more likely to be performed through a minimally invasive approach compared with those performed by low-volume surgeons (intermediate-volume: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.68, 95% CI, 1.47-1.92; high-volume: aOR 2.14, 95% CI, 1.87-2.46). Moreover, this likelihood increased with increasing uterine weight. For uteri weighing between 1,000 g and 1,999 g, the odds of minimally invasive approach was significantly higher among intermediate-volume surgeons (aOR 3.38, 95% CI, 2.04-5.12) and high-volume (aOR 9.26, 95% CI, 5.64-15.2) surgeons, compared with low-volume surgeons. After including an interaction term for uterine weight and surgeon volume, we identified effect modification of surgeon volume on the relationship between uterine size and choice of minimally invasive surgery.

Conclusion: For uteri up to 3,000 g in weight, hysterectomies performed by high-volume surgeons have a higher likelihood of being performed through a minimally invasive approach compared with those performed by low-volume surgeons.

目的评估不同大小子宫的良性子宫切除术患者的外科医生数量和手术方法之间的关系:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是密歇根州手术质量协作登记处 2012 年至 2021 年期间因良性适应症接受子宫切除术的患者。对于每例子宫切除术,通过计算外科医生在每一日历年所贡献的子宫切除术病例占当年注册表中子宫切除术总数的比例,来评估实施手术的外科医生的相对年手术量。子宫切除术分为三等分:由低手术量外科医生、中等手术量外科医生和高手术量外科医生实施的子宫切除术。子宫大小以子宫标本重量表示,并进行分类以方便临床解释。我们建立了多变量逻辑回归模型,其中包含了外科医生数量和子宫大小的交互项,以探索潜在的影响修正:结果:共纳入了 54,150 例子宫切除术。与手术量小的外科医生相比,手术量中等和手术量大的外科医生更有可能采用微创方法进行子宫切除术(手术量中等:调整赔率比 [aOR] 1.68,95% CI,1.47-1.92;手术量大:aOR 2.14,95% CI,1.87-2.46)。此外,这种可能性随着子宫重量的增加而增加。对于子宫重量在 1,000 克到 1,999 克之间的患者,与手术量小的外科医生相比,手术量中等的外科医生(aOR 3.38,95% CI,2.04-5.12)和手术量大的外科医生(aOR 9.26,95% CI,5.64-15.2)采用微创方法的几率明显更高。在加入子宫重量与外科医生数量的交互项后,我们确定了外科医生数量对子宫大小与选择微创手术之间关系的影响:结论:对于重量不超过 3,000 克的子宫,与手术量小的外科医生相比,手术量大的外科医生采用微创方法进行子宫切除术的可能性更高。
{"title":"Association Among Surgeon Volume, Surgical Approach, and Uterine Size for Hysterectomy for Benign Indications.","authors":"Sarah Santiago, Darington Richardson, Neil Kamdar, Sara R Till, Sawsan As-Sanie, Christopher X Hong","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005745","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005745","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the relationship between surgeon volume and surgical approach for patients undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications among uteri of varying sizes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent hysterectomy for benign indications from 2012 to 2021 within the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative registry. For each hysterectomy, the relative annual volume of the performing surgeon was assessed by calculating the proportion of hysterectomy cases contributed by the surgeon each calendar year relative to the total number of hysterectomies in the registry for that year. Hysterectomies were stratified into tertiles: those performed by low-volume surgeons, intermediate-volume surgeons, and high-volume surgeons. Uterine size was represented by the uterine specimen weight and categorized to facilitate clinical interpretation. Multivariable logistic regression models were developed incorporating interaction terms for surgeon volume and uterine size to explore potential effect modification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 54,150 hysterectomies were included. Hysterectomies performed by intermediate- and high-volume surgeons were more likely to be performed through a minimally invasive approach compared with those performed by low-volume surgeons (intermediate-volume: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.68, 95% CI, 1.47-1.92; high-volume: aOR 2.14, 95% CI, 1.87-2.46). Moreover, this likelihood increased with increasing uterine weight. For uteri weighing between 1,000 g and 1,999 g, the odds of minimally invasive approach was significantly higher among intermediate-volume surgeons (aOR 3.38, 95% CI, 2.04-5.12) and high-volume (aOR 9.26, 95% CI, 5.64-15.2) surgeons, compared with low-volume surgeons. After including an interaction term for uterine weight and surgeon volume, we identified effect modification of surgeon volume on the relationship between uterine size and choice of minimally invasive surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For uteri up to 3,000 g in weight, hysterectomies performed by high-volume surgeons have a higher likelihood of being performed through a minimally invasive approach compared with those performed by low-volume surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142372449","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sexual Orientation-Related Disparities in Neonatal Outcomes. 新生儿结局中与性取向相关的差异。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005747
Payal Chakraborty, Colleen A Reynolds, Sarah McKetta, Kodiak R S Soled, Aimee K Huang, Brent Monseur, Jae Downing Corman, Juno Obedin-Maliver, A Heather Eliassen, Jorge E Chavarro, S Bryn Austin, Bethany Everett, Sebastien Haneuse, Brittany M Charlton

Objective: To evaluate whether disparities exist in adverse neonatal outcomes among the offspring of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and other sexually minoritized (LGB+) birthing people.

Methods: We used longitudinal data from 1995 to 2017 from the Nurses' Health Study II, a cohort of nurses across the United States. We restricted analyses to those who reported live births (N=70,642) in the 2001 or 2009 lifetime pregnancy questionnaires. Participants were asked about sexual orientation identity (current and past) and same-sex attractions and partners. We examined preterm birth, low birth weight, and macrosomia among 1) completely heterosexual; 2) heterosexual with past same-sex attractions, partners, or identity; 3) mostly heterosexual; 4) bisexual; and 5) lesbian or gay participants. We used log-binomial models to estimate risk ratios for each outcome and weighted generalized estimating equations to account for multiple pregnancies per person over time and informative cluster sizes.

Results: Compared with completely heterosexual participants, offspring born to parents in all LGB+ groups combined (groups 2-5) had higher estimated risks of preterm birth (risk ratio 1.22, 95% CI, 1.15-1.30) and low birth weight (1.27, 95% CI, 1.15-1.40) but not macrosomia (0.98, 95% CI, 0.94-1.02). In the subgroup analysis, risk ratios were statistically significant for heterosexual participants with past same-sex attractions, partners, or identity (preterm birth 1.25, 95% CI, 1.13-1.37; low birth weight 1.32, 95% CI, 1.18-1.47). Risk ratios were elevated but not statistically significant for lesbian or gay participants (preterm birth 1.37, 95% CI, 0.98-1.93; low birth weight 1.46, 95% CI, 0.96-2.21) and bisexual participants (preterm birth 1.29, 95% CI, 0.85-1.93; low birth weight 1.24, 95% CI, 0.74-2.08).

Conclusion: The offspring of LGB+ birthing people experience adverse neonatal outcomes, specifically preterm birth and low birth weight. These findings highlight the need to better understand health risks, social inequities, and health care experiences that drive these adverse outcomes.

目的评估女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和其他性取向未成年者(LGB+)的后代在新生儿不良结局方面是否存在差异:我们使用了 "护士健康研究 II"(Nurses' Health Study II)中 1995 年至 2017 年的纵向数据。我们的分析仅限于在 2001 年或 2009 年终生妊娠调查问卷中报告活产的人群(N=70642)。我们询问了参与者的性取向认同(当前和过去)以及同性吸引力和伴侣。我们研究了以下人群的早产、低出生体重和巨大儿情况:1)完全异性恋者;2)有同性吸引、伴侣或身份的异性恋者;3)大部分为异性恋者;4)双性恋者;5)女同性恋或男同性恋者。我们使用对数二项式模型来估算每种结果的风险比,并使用加权广义估计方程来考虑每个人在不同时期的多次怀孕情况和信息集群规模:与完全异性恋的参与者相比,所有 LGB+ 组别(第 2-5 组)的父母所生的后代发生早产(风险比为 1.22,95% CI 为 1.15-1.30)和低出生体重(1.27,95% CI 为 1.15-1.40)的估计风险较高,但发生巨大儿(0.98,95% CI 为 0.94-1.02)的估计风险不高。在亚组分析中,曾有同性吸引、伴侣或身份的异性恋参与者的风险比具有统计学意义(早产 1.25,95% CI,1.13-1.37;低出生体重 1.32,95% CI,1.18-1.47)。女同性恋或男同性恋参与者(早产 1.37,95% CI,0.98-1.93;出生体重不足 1.46,95% CI,0.96-2.21)和双性恋参与者(早产 1.29,95% CI,0.85-1.93;出生体重不足 1.24,95% CI,0.74-2.08)的风险比升高,但无统计学意义:结论:LGB+生育者的后代会经历不良的新生儿结局,尤其是早产和出生体重不足。这些发现突出表明,有必要更好地了解导致这些不良后果的健康风险、社会不平等和医疗保健经历。
{"title":"Sexual Orientation-Related Disparities in Neonatal Outcomes.","authors":"Payal Chakraborty, Colleen A Reynolds, Sarah McKetta, Kodiak R S Soled, Aimee K Huang, Brent Monseur, Jae Downing Corman, Juno Obedin-Maliver, A Heather Eliassen, Jorge E Chavarro, S Bryn Austin, Bethany Everett, Sebastien Haneuse, Brittany M Charlton","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005747","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005747","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether disparities exist in adverse neonatal outcomes among the offspring of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and other sexually minoritized (LGB+) birthing people.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used longitudinal data from 1995 to 2017 from the Nurses' Health Study II, a cohort of nurses across the United States. We restricted analyses to those who reported live births (N=70,642) in the 2001 or 2009 lifetime pregnancy questionnaires. Participants were asked about sexual orientation identity (current and past) and same-sex attractions and partners. We examined preterm birth, low birth weight, and macrosomia among 1) completely heterosexual; 2) heterosexual with past same-sex attractions, partners, or identity; 3) mostly heterosexual; 4) bisexual; and 5) lesbian or gay participants. We used log-binomial models to estimate risk ratios for each outcome and weighted generalized estimating equations to account for multiple pregnancies per person over time and informative cluster sizes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with completely heterosexual participants, offspring born to parents in all LGB+ groups combined (groups 2-5) had higher estimated risks of preterm birth (risk ratio 1.22, 95% CI, 1.15-1.30) and low birth weight (1.27, 95% CI, 1.15-1.40) but not macrosomia (0.98, 95% CI, 0.94-1.02). In the subgroup analysis, risk ratios were statistically significant for heterosexual participants with past same-sex attractions, partners, or identity (preterm birth 1.25, 95% CI, 1.13-1.37; low birth weight 1.32, 95% CI, 1.18-1.47). Risk ratios were elevated but not statistically significant for lesbian or gay participants (preterm birth 1.37, 95% CI, 0.98-1.93; low birth weight 1.46, 95% CI, 0.96-2.21) and bisexual participants (preterm birth 1.29, 95% CI, 0.85-1.93; low birth weight 1.24, 95% CI, 0.74-2.08).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The offspring of LGB+ birthing people experience adverse neonatal outcomes, specifically preterm birth and low birth weight. These findings highlight the need to better understand health risks, social inequities, and health care experiences that drive these adverse outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142372452","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Late-Onset Postpartum Hypertension After Normotensive Pregnancy. 妊娠期血压正常,产后高血压迟发。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005751
Colleen Sinnott, Lisbet Lundsberg, Jennifer Culhane, Caitlin Partridge, Anna E Denoble

To better inform efforts to improve and extend postpartum care, we sought to estimate the incidence of de novo hypertension up to 6 months postpartum in patients without evidence of hypertension during pregnancy or immediately postpartum. This retrospective cohort study included all patients delivering within an academic health care system. All blood pressure (BP) measurements from fertilization to 6 months postpartum were obtained from the electronic medical record and used to identify patients who remained normotensive throughout pregnancy and in the first 6 weeks postpartum. By 6 months postpartum, nearly one-fifth of this large, previously normotensive cohort had developed BP abnormalities per American College of Cardiology-American Heart Association criteria. These findings underscore the importance of optimizing the transition from obstetrics to primary care in the postpartum period.

为了更好地为改善和扩大产后护理提供信息,我们试图估算在孕期或产后6个月内没有高血压迹象的患者的新发高血压发生率。这项回顾性队列研究包括一个学术医疗保健系统中的所有分娩患者。研究人员从电子病历中获得了从受精到产后 6 个月的所有血压测量值,并通过这些测量值确定了在整个孕期和产后前 6 周内血压保持正常的患者。根据美国心脏病学会-美国心脏协会的标准,到产后 6 个月时,在这一大批之前血压正常的患者中,有近五分之一出现了血压异常。这些发现强调了优化产后从产科到初级保健过渡的重要性。
{"title":"Late-Onset Postpartum Hypertension After Normotensive Pregnancy.","authors":"Colleen Sinnott, Lisbet Lundsberg, Jennifer Culhane, Caitlin Partridge, Anna E Denoble","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005751","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005751","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To better inform efforts to improve and extend postpartum care, we sought to estimate the incidence of de novo hypertension up to 6 months postpartum in patients without evidence of hypertension during pregnancy or immediately postpartum. This retrospective cohort study included all patients delivering within an academic health care system. All blood pressure (BP) measurements from fertilization to 6 months postpartum were obtained from the electronic medical record and used to identify patients who remained normotensive throughout pregnancy and in the first 6 weeks postpartum. By 6 months postpartum, nearly one-fifth of this large, previously normotensive cohort had developed BP abnormalities per American College of Cardiology-American Heart Association criteria. These findings underscore the importance of optimizing the transition from obstetrics to primary care in the postpartum period.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142372450","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Screening Characteristics of Hemoglobin and Mean Corpuscular Volume for Detection of Iron Deficiency in Pregnancy. 用于检测妊娠期铁缺乏症的血红蛋白和平均体液容积筛查特征。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005753
Hui Xiao Chao, Travis Zack, Andrew D Leavitt

Iron deficiency in pregnancy remains underdiagnosed despite professional society recommendations for first-trimester complete blood count (CBC) screening. To determine the effectiveness of the CBC hemoglobin and mean corpuscular volume (MCV) to identify iron deficiency in pregnancy, we conducted a retrospective analysis of 20,550 pregnancies from 2009 to 2022 at the University of California, San Francisco, obstetrics clinics. A total of 16,547 (80.5%) pregnant individuals had first-trimester screening CBC; 345 (2.1%) had a coincident ferritin test. Hemoglobin level less than 11 g/dL and MCV level less than 80 fL each had sensitivity of only 30% (95% CI, 20-41%) to detect first-trimester iron deficiency (ferritin level less than 30), corresponding to a negative likelihood ratio of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.77-1.05) and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.73-0.99), respectively. More than 50% of the 1,749 women with documented iron deficiency anytime during pregnancy were neither anemic nor microcytic at the time of diagnosis.

尽管专业协会建议进行首胎全血细胞计数(CBC)筛查,但妊娠期铁缺乏症的诊断率仍然很低。为了确定全血细胞计数血红蛋白和平均血球容积(MCV)对识别妊娠期铁缺乏症的有效性,我们对加州大学旧金山分校产科诊所 2009 年至 2022 年的 20,550 名孕妇进行了回顾性分析。共有 16,547 名孕妇(80.5%)进行了第一胎全血细胞计数筛查;345 名孕妇(2.1%)同时进行了铁蛋白检测。血红蛋白水平低于 11 g/dL 和 MCV 水平低于 80 fL 对检测初产妇缺铁(铁蛋白水平低于 30)的灵敏度仅为 30% (95% CI, 20-41%),对应的阴性似然比分别为 0.90 (95% CI, 0.77-1.05) 和 0.85 (95% CI, 0.73-0.99)。在 1,749 名怀孕期间随时都有缺铁记录的妇女中,有 50%以上在确诊时既没有贫血也没有小红细胞症。
{"title":"Screening Characteristics of Hemoglobin and Mean Corpuscular Volume for Detection of Iron Deficiency in Pregnancy.","authors":"Hui Xiao Chao, Travis Zack, Andrew D Leavitt","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005753","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005753","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Iron deficiency in pregnancy remains underdiagnosed despite professional society recommendations for first-trimester complete blood count (CBC) screening. To determine the effectiveness of the CBC hemoglobin and mean corpuscular volume (MCV) to identify iron deficiency in pregnancy, we conducted a retrospective analysis of 20,550 pregnancies from 2009 to 2022 at the University of California, San Francisco, obstetrics clinics. A total of 16,547 (80.5%) pregnant individuals had first-trimester screening CBC; 345 (2.1%) had a coincident ferritin test. Hemoglobin level less than 11 g/dL and MCV level less than 80 fL each had sensitivity of only 30% (95% CI, 20-41%) to detect first-trimester iron deficiency (ferritin level less than 30), corresponding to a negative likelihood ratio of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.77-1.05) and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.73-0.99), respectively. More than 50% of the 1,749 women with documented iron deficiency anytime during pregnancy were neither anemic nor microcytic at the time of diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142372451","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Obstetrics and gynecology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1