None.
Introduction: The incidence of anaemia and its consequences are often underestimated during cancer management. We propose to evaluate the situation before and after the recommendations were updated in order to assess their impact on the day-to-day practice.
Methods: In this single-centre retrospective study, eligible patients were treated for cancer and warranted overnight hospitalization over two periods (n = 206 in 2011, n = 143 in 2018). The diagnosis of anaemia was defined by a haemoglobin level below 12 and 13 g/dL for women and men, respectively.
Results: The prevalence of anaemia was 26% in 2011 and 16% in 2018 (p < 0.001). Biological assessment had changed between the two periods, with more tests of iron metabolism and measurements of inflammatory parameters. Patients hospitalized in 2018 had more advanced cancer and more severe anaemia (8.2 g/dL [±1.07] in 2011 vs. 7.9 g/dL [±1.18] in 2018). Rate of transfusion therapy did not change, but patients with mild and moderate anaemia were transfused less in 2018 (57% in 2011 vs. 44% in 2018). Intravenous iron and erythropoiesis-stimulating agent were used more frequently in 2018 (1 and 5 and 13 and 23% in 2011 and 2018, respectively), mainly for mild anaemia and life-threatening anaemia, respectively. Overall survival was poor in both cohorts at 24 months (15.4% in 2011 and 6.5% in 2018, p = 0.048).
Conclusion: Practices have changed in the diagnosis of anaemia and prescriptions for erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and intravenous iron have increased. Efforts must continue to explore the causes of anaemia, optimize patients' quality of life, and reduce transfusions.
Background: Lung cancer is a major contributor to cancer-related death worldwide. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of all lung cancers. Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are currently viewed as the established first-line therapy for patients with advanced NSCLC with EGFR mutations.
Summary: The potential predictive value of the quantitative abundance of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in the treatment of NSCLC is widely recognized and regarded as a significant indicator. The definition of mutation abundance in the EGFR gene in most current studies is mainly calculated based on the ratio of mutation to wild-type gene copy number or based on the ratio of allele number; for example, variant allele frequency is the ratio of the number of mutant alleles to the total number of alleles at a particular locus. Results of the included primary studies are as follows. (1) Significant association between EGFR mutation abundance and progression-free survival (PFS): median PFS was significantly longer in the high abundance group (11.0 months, 95% CI: 9.7-12.3 months) than in the low abundance group (5.3 months, 95% CI: 3.6-7.0 months) in the study by Liu et al. High mutation abundance (HR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.66-0.82, p = 0.037) was an independent prognostic determinant of PFS in the study by Wang et al. Among patients receiving EGFR-TKI as first-line therapy, the median PFS was significantly longer in the high mutation abundance group than in the low mutation abundance group (12.7 months vs. 8.7 months, p = 0.002). EGFR mutation abundance ≥30% was an independent risk factor for PFS (HR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.17-2.31). (2) Significant association between EGFR mutation abundance and overall survival (OS): the median OS in the high abundance group in the study by Liu et al. was 20.9 months (95% CI: 18.3-23.5 months), while that in the low abundance group was 13.0 months (95% CI: 10.0 months) (95% CI: 10.3-15.7 months); longer OS was independently associated with high mutation abundance (HR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.50-0.79, p = 0.027).
Key messages: The objective of this article was to conduct a comprehensive examination and analysis of the association between the abundance of EGFR mutations in NSCLC and the effectiveness of treatment with TKIs while also considering the development of drug resistance.
Introduction: Early integration of palliative care and advance care planning (ACP) play an increasingly important role in the treatment of patients with advanced cancer. Advance directives (ADs) and patients' preferences regarding end-of-life (EoL) care are important aspects of ACP. In the outpatient setting, the prevalence of those documents and EoL care wishes is not well investigated, and changes in the longitudinal course are poorly understood.
Methods: From June 2020 to August 2022, 67 outpatients with advanced solid tumors undergoing palliative cancer therapy were interviewed on the topic of ACP in a longitudinal course. From this database, the prevalence of ADs, healthcare proxy, EoL care wishes, and the need for counseling regarding these issues were collected. In addition, EoL care wishes were examined for their stability.
Results: Fifty-one patients (76.1%) reported having ADs, and 41 patients (61.2%) reported having a healthcare proxy. Nineteen patients (37.3%) with ADs and 11 patients (68.7%) without ADs indicated a wish for counseling. Reported EoL care wishes remained stable over a period of approximately 6 months. Nevertheless, intraindividual changes occurred over time within the different EoL care preferences. The desire for resuscitation and dialysis were significantly higher in men than in women (resuscitation: 15 of 21 men [71.4%] versus 9 of 22 women [40.9%], odds ratio [OR] 3.611, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-12.89, p = 0.048; dialysis: 16 of the 23 men [69.6%] versus 9 of the 25 women [36.0%], OR: 4.063, 95% CI: 1.22-13.58, p = 0.023).
Conclusion: Our results show a reasonably high percentage of ADs and healthcare proxies in our study cohort. The observed stability of EoL requests encourages the implementation of structured queries for ADs and healthcare proxy for outpatients undergoing palliative treatment. Our data suggest that gender-specific characteristics should be further investigated in this context.
Introduction: Extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma (EEwS) is a rare malignant tumor, and current international recommendations indicate systemic and local treatment like bone Ewing sarcoma (BEwS); to the best of our knowledge, very few studies tried to explore the clinical and genetic characteristics of this tumor, and the most appropriate treatment strategy remains uncertain.
Methods: We reviewed 35 EEwS cases enrolled at Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute in Bologna, Italy, between 1988-2022. We performed RNA sequencing in 18 Ewing sarcoma cases, including 12 BEwSs and 6 EEwSs. We analyzed overall survival (OS), local relapse-free survival (LRFS), and metastasis-free survival (MFS) and the risk factors associated to survival.
Results: Unsupervised hierarchical clustering showed no differences in the transcriptional profile between EEwS and BEwS. Five-year OS was 67% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 47-80), 5-year LRFS was 61% (95% CI: 43-75), and 5-year MFS was 55% (95% CI: 38-70). Recurrent tumors, larger than 8 cm, and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) serum value resulted to be negative prognostic factors.
Conclusions: The finding/detection of a genetic profile that is indistinguishable between EEwS and BEwS confirms the view that the two subgroups belong to the same tumor entity and supports the use of a single therapeutic approach for Ewing sarcoma, regardless of the site of origin. Statistical evaluation showed that size bigger than 8 cm, elevated LDH, and recurrent tumors had a worse prognosis, suggesting a risk-stratification method for identifying patients for specific therapy treatment. However, larger, multicenter, prospective trials are called for to validate our findings.