Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2023-12-11DOI: 10.1159/000535664
Gang Zhai, Yuncheng Wang
Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most prevalent malignant tumor worldwide and the second leading cause of cancer-related death. This study aimed at reporting the disease burden of CRC in China from 1990 to 2019 and predicting the trend of mortality burden over the next 10 years.
Methods: The age-period-cohort model was implemented to analyze the trends of mortality from CRC in China from 1990 to 2019, and the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model was used to predict the trends of CRC incidence and mortality from 2020 to 2029.
Results: From 1990 to 2019, the incidence of CRC in China increased from 105,911 cases (95% uncertainty interval [UI]: 93,808-119,021) to 607,900 cases (95% UI: 521,805-708,420). The age-standardized incidence rate increased from 12.52 per 100,000 (95% UI: 11.15-14.03) to 30.55 per 100,000 (95% UI: 26.37-35.5), with an estimated annual percentage change (EAPC) of 3.66 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.37-3.95), showing an upward trend. The age-standardized mortality rate increased from 10.18 per 100,000 (95% UI: 9.03-11.37) to 13.86 per 100,000 (95% UI: 11.92-16.01), with an EAPC of 1.39 (95% CI: 1.14-1.63), also showing an upward trend. The age group with the highest incidence and mortality in 2019 was 65-69 years old for both sexes, and the age group with the highest mortality was 70-74 years old. Males had higher relative risks of incidence and mortality than females. Low-calcium diet was the risk factor for both sexes and females alone in 1990, while low-milk diet was the risk factor in 2019; however, smoking remained the risk factor for males. The ARIMA model predicted an increase in both disease and mortality burden of CRC over the next 10 years.
Conclusion: The disease and mortality burden of CRC in China showed an overall upward trend from 1990 to 2019, with higher burden in males than females, and the situation remains extremely severe in the next decade.
{"title":"Disease Burden of Colorectal Cancer in China from 1990 to 2019: Age- and Sex-Specific Time Trends and 10-Year Forecast.","authors":"Gang Zhai, Yuncheng Wang","doi":"10.1159/000535664","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000535664","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most prevalent malignant tumor worldwide and the second leading cause of cancer-related death. This study aimed at reporting the disease burden of CRC in China from 1990 to 2019 and predicting the trend of mortality burden over the next 10 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The age-period-cohort model was implemented to analyze the trends of mortality from CRC in China from 1990 to 2019, and the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model was used to predict the trends of CRC incidence and mortality from 2020 to 2029.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 1990 to 2019, the incidence of CRC in China increased from 105,911 cases (95% uncertainty interval [UI]: 93,808-119,021) to 607,900 cases (95% UI: 521,805-708,420). The age-standardized incidence rate increased from 12.52 per 100,000 (95% UI: 11.15-14.03) to 30.55 per 100,000 (95% UI: 26.37-35.5), with an estimated annual percentage change (EAPC) of 3.66 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.37-3.95), showing an upward trend. The age-standardized mortality rate increased from 10.18 per 100,000 (95% UI: 9.03-11.37) to 13.86 per 100,000 (95% UI: 11.92-16.01), with an EAPC of 1.39 (95% CI: 1.14-1.63), also showing an upward trend. The age group with the highest incidence and mortality in 2019 was 65-69 years old for both sexes, and the age group with the highest mortality was 70-74 years old. Males had higher relative risks of incidence and mortality than females. Low-calcium diet was the risk factor for both sexes and females alone in 1990, while low-milk diet was the risk factor in 2019; however, smoking remained the risk factor for males. The ARIMA model predicted an increase in both disease and mortality burden of CRC over the next 10 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The disease and mortality burden of CRC in China showed an overall upward trend from 1990 to 2019, with higher burden in males than females, and the situation remains extremely severe in the next decade.</p>","PeriodicalId":19543,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"76-87"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138807514","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: This multicenter, phase II randomized, non-inferiority study reports from the first prospective two-armed randomized control trial that compared the efficacy, safety, and quality of life (QoL) of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD)-based and epirubicin-based as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage I-II human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer.
Methods: Patients with stage I/II HER2-negative breast cancer received PLD (37.5 mg/m2, Q3W, 5 cycles, LC arm) plus cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) or epirubicin (90 mg/m2, Q3W, 4 cycles, EC arm) plus cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2). Randomization was stratified by lymph node and ER and PR status. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS), and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), safety profiles, and QoL. QoL was assessed using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 questionnaires.
Results: A total of 256 patients were assigned to LC (n = 148) and EC (n = 108). There was no difference in 5-year DFS and OS rate between the two groups. LC-based adjuvant regimens had significantly less alopecia and low-grade 3-4 hematologic adverse events (AEs). Significantly improved QoL was observed in the LC arm during and after treatment for symptoms including fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and systemic therapy side effects.
Conclusion: Comparable efficacy and safety between adjuvant PLD and epirubicin for stage I-II HER2-negative breast cancer was observed. There was no difference in the 5-year DFS and OS rates between the two treatment arms. However, low-grade 3-4 AEs and a trend of favorable QoL symptom scales were observed in the LC arm, suggesting that PLD-containing regimen could become a new standard treatment for early-stage HER2-negative breast cancer patients.
{"title":"Comparison of the Efficacy, Safety, and Quality of Life of Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin-Cyclophosphamide versus Epirubicin-Cyclophosphamide in Patients with Early-Stage HER2-Negative Breast Cancer: A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter, Phase II Study.","authors":"Ling-Ming Tseng, Fang Ming Chen, Shou-Tung Chen, Fiona Tsui-Fen Cheng, Tsu-Yi Chao, Ming-Shen Dai, Woei-Yau Kao, Ming-Hsin Yeh, Dar-Ren Chen, Liang-Chih Liu, Hewi Chung Wang, Hong-Tai Chang, Being Whey Wang, Jyh-Cherng Yu, Shin Cheh Chen, Guo-Shiou Liao, Ming-Feng Hou","doi":"10.1159/000540369","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000540369","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This multicenter, phase II randomized, non-inferiority study reports from the first prospective two-armed randomized control trial that compared the efficacy, safety, and quality of life (QoL) of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD)-based and epirubicin-based as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage I-II human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with stage I/II HER2-negative breast cancer received PLD (37.5 mg/m2, Q3W, 5 cycles, LC arm) plus cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) or epirubicin (90 mg/m2, Q3W, 4 cycles, EC arm) plus cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2). Randomization was stratified by lymph node and ER and PR status. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS), and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), safety profiles, and QoL. QoL was assessed using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 256 patients were assigned to LC (n = 148) and EC (n = 108). There was no difference in 5-year DFS and OS rate between the two groups. LC-based adjuvant regimens had significantly less alopecia and low-grade 3-4 hematologic adverse events (AEs). Significantly improved QoL was observed in the LC arm during and after treatment for symptoms including fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and systemic therapy side effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Comparable efficacy and safety between adjuvant PLD and epirubicin for stage I-II HER2-negative breast cancer was observed. There was no difference in the 5-year DFS and OS rates between the two treatment arms. However, low-grade 3-4 AEs and a trend of favorable QoL symptom scales were observed in the LC arm, suggesting that PLD-containing regimen could become a new standard treatment for early-stage HER2-negative breast cancer patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19543,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"484-495"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141734753","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Lymphadenectomy is a cornerstone in the surgical management of resectable primary lung cancer. However, its prognostic significance in early-stage metachronous second primary lung cancer (MSPLC) remains poorly understood. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of lymphadenectomy in these patients using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the SEER Database for patients surgically treated for stage I MSPLC between 2004 and 2015. Propensity score-matching was employed to create comparable cohorts, and the Cox proportional hazards model was utilized to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival after lymphadenectomy compared to non-lymphadenectomy. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test.
Results: Among 920 identified patients with MSPLC, 574 (62.4%) underwent lymphadenectomy. Propensity score-matching yielded 255 patients in both the lymphadenectomy and non-lymphadenectomy groups. Over a median follow-up of 38 months, the 5-year overall survival probability after a diagnosis of MSPLC was 58.7% in the lymphadenectomy group and 43.9% in the non-lymphadenectomy group (HR: 0.76; 95% confidence interval 0.64-0.90; p = 0.002).
Conclusion: In this population-based study, lymphadenectomy is associated with prolonged overall survival in patients with stage I MSPLC. These findings suggest the potential benefit of incorporating lymphadenectomy into the surgical management of MSPLC, providing valuable guidance for thoracic surgeons in clinical decision-making.
{"title":"Enhanced Survival with Lymphadenectomy in Early-Stage Metachronous Second Primary Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis.","authors":"Jieshi Zhang, Yuxiao Lin, Jiong Zhou, Ruixuan Geng, Zhibo Zheng, Chao Guo, Xiaojun Ma, Shanqing Li","doi":"10.1159/000538259","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000538259","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lymphadenectomy is a cornerstone in the surgical management of resectable primary lung cancer. However, its prognostic significance in early-stage metachronous second primary lung cancer (MSPLC) remains poorly understood. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of lymphadenectomy in these patients using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the SEER Database for patients surgically treated for stage I MSPLC between 2004 and 2015. Propensity score-matching was employed to create comparable cohorts, and the Cox proportional hazards model was utilized to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival after lymphadenectomy compared to non-lymphadenectomy. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 920 identified patients with MSPLC, 574 (62.4%) underwent lymphadenectomy. Propensity score-matching yielded 255 patients in both the lymphadenectomy and non-lymphadenectomy groups. Over a median follow-up of 38 months, the 5-year overall survival probability after a diagnosis of MSPLC was 58.7% in the lymphadenectomy group and 43.9% in the non-lymphadenectomy group (HR: 0.76; 95% confidence interval 0.64-0.90; p = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this population-based study, lymphadenectomy is associated with prolonged overall survival in patients with stage I MSPLC. These findings suggest the potential benefit of incorporating lymphadenectomy into the surgical management of MSPLC, providing valuable guidance for thoracic surgeons in clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":19543,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"198-205"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11078322/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140143924","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-05-07DOI: 10.1159/000539087
Lars Gerland, Nadia Harbeck, Susanne Frisse, Wilhelm Bloch, Wolfram Malter, Ronald Kates, Freerk Theeagnus Baumann
Introduction: Breast cancer patients (BCP) experience considerable side effects during and after treatment. Several studies have shown positive effects of exercise on therapy-related side-effects such as loss of muscle strength, loss of bone mineral density, lymphedema, and several elements of quality of life (QoL). Resistance exercise has proven effective and beneficial for BCP; however, optimal individual training parameters remain to be determined.
Methods: The aim of our study was to implement an adaptive, progressive, supervised resistance protocol for BCPs during chemotherapy, improving muscle strength, physical condition, and overall QoL while reducing therapy-induced side-effects. Forty patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy were included 6-12 weeks post-OP. Twenty patients underwent high intensity resistance-training twice a week for 12 weeks, and the control group received usual care.
Results: Strength parameters improved significantly in the intervention group and in different scales of QoL. We documented a cyclic performance level dependent on the number of days after treatment.
Conclusion: Adaptive resistance training with simple training control mechanisms proved to be effective regarding optimal intensity in each training session and needs to be implemented in further studies in order to guarantee adequate loads in accordance to the training protocols.
导言:乳腺癌患者(BCP)在治疗期间和治疗后都会经历相当大的副作用。多项研究表明,运动对治疗相关的副作用有积极影响,如肌肉力量下降、骨矿物质密度下降、淋巴水肿以及生活质量(QoL)的若干因素。阻力运动已被证明对 BCP 有效且有益,但最佳的个人训练参数仍有待确定:我们的研究旨在为化疗期间的乳腺癌患者实施一套适应性强、循序渐进、有监督的抗阻力训练方案,以改善患者的肌肉力量、身体状况和整体生活质量,同时减少治疗引起的副作用。40 名接受辅助化疗的患者在术后六到十二周内接受了治疗。20 名患者接受了每周两次、为期 12 周的高强度阻力训练,对照组则接受常规护理:结果:干预组的力量参数和不同的 QoL 量表均有明显改善。我们记录了一个周期性的表现水平,强调了适应性训练和训练控制在进一步试验中的重要性。
{"title":"Evaluation of the Impact of Adaptive Progressive Supervised Resistance Training on Strength and Quality of Life in Patients with Breast Cancer during Chemotherapy: The VALESCO Study.","authors":"Lars Gerland, Nadia Harbeck, Susanne Frisse, Wilhelm Bloch, Wolfram Malter, Ronald Kates, Freerk Theeagnus Baumann","doi":"10.1159/000539087","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000539087","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Breast cancer patients (BCP) experience considerable side effects during and after treatment. Several studies have shown positive effects of exercise on therapy-related side-effects such as loss of muscle strength, loss of bone mineral density, lymphedema, and several elements of quality of life (QoL). Resistance exercise has proven effective and beneficial for BCP; however, optimal individual training parameters remain to be determined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The aim of our study was to implement an adaptive, progressive, supervised resistance protocol for BCPs during chemotherapy, improving muscle strength, physical condition, and overall QoL while reducing therapy-induced side-effects. Forty patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy were included 6-12 weeks post-OP. Twenty patients underwent high intensity resistance-training twice a week for 12 weeks, and the control group received usual care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Strength parameters improved significantly in the intervention group and in different scales of QoL. We documented a cyclic performance level dependent on the number of days after treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adaptive resistance training with simple training control mechanisms proved to be effective regarding optimal intensity in each training session and needs to be implemented in further studies in order to guarantee adequate loads in accordance to the training protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":19543,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"387-400"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140876977","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-05-18DOI: 10.1159/000539275
Antonio Piras, Andrea D'Aviero, Antonella Sanfratello, Luca Boldrini, Gianfranco Pernice, Massimiliano Spada, Gianluca Gaudio, Mirko Pinelli, Giuseppe Salamone, Vittorio Gebbia, Nino Dispensa, Gabriele Tulone, Riccardo Laudicella, Albert Comelli, Domenico Di Raimondo, Antonino Tuttolomondo, Tommaso Angileri, Antonino Daidone
Introduction: Penile metastases (PMs) are a rare clinical presentation mainly related to advanced stages of disease. Considering the low incidence, an optimal treatment approach has not yet been defined; surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy (RT) are different options used in the vast majority with palliative intent. The advances in modern RT can represent an innovative tool in PM management and a curative option. This paper aimed to report the case of a PM patient treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and perform a systematic literature review of current evidence on the RT approach to PM.
Case presentation: We reported the case of an 80-year-old patient with PM from primary bladder cancer. Following the surgical approach for the primary tumor, evidence of PM was shown, and the patient was admitted to SBRT treatment on PM after an adjuvant RT course on the pelvis. A 25 Gy in 5-fraction SBRT treatment was performed, and a complete clinical response was shown at the first follow-up. A PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase systematic review was carried out. The search strategy terms were [("penile metastasis"/exp OR "penile metastasis" OR (penile AND ("metastasis"/exp OR metastasis))) AND ("radiotherapy"/exp OR radiotherapy)] and only original articles up to October 24, 2023 were considered.
Conclusion: A total of 174 studies were obtained using the previously mentioned search strategy, and the analysis was performed on 15 papers obtained following the complete selection process. All reported evidence was focused on the palliative approach of PM, showing good results in terms of symptom control. The potential role of modern RT in the management of PM has yet to be defined. The reported case showed the feasibility and the clinical impact of SBRT in PM treatment.
{"title":"Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Penile Metastasis: Case Report and Systematic Literature Review.","authors":"Antonio Piras, Andrea D'Aviero, Antonella Sanfratello, Luca Boldrini, Gianfranco Pernice, Massimiliano Spada, Gianluca Gaudio, Mirko Pinelli, Giuseppe Salamone, Vittorio Gebbia, Nino Dispensa, Gabriele Tulone, Riccardo Laudicella, Albert Comelli, Domenico Di Raimondo, Antonino Tuttolomondo, Tommaso Angileri, Antonino Daidone","doi":"10.1159/000539275","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000539275","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Penile metastases (PMs) are a rare clinical presentation mainly related to advanced stages of disease. Considering the low incidence, an optimal treatment approach has not yet been defined; surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy (RT) are different options used in the vast majority with palliative intent. The advances in modern RT can represent an innovative tool in PM management and a curative option. This paper aimed to report the case of a PM patient treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and perform a systematic literature review of current evidence on the RT approach to PM.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>We reported the case of an 80-year-old patient with PM from primary bladder cancer. Following the surgical approach for the primary tumor, evidence of PM was shown, and the patient was admitted to SBRT treatment on PM after an adjuvant RT course on the pelvis. A 25 Gy in 5-fraction SBRT treatment was performed, and a complete clinical response was shown at the first follow-up. A PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase systematic review was carried out. The search strategy terms were [(\"penile metastasis\"/exp OR \"penile metastasis\" OR (penile AND (\"metastasis\"/exp OR metastasis))) AND (\"radiotherapy\"/exp OR radiotherapy)] and only original articles up to October 24, 2023 were considered.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A total of 174 studies were obtained using the previously mentioned search strategy, and the analysis was performed on 15 papers obtained following the complete selection process. All reported evidence was focused on the palliative approach of PM, showing good results in terms of symptom control. The potential role of modern RT in the management of PM has yet to be defined. The reported case showed the feasibility and the clinical impact of SBRT in PM treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19543,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"565-572"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141066135","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-07-22DOI: 10.1159/000540244
Faruk Tas, Akin Ozturk, Kayhan Erturk
Introduction: Several previous studies have explored whether sex has prognostic significance in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). In this retrospective study, we aimed to show the clinical significance of sex in SCLC patients.
Methods: A total of 378 SCLC patients were assessed retrospectively.
Results: Sixty-one (16.1%) patients were women; 26 of 131 (19.9%) patients had limited disease (LD-SCLC); and 14.2% of patients (35 of 247 patients) had extended disease (ED-SCLC). In all SCLC patients, regardless of stage, female patients were more likely to be nonsmokers (7.7 vs. 1%, p = 0.04 for LD-SCLC; and 11.4 vs. 1.4%, p = 0.001 for ED-SCLC) and more often to be anemic (26.9 vs. 11.4%, p = 0.04 for LD-SCLC; and 45.7 vs. 28%, p = 0.03 for ED-SCLC). While women with LD-SCLC were diagnosed younger (<60) than men (65.4 vs. 37.1%, p = 0.009), they had larger (>5 cm) tumors (69.2 vs. 42.9%, p = 0.01). Moreover, obesity (77.1 vs. 56.4%, p = 0.02) and less weight loss (88.6 vs. 73.6%, p = 0.04) were more common in women with ED-SCLC than in men. However, there were no associations between sex and significant prognostic factors, such as performance status, metastasis site, serum LDH level, response to chemotherapy, and disease recurrence. Outcomes in LD-SCLC patients were found to be similar between sexes; median overall survivals in women compared to men was 18 versus 15 months, respectively (p = 0.8). On the other hand, female patients with ED-SCLC had better survivals; median survivals for women versus men were 10 versus 7 months, respectively (p = 0.008). This significance for female ED-SCLC patients was also maintained in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.001).
Conclusion: While the survival rates of female patients, who constitute a small proportion of SCLC patients, are no different from men in LD-SCLC, they are better in ED-SCLC.
{"title":"Female Patients with Small Cell Lung Cancer Have Better Survival than Males with Extensive but Not Limited Disease.","authors":"Faruk Tas, Akin Ozturk, Kayhan Erturk","doi":"10.1159/000540244","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000540244","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Several previous studies have explored whether sex has prognostic significance in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). In this retrospective study, we aimed to show the clinical significance of sex in SCLC patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 378 SCLC patients were assessed retrospectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-one (16.1%) patients were women; 26 of 131 (19.9%) patients had limited disease (LD-SCLC); and 14.2% of patients (35 of 247 patients) had extended disease (ED-SCLC). In all SCLC patients, regardless of stage, female patients were more likely to be nonsmokers (7.7 vs. 1%, p = 0.04 for LD-SCLC; and 11.4 vs. 1.4%, p = 0.001 for ED-SCLC) and more often to be anemic (26.9 vs. 11.4%, p = 0.04 for LD-SCLC; and 45.7 vs. 28%, p = 0.03 for ED-SCLC). While women with LD-SCLC were diagnosed younger (<60) than men (65.4 vs. 37.1%, p = 0.009), they had larger (>5 cm) tumors (69.2 vs. 42.9%, p = 0.01). Moreover, obesity (77.1 vs. 56.4%, p = 0.02) and less weight loss (88.6 vs. 73.6%, p = 0.04) were more common in women with ED-SCLC than in men. However, there were no associations between sex and significant prognostic factors, such as performance status, metastasis site, serum LDH level, response to chemotherapy, and disease recurrence. Outcomes in LD-SCLC patients were found to be similar between sexes; median overall survivals in women compared to men was 18 versus 15 months, respectively (p = 0.8). On the other hand, female patients with ED-SCLC had better survivals; median survivals for women versus men were 10 versus 7 months, respectively (p = 0.008). This significance for female ED-SCLC patients was also maintained in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While the survival rates of female patients, who constitute a small proportion of SCLC patients, are no different from men in LD-SCLC, they are better in ED-SCLC.</p>","PeriodicalId":19543,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"401-409"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141555304","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-05-07DOI: 10.1159/000539217
Ina Pretzell, Alexander Desuki, Annalen Bleckmann, Sonja Loges, Anke Reinacher-Schick, C Benedikt Westphalen, Sebastian Lange
Introduction: Comprehensive molecular tumor profiling is widely used in the management of patients with cancer. Molecular tumor boards devise treatment strategies based on testing results. In this setting, the Transsectoral Molecular Tumor Board exchange platform Deutschland (TEAM-D) aims to drive peer-to-peer exchange to connect experts in the field.
Methods: During the first virtual TEAM-D meeting, participants from 16 German universities and 5 nonacademic institutions discussed five cases with PIK3CA hotspot mutations. Furthermore, an illustrative case vignette was presented.
Results: Overall, German caregivers show restraint in administering off-label PIK3CA inhibitor and favor clinical trials in this setting.
Conclusion: In the setting of precision oncology, TEAM-D enables virtual case discussion across the different sectors of the German healthcare system. Based on the example of PIK3CA hotspot mutations, TEAM-D demonstrated the value of integrating knowledge from different healthcare professionals.
{"title":"What Do German Molecular Tumor Boards Recommend in Patients with PIK3CA-Mutated Tumors? Launch and First Results from the German Transsectoral Molecular Tumor Board Exchange Platform Deutschland.","authors":"Ina Pretzell, Alexander Desuki, Annalen Bleckmann, Sonja Loges, Anke Reinacher-Schick, C Benedikt Westphalen, Sebastian Lange","doi":"10.1159/000539217","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000539217","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Comprehensive molecular tumor profiling is widely used in the management of patients with cancer. Molecular tumor boards devise treatment strategies based on testing results. In this setting, the Transsectoral Molecular Tumor Board exchange platform Deutschland (TEAM-D) aims to drive peer-to-peer exchange to connect experts in the field.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>During the first virtual TEAM-D meeting, participants from 16 German universities and 5 nonacademic institutions discussed five cases with PIK3CA hotspot mutations. Furthermore, an illustrative case vignette was presented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, German caregivers show restraint in administering off-label PIK3CA inhibitor and favor clinical trials in this setting.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the setting of precision oncology, TEAM-D enables virtual case discussion across the different sectors of the German healthcare system. Based on the example of PIK3CA hotspot mutations, TEAM-D demonstrated the value of integrating knowledge from different healthcare professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":19543,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"410-419"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140876978","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-03-14DOI: 10.1159/000538171
Celine Lugnier, Sabine Sommerlatte, Ulrike Attenberger, Ambros J Beer, Martin Bentz, Stefan R Benz, Thomas Birkner, Jens Büntzel, Matthias P A Ebert, Peter Fasching, Wolfgang Fischbach, Emmanouil Fokas, Birgit Fricke, Helene Hense, Erich Grohmann, Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz, Dietrich Hüppe, Stefan Huster, Patrick Jahn, Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke, Wolfgang Knauf, Anna-Lena Kraeft, Bernd Oliver Maier, Georg Marckmann, Günter Niegisch, Lutz Otto, Uwe Pelzer, Pompiliu Piso, Henning Rosenau, Jochen Schmitt, Olaf Schoffer, Jalid Sehouli, Andrea Tannapfel, Ulrich Wedding, Simone Wesselmann, Eva C Winkler, Tanja Zimmermann, Bernhard Wörmann, Anke Reinacher-Schick, Jan Schildmann
In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a scarcity of resources with various effects on the care of cancer patients. This paper provides an English summary of a German guideline on prioritization and resource allocation for colorectal and pancreatic cancer in the context of the pandemic. Based on a selective literature review as well as empirical and ethical analyses, the research team of the CancerCOVID Consortium drafted recommendations for prioritizing diagnostic and treatment measures for both entities. The final version of the guideline received consent from the executive boards of nine societies of the Association of Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF), 20 further professional organizations and 22 other experts from various disciplines as well as patient representatives. The guiding principle for the prioritization of decisions is the minimization of harm. Prioritization decisions to fulfill this overall goal should be guided by (1) the urgency relevant to avoid or reduce harm, (2) the likelihood of success of the diagnostic or therapeutic measure advised, and (3) the availability of alternative treatment options. In the event of a relevant risk of harm as a result of prioritization, these decisions should be made by means of a team approach. Gender, age, disability, ethnicity, origin, and other social characteristics, such as social or insurance status, as well as the vehemence of a patient's treatment request and SARS-CoV-2 vaccination status should not be used as prioritization criteria. The guideline provides concrete recommendations for (1) diagnostic procedures, (2) surgical procedures for cancer, and (3) systemic treatment and radiotherapy in patients with colorectal or pancreatic cancer within the context of the German healthcare system.
{"title":"Prioritization and Resource Allocation in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Recommendations for Colorectal and Pancreatic Cancer in Germany.","authors":"Celine Lugnier, Sabine Sommerlatte, Ulrike Attenberger, Ambros J Beer, Martin Bentz, Stefan R Benz, Thomas Birkner, Jens Büntzel, Matthias P A Ebert, Peter Fasching, Wolfgang Fischbach, Emmanouil Fokas, Birgit Fricke, Helene Hense, Erich Grohmann, Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz, Dietrich Hüppe, Stefan Huster, Patrick Jahn, Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke, Wolfgang Knauf, Anna-Lena Kraeft, Bernd Oliver Maier, Georg Marckmann, Günter Niegisch, Lutz Otto, Uwe Pelzer, Pompiliu Piso, Henning Rosenau, Jochen Schmitt, Olaf Schoffer, Jalid Sehouli, Andrea Tannapfel, Ulrich Wedding, Simone Wesselmann, Eva C Winkler, Tanja Zimmermann, Bernhard Wörmann, Anke Reinacher-Schick, Jan Schildmann","doi":"10.1159/000538171","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000538171","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a scarcity of resources with various effects on the care of cancer patients. This paper provides an English summary of a German guideline on prioritization and resource allocation for colorectal and pancreatic cancer in the context of the pandemic. Based on a selective literature review as well as empirical and ethical analyses, the research team of the CancerCOVID Consortium drafted recommendations for prioritizing diagnostic and treatment measures for both entities. The final version of the guideline received consent from the executive boards of nine societies of the Association of Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF), 20 further professional organizations and 22 other experts from various disciplines as well as patient representatives. The guiding principle for the prioritization of decisions is the minimization of harm. Prioritization decisions to fulfill this overall goal should be guided by (1) the urgency relevant to avoid or reduce harm, (2) the likelihood of success of the diagnostic or therapeutic measure advised, and (3) the availability of alternative treatment options. In the event of a relevant risk of harm as a result of prioritization, these decisions should be made by means of a team approach. Gender, age, disability, ethnicity, origin, and other social characteristics, such as social or insurance status, as well as the vehemence of a patient's treatment request and SARS-CoV-2 vaccination status should not be used as prioritization criteria. The guideline provides concrete recommendations for (1) diagnostic procedures, (2) surgical procedures for cancer, and (3) systemic treatment and radiotherapy in patients with colorectal or pancreatic cancer within the context of the German healthcare system.</p>","PeriodicalId":19543,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"296-305"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140132221","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma (MCA) of the breast is an extremely rare type of breast carcinoma. Since its biological characteristics, treatment options, and clinical outcomes are unclear, there is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal management of this disease. Thus, our single case report will aid our understanding of its natural history, prognostic factors, and treatment strategies.
Case presentation: We presented a 54-year-old woman with a case of advanced MCA of the breast accompanied by a huge breast mass, lymph node involvement, and distant bone metastases. We diagnosed primary breast MCA through clinical examination, imaging, and immunohistochemical assessments. Subsequently, the patient was treated with a regimen of nab-paclitaxel and bevacizumab, resulting in a significant clinical response. Progression-free survival was maintained during the 6-month follow-up period.
Conclusion: We present the first report worldwide of a rare case of MCA of the breast with a large local mass and bone metastases. Our report adds to the limited literature on this rare breast cancer subtype and highlights the importance of accurate diagnosis and appropriate management of aggressive breast tumors.
{"title":"Mucinous Cystadenocarcinoma of the Breast with Bone Metastases: First Case Report and Literature Review.","authors":"Ying Gong, Xuhua Geng, Yaxin Liu, Ruyan Zhang, Yiqiang Liu, Huiping Li","doi":"10.1159/000535649","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000535649","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma (MCA) of the breast is an extremely rare type of breast carcinoma. Since its biological characteristics, treatment options, and clinical outcomes are unclear, there is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal management of this disease. Thus, our single case report will aid our understanding of its natural history, prognostic factors, and treatment strategies.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>We presented a 54-year-old woman with a case of advanced MCA of the breast accompanied by a huge breast mass, lymph node involvement, and distant bone metastases. We diagnosed primary breast MCA through clinical examination, imaging, and immunohistochemical assessments. Subsequently, the patient was treated with a regimen of nab-paclitaxel and bevacizumab, resulting in a significant clinical response. Progression-free survival was maintained during the 6-month follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We present the first report worldwide of a rare case of MCA of the breast with a large local mass and bone metastases. Our report adds to the limited literature on this rare breast cancer subtype and highlights the importance of accurate diagnosis and appropriate management of aggressive breast tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":19543,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"97-103"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138830838","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-08-07DOI: 10.1159/000540662
Yang-Kai Fu, Yi-Nan Li, De-Yi Liu, Zhen-Xin Zeng, Jia-Yi Wu, Jun-Yi Wu, Jin-Xiu Wang, Han Li, Xiang-Ye Ou, Mao-Lin Yan
Introduction: Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and inferior vena cava tumor thrombus (IVCTT) have poor prognosis. Combination therapy involving the blockade of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors is an efficient treatment strategy for advanced HCC. However, surgical treatment after a combination of systemic therapy and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for HCC with IVCTT has not been widely reported, and the efficacy and safety of this treatment have not been studied.
Methods: In the 21 cases reported herein, the patients were treated with TACE, lenvatinib, and PD-1 blockade. The treatment responses, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate, and toxicities were evaluated, and the related literature was reviewed.
Results: The overall response and disease control rates were 66.7% and 85.7%, respectively. The median PFS time was 16.0 months, with a 1-year PFS rate of 55.60%. The median OS was not reached, with a 1-year OS rate of 66.70%. Four patients underwent hepatectomy without serious complications and survived for 29.1, 24.7, 14.2, and 13.8 months. Three patients survived tumor-free, and 1 patient experienced intrahepatic recurrence. Pathological complete response and major pathological responses were observed in 1 and 3 patients, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events of any grade occurred in 8/9 patients (88.9%), and grade 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 1 patient.
Conclusion: The combination of TACE, lenvatinib, and PD-1 is effective for HCC with IVCTT and has acceptable adverse effects.
{"title":"Combination Therapy Consisting of Transarterial Chemoembolization, Lenvatinib, and Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 Blockade for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Inferior Vena Cava Tumor Thrombus: A Case Series Study and Literature Review.","authors":"Yang-Kai Fu, Yi-Nan Li, De-Yi Liu, Zhen-Xin Zeng, Jia-Yi Wu, Jun-Yi Wu, Jin-Xiu Wang, Han Li, Xiang-Ye Ou, Mao-Lin Yan","doi":"10.1159/000540662","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000540662","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and inferior vena cava tumor thrombus (IVCTT) have poor prognosis. Combination therapy involving the blockade of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors is an efficient treatment strategy for advanced HCC. However, surgical treatment after a combination of systemic therapy and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for HCC with IVCTT has not been widely reported, and the efficacy and safety of this treatment have not been studied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the 21 cases reported herein, the patients were treated with TACE, lenvatinib, and PD-1 blockade. The treatment responses, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate, and toxicities were evaluated, and the related literature was reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall response and disease control rates were 66.7% and 85.7%, respectively. The median PFS time was 16.0 months, with a 1-year PFS rate of 55.60%. The median OS was not reached, with a 1-year OS rate of 66.70%. Four patients underwent hepatectomy without serious complications and survived for 29.1, 24.7, 14.2, and 13.8 months. Three patients survived tumor-free, and 1 patient experienced intrahepatic recurrence. Pathological complete response and major pathological responses were observed in 1 and 3 patients, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events of any grade occurred in 8/9 patients (88.9%), and grade 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 1 patient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of TACE, lenvatinib, and PD-1 is effective for HCC with IVCTT and has acceptable adverse effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":19543,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"465-473"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141902525","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}