首页 > 最新文献

Obstetrics and gynecology最新文献

英文 中文
Virtual Compared With In-Office Postoperative Visits After Urogynecologic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. 泌尿妇科手术术后虚拟访视与诊室访视的比较:随机对照试验。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005694
Lannah L Lua-Mailland, Amy S Nowacki, Marie Fidela R Paraiso, Amy J Park, Shannon L Wallace, Cecile A Ferrando

Objective: To compare patient satisfaction, health care resource utilization, and adverse events among patients receiving a virtual video compared with in-office postoperative visit after urogynecologic surgery. We hypothesized that virtual video visits would be noninferior to in-office visits.

Methods: This was a randomized noninferiority clinical trial of patients undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence at a single academic tertiary referral center. Participants were randomized to receive either a virtual video postoperative visit or a standard in-office postoperative visit. The primary outcome was patient satisfaction measured by the validated PSQ-18 (Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire-18) (noninferiority margin 5 points) at the 6-week postoperative visit. Secondary outcomes included PSQ-18 domain scores (noninferiority margin 0.5 points) and composite health care resource utilization and adverse events after the 6-week postoperative visit up to 12 weeks after surgery (noninferiority margin 10%). A sample size of 100 participants (50 per group) would allow 80% power to assess a 5-point noninferiority margin on the total PSQ-18 with an SD of 10 and α=0.05.

Results: From January 2023 to September 2023, 265 patients were screened for eligibility, and 104 were randomized. A total of 100 participants (50 per arm) completed the study and were included in the analysis. The mean±SD age of all participants was 57.0±13.2 years. The mean±SD PSQ-18 total score was 75.18±8.15 in the virtual group and 75.14±8.7 in the in-office group. The mean PSQ-18 total score was 0.04 points higher (ie, greater degree of satisfaction) in the virtual group, with a 95% CI of -2.75 to 2.83, which met the criterion for noninferiority. Between-group differences for all PSQ-18 domain scores likewise met criterion for noninferiority. Composite health care resource utilization was 14.0% lower in the virtual group than in the in-office group (20.0% vs 34.0%, 95% CI, -28.0% to 1.0%). For composite adverse events, the between-group difference was 2.0% (2.0% in virtual group vs 0.0% in in-office group, 95% CI,-3.0% to 8.0%).

Conclusion: Virtual video postoperative visits were noninferior to in-office visits with regard to patient satisfaction, health care resource utilization, and adverse events and can be offered as an alternative to in-office visits for postoperative follow-up after urogynecologic surgery.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05641077.

目的比较泌尿妇科手术后接受虚拟视频和诊室术后访视的患者的满意度、医疗资源利用率和不良事件。我们假设虚拟视频访视的效果不劣于诊室访视:这是一项随机非劣效性临床试验,对象是在一家学术性三级转诊中心接受盆腔器官脱垂和尿失禁手术的患者。参与者被随机分配接受虚拟视频术后访视或标准诊室术后访视。主要结果是患者在术后6周就诊时通过有效的PSQ-18(患者满意度问卷-18)测量的满意度(非劣效差5分)。次要结果包括 PSQ-18 领域得分(非劣效差值为 0.5 分)以及术后 6 周访视后至术后 12 周的综合医疗资源利用率和不良事件(非劣效差值为 10%)。100名参与者(每组50名)的样本量将使80%的力量能够评估PSQ-18总分5分的非劣效差,SD为10,α=0.05.结果:从 2023 年 1 月到 2023 年 9 月,共筛选出 265 名符合条件的患者,并对 104 名患者进行了随机分组。共有 100 名参与者(每组 50 人)完成研究并纳入分析。所有参与者的平均(±SD)年龄为 57.0±13.2 岁。虚拟组 PSQ-18 总分的平均值(±SD)为 75.18±8.15,诊室组为 75.14±8.7。虚拟组的 PSQ-18 总分平均值高出 0.04 分(即满意度更高),95% CI 为 -2.75 至 2.83,符合非劣效性标准。所有 PSQ-18 领域得分的组间差异同样符合非劣效标准。虚拟组的综合医疗资源利用率比诊室组低 14.0%(20.0% vs 34.0%,95% CI,-28.0% 至 1.0%)。综合不良事件方面,组间差异为 2.0%(虚拟组为 2.0%,诊室组为 0.0%,95% CI,-3.0% 至 8.0%):在患者满意度、医疗资源利用率和不良事件方面,虚拟视频术后随访并不比诊室随访差,可以作为诊室随访的替代方案用于泌尿妇科手术后的术后随访:临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT05641077。
{"title":"Virtual Compared With In-Office Postoperative Visits After Urogynecologic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Lannah L Lua-Mailland, Amy S Nowacki, Marie Fidela R Paraiso, Amy J Park, Shannon L Wallace, Cecile A Ferrando","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005694","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005694","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare patient satisfaction, health care resource utilization, and adverse events among patients receiving a virtual video compared with in-office postoperative visit after urogynecologic surgery. We hypothesized that virtual video visits would be noninferior to in-office visits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a randomized noninferiority clinical trial of patients undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence at a single academic tertiary referral center. Participants were randomized to receive either a virtual video postoperative visit or a standard in-office postoperative visit. The primary outcome was patient satisfaction measured by the validated PSQ-18 (Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire-18) (noninferiority margin 5 points) at the 6-week postoperative visit. Secondary outcomes included PSQ-18 domain scores (noninferiority margin 0.5 points) and composite health care resource utilization and adverse events after the 6-week postoperative visit up to 12 weeks after surgery (noninferiority margin 10%). A sample size of 100 participants (50 per group) would allow 80% power to assess a 5-point noninferiority margin on the total PSQ-18 with an SD of 10 and α=0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From January 2023 to September 2023, 265 patients were screened for eligibility, and 104 were randomized. A total of 100 participants (50 per arm) completed the study and were included in the analysis. The mean±SD age of all participants was 57.0±13.2 years. The mean±SD PSQ-18 total score was 75.18±8.15 in the virtual group and 75.14±8.7 in the in-office group. The mean PSQ-18 total score was 0.04 points higher (ie, greater degree of satisfaction) in the virtual group, with a 95% CI of -2.75 to 2.83, which met the criterion for noninferiority. Between-group differences for all PSQ-18 domain scores likewise met criterion for noninferiority. Composite health care resource utilization was 14.0% lower in the virtual group than in the in-office group (20.0% vs 34.0%, 95% CI, -28.0% to 1.0%). For composite adverse events, the between-group difference was 2.0% (2.0% in virtual group vs 0.0% in in-office group, 95% CI,-3.0% to 8.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Virtual video postoperative visits were noninferior to in-office visits with regard to patient satisfaction, health care resource utilization, and adverse events and can be offered as an alternative to in-office visits for postoperative follow-up after urogynecologic surgery.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05641077.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141907256","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Standard Compared With Extended Red Blood Cell Antigen Matching for Prevention of Subsequent Hemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn: A Systematic Review. 标准红细胞抗原配型与扩展红细胞抗原配型在预防胎儿和新生儿溶血病方面的比较:系统回顾。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005701
Ronan P Sugrue, Jaxon Olsen, Marie Elise Abi Antoun, Lesley A Skalla, Jennifer Cate, Andra H James, Alexandra Stonehill, Virginia Watkins, Marilyn J Telen, Jerome J Federspiel

Objective: To systematically review and meta-analyze alloimmunization among recipients of red blood cells (RBCs) matched for ABO blood type and Rhesus D (ABO+D) antigen compared with those also matched for c, E, and Kell (cEK).

Data sources: Four online databases (Medline, Scopus, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov) were searched from March 28, 2023, to April 1, 2024. The search protocol was peer reviewed and published on PROSPERO (CRD42023411620).

Methods of study selection: Studies reporting alloimmunization as the primary outcome among recipients of RBCs matched for ABO+D or additional cEK matching were included. Patients transfused with unmatched RBCs or a mixture of matching regimens were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane Tool to Assess Risk of Bias in Cohort Studies and Tool for Risk of Bias. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to combine effect estimates.

Tabulation, integration, and results: Ten studies met criteria. Risk of bias was low. Overall, 91,221 patients were transfused, of whom 40,220 (44.1%) received additional cEK-matched RBCs. The overall rate of alloimmunization was 6.2% (95% CI, 2.5-14.9%) for ABO+D-only matching and 1.9% (95% CI, 0.7-5.1%) when cEK was added. Time of follow-up antibody testing ranged from 6 to 18 months after transfusion. Additional cEK match was associated with significantly less alloimmunization compared with standard ABO+D match (odds ratio [OR] 0.37, 95% CI, 0.20-0.69). This association remained when chronically transfused patients were excluded (OR 0.65, 95% CI, 0.54-0.79) and for alloimmunization to c, E, or K antigens only (OR 0.29, 95% CI, 0.18-0.47).

Conclusion: Additional cEK RBC matching protocols were associated with lower odds of recipient alloimmunization. Given severe sequelae of alloimmunization in pregnancy, routine cEK matching for transfusion in people with pregnancy potential younger than age 50 years in the United States merits consideration.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO, CRD42023411620.

目的系统回顾和荟萃分析ABO血型和恒河猴D(ABO+D)抗原匹配的红细胞(RBC)与c、E和Kell(cEK)匹配的红细胞(RBC)接受者之间的同种免疫情况:从 2023 年 3 月 28 日至 2024 年 4 月 1 日检索了四个在线数据库(Medline、Scopus、EMBASE、ClinicalTrials.gov)。检索协议经同行评审后发布在 PROSPERO (CRD42023411620)上:纳入的研究报告将同种异体免疫作为 ABO+D 或额外 cEK 匹配的 RBC 受体的主要结果。排除了输注未配型RBC或混合配型方案的患者。使用科克伦队列研究偏倚风险评估工具(Cochrane Tool to Assess Risk of Bias in Cohort Studies)和偏倚风险工具(Tool for Risk of Bias)评估偏倚风险。随机效应荟萃分析用于合并效应估计值:十项研究符合标准。偏倚风险较低。共有 91,221 名患者接受了输血,其中 40,220 人(44.1%)接受了额外的 cEK 匹配红细胞。仅 ABO+D 配型的总异体免疫率为 6.2% (95% CI, 2.5-14.9%),加入 cEK 后为 1.9% (95% CI, 0.7-5.1%)。抗体检测的随访时间从输血后 6 个月到 18 个月不等。与标准的 ABO+D 配型相比,额外的 cEK 配型可显著降低同种异体免疫(几率比 [OR] 0.37,95% CI,0.20-0.69)。如果排除长期输血的患者(OR 0.65,95% CI,0.54-0.79)以及仅对 c、E 或 K 抗原的同种异体免疫(OR 0.29,95% CI,0.18-0.47),这种关联性依然存在:结论:额外的 cEK 红细胞匹配方案与受体发生同种异体免疫的几率较低有关。考虑到妊娠期同种免疫的严重后遗症,美国值得考虑对 50 岁以下有妊娠可能的人群输血时进行常规 cEK 配型:prospero,CRD42023411620。
{"title":"Standard Compared With Extended Red Blood Cell Antigen Matching for Prevention of Subsequent Hemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Ronan P Sugrue, Jaxon Olsen, Marie Elise Abi Antoun, Lesley A Skalla, Jennifer Cate, Andra H James, Alexandra Stonehill, Virginia Watkins, Marilyn J Telen, Jerome J Federspiel","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005701","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005701","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically review and meta-analyze alloimmunization among recipients of red blood cells (RBCs) matched for ABO blood type and Rhesus D (ABO+D) antigen compared with those also matched for c, E, and Kell (cEK).</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Four online databases (Medline, Scopus, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov) were searched from March 28, 2023, to April 1, 2024. The search protocol was peer reviewed and published on PROSPERO (CRD42023411620).</p><p><strong>Methods of study selection: </strong>Studies reporting alloimmunization as the primary outcome among recipients of RBCs matched for ABO+D or additional cEK matching were included. Patients transfused with unmatched RBCs or a mixture of matching regimens were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane Tool to Assess Risk of Bias in Cohort Studies and Tool for Risk of Bias. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to combine effect estimates.</p><p><strong>Tabulation, integration, and results: </strong>Ten studies met criteria. Risk of bias was low. Overall, 91,221 patients were transfused, of whom 40,220 (44.1%) received additional cEK-matched RBCs. The overall rate of alloimmunization was 6.2% (95% CI, 2.5-14.9%) for ABO+D-only matching and 1.9% (95% CI, 0.7-5.1%) when cEK was added. Time of follow-up antibody testing ranged from 6 to 18 months after transfusion. Additional cEK match was associated with significantly less alloimmunization compared with standard ABO+D match (odds ratio [OR] 0.37, 95% CI, 0.20-0.69). This association remained when chronically transfused patients were excluded (OR 0.65, 95% CI, 0.54-0.79) and for alloimmunization to c, E, or K antigens only (OR 0.29, 95% CI, 0.18-0.47).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Additional cEK RBC matching protocols were associated with lower odds of recipient alloimmunization. Given severe sequelae of alloimmunization in pregnancy, routine cEK matching for transfusion in people with pregnancy potential younger than age 50 years in the United States merits consideration.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO, CRD42023411620.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141907255","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Racial Disparities in Newborn Drug Testing After Implementation of Question-Based Screening for Prenatal Substance Use. 实施基于问题的产前药物使用筛查后新生儿药物检测中的种族差异。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-06 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005631
Alexandra Soos, Melissa Plegue, Adam Darwiche, Lauren Oshman, Christopher J Frank

Objective: To examine the association of universal question-based screening for prenatal substance use on racial inequities in prenatal and newborn drug testing.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 32,802 live births of patients receiving prenatal care at an academic medical center in the midwestern United States from 2014 to 2022, before and after implementation of question-based screening in 2018. Primary outcomes included prenatal and newborn drug test orders. Logistic regression models using a generalized estimating equation framework assessed associations with question-based screening and results, birthing parent age, race, ethnicity, marital status, and insurance type. Charts of patients who indicated difficulties stopping substance use were audited for guideline-directed care.

Results: A total of 12,725 of 14,992 pregnant people (85.3%) received question-based screening. Implementation of question-based screening was associated with a decrease in prenatal urine test orders (5.0% [95% CI, 4.6-5.3%] before implementation, 3.1% [95% CI, 2.8-3.4%] after implementation; P <.001), with Black birthing parents having the largest reduction in prenatal urine drug testing (10.3% [95% CI, 9.0-11.7%] before implementation, 4.9% [95% CI, 3.9-5.9%] after implementation). However, rates of newborn drug testing did not change (4.7% [95% CI, 4.4-5.0%] before implementation, 4.5% [95% CI, 4.2-4.8%] after implementation; P =.46), and clinicians continued to order significantly more newborn drug tests for newborns of Black birthing parents compared with other race and ethnicity groups.

Conclusion: Implementation of question-based screening for substance use in pregnancy was associated with decreased prenatal urine drug testing but no change in overall newborn drug testing or racial inequities in newborn drug testing for Black birthing people. Further policy efforts are warranted to improve substance use treatment and to eliminate racial inequities in punitive policies such as newborn drug testing and subsequent child protective services reporting.

目的研究基于问题的产前药物使用普遍筛查与产前和新生儿药物检测中种族不平等的关系:我们对 2014 年至 2022 年期间在美国中西部一家学术医疗中心接受产前护理的 32802 名活产儿,在 2018 年实施基于问题的筛查之前和之后进行了一项回顾性队列研究。主要结果包括产前和新生儿药物测试订单。使用广义估计方程框架的逻辑回归模型评估了基于问题的筛查与结果、分娩父母年龄、种族、民族、婚姻状况和保险类型之间的关联。对表示难以停止使用药物的患者的病历进行了审核,以获得指导性护理:在 14992 名孕妇中,共有 12725 人(85.3%)接受了基于问题的筛查。基于问题的筛查的实施与产前尿检单的减少有关(实施前为 5.0% [95% CI, 4.6-5.3%],实施后为 3.1% [95% CI, 2.8-3.4%];PC结论:基于问题的孕期药物使用筛查的实施与产前尿液药物检测的减少有关,但新生儿药物检测的总体情况或黑人新生儿药物检测的种族不平等情况没有发生变化。需要进一步制定政策,改善药物使用治疗,消除新生儿药物检测和随后的儿童保护服务报告等惩罚性政策中的种族不平等。
{"title":"Racial Disparities in Newborn Drug Testing After Implementation of Question-Based Screening for Prenatal Substance Use.","authors":"Alexandra Soos, Melissa Plegue, Adam Darwiche, Lauren Oshman, Christopher J Frank","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005631","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005631","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the association of universal question-based screening for prenatal substance use on racial inequities in prenatal and newborn drug testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 32,802 live births of patients receiving prenatal care at an academic medical center in the midwestern United States from 2014 to 2022, before and after implementation of question-based screening in 2018. Primary outcomes included prenatal and newborn drug test orders. Logistic regression models using a generalized estimating equation framework assessed associations with question-based screening and results, birthing parent age, race, ethnicity, marital status, and insurance type. Charts of patients who indicated difficulties stopping substance use were audited for guideline-directed care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12,725 of 14,992 pregnant people (85.3%) received question-based screening. Implementation of question-based screening was associated with a decrease in prenatal urine test orders (5.0% [95% CI, 4.6-5.3%] before implementation, 3.1% [95% CI, 2.8-3.4%] after implementation; P <.001), with Black birthing parents having the largest reduction in prenatal urine drug testing (10.3% [95% CI, 9.0-11.7%] before implementation, 4.9% [95% CI, 3.9-5.9%] after implementation). However, rates of newborn drug testing did not change (4.7% [95% CI, 4.4-5.0%] before implementation, 4.5% [95% CI, 4.2-4.8%] after implementation; P =.46), and clinicians continued to order significantly more newborn drug tests for newborns of Black birthing parents compared with other race and ethnicity groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementation of question-based screening for substance use in pregnancy was associated with decreased prenatal urine drug testing but no change in overall newborn drug testing or racial inequities in newborn drug testing for Black birthing people. Further policy efforts are warranted to improve substance use treatment and to eliminate racial inequities in punitive policies such as newborn drug testing and subsequent child protective services reporting.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141284355","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Validation of a Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery Prediction Model Without Race and Ethnicity in Individuals With Two Prior Cesarean Deliveries. 验证剖宫产后阴道分娩预测模型,不考虑曾有两次剖宫产经历者的种族和民族因素。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-06 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005633
Lillian H Goodman, Amanda A Allshouse, Ann M Bruno, Torri D Metz

Previous models for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) relied on race and ethnicity, raising concern for bias. In response, the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network (MFMU) created a new prediction model without race and ethnicity for individuals with one prior cesarean delivery. We performed a secondary analysis of the MFMU Cesarean Registry database to evaluate whether the MFMU VBAC prediction model without race and ethnicity could accurately predict VBAC for individuals with two prior cesarean deliveries. Overall, 353 individuals were included and 252 (71%) had VBAC. An area under the curve for the receiver operating curve of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.69-0.80) was reported for the predicted probabilities for VBAC, indicating that the model can be used for prediction of VBAC in this population.

以前的剖宫产后阴道分娩(VBAC)预测模型依赖于种族和人种,这引起了人们对偏差的担忧。为此,母胎医学单位网络(MFMU)创建了一个新的预测模型,该模型不考虑种族和民族因素,适用于之前有过一次剖宫产经历的个体。我们对 MFMU 剖宫产登记数据库进行了二次分析,以评估 MFMU 不含种族和族裔的 VBAC 预测模型是否能准确预测曾有两次剖宫产经历者的 VBAC。共纳入 353 人,其中 252 人(71%)进行了 VBAC。VBAC 预测概率的接收者操作曲线下面积为 0.74(95% CI,0.69-0.80),表明该模型可用于预测该人群的 VBAC。
{"title":"Validation of a Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery Prediction Model Without Race and Ethnicity in Individuals With Two Prior Cesarean Deliveries.","authors":"Lillian H Goodman, Amanda A Allshouse, Ann M Bruno, Torri D Metz","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005633","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005633","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous models for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) relied on race and ethnicity, raising concern for bias. In response, the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network (MFMU) created a new prediction model without race and ethnicity for individuals with one prior cesarean delivery. We performed a secondary analysis of the MFMU Cesarean Registry database to evaluate whether the MFMU VBAC prediction model without race and ethnicity could accurately predict VBAC for individuals with two prior cesarean deliveries. Overall, 353 individuals were included and 252 (71%) had VBAC. An area under the curve for the receiver operating curve of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.69-0.80) was reported for the predicted probabilities for VBAC, indicating that the model can be used for prediction of VBAC in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11257801/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141284367","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rates of Female Sterilization, Vasectomy, and LARC Placement Before and After the Dobbs Decision: A Retrospective Cohort Study [ID 2683404]. 多布斯决定前后女性绝育、输精管结扎和 LARC 植入的比率:回顾性队列研究 [ID 2683404]。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005653
{"title":"Rates of Female Sterilization, Vasectomy, and LARC Placement Before and After the Dobbs Decision: A Retrospective Cohort Study [ID 2683404].","authors":"","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005653","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005653","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141724055","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Postmenopausal Bleeding After Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccination: Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. 接种冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)疫苗后绝经后出血:疫苗不良事件报告系统。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-23 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005615
Penelope Strid, Winston E Abara, Elizabeth Clark, Pedro L Moro, Christine K Olson, Julianne Gee

We identified U.S. reports of postmenopausal bleeding in the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) between December 13, 2020, and December 13, 2021. Among 711,224 VAERS reports after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination, during our study period, we identified 554 presumptive postmenopausal bleeding reports; 434 were further classified as verified based on data abstracted from reports and medical records, when available. In the United States, by December 14, 2021, 58.8 million women aged 50 years or older had received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, corresponding to approximately seven verified VAERS postmenopausal bleeding reports per 1 million women aged 50 years or older who received a COVID-19 vaccine. Reports of postmenopausal bleeding after COVID-19 vaccination in VAERS were rare, and causes of postmenopausal bleeding based on medical record review were consistent with known causes of postmenopausal bleeding.

我们在 VAERS(疫苗不良事件报告系统)中确定了 2020 年 12 月 13 日至 2021 年 12 月 13 日期间的美国绝经后出血报告。在研究期间,接种 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫苗后的 711,224 份 VAERS 报告中,我们发现了 554 份推测性绝经后出血报告;根据从报告和医疗记录(如有)中摘录的数据,进一步将 434 份报告归类为经过核实的报告。在美国,截至 2021 年 12 月 14 日,有 5880 万名 50 岁或以上的女性至少接种过一剂 COVID-19 疫苗,相当于每 100 万名接种过 COVID-19 疫苗的 50 岁或以上女性中约有 7 例经核实的 VAERS 绝经后出血报告。VAERS中关于接种COVID-19疫苗后绝经后出血的报告很少见,根据病历审查,绝经后出血的原因与已知的绝经后出血原因一致。
{"title":"Postmenopausal Bleeding After Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccination: Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System.","authors":"Penelope Strid, Winston E Abara, Elizabeth Clark, Pedro L Moro, Christine K Olson, Julianne Gee","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005615","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005615","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We identified U.S. reports of postmenopausal bleeding in the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) between December 13, 2020, and December 13, 2021. Among 711,224 VAERS reports after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination, during our study period, we identified 554 presumptive postmenopausal bleeding reports; 434 were further classified as verified based on data abstracted from reports and medical records, when available. In the United States, by December 14, 2021, 58.8 million women aged 50 years or older had received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, corresponding to approximately seven verified VAERS postmenopausal bleeding reports per 1 million women aged 50 years or older who received a COVID-19 vaccine. Reports of postmenopausal bleeding after COVID-19 vaccination in VAERS were rare, and causes of postmenopausal bleeding based on medical record review were consistent with known causes of postmenopausal bleeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141088644","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pre-existing Diabetes and Stillbirth or Perinatal Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. 既往糖尿病与死产或围产期死亡率:系统回顾与元分析》。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005682
Anna R Blankstein, Sarah M Sigurdson, Levi Frehlich, Zach Raizman, Lois E Donovan, Patricia Lemieux, Christy Pylypjuk, Jamie L Benham, Jennifer M Yamamoto

Objective: Despite the well-recognized association between pre-existing diabetes mellitus and stillbirth or perinatal mortality, there remain knowledge gaps about the strength of association across different populations. The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to quantify the association between pre-existing diabetes and stillbirth or perinatal mortality, and secondarily, to identify risk factors predictive of stillbirth or perinatal mortality among those with pre-existing diabetes.

Data sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to April 2022.

Methods of study selection: Cohort studies and randomized controlled trials in English or French that examined the association between pre-existing diabetes and stillbirth or perinatal mortality (as defined by the original authors) or identified risk factors for stillbirth and perinatal mortality in individuals with pre-existing diabetes were included. Data extraction was performed independently and in duplicate with the use of prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Assessment for heterogeneity and risk of bias was performed. Meta-analyses were completed with a random-effects model.

Tabulation, integration, and results: From 7,777 citations, 91 studies met the inclusion criteria. Pre-existing diabetes was associated with higher odds of stillbirth (37 studies; pooled odds ratio [OR] 3.74, 95% CI, 3.17-4.41, I2=82.5%) and perinatal mortality (14 studies; pooled OR 3.22, 95% CI, 2.54-4.07, I2=82.7%). Individuals with type 1 diabetes had lower odds of stillbirth (pooled OR 0.81, 95% CI, 0.68-0.95, I2=0%) and perinatal mortality (pooled OR 0.73, 95% CI, 0.61-0.87, I2=0%) compared with those with type 2 diabetes. Prenatal care and prepregnancy diabetes care were significantly associated with lower odds of stillbirth (OR 0.26, 95% CI, 0.11-0.62, I2=87.0%) and perinatal mortality (OR 0.41, 95% CI, 0.29-0.59, I2=0%).

Conclusion: Pre-existing diabetes confers a more than threefold increased odds of both stillbirth and perinatal mortality. Maternal type 2 diabetes was associated with a higher risk of stillbirth and perinatal mortality compared with maternal type 1 diabetes.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO, CRD42022303112.

目的:尽管已有糖尿病与死产或围产期死亡率之间的关联已得到广泛认可,但在不同人群之间的关联强度方面仍存在知识空白。本系统综述和荟萃分析的主要目的是量化原有糖尿病与死产或围产期死亡率之间的关联,其次是确定可预测原有糖尿病患者死产或围产期死亡率的风险因素:数据来源:MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane 系统综述数据库和 Cochrane 对照试验中央登记册(从开始到 2022 年 4 月):研究方法:纳入以英文或法文撰写的队列研究和随机对照试验,这些研究考察了原有糖尿病与死胎或围产期死亡率(由原作者定义)之间的关系,或确定了原有糖尿病患者死胎和围产期死亡率的风险因素。数据提取采用预设的纳入和排除标准,独立进行,一式两份。对异质性和偏倚风险进行了评估。采用随机效应模型完成 Meta 分析:在 7777 条引用文献中,有 91 项研究符合纳入标准。既往糖尿病与死产(37 项研究;汇总比值比 [OR] 3.74,95% CI,3.17-4.41,I2=82.5%)和围产期死亡率(14 项研究;汇总比值比 3.22,95% CI,2.54-4.07,I2=82.7%)较高有关。与 2 型糖尿病患者相比,1 型糖尿病患者的死产几率(汇总 OR 0.81,95% CI,0.68-0.95,I2=0%)和围产期死亡率(汇总 OR 0.73,95% CI,0.61-0.87,I2=0%)较低。产前护理和孕前糖尿病护理与较低的死胎几率(OR 0.26,95% CI,0.11-0.62,I2=87.0%)和围产期死亡率(OR 0.41,95% CI,0.29-0.59,I2=0%)显著相关:结论:先证糖尿病导致死产和围产期死亡的几率增加三倍以上。与 1 型糖尿病产妇相比,2 型糖尿病产妇死产和围产期死亡的风险更高:prospero,CRD42022303112。
{"title":"Pre-existing Diabetes and Stillbirth or Perinatal Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Anna R Blankstein, Sarah M Sigurdson, Levi Frehlich, Zach Raizman, Lois E Donovan, Patricia Lemieux, Christy Pylypjuk, Jamie L Benham, Jennifer M Yamamoto","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005682","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005682","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Despite the well-recognized association between pre-existing diabetes mellitus and stillbirth or perinatal mortality, there remain knowledge gaps about the strength of association across different populations. The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to quantify the association between pre-existing diabetes and stillbirth or perinatal mortality, and secondarily, to identify risk factors predictive of stillbirth or perinatal mortality among those with pre-existing diabetes.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to April 2022.</p><p><strong>Methods of study selection: </strong>Cohort studies and randomized controlled trials in English or French that examined the association between pre-existing diabetes and stillbirth or perinatal mortality (as defined by the original authors) or identified risk factors for stillbirth and perinatal mortality in individuals with pre-existing diabetes were included. Data extraction was performed independently and in duplicate with the use of prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Assessment for heterogeneity and risk of bias was performed. Meta-analyses were completed with a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Tabulation, integration, and results: </strong>From 7,777 citations, 91 studies met the inclusion criteria. Pre-existing diabetes was associated with higher odds of stillbirth (37 studies; pooled odds ratio [OR] 3.74, 95% CI, 3.17-4.41, I2=82.5%) and perinatal mortality (14 studies; pooled OR 3.22, 95% CI, 2.54-4.07, I2=82.7%). Individuals with type 1 diabetes had lower odds of stillbirth (pooled OR 0.81, 95% CI, 0.68-0.95, I2=0%) and perinatal mortality (pooled OR 0.73, 95% CI, 0.61-0.87, I2=0%) compared with those with type 2 diabetes. Prenatal care and prepregnancy diabetes care were significantly associated with lower odds of stillbirth (OR 0.26, 95% CI, 0.11-0.62, I2=87.0%) and perinatal mortality (OR 0.41, 95% CI, 0.29-0.59, I2=0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pre-existing diabetes confers a more than threefold increased odds of both stillbirth and perinatal mortality. Maternal type 2 diabetes was associated with a higher risk of stillbirth and perinatal mortality compared with maternal type 1 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO, CRD42022303112.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141875481","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Preliminary Efficacy of Topical Sildenafil Cream for the Treatment of Female Sexual Arousal Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial. 外用西地那非乳膏治疗女性性唤起障碍的初步疗效:随机对照试验
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-18 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005648
Isabella Johnson, Andrea Ries Thurman, Katherine A Cornell, Jessica Hatheway, Clint Dart, C Paige Brainard, David R Friend, Andrew Goldstein

Objective: To assess the efficacy of topical sildenafil cream, 3.6% among healthy premenopausal women with female sexual arousal disorder.

Methods: We conducted a phase 2b, exploratory, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of sildenafil cream. Coprimary efficacy endpoints were the change from baseline to week 12 in the Arousal Sensation domain of the SFQ28 (Sexual Function Questionnaire) and question 14 of the FSDS-DAO (Female Sexual Distress Scale-Desire, Arousal, Orgasm).

Results: Two hundred women with female sexual arousal disorder were randomized to sildenafil cream (n=101) or placebo cream (n=99). A total of 174 participants completed the study (sildenafil 90, placebo 84). Among the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, which included women with only female sexual arousal disorder and those with female sexual arousal disorder with concomitant sexual dysfunction diagnoses or genital pain, although the sildenafil cream group demonstrated greater improvement in the SFQ28 Arousal Sensation domain scores, there were no statistically significant differences between sildenafil and placebo cream users in the coprimary and secondary efficacy endpoints. An exploratory post hoc subset of the ITT population with an enrollment diagnosis of female sexual arousal disorder with or without concomitant decreased desire randomized to sildenafil cream reported significant increases in their SFQ28 Arousal Sensation domain score (least squares mean 2.03 [SE 0.62]) compared with placebo cream (least squares mean 0.08 [SE 0.71], P =.04). This subset achieved a larger mean improvement in the SFQ28 Desire and Orgasm domain scores. This subset population also had significantly reduced sexual distress and interpersonal difficulties with sildenafil cream use as measured by FSDS-DAO questions 3, 5, and 10 (all P ≤.04).

Conclusion: Topical sildenafil cream improved outcomes among women with female sexual arousal disorder, most significantly in those who did not have concomitant orgasmic dysfunction. In particular, in an exploratory analysis of a subset of women with female sexual arousal disorder with or without concomitant decreased desire, topical sildenafil cream increased sexual arousal sensation, desire, and orgasm and reduced sexual distress.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT04948151.

目的评估外用 3.6% 西地那非乳膏对患有女性性唤起障碍的绝经前健康女性的疗效:我们对西地那非乳膏进行了一项 2b 期、探索性、随机、安慰剂对照、双盲研究。主要疗效终点是 SFQ28(性功能问卷)唤醒感觉领域和 FSDS-DAO(女性性困扰量表-欲望、唤醒、性高潮)问题 14 从基线到第 12 周的变化:200名患有女性性唤起障碍的女性被随机分配使用西地那非乳膏(101人)或安慰剂乳膏(99人)。共有 174 人完成了研究(西地那非 90 人,安慰剂 84 人)。在意向治疗(ITT)人群中,包括仅患有女性性唤起障碍的女性和患有女性性唤起障碍并同时伴有性功能障碍诊断或生殖器疼痛的女性,虽然西地那非乳膏组在SFQ28唤起感觉域得分上有更大的改善,但西地那非和安慰剂乳膏使用者在共性和次要疗效终点上没有显著的统计学差异。在随机使用西地那非乳膏的 ITT 受试者中,有一个探索性的事后子集,其入选诊断为女性性唤起障碍并伴有或不伴有性欲减退,与安慰剂乳膏(最小二乘法平均值为 0.08 [SE0.71],P=.04)相比,该子集的 SFQ28 唤醒感觉域得分(最小二乘法平均值为 2.03 [SE0.62])有显著提高。该亚组人群在 SFQ28 欲望和性高潮领域得分的平均改善幅度更大。根据FSDS-DAO问题3、5和10的测量,使用西地那非乳膏后,该亚组人群的性困扰和人际交往困难也明显减少(P均≤.04):外用西地那非乳膏可改善女性性唤起障碍患者的治疗效果,对那些不伴有性高潮功能障碍的患者效果最为显著。特别是,在对伴有或不伴有性欲减退的女性性唤起障碍亚群进行的探索性分析中,外用西地那非乳膏提高了性唤起感觉、性欲和性高潮,减少了性困扰:临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT04948151。
{"title":"Preliminary Efficacy of Topical Sildenafil Cream for the Treatment of Female Sexual Arousal Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Isabella Johnson, Andrea Ries Thurman, Katherine A Cornell, Jessica Hatheway, Clint Dart, C Paige Brainard, David R Friend, Andrew Goldstein","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005648","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005648","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the efficacy of topical sildenafil cream, 3.6% among healthy premenopausal women with female sexual arousal disorder.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a phase 2b, exploratory, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of sildenafil cream. Coprimary efficacy endpoints were the change from baseline to week 12 in the Arousal Sensation domain of the SFQ28 (Sexual Function Questionnaire) and question 14 of the FSDS-DAO (Female Sexual Distress Scale-Desire, Arousal, Orgasm).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred women with female sexual arousal disorder were randomized to sildenafil cream (n=101) or placebo cream (n=99). A total of 174 participants completed the study (sildenafil 90, placebo 84). Among the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, which included women with only female sexual arousal disorder and those with female sexual arousal disorder with concomitant sexual dysfunction diagnoses or genital pain, although the sildenafil cream group demonstrated greater improvement in the SFQ28 Arousal Sensation domain scores, there were no statistically significant differences between sildenafil and placebo cream users in the coprimary and secondary efficacy endpoints. An exploratory post hoc subset of the ITT population with an enrollment diagnosis of female sexual arousal disorder with or without concomitant decreased desire randomized to sildenafil cream reported significant increases in their SFQ28 Arousal Sensation domain score (least squares mean 2.03 [SE 0.62]) compared with placebo cream (least squares mean 0.08 [SE 0.71], P =.04). This subset achieved a larger mean improvement in the SFQ28 Desire and Orgasm domain scores. This subset population also had significantly reduced sexual distress and interpersonal difficulties with sildenafil cream use as measured by FSDS-DAO questions 3, 5, and 10 (all P ≤.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Topical sildenafil cream improved outcomes among women with female sexual arousal disorder, most significantly in those who did not have concomitant orgasmic dysfunction. In particular, in an exploratory analysis of a subset of women with female sexual arousal disorder with or without concomitant decreased desire, topical sildenafil cream increased sexual arousal sensation, desire, and orgasm and reduced sexual distress.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT04948151.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11250102/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141420153","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cannabidiol-Only Product Use in Pregnancy in the United States and Canada: Findings From the International Cannabis Policy Study. 美国和加拿大妊娠期仅使用大麻二酚产品的情况:国际大麻政策研究的结果。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-09 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005603
Devika Bhatia, Sharonya Battula, Susan Mikulich-Gilbertson, Joseph Sakai, David Hammond

This study aimed to characterize pregnant individuals' use of cannabidiol (CBD). Data are from the International Cannabis Policy Study (2019-2021), a repeated cross-sectional survey of individuals aged 16-65 years in the United States and Canada (N=66,457 women, including 1,096 pregnant women). The primary analysis compared pregnant and nonpregnant women's CBD-only product use patterns and reasons for use. The prevalence of CBD-only use in pregnant women was 20.4% compared with 11.3% among nonpregnant women, P <.001. Reasons for CBD use among pregnant women included anxiety (58.4%), depression (40.3%), posttraumatic stress disorder (32.1%); pain (52.3%), headache (35.6%), and nausea or vomiting (31.9%). Thus, CBD-only product use was prevalent in this large sample, with one in five pregnant women reporting use. Characterization of prenatal CBD use is an important first step to exploring potential risks to exposed offspring.

本研究旨在了解孕妇使用大麻二酚(CBD)的情况。数据来自国际大麻政策研究(2019-2021 年),这是一项针对美国和加拿大 16-65 岁人群的重复横断面调查(样本数=66 457 名女性,包括 1 096 名孕妇)。主要分析比较了孕妇和非孕妇使用纯生物柴油产品的模式和原因。孕妇只使用 CBD 的比例为 20.4%,而非孕妇为 11.3%,P<0.05。
{"title":"Cannabidiol-Only Product Use in Pregnancy in the United States and Canada: Findings From the International Cannabis Policy Study.","authors":"Devika Bhatia, Sharonya Battula, Susan Mikulich-Gilbertson, Joseph Sakai, David Hammond","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005603","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005603","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to characterize pregnant individuals' use of cannabidiol (CBD). Data are from the International Cannabis Policy Study (2019-2021), a repeated cross-sectional survey of individuals aged 16-65 years in the United States and Canada (N=66,457 women, including 1,096 pregnant women). The primary analysis compared pregnant and nonpregnant women's CBD-only product use patterns and reasons for use. The prevalence of CBD-only use in pregnant women was 20.4% compared with 11.3% among nonpregnant women, P <.001. Reasons for CBD use among pregnant women included anxiety (58.4%), depression (40.3%), posttraumatic stress disorder (32.1%); pain (52.3%), headache (35.6%), and nausea or vomiting (31.9%). Thus, CBD-only product use was prevalent in this large sample, with one in five pregnant women reporting use. Characterization of prenatal CBD use is an important first step to exploring potential risks to exposed offspring.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11257799/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140899222","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Magnesium Sulfate Before Preterm Birth for Neuroprotection: An Updated Cochrane Systematic Review. 早产儿出生前服用硫酸镁以保护神经:最新 Cochrane 系统综述。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-03 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005644
Emily S Shepherd, Shona Goldsmith, Lex W Doyle, Philippa Middleton, Stéphane Marret, Dwight J Rouse, Peter Pryde, Hanne T Wolf, Caroline A Crowther

Objective: To systematically review the evidence for the effectiveness and safety of magnesium sulfate as a fetal neuroprotective agent when given to individuals at risk of preterm birth.

Data sources: We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov , the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (through March 17, 2023), and reference lists of relevant studies.

Methods of study selection: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing magnesium sulfate for fetal neuroprotection in pregnant participants at risk of imminent preterm birth were eligible. Two authors assessed RCTs for inclusion, extracted data, and evaluated risk of bias, trustworthiness, and evidence certainty (GRADE [Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation]).

Tabulation, integration, and results: We included six RCTs (5,917 pregnant participants and 6,759 fetuses at less than 34 weeks of gestation at randomization). They were conducted in high-income countries (two in the United States, two across Australia and New Zealand, and one each in Denmark and France) and commenced between 1995 and 2018. Primary outcomes: up to 2 years of corrected age, magnesium sulfate compared with placebo reduced the risk of cerebral palsy (risk ratio [RR] 0.71, 95% CI, 0.57-0.89; six RCTs, 6,107 children) and death or cerebral palsy (RR 0.87, 95% CI, 0.77-0.98; six RCTs, 6,481 children) (high-certainty evidence). Magnesium sulfate had little or no effect on death up to 2 years of corrected age (moderate-certainty evidence) or these outcomes at school age (low-certainty evidence). Although there was little or no effect on death or cardiac or respiratory arrest for pregnant individuals (low-certainty evidence), magnesium sulfate increased adverse effects severe enough to stop treatment (RR 3.21, 95% CI, 1.88-5.48; three RCTs, 4,736 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Secondary outcome: magnesium sulfate reduced the risk of severe neonatal intraventricular hemorrhage (moderate-certainty evidence).

Conclusion: Magnesium sulfate for preterm fetal neuroprotection reduces cerebral palsy and death or cerebral palsy for children. Further research is required on longer-term benefits and harms for children, effect variation by participant and treatment characteristics, and the generalizability of findings to low- and middle-income countries.

Systematic review registration: The review protocol was based on a standard Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth template and our previous Cochrane Systematic Review (doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004661.pub3 ; published before the introduction of PROSPERO).

目的系统回顾硫酸镁作为胎儿神经保护剂用于早产风险个体的有效性和安全性的证据:我们检索了Cochrane妊娠与分娩试验登记册、ClinicalTrials.gov、世界卫生组织国际临床试验登记平台(截止到2023年3月17日)以及相关研究的参考文献列表:符合条件的研究均为随机对照试验(RCT),这些试验评估了硫酸镁对面临早产风险的孕妇胎儿神经的保护作用。两位作者对纳入的 RCT 进行了评估,提取了数据,并对偏倚风险、可信度和证据确定性进行了评估(GRADE [Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation]):我们纳入了六项研究性临床试验(5917 名孕期参与者和 6759 名随机妊娠不足 34 周的胎儿)。这些研究均在高收入国家进行(美国 2 项、澳大利亚和新西兰 2 项、丹麦和法国各 1 项),研究始于 1995 年至 2018 年。主要研究结果:与安慰剂相比,硫酸镁可降低2岁以内患脑瘫(风险比[RR]0.71,95% CI,0.57-0.89;6项RCT,6107名儿童)和死亡或脑瘫(RR 0.87,95% CI,0.77-0.98;6项RCT,6481名儿童)的风险(高确定性证据)。硫酸镁对2岁以内的死亡(中度确定性证据)或学龄期的这些结果(低确定性证据)几乎没有影响。虽然硫酸镁对孕妇的死亡或心脏或呼吸骤停影响很小或没有影响(低度确定性证据),但硫酸镁会增加不良反应,严重到足以停止治疗(RR 3.21,95% CI,1.88-5.48;三项 RCT,4736 名参与者;中度确定性证据)。次要结果:硫酸镁可降低新生儿严重脑室出血的风险(中度确定性证据):结论:硫酸镁用于早产胎儿神经保护可减少脑瘫和儿童死亡或脑瘫。还需要进一步研究对儿童的长期益处和危害、参与者和治疗特征的效果差异以及研究结果在中低收入国家的推广性:综述方案基于标准的 Cochrane 妊娠与分娩模板以及我们之前的 Cochrane 系统综述(doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004661.pub3;在 PROSPERO 推出之前发表)。
{"title":"Magnesium Sulfate Before Preterm Birth for Neuroprotection: An Updated Cochrane Systematic Review.","authors":"Emily S Shepherd, Shona Goldsmith, Lex W Doyle, Philippa Middleton, Stéphane Marret, Dwight J Rouse, Peter Pryde, Hanne T Wolf, Caroline A Crowther","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005644","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005644","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically review the evidence for the effectiveness and safety of magnesium sulfate as a fetal neuroprotective agent when given to individuals at risk of preterm birth.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov , the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (through March 17, 2023), and reference lists of relevant studies.</p><p><strong>Methods of study selection: </strong>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing magnesium sulfate for fetal neuroprotection in pregnant participants at risk of imminent preterm birth were eligible. Two authors assessed RCTs for inclusion, extracted data, and evaluated risk of bias, trustworthiness, and evidence certainty (GRADE [Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation]).</p><p><strong>Tabulation, integration, and results: </strong>We included six RCTs (5,917 pregnant participants and 6,759 fetuses at less than 34 weeks of gestation at randomization). They were conducted in high-income countries (two in the United States, two across Australia and New Zealand, and one each in Denmark and France) and commenced between 1995 and 2018. Primary outcomes: up to 2 years of corrected age, magnesium sulfate compared with placebo reduced the risk of cerebral palsy (risk ratio [RR] 0.71, 95% CI, 0.57-0.89; six RCTs, 6,107 children) and death or cerebral palsy (RR 0.87, 95% CI, 0.77-0.98; six RCTs, 6,481 children) (high-certainty evidence). Magnesium sulfate had little or no effect on death up to 2 years of corrected age (moderate-certainty evidence) or these outcomes at school age (low-certainty evidence). Although there was little or no effect on death or cardiac or respiratory arrest for pregnant individuals (low-certainty evidence), magnesium sulfate increased adverse effects severe enough to stop treatment (RR 3.21, 95% CI, 1.88-5.48; three RCTs, 4,736 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Secondary outcome: magnesium sulfate reduced the risk of severe neonatal intraventricular hemorrhage (moderate-certainty evidence).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Magnesium sulfate for preterm fetal neuroprotection reduces cerebral palsy and death or cerebral palsy for children. Further research is required on longer-term benefits and harms for children, effect variation by participant and treatment characteristics, and the generalizability of findings to low- and middle-income countries.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>The review protocol was based on a standard Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth template and our previous Cochrane Systematic Review (doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004661.pub3 ; published before the introduction of PROSPERO).</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11250087/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141238414","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Obstetrics and gynecology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1