Oncology Research and Treatment最新文献

Introduction: SARS-CoV-2 infected patients with cancer have a worse outcome including a significant higher mortality, compared to non-cancer patients. However, limited data are available regarding in-hospital mortality during the Omicron phase of the pandemic. Therefore, the aim of the study was the comparison of mortality in patients with history of cancer and patients with active cancer disease during the different phases of the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on the current Omicron variant of concern.

Methods: We conducted a multicenter, observational, epidemiological cohort study at 45 hospitals in Germany. Until July 20, 2022, all adult hospitalized SARS-CoV-2 positive patients were included. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality regarding cancer status (history of cancer and active cancer disease) and SARS-CoV-2 virus type.

Results: From March 11, 2020, to July 20, 2022, a total of 27,490 adult SARS-CoV-2 positive patients were included in the study. 2,578 patients (9.4%) had diagnosis of cancer, of whom 1,065 (41.3%) had history of cancer, whereas 1,513 (58.7%) had active cancer disease. Overall 3,749 out of the total of 27,490 patients (13.6%) died during the hospital stay. Patients with active cancer disease had a significantly higher mortality compared to patients without cancer diagnosis, in both phases of the pandemic (wild-type to Delta: OR 1.940 [1.646-2.285]); Omicron: 2.864 [2.354-3.486]). After adjustment to co-variables, SARS-CoV-2 infected patients with active cancer disease had the highest risk for in-hospital mortality compared to the other groups, in both phases of the pandemic.

Conclusion: The CORONA Germany study indicates that hospitalized patients with active cancer disease are at high risk of death during a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Mortality of patients with history of cancer improved to nearly the level of non-cancer patients during Omicron phase.

Introduction: Soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) are rare diseases. A high level of standardization and centralization was lacking in Germany until 2018.

Methods: By developing an evidence-based guideline and a certification system for sarcoma centres, foundations for structured, guideline-based, and centralized sarcoma care were defined. First results of the certified sarcoma centres are presented.

Results: The first 3 years of data collection show good results for case volume, presentation rates in pretherapeutic and postoperative tumour boards, psycho-oncological counselling, and study rates. However, other indicators (e.g., preoperative or postoperative radiotherapy for operated high-risk STS without GIST, counselling rates social services) still have potential for improvement. Based on these results, the set of indicators could be further improved.

Conclusions: A sarcoma-specific quality assurance scheme that includes guideline-derived quality indicators was developed. In future, a broader database will allow further insights into sarcoma care in Germany.

Young oncologists around the globe face many challenges when it comes to their career and professional development. Aspects such as time management, work-life balance, career progression, and educational opportunities are only some of them. Professional societies have identified these challenges in this professional group and designed programs to tackle them specifically. The importance of this strategy cannot be overstated, as young oncologists, defined by most societies as oncologists under 40 years of age, compose almost 50% of the oncology workforce. On the other hand, recent surveys have shown that many young oncologists are considering alternative career paths due to burnout issues aggravated by the COVID-19 pandemic, on top of all other challenges. The virtual setting that has been forcedly introduced into our professional life has shortened distances between professionals and might have contributed to more accessible access to information and opportunities that some young oncologists could not profit from due to their traveling constraints. On the other hand, this virtual setting has shown us the asymmetries in opportunities for these professionals. Knowledgeable of all this, we summarize in this article some of the career and professional development offers available to all young oncologists, which we consider could help them deal with current and future challenges.

Introduction: Aortoesophageal fistulas are a rare but life-threatening complication in patients with thoracic malignancies.

Case presentation: We describe a case of a 55-year-old female patient with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. Due to esophageal tumor compression, a fully covered self-expanding metal stent (fcSEMS) had been deployed in the esophagus several months before. The patient was subsequently admitted to the emergency department with massive hematemesis. Endoscopy suggested a fistula between the aorta and the esophagus proximal of the fcSEMS, which was confirmed by computed tomography and led to hemodynamical relevant upper gastrointestinal bleeding. A thoracic endovascular aortic repair was performed to stop the hemorrhage. After the successful intervention, the patient needed long-term antibiotic treatment, and the fcSEMS remained in place. Afterward, the patient continued palliative tumor therapy using pembrolizumab for further 5 months. The patient died 8 months after the initial admission to the emergency department.

Conclusion: This is to the best of our knowledge the first case of a technically successful interventional therapy of an aortoesophageal fistula which did not only achieve hemostasis but also enabled the patient to continue tumor therapy to regain quality of life.

Introduction: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial compared the efficacy, and safety of adding pyrotinib to trastuzumab, docetaxel, and carboplatin versus placebo, trastuzumab, docetaxel, and carboplatin in Chinese patients with human epidermal receptor 2 (HER2)-positive early or locally advanced breast cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03756064).

Methods: Sixty-nine women with HER2-positive early (T1-3, N0-1, M0) or locally advanced breast cancer (T2-3, N2 or N3, M0; T4, any N, M0) were recruited from October 1, 2019, to June 1, 2021. Before surgery, patients received 6 cycles of orally pyrotinib (400 mg once per day), trastuzumab (8-mg/kg loading dose and 6-mg/kg maintenance doses), docetaxel (75 mg/m2), and carboplatin (AUC = 6 mg/mL·min) or orally placebo, trastuzumab, and docetaxel, and carboplatin every 3 weeks. The primary end point was independent review committee-assessed total pathologic complete response rate. The 2-sided Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, stratified by age, hormone receptor status, tumor stage, nodal status, cTNM stage, and Ki-67 level was used to compare rates between treatment groups.

Results: In total, 69 female patients were randomized (pyrotinib, 36; and placebo, 33; median age, 53 [31-69] years). In the intention-to-treat population, total pathologic complete response rates were 65.5% (19/29) in the pyrotinib group and 33.3% (10/30) in the placebo group (difference, 32.2%, p = 0.013). Diarrhea was been reported in 86.1% of patients (31/36) in the pyrotinib group as the most common adverse events (AEs) and 15.2% of patients (5/33) in the placebo group. But no grade 4 or 5 AEs were reported.

Conclusion: Treatment with pyrotinib, trastuzumab, docetaxel, and carboplatin resulted in a statistically significant improvement in the total pathologic complete response rate versus placebo, trastuzumab, docetaxel, and carboplatin for the neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive early or locally advanced breast cancer in Chinese patients. Safety data were in line with the known pyrotinib safety profile and generally comparable between treatment groups.

no abstract.