Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-02-28DOI: 10.1159/000544977
Miroslav Stojadinovic, Milorad Stojadinovic, Slobodan Jankovic
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa). The study examines any predictions that could point to future models.
Methods: Two interrupted time series analyses were conducted: one for the pre-COVID period (January 2017 to December 2019) and another for the post-COVID period during 2022. Information on age, total prostate-specific antigen (PSA), abnormal digital rectal exam (DRE), prostate volume, previous negative biopsy, number of positive biopsies, Gleason score, and biopsy outcome were collected for all patients. The categories for the results were no cancer, insignificant, low and intermediate, high-risk, and very high-risk PCa. Using a generalized linear model (GLM), the outcomes are modeled. The area under the curve (AUC) and accuracy were used to assess how well multi-class predictions performed.
Results: Overall, 244 patients who had biopsies following the COVID-19 pandemic and 832 patients who had biopsies before the pandemic were compared. The accuracy of the GLM was only 0.635. The AUC for categories no-cancer, low- and intermediate-risk, and very high-risk patients was 0.821, 0.716, and 0.926. With scaled relevance values, PSA was the most critical test. The two features that significantly influenced the treatment model prediction for PCa were biopsy PSA level and DRE, respectively.
Conclusion: Advanced age and a very high-risk group appear to have a detrimental impact on the results of biopsies conducted after the first wave of the COVID-19 era. At the same time, PSA levels and abnormal DRE are the most significant predictors in GLM.
{"title":"Modifications to Prostate Cancer Diagnosis following COVID-19 and Following Models.","authors":"Miroslav Stojadinovic, Milorad Stojadinovic, Slobodan Jankovic","doi":"10.1159/000544977","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000544977","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa). The study examines any predictions that could point to future models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two interrupted time series analyses were conducted: one for the pre-COVID period (January 2017 to December 2019) and another for the post-COVID period during 2022. Information on age, total prostate-specific antigen (PSA), abnormal digital rectal exam (DRE), prostate volume, previous negative biopsy, number of positive biopsies, Gleason score, and biopsy outcome were collected for all patients. The categories for the results were no cancer, insignificant, low and intermediate, high-risk, and very high-risk PCa. Using a generalized linear model (GLM), the outcomes are modeled. The area under the curve (AUC) and accuracy were used to assess how well multi-class predictions performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 244 patients who had biopsies following the COVID-19 pandemic and 832 patients who had biopsies before the pandemic were compared. The accuracy of the GLM was only 0.635. The AUC for categories no-cancer, low- and intermediate-risk, and very high-risk patients was 0.821, 0.716, and 0.926. With scaled relevance values, PSA was the most critical test. The two features that significantly influenced the treatment model prediction for PCa were biopsy PSA level and DRE, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Advanced age and a very high-risk group appear to have a detrimental impact on the results of biopsies conducted after the first wave of the COVID-19 era. At the same time, PSA levels and abnormal DRE are the most significant predictors in GLM.</p>","PeriodicalId":19543,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"332-340"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143537633","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-03-21DOI: 10.1159/000545363
Hannes Hofbauer, Birgit Abberger, Nadia Kheirandish, Kristin Kieselbach, Kristin Kieselbach
Introduction: Up to 40% of long-term cancer survivors suffer from chronic cancer-related pain (CCRP) with often inadequate treatment. CCRP is influenced by biopsychosocial factors, with interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy (IMPT) being a comprehensive treatment option. In our study, patients with CCRP were asked about their treatment satisfaction and treatment wishes.
Methods: Two anonymous online surveys on CCRP in long-term survivors were analyzed: survey 1 from cancer self-help group members and survey 2 from patients with CCRP assessed at the Interdisciplinary Pain Center (IPC), resulting in recommendations ranging from outpatient treatment to IMPT.
Results: Thirty-eight members of 8 self-help groups in survey 1 and 50 of 158 patients with CCRP in survey 2 completed the questionnaire. In both surveys, relevant pain impairment and pain therapy dissatisfaction were identified. A higher intensity of therapy, including the implementation of IMPT, did not lead to better pain control. Consistent with the biopsychosocial factors in CCRP, increased depression scores and increased treatment dissatisfaction correlated. In both surveys, participants expressed extensive therapy wishes.
Conclusion: Despite comprehensive therapeutic approaches, long-term survivors with CCRP suffer from severe pain and treatment dissatisfaction. Biopsychosocial influences are evident, with depression worsening treatment satisfaction. Classical IMPT for CCRP may not be targeted enough and a more specific therapeutic approach should be developed and must be tested using patient-reported outcome measures.
{"title":"Treatment Satisfaction and Treatment Wishes of Patients with Chronic Cancer-Related Pain.","authors":"Hannes Hofbauer, Birgit Abberger, Nadia Kheirandish, Kristin Kieselbach, Kristin Kieselbach","doi":"10.1159/000545363","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000545363","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Up to 40% of long-term cancer survivors suffer from chronic cancer-related pain (CCRP) with often inadequate treatment. CCRP is influenced by biopsychosocial factors, with interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy (IMPT) being a comprehensive treatment option. In our study, patients with CCRP were asked about their treatment satisfaction and treatment wishes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two anonymous online surveys on CCRP in long-term survivors were analyzed: survey 1 from cancer self-help group members and survey 2 from patients with CCRP assessed at the Interdisciplinary Pain Center (IPC), resulting in recommendations ranging from outpatient treatment to IMPT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-eight members of 8 self-help groups in survey 1 and 50 of 158 patients with CCRP in survey 2 completed the questionnaire. In both surveys, relevant pain impairment and pain therapy dissatisfaction were identified. A higher intensity of therapy, including the implementation of IMPT, did not lead to better pain control. Consistent with the biopsychosocial factors in CCRP, increased depression scores and increased treatment dissatisfaction correlated. In both surveys, participants expressed extensive therapy wishes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite comprehensive therapeutic approaches, long-term survivors with CCRP suffer from severe pain and treatment dissatisfaction. Biopsychosocial influences are evident, with depression worsening treatment satisfaction. Classical IMPT for CCRP may not be targeted enough and a more specific therapeutic approach should be developed and must be tested using patient-reported outcome measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":19543,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"437-447"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143692868","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Previous research indicates that combining antiviral and anti-tumor drugs may lead to compounded toxic side effects and risks of drug-drug interactions. Our study aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of pharmacotherapy combining second-generation integrase inhibitors (INSTIs) with chemotherapy drugs in patients with AIDS-related diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (AR-DLBCL).
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of newly diagnosed AR-DLBCL patients at the Public Health Clinical Center of Chengdu from February 2020 to May 2023. All patients received a second-generation INSTI-based regimen alongside chemotherapy. Primary endpoints included the frequency and severity of adverse effects (AEs), while secondary endpoints encompassed CD4 count, CD4/CD8 ratio, HIV viral load, and complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and overall response rate (ORR) at the end of treatment. Evaluations were performed at each chemotherapy cycle, with AEs assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.02.
Results: We enrolled 96 AR-DLBCL patients with a median follow-up of 15.5 months (range: 5-33). Of these patients, 60 received bictegravir/tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine, while 36 were treated with dolutegravir/lamivudine/albuvirtide as their antiretroviral therapy regimen. Regarding chemotherapy, 75 patients underwent R±CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone), while 21 received R±EPOCH (rituximab, etoposide, doxorubicin, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone). The most common grade 3 or higher AEs during treatment were neutropenia (32.29%) and thrombocytopenia (20.83%). Seven patients experienced serious complications during treatment, including pulmonary tuberculosis (2), multiple organ dysfunction (1), intracranial infection (1), renal failure (1), and severe COVID-19 (2), resulting in 3 deaths. CD4 count and CD4/CD8 ratio showed slight decreases from baseline (251.76 ± 188.53 cells/μL and 0.71 ± 0.69, respectively) to the 6th month (233.44 ± 140.53 cells/μL and 0.66 ± 0.55, respectively), with no statistical significance observed (p = 0.375 and p = 0.608). Viral load rebound was not observed. The objective response rate was 85.41%, with a CR rate of 51.04%. As of June 2024, 15 patients had died from severe infections or progressive disease.
Conclusion: Second-generation INSTIs seem to be a safe and effective first-line treatment option for AR-DLBCL patients undergoing chemotherapy, regardless of the chemotherapy type.
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of Pharmacotherapy Containing the Second-Generation Integrase Inhibitors and Chemotherapy Drugs in AIDS-Related Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.","authors":"Jing Yang, Xingzhen Cheng, Guo Wei, Tingyu Chen, Yong Zhao, Yong Zhao","doi":"10.1159/000545644","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000545644","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Previous research indicates that combining antiviral and anti-tumor drugs may lead to compounded toxic side effects and risks of drug-drug interactions. Our study aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of pharmacotherapy combining second-generation integrase inhibitors (INSTIs) with chemotherapy drugs in patients with AIDS-related diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (AR-DLBCL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of newly diagnosed AR-DLBCL patients at the Public Health Clinical Center of Chengdu from February 2020 to May 2023. All patients received a second-generation INSTI-based regimen alongside chemotherapy. Primary endpoints included the frequency and severity of adverse effects (AEs), while secondary endpoints encompassed CD4 count, CD4/CD8 ratio, HIV viral load, and complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and overall response rate (ORR) at the end of treatment. Evaluations were performed at each chemotherapy cycle, with AEs assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.02.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 96 AR-DLBCL patients with a median follow-up of 15.5 months (range: 5-33). Of these patients, 60 received bictegravir/tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine, while 36 were treated with dolutegravir/lamivudine/albuvirtide as their antiretroviral therapy regimen. Regarding chemotherapy, 75 patients underwent R±CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone), while 21 received R±EPOCH (rituximab, etoposide, doxorubicin, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone). The most common grade 3 or higher AEs during treatment were neutropenia (32.29%) and thrombocytopenia (20.83%). Seven patients experienced serious complications during treatment, including pulmonary tuberculosis (2), multiple organ dysfunction (1), intracranial infection (1), renal failure (1), and severe COVID-19 (2), resulting in 3 deaths. CD4 count and CD4/CD8 ratio showed slight decreases from baseline (251.76 ± 188.53 cells/μL and 0.71 ± 0.69, respectively) to the 6th month (233.44 ± 140.53 cells/μL and 0.66 ± 0.55, respectively), with no statistical significance observed (p = 0.375 and p = 0.608). Viral load rebound was not observed. The objective response rate was 85.41%, with a CR rate of 51.04%. As of June 2024, 15 patients had died from severe infections or progressive disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Second-generation INSTIs seem to be a safe and effective first-line treatment option for AR-DLBCL patients undergoing chemotherapy, regardless of the chemotherapy type.</p>","PeriodicalId":19543,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"426-436"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12068825/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143780801","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-02-25DOI: 10.1159/000543540
Valerie Catherine Linz, Marco Johannes Battista, Regina Hummel, Markus Schepers, Eva-Verena Griemert, Mona Wanda Schmidt, Marcus Schmidt, Annette Hasenburg, Katharina Gillen
Introduction: Epidural anesthesia is a standard procedure to mitigate pain during surgery for endometrial cancer (EC). Little data exist about the influence of epidural anesthesia on the oncological outcome in elderly patients with EC. This retrospective study aimed to investigate potential correlations between epidural anesthesia and cancer recurrence in patients with EC.
Methods: We screened the medical records of patients ≥60 years treated surgically for EC at the University Medical Center Mainz between January 2008 and December 2019. All women underwent general anesthesia (GA) alone or combined with epidural anesthesia (EGA). Cox regression, the Kaplan-Meier method and propensity score matching were used to analyze the prognostic influence of the anesthesiologic regime on survival.
Results: A total of 152 women with EC were included. Twenty-nine patients (19.1%) formed the EGA cohort. The median time of follow-up (FU) was 31 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 8-67.5). The EGA cohort showed more in-hospital complications (27.6 vs. 8.9%; p = 0.006), especially thromboembolic events (3 vs. 0 events; p = 0.006), as well as a longer hospital stay (11 [IQR: 8-13] vs. 7 [IQR: 4-9] days; p < 0.001). Twenty-six patients (17.1%) developed a recurrence in the follow-up at a median of 13 months [IQR: 7.75-29.5]. Thirty-two patients died during FU (21.1%). The EGA cohort showed higher FIGO stages and a higher histological grading than the GA cohort. In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, EGA showed a significantly reduced 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) (36.5% vs. 72.6%, p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (58.6% vs. 79.9%, p = 0.008). However, in multivariate Cox regression analysis including FIGO stages and histological grading, EGA did not influence RFS (HR: 2.02; 95%-CI: [0.99-4.12], p = 0.054), and OS (HR: 1.03; 95%-CI: [0.40-2.66], p = 0.951). This was backed up by the propensity score- matched analysis for survival (RFS: p = 0.604, OS: p = 0.86).
Conclusion: Considering risk factors, epidural anesthesia in combination with GA did not differ in recurrence-free and overall survival compared to GA. Prospective randomized trials are warranted in order to further evaluate this topic.
简介:硬膜外麻醉是减轻子宫内膜癌(EC)手术期间疼痛的标准程序。硬膜外麻醉对老年EC患者肿瘤预后影响的研究资料很少。本回顾性研究旨在探讨硬膜外麻醉与EC患者癌症复发之间的潜在相关性。方法:我们筛选了2008年1月至2019年12月在美因茨大学医学中心接受手术治疗的≥60岁的EC患者的医疗记录。所有的妇女都接受了单独的全身麻醉(GA)或联合硬膜外麻醉(EGA)。采用Cox回归、Kaplan-Meier法和倾向评分匹配分析麻醉方案对生存的预后影响。结果:共纳入152例EC患者。29例患者(19.1%)形成EGA队列。中位随访时间(FU)为31个月[四分位间距(IQR): 8-67.5]。EGA组出现更多的院内并发症(27.6% vs 8.9%;P =0.006),尤其是血栓栓塞事件(3 vs 0事件;p=0.006),以及更长的住院时间(11 (IQR: 8-13)对7 (IQR: 4-9)天;结论:考虑危险因素,硬膜外麻醉联合GA与GA相比,在无复发和总生存率方面没有差异。为了进一步评估这一主题,前瞻性随机试验是必要的。
{"title":"Impact of Epidural Anesthesia on the Outcome of Elderly Patients with Endometrial Cancer: Results of a Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.","authors":"Valerie Catherine Linz, Marco Johannes Battista, Regina Hummel, Markus Schepers, Eva-Verena Griemert, Mona Wanda Schmidt, Marcus Schmidt, Annette Hasenburg, Katharina Gillen","doi":"10.1159/000543540","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000543540","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Epidural anesthesia is a standard procedure to mitigate pain during surgery for endometrial cancer (EC). Little data exist about the influence of epidural anesthesia on the oncological outcome in elderly patients with EC. This retrospective study aimed to investigate potential correlations between epidural anesthesia and cancer recurrence in patients with EC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We screened the medical records of patients ≥60 years treated surgically for EC at the University Medical Center Mainz between January 2008 and December 2019. All women underwent general anesthesia (GA) alone or combined with epidural anesthesia (EGA). Cox regression, the Kaplan-Meier method and propensity score matching were used to analyze the prognostic influence of the anesthesiologic regime on survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 152 women with EC were included. Twenty-nine patients (19.1%) formed the EGA cohort. The median time of follow-up (FU) was 31 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 8-67.5). The EGA cohort showed more in-hospital complications (27.6 vs. 8.9%; p = 0.006), especially thromboembolic events (3 vs. 0 events; p = 0.006), as well as a longer hospital stay (11 [IQR: 8-13] vs. 7 [IQR: 4-9] days; p < 0.001). Twenty-six patients (17.1%) developed a recurrence in the follow-up at a median of 13 months [IQR: 7.75-29.5]. Thirty-two patients died during FU (21.1%). The EGA cohort showed higher FIGO stages and a higher histological grading than the GA cohort. In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, EGA showed a significantly reduced 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) (36.5% vs. 72.6%, p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (58.6% vs. 79.9%, p = 0.008). However, in multivariate Cox regression analysis including FIGO stages and histological grading, EGA did not influence RFS (HR: 2.02; 95%-CI: [0.99-4.12], p = 0.054), and OS (HR: 1.03; 95%-CI: [0.40-2.66], p = 0.951). This was backed up by the propensity score- matched analysis for survival (RFS: p = 0.604, OS: p = 0.86).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Considering risk factors, epidural anesthesia in combination with GA did not differ in recurrence-free and overall survival compared to GA. Prospective randomized trials are warranted in order to further evaluate this topic.</p>","PeriodicalId":19543,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"341-350"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12140583/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143502140","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Endometrium cancer is the most common gynecological malignancy in developed countries. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of HER2 positivity on prognosis in endometrial cancer.
Methods: In our study, patients admitted to our clinic with a diagnosis of endometrial cancer between September 2019 and December 2023 were retrospectively evaluated. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) immunohistochemistry was performed in 121 patients. HER2-low group (HER2 score: 0 and 1) and HER2-high group (HER2 score: 2 and 3) were defined according to the HER2 immunohistochemistry score in the pathology, and patients were compared accordingly.
Results: We observed that 97 (80.2%) of the patients were in the HER2-low group, while 24 (19.8%) were in the HER2-high group. In the OS analysis, age (p = 0.381), menopausal status (p = 0.511), ECOG performance status (p = 0.087), histological type of tumor (p = 0.727), pathological grade (p = 0.206), serum LDH (p = 0.091), and albumin (p = 0.315) levels did not affect the prognosis. Patients with lower FIGO stage (p = 0.003) and HER2-high patients (p = 0.040) had better survival outcomes. Multivariable analysis showed that FIGO stage (p = 0.004) and HER2 status (p = 0.040) were independent risk factors affecting survival in endometrial cancer.
Conclusion: As a result of our study, it was observed that FIGO stage and HER2 status were independent risk factors affecting OS in endometrial cancer patients. HER2-high group had a better prognosis than HER2-low group.
{"title":"Prognostic Significance of HER2 Positivity in Endometrium Cancer.","authors":"Serhat Sekmek, Dogan Bayram, Irfan Karahan, Ismet Seven, Perihan Perkin, Kamil Hakan Muftuoglu, Oznur Bal, Bulent Yalcin, Dogan Uncu, Efnan Algin","doi":"10.1159/000542900","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000542900","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endometrium cancer is the most common gynecological malignancy in developed countries. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of HER2 positivity on prognosis in endometrial cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In our study, patients admitted to our clinic with a diagnosis of endometrial cancer between September 2019 and December 2023 were retrospectively evaluated. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) immunohistochemistry was performed in 121 patients. HER2-low group (HER2 score: 0 and 1) and HER2-high group (HER2 score: 2 and 3) were defined according to the HER2 immunohistochemistry score in the pathology, and patients were compared accordingly.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed that 97 (80.2%) of the patients were in the HER2-low group, while 24 (19.8%) were in the HER2-high group. In the OS analysis, age (p = 0.381), menopausal status (p = 0.511), ECOG performance status (p = 0.087), histological type of tumor (p = 0.727), pathological grade (p = 0.206), serum LDH (p = 0.091), and albumin (p = 0.315) levels did not affect the prognosis. Patients with lower FIGO stage (p = 0.003) and HER2-high patients (p = 0.040) had better survival outcomes. Multivariable analysis showed that FIGO stage (p = 0.004) and HER2 status (p = 0.040) were independent risk factors affecting survival in endometrial cancer.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As a result of our study, it was observed that FIGO stage and HER2 status were independent risk factors affecting OS in endometrial cancer patients. HER2-high group had a better prognosis than HER2-low group.</p>","PeriodicalId":19543,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"75-81"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142770943","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Tumor is a major public health problem worldwide and poses a serious threat to human life and health. Vitamin D deficiency increases the risk of developing tumors.
Summary: Epidemiological evidence supports the antitumor effect of vitamin D mainly comes from the binding of its active metabolites and vitamin D receptor to play relevant biological functions. The meta-analysis generally reported that high vitamin D status was a protective factor for breast cancer. In addition, the relationship of vitamin D-related gene polymorphisms with the tumor and the relationship between vitamin D levels and tumor occurrence and risk have also attracted much attention.
Key messages: This paper reviews the research progress of vitamin D metabolism, potential anticancer mechanisms in the tumor microenvironment, and its relationship with the risk of different tumors, and explores the relationship between vitamin D-related gene polymorphisms and tumors, providing theoretical reference for primary prevention of future tumors.
{"title":"Systematic Evaluation of Vitamin D and the Risk of Breast Cancer Development.","authors":"Mei Zhang, Junting Zhang, Guangyao Huang, Shan Gao, Junping Wang, Shan Gao","doi":"10.1159/000545130","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000545130","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tumor is a major public health problem worldwide and poses a serious threat to human life and health. Vitamin D deficiency increases the risk of developing tumors.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Epidemiological evidence supports the antitumor effect of vitamin D mainly comes from the binding of its active metabolites and vitamin D receptor to play relevant biological functions. The meta-analysis generally reported that high vitamin D status was a protective factor for breast cancer. In addition, the relationship of vitamin D-related gene polymorphisms with the tumor and the relationship between vitamin D levels and tumor occurrence and risk have also attracted much attention.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>This paper reviews the research progress of vitamin D metabolism, potential anticancer mechanisms in the tumor microenvironment, and its relationship with the risk of different tumors, and explores the relationship between vitamin D-related gene polymorphisms and tumors, providing theoretical reference for primary prevention of future tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":19543,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"448-456"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143763988","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-04-22DOI: 10.1159/000545643
Jan-Philipp Cieslik, Bianca Behrens, Maggie Banys-Paluchowski, Maximilan Pruss, Melissa Neubacher, Eugen Ruckhäberle, Hans Neubauer, Tanja Fehm, Natalia Krawczyk, Natalia Krawczyk
Background: The detection of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in breast cancer has seen significant progress over the last two decades. These blood-based biomarkers offer a minimally invasive alternative to traditional methods for assessing disease progression and monitoring treatment response, with the potential to transform breast cancer management.
Summary: CTCs and ctDNA have emerged as valuable tools for prognosis and treatment guidance in breast cancer. Studies have shown that CTC count correlates with survival and changes in CTC levels can predict clinical outcomes (STIC CTC, DETECT III). Additionally, the molecular characterization of CTCs can help guide therapy (DETECT III). ctDNA, while also predictive of survival (BioItaLEE), provides further utility in identifying treatment failure (PADA-1, PALOMA III) and functions as a real-time tumor biopsy (plasmaMATCH, MONALEESA). Despite these promising advances, challenges remain, including the rarity of CTCs and the need for standardization in ctDNA detection methods.
Key messages: CTC and ctDNA detection have improved significantly and hold the potential for less invasive breast cancer management. CTCs are associated with survival outcomes and treatment guidance, while ctDNA is helpful in predicting treatment failure and can serve as a dynamic tumor biopsy. Ongoing research is needed to address the challenges of CTC rarity and variability in ctDNA detection methods for widespread clinical use.
{"title":"Liquid Biopsy in Metastatic Breast Cancer: Path to Personalized Medicine.","authors":"Jan-Philipp Cieslik, Bianca Behrens, Maggie Banys-Paluchowski, Maximilan Pruss, Melissa Neubacher, Eugen Ruckhäberle, Hans Neubauer, Tanja Fehm, Natalia Krawczyk, Natalia Krawczyk","doi":"10.1159/000545643","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000545643","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The detection of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in breast cancer has seen significant progress over the last two decades. These blood-based biomarkers offer a minimally invasive alternative to traditional methods for assessing disease progression and monitoring treatment response, with the potential to transform breast cancer management.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>CTCs and ctDNA have emerged as valuable tools for prognosis and treatment guidance in breast cancer. Studies have shown that CTC count correlates with survival and changes in CTC levels can predict clinical outcomes (STIC CTC, DETECT III). Additionally, the molecular characterization of CTCs can help guide therapy (DETECT III). ctDNA, while also predictive of survival (BioItaLEE), provides further utility in identifying treatment failure (PADA-1, PALOMA III) and functions as a real-time tumor biopsy (plasmaMATCH, MONALEESA). Despite these promising advances, challenges remain, including the rarity of CTCs and the need for standardization in ctDNA detection methods.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>CTC and ctDNA detection have improved significantly and hold the potential for less invasive breast cancer management. CTCs are associated with survival outcomes and treatment guidance, while ctDNA is helpful in predicting treatment failure and can serve as a dynamic tumor biopsy. Ongoing research is needed to address the challenges of CTC rarity and variability in ctDNA detection methods for widespread clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":19543,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"532-547"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143972285","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-11-07DOI: 10.1159/000542460
Viktoria Mathies, Anna P Kipp, Jakob Hammersen, Karin G Schrenk, Sebastian Scholl, Ulf Schnetzke, Andreas Hochhaus, Thomas Ernst
Introduction: Cancer-related malnutrition is a highly prevalent, yet often overlooked concern in clinical practice. Although cancer-related management guidelines recommend standardized nutritional care, its implementation is scarce. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of malnutrition and the medical need for nutrition counseling in cancer patients employing a novel standardized nutritional management program (containing malnutrition risk screening, nutritional assessment, and counseling). Furthermore, differences of malnutrition parameters in different cancer patient cohorts were examined.
Methods: Cancer patients were screened for malnutrition using the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment Short Form (PG-SGA SF) on the first day of their inpatient admission to the internal oncology or hematology wards. PG-SGA total score and classification into the three PG-SGA nutrition stages (A, B, C) were used to determine nutritional status. In case of a positive screening, nutritional assessment and individualized counseling by a nutritionist followed. For group comparisons, patients were divided into different groups (e.g., age, gender, tumor entity) and were evaluated accordingly.
Results: A total of 1,100 inpatients were included. 56.8% of the patients had suspected or already existing malnutrition. The most common nutrition impact symptom was loss of appetite (26.7%), followed by fatigue (16.5%) and pain (16.0%). Female (p < 0.001), elderly (p < 0.001), and patients with upper gastrointestinal tract tumors (p < 0.001) showed an unfavorable nutritional status and higher need for counseling. Despite suffering from malnutrition, patients had body mass indices within the upper end of the normal range.
Conclusion: This study shows a high prevalence of malnutrition in hospitalized cancer patients and highlights the need for a standardized nutritional management in the clinical setting. Therefore, it is recommended to provide a malnutrition risk screening for all cancer patients and a following adequate assessment and personalized nutritional care if needed.
{"title":"Standardizing Nutritional Care for Cancer Patients: Implementation and Evaluation of a Malnutrition Risk Screening.","authors":"Viktoria Mathies, Anna P Kipp, Jakob Hammersen, Karin G Schrenk, Sebastian Scholl, Ulf Schnetzke, Andreas Hochhaus, Thomas Ernst","doi":"10.1159/000542460","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000542460","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cancer-related malnutrition is a highly prevalent, yet often overlooked concern in clinical practice. Although cancer-related management guidelines recommend standardized nutritional care, its implementation is scarce. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of malnutrition and the medical need for nutrition counseling in cancer patients employing a novel standardized nutritional management program (containing malnutrition risk screening, nutritional assessment, and counseling). Furthermore, differences of malnutrition parameters in different cancer patient cohorts were examined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cancer patients were screened for malnutrition using the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment Short Form (PG-SGA SF) on the first day of their inpatient admission to the internal oncology or hematology wards. PG-SGA total score and classification into the three PG-SGA nutrition stages (A, B, C) were used to determine nutritional status. In case of a positive screening, nutritional assessment and individualized counseling by a nutritionist followed. For group comparisons, patients were divided into different groups (e.g., age, gender, tumor entity) and were evaluated accordingly.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,100 inpatients were included. 56.8% of the patients had suspected or already existing malnutrition. The most common nutrition impact symptom was loss of appetite (26.7%), followed by fatigue (16.5%) and pain (16.0%). Female (p < 0.001), elderly (p < 0.001), and patients with upper gastrointestinal tract tumors (p < 0.001) showed an unfavorable nutritional status and higher need for counseling. Despite suffering from malnutrition, patients had body mass indices within the upper end of the normal range.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows a high prevalence of malnutrition in hospitalized cancer patients and highlights the need for a standardized nutritional management in the clinical setting. Therefore, it is recommended to provide a malnutrition risk screening for all cancer patients and a following adequate assessment and personalized nutritional care if needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":19543,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"26-36"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142605884","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-05-05DOI: 10.1159/000546245
Walther Kuhn, Sara Tato Varela, Alaa El Housheimi, Walther Christian Kuhn
Background: Ovarian cancer (OC) remains the most common cause of death among all gynecological cancer. For early-stage disease (FIGO stages I and II), staging surgery followed by chemotherapy (CT) with carboplatin ± paclitaxel often results in high rates of progression-free and overall survival. However, this is not the case for advanced-stage disease (stages III and IV), where recurrence rates are significantly higher. Consequently, additional therapeutic strategies, such as maintenance treatment, are essential to improve outcomes in these patients.
Summary: Several randomized controlled trials have proven the benefit of bevacizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody (anti-VEGF) as first-line maintenance treatment. Molecular testing led to the introduction of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis), with outstanding results in BRCA-mutated (BRCAmt) and homologous recombination-deficient without BRCAmt (HRd) tumors, but not as ideal in HR-proficient (HRp) tumors, which make up the majority of the OC tumors; therefore, further research in this category of tumors is urgently warranted. Immunotherapy, both with CT and as maintenance, failed to improve survival in advanced OC.
Key messages: Combining multiple drug classes (immune checkpoint inhibitors, anti-VEGF, and PARPi) was able to improve survival; results in HRp tumors are however still pending. Phase 2 and 3 trials are underway to investigate more innovative treatment of OC.
{"title":"Prognosis and Therapy of Ovarian Cancer: Part 2 - the Shifting Landscape of Medical Treatment in Ovarian Cancer.","authors":"Walther Kuhn, Sara Tato Varela, Alaa El Housheimi, Walther Christian Kuhn","doi":"10.1159/000546245","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000546245","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ovarian cancer (OC) remains the most common cause of death among all gynecological cancer. For early-stage disease (FIGO stages I and II), staging surgery followed by chemotherapy (CT) with carboplatin ± paclitaxel often results in high rates of progression-free and overall survival. However, this is not the case for advanced-stage disease (stages III and IV), where recurrence rates are significantly higher. Consequently, additional therapeutic strategies, such as maintenance treatment, are essential to improve outcomes in these patients.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Several randomized controlled trials have proven the benefit of bevacizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody (anti-VEGF) as first-line maintenance treatment. Molecular testing led to the introduction of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis), with outstanding results in BRCA-mutated (BRCAmt) and homologous recombination-deficient without BRCAmt (HRd) tumors, but not as ideal in HR-proficient (HRp) tumors, which make up the majority of the OC tumors; therefore, further research in this category of tumors is urgently warranted. Immunotherapy, both with CT and as maintenance, failed to improve survival in advanced OC.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>Combining multiple drug classes (immune checkpoint inhibitors, anti-VEGF, and PARPi) was able to improve survival; results in HRp tumors are however still pending. Phase 2 and 3 trials are underway to investigate more innovative treatment of OC.</p>","PeriodicalId":19543,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"643-654"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144034294","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-11-27DOI: 10.1159/000542773
Antje Mevius, Johanna Lutter, Florian M Karl, Liam Tuffy, Fabienne Schochter, Andreas Fuchs, Thomas Wilke
<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to describe the epidemiology of primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer and the outcomes from real-world treatment patterns of patients affected in Germany between 2015 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study covering the period from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2021, data from patients with primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer who initiated systemic treatment for their disease were extracted from an anonymized claims dataset from a regional health insurance fund in the German states of Saxony and Thuringia. Epidemiologic outcomes were cumulative incidence of endometrial cancer and point prevalence. Overall survival after the index date was assessed, with all-cause death used as an event. Endometrial cancer-related real-world treatment patterns were described for the post-index period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer in 2021 was 4.77 cases/100,000 persons, with no substantial change over time (4.63 in 2018; 4.93 in 2019; 4.45 in 2020). The point prevalence on 1 January 2022 was 0.023%, with a slight increase in prevalence observed from 1 January 2019 onwards. Among 466 patients with confirmed endometrial cancer, the mean (standard deviation) age was 68.0 (11.6) years; the tumor material from 86 patients (18.5%) underwent immunohistochemistry or polymerase chain reaction testing. Median overall survival was estimated to be 47.5 months (95% CI: 35.1-70.4) and the 5-year survival probability was 46.2%. The most frequent first-line systemic therapies were carboplatin (45.7%) and paclitaxel (43.1%). Second-line therapy was received by 153 patients (32.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The analysis of the German claims data produced contemporary epidemiologic estimates for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. Treatments were aligned with guideline recommendations during the study period, with tumor testing yet to enter mainstream practice.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to describe the epidemiology of primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer and the outcomes from real-world treatment patterns of patients affected in Germany between 2015 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study covering the period from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2021, data from patients with primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer who initiated systemic treatment for their disease were extracted from an anonymized claims dataset from a regional health insurance fund in the German states of Saxony and Thuringia. Epidemiologic outcomes were cumulative incidence of endometrial cancer and point prevalence. Overall survival after the index date was assessed, with all-cause death used as an event. Endometrial cancer-related real-world treatment patterns were described for the post-index period.</p><p><strong>Resul
{"title":"Epidemiology, Real-World Treatment Patterns, and Patient Outcomes of Primary Advanced or Recurrent Endometrial Cancer in Germany between 2015 and 2021.","authors":"Antje Mevius, Johanna Lutter, Florian M Karl, Liam Tuffy, Fabienne Schochter, Andreas Fuchs, Thomas Wilke","doi":"10.1159/000542773","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000542773","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to describe the epidemiology of primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer and the outcomes from real-world treatment patterns of patients affected in Germany between 2015 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study covering the period from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2021, data from patients with primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer who initiated systemic treatment for their disease were extracted from an anonymized claims dataset from a regional health insurance fund in the German states of Saxony and Thuringia. Epidemiologic outcomes were cumulative incidence of endometrial cancer and point prevalence. Overall survival after the index date was assessed, with all-cause death used as an event. Endometrial cancer-related real-world treatment patterns were described for the post-index period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer in 2021 was 4.77 cases/100,000 persons, with no substantial change over time (4.63 in 2018; 4.93 in 2019; 4.45 in 2020). The point prevalence on 1 January 2022 was 0.023%, with a slight increase in prevalence observed from 1 January 2019 onwards. Among 466 patients with confirmed endometrial cancer, the mean (standard deviation) age was 68.0 (11.6) years; the tumor material from 86 patients (18.5%) underwent immunohistochemistry or polymerase chain reaction testing. Median overall survival was estimated to be 47.5 months (95% CI: 35.1-70.4) and the 5-year survival probability was 46.2%. The most frequent first-line systemic therapies were carboplatin (45.7%) and paclitaxel (43.1%). Second-line therapy was received by 153 patients (32.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The analysis of the German claims data produced contemporary epidemiologic estimates for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. Treatments were aligned with guideline recommendations during the study period, with tumor testing yet to enter mainstream practice.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to describe the epidemiology of primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer and the outcomes from real-world treatment patterns of patients affected in Germany between 2015 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study covering the period from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2021, data from patients with primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer who initiated systemic treatment for their disease were extracted from an anonymized claims dataset from a regional health insurance fund in the German states of Saxony and Thuringia. Epidemiologic outcomes were cumulative incidence of endometrial cancer and point prevalence. Overall survival after the index date was assessed, with all-cause death used as an event. Endometrial cancer-related real-world treatment patterns were described for the post-index period.</p><p><strong>Resul","PeriodicalId":19543,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"92-101"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11878414/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142740185","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}